On twisted group ring isomorphism problem for p-groups
Abstract.
In this article, we explore the problem of determining isomorphisms between the twisted complex group algebras of finite -groups. This problem bears similarity to the classical group algebra isomorphism problem and has been recently examined by Margolis-Schnabel. Our focus lies on a specific invariant, referred to as the generalized corank, which relates to the twisted complex group algebra isomorphism problem. We provide a solution for non-abelian -groups with generalized corank at most three.
Key words and phrases:
twisted group algebras, projective representations, Schur multiplier2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 16S35; Secondry 20C25, 20E991. Introduction
The group ring , where is a finite group and is a commutative ring, holds significant importance in representation theory. Over the past few decades, there has been considerable interest in decoding information about a group from its group ring . One particularly challenging problem in this context is the isomorphism problem, which investigates whether a group ring uniquely determines its corresponding group. Specifically, if and are isomorphic as -rings, does it imply that the groups and are isomorphic as well? For the current status of this problem, one can refer to [2, 13, 15, 16, 27]. The solution to this problem depends mainly upon the ring under consideration. For example, all the finite abelian groups of a given order have isomorphic complex group algebras, whereas the rational group algebras of any two non-isomorphic abelian groups are always non-isomorphic (see [25]). In 1971, Dade [3] constructed an example demonstrating the existence of two non-isomorphic metabelian groups that possess isomorphic group algebras over any field. Subsequently, Hertweck [10] presented a counterexample to this phenomenon specifically for integral group rings, showcasing two non-isomorphic groups of even order whose integral group rings are isomorphic. However, the problem of determining whether integral group rings of groups with odd order exhibit isomorphism remains an open question. Additionally, investigating this problem in the context of modular group rings, in particular, for the group rings of finite -groups over a field of characteristic has been of significant interest (see [26]).
In recent times, a variant of the classical isomorphism problem known as the twisted group ring isomorphism problem has gained considerable attention. The problem was initially introduced in [17] and has been further explored by the authors in [18, 19]. In order to explain this version of the isomorphism problem, we start by introducing some notation.
Let be a commutative ring with unity and be the unit group of . Following [14], we denote the set of -cocyles of by and the second cohomology group of over by . For a -cocycle let denote its cohomology class. Given a ring , we write if there exists an isomorphism such that for every . The twisted group ring isomorphism problem is to determine the equivalence classes of groups of order under the relation . We call these equivalence classes to be the -twist isomorphism classes.
If two groups belong to the same -twist isomorphism class, then their group rings over are isomorphic. The order of the group remains unchanged under the relation for the twisted group ring of . Throughout this article, our focus lies on the -twist isomorphism classes of finite -groups. The structure of the complex group algebras remains invariant under -twist isomorphism. Also, the group is commonly referred to as the Schur multiplier of .
In [17, Theorem 4.3], Margolis and Schnabel determined the -twist isomorphism classes of groups of order , where is a prime. In the same article, they proved (see [17, Lemma 1.2]) that any equivalence class of a finite abelian group with respect to is a singleton. Hence it is sufficient to focus on the classification of the -twist isomorphism classes of non-abelian finite groups. In this article, we continue this line of investigation of the -twist isomorphism classes of finite non-abelian -groups by fixing the order of the Schur multiplier. In this direction, Green [6] proved that the order of the Schur multiplier of a -group of order is at most Niroomand [20] improved this bound for non-abelian -groups and proved that for any non-abelian group of order . Motivated by this result, a finite non-abelian -group is said to have generalized corank if
We study the -twist isomorphism classes of finite non-abelian -groups by fixing their generalized corank. In particular, we describe the -twist isomorphism classes of all -groups with . The classification of all non-isomorphic -groups with is known in the literature by the work of P. Niroomand [22] and S. Hatui [8]. We use this classification along with the structure of the corresponding twisted group algebras to obtain our results. We use the following notation:
-
•
denotes the cyclic group of order .
-
•
or denote the direct product of -copies of the cyclic group of order .
-
•
and denote the extraspecial -groups of order and of exponent and , respectively.
-
•
denotes the central product of the groups and .
-
•
, where is an extraspecial -group.
We now list the main results of this article. Our first result describes the -twist isomorphism classes of groups with generalized corank zero or one.
Lemma 1.1.
For non-abelian groups of order with , every -twist isomorphism class is a singleton, i.e. consists of only one group up to isomorphism.
In our next result, we describe all non-singleton -twist isomorphism classes of finite -groups with .
Theorem 1.2.
