Optimal Regularity for Fully Nonlinear Nonlocal Equations with Unbounded Source Terms
Abstract.
We prove optimal regularity estimates for viscosity solutions to a class of fully nonlinear nonlocal equations with unbounded source terms. More precisely, depending on the integrability of the source term , we establish that solutions belong to classes ranging from to , at critical thresholds. We use approximation techniques and Liouville-type arguments. These results represent a novel contribution, providing the first such estimates in the context of not necessarily concave nonlocal equations.
Keywords: Nonlocal operators, Unbounded source, Hölder regularity.
AMS Subject Classifications: 35B65, 35D40, 35R11.
1. Introduction
In this article, we examine the regularity theory of viscosity solutions to a fully nonlinear nonlocal equation of the form
(1.1) |
where , is a normalizing constant, , and are indexes sets, and the source term belongs to a suitable Lesbegue space. Moreover, we suppose the following ellipticity-type condition: for each and , is a symmetric matrix -elliptic, i.e.,
(1.2) |
for . We establish Hölder regularity for solutions (or their gradient), depending on the range of for which .
Regularity results for nonlocal operators have been extensively studied over the years. In [15], the author presents an analytical proof of Hölder continuity and introduces more flexible assumptions on the operator than previous studies. But it is only in [6], where such regularity estimates were given uniformly as the degree of the operator , seen as a natural extension of second-order operators. In that paper, the authors also prove properties such as comparison principle, a nonlocal Alexandrov-Bakelman-Pucci estimate (ABP for short), Harnack inequality, and regularity in spaces for viscosity solutions to equations of type (1.1).
Numerous results were uncovered based on the findings in [6]. In [8], the authors extended their previous results using perturbative methods, including the -regularity for a class of non translation-invariant equations. Around the same time, the authors in [3] also worked with non translation-invariant equations, establishing Hölder regularity of solutions, using different assumptions from [8], allowing first-order terms and some degeneracy in the operators. We also mention the work [12], where the author gives -estimates for more general kernels than previous results.
Besides the estimates, Evans-Krylov-type results have been explored by the community. In this direction, the authors in [7] proved that viscosity solutions for concave (or convex) equations of the form
(1.3) |
are of class . They assume that, for each , the kernel belongs to the class , i.e., they are of class away from the origin, symmetric, satisfies the ellipticity condition
(1.4) |
and
(1.5) |
In [13], the author extended the result above to equations of type (1.3) with rough kernels, i.e., where the kernels satisfy (1.4) but not necessarily (1.5), for every . Under the additional (and optimal) assumption of exterior data for the solution, the author provides a priori estimates. Moreover, results involving non translation-invariant kernels are also given, provided the dependency on the variable is of a -fashion. We also mention the work [18], where the author also provides for viscosity solutions to nonlocal equations of the type
provided the quantities and are sufficiently small.
A natural question is whether one can prove optimal regularity estimates for fully nonlinear nonlocal equations with an unbounded right-hand side. However, such results are relatively scarce in the literature. One of the primary challenges in this context is the lack of compactness properties for viscosity solutions of (1.1) (or even the simpler equation (1.7) below) when . In addition, stability results are also crucial for implementing the now-classic strategy proposed in [8]. In fact, only a few works involving an unbounded norm on the right-hand side are available. Moreover, the existing results consider a class of kernels that differ from the broader class discussed in [6, 8, 12, 13], which defines the extremal operator
Instead, they work with kernels of the form
(1.6) |
where is a symmetric matrix satisfying
(1.7) |
for positive constants . These kernels define a class of extremal operators as
It is important to note that, because they allow some degeneracy (conform (1.7)), although this is a smaller class, it is not necessarily contained within the .
