Periods and -factors of Cuspidal Automorphic Forms of Metaplectic Groups
Abstract.
We give constraints on the existence of -factors in the global -parameter of a genuine cuspidal automorphic representation of a metaplectic group in terms of the invariant, lowest occurrence index, of theta lifts to odd orthogonal groups. We also give a refined result that relates the invariant, first occurrence index, to non-vanishing of period integrals of residues of Eisenstein series associated to the cuspidal datum . This complements our previous results for symplectic groups.
Key words and phrases:
Arthur Parameters; Poles of L-functions; Periods of Automorphic Forms; Theta Correspondence; Arthur Truncation of Eisenstein Series and ResiduesIntroduction
Let be a classical group over a number field . Let be the ring of adeles of . Let be an automorphic representation of in the discrete spectrum, though later we consider only cuspidal automorphic representations. By the theory of endoscopic classification developed by [3] and extended by [31, 24], one attaches a global -parameter to . These works depend on the stabilisation of the twisted trace formula which has been established by a series of works by Mœglin and Waldspurger. We refer the readers to their books [33, 34]. Via the Shimura–Waldspurger correspondence of the metaplectic group , which is the non-trivial double cover of the symplectic group , and odd special orthogonal groups, Gan and Ichino [9] also attached global -parameters to genuine automorphic representations of in the discrete spectrum. This depends on the choice of an additive character that is used in the Shimura–Waldspurger correspondence. In this introduction, we also let denote by abuse of notation and we suppress the dependence on . The -parameter of is a formal sum
where is an irreducible self-dual cuspidal automorphic representation of some , is a positive integer which represents the unique -dimensional irreducible representation of Arthur’s , together with some conditions on so that the type is compatible with the type of the dual group of . When is a unitary group, then we need to introduce a quadratic field extension of . As this case is not the focus of this article, we refer the readers to [42, Sec. 1.3] for details. The exact conditions for are spelled out in Sec. 2. Here we have adopted the notation of [19] where the theory of was introduced.
One principle of the -theory is that if has as a simple factor, then there should exist a kernel function constructed out of that transfers to a certain automorphic representation in the -packet attached to ‘’, i.e., with the factor removed. From the work of Rallis [36] and Kudla–Rallis [25], it is clear when is a character , the kernel function is the theta kernel possibly twisted by . (See Sec. 7 of [19].)
Now we focus on the case of the metaplectic groups. We will put the additive character back into the notation to emphasise, for example, that the -functions etc. depend on it. Let be a -dimensional symplectic space. We will now write for to match the notation in the body of the article.
The poles of the tensor product -function detect the existence of -factors in the -parameter . As a first step, we consider the case when is a quadratic automorphic character of . The -function has been well-studied. By the regularised Rallis inner product formula [25] which was proved using the regularised Siegel-Weil formula also proved there and the doubling method construction [35] (see also [29, 6, 43]), the partial -function detects whether the theta lifts of to the odd orthogonal groups in certain Witt towers vanish or not. The complete theory that interprets the existence of poles or non-vanishing of the complete -function as the obstruction to the local-global principle of theta correspondence was done in [43] and then extended to the ‘second term’ range by [11]. We will relate certain invariants of the theta lifts of to the existence of -factors in the -parameter .
We now describe our main results which are concerned with the metaplectic case, while pointing out the similarity to the statements in the symplectic case. Let denote the lowest occurrence index of in the theta correspondence to all Witt towers associated to the quadratic character . (See Sec. 4 for the precise definition.) Let denote the set of all irreducible genuine cuspidal automorphic representations of . We note that there is no algebraic group and that the notation is used purely for aesthetic reason. Then we get the following constraint on -factors of in terms of the invariant .
Theorem 0.1 (Thm. 4.4).
Let and be a quadratic automorphic character of . Let denote the A-parameter of with respect to . Then the following hold.
-
(1)
If has a -factor, then .
-
(2)
If has a -factor with maximal among all simple factors of , then .
-
(3)
If , then cannot have a -factor with maximal among all simple factors of and .
-
(4)
If , then cannot have a -factor with maximal among all simple factors of .
Remark 0.2.
Coupled with the results of [23], we see that in both the and cases, if has a -factor with maximal among all simple factors, then .
The symplectic analogue of our result on the existence of -factors in the -parameter of is a key input to [20, Sec. 5] which gives a bound on the exponent that measures the departure from temperedness of the local components of cuspidal automorphic representations. In this sense, our results have bearings on the generalised Ramanujan conjecture as proposed in [38].
Following an idea of Mœglin’s in [30] which considered the even orthogonal and the symplectic case, we consider, instead of the partial -function , the Eisenstein series attached to the cuspidal datum (c.f. Sec. 3). The theorem above is derived from our results on poles of . We get much more precise relation between poles of the Eisenstein series and . This line of investigation has been taken up by [10] in the odd orthogonal group case and by [22, 42] in the unitary group case. We treat the metaplectic group case in this paper. Let denote the set of all positive poles of the Eisenstein series we consider. Then we get:
Theorem 0.3 (Thm. 6.4).
Let and let be the maximal element in . Write . Then
-
(1)
is an integer such that .
-
(2)
.
Remark 0.4.
Coupled with the results of [23], we see that is a non-integral half-integer in in the case and an integer in the same range in the case; and in both cases.
It is known by Langlands’ theory [27] of Eisenstein series that the pole in the theorem is simple. (See also [32].) We note that the equality in the theorem is actually informed by considering periods of residues of the Eisenstein series. We get only the upper bound by considering only poles of Eisenstein series. The odd orthogonal case was considered in [10], the symplectic case in [23] and the unitary case in [42]. Each case has its own technicalities. In this paper, we extend all results in the symplectic case to the metaplectic case to complete the other half of the picture. As pointed out in [6], unlike the orthogonal or symplectic case, the local factors change in the metaplectic case when taking contragredient. Thus it is important, in the present case, to employ complex conjugation in the definition of the global theta lift.