For non-abelian groups of order with , all non-singleton -twist isomorphism classes are as follows:
-
(1)
for any , ;
-
(2)
for an odd prime , ;
-
(3)
for , ;
-
(4)
for and ;
-
(5)
for and , .
See Section 3 for the proof of Lemma 1.1 and Theorem 1.2. The next result describes the non-singleton -twist isomorphism classes for the groups of order with . A complete classification of these groups was given by Hatui [8, Theorem 1.1]. We refer the reader to Theorem 4.1 for the details and for the notation appearing in our next result.
Theorem 1.3.
For non-abelian groups of order with , all non-singleton -twist isomorphism classes are as follows:
-
(1)
-
(2)
A proof of the above result is included in Section 4.
Remark 1.4.
In literature, classification of all finite -groups with corank of (denoted by ) atmost is also known, see [1, 4, 7, 23, 24, 28]. By definition, for any non-abelian group of order implies and . Further, gives . Therefore, our above description of -twist isomorphism classes along with the known results from literature also gives classes of groups with .
2. Preliminaries
We first recall the results of Clifford theory regarding the ordinary characters of a finite group. For proofs, see [11, Chapter 6]. Clifford theory provides an important connection between the complex characters of a finite group and its normal subgroups. For a finite group , we use to denote the set of all inequivalent irreducible representations of . For an abelian group , we also use to denote and call this to be the set of characters of . For , where is a normal subgroup of , we use to denote the set of irreducible representations of lying above , i.e., .
Theorem 2.1.
Let be a finite group and be a normal subgroup. For any irreducible representation of , let denote the stabilizer of in . Then the following hold:
-
(a)
The map
is a bijection of onto .
-
(b)
Let be a subgroup of containing , and suppose that is an irreducible representation of which has an extension to (i.e. ). Then the representations for are irreducible, distinct for distinct and
Another useful result in this direction is as follows:
Theorem 2.2.
([11], Corollary 11.22) Let and suppose is cyclic. Let such that . Then is extendible to G.
Recall that a finite group is said to be of central type if it has a non-degenerate 2-cocycle ; or in other words, it has a unique irreducible -projective representation so that the twisted group algebra is simple. The following result given by Margolis-Schnabel [17] will be used later to determine -twist isomorphism classes:
Lemma 2.3.
Let and be groups of order . Then if the following three conditions are satisfied.
-
(1)
-
(2)
-
(3)
and are not of central type.
3. -groups with
In this section, we study the -twist isomorphism classes of -groups with . We first deal with the case of .
Proof of Lemma 1.1.
Niroomand [21, Theorem 21, Corollary 23] proved the following classification of finite non-abelian -groups with :
-
(a)
A group has if, and only if, is isomorphic to .
-
(b)
A group has if, and only if, is isomorphic to or .
We remark that in [21], Niroomand uses the corank of a group (denoted ) instead of the generalized corank of . We have used the well known relation for any non-abelian -group to use the results of [21]. We obtain Lemma 1.1 by observing that all of the above groups with fixed have non-isomorphic complex group algebras. ∎
The rest of this section is devoted to the case. The following result from [22] classifies all the non-abelian groups of order with
Theorem 3.1.
([22], Theorem 11) Let be a group of order . Then if, and only if, is isomorphic to one of the following:
-
(i)
-
(ii)
-
(iii)
-
(iv)
-
(a)
where is an extraspecial -group of order and exponent
-
(b)
where is an extraspecial -group of order and exponent
-
(a)
-
(v)
-
(vi)
-
(vii)
-
(viii)
-
(ix)
-
(x)
In order to prove Theorem 1.2, we need the following lemma:
Lemma 3.2.
Suppose and are two groups with isomorphisms and the following short exact sequences for
If and are the induced isomorphisms such that the Figure 3.1 is commutative, then .
Proof.
Our goal is to define an isomorphism that gives -twist isomorphism between and . It follows from Theorem in [14] and Theorem in [9] that the projective representations of are obtained from those of via inflation and
(3.1) |
The map is an induced isomorphism obtained from . Hence Therefore, it is sufficient to define an isomorphism such that Figure 3.1 is commutative. Indeed such a is obtained by defining
where is any element such that . ∎
Proposition 3.3.
The distinct -twist isomorphism classes of groups of order are as follows:
-
(i)
-
(a)
for
-
(b)
-
(a)
-
(ii)
-
(a)
For and ,
-
(b)
For and ,
-
(a)
Proof.
We proceed to prove (i). The proof of (ii) is similar so we only give essential ingredients there and omit the details.