In this direction, the authors in [9] established a quantitative ABP estimate for viscosity supersolutions to
(1.8) |
They show that supersolutions to the equation above satisfy
where is the coincidence set between and a type of fractional convex envelope of . In [10], the author improved the previous result, by removing the dependency of the -norm in the estimate above, in case is sufficiently close to 2. In [11], the author removed the restriction on the degree of the operator present in [10], by proving that supersolutions to (1.8) with , for , satisfy
Moreover, the author also gives -estimates for viscosity solutions to concave equations of the form
(1.9) |
which, in particular, implies that solutions are of class . To our knowledge, this is the only result in the literature that gives this type of regularity for fully nonlinear nonlocal equations as in (1.9), in the presence of an unbounded right-hand side.
The main purpose of this paper is to establish optimal regularity estimates for viscosity solutions to equation (1.1), where the source term . We emphasize that such estimates have not been previously available for this type of equation. We employ the so-called half-relaxed method, originally introduced in [4], to prove that a sequence of merely bounded viscosity solutions to (1.1) converges uniformly to a function which solves a suitable equation, see Lemma 2.11 below. This method relies on the comparison principle of the operator and has been used previously in the context of Hamilton-Jacobi equations and nonlocal equations with Neumann boundary conditions in a half-space. We refer the reader to [1, 2]. Once compactness and stability are available, standard approximation arguments can be applied to show the regularity properties of the viscosity solutions.
As discussed earlier, the regularity of solutions depends on the range of for which , in the spirit of [16]. First, we prove that if , then solutions are of class . The constant is known as the Escauriaza’s exponent. Notice that this type of regularity was previously known from [11] in the context of a concave equation as in (1.9).
The borderline case is particularly significant. In the local case, i.e., , this value separates continuity estimates from differentiability properties in the regularity theory. Moreover, this quantity also appears in ABP and Harnack estimates. Meanwhile, in the nonlocal case, this is the first time such a threshold has been explicitly considered, as previous ABP estimates in [9, 10, 11] only consider the -norm of the right-hand side. We believe this is the correct threshold for future general ABP estimates for the general class . Nevertheless, in this scenario, we show that viscosity solutions to (1.1) are Log-Lipschitz, which is better than for every .
For for , we prove that the solutions belong to the class , where is defined in (2.2). Finally, for the borderline case where , we show that viscosity solutions to (1.9) are locally of class , which is the best regularity we can hope for without assuming further regularity for . These results are detailed in Theorems 2.6, 2.7, 2.8 and 2.9 below.
The class of kernels in (1.1) follows the form of (1.6), as described in [9, 10, 11], but with the additional requirement of uniform ellipticity, as in (1.2). In particular, the class of kernels that we deal with is a subset of and enjoys all its properties. Furthermore, because uniform ellipticity as in (1.2) ensures that the condition (1.7) is satisfied with the same ellipticity constants, our class of kernels is also included in those described in [9, 10, 11]. Developing a similar theory for more general kernels, such as those in , remains an open challenge, primarily due to the need for an appropriate ABP estimate, as discussed earlier.
The remainder of this paper is structured as follows: In section 2 we gather some auxiliary results and present our main results. The proof of the optimal Hölder regularity is the subject of Section 3. In Section 4 we put forward the Log-Lipschitz regularity of solutions. Section 5 is devoted to the proof of Hölder regularity for the gradient of solutions. Finally, in the last section, we investigate the borderline -regularity.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Notations and definitions
This section collects some definitions and notations used throughout the paper. The open ball of radius and centered at in is denoted by . For , the notation means that , for every . We proceed by defining the Log-Lipschitz space.
Definition 2.1.
A function belongs to if there exists a universal constant such that
Definition 2.2 (BMO space).
We say that if for all , we have
where .
Since is defined in the whole , it can behave very widely as . Hence, we work within a class where we have a certain decay of the solutions as they approach infinity, see also [6].
Definition 2.3 (Growth at infinity).
We say that a function belongs to , if
In the next, we define viscosity solutions:
Definition 2.4 (Viscosity solution).
We say that an upper (lower) semicontinuous function is a viscosity subsolution (supersolution) to (1.1), if for any and such that has a local maximum (minimum) at , then the function
satisfies
We say a function is a viscosity solution to (1.1) if it is simultaneously a viscosity subsolution and supersolution.
Remark 2.5 (Scaling properties).
