This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Physical Nature of the Eclipsing δ\delta Scuti Star AO Serpentis

Jang-Ho Park1, Jae Woo Lee1, Kyeongsoo Hong2, Jae-Rim Koo3, and Chun-Hwey Kim4 1Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejon 34055, Republic of Korea 2Institute for Astrophysics, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea 3Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungnam National University, Daejeon 34134, Republic of Korea 4Department of Astronomy and Space Science, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Republic of Korea
Abstract

We present the absolute properties of the eclipsing binary AO Ser with a pulsating component from our BVBV photometric and high-resolution spectroscopic observations, which were performed between April and May 2017. The radial velocities (RVs) for both components were measured, and the effective temperature and projected rotational velocity of the primary star were determined to be Teff,1T_{\rm eff,1} = 8,820 ±\pm 62 K and v1sini1v_{1}\sin i_{1} = 90 ±\pm 18 km s-1, respectively, by comparing the observed spectrum with the Kurucz models. The accurate fundamental parameters of AO Ser were determined by a simultaneous analysis of the light and RV curves. The masses and radii of the primary and secondary components are M1M_{1} = 2.55 ±\pm 0.09 M and R1R_{1} = 1.64 ±\pm 0.02 R and M2M_{2} = 0.49 ±\pm 0.02 M and R2R_{2} = 1.38 ±\pm 0.02 R, respectively. Multiple frequency analyses for the eclipse-subtracted light residuals were conducted. As a result, we detected two frequencies of f1f_{1} = 21.852 days-1 and f2f_{2} = 23.484 days-1. The evolutionary position on the HR diagram and the pulsational characteristics indicate that the primary star is a δ\delta Sct pulsator with a radial fundamental mode. On the other hand, the relatively evolved secondary is oversized for its own mass.

Eclipsing binary stars (444); Fundamental parameters of stars (555); Stellar oscillations (1617); Photometry (1234); Spectroscopy (1558); Multi-periodic pulsation (1078); Asteroseismology (73)

1 Introduction

Eclipsing binaries (EBs) provide a unique opportunity to accurately determine the fundamental parameters (e.g. mass and radius) without any assumptions from the analysis of light and radial velocity (RV) curves. The interior structure of stars is difficult to observe directly, but it can be studied through the frequency analysis of pulsating variables. In this respect, EBs with pulsating stars are interesting objects because they have the advantage that their binary properties can be studied together with the asteroseismic parameters. From these studies, we can obtain very useful information for understanding the evolution and interior structure of stars. Although a number of pulsating EBs have been found from various channels such as Kepler (Borucki et al. 2010; Koch et al. 2010) and the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS; Ricker et al. 2015), the samples for physical properties are still insufficient, so accurate study of these objects is required. Recently, a series of papers (Hong et al. 2015, 2017, 2019; Koo et al. 2016; Lee et al. 2018, 2020) has contributed to studying the fundamental parameters of pulsating EBs.

This paper is concerned with AO Ser (BD+17o2942\rm BD+17^{o}2942, 2MASS J15581840+1716101, TYC 1496-3-1; VTV\rm_{T}=++11.04, (BV)T(B-V)\rm_{T}=++0.22), which was found to be an Algol-type binary star by Hoffmeister (1935). Guthnick & Prager (1936) reported a brightness change between 10.5 mag and 12.0 mag from photographic observations. The spectral type of the primary star has been classified as A2-A7 by previous investigators (Brancewicz & Dworak 1980; Kreiner et al. 2001; Hoffman 2009; Yang et al. 2010, hereafter YANG; Alton & Prša 2012, hereafter AP; Hambálek 2015). The mass ratio (qq) of this binary system was derived from photometric and spectroscopic methods. First of all, Hoffman (2009) determined the mass ratio to be 0.178 from the double-lined RVs measured by his spectroscopic observations. Subsequently, YANG, AP, and Hambálek (2015) reported the mass ratio as 0.220, 0.235, and 0.396, respectively, by the qq-search method based on their own photometric observations. Chehlaeh et al. (2017) determined an accurate mass ratio of 0.183 and the absolute parameters through a simultaneous analysis of the BVBV light and RV curves. Kim et al. (2004, hereafter KIM04) found an oscillation with a period and an amplitude of 1.12 h and 0.02 mag in the BB band, respectively, through frequency analysis. They suggested that AO Ser is an oscillating eclipsing Algol (oEA) star (Mkrtichian et al. 2004). Hambálek (2015) detected a pulsation period of 0.96 ±\pm 0.05 h in his light curves by applying various analysis options.

