Quasi-two-body Decays with Resonance in PQCD Approach
Abstract
Motivated by the measurements of branching fractions of the quasi-two-body decays and , we study the charmless decays in the perturbative QCD approach. Supposing that is a two-quark state and mixture of and with the mixing angle , we calculate the branching fractions of these decays with the new introduced -wave -pair wave function. When the mixing angle lies in the range , the calculated branching fractions of the and decays are in agreement with the experimental data. The branching fractions of other decays could be measured in the current LHCb and Belle II experiments. Considering the isospin symmetry, we also estimate the branching fractions of the quasi-two-body decays , which are half of those the corresponding decays . Moreover, the direct asymmetries of these decays are also calculated, and some of them can be tested in the current experiments.
pacs:
13.25.Hw, 12.38.BxI Introduction
In recent years, non-leptonic three-body decays of mesons have been paid more attention on both experimental and theoretical sides, as these decays can be used to test the standard model (SM), to extract the CKM angles, and to search for the sources of the violation. From last century, a large number of three-body decays have been measured by BaBar Lees:2012kxa , Belle Nakahama:2010nj , CLEO Eckhart:2002qr and LHCb Aaij:2018rol ; Aaij:2016qnm ; Aaij:2019nmr ; Aaij:2017zgz ; Aaij:2019jaq ; Aaij:2020ypa ; Aaij:2020dsq . Meanwhile, on the factorization hypothesis, a few of theoretical methods have been proposed to study these decays, such as approaches based on the symmetry principle He:2014xha , the QCD factorization approachKrankl:2015fha ; Virto:2016fbw ; Cheng:2007si ; Cheng:2016shb ; Li:2014oca , the perturbative QCD approach (PQCD) Wang:2016rlo ; Li:2016tpn ; Zou:2020atb ; Zou:2020fax ; Zou:2021lex ; Zou:2020dpg , and other theoretical methods Wang:2015ula .
Unlike the two-body decays where the kinematics is fixed, three-body decay amplitudes depend on two kinematic variables. For a decay , it is general to define the variables as two invariant masses of two pairs of final state particles, for instance, and with the definition . All physical kinematics configurations could define a two-dimensional region in the plane, and the density plot of the differential decay rate in this region is called a Dalitz plot. Specially, when the final states are the light mesons such as the and mesons, the corresponding configuration reduces to a triangle region. In general, the Dalitz plot has three typical regions according to the characteristic kinematics. The central region so-called “Mercedes Star” configuration corresponds to the case where all the invariant masses are roughly the same and of order of . In this region all three light mesons have a large energy in the meson rest frame and fly apart at about angles. The corners regions correspond to the cases where one final state is soft and the others fly back-to-back with large energy about . At the edges of the Dalitz plot one invariant mass is small and the other two are large, which implies that two particles move collinearly and the third bachelor particle recoils back. The interactions between two collinear mesons leads eventually to the resonances. Compared with two other regions, the physics picture at the edges of the Dalitz plot is very similar to a two-body decay by viewing the two-meson pair as a whole, and we thus call it quasi-two-body decay. In the past twenty years, PQCD approach based on the factorization has been used to study the meson two-body decays successfully, therefore it can be generalized for studying the quasi-two-body decays.
In the past few years, a large number of charmless quasi-two-body decays have been measured in the experiments Zyla:2020zbs , and some branching fractions or upper limits of them are summarized as follows
(1) |
Except the decay , other decays have not been studied theoretically in the literatures. Motivated by this, we shall study above decays in PQCD approach, so as to further check the reliability of PQCD in multi-body decays and present more predictions.For the sake of convenience is abbreviated to in the following context unless special statement.
II Framework
In the framework of PQCD, the decay amplitude of decay can be decomposed as the convolution
(2) |
where are the momentum fractions of the light quarks, are the conjugate variables of the quarks’ transverse momenta . and are the wave functions of the mesons and vector mesons, while the is the -wave -pair wave function. These wave functions are non-perturbative and universal. The exponential term is the so-called Sudakov form factor caused by the additional scale introduced by the intrinsic transverse momenta , which suppresses the soft dynamics effectively Li:2001ay ; Lu:2000hj . is the hard kernel, which can be calculated perturbatively. The parameter is the largest scale in the hard kernel, which ensures the higher order corrections as small as possible.
