This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Production of hidden-heavy and double-heavy hadronic molecules at the ZZ factory of CEPC

Zhao-Sai Jia College of Physics and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
   Gang Li [email protected] College of Physics and Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China    Pan-Pan Shi [email protected] CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China Instituto de Física Corpuscular (centro mixto CSIC-UV),
Institutos de Investigación de Paterna, Apartado 22085, 46071, Valencia, Spain
   Zhen-Hua Zhang [email protected] CAS Key Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, Institute of Theoretical Physics,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
School of Physical Sciences, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Abstract

With a clean environment and high collision energy, the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) would be an excellent facility for heavy flavor physics. Using the Monte Carlo event generator Pythia, we simulate the production of the charmed (bottom) hadron pairs in the electron-positron collisions at the ZZ factory of CEPC, and the inclusive production rates for typical candidates of the hidden/double-charm and hidden/double-bottom SS-wave hadronic molecules are estimated at an order-of-magnitude level with the final state interactions after the hadron pair production. The predicted cross sections for the hidden-charm meson-meson molecules X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900) are at pb\rm{pb} level, which are about two to three orders of magnitude larger than the production cross sections for the double-charm meson-meson molecules TccT_{cc} and TccT_{cc}^{*}, as the double-charmed ones require the production of two pairs of cc¯c\bar{c} from the ZZ boson decay. The production cross sections for the hidden-charm pentaquark states PcP_{c} and PcsP_{cs} as meson-baryon molecules are a few to tens of fb, which are about one magnitude larger than those of the possible hidden-charm baryon-antibaryon and double-charm meson-baryon molecules. In the bottom sector, the production cross sections for the ZbZ_{b} states as B()B¯B^{(*)}\bar{B}^{*} molecules are about tens to hundreds of fb, indicating 10610^{6}10710^{7} events from a two-year operation of CEPC, and the expected events from the double-bottom molecules are about 2 – 5 orders of magnitude smaller than the ZbZ_{b} states. Our results shows great prospects of probing heavy exotic hadrons at CEPC.

I Introduction

Since 2003, many of so-called XYZXYZ states have been observed in the hidden-charm sector, which exhibit different properties from the traditional hadrons in the quark model and thus are candidates of exotic hadrons. One of the most famous XYZXYZ states is the X(3872)X(3872) Choi et al. (2003), also called χc1(3872)\chi_{c1}(3872) Workman et al. (2022), observed in the J/ψππJ/\psi\pi\pi invariant mass distribution by the Belle Collaboration and confirmed by many other experiments Acosta et al. (2004); Abazov et al. (2004); Aaij et al. (2013); Chatrchyan et al. (2013); Ablikim et al. (2014); Aaij et al. (2014, 2012); del Amo Sanchez et al. (2010); Aubert et al. (2009, 2008a, 2008b). Another important state is the isovector Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900) discovered in the J/ψπJ/\psi\pi invariant mass distribution by the BESIII and Belle Collaborations Ablikim et al. (2013); Liu et al. (2013); Ablikim et al. (2015), which must have nontrivial structures beyond the traditional charmonium. In the past few years, the LHCb Collaboration has reported the hidden-charm pentaquark candidates Pc(4380)+P_{c}(4380)^{+}, Pc(4440)+P_{c}(4440)^{+}, Pc(4450)+P_{c}(4450)^{+}, and Pc(4312)+P_{c}(4312)^{+} in the J/ψpJ/\psi p invariant mass distribution Aaij et al. (2015, 2019); the strange pentaquark candidates Pcs(4459)P_{cs}(4459) and Pcs(4338)P_{cs}(4338) states in the J/ψΛJ/\psi\Lambda spectrum Aaij et al. (2021, 2023); and the double-charm tetraquark candidate Tcc(3875)+T_{cc}(3875)^{+} in the D0D0π+D^{0}D^{0}\pi^{+} distribution Aaij et al. (2022a). The masses of these states are close to the thresholds of at least a pair of heavy hadrons, making them candidates of hadronic molecules. There are also other interpretations. For instance, the compact multiquark picture has also been utilized to understand the structures of exotic states (for recent reviews, see Chen et al. (2016); Hosaka et al. (2016); Esposito et al. (2017); Lebed et al. (2017); Ali et al. (2017); Olsen et al. (2018); Guo et al. (2018); Albuquerque et al. (2019); Liu et al. (2019); Guo et al. (2020); Brambilla et al. (2020); Chen et al. (2023)). According to heavy quark flavor symmetry (HQFS), the bottom counterparts of these states like the XbX_{b}, ZbZ_{b}, PbP_{b}, and TbbT_{bb} should also exist and have been predicted in various models Ebert et al. (2006); Hou (2006); Bondar et al. (2012); Yang et al. (2019); Sharma and Upadhyay (2024); Ren et al. (2022); Deng and Zhu (2022), but so far only two bottomonium-like ZbZ_{b} states, Zb±(10610)Z_{b}^{\pm}(10610) and Zb±(10650)Z_{b}^{\pm}(10650), have been observed by the Belle experiment in the Υ(5S)\Upsilon(5S) decay processes Bondar et al. (2012). One of the decisive reasons for the deficiency of the signals from exotic states in the bottom sector is the limitation of the collision energy and detection efficiency of the present high-energy colliders. The ZZ factory of future Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) Gao (2022) with high center-of-mass (c.m.) energy (close to the mass of the ZZ boson), clean background, high resolution and detection ability can provide great opportunity to study the heavy exotic states.