(i)(a) For simplification of notations, we denote and by and , respectively. The groups and have following presentations:
Therefore, and for . Also, in view of Proposition 1.3 of [14],
This yields the following short exact sequences for :
We now define and such that the Figure 3.1 is commutative. Define by and by
for all . We now describe transgression maps for these groups.
Define a section by
For and we have
Hence a representative of is given by for . Define a section by
For and we have
Therefore, a representative of is given by for . This combined with the given isomorphisms and gives the commutativity of Figure 3.1. Now, the result follows as a direct consequence of Lemma 3.2.
For , proof is along the same lines as that of with only difference that has the following presentation:
We leave the rest of the details for the reader.
(ii) We denote the groups , and by , and , respectively. Note that if , then for any the complex group algebras of and are not isomorphic. Further, observe that for any , the order of is such that Therefore, for some if is -twist isomorphic to then it implies that . Similarly, when a necessary condition for the -twist isomorphism of and is that . Therefore, now onwards we fix and prove the result.
The commutator subgroup of is central and is isomorphic to and Further, since for any , we get the following short exact sequences:
As in (i), the proof of -twist isomorphism follows by considering the image of the for and by proving the commutativity of Figure 3.1. This is obtained by using the following presentation of groups
Below we calculate explicitly and leave the details for and as those are similar. By the given presentation of , we have . Define a section by
Note that for any two elements
of we have Therefore, for any , a representative of is given by By a similar computation of and , we obtain that for all the groups pairwise satisfy the hypothesis of Lemma 3.2 and hence are -twist isomorphic. ∎
We now complete the details regarding the -twist isomorphism classes for -groups with .
Proof of Theorem 1.2.
It follows from Theorem 3.1 that for any fixed , there exists only one -group of order with and so it forms a singleton -twist class. We now consider cases when
: Any group of order with is isomorphic to one of the following:
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
Here the group is isomorphic to As mentioned in Theorem in [17], any non-singleton -twist isomorphism class of groups of order consists of two groups, when and of three groups, when is an odd prime. Thus comparing with the groups given in Table 3 and Table 4 in [17], we obtain the following non-singleton -twist isomorphism classes of groups of order with generalized corank :
-
•
when
-
•
, when is odd.
Thus each of the remaining groups of order in the above list constitutes a -twist isomorphism class of size
Any group of order with and is isomorphic to one of the following:
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
-
•
The derived subgroup of is of order ; whereas the derived subgroup of the rest of the groups in the above list is of order . Therefore, by comparing the complex group algebras, we obtain that for a fixed odd prime the group forms a singleton -twist isomorphism class. Finally, Proposition 3.3 completes the classification of the rest of the groups into -twist isomorphism classes. ∎
4. -groups with
In this section, we proceed with the determination of the -twist isomorphism classes of the -groups with The following result, using the notations of [12], gives a complete list of -groups with .
Theorem 4.1.
([8], Theorem 1.1) Let be a finite non-abelian -group of order with . Let be the smallest positive integer which is a non-quadratic residue mod .
-
(a)
For an odd prime , is isomorphic to one of the following groups:
-
(i)
-
(ii)
-
(iii)
where is either or
-
(iv)
, where
-
(v)
-
(vi)
, where
-
(vii)
-
(viii)
-
(ix)
-
(x)
-
(xi)
, where is the smallest positive integer which is a primitive root modulo
-
(xii)
.
-
(i)
-
(b)
For , is isomorphic to one of the following groups:
-
-
(xiii)
-
(xiv)
-
(xv)
-
(xvi)
, the dihedral group of order 16.
-
(xiii)
As mentioned earlier, the -twist isomorphism classes of the groups of order were described by Margolis-Schnabel [17]. We now consider the groups of order with . Let and denote the groups and respectively. We proceed to prove that and are -twist isomorphic. We use the following general result to prove this. We refer the reader to [14, Chapter 3] for results regarding the existence and construction of the representation group of a finite group.
Lemma 4.2.
Let and be two finite groups with and as their representation groups respectively. Let be central subgroups of and respectively such that and the transgression maps are isomorphisms. Let be an isomorphism such that the following sets are in a dimension preserving bijection for every :
Then and are -twist isomorphic.
Proof.
For , we denote by . We note that
gives
Therefore, the map between and gives the required -twist isomorphism between and . ∎
Note that and . Define the following groups:
and
The following lemma plays a very crucial role towards this end:
Lemma 4.3.
The groups and are representations groups of and , respectively.
Proof.
