11email: [email protected] 22institutetext: School of Astronomy and Space Science, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China 33institutetext: School of Physics and Technology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210023, China 44institutetext: National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan
44email: [email protected] 55institutetext: Department of Astronomy, School of Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), 2-21-1 Osawa, Mitaka Tokyo, 181-1855 Japan 66institutetext: ALMA Project, National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, 2-21-1, Osawa, Mitaka, Tokyo 181-8588, Japan 77institutetext: Department of Physics, Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223–8522 Japan 88institutetext: European Southern Observatory, Alonso de Córdova, 3107, Vitacura, Santiago 763-0355, Chile 99institutetext: Joint ALMA Observatory, Alonso de Córdova, 3107, Vitacura, Santiago 763-0355, Chile 1010institutetext: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, 520 Edgemont Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475, USA 1111institutetext: Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, 11F of AS/NTU Astronomy-Mathematics Building, No.1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd, Taipei 10617, Taiwan 1212institutetext: Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Onsala Space Observatory, SE-439 92 Onsala, Sweden 1313institutetext: Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, P.O. Box 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands 1414institutetext: Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), Ctra. de Ajalvir Km. 4, Torrejón de Ardoz, 28850 Madrid, Spain 1515institutetext: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 1616institutetext: National Radio Astronomy Observatory, PO Box O, 1003 Lopezville Road, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 1717institutetext: Max-Planck-Institut für Radioastronomie, Auf dem Hügel 69, 53121 Bonn, Germany 1818institutetext: Astronomy Department, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, P. O. Box 80203, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia 1919institutetext: Departamento de Astronomia, Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica e Ciências Atmosféricas da USP, Cidade Universitária, 05508-900 São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Physical Properties of the Southwest Outflow Streamer in the Starburst Galaxy NGC 253 with ALCHEMI
Abstract
Aims. The physical properties of galactic molecular outflows are important as they could constrain outflow formation mechanisms. In this work, we study the properties of the southwest (SW) outflow streamer including gas kinematics, optical depth, dense gas fraction, and shock strength through molecular emission in the central molecular zone of the starburst galaxy NGC 253.
Methods. We image the molecular emission in NGC 253 at a spatial resolution of 1.6′′(27 pc at D3.5 Mpc) based on data from the ALMA Comprehensive High-resolution Extragalactic Molecular Inventory (ALCHEMI) large program. We trace the velocity and the velocity dispersion of molecular gas with CO(1-0) line and study the molecular spectra in the SW streamer region, the brightest CO streamer in NGC 253. We constrain the optical depth of CO emission with CO/13CO(1-0) ratio, the dense gas fraction with HCN/CO(1-0), H13CN/13CO(1-0) and N2H+/13CO(1-0) ratios, as well as the shock strength with SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) and CH3OH(2k-1k)/13CO(1-0) ratios.
Results. The CO/13CO(1-0) integrated intensity ratio is 21 in the SW streamer region, which approximates the C/13C isotopic abundance ratio. The higher integrated intensity ratio compared to the disk can be attributed to the optically thinner environment for CO(1-0) emission inside the SW streamer. The HCN/CO(1-0) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) integrated intensity ratios both approach 0.2 in three giant molecular clouds (GMCs) at the base of the outflow streamers, which implies the higher dense gas fraction and enhanced strength of fast shocks in those GMCs than in the disk, while the HCN/CO(1-0) integrated intensity ratio is moderate in the SW streamer region. The contours of those two integrated intensity ratios are extended towards the directions of outflow streamers, which connects the enhanced dense gas fraction and shock strength with molecular outflow. Moreover, the molecular gas with enhanced dense gas fraction and shock strength located at the base of the SW streamer shares the same velocity with the outflow.
Conclusions. The enhanced dense gas fraction and shock strength at the base of the outflow streamers suggest that the star formation inside the GMCs can trigger the shocks and further drive the molecular outflow. The increased CO/13CO(1-0) integrated intensity ratio coupled with the moderate HCN/CO(1-0) integrated intensity ratio in the SW streamer region are consistent with the picture that the gas velocity gradient inside the streamer may decrease the optical depth of CO(1-0) emission, as well as the dense gas fraction in the extended streamer region.
Key Words.:
Galaxies: individual: NGC 253 – Galaxies: evolution – Galaxies: starburst – Galaxies: kinematics and dynamics1 Introduction
Outflows on the galactic scale are ubiquitous in the local and distant Universe. Together with gas accretion, star formation, and black hole growth, outflows can govern the cycle of material between a galaxy and the circumgalactic medium (Veilleux et al., 2005). Cool outflows, which include atomic and molecular gas, as well as dust, dominate the mass and energy of the outflowing material. The study of extragalactic cool outflows only dates back to 20 years, which is a relatively new field in the research of galactic outflows (Veilleux et al., 2020). The physical properties of cool outflows are gradually uncovered thanks to the development of high-capability radio telescopes, including ALMA (ALMA Partnership et al., 2015), NOEMA (Lefèvre et al., 2020), and VLA (Greisen, 2003).
As one of the key phases of cool gas, molecular gas is the raw material for star formation, an important process in galaxy evolution. More than 300 molecular species have been detected in the circumstellar envelopes of evolved stars and the interstellar medium (ISM) of the Galaxy 111https://cdms.astro.uni-koeln.de/classic/molecules. One-third of those species have also been detected in external galaxies (Takano et al., 2019; Martín et al., 2021). Among them, carbon monoxide (CO) is the second most abundant molecule after H2 and serves as the main observational tracer of molecular gas. Moreover, other molecules with different chemical formation pathways and excitation requirements provide supplementary information to constrain the evolution of external galaxies (Aalto, 2015).
The formation scenarios for molecular outflows can be roughly divided into three categories. The outflowing molecular gas can be directly driven by radiation (Murray et al., 2011) and/or pressure gradients (Socrates et al., 2008; Uhlig et al., 2012). Alternatively, hot winds can entrain molecular clouds (Banda-Barragán et al., 2019; Fielding & Bryan, 2022), while the lifetime of the molecular clouds depends on the balance between radiation, conduction, and turbulence (Orlando et al., 2005). The third scenario is that molecular gas forms in situ from hot winds through cooling and/or thermal instability. The first step in the formation of molecules consists of hydrogen atoms (H) combining to form hydrogen molecules (H2). Given that H atoms can combine on the surface of dust grains, those grains are catalysts for the formation of H2 (Hollenbach & Salpeter, 1971; Pantaleone et al., 2021). However, along with temperature rises, dust grains undergo destructive sputtering via gas-grain collisions in the hot winds, which reduces the efficiency of H2 formation (Le Bourlot et al., 2012). Hence, a cooling timescale shorter than a dynamical timescale is a premise for the in situ formation (Efstathiou, 2000; Silich et al., 2003).
There is no agreement on the influence of outflows on the star formation activity inside host galaxies. On the one hand, the hot ionized winds are one of the leading processes that can quench star formation (Tacchella et al., 2015, 2016; Spilker et al., 2019), namely, negative feedback. The quenching is owing to the energy that is injected into molecular clouds, or to the entrainment/depletion of molecular clouds. On the other hand, the shocks, which form through the encounter between winds and molecular clouds, can compress the molecular clouds and trigger star formation (Klein et al., 1994), namely, positive feedback.
The engines for outflows can be central starbursts and/or active galactic nuclei (AGN). Different physical processes including thermal energy, radiation, cosmic rays, and/or radio jets can work together in either driving mechanism. AGN-driven molecular outflows have been well studied in a few nearby cases such as the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 1068 (Kormendy & Ho, 2013) and the Quasar Mrk 231 (Veilleux et al., 2009). However, to study how molecular outflows relate to star formation, we need to target sources without contamination from AGN.
