This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Possible cardinalities of the center of a graph111E-mail addresses: [email protected](Y.Hu), [email protected](X.Zhan).

Yanan Hu and Xingzhi Zhan
Department of Mathematics, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200241, China
Corresponding author.
Abstract

A central vertex of a graph is a vertex whose eccentricity equals the radius. The center of a graph is the set of all central vertices. The central ratio of a graph is the ratio of the cardinality of its center to its order. In 1982, Buckley proved that every positive rational number not exceeding one is the central ratio of some graph. In this paper, we obtain more detailed information by determining which cardinalities are possible for the center of a graph with given order and radius. There are unexpected phenomena in the results. For example, there exists a graph of order 1414 and radius 66 whose center has cardinality ss if and only if s{1,2,3,4,9,10,11,12,14}.s\in\{1,2,3,4,9,10,11,12,14\}. We also prove a related uniqueness result.

Key words. Center; radius; central ratio; lollipop

Mathematics Subject Classification. 05C12, 05C30

1 Introduction

We consider finite simple graphs. The order of a graph is its number of vertices. We denote by V(G)V(G) and E(G)E(G) the vertex set and edge set of a graph GG respectively. Denote by dG(u,v)d_{G}(u,v) the distance between two vertices uu and vv in G.G. If the graph GG is clear from the context, we simply write d(u,v).d(u,v). The eccentricity, denoted by e(v),e(v), of a vertex vv in a graph GG is the distance to a vertex farthest from v.v. Thus e(v)=max{d(v,u)|uV(G)}.e(v)={\rm max}\{d(v,u)|u\in V(G)\}. If e(v)=d(v,x),e(v)=d(v,x), then the vertex xx is called an eccentric vertex of v.v. The radius of a graph G,G, denoted rad(G),{\rm rad}(G), is the minimum eccentricity of all the vertices in V(G),V(G), whereas the diameter of G,G, denoted diam(G),{\rm diam}(G), is the maximum eccentricity. A vertex vv is a central vertex of GG if e(v)=rad(G).e(v)={\rm rad}(G). The center of a graph G,G, denoted C(G),C(G), is the set of all central vertices of G.G. A vertex uu is a peripheral vertex of GG if e(u)=diam(G).e(u)={\rm diam}(G). A graph with a finite radius or diameter is necessarily connected. If rad(G)=diam(G),{\rm rad}(G)={\rm diam}(G), then the graph GG is called self-centered. Thus, a self-centered graph is a graph in which every vertex is a central vertex. A graph is called trivial if it is of order 1;1; otherwise it is nontrivial.

The central ratio of a graph GG is the ratio of the cardinality of its center to its order; i.e., |C(G)|/|V(G)|.|C(G)|/|V(G)|. In 1982, Buckley [1] proved the following result.

Theorem 1. (Buckley [1]) If cc is a rational number with 0<c1,0<c\leq 1, then there exists a graph whose central ratio is equal to c.c.

In this paper, we obtain more detailed information by determining which cardinalities are possible for the center of a graph with given order and radius, from which Theorem 1 follows immediately. There are unexpected phenomena in the results. We also prove a related uniqueness result.

2 Main Results

First recall the basic fact that if nn and rr are the order and radius of a graph respectively, then rn/2.r\leq n/2. This can be seen by considering a spanning tree of the graph. It is well-known (e.g. [4]) that there exists a graph of radius rr and diameter dd if and only if rd2r.r\leq d\leq 2r.

We will need the following two lemmas due to other authors.

Lemma 2. (Erdős, Saks and Sós [2, Theorem 2.1]) Every connected graph of radius rr has an induced path of order 2r1.2r-1.

A cycle CC in a graph HH is called a geodesic cycle if for any two vertices x,yV(C),x,y\in V(C), dC(x,y)=dH(x,y).d_{C}(x,y)=d_{H}(x,y). Thus, a geodesic cycle is necessarily induced; i.e., it has no chords.

Lemma 3. (Haviar, Hrnčiar and Monoszová [3, Theorem 2.6]) Let GG be a graph of order n,n, radius rr and diameter d.d. If n3r2n\leq 3r-2 and d2r2,d\leq 2r-2, then GG contains a geodesic cycle of length 2r2r or 2r+1.2r+1.

Notation 1. For a positive integer n,n,n={1,2,,n},\langle n\rangle=\{1,2,\ldots,n\}, the set of the first nn positive integers.