Throughout the manuscript, we assume certain smallness conditions on the norms of and the source term . We want to stress that such conditions are not restrictive. In fact, if is a viscosity solution to (1.1), then for the function
satisfy and solves
where
is such that .
2.2. Main results
As mentioned earlier, the regularity of solutions depends on the range of under consideration. The critical cases occur when for -regularity and for -regularity. Due to the nonlocal nature of the problem, achieving these critical cases requires to possess higher regularity compared to the local case. For instance, in the local case, the first critical threshold is at , leading to -regularity. Similarly, when in the local case, it yields -regularity.
We now present the main results of this article, beginning with a result in Hölder spaces for the case where is below .
Theorem 2.6.
Let be a viscosity solution to (1.1), with , . Then, for any
(2.1) |
Moreover, there exists a positive constant , such that
We observe that for , we have and , recovering the regularity result for the local case reported in [16]. Next, we consider the borderline case . In this scenario, we show that solutions are Log-Lipschitz continuous, achieving the same level of regularity as in [16, Theorem 2], but with the requirement of higher regularity for the source term .
Theorem 2.7.
Let be a viscosity solution to (1.1), with , . Then, , and there exists a positive constant , such that
In what follows, we present our third main theorem. As before, we recover the local regularity in the limit as , demonstrated in [16, Theorem 3]. Recall that comes from the -regularity of -harmonic functions.
Theorem 2.8.
Let be a viscosity solution to (1.1), with , . Then, for any
(2.2) |
Moreover, there exists a positive constant , such that
Observe that as , the corresponding Hölder exponent approaches , indicating that we achieve -regularity in the case , which is indeed the case as confirmed in [17]. However, we also show that this result holds under the weaker assumption that , which is a proper subset of . This is the content of our last main result.
Theorem 2.9.
Let be a viscosity solution to (1.9), with . Then, and there exists a positive constant , such that
The proof of Theorem 2.9 differs from the strategies used for the previous theorems. This is primarily because scaling of the form , for , leads to a growth rate of at infinity, which increases too rapidly to be integrable with respect to the tails of our kernel. Consequently, we employ techniques similar to those in [13, 14], where Liouville-type results are used to establish interior regularity of solutions through blow-up arguments.
2.3. Auxiliary results
In this subsection, we prove some results used throughout the paper. Since we did not find any references stating exactly what we needed, we start with a comparison principle for viscosity solutions of (1.1) (and also (1.9)), in the case where . See also [6, Theorem 5.2].
Proposition 2.10 (Comparison principle).
Let , upper semicontinuous and lower semicontinuous, be respectively a viscosity subsolution and supersolution to the equation
(2.3) |
such that in . Then, in .
Proof.
Suppose by contradiction that
For we define the auxiliary function
and consider such that
Notice that , which yields to
(2.4) |
By compactness, we have that as , and by using (2.4) we obtain . Therefore
which implies
Moreover, since on , we have . We set and , and observe that has a local maximum at , while has a local minimum at . Hence by using that is a subsolution and is a supersolution of (2.3), we have the viscosity inequalities
and
for small enough. Hence, from the definition of and , there exist and such that
and
for sufficiently small. Subtracting the inequalities above yields to
Notice that, When , by the contradiction hypotheses we have
Moreover,
Therefore
which is a contradiction for small enough. This finishes the proof. ∎
We now focus on one of the main contributions of this paper: the stability of solutions to (1.1) when . To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time such a result has been established in the fully nonlinear nonlocal context. For comparison, see [6, Corollary 4.7].
Proposition 2.11 (Compactness and stability).
Let be a normalized viscosity solution to
Suppose that there exists a positive constant such that
(2.5) |
Suppose further that
for . Then there exists such that
Moreover, solves
(2.6) |
Proof.
