Quantum sensing of rotation velocity based on Bose-Hubbard model
Abstract
This work theoretically study the Bose-Hubbard model in a ring geometry in a rotating frame. We obtain an effective Hamiltonian by using unitary transformation, where the effect of the rotating reference frame is introducing additional phases to the hopping constant. Within the mean-field theory, the phase transition edge of the Bose-Hubbard model not only depends on the particle numbers and the ring radius, but also depends on the rotation velocity. Therefore, we propose a sensing method of the rotation velocity using the phase transition edge of the Bose-Hubbard model. At the exact phase transition edge where this sensing method is most sensitive, the resolution depends on the rotation velocity, the particle numbers and the ring radius, while is independent of the parameters in the Bose-Hubbard model such as the hopping constant and the on-site interaction.
pacs:
03.65.Vf, 42.50.Ct, 03.67.-aI Introduction
Gyroscope can measure rotation velocity to get orientation information and plays a crucial role in inertial navigation King98 and geophysics Schreiber04 . Furthermore, a gyroscope with extreme high precision can facilitate fundamental researches such as general relativity Jonsson07 , etc. Comparing to a classical mechanical gyroscope using the principle of angular momentum conservation, the gyroscope utilizing quantum effects has great advantages such as high precision, high sensitivity, stable components and compact size Armenise10 . On the other hand, the optical and laser gyroscopes measure the rotation velocity by sensing the shift of the interference fringes between two split laser beams, which is known as the Sagnac effect Post67 ; Arditty81 . Such sensing scheme is firstly proposed and observed by using optical interferometer such as ring laser interferometers Macek63 ; Aronowitz71 ; Stedman97 ; Rowe99 and optical fiber interferometers Ezekiel82 ; Lefevre93 ; Dakin97 . The similar interference concept is then generalized to atom interferometer gyroscope (AIG) ,the first kind of quantum gyroscope, measuring the change of the two-photon Raman transitions for the manipulation of atomic wave packets Barrett14 . Various AIGs are theoretically proposed and experimentally implemented using particles such as neutrons Werner79 , the electrons Hasselbach93 and neutral atoms Riehle91 ; Lenef97 ; Gustavson97 ; Gustavson00 ; Oberthaler96 . The second kind of quantum gyroscope is nuclear magnetic resonance gyroscope(NMRG), which measures the rotation velocity by detecting the precession frequency of the nuclear magnetic moment in the rotating frame Noor17 . Recently, the third type of the quantum gyroscope has been experimentally implemented in the nitrogen-vacancy in diamond, where the Berry phase shifts in the NV electronic ground-state coherence facilitate the sensing of the rotation velocity Noor17 .
In order to improve the rotation velocity measurement, novel quantum effects are introduced into the sensing scheme. One example is that characteristics of the quantum system can be very sensitive at the critical point of the quantum phase transition, resulting in the transition edge sensor(TES) Irwin05 ; Sachdev ; Zhang08 . Although the TES is originally proposed to detect single photon in a superconducting system, it can also facilitate other sensing schemes. Yu-Han Ma et. al. explored the dynamics of transvers field Ising model (TFIM) and found the Loschmidt echo of TFIM is sensitive to the rotation velocity at the critical point of quantum phase transition (QPT) Ma17 . The reason to achieve higher resolution is that the Loschmidt echo possesses much more rapid decay around the critical point of QPT. Determined by various coefficients of the QPT system, if the phase boundaries between different phases varies when the whole system is placed in a rotating frame, the sudden changes of the order parameters guarantee not only the high resolution of the sensing of the rotation velocity, but also the various sensing schemes as well.
Therefore, this work explores more sensing schemes of the rotation velocity by measuring the QPT as long as it is directly affected by the rotation velocity in a rotating frame. Comparing to the transvers field Ising model where the rotating frame equivalently plays the role of an external magnetic field, this work considers the Bose-Huddbard(BH) model in a rotating reference frame due to its Bosonic nature and following reasons. First, various phase boundaries exist between the Mott insulator phases and the superfluid phases because of different occupation numbers. When the unitary transformation is applied to transfer the non-inertial reference frame to an inertial one, the rotation introduces additional phases to the hopping constant between the nearest neighbor sites. It eventually changes the order parameter of BH model and modifies the phase boundaries. Therefore, the rotation velocity is obtained by measuring the changes of the order parameter. The second reason is that the order parameter changes dramatically at the phase transition edges. A sensing scheme of rotation velocity is proposed using the QPT of BH model. It is found that the resolution reaches its maximum value at the phase transition edges. Additionally, it only depends on the rotation velocity, the particle numbers and the ring radius, while it is independent of the Bose-Hubbard model such as the hopping constant and the on-site interaction. Thus this work may shed light on the quantum gyroscope using the transition edge sensors.
The paper is organized as follows. In section II, we introduce the BH model of the ring system in rotating frame. The sensing scheme of the rotation velocity is proposed in the Sec. III. In Sec IV, we calculate the resolution of the sensing scheme.We conclude in section V.
II The Bose-Hubbard Model in Rotating Reference Frame
The Bose-Hubbard model is used to describe the phase transition between the Mott insulator phase and superfluid phase at zero temperature, which has been experimentally implemented in a cold atom system. The Hamiltonian of the BH model in an inertial reference is introduced as
(1) |
Where the and are respectively the annihilation and creation operators of bosons at site, is the hopping constant between the nearest neighbor sites , is the on-site interaction, is the chemical potential and is the particle number operator. The system prefers Mott insulator phase for small and prefers the superfluid phase for large .
Now we consider the BH model in a rotating reference frame with rotating angular velocity . Without loss of generality, the rotating axis is along the z-axis as . In the inertial reference frame, the effect of the rotating reference frame can be described by the following unitary transformation as
(2) |
with the time-dependent unitary transformation matrix with angular momentum After the second quantization, the Hamiltonian in the laboratory reference frame can be written as
(3) | |||||
where is the Peierls phases at the site and is the velocity vector with particle mass As we can see, the effect of the rotating reference frame is introducing the site-dependent Peierls phases at each site, which eventually will affect the QPT of the BH model. In the sake of simplicity, we consider a ring geometry of BH model with ring radius and rotates around the axis with rotation velocity (Shown in Fig. 1). In this sense, the Peierls phases become site-independent ones as
(4) |

