Principal Specialization of Monomial Symmetric Polynomials and Group Determinants of Cyclic Groups
Abstract
We give explicit expressions of some special values for the monomial symmetric polynomials as applications of symmetric functions and group determinants. We also prove some vanishing or non-vanishing properties of these special values.
1 Introduction
For a positive integer , is the symmetric group of degree and acts on by
(3) |
Let be the ring of polynomials in independent variables with complex numbers coefficients. The group also acts on the ring by permutation of the variables . We consider a subring
and we call elements of symmetric polynomials. For any positive integer , the set
is a finite-dimensional vector space over , and the subring is graded and has the following decomposition:
We denote the set of partitions of length by
and define the Monomial Symmetric Polynomial (MSP) by
where and . For any , the stabilizer subgroup of with respect to is defined by . By the definition of MSP and
we obtain a well-known expression of the MSP:
(4) |
If , then defines a -invariant Laurent polynomial. For any partitions satisfying the condition , the set forms a standard basis of the vector space . If we consider some special partitions or , MSP become the th power sum
and the th elementary symmetric polynomial
respectively.
These symmetric polynomials and their variations are very fundamental and important in various fields such as multivariate special functions [10], [13], combinatorics [1], representation theory, harmonic analysis [3], [6], and even outside mathematics in mathematical physics and statistics [4], [12]. Not only the symmetric polynomials themselves, but also their special values, are equally fundamental and important. In fact, many classical special sequences like binomials coefficients, Stirling numbers, Fibonacci and Lucas numbers are expressed as special values of these symmetric polynomials. One of the most important and standard specialization of symmetric polynomials is the principal specializations
which are related to dimension formulas of irreducible representations for some groups or algebras and some enumeration formulas of various partitions.
In our paper, for and a primitive complex th root of unity , we consider a specialization
and study special values which appear naturally zonal spherical functions of Gelfand pairs for the complex reflection groups or arithmetic exponential sums. From a generating function for (see Proposition 2.1), these special values appear the generalized Waring’s formula [9] that is a formula to expand by .
The MSP is a special case of the Macdonald polynomial (see [10, Chapter VI]) whose the principal specialization evaluate explicitly. However, since , it is very hard to obtain explicit or simple expression of in general. Our main results give some explicit formulas and vanishing (or non-vanishing) properties of these special values for partitions
satisfying some conditions. First, we have the following results from some properties of MSP and Lemma 2.2.
Theorem 1.1.
The following is true for
-
(1)
Let be a prime. Then, for any ,
-
(2)
For any with ,
-
(3)
For any with ,
where .
On the other hand, from Dedekind’s theorem on group determinants for finite abelian groups, special values appear as coefficients of th power of the group determinant a cyclic group . Also, in order to determine the multiplication table of the group from the group determinant, the coefficients of the terms of several types of the group determinant were obtained by Mansfield [11]. Hence, by applications of some results for group determinants, we have the second main results.
Theorem 1.2.
The following is true for
-
(1)
For any with and ,
-
(2)
For any with and , .
-
(3)
For any , where and are mutually incongruent modulo , we have .
-
(4)
For any , where and are mutually incongruent modulo , we have .
-
(5)
For any , .
-
(6)
For any with , .
-
(7)
When and satisfy
and for any , we write as and we define as the sequence obtained by removing from . Then, for any ,
-
(8)
For any and with ,
where
From the point of view of the group determinant, these results derive some non-vanishing properties for the terms of the group determinant.
The content of this paper is as follows. In Section 2, we mention a generating function of which is a specialization of the dual Cauchy kernel. From this generating function, we have integer and vanishing properties of (Theorem 1.2 (5) and (6)). We also prove a reduction formula of the sum over the symmetric group for a periodic function, which is a key step in the proof of Theorem 1.1 (1). Next, we introduce some fundamental results for the group determinant of finite abelian groups, in particular cyclic groups in Section 3. We give proofs of main theorems and some remarks in Section 4. Finally, we mention some future works related to some non-vanishing properties of and the numbers of terms of the group determinant.
2 A generating function of and a reduction formula
First we mention the dual Cauchy kernel formula [10, Chapter I (4.2′)]. For any partitions and , let be the inclusion partial order defined by
For positive integers and , the following identity holds:
where
As a corollary of this famous result, we obtain a generating function of immediately.
Proposition 2.1.
