This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Polymer Network Diffusion in Charged Gels

Shoei Sano Department of Bioengineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.    Takashi Yasuda Department of Bioengineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.    Takeshi Fujiyabu Department of Bioengineering, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.    Naoyuki Sakumichi [email protected] Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.    Takamasa Sakai [email protected] Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, The University of Tokyo, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.
Abstract

The swelling kinetics of charged polymer gels reflect the complex competition among elastic, mixing, and ionic contributions. Here, we used dynamic light scattering to investigate the collective diffusion coefficient of model gels, whose polymer network structure was controlled so that the three contributions were comparable. We demonstrate that the collective diffusion coefficient stems from the sum of elastic, mixing, and ionic contributions, without evident cross-correlations. The significant ionic contribution conforms to the Donnan equilibrium, which explains equilibrium electrical potential gradients in biological systems.

Charged gels, characterized by ionic species immobilized in the polymer network, exhibit enhanced swelling compared to electrically neutral gels because of the excess osmotic pressure caused by the Donnan effect donnan1911theory ; adair1923donnan . Their remarkable ability to swell up to 10001000 times their dry weight has facilitated their use as superabsorbent polymers for diapers, horticultural water retention agents, and self-healing concrete. This has led to extensive investigation of their swelling behaviors schneider2004discontinuous ; cheng2017preparation ; ricka1984swelling ; jeon1998swelling ; tang2020swelling .

Swelling kinetics are crucial for practical applications of these gels. Tanaka and co-workers tanaka1973spectrum ; tanaka1979kinetics modeled the swelling kinetics of electrically neutral polymer gels, introducing the collective diffusion coefficient DD of a polymer network as

D=K+43Gf,D=\frac{K+\frac{4}{3}G}{f}, (1)

where KK is the osmotic bulk modulus, GG is the shear modulus, and ff is the friction coefficient (per unit volume) between polymer networks and solvents. However, quantifying DD based on Eq. (1) remains challenging munch1977inelastic due to difficulties in estimating KK and ff. Moreover, GKG\ll K is often assumed, leading to D=K/fD=K/f tanaka1979kinetics , even though this is an oversimplification.

Equation (1) extends to charged gels by including ionic contribution to KK from Donnan equilibrium donnan1911theory ; ricka1984swelling ; adair1923donnan . However, validation of this approach is complicated due to the complex competition among polymer-solvent mixing, elastic, and ionic contributions. To date, only a few scaling laws between DD and the polymer volume fraction ϕ\phi have been experimentally examined, including Dϕ1/2D\sim\phi^{1/2} at low salt concentrations skouri1995swelling ; joosten1991dynamic ; raasmark2005fast and Dϕ2/3D\sim\phi^{2/3} at high salt concentrations morozova2017elasticity . The main obstacle in experimental validation arises from the difficulty in controlling polymer networks. Consequently, studies often use natural polymers like xanthan, chitosan, and hyaluronic acid, which lack precise control over network structure, have been typically used, limiting accurate gel dynamics research.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) Schematic illustration of the swelling of a charged gel. The charged gel with immobilized charge cimc_{\mathrm{im}} is equilibrated in the outer salt solution, whose mobile ion coutc_{\mathrm{out}} is equivalent to that of cations and anions: cout=cout+=coutc_{\mathrm{out}}=c_{\mathrm{out}}^{+}=c_{\mathrm{out}}^{-}. The mobile cations and anions inside the gels (c+c^{+} and cc^{-}) follow the Donnan equilibrium donnan1911theory ; ricka1984swelling ; adair1923donnan : c+c=(cout)2c^{+}c^{-}=(c_{\mathrm{out}})^{2}. (b) Schematic illustration of charged gels with precisely controlled polymer networks. The unreacted end functional groups yield the immobilized charge in the gel at the as-prepared state cim0c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0} with the decrease of the shear modulus G0G_{0}, which is controlled by nonstoichiometrically mixing two types of precursors in an AB-type polymerization system.

Recently, we have developed a strategy to synthesize tunable model polymer networks sakai2008design and identified the equations governing gel elasticity, including negative energy elasticity yoshikawa2021negative ; sakumichi2021linear , as well as the equation of state of osmotic pressure yasuda2020universal ; sakumichi2022semidilute . We have also quantitatively validated Eq. (1) for neutral gels fujiyabu2018three ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing ; fujiyabu2021temperature , by decomposing DD into mixing (DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}}) and elastic (DelD_{\mathrm{el}}) contributions as D=Dmix+DelD=D_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}, where DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}} are expressed by measurable macroscopic properties.

