Optimizing Large Language Models through Quantization: A Comparative Analysis of PTQ and QAT Techniques

The emergence of Large Language Models (LLMs) has revolutionized the field of natural language processing (NLP), enabling significant advancements in tasks such as machine translation, sentiment analysis, question answering, and conversational agents. Models like GPT-3, with 175 billion parameters, and PaLM, boasting 540 billion parameters, have demonstrated unprecedented capabilities in understanding and generating human-like text. These models leverage vast amounts of data and intricate architectures to achieve high performance, often surpassing previous benchmarks and setting new standards in the industry. However, the impressive capabilities of LLMs come at a substantial computational and financial cost. Training such models requires extensive computational resources, including powerful GPUs or TPUs, vast memory, and significant energy consumption. Moreover, the inference phase—where the model is deployed to perform tasks—demands considerable computational power and memory bandwidth, which can limit the feasibility of deploying LLMs on devices with constrained resources [1], such as mobile phones, Internet of Things (IoT) devices, and edge computing platforms. This limitation poses a significant barrier to the widespread adoption and accessibility of LLMs, particularly in applications where low latency and high efficiency are critical.

Quantization in neural networks offers a promising solution to these challenges by reducing the precision of model parameters and activations. Typically, neural network weights and activations are represented using 32-bit floating-point (FP32) numbers, which provide high precision but consume substantial memory and computational resources. Quantization techniques convert these high-precision values to lower-bit representations, such as 8-bit integers (INT8), 4-bit integers (INT4), or even binary representations [2]. This reduction not only decreases the memory footprint of the model but also accelerates computations by leveraging hardware optimizations designed for lower precision arithmetic. In the context of LLMs, which often consist of billions of parameters, quantization becomes particularly beneficial. By reducing the model size, quantization facilitates the deployment of LLMs on devices with limited computational capabilities and power budgets. Additionally, lower-precision computations can significantly speed up inference times, enabling real-time applications and reducing operational costs.

Despite these advantages, quantization presents challenges, including potential degradation in model accuracy and the complexity of implementing effective quantization strategies. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive review of quantization techniques applied to LLMs, exploring their methodologies, benefits, challenges, and future directions.

The primary challenge lies in reducing the model’s memory footprint and computational requirements while maintaining its performance. We formalize this as an optimization problem:

where $\mathcal{L}(\cdot)$ represents the loss function, $\hat{\Theta}$ denotes the quantized parameters, and $\alpha<1$ is the target compression ratio.The objective is to minimize the difference in loss between the original model and the quantized model [3] while ensuring that the quantized model occupies less memory than the original. Achieving this balance requires careful consideration of the quantization strategy, as overly aggressive quantization can lead to significant performance degradation, while insufficient quantization may not yield the desired reductions in memory and computational requirements. Therefore, the formulation underscores the need for quantization techniques that optimize both efficiency and effectiveness.

Quantization in neural networks involves mapping high-precision weights and activations to lower-bit representations. This process can be broadly categorized into uniform and non-uniform quantization methods, each with its own advantages and trade-offs.

This lemma provides a theoretical guarantee on the maximum deviation introduced by quantization, which is crucial for understanding the potential impact on model performance. By controlling the step size $\Delta$, one can manage the trade-off between quantization precision and the resulting memory/computational savings.

This theorem provides a closed-form solution for the scale factor that minimizes the quantization error under the mean squared error (MSE) criterion. By ensuring that $s^{*}$ is optimally chosen based on the range of the weights, the quantization process can achieve a balance between minimizing error and maximizing the dynamic range of the quantized values.

Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) integrates the quantization process into the training phase, allowing the model to adjust its parameters to accommodate lower precision representations. The primary objective of QAT is to minimize the loss function while accounting for the quantization effects, thereby ensuring that the final quantized model maintains high performance.

Formally, let $\mathcal{L}(\Theta)$ be the loss function for the original model. The quantization-aware training objective becomes:

where $Q(\Theta)$ represents the quantized parameters and $\mathcal{D}$ is the data distribution.

By simulating quantization during training, QAT allows the model to learn parameters that are more robust to the precision reduction, effectively minimizing the degradation in performance caused by quantization. This method typically involves strategies such as fake quantization, where quantization operations are inserted into the computational graph, and straight-through estimators (STE) for handling the non-differentiable quantization steps during backpropagation.

Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) is a straightforward approach where a pre-trained model is converted to a lower precision without additional training [6]. The process begins by computing the range $(x_{\text{min}},x_{\text{max}})$ of the model parameters using a calibration dataset. The scale factor $s$ is then determined based on this range and the desired bit-width $b$. The zero-point $z$ is calculated to align the quantized values appropriately.

Each tensor $T$ in the model parameters is quantized by scaling and rounding, followed by dequantization to obtain the quantized model parameters $\hat{\Theta}$. PTQ is advantageous due to its simplicity and efficiency, making it suitable for scenarios where retraining is impractical or where computational resources are limited. However, PTQ may lead to performance degradation, especially in models that are sensitive to precision loss.

Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) integrates the quantization process into the training loop, allowing the model to adapt its parameters to the lower precision representation. During each training iteration, a batch $B$ is sampled from the training data $D$, and the current model parameters $\Theta$ are quantized to obtain $\hat{\Theta}$. The loss $\mathcal{L}$ is then computed using the quantized parameters and the batch data.

Gradients $g$ are calculated with respect to the loss using a Straight-Through Estimator (STE) [7], which approximates the gradients through the non-differentiable quantization function. The model parameters are then updated using the learning rate $\eta$ and the computed gradients. This process continues until convergence, resulting in quantization-aware trained parameters $\Theta^{*}$ that are optimized to perform well despite the precision reduction.

QAT typically results in better performance compared to PTQ, as the model can learn to compensate for the quantization-induced errors. However, it requires additional computational resources and time for training, making it more suitable for scenarios where maintaining high accuracy is critical and retraining is feasible.

Quantization introduces errors into the neural network, which can affect the model’s performance. Understanding and mitigating these errors is crucial for developing effective quantization techniques.

For a quantized neural network layer with input $x$ and quantized weights $\hat{W}$, the forward propagation error can be decomposed as:

where $\epsilon_{q}$ is the relative quantization error bound:

This lemma illustrates how quantization errors accumulate across multiple layers in a neural network. As the number of layers increases, even small quantization errors at each layer can compound, potentially leading to significant overall errors. This highlights the importance of minimizing $\epsilon_{q}$ at each layer through careful quantization strategies and possibly incorporating techniques like QAT to mitigate error accumulation.

Quantization does not necessarily require uniform precision across all layers of a neural network. Mixed-precision quantization assigns different bit-widths to different layers or operations based on their sensitivity to quantization. This approach balances the trade-off between model size, computational speed, and accuracy by allocating higher precision to more sensitive layers and lower precision to less sensitive ones.

We formulate the mixed-precision quantization as a constrained optimization problem [8]:

where $b_{l}$ is the bit-width for layer $l$, $\alpha_{l}$ is the layer sensitivity coefficient, and $B$ is the total bit budget.

This theorem provides a method for determining the optimal number of bits to allocate to each layer in a neural network to minimize the overall quantization error while adhering to a total bit budget $B$. The allocation is influenced by the sensitivity of each layer ($\alpha_{l}$) and the variance of its weights ($\sigma_{l}^{2}$). Layers with higher sensitivity or greater weight variance require higher precision to maintain performance, whereas less sensitive layers can be quantized more aggressively.

The Lagrange multiplier $\lambda$ is introduced to balance the trade-off between minimizing quantization error and adhering to the bit budget. By solving this optimization problem, one can achieve a more efficient quantization scheme that maintains high performance while reducing computational and memory requirements.

To simulate the scaling of model parameters reflective of state-of-the-art LLMs, we employed synthetic neural network architectures with varying depths and widths. Specifically, we constructed models with parameter counts in the millions and billions to evaluate the efficacy of quantization techniques across different scales. The configurations are as follows:

• •

  Small Scale: Models with approximately 10 million parameters, characterized by a moderate number of layers and units, suitable for initial qualitative assessments.

• •

  Medium Scale: Models encompassing around 100 million parameters, introducing increased complexity and computational demands.

• •

  Large Scale: Models approaching 1 billion parameters, mirroring the scale of cutting-edge LLMs like GPT-3 and PaLM.

The choice of these scales is motivated by the need to understand how quantization impacts models of varying sizes, particularly focusing on the transition from medium to large-scale models that dominate current research and applications.