First, observe that given , we obtain from (2.5)
Hence, Given any compact set , we have that the a.e. limits
and
are well-defined. Since the a.e. convergence holds for every compact set of , we also have the a.e. convergence in the whole . Using this fact and once again (2.5), the Dominated Convergence Theorem ensures that
(2.7) |
and
(2.8) |
through the respective subsequences. We are going to show that is a viscosity subsolution to (2.6), and is a viscosity supersolution to (2.6). We will prove the subsolution case since the supersolution case is analogous. Let and be such that has a maximum at . Without loss of generality, we can assume that is defined by
for some paraboloid . We need to show that
(2.9) |
Suppose by contradiction that
(2.10) |
for some . Now, let be a viscosity solution to
(2.11) |
for some to be chosen later. Here, the maximal operator is defined with respect to the class , as in [6] (and defined below). We have
where we have used (2.11) to conclude
Now, by choosing such that and , we obtain
(2.12) |
Let be defined by
(2.13) |
and
(2.14) |
By using the ABP estimates in [11, Theorem 3.1] we have , as . Then, there exists a such that touch by above in . Therefore, we have the viscosity inequality
(2.15) |
By ellipticity and using (2.10) and (2.12) we obtain that
(2.16) |
We observe that
and by using (2.7), we can conclude that for sufficiently large
(2.17) |
Hence, from (2.16) and (2.17), we obtain
Now, choose sufficiently small so that
Finally, for sufficiently large we get
which is a contradiction with (2.15). This finishes the proof of (2.9), i.e., solves in the viscosity sense
We similarly show that
Now, from the definition of , and the viscosity inequalities above we can infer from Proposition 2.10, that in fact
and hence up to a subsequence, locally uniformly in (see for instance [2, Lemma 6.2]). Moreover, from the viscosity inequalities satisfied by and , we conclude that solves
in the viscosity sense. ∎
Using the stability result above, we can prove the following Approximation Lemma, which relates the solutions to our problem with -harmonic functions.
Lemma 2.12 (Approximation Lemma).
Let be a normalized viscosity solution to (1.1), with . Suppose that
Given there exist , such that if
we can find a function satisfying
Proof.
Suppose not, then there exist and sequences , such that
(2.18) |
(2.19) |
and
(2.20) |
but,
(2.21) |
for all . From the contradiction hypotheses (2.18), (2.19), (2.20) and Proposition 2.11, we can guarantee the existence of a function such that locally uniformly in satisfying
(2.22) |
Now, the regularity available for (2.22), see [6], implies that . By taking , we reach a contradiction with (2.21) for sufficiently large. ∎
3. Hölder regularity
In this section, we detail the proof of Theorem 2.6, namely, the optimal -regularity, for
where . We start by applying Lemma 2.12 and showing the existence of a constant close to in sufficiently small balls.
Proposition 3.1.
Let be a normalized a viscosity solution to (1.1), with . Assume that
If
then there exist constants and satisfying, and
where is a universal constant.
Proof.
Fix (to be chosen later) and let be the function from Lemma 2.12. Since , for sufficiently small, we have
Now, from Lemma 2.12 and the Triangular inequality we obtain
Now, we make the universal choices
(3.1) |
and by setting , we conclude that
Notice that the choice of determines the value of via Lemma 2.12. ∎
In what follows, we iterate the previous proposition to find a sequence of constants that approaches at the origin.
Proposition 3.2.
Let be a normalized a viscosity solution to (1.1), with . Assume that
If
then we can find a sequence satisfying
(3.2) |
with
(3.3) |
Proof.
We argue by an induction argument. By setting , the case follows immediately. Suppose we have verified the statement for , and let us prove the case . We introduce the auxiliary function
Notice that by (3.2) we have in . In addition, solves
where . Moreover, our choice of in (2.1) assures . Next, we are going to show that satisfies
(3.4) |
for some universal constant . In fact, we resort again to an induction argument. For , we have and (3.4) is verified. Now, assume that the case is already verified. We shall prove the case . Observe that
where comes from Lemma (2.12) applied to . Now, for we estimate
where in the last inequality we used (3.1). On the other hand, if , we obtain
where , and hence (3.4) is proved. Finally, we now can apply Proposition 3.1 to and we obtain
and rescaling back to we conclude
where , which satisfies (3.3). This finishes the proof. ∎
We are now ready to prove Theorem 2.6.