Table 1: The energy configurations, instantaneous luminosity (LL), integrated luminosity (L\int{L}), and event yields of the ZZ factory at CEPC Gao (2022); Sun et al. (2023).
s\sqrt{s} Run time Instantaneous luminosity Integrated luminosity Event yields
(GeV)(\rm{GeV}) (year) (1034cm2s110^{34}~{}\rm{cm^{-2}s^{-1}}, per IP) (ab1\text{ab}^{-1}, 2 IPs)
91.291.2 22 191.7191.7 100100 3×10123\times 10^{12}

The c.m. energy, luminosity and event yields of the ZZ factory are listed in Table 1 Gao (2022); Sun et al. (2023). At parton level, the hidden-charm, hidden-bottom, double-charm, and double-bottom exotic states are produced in the processes Zcc¯Z\to c\bar{c}, Zbb¯Z\to b\bar{b}, Zcc¯cc¯Z\to c\bar{c}c\bar{c}, and Zbb¯bb¯Z\to b\bar{b}b\bar{b}, respectively. The branching radios measured at LEP are Br[Zcc¯]=12.03±0.21%\mathrm{Br}[Z\to c\bar{c}]=12.03\pm 0.21\%, Br[Zbb¯]=15.12±0.05%\mathrm{Br}[Z\to b\bar{b}]=15.12\pm 0.05\%, and Br[Zbb¯bb¯]=(3.6±1.3)×104\mathrm{Br}[Z\to b\bar{b}b\bar{b}]=(3.6\pm 1.3)\times 10^{-4} Workman et al. (2022). The production of the doubly heavy baryons Ξcc\Xi_{cc}, Ξbc\Xi_{bc}, and Ξbb\Xi_{bb} at the ZZ factory with the underlying processes Zcc¯cc¯Z\to c\bar{c}c\bar{c}, Zbb¯cc¯Z\to b\bar{b}c\bar{c}, and Zbb¯bb¯Z\to b\bar{b}b\bar{b} has been studied in Ref. Niu et al. (2023) in the NRQCD framework, and the total production cross sections for Ξcc\Xi_{cc}, Ξbc\Xi_{bc}, and Ξbb\Xi_{bb} are 848.03 fb, 2260.51 fb, and 41.16 fb, respectively. The production of the TbbT_{bb} state in the compact tetraquark configuration at the ZZ factory has also been studied in Refs. Ali et al. (2018, 2019) by employing the Monte Carlo (MC) event generators MadGraph5_aMC@NLO Alwall et al. (2014) and Pythia6 Sjostrand et al. (2006), and the estimated production cross section is about 36 fb, corresponding to 3.6×1063.6\times 10^{6} events produced at the ZZ factory during a two-year operation. The MC generator Pythia has also been widely used to simulate the production of the multiquark states in the e+ee^{+}e^{-} Artoisenet and Braaten (2011); Qin et al. (2021), epep Yang and Guo (2021); Shi et al. (2022a), pppp Guo et al. (2014a, b, c); Albaladejo et al. (2017); Ling et al. (2021); Shi et al. (2022b); Jin et al. (2021); Hua et al. (2023), and pp¯p\bar{p} Guo et al. (2014a); Bignamini et al. (2009, 2009); Guo et al. (2014c); Albaladejo et al. (2017) collisions.

In this work, we will employ the Pythia8 Bierlich et al. (2022) to estimate the production cross sections of the charmonium-like states X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900), the double-charm tetraquark state Tcc(3875)+T_{cc}(3875)^{+}, the hidden-charm pentaquark states Pc(4380)+P_{c}(4380)^{+}, Pc(4440)+P_{c}(4440)^{+}, Pc(4450)+P_{c}(4450)^{+}, Pc(4312)+P_{c}(4312)^{+}, and Pcs(4459)P_{cs}(4459), and the bottomonium-like states Zb(10610)Z_{b}(10610) and Zb(10650)Z_{b}(10650) in the e+ee^{+}e^{-} collisions at the ZZ factory, assuming they are SS-wave hadronic molecules. The production cross sections of some typical hidden-charm and double-charm hadronic molecules predicted in Refs. Dong et al. (2021a, b) as well as the TbbT_{bb} state as a B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}^{*} molecule will also be calculated.

The remaining parts of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we introduce the inclusive production mechanism of the hadronic molecules. The numerical results of the cross sections are presented in Sec. III. A brief summary is given in Sec. IV.

II Leptoproduction

Refer to caption
Figure 1: The inclusive production of the XX as a HHHH^{\prime} hadronic molecule in e+ee^{+}e^{-} collisions, where “all” denotes the other particles produced in this process.

In this section, we introduce the inclusive production mechanism of the hadronic molecule XX in e+ee^{+}e^{-} collisions. As shown in Fig. 1, a heavy-hadron pair HHHH^{\prime} is inclusively generated in the e+ee^{+}e^{-} collision, which is of short-distance nature, and then they are bound through the final state interaction (FSI) to form a hadronic molecule. At the ZZ factory, the typical short-distance pair-production process is mediated by a virtual photon and ZZ boson, while the contribution from the intermediate photon is negligible Niu et al. (2023). To give an order-of-magnitude estimation for the production cross sections of the hadronic molecules in e+ee^{+}e^{-} collision, we utilize the Pythia8 to simulate the short-distance inclusive production of the HHHH^{\prime} pair and other particles, and the long-distance FSI is derived in the nonrelativistic effective field theory (NREFT) framework. In general, the amplitude for the production of the hadronic molecule state XX can be factorized as Braaten and Kusunoki (2005); Artoisenet and Braaten (2010); Guo et al. (2014c)

[X+all]=[HH+all]×G×TX,\displaystyle\mathcal{M}[X+\text{all}]=\mathcal{M}[HH^{\prime}+\text{all}]\times G\times T_{X}, (1)

where [HH+all]\mathcal{M}[HH^{\prime}+\text{all}] is the short-distance amplitude for the inclusive production process e+eHH+alle^{+}e^{-}\to HH^{\prime}+\text{all}, GG is the Green function of the intermediate heavy hadron HHHH^{\prime} pair, and TXT_{X} is the long-distance amplitude for HHXHH^{\prime}\to X. Here the Green’s function GG is UV divergent and is regularized by the Gaussian regulator Nieves and Valderrama (2012)

G(E,Λ)=μπ2{2πΛ4+γπ2e2γ2/Λ2[ierfi(2γΛ)]},\displaystyle G(E,\Lambda)=-\frac{\mu}{\pi^{2}}\left\{\sqrt{2\pi}\frac{\Lambda}{4}+\frac{\gamma\pi}{2}e^{-2\gamma^{2}/\Lambda^{2}}\left[i-\text{erfi}\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}\gamma}{\Lambda}\right)\right]\right\}, (2)

where γ=2μ(EmHmH)\gamma=\sqrt{2\mu(E-m_{H}-m_{H^{\prime}})} is the binding momentum of the HHHH^{\prime} pair with μ\mu the reduced mass of HH and HH^{\prime}, erfi(z)=2/π0zet2𝑑t\text{erfi}(z)=2/\sqrt{\pi}\int_{0}^{z}e^{t^{2}}dt is the imaginary error function, and the cutoff Λ\Lambda is in the range of 0.5–1.0 GeV, following Refs. Guo et al. (2013, 2014c); Shi et al. (2022a).