Here, we give a proof for . The proof for is along the same lines so we omit that part. The group has the following presentation:
Consider the projection map from onto obtained by mapping to respectively and all to . Let be the kernel of this projection map. Then and . Therefore, by [14, Theorem 3.7 (Chapter 3)], is a representation group of . ∎
Proposition 4.4.
The groups and satisfy the following:
Furthermore, for the subgroups and of and respectively, there exists an isomorphism such that the following sets are in a dimension preserving bijection for every :
Proof.
Representations of : We first justify the representations of . By the definition of , the derived subgroup of (denoted ) is and the center of is . By considering the quotient group /, we obtain that has exactly number of one-dimensional representations.
We next consider the abelian normal subgroup of . The group has order . Hence every irreducible representation of has dimension either , or . We have already justified all one-dimensional representations. Our next goal is to determine all and dimensional representations.
Let such that , , and , where is a primitive root of unity and . We determine the stabilizer of in , denoted by Recall By definition of , . Next, consider , with . Recall that every satisfes for some Therefore, we have
if and only if Since
we obtain that if and only if . This is equivalent to saying that
We now consider various cases of irreducible characters of . Note that in each of the cases discussed below, all the computations for and are done modulo .
-
•
Case I: Consider the characters of such that . These are exactly in number. Among these there are characters which act trivially on and hence on . These give number of one dimensional characters of . The other character of of this case give irreducible character of of dimension and therefore we obtain many characters of of dimension .
-
•
Case II: When any three of are and the fourth one is non-zero, then if and only if either or is . Thus
-
•
Case III: When any two of are and the other two are non-zero, then is a non-zero multiple of or one of them is zero and other can take any value. Hence
-
•
Case IV: When any three of are non-zero and the fourth one is , then and hence
-
•
Case V: Assume that each where is non-zero. When and and when and Therefore, which holds if and only if Now if then and hence Here note that many characters of satisfy and their inertia group is of order Thus the remaining characters have inertia group
Considering the case of many characters of discussed in Cases II-V, the inertia group of characters is and for the other characters, it is of order By using Clifford theory, we obtain
Representations of : We have and . Clearly, there are exactly number of linear characters of . Consider the subgroup
of . This is an abelian normal group of order . Let such that , , and where is a primitive root of unity and . Let , where be an element of Therefore, for any where we have Now similar computations yield that we must have and hence the following cases arise:
-
•
Case I: When any three of are and the fourth one is non-zero, then either or is Thus
-
•
Case II: When any two of are and the other two are non-zero, then is a non-zero multiple of or one of them is zero and other can take any value. Hence
-
•
Case III: When any three of are non-zero and the fourth one is , then and hence
-
•
Case IV: Assume that each where is non-zero. When and and when and Therefore, which holds if and only if Now if then and hence On the other hand, if then Therefore, in this case the inertia group of many characters is of order and for the remaining characters it is
Considering all the above cases along with the Clifford theory gives
The required isomorphism is also obtained from the above construction. ∎
Proposition 4.5.
The groups and are -twist isomorphic.
Lemma 4.6.
.
Proof.
It follows from the presentations of and that the nilpotency class of both the groups is Now, consider the abelian normal subgroup of Since it is of index each irreducible representation of is of dimension at most
Now note that the derived subgroup of is and its center is . Consider the abelian normal subgroup of . Let such that and , where is a primitive -th root of unity and Assume that for some stabilizes Let . Since the group is of nilpotency class ,
Thus, stabilizes if, and only if, When and then for and we have which implies that Further, (note that is invertible modulo ) gives . Hence and it follows that the inertia group of in is Therefore, the character of induced from is irreducible of degree Since has no irreducible representations of dimension the complex group algebras of and are not isomorphic. ∎
Proof of Theorem 1.3.
From Theorem 4.1, it is clear that every -group with has order where . In the following, we separately consider the cases of with :
n=4
For an odd prime the only groups of order whose generalized corank is are and It follows from the presentation that the derived subgroup of the group is which is of order whereas for the rest of the three groups, the derived subgroup is of order Therefore, each of these groups has and irreducible characters of degree and respectively, and hence their complex group algebras are isomorphic. Since these groups are not of central type, it follows from Lemma 2.3 that they lie in the same -twist isomorphism class.