Let denote the first occurrence index of in the Witt tower of where is a quadratic space (c.f. Sec. 4). We get a result on and the non-vanishing of periods of residues of the Eisenstein series (or distinction by subgroups of ). Note that is a finer invariant than while the non-vanishing of periods of residues provides more information than locations of simple poles do. The following theorem is part of Cor. 6.3. Let denote the residue of the Eisenstein series at and let be the theta function attached to the Schwartz function . The space is the symplectic space formed by adjoining a hyperbolic plane to and similarly is formed by adjoining the same hyperbolic place to . Thus . Let be a totally isotropic subspace. Then the group is defined to be the subgroup of that fixes element-wise.
Theorem 0.5.
Let and let be an anisotropic quadratic space of odd dimension. Assume that . Let . Then is a pole of for some choice of the section . Assume further that . Then there exist a non-degenerate symplectic subspace of and an isotropic subspace of satisfying and with or such that is -distinguished for some choice of the section and the Schwartz function .
We hope our period integrals can inform problems in Arithmetic Geometry. For example, similar work in [10] has been used in [4]. (See also [5] and [14]). It should be pointed out that unlike the orthogonal or the unitary case, our period integrals may involve a Jacobi group when is non-trivial (which occurs half of the time). This is to account for the lack of ‘odd symplectic group’.
The structure of the paper is as follows. Since we aim to generalise results of symplectic groups to metaplectic groups, we try not deviate too much from the structure of [23]. Many of the results there generalise readily, in which case, we put in a few words to explain why this is so. However at several points, new input is needed to get the proof through, in which case, we derive the results in great detail, noting all the subtleties. We hope in this way, this article makes the flow of arguments more evident than [23] in which we dealt with many technicalities.
In Sec. 1, we set up some common notation and in Sec. 2, we describe the global -parameters of genuine automorphic representations of the metaplectic group following [9]. In Sec. 3, we introduce the Eisenstein series attached to the cuspidal datum and deduce results on their maximal poles. In Sec. 4, we define the two invariants, the first occurrence index and the lowest occurrence index of theta lifts. We deduce a preliminary result on the relation between the lowest occurrence index and the maximal pole of the Eisenstein series and hence get a characterisation of the locations of poles of the partial -function. In this way, we are able to show that the lowest occurrence index poses constraints on the existence of -factors in the -parameter of . Then in Sec. 5, we turn to studying Fourier coefficients of theta lifts and we get results on vanishing and non-vanishing of certain periods on . Inspired by these period integrals, in Sec. 6, we study the augmented integrals which are periods of residues of Eisenstein series. We make use of the Arthur truncation to regularise the integrals. We derive results on first occurrence indices and the vanishing and the non-vanishing of periods of residues of Eisenstein series. To evaluate our period integral, we cut it into many pieces according to certain orbits in a flag variety in Sec. 6 and we devote Sec. 7 to the computation of each piece.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank her post-doctoral mentor, Dihua Jiang, for introducing her to the subject and leading her down this fun field of research.
1. Notation and Preliminaries
Since this article aims at generalising results in [23] to the case of metaplectic groups, we will adopt similar notation to what was used there.
Let be a number field and be its ring of adeles. Let be a non-degenerate symplectic space over . For a non-negative integer , let be the direct sum of copies of the hyperbolic plane. We form the augmented symplectic space by adjoining to . Let be a basis of such that and , for , where is the Kronecker delta. Let (resp. ) be the span of ’s (resp. ’s). Then is a polarisation of . Let be the isometry group of with the action on the right.
Let be an isotropic subspace of . Let denote the parabolic subgroup of that stabilises and let denote its unipotent radical. We write (resp. ) for (resp. ) as shorthand. We also write for the Levi subgroup of such that with respect to the ‘basis’ , consists of elements of the form
for and where is the adjoint of . Fix a maximal compact subgroup of for each place of and set . We require that is good in the sense that the Iwasawa decomposition holds and that it is compatible with the Levi decomposition (c.f. [32, I.1.4]). Most often we abbreviate as .
Next we describe the metaplectic groups. Let be a place of . Let denote the metaplectic double cover of . It sits in the unique non-trivial central extension
unless , in which case, the double cover splits. Let be the double cover of defined as the restricted product of over all places modulo the group
We note that there is a canonical lift of to and that splits uniquely over any unipotent subgroup of .
Fix a non-trivial additive character . It will be used in the construction of the Weil representation that underlies the theta correspondence and the definition of Arthur parameters for cuspidal automorphic representations of the metaplectic group. For any subgroup of (resp. ) we write for its preimage in (resp. ). We note that occurs as a direct factor of and on multiplication is given by
which has a Hilbert symbol twist when multiplying the -part. Analogous to the notation above, we write
for , and . There is also a local version.
As we integrate over automorphic quotients often, we write for if is an algebraic group and for if covers a subgroup of a metaplectic group.
Let denote the set of all irreducible genuine cuspidal automorphic representations of . We note that there is no algebraic group and that it is used purely for aesthetic reason.
2. Arthur Parameters
We recall the description of -parameters attached to genuine irreducible cuspidal automorphic representations of metaplectic groups from [9]. The -parameters are defined via those attached to irreducible automorphic representations of odd special orthogonal groups via Shimura–Waldspurger correspondence. In this section, we write rather than .
The global elliptic -parameters for are of the form:
where
-
•
is an irreducible self-dual cuspidal automorphic representation of ;
-
•
is a positive integer which represents the unique -dimensional irreducible representation of
such that
-
•
;
-
•
if is odd, then is symplectic, that is, has a pole at ;
-
•
if is even, then is orthogonal, that is, has a pole at ;
-
•
the factors are pairwise distinct.
