This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Polarized Raman Analysis at Low Temperature to Examine Interface Phonons in InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} Quantum Dot Heterostructures

Priyesh Kumar Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar-382055, Gujarat, India.    Sudip Kumar Deb Centre for Research in Nanotechnology & Science, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai-400076, Maharashtra, India    Subhananda Chakrabarti Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai-400076, Maharashtra, India    Jhuma Saha [email protected] Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar, Gandhinagar-382055, Gujarat, India.
Abstract

An experimental study of optical phonon modes, both normal and interface (IF) phonons, in bilayer strain-coupled InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} quantum dot heterostructures has been presented by means of low-temperature polarized Raman scattering. The effect of SbSb-content on the frequency positions of these phonon modes has been very well correlated with the simulated strain. The Raman peaks show different frequency shifts in the heterostructure with varying SbSb-content in the capping layer. This shift is attributed to the strain relaxation, bigger size of quantum dots and type-II band alignment.

preprint: AIP/123-QED

I Introduction

Self-assembled InAsInAs based quantum dot (QD) devices have garnered significant attention from the research community due to their potential for use in a broad spectrum of optoelectronic applications. These self-assembled QDs offer the advantage of creating defect-free systems that confine charge carriers within nanometer-scale dimensions without the need for complex lithography and etching processes. These QDs are usually produced by the Stranski-Krastanov process during the growth of mismatched materials using molecular beam epitaxy (MBE). In this process, interlayer strain is essential in creating pyramid-shaped or hemispherical dots on a thin wetting layer. The strain-coupling in these self-assembled QD systems is particularly advantageous as it facilitates the vertical ordering of QDs in multilayer QD systems. This vertical alignment increases the volume of active regions, thereby enhancing absorption efficiency. Tutu et al. (2012); Kim et al. (2004); Panda et al. (2018) Moreover, the linewidth of photoluminescence (PL) spectra and the uniformity in dot size can be precisely controlled, making these systems highly desirable for various applications. Panda et al. (2017) Specifically, this strain-coupling effect has been effectively utilized in InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs QD systems to achive an emission wavelength of 1.3μm1.3\mu m, which is highly relevant for telecommunications applications. Dowd et al. (1999); Ledentsov et al. (2002) Given the significance of these strain-coupled heterostructures, they have become a focal point of research in device applications, particularly in the telecommunications sector. However, there is ongoing research to push the emission wavelength beyond 1.3μm1.3\mu m to meet the increasing demands of advanced telecommunications technologies. One promising approach to achieving this is the incorporation of SbSb into the the system, where GaAsSbGaAsSb is used as a capping layer in InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs QD systems. This modification increases the aspect ratio of the QDs, thereby reducing the strain within them and leads to a redshift of the emission wavelength. The InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} QD systems have gained popularity due to the intriguing properties that arise from varying the SbSb composition. Notably, it has been observed that the band alignment in these systems shifts from type-I to type-II beyond a certain SbSb-composition (approximately 1416%14-16\%).Ulloa et al. (2012); Ripalda et al. (2005); Jang et al. (2008) This unique property allows InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} QDs to facilitates emission wavelength beyond 1.5μm1.5\mu m, which is particularly valuable for advanced telecommunications. Akahane et al. (2006) For instance, recent work by Saha et alSaha et al. (2019) reported a room temperature emission at approximately 1.7μm\sim 1.7\mu m from the strain-coupled bilayer InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} QD heterostructures, further highlighting the potential of these systems for next-generation optoelectronic devices.

