This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Prediction of dual quantum spin Hall insulator in NbIrTe4 monolayer

Xiangyang Liu School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.    Junwen Lai School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.    Jie Zhan School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.    Tianye Yu Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.    Wujun Shi Center for Transformative Science, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China Shanghai High Repetition Rate XFEL and Extreme Light Facility (SHINE), ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China    Peitao Liu School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.    Xing-Qiu Chen [email protected] School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.    Yan Sun [email protected] School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology of China, Shenyang 110016, China. Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science, Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenyang 110016, China.
Abstract

Dual quantum spin Hall insulator (QSHI) is a newly discovered topological state in the 2D material TaIrTe4, exhibiting both a traditional Z2Z_{2} band gap at charge neutrality point and a van Hove singularity (VHS) induced correlated Z2Z_{2} band gap with weak doping. Inspired by the recent progress in theoretical understanding and experimental measurements, we predicted a promising dual QSHI in the counterpart material of the NbIrTe4 monolayer by first-principles calculations. In addition to the well-known band inversion at the charge neutrality point, two new band inversions were found after CDW phase transition when the chemical potential is near the VHS, one direct and one indirect Z2Z_{2} band gap. The VHS-induced non-trivial band gap is around 10 meV, much larger than that from TaIrTe4. Furthermore, since the new generated band gap is mainly dominated by the 4d4d orbitals of Nb, electronic correlation effects should be relatively stronger in NbIrTe4 as compared to TaIrTe4. Therefore, the dual QSHI state in the NbIrTe4 monolayer is expected to be a good platform for investigating the interplay between topology and correlation effects.

I Introduction and motivation

Two-dimensional (2D) materials with VHS near the Fermi level are ideal platforms for studying the interplay between topological electronic structure and correlation effects[1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. As a typical layered material, TaIrTe4 monolayer was predicted to be a 2D topological insulator with a band gap around 32 meV[12, 13, 14]. Very recently, a new quantum topological state of duel QSHI was discovered in the TaIrTe4 monolayer by the observation of quantized longitudinal conductance, which is rare in other QSHIs[15]. It was found that, in addition to the QSHI state at the charge neutrality point, two new non-trivial Z2 gaps are generated when the Fermi level shifts to the VHS points by weak electron and hole doping effects, respectively.

Owing to the divergence of density of states (DOSs), a CDW phase transition is induced when the Fermi level shifts to the VHSs, resulting in the correlated Z2Z_{2} band gap. Different from traditional Z2Z_{2} band gaps, the VHSs generated topological band gap is expected to naturally relate to the novel correlated electronic topological states of the fractional quantum spin Hall effect and helical quantum spin liquid[16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Though the VHSs generated Z2Z_{2} band gap and integer quantized longitudinal conductance can exist in TaIrTe4, the corresponding fractional topology and other strongly correlated topological states have, so far, not been observed. Therefore, it is necessary to find out some more materials candidates that host both topology and correlation[23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31]. One possible reason for the absence of strongly correlated topological phenomena in TaIrTe4 is the weak strength of electron correlation. With this inspiration, we analyzed the dual Z2Z_{2} topological state in NbIrTe4, an isoelectronic counterpart of TaIrTe4. Due to the difference between Ta-5d and Nb-4d orbitals near VHSs, the electronic correlation effect is expected to be more pronounced in NbIrTe4 than in TaIrTe4. This makes the NbIrTe4 to be a good candidate material for observing the correlated topological phenomena that are absent in TaIrTe4.

II Result and Discussion

The crystal structure of a NbIrTe4 monolayer shares the same structural prototype as 1T-MoTe2 monolayer[32] and features a sandwich-like structure, as depicted in Fig. 1(a). In this arrangement, the Nb and Ir atoms are positioned in the middle layer, forming parallel zigzag chains along the bb-axis. Each Nb or Ir atom is surrounded by six Te atoms, forming a distorted octahedron. Fig. 1(c) shows the energy dispersion along the high-symmetry lines (Fig. 1(b)) calculated by employing Vienna Ab initio Simulation Package (VASP)[33] with generalized gradient approximation (GGA) of the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) aproximation[34]. One can observe that a band inversion exists near the XX point with a band gap of around 35 meV, in agreement with previous reports[13, 35]. In addition, two VHSs are located around Γ\Gamma and XX, respectively, with the former one above the Fermi level and the latter below the Fermi level. Correspondingly, two narrow peaks of DOSs generated from the VHSs can be found above and below the Fermi level with energy of \simEF + 60 meV and \simEF - 60 meV, respectively. From the orbital projected band structure and DOS, the two VHSs below and above the Fermi level are dominated by the 4d4d orbitals of Nb and hence a strong correlation is expected here. With the above understanding of the electronic band structure near the Fermi level, we projected the Bloch wavefunctions into maximally localized Wannier functions (MLWFs) and constructed effective tight binding model Hamiltonians based on the overlaps of these Wannier orbitals[36].