NGC 253 (D3.5 Mpc, Rekola et al. 2005) is one of the nearest starburst galaxies. It possesses a strong bar in the center (Das et al., 2001; Paglione et al., 2004), but shows no sign of AGN activity (Brunthaler et al., 2009). It is an edge-on (i78.5∘) spiral galaxy and hosts a bipolar outflow (Turner, 1985; Westmoquette et al., 2011). The outflow was proven to be driven by the starburst that has been occurring in the central 500 pc region during the last 20-30 Myr (Rieke et al., 1980; Engelbracht et al., 1998), where the star formation rate is 3 M⊙ yr-1 (Ott et al., 2005; Bendo et al., 2015). The outflow has been detected in multi-phases, including molecular gas phase (Turner, 1985; Sturm et al., 2011; Heesen et al., 2011; Bolatto et al., 2013; Walter et al., 2017; Zschaechner et al., 2018; Krieger et al., 2019), ionized gas phase (Heckman et al., 2000; Westmoquette et al., 2011; Cohen et al., 2020), X-ray emitting gas phase (Pietsch et al., 2000; Strickland et al., 2000, 2002; Lopez et al., 2023), and dust phase (Levy et al., 2022). The ionized outflow shows a wide opening angle of 60∘, a deprojected velocity of a few 100 km s-1 (Westmoquette et al., 2011), and an extension of 10 kpc (Strickland et al., 2002).
There have been several ALMA-based studies of the molecular outflow of NGC 253. Krieger et al. (2019) presented ALMA observation of CO(3-2) in the central 30′′ starburst region. They obtained the non-disk component by modeling the disk, deducted the disk from position-velocity diagrams (PVDs), and found that 7%-16% of CO luminosity is emitted by the non-disk component. Bolatto et al. (2013) presented ALMA observation of CO(1-0) in the central arcminute, and found the extraplanar molecular gas closely tracking the H filaments; they estimated the mass outflow rate assuming an optically thin conversion factor (). By comparing the molecular mass outflow rate (9 yr-1) with the star formation rate (2.8 yr-1, Ott et al., 2005), Bolatto et al. (2013) concluded that the starburst-driven outflow limits the star-formation activity in NGC 253. Zschaechner et al. (2018) presented ALMA observations of CO(1-0) and CO(2-1) in the central 40′′ region. They located the molecular outflow via the extended structure in the velocity-integrated intensity map of CO(2-1). Based on the velocity-integrated intensity ratio between CO(2-1) and CO(1-0), they constrained the optical depth of the CO emission in the outflow region. Walter et al. (2017) presented a detailed study of one streamer of the molecular outflow on the southwestern side (SW streamer). In addition to the CO emission, they found many bright tracers of dense gas such as HCN, CN, HCO+, and CS in the SW streamer.
This paper is based on the data from the ALMA Comprehensive High-resolution Extragalactic Molecular Inventory (ALCHEMI) project (Martín et al., 2021). The ALCHEMI data targeting the central molecular zone (CMZ) of NGC 253 with high resolution, provide insight into the physical condition in the center of this galaxy (Haasler et al., 2022). Those data have been used to study the abundance and excitation of different molecular species (Holdship et al., 2021; Harada et al., 2022) in the CMZ of NGC 253, and how they vary with different heating environments (Harada et al., 2021; Holdship et al., 2022; Behrens et al., 2022). In this paper, we uncover the physical properties of the molecular outflow in NGC 253, focusing on the properties of the SW streamer. Taking advantage of the numerous molecular species in the ALCHEMI survey, we study the properties through various integrated intensity ratios. In detail, we use the CO/13CO(1-0) ratio to probe the optical depth (Israel, 2020), HCN/CO(1-0), H13CN/13CO(1-0) and N2H+/13CO(1-0) ratios to probe the dense gas fraction (Gao & Solomon, 2004a; Barnes et al., 2020). Moreover, we use SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) and CH3OH(2k-1k)/13CO(1-0) ratios to probe the shock strength (García-Burillo et al., 2010).
This paper is organized as follows. The data analysis is presented in Section 2. The physical properties of the molecular outflow, including gas kinematics, optical depth, dense gas fraction, and shock strength, are studied in Section 3. In Section 4, we analyse the correlation between the dense gas fraction and the strength of fast shocks, and discuss how the molecular outflow relates to the star formation in NGC 253. Finally, the results are summarized in Section 5.
2 Data analysis
The data used in this study have been obtained as part of the ALCHEMI survey, which is an ALMA Cycle 5 large program (2017.1.00161.L). It consists of a wide and unbiased spectral survey covering the CMZ of NGC 253 in Bands 3, 4, 6, and 7. The phase center of observation is , . In this paper, we only make use of the Band 3 data, which covers the ground-state transitions of common molecular lines that can be emitted even from the coldest (10 K) medium. We refer readers to Martín et al. (2021) for more details about the data analysis, and only enumerate here the relevant information to this work.
The data cubes from the ALCHEMI survey are imaged to a spatial resolution of 1.6′′ ( pc) and a spectral resolution of v10 km s-1. We uniformly use the continuum emission subtracted cubes, which are created by the Python-based tool STATCONT (Sánchez-Monge et al., 2018). Those cubes are primary beam corrected in the ALCHEMI imaging process. The Högbom deconvolver function is used for all the cubes from the ALCHEMI survey. Meanwhile, we produce the self-calibrated data cubes with a multi-scale deconvolver function for the integrated intensities of CO and 13CO in the J = 1-0 transition in Figs. 5(a) and 10(a). The use of self-calibration allows for a higher signal-to-noise ratio and is better for images with complicated spatial structures, which helps us in precisely obtaining the optical depth of CO emission in both disk and outflow regions (see Section 3.3).
The data cubes from the ALCHEMI survey are subject to the missing flux problem due to the lack of short spacing in interferometric observations. However, the band 3 observations here probe scales up to 30′′, while spatial filtering should be relevant to larger scales (Martín et al., 2021). In order to quantify the missing fluxes, we collect the results of IRAM 30m single-dish observations from Aladro et al. (2015). We unify the beam size of the ALCHEMI data cubes to that of the IRAM 30m observations using the CASA command imsmooth (The CASA Team et al., 2022) and compare the integrated intensities between them. All the missing fluxes of the molecular lines in this work are less than a few percent.
To ensure sufficient signal-to-noise ratio (S/N), we mask the region without 3-detection. Details of our procedures are as follows. We take the data cubes before primary beam correction as references, which share the same dimensions as those after primary beam correction. For each targeted molecular line, we mask the region without 3-detection for each channel in the corresponding data cube. The integrated intensity, velocity, and velocity dispersion maps, i.e., moments 0, 1, and 2 maps, in the CMZ (inner 500 pc) of NGC 253 are generated by the CASA command immoments (The CASA Team et al., 2022). The PVDs are generated by the Python-based tool pvextractor (Ginsburg et al., 2016). Given the 3-detection limits prior to analyses, all the features presented in the following maps and PVDs will be robust.
3 Physical properties of the molecular outflow
3.1 Molecular emission
Fig. 1 shows the integrated intensity maps of CO, 13CO, HCN, H13CN, and N2H+ in the J = 1-0 transition and CH3OH (methanol) in the Jk = 2k-1k transition series. We extract spectral channels covering velocity range around each transition from the continuum-subtracted cubes, where the rest-frame frequencies are 115.271, 110.201, 88.632, 86.340, 93.174, and 96.741 GHz, respectively. The black solid line in Fig. 1(a) marks the galactic major axis (hereafter major axis) with a position angle of 55∘, and is defined following Krieger et al. (2019). The strong CO(1-0) emission in Fig. 1(a), which is marked by the blue contour at 4300 K km s-1, concentrates in the galactic center and distributes along the major axis. Similar structures also exist in other panels of Fig. 1. Das et al. (2001) found that a bar structure along the major axis is necessary for modeling the ionized gas velocity field in the central 100 pc region of NGC 253. A bar structure is also applicable in the CO map in the central 300 pc region of NGC 253 (Paglione et al., 2004). A stellar bar, which is known as an efficient mechanism for gas accretion, can trigger strong molecular emission along the major axis as is seen in Fig. 1. One different point in Fig. 1(f) from the other panels in Fig. 1 is that the strongest CH3OH(2k-1k) emission exists on the outskirts of the gas disk, suggesting quasi-thermal emission in agreement with Humire et al. (2022).