In PQCD, the most important inputs are the initial and final mesons’ wave functions. For the meson and the light vector mesons, their wave functions have been studied extensively and the inner parameters have been fixed by the well measured two-body meson decays Liu:2019ymi ; Li:2004ep , so we will not discuss them in this work. For the -pair, its -wave wave function can be written as Diehl:1998dk ; Diehl:2000uv ; Pire:2002ut ; Xing:2019xti ; Wang:2018xux
(3) |
with being the momentum fraction of the light quark in the -pair. The parameter is the momentum fraction of one meson in the -pair. The momentum of the -pair satisfies the condition , being the invariant mass of -pair. and are the light-like vectors. For the explicit expressions of the light-core distributions , we adopt the form Wang:2014ira ; Wang:2015uea
(4) |
with Gegenbauer moment Xing:2019xti . is the time-like form factor. In particular, for a narrow intermediate resonance, the time-like form factor can be well described by the relative Breit-Wigner lineshape Back:2017zqt . However, due to the remarkable interference between two decays and , the relative Breit-Wigner lineshape cannot work well for the time-like form factor of . In this case, the Flatt lineshape is proposed to describe that of Flatte:1976xu ; Back:2017zqt , which is given as
(5) |
with
(6) |
The and are the coupling constants corresponding to and decays, respectively, whose values are taken as and Back:2017zqt . In addition, the factor is introduced to suppress the width above the threshold. The parameter is taken , which does not affect the predictions remarkably Aaij:2014emv . It is noted that this lineshape has been also adopted extensively in analyzing data in the LHCb experiment Aaij:2014emv .
Although the quark model has achieved great successes, the underlying structures of the scalar mesons are not well established so far. There are many scenarios for the classification of the scalar mesons. One scenario is the naive 2-quark model, and the light scalar mesons below or near 1 GeV are identified as the lowest lying states. Another consistent picture Close:2002zu provided by the data implies that light scalar mesons below or near 1 GeV can be described by the , while scalars above 1 GeV will form a conventional nonet with with some possible glue content Cheng:2005ye ; Jaffe:1976ig ; Alford:2000mm . This picture can be used to interpret the mass degeneracy of and , the reason why the widths of and is broader than those of and , and the large couplings of and to . However, in practice it is hard for us to make quantitative predictions on decays based on the four-quark picture for light scalar mesons as it involves the unknown form factors and decay constants that are beyond the conventional quark model. Hence, we here only discuss the two-quark scenario for . Moreover, some experimental evidences indicate the existence of the non-strange and strange quark contents in , we therefore regard it as a mixture of and
(7) |
where is the mixing angle. Recent studies Cheng:2002ai ; Anisovich:2002wy ; Gokalp:2004ny show that the mixing angle lies in the ranges of and , and studies based on the decays favor the later range.
With the initial and final wave functions, we can calculate the whole amplitude of each decay mode in PQCD approach. In the leading order, the diagrams contributing to the decay are shown in the Fig.1. The first two diagrams are the emission type diagrams with the first one emitting the -pair and the second one with the vector meson emitted. The last two are the annihilation type diagrams. Because the decay amplitudes are very similar to those presented in the ref.Zou:2020dpg , for the sake of simplicity, we shall not present them in this work. The other parameters used in the numerical calculations, such as the mass of the mesons, CKM matrix elements and the life times of mesons, are taken from the Particle Data Group Zyla:2020zbs .

III Numerical Results
As aforementioned, the mixing angle of have not yet been determined. At first, we set as a free parameter and plot the branching fractions of decays dependent on it in Fig. 2, where the green bands are the allowed regions in the experiments. Combining the experimental data of and decays, we get the range of the mixing angle , which is consistent with the results obtained from and . In our previous work Li:2019jlp , the decays have been investigated, and we obtained after comparing with experimental result Lees:2011dq . If the mixing angle is adopted, the branching ratios of the and decays are given as
(8) | |||||
(9) |
which well match the experimental measurements:
(10) | |||||
(11) |
In view of this, we present all calculated results of the -averaged branching fractions and the local direct asymmetries of the concerned decay modes with in Table. 1. For comparison, the available experimental data are also listed. One can find that adopting the appropriate wave functions of initial and final states, our predictions are in good agreement with the current experimental data, although there are only upper limits for the and decays. Finally, we plot all the branching fractions dependent on the mixing angle , which may shed light on the mixing angle by combining the ongoing experimental measurements.