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Crystal and electronic structure of NbIrTe4 monolayer. (a) Top view of the crystal structure. (b) Two-dimensional (2D) Brillouin zone (BZ) and its projection along the cc-axis for both the primitive cell and CDW supercell. The high-symmetry lines are denoted as follows: Γ\Gamma-X-S-Y for the primitive cell, Γ\Gamma-X-S1-Y1 for the 1×\times 20 ×\times 1 supercell, and Γ¯\bar{\Gamma}-X¯\bar{X} for the edge lines along the b-axis. (c) Energy dispersion along high-symmetry lines of NbIrTe4 monolayer primitive cell. (d) Density of states of NbIrTe4 monolayer primitive cell. (e) Wannier charge center evolution with Fermi level fixed at charge neutrality point. (f) Energy dispersion of edge state of NbIrTe4 monolayer primitive cell.

To verify the topological state, we calculated the Wannier center evolution and edge state with chemical potential locating at the charge neutrality point[37]. The wanneir center evolution in Fig. 1(e) presents as a zigzag form with changing partner at the edges of kx=0 and π\pi/a, which is a typical feature in Z2Z_{2} topological insulators[38]. Consistent with the bulk state analysis, the edge state with open boundary condition along the bb-axis direction shows linear band crossing at the Γ\Gamma point and connects the occupied and unoccupied bulk bands. Hence, the Z2Z_{2} band gap at the charge neutrality point can be confirmed from both bulk band order and edge Dirac point.

In order to identify the detailed positions of the VHSs near the charge neutrality point, we plot the energy dispersion of band-nocc+2n_{occ}+2 and band-nocc2n_{occ}-2 in the whole 2D Brillouin zone (BZ), where noccn_{occ} refers to the index of the highest occupied band in a primitive cell considering the spin. As presented in Fig. 2(a), the four VHS points on band-nocc+2n_{occ}+2 are located at (0.2112πa\frac{2\pi}{a}, 0.0242πb\frac{2\pi}{b}), and its inversion and mirror partners. Considering the one-dimensional Nb-chains are similar to the Ta-chains in TaIrTe4, the wavevectors along the bb direction roughly corresponds to 1×\times 20 ×\times 1 and 1×\times 21 ×\times 1 supercells for the nearby VHSs on band-nocc+2n_{occ}+2 and band-nocc2n_{occ}-2, respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Band structure and charge susceptibility in NbIrTe4 monolayer primitive cell. (a) Three dimensional (3D) plot of energy dispersion (kakbEk_{a}-k_{b}-E) and location of van Hove singularities near the Fermi level. (b, c) Charge susceptibility of NbIrTe4 with chemical potential at VHSs level of the valence and conduction bands, respectively.

We further calculated the charge susceptibility by shifting the chemical potential at \simEF + 60 meV and \simEF - 60 meV, corresponding to the position of VHSs on band-nocc+2n_{occ}+2 and band-nocc2n_{occ}-2, respectively. The charge susceptibility χ(q)\chi(\textbf{q}) at a given energy is computed by following the formula of the Lindhard function χ(q)\chi(\textbf{q}) = fk(1fk+q)εk+qεk+iδ\sum\frac{f_{\textbf{k}}(1-f_{\textbf{k}+\textbf{q}{)}}}{\varepsilon_{\textbf{k}+\textbf{q}}-\varepsilon_{\textbf{k}}+i\delta}, where ff refers to the Fermi-Dirac distribution, ε\varepsilon is a momentum-dependent energy and δ\delta refers to the broadening in data processing. Guided by the fact that the direction of Q is parallel to the Ta-chains in the TaIrTe4 monolayer[15], we specifically chose a vector aligned with the Nb-chains in the NbIrTe4 monolayer prior to further analysis. From Fig. 2(b) and (c), one can see that a local maximum of the charge susceptibility is located at the wavevectors of Q1=(0,0.0462πa)\textbf{Q}^{*1}=(0,0.046\frac{2\pi}{a}) and Q2=(0,0.0482πb)\textbf{Q}^{*2}=(0,0.048\frac{2\pi}{b}) for the valence bands and conduction bands, respectively. Therefore, a CDW phase transition may occur when the chemical potential is shifted to near \simEF + 60 meV and \simEF - 60 meV via weak doping or gating effects.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Band structure and topological properties in CDW phase. (a) Energy dispersion along high symmetry lines. The pink range represent the VHS generated Z2Z_{2} band gap. (b-c) Wannier charge center evolutions with Fermi level lying at E0 and E0 + 80 meV, respectively. (d) Energy dispersion of edge states.

