This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Quantum entanglement generation on magnons assisted with microwave cavities coupled to a superconducting qubit

Jiu-Ming Li    Shao-Ming Fei [email protected] School of Mathematical Sciences, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Abstract

We present protocols to generate quantum entanglement on nonlocal magnons in hybrid systems composed of yttrium iron garnet (YIG) spheres, microwave cavities and a superconducting (SC) qubit. In the schemes, the YIGs are coupled to respective microwave cavities in resonant way, and the SC qubit is placed at the center of the cavities, which interacts with the cavities simultaneously. By exchanging the virtual photon, the cavities can indirectly interact in the far-detuning regime. Detailed protocols are presented to establish entanglement for two, three and arbitrary NN magnons with reasonable fidelities.

magnon, superconducting qubit, quantum electrodynamics, quantum entanglement, indirect interaction

I INTRODUCTION

Quantum entanglement is one of the most important features in quantum mechanics. The quantum entangled states EPR ; GHZ1 ; W1 ; QE are significant ingredients in quantum information processing. Over past decades, various theoretical and experimental proposals have been presented for processing quantum information by using various systems such as atoms AP ; A1 ; A2 ; A3 ; A4 ; A5 ; A6 ; A7 ; A8 ; A9 , spins S1 ; S2 ; S3 ; S4 ; S5 ; S6 ; S7 , ions I1 ; I2 ; I3 ; I4 ; I5 ; I6 ; I7 ; I8 , photons AP ; PT1 ; PT2 ; PT3 ; PT4 ; PT5 ; PT6 ; PT7 ; PT8 ; PT9 ; PT10 , phonons PN1 ; PN2 ; PN3 , and so on. With the development of technologies, the quantum entanglement has been established not only in microscopic systems, but also in the macroscopic systems such as superconducting circuits SC1 ; SC2 ; SC3 ; SC4 ; SC5 ; SC6 and magnons system LJ1 ; LJ2 ; Kong ; M1 ; M2 ; M3 .

Hybrid systems exploit the advantages of different quantum systems in achieving certain quantum tasks, such as creating quantum entanglement and carrying out quantum logic gates. Many works have been presented so far for quantum information processing in the hybrid systems HS1 ; HS2 ; HS3 ; HS4 . For instance, as an important quantum technology HSC , the hybrid quantum circuits combine superconducting systems with other physical systems which can be fabricated on a chip. The superconducting (SC) qubit circuits SCQ1 ; SCQ2 , based on the Josephson junctions, can exhibit quantum behaviors even at macroscopic scale. Generally, the interaction between the SC qubits and the environment, e.g., systems in strong or even ultrastrong coupling regime via quantized electromagnetic fields, would result in short coherence time. Thus many researches on circuit quantum electrodynamics (QED) CQED have been presented with respect to the SC qubits, superconducting coplanar waveguide resonators, LC resonators and so on. This circuit QED focuses on studies of the light-matter interaction by using the microwave photons, and has become a relative independent research field originated from cavity QED.

The hybrid systems composed of collective spins (magnons) in ferrimagnetic systems and other systems are able to constitute the magnon-photon MT1 ; MT2 , magnon-phonon MN3 ; MN1 ; MN2 , magnon-photon-phonon LJ1 ; LJ2 ; MTN systems and so on, giving rise to new interesting applications. Ferrimagnetic systems such as yttrium iron garnet (YIG) sphere have attracted considerable attention in recent years, which provide new platforms for investigating the macroscopic quantum phenomena particularly. Such systems are able to achieve strong and even ultrastrong couplings SU between the magnons and the microwave photons, as a result of the high density of the collective spins in YIG and the lower dissipation. The YIG has the unique dielectric microwave properties with very lower microwave magnetic loss parameter. Meanwhile, some important works have been presented on magnon Kerr effect Kerr1 ; Kerr2 , quantum transduction MQT , magnon squeezing MS1 ; MS2 , magnon Fock state MFS and entanglement of magnons. For example, In 2018 Li et al. LJ1 proposed a system consisted of magnons, microwave photons and phonons for establishing tripartite entangled states based on the magnetostrictive interaction and that the entangled state in magnon-photon-phonon system is robust. In 2019 Li et al. LJ2 constructed the entangled state of two magnon modes in a cavity magnomechanical system by applying a strong red-detuned microwave field on a magnon mode to activate the nonlinear magnetostrictive interaction. In 2021 Kong et al. Kong used the indirect coherent interaction for accomplishing two magnons entanglement and squeezing via virtual photons in the ferromagnetic-superconducting system.

In this work, we first present a hybrid system composed of two YIG spheres, two identical microwave cavities and a SC qubit to establish quantum entanglement on two nonlocal magnons. In this system, two YIGs are coupled to respective microwave cavities that cross each other. And a SC qubit is placed at the center of the crossing of two identical cavities, namely, the SC qubit interacts with the two cavities simultaneously. The magnons in YIGs can be coupled to the microwave cavities in the resonant way, owing to that the frequencies of two magnons can be tuned by biased magnetic fields, respectively. Compared with other works, the SC qubit is coupled to the two microwave cavities in the far-detuning regime, meaning that the two identical cavities indirectly interact with each other by exchanging virtual photons. Then, we give the effective Hamiltonian of the subsystem composed of the SC qubit and two cavities, and present the protocol of entanglement establishment. In Sec. III, we consider the case of three magnons. In the hybrid system shown in Fig.3, the three identical microwave cavities could indirectly interact via the virtual photons, and each magnon is resonant with the respective cavity by tuning the frequency of the magnon. At last, we get the isoprobability entanglement on three nonlocal magnons. Moreover, the hybrid system composed of N magnons, N identical microwave cavities and a SC qubit is derived in Sec. IV. We summarize in Sec. V.

II QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT ON TWO NONLOCAL MAGNONS

II.1 Hamiltonian of the hybrid system

We consider a hybrid system, see Fig.1, in which two microwave cavities cross each other, two yttrium iron garnet (YIG) spheres are coupled to the microwave cavities, respectively. A superconducting (SC) qubit, represented by black spot in the Fig.1, is placed at the center of the crossing in order to interact with the two microwave cavities simultaneously. The YIG spheres are placed at the antinode of two microwave magnetic fields, respectively, and a static magnetic field is locally biased in each YIG sphere. In our model, the SC qubit is a two-level system with ground state |gq|g\rangle\!_{q} and excited state |eq|e\rangle\!_{q}.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) Schematic of the hybrid system composed of two yttrium iron garnet spheres coupled to respective microwave cavities. Two cavities cross each other, and a superconducting qubit (black spot) is placed at the center of the crossing.

The magnetostatic modes in YIG can be excited when the magnetic component of the microwave cavity field is perpendicular to the biased magnetic field. We only consider the Kittel mode Kittel in the hybrid system, namely, the magnon modes can be excited in YIG. The frequency of the magnon is in the gigahertz range. Thus the magnon generally interacts with the microwave photon via the magnetic dipole interaction. The frequency of the magnon is given by ωm=γH\omega_{m}=\gamma H, where HH is the biased magnetic field and γ/2π=28\gamma/2\pi=28 GHz/T is the gyromagnetic ratio.