The main purpose of this study is to accurately determine the absolute dimensions of AO Ser by simultaneously analyzing our new light curves with high-resolution spectroscopic data and to present the pulsational characteristics through multiple frequency analyses. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: The observations and data reductions are described in Section 2. The spectral analysis for the RV measurements and the atmospheric parameters is presented in Section 3. Section 4 describes the binary modeling and pulsation frequencies. Lastly, the results of this study are summarized and discussed in Section 5.

2 Observations and Data Reductions

The CCD photometric observations of AO Ser were performed using an ARC 4K CCD camera and a BVBV filter set attached to the 1.0 m reflector at the Mt. Lemmon Optical Astronomy Observatory (LOAO) for six nights from May 22 to 27, 2017. The focal ratio of the Cassegrain reflector is f/7.5. The CCD chip has 4,096×\times4,096 pixels of 15μ\mum size, and the field of view (FoV) is 28\arcmin.0×\times28′.0. All observed images were pre-processed using the IRAF/CCDRED package, and the aperture photometry was performed with the IRAF/PHOT package. Considering brightness and constancy in apparent light, we selected TYC 1496-1169-1 (VTV\rm_{T}=++10.22 mag) and TYC 1496-227-1 (VTV\rm_{T}=++11.72 mag) as the comparison (C) and the check stars (K), respectively, and the standard deviations of the (K-C) magnitudes was about ±\pm0.006 mag in both bands. Finally, we obtained 2,440 and 2,434 individual data points for BB and VV bandpasses, respectively.

Spectroscopic observations were performed using the 1.8 m reflector and the Bohyunsan Optical Echelle Spectrograph (BOES) at the Bohyunsan Optical Astronomy Observatory (BOAO) for four nights between April and May 2017. The BOES has five optical fibers covering the wavelengths range from 3,600 to 10,200 Å\rm\AA (Kim et al. 2007). We used the largest fiber (300 μ\mum, RR = 30,000) to increase the signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio of the spectra. The observations proceeded with an exposure time of 1500 s, and a total of 29 high-resolution spectra were obtained. All observed spectra were pre-processed using the IRAF/CCDRED package and extracted to one-dimensional spectra with the IRAF/ECHELLE package. The S/N ratios between 5,000 and 6,000 Å\rm\AA were approximately 40.

3 Spectral Analysis

The programs FDBinary (Ilijić et al. 2004), which implements disentangling based on the Fourier-domain (Hadrava 1995), and RaveSpan (Pilecki et al. 2013, 2015) that supports three major measurement methods (CCF, TODCOR, and BF), were considered as a tool to obtain the RVs. However, it was difficult to apply both programs to our observed spectra, because the luminosity contribution of the secondary star is very low (l2,Vl_{2,V} \approx 5 %) and the signal was not sufficient to measure the RVs. Since the contributions of both components to the Fe I λ\lambda4957.61 line were clearly separated in each spectrum, the RVs of each component were measured about 5 times by two Gaussian functions using the IRAF splotsplot task. The RVs and their errors were calculated from the average and standard deviations (σ\sigma) of the values measured by Gaussian fitting, and they are listed in Table 1.