Decay Modes | Br(PQCD) | Br(EXP) Zyla:2020zbs | |
---|---|---|---|
… | |||
… | |||
… | |||
… |








We acknowledge that there are many uncertainties in our calculations. In this work, we mainly evaluate three kinds of errors, namely the parameters in wave functions of the initial and final states, the higher order and power corrections, and the CKM matrix elements, respectively. In fact, the first kind of errors come from the uncertainties of nonperturbative parameters, such as the meson decay constants , the sharp parameters in the distribution amplitudes of mesons, the Gegenbauer moments in the LCDAs of vector mesons, and the Gagenbauer moment in the -wave LCDAs of the -pair, et.al. We can find from the table that this kind of uncertainties are dominant. Fortunately, this kind of uncertainties could be reduced with the developments of the experiments or other nonperturbative theoretical approaches in future. The second kind of errors arise from the unknown higher order of and higher power corrections, which are reflected by varying the and the factorization scale from to , respectively. The last ones are caused by the uncertainties of the CKM matrix elements.
If the narrow-width approximation (NWA) holds in these decays, the branching fraction of the quasi-two-body meson decay can be decomposed as
(12) |
with represents a resonance. If two decays have a same resonance, we then define a ratio as
(13) |
Based on the predictions in Table. 1, the ratio between the and is given as
(14) |
which is agreement with the results of QCDF Cheng:2013fba . Within the isospin relation
(15) |
we obtain the relation
(16) |
which can be used to predict the branching fractions of the corresponding quasi-two-body decays.
Now we turn to discuss the local direct asymmetries of these decays. In the quark level, , , and are induced by transition, while and are controlled by transition. From Table. 1, it is found that the local asymmetries of decays and are very small, and the reason is that the tree diagrams contributions are both color and CKM elements suppressed. However, for the decay , because the spectator quark enters into not only meson but also -pair, the contributions from tree and penguin operators are comparable, leading to a large asymmetry. For the decays , although the contributions from tree operators are color suppressed, the destructive interference between the diagrams with vector meson emitted and ones with -pair emitted decreases the effects of penguin operators remarkably, therefore the asymmetries are as small as about . For decay, its amplitude is more complicated. In eq. (7), if the mixing angle of is an obtuse angle, the sign of is negative. The spectator -quark of can enter into both and -pair, so the negative sign leads to the cancellation between two tree operators contributions. With the sizable contributions of penguin operators, the asymmetry of this decay is as large as . The decay of is very similar to , but the spectator is a strange quark. When the spectator enters into the kaon, both the tree and penguin operators contribute, and the tree operators are color suppressed. However, when it enters into the -pair, only penguin operators play roles. Due to large interference between two kinds of above contributions, the large asymmetry in is reasonable. On the experimental side, these asymmetries have not been measured, and we hope these predictions can be tested in future.
IV Summary
In this work, we investigated the quasi-two-body decays in PQCD approach, assuming that is a mixture of and with the mixing angle . Within the -wave two-pion wave function, both the branching fractions and the located asymmetries have been calculated. When the mixing angle is around , the obtained branching fractions of the and are in good agreement with the experimental data, and other results could be tested in the future experiments. In addition, the branching fractions of could be predicted based on the isospin symmetry, which can be measured in the LHCb and Belle II experiments. We note that the calculated asymmetries of the and decays are very large, which can be tested in the ongoing experiments. We acknowledge that there are many uncertainties in the calculation, and the dominant one is the two-meson wave function. Therefore, more precise multi-meson wave functions from non-perturbative approach are needed.