In recent years, some experiments have already realized the strong and ultrastrong magnon-magnon coupling mm1 ; mm2 ; mm3 as well as the magnon-qubit interaction MSC ; PMS , which means that in the hybrid system shown in Fig.1 the magnon is both coupled to the SC qubit and another magnon. However, we mainly consider that the magnons which frequencies are tuned by the locally biased static magnetic fields can be resonant with the cavities. In the meantime, the two cavities modes interact indirectly in the far-detuning regime for exchanging photons. The entanglement of two nonlocal magnons can be constructed by using two cavities and the SC qubit. Given that there are magnon-magnon and magnon-qubit interactions, the magnon can be detuned with the qubit and another magnon in order to neglect their interactions. In the rotating wave approximation the Hamiltonian of the hybrid system is (=1\hbar=1 hereafter) Hm

H(S)=H0+Hint\displaystyle H^{(\mathrm{S})}\!=H_{0}+H_{\mathrm{int}}
H0\displaystyle H_{0} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! ωm1m1m1+ωm2m2m2+12ωqσz\displaystyle\omega_{m_{1}}m_{1}^{\dagger}m_{1}+\omega_{m_{2}}m_{2}^{\dagger}m_{2}+\frac{1}{2}\omega_{q}\sigma_{z}
+ωa1a1a1+ωa2a2a2\displaystyle+\omega_{a_{1}}a_{1}^{\dagger}a_{1}+\omega_{a_{2}}a_{2}^{\dagger}a_{2}
Hint\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{int}} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! λm1(a1m1+a1m1)+λm2(a2m2+a2m2)\displaystyle\lambda_{m_{1}}(a_{1}m^{\dagger}_{1}+a_{1}^{\dagger}m_{1})+\lambda_{m_{2}}(a_{2}m^{\dagger}_{2}+a_{2}^{\dagger}m_{2}) (1)
+λq1(a1σ++a1σ)+λq2(a2σ++a2σ).\displaystyle+\lambda_{q_{1}}(a_{1}\sigma^{+}+a_{1}^{\dagger}\sigma)+\lambda_{q_{2}}(a_{2}\sigma^{+}+a_{2}^{\dagger}\sigma).

Here, H0H_{0} is the free Hamiltonian of the two cavities, two magnons and the SC qubit. HintH_{\mathrm{int}} is the interaction Hamiltonian among the cavities, magnons and SC qubit. ωm1\omega_{m_{1}} and ωm2\omega_{m_{2}} are the frequencies of the two magnons, which are tunable under biased magnetic fields, respectively. ωa1\omega_{a_{1}} and ωa2\omega_{a_{2}} are the frequencies of two cavities, and ωq\omega_{q} is the state transition frequency between |gq|eq|g\rangle\!_{q}\leftrightarrow|e\rangle\!_{q} of the SC qubit. In the Kittel mode, the collective spins in YIGs can be expressed by the boson operators. m1m_{1} (m2m_{2}) and m1m_{1}^{\dagger} (m2m_{2}^{\dagger}) are the annihilation and creation operators of magnon mode 1 (2). a1a_{1} (a2a_{2}) and a1a_{1}^{\dagger} (a2a_{2}^{\dagger}) denote the annihilation and creation operators of cavity mode 1 (2), respectively. They satisfy commutation relations [O,O]=1[O,O^{\dagger}]=1 for O=a1,a2,m1,m2O=a_{1},a_{2},m_{1},m_{2}. σz=|eqe||gqg|\sigma_{z}=|e\rangle_{q}\langle e|-|g\rangle_{q}\langle g|. σ=|gqe|\sigma=|g\rangle_{q}\langle e| and σ+=|eqg|\sigma^{+}=|e\rangle_{q}\langle g| are the lowing and raising operators of the SC qubit. λq1\lambda_{q_{1}} (λq2\lambda_{q_{2}}) is the coupling strength between the SC qubit and the cavity mode 1 (2). λm1\lambda_{m_{1}} (λm2\lambda_{m_{2}}) is the coupling between the magnon mode 1 (2) and the cavity mode 1 (2).

As mentioned above, the two microwave cavities are identical ones with the same frequency ωa1=ωa2=ωa\omega_{a_{1}}=\omega_{a_{2}}=\omega_{a}. Meanwhile, one can assume that λq1=λq2=λq\lambda_{q_{1}}=\lambda_{q_{2}}=\lambda_{q}. In the interaction picture with respect to eiH0te^{-\mathrm{i}H_{0}t}, the Hamiltonian is expressed as

H(I)\displaystyle H^{(\mathrm{I})} =\displaystyle\!\!=\!\! λm1a1m1eiδ1t+λm2a2m2eiδ2t+λqa1σ+eiΔ1t\displaystyle\lambda_{m_{1}}a_{1}m^{\dagger}_{1}e^{\mathrm{i}\delta_{1}t}+\lambda_{m_{2}}a_{2}m^{\dagger}_{2}e^{\mathrm{i}\delta_{2}t}+\lambda_{q}a_{1}\sigma^{+}e^{\mathrm{i}\Delta_{1}t} (2)
+λqa2σ+eiΔ2t+H.c.,\displaystyle+\lambda_{q}a_{2}\sigma^{+}e^{\mathrm{i}\Delta_{2}t}+H.c.,

where δ1=ωm1ωa\delta_{1}=\omega_{m_{1}}-\omega_{a}, δ2=ωm2ωa\delta_{2}=\omega_{m_{2}}-\omega_{a}, Δ1=ωqωa\Delta_{1}=\omega_{q}-\omega_{a} and Δ2=ωqωa\Delta_{2}=\omega_{q}-\omega_{a}. The SC qubit is coupled to the two cavities simultaneously. Owing to Δ1=Δ2=Δ00\Delta_{1}=\Delta_{2}=\Delta_{0}\neq 0 and Δ0λq\Delta_{0}\gg\lambda_{q}, the two identical microwave cavities indirectly interact with each other in the far-detuning regime. Therefore, the effective Hamiltonian of the subsystem composed of the two microwave cavities and the SC qubit in the far-detuning regime is given by EH

Heff=λ~q[σz(a1a1+a2a2+a1a2+a1a2)+2|eqe|],\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{eff}}\!=\!\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}\!\left[\sigma_{z}(a_{1}^{{\dagger}}a_{1}+a_{2}^{{\dagger}}a_{2}+a_{1}^{{\dagger}}a_{2}+a_{1}a_{2}^{{\dagger}})+2|e\rangle_{q}\langle e|\right], (3)

where λ~q=λq2/Δ0\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}=\lambda_{q}^{2}/\Delta_{0}.

II.2 Entangled state generation on two nonlocal magnons

We now give the protocol of quantum entanglement generation on two nonlocal magnons. Generally, the magnon can be excited by a drive magnetic field. For convenience the state of magnon 1 is prepared as |1m1|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}} via the magnetic field. The initial state of the hybrid system is |φ0=|1m1|0m2|0a1|0a2|gq|\varphi\rangle_{0}=|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}|g\rangle\!_{q}, in which the two cavities are all in the vacuum state, magnon 2 is in the state |0m2|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}, and the SC qubit is in state |gq|g\rangle\!_{q} which is unaltered all the time due to the indirect interaction between the two cavities.

step 1: The frequency of magnon 1 is tuned to be ωm1=ωa1\omega_{m_{1}}\!=\!\omega_{a_{1}} so that the cavity 1 could be resonated with it. Therefore, the magnon 1 and cavity 1 are in a superposed state after time T1=π/4λm1T_{1}=\pi/4\lambda_{m_{1}}. The local evolution is |1m1|0a112(|1m1|0a1i|0m1|1a1)|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}\rightarrow\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}-\mathrm{i}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}), which means that the states of SC qubit, magnon 2 and cavity 2 are unchanged due to decoupling between the SC and two cavities, and the magnon 2 is far-detuned with cavity 2. The state evolves to

|φ1\displaystyle|\varphi\rangle_{1} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! 12(|1m1|0a1i|0m1|1a1)\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}-\mathrm{i}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}) (4)
|0m2|0a2|gq.\displaystyle\otimes|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}\otimes|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}.

step 2: The magnons are tuned to far detune with respective cavities. From Eq. (3), the evolution of subsystem composed of two microwave cavities and SC qubit is given by

|χ(t)sub\displaystyle|\chi(t)\rangle\!_{\mathrm{sub}} =\displaystyle\!\!=\!\! eiλ~qt[cos(λ~qt)|1a1|0a2+isin(λ~qt)|0a1|1a2]\displaystyle e^{\mathrm{i}\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}t}\big{[}\cos(\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}t)|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}+\mathrm{i}\sin(\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}t)|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}\big{]} (5)
|gq\displaystyle\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}

under the condition Δ0λq\Delta_{0}\gg\lambda_{q}.