This Letter extends the relationship D=Dmix+DelD=D_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}} to charged gels, introducing an ionic contribution DionD_{\mathrm{ion}}:

D=Dmix+Del+Dion.D=D_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}+D_{\mathrm{ion}}. (2)

To validate Eq. (2), we experimentally investigated DD in charged gels with comparable DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}}, DelD_{\mathrm{el}}, and DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} via dynamic light scattering (DLS). We controlled the molar concentrations of immobilized charge in the gel at the as-prepared state cim0c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0} and equilibrated the gels in various outer salt solutions with diverse molar concentrations of mobile ions coutc_{\mathrm{out}} [Fig. 1(a)]. Our results indicate that the significant contribution of DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} to DD is explained by the excess osmotic pressure from the Donnan equilibrium donnan1911theory ; adair1923donnan . These findings demonstrate the successful prediction of dynamic property from the static properties of charged gels, suggesting broader applicability of this relationship to charged gels in good solvents.

Theoretical derivation of collective diffusion coefficient in charged gels.—We derive the contribution of DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} to DD, using a similar procedure as that for DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}} in neutral gels fujiyabu2018three ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing ; fujiyabu2021temperature . The osmotic bulk modulus Kc(Π/c)K\equiv c(\partial\Pi/\partial c) in Eq. (1) is quantified by total osmotic pressure Π\Pi, where cc is the polymer mass concentrations. For charged gels, Π\Pi is considered as the sum of polymer-solvent mixing Πmix\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}}, elastic Πel\Pi_{\mathrm{el}}, and ionic Πion\Pi_{\mathrm{ion}} contributions flory1953principles ; flory1943statistical1 ; flory1943statistical2 ; katchalsky1955polyelectrolyte ; katchalsky1951equation ; treloar1973elasticity ; duvsek1993responsive as Π=Πmix+Πel+Πion\Pi=\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}}+\Pi_{\mathrm{el}}+\Pi_{\mathrm{ion}}, where Πmixc3ν/(3ν1)\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}}\sim c^{3\nu/(3\nu-1)} yasuda2020universal ; sakumichi2022semidilute and Πel=G0(c/c0)1/3\Pi_{\mathrm{el}}=-G_{0}(c/c_{0})^{1/3} james1949simple ; horkay2000osmotic . Here, ν0.588\nu\approx 0.588 is the excluded volume parameter flory1953principles , and G0G_{0} and c0c_{0} is the shear modulus and polymer mass concentration, respectively, at the as-prepared state. Further, the friction coefficient per unit volume ff in Eq. (1) follows fc3/2f\sim c^{3/2} fujiyabu2017permeation ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing . Notably, Πmix\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}} and ff depend only on cc at a constant TT within the same polymer-solvent system, regardless of the polymer network structures yasuda2020universal ; fujiyabu2017permeation ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing . Assuming same dependences of Πmix\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}}, Πel\Pi_{\mathrm{el}}, and ff in charged gels, we can express each contribution to DD using Eq. (1) as

Dmix=3ν3ν1Πmixf,Del=Gf,D_{\mathrm{mix}}=\frac{3\nu}{3\nu-1}\frac{\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}}}{f},\quad D_{\mathrm{el}}=\frac{G}{f}, (3)

and

Dion=cfΠionc.D_{\mathrm{ion}}=\frac{c}{f}\frac{\partial\Pi_{\mathrm{ion}}}{\partial c}. (4)

The DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} originates from Πion\Pi_{\mathrm{ion}} produced by immobilized charge in polymer networks. Notably, Eqs. (3) have been validated for neutral gels at as-prepared states fujiyabu2018three ; fujiyabu2019shear ; fujiyabu2021temperature and swollen states kim2020mixing .

We quantified Πion\Pi_{\mathrm{ion}} using the Donnan equilibrium donnan1911theory ; ricka1984swelling ; adair1923donnan . For a polymer network with immobilized charge molar concentration cimc_{\mathrm{im}} in a solution containing monovalent ions, the molar concentrations of mobile cations and anions inside the gel (c+c^{\mathrm{+}} and cc^{\mathrm{-}}) and in the outer salt solution (cout+c_{\mathrm{out}}^{+} and coutc_{\mathrm{out}}^{-}) satisfy the following electric neutrality conditions: (i) cim+c+=cc_{\mathrm{im}}+c^{\mathrm{+}}=c^{\mathrm{-}} for the inner gel, (ii) coutcout+=coutc_{\mathrm{out}}\equiv c_{\mathrm{out}}^{+}=c_{\mathrm{out}}^{-} for the outer salt solution, and (iii) c+c=(cout)2c^{\mathrm{+}}c^{\mathrm{-}}=(c_{\mathrm{out}})^{2} between inner gel and outer salt solution. Combining the conditions (i) and (iii) yields c±=12cim(1+4α21)c^{\mathrm{\pm}}=\frac{1}{2}c_{\mathrm{im}}\left(\sqrt{1+4\alpha^{2}}\mp 1\right), where αcout/cim\alpha\equiv c_{\mathrm{out}}/c_{\mathrm{im}} (0\geq 0) is the molar concentration ratio between the mobile ion in the outer salt solution and the immobilized charge in the polymer network. Hence, the osmotic pressure due to the immobilized charge is