The generation of quantum dots (QDs) is heavily dependent on strain, which has important ramifications for QD applications in various devices. Understanding how strain affects the electronic, vibrational, and optical properties of QDs is therefore essential. Numerous studies have been conducted to explore the impact of strain on the electronic and vibrational (phonon) structures of QDs using techniques such as X-ray diffraction, Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence (PL), and photoluminescence excitation spectroscopy. Phonons are essential to electron-phonon scattering, which affects the carrier relaxation process, which is a crucial element in determining the performance of semiconductor devices. For this reason, the study of phonon characteristics is especially relevant to device applications. Raman spectroscopy is an effective tool for investigating phonon modes, as it provides valuable insights into doping levels, crystalline quality, impurity concentrations, and other material characteristics. Despite its advantages, the study of phonon properties in strained QD systems using Raman spectroscopy has been limited. This is primarily because the Raman signals from QDs are often weak due to the small scattering volume of the QDs compared to the surrounding capping material and substrate. Additionally, self-assembled QDs typically exhibit strongly corrugated interfaces, which can lead to the emergence of IF phonon modes that are localized at the tips and cusps of the QDs, as predicted by Knipp and ReineckeKnipp and Reinecke (1992) using the dielectric continuum model. There have been several studies focusing on the IF phonon modes in QDs, utilizing techniques such as PL and both normal and resonance Raman spectroscopy. These studies have successfully identified various IF modes and examined their behavior in response to different growth parameters. For example, Puesp et alPusep et al. (1998) reported the presence of IF modes localized near the edges of the InAsInAs QDs in GaAsGaAs and in (In,Ga,AlIn,Ga,Al)Sb/GaAsSb/GaAs structures. In further research, Puesp et alPusep et al. (1998) used resonance Raman scattering at the E0+Δ0E_{0}+\Delta_{0} gaps of InAsInAs and GaAsGaAs to identify distinct IF modes and demonstrated a strong influence of strain on these modes. These findings underscore the importance of studying phonon properties in strained QD systems, as they provide critical insights about how strain affects the electronic and vibrational properties of the material.

Despite the significant interest in the optical and electronic properties of InAsInAs/GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} quantum dot (QD) systems, there has been a noticeable lack of studies focusing on the normal and IF phonon modes in these structures. The work by Dai et alDai et al. (2015) represents one of the few exceptions, where they examined InAsInAs QDs capped with GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} using an SbSb spray technique applied immediately prior to GaAsGaAs capping. Their research highlighted changes in photoluminescence (PL) emission intensity and a redshift in emission wavelength corresponding to different durations of SbSb spray. However, the weak signals obtained in their study limited the unambiguous identification of distinct phonon modes. Dai et alDai et al. (2015) concluded that the SbSb spray likely reduced defects and contributed to strain relaxation by facilitating the formation of GaAsSbGaAsSb at the QD/cap interface. In this paper, we address this gap by presenting the results and analysis of our low-temperature polarized Raman measurements aimed at investigating the frequency positions of both normal and IF phonons in InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} bilayer QDs heterostructures. Our study seeks to provide a clearer understanding of the phonon modes in these strained systems, which is critical for advancing the development of QD-based optoelectronic devices.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Schematic of bilayer QD heterostructure .

II Experimental details

Strain-coupled bilayer InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} QDs were grown by the MBE system via Stransky-Krastanov growth. Fig. 1 illustrates the schematic representation of the developed heterostructure, featuring two layers of InAsInAs QDs capped with a GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} capping layer. The bilayer QD architecture is characterized by strain coupling with a GaAs1xSbx/GaAsGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x}/GaAs spacer, wherein the lower QD possesses a 2.5ML2.5ML coverage, while the upper QD (UQD) has a 3.2 ML coverage. Consequently, the UQD exhibits larger dimensions compared to the lower QD (LQD), as evidenced by a Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) image as shown in Fig. 2. The two dot layers are separated by a spacer layer of 6.5nm6.5nm and capped with 4nm4nm GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} capping material. The SbSb-composition has been taken as 1010% and 2020% in the capping material and referred as samples A and B, respectively. The details of the growth have been mentioned in our previous study. Saha et al. (2019)

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Cros-sectional TEM images of (a) Sample A &\& (b) Sample B.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Strain field contour in (a) sample A, &\& (b) sample B. The vertical dash lines indicate cutlines at which the strain profile has been observed. Cutline 1 (A1A_{1} and B1B_{1} for sample A &\& sample B respectively) is through the center of QD and cutline 2 (A2A_{2} and B2B_{2} for sample A &\& sample B respectively) is through the edge of QD.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Strain profiles of (a) sample A at cutlines A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} &\& (b) sample B at cutlines B1B_{1} and B2B_{2}. Biaxial (εB\varepsilon_{B}) and hydrostatic strain (εH\varepsilon_{H}) profiles of (c) sample A at cutlines A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} &\& (d) sample B at cutlines B1B_{1} and B2B_{2}.