After time T2=π/2λ~qT_{2}=\pi/2\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}, the evolution between two cavities is |1a1|0a2|0a1|1a2|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}\rightarrow-|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}, which indicates that the photon can be indirectly transmitted between the two cavities, with the state of SC qubit unchanged. Therefore, the state after this step changes to

|φ2\displaystyle|\varphi\rangle_{2} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! 12(|1m1|0a1|0a2+i|0m1|0a1|1a2)\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}+\mathrm{i}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}) (6)
|0m2|gq.\displaystyle\otimes|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}.

step 3: The frequency of magnon 2 is tuned with ωm2=ωa2\omega_{m_{2}}=\omega_{a_{2}} to resonate with the cavity 2. In the meantime the cavities are decoupled to the SC qubit and the magnon 1 is far detuned with the cavity 1. After time T3=π/2λm2T_{3}=\pi/2\lambda_{m_{2}}, the local evolution |0m2|1a2i|1m2|0a2|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}\rightarrow-\mathrm{i}|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}} is attained. The final state is

|φ3\displaystyle|\varphi\rangle_{3} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! 12(|1m1|0m2+|0m1|1m2)\displaystyle\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}+|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}) (7)
|0a1|0a2|gq,\displaystyle\otimes|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}\otimes|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q},

which is just the single-excitation Bell state on two nonlocal magnons.

In the whole process, we mainly consider the interactions between the magnons and the cavities, and between the cavities and the SC qubit. However, the SC qubit can be coupled to the magnons. In terms of Ref.MSC , the interactions between the magnons and the SC qubit are described as Hqm,1=λqm,1(σ+m1+H.c.)H_{qm,1}=\lambda_{qm,1}(\sigma^{+}m_{1}+H.c.) and Hqm,2=λqm,2(σ+m2+H.c.)H_{qm,2}=\lambda_{qm,2}(\sigma^{+}m_{2}+H.c.) where λqm,1=λqλm1/Δ0\lambda_{qm,1}=\lambda_{q}\lambda_{m_{1}}/\Delta_{0} and λqm,2=λqλm2/Δ0\lambda_{qm,2}=\lambda_{q}\lambda_{m_{2}}/\Delta_{0}, while the conditions ωq=ωm1\omega_{q}=\omega_{m_{1}} and ωq=ωm2\omega_{q}=\omega_{m_{2}} are attained. In the meantime, the two magnons are interacts each other by using the SC qubit. Generally, the frequencies of two magnon modes are tuned by the locally biased magnetic fields. Therefore, the magnon can be detuned with the SC qubit and another magnon in order to neglect the interactions between the magnons and the SC qubit.

II.3 Numerical result

Refer to caption Refer to caption
Refer to caption Refer to caption
Figure 2: (a) The fidelity of the Bell state of two nonlocal magnons with respect to the coupling strength λq\lambda_{q}. Since λ~q=λq2/Δ0\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}=\lambda_{q}^{2}/\Delta_{0} in Eq.(3), the fidelity is similar to parabola. (b)-(d) The fidelity of the Bell state versus the dissipations of cavities, magnons, and SC qubit, respectively.

We here simulate SIM the fidelity of the Bell state on two nonlocal magnons by considering the dissipations of all constituents of the hybrid system. The realistic evolution of the hybrid system composed of magnons, microwave cavities and SC qubit is governed by the master equation

ρ˙\displaystyle\dot{\rho} =\displaystyle\!\!=\!\! i[H(I),ρ]+κm1D[m1]ρ+κm2D[m2]ρ\displaystyle-\mathrm{i}[H^{(I)},\rho]+\kappa_{m_{1}}D[m_{1}]\rho+\kappa_{m_{2}}D[m_{2}]\rho (8)
+κa1D[a1]ρ+κa2D[a2]ρ+γqD[σ]ρ.\displaystyle+\kappa_{a_{1}}D[a_{1}]\rho+\kappa_{a_{2}}D[a_{2}]\rho+\gamma_{q}D[\sigma]\rho.

Here, ρ\rho is the density operator of the hybrid system, κm1\kappa_{m_{1}} and κm2\kappa_{m_{2}} are the dissipation rates of magnon 1 and 2, κa1\kappa_{a_{1}} and κa2\kappa_{a_{2}} denote the dissipation rates for the two microwave cavities 1 and 2, γq\gamma_{q} is the dissipation rate of the SC qubit, D[X]ρ=(2XρXXXρρXX)/2D[X]\rho\!\!=\!\!(2X\rho X^{\dagger}-X^{\dagger}X\rho-\rho X^{\dagger}X)/2 for X=m1,m2,a1,a2,σX=m_{1},m_{2},a_{1},a_{2},\sigma. The fidelity of the entangled state of two nonlocal magnons is defined by F=3φ|ρ|φ3F=_{3}\!\!\langle\varphi|\rho|\varphi\rangle_{3}.

The related parameters are chosen as ωq/2π=7.92\omega_{q}/2\pi=7.92 GHz, ωa/2π=6.98\omega_{a}/2\pi=6.98 GHz, λq/2π=83.2\lambda_{q}/2\pi=83.2 MHz, λm1/2π=15.3\lambda_{m_{1}}/2\pi=15.3 MHz, λm2/2π=15.3\lambda_{m_{2}}/2\pi=15.3 MHz PMS , κm1/2π\kappa_{m_{1}}/2\pi=κm2/2π=κm/2π=1.06\kappa_{m_{2}}/2\pi=\kappa_{m}/2\pi=1.06 MHz, κa1/2π=κa2/2π=κa/2π=1.35\kappa_{a_{1}}/2\pi=\kappa_{a_{2}}/2\pi=\kappa_{a}/2\pi=1.35 MHz SU , γq/2π=1.2\gamma_{q}/2\pi=1.2 MHz MSC . The fidelity of the entanglement between two nonlocal magnons can reach 92.9%\%.

The influences of the imperfect relationship among parameters is discussed next. The Fig.2(a) shows the fidelity influenced by the coupling strength between the microwave cavities and the SC qubit. Since λ~q=λq2/Δ0\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}=\lambda_{q}^{2}/\Delta_{0} in Eq.(3), the fidelity is similar to parabola. In Fig.2(b)-(d), we give the fidelity varied by the dissipations of cavities, magnons, and SC qubit. As a result of the virtual photon, the fidelity is almost unaffected by the SC qubit, shown in Fig.2(d).

III ENTANGLEMENT GENERATION FOR THREE NONLOCAL MAGNONS

III.1 Entangled state of three nonlocal magnons

Similar to the protocol of entangled state generation for two nonlocal magnons in two microwave cavities, we consider the protocol for entanglement of three nonlocal magnons. As shown in Fig.3, similar to the hybrid system composed of two magnons coupled to the respective microwave cavities and a SC qubit in Fig.1, there are three magnons in three YIGs coupled to respective microwave cavities and a SC qubit placed at the center of the three identical cavities (ωa1=ωa2=ωa3=ωa\omega_{a_{1}}\!=\!\omega_{a_{2}}\!=\!\omega_{a_{3}}\!=\!\omega_{a}). Each magnon is in biased static magnetic field and is located at the antinode of the microwave magnetic field.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) Schematic of the hybrid system composed of three yttrium iron garnet spheres coupled to respective microwave cavities. A superconducting qubit (black spot) is placed at the center of the three cavities.