Kt,K_{t}, CtC_{t} and PtP_{t} will denote the complete graph of order t,t, the cycle of order tt and the path of order tt respectively. Recall that the join of graphs GG and H,H, denoted GH,G\vee H, is the graph obtained from the disjoint union G+HG+H by adding the edges xyxy with xV(G)x\in V(G) and yV(H).y\in V(H). G¯\overline{G} denotes the complement of a graph G.G. A leaf in a graph is a vertex of degree 1.1.

Notation 2. A lollipop is the union of a cycle and a path having exactly one common vertex which is an end-vertex of the path. We denote by L(n,k)L(n,k) the lollipop of order nn whose cycle has length k.k. A broom is a tree obtained by subdividing one edge of a star an arbitrary number of times. We denote by B(n,k)B(n,k) the broom of order nn and diameter k.k. If kn2,k\leq n-2, the broom B(n,k)B(n,k) has a unique vertex of degree at least 3,3, which we call the joint of the broom. The joint of the path B(n,n1)=PnB(n,n-1)=P_{n} is defined to be the neighbor of one of the two end-vertices.

Two examples are depicted in Figure 1.

[Uncaptioned image]

Now we are ready to state and prove the main results.

Theorem 4. Given positive integers nn and rr with rn/2,r\leq n/2,  let Ω(n,r)\Omega(n,r) denote the set of those integers kk such that there exists a graph of order nn and radius rr whose center has cardinality k.k. If n3n\geq 3 then

Ω(n,r)={n{n1}ifr(3n+2)/8;{1,2,,n2r+2}{6r2n+1,,n2,n}if(3n+2)/8<r<n/2;{2,n}ifr=n/2.\Omega(n,r)=\begin{cases}\langle n\rangle\setminus\{n-1\}\quad{\rm if}\,\,\,r\leq(3n+2)/8;\\ \{1,2,...,n-2r+2\}\cup\{6r-2n+1,...,n-2,n\}\quad{\rm if}\,\,\,(3n+2)/8<r<n/2;\\ \{2,n\}\quad{\rm if}\,\,\,r=n/2.\end{cases}

Proof. We first show that every value ss in the expression of Ω(n,r)\Omega(n,r) can be attained. Note that the condition (3n+2)/8<r(3n+2)/8<r means (n2r+2)+1<6r2n+1;(n-2r+2)+1<6r-2n+1; i.e., there is an integer gap between n2r+2n-2r+2 and 6r2n+1.6r-2n+1.

For this part, there is no need to distinguish the case r(3n+2)/8r\leq(3n+2)/8 and the case (3n+2)/8<r<n/2.(3n+2)/8<r<n/2. The constructions below give two graphs attaining some values of ss in the former case.

Suppose r=1.r=1. For any sn{n1},s\in\langle n\rangle\setminus\{n-1\}, the graph KsKns¯K_{s}\vee\overline{K_{n-s}} has order nn and radius 1,1, and its center has cardinality s.s.

Now suppose 2r<n/2.2\leq r<n/2. We distinguish six cases.

Case 1. s=1.s=1. The broom B(n,2r)B(n,2r) has order nn and radius r,r, and its center has cardinality 1.1.

Case 2. 2sn2r+2.2\leq s\leq n-2r+2. Let G1(n,r,s)G_{1}(n,r,s) be the graph obtained from the broom B(ns+2,2r1)B(n-s+2,2r-1) by adding s2s-2 additional vertices and joining each of them to the two central vertices of B(ns+2,2r1).B(n-s+2,2r-1). Then G1(n,r,s)G_{1}(n,r,s) has order nn and radius r,r, and its center has cardinality s.s. The graph G1(14,4,5)G_{1}(14,4,5) is depicted in Figure 2.

[Uncaptioned image]

Case 3. 6r2n+1s2r16r-2n+1\leq s\leq 2r-1 and ss is odd. Then s=2r2k+1s=2r-2k+1 for some kk with 1kn2r.1\leq k\leq n-2r. If n=2r+k,n=2r+k, define the graph G2(n,r,s)G_{2}(n,r,s) to be the lollipop L(n,2r).L(n,2r). If n>2r+k,n>2r+k, G2(n,r,s)G_{2}(n,r,s) is obtained by identifying the joint of the broom B(n2r+1,k+1)B(n-2r+1,k+1) with one vertex of the cycle C2r.C_{2r}. Then G2(n,r,s)G_{2}(n,r,s) has order nn and radius r,r, and its center has cardinality s.s. The graph G2(15,4,3)G_{2}(15,4,3) is depicted in Figure 3.

