One-level density of quadratic twists of -functions
Abstract.
In this paper, we investigate the one-level density of low-lying zeros of quadratic twists of automorphic -functions under the generalized Riemann hypothesis and the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture. We improve upon the known results using only functional equations for quadratic Dirichlet -functions.
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 11M26, 11M50, 11F66
Keywords: one-level density, low-lying zeros, quadratic twists, automorphic -function
1. Introduction
According to the Langlands program (see [Langlands]), the most general -function is that attached to an
automorphic representation of over a number field, which in turn can be written as products of the -functions attached to cuspidal automorphic representations of over .
Let be the -function attached to an automorphic cuspidal representation of over . For large enough, can be expressed as an Euler product of the form
The order of vanishing of at the central point has rich arithmetic applications as can be seen from the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer
conjecture on the rank of an elliptic curve. One way to address the non-vanishing issue is to apply the density conjecture of N. Katz
and P. Sarnak [KS1, K&S], which suggests that the distribution of zeros near the central point of a family of -functions is the same as that of eigenvalues near of a corresponding classical compact group. The truth of the density conjecture would imply that for almost all quadratic Dirichlet characters .
In this direction, it was estbalished unconditionally by K. Soundararajan [sound1] that for at least 87.5% of odd square-free .
Here and after, stands for the Kronecker symbol. Conditionally under the truth of the generalized Riemann hypothesis (GRH), A. E. Özluk and C. Snyder [O&S] computed the one level density for the family of quadratic Dirichlet -functions. Their result implies that, after optimizing the test function involved as done in [B&F, ILS], we have for at least of the fundamental discriminants .
The work of A. E. Özluk and C. Snyder has been extended by M. O. Rubinstein [Ru] to all -level densities for families of
quadratic twists of automorphic -functions. In [Gao], the first-named author computed the -level densities for the family of quadratic Dirichlet -functions under GRH. In [G&Zhao2], the authors studied the one-level
density for the family for quadratic twists of modular -functions under GRH. In [ER-G&R], A. Entin, E. Roditty-Gershon and Z. Rudnick
considered the -level densities for the family for quadratic Dirichlet -functions over function field. For other works on the -level
densities of families of quadratic twists of -functions and their relations to the random matrix theory, see [A&B, BFK21-1, B&F, MS, MS1, Miller1, FPS, FPS1, FPS2, HMM, HKS, G&Zhao4, G&Zhao5, G&Zhao6, G&Zhao9].
The aim of this paper to compute the one-level density for the family for quadratic twists of automorphic -functions under GRH. For this, we fix a self-contragredient representation of over so that . As the cases of have been studied in [O&S, G&Zhao2], we assume that . We also assume the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture, which implies that
(1.1) |
The Rankin-Selberg symmetric square -function factors as the product of the symmetric and exterior square -functions ( see [BG, p. 139]):
(1.2) |
and has a simple pole at which is carried by one of the two factors. Write the
order of the pole of as so that . The order of the pole of then equals to . In this paper, we restrict our attention to those with . The case in which will be discussed later at the end of this section.
We are interested in the following family of quadratic twists of -functions given by
Note that is a primitive quadratic Dirichlet character modulo when is positive, odd and square-free. Any has an Euler product given by (see [Ru, Section 3.6])
As , has a functional equation of the form
where and satisfies since we are assuming GRH.
Moreover, as , we have
where is the conductor of and it is known (see [M&T-B, Section 2]) that
(1.3) |
As we assume GRH, we may write the zeros of as with and we order them as
Let be a large real number and we normalize the zeros by defining
We define for a fixed even Schwartz class function ,
We shall regard the function in the above expression as a test function and we also fix a non-zero, non-negative function compactly supported on , which we shall regard as a weight function. We then define the one-level density of the family with respect to by
(1.4) |
where we use to denote a sum over square-free integers throughout the paper and is the total weight given by
We evaluate the one-level density asymptotically in this paper and our result is as follows.
Theorem 1.1.