In the interaction picture, the Hamiltonian of the hybrid system depicted in Fig.3 is

H3(I)\displaystyle H^{(\mathrm{I})}_{3} =\displaystyle\!\!=\!\! λm1a1m1eiδ1t+λm2a2m2eiδ2t\displaystyle\lambda_{m_{1}}a_{1}m^{\dagger}_{1}e^{\mathrm{i}\delta_{1}t}+\lambda_{m_{2}}a_{2}m^{\dagger}_{2}e^{\mathrm{i}\delta_{2}t} (9)
+λm3a3m3eiδ3t+λqa1σ+eiΔ1t\displaystyle+\lambda_{m_{3}}a_{3}m^{\dagger}_{3}e^{\mathrm{i}\delta_{3}t}+\lambda_{q}a_{1}\sigma^{+}e^{\mathrm{i}\Delta_{1}t}
+λqa2σ+eiΔ2t+λqa3σ+eiΔ3t+H.c.,\displaystyle+\lambda_{q}a_{2}\sigma^{+}e^{\mathrm{i}\Delta_{2}t}+\lambda_{q}a_{3}\sigma^{+}e^{\mathrm{i}\Delta_{3}t}+H.c.,

where λm3\lambda_{m_{3}} is the coupling strength between magnon 3 and microwave cavity 3, a3a_{3} and m3m^{\dagger}_{3} are annihilation operator of the cavity 3 and creation operator of the magnon 3, respectively. λq\lambda_{q} is the coupling between the SC qubit and three cavities, δ3=ωm3ωa\delta_{3}=\omega_{m_{3}}-\omega_{a}. The frequency ωm3\omega_{m_{3}} can be tuned by the biased magnetic field in microwave cavity 3. Δ3=ωqωa=Δ0\Delta_{3}=\omega_{q}-\omega_{a}=\Delta_{0}.

At the beginning we have the initial state |ψ0(3)=|ψm(3)|ψa(3)|gq|\psi\rangle_{0}^{(3)}\!\!\!=\!\!|\psi\rangle\!_{m}^{(3)}\otimes|\psi\rangle\!_{a}^{(3)}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q} with |ψm(3)=|1m1|0m2|0m3=|100m|\psi\rangle\!_{m}^{(3)}\!\!\!=\!\!|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{3}}\!=\!|100\rangle\!_{m} and |ψa(3)=|0a1|0a2|0a3=|000a|\psi\rangle\!_{a}^{(3)}\!\!\!=\!\!|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{3}}\!=\!|000\rangle\!_{a}. The single-excitation is set in the magnon 1. The magnon 1 is resonant with the cavity 1 by tuning the frequency of magnon 1, and the SC qubit is decoupled to the cavities. After time T1(3)=π/2λm1T_{1}^{(3)}=\pi/2\lambda_{m_{1}}, the local evolution |1m1|0a1i|0m1|1a1|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}\rightarrow-\mathrm{i}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}} is attained. The state is evolved to

|ψ1(3)=i|000m|100a|gq.\displaystyle|\psi\rangle_{1}^{(3)}=-\mathrm{i}|000\rangle\!_{m}\!|100\rangle\!_{a}|g\rangle\!_{q}. (10)

The SC qubit is coupled to the three identical microwave cavities at the same time in far-detuning regime Δ0λq\Delta_{0}\gg\lambda_{q}. Therefore, the effective Hamiltonian of the subsystem composed of the SC qubit and the three identical cavities is of the form EH

Heff(3)\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(3)} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! λ~q[σz(a1a1+a2a2+a3a3)+3|eqe|\displaystyle\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}\bigg{[}\sigma_{z}(a_{1}^{\dagger}a_{1}+a_{2}^{\dagger}a_{2}+a_{3}^{\dagger}a_{3})+3|e\rangle_{q}\langle e| (11)
+σz(a1a2+a1a3+a2a3+H.c.)].\displaystyle+\sigma_{z}(a_{1}a_{2}^{\dagger}+a_{1}a_{3}^{\dagger}+a_{2}a_{3}^{\dagger}+H.c.)\bigg{]}.

The magnons are then all detuned with the cavities. The local evolution eiHeff(3)t|100a|ge^{-\mathrm{i}H_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(3)}t}|100\rangle\!_{a}|g\rangle of the subsystem is given by

|χ(t)sub(3)\displaystyle|\chi(t)\rangle\!_{\mathrm{sub}}^{(3)} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! [C1,t(3)|100a+C2,t(3)|010a+C3,t(3)|001a]\displaystyle\bigg{[}C^{(3)}_{1,t}|100\rangle\!_{a}+C^{(3)}_{2,t}|010\rangle\!_{a}+C^{(3)}_{3,t}|001\rangle\!_{a}\bigg{]} (12)
|gq,\displaystyle\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q},

where C1,t(3)=ei3λ~qt+23C^{(3)}_{1,t}=\frac{e^{\mathrm{i}3\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}t}+2}{3} and C2,t(3)=C3,t(3)=ei3λ~qt13C^{(3)}_{2,t}=C^{(3)}_{3,t}=\frac{e^{\mathrm{i}3\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}t}-1}{3}. It is easy to derive that

|C1,t(3)|2+|C2,t(3)|2+|C3,t(3)|2=1.\displaystyle|C^{(3)}_{1,t}|^{2}+|C^{(3)}_{2,t}|^{2}+|C^{(3)}_{3,t}|^{2}=1. (13)

Fig.4 shows the probability related to the states |100a|000m|gq|100\rangle\!_{a}|000\rangle\!_{m}|g\rangle\!_{q}, |010a|000m|gq|010\rangle\!_{a}|000\rangle\!_{m}|g\rangle\!_{q} and |001a|000m|gq|001\rangle\!_{a}|000\rangle\!_{m}|g\rangle\!_{q}. In particular, one has |C1,t(3)|2=|C2,t(3)|2=|C3,t(3)|2=13|C^{(3)}_{1,t}|^{2}=|C^{(3)}_{2,t}|^{2}=|C^{(3)}_{3,t}|^{2}=\frac{1}{3}, with

C1(3)=3+i23,C2(3)=C3(3)=3+i23\displaystyle C^{(3)}_{1}=\frac{\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}},C^{(3)}_{2}=C^{(3)}_{3}=\frac{-\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}} (14)

at time T2(3)=2π/9λ~qT_{2}^{(3)}=2\pi/9\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}. Correspondingly, the state evolves to

|ψ2(3)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle_{2}^{(3)} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! [3+i23|100a+3+i23|010a+3+i23|001a]\displaystyle\bigg{[}\frac{\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}}|100\rangle\!_{a}+\frac{-\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}}|010\rangle\!_{a}+\frac{-\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}}|001\rangle\!_{a}\bigg{]} (15)
(i)|000m|gq.\displaystyle\otimes(-\mathrm{i})|000\rangle\!_{m}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color online) Evolution probabilities of the states: P1=|C1,t(3)|2P_{1}=|C^{(3)}_{1,t}|^{2} for |100a|000m|gq|100\rangle\!_{a}|000\rangle\!_{m}|g\rangle\!_{q} (red), P2=|C2,t(3)|2P_{2}=|C^{(3)}_{2,t}|^{2} for |010a|000m|gq|010\rangle\!_{a}|000\rangle\!_{m}|g\rangle\!_{q}, P3=|C3,t(3)|2P_{3}=|C^{(3)}_{3,t}|^{2} for |001a|000m|gq|001\rangle\!_{a}|000\rangle\!_{m}|g\rangle\!_{q}, and P2=P3P_{2}=P_{3} (blue).