Πion=RT(c++c2cout)=cimRT(1+4α22α).\Pi_{\mathrm{ion}}=RT(c^{\mathrm{+}}+c^{\mathrm{-}}-2c_{\mathrm{out}})=c_{\mathrm{im}}RT\left(\sqrt{1+4\alpha^{2}}-2\alpha\right). (5)

Substituting Eq. (5) into Eq. (4) gives

Dion=cimRTf1+4α2.D_{\mathrm{ion}}=\frac{c_{\mathrm{im}}RT}{f\sqrt{1+4\alpha^{2}}}. (6)

According to Eq. (6), α\alpha regulates the efficiency of DionD_{\mathrm{ion}}, with Dion=cimRT/fD_{\mathrm{ion}}=c_{\mathrm{im}}RT/f in the charged gel limit (α1\alpha\ll 1) and Dion=0D_{\mathrm{ion}}=0 in the neutral gel limit (α1\alpha\gg 1).

Materials and methods.—As a model system to investigate charged gels, we used a tetra-arm poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) hydrogel, synthesized via the AB-type cross-end coupling of two prepolymers (tetra-arm PEG) of equal size. Each end of the tetra-arm PEG was modified with a mutually reactive amine (tetra-PEG-NH2) and succinimidyl ester (tetra-PEG-OSu) (NOF Co., Tokyo, Japan). All other reagents were purchased from WAKO Pure Chemicals (Osaka, Japan). All materials were used without further purification. We dissolved tetra-PEG-NH2 and tetra-PEG-OSu (molar mass 1111 kg//mol) in phosphate buffer (pH=7.0p\mathrm{H}=7.0, 6060 mM) to achieve a concentration of c=60c=60 g//L.

To fabricate charged gels, we mixed two solutions at stoichiometrically imbalanced ratios of s=0.325s=0.325, 0.3500.350, 0.3750.375, and 0.4000.400 (Table 1), where ss is the molar fraction of minor tetra-PEG polymers ([tetra-PEG-OSu]) to total tetra-PEG polymers ([tetra-PEG-NH2] ++ [tetra-PEG-OSu]). An excess tetra-PEG-NH2 (s>0.5s>0.5) allowed some amine groups to remain partly unreacted yoshikawa2019connectivity , serving as the immobilized cations in the polymer networks [see Fig. 1(b)]. We kept each sample in an enclosed space to maintain humid conditions at room temperature (T298KT\approx 298K) for reaction completion.

We immersed each charged gel into the outer salt (HCl ++ NaCl) solutions of pH=4.0p\mathrm{H}=4.0 and cout=0.1c_{\mathrm{out}}=0.13030 mM (Table 1) to completely protonate immobilized cations and to tune the parameter αcout/cim\alpha\equiv c_{\mathrm{out}}/c_{\mathrm{im}} in Eq. (6). We replaced the outer salt solution twice every 2020 hours to achieve equilibrium swollen state. The Henderson-Hasselbalch equation henderson1908concerning ; hasselbalch1917calculation determined the dissociation constant of immobilized residues as Ka1.0×1010K_{a}\approx 1.0\times 10^{-10} M (see Supplemental Material, Sec. S1 supplement ), confirming complete protonation of amines in all experimental conditions because KaK_{a} was smaller than [H+] =104=10^{-4} M.

We measured the diameter dd of each gel at equilibrium in the outer salt solutions, using an optical microscope (M165 C; Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) to calculate the volume swelling ratio Q=(d/d0)3Q=(d/d_{0})^{3} (initial diameter d0=1.04d_{0}=1.04 mm), determining c=c0/Qc=c_{0}/Q and cim=cim0(c/c0)c_{\mathrm{im}}=c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0}(c/c_{0}). To ensure accurate c0c_{0} and cim0c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0} values at each ss, we assessed the sol fraction eluted out from the polymer network during the swelling process using the Bethe approximation supplement ; macosko1976new ; miller1976new (Further details are described in Supplemental Material, Sec. S2 supplement ).