For any positive integers and , we have
From this generating function, we have integer and vanishing properties of (see Theorem 1.2 (5), (6) and Remark 4.1).
To prove Theorem 1.1 (1), we use the following lemma.
Lemma 2.2.
Let with and be a function of period . Then
Proof.
First, the following is true:
Put for any . Proving
is sufficient to complete the proof of the lemma. Since, for any ,
holds, there uniquely exists such that
for any . Therefore, the map is well-defined. We prove is bijective. It is sufficient to show that is injective. If , then
for any .
-
(i)
When , from , we have for any .
-
(ii)
When , from , we have
This leads to for any .
Therefore, . That is, is bijective. Since
and is bijective, we have
for any . This completes the proof. ∎
3 Coefficients of group determinants of cyclic groups
We derive a relation between and the group determinant of a cyclic group. Using the relation, we give some properties of .
For a finite group , let be an indeterminate for each , and let be the multivariate polynomial ring in over . The group determinant of is defined as follows (see e.g., [7], [8]):
From this definition, it is evident that is a homogeneous polynomial of degree in variables. Furthermore, when is abelian, for any term in , the product of becomes the unit element of (actually, this is true even when is non-abelian if the product is properly ordered. For a detailed explanation, see [11, Lemma 1]). From the above, for a cyclic group , each term in is of the form with . Therefore, let for , then there exist integers such that
This is one of the simplest representations of that summates similar terms.
Example 3.1.
The group determinant of is . The terms , , and correspond to , , and , respectively.
More generally, there exist integers such that
The following theorem implies that the coefficient is equal to .
Theorem 3.2.
For any positive integer ,
To prove Theorem 3.2, we use Dedekind’s theorem. Supposing in the following is abelian, let be a complete set of representatives of the equivalence classes of irreducible representations for over . Dedekind’s theorem is as follows (see e.g., [1], [5], [14]): The group determinant can be factorized into irreducible polynomials over as
Proof of Theorem 3.2.
From Dedekind’s theorem and the expression of the MSP (1), we have
Moreover, by the definition of the group determinant, terms with do not appear in . That is, for any with . ∎
Remark 3.3.
Denote the number of terms in as , and let
From Theorem 3.2, we have . Now, we use the formula obtained in [2]:
where is the dimension of the vector space of degree homogeneous invariants of the regular representation of the cyclic group of order and is Euler’s totient function. Noting that , we have
From
we have
Mansfield [11] obtained the following lemma. Unfortunately, there is a mistake in the last sentence of the proof of [11, Lemma 3]. It says that the coefficient of is or , but the coefficient is when . This mistake was corrected in [15].
Lemma 3.4 ([11, Proofs of Lemmas 2 and 3], [15, Lemma 3.3]).
Let be a finite group, let be the unit element of and let be the order of .
-
If none of , is and the monomial occurs in , the coefficient of the monomial is or depending on whether or not .
-
If none of , , is and the monomial occurs in , the coefficient of the monomial is
-
if
-
if two of , , are equal;
-
if no two of them are equal and
-
if no two of them are equal and . Note that if , then if and only if , and are commutative.
-
Here, we say that a monomial occurs in a polynomial if the monomial is not canceled after combining like terms.
4 Proofs of Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2
The proof of Theorem 1.1 is as follows.
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Using Lemma 2.2 and Theorem 3.2, we prove Theorem 1.1 (1). Let be a prime and . We prove that if then
In the case of , can be proved via direct calculation. Let be an odd prime and . Then, from Lemma 2.2,
There exists such that and
Suppose . Since is linearly independent over , it follows that . This implies that . However, it contradicts . If , then from Theorem 3.2.
To prove Theorem 1.1 (2), we calculate an explicit expression of the generating function for the partition with . Let be an indeterminate. Then, we have
Supposing here that and , then is a primitive th root of unity. Therefore,
It follows that
By comparing the above expression with the coefficients of , we have
From , the proof is complete.
Theorem 1.1 (3) follows from a direct calculation. In fact, for
with , we have
where and . Then,
Since
we have
where . ∎
The proof of Theorem 1.2 is as follows.
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
For any , we write satisfying and as . Using this notation, for any , let . Then, and hold for any . Thus, it is sufficient to prove Theorem 1.2 – and under the assumption that . Theorem 1.2 (1)–(4) are immediately obtained from Theorem 3.2 and Lemma 3.4. From Theorem 3.2, and hold. From Theorem 3.2 and , holds. For any with , let be the automorphism of defined by . Also, let be the -algebra map on induced by . Then, noting that
holds for any automorphism of , we have . From this and Theorem 3.2, is obtained. ∎
Remark 4.1.