Finally, the magnons can be resonated with the respective cavities under the condition {δ1,δ2,δ3}=0\{\delta_{1},\delta_{2},\delta_{3}\}=0. The local evolution and the time are |0mk|1aki|1mk|0ak|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{k}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{k}}\rightarrow-\mathrm{i}|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{k}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{k}} and T3k(3)=π/2λmkT_{3k}^{(3)}=\pi/2\lambda_{m_{k}} (k=1,2,3k=1,2,3), respectively. Thus the final state is

|ψ3(3)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle_{3}^{(3)} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! [3+i23|100m+3+i23|010m+3+i23|001m]\displaystyle-\bigg{[}\frac{\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}}|100\rangle\!_{m}\!+\!\frac{-\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}}|010\rangle\!_{m}\!+\!\frac{-\sqrt{3}+\mathrm{i}}{2\sqrt{3}}|001\rangle\!_{m}\!\bigg{]} (16)
|000a|gq.\displaystyle\otimes|000\rangle\!_{a}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}.

In the whole process, the state of the SC qubit is kept unchanged.

III.2 Numerical result

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: (a)-(c) The fidelity of the entanglement on three nonlocal magnons versus the dissipations of cavities, magnons and SC qubit.

The entanglement fidelity of three nonlocal magnons is given here by taking into account the dissipations of hybrid system. Firstly, the master equation which governs the realistic evolution of the hybrid system composed of three magnons, three microwave cavities and a SC qubit can be expressed as

ρ˙(3)\displaystyle\dot{\rho}^{(3)} =\displaystyle\!\!=\!\! i[H3(I),ρ(3)]+κm1D[m1]ρ(3)+κm2D[m2]ρ(3)\displaystyle-\mathrm{i}[H^{(I)}_{3},\rho^{(3)}]+\kappa_{m_{1}}D[m_{1}]\rho^{(3)}+\kappa_{m_{2}}D[m_{2}]\rho^{(3)} (17)
+κm3D[m3]ρ(3)+κa1D[a1]ρ(3)+κa2D[a2]ρ(3)\displaystyle+\kappa_{m_{3}}D[m_{3}]\rho^{(3)}+\kappa_{a_{1}}D[a_{1}]\rho^{(3)}+\kappa_{a_{2}}D[a_{2}]\rho^{(3)}
+κa3D[a3]ρ(3)+γqD[σ]ρ(3),\displaystyle+\kappa_{a_{3}}D[a_{3}]\rho^{(3)}+\gamma_{q}D[\sigma]\rho^{(3)},

where ρ(3)\rho^{(3)} is the density operator of realistic evolution of the hybrid system, κm3\kappa_{m_{3}} is the dissipation rate of magnon 3 with κm3/2π=κm/2π=1.06\kappa_{m_{3}}/2\pi=\kappa_{m}/2\pi=1.06 MHz SU , κa3\kappa_{a_{3}} denotes the dissipation rate for the microwave cavities 3 with κa3/2π=κa/2π=1.35\kappa_{a_{3}}/2\pi=\kappa_{a}/2\pi=1.35 MHz SU , D[X]ρ(3)=(2Xρ(3)XXXρ(3)ρ(3)XX)/2D[X]\rho^{(3)}\!\!=\!\!(2X\rho^{(3)}X^{\dagger}-X^{\dagger}X\rho^{(3)}-\rho^{(3)}X^{\dagger}X)/2 for any X=m1,m2,m3,a1,a2,a3,σX=m_{1},m_{2},m_{3},a_{1},a_{2},a_{3},\sigma.

The entanglement fidelity for three nonlocal magnons is defined by F(3)=3(3)ψ|ρ(3)|ψ3(3)F^{(3)}=_{3}^{(3)}\!\!\langle\psi|\rho^{(3)}|\psi\rangle_{3}^{(3)}, which can reach 84.9%\%. The fidelity with respect to the parameters is shown in Fig.5.

IV N MAGNONS SITUATION

In Sec. II and Sec. III, the entanglement of two and three nonlocal magnons have been established. In this section we consider the case of N magnons. In the hybrid system shown in Fig.6, the SC qubit is coupled to N cavity modes that have the same frequencies ωa\omega_{a}. A magnon is coupled to the cavity mode in each cavity. Each magnon is placed at the antinode of microwave magnetic field of the respective cavity and biased static magnetic field.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: (Color online) Schematic of the hybrid system composed of N yttrium iron garnet spheres coupled to respective microwave cavities. A superconducting qubit is placed at the center of the N identical microwave cavities.

In the interaction picture the Hamiltonian of whole system shown in Fig.6 can be expressed as

HN(I)\displaystyle H^{(\mathrm{I})}_{N}\!\! =\displaystyle=\!\! n[λmn(anmneiδnt+H.c.)\displaystyle\sum_{n}\bigg{[}\lambda_{m_{n}}(a_{n}m^{\dagger}_{n}e^{\mathrm{i}\delta_{n}t}+H.c.) (18)
+λq(anσ+eiΔnt+H.c.)],\displaystyle\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,+\lambda_{q}(a_{n}\sigma^{+}e^{\mathrm{i}\Delta_{n}t}+H.c.)\bigg{]},

where ana_{n} and mnm^{\dagger}_{n} (n=1,2,3,,Nn=1,2,3,\cdots,N) are the annihilation operator of the nth cavity mode and the creation operator of the nth magnon, λmn\lambda_{m_{n}} is the coupling between the nth magnon and the nth cavity mode, λq\lambda_{q} denotes the coupling strength between the SC qubit and the nth cavity mode, δn=ωmnωa\delta_{n}=\omega_{m_{n}}-\omega_{a}, ωmn\omega_{m_{n}} is the frequency of the nth magnon, Δn=Δ0=ωqωa\Delta_{n}=\Delta_{0}=\omega_{q}-\omega_{a}.

The initial state is prepared as

|ψ0(N)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle^{(N)}_{0}\!\!\! =\displaystyle= |ψm(N)|ψa(N)|gq,\displaystyle\!\!\!|\psi\rangle\!_{m}^{(N)}\otimes|\psi\rangle\!_{a}^{(N)}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}, (19)
|ψm(N)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle\!_{m}^{(N)}\!\!\! =\displaystyle= |1m1|0m2|0m3|0mN=|1000m,\displaystyle\!\!\!|1\rangle\!_{m\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{2}}|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{3}}\cdots|0\rangle\!_{m\!_{N}}\!=\!|100\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m},
|ψa(N)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle\!_{a}^{(N)}\!\!\! =\displaystyle= |0a1|0a2|0a3|0aN=|0000a.\displaystyle\!\!\!|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{3}}\cdots|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{N}}\!=\!|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}.

At first, we tune the frequency of magnon 1 under the condition δ1=0\delta_{1}=0. The magnon 1 is resonant with the cavity 1, which means that the single photon is transmitted to cavity 1, and the SC qubit is decoupled to all the cavities. The state evolves to

|ψ1(N)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle^{(N)}_{1}\!\!\! =\displaystyle= i|0000m|1000a|gq\displaystyle\!\!\!-\mathrm{i}|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m}|100\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}|g\rangle\!_{q} (20)

after time T1(N)=π/2λm1T_{1}^{(N)}=\pi/2\lambda_{m_{1}}.

Next the magnons are tuned to detune with respective cavities. The SC qubit is coupled to the N microwave cavities at the same time in far-detuning regime Δ0λq\Delta_{0}\gg\lambda_{q}. Under the condition Δn=Δ0\Delta_{n}=\Delta_{0}, the effective Hamiltonian of the subsystem composed of the SC qubit and N microwave cavities is of the form EH

Heff(N)\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{eff}}^{(N)} =\displaystyle\!\!=\!\! nλ~q[σzanan+|eqe|]\displaystyle\sum_{n}\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}\bigg{[}\sigma_{z}a_{n}^{\dagger}a_{n}+|e\rangle_{q}\langle e|\bigg{]} (21)
+l<nλ~q[σz(alan+H.c.)].\displaystyle+\sum_{l<n}\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}\bigg{[}\sigma_{z}(a_{l}a_{n}^{\dagger}+H.c.)\bigg{]}.