Table 1: Synthetic conditions of charged gels (ss, c0c_{0}, and cim0c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0}) and experimental conditions for immersing charged gels in outer salt solutions (coutc_{\mathrm{out}}). We evaluated αcout/cim\alpha\equiv c_{\mathrm{out}}/c_{\mathrm{im}} and measured G0G_{0} and QQ for each gel sample.
ss c0c_{0} (g//L) cim0c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0} (mM) coutc_{\mathrm{out}} (mM) cout/cimc_{\mathrm{out}}/c_{\mathrm{im}} G0G_{0} (kPa) QQ
0.4000.400 57.257.2 3.43.4 0.100.10 0.0790.079 5.935.93 2.72.7
3.03.0 1.71.7 1.91.9
10.010.0 5.35.3 1.81.8
30.030.0 16.816.8 1.91.9
0.3750.375 56.556.5 4.04.0 0.100.10 0.0950.095 4.794.79 3.83.8
1.11.1 0.7150.715 2.62.6
10.010.0 5.05.0 2.02.0
30.030.0 15.015.0 2.02.0
0.3500.350 54.754.7 4.54.5 0.100.10 0.110.11 3.433.43 4.84.8
1.11.1 0.730.73 3.03.0
10.010.0 4.94.9 2.22.2
30.030.0 14.714.7 2.22.2
0.3250.325 52.552.5 4.84.8 0.100.10 0.140.14 2.232.23 6.76.7
0.300.30 0.330.33 5.35.3
10.010.0 6.56.5 3.13.1
30.030.0 15.015.0 2.42.4

We measured DD of charged gels via DLS (ALV/CGS-3 compact goniometer, Langen, Germany) in the same way as Refs. fujiyabu2018three ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing ; fujiyabu2021temperature . Each gel sample was fabricated in a scattering glass tube (disposable culture tube 9830-1007 with an inner diameter of 8.48.4 mm; IWAKI, Japan) and was swollen in the outer salt solution. We carefully selected d0d_{0} of each gel to prevent contact between a swollen gel and an inner wall of the glass tube. Once equilibrium was reached, we measured the scattering light intensity I(t)I(t) at time tt over 600600 s at a scattering wavelength λ=632.8\lambda=632.8 nm and a scattering angle θ=π/2\theta=\pi/2, to evaluate the autocorrelation function johnson1994laser ; berne2000dynamic g(2)(τ)I(0)I(τ)/I(0)2g^{(2)}(\tau)\equiv\langle I(0)I(\tau)\rangle/\langle I(0)\rangle^{2} for delay time τ0.01\tau\approx 0.010.10.1 ms, corresponding to the thermal fluctuation of a polymer network li2017probe ; fujiyabu2018three ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing ; fujiyabu2021temperature ; ohira2018dynamics (results are provided in Supplemental Material, Sec. S3 supplement ). Here, \langle\rangle denotes the time-average. We fitted the autocorrelation functions using a stretched exponential function g2(τ)1=Aexp[2(τ/τg)B]+ϵg^{2}(\tau)-1=A\exp[-2(\tau/\tau_{g})^{B}]+\epsilon, where AA is the initial amplitude, BB is the stretched exponent, and ϵ\epsilon is the time-independent background. Using the partial heterodyne model joosten1991dynamic ; shibayama2002gel , we evaluate D=(1+1+A)/(q2τg)D=(1+\sqrt{1+A})/(q^{2}\tau_{g}), where q=(4πn/λ)sin(θ/2)0.0187q=(4\pi n/\lambda)\sin(\theta/2)\approx 0.0187 nm-1 is the scattering vector with the refractive index n1.333n\approx 1.333 of the aqueous solvents.

We measured the (equilibrium) shear modulus of gels at the equilibrium swollen state GG for each coutc_{\mathrm{out}} using a rheometer (MCR302; Anton Paar, Graz, Austria) with a 2525-mm parallel plate geometry. The gels, shaped into discs with a height 11 mm and a diameter 3535 mm, were equilibrated in outer salt solutions with varying coutc_{\mathrm{out}} (Table 1). We measured the storage modulus GG^{\prime} and loss modulus G′′G^{\prime\prime} at T=298T=298 K with angular frequency ω=0.63\omega=0.636363 rad//s and shear strain γ=1.0\gamma=1.0%, as well as ω=6.3\omega=6.3 rad//s and γ=0.1\gamma=0.1% –1010%. For all samples, GG^{\prime} was independent of γ\gamma and ω\omega, and was much larger than G′′G^{\prime\prime} (Supplemental Material, Sec. S4 supplement ). Hence, we selected GG^{\prime} measured at ω=6.3\omega=6.3 rad//s and γ=1.0\gamma=1.0% as the (equilibrium) shear modulus GG. Using G=G0(c/c0)1/3G=G_{0}(c/c_{0})^{1/3} for swollen gels james1949simple ; horkay2000osmotic (see Supplemental Material, Sec. S5 supplement ), we evaluated G0G_{0} at the as-prepared state as G0=G(c0/c)1/3G_{0}=G(c_{0}/c)^{1/3} for each ss (Table 1).