For the SS-wave shallow hadronic molecule, the amplitude TXT_{X} can be approximated by the effective coupling constant gXg_{X}, which can be extracted from the residues of the low-energy HHHHHH^{\prime}\to HH^{\prime} scattering amplitude T(E)T(E) as

gX2=limEE0(E2E02)T(E),\displaystyle g_{X}^{2}=\lim_{E\to E_{0}}(E^{2}-E_{0}^{2})T(E), (3)

where E0E_{0} is the pole position in the complex EE-plane, satisfying det[1VG(E0,Λ)]=0\text{det}[1-VG(E_{0},\Lambda)]=0. One has E0=MXE_{0}=M_{X} for a bound state on the physical Riemann sheet (RS) or virtual state on the unphysical RS, and E0=MXiΓ/2E_{0}=M_{X}-i\Gamma/2 for a resonance on the unphysical RS with mass MXM_{X} and width Γ\Gamma. For the near-threshold hadronic molecules, one can use a constant separateable potential VV for the HHHHHH^{\prime}\to HH^{\prime} scattering, and the scattering amplitude T(E)T(E) can be solved from the Lippmann-Schwinger equation as

T(E)=V1VG(E,Λ).\displaystyle T(E)=\frac{V}{1-VG(E,\Lambda)}. (4)

The production cross section of the hadronic molecule XX can also be factorized into short-distance and long-distance parts. The short-distance part is given by the differential MC cross section of the inclusive HHHH^{\prime} production,

dσ[HH(k)+all]MC=\displaystyle d\sigma[HH^{\prime}(k)+\text{all}]_{\text{MC}}= KHH1fluxall𝑑ϕHH+all|[HH(k)+all]|2d3k(2π)32μ,\displaystyle\,K_{HH^{\prime}}\frac{1}{\text{flux}}\sum_{\text{all}}\int d\phi_{HH^{\prime}+\text{all}}|\mathcal{M}[HH^{\prime}(k)+\text{all}]|^{2}\frac{d^{3}k}{(2\pi)^{3}2\mu}, (5)

where kk is the three-momentum in the c.m. frame of the HHHH^{\prime} system. The overall factor KHH𝒪(1)K_{HH^{\prime}}\sim\mathcal{O}(1) represents the difference between the MC simulation and the experimental data, and can be roughly taken as KHH1K_{HH^{\prime}}\simeq 1 for an order-of-magnitude estimate Guo et al. (2014c); Shi et al. (2022a). The short-distance production amplitude [HH+all]\mathcal{M}[HH^{\prime}+\text{all}], which is insensitive to the final-state relative momentum kk  Guo et al. (2014c); Shi et al. (2022a), can be approximated as a constant and taken outside from the integration of the final-state momentum kk. Consequently, the differential cross section for HHHH^{\prime} production in the MC event generator is proportional to k2k^{2},

(dσ[HH(k)+all]dk)MCk2.\displaystyle\left(\frac{d\sigma[HH^{\prime}(k)+\text{all}]}{dk}\right)_{\text{MC}}\propto k^{2}. (6)

The total cross section for the hadronic molecule XX production is given by

σ[X+all]=1fluxall𝑑ϕX+all|[X+all]|2,\displaystyle\sigma[X+\text{all}]=\frac{1}{\text{flux}}\sum_{\text{all}}\int d\phi_{X+\text{all}}|\mathcal{M}[X+\text{all}]|^{2}, (7)

where the phase-space integration is the same as that in Eq. (5Guo et al. (2014c). With the use of Eqs. (1) and  (5), the production cross section of XX can be derived as

σ[X+all]=14mHmH|GgX|2(dσ[HH(k)+all]dk)MC4π2μk2,\displaystyle\sigma[X+\text{all}]=\frac{1}{4m_{H}m_{H^{\prime}}}|Gg_{X}|^{2}\left(\frac{d\sigma[HH^{\prime}(k)+\text{all}]}{dk}\right)_{\text{MC}}\frac{4\pi^{2}\mu}{k^{2}}, (8)

where mHm_{H} and mHm_{H^{\prime}} are the masses of the heavy hadrons HH and HH^{\prime}, respectively.

III Numerical Results

In this section, the production cross sections of the typical hidden-heavy and double-heavy hadronic molecules at the ZZ factory are estimated at an order-of-magnitude level using Eq. (8). The differential cross sections (dσ[HH+all]/dk)MC(d\sigma[HH^{\prime}+\text{all}]/dk)_{\text{MC}} of the HHHH^{\prime} pair production in the e+ee^{+}e^{-} collisions are obtained using the MC event generator Pythia Sjostrand et al. (2006). Some typical differential cross sections for the production of the charm-anticharm, double-charm, bottom-antibottom, and double-bottom hadron pairs are shown in Fig. 2, and the differential cross sections for other heavy hadron pairs can be found in Appendix A. The formation of a hadronic molecule requires the constituent hadrons move collinearly with a small relative momentum. The choice of the cut of momentum kk has a small effect to the cross section and does not change our order-of-magnitude estimate. Therefore we follow the works in Refs. Yang and Guo (2021); Shi et al. (2022a) and choose a small relative momentum range |k|<350MeV|k|<350\,\rm{MeV} where

(dσ[HH+all]dk)MC=ak2,\displaystyle\left(\frac{d\sigma[HH^{\prime}+\text{all}]}{dk}\right)_{\text{MC}}=ak^{2}, (9)

and the coefficient aa is obtained by fitting the differential pair-production cross sections simulated by the MC event generator. The final expression of the production cross section of XX can be written as