The wavevectors of Q1=(0,0.0462πa)\textbf{Q}^{*1}=(0,0.046\frac{2\pi}{a}) and Q2=(0,0.0482πb)\textbf{Q}^{*2}=(0,0.048\frac{2\pi}{b}) in Fig. 2 can be described by the supercell of 1×\times 21 ×\times 1 and 1×\times 20 ×\times 1, respectively. To study the possible CDW phase transition, we constructed an effective Hamiltonian model for a supercell of 1×\times 20 ×\times 1 based on the overlaps of Wannier orbitals. Following the Fro¨\ddot{o}hlich-Peierls Hamiltonian approach with supercell along the bb-axis and only the intra-orbital interaction considered, the CDW modulated electronic band structure can be described by H=Hr+Vcos(Qy)ψrψrH=H_{r}+Vcos(Qy)\psi_{r}^{\dagger}\psi_{r}[39]. Here, VV represents the potential induced by the superlattice. The periodicity of this potential is determined by the parameter QQ, which can be identified by examining Q in Fig. 2.

By increasing the potential VV, a new band gap emerges near EF + 80 meV, originating from the original VHSs, as illustrated by the pink range in Fig. 3(a). However, when the potential V was varied from 0.01 eV to 0.15 eV, no indirect band gap was observed between band-Nocc and band-Nocc - 10 for the VHSs below the charge neutrality point. Here NoccN_{occ} refers to the index of the highest occupied band in a supercell, taking into account the spin. This lack of an indirect band gap may be attributed to the competition between the detailed shape of the electronic band structure and the strength of the modulation potential. From Fig. 3(a), one can see that there are two global band gaps in the energy window from \simEF - 150 meV to \simEF + 150 meV. One is located at the charge neutrality point and the other one is generated between the band-Nocc+4N_{occ}+4 and band-Nocc+6N_{occ}+6. The band gaps at and above the charge neutrality point are around 15 and 10 meV, respectively, when the modulation potential V is set to 0.1 eV.

To check the topological charge of these two gaps, we calculated the bulk Wannier center evolutions and energy dispersions of edge states. Fig. 3(b) shows the Wannier center evolutions by modulating the chemical potential at the charge neutrality point. One can observe that each pair of evolution lines exhibits a fixed partner and becomes degenerate at two time-reversal-invariant points kxk_{x}=0 and π/a\pi/a. Therefore, the Wannier center evolutions do not intersect with the reference lines, indicating that the gap at the charge neutrality point is topologically trivial. However, the Wannier center evolutions switch partners at kx = 0 and π\pi/a while keeping the occupied bands fixed at band-Nocc + 4, as depicted in Fig. 3(c). The zigzag pattern of the Wannier center evolutions ensures an odd number of intersections with the reference lines, resulting in a non-trivial Z2 band gap.

The topological phases were further checked by calculating edge states with open boundary conditions along the bb-axis. From the energy dispersion illustrated in Fig. 3(d), we are mainly interested in the three zones that are indexed by the energy windows of \simEF - 0.04 eV to \simEF + 0.01 eV, \simEF + 0.01 eV to \simEF + 0.06 eV, and \simEF + 0.06 eV to \simEF + 0.1 eV. In the first region, although edge bands are present within the bulk band gap, they intersect the Fermi level twice. Consequently, these edge states lack topological protection and can be eliminated through external perturbations, consistent with the behavior exhibited by the Wannier center evolutions depicted in Fig. 3(b). In the second region, we observe a Dirac-point-like edge band structure connecting the bulk states originating from band-Nocc + 2 and band-Nocc + 4, as depicted in Fig. 3(a). Notably, there exists a noticeable band anti-crossing between band-Nocc + 2 and band-Nocc + 4 around the X point, although there is no indirect band gap present. Therefore, the band structure resulted from band-Nocc + 2 and band-Nocc + 4 forms a non-trivial Z2 topological semimetal state when considering the CDW modulation potential. This differs from the case in monolayer TaIrTe4, where a direct non-trivial Z2 band gap of approximately 5 meV is formed by band-Nocc + 2 and band-Nocc + 4.