[Uncaptioned image]

Case 4. 6r2n+1s2r16r-2n+1\leq s\leq 2r-1 and ss is even. Then s=2r2ks=2r-2k for some kk with 1kn2r1.1\leq k\leq n-2r-1. If n=2r+k+1,n=2r+k+1, we identify the eccentric vertex of the unique leaf of the lollipop L(2r+1,2r)L(2r+1,2r) with one end-vertex of the path Pk+1P_{k+1} to obtain the graph G3(n,r,s).G_{3}(n,r,s). If n>2r+k+1,n>2r+k+1, we identify the eccentric vertex of the unique leaf of the lollipop L(2r+1,2r)L(2r+1,2r) with the joint of the broom B(n2r,k+1)B(n-2r,k+1) to obtain the graph G3(n,r,s).G_{3}(n,r,s). Then G3(n,r,s)G_{3}(n,r,s) has order nn and radius r,r, and its center has cardinality s.s. The graph G3(15,4,2)G_{3}(15,4,2) is depicted in Figure 4.

[Uncaptioned image]

Case 5. 2rsn2.2r\leq s\leq n-2. Then s=2r+k1s=2r+k-1 for some kk with 1kn2r1.1\leq k\leq n-2r-1. Define the graph G4(n,r,s)G_{4}(n,r,s) as follows. Let C:x1,x2,,x2rC:\,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{2r} be a cycle of length 2r.2r. Add n2rkn-2r-k new vertices to CC and join each of them to the vertex x1x_{1} to obtain a graph D.D. Add kk new vertices to DD and join each of them to the two vertices x2x_{2} and x2rx_{2r} to obtain the graph G4(n,r,s),G_{4}(n,r,s), which has order nn and radius r,r, and whose center has cardinality s.s. The graph G4(15,4,11)G_{4}(15,4,11) is depicted in Figure 5.

[Uncaptioned image]

Case 6. s=n.s=n. We obtain a graph G5(n,r)G_{5}(n,r) by adding n2rn-2r new vertices to the cycle C:x1,x2,,x2rC:\,x_{1},x_{2},\ldots,x_{2r} of length 2r2r and joining each of them to the two vertices x2x_{2} and x2r.x_{2r}. Then G5(n,r)G_{5}(n,r) is a self-centered graph of order nn and radius r.r. The graph G5(12,4)G_{5}(12,4) is depicted in Figure 6.

[Uncaptioned image]

Finally suppose r=n/2.r=n/2. We have n=2r.n=2r. The center of the path P2rP_{2r} has cardinality 22 and the center of the cycle C2rC_{2r} has cardinality n.n.

Conversely, we prove that the integers appearing in the expression of Ω(n,r)\Omega(n,r) are the only possible elements of the set Ω(n,r).\Omega(n,r).

First note that any nontrivial graph has at least two peripheral vertices. Indeed, suppose vv is a peripheral vertex and uu is an eccentric vertex of v.v. Then both vv and uu are peripheral vertices. Thus, we always have n1Ω(n,r).n-1\not\in\Omega(n,r).

We then treat the easier case r=n/2.r=n/2. Let HH be a graph of order nn and radius rr with r=n/2.r=n/2. By Lemma 2, HH has an induced path PP of order 2r1=n1.2r-1=n-1. Thus there is only one vertex yy outside P.P. Since PP is an induced path of radius r1r-1 and HH has radius r,r, the two end-vertices of PP are the only possible neighbors of y.y. Hence HH is either a path or a cycle of the even order n.n. Consequently the center of HH has cardinality 22 or n.n.

Now we consider the case (3n+2)/8<r<n/2.(3n+2)/8<r<n/2. Let GG be a graph of order nn and radius rr whose center has cardinality t.t. We will show that either tn2r+2t\leq n-2r+2 or t6r2n+1.t\geq 6r-2n+1. Note that the condition (3n+2)/8<r(3n+2)/8<r implies that n3r2.n\leq 3r-2. Denote by dd the diameter of G.G. We distinguish two cases.

Case 1. d2r1.d\geq 2r-1. Let QQ be a diametral path of G;G; i.e., a path of length dd whose end-vertices are at distance d.d. There are two possible values of d.d. If d=2r,d=2r, then there are at least 2r2r non-central vertices of GG on Q.Q. Hence tn2r.t\leq n-2r. If d=2r1,d=2r-1, then there are at least 2r22r-2 non-central vertices of GG on Q.Q. Hence tn2r+2.t\leq n-2r+2. In both cases we have tn2r+2.t\leq n-2r+2.