In order to demonstrate how the rotation velocity affects the quantum phase transition, the mean field theory is adopted where the order parameter is the average of the annihilation operator on the ground state. In this sense, the hopping terms can be written as
(5) |
Eventually the Hamiltonian become the summation of one-body Hamiltonian with
(6) | |||||
According to the Landau phase transition theory, the ground state energy expanded to the forth-order of the order parameter have spontaneous symmetry breaking at the critical point To analytically determine the ground state and the order parameter simultaneously, we apply the forth-order perturbation theory and obtain the following results
(7) |
(8) | |||||
where is the energy difference between the eigen-states with eigen-energies in the local limit ().
The critical point determines the phase boundary as
(9) |
where , , . Above the critical point the system stays in Mott insulator phase with zero order parameter . When getting below the critical point the system stays in the superfluid phase with nonzero order parameter , which can be experimentally measured by the critical momentum in the transport measurement.
The rotation of the system affects the ground state of the system and eventually shifts the critical point and the phase boundary. The information of the rotation velocity is also contained in the change of the order parameter, which is experimentally measurable. Therefore by measuring the change of the order parameter, we can sense the rotation velocity.
III Quantum sensing scheme of the rotation velocity
In this section, we propose a quantum sensing scheme of the rotation velocity through the observation of the Bose-Hubbard Model’s quantum phase transition. The phase diagram of the Bose-Hubbard Model is analytically obtained from Eq.(9), which is shown in Fig. 2. Here the different phase boundaries correspond to different . Since is proportional to the rotation velocity, will decreases when the rotation velocity increases. As shown in Fig. 2, there are several lobes characterized by an integer value of , in which the ground state of system refers to the Mott insulator. Outside the lobes the nonzero order parameter of the ground state indicates the superfluidity of the system.

If the system in an inertial reference is originally prepared in a superfluid state in the vicinity of phase boundary. Then the whole system starts to rotate. The introduction of the rotation velocity results in the expansion of the phase boundary as shown in Fig. 2. The order parameter shall varies dramatically because of the phase transition from superfluid to Mott insulator. The rotation velocity can be derived by detecting the change of order parameter. Since the rotation velocity only changes the hopping constant from to , the sensing loop from the superfluid to Mott insulator is a straight line with the constant chemical potential , which is also shown as the solid line A in Fig. 2.

The order parameters along line A versus the rotation velocity and hopping constant is shown in Fig. 3. The order parameter varies dramatically in the vicinity of the phase boundary. By measurement the variance of order parameter, the rotation velocity can be determined. The variance of the order parameters is also determined by the -th slobe, the variance of the boundary is shown in Fig. 4. Obviously, the variance of order parameter is more dramatic for higher , which indicates more efficient sensing scheme in the vicinity of the phase boundary with higher .

IV The resolution of the quantum sensing scheme
In order to characterize the efficiency of the quantum sensing scheme based on the Bose Hubbard model, the resolution of the sensing scheme with respect to the rotation velocity is obviously important. The resolution can be defined as the full width at half(FWHM) of the change in order parameters, which is defined as
(10) |
The change in order parameters is caused by the change in rotation velocity(, ). When the system is exactly prepared on the phase boundary (), the change in order parameters can be factorized as
(11) |
where
(12) | |||||
(13) | |||||
with , and It should be pointed out that since is independent of the rotation velocity only plays essential role in the resolution. For a fixed and fixed almost exponentially increases when increases as shown in Fig. 4. To obtain the resolution analytically, the following approximate fitting formula is adopted as
(14) |
with one dependent fitting parameter

In this sense, the reaches its maximum value when . Here, not all maximum value can be exactly obtained because , which gives rise to the critical point and the maximum value of is
(15) |
Since the resolution defined as full width at half(FWHM) of the change in order parameters, the resolution is by the following equation which is
(16) |
Here the is the solution of the equation
The numerical calculation is shown in Fig.6. The red line and blue line represents respectively the rigorous one by solving and the fitting one from Eq. 16. As shown in Fig. 6, the resolution increases when the rotation velocity increases. The approximate resolution fits the rigorous one very well.