Acknowledgment
This work is supported in part by the National Science Foundation of China under the Grant Nos. 11705159, 11975195, 11875033, and 11765012, and the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province under the Grant No.ZR2019JQ04. This work is also supported by the Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program under Grants No. 2019KJJ007.
References
- (1) BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., Study of CP violation in Dalitz-plot analyses of , , and , Phys. Rev. D85 (2012) 112010, [arXiv:1201.5897].
- (2) Belle Collaboration, Y. Nakahama et al., Measurement of CP violating asymmetries in decays with a time-dependent Dalitz approach, Phys. Rev. D82 (2010) 073011, [arXiv:1007.3848].
- (3) CLEO Collaboration, E. Eckhart et al., Observation of and evidence for , Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 251801, [hep-ex/0206024].
- (4) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of the decay , Phys. Rev. D98 (2018), no. 7 072006, [arXiv:1807.01891].
- (5) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Observation of the decay and evidence for , Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 1 012006, [arXiv:1610.05187].
- (6) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of decays, JHEP 06 (2019) 114, [arXiv:1902.07955].
- (7) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Resonances and violation in and decays in the mass region above the , JHEP 08 (2017) 037, [arXiv:1704.08217].
- (8) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of the decay, Phys. Rev. D101 (2020), no. 1 012006, [arXiv:1909.05212].
- (9) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Amplitude analysis of the decay, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 112003, [arXiv:2009.00026].
- (10) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of the relative branching fractions of decays, Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020) 112010, [arXiv:2010.11802].
- (11) X.-G. He, G.-N. Li, and D. Xu, SU(3) and isospin breaking effects on amplitudes, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 1 014029, [arXiv:1410.0476].
- (12) S. Krankl, T. Mannel, and J. Virto, Three-body non-leptonic B decays and QCD factorization, Nucl. Phys. B899 (2015) 247–264, [arXiv:1505.04111].
- (13) J. Virto, Charmless Non-Leptonic Multi-Body B decays, PoS FPCP2016 (2017) 007, [arXiv:1609.07430].
- (14) H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and A. Soni, Charmless three-body decays of B mesons, Phys. Rev. D76 (2007) 094006, [arXiv:0704.1049].
- (15) H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua, and Z.-Q. Zhang, Direct CP Violation in Charmless Three-body Decays of Mesons, Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), no. 9 094015, [arXiv:1607.08313].
- (16) Y. Li, Comprehensive study of decays in the factorization approach, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 9 094007, [arXiv:1402.6052].
- (17) W.-F. Wang and H.-n. Li, Quasi-two-body decays in perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Lett. B763 (2016) 29–39, [arXiv:1609.04614].
- (18) Y. Li, A.-J. Ma, W.-F. Wang, and Z.-J. Xiao, Quasi-two-body decays in perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D95 (2017), no. 5 056008, [arXiv:1612.05934].
- (19) Z.-T. Zou, Y. Li, Q.-X. Li, and X. Liu, Resonant contributions to three-body decays in perturbative QCD approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020), no. 5 394, [arXiv:2003.03754].
- (20) Z.-T. Zou, Y. Li, and X. Liu, Branching fractions and CP asymmetries of the quasi-two-body decays in within PQCD approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2020), no. 6 517, [arXiv:2005.02097].
- (21) Z.-T. Zou, Y. Li, and H.-n. Li, Is observed in the decays ?, Phys. Rev. D 103 (2021), no. 1 013005, [arXiv:2007.13141].
- (22) Z.-T. Zou, L. Yang, Y. Li, and X. Liu, Study of quasi-two-body decays in perturbative QCD approach, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (2021), no. 1 91, [arXiv:2011.07676].
- (23) C. Wang, Z.-H. Zhang, Z.-Y. Wang, and X.-H. Guo, Localized direct CP violation in , Eur. Phys. J. C75 (2015), no. 11 536, [arXiv:1506.00324].
- (24) Particle Data Group Collaboration, P. Zyla et al., Review of Particle Physics, PTEP 2020 (2020), no. 8 083C01.
- (25) H.-n. Li, Threshold resummation for exclusive meson decays, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 094010, [hep-ph/0102013].
- (26) C.-D. Lu and M.-Z. Yang, decays in perturbative QCD approach, Eur. Phys. J. C23 (2002) 275–287, [hep-ph/0011238].