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Collective diffusion coefficient for neutral gels. (a) Typical result of shear modulus (G0G_{0}) dependence of the collective diffusion coefficient and its components (DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}}) for neutral gels at the as-prepared state. We tune ss at the constant cc so that DelD_{\mathrm{el}} can be controlled independently. (b) Comparison between the collective diffusion coefficients measured via DLS (DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}}) and calculated by Eqs. (3) (Dmix+DelD_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}) for neutral gels, using Dmix=2.2×1012c0.8D_{\mathrm{mix}}=2.2\times 10^{-12}c^{0.8} and Del=G0/(8.0×1011c1.5)D_{\mathrm{el}}=G_{0}/(8.0\times 10^{11}c^{1.5}). The solid line represents DDLS=Dmix+DelD_{\mathrm{DLS}}=D_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}. In (a) and (b), the data of neutral gels for c=30,60,90c=30,60,90, and 120120 g//L with the molar mass 2020 kg//mol at s=0.35,0.4,0.45s=0.35,0.4,0.45, and 0.50.5 are taken from Ref. fujiyabu2021temperature .

Estimating DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}} in neutral gels.—Before considering charged gels, we briefly revisit the decomposition of mixing (DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}}) and elastic (DelD_{\mathrm{el}}) contributions to DD in a model neutral gels, based on our previous studies fujiyabu2018three ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing ; fujiyabu2021temperature . Figure 2(a) shows the collective diffusion coefficient measured via DLS DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}} in neutral gels at the as-prepared state, plotted against G0G_{0} for various ss. The observed linear relationship between DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}} and G0G_{0} is consistent with Eqs. (3). Notably, DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} is independent of ss, because Πmix\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}} and ff is independent of ss yasuda2020universal ; fujiyabu2017permeation ; fujiyabu2019shear ; kim2020mixing . Thus, we can decompose DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}} into the mixing contribution Dmix=limG0DDLSD_{\mathrm{mix}}=\lim_{G\to 0}D_{\mathrm{DLS}} and the elastic contribution Del=DDLSDmixD_{\mathrm{el}}=D_{\mathrm{DLS}}-D_{\mathrm{mix}} [see Fig. 2(a)].

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Polymer mass concentration (cc) dependence of the collective diffusion coefficient and its components (DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}}) for neutral gels at (a) s=0.500s=0.500 and charged gels for varying coutc_{\mathrm{out}} at (b) s=0.400s=0.400 and (c) s=0.325s=0.325. The cim0c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0} increases as ss decreases (black dotted arrow). For charged gels, Dmix=2.2×1012c0.8D_{\mathrm{mix}}=2.2\times 10^{-12}c^{0.8} and Del=G0(c/c0)1/3/(8.0×1011c1.5)D_{\mathrm{el}}=G_{0}(c/c_{0})^{1/3}/(8.0\times 10^{11}c^{1.5}) were assumed to be equal to neutral gels. The results at s=0.375s=0.375 and s=0.350s=0.350 are shown in Supplemental Material, Sec. S6 supplement .

Through the decomposition of DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}}, we obtain the empirical formulas Dmix=2.2×1012c0.8D_{\mathrm{mix}}=2.2\times 10^{-12}c^{0.8} and f=8.0×1011c1.5f=8.0\times 10^{11}c^{1.5} for neutral gels (the detailed results are provided in Supplemental Material, Sec. S7), corroborating the scaling predictions fc1.5f\sim c^{1.5} tokita1991friction and Πmixc2.3\Pi_{\mathrm{mix}}\sim c^{2.3} des1975lagrangian ; de1979scaling (for gels in a good solvent). These formulas are applicable to neutral gels at the as-prepared and swollen states, as confirmed in our previous study kim2020mixing . Using values of cc and GG, we can accurately calculate DD for a neutral gel. Figure 2(b) demonstrates that the collective diffusion coefficient of neutral gels measured via DLS (DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}}) shows excellent agreement with Eqs. (3), using empirical formulas of DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and ff.