Case 2. d2r2.d\leq 2r-2. As remarked above, we also have n3r2.n\leq 3r-2. By Lemma 3, GG has a cycle CC of length 2r2r or 2r+1.2r+1. We distinguish two subcases.

Subcase 2.1. CC has length 2r.2r. Since 2r<n,2r<n, GG has vertices outside C.C. Suppose u1v1u_{1}v_{1} is a non-cut-edge of GG with u1V(C)u_{1}\in V(C) and v1V(C).v_{1}\not\in V(C). Recall that an edge is a cut-edge if and only if it belongs to no cycle [5, p.23]. Thus there is a cycle containing u1v1.u_{1}v_{1}. In this cycle we choose an edge ee such that eu1v1e\not=u_{1}v_{1} and eE(C).e\not\in E(C). Delete ee to obtain a new graph. If u1v1u_{1}v_{1} is still a non-cut-edge of this new graph, delete an edge ff in a cycle containing u1v1u_{1}v_{1} such that fu1v1f\not=u_{1}v_{1} and fE(C).f\not\in E(C). After finitely many such edge deletion steps, we obtain a graph G1G_{1} containing CC in which u1v1u_{1}v_{1} is a cut-edge.

If G1G_{1} contains a non-cut-edge u2v2u_{2}v_{2} with exactly one endpoint in C,C, by repeating the above edge deletion procedure,we obtain a graph G2G_{2} containing CC in which u2v2u_{2}v_{2} is a cut-edge. Continuing this process, after finitely many steps we obtain a graph RR containing CC in which every edge with exactly one endpoint in CC is a cut-edge of R.R. Suppose uivi,u_{i}v_{i}, i=1,2,,pi=1,2,\ldots,p are all such cut-edges of RR with uiV(C).u_{i}\in V(C). The vertices v1,,vpv_{1},\ldots,v_{p} are pairwise distinct, but it is possible that ui=uju_{i}=u_{j} for some pairs ij.i\neq j. Since deleting edges cannot decrease the radius of a graph, we have r=rad(G)rad(R).r={\rm rad}(G)\leq{\rm rad}(R). Denote by FiF_{i} the component of RuiviR-u_{i}v_{i} containing vi.v_{i}. Then F1,,FpF_{1},\ldots,F_{p} are pairwise vertex-disjoint.

Denote ai=max{dR(ui,x)|xV(Fi)},a_{i}={\rm max}\{d_{R}(u_{i},x)|x\in V(F_{i})\}, i=1,,p.i=1,\ldots,p. Since CC contains 2r2r vertices and F1,,FpF_{1},\ldots,F_{p} are pairwise vertex-disjoint, we have a1+a2++apn2r.a_{1}+a_{2}+\cdots+a_{p}\leq n-2r. Since the order nn of RR satisfies n3r2,n\leq 3r-2, we deduce that ain2rr2a_{i}\leq n-2r\leq r-2 for each i.i. It follows that CC contains at most 2r(2(rai)+1)=2ai12r-(2(r-a_{i})+1)=2a_{i}-1 vertices yy such that there exists a vertex zV(Fi)z\in V(F_{i}) with dR(y,z)>r.d_{R}(y,z)>r. In R,R, altogether CC contains at most

i=1p(2ai1)=2(i=1pai)p2(n2r)1=2n4r1\sum_{i=1}^{p}(2a_{i}-1)=2\left(\sum_{i=1}^{p}a_{i}\right)-p\leq 2(n-2r)-1=2n-4r-1 (1)

vertices with eccentricity larger than r.r. Hence CC contains at least 2r(2n4r1)=6r2n+12r-(2n-4r-1)=6r-2n+1 vertices with eccentricity not exceeding rr in R.R. Since 6r2n+16r2(3r2)+1=5,6r-2n+1\geq 6r-2(3r-2)+1=5, we have rad(R)r.{\rm rad}(R)\leq r. Combining this conclusion with the fact that rad(R)r{\rm rad}(R)\geq r we obtain rad(R)=r;{\rm rad}(R)=r; i.e., RR and GG have the same radius. Since RR is obtained from GG by deleting edges, every central vertex of RR is also a central vertex of G.G. We deduce that RR and hence GG contains at least 6r2n+16r-2n+1 central vertices.