A 532nm532nm frequency doubled Nd:Yag laser focused on a 23μm2-3\mu m spot with 10mW10mW of power at the laser head was used to excite the Raman spectra. Spectra were collected in backscattering geometry and analyzed using an HR800-UV confocal micro-Raman spectrometer. The measurements were acquired in z(yx)z¯z(yx)\overline{z} and z(xx)z¯z(xx)\overline{z} polarization with x[110],y[11¯0]x\|[110],y\|[1\overline{1}0] and z[001]z\|[001]. Samples were cooled to 77K77K to reduce the width of the different Raman lines so that the very weak IF phonon modes could be observed in the presence of comparatively stronger normal phonon modes. The heterostructures were simulated by Nextnano softwareBirner et al. (2007) to visualize the distribution of strain field in the different layers and dimensions of QD were taken according to the TEM image shown in Fig. 2. This software comprises a complete database of group III-V materials’ characteristics and allows for 3-dimensional simulations of the quantum mechanical electronic structure within the heterostructure. We have already mentioned the software related details in our previous work by Saha et al.Saha et al. (2019)

Fig. 3 shows the contour of the strain field in both samples, wherein both QDs are under tensile strain. Generally, tensile strain is positive, and compressive strain is negative in magnitude. The strain is compressive at the bottom of LQD, tensile inside the QD region, compressive towards the capping layers, and finally tensile at the end of the capping layer of UQD. This can be attributed to the larger lattice constant of InAs compared to GaAs. Additionally, it can be observed that the strain field is different at the center and the edge of QD. Two cutlines, cutline 11 (A1A_{1} and B1B_{1}) and cutline 22 (A2A_{2} and B2B_{2}), are marked at the center and edge of QD respectively, and these markings are used to analyze strain later in the manuscript. The magnitude of strain in sample B is lower as compared to sample A. This is due to the bigger size of QDsSaha et al. (2019) and the presence of high SbSb-composition in the capping layer of sample B, which reduces the lattice mismatch between the InAs QDs and GaAs0.8Sb0.2GaAs_{0.8}Sb_{0.2} capping layer, and thereby decreasing the strain within the entire heterostructure.

III Theoretical Analysis

Refer to caption
Figure 5: Shifted TOTO phonons of (a) sample A at cutlines A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} &\& (b) sample B at cutlines B1B_{1} and B2B_{2}. Shifted LOLO phonons (c) sample A at cutlines A1A_{1} and A2A_{2} &\& (d) sample B at cutlines B1B_{1} and B2B_{2}.

In order to assign the different phonon modes, it is necessary to analyze and estimate quantitatively the effects of strain on different phonon modes. As shown by the simulation of strain profiles in both the samples, both UQD and LQD are under considerable strain and it is known that the phonon mode frequencies exhibit both blue-shift as well as red-shift, by compressive and tensile strains. Thus, it is necessary to estimate the strain profiles over the QD heterostructures to provide explanation for the origin of the different Raman lines in both samples. Cardeira et al Cerdeira et al. (1972) have carried out a detailed examination of stress-induced Raman mode shifts in various zinc-blende and diamond semiconductors and we use their framework to estimate the position of different phonon modes. The strain tensor components can be broadly expressed as hydrostatic and biaxial strain denoted by εH\varepsilon_{H} and εB\varepsilon_{B} respectively. These are defined asXiong and Zhang (2017)

εH=εxx+εyy+εzz\varepsilon_{H}=\varepsilon_{xx}+\varepsilon_{yy}+\varepsilon_{zz} (1)
εB=εzz0.5×(εxx+εyy)\varepsilon_{B}=\varepsilon_{zz}-0.5\times{(\varepsilon_{xx}+\varepsilon_{yy})} (2)