The CO(1-0) contours (especially the white one at 180 K km s-1) in Fig. 1(a) are extended towards the SW streamer defined by Walter et al. (2017), which is indicated by a white arrow. Similar extent can be found in the HCN(1-0) contours (Fig. 1c), while the 13CO(1-0) contours are not so extended (Fig. 1b). Based on the ratios between the main and rarer isotopologues, Meier et al. (2015) found that CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0) emission is on average optically thick in the central kpc-scale region of NGC 253. As 13C-bearing molecular species, 13CO(1-0) emission should be moderately optically thin (Martín et al., 2019). The different extents towards the SW streamer of CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0) emission from the 13CO(1-0) emission imply that the optical depths of CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0) emission in the SW streamer region may be lower than that in the gas disk. Moreover, the fainter emission of H13CN(1-0), N2H+(1-0) and CH3OH(2k-1k) in Figs. 1(d), 1(e) and 1(f) share similar extents towards the SW streamer with 13CO(1-0).

Fig. 2 shows the intensities of five molecular lines from Fig. 1 and SiO in the J = 2-1 transition (86.847 GHz, see Huang et al. 2023 for its integrated intensity map) in the PVDs along the major axis with systemic velocity reserved and distance referenced from the phase center. The CO(1-0) PVD in Fig. 2(a) mainly follows a rotating pattern, which is consistent with Figure 5 from Krieger et al. (2019). Another common point is that the CO(1-0) PVD shows non-disk features towards both redshifted and blueshifted sides. The strong CO(1-0) emission that is marked by blue contours at [20, 30] K is located in the region within a galactocentric distance range of [-10, 10] arcsec and follows a rotating pattern. The white arrow in Fig. 2(a) points to the SW streamer, and the strongest CO(1-0) emission is located near the base of this streamer.

The 13CO(1-0) PVD in Fig. 2(b) is less extended than the CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0) PVDs, but all have similar strong emission patterns. The H13CN(1-0), SiO(2-1), and CH3OH(2k-1k) PVDs in the second row of Fig. 2 are the least extended. For H13CN(1-0) and SiO(2-1) PVDs in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e), the strong emission marked by the blue contours at 0.62 K is distributed in a few clumpy regions, among which the strongest two clumps are located near the base of the SW streamer (indicated by the white arrow). For the CH3OH(2k-1k) PVD in Fig. 2(f), the strongest emission originates from the outskirts of the gas disk, which agrees with the integrated intensity map in Fig. 1(f).
Fig. 3 shows the intensities in the PVDs along a slice across the SW streamer (SW slice, black dashed line in Fig. 1a) with systemic velocity reserved and distance taken zero in the slice center. The slice center is the same as Figure 1 from Walter et al. (2017), and the position angle of the slice equals 150∘. In Fig. 3(a), the CO(1-0) emission in the PVD is dominated by the disk component, and is extended towards the SW streamer in the region with D[-15, 0] arcsec and V200 km s-1. Such extension outlined by the white dashed profiles, is consistent with Figure 2 from Walter et al. (2017). The 13CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0) PVDs in Figs. 3(b) and 3(c) are less extended, but have similar patterns as the CO(1-0) PVD. The H13CN(1-0), SiO(2-1) and CH3OH(2k-1k) PVDs in the second row of Fig. 3 are least extended, where the molecular emission only extends at the base of the SW streamer with D[-5, 0] arcsec and V200 km s-1. The intensities of N2H+(1-0) in the PVDs along the major axis and along the SW slice are also checked, which show similar patterns to the H13CN(1-0) PVDs.
3.2 Gas kinematics
The CO(1-0) line is generally the best tracer of total molecular gas content thanks to its high abundance and low critical density for excitation. Fig. 4 shows the kinematics of the molecular gas in NGC 253 traced with CO(1-0). There are two interesting kinematic features in Figs. 4(a) and 4(b): (1) the velocity field showing gradients along both major and minor axes; (2) the blueshifted velocity and high velocity dispersion in the SW streamer region.
The white contours showing the velocity gradient in the center within a radius of 100 pc in Fig. 4(a) have the same pattern as the CO velocity field from Das et al. (2001) and Krieger et al. (2019). Their studies showed that the molecular bar shares the same direction as the stellar bar in the near-infrared band, and tilts 18∘ with respect to the major axis (Peng et al., 1996; Iodice et al., 2014). The direction of molecular and stellar bars is shown as a white solid line in Fig. 4(a). There is a velocity gradient (white contours) in Fig. 4(a) along the direction of the molecular bar (white solid line). Yet the ionized bar traced with the H92 recombination lines is almost parallel to the major axis (Cohen et al., 2020). Das et al. (2001) explained this phenomenon as different velocities for the gas moving in different bar orbits and suggested that the perturbation in the gas velocity field in NGC 253 is due to an accretion event occurred 10 Myr ago.
The gas velocity in the SW streamer region (pointed out by the black arrow) is blueshifted () as shown in Fig. 4(a), which means the outflowing gas is on the approaching side of NGC 253. The blueshifted outflow is visibly distinguishable from the redshifted () disk rotation. Meanwhile, the other outflow streamers are indistinguishable in Fig. 4(a), because they are fainter than SW streamer and/or locate behind the galactic disk (Bolatto et al., 2013). In Fig 4(b), the gas in the SW streamer region presents high velocity dispersion, which can be contributed by blueshifted outflow and redshifted rotation.
To compare the kinematics between the outflow and disk, we decompose two components from the CO(1-0) spectra in the SW streamer region. From a circular region in the SW streamer region having the same area as the beam size (the black empty circle in Fig. 4b), we extract the averaged CO(1-0) spectrum, which is displayed by the black solid profile in Fig. 4(c). The averaged CO(1-0) spectrum shows a double-peak structure, where we take the velocity 300 km s-1 as a reference velocity for the emission near the base of the SW streamer. Combining the velocity field of CO(1-0) in Fig. 4(a), the blueshifted component relative to the reference velocity is emitted by the SW streamer, and the redshifted component is emitted by the gas disk. We also extract the averaged CO(1-0) spectrum from a region with high-velocity-dispersion (high-) in the SW streamer region (the black empty ellipse in Fig. 4b), which is displayed by the black solid profile in Fig. 4(d) also showing a double peak structure. Using Python-based tool curve_fit, we fit the CO(1-0) spectra in Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) with double Gaussian function. The blue dashed profiles show the blueshifted Gaussian components, the red dashed profiles show the redshifted Gaussian components and the green solid profiles show the superpositions. The velocity and full width at half maximum (FWHM) in the velocity space of each Gaussian component are listed in Table 1.

Region | VStreamer (km s-1) | FWHMStreamer (km s-1) | VDisk (km s-1) | FWHMDisk (km s-1) | FWHMStreamer/FWHMDisk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Beam-size | 235.5 0.2 | 81.8 0.6 | 386.9 0.2 | 87.5 0.5 | 0.93 |
High- | 219.7 0.5 | 118.4 1.3 | 373.9 0.2 | 82.4 0.5 | 1.44 |
We find that the blueshifted and redshifted components of the averaged CO(1-0) spectrum from the beam-size region (the black empty circle in Fig. 4b) have similar FWHMs in the velocity space (line widths). The redshifted component of the averaged CO(1-0) spectrum from the high- region (the black empty ellipse in Fig. 4b) has similar FWHM to the components from the beam-size region, while the blueshifted component is 50% wider than the redshifted component. Moreover, there is a gradual velocity shift along the SW streamer in the CO(1-0) PVD outlined by white dashed profiles in Fig. 3(a). The velocity gradient inside the SW streamer can be evidence for an inside-out acceleration on the gas velocity, i.e., the gas inside the SW streamer is accelerated as it outflows. It can also be attributed to the ability for the fast ejecta to reach farther away than the slow ejecta. Those two possibilities were also discussed in Walter et al. (2017). If we take the velocity center of the blueshifted component from the high- region (219.7 km s-1) as the averaged velocity for the SW streamer, then the projected local velocity of the SW streamer equals 80 km s-1. Considering the inclination angle of the gas disk (78.5∘) and the outflow being perpendicular to the disk, the deprojected local velocity of the SW streamer approaches 400 km s -1, which is comparable with the outflow velocity in the ionized gas phase (Westmoquette et al., 2011).