Suppose that GRH and the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture are true. Let and let be a fixed self-contragredient representation of over such that . Let be a non-negative function that is not identically zero and compactly supported on and let be an even Schwartz function whose Fourier transform has compact support in . Then we have
(1.5) |
Note that the kernel in the integral of (1.5) is the same one appearing on the random matrix theory side, when studying the eigenvalues of unitary symplectic matrices. This implies that the family of quadratic twists of -functions is a symplectic family and hence verifies the density conjecture of N. Katz and P. Sarnak for this family when the support of the Fourier transform of the test function is contained in the interval . Our result improves upon a result of Rubinstein given in [Ru, Theorem 3.2] by doubling the size of the allowable support of in the case of the one-level density.
Theorem 1.1 can be regarded as a generalization of the result of Özluk and Snyder [O&S] on the one-level density of the family of quadratic Dirichlet -functions and Theorem 1.1 of [G&Zhao2] on the one-level density of the family of quadratic
twists of modular -functions. A key step in the proofs of all cases is to estimate certain character sums. The treatments in [O&S] and [G&Zhao2] use Poisson summations to convert the character sums into corresponding dual sums (see the work of K. Soundararajan [sound1] for a systematic development of this Poisson summation formula). Our proof of Theorem 1.1 is different as we only makes use of functional equations of the -functions involved, although we shall call this approach Poisson summation as well. In fact, our approach here is motivated by a Poisson summation formula over number fields established by L. Goldmakher and B. Louvel in [G&L, Lemma 3.2]. The equivalence of this version of Poisson summation formula and that developed by Soundararajan [sound1] over primitive Hecke character of the Gaussian filed has already been pointed out in [Gao2, Section 2.6]. More generally, one may evaluate the expression for in (1.4) by first applying the explicit formula given in Lemma 2.2 to convert the sum over zeros of -function into a sum over prime powers. The resulting double sum can then be viewed as a double Dirichlet series and the use of functional equations can be thought of as an effort to understand the analytical behavior of the double Dirichlet series. One may find in [DGH] a build-up of the theory of double Dirichlet series.
We remark here that Theorem 1.1 may be extended to the case in which . This requires generalizing the Possion summation formula in Lemma 2.5 to smoothed character sums over arithmetic progressions. As noted in [Ru, pp. 173–176], the sign of the functional equation of depends on lying in certain fixed arithmetic progressions.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. The Explicit Formula
Our approach in this paper relies on the following explicit formula given in [Ru, (3.65)], which essentially converts a sum over zeros of an -function to a sum over primes.
Lemma 2.2.
Let be an even Schwartz function whose Fourier transform has compact support. For any odd, positive and square-free integer , we have
(2.1) |
where
Note that the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture (1.1) implies that for all and . It follows that the terms corresponding to with in (2.1) contributes . Moreover, note that by [Levinson, Lemma 3.9],
We then deduce that the terms corresponding to in (2.1) can be written as
To estimate the above sum, we note the Euler products for and can be found in [R&S, (2.18)] and on [BG, p. 167], respectively. Thus, we see by (1.2) that if we write
(2.2) |
then we have for unramified ,
Upon taking the logarithmic derivatives on both sides of the expressions in (2.2) with the above in mind, we deduce from [iwakow, Theorem 5.15] that under GRH,
where the implied constants depend on only.
Taking difference of the above expressions then implies that under GRH,
(2.3) |
We now apply (2.3) (by noting that ) and partial summation to get
Our discussions above allow us to simplify the expression for in (2.1) in the following way.
Lemma 2.3.