While there is not a global band gap between band-Nocc+2N_{occ}+2 and band-Nocc+4N_{occ}+4, we do observe a direct gap formed by band-Nocc+4N_{occ}+4 and band-Nocc+6N_{occ}+6 in the range of \simEF + 60 meV to \simEF + 100 meV. From the edge energy dispersion in this energy window, one can observe that a Dirac-point state connecting the bulk bands originating from original band-Nocc+4N_{occ}+4 and band-Nocc+6N_{occ}+6. It is a typical feature of a 2D Z2Z_{2} topological insulator and fully agreement with the analysis from Wannier charge evolutions in Fig. 3(c). Therefore, NbIrTe4 is expected to undergo a CDW phase transition along the bb-axis direction and results in two non-trivial Z2Z_{2} band gap. One is a direct band gap with a globally semimetallic nature, and the other one is an indirect band gap of around 10 meV. Since both gaps are not far away from the charge neutrality point, they can be achieved via weak electron doping or gating.

III conclusion

In summary, we have predicted a dual QSHI state in monolayer NbIrTe4 via first-principles calculations. In addition to the original non-trivial Z2Z_{2} band gap at the charge neutrality point, a new global Z2Z_{2} band gap of around 10 meV can be obtained when the chemical potential is shifted to the VHS point in the electron doping range. Besides, an indirect band inversion in the CDW phase was found in the energy window around E0 + 20 meV to E0 + 30 meV near the X point. Since both of these two nontrivial band gaps are close to the charge neutrality point, they are expected to be experimentally detected after weak electron doping or gating. Moreover, the VHS point above the Fermi level is mainly dominated by the 4d4d orbitals of Nb. In comparison with Ta-5d5d orbitals in TaIrTe4, the dual QSHI state in NbIrTe4 should manifest a strong correlation effect and some more correlated topological states are expected.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2021YFB3501503), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No. 52271016 and No. 52188101), and Foundation from Liaoning Province (Grant No. XLYC2203080). Part of the numerical calculations in this study were carried out on the ORISE Supercomputer.