We can also prove Theorem 1.2 , and without the results of the group determinant in Section . In fact, Theorem 1.2 and follows from Proposition 2.1 immediately and Theorem 1.2 is proved by the definition of . For Theorem 1.2 , we have a similar result from a branching formula of the Hall-Littlewood functions [10, Chapter III ()]:
where are partitions and is a skew Young table. Theorem 1.2 is stronger than this formula and we do not prove Theorem 1.2 from some facts of the symmetric polynomials alone.
Corollary 4.2.
For any prime , we have
5 Concluding remarks
In this paper, we determine some special values for some types of and prove their non-zero properties. Thus we desire more explicit formulas of for other types of . That is the first future problem.
The second problem is to give some necessary and sufficient conditions of non-zero property of . At the present, we can not prove non-zero properties of these special values without explicit evaluations like the above main results except Theorem 1.1 (1). Thus, it is a natural question how to derive their non-zero properties without explicit calculations. It might be open even in the cases of Theorem 1.1 (2) and Theorem 1.2 (1)–(4). On the other hand, we have non-zero property of in Theorem 1.1 (1) without an explicit expression of . As a generalization of this result, we conjecture that the following is true.
Conjecture 5.1.
For any , where is a prime power and is a positive integer, if and only if . This conjecture is equivalent to the following For any positive integer , is a prime power if and only if .
References
- [1] Keith Conrad. The origin of representation theory. Enseign. Math. (2), 44(3-4):361–392, 1998.
- [2] A. Elashvili and M. Jibladze. Hermite reciprocity for the regular representations of cyclic groups. Indag. Math. (N.S.), 9(2):233–238, 1998.
- [3] Jacques Faraut and Adam Korányi. Analysis on symmetric cones. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1994. Oxford Science Publications.
- [4] P. J. Forrester. Log-gases and random matrices, volume 34 of London Mathematical Society Monographs Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010.
- [5] Thomas Hawkins. The origins of the theory of group characters. Arch. History Exact Sci., 7(2):142–170, 1971.
- [6] L. K. Hua. Harmonic analysis of functions of several complex variables in the classical domains. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1963. Translated from the Russian by Leo Ebner and Adam Korányi.
- [7] K. W. Johnson. On the group determinant. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc., 109(2):299–311, 1991.
- [8] K.W. Johnson. Group Matrices, Group Determinants and Representation Theory: The Mathematical Legacy of Frobenius. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer International Publishing, 2019.
- [9] John Konvalina. A generalization of Waring’s formula. J. Combin. Theory Ser. A, 75(2):281–294, 1996.
- [10] I. G. Macdonald. Symmetric functions and Hall polynomials. Oxford Mathematical Monographs. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, second edition, 1995. With contributions by A. Zelevinsky, Oxford Science Publications.
- [11] Richard Mansfield. A group determinant determines its group. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 116(4):939–941, 1992.
- [12] Robb J. Muirhead. Aspects of multivariate statistical theory. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1982.
- [13] N. Ja. Vilenkin and A. U. Klimyk. Representation of Lie groups and special functions, volume 316 of Mathematics and its Applications. Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1995. Recent advances, Translated from the Russian manuscript by V. A. Groza and A. A. Groza.
- [14] Naoya Yamaguchi. An extension and a generalization of Dedekind’s theorem. Int. J. Group Theory, 6(3):5–11, 2017.
- [15] Naoya Yamaguchi and Yuka Yamaguchi. Generalized group determinant gives a necessary and sufficient condition for a subset of a finite group to be a subgroup. Comm. Algebra, 49(4):1805–1811, 2021.
Naoya Yamaguchi
Faculty of Education
University of Miyazaki
1-1 Gakuen Kibanadai-nishi
Miyazaki 889-2192
JAPAN
Yuka Yamaguchi
Faculty of Education
University of Miyazaki
1-1 Gakuen Kibanadai-nishi
Miyazaki 889-2192
JAPAN
Genki Shibukawa
Department of Mathematics
Graduate School of Science
Kobe University
1-1, Rokkodai, Nada-ku
Kobe, 657-8501
JAPAN