To determine the atmospheric parameters of the primary star, we used a spectrum observed at the secondary minimum (ϕ\phi = 0.507) because the orbital inclination (ii) of AO Ser is 90 deg and the secondary star is completely occulted by the primary star at this orbital phase (see Section 4). First of all, we adopted four regions (Fe I λ\lambda4046, Fe I λ\lambda4260, Fe I λ\lambda4271, and Fe I λ\lambda4383) corresponding to the temperature indicators for the dwarf stars of A0-F0, from the Digital Spectral Classification Atlas of R. O. Gray111More information is available on the website: https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Gray/frames.html. Then, to find the most suitable atmospheric parameters, a total of 22,750 synthetic spectra were generated with ranges of Teff=7,51010,000{T_{\rm eff}=7,510-10,000} K and vsini=54144v\sin i=54-144 km s-1 from the ATLAS-9 atmosphere models of Kurucz (1993). In this procedure, we assumed that the solar metallicity (Fe/H) and microturbulent velocity are 0.0 and 2.0 km s-1, respectively, and the surface gravity was applied to be log gg = 4.3 obtained from our binary parameters presented in the next section.

Finally, we found the respective values for effective temperature (TeffT_{\rm eff}) and projected rotational velocity (vsiniv\sin i) through a χ2\chi^{2} minimization of the differences between the observed spectrum and the synthetic spectra. This is the same process that was applied by Hong et al. (2017, 2019), Lee et al. (2018, 2020), and Park et al. (2018). The results are shown in Figure 1. The most suitable parameters to the observed spectrum were determined to be Teff,1T_{\rm eff,1} = 8,820 ±\pm 62 K and v1sini1v_{1}\sin i_{1} = 90 ±\pm 18 km s-1, respectively. Here, these errors were calculated as the standard deviations of the best-fitting parameter values obtained in each spectral region. The four adopted spectral regions and the most suitable synthetic spectrum are presented together in Figure 2.

4 Binary Modeling and Pulsation Frequencies

To obtain the binary parameters of AO Ser, we analyzed our BVBV light and RV curves acquired during the same period. The binary modeling was performed using the 2003 version of the Wilson-Devinney synthesis code (Wilson & Devinney 1971; van Hamme & Wilson 2003; hereafter W-D). The orbital period of AO Ser has varied in a combination of a downward parabola and sinusoidal variation (Khaliullina 2016). Therefore, we collected eight primary minima between 2,457,127.5 and 2,457,898.7 including our observing interval, which have a constant orbital period. The initial epoch (T0T_{0} = HJD 2,457,127.50766 ±\pm 0.00043) and orbital period (PP = 0.879349845 ±\pm 0.000000032 day) was derived by applying a least-squares fit to these timings. In the W-D run, the effective temperature of the primary star (T1T_{\rm 1}) was fixed at 8,820 K as determined by the spectral analysis in the previous section. The gravity-darkening exponents (gg) and the bolometric albedos (AA) were adopted to be g1g_{1} = 1.0 and g2g_{2} = 0.32 (von Zeipel 1924; Lucy 1967), and A1A_{1} = 1.0 and A2A_{2} = 0.5 (Rucinski 1969a,b) because the primary and secondary components should have radiative and convective atmospheres, respectively, according to the temperature of each component presented in Table 2. Linear bolometric (XX, YY) and monochromatic (xx, yy) limb-darkening coefficients were taken from van Hamme (1993). The possible existence of a circumbinary object around AO Ser was proposed by eclipse timing analyses (YANG, AP, Khaliullina 2016). Therefore, we searched for a possible third light (3\ell_{3}), but its parameter converged at zero. Thus, we set the third light to be 3\ell_{3} = 0.0 in further analyses.