3.3 Optical depth
Figs. 1(a) and 1(b) show the contours of CO(1-0) emission being more extended towards the SW streamer region than 13CO(1-0) emission, which can be a result of the different optical depths. Fig. 5(a) shows the integrated intensity ratio map of CO/13CO(1-0) based on self-calibration, where we masked the regions with ratio S/N being less than . The CO/13CO(1-0) ratio increases in the SW, southeastern (SE) and northwestern (NW) directions (named after Bolatto et al. 2013), which are pointed out by the black/grey arrows and are perpendicular to the gas disk (Fig. 5). The black contour with CO/13CO(1-0) ratio of 15 defines the boundary between the outflow streamers and the disk. The CO/13CO(1-0) ratio further increases in part of the outflow region and is outlined by the blue contour at 21, where the CO/13CO(1-0) ratio is highest in the SW streamer region. CO is generally optically thick, while its isotopologue 13CO is optically thinner. The molecular gas in the CMZ of NGC 253 shows high kinetic temperature in the previous studies (Paglione et al., 2004; Sakamoto et al., 2011), which weakens the fractionation effects on C-bearing species (Colzi et al., 2020). Moreover, 13C preferentially forms in the center, while the C and 13C can be well mixed in the outflow region. The CO/13CO(1-0) ratio is expected to be similar to the C/13C isotope ratio in the optically thin limit, and decreases as the optical depth increases.

Martín et al. (2019) estimated a value of the isotopic ratio C/13C216 via the integrated intensity ratio between C18O(1-0) and 13C18O(1-0). In Fig. 5(a), the observed CO/13CO(1-0) ratio in the gas disk is lower than the C/13C ratio, which can be contributed by the optically thick CO emission in the disk. The CO/13CO(1-0) ratio in the SW, SE and NW outflow regions approaches or exceeds the C/13C ratio, where the fluctuation in isotopic abundance is weak. Part of the outflow region (outlined by the blue contour at 21), including the SW streamer region, shows the CO/13CO(1-0) ratio consistent with the C/13C ratio. Except for NGC 253, Weiß et al. (2005) found the integrated intensity ratio CO/13CO(1-0) of the prominent molecular streamers being comparable to that of the starburst disk in M82, which is different from the increasing CO/13CO(1-0) ratio towards the directions of outflow in NGC 253.

To decompose different velocity components, we plot in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b) the intensity ratio of CO/13CO(1-0) in the PVDs along the major axis and the SW slice, which are marked by the black solid and dashed lines in Fig. 1(a). In Fig. 6(a), the CO/13CO(1-0) ratio increases in the non-disk components and is highest on the blueshifted side, which implies the decrease in the optical depth of CO emission in the molecular gas on the approaching side of NGC 253. This phenomenon is more obvious in the PVD along the SW slice in Fig. 6(b), where the CO/13CO(1-0) ratio is low along the gas disk and increases inside the SW streamer with D[-15, 0] arcsec and V200 km s-1 outlined by the two black dashed profiles. Combining Figs. 5(a), 6(a), and 6(b), we infer that the decrease in the optical depth of CO emission happens inside the molecular outflow including the SW streamer, which can be attributed to the gas velocity gradient inside the outflow.
Measuring the molecular mass outflow rate is important because it may indicate the rate at which the fuel for star formation is expelled, which may significantly suppress star formation activity. The optical depth of CO emission is a key factor in estimating the molecular mass outflow rate. Zschaechner et al. (2018) derived the optical depth with the integrated intensity ratio of CO(2-1)/CO(1-0), and suggested that the majority of the CO emission is optically thick in the outflow region of NGC 253. However, the 13C-bearing molecular species being optically thinner than the 12C-bearing ones implies that the CO/13CO(1-0) ratio is a more reliable indicator of CO optical depth. Hence, the agreement between the CO/13CO(1-0) ratio (Fig. 5a) and the C/13C ratio (Martín et al., 2019) suggests that the CO emission in a considerable portion of the outflow region is optically thin in NGC 253. Such phenomenon supports the estimation from Bolatto et al. (2013) on the total molecular mass outflow rate , which is three times the star formation rate (Ott et al., 2005) in NGC 253.
HCN is one of the most abundant high dipole-moment molecules that trace dense gas. The permanent electric dipole-moment of HCN ( 2.99 D) is much higher than CO ( 0.11 D) (Ebenstein & Muenter, 1984; Goorvitch, 1994), which makes the critical density of HCN three orders of magnitude higher than that of CO. Fig. 5(b) shows the integrated intensity ratio map of HCN/13CO(1-0). The HCN/13CO(1-0) ratio is lowest in the gas disk, increases towards the outflow directions, and becomes the highest in parts of the outflow region (outlined by the blue contour at a ratio of 2) including the SW streamer region. Such a trend reminds us of the increasing CO/13CO(1-0) ratio in the outflow region with an increasing distance from the major axis in Fig. 5(a). Given that HCN(1-0) emission is optically thick in the central kpc region of NGC 253 (Meier et al., 2015), the increased line width attributed to gas velocity gradient in the SW streamer region not only can decrease the optical depth of CO(1-0) emission tracing molecular gas, but also can decrease the optical depth of HCN(1-0) emission tracing dense gas.
3.4 Dense gas fraction
The HCN/CO(1-0) ratio is widely used as an indicator of the fraction of dense gas, which is immediately responsible for the star formation inside galaxies (Gao & Solomon, 2004a, b; Lada et al., 2012). Tanaka et al. (2024) presented non-LTE analyses with ALCHEMI data for the CMZ of NGC 253, and compared the dense gas fraction in this region with the center of the Milky Way. The difference turned out to be consistent with that in the HCN/CO(1-0) ratio between the CMZ of NGC 253 and the Galactic center, which confirms the HCN/CO(1-0) ratio as a good measurement of the mass fraction of the dense gas to the entire molecular gas.
Fig. 5(c) shows the integrated intensity ratio map of HCN/CO(1-0). The HCN/CO(1-0) ratio is the highest in three clumpy regions along the major axis (black solid line), which are marked by the blue contour at a ratio of 0.15. The physical sizes of the three regions in Fig. 5(c) are 100 pc, which fit the scales of giant molecular clouds (GMCs), and can be further resolved into star-forming clumps (10 pc) (Ando et al., 2017). The positions of those GMCs are consistent with the observation in Leroy et al. (2015), which were numbered 3, 6, and 7. The bar of NGC 253 traced with ionized gas is also along the major axis (Das et al., 2001). The inflowing gas along the bar interacting with the gas in the disk can trigger star formation inside those GMCs. The existence of supernova remnants and Hii region in the inner 200 pc of NGC 253 has been revealed about thirty years ago (Ulvestad & Antonucci, 1997). The forming super star clusters and the winds from young clusters were detected in high spatial resolution (Leroy et al., 2018; Levy et al., 2021, 2022). The GMCs 3, 6, and 7 in Fig. 5(c) are located at the base of outflow streamers outlined by the white contour, and the black contour at 0.09 is extended towards the directions of outflow streamers. Given that the dynamical age of the SW streamer equaling 1 Myr is short (Walter et al., 2017), the star formation inside the GMCs can be the engine for the outflow streamers (Krieger et al., 2019).
Walter et al. (2017) measured the ratio of peak intensities between HCN(1-0) and CO(1-0), which equals 1/10 both in the SW streamer region and the starburst center of NGC 253. The orange, purple, and yellow stars in Fig. 5(c) mark the corresponding positions at -1.5′′, -4′′ and -6.5′′ offsets from the slice center along the SW slice following Walter et al. (2017). Based on the spatially resolved map, we can estimate the integrated intensity ratios at the three stars to be 0.19, 0.13, and 0.08. It is understandable that the dense gas fraction is the highest inside the GMC, and monotonously decreases away from the GMC.