Given a global elliptic -parameter for , for each place of , we can attach a local -parameter
where is the -parameter of given by the local Langlands correspondence [28, 15, 13, 39] for . We can write the local -parameter as a homomorphism
where is the local Langlands group, which is the Weil–Deligne group of for non-archimedean and is the Weil group of for archimedean. We associate to it the -parameter
Let denote the subspace of on which acts as the non-trivial character. Let denote the subspace of that is the direct sum of all irreducible sub-representations of under the action of . Let denote subspace of generated by the full near equivalence class of such that the -parameter of with respect to is for almost all . We note here that for a genuine irreducible automorphic representation of the metaplectic group, its -parameter depends on the choice of an additive character . If one changes to , the -parameter changes in the way prescribed in [9, Remark 1.3]. See also [12]. Then we have the decomposition:
Theorem 2.1 ([9, Theorem 1.1]).
where runs over global elliptic -parameters for .
Thus we see that the -parameter of has the factor where is a quadratic automorphic character of and maximal among all factors if and only if the partial -function has its rightmost pole at . The additive character used in the definition of the -function is required to agree with the one used in defining the -parameter of .
Remark 2.2.
We note that the partial -function is as defined in [6] and [6, Sec. 6] shows that at each unramified place , the local -factor is equal to where denotes the base change of to with respect to . The -function is in the notation of [43]. Note that the degenerate principal series defined in [43, Sec. 3.1] is in the notation of [6, Sec. 3] due to the use of right action in [43] and this accounts for the of use of , but then by [43, Prop. 5.4], it is equal to .
3. Eisenstein series
For and a quadratic automorphic character of , the -function appears in the constant term of the Eisenstein series on attached to the maximal parabolic subgroup . We study the poles of these Eisenstein series in this section.
Let and where denotes the group of rational characters of . Let . As is a maximal parabolic subgroup, and we identify with via , following [40], where is the half sum of the positive roots in . Thus we may regard as the number . In fact, it is clear that for .
Let be the homomorphism such that for and we have . We may think of as . We extend to via the Iwasawa decomposition and then to via projection.
Let be the genuine character of defined by
where , valued in the 4-th roots of unity, is defined via the Weil index. We note that the notation here agrees with that in [8, page 521]. Then via the determinant map, we get a genuine character of which we also denote by .
Let be a genuine cuspidal automorphic representation of . Let be a quadratic automorphic character of . Then gives a genuine automorphic character of . Let denote the space of -valued smooth functions on that satisfy the following properties:
-
(1)
is right -finite;
-
(2)
for any and we have
-
(3)
for any fixed , the function on is a smooth right -finite vector in the space of .
Let and . Since the metaplectic group splits over , we can form the Eisenstein series on the metaplectic group as in the case of non-cover groups:
where . By the general theory of Eisenstein series [32, IV.1], it is absolute convergent for and has meromorphic continuation to the whole -plane with finitely many poles in the half plane , which are all real as we identify with .
Let denote the set of positive poles of for running over .
Proposition 3.1.
Assume that is non-empty and let be its maximal member. Then for all integers , lies in and is its maximal member.
Proof.
We remark how to carry over the proofs in [30] which treated orthogonal/symplectic case and [22] which treated the unitary case. The proofs relied on studying constant terms of the Eisenstein series, which are integrals over unipotent groups. Since the metaplectic group splits over the unipotent groups, the proofs carry over. We just need to replace occurrences of in [22, Prop. 2.1] with the genuine character . ∎
Proposition 3.2.
Let be the set of places of that contains the archimedean places and outside of which , and are unramified. Assume one of the following.
-
•
The partial -function has a pole at and that it is holomorphic for .
-
•
The partial -function is non-vanishing at and is holomorphic for .
Then for all integers , .
Proof.
By Langlands’ theory of Eisenstein series, the poles are determined by those of its constant terms. In our case, this amounts to studying the poles of the intertwining operator attached to the longest Weyl element in the Bruhat decomposition of . Those attached to shorter Weyl elements will not be able to cancel out the pole at . For , the local intertwining operator sends the normalised spherical vector of the local component at of to a multiple of the normalised spherical vector in another induced representation. The Gindikin-Karpelevich formula extended to the Brylinski-Deligne extensions by [7] shows that the ratio is
where is the partial Dedekind zeta function. A little simplification shows that it is equal to with
If we assume the first condition, then the numerator of has a pole at which cannot be cancelled out by other terms. If we assume the second condition, then has a pole which cannot be cancelled out by other terms. Also note that at ramified places the local intertwining operators are non-zero. Thus we have shown that . ∎
Next we relate the Eisenstein series to Siegel Eisenstein series on the ‘doubled group’ to glean more information on the locations of poles.
Let be the symplectic space with the same underlying vector space as but with the negative symplectic form . Let and form . Let and . Then has the polarisation . Let be the Siegel parabolic subgroup of that stabilises . For a -finite section in , we form the Siegel Eisenstein series .
Since acts on and acts on , we have the obvious embedding which induces a homomorphism . The cocycles for the cover groups are compatible by [37, Theorem 4.1].
The following is the metaplectic version of [23, Proposition 2.3] whose proof generalises immediately. We note that the integrand is non-genuine, and thus descends to a function on .
Proposition 3.3.
Let be a -finite section of and . Define a function on by
(3.1) |
Then
-
(1)
It is absolutely convergent for and has meromorphic continuation to the whole -plane;
-
(2)
It is a section in ;
-
(3)
The following identity holds
Proposition 3.4.
The poles with of are at most simple and are contained in the set
Combining the above propositions, we get:
Proposition 3.5.
The maximal member of is of the form for such that .
Proof.