Where, ϵij\epsilon_{ij} is the diagonal components of the strain tensor. Fig. 4 (a) and (b) for samples A and B, respectively, at both cutlines, display the simulated strain components. The εxx\varepsilon_{xx} and εyy\varepsilon_{yy} strain profiles are similar (compressive), as the definition of material layers are the same in the both x and y directions, whereas the strain is tensile in the z-direction. The changes in the phonon frequencies for the transverse optical modes (TOTO) and longitudinal optical mode (LOLO) can be calculated following the prescription outlined by Cardeira et alCerdeira et al. (1972) where they have shown that the application of uniaxial stress causes a shift of the LOLO phonon, while the TOTO mode shows both a splitting and shift. They had further shown that the shifts can be expressed as due to hydrostatic and biaxial stain ( εH\varepsilon_{H} and εB\varepsilon_{B} respectively ) and can be calculated in terms of the material properties pp, qq, and rr which outline the modifications to the “spring constants” of the k=0k=0 optical phonons. These parameters have been listed by Cardeira et alCerdeira et al. (1972) for a set of III- V semiconductors. The unperturbed LO/TOLO/TO phonons are denoted by ωL0/ωT0\omega_{L0}/\omega_{T0} and the shifted ones are by ωL0/ωT0\omega^{L0}/\omega^{T0} respectively. The frequency shift of the TOTO and LOLO modes as a function of hydrostatic and biaxial strain along the growth direction of the QD heterostructures can be used to calculate and interpret the various observed lines in the Raman spectra for the two samples (discussed in next section). We note here that GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} exhibits two mode behavior with GaAsGaAs like LO/TOLO/TO and GaSbGaSb like LO/TOLO/TO modes with GaAsGaAs like LOLO modes are most intenseYano et al. (1989). For x10%x\approx 10\%, the GaAsGaAs like LOLO mode for GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} is more or less the same as that for GaAsGaAs LOLO and the TOTO modeYano et al. (1989) is at 238cm1238cm^{-1}. However, for x20%x\approx 20\%, we use LOLO phonon modeYano et al. (1989) at 285cm1285cm^{-1} and for TOTO phonon 240cm1240cm^{-1}. The frequencies of GaAsGaAs, InAsInAs, and GaAsSbGaAsSb layers in the lower and upper QDs and the capping layers have been calculated and can be Visualized in terms of depth. It is evident that the strain profile is slightly different at the center (A1A_{1} and B1B_{1}) and at the edge (A2A_{2} and B2B_{2}) and the Raman frequencies have also been calculated for these positions. Fig. 4 (c) and (d) show εH\varepsilon_{H} and εB\varepsilon_{B} for both of the samples A and B respectively Corresponding to growth direction covering both the UQD and LQD. It can seen that the variation of both εH\varepsilon_{H} and εB\varepsilon_{B} over LQD and UQD at the center of QD (A1A_{1} and B1B_{1}) and edge of QD (A2A_{2} and B2B_{2}) are quite different for both of the samples. In particular, εB\varepsilon_{B} over LQD has a sharp spike while its variation over UQD is more gradual. Using Eqs. 39 and 42 from MS thesis of HusseyHussey (2007) and εH\varepsilon_{H}/εB\varepsilon_{B} strain distribution we can determine the phonon shift for the TOTO and LOLO modes, as shown in Fig. 5. The figure depicts the shift in LOLO and TOTO phonon modes in the UQD region for both samples. It is mainly because most of the Raman signal originates from top 100nm\approx 100nm. Since LOLO modes are usually stronger compared to TOTO modes we concentrate on Fig. 5 (c) and (d). The LOLO phonon over most of the region around the center of QD (A1A_{1} and B1B_{1}) is 258260\approx 258-260 cm1cm^{-1} with a sharp downward spike at edge of QD (A2A_{2} and B2B_{2}). This is to be mentioned here that there are different expressions for the biaxial strain as a function of different strain components ϵij\epsilon_{ij} used by different authors.