Estimating DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} in charged gels.— We expand our analysis to electrically charged gels and examine Eq. (2), by hypothesizing that the formulas of DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}}, as established for neutral gels, remain applicable. Figure 3 shows DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}} for swollen neutral and charged gels (equilibrated in outer salt solutions with varying coutc_{\mathrm{out}}), as measured via DLS. For varying ss samples, a decrease in ss corresponded with an increase in cim0c_{\mathrm{im}}^{0} and a decrease in G0G_{0}. This resulted in an increase in QQ to be a decrease in cc (=c0/Q=c_{0}/Q) in outer salt solutions (Table 1). The decrease in G0G_{0} is attributed to a decrease in elastically effective subchains in polymer networks sakai2008design . Moreover, for a fixed ss, a decrease in coutc_{\mathrm{out}} in outer salt solutions led to a lower α\alpha (cout/cim\equiv c_{\mathrm{out}}/c_{\mathrm{im}}), resulting in increased QQ to be decreased cc (=c0/Q=c_{0}/Q) (Table 1).

For neutral gels [Fig. 3(a)], DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}} agrees with Dmix+DelD_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}, which is independent of coutc_{\mathrm{out}} (see Supplemental Material, Sec. S8 supplement for further details). For charged gels with each ss [Fig. 3(b) and (c)], we calculate DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} (gray region) and DelD_{\mathrm{el}} (blue region), using the same empirical formulas for neutral gels with all measurable G0G_{0} and QQ. Here, we experimentally confirmed that G=G0(c/c0)1/3G=G_{0}(c/c_{0})^{1/3} holds for charged gels (see Supplemental Material, Sec. S5 supplement ), indicating that the immobilized charge does not significantly affect the elastic modulus. At high coutc_{\mathrm{out}} (α1\alpha\gg 1), DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}} approaches the neutral gel limit (Dmix+DelD_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}), because Dion0D_{\mathrm{ion}}\to 0 in Eq. (6). In contrast, at low coutc_{\mathrm{out}} (α1\alpha\ll 1), DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}} deviates from the neutral gel limit (D=Dmix+DelD=D_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}), indicating a significant DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} to DD (indicated by red arrows), which contributed up to approximately half of DD at its maximum.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Comparison between the collective diffusion coefficients measured via DLS (DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}}) and calculated by Eqs. (3) and (4) (Dmix+Del+DionD_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}+D_{\mathrm{ion}}) for charged gels. Here, DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}} were assumed to be equal in neutral gels: Dmix=2.2×1012c0.8D_{\mathrm{mix}}=2.2\times 10^{-12}c^{0.8} and Del=G0(c/c0)1/3/(8.0×1011c1.5)D_{\mathrm{el}}=G_{0}(c/c_{0})^{1/3}/(8.0\times 10^{11}c^{1.5}), and DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} was calculated by Eq. (6) with each cimc_{\mathrm{im}} and α\alpha. The solid line represents DDLS=Dmix+Del+DionD_{\mathrm{DLS}}=D_{\mathrm{mix}}+D_{\mathrm{el}}+D_{\mathrm{ion}}.

We show that DD of charged gels can be accurately described by simply adding DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} in Eq. (6). Figure 4 demonstrates that the collective diffusion coefficient of charged gels measured via DLS (DDLSD_{\mathrm{DLS}}) shows excellent agreement with the predictions of Eqs. (3) and (4), using the same empirical formulas of DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and ff as in neutral, and applying Eq. (6) with each cimc_{\mathrm{im}} and α\alpha. These findings suggest that Eq. (1) can be extended to include charged gels by simply adding DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} without evident cross-correlations. Notably, Eq. (6) is applicable in weakly charged gels and is less effective in polyelectrolyte gels with high cimc_{\mathrm{im}}, due to counterion condensation tang2020swelling ; manning1969limiting .

Concluding remarks.— We developed model charged gels [Fig. 1 and Table 1] with comparable Dmix,Del,D_{\mathrm{mix}},D_{\mathrm{el}}, and DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} and measured their collective diffusion coefficient DD via DLS. Based on the same decomposition of DmixD_{\mathrm{mix}} and DelD_{\mathrm{el}} to DD in neutral gels [Figs. 2 and 3], our results indicate that DD in the charged gel is governed by Eq. (1), where DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} emerges as an additive component [Fig. 4]. The significant ionic contribution DionD_{\mathrm{ion}} to DD is quantitatively described through the ionic osmotic pressure Πion\Pi_{\mathrm{ion}} [Eqs. (5) and (6)], which originates from the Donnan equilibrium.

Our findings demonstrate the successful prediction of the dynamic behaviors from the static properties of charged gels equilibrated in a good solvent. This aspect is particularly relevant considering the dynamics in gel-like biological systems such as extracellular matrices, which are predominantly negatively charged theocharis2016extracellular and influenced by the Donnan effect. Therefore, an in-depth understanding of the dynamics in charged gels will enhance our comprehension of the behaviors of biological systems.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) through the Grants-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellows Grant No. 19J22561 to T.F. and No. 202214177 to T.Y., Scientific Research (B) Grant No. 22H01187 to N.S., Scientific Research (A) Grant No. 21H04688 to T.S., Transformative Research Area Grant No. 20H05733 to T.S., and MEXT Program Grant No. JPMXP1122714694 to T.S. This work was also supported by JST through CREST Grant No. JPMJCR1992 and Moon-shot R&D Grant No. 1125941 to T.S.