By Prop. 3.1, is the maximal member of . To ensure that (3.1) provides enough sections for poles of the Siegel Eisenstein series to manifest, we need to take large enough. See [23, Lemma 2.6] for details. Then by Prop. 3.3, it is a pole of the Siegel Eisenstein series whose possible poles are determined in Prop. 3.4. Thus must be of the form for such that . ∎
4. First Occurrence and Lowest Occurrence of Theta Correspondence
The locations of poles of the Eisenstein series defined in Sec. 3 are intimately related to the invariants, called the lowest occurrences of theta lifts, attached to . The lowest occurrences are defined via the more familiar notion of first occurrences. In Sec. 6, we will derive a relation between periods of residues of Eisenstein series and first occurrences.
First we review briefly the definition of theta lift. For each automorphic additive character of , there is a Weil representation of the metaplectic group unique up to isomorphism. In our case, is a symplectic space and is a quadratic space. From them, we get the symplectic space . We consider the Weil representation of realised on the Schwartz space where denotes any maximal isotropic subspace of . Different choices of maximal isotropic subspaces give different Schwartz spaces which are intertwined by Fourier transforms. Thus the choice is not essential and sometimes we simply write for .
Let denote the isometric group of the quadratic space . We have the obvious homomorphism . By [26], there is a homomorphism that covers it. Thus we arrive at the representation of on , which is also called the Weil representation. The explicit formulae can be found in [18], for example.
For , and , we form the theta series
It is absolutely convergent and is automorphic in both and . In general, it is of moderate growth.
With this we define the global theta lift. Let . For and , define
The integrand is the product of two genuine functions on and hence can be regarded as a function on . We define the global theta lift of to be the space spanned by the above integrals. Let be the quadratic character of associated to as in [25, (0.7)].
Definition 4.1.
-
(1)
The first occurrence index of in the Witt tower of is defined to be
where runs through all the quadratic spaces in the same Witt tower as .
-
(2)
For a quadratic automorphic character of , define the lowest occurrence index with respect to , to be
where runs over all quadratic spaces with and odd dimension.
With this we get results on the lowest occurrence and the location of the maximal pole of the Eisenstein series. We will strengthen the results using periods in Sec. 6.
Theorem 4.2.
Let and be the maximal member of . Then
-
(1)
for some such that ;
-
(2)
;
-
(3)
where is the Witt index of .
Proof.
The third part is stated in terms of the Witt index of so that the analogy with [22, Thm. 3.1] is more obvious.
The first part is just Prop. 3.5 which we reproduce here.
For the second part we make use of the regularised Siegel-Weil formula that links residues of Siegel Eisenstein series to theta integrals. Assume that is the maximal element in . By Prop. 3.1, is the maximal element in . In other words, has a pole at for some . (We put in a superscript to be clear that we are talking about the Eisenstein series associated to the parabolic subgroup .) Furthermore if is large enough this can be taken to be of the form (see Prop. 3.3 and also the proof of Prop. 3.5). Enlarge if necessary to ensure that . Then the regularised Siegel-Weil formula shows that
where the sum runs over quadratic spaces of dimension with and are appropriate -finite Schwartz functions so that the theta integrals are absolutely convergent. We remark that for any Schwartz function there is a natural way to ‘truncate’ it for regularising the theta integrals. See [25] and [16] for details. Now we integrate both sides against over . Then by Prop. 3.3 the left hand side becomes a residue of , which is non-vanishing for some choice of . Thus at least one term on the right hand side must be non-zero. In other words, there exists a quadratic space of dimension and of character such that
We may replace by with and such that the inequality still holds. Then after separating the variables we get
The complex conjugate appears because we have switched from to . In particular, the inner integral is non-vanishing, but it is exactly the complex conjugate of the theta lift of to . Thus the lowest occurrence must be lower or equal to .
For the third part, assume that the lowest occurrence is realised by . Thus with . Let . It is non-zero and it is cuspidal because it is the first occurrence representation in the Witt tower of . It is also irreducible by [21, Theorem 1.3]. By stability, . By the involutive property in [21, Theorem 1.3], we have
Note in [21], the theta lift was defined without the complex conjugation on the theta series, which resulted in the use of in the inner theta lift. Thus we find and we get . ∎
Thus we glean some information on poles of (or equivalently factors of the form in the Arthur parameter of ) and lowest occurrence of theta lift.
Theorem 4.3.
Let and be a quadratic automorphic character of . Then the following hold.
-
(1)
If the partial -function has a pole at , then is an integer such that . In other words, the possible positive poles of the partial -function are non-integral half-integers such that .
-
(2)
If the partial -function has a pole at , then .
-
(3)
If , then is holomorphic for .
-
(4)
If , then is holomorphic for .
Proof.
By [41, Prop. 6.2], the poles of with are contained in the set , where the extraneous should be removed from in the statement there. The proof there actually implies that this is the set of possible poles in . See also [43, Theorem 9.1]. Let be its maximal pole. Then . By Prop. 3.2, is in . Assume is the maximal member in . Then by Thm. 4.2, we have . As , we get . We have shown part (1).
Assume that has a pole at . Let be its maximal pole. Then by Prop. 3.2, is in . Let be the maximal member in . By Thm. 4.2, .
Assume that and has a pole in , say at for . Then by part (2), . We arrive at a contradiction.
Assume that and has a pole in , say at for . Then by part (2), . We arrive at a contradiction. ∎
In terms of A-parameters, the theorem above says:
Theorem 4.4.
Let and be a quadratic automorphic character of . Let denote the A-parameter of with respect to . Then the following hold.
-
(1)
If has a -factor, then .
-
(2)
If has a -factor with maximal among all simple factors of , then .
-
(3)
If , then cannot have a -factor with maximal among all simple factors of and .
-
(4)
If , then cannot have a -factor with maximal among all simple factors of .