V CONCLUSION
This work develops a Bose-Hubbard(BH) model in a rotating frame into consideration due to its Bosonic nature. One reason to choose the BH model is that various phase boundaries between the Mott insulator phase and the superfluid phase emerges due to different occupation numbers. When the unitary transformation is applied to transfer the non-inertial reference frame to an inertial one, the rotation introduces additional phases to the hopping constant between the nearest neighbor sites. It eventually changes the order parameter of BH model, resulting in the changed phase boundary. Therefore it is feasible to obtain the rotation velocity by measuring the changes of the order parameter. Another reason to choose the BH model is that the dramatic change order parameter at the phase transition edges can improve the sensitivity. We propose a sensing scheme of rotation velocity using the QPT of BH model. We find that sensitivity reaches the maximum value at the phase transition edges. Additionally, this sensitivity only depends on the rotation velocity of the rotating reference, the particle numbers and the ring radius, and it is independent of those parameters of the Bose-Hubbard model such as the hopping constant and the on-site interaction. This work may shed light on the quantum gyroscope using the phase transition edges.
Acknowledgements.
The work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12175150) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guang-dong Province (Grant No. 2019A1515011400).References
- (1) A. D. King, GEC Rev. 13, 140–149 (1998).
- (2) K. U. Schreiber, A. Velikoseltsev, M. Rothacher, T. Klügel, G. E. Stedman, and D. L. Wiltshire, Journal of Geophysical Research 109, B06405 (2004).
- (3) Rickard M. Jonsson, American Journal of Physics 75, 463 (2007).
- (4) M.N. Armenise, C. Ciminelli, F. Dell’Olio et al., Advances in gyroscope technologies [M] (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)
- (5) E. J. Post, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 475 (1967).
- (6) H. J. Arditty and H. C. Lefevre, Optics Letters 6, 401 (1981).
- (7) W. M. Macek and D. T. Davis, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2, 67–68 (1963).
- (8) F. Aronowitz, “The laser gyro”, in Laser Applications, M. Ross, ed. (Academic Press, 1971), pp. 133-200.
- (9) G. E. Stedman, Rep. Prog. Phys. 60, 615–87 (1997).
- (10) Clive H. Rowe, Ulrich K. Schreiber, Steven J. Cooper, B. Tom King, Morrie Poulton, and Geoffrey E. Stedman, Appl. Opt. 38, 2516–23 (1999).
- (11) S. Ezekiel, H. J. Arditty, Fiber-Optic Rotation Sensors and Related Technologies. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, vol 32. (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg,1982).
- (12) H. Lefevre, The Fiber Optic Gyroscope, 3rd ed. (Artech House: London, UK, 1993).
- (13) J. Dakin and B. Culshaw, Fiber Sensors, Applications, Analysis and Future Trends, (Artech House: London, UK, 1997).
- (14) S. A. Werner, J. -L. Staudenmann, and R. Colella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 1103 (1979).
- (15) Franz Hasselbach and Marc Nicklaus, Phys. Rev. A 48, 143 (1993).
- (16) F. Riehle, Th. Kisters, A. Witte, J. Helmcke, and Ch. J. Bordé, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 177 (1991).
- (17) Alan Lenef, Troy D. Hammond, Edward T. Smith, Michael S. Chapman, Richard A. Rubenstein, and David E. Pritchard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 760 (1997).
- (18) T. L. Gustavson, P. Bouyer, and M. A. Kasevich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 2046 (1997).
- (19) T. L. Gustavson, A. Landragin, and M. A. Kasevich, Class. Quantum Grav. 17, 2385–2398 (2000).
- (20) M.K. Oberthaler, S. Bernet, E.M. Rasel, J. Schmiedmayer, A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3165 (1996).
- (21) B. Barrett, R. Geiger, I. Dutta et al., C. R. Phys. 15, 875 (2014).
- (22) R.M. Noor, V. Gundeti, A.M. Shkel, in IEEE International Symposium on Inertial Sensors and Systems (INERTIAL) (IEEE, 2017), p. 156.
- (23) K. D. Irwin and G. C. Hilton, "Transition-edge sensors", Cryogenic Particle Detection, ed. C. Enss, Springer (2005).
- (24) S. Sachdev, Quantum phase transitions [M] (John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Cambridge, England, 2007) .
- (25) J. Zhang, X. Peng, N. Rajendran et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 100501 (2008).
- (26) Yu-Han Ma and Chang-Pu Sun, Eur. Phys. J. D (2017) 71: 249.