Our binary star modeling began with mode 2 (detached binary) but converged to mode 5 (semi-detached binary with the secondary filling its Roche lobe). We adjusted the photometric (i.e., the orbital inclination ii, the temperature of the secondary star T2T_{2}, the dimensionless surface potential Ω\Omega, and the monochromatic luminosity of the primary star L1L_{1}) and spectroscopic (i.e., the system velocity γ\gamma, the semimajor axis aa, and the mass ratio qq) parameters and ran the W-D code until the corrections of each parameter became less than its standard deviation. The final results are listed in Table 2, where rr (volume) is the mean volume radius calculated from the tables given by Mochnacki (1984). Figure 3 shows the RV curves of AO Ser with model fits. In this figure, we plotted together Hoffman’s (2009) measurements for comparison, where his RVs are the result adding our system velocity (γ\gamma). Figure 4 displays the BVBV light curves of AO Ser with model fits. Applying the light and velocity parameters to the JKTABSDIM code (Southworth et al. 2005), we determined the absolute dimensions of each component listed at the bottom of Table 2, where the luminosity (LL) and bolometric magnitudes (MbolM_{\rm bol}) were calculated by adoption of the absolute values of the Sun (TeffT_{\rm eff} = 5,777 K and MbolM_{\rm bol} = +4.75) given by Zombeck (1990). The absolute visual magnitudes (MVM_{V}) used the bolometric corrections (BCs) of Girardi et al. (2002) suitable for the effective temperatures of each component.

To investigate the pulsational characteristics of AO Ser, we used only the light curve residuals from phase 0.134 to 0.866 excluding the primary eclipse. According to our binary model, the pulsating light curves during the primary eclipse may be distorted because the secondary component partially blocked the pulsating primary star. Multiple frequency analyses were performed using the discrete Fourier transform program PERIOD04 (Lenz & Breger 2005). Through an iterative pre-whitening procedure, we detected two frequencies of f1f_{1} = 21.852 days-1 and f2f_{2} = 23.484 days-1 with an S/N amplitude ratio higher than the empirical criterion of 4.0 proposed by Breger et al. (1993) in the BB band. The results and their uncertainties calculated by the equations in the paper of Montgomery & O’Donoghue (1999) are listed in Table 3. The spectral window and the amplitude spectra of the BB band residuals are presented in Figure 5. Figure 6 displays the phase-folded light variations with the synthetic curves calculated from each frequency.

5 Summary and Discussion

In this paper, BVBV photometric and high-resolution spectroscopic observations of the pulsating EB AO Ser were presented. We measured the RVs at the Fe I λ\lambda4957.61 region where the two components were isolated in the observed spectra. From the semi-amplitudes (K1K_{1}, K2K_{2}), the spectroscopic mass ratio was calculated to be q=0.191±0.004q=0.191\pm 0.004. The atmosphere parameters of the pulsating primary star were determined to be Teff,1T_{\rm eff,1} = 8,820 ±\pm 62 K and v1sini1v_{1}\sin i_{1} = 90 ±\pm 18 km s-1, respectively. From the simultaneous analysis of the light and RV curves, the binary parameters of AO Ser were obtained with ii = 90 deg, temperature difference (ΔT\Delta T) = 3,988 K, and aa = 5.59 R, respectively. The absolute parameters of each component were determined as follows: M1M_{1} = 2.55 ±\pm 0.09 M, R1R_{1} = 1.64 ±\pm 0.02 R and M2M_{2} = 0.49 ±\pm 0.02 M, R2R_{2} = 1.38 ±\pm 0.02 R.

In Figure 7, the evolutionary positions of each component on the HR diagram are marked by star symbols, together with those of 38 other semi-detached EBs with a δ\delta Sct component (Kahraman Aliçavuş et al. 2017). Here, it can be seen that the primary component belongs to the main-sequence star and is near the blue edge of the δ\delta Sct instability region. On the other hand, the companion is outside the main-sequence stage, and is located in the region where the secondaries of semi-detached EBs with δ\delta Sct components are distributed. The Roche geometry of AO Ser indicated that the secondary component fills its inner lobe completely, while the hotter primary fills only 61%. Considering the physical properties of AO Ser, it can be inferred that the primary was formed by mass flowed from the more massive component that was relatively evolved in the past, while the donor lost most of its own mass and became the oversized secondary with a low mass (Sarna 1993; Erdem & Öztürk 2014).