5. Fourier coefficients of theta lift and periods
In this section we compute certain Fourier coefficients of theta lifts from the metaplectic group to odd orthogonal groups and we derive some vanishing and non-vanishing results of period integrals over symplectic subgroups and Jacobi subgroups of .
We define these subgroups first. Let be a non-degenerate symplectic subspace of and let be a totally isotropic subspace of . Then is a symplectic subgroup of . Let be the parabolic subgroup of that stabilisers and be the Jacobi subgroup that fixes element-wise. When , then is just . In this section, (resp. , ) will always be a non-degenerate symplectic subspace of and (resp. ) will always be a totally isotropic subspace of (resp. , ). For concreteness, we define distinction.
Definition 5.1.
Let be a reductive group and be a subgroup of . Let be an automorphic representation of . For , if the period integral
(5.1) |
is absolutely convergent and non-vanishing, we say that is -distinguished. Assume that for all , the period integral is absolutely convergent. If there exists such that is -distinguished, then we say is -distinguished.
Let be an anisotropic quadratic space, so that it sits at the bottom of its Witt tower. We can form the augmented quadratic spaces analogously by adjoining -copies of the hyperbolic plane to . Let denote the space of theta functions for running over . Then we have the following that is derived from the computation of Fourier coefficients of theta lift of to various ’s.
Proposition 5.2.
Let and let be an odd dimensional anisotropic quadratic space. Assume that . Let be a non-degenerate symplectic subspace of and a totally isotropic subspace of . Let be a non-negative integer. Then the following hold.
-
(1)
If , then is not -distinguished.
-
(2)
If and , then is -distinguished for some choice of .
Proof.
This is the metaplectic analogue of [23, Proposition 3.2]. The period integrals involved are the complex conjugates of
(5.2) |
where and . As both factors of the integrand are genuine in , the product is a well-defined function of , which we can restrict to . We note that the proof of [23, Proposition 3.2] involves taking Fourier coefficients of automorphic forms (on orthogonal groups) in the spaces of for varying and these Fourier coefficients can be written as sums of integrals which have (5.2) as inner integrals. The proof there also works for odd orthogonal groups.
∎
We have a converse in the following form.
Proposition 5.3.
Let and let be an odd dimensional anisotropic quadratic space. Assume that is -distinguished for some choice of with , but that it is not -distinguished for all with and . Then if we set , then .
Combined with Prop. 5.2, we have the implication.
Proposition 5.4.
Let and let be an odd dimensional anisotropic quadratic space. Assume that for some , is not -distinguished for all with and . Then is not -distinguished for all with .
Both propositions can be proved in the same way as in [23, Propositions 3.4, 3.5].
6. Periods of Eisenstein series
In this section, to avoid clutter we write for the -rational points of etc. We also suppress the additive character from notation. In this section, again (resp. , ) will always be a non-degenerate symplectic subspace of and (resp. ) will always be an isotropic subspace of (resp. , ). The periods considered in this section involve an Eisenstein series and a theta function. They are supposed to run parallel to those in Sec. 5 which involve a cuspidal automorphic form and a theta function (5.2). Through our computation, we will relate the periods of Eisenstein series to (5.2) and hence also to invariants of theta correspondence.
Assume that is an anisotropic quadratic space of odd dimension. Let be a non-degenerate symplectic subspace of . Let be its orthogonal complement in so that . Form similarly the augmented space . Then . Let be a totally isotropic subspace of of dimension or . Then the subgroup of is defined to be the fixator of element-wise. Via the natural embedding of into , we regard as a subgroup of .
Then the period integrals we consider are of the form
for and . The integrals diverge in general, but they can be regularised by using the Arthur truncation [2, 1] (See also [32, I.2.13] which includes the metaplectic case). We write down how the Arthur truncation works in the present case. We follow closely Arthur’s notation. We note that the need for Jacobi groups is special to the symplectic/metaplectic case due to the lack of ‘odd symplectic groups’. Compare with the unitary case [42] and the orthogonal case [10].
We continue to use our notation from Sec. 3. Note that the Eisenstein series is attached to a maximal parabolic subgroup of . In this case, is 1-dimensional and we identify it with . For , set to be the characteristic function of and set . Then the truncated Eisenstein series is
(6.1) |
where is the constant term of along . The summation has only finitely many non-vanishing terms for each fixed . The truncated Eisenstein series is rapidly decreasing while the theta series is of moderate growth. Thus if we replace the Eisenstein series with the truncated Eisenstein series, we get a period integral that is absolutely convergent:
(6.2) |
We state our main theorems.
Theorem 6.1.
Let and let be an anisotropic quadratic space of odd dimension. Assume that is -distinguished for some with or , but it is not -distinguished for all such that and . Set and . Then has a pole at for some choice of .
For a complex number , let denote the residue of at . When , we consider the period integral
(6.3) |
We have the following result.
Theorem 6.2.
Adopt the same setup as in Thm. 6.1. Assume further that . Then the following hold.
-
(1)
lies in and it corresponds to a simple pole.
-
(2)
is -distinguished for some choice of and .
-
(3)
If , then is not -distinguished for any and .
-
(4)
For with or such that , then for any , is not -distinguished for any and .
Now we bring in the first occurrence index for . By Prop. 5.2, if , then is distinguished for some such that and with or and it is not -distinguished for any such that or equivalently . In other words the conditions of Thm. 6.1 are satisfied. We get:
Corollary 6.3.
Let and let be an anisotropic quadratic space of odd dimension. Assume that . Let . Then has a pole at for some choice of . Assume further that . Then the following hold.
-
(1)
lies in and it corresponds to a simple pole.
-
(2)
There exist a non-degenerate symplectic subspace of and an isotropic subspace of satisfying and with or such that is -distinguished for some choice of and .
-
(3)
If , then is not -distinguished for any and where is any non-degenerate symplectic subspace of and is any isotropic subspace of such that and with or .
-
(4)
For with or such that and for , is not -distinguished for any and .
