This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

\ytableausetup

centertableaux

Poset Associahedra and Stack-sorting

Son Nguyen, Andrew Sack This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. DGE-2034835 and National Science Foundation Grants No. DMS-1954121 and DMS-2046915. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Abstract

For any finite connected poset PP, Galashin introduced a simple convex (|P|βˆ’2)(|P|-2)-dimensional polytope π’œβ€‹(P)\mathscr{A}(P) called the poset associahedron. For a certain family of posets, whose poset associahedra interpolate between the classical permutohedron and associahedron, we give a simple combinatorial interpretation of the hh-vector. Our interpretation relates to the theory of stack-sorting of permutations. It also allows us to prove real-rootedness of some of their hh-polynomials.

1 Introduction

For a finite connected poset PP, Galashin introduced the poset associahedron π’œβ€‹(P)\mathscr{A}(P) (see [galashin2021poset]). The faces of π’œβ€‹(P)\mathscr{A}(P) correspond to tubings of PP, and the vertices of π’œβ€‹(P)\mathscr{A}(P) correspond to maximal tubings of PP; see SectionΒ LABEL:sec:poset-ass for the definitions. π’œβ€‹(P)\mathscr{A}(P) can also be described as a compactification of the configuration space of order-preserving maps P→ℝP\rightarrow\mathbb{R}. Many polytopes can be described as poset associahedra, including permutohedra and associahedra. In particular, when PP is the claw poset, i.e. PP consists of a unique minimal element 0 and nn pairwise-incomparable elements, then π’œβ€‹(P)\mathscr{A}(P) is the nn-permutohedron. On the other hand, when PP is a chain of n+1n+1 elements, i.e. P=Cn+1P=C_{n+1}, then π’œβ€‹(P)\mathscr{A}(P) is the associahedron Kn+1K_{n+1}. Among many different combinatorial interpretations for the hh-vector (h0,h1,…,hnβˆ’1)(h_{0},h_{1},\ldots,h_{n-1}) of Kn+1K_{n+1}, we want to recall the following interpretation: hih_{i} counts the number of 231-avoiding permutations with exactly ii descents.

Stack-sorting is a function s:𝔖n→𝔖ns:\mathfrak{S}_{n}\rightarrow\mathfrak{S}_{n} which attempts to sort the permutations ww in 𝔖n\mathfrak{S}_{n} in linear time, not always sorting them completely (see definition in Section LABEL:subsec:stack-sorting). A permutation w∈Snw\in S_{n} is stack-sortable if s​(w)=12​…​ns(w)=12\ldots n. It is well-known that stack-sortable permutations are exactly 231-avoiding permutations. Thus, we have an alternative interpretation for the hh-vector of π’œβ€‹(Cn+1)\mathscr{A}(C_{n+1}): hih_{i} counts the number of permutations in sβˆ’1​(12​…​n)s^{-1}(12\ldots n) with exactly ii descents.

The focus of our paper is the posets An,k=Cn+1βŠ•AkA_{n,k}=C_{n+1}\oplus A_{k} where AkA_{k} is the antichain of kk elements. In particular, A0,kA_{0,k} is a claw poset, and An,0A_{n,0} is the chain Cn+1C_{n+1}. Surprisingly, the hh-vector of π’œβ€‹(An,k)\mathscr{A}(A_{n,k}) is also counted by descents of stack-sorting preimages. Let 𝔖n,k={w|wβˆˆπ”–n+k,wi=i​for all​i>k}\mathfrak{S}_{n,k}=\{w~{}|~{}w\in\mathfrak{S}_{n+k},w_{i}=i~{}\text{for all}~{}i>k\}, we prove the following generalization of the above classic result.

Theorem LABEL:thm:A_n,k-h-vector.

Let h=(h0,h1,…,hn+kβˆ’1)h=(h_{0},h_{1},\ldots,h_{n+k-1}) be the hh-vector of π’œβ€‹(An,k)\mathscr{A}(A_{n,k}). Then hih_{i} counts the number of permutations in sβˆ’1​(𝔖n,k)s^{-1}(\mathfrak{S}_{n,k}) with exactly ii descents.

An immediate corollary of Theorem LABEL:thm:A_n,k-h-vector is Ξ³\gamma-nonnegativity of π’œβ€‹(An,k)\mathscr{A}(A_{n,k}). In particular, we have the following result by BrΓ€nden.

Theorem LABEL:thm:ss-preimage-gamma ([branden2008actions]).

For AβŠ†π”–nA\subseteq\mathfrak{S}_{n}, we have

βˆ‘Οƒβˆˆsβˆ’1​(A)xdes⁑(Οƒ)=βˆ‘m=0⌊nβˆ’12βŒ‹|{Οƒβˆˆsβˆ’1​(A):peak​(Οƒ)=m}|2nβˆ’1βˆ’2​m​xm​(1+x)nβˆ’1βˆ’2​m,\sum_{\sigma\in s^{-1}(A)}x^{\operatorname{des}(\sigma)}=\sum_{m=0}^{\lfloor\frac{n-1}{2}\rfloor}\dfrac{|\{\sigma\in s^{-1}(A)~{}:~{}\text{peak}(\sigma)=m\}|}{2^{n-1-2m}}x^{m}(1+x)^{n-1-2m},

where peak​(Οƒ)\text{peak}(\sigma) is the number of index ii such that Οƒiβˆ’1​<Οƒi>​σi+1\sigma_{i-1}<\sigma_{i}>\sigma_{i+1}.

Thus, we have the following corollary.

Corollary LABEL:cor:A_n,k-gamma-nonnegative.

The Ξ³\gamma-vector of π’œβ€‹(An,k)\mathscr{A}(A_{n,k}) is nonnegative.

In addition, in the process of proving Theorem LABEL:thm:A_n,k-h-vector, we find the size of sβˆ’1​(𝔖n,k)s^{-1}(\mathfrak{S}_{n,k}) in terms of k!k! and the Catalan convolution Cn(k)C_{n}^{(k)}, which will be introduced in Section LABEL:subsec:catalan-convolution.