Consequently, the evolution of the hybrid system is given by

|ψ2(N)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle^{(N)}_{2} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! [C1,t(N)|1000a+C2,t(N)|0100a\displaystyle\bigg{[}C^{(N)}_{1,t}|100\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}+C^{(N)}_{2,t}|010\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a} (22)
+C3,t(N)|0010a++CN,t(N)|0001a]\displaystyle+C^{(N)}_{3,t}|001\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}+\cdots+C^{(N)}_{N,t}|000\cdots 1\rangle\!_{a}\bigg{]}
(i)|0000m|gq,\displaystyle\otimes(-\mathrm{i})|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q},

where

C1,t(N)\displaystyle C^{(N)}_{1,t} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! eiNλ~qt+(N1)N,\displaystyle\frac{e^{\mathrm{i}N\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}t}+(N-1)}{N},
C2,t(N)=C3,t(N)\displaystyle C^{(N)}_{2,t}=C^{(N)}_{3,t} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! =CN,t(N)=eiNλ~qt1N.\displaystyle\cdots=C^{(N)}_{N,t}=\frac{e^{\mathrm{i}N\widetilde{\lambda}_{q}t}-1}{N}. (23)

In addition, we have the following relation

n|Cn,t(N)|2\displaystyle\sum_{n}|C^{(N)}_{n,t}|^{2}\!\! =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! |C1,t(N)|2+|C2,t(N)|2+|C3,t(N)|2++|CN,t(N)|2\displaystyle\!\!|C^{(N)}_{1,t}|^{2}+|C^{(N)}_{2,t}|^{2}+|C^{(N)}_{3,t}|^{2}+\cdots+|C^{(N)}_{N,t}|^{2} (24)
=\displaystyle= 1\displaystyle\!\!1

by straightforward calculation.

At last, the SC qubit is decoupled to the cavities, and the magnons are resonant with the cavities, respectively. Thus, after the time T3n(N)=π/2λmnT_{3n}^{(N)}=\pi/2\lambda_{m_{n}}, the final state is given by

|ψ3(N)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle^{(N)}_{3} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! [C1,t(N)|1000m+C2,t(N)|0100m\displaystyle-\bigg{[}C^{(N)}_{1,t}|100\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m}+C^{(N)}_{2,t}|010\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m} (25)
+C3,t(N)|0010m++CN,t(N)|0001m]\displaystyle+C^{(N)}_{3,t}|001\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m}+\cdots+C^{(N)}_{N,t}|000\cdots 1\rangle\!_{m}\bigg{]}
|0000a|gq.\displaystyle\otimes|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}.

In the whole process, the state of SC qubit is unchanged all the time.

Refer to caption Refer to caption Refer to caption
Figure 7: (a)-(c) Evolution probabilities for N=4N=4 (left), N=5N=5 (middle), and N=6N=6 (right). If N5N\geqslant 5, p1(N)p2(N)p_{1}^{(N)}\neq p_{2}^{(N)} implies that the isoprobability entanglement does not exist.

[Remark] Concerning the coefficients Eq. (23), the probabilities with respect to the states |1000m|0000a|gq|100\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m}|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}|g\rangle\!_{q}, |0100m|0000a|gq|010\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m}|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}|g\rangle\!_{q}, |0010m|0000a|gq|001\cdots 0\rangle\!_{m}|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}|g\rangle\!_{q}, \cdots, |0001m|0000a|gq|000\cdots 1\rangle\!_{m}|000\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}|g\rangle\!_{q} are p1(N)=|C1,t(N)|2p^{(N)}_{1}=|C^{(N)}_{1,t}|^{2}, p2(N)=|C2,t(N)|2p^{(N)}_{2}=|C^{(N)}_{2,t}|^{2}, p3(N)=|C3,t(N)|2p^{(N)}_{3}=|C^{(N)}_{3,t}|^{2}, \cdots, pN(N)=|CN,t(N)|2p^{(N)}_{N}=|C^{(N)}_{N,t}|^{2}, respectively, and p2(N)=p3(N)==pN(N)p^{(N)}_{2}=p^{(N)}_{3}=\cdots=p^{(N)}_{N}. If the condition p1(N)=p2(N)p^{(N)}_{1}=p^{(N)}_{2} can be attained, the isoprobability entanglement can be obtained. For instance, for N=4N=4, the entangled state of the four nonlocal magnons is given by

|ψ3(4)\displaystyle|\psi\rangle^{(4)}_{3} =\displaystyle\!\!\!=\!\!\! 12[|1000m|0100m|0010m|0001m]\displaystyle-\frac{1}{2}\!\bigg{[}|1000\rangle\!_{m}\!-\!|0100\rangle\!_{m}\!-\!|0010\rangle\!_{m}\!-\!|0001\rangle\!_{m}\bigg{]} (26)
|0000a|gq.\displaystyle\otimes|0000\rangle\!_{a}\otimes|g\rangle\!_{q}.

However, if N5N\geqslant 5, the isoprobability entanglement does not exist as a result of p1(N)p2(N)p^{(N)}_{1}\neq p^{(N)}_{2}, see illustration in Fig.7(b)(c).

V SUMMARY AND DISCUSSION

We have presented protocols of establishing entanglement on magnons in hybrid systems composed of YIGs, microwave cavities and a SC qubit. By exploiting the virtual photon, the microwave cavities can indirectly interact in far-detuning regime, and the frequencies of magnons can be tuned by the biased magnetic field, which leads to the resonant interaction between the magnons and the respective microwave cavities. We have constructed single-excitation entangled state on two and three nonlocal magnons, respectively, and the entanglement for N magnons has been also derived in term of the protocol for three magnons.

By analyzing the coefficients in Eq. (23), the isoprobability entanglement has been also constructed for cases N=2N=2, N=3N=3 and N=4N=4. In particular, such isoprobability entanglement no longer exists for N5N\geqslant 5.

In the protocol for the case of two magnons discussed in Sec. II, we have firstly constructed the superposition of magnon 1 and microwave cavity 1. Then the photon could be transmitted |1a1|0a2|0a1|1a2|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}}\rightarrow-|0\rangle\!_{a\!_{1}}|1\rangle\!_{a\!_{2}} between two cavities. At last, the single-excitation Bell state is finally constructed in resonant way. As for N3N\geqslant 3, however, such method is no longer applicable because of |1000aα2|0100a+α3|0010a++αN|0001a|100\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}\nrightarrow\alpha_{2}|010\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}+\alpha_{3}|001\cdots 0\rangle\!_{a}+\cdots+\alpha_{N}|000\cdots 1\rangle\!_{a}, namely, p1(N)0p_{1}^{(N)}\neq 0.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant Nos. 12075159 and 12171044, Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No. Z190005), the Academician Innovation Platform of Hainan Province.