With these results on period integrals involving residues of Eisenstein series, we can strengthen Thm. 4.2.
Theorem 6.4.
Let and let be the maximal element in . Write . Then
-
(1)
is an integer such that .
-
(2)
.
Proof.
Part (1) is a restatement of Thm. 4.2 and we have also shown that there. We just need to show the other inequality. Assume that the lowest occurrence of is achieved in the Witt tower of . Thus . We assume . Then by Cor. 6.3, is a member of . Since is the maximal member, we get or . We have shown that . ∎
Now we proceed to prove the main theorems. We cut the period integral (6.2) into several parts and evaluate each part. We proceed formally and justify that each part is absolutely convergent for and large and that it has meromorphic continuation to all at the end.
We have as continued meromorphic functions in where is the intertwining operator associated to the longest Weyl element in . When , we get
The first series is absolutely convergent for while the second series has only finitely many non-vanishing terms for each fixed . Both series have meromorphic continuation to the whole complex plane. Set
and set
for or . Then the period integral we are concerned with is equal to
as long as the integrals defining the two terms on right hand side are absolutely convergent.
Now we cut into several parts according to -orbits in , show that the parts are absolute convergent and compute their values. The set corresponds to isotropic lines in :
For an isotropic line , we write for an element in such that . We will exercise our freedom to choose as simple as possible.
First we consider the -orbits in . If is non-trivial, then we will further consider the -orbits. Given an isotropic line in , we pick a non-zero vector on the line and write according to the decomposition . There are three cases, so we define:
-
(1)
to be the set of (isotropic) lines in whose projection to is ;
-
(2)
to be the set of (isotropic) lines in whose projection to is ;
-
(3)
to be the set of (isotropic) lines in whose projections to both and are non-zero.
Each set is stable under the action of . The set forms one -orbit. We may take as the orbit representative. Its stabiliser in is the parabolic subgroup that stabilises . The set is acted on by trivially. A set of orbit representatives is and for each representative the stabiliser is . Finally consider the set . A line in is in the same -orbit as . For , and are in the same orbit, if and only if there exist and such that . Thus a set of orbit representatives is for running over a set of representatives of . For each orbit representative, the stabiliser is .
Thus we cut the series over into three parts and we get
with
(6.4) | ||||
Proposition 6.5.
For or , the integrals , and are absolutely convergent for and large enough and each has meromorphic continuation to the whole complex plane.
Proof.
Thus we are free to change the order of summation and integration when we evaluate the integrals. By using the results in Sec. 7 which is dedicated to evaluating the integrals, we can now prove Theorems. 6.1, 6.2.
Proof of Thm. 6.1.
First assume that . Then the non-distinction conditions for groups ‘larger than’ in the assumption of the theorem mean that the conditions of Propositions 7.2 and 7.3 are satisfied. Thus the propositions show that and vanish.
Assume that does not have a pole at . Then by (7.1), does not have a pole at . By part (3) of Prop. 7.1, the assumption of distinction by shows that has a pole at . This means that and as a result has a pole at . We get a contradiction. Thus must have a pole at , which implies that has a pole at .
Next assume that . We note that in Sec. 7.2, is further cut into 3 parts: , and and that is further cut into 3 parts: , and . The non-distinction conditions for groups ‘larger than’ in the assumption of the theorem mean that the conditions of Propositions 7.4, 7.6, 7.7, 7.8, 7.9, 7.10 are satisfied. Thus , , , , and all vanish. It remains to consider which is defined in (7.5).
Assume that does not have a pole at , then by (7.7), does not have a pole at . By part (3) of Prop. 7.5, the assumption of distinction by shows that has a pole at . This means that and as a result has a pole at . We get a contradiction. Thus must have a pole at , which implies that has a pole at . ∎
Proof of Thm. 6.2.
Let . We show that the integral (6.3) is absolutely convergent and we then check if it vanishes or not.
We take residue of the second term in (6.1) and set
Note that this is a finite sum for fixed . Then the truncated residue is
The integral
is absolutely convergent when and are large and has meromorphic continuation to all by Prop. 6.5. It is equal to . Thus
In addition, the first equality shows that (6.3) is absolutely convergent.
7. Computation of integrals
Set and . The goal of this section is to compute , and defined in (6.4).
7.1. Case
We note that since , is simply the symplectic group .
7.1.1.
We collapse the integral and series. We get
We note that is the product of two genuine factors, so it is not genuine itself. Let . Then
We integrate over first. The only term involving is . If we realise the Weil representation on the mixed model , then using explicit formulae for the Weil representation and noting that is anisotropic we get
Here and for , denote the unipotent element in that is characterised by the condition that the -component of the image of under is . Next we integrate over . More precisely, in the following expression, should be viewed as any element in the pre-image of in , but the choice does not matter. Excluding terms not involving , we get
For , we get
This expression provides the meromorphic continuation of as a function in .
Next let . The computation is analogous and we get for ,
(7.1) |
With this computation, we get immediately the first two statements of the next proposition:
Proposition 7.1.
-
(1)
If is not -distinguished, then both and vanish identically.
-
(2)
does not have a pole at .
-
(3)
If is -distinguished, then the residue
(7.2) of at does not vanish for some choice of data.
7.1.2.
For each , we look at the -summand of :
(7.3) |
Take in such that . We take to be the element in that is determined by and on the span of and the identity action on the orthogonal complement. Then . Thus (7.3) is equal to
This is a period integral on over the subgroup of . Thus we get
Proposition 7.2.
If is not -distinguished for all with , then vanishes for and .
7.1.3.
We collapse the series over and the integral to get
Using the Iwasawa decomposition we get that each -term is equal to
We take to be the element that is given by , , and on the span of and the identity action on the orthogonal complement. Since , we get the inner integral
which is a period integral on over the subgroup of . Thus we get
Proposition 7.3.