4. Log-Lipschitz continuity
This section addresses the first critical case , which yields the desired Log-Lipschitz regularity. In particular, solutions are of class for every . As before, we begin by demonstrating the existence of a linear approximation of within sufficiently small balls.
Proposition 4.1.
Let be a normalized viscosity solution to (1.1), with . Suppose further that
If
then, there exist a constant and an affine function of the form
satisfying and
Proof.
Proposition 4.2.
Let be a normalized viscosity solution to (1.1), with . Suppose further that
If
then, there exists a sequence of affine function of the form
satisfying
(4.2) |
and
Proof.
As before, we resort to an induction argument. By considering , the case follows trivially. Now, suppose that the cases have been verified, and let us prove the case . We define the auxiliary function by
We have that in , and solves
where . Notice that as , we have . Arguing similarly as in Proposition 3.2, we can also show that
Hence, we can apply Proposition 5.1 to to conclude that there exists such that
Rescaling back to , we obtain
where . Observe that
We now present the proof of Theorem 2.7
5. Höder continuity of the gradient
In this section, we give the proof of Theorem 2.8, in which we prove -regularity for
The proof follows the general lines of the proof of Theorem 2.6, but now at the gradient level.
Proposition 5.1.
Let be a normalized viscosity solution to (1.1), with . Suppose further that
If
then, there exist a constant and an affine function of the form
satisfying and
Proof.
Proposition 5.2.
Let be a normalized viscosity solution to (1.1), with . Suppose further that
If
then, there exists a sequence of affine function of the form
satisfying
(5.2) |
and
Proof.
As before, we resort to an induction argument. By considering , the case follows trivially. Now, suppose that the cases have been verified, and let us prove the case . We define the auxiliary function by
We have that in , and solves
where . Notice that for our choice of in (2.2), we have . Arguing similarly as in Proposition 3.2, we can also show that
Hence, we can apply Proposition 5.1 to to conclude that there exists such that
Rescaling back to , we obtain
where . From the definition of , it is immediate that condition (5.2) is also satisfied. This finishes the proof. ∎
Proof of Theorem 2.8.
The proof follows the same lines as in Theorem 1.1 and Theorem 1.2. Notice that from (5.2) we have that and are a Cauchy sequence, and hence, we can find and satisfying and , as . Moreover, we have
Now, fix and let be such that . We have,
Finally, by taking the limit as in (3.2), we obtain . We can also show that , see for instance [5]. This finishes the proof. ∎
6. The borderline case
This section deals with the -regularity for viscosity solutions of (1.9). As previously discussed, since , we can no longer follow the strategy employed above. In this case, we follow the ideas put forward in [13] (see also[18]). We begin with a technical lemma, that can be found in [13, Claim 3.2].
Lemma 6.1.
Let and . If and
for a constant , then
Proposition 6.2.
Proof.
We argue by contradiction. Suppose that the result is false, then we can find sequences , such that for every ,
(6.1) |
but
where , as . For , we define the quantity
and observe that
Moreover, if , then . By the Lemma 6.1 we have that
therefore there exists a and such that
(6.2) |
Since from (6.1) , we have as . Now, for , we define the blow-up
Notice that
(6.3) |
Consider the auxiliary function defined as
where
Since that , it follows from (6.3) that
(6.4) |
In particular, for we have
therefore
which implies
(6.5) |
for all . Let be a smooth function such that in and outside . For we have
Hence, there exists such that and by (6.4) we have
Therefore, for and ,
(6.6) |
Our goal now is to show that
(6.7) |
for all and .
Case : In this case, we estimate for
which gives
(6.9) |
Case : Finally, we have
which implies
or equivalently
(6.10) |
Therefore, (6.7) follows from (6.8), (6.9) and (6.10). Thus, there exists a such that locally uniformly in the -norm. Now, from (6.2), we have that
and therefore
(6.11) |
Moreover, from (6.7),
(6.12) |
for all and . Notice that solves
where , for , we have
Hence,
Moreover,
and as (and therefore ), we have from Proposition 2.11 that
Similarly, we can prove that
Therefore,
(6.13) |
Finally, for
we have that
The concavity of yields
Hence, by passing the limit as we get
(6.14) |
Therefore, from (6.12), (6.13) and (6.14), we can apply Theorem [13, Theorem 2.1], to conclude that is a polynomial of degree 1, which is a contradiction with (6.11).