References

  • (1) F. G. Donnan, Theory of the balances of membranes and potential of membranes at the existence of non dialysing electrolytes-A contribution to physical chemical physiology, Z. Elektrochem. Angew. Phys. Chem. 17, 572 (1911).
  • (2) G. S. Adair, On the Donnan equilibrium and the equation of Gibbs, Science 58, 13 (1923).
  • (3) J. Ricka and T. Tanaka, Swelling of ionic gels: quantitative performance of the Donnan theory, Macromolecules 17, 2916 (1984).
  • (4) C. H. Jeon, E. E. Makhaeva, and A. R. Khokhlov, Swelling behavior of polyelectrolyte gels in the presence of salts, Macromol. Chem. Phys. 199, 2665 (1998).
  • (5) S. Schneider and P. Linse, Discontinuous volume transitions in cross-linked polyelectrolyte gels induced by short-range attractions and strong electrostatic coupling, Macromolecules 37, 3850 (2004).
  • (6) W. M. Cheng, X. M. Hu, Y. Y. Zhao, M. Y. Wu, Z. X. Hu, and X. T. Yu, Preparation and swelling properties of poly (acrylic acid-co-acrylamide) composite hydrogels, e-Polym. 17, 95 (2017).
  • (7) J. Tang, T. Katashima, X. Li, Y. Mitsukami, Y. Yokoyama, N. Sakumichi, U. Chung, M. Shibayama, and T. Sakai, Swelling behaviors of hydrogels with alternating neutral/highly charged sequences, Macromolecules 53, 8244 (2020).
  • (8) T. Tanaka, L. O. Hocker, and G. B. Benedek, Spectrum of light scattered from a viscoelastic gel, J. Chem. Phys. 59, 5151 (1973).
  • (9) T. Tanaka and D. J. Fillmore, Kinetics of swelling of gels, J. Chem. Phys. 70, 1214 (1979).
  • (10) J. P. Munch, S. Candau, J. Herz, and G. Hild, Inelastic light scattering by gel modes in semi-dilute polymer solutions and permanent networks at equilibrium swollen state, J. Phys. 38, 971 (1977).
  • (11) R. Skouri, F. Schosseler, J. P. Munch, and S. J. Candau, Swelling and elastic properties of polyelectrolyte gels, Macromolecules 28, 197 (1995).
  • (12) J. G. H. Joosten, J. L. McCarthy, and P. N. Pusey, Dynamic and static light scattering by aqueous polyacrylamide gels, Macromolecules 24, 6690 (1991).
  • (13) P. J. Råsmark, Č. Koňák, and P. Štěpánek, and C. Elvingson, Fast internal dynamics in polyelectrolyte gels measured by dynamic light scattering, Polym. Bull. 54, 335 (2005).
  • (14) S. Morozova and M. Muthukumar, Elasticity at swelling equilibrium of ultrasoft polyelectrolyte gels: Comparisons of theory and experiments, Macromolecules 50, 2456 (2017).
  • (15) T. Sakai, T. Matsunaga, Y. Yamamoto, C. Ito, R. Yoshida, S. Suzuki, N. Sasaki, M. Shibayama, and U. Chung, Design and fabrication of a high-strength hydrogel with ideally homogeneous network structure from tetrahedron-like macromonomers, Macromolecules 41, 5379 (2008).
  • (16) Y. Yoshikawa, N. Sakumichi, U. I. Chung, and T. Sakai, Negative Energy Elasticity in a Rubberlike Gel, Phys. Rev. X 11, 011045 (2021).
  • (17) N. Sakumichi, Y. Yoshikawa, and T. Sakai, Linear elasticity of polymer gels in terms of negative energy elasticity, Polym. J. 53, 1293 (2021).
  • (18) T. Yasuda, N. Sakumichi, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Universal equation of state describes osmotic pressure throughout gelation process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 267801 (2020).
  • (19) N. Sakumichi, T. Yasuda, and T. Sakai, Semidilute Principle for Gels, arXiv:2210.15275.
  • (20) T. Fujiyabu, F. Toni, X. Li, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Three cooperative diffusion coefficients describing dynamics of polymer gels, Chem. Commun. 54, 6784 (2018).
  • (21) T. Fujiyabu, Y. Yoshikawa, J. Kim, N. Sakumichi, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Shear modulus dependence of the diffusion coefficient of a polymer network, Macromolecules 52, 9613 (2019).
  • (22) J. Kim, T. Fujiyabu, N. Sakumichi, T. Katashima, Y. Yoshikawa, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Mixing and elastic contributions to the diffusion coefficient of polymer networks, Macromolecules 53, 7717 (2020).