Figs. 7(a) and 7(d) show the intensity ratio of HCN/CO(1-0) in the PVDs along the major axis and the SW slice. In Fig. 7(a), the HCN/CO(1-0) intensity ratio increases at the bottom of the PVD where the blueshifted non-disk component is located. In Fig. 7(d), the HCN/CO(1-0) ratio is highest in the SW streamer region with D[-5, 0] arcsec and V200 km s -1. Figs. 4(c) and 4(d) show that the averaged projected velocity of the outflowing gas in the SW streamer region is around 200 km s -1. Hence, the HCN/CO(1-0) ratio increases in the gas at the base of the SW streamer that shares the same velocity with the molecular outflow. The HCN/CO(1-0) ratio in the extended streamer region with D[-15, -5] is moderate as in the gas disk (Fig. 7d), which agrees with the tendency at -6.5′′ offset in Figure 7 from Walter et al. (2017).
It is possible to detect strong molecular emission at densities below the critical density. The effective excitation density is defined as the density at which the integrated intensity of a molecular line equals 1 K km s-1 with reasonable assumptions about the column density and kinetic temperature. Shirley (2015) calculated the optically thin critical densities and effective excitation densities at assumed column density and kinetic temperature for the common dense gas tracers. The kinetic temperatures are assumed to be 100 K (Mangum et al., 2019) in the following comparisons on the effective excitation densities between different tracers. Shirley (2015) calculated the critical density and effective excitation density of HCN(1-0) at a column density of 1014 cm-2, to be cm-3 and cm-3, respectively.
To confirm the distribution of the dense gas in the CMZ of NGC 253, we turn to tracers of dense gas with lower opacity. The critical density and effective excitation density of H13CN(1-0) at a column density of 1012.3 cm-2, equal cm-3 and cm-3. Even though the higher effective excitation density originates from a lower reference column density compared with that of HCN (Shirley, 2015), H13CN(1-0) as an isotopologue can trace the dense gas with less limitation of optical depth. Fig. 7(b) shows the intensity ratio of H13CN/13CO(1-0) in the PVD along the major axis, where the ratio also increases in the blueshifted non-disk component. Although the H13CN/13CO(1-0) ratio in the PVD along the SW slice in Fig. 7(e) is not as extended as HCN/CO(1-0), we still observe high ratios in two regions. One is the ellipse named region A with D0 arcsec and V300 km s -1 (reference velocity) that represents the gas inside GMC 3. The other is the ellipse named region B with D[-5, 0] arcsec and V200 km s-1 (outflow velocity) that represents the gas at the base of the SW streamer.
The critical density and effective excitation density at a column density of 1013 cm-2 of another dense gas tracer N2H+(1-0) equal cm-3 and cm-3. Even though the critical density of N2H+(1-0) is lower than HCN(1-0) and H13CN(1-0), Galactic parsec-scale observations show that the N2H+(1-0) emission is exclusively associated with rather dense gas (Kauffmann et al., 2017; Tafalla et al., 2021). The intensity ratio of N2H+/13CO(1-0) in the PVD along the major axis (Fig. 7c) has an accordant pattern with H13CN/13CO(1-0) PVD (Fig. 7b). In the PVD along the SW slice (Fig. 7f), the N2H+/13CO(1-0) ratio increases at the base of the SW streamer (region B). On one hand, the increased patterns in Figs. 7(d) and 7(f) are highly consistent. Given that N2H+(1-0) is not safely optically thin and the optical depths of HCN(1-0) and CO(1-0) can be different in the central region, the N2H+/13CO(1-0) and HCN/CO(1-0) ratios inside GMC 3 may be affected by optical depths. On the other hand, all three ratios in Figs. 7(d), 7(e) and 7(f) are higher in region B, which implies a negligible influence of optical depths at the base of the SW streamer, not to mention in the extended streamer region (Fig. 6b).
In summary, we find that the dense gas fraction is high inside GMC 3 (with reference velocity, region A) and at the base of the SW streamer (with outflow velocity, region B). The dense gas fraction in the extended streamer region (outlined by the black dashed profiles) is moderate in Fig. 7(d) and doesn’t show visible signs of accumulation of dense gas traced with HCN/CO(1-0). Combining the low optical depths of CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0) emission in the extended streamer region (Figs. 5a and 5b), we suggest the existence of gas velocity gradient prevents the gas from accumulation inside the SW streamer of NGC 253.
3.5 Shock strength
Si-bearing material and solid-phase methanol are located in different parts of the dust grains. Silicon tends to reside in the core of grains and can be sputtered to the gas phase by fast shocks (v 15-20 km s-1, Kelly et al. 2017). Gas-phase silicon reacts with molecular oxygen or a hydroxyl radical and forms SiO (Schilke et al., 1997). On the other hand, solid-phase methanol is in the icy mantle of grains. Slow shocks (v 15-20 km s-1, Nesterenok 2022) are able to impact the icy mantle and inject gas-phase methanol into the ISM without destroying the grain core nor the methanol molecule (Millar et al., 1991; Charnley et al., 1995). Huang et al. (2023) studied the shock tracers SiO and HNCO with the ALCHEMI data, and revealed a picture that most of the GMCs are subjected to shocks. They declared that HNCO may not be a unique tracer of slow shocks, while a high abundance of silicon in the gas phase can only be explained by fast shocks. In this section, we will explore the methanol emission to verify the state of slow shocks, and inspect the relation between fast shocks traced by SiO emission and outflow streamers.

Fig. 8(a) shows the integrated intensity ratio map of SiO(2-1)/CO(1-0). The three dense GMCs (labeled by ‘3’, ‘6’, ‘7’ following Fig. 5c) also show increased SiO(2-1)/CO(1-0) ratio that is marked by the blue contour at 0.01. Moreover, two SiO(2-1)/CO(1-0) ratio peaks appear around GMC 3 in Fig. 8(a), with the second one consistent with the position of GMC 4 in Leroy et al. (2015). To examine the influence of optical depth, we also plot the integrated intensity ratio map of SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) in Fig. 8(b). The increased SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) ratio exists in the four GMCs (marked by blue contour at 0.1). The increased ratios in the GMCs imply the enhanced fast shocks there. The grey contour in Fig. 8(b) outlines the outflow streamers that originate from the four GMCs. Both the distributions of SiO(2-1)/CO(1-0) (marked by black contour at 0.003) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) (marked by black contour at 0.04) are extended towards the outflow streamers, which connect the fast shocks with the formation of the molecular outflow.

Fig. 8(c) shows the integrated intensity ratio map of CH3OH(2k-1k)/13CO(1-0). The increased CH3OH(2k-1k)/13CO(1-0) ratio that is marked by black contour at 0.15 located on the outskirts of the gas disk. Locations with high CH3OH(2k-1k)/13CO(1-0) ratio are similar to those with high CH3OH(2k-1k) integrated intensity shown in Fig. 1(f). Such a tendency is in agreement with HNCO 40,4-30,3 emission in Huang et al. (2023) that shows high integrated intensity in the outermost CMZ of NGC 253. The strong methanol emission on the outskirts, with positions in consistent with the methanol masers found by Gorski et al. (2017), implies the frequent occurrence of slow shocks. Meanwhile, the weak methanol emission in the center could be a result of the infrequent slow shocks, or the depletion of methanol molecules (Hartquist et al., 1995; Ellingsen et al., 2017) by fast shocks or photo-dissociation due to intense star formation (Humire et al., 2022). The non-cospatial distributions of fast and slow shocks were also found in another nearby galaxy NGC 1068 (Kelly et al., 2017) and imply that fast shocks do not necessarily occur with slow shocks. To obtain the relative strength between the fast and slow shocks, we plot the integrated intensity ratio map of SiO(2-1)/CH3OH(2k-1k) in Fig. 8(d), where the central region turns out to be dominated by the fast shocks.