Our synthetic models are designed using a fully connected (dense) architecture for simplicity and scalability. While transformer-based architectures like GPT-3 and PaLM are more prevalent in LLM applications, dense models serve as a controlled environment to isolate and analyze the effects of quantization without the additional complexity introduced by attention mechanisms. The architecture comprises multiple linear layers interleaved with non-linear activation functions (ReLU) and dropout layers to prevent overfitting.

We implemented both Post-Training Quantization (PTQ) and Quantization-Aware Training (QAT) methodologies to assess their performance across different model scales:

• •

  Post-Training Quantization (PTQ): This technique involves quantizing a pre-trained model without additional training. PTQ is advantageous for its simplicity and speed, making it suitable for scenarios where retraining is computationally prohibitive.

• •

  Quantization-Aware Training (QAT): QAT integrates quantization into the training process, allowing the model to adapt its weights and activations to the lower precision during training. This approach generally results in better performance retention compared to PTQ, albeit at the cost of increased training complexity and time.

Quantization fundamentally involves reducing the precision of model parameters and activations, which can introduce numerical inaccuracies. To mitigate the adverse effects of quantization on the model’s stability and performance, we introduce a scaling factor, denoted as $\gamma$. This scaling factor is designed to preserve the second moment (i.e., the variance) of the activations post-quantization, thereby maintaining the distribution of the data and ensuring stable training and inference processes.

Here, $\mathbb{E}[x^{2}]$ represents the expected value of the squared original activations, and $\mathbb{E}[Q(x)^{2}]$ denotes the expected value of the squared quantized activations. By calibrating $\gamma$ in this manner, we ensure that the energy of the activations remains consistent before and after quantization.

Quantization not only impacts numerical stability but also plays a crucial role in enhancing hardware efficiency. By reducing the bit-widths of weights and activations, quantized models can leverage specialized hardware accelerators optimized for lower-precision arithmetic, leading to significant reductions in computational costs and energy consumption. The computational cost for quantized operations, denoted as $C_{q}$, can be expressed as:

where:

• •

  $b_{w}$ and $b_{a}$ are the bit-widths for weights and activations, respectively.

• •

  $w_{0}$ and $a_{0}$ are the reference bit-widths (typically 32-bit floating-point).

• •

  $C_{f}$ represents the floating-point operation cost.

This equation highlights that reducing the bit-widths $b_{w}$ and $b_{a}$ proportionally decreases the computational cost $C_{q}$, assuming the reference bit-widths remain constant.

To illustrate the practical implications of hardware efficiency, we deployed the quantized models on an edge device [9] equipped with a specialized low-precision accelerator. The performance metrics are summarized in Table V.

Deploying quantized models on an edge device demonstrates substantial improvements in throughput and reductions in power consumption. The INT8 configuration doubles the inference throughput and reduces power usage by 40%, while the INT4 configuration quadruples the throughput and cuts power consumption by 60%. These enhancements are pivotal for battery-operated devices and applications requiring rapid response times.

The observed efficiencies are expected to scale with larger models. For instance, applying INT8 quantization to a GPT-3-like model (175B parameters) would theoretically reduce the computational cost by approximately 40%, translating to feasible deployment on server clusters and cloud infrastructures with optimized hardware for low-precision computations.

The interplay between numerical stability and hardware efficiency is critical for the optimal deployment of quantized LLMs. Maintaining numerical stability through scaling factors like $\gamma$ ensures that the reduction in precision does not compromise model performance, while the associated hardware efficiencies maximize the practical benefits of quantization. Our experiments underscore that with appropriate scaling, quantized models can achieve near-original performance metrics while significantly enhancing computational and energy efficiencies. This balance is essential for the practical deployment of LLMs across diverse platforms, from high-performance servers to edge devices.

Quantization involves reducing the precision of the model’s weights and activations [10], typically from 32-bit floating-point (FP32) to lower bit-width representations such as 8-bit integers (INT8) or even binary representations. Jacob et al. [11] introduced a pioneering approach to quantize neural networks for efficient integer-arithmetic-only inference, demonstrating significant speedups and memory savings with minimal loss in accuracy. Their work laid the foundation for subsequent advancements in post-training quantization (PTQ). Building on PTQ, Cheng et al. [12] explored fixed-point quantization for deep neural networks, addressing the challenges of maintaining numerical stability and minimizing quantization errors. Their techniques have been instrumental in refining uniform quantization methods, ensuring reliable performance across various layers of neural networks.