References

  • [1] L. Wang, E.-M. Shih, A. Ghiotto, L. Xian, D. A. Rhodes, C. Tan, M. Claassen, D. M. Kennes, Y. Bai, B. Kim, et al., “Correlated electronic phases in twisted bilayer transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature materials, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 861–866, 2020.
  • [2] G.-B. Liu, D. Xiao, Y. Yao, X. Xu, and W. Yao, “Electronic structures and theoretical modeling of two-dimensional group-vib transition metal dichalcogenides,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 2643–2663, 2015.
  • [3] Y.-T. Hsu, A. Vaezi, M. H. Fischer, and E.-A. Kim, “Topological superconductivity in monolayer transition metal dichalcogenides,” Nature communications, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2017.
  • [4] L. Wei, Q. Xu, Y. He, Q. Li, Y. Huang, W. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Claassen, D. A. Rhodes, D. M. Kennes, L. Xian, A. Rubio, and L. Wang, “Linear resistivity at van Hove singularities in twisted bilayer WSe2,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 121, p. e2321665121, Apr. 2024.
  • [5] K. Kim, S. Kim, J. S. Kim, H. Kim, J.-H. Park, and B. I. Min, “Importance of the van Hove singularity in superconducting PdTe2,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 97, p. 165102, Apr. 2018.
  • [6] S. Xu, M. M. Al Ezzi, N. Balakrishnan, A. Garcia-Ruiz, B. Tsim, C. Mullan, J. Barrier, N. Xin, B. A. Piot, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, A. Carvalho, A. Mishchenko, A. K. Geim, V. I. Fal’ko, S. Adam, A. H. C. Neto, K. S. Novoselov, and Y. Shi, “Tunable van Hove singularities and correlated states in twisted monolayer-bilayer graphene,” Nature Physics, vol. 17, pp. 619–626, May 2021.
  • [7] S. Wu, Z. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and E. Y. Andrei, “Chern insulators, van Hove singularities and topological flat bands in magic-angle twisted bilayer graphene,” Nature Materials, vol. 20, pp. 488–494, Apr. 2021.
  • [8] K. Lee, G. F. Lange, L.-L. Wang, B. Kuthanazhi, T. V. Trevisan, N. H. Jo, B. Schrunk, P. P. Orth, R.-J. Slager, P. C. Canfield, and A. Kaminski, “Discovery of a weak topological insulating state and van Hove singularity in triclinic RhBi2,” Nature Communications, vol. 12, p. 1855, Mar. 2021.
  • [9] M. Kang, L. Ye, S. Fang, J.-S. You, A. Levitan, M. Han, J. I. Facio, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, M. K. Chan, R. D. McDonald, D. Graf, K. Kaznatcheev, E. Vescovo, D. C. Bell, E. Kaxiras, J. van den Brink, M. Richter, M. Prasad Ghimire, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin, “Dirac fermions and flat bands in the ideal kagome metal FeSn,” Nature Materials, vol. 19, pp. 163–169, Feb. 2020.
  • [10] Y. Xu, B. Yan, H.-J. Zhang, J. Wang, G. Xu, P. Tang, W. Duan, and S.-C. Zhang, “Large-gap quantum spin hall insulators in tin films,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 111, p. 136804, Sept. 2013.
  • [11] B. Sun, W. Zhao, T. Palomaki, Z. Fei, E. Runburg, P. Malinowski, X. Huang, J. Cenker, Y.-T. Cui, J.-H. Chu, X. Xu, S. S. Ataei, D. Varsano, M. Palummo, E. Molinari, M. Rontani, and D. H. Cobden, “Evidence for equilibrium exciton condensation in monolayer WTe2,” Nature Physics, vol. 18, pp. 94–99, Jan. 2022.
  • [12] P.-J. Guo, X.-Q. Lu, W. Ji, K. Liu, and Z.-Y. Lu, “Quantum spin hall effect in monolayer and bilayer TaIrTe4,” Physical Review B, vol. 102, no. 4, p. 041109, 2020.
  • [13] J. Liu, H. Wang, C. Fang, L. Fu, and X. Qian, “Van der waals stacking-induced topological phase transition in layered ternary transition metal chalcogenides,” Nano letters, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 467–475, 2017.
  • [14] A. Marrazzo, M. Gibertini, D. Campi, N. Mounet, and N. Marzari, “Relative abundance of Z2 topological order in exfoliable two-dimensional insulators,” Nano letters, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 8431–8440, 2019.
  • [15] J. Tang, T. S. Ding, H. Chen, A. Gao, T. Qian, Z. Huang, Z. Sun, X. Han, A. Strasser, J. Li, et al., “Dual quantum spin hall insulator by density-tuned correlations in TaIrTe4,” Nature, vol. 628, no. 8008, pp. 515–521, 2024.
  • [16] J. Maciejko, X.-L. Qi, A. Karch, and S.-C. Zhang, “Fractional topological insulators in three dimensions,” Physical review letters, vol. 105, no. 24, p. 246809, 2010.
  • [17] L. Santos, T. Neupert, S. Ryu, C. Chamon, and C. Mudry, “Time-reversal symmetric hierarchy of fractional incompressible liquids,” Physical Review B, vol. 84, no. 16, p. 165138, 2011.
  • [18] M. Goerbig, “From fractional chern insulators to a fractional quantum spin hall effect,” The European Physical Journal B, vol. 85, pp. 1–8, 2012.