εB=(εxxεyy)2+(εyyεzz)2+(εzzεxx)2\varepsilon_{B}=\sqrt{(\varepsilon_{xx}-\varepsilon_{yy})^{2}+(\varepsilon_{yy}-\varepsilon_{zz})^{2}+(\varepsilon_{zz}-\varepsilon_{xx})^{2}} (3)
εB=2εzz(εxx+εyy)\varepsilon_{B}=2\varepsilon_{zz}-(\varepsilon_{xx}+\varepsilon_{yy}) (4)

To compare the magnitude of shifts obtained using the different expressions, we have also performed calculations using two other expressions ( Eqs. (3)Cusack, Briddon, and Jaros (1996) and Eqs. (LABEL:eq:four)Grundmann, Stier, and Bimberg (1995)) for biaxial strains. However, we observe that the changes are very small and it can be attributed to the fact that the biaxial strain for these materials (InAsInAs, GaAsGaAs, GaSbGaSb) is much smaller compared to that for hydrostatic strain.

IV Experimental Results

The Raman selection criteria for backscattering geometry for GaAsGaAs type z[001]z[001] substrates predicts LOLO allowed and TOTO forbidden for z(xy)z¯z(xy)\overline{z} geometry and LOLO and TOTO both forbidden for z(xx)z¯z(xx)\overline{z} geometry. Fig. 6 (a) and (b) exhibit the Raman spectra acquired in z(xy)z¯z(xy)\overline{z} geometry for samples A and B. It can be seen that only two distinct peaks are visible, which are attributed to GaAsGaAs (TOTO) and (LOLO) phonons at 270cm1\approx 270cm^{-1} and 294cm1\approx 294cm^{-1} respectively. This is expected since the penetration depth of 532nm532nm laser line for GaAs is 150nm\approx 150nm and most of the signal arises from the top 100nm100nm GaAsGaAs capping layer and the UQD with GaAsSbGaAsSb capping layer, however, the contribution of the Raman signals arising from the LQD and GaAsSbGaAsSb layers is relatively poorer. Further, it has been earlier reported that the InAsInAs and GaAsGaAs like IF modes appear close to LOLO peak positions and are very small in intensityPusep et al. (1998), and thus the z(xx)z¯z(xx)\overline{z} geometry is suitable to minimize the contributions for both the GaAsGaAs LOLO and TOTO modes. It is known that the Raman linewidth reduces with decreasing temperature, parallel polarized Raman measurements in the later geometry were recorded at 77K77K to visualize different peaks originating from the corrugated interfaces of InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs, InAs/GaAsSbInAs/GaAsSb, and GaAsSb/GaAsGaAsSb/GaAs. Fig. 6 (c) and (d) show low temperature (77K77K) Raman spectra of both the samples measured in z(xx)z¯z(xx)\overline{z} scattering geometry and they were best fitted with five Lorentzian curves. The highest intensity peaks, peak 3 and peak 5 correspond to GaAsGaAs TOTO (269cm1)\approx 269cm^{-1}), and GaAsGaAs LOLO (293cm1)\approx 293cm^{-1}) phonon modes respectively. The other peaks correspond to InAsInAs QDs and GaAsGaAs, GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} capping layer phonon modes. Also, the Raman peaks have a broad asymmetrical feature around 260cm1260cm^{-1} (peak 22) and 293cm1293cm^{-1} (peak 55). These modes are at slightly different frequency positions for both samples. The frequency positions are right-shifted to higher energy in sample B (20%20\% SbSb-content) as compared to sample A (having 10%10\% SbSb-content). The higher SbSb content in sample B reduces the strain over the entire heterostructure (as earlier observed in the simulated strain profiles), which results in shift of the peak positions from their bulk value. The frequencies of TOTO and LOLO phonons in bulk InAsInAs are 218cm1218cm^{-1} and 243cm1243cm^{-1}, respectivelyPusep et al. (1998), whereas we observe two peaks at 260.31cm1260.31cm^{-1} and 261.72cm1261.72cm^{-1} in samples A and B respectively. These peak positions are at much higher frequencies than the InAsInAs modes but considerably lower than those for GaAsGaAs. The origin of these modes can be explained using our theoretical analysis for uniaxial and biaxial stress-induced shift of the optical phonon modes in QDs using the method outlined in the previous section (Theoretical Analysis) for both samples A and B. Fig. 5 (c) and (d) show that the InAsInAs LOLO phonon modes are shifted to higher frequency 260cm1\approx 260cm^{-1}, which is attributed to the compressive hydrostatic and tensile biaxial strain. Thus, we assign these modes (peak 2) as InAsInAs LOLO peaks. This agrees with the results reported by other authors. Raman spectroscopic study by Puesp et alPusep et al. (1998) on self-assembled QDs have observed the InAsInAs QD LO mode at 258cm1258cm^{-1} which agrees very well with our value. Similarly, Milekhin et alMilekhin et al. (2004a) also assigned a value of 255cm1255cm^{-1} for this mode.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Unpolarized Raman spectra of (a) sample A, &\& (b) sample B acquired in z(yx)z¯z(yx)\overline{z} mode. Polarized Raman spectra of (c) sample A, &\& (d) sample B acquired in z(xx)z¯z(xx)\overline{z} mode.