Let be an even Schwartz function whose Fourier transform has compact support. For any odd, positive and square-free integer , we have
(2.4) |
where the implicit constant in the -term depends on alone and
2.4. Poisson summation
In this section we develop a Poisson summation formula for a primitive quadratic Dirichlet character , where is an odd prime. This is already contained in [G&L, Lemma 3.2] and we include the details here for the completeness. We let or be given by and define
(2.5) |
Then we have the following functional equation (see [Da, §9, (14)])
(2.6) |
where is the Gauss sum associated to defined by
Note that and that (see [Da, §2]), so that the functional equation given in (2.6) becomes
(2.7) |
We recall that the Mellin transform for any function is defined to be
Now, for any smooth function of compact support, we further define for , or ,
(2.8) |
It goes without saying that appearing in this section denotes the number and not the self-contragredient representation under our consideration.
We note that integration by parts implies that for any integer and any ,
It follows from this and Stirling’s formula that the integration in (2.8) is convergent.
Moreover, by pairing together the and values of the integrand in (2.8), we see that is real-valued for . Upon shifting the contour of integration in (2.8) to the left and right according to whether or not, and observing that has a pole at , we see that for any integer and any real ,
Our next result gives a Poisson summation formula for smoothed character sums over integers in .
Lemma 2.5.
Let be an odd prime and let . For any smooth function of compact support, we have for ,
(2.9) |
Proof.
We apply the inverse Mellin transform to write as, for some ,
It follows that
(2.10) |
We move the line of integration above to for some , encountering no poles in the process. Thus, we obtain that
We apply the functional equation given in (2.7) to recast the expression above as
We make a change of variable in the last expression above to see that for some ,
Now substituting in the Dirichlet series for the -function, interchanging the sum and integral leads to (2.9). This completes the proof. ∎
3. Proof of Theorem 1.1
3.1. Setup
Applying the explicit formula (2.4) in (1.4) and using the Möbius function to detect square-free ’s, we get
(3.1) |
where
(3.2) |
Note that we have by [FPS, (2.2)] that as ,
Observe also that, implies that the support of is contained in . Thus we have
(3.3) |
We then deduce from (3.1) and (3.3) that in order to prove Theorem 1.1, it suffices to show that
(3.4) |
as .
To this end, we may assume that the support of is contained in the interval for any . This then implies that we may also restrict the sum over in (3.2) to , where we set . Let be a real parameter to be chosen later and we write where
Now set
and
Thus .
3.2. Estimation of
For any odd, positive integer , we write with square-free and apply the bound in (1.1) to obtain that for any real ,
We further apply [iwakow, Theorem 5.15] and (1.3) to bound the sum
under GRH. The main term in [iwakow, (5.56)] equals to in our case since we have here. We thus arrive at the following.
Lemma 3.3.
Suppose that GRH and the Ramanujan-Petersson conjecture are true. For any odd, positive integer , we have for ,
We now define
where for some bounded real number .
It follows from Lemma 3.3 and partial summation that
(3.5) |
Now on writing , we see that
(3.6) |
3.4. Estimation of
First note that we have, after interchanging sumations,
Observe that
We recast the inner sum above as
Now applying the Poisson summation formula in (2.9) renders the above as
This enables us to write as
As the estimations are similar, we only deal with in what follows. We recast it as
We then use to detect the conditions that , thus further decomposing as
where
In the above expression for , we may assume that (in fact, our later choice of is much smaller than ). Again, as the estimations are similar, we only consider in what follows. The condition is detected using and we use (3.5) to estimate . Mindful of the size of , we deduce via partial summation that
It follows that
where
and
Estimations for the above quantities can be found in [G&Zhao2, (3.4)] by setting there. Hence we obtain that
(3.7) |
3.5. Conclusion
We now combine the bounds (3.6), (3.7) and take with any fixed to conclude that the estimation given in (3.4) holds. This completes the proof of Theorem 1.1.
Acknowledgments. P. G. is supported in part by NSFC grant 11871082 and L. Z. by the Faculty Silverstar Grant PS65447 at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). The authors would also like to thank the anonymous referee of his/her careful inspection of the paper and many helpful comments and suggestions.
References
School of Mathematical Sciences | School of Mathematics and Statistics |
Beihang University | University of New South Wales |
Beijing 100191 China | Sydney NSW 2052 Australia |
Email: [email protected] | Email: [email protected] |