σ[X+all]=π2mH+mH|GgX|2a.\displaystyle\sigma[X+\text{all}]=\frac{\pi^{2}}{m_{H}+m_{H^{\prime}}}|Gg_{X}|^{2}a. (10)

The predicted cross sections for the hidden-charm, double-charm, and hidden-bottom hadronic molecules with Λ=0.5\Lambda=0.5 GeV (out of the parentheses) and Λ=1.0\Lambda=1.0 GeV (in the parentheses) are listed in Tables 2, 3, and 4, respectively, where the binding energy is defined as EB=mH+mHmXE_{B}=m_{H}+m_{H^{\prime}}-m_{X}111Here we use the isospin averaged mass for the heavy hadron H()H^{(\prime)} in the isospin multiplet. with mXm_{X} the mass of the produced hadronic molecule. The binding energies at the outside and inside of the square brackets in these tables correspond to Λ=0.5\Lambda=0.5 and 1.01.0 GeV, respectively.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the process e+eZ0HHe^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to HH^{\prime}. The range of the relative momentum between the two produced hadrons is chosen as |k|<350MeV|k|<350~{}\rm{MeV}. The histograms denote the differential cross sections simulated by Pythia8, and the red dashed curves are obtained from the fits using dσ\sigma/dkk k2\propto k^{2}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) Ξc0D¯0\Xi_{c}^{0}\bar{D}^{0}; (b) Ξc+D\Xi_{c}^{+}D^{-}; (c) D+D0D^{\ast+}D^{0}; (d) D0D+D^{\ast 0}D^{+}; (e) B+B¯0B^{\ast+}\bar{B}^{0}; (f) B+B¯0B^{+}\bar{B}^{\ast 0}; (g) BB¯0B^{\ast-}\bar{B}^{0}; and (h) B¯0B\bar{B}^{\ast 0}B^{-}.
Table 2: Order-of-magnitude estimations of the inclusive production cross sections (in units of pb\rm{pb}) for the hidden-charm hadronic molecules at the ZZ factory. The values of the binding energies at the outside (inside) of the square brackets and the cross sections at the outside (inside) of the parentheses correspond to the cutoff Λ=0.5GeV(1.0GeV)\Lambda=0.5~{}\rm{GeV}~{}(1.0~{}\rm{GeV}).
Constituents I(JPC)I(J^{PC}) Binding energy (MeV) σ[X](pb)\sigma[X]~{}(\rm{pb})
X(3872)X(3872) DD¯D\bar{D}^{*} 0(1++)0(1^{++}) 4.154.15 Workman et al. (2022) 0.3(1.6)0.3(1.6)
Zc(3900)0{Z_{c}(3900)^{0}} DD¯D\bar{D}^{*} 1(1+)1(1^{+-}) 11.30-11.30 Workman et al. (2022) 4.0(8.1)4.0(8.1)
Zc(3900)+{Z_{c}(3900)^{+}} DD¯D\bar{D}^{*} 1(1+)1(1^{+}) 12.00-12.00 Workman et al. (2022) 3.8(7.4)3.8(7.4)
PcsP_{cs} ΞcD¯\Xi_{c}\bar{D} 0(12)0(\frac{1}{2}^{-}) 2.14[7.53]2.14[7.53] Dong et al. (2021b) 4.4×103(0.03)4.4\times 10^{-3}(0.03)
Pcs(4459)P_{cs}(4459) ΞcD¯\Xi_{c}\bar{D}^{*} 0(12)0(\frac{1}{2}^{-}) 18.8318.83 Workman et al. (2022) 1.7×103(0.01)1.7\times 10^{-3}(0.01)
Pcs(4459)P_{cs}(4459) ΞcD¯\Xi_{c}\bar{D}^{*} 0(32)0(\frac{3}{2}^{-}) 18.8318.83 Workman et al. (2022) 3.3×103(0.02)3.3\times 10^{-3}(0.02)
Pc(4312)+P_{c}(4312)^{+} ΣcD¯\Sigma_{c}\bar{D} 12(12)\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}^{-}) 6.716.71 Workman et al. (2022) 2.1×103(0.01)2.1\times 10^{-3}(0.01)
Pc(4380)+P_{c}(4380)^{+} ΣcD¯\Sigma_{c}^{*}\bar{D} 12(32)\frac{1}{2}(\frac{3}{2}^{-}) 7.357.35 Workman et al. (2022) 4.1×103(0.02)4.1\times 10^{-3}(0.02)
Pc(4440)+P_{c}(4440)^{+} ΣcD¯\Sigma_{c}\bar{D}^{*} 12(32)\frac{1}{2}(\frac{3}{2}^{-}) 21.0121.01 Workman et al. (2022) 1.8×103(0.01)1.8\times 10^{-3}(0.01)
Pc(4457)+P_{c}(4457)^{+} ΣcD¯\Sigma_{c}\bar{D}^{*} 12(12)\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}^{-}) 3.013.01 Workman et al. (2022) 1.4×103(6.4×103)1.4\times 10^{-3}(6.4\times 10^{-3})
ΛcΛ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Lambda}_{c} 0(0+)0(0^{-+}) 1.98[33.8]1.98[33.8] Dong et al. (2021b) 4.9×103(0.06)4.9\times 10^{-3}(0.06)
ΣcΣ¯c\Sigma_{c}\bar{\Sigma}_{c} 0(0+)0(0^{-+}) 11.1[60.8]11.1[60.8] Dong et al. (2021b) 7.2×105(5.7×104)7.2\times 10^{-5}(5.7\times 10^{-4})
ΣcΣ¯c\Sigma_{c}\bar{\Sigma}_{c} 1(0+)1(0^{-+}) 8.28[53.3]8.28[53.3] Dong et al. (2021b) 1.1×104(8.7×104)1.1\times 10^{-4}(8.7\times 10^{-4})
ΞcΞ¯c\Xi_{c}\bar{\Xi}_{c} 0(0+)0(0^{-+}) 4.72[42.2]4.72[42.2] Dong et al. (2021b) 9.3×104(7.5×103)9.3\times 10^{-4}(7.5\times 10^{-3})
ΞcΞ¯c\Xi_{c}\bar{\Xi}_{c} 1(0+)1(0^{-+}) 18.2[0.39]18.2[0.39] Dong et al. (2021b) 9.5×104(1.4×103)9.5\times 10^{-4}(1.4\times 10^{-3})
ΛcΣ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Sigma}_{c} 1(0)1(0^{-}) 2.19[33.9]2.19[33.9] Dong et al. (2021b) 1.5×104(1.6×103)1.5\times 10^{-4}(1.6\times 10^{-3})
ΛcΞ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Xi}_{c} 12(0)\frac{1}{2}(0^{-}) 1.29[8.42]1.29[8.42] Dong et al. (2021b) 4.7×104(2.9×103)4.7\times 10^{-4}(2.9\times 10^{-3})