If is not -distinguished for all with and an isotropic line of in the orthogonal complement of , then vanishes for and .
7.2. Case
7.2.1.
We consider the -orbits in or equivalently in the set of isotropic lines in . For an isotropic line in , let denote any element in such that . There are three -orbits. Let be any non-zero element in and be an element in such that . Write and form the augmented space . We note that . An isotropic line in for and is in the same -orbit as
The stabiliser of in is and we have . To describe the stabiliser of , let be the subgroup of consisting of elements of the form
with respect to the ‘basis’ and the subgroup of consisting of elements of the form
Then the stabiliser of in is . For the stabiliser is the full . Thus is further split into three parts:
(7.4) | ||||
(7.5) | ||||
(7.6) |
Now we evaluate them one by one.
We collapse the series and the integral and find that (7.4) is equal to
Consider the inner integral. We may pick to be the element that is given by and on the span of and identity on the orthogonal complement. Since , this inner integral is a period integral on over the subgroup of . Thus we get
Proposition 7.4.
If is not -distinguished, then vanishes for and .
We collapse the series and the integral and find that (7.5) is equal to
Then using the Iwasawa decomposition of we get
Now we collapse part of and to get . We get
Note that is formed out of the leftover part of and .
Suppose that . Then
The only term that involves is . By the explicit formulae of the Weil representation, we get
where . In total, the exponent of is
Thus is equal to
where where we note that .
Thus it can possibly have a pole only at with residue
Note that the innermost integral is a period integral on over the subgroup of . Similarly we evaluate to get
(7.7) | ||||
Thus we get parts (1) and (2) of the following
Proposition 7.5.
-
(1)
If is not -distinguished, then vanishes identically for and ;
-
(2)
does not have a pole at ;
-
(3)
If is -distinguished, then the residue
(7.8) of does not vanish for some choice of data.
Proof.
For the proof of (3), it can be checked that we can extend the proof in [23, Prop. 4.5] for the symplectic case to the metaplectic case. The proof there is quite technical due to the presence of the integration over which is a unipotent subgroup. We start with some choice of data such that
Then we can construct a section that ‘extends’ and a Schwartz function that ‘extends’ such that (7.8) is non-vanishing. ∎
Finally we evaluate (7.6). We take to be the element that is given by and on the span of and identity on the orthogonal complement. Then . Thus (7.6) is equal to
whose inner integral is a period integral on over . Thus we get:
Proposition 7.6.
If is not -distinguished, then vanishes for and .
7.2.2.
For each , fix that is dual to , i.e., . Then we take that is determined by and on the span of and identity on the orthogonal complement. Since , is equal to
which is a sum of period integrals on over . Thus we get
Proposition 7.7.
If is not -distinguished for all such that , then vanishes for and .
7.2.3.
We fix and consider each -term
We note that parametrises the set of non-zero isotropic vectors in . We consider the -orbits on this set. The analysis is similar to that in Sec. 7.2.1 where we considered isotropic lines in . Again we have and an element in such that . We write and form the augmented space . We note that . A non-zero isotropic vector in for and is in the same -orbit as
For , the stabiliser of in is and we have
The stabiliser of in is , where we adopt the same notation and as in Sec. 7.2.1. For , the stabiliser of in is . Thus is further split into three parts:
(7.9) | ||||
(7.10) | ||||
(7.11) |
We take the same as in Sec. 7.1.3. We proceed to evaluate each part.
For each -term in , we get
Since and commutes with , the inner integral becomes
which is a period integral on over the subgroup of . We get
Proposition 7.8.
If is not -distinguished, then vanishes for and .
For we collapse the integral and the series to get
Then using the Iwasawa decomposition for we get
Since , the innermost integral is equal to
which is a period integral on over . Thus we get
Proposition 7.9.
If is not -distinguished for any such that and an isotropic line of in the orthogonal complement of , then vanishes for and .
For each -term in , we take to be the element that is given by and and identity on the orthogonal complement. We evaluate
We have and . Thus we get
which is a period integral on over . We get
Proposition 7.10.
If is not -distinguished for any such that and an isotropic line of in the orthogonal complement of , then vanishes for and .
References
- Art [78] James G. Arthur. A trace formula for reductive groups. I. Terms associated to classes in . Duke Math. J., 45(4):911–952, 1978.
- Art [80] James Arthur. A trace formula for reductive groups. II. Applications of a truncation operator. Compositio Math., 40(1):87–121, 1980.
- Art [13] James Arthur. The endoscopic classification of representations, volume 61 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2013. Orthogonal and symplectic groups.
- BMM [16] Nicolas Bergeron, John Millson, and Colette Moeglin. The Hodge conjecture and arithmetic quotients of complex balls. Acta Math., 216(1):1–125, 2016.
- BMM [17] Nicolas Bergeron, John Millson, and Colette Moeglin. Hodge type theorems for arithmetic hyperbolic manifolds. In Geometry, analysis and probability, volume 310 of Progr. Math., pages 47–56. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2017.
- Gan [12] Wee Teck Gan. Doubling zeta integrals and local factors for metaplectic groups. Nagoya Math. J., 208:67–95, 2012.
- Gao [18] Fan Gao. The Langlands-Shahidi -functions for Brylinski-Deligne extensions. Amer. J. Math., 140(1):83–137, 2018.
- GI [14] Wee Teck Gan and Atsushi Ichino. Formal degrees and local theta correspondence. Invent. Math., 195(3):509–672, 2014.
- GI [18] Wee Teck Gan and Atsushi Ichino. The Shimura-Waldspurger correspondence for . Ann. of Math. (2), 188(3):965–1016, 2018.
- GJS [09] David Ginzburg, Dihua Jiang, and David Soudry. Poles of -functions and theta liftings for orthogonal groups. J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 8(4):693–741, 2009.