Fig. 9 shows intensity ratios of the shock tracers in PVDs, where the top panels show the PVDs along the major axis and the bottom panels show the PVDs along the SW slice. The asymmetric and increased pattern (including regions A and B) of SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) ratio in PVDs (Figs. 9a and 9d) are highly similar to the H13CN/13CO(1-0) ratio in PVDs (Figs. 7b and 7e). We will study in detail the correlation between the dense gas fraction and the strength of fast shocks in the next section. The increased intensity ratio of CH3OH(2k-1k)/13CO(1-0) on the outskirts of the gas disk in Fig. 9(b) is coherent with the distribution of the increased integrated intensity ratio in Fig. 8(c). It is worth noting that a few red pixels located in region B of Fig. 9(e) indicate an enhancement of the slow shocks at the base of the SW streamer. In Figs. 9(c) and 9(f), we plot the SiO(2-1)/CH3OH(2k-1k) ratio in PVDs. The region A in Fig. 9(f) is dominated by the fast shocks, while the SiO(2-1)/CH3OH(2k-1k) ratio in region B is not so high as region A. We infer that the fast shocks are triggered by the star formation inside GMC, which supports the second scenario for the origin of shocks in Huang et al. (2023). Meanwhile, the fast and slow shocks co-exist in the SW streamer, and can further be related to the formation of the molecular outflow.
4 Formation of the molecular outflow
Walter et al. (2017) presented molecular spectra in the SW streamer region and quantified the relationship between the different molecular transitions, including CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0). Based on the data from the ALCHEMI survey, we can add several weaker molecular lines. In Fig. 10(a), we plot orange, purple, and yellow stars the same as Fig. 5(c) onto the self-calibrated integrated intensity ratio map of CO/13CO(1-0), where the increased ratio indicated by red color represents the outflow region. The purple star is located at -4′′ offset on the SW slice following Walter et al. (2017). The molecular emission shown in Fig. 10(b) are averaged intensity profiles from a beam-size region centering on this purple star. The black profile shows the averaged intensity of the CO(1-0) spectrum (scaled down by a factor of 100), the red and grey profiles show the averaged intensities of HCN(1-0) and 13CO(1-0) spectra (scaled down by a factor of 10), as well as pink, orange, blue and green profiles, show the averaged intensities of H13CN(1-0), N2H+(1-0), SiO(2-1) and CH3OH(2k-1k) spectra.

Line | Streamer (mJy beam-1) | Disk (mJy beam-1) | Streamer-to-disk ratio |
---|---|---|---|
CO(1-0) | 161.75 1.43 | 367.44 1.47 | 0.440 0.004 |
13CO(1-0) | 7.54 0.36 | 25.17 0.38 | 0.300 0.015 |
HCN(1-0)* | 12.60 1.29 | 22.02 1.43 | 0.572 0.069 |
H13CN(1-0)* | 0.64 0.10 | 1.22 0.09 | 0.524 0.091 |
N2H+(1-0)* | 1.07 0.05 | 2.14 0.05 | 0.500 0.028 |
SiO(2-1) | 0.27 0.42 | 0.93 0.41 | 0.290 0.471 |
CH3OH(2k-1k) | 0.76 0.09 | 2.66 0.10 | 0.286 0.034 |
-
*
The star symbols in the first column mark the dense gas tracers.
All the molecular lines in Fig. 10(b) show double peak structures, which are in agreement with Figure 7 from Walter et al. (2017) and CO(3-2) lines in Figure 4 from Levy et al. (2022). The relatively weak blueshifted component is emitted by the SW streamer, and the relatively strong redshifted component is emitted by the gas disk. We use the Python-based tool curve_fit to conduct a double Gaussian fit on each molecular line. The peak intensities together with errors from the Gaussian fit of the streamer and disk components for each molecular line are listed in the second and third columns of Table 2, and the corresponding line name is listed in the first column. Although the streamer component is weak in the SiO(2-1) line, it exists in all the molecular lines that are extracted from the beam-size region (purple star in Fig. 10a) in the SW streamer.
As described in the introduction, there are three main formation scenarios previously proposed for the molecular outflow. One is the molecular outflow directly driven by radiation and/or pressure, one is the molecular cloud entrained by the hot wind, and the other is the molecular outflow in situ forming from the hot wind. The last scenario assumes the cooling timescale to be shorter than the dynamical timescale (Efstathiou, 2000; Silich et al., 2003). Walter et al. (2017) estimated that the molecular gas inside the SW streamer of NGC 253 is ejected from the disk 1 Myr ago, which is too short to create new CO molecules that can emit (Clark et al., 2012). Moreover, the phenomenon that all the molecular lines in Table 2 show streamer features indicates that the SW streamer starts as dense, shocked, and chemically rich outflowing gas. The existence of dense gas tracers, e.g., HCN, H13CN and N2H+, inside the outflow further excludes the possibility of in situ formation. However, it is still difficult to distinguish whether the outflowing molecular gas is directly driven by radiation/pressure or is entrained by the hot wind.
4.1 Correlation between the dense gas fraction and the strength of fast shocks
Fig. 11(a) shows the integrated intensity ratio map of H13CN/13CO(1-0), where the GMCs have the highest ratios marked by the blue contour at 0.12, and the black contour at 0.06 is extended towards the outflow streamers. Such increased patterns are similar to that of SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) in Fig. 8(b). Moreover, the increased H13CN/13CO(1-0) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) ratios in PVDs in Figs. 7 and 9 also share similar patterns. The consistency in the enhanced emissions of H13CN(1-0) and SiO(2-1) implies a positive correlation between the dense gas fraction and the strength of fast shocks in NGC 253. We regrid the H13CN(1-0), SiO(2-1) and 13CO(1-0) data cubes to a 1.6′′ beam-size to avoid oversampling, then statistically quantify the linear relationship between H13CN/13CO(1-0) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0).

The blue points in Fig. 11(b) show the H13CN/13CO(1-0) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) ratios in each beam size region from Figs 8(b) and 11(a). To check the linear relationship between two ratios, which is visibly tight, we calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient using the Python-based package pearsonr. The correlation coefficient () equals 0.85, which reveals a tight positive correlation between H13CN/13CO(1-0) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) ratios. We perform a linear fit for the data set, which is shown by the grey solid line in Fig. 11(b). We also calculate the Pearson correlation coefficient between H13CN(1-0) and SiO(2-1) integrated intensities, which approaches 0.96 and reveals a tight correlation between the intensities of two lines. Therefore, the correlation between H13CN/13CO(1-0) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) ratios is real, it is not a result from the common denominator. Meanwhile, we keep in mind that the high critical densities of H13CN(1-0) and SiO(2-1) may contribute to the tight positive correlation between two ratios. Theoretically, the star formation that happens in the region with a high dense gas fraction can trigger fast shocks. Combining the similar extensions of the SiO(2-1) and H13CN(1-0) emissions towards the outflow in Figs 8(b) and 11(a), the star formation inside the GMCs can trigger fast shocks and contribute to the formation of the molecular outflow in NGC 253.
The difference between the tracers of dense gas and shocks presents when we further analyse the molecular spectra in Fig. 10(b). Given that all the lines show double peak structures, we can distinguish the contributions of steamer and disk via the double Gaussian fits. In the last column of Table 2, we list the streamer-to-disk peak intensity ratios (streamer-to-disk ratios for short) together with errors for different molecular lines. Each ratio is calculated by dividing the peak intensity of the streamer component by that of the disk component.
The streamer-to-disk ratio of CO(1-0) is higher than its isotopologue 13CO(1-0), which can be explained by the lower opacity environment inside the SW streamer than in the gas disk for CO emission as discussed in Section 3.3. It is interesting to find that all the dense gas tracers (marked by the star symbols in the first column of Table 2) have higher streamer-to-disk ratios than the others. The optical depth decreasing inside the SW streamer for HCN emission can explain the highest streamer-to-disk ratio of HCN(1-0) among the dense gas tracers. In addition, the SiO(2-1) and methanol, as the tracers of fast and slow shocks, respectively, have similar streamer-to-disk ratios to 13CO(1-0). It seems that the enhancement of dense gas fraction is stronger in the SW streamer than in the gas disk, while the shock strength is equivalently enhanced in the SW streamer and the gas disk. More detailed clues are needed to explain such a difference.