References

  • (1) A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen, Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete, Phys. Rev. 47, 777 (1935)
  • (2) D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Observation of three-photon Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345 (1999)
  • (3) W. Dür, G. Vidal, and J. I. Cirac, Three qubits can be entangled in two inequivalent ways, Phys. Rev. A 62, 062314 (2000)
  • (4) R. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, M. Horodecki, and K. Horodecki, Quantum entanglement, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865 (2009)
  • (5) J. M. Raimond, M. Brune, and S. Haroche, Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 565 (2001)
  • (6) K. G. H. Vollbrecht and J. I. Cirac, Delocalized entanglement of atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 190502 (2007)
  • (7) M. Bina, F. Casagrande, A. Lulli, and E. Solano, Monitoring atom-atom entanglement and decoherence in a solvable tripartite open system in cavity QED, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033839 (2008)
  • (8) J. León and C. Sabín, Photon exchange and correlation transfer in atom-atom entanglement dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 79, 012301 (2009)
  • (9) W.-A. Li and G.-Y. Huang, Deterministic generation of a three-dimensional entangled state via quantum Zeno dynamics, Phys. Rev. A 83, 022322 (2011)
  • (10) M. Roghani, H. Helm, and H.-P. Breuer, Entanglement dynamics of a strongly driven trapped atom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 040502 (2011)
  • (11) R. Rogers, N. Cummings, L. M. Pedrotti, and P. Rice, Atom-field entanglement in cavity QED: nonlinearity and saturation, Phys. Rev. A 96, 052311 (2017)
  • (12) H. Jo, Y. Song, M. Kim, and J. Ahn, Rydberg atom entanglements in the weak coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 033603 (2020)
  • (13) X.-Y. Luo, Y. Yu, J.-L. Liu, M.-Y. Zheng, C.-Y. Wang, B. Wang, J. Li, X. Jiang, X.-P. Xie, Q. Zhang, X.-H. Bao, and J.-W. Pan, Postselected entanglement between two atomic ensembles separated by 12.5 km, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 050503 (2022)
  • (14) Z. Jin, S.-L. Su, A.-D. Zhu, H.-F. Wang, and S. Zhang, Engineering multipartite steady entanglement of distant atoms via dissipation, Front. Phys. 13, 134209 (2018)
  • (15) S. Michalakis and B. Nachtergaele, Entanglement in finitely correlated spin states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 140601 (2006)
  • (16) G. Tóth, C. Knapp, O. Gühne, and H. J. Briegel, Spin squeezing and entanglement, Phys. Rev. A 79, 042334 (2009)
  • (17) H, Zheng, H. T. Dung, and M. Hillery, Application of entanglement conditions to spin systems, Phys. Rev. A 81, 062311 (2010)
  • (18) F. Troiani, S. Carretta, and P. Santini, Detection of entanglement between collective spins, Phys. Rev. B 88, 195421 (2013)
  • (19) A. Ström, H. Johannesson, and P. Recher, Controllable spin entanglement production in a quantum spin Hall ring, Phys. Rev. B 91, 245406 (2015)
  • (20) J. C. Szabo and N. Trivedi, Entanglement dynamics between Ising spins and a central ancilla, Phys. Rev. A 105, 052431 (2022)
  • (21) V. Azimi-Mousolou, A. Bergman, A. Delin, O. Eriksson, M. Pereiro, D. Thonig, and E. Sjöqvist, Entanglement duality in spin-spin interactions, Phys. Rev. A 106, 032407 (2022)
  • (22) A. Retzker, J. I. Cirac, and B. Reznik, Detecting vacuum entanglement in a linear ion trap, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 050504 (2005)
  • (23) G.-X. Li, S.-P. Wu, and G.-M. Huang, Generation of entanglement and squeezing in the system of two ions trapped in a cavity, Phys. Rev. A 71, 063817 (2005)
  • (24) F. L. Semião and K. Furuya, Entanglement in the dispersive interaction of trapped ions with a quantized field, Phys. Rev. A 75, 042315 (2007)
  • (25) F. Nicacio, K. Furuya, and F. L. Semião, Motional entanglement with trapped ions and a nanomechanical resonator, Phys. Rev. A 88, 022330 (2013)
  • (26) C. D. B. Bentley, A. R. R. Carvalho, D. Kielpinski, and J. J. Hope, Detection-enhanced steady state entanglement with ions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 040501 (2014)
  • (27) K. Lake, S. Weidt, J. Randall, E. D. Standing, S. C. Webster, and W. K. Hensinger, Generation of spin-motion entanglement in a trapped ion using long-wavelength radiation, Phys. Rev. A 91, 012319 (2015)
  • (28) J. Hannegan, J. D. Siverns, J. Cassell, and Q. Quraishi, Improving entanglement generation rates in trapped-ion quantum networks using nondestructive photon measurement and storage, Phys. Rev. A 103, 052433 (2021)
  • (29) D. C. Cole, S. D. Erickson, G. Zarantonello, K. P. Horn, P.-Y. Hou, J. J. Wu, D. H. Slichter, F. Reiter, C. P. Koch, and D. Leibfried, Resource-efficient dissipative entanglement of two trapped-ion qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 080502 (2022)
  • (30) H. S. Eisenberg, G. Khoury, G. A. Durkin, C. Simon, and D. Bouwmeester, Quantum entanglement of a large number of photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 193901 (2004)
  • (31) J. O. S. Yin and S. J. van Enk, Entanglement and purity of one- and two-photon states, Phys. Rev. A 77, 062333 (2008)
  • (32) D. Salart, O. Landry, N. Sangouard, N. Gisin, H. Herrmann, B. Sanguinetti, C. Simon, W. Sohler, R. T. Thew, A. Thomas, and H. Zbinden, Purification of single-photon entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 180504 (2010)
  • (33) H. Wang, M. Mariantoni, R. C. Bialczak, M. Lenander, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, M. Weides, J. Wenner, T. Yamamoto, Y. Yin, J. Zhao, John M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Deterministic entanglement of photons in two superconducting microwave resonators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 060401 (2011)
  • (34) X.-L. Wang, L.-K. Chen, W. Li, H.-L. Huang, C. Liu, C. Chen, Y.-H. Luo, Z.-E. Su, D. Wu, Z.-D. Li, H. Lu, Y. Hu, X. Jiang, C.-Z. Peng, L. Li, N.-L. Liu, Y.-A. Chen, C.-Y. Lu, and J.-W. Pan, Experimental ten-photon entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 210502 (2016)
  • (35) O. Kfir, Entanglements of electrons and cavity photons in the strong-coupling regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 103602 (2019)
  • (36) A. C. Dada, J. Kaniewski, C. Gawith, M. Lavery, R. H. Hadfield, D. Faccio, and M. Clerici, Near-maximal two-photon entanglement for optical quantum communication at 2.1μ\mum, Phys. Rev. Applied 16, L051005 (2021)
  • (37) J. V. Rakonjac, D. Lago-Rivera, A. Seri, M. Mazzera, S. Grandi, and Hugues de Riedmatten, Entanglement between a telecom photon and an on-demand multimode solid-state quantum memory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 210502 (2021)
  • (38) H. Wang, B.-C. Ren, A. H. Wang, A. Alsaedi, T. Hayat, and F.-G. Deng, General hyperentanglement concentration for polarizationspatial- time-bin multi-photon systems with linear optics, Front. Phys. 13, 130315 (2018)
  • (39) T. Liu, Z.-F. Zheng, Y. Zhang, Y.-L. Fang, and C.-P. Yang, Transferring entangled states of photonic cat-state qubits in circuit QED, Front. Phys. 15, 21603 (2020)
  • (40) U. Akram, W. Munro, K. Nemoto, and G. J. Milburn, Photon-phonon entanglement in coupled optomechanical arrays, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042306 (2012)
  • (41) S. Finazzi and I. Carusotto, Entangled phonons in atomic Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. A 90, 033607 (2014)
  • (42) S.-S. Chen, H. Zhang, Q. Ai, and G.-J. Yang, Phononic entanglement concentration via optomechanical interactions, Phys. Rev. A 100, 052306 (2019)
  • (43) M. Di Tullio, N. Gigena, and R. Rossignoli, Fermionic entanglement in superconducting systems, Phys. Rev. A 97, 062109 (2018)