The results in Tables 2, 3, and 4 reveal that:

  • The production cross sections of the hidden-charm hadronic molecules X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900) at the ZZ factory are at pb level, and the production cross section of the Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900) state is about 551010 times larger than that of the X(3872)X(3872), which is comparable with the prediction in the semi-inclusive leptoproduction process Yang and Guo (2021). Considering the integrated luminosity L=100ab1\int L=100~{}\mathrm{ab}^{-1} as listed in Table 1, there will be approximately 3×1073\times 10^{7}1.6×1081.6\times 10^{8} and 4×1084\times 10^{8}8×1088\times 10^{8} events of the X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900) produced in the two-year operation of the ZZ factory, respectively.

  • The production cross sections of the hidden-charm pentaquark candidates PcP_{c} and PcsP_{cs} states at the ZZ factory are at the same level (about a few to tens of fb), two to three orders of magnitude smaller than those of the X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900). Such cross sections give 10510^{5}10610^{6} production events at the ZZ factory during the two-year operation.

    Table 3: Order-of-magnitude estimations of the inclusive production cross sections (in units of pb\rm{pb}) for the double-charm hadronic molecules at the ZZ factory. The values of the binding energies at the outside (inside) of the square brackets and the cross sections at the outside (inside) of the parentheses correspond to the cutoff Λ=0.5GeV(1.0GeV)\Lambda=0.5~{}\rm{GeV}~{}(1.0~{}\rm{GeV}).
    Constituents I(JPC)I(J^{PC}) Binding energy (MeV) σ[X](pb)\sigma[X]~{}(\rm{pb})
    Tcc+T_{cc}^{+} DDDD^{*} 0(1+)0(1^{+}) 0.2730.273Aaij et al. (2022b, a) 2.3×103(9.7×103)2.3\times 10^{-3}(9.7\times 10^{-3})
    Tcc+T_{cc}^{*+} DDD^{*}D^{*} 0(1+)0(1^{+}) 0.5030.503Du et al. (2022) 1.3×103(5.5×103)1.3\times 10^{-3}(5.5\times 10^{-3})
    ΛcD\Lambda_{c}D 12(12)\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}^{-}) 3.44[5.62]3.44[5.62]Dong et al. (2021a) 2.4×104(1.8×103)2.4\times 10^{-4}(1.8\times 10^{-3})
    ΛcD\Lambda_{c}D^{*} 12(12)\frac{1}{2}(\frac{1}{2}^{-}) 2.53[6.73]2.53[6.73]Dong et al. (2021a) 5.6×105(5.3×104)5.6\times 10^{-5}(5.3\times 10^{-4})
    ΛcD\Lambda_{c}D^{*} 12(32)\frac{1}{2}(\frac{3}{2}^{-}) 2.53[6.73]2.53[6.73]Dong et al. (2021a) 1.1×104(1.1×103)1.1\times 10^{-4}(1.1\times 10^{-3})
  • The production cross sections of the double-charm tetraquark candidates Tcc+T_{cc}^{+} and its heavy-quark-spin symmetry (HQSS) partner Tcc+T_{cc}^{\ast+} Du et al. (2022) are comparable with the cross sections of the PcP_{c} and PcsP_{cs} states, two to three orders of magnitude smaller than those of the hidden-charm tetraquarks. Such a large gap between the production cross sections of the TccT_{cc} and the hidden-charm tetraquarks can be attributed to the parton level where the production of double-charm molecules requires two pairs of cc¯c\bar{c} produced from the ZZ boson decay. The branching ratio of Zcc¯cc¯Z\to c\bar{c}c\bar{c} is much smaller than that of Zcc¯Z\to c\bar{c}, which is the underlying process for the production of the hidden-charm hadronic molecules. There will be about 2.3×1052.3\times 10^{5}9.7×1059.7\times 10^{5} and 1.3×1051.3\times 10^{5}5.5×1055.5\times 10^{5} events for the production of TccT_{cc} and TccT_{cc}^{*} at the ZZ factory, respectively. The TccT_{cc} events produced at the ZZ factory is roughly three times larger than those in the proposed electron-ion colliders in US in the two-year operation Shi et al. (2022a). Furthermore, assuming Br[Tcc+D0D¯0π+]59.6%[T_{cc}^{+}\to D^{0}\bar{D}^{0}\pi^{+}]\simeq 59.6\% in terms of the leading-order estimation of the XEFT Dai et al. (2023) and Br[D0Kπ+]=3.9%[D^{0}\to K^{-}\pi^{+}]=3.9\% Workman et al. (2022), the number of TccT_{cc} events reconstructed in the D0D0π+D^{0}D^{0}\pi^{+} invariant mass distribution can reach 𝒪(103){\cal O}(10^{3}) at the ZZ factory. The event number for Tcc+D0(Kπ+)D¯0(Kπ+)π+T_{cc}^{+}\to D^{0}(\to K^{-}\pi^{+})\bar{D}^{0}(\to K^{-}\pi^{+})\pi^{+} observed by the LHCb Collaboration is 117±16117\pm 16 with an integrated luminosity of 9fb19~{}\rm{fb}^{-1} Aaij et al. (2022a). Therefore, the ZZ factory could be a much better platform to study the TccT_{cc} in detail and to search for its spin partner TccT_{cc}^{*}.