In addition to the strong LOLO and TOTO modes of GaAsGaAs (peaks 55 and 33) and InAsInAs QD LOLO mode( peak 22), there are additional weak shoulder peaks present at lower frequency side of LOLO phonons (peak 44 and peak 11) which cannot be assigned to optical phonons. We ascribe them to be IF modes between the InAsInAs QD in GaAsGaAs and GaAsSbGaAsSb matrix. The frequency positions of the GaAsGaAs-like IF peak are at 287cm1\approx 287cm^{-1} (peak 4) in both the samples. This peak position is right shifted towards higher energy from the earlier reportedMilekhin et al. (2004b) position of 283cm1283cm^{-1} because of the inclusion of SbSb composition in the capping layer which causes strain relaxation in the heterostructureMilekhin et al. (2004b) with shift towards the bulk value. Another distinct peak at 259cm1\approx 259cm^{-1} (peak 11) is attributed to the IF mode of InAsInAs QD like LOLO mode. This peak is at position 258.36cm1258.36cm^{-1} and 259.54cm1259.54cm^{-1} in samples A and B, respectively. Furthermore, the Full Width Half Maximum (FWHM) of most of the peaks (peak 11, 22 and 33) is larger in sample B as compared to sample A. This might be due to the higher SbSb-composition in the capping layer, which causes the localization of electrons in one material (InAsInAs QDs) and holes in another material (GaAsSbGaAsSb capping region), thereby transforming the band alignment to be of type-II nature. However, all the peak positions in sample B are right-shifted by more than 1cm11cm^{-1}, which is due to the bigger dot size and better strain relaxation inside the heterostructure (as discussed earlier). Dai et alDai et al. (2015) had attributed a mode at 230cm1230cm^{-1} GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} alloy mode with longest SbSb spray time, which we don’t observe due to poor S/N value over 220250cm1220-250cm^{-1}. However a Raman study of GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} with varying xx (Yano et alYano et al. (1989) ) indicates that it can be assigned as GaSbGaSb pure TOTO mode. In addition, they assign 220cm1220cm^{-1} as InAsInAs QD mode while we observe the InAsInAs QD LOLO mode at 260cm1260cm^{-1}. We can estimate the frequency of the IF modes by following the prescription by Knipp and ReineckeKnipp and Reinecke (1992) based on the classical continuum dielectric approach without retardation, whereby the IF mode frequencies fall with the non-overlapping regions of the dot and the barrier materials. This is valid for InAsInAs QDs in GaAsGaAs barrier and assuming the QDs as ellipsoidal shapes with height and width obtained from the cross-sectional TEM. We calculate the IF frequencies by following the code given by HussayHussey (2007) using Mathematica. The calculated frequencies for l=1-3 are shown in Table 1. According to the calculation, the first IF mode (peak 4) matches well with l=3 and m=0 in both samples, while IF mode with l=1l=1 and m=0m=0 is closer to the strong GaAsGaAs LOLO mode. Thus, peak 11 and peak 44 are assigned as InAsInAs-like IF and GaAsGaAs-like IF modes respectively.

