Optimal estimates for mappings admitting general Poisson representations in the unit ball
Abstract
Suppose that and In this note, we use Hölder inequality and some basic properties of hypergeometric functions to establish the sharp constant and function in the following inequalities
and
where are those mapping from the unit ball into admitting general Poisson representations. The obtained results generalize and extend some known results from harmonic mappings ([2, Proposition 6.16] and [4, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2]) and hyperbolic harmonic mappings ([3, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2]).
keywords:
Harmonic mapping, hyperbolic harmonic mapping, general Poisson representationsMSC:
[2020] 31B05,31B10, 42B301 Introduction and main results
Let be the unit ball of and be its boundary. For any its vector norm is defined by For the hypergeometric function is defined by
where and is the Gamma function; cf. [1]. The following two elemental properties on hypergeometric function is well known; cf. [1, Chapter 2].
(1) |
(2) |
For Then the general Poisson kernel [6] is defined by
(3) |
In the following discussion, we always consider the positive integers which greater than or equal to . In this paper, we are interesting in those mappings admitting the following general Poisson representations:
(4) |
where and is the surface measure on normalized by Here, we choose the constant to be met the identity equation
when It is noted that many classical functions defined in the unit ball can be written as the form in (4). For example, a harmonic mapping defined in the unit ball can be represented as where If then the function is hyperbolic harmonic mapping. It was show by Liu and Peng [5] that the following Dirichlet problem
(5) |
has a solution for all if and only if where
In this case the solution is unique and is represented as
In this paper, our aim is to obtain the sharp constants and sharp function in the following inequalities
(6) |
and
(7) |
where and
A similar result proved in [8, Lemma 5.1.1], which states that if then
Here stands for the Hardy space consisting of analytic functions and satisfying
Suppose Let be the harmonic Hardy spaces on the unit ball which the function satisfying the following conditions
For the case of the following sharp estimate
was obtained in [2, Proposition 6.23]. In [4], Kalaj and Marković obtained the following optimal estimates for harmonic functions in the unit ball.
Theorem 1.1.
[4, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2] Let and be its conjugate. For all and we have the following sharp inequalities
(8) |
and
(9) |
where
(10) |
and
(11) |
Later, Chen and Kalaj [3] derived the following optimal estimates for hyperbolic Poisson integrals of functions in the unit ball.
Theorem 1.2.
[3, Theorems 1.1 and 1.2] Let and be its conjugate. If and then for any we have the following sharp inequalities
(12) |
and
(13) |
where
(14) |
and
(15) |
In this paper, we will povide a simple and direct method to established the following optimal estimates for mappings admitting general Poisson representations in the unit ball.
Theorem 1.3.
Let and be its conjugate. Suppose that and If and Then for any we have the following sharp inequality
(16) |
where
(17) |
Theorem 1.4.
Let and be its conjugate. Suppose that If and Then for any we have the following sharp inequality
(18) |
In the case that we have
(19) |
In the case that we have
(20) |
Remark 1.
Remark 2.
Corollary 1.5.
Suppose that Let be a function from unit ball satisfying the Dirichlet problem (5). Then for any we have the following sharp inequalities
(21) |
and
(22) |
where
(23) |
and in the case that
(24) |
and in the case that
(25) |
2 Preliminaries
The following lemma concerning the monotonicity of hypergeometric functions was proved in [7].
Lemma 2.6.
[7, Lemma 1.2] Suppose that and Then the hypergeometric function is decreasing (increasing) on
The proof of following lemma can be found in [5, Lemma 2.1].
Lemma 2.7.
[5, Lemma 2.1] For and Then we have
(26) |
3 The proof of Theorem 1.3
4 The proof of Theorem 1.4
Proof.
Here we also only consider the case when . The main ideal of proof of Theorem 4 is to study the monotonicity of function
This can be done by virtue of Lemma 2.6. To do this, it is noted that Next, we will discuss in the following two cases:
Case (i): If Since in this case, we have
(30) |
Hence, we see from Lemma 2.6 that is monotonically decreasing (increasing) on if (). So there holds
(31) |
Case (ii): If In this case, we have
which implies that is monotonically increasing on for all according to Lemma 2.6. Hence, in this case, we have
Acknowledgements
The first author was supported by Supporting Foundation of Shenzhen Polytechnic University (No. ZX2023000301) and Research Foundation of Shenzhen Polytechnic University (No. 6023312032K). The third author was supported by Guangdong Province Higher Vocational Education Teaching Reform Research and Practice Project of in 2020 (No. JGGZKZ2020167).
References
- [1] G. E. Andrews, R. Askey, R. Roy, Special Functions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999).
- [2] S. Axler, P. Bourdon, W. Ramey, Harmonic function theory. Springer, New York, 1992.
- [3] J. L. Chen, D. Kalaj, Optimal estimates for hyperbolic Poisson integrals of functions in with and radial eigenfunctions of the hyperbolic Laplacian, Indag. Math., 31(2020): 1099-1109.
- [4] D. Kalaj, M. Marković, Optimal estimates for harmonic functions in the unit ball, Positivity, 16(2012): 771-782.
- [5] C. W. Liu and L. Peng, Boundary regularity in the Dirichlet problem for the invariant Laplacians on the unit real ball, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 132(2004): 3259-3268.
- [6] A. Khalfallah, M. Mateljević, M. Mhamdi, Some Properties of Mappings Admitting General Poisson Representations, Mediterr. J. Math., 18, 193 (2021).
- [7] A. Olofsson, Differential operators for a scale of Poisson type kernels in the unit disc, J. Anal. Math., 123(2014): 227-249.
- [8] M. Pavlović, Introduction to function spaces on the disk, Matematic̆ki Institut SANU, Belgrade, (2004).