Subcase 2.2. CC has length 2r+1.2r+1. The proof is similar to that for Subcase 2.1, but there are some differences in details. Continue using the above notations. CC contains at most 2i=1pai2\sum_{i=1}^{p}a_{i} vertices with eccentricity larger than r.r. We have 2i=1pai2(n2r1).2\sum_{i=1}^{p}a_{i}\leq 2(n-2r-1). Hence, CC contains at least

(2r+1)2(n2r1)=6r2n+36r2(3r2)+3=7(2r+1)-2(n-2r-1)=6r-2n+3\geq 6r-2(3r-2)+3=7

vertices of eccentricity r.r. Thus, GG has at least 6r2n+36r-2n+3 central vertices.

Combining subcases 2.1 and 2.2 we conclude that t6r2n+1.t\geq 6r-2n+1. This completes the proof. \Box

Theorem 5. Let nn and rr be positive integers with (3n+2)/8r<n/2.(3n+2)/8\leq r<n/2. Then the lollipop L(n,2r)L(n,2r) is the unique graph of order nn and radius rr whose center has cardinality 6r2n+1.6r-2n+1.

Proof. First note that the condition (3n+2)/8r<n/2(3n+2)/8\leq r<n/2 implies that n7,n\geq 7, n3r2n\leq 3r-2 and n2r+2<6r2n+1.n-2r+2<6r-2n+1.

We observe that the lollipop L(n,2r)L(n,2r) has order nn and radius r,r, and its center has cardinality 6r2n+1.6r-2n+1.

Next suppose GG is a graph of order nn and radius rr whose center has cardinality 6r2n+1.6r-2n+1. Denote by dd the diameter of G.G. We assert that d2r2,d\leq 2r-2, since in the proof of Theorem 4 we have shown that if d2r1,d\geq 2r-1, then the center of GG has cardinality at most n2r+2,n-2r+2, which contradicts the fact that the center of GG has cardinality 6r2n+1.6r-2n+1.

By Lemma 3, GG contains a geodesic cycle CC of length 2r2r or 2r+1.2r+1. In the proof of Theorem 4 we have shown that if CC has length 2r+1,2r+1, then the center of GG has cardinality at least 6r2n+3,6r-2n+3, which contradicts our assumption. Hence CC has length 2r.2r. Since CC is geodesic, it is an induced cycle. Continue using the notations in the proof of Theorem 4. Since the center of GG has cardinality 6r2n+1,6r-2n+1, equality must hold in (1), which implies that p=1p=1 and i=1pai=n2r.\sum_{i=1}^{p}a_{i}=n-2r. Thus, in R,R, the component F1F_{1} is a path of order n2r,n-2r, implying that RR is the lollipop L(n,2r).L(n,2r). Note that the center of L(n,2r)L(n,2r) has cardinality 6r2n+1.6r-2n+1. If in GG there is an edge other than u1v1u_{1}v_{1} joining a vertex of CC and a vertex of F1,F_{1}, then the cardinality of the center of GG would be larger than 6r2n+1,6r-2n+1, a contradiction. It follows that G=R=L(n,2r)G=R=L(n,2r) and the proof is complete. \Box

For example, Theorem 5 asserts that the lollipop L(14,12)L(14,12) is the unique graph of order 1414 and radius 66 whose center has cardinality 9.9.

Finally we show that Buckley’s Theorem 1 follows from Theorem 4.

Proof of Theorem 1. Any self-centered graph, say, a cycle, has central ratio 1.1. Now let c=a/bc=a/b with a<b.a<b. First suppose ab1.a\neq b-1. Choose any positive integer rr with r(3b+2)/8.r\leq(3b+2)/8. By Theorem 4, there exists a graph GG of order bb and radius rr whose center has cardinality a.a. Then GG has central ratio a/b.a/b. Next suppose a=b1.a=b-1. We have 2a2b1.2a\neq 2b-1. Reasoning as above, there exists a graph HH of order 2b2b whose center has cardinality 2a.2a. Clearly HH has central ratio (2a)/(2b)=c.(2a)/(2b)=c. \Box


Acknowledgement. This research was supported by the NSFC grants 11671148 and 11771148 and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (STCSM) grant 18dz2271000.

References

  • [1] F. Buckley, The central ratio of a graph, Discrete Math., 38(1982), 17-21.
  • [2] P. Erdős, M. Saks and V.T. Sós, Maximum induced trees in graphs, J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 41(1986), 61-79.
  • [3] A. Haviar, P. Hrnčiar and G. Monoszová, Eccentric sequences and cycles in graphs, Acta Univ. M. Belii Math., 11(2004), 7-25.
  • [4] P.A. Ostrand, Graphs with specified radius and diameter, Discrete Math., 4(1973), 71-75.
  • [5] D.B. West, Introduction to Graph Theory, Prentice Hall, Inc., 1996.