We suggest the physical pictures that are related to the SW streamer in NGC 253 as follows: (i) The GMCs (Fig. 5c) in the direction of the major axis are related to the gas accretion along the bar structure that further provides material for the star formation. Meanwhile, the star formation inside the GMCs that are located at the base of the outflow streamers contributes to driving the molecular outflow, which is in agreement with the model presented by Levy et al. (2022). (ii) There can be intense star formation inside the GMCs also presenting as higher dense gas fraction, and results in enhanced shock strength at the base of the outflow (Figs. 7 and 9) including the SW streamer. (iii) The optical depths of CO and HCN emission decrease in the SW streamer (Figs. 5a and 5b), and the dense gas is diluted in the extended SW streamer region (Fig. 7d), which can be attributed to the gas velocity gradient inside the molecular outflow.
5 Summary
In this work, we analyse data from the ALCHEMI survey and study the physical properties of the molecular outflow in the starburst galaxy NGC 253.
-
(1)
The emission of CO(1-0), 13CO(1-0), HCN(1-0), H13CN(1-0), N2H+(1-0) and CH3OH(2k-1k) is extended towards the SW streamer. The CO(1-0) and HCN(1-0) emission is the most extended, which can be attributed to the optically thick environments in the gas disk and decreased optical depths towards the SW streamer.
-
(2)
The molecular outflow in the SW streamer region is blueshifted with a deprojected local velocity of 400 km s-1, which is consistent with previous studies. The wider blueshifted component than the disk component suggests an inside-out acceleration of molecular outflow or the fast ejecta getting farther away than the slow ejecta. All the molecular spectra from the SW streamer region show double peak structures, which indicate that the SW streamer starts as dense, shocked and chemically rich outflowing gas, rather than in situ formation from hot wind.
-
(3)
The integrated intensity ratio maps of CO/13CO(1-0) and HCN/13CO(1-0) show similar patterns. Both are lowest in the gas disk, increase towards outflow directions that are perpendicular to the gas disk, and become highest in the SW streamer region. Combining the isotopic ratio of C/13C from a previous study, we suggest that the CO(1-0) emission is optically thin in the SW streamer region, which may be a result of the gas velocity gradient.
-
(4)
Three GMCs present in the integrated intensity ratio map of HCN/CO(1-0), which are aligned with the direction of the major axis and can be caused by the gas accretion along the bar structure. Those GMCs are located at the base of the outflow streamers including the SW streamer, where the star formation can drive molecular outflow. The HCN/CO(1-0), H13CN/13CO(1-0) and N2H+/13CO(1-0) intensity ratios in PVDs show high dense gas fraction at the base of the SW streamer. The HCN/CO(1-0) intensity ratio in PVDs suggests moderate dense gas fraction in the extended streamer region without visible signs of accumulation of dense gas, which may also be a result of gas velocity gradient.
-
(5)
The SiO(2-1)/CO(1-0) and SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) integrated intensity ratios show enhanced fast shocks in the GMCs. The SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0) and CH3OH(2k-1k)/13CO(1-0) intensity ratios in PVDs indicate that fast shocks can be triggered by the star formation inside GMC, while fast and slow shocks co-exist at the base of the SW streamer and can be related to the formation of molecular outflow.
-
(6)
There is a tight positive correlation between the dense gas fraction traced with H13CN/13CO(1-0) and the strength of fast shocks traced with SiO(2-1)/13CO(1-0). The dense gas fraction is high in GMCs, where the star formation can trigger fast shocks and contribute to the formation of molecular outflow. One difference is that the enhancement of the dense gas fraction is more tightly related to the SW streamer than the gas disk, while the shock strength is equivalently enhanced in the SW streamer and the gas disk.
Acknowledgements.
We thank the referee for constructive comments that greatly improved this paper. This paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2017.1.00161.L. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST and ASIAA (Taiwan), and KASI (Republic of Korea), in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. The Joint ALMA Observatory is operated by ESO, AUI/NRAO and NAOJ. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17H06130 and the NAOJ ALMA Scientific Research Grant Number 2017-06B. M.B. acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 12303009) and the China Scholarship Council (No. 202006860042). N.H. acknowledges support from JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP21K03634. F.E. is financially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers JP17K14259 and JP20H00172. L.C. acknowledges financial support through the Spanish grant PID2019-105552RB-C41 funded by MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033. V.M.R. has received support from the project RYC2020-029387-I funded by MCIN/AEI /10.13039/501100011033. S.V., M.B., and K-Y. Huang acknowledge support from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme MOPPEX 833460. M.B. acknowledges Prof. Yu Gao for his remarkable discovery of the HCN J = 1-0 as an indicator of dense molecular gas, as well as for his gentle clarification to her regarding the ALMA instrument in 2018.References
- Aalto (2015) Aalto, S. 2015, Revolution in Astronomy with ALMA: The Third Year, 499, 85
- ALMA Partnership et al. (2015) ALMA Partnership, Fomalont, E. B., Vlahakis, C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L1
- Aladro et al. (2015) Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A101
- Ando et al. (2017) Ando, R., Nakanishi, K., Kohno, K., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 81
- Banda-Barragán et al. (2019) Banda-Barragán, W. E., Zertuche, F. J., Federrath, C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 4526
- Barnes et al. (2020) Barnes, A. T., Kauffmann, J., Bigiel, F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 1972
- Behrens et al. (2022) Behrens, E., Mangum, J. G., Holdship, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 119
- Bendo et al. (2015) Bendo, G. J., Beswick, R. J., D’Cruze, M. J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, L80
- Bolatto et al. (2013) Bolatto, A. D., Warren, S. R., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2013, Nature, 499, 450
- Brunthaler et al. (2009) Brunthaler, A., Castangia, P., Tarchi, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 497, 103
- Charnley et al. (1995) Charnley, S. B., Kress, M. E., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 1995, ApJ, 448, 232
- Clark et al. (2012) Clark, P. C., Glover, S. C. O., Klessen, R. S., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2599
- Cohen et al. (2020) Cohen, D. P., Turner, J. L., & Consiglio, S. M. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 627
- Colzi et al. (2020) Colzi, L., Sipilä, O., Roueff, E., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A51
- Das et al. (2001) Das, M., Anantharamaiah, K. R., & Yun, M. S. 2001, ApJ, 549, 896
- Ebenstein & Muenter (1984) Ebenstein, W. L., & Muenter, J. S. 1984, J. Chem. Phys., 80, 3989
- Efstathiou (2000) Efstathiou, G. 2000, MNRAS, 317, 697
- Ellingsen et al. (2017) Ellingsen, S. P., Chen, X., Breen, S. L., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 472, 604
- Endres et al. (2016) Endres, C. P., Schlemmer, S., Schilke, P., et al. 2016, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 327, 95
- Engelbracht et al. (1998) Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, M. J., Rieke, G. H., et al. 1998, ApJ, 505, 639
- Fielding & Bryan (2022) Fielding, D. B. & Bryan, G. L. 2022, ApJ, 924, 82
- Gao & Solomon (2004a) Gao, Y. & Solomon, P. M. 2004, ApJ, 606, 271
- Gao & Solomon (2004b) Gao, Y. & Solomon, P. M. 2004, ApJS, 152, 63