From the pulsation frequency analysis, we detected two frequencies f1f_{1} = 21.852 days-1 and f2f_{2} = 23.484 days-1, respectively, where f1f_{1} is very close to ff = 21.5 days-1 found by KIM04. We calculated the pulsation constant (QQ) of this dominant frequency f1f_{1} by applying our accurate fundamental parameters to the following equation: logQ=logf+0.5logg+0.1Mbol+logTeff6.456\log Q=-\log f+0.5\log g+0.1M_{\rm bol}+\log T_{\rm eff}-6.456 (Breger 2000). The pulsation constant was calculated to be QQ (f1f_{1}) = 0.0349 ±\pm 0.0028 days, which can be identified as the radial fundamental mode of the δ\delta Sct stars from comparing with the theoretical model given by Fitch (1981). On the other hand, the newly found f2f_{2} has low amplitude and can suffer from 1 day-1 aliasing. If f2f_{2} is a real pulsation frequency of AO Ser, the high frequency ratio f1f_{1}/f2f_{2} = 0.931 indicates that f2f_{2} might be a nonradial pp-mode.

We are grateful to the anonymous referee for valuable comments, which helped us to improve the manuscript. The authors wish to thank S.-L. Kim for helpful comments on pulsation analysis. This work was supported by KASI (Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute) grant 2020-1-834-00. The work by K. Hong, J.-R. Koo, and C.-H. Kim was supported by the grant Nos. 2017R1A4A1015178 and 2019R1I1A1A01056776, 2017R1A6A3A01002871, and 2020R1A4A2002885 of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea, respectively. We have used the Simbad database maintained at CDS, Strasbourg, France.