  • [19] W. Li, D. Sheng, C. Ting, and Y. Chen, “Fractional quantum spin hall effect in flat-band checkerboard lattice model,” Physical Review B, vol. 90, no. 8, p. 081102, 2014.
  • [20] C. Wang and T. Senthil, “Time-reversal symmetric uu(1) quantum spin liquids,” Physical Review X, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 011034, 2016.
  • [21] M. Barkeshli, P. Bonderson, M. Cheng, and Z. Wang, “Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases,” Physical Review B, vol. 100, no. 11, p. 115147, 2019.
  • [22] K.-S. Park and H. Han, “Dirac quantization and fractional magnetoelectric effect in interacting topological insulators,” Physical Review B, vol. 82, no. 15, p. 153101, 2010.
  • [23] N. J. Ghimire and I. I. Mazin, “Topology and correlations on the kagome lattice,” Nature materials, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 137–138, 2020.
  • [24] S. Paschen and Q. Si, “Quantum phases driven by strong correlations,” Nature Reviews Physics, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 9–26, 2021.
  • [25] M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, “Colloquium: Topological insulators,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 82, pp. 3045–3067, Nov. 2010.
  • [26] X. Teng, L. Chen, F. Ye, E. Rosenberg, Z. Liu, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, J. S. Oh, M. Z. Hasan, K. J. Neubauer, B. Gao, Y. Xie, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, R. J. Birgeneau, J.-H. Chu, M. Yi, and P. Dai, “Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome lattice antiferromagnet,” Nature, vol. 609, pp. 490–495, Sept. 2022.
  • [27] J.-X. Yin, B. Lian, and M. Z. Hasan, “Topological kagome magnets and superconductors,” Nature, vol. 612, pp. 647–657, Dec. 2022.
  • [28] J.-X. Yin, W. Ma, T. A. Cochran, X. Xu, S. S. Zhang, H.-J. Tien, N. Shumiya, G. Cheng, K. Jiang, B. Lian, Z. Song, G. Chang, I. Belopolski, D. Multer, M. Litskevich, Z.-J. Cheng, X. P. Yang, B. Swidler, H. Zhou, H. Lin, T. Neupert, Z. Wang, N. Yao, T.-R. Chang, S. Jia, and M. Zahid Hasan, “Quantum-limit Chern topological magnetism in TbMn6Sn6,” Nature, vol. 583, pp. 533–536, July 2020.
  • [29] J.-X. Yin, S. S. Zhang, H. Li, K. Jiang, G. Chang, B. Zhang, B. Lian, C. Xiang, I. Belopolski, H. Zheng, T. A. Cochran, S.-Y. Xu, G. Bian, K. Liu, T.-R. Chang, H. Lin, Z.-Y. Lu, Z. Wang, S. Jia, W. Wang, and M. Z. Hasan, “Giant and anisotropic many-body spin–orbit tunability in a strongly correlated kagome magnet,” Nature, vol. 562, pp. 91–95, Oct. 2018.
  • [30] M. Kang, S. Fang, L. Ye, H. C. Po, J. Denlinger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, E. Kaxiras, J. G. Checkelsky, and R. Comin, “Topological flat bands in frustrated kagome lattice CoSn,” Nature Communications, vol. 11, p. 4004, Aug. 2020.
  • [31] C. Guo, G. Wagner, C. Putzke, D. Chen, K. Wang, L. Zhang, M. Gutierrez-Amigo, I. Errea, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, M. H. Fischer, T. Neupert, and P. J. W. Moll, “Correlated order at the tipping point in the kagome metal CsV3Sb5,” Nature Physics, vol. 20, pp. 579–584, Apr. 2024.
  • [32] T. A. Empante, Y. Zhou, V. Klee, A. E. Nguyen, I.-H. Lu, M. D. Valentin, S. A. Naghibi Alvillar, E. Preciado, A. J. Berges, C. S. Merida, et al., “Chemical vapor deposition growth of few-layer MoTe2 in the 2H, 1T’, and 1T phases: tunable properties of MoTe2 films,” ACS nano, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 900–905, 2017.
  • [33] J. Hafner, “Ab-initio simulations of materials using vasp: Density-functional theory and beyond,” Journal of computational chemistry, vol. 29, no. 13, pp. 2044–2078, 2008.
  • [34] K. F. Garrity, J. W. Bennett, K. M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, “Pseudopotentials for high-throughput dft calculations,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 81, pp. 446–452, 2014.
  • [35] M. Lv, G. Yu, and W. Chen, “2D NbIrTe4 and TaRhTe4 monolayers: Two fascinating topological insulators as electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction,” Inorg. Chem. Front., vol. 9, no. 23, pp. 6133–6146, 2022.
  • [36] A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, “wannier90: A tool for obtaining maximally-localised wannier functions,” Computer physics communications, vol. 178, no. 9, pp. 685–699, 2008.
  • [37] G. W. Bryant, “Surface states of ternary semiconductor alloys: effect of alloy fluctuations in one-dimensional models with realistic atoms,” Physical Review B, vol. 31, no. 8, p. 5166, 1985.
  • [38] A. A. Soluyanov and D. Vanderbilt, “Wannier representation of Z2 topological insulators,” Physical Review B, vol. 83, no. 3, p. 035108, 2011.
  • [39] H. Fröhlich, “On the theory of superconductivity: the one-dimensional case,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 223, no. 1154, pp. 296–305, 1954.