While PTQ offers a straightforward method for quantizing pre-trained models, it often results in performance degradation, especially for models with high sensitivity to precision loss. To mitigate this, Courbariaux et al. [13] proposed BinaryConnect, a method that binarizes weights during propagations while maintaining full-precision weights for updates. This approach exemplifies the concept of Quantization-Aware Training (QAT), where quantization effects are simulated during training to allow the model to adapt its parameters accordingly. Mishra and Marr [14] further advanced QAT by incorporating Hessian-based model compression techniques, which leverage second-order information to optimize the quantization process. Their methodology enhances the robustness of quantized models, ensuring that critical parameters retain higher precision where necessary.

Recognizing that not all layers within a neural network exhibit the same sensitivity to quantization, researchers have investigated mixed-precision quantization strategies. Rastegari et al. [15] introduced XNOR-Net, which employs binary convolutional neural networks, selectively maintaining higher precision in layers deemed more critical for performance. This selective approach allows for a balanced trade-off between model efficiency and accuracy. Bibi et al. [16] complemented mixed-precision techniques with pruning strategies, selectively removing less significant weights to further compress the model. The synergy between pruning and quantization enables the deployment of highly efficient models without substantial losses in performance.

Beyond uniform and mixed-precision quantization, advanced schemes such as log-based and non-uniform quantization have been explored to better capture the distribution of weights and activations. Gong et al. [17], [18] proposed low-precision deep neural networks that employ non-uniform quantization levels tailored to the statistical properties of the data. This approach enhances the representation capability of quantized models, particularly in capturing rare but significant features. Zhu et al. [19] introduced Trained Binary Quantization, a method that optimizes the binary quantization process through training, enabling 1-bit convolutional neural networks. Their work demonstrates the feasibility of extreme quantization levels while maintaining competitive performance, paving the way for ultra-efficient model deployments.

The application of quantization to transformer-based models, which form the backbone of many LLMs, has been a focal point of recent research. Menon et al. [20] provided a comprehensive survey on quantization techniques for resource-efficient inference, highlighting their applicability to transformer architectures. Their analysis underscores the importance of layer-wise quantization strategies and the integration of QAT to preserve the intricate dependencies inherent in transformer models. Relatedly, Javed et al. [21] investigated the implicit regularization effects of quantization in deep learning, providing insights into how quantized weights can influence the generalization capabilities of transformer models. Their findings emphasize the need for carefully designed quantization schemes that align with the training dynamics of LLMs.

Quantization is often combined with other model compression techniques to achieve compounded efficiency gains. Pruning, as discussed by Bibi et al. [16], and knowledge distillation, where a smaller model is trained to replicate the behavior of a larger one, are frequently integrated with quantization. This multi-faceted approach allows for substantial reductions in model size and computational requirements, facilitating the deployment of LLMs in diverse and constrained environments.

The body of research in neural network quantization has significantly evolved, with various techniques tailored to optimize different aspects of model performance and efficiency. While foundational works have established the viability of quantization, ongoing advancements continue to refine these methods, particularly in the context of transformer-based LLMs. The integration of quantization with training processes and other compression strategies underscores its central role in the future of efficient AI deployments.

Our findings align with the results presented by Jacob et al. [11], who reported up to a 68% reduction in model size with minimal accuracy loss using PTQ. Similarly, Mishra and Marr [14] demonstrated that QAT could preserve up to 98% of the original model’s performance metrics, corroborating our observations.

Future research should focus on developing more sophisticated quantization schemes that further minimize performance loss while maximizing hardware efficiencies. Areas of interest include:

• •

  Dynamic Quantization: Adjusting quantization parameters in real-time based on input data characteristics to maintain optimal performance.

• •

  Quantization in Multi-Modal Models: Extending quantization techniques to models handling multiple data modalities (e.g., text, images, audio) to ensure consistent performance across different types of data.

• •

  Integration with Other Compression Techniques: Combining quantization with methods like pruning, knowledge distillation, and tensor decomposition to achieve compounded efficiency gains.