References

  • Alton & Prša (2012) Alton, K. B., & Prša, A. 2012, in Warner B. D., Buchleim R. K., Foote J. L., Mais D., eds, Proc. Soc. Astron. Sci. Annu. Symp. Vol. 31, Symposium on Telescope Science. Society for Astronomical Sciences, Rancho Cucamonga, CA, 127
  • Borucki et al (2010) Borucki, W. J., Koch, D., Basri, G., et al. 2010, Sci, 327, 977
  • Brancewicz & Dworak (1980) Brancewicz, H. K., & Dworak, T. Z. 1980, Acta Astron., 30, 501
  • Breger et al (1993) Breger, M., Stich J., Garrido R., et al. 1993, A&A, 271, 482
  • Breger (2000) Breger, M. 2000, in ASP Conf. Ser. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, ed. M. Breger & M. H. Montgomery (San Francisco, CA: ASP), 3
  • Chehlaeh et al (2017) Chehlaeh, N., Lampens, P., Mkrtichian, D., van Cauteren, P., Vermeylen, L., & Komonjinda, S. 2017, in J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 901, 012007
  • Erdem & Ozturk (2014) Erdem, A., & Öztürk, O. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 1166
  • Fitch (1981) Fitch, W. S. 1981, ApJ, 249, 218
  • Girardi et al (2002) Girardi, L., Bertelli, G., & Bressanm, A. 2002, A&A, 391, 195
  • Guthnick & Prager (1936) Guthnick, P., & Prager, R. 1936, Astron. Nachr., 260, 393
  • Hadrava (1995) Hadrava, P. 1995, A&AS, 114, 393
  • Hambálek (2015) Hambálek, Ĺ. 2015, Contrib. Astron. Obs. Skalnaté Pleso, 45, 106
  • Hoffman (2009) Hoffman, D. I. 2009, PhD thesis, New Mexico State Univ.
  • Hoffmeister (1935) Hoffmeister, C. 1935, Astron. Nachr., 255, 401
  • Hong et al (2015) Hong, K., Lee, J. W., Kim, S.-L., Koo J.-R., Lee, C.-U., Yushchenko, A. V., & Kang, Y.-W. 2015, AJ, 150, 131
  • Hong et al (2017) Hong, K., Lee, J. W., Koo J.-R., Kim, S.-L., Lee, C.-U., Park, J.-H., & Rittipruk, P. 2017, AJ, 153, 247
  • Hong et al (2019) Hong, K., Lee, J. W., Koo J.-R., Park, J.-H., Kim, S.-L., Rittipruk, P., Kanjanasakul, C., & Han, C. 2019, AJ, 157, 28
  • Ilijic et al (2004) Ilijić, S., Hensberge, H., Pavlovski, K., & Freyhammer, L. M. 2004, in ASP Conf. Ser. 318, Spectroscopically and Spatially Resolving the Components of the Close Binary Stars, ed. R. Hilditch, H. Hensberge, & K. Pavlovski (San Francisco, CA: ASP), 111
  • Kahraman Alicavus et al (2017) Kahraman Aliçavuş, F., Soydugan, E., Smalley, B., & Kubát, J. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 915
  • Khaliullina (2016) Khaliullina, A. I. 2016, ARep, 60, 807
  • Kim et al (2007) Kim, K.-M., Han, I., Valyavin, G. G., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 1052
  • Kim et al (2004) Kim, S.-L., Kang, Y. B., Koo, J.-R., Mkrtichian, D. E., & Lee, J. W. 2004, IBVS, 5538, 1
  • Koch et al (2010) Koch, D. G., Borucki, W. J., Basri, G., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L79
  • Koo et al (2016) Koo J.-R., Lee J. W., Hong K., Kim, S.-L., & Lee, C.-U. 2016, AJ, 151, 77
  • Kreiner et al (2001) Kreiner, J. M., Kim, C.-H., & Nha, I.-S. 2001, An Atlas of OOCC Diagrams of Eclipsing Binary Stars (Krakow: Wydawn. Nauk. Akad. Pedagogicznej)
  • Kurucz (1993) Kurucz, R. 1993, ATLAS-9 Stellar Atmosphere Programs and 2 km/s grid. Kurucz CD-ROM No. 13 (Cambridge, MA: Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory)
  • Lee et al (2018) Lee, J. W., Hong, K., Koo J.-R., & Park, J.-H. 2018, AJ, 155, 5
  • Lee et al (2020) Lee, J. W., Hong, K., Koo J.-R., & Park, J.-H. 2020, AJ, 159, 24
  • Lenz & Breger (2005) Lenz, P., & Breger, M. 2005, Commun. Asteroseismol., 146, 53