- GQT [14] Wee Teck Gan, Yannan Qiu, and Shuichiro Takeda. The regularized Siegel-Weil formula (the second term identity) and the Rallis inner product formula. Invent. Math., 198(3):739–831, 2014.
- [12] Wee Teck Gan and Gordan Savin. Representations of metaplectic groups i: Epsilon dichotomy and local langlands correspondence. preprint.
- Hen [00] Guy Henniart. Une preuve simple des conjectures de Langlands pour sur un corps -adique. Invent. Math., 139(2):439–455, 2000.
- HH [12] Hongyu He and Jerome William Hoffman. Picard groups of Siegel modular 3-folds and -liftings. J. Lie Theory, 22(3):769–801, 2012.
- HT [01] Michael Harris and Richard Taylor. The geometry and cohomology of some simple Shimura varieties, volume 151 of Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001. With an appendix by Vladimir G. Berkovich.
- Ich [01] Atsushi Ichino. On the regularized Siegel-Weil formula. J. Reine Angew. Math., 539:201–234, 2001.
- Ike [92] Tamotsu Ikeda. On the location of poles of the triple -functions. Compositio Math., 83(2):187–237, 1992.
- Ike [96] Tamotsu Ikeda. On the residue of the Eisenstein series and the Siegel-Weil formula. Compositio Math., 103(2):183–218, 1996.
- Jia [14] Dihua Jiang. Automorphic integral transforms for classical groups i: Endoscopy correspondences. In James W. Cogdell, Freydoon Shahidi, and David Soudry, editors, Automorphic Forms and Related Geometry: Assessing the Legacy of I.I. Piatetski-Shapiro, volume 614 of Contemporary Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2014.
- JL [18] Dihua Jiang and Baiying Liu. Fourier coefficients and cuspidal spectrum for symplectic groups. In Geometric aspects of the trace formula, Simons Symp., pages 211–244. Springer, Cham, 2018.
- JS [07] Dihua Jiang and David Soudry. On the genericity of cuspidal automorphic forms of . II. Compos. Math., 143(3):721–748, 2007.
- JW [16] Dihua Jiang and Chenyan Wu. On -factors of cuspidal automorphic representations of unitary groups I. J. Number Theory, 161:88–118, 2016.
- JW [18] Dihua Jiang and Chenyan Wu. Periods and (, b)-factors of cuspidal automorphic forms of symplectic groups. Israel J. Math., 225(1):267–320, 2018.
- [24] Tasho Kaletha, Alberto Minguez, Sug Woo Shin, and Paul-James White. Endoscopic classification of representations: Inner forms of unitary groups. arXiv:1409.3731.
- KR [94] Stephen S. Kudla and Stephen Rallis. A regularized Siegel-Weil formula: the first term identity. Ann. of Math. (2), 140(1):1–80, 1994.
- Kud [94] Stephen S. Kudla. Splitting metaplectic covers of dual reductive pairs. Israel J. Math., 87(1-3):361–401, 1994.
- Lan [71] Robert P. Langlands. Euler products. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn.-London, 1971. A James K. Whittemore Lecture in Mathematics given at Yale University, 1967, Yale Mathematical Monographs, 1.
- Lan [89] R. P. Langlands. On the classification of irreducible representations of real algebraic groups. In Representation theory and harmonic analysis on semisimple Lie groups, volume 31 of Math. Surveys Monogr., pages 101–170. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1989.
- LR [05] Erez M. Lapid and Stephen Rallis. On the local factors of representations of classical groups. In Automorphic representations, -functions and applications: progress and prospects, volume 11 of Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ., pages 309–359. de Gruyter, Berlin, 2005.
- Mœg [97] Colette Mœglin. Non nullité de certains relêvements par séries théta. J. Lie Theory, 7(2):201–229, 1997.
- Mok [15] Chung Pang Mok. Endoscopic classification of representations of quasi-split unitary groups. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 235(1108):vi+248, 2015.
- MW [95] C. Mœglin and J.-L. Waldspurger. Spectral decomposition and Eisenstein series, volume 113 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. Une paraphrase de l’Écriture [A paraphrase of Scripture].
- [33] Colette Moeglin and Jean-Loup Waldspurger. Stabilisation de la formule des traces tordue. Vol. 1, volume 316 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2016.
- [34] Colette Moeglin and Jean-Loup Waldspurger. Stabilisation de la formule des traces tordue. Vol. 2, volume 317 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham, 2016.
- PSR [87] Ilya Piatetski-Shapiro and Stephen Rallis. -functions for the classical groups. In Explicit constructions of automorphic -functions, volume 1254 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics, pages 1–52. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.
- Ral [82] Stephen Rallis. Langlands’ functoriality and the Weil representation. Amer. J. Math., 104(3):469–515, 1982.
- RR [93] R. Ranga Rao. On some explicit formulas in the theory of Weil representation. Pacific J. Math., 157(2):335–371, 1993.
- Sar [05] Peter Sarnak. Notes on the generalized Ramanujan conjectures. In Harmonic analysis, the trace formula, and Shimura varieties, volume 4 of Clay Math. Proc., pages 659–685. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2005.
- Sch [13] Peter Scholze. The local Langlands correspondence for over -adic fields. Invent. Math., 192(3):663–715, 2013.
- Sha [10] Freydoon Shahidi. Eisenstein series and automorphic -functions, volume 58 of American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010.
- Wu [17] ChenYan Wu. A critical case of Rallis inner product formula. Sci. China Math., 60(2):201–222, 2017.
- Wu [21] Chenyan Wu. On -factors of cuspidal automorphic representations of unitary groups, II. preprint. arXiv:2104.11954v1. Submitted, 2021.
- Yam [14] Shunsuke Yamana. L-functions and theta correspondence for classical groups. Invent. Math., 196(3):651–732, 2014.