- García-Burillo et al. (2010) García-Burillo, S., Usero, A., Fuente, A., et al. 2010, A&A, 519, A2
- Goldsmith & Kauffmann (2017) Goldsmith, P. F. & Kauffmann, J. 2017, ApJ, 841, 25
- Goorvitch (1994) Goorvitch, D. 1994, ApJS, 95, 535
- Gorski et al. (2017) Gorski, M., Ott, J., Rand, R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 124
- Greisen (2003) Greisen, E. W. 2003, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, 285, 109
- Ginsburg et al. (2016) Ginsburg, A., Robitaille, T., & Beaumont, C. 2016, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:1608.010
- Haasler et al. (2022) Haasler, D., Rivilla, V. M., Martín, S., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A158
- Harada et al. (2021) Harada, N., Martín, S., Mangum, J. G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 923, 24
- Harada et al. (2022) Harada, N., Martín, S., Mangum, J. G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 938, 80
- Hartquist et al. (1995) Hartquist, T. W., Menten, K. M., Lepp, S., et al. 1995, MNRAS, 272, 184
- Heckman et al. (2000) Heckman, T. M., Lehnert, M. D., Strickland, D. K., et al. 2000, ApJS, 129, 493
- Heesen et al. (2011) Heesen, V., Beck, R., Krause, M., et al. 2011, A&A, 535, A79
- Hollenbach & Salpeter (1971) Hollenbach, D. & Salpeter, E. E. 1971, ApJ, 163, 155
- Huang et al. (2022) Huang, K.-Y., Viti, S., Holdship, J., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A102
- Huang et al. (2023) Huang, K.-Y., Viti, S., Holdship, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A151
- Holdship et al. (2021) Holdship, J., Viti, S., Martín, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A55
- Holdship et al. (2022) Holdship, J., Mangum, J. G., Viti, S., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 89
- Humire et al. (2022) Humire, P. K., Henkel, C., Hernández-Gómez, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A33
- Iodice et al. (2014) Iodice, E., Arnaboldi, M., Rejkuba, M., et al. 2014, A&A, 567, A86
- Israel (2020) Israel, F. P. 2020, A&A, 635, A131
- Kahle et al. (2023) Kahle, K. A., Hernández-Gómez, A., Wyrowski, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A143
- Kauffmann et al. (2017) Kauffmann, J., Goldsmith, P. F., Melnick, G., et al. 2017, A&A, 605, L5
- Kelly et al. (2017) Kelly, G., Viti, S., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2017, A&A, 597, A11
- Klein et al. (1994) Klein, R. I., McKee, C. F., & Colella, P. 1994, ApJ, 420, 213
- Kormendy & Ho (2013) Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511
- Krieger et al. (2019) Krieger, N., Bolatto, A. D., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJ, 881, 43
- Lada et al. (2012) Lada, C. J., Forbrich, J., Lombardi, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 745, 190
- Le Bourlot et al. (2012) Le Bourlot, J., Le Petit, F., Pinto, C., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A76
- Lefèvre et al. (2020) Lefèvre, C., Kramer, C., Neri, R., et al. 2020, mm Universe @ NIKA2 - Observing the mm Universe with the NIKA2 Camera, 228, 00014
- Leroy et al. (2015) Leroy, A. K., Bolatto, A. D., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 25
- Leroy et al. (2018) Leroy, A. K., Bolatto, A. D., Ostriker, E. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 126
- Lopez et al. (2023) Lopez, S., Lopez, L. A., Nguyen, D. D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 942, 108
- Levy et al. (2021) Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 912, 4
- Levy et al. (2022) Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 19
- Mangum et al. (2019) Mangum, J. G., Ginsburg, A. G., Henkel, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 170
- Martín et al. (2019) Martín, S., Muller, S., Henkel, C., et al. 2019, A&A, 624, A125
- Martín et al. (2021) Martín, S., Mangum, J. G., Harada, N., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A46
- McGuire (2022) McGuire, B. A. 2022, ApJS, 259, 30
- Meier et al. (2015) Meier, D. S., Walter, F., Bolatto, A. D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 801, 63
- Michiyama et al. (2018) Michiyama, T., Iono, D., Sliwa, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 868, 95
- Millar et al. (1991) Millar, T. J., Herbst, E., & Charnley, S. B. 1991, ApJ, 369, 147
- Murray et al. (2011) Murray, N., Ménard, B., & Thompson, T. A. 2011, ApJ, 735, 66
- Nesterenok (2022) Nesterenok, A. V. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 4555
- Orlando et al. (2005) Orlando, S., Peres, G., Reale, F., et al. 2005, A&A, 444, 505
- Ott et al. (2005) Ott, J., Weiss, A., Henkel, C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 629, 767
- Paglione et al. (2004) Paglione, T. A. D., Yam, O., Tosaki, T., et al. 2004, ApJ, 611, 835
- Pantaleone et al. (2021) Pantaleone, S., Enrique-Romero, J., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2021, ApJ, 917, 49
- Peng et al. (1996) Peng, R., Zhou, S., Whiteoak, J. B., et al. 1996, ApJ, 470, 821
- Pietsch et al. (2000) Pietsch, W., Vogler, A., Klein, U., et al. 2000, A&A, 360, 24
- Rekola et al. (2005) Rekola, R., Richer, M. G., McCall, M. L., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 361, 330
- Rieke et al. (1980) Rieke, G. H., Lebofsky, M. J., Thompson, R. I., et al. 1980, ApJ, 238, 24
- Sakamoto et al. (2011) Sakamoto, K., Mao, R.-Q., Matsushita, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 19
- Sánchez-Monge et al. (2018) Sánchez-Monge, Á., Schilke, P., Ginsburg, A., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A101
- Schilke et al. (1997) Schilke, P., Walmsley, C. M., Pineau des Forets, G., et al. 1997, A&A, 321, 293
- Shirley (2015) Shirley, Y. L. 2015, PASP, 127, 299
- Silich et al. (2003) Silich, S., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Muñoz-Tuñón, C. 2003, ApJ, 590, 791
- Socrates et al. (2008) Socrates, A., Davis, S. W., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2008, ApJ, 687, 202
- Spilker et al. (2019) Spilker, J. S., Bezanson, R., Weiner, B. J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 81
- Strickland et al. (2000) Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Weaver, K. A., et al. 2000, AJ, 120, 2965
- Strickland et al. (2002) Strickland, D. K., Heckman, T. M., Weaver, K. A., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, 689
- Sturm et al. (2011) Sturm, E., González-Alfonso, E., Veilleux, S., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, L16
- The CASA Team et al. (2022) CASA Team et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501
- Tacchella et al. (2015) Tacchella, S., Carollo, C. M., Renzini, A., et al. 2015, Science, 348, 314
- Tacchella et al. (2016) Tacchella, S., Dekel, A., Carollo, C. M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 242
- Tafalla et al. (2021) Tafalla, M., Usero, A., & Hacar, A. 2021, A&A, 646, A97
- Takano et al. (2019) Takano, S., Nakajima, T., & Kohno, K. 2019, PASJ, 71, S20
- Tanaka et al. (2024) Tanaka, K., Mangum, J. G., Viti, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 18
- Tang et al. (2019) Tang, X. D., Henkel, C., Menten, K. M., et al. 2019, A&A, 629, A6
- Turner (1985) Turner, B. E. 1985, ApJ, 299, 312
- Uhlig et al. (2012) Uhlig, M., Pfrommer, C., Sharma, M., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2374
- Ulvestad & Antonucci (1997) Ulvestad, J. S. & Antonucci, R. R. J. 1997, ApJ, 488, 621
- Veilleux et al. (2005) Veilleux, S., Cecil, G., & Bland-Hawthorn, J. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 769
- Veilleux et al. (2009) Veilleux, S., Kim, D.-C., Rupke, D. S. N., et al. 2009, ApJ, 701, 587
- Veilleux et al. (2020) Veilleux, S., Maiolino, R., Bolatto, A. D., et al. 2020, A&A Rev., 28, 2
- Walter et al. (2017) Walter, F., Bolatto, A. D., Leroy, A. K., et al. 2017, ApJ, 835, 265
- Weiß et al. (2005) Weiß, A., Walter, F., & Scoville, N. Z. 2005, A&A, 438, 533
- Westmoquette et al. (2011) Westmoquette, M. S., Smith, L. J., & Gallagher, J. S. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 3719
- Zschaechner et al. (2018) Zschaechner, L. K., Bolatto, A. D., Walter, F., et al. 2018, ApJ, 867, 111