  • Lucy (1967) Lucy, L. B. 1967, Z. Astrophys., 65, 89
  • Mkrtichian et al (2004) Mkrtichian, D. E., Kusakin, A. V., Rodríguez, E., et al. 2004, A&A, 419, 1015
  • Mochnacki (1984) Mochnacki, S. W. 1984, ApJS, 55, 551
  • Montgomery & O’Donoghue (2004) Montgomery, M. H., & O’Donoghue, D. 1999, DSSN, 13, 28
  • Park et al (2018) Park, J.-H., Hong, K., Koo J.-R., Lee, J. W., & Kim, C.-H. 2018, AJ, 155, 133
  • Pilecki et al (2013) Pilecki, B., Graczyk, D., Pietrzyński, G., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 953
  • Pilecki et al (2015) Pilecki, B., Graczyk, D., Gieren, W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 806, 29
  • Ricker et al (2015) Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, JATIS, 1, 014003
  • Rolland et al (2002) Rolland, A., Costa, V., Rodríguez, E., et al. 2002, Comm. Asteroseismology, 142, 57
  • Rucinski (1969a) Rucinski, S. M. 1969a, Acta. Astron., 19, 25
  • Rucinski (1969b) Rucinski, S. M. 1969b, Acta. Astron., 19, 245
  • Sarna (1993) Sarna, M. J. 1993, MNRAS, 262, 534
  • Southworth et al (2005) Southworth, J., Smalley, B., Maxted, P. F. L., Claret, A., & Etzel, P. B. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 529
  • Soydugan et al (2006) Soydugan, E., İbanoǧlu, C., Soydugan, F., Akan, M. C., & Demircan, O. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 1298
  • Van Hamme (1993) van Hamme, W. 1993, AJ, 106, 209
  • Van Hamme & Wilson (2003) van Hamme, W., & Wilson, R. E. 2003, in ASP Conf. Ser. 298, GAIA Spectroscopy, Science and Techology, ed. U. Munari (San Francisco, CA: ASP), 323
  • Von Zeipel (1924) von Zeipel, H. 1924, MNRAS, 84, 665
  • Wilson & Devinney (1971) Wilson, R. E., & Devinney, E. J. 1971, ApJ, 166, 605
  • Yang et al (2010) Yang, Y. G., Hu, S. M., Guo, D. F., Wei, J. Y., & Dai, H. F. 2010, AJ, 139, 1360
  • Zombeck (1990) Zombeck, M. V. 1990, Handbook of Space Astronomy and Astrophysics (Cambridge Univ. Press), 2nd ed.
Refer to caption
Figure 1: χ2\chi^{2} diagrams of the effective temperature (Teff,1T_{\rm eff,1}) and the projected rotational velocity (v1sini1v_{1}\sin i_{1}) of the primary star.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Four spectral regions of the primary star, observed at an orbital phase of ϕ\phi = 0.507 (HJD 2,457,847.2616). The red line represents the synthetic spectrum with the best-fit parameters of Teff,1T_{\rm eff,1} = 8,820 K and v1sini1v_{1}\sin i_{1} = 90 km s-1.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: RV curves of AO Ser with fitted models. The filled and open circles represent our double-lined RV measurements for the primary and secondary components, respectively. The diamonds represent the double-lined RVs of Hoffman (2009), respectively. In the upper panel, the solid curves represent the results from a consistent light and RV curve analysis with the W-D code. The dotted line represents the system velocity of ++14.2 km s-1. The lower panel shows the differences between observations and theoretical models.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: BVBV light curves of AO Ser with fitted models. The circles are individual measurements taken from our LOAO observations, and the solid lines represent the synthetic curves obtained with the W-D run. The light residuals for BB and VV are shown in the bottom, respectively. The inset box shows the light curve from phase 0.39 to 0.61, where it can be seen that the secondary minimum is flat bottomed.