  • (23) T. Fujiyabu, T. Sakai, R. Kudo, Y. Yoshikawa, T. Katashima, U. Chung, and N. Sakumichi, Temperature dependence of polymer network diffusion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 237801 (2021).
  • (24) P. J. Flory, Principles of polymer chemistry (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1953).
  • (25) P. J. Flory and J. Rehner, Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks I. Rubberlike elasticity., J. Chem. Phys. 11, 512 (1943).
  • (26) P. J. Flory and J. Rehner, Statistical mechanics of cross-linked polymer networks II. Swelling. J. Chem. Phys., J. Chem. Phys. 11, 521 (1943).
  • (27) A. Katchalsky, S. Lifson, and H. Exsenberg, Equation of swelling for polyelectrolyte gels, J. Polym. Sci. 7, 571 (1951).
  • (28) A. Katchalsky and I. Michaeli, Polyelectrolyte gels in salt solutions, J. Polym. Sci. 15, 69 (1955).
  • (29) L. R. G. Treloar, The elasticity and related properties of rubbers, Reports Prog. Phys. 36, 755 (1973).
  • (30) K. Dušek and M. Ilavskỳ, Responsive gels: volume transitions I (Springer, Berlin, 1993).
  • (31) H. M. James and E. Guth, Simple Presentation of Network Theory of Rubber, with a Discussion of Other Theories. J. Polym. Sci. 4, 153 (1949).
  • (32) F. Horkay, I. Tasaki, and P. J. Basser, Osmotic Swelling of Polyacrylate Hydrogels in Physiological Salt Solutions. Biomacromolecules 1, 84 (2000).
  • (33) T. Fujiyabu, X. Li, M. Shibayama, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Permeation of water through hydrogels with controlled network structure. Macromolecules 50, 9411 (2017).
  • (34) Y. Yoshikawa, N. Sakumichi, U. Chung, and T. Sakai, Connectivity dependence of gelation and elasticity in AB-type polymerization: an experimental comparison of the dynamic process and stoichiometrically imbalanced mixing, Soft Matter 15, 5017 (2019).
  • (35) L. J. Henderson, Concerning the relationship between the strength of acids and their capacity to preserve neutrality, Am. J. Physiol. Content 21, 173 (1908).
  • (36) K. A. Hasselbalch, The calculation of the hydrogen content in blood from free and combined carbonic acid, and the oxygen compound of the blood as the function of the hydrogen content, Biochem. Z. 78, 112 (1917).
  • (37) See Supplemental Material at [URL] for details of experiments and analyses, including calculations.
  • (38) C. W. Macosko and D. R. Miller, A new derivation of average molecular weights of nonlinear polymers, Macromolecules 9, 199 (1976).
  • (39) D. R. Miller and C. W. Macosko, A new derivation of post gel properties of network polymers, Macromolecules 9, 206 (1976).
  • (40) C. S. Johnson and D. A. Gabriel, Laser light scattering (Dover Publications, Mineola, 1994).
  • (41) B. J. Berne and R. Pecora, Dynamic light scattering: with applications to chemistry, biology, and physics (Dover Publications, Mineola, 2000).
  • (42) M. Ohira, X. Li, C. I. Gupit, H. Kamata, T. Sakai, and M. Shibayama, Dynamics of thermoresponsive conetwork gels composed of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(ethyl glycidyl ether-co-methyl glycidyl ether), Polymer 155, 75 (2018).
  • (43) X. Li, N. Watanabe, T. Sakai, and M. Shibayama, Probe diffusion of sol-gel transition in an isorefractive polymer solution, Macromolecules 50, 2916 (2017).
  • (44) M. Shibayama and T. Norisuye, Gel formation analyses by dynamic light scattering, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 75, 641 (2002).
  • (45) M. Tokita and T. Tanaka, Friction coefficient of polymer networks of gels, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 4613 (1991).
  • (46) J. des Cloizeaux, The Lagrangian theory of polymer solu- tions at intermediate concentrations, J. Phys. (Paris) 36, 281 (1975).
  • (47) P. G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1979).
  • (48) G. S. Manning, Limiting laws and counterion condensation in polyelectrolyte solutions I. Colligative properties, J. Chem. Phys. 51, 924 (1969).
  • (49) A. D. Theocharis, S. S. Skandalis, C. Gialeli, N. K. Karamomos, Extracellular matrix structure, Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 97, 4 (2016).