∎
Proof of Theorem 2.9.
Acknowledgement: D. dos Prazeres was partially supported by CNPq and CAPES/Fapitec. M. Santos was partially supported by the Portuguese government through FCT-Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., under the projects UID/MAT/04459/2020, and PTDC/MAT-PUR/1788/2020. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brazil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.
References
- [1] G. Barles, E. Chasseigne, C. Georgelin, and E. Jakobsen. On neumann type problems for nonlocal equations set in a half space. arXiv preprint arXiv:1112.0476, 2011.
- [2] Guy Barles. An Introduction to the Theory of Viscosity Solutions for First-Order Hamilton–Jacobi Equations and Applications, pages 49–109. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.
- [3] Guy Barles, Emmanuel Chasseigne, and Cyril Imbert. Hölder continuity of solutions of second-order non-linear elliptic integro-differential equations. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 13(1):1–26, 2011.
- [4] Guy. Barles and Benoît Perthame. Discontinuous solutions of deterministic optimal stopping time problems. RAIRO Modél. Math. Anal. Numér., 21(4):557–579, 1987.
- [5] Anne Bronzi, Edgard Pimentel, Giane Rampasso, and Eduardo Teixeira. Regularity of solutions to a class of variable-exponent fully nonlinear elliptic equations. J. Funct. Anal., 279(12):108781, 31, 2020.
- [6] Luis Caffarelli and Luis Silvestre. Regularity theory for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 62(5):597–638, 2009.
- [7] Luis Caffarelli and Luis Silvestre. The Evans-Krylov theorem for nonlocal fully nonlinear equations. Ann. of Math. (2), 174(2):1163–1187, 2011.
- [8] Luis Caffarelli and Luis Silvestre. Regularity results for nonlocal equations by approximation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 200(1):59–88, 2011.
- [9] Nestor Guillen and Russell W. Schwab. Aleksandrov-Bakelman-Pucci type estimates for integro-differential equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 206(1):111–157, 2012.
- [10] Shuhei Kitano. ABP maximum principles for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations with unbounded inhomogeneous terms. Partial Differ. Equ. Appl., 1(4):Paper No. 16, 11, 2020.
- [11] Shuhei Kitano. a priori estimates for fully nonlinear integro-differential equations. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 61(4):Paper No. 153, 19, 2022.
- [12] Dennis Kriventsov. interior regularity for nonlinear nonlocal elliptic equations with rough kernels. Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 38(12):2081–2106, 2013.
- [13] Joaquim Serra. regularity for concave nonlocal fully nonlinear elliptic equations with rough kernels. Calculus of Variations and Partial Differential Equations, 54:3571–3601, 2014.
- [14] Joaquim Serra. Regularity for fully nonlinear nonlocal parabolic equations with rough kernels. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 54(1):615–629, 2015.
- [15] Luis Silvestre. Hölder estimates for solutions of integro-differential equations like the fractional Laplace. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 55(3):1155–1174, 2006.
- [16] E. Teixeira. Universal moduli of continuity for solutions to fully nonlinear elliptic equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 211(3):911–927, 2014.
- [17] H. Vivas. regularity for fully nonlinear nonlocal equations with bounded right hand side. ArXiv preprint arXiv:1907.02455, 2019.
- [18] Hui Yu. Small perturbation solutions for nonlocal elliptic equations. Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 42(1):142–158, 2017.
Makson S. Santos
Departamento de Matemática do Instituto Superior Técnico
Universidade de Lisboa
1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
[email protected]
Disson dos Prazeres
Department of Mathematics
Universidade Federal de Sergipe - UFS,
49100-000, Jardim Rosa Elze, São Cristóvão - SE, Brazil
[email protected]