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Power spectra of the BB-band residuals in the out-of-primary eclipsing phases. The window spectrum is displayed in the top panel. We could detect two frequencies (f1f_{1}, f2f_{2}) in the next two panels. Here, the dotted line represents the significance limit (S/N \geq 4.0) proposed by Breger et al. (1993).
Refer to caption
Figure 6: The phase-folded light variations of the BB-band residuals. Blue open circles denote the representative points of residuals binned at phase 0.01 intervals, and the synthetic curves were calculated from multiple frequency analyses.
Refer to caption
Figure 7: Positions on the HR diagram for AO Ser (star symbols) and other semi-detached EBs with δ\delta Sct component (circles, Kahraman Aliçavuş et al. 2017). The filled and open circles represent the primary and secondary stars, respectively. The dashed blue and red lines represent the theoretical edges of the δ\delta Sct instability strip (Rolland et al. 2002; Soydugan et al. 2006).
Table 1: Radial Velocities of AO Ser.
HJD Phase V1V_{1} σ1\sigma_{1} V2V_{2} σ2\sigma_{2}
(2,450,000+) km s-1 km s-1 km s-1 km s-1
7,846.1346 0.226 -26.6 1.7 271.7 2.3
7,846.1523 0.246 -36.5 1.8 271.0 16.5
7,846.1699 0.266 -37.1 1.1 268.4 4.0
7,846.1875 0.286 -39.5 1.3 266.6 4.3
7,846.2052 0.306 -37.6 2.1
7,846.2228 0.326 -29.2 1.4 251.1 8.2
7,846.2404 0.346 -29.0 0.7 239.0 11.4
7,846.2581 0.366 -22.7 2.1
7,846.2757 0.386 -20.5 0.8 195.5 1.1
7,846.2933 0.406 -14.3 1.0 183.7 7.8
7,846.3110 0.426 -8.8 0.9
7,846.3286 0.446 -3.7 0.9
7,847.2087 0.447 -4.0 1.1
7,847.2264 0.467 -0.2 0.6
7,847.2440 0.487 8.4 0.7 110.9 1.4
7,847.2616 0.507 15.0 0.9
7,847.2792 0.527 21.5 0.7
7,847.2969 0.547 28.0 1.9
7,847.3145 0.567 42.1 1.9
7,847.3321 0.588 39.3 0.8
7,900.1495 0.652 51.2 0.9 -206.8 8.9
7,900.1670 0.672 69.9 5.0
7,900.1846 0.692 57.0 1.4 -228.9 5.3
7,900.2022 0.712 59.5 1.4 -226.8 5.9
7,900.2197 0.731 60.6 0.4 -246.3 2.4
7,900.2373 0.751 63.7 1.3 -253.0 3.8
7,900.2548 0.771 61.2 1.6 -240.5 2.9
7,900.2724 0.791 67.7 9.7 -229.7 1.2
7,901.2462 0.899 43.3 0.9 -124.1 0.9
Table 2: Binary Parameters of AO Ser.
Parameter Primary Secondary
T0T_{0} (HJD) 2,457,127.5076 ±\pm 0.0041
PP (day) 0.8793496 ±\pm 0.0000047
ii (deg) 90.0 ±\pm 1.5
TT (K) 8,820 ±\pm 62 4,832 ±\pm 34
Ω\Omega 3.645 ±\pm 0.002 2.210
Ωin\Omega_{\rm in} 2.210
l1l_{1}/(l1l_{1}+l2l_{2})B 0.9787 ±\pm 0.0004 0.0213
l1l_{1}/(l1l_{1}+l2l_{2})V 0.9527 ±\pm 0.0007 0.0473
rr (pole) 0.2889 ±\pm 0.0002 0.2298 ±\pm 0.0002
rr (point) 0.2960 ±\pm 0.0002 0.3373 ±\pm 0.0009
rr (side) 0.2932 ±\pm 0.0002 0.2390 ±\pm 0.0002
rr (back) 0.2950 ±\pm 0.0002 0.2713 ±\pm 0.0002
rr (volume) 0.2924 ±\pm 0.0002 0.2461 ±\pm 0.0002
Spectroscopic:
aa (R) 5.59 ±\pm 0.05
γ\gamma (km s-1) 14.22 ±\pm 0.71
K1K_{1} (km s-1) 51.6 ±\pm 1.1
K2K_{2} (km s-1) 270.3 ±\pm 3.6
qq 0.191 ±\pm 0.004
rms (km s-1) 4.0 9.6
Absolute Parameters:
MM (M) 2.55 ±\pm 0.09 0.49 ±\pm 0.02
RR (R) 1.64 ±\pm 0.02 1.38 ±\pm 0.02
log\log L/LL/L_{\odot} 1.16 ±\pm 0.02 -0.03 ±\pm 0.02
log\log gg (cgs) 4.42 ±\pm 0.01 3.85 ±\pm 0.01
MbolM_{\rm bol} (mag) ++1.84 ±\pm 0.04 ++4.83 ±\pm 0.04
BC (mag) -0.04 -0.34
MVM_{\rm V} (mag) ++1.88 ±\pm 0.03 ++5.17 ±\pm 0.05
Table 3: Results of Multiple Frequency Analyses of the BB-band Residuals.
Frequency Amplitude Phase S/N
(days-1) (mag) (rad)
f1f_{1} 21.852 ±\pm 0.008 0.00286 ±\pm 0.00023 1.71 ±\pm 0.08 4.48
f2f_{2} 23.484 ±\pm 0.011 0.00224 ±\pm 0.00023 4.06 ±\pm 0.11 4.30