Table 1: Calculated IF modes of sample A and B.
Sample l=1l=1 l=2l=2 l=3l=3
m=0,1m=0,1 m=0,1,2m=0,1,2 m=0,1,2,3m=0,1,2,3
A 288.222288.222 286.917286.917
290.193290.193 285.094285.094 285.156285.156
284.678284.678 283.792283.792 284.022284.022
283.525283.525
B 288.77288.77 287.432287.432
290.789290.789 285.476285.476 285.553285.553
285.038285.038 284.14284.14 284.377284.377
283.872283.872

V Conclusion

In conclusion, we have identified distinct Raman peaks in the InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} QD heterostructures. The phonon modes exhibited a shift to higher frequencies due to the increased SbSb-composition in the capping layer. Additionally, the FWHM of the peaks was broader, indicating increased disorder and type-II band alignment. The QD heterostructure with a GaAs0.8Sb0.2GaAs_{0.8}Sb_{0.2} capping layer demonstrated a reduced strain profile, attributed to the lower lattice mismatch between InAsInAs QDs and the capping material. This reduction in strain led to larger quantum dots and resulted in longer wavelength emission. All observed modes have been assigned to the highly strained LOLO mode of the InAsInAs QD and the LOLO and TOTO modes of GaAsGaAs. Additionally, we have identified two IF modes, which we have assigned as GaAsGaAs-like and InAsInAs-like IF modes.

Acknowledgements.
Financial support was provided by the Indian Institute of Technology Gandhinagar under grant number IP/ITGN/EE/JS/2122/08. The authors acknowledge Baolai Liang of UCLA for the growth of the samples and Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility) SAIF, IIT Bombay.