- (27) X. Liu, Z.-T. Zou, Y. Li, and Z.-J. Xiao, Phenomenological studies on the decays, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 1 013006, [arXiv:1906.02489].
- (28) Y. Li, C.-D. Lu, Z.-J. Xiao, and X.-Q. Yu, Branching ratio and CP asymmetry of decays in the perturbative QCD approach, Phys. Rev. D70 (2004) 034009, [hep-ph/0404028].
- (29) M. Diehl, T. Gousset, B. Pire, and O. Teryaev, Probing partonic structure in near threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 1782–1785, [hep-ph/9805380].
- (30) M. Diehl, T. Gousset, and B. Pire, Exclusive production of pion pairs in collisions at large , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 073014, [hep-ph/0003233].
- (31) B. Pire and L. Szymanowski, Impact representation of generalized distribution amplitudes, Phys. Lett. B 556 (2003) 129–134, [hep-ph/0212296].
- (32) Y. Xing and Z.-P. Xing, -wave contributions in within perturbative QCD approach, Chin. Phys. C43 (2019), no. 7 073103, [arXiv:1903.04255].
- (33) N. Wang, Q. Chang, Y. Yang, and J. Sun, Study of the decay with perturbative QCD approach, J. Phys. G 46 (2019), no. 9 095001, [arXiv:1803.02656].
- (34) W.-F. Wang, H.-C. Hu, H.-n. Li, and C.-D. Lü, Direct CP asymmetries of three-body decays in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 7 074031, [arXiv:1402.5280].
- (35) W.-F. Wang, H.-n. Li, W. Wang, and C.-D. Lü, -wave resonance contributions to the and decays, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015), no. 9 094024, [arXiv:1502.05483].
- (36) J. Back et al., LAURA++: A Dalitz plot fitter, Comput. Phys. Commun. 231 (2018) 198–242, [arXiv:1711.09854].
- (37) S. M. Flatte, Coupled - Channel Analysis of the and Systems Near Threshold, Phys. Lett. 63B (1976) 224–227.
- (38) LHCb Collaboration, R. Aaij et al., Measurement of resonant and CP components in decays, Phys. Rev. D89 (2014), no. 9 092006, [arXiv:1402.6248].
- (39) F. E. Close and N. A. Tornqvist, Scalar mesons above and below 1-GeV, J. Phys. G 28 (2002) R249–R267, [hep-ph/0204205].
- (40) H.-Y. Cheng and K.-C. Yang, decays and subleading corrections, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 054020, [hep-ph/0501253].
- (41) R. L. Jaffe, Multi-Quark Hadrons. 1. The Phenomenology of (2 Quark 2 anti-Quark) Mesons, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 267.
- (42) M. G. Alford and R. L. Jaffe, Insight into the scalar mesons from a lattice calculation, Nucl. Phys. B 578 (2000) 367–382, [hep-lat/0001023].
- (43) H.-Y. Cheng, Hadronic D decays involving scalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D67 (2003) 034024, [hep-ph/0212117].
- (44) SIGMA-AYAKS Collaboration, A. V. Anisovich, V. V. Anisovich, V. N. Markov, and N. A. Nikonov, Radiative decays and quark content of and , Phys. Atom. Nucl. 65 (2002) 497–512.
- (45) A. Gokalp, Y. Sarac, and O. Yilmaz, An Analysis of mixing in light cone QCD sum rules, Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 291–297, [hep-ph/0410380].
- (46) Q.-X. Li, L. Yang, Z.-T. Zou, Y. Li, and X. Liu, Calculation of the decays in the perturbative QCD approach, Eur. Phys. J. C79 (2019), no. 11 960, [arXiv:1910.09209].
- (47) BaBar Collaboration, J. P. Lees et al., meson decays to , , and , including higher resonances, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 072005, [arXiv:1112.3896].
- (48) H.-Y. Cheng, C.-K. Chua, K.-C. Yang, and Z.-Q. Zhang, Revisiting charmless hadronic B decays to scalar mesons, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013), no. 11 114001, [arXiv:1303.4403].