  • The production cross sections of the hidden-charm baryon-antibaryon hadronic molecules predicted in Ref. Dong et al. (2021b) and the double-charm meson-baryon hadronic molecules predicted in Ref. Dong et al. (2021a) are at the same order of magnitude, about 0.10.11.01.0 fb, one order of magnitude smaller than those of the PcP_{c}, PcsP_{cs}, and Tcc()T_{cc}^{(*)}. An exception is the ΛcΛ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Lambda}_{c} molecule, whose production cross section is one magnitude larger than other hidden-charm baryon-antibaryon hadronic molecules, and the resulting events for the ΛcΛ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Lambda}_{c} molecule production at the ZZ factory is about 4.9×1054.9\times 10^{5}6×1066\times 10^{6}. Therefore it is purposeful to search for the ΛcΛ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Lambda}_{c} molecule at the ZZ factory of CEPC.

    Table 4: Order-of-magnitude estimations of the inclusive production cross sections (in units of pb\rm{pb}) for the hidden-bottom hadronic molecules at the ZZ factory. The values of the cross sections at the outside (inside) of the parentheses correspond to the cutoff Λ=0.5GeV(1.0GeV)\Lambda=0.5~{}\rm{GeV}~{}(1.0~{}\rm{GeV}).
    Constituents I(JPC)I(J^{PC}) Binding energy (MeV) σ[X](pb)\sigma[X]~{}(\rm{pb})
    Zb(10610)±Z_{b}(10610)^{\pm} BB¯B\bar{B}^{*} 1(1+)1(1^{+}) 2.99-2.99 Workman et al. (2022) 6.5×102(8.7×102)6.5\times 10^{-2}(8.7\times 10^{-2})
    Zb(10610)0Z_{b}(10610)^{0} BB¯B\bar{B}^{*} 1(1+)1(1^{+-}) 4.79-4.79 Workman et al. (2022) 7.2×102(1.0×101)7.2\times 10^{-2}(1.0\times 10^{-1})
    Zb(10650)±Z_{b}(10650)^{\pm} BB¯B^{*}\bar{B}^{*} 1(1+)1(1^{+}) 2.78-2.78 Workman et al. (2022) 6.6×102(1.2×101)6.6\times 10^{-2}(1.2\times 10^{-1})
    Zb(10650)0Z_{b}(10650)^{0} BB¯B^{*}\bar{B}^{*} 1(1+)1(1^{+-}) 2.78-2.78 Workman et al. (2022) 7.8×102(1.4×101)7.8\times 10^{-2}(1.4\times 10^{-1})
  • In the bottom sector, the production cross sections of the hidden-bottom hadronic molecules Zb(10610)Z_{b}(10610) and Zb(10650)Z_{b}(10650) can reach tens to hundreds of fb, about one to two order(s) of magnitude smaller than those of the X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900), and one order of magnitude larger than the production cross section of the double-charm states TccT_{cc} and TccT_{cc}^{*}. The expected number of ZbZ_{b} events at CEPC over a two-year period is around 10710^{7}, indicating promising prospects for its discovery and detailed study. Considering that the branching ratios of the Zb(10610)Z_{b}(10610) decays to the Υ(1S)π\Upsilon(1S)\pi, Υ(2S)π\Upsilon(2S)\pi, and Υ(3S)π\Upsilon(3S)\pi final states are 5.41.5+1.9×1035.4_{-1.5}^{+1.9}\times 10^{-3}, 3.60.8+1.1%3.6_{-0.8}^{+1.1}\%, and 2.10.6+0.8%2.1_{-0.6}^{+0.8}\% , respectively, and Zb(10650)Z_{b}(10650) decays to the Υ(1S)π\Upsilon(1S)\pi, Υ(2S)π\Upsilon(2S)\pi, and Υ(3S)π\Upsilon(3S)\pi final states are 1.70.6+0.8×1031.7_{-0.6}^{+0.8}\times 10^{-3}, 1.40.4+0.6%1.4_{-0.4}^{+0.6}\%, and 1.60.5+0.7%1.6_{-0.5}^{+0.7}\%, respectively Workman et al. (2022), the event yields of e+eZZb(10650)/Zb(10610)+allΥ(nS)π+all,n=1,2,3e^{+}e^{-}\to Z\to Z_{b}(10650)/Z_{b}(10610)+\mathrm{all}\to\Upsilon(nS)\pi+\mathrm{all},\;n=1,2,3 are about 10410^{4}10510^{5}. Although the production cross sections of e+eZZb(10650)/Zb(10610)+allΥ(nS)π+all,n=1,2,3e^{+}e^{-}\to Z\to Z_{b}(10650)/Z_{b}(10610)+\mathrm{all}\to\Upsilon(nS)\pi+\mathrm{all},\;n=1,2,3 at the ZZ factory is about two orders of magnitude smaller than the cross sections at Belle222The exclusive production of ZbZ_{b} can occur through the process e+eΥ(5S)Zbπe^{+}e^{-}\to\Upsilon(5S)\to Z_{b}\pi via the intermediate states B1B¯B_{1}^{\prime}\bar{B} and B0B¯B_{0}^{*}\bar{B}^{*}. The enhancement of this process, as discussed in Ref. Wu et al. (2019), can lead to a large exclusive cross section. Bondar et al. (2012); Garmash et al. (2015), the integrated luminosity at the ZZ factory, roughly three orders of magnitude higher than Belle’s (121.4fb1121.4~{}\mathrm{fb}^{-1}), results in approximately one order of magnitude larger ZbZ_{b} event yields compared to Belle.