  • (44) M. Gong, M.-C. Chen, Y. Zheng, S. Wang, C. Zha, H. Deng, Z. Yan, H. Rong, Y. Wu, S. Li, F. Chen, Y. Zhao, F. Liang, J. Lin, Y. Xu, C. Guo, L. Sun, A. D. Castellano, H. Wang, C. Peng, C.-Y. Lu, X. Zhu, and J.-W. Pan, Genuine 12-qubit entanglement on a superconducting quantum processor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 110501 (2019)
  • (45) W. Ning, X.-J. Huang, P.-R. Han, H. Li, H. Deng, Z.-B. Yang, Z.-R. Zhong, Y. Xia, K. Xu, D. Zheng, and S.-B. Zheng, Deterministic entanglement swapping in a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 060502 (2019)
  • (46) Y. Ma, X. Pan, W. Cai, X. Mu, Y. Xu, L. Hu, W. Wang, H. Wang, Y. P. Song, Z.-B. Yang, S.-B. Zheng, and L. Sun, Manipulating complex hybrid entanglement and testing multipartite bell inequalities in a superconducting circuit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 180503 (2020)
  • (47) S. Krastanov, H. Raniwala, J. Holzgrafe, K. Jacobs, M. Lončar, M. J. Reagor, and D. R. Englund, Optically heralded entanglement of superconducting systems in quantum networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 040503 (2021)
  • (48) A. Cervera-Lierta, M. Krenn, A. Aspuru-Guzik, and A. Galda, Experimental high-dimensional Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger entanglement with superconducting transmon qutrits, Phys. Rev. Applied 17, 024062 (2022)
  • (49) J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Magnon-photon-phonon entanglement in cavity magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 203601 (2018)
  • (50) J. Li and S.-Y. Zhu, Entangling two magnon modes via magnetostrictive interaction, New J. Phys. 21, 085001 (2019)
  • (51) H. Y. Yuan, S. Zheng, Z. Ficek, Q. Y. He, and M.-H. Yung, Enhancement of magnon-magnon entanglement inside a cavity, Phys. Rev. B 101, 014419 (2020)
  • (52) D. Kong, X. Hu, L. Hu, and J. Xu, Magnon-atom interaction via dispersive cavities: magnon entanglement, Phys. Rev. B 103, 224416 (2021)
  • (53) V. Azimi Mousolou, Y. Liu, A. Bergman, A. Delin, O. Eriksson, M. Pereiro, D. Thonig, and Erik Sjöqvist, Magnon-magnon entanglement and its quantification via a microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. B 104, 224302 (2021)
  • (54) F. Wang, C. Gou, J. Xu, and C. Gong, Hybrid magnon-atom entanglement and magnon blockade via quantum interference, Phys. Rev. A 106, 013705 (2022)
  • (55) B. Rogers, M. Paternostro, G. M. Palma, and G. De Chiara, Entanglement control in hybrid optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 86, 042323 (2012)
  • (56) M. Borrelli, M. Rossi, C. Macchiavello, and S. Maniscalco, Witnessing entanglement in hybrid systems, Phys. Rev. A 90, 020301(R) (2014)
  • (57) C. Joshi, J. Larson, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum state engineering in hybrid open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 93, 043818 (2016)
  • (58) Q.-Z. Ye, Z.-T. Liang, W.-X. Zhang, D.-J. Pan, Z.-Y. Xue, and H. Yan, Speedup of entanglement generation in hybrid quantum systems through linear driving, Phys. Rev. A 106, 012407 (2022)
  • (59) Z.-L. Xiang, S. Ashhab, J. Q. You, and F. Nori, Hybrid quantum circuits: superconducting circuits interacting with other quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 623 (2013)
  • (60) A. Blais, R.-S. Huang, A. Wallraff, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Cavity quantum electrodynamics for superconducting electrical circuits: an architecture for quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 69, 062320 (2004)
  • (61) J. Q. You and F. Nori, Superconducting circuits and quantum information, Phys. Today 58, 42 (2005)
  • (62) A. Blais, A. L. Grimsmo, S. M. Girvin, and A. Wallraff, Circuit quantum electrodynamics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 025005 (2021)
  • (63) H. Y. Yuan, P. Yan, S Zheng, Q. Y. He, K. Xia, and M.-H. Yung, Steady Bell state generation via magnon-photon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 053602 (2020)
  • (64) Y. Zhao, L. Wang, J. Xue, Q. Zhang, Y. Tian, S. Yan, L. Bai, M. Harder, Q. Guo, and Y. Zhai, Measuring the magnon phase in a hybrid magnon-photon system, Phys. Rev. B 105, 174405 (2022)
  • (65) X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. Tang, Cavity magnomechanics, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501286 (2016)
  • (66) S. Streib, N. Vidal-Silva, K. Shen, and G. E. W. Bauer, Magnon-phonon interactions in magnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. B 99, 184442 (2019)
  • (67) M. Yu, H. Shen, and J. Li, Magnetostrictively induced stationary entanglement between two microwave fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 213604 (2020)
  • (68) S.-F. Qi and J. Jing, Magnon-assisted photon-phonon conversion in the presence of structured environments, Phys. Rev. A 103, 043704 (2021)
  • (69) X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014)
  • (70) Y.-P. Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, X.-Q. Luo, W. Xiong, S.-P. Wang, T.-F. Li, C.-M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Magnon Kerr effect in a strongly coupled cavity-magnon system, Phys. Rev. B 94, 224410 (2016)
  • (71) Y.-P. Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, T.-F. Li, C.-M. Hu, and J. Q. You, Bistability of cavity magnon polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 057202 (2018)
  • (72) R. Hisatomi, A. Osada, Y. Tabuchi, T. Ishikawa, A. Noguchi, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Bidirectional conversion between microwave and light via ferromagnetic magnons, Phys. Rev. B 93, 174427 (2016)
  • (73) J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and G. S. Agarwal, Squeezed states of magnons and phonons in cavity magnomechanics, Phys. Rev. A 99, 021801(R) (2019)
  • (74) J. Zou, S. K. Kim, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Tuning entanglement by squeezing magnons in anisotropic magnets, Phys. Rev. B 101, 014416 (2020)
  • (75) V. A. S. V. Bittencourt, V. Feulner, and S. V. Kusminskiy, Magnon heralding in cavity optomagnonics, Phys. Rev. A 100, 013810 (2019)
  • (76) C. Kittel, On the theory of ferromagnetic resonance absorption, Phys. Rev. 73, 155 (1948)
  • (77) J. Chen, C. Liu, T. Liu, Y. Xiao, K. Xia, G. E.W.Bauer, M. Wu, and H. Yu, Strong interlayer magnon-magnon coupling in magnetic metal-insulator hybrid nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 217202 (2018)
  • (78) L. Liensberger, A. Kamra, H. Maier-Flaig, S. Geprägs, A. Erb, S. T.B.Goennenwein, R. Gross, W. Belzig, H. Huebl, and M. Weiler, Exchange-enhanced ultrastrong magnon-magnon coupling in a compensated ferrimagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 117204 (2019)
  • (79) Y. Li, V. G. Yefremenko, M. Lisovenko, C. Trevillian, T. Polakovic, T. W. Cecil, P. S. Barry, J. Pearson, R. Divan, V. Tyberkevych, C. L. Chang, U. Welp, W.-K. Kwok, and V. Novosad, Coherent coupling of two remote magnonic resonators mediated by superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 047701 (2022)
  • (80) Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit, Science 349, 405 (2015)
  • (81) D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Entanglement-based single-shot detection of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit, Science 367, 425 (2020)
  • (82) J.-K. Xie , S.-L Ma, and F.-L. Li, Quantum-interference-enhanced magnon blockade in an yttrium-iron-garnet sphere coupled to superconducting circuits, Phys. Rev. A 101, 042331 (2020)
  • (83) D. F. James and J. Jerke, Effective Hamiltonian theory and its applications in quantum infromation, Can. J. Phys. 85, 625 (2007)
  • (84) I. Buluta and F. Nori, Quantum Simulators, Science 326, 108 (2009)