References

  • Tutu et al. (2012) F. Tutu, I. Sellers, M. Peinado, C. Pastore, S. Willis, A. Watt, T. Wang,  and H. Liu, “Improved performance of multilayer InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs quantum-dot solar cells using a high-growth-temperature GaAsGaAs spacer layer,” Journal of Applied Physics 111 (2012).
  • Kim et al. (2004) E.-T. Kim, A. Madhukar, Z. Ye,  and J. C. Campbell, “High detectivity InAsInAs quantum dot infrared photodetectors,” Applied Physics Letters 84, 3277–3279 (2004).
  • Panda et al. (2018) D. Panda, J. Saha, A. Balgarkashi, S. Shetty, H. Rawool, S. M. Singh, S. Upadhyay, B. Tongbram,  and S. Chakrabarti, “Optimization of dot layer periodicity through analysis of strain and electronic profile in vertically stacked InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs quantum dot heterostructure,” Journal of Alloys and Compounds 736, 216–224 (2018).
  • Panda et al. (2017) D. Panda, A. Ahmad, H. Ghadi, S. Adhikary, B. Tongbram,  and S. Chakrabarti, “Evidence of quantum dot size uniformity in strain-coupled multilayered In(Ga)As/GaAsIn(Ga)As/GaAs QDs grown with constant overgrowth percentage,” Journal of Luminescence 192, 562–566 (2017).
  • Dowd et al. (1999) P. Dowd, W. Braun, C. Ryu, C.-Z. Guo, S. Chen, U. Koelle, S. Johnson, Y.-H. Zhang,  and D. Smith, “1.3 μ\mum InGaAsInGaAs GaPAsSbGaPAsSb light emitting diode grown on GaAsGaAs,” in Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics (Optica Publishing Group, 1999) p. CThV5.
  • Ledentsov et al. (2002) N. N. Ledentsov, V. M. Ustinov, D. Bimberg, J. A. Lott,  and Z. I. Alferov, “Applications of quantum dots in semiconductor lasers,” International journal of high speed electronics and systems 12, 177–205 (2002).
  • Ulloa et al. (2012) J. Ulloa, J. Llorens, M. Del Moral, M. Bozkurt, P. Koenraad,  and A. Hierro, “Analysis of the modified optical properties and band structure of GaAs1xSbxGaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x}-capped InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs quantum dots,” Journal of Applied Physics 112 (2012).
  • Ripalda et al. (2005) J. M. Ripalda, D. Granados, Y. González, A. Sánchez, S. I. Molina,  and J. García, “Room temperature emission at 1.6 μ\mum from InGaAsInGaAs quantum dots capped with GaAsSbGaAsSb,” Applied Physics Letters 87 (2005).
  • Jang et al. (2008) Y. Jang, T. Badcock, D. Mowbray, M. Skolnick, J. Park, D. Lee, H. Liu, M. Steer,  and M. Hopkinson, “Carrier lifetimes in type-ii InAsInAs quantum dots capped with a GaAsSbGaAsSb strain reducing layer,” Applied Physics Letters 92 (2008).
  • Akahane et al. (2006) K. Akahane, N. Yamamoto, S.-i. Gozu, A. Ueta,  and N. Ohtani, “1.5 μ\mum emission from InAsInAs quantum dots with InGaAsSbInGaAsSb strain-reducing layer grown on GaAsGaAs substrates,” Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures 32, 81–84 (2006).
  • Saha et al. (2019) J. Saha, D. Das, D. Panda, B. Tongbram, A. Chatterjee, B. Liang, K. D. Gupta, S. K. Pal,  and S. Chakrabarti, “Broad tunability of emission wavelength by strain coupled InAs/GaAs1xSbxInAs/GaAs_{1-x}Sb_{x} quantum dot heterostructures,” Journal of Applied Physics 126 (2019).
  • Knipp and Reinecke (1992) P. Knipp and T. Reinecke, “Classical interface modes of quantum dots,” Physical Review B 46, 10310 (1992).
  • Pusep et al. (1998) Y. A. Pusep, G. Zanelatto, S. Da Silva, J. Galzerani, P. P. González-Borrero, A. Toropov,  and P. Basmaji, “Raman study of interface modes subjected to strain in InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots,” Physical Review B 58, R1770 (1998).
  • Dai et al. (2015) L. Dai, S. P. Bremner, S. Tan, S. Wang, G. Zhang,  and Z. Liu, “Raman scattering study on Sb spray InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs quantum dot nanostructure systems,” Nanoscale research letters 10, 1–6 (2015).
  • Birner et al. (2007) S. Birner, T. Zibold, T. Andlauer, T. Kubis, M. Sabathil, A. Trellakis,  and P. Vogl, “Nextnano: general purpose 3-d simulations,” IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 54, 2137–2142 (2007).
  • Cerdeira et al. (1972) F. Cerdeira, C. Buchenauer, F. H. Pollak,  and M. Cardona, “Stress-induced shifts of first-order raman frequencies of diamond-and zinc-blende-type semiconductors,” Physical Review B 5, 580 (1972).
  • Xiong and Zhang (2017) Y. Xiong and X. Zhang, “An accurate method of modeling self-assembled InAs/InGaAsP/InPInAs/InGaAsP/InP (001) quantum dot with double-capping procedure,” IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 53, 1–11 (2017).
  • Yano et al. (1989) M. Yano, M. Ashida, A. Kawaguchi, Y. Iwai,  and M. Inoue, “Molecular-beam epitaxial growth and interface characteristics of GaAsSbGaAsSb on GaAsGaAs substrates,” Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B: Microelectronics Processing and Phenomena 7, 199–203 (1989).
  • Hussey (2007) L. K. Hussey, “Raman spectroscopy of InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs quantum dots patterned by nano-indentation,” MS thesis, College of Arts and Sciences, University of South Florida  (2007).
  • Cusack, Briddon, and Jaros (1996) M. Cusack, P. Briddon,  and M. a. Jaros, “Electronic structure of InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs self-assembled quantum dots,” Physical Review B 54, R2300 (1996).
  • Grundmann, Stier, and Bimberg (1995) M. Grundmann, O. Stier,  and D. Bimberg, “InAs/GaAsInAs/GaAs pyramidal quantum dots: Strain distribution, optical phonons, and electronic structure,” Physical Review B 52, 11969 (1995).
  • Milekhin et al. (2004a) A. G. Milekhin, D. A. Tenne, A. I. Toropov, A. K. Bakarov, S. Schulze,  and D. R. Zahn, “Raman study of interface phonons in InAsInAs quantum dot structures,” physica status solidi (c) 1, 2629–2633 (2004a).
  • Milekhin et al. (2004b) A. Milekhin, A. Toropov, A. Bakarov, D. Tenne, G. Zanelatto, J. Galzerani, S. Schulze,  and D. Zahn, “Interface phonons in InAsInAs and AlAsAlAs quantum dot structures,” Physical Review B 70, 085314 (2004b).