Despite the absence of the experimental signal from the double-bottom tetraquark (bbu¯d¯bb\bar{u}\bar{d}) TbbT_{bb} state at present, the existence of the TbbT_{bb} with quantum numbers I(JP)=0(1+)I(J^{P})=0(1^{+}) has been approved by the lattice QCD (LQCD) calculation Aoki et al. (2023) in the HAL QCD method, where the TbbT_{bb} is predicted to be a deeply bound state with a binding energy ETbbsingle=155±17E_{T_{bb}}^{\mathrm{single}}=155\pm 17 MeV only considering the B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}^{\ast} single channel and a binding energy ETbbcoupled=83±10E_{T_{bb}}^{\mathrm{coupled}}=83\pm 10 MeV considering the B¯B¯B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}^{\ast}-\bar{B}^{\ast}\bar{B}^{\ast} coupled channel treatment relative to the B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}^{\ast} threshold. In addition, the b¯b¯ud\bar{b}\bar{b}ud and b¯b¯us\bar{b}\bar{b}us tetraquarks have also been predicted by the LQCD calculation in Ref. Alexandrou et al. (2024), with binding energies 100±1036+43100\pm 10^{+43}_{-36} MeV and 30±311+3130\pm 3^{+31}_{-11} MeV relative to the BBBB^{\ast} and BBsBB_{s}^{\ast} thresholds, respectively. The large binding energies for both the double bottom and anti-bottom tetraquarks indicate the TbbT_{bb} could not be simply regarded as a pure B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}^{\ast} hadronic molecule. To give an order-of-magnitude estimate, we assume that the TbbT_{bb} and TbbT_{bb}^{*} have the same binding energy (83 MeV), and still calculate their production cross sections in the hadronic molecule picture. The results are about σ[Tbb()]103(101)\sigma[T_{bb}^{(\ast)}]\approx 10^{-3}(10^{-1}) fb for Λ=0.5(1.0)\Lambda=0.5(1.0) GeV, 2 – 5 orders of magnitude smaller than those of the ZbZ_{b} states and the TbbT_{bb} state in the compact tetraquark configuration predicted in Refs. Ali et al. (2018, 2019).

IV Summary

In summary, we have investigated the inclusive differential production cross sections of the e+eHH+alle^{+}e^{-}\to HH^{\prime}+\text{all} processes using the Monte Carlo event generator Pythia8 and estimated the production cross sections of typical hidden/double-charm, and hidden/double-bottom hadronic molecules at the ZZ factory by considering the FSI between the hadron pairs HHHH^{\prime}. The predicted production cross sections of the hidden-charm molecules X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900) are at the pb\rm{pb} level, and the expected event yields of these molecules are about 10710^{7}10810^{8}. The production cross sections of the hidden-charm pentaquark candidates PcP_{c} and PcsP_{cs}, and the double-charm tetraquark candidates TccT_{cc} and TccT_{cc}^{\ast} as SS-wave hadronic molecules are at the same order of magnitude, about two to three orders of magnitude smaller than the cross sections of X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900). The production cross sections of some possible hidden-charm baryon-antibaryon and double-charm meson-baryon hadronic molecules predicted in Refs. Dong et al. (2021a, b) are further smaller than those of the PcP_{c}, PcsP_{cs}, and Tcc()T_{cc}^{(*)} by about one order of magnitude, except the ΛcΛ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Lambda}_{c} molecule whose production cross section is one order of magnitude larger than those of other hidden-charm baryon-antibaryon molecules. As the ZZ boson can decay to one and two pairs of bb¯b\bar{b} in the parton level with sizeable branching ratios, the ZZ factory is a ideal platform for the study of hidden/double bottom exotic states. The estimated production cross sections of the ZbZ_{b} states can reach tens to hundreds of pb, giving 10410^{4}10510^{5} event yields of e+eZZb(10650)/Zb(10610)+allΥ(nS)π+all,n=1,2,3e^{+}e^{-}\to Z\to Z_{b}(10650)/Z_{b}(10610)+\mathrm{all}\to\Upsilon(nS)\pi+\mathrm{all},\;n=1,2,3 with the two-year integrated luminosity L=100ab1\int L=100~{}\mathrm{ab}^{-1}, which is about one order of magnitude larger than the event yields in the Belle experiment. The production cross sections of the double-bottom tetraquark candidate TbbT_{bb} as a deeply bound SS-wave B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}^{\ast} molecule is also estimated using the binding energy from LQCD calculation as an input, and the result is about σ[Tbb()]103(101)\sigma[T_{bb}^{(\ast)}]\approx 10^{-3}(10^{-1}) fb for Λ=0.5(1.0)\Lambda=0.5(1.0) GeV, 2–5 orders of magnitude smaller than those of the ZbZ_{b} states and the TbbT_{bb} state in the compact tetraquark configuration predicted in Refs. Ali et al. (2018, 2019). Our order-of-magnitude estimates indicate appreciable production event yields of these hidden/double-charm and hidden/double-bottom hadronic molecules at the ZZ factory.

V Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Feng-Kun Guo for suggestions, Shu-Ming Wu for useful discussions, and Shi-Dong Liu for a careful reading of this manuscript. The numerical calculations were done at the HPC Cluster of ITP-CAS. This work is supported in part by the Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant No. XDB34030000; by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grants No. 12125507, No. 11835015, No. 12047503, and No. 12075133; and by the NSFC and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) through the funds provided to the TRR110 “Symmetries and the Emergence of Structure in QCD” (NSFC Grant No. 12070131001, DFG Project-ID No. 196253076). This work is also supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong province under the Grant No. ZR2022ZD26, Taishan Scholar Project of Shandong Province under Grant No. tsqn202103062 and the Higher Educational Youth Innovation Science and Technology Program Shandong Province under Grant No. 2020KJJ004. P.-P.S. also acknowledges the Generalitat valenciana (GVA) for the project with ref. CIDEGENT/2019/015.

Appendix A Differential cross sections of the hadron pairs

In this section, we show all the differential cross sections for the constituent hadron pairs of the hadronic molecules considered in the main text. In the charm sector, Fig. 3 shows the differential cross sections of the constituents of X(3872)X(3872) and Zc(3900)Z_{c}(3900). Fig. 4 shows the differential cross sections of the constituents of PcsP_{cs} states. Fig. 5 shows the differential cross sections of the constituents of Pc(4312)P_{c}(4312), Pc(4380)P_{c}(4380), Pc(4440)P_{c}(4440), and Pc(4457)P_{c}(4457). Fig. 6 shows the differential cross sections of the ΛcΛ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Lambda}_{c}, ΣcΣ¯c\Sigma_{c}\bar{\Sigma}_{c}, ΞcΞ¯c\Xi_{c}\bar{\Xi}_{c}, ΛcΣ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Sigma}_{c}, and ΛcΞ¯c\Lambda_{c}\bar{\Xi}_{c} pairs as constituents of the hidden-charm baryon-antibaryon hadronic molecules predicted in Ref. Dong et al. (2021b). Fig. 7 shows the differential cross sections of the constituents of TccT_{cc}, TccT_{cc}^{*}, and the ΛcD\Lambda_{c}D, ΛcD\Lambda_{c}D^{*} pairs as constituents of double-charm meson-baryon hadronic molecules predicted in Ref. Dong et al. (2021a).

In the bottom sector, Fig. 8 shows the differential cross sections of the constituents of Zb(10610)±Z_{b}(10610)^{\pm} and Zb(10650)±Z_{b}(10650)^{\pm}. Fig. 9 shows the differential cross sections of the constituents of Zb(10610)0Z_{b}(10610)^{0} and Zb(10650)0Z_{b}(10650)^{0}. Fig. 10 shows the differential cross sections of the constituents of TbbT_{bb} and TbbT_{bb}^{*}.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the process e+eZ0D()D¯()e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to D^{(*)}\bar{D}^{(*)}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) D¯0D0\bar{D}^{\ast 0}D^{0}; (b) D0D¯0D^{\ast 0}\bar{D}^{0}; (c) D+DD^{\ast+}D^{-}; (d) DD+D^{\ast-}D^{+}; (e) D+D¯0D^{\ast+}\bar{D}^{0}; and (f) D¯0D+\bar{D}^{\ast 0}D^{+}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the process e+eZ0ΞcD¯()e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to\Xi_{c}\bar{D}^{(*)}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) Ξc0D¯0\Xi_{c}^{0}\bar{D}^{\ast 0}; (b) Ξc+D\Xi_{c}^{+}D^{\ast-}; (c) Ξc0D¯0\Xi_{c}^{0}\bar{D}^{0}; and (d) Ξc+D\Xi_{c}^{+}D^{-}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the process e+eZ0Σc()D¯()e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to\Sigma_{c}^{(*)}\bar{D}^{(*)}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) Σc+D¯0\Sigma_{c}^{+}\bar{D}^{\ast 0}; (b) Σc++D\Sigma_{c}^{++}D^{\ast-}; (c) Σc+D¯0\Sigma_{c}^{\ast+}\bar{D}^{0}; (d) Σc++D\Sigma_{c}^{\ast++}D^{-}; (e) Σc+D¯0\Sigma_{c}^{+}\bar{D}^{0}; and (f) Σc++D\Sigma_{c}^{++}D^{-}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the charmed baryon-antibaryon pairs as constituents of hidden-charm hadronic molecules predicted in Ref. Dong et al. (2021b). The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) Σc0Σ¯c0\Sigma_{c}^{0}\bar{\Sigma}_{c}^{0}; (b) Σc+Σc\Sigma_{c}^{+}\Sigma_{c}^{-}; (c) Σc++Σc\Sigma_{c}^{++}\Sigma_{c}^{--}; (d) Λc+Λc\Lambda_{c}^{+}\Lambda_{c}^{-}; (e) Ξc0Ξ¯c0\Xi_{c}^{0}\bar{\Xi}_{c}^{0}; (f) Ξc+Ξc\Xi_{c}^{+}\Xi_{c}^{-}; (g) Λc+Σ¯c0\Lambda_{c}^{+}\bar{\Sigma}_{c}^{0}; and (h) Λc+Ξ¯c0\Lambda_{c}^{+}\bar{\Xi}_{c}^{0}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the processes e+eZ0D()0D()+e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to D^{(*)0}D^{(*)+} and e+eZ0Λc+D()0e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to\Lambda_{c}^{+}D^{(*)0}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) D+D0D^{\ast+}D^{0}; (b) D0D+D^{\ast 0}D^{+}; (c) D0D+D^{\ast 0}D^{\ast+}; (d) Λc+D0\Lambda_{c}^{+}D^{0}; and (e) Λc+D0\Lambda_{c}^{+}D^{\ast 0}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the processes e+eZ0B()+B¯()0e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to B^{(*)+}\bar{B}^{(*)0} and e+eZ0B()B()0e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to B^{(*)-}B^{(*)0}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) B+B¯0B^{\ast+}\bar{B}^{0}; (b) B+B¯0B^{+}\bar{B}^{\ast 0}; (c) BB0B^{\ast-}B^{0}; (d) BB0B^{-}B^{\ast 0}; (e) B+B¯0B^{\ast+}\bar{B}^{\ast 0}; and (f) BB0B^{\ast-}B^{\ast 0}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the process e+eZ0B()0B¯()0e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to B^{(*)0}\bar{B}^{(*)0} and e+eZ0B()±B¯()e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to B^{(*)\pm}\bar{B}^{(*)\mp}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) B+BB^{\ast+}B^{-}; (b) B+BB^{+}B^{\ast-}; (c) B0B¯0B^{\ast 0}\bar{B}^{0}; (d) B0B¯0B^{0}\bar{B}^{\ast 0}; (e) B+BB^{\ast+}B^{\ast-}; and (f) B0B¯0B^{\ast 0}\bar{B}^{\ast 0}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 10: Differential cross sections dσ\sigma/dkk (in units of pb/GeV\rm{pb/GeV}) for the process e+eZ0B()B¯()0e^{+}e^{-}\to Z^{0}\to B^{(*)-}\bar{B}^{(*)0}. The subfigures demonstrate the differential production cross sections for (a) BB¯0B^{\ast-}\bar{B}^{0}; (b) B¯0B\bar{B}^{\ast 0}B^{-}; and (c) BB¯0B^{\ast-}\bar{B}^{\ast 0}.

References