On the other hand, when ; the only two -groups with that correspond to the case of are and Since the complex group algebras of these two groups are not isomorphic, each of these groups constitutes a singleton -twist isomorphism class.
n=5
When is an odd prime, it follows from Theorem 4.1 that the only groups of order with are , and . Consequently, the result follows from Proposition 4.5. The derived subgroup of the groups and is elementary abelian of order and of and is of order Thus the groups and have linear characters; where as and have linear characetrs. Therefore, no group in the set can be -twist isomorphic to any group in Now it follows from Lemma 4.6 and Proposition 4.5 that in this case the only non-singleton -twist isomorphism class is constituted by and
For , the only two -groups of order that have generalized corank are and . It can be checked using GAP [5] that the size of the derived subgroup of the first group is and that of the second is Thus the complex group algebras of these groups are not isomorphic, which establishes the desired result.
n=6
The groups of order with are and Note that the size of the commutator subgroup of is and of the rest of the groups is
It can be checked that has inequivalent irreducible representations of dimension and of dimension Further, it follows from [12, Table 4.1] that has representations of dimension ; whereas has no representation of dimension . Thus each group of order with generalized corank 3 constitutes a singleton -twist isomorphism class.
n=7
Any group of order with is isomorphic to . Hence such a group forms a singleton -twist isomorphism class. ∎
Acknowledgement
GK acknowledges the research support of the National Board for Higher Mathematics, Department of Atomic Energy, Govt. of India (0204/16(7)/2022/R&D-II/ 11978). SK acknowledges the support of the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), India (09/092(1066)/2020-EMR-I). PS thanks the support of SERB power grant(SPG/2022/001099).
Declaration of interests
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
References
- [1] Ya. G. Berkovich, On the order of the commutator subgroup and the Schur multiplier of a finite -group, J. Algebra 144 (1991), no. 2, 269–272. MR 1140606
- [2] D. B. Coleman, Finite groups with isomorphic group algebras, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 105 (1962), 1–8. MR 142622
- [3] E. C. Dade, Deux groupes finis distincts ayant la même algèbre de groupe sur tout corps, Math. Z. 119 (1971), 345–348. MR 280610
- [4] Graham Ellis, On the Schur multiplier of -groups, Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), no. 9, 4173–4177. MR 1705860
- [5] The GAP Group, Gap – groups, algorithms, and programming, version 4.12.2, 2022.
- [6] J. A. Green, On the number of automorphisms of a finite group, Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 237 (1956), 574–581. MR 81901
- [7] Jafari S H, Finite p-groups whose order of their schur multiplier is given (t=6), the Extended Abstract of the 6th International Group Theory Conference (2014).
- [8] S. Hatui, Characterization of finite -groups by their Schur multiplier, Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci. 128 (2018), no. 4, Paper No. 49, 9. MR 3834965
- [9] S. Hatui and P. Singla, On Schur multiplier and projective representations of Heisenberg groups, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 225 (2021), no. 11, Paper No. 106742, 16. MR 4232687
- [10] M. Hertweck, A counterexample to the isomorphism problem for integral group rings, Ann. of Math. (2) 154 (2001), no. 1, 115–138. MR 1847590
- [11] I. M. Isaacs, Character theory of finite groups, AMS Chelsea Publishing, Providence, RI, 2006, Corrected reprint of the 1976 original [Academic Press, New York; MR0460423]. MR 2270898
- [12] R. James, The groups of order ( an odd prime), Math. Comp. 34 (1980), no. 150, 613–637. MR 559207
- [13] G. Karpilovsky, Finite groups with isomorphic group algebras, Illinois J. Math. 25 (1981), no. 1, 107–111. MR 602901
- [14] by same author, Projective representations of finite groups, Monographs and Textbooks in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 94, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1985. MR 788161
- [15] L. Margolis, The modular isomorphism problem: a survey, Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 124 (2022), no. 3, 157–196. MR 4472590
- [16] L. Margolis and A. Del Rio, Finite subgroups of group rings: a survey, arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.00718 (2018).
- [17] L. Margolis and O. Schnabel, Twisted group ring isomorphism problem, Q. J. Math. 69 (2018), no. 4, 1195–1219. MR 3908699
- [18] by same author, The twisted group ring isomorphism problem over fields, Israel J. Math. 238 (2020), no. 1, 209–242. MR 4145799
- [19] L Margolis and OFIR Schnabel, Twisted group ring isomorphism problem and infinite cohomology groups, arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.10129 (2020).
- [20] P. Niroomand, On the order of Schur multiplier of non-abelian -groups, J. Algebra 322 (2009), no. 12, 4479–4482. MR 2558872
- [21] by same author, A note on the Schur multiplier of groups of prime power order, Ric. Mat. 61 (2012), no. 2, 341–346. MR 3000665
- [22] by same author, Classifying -groups by their Schur multipliers, Math. Rep. (Bucur.) 20(70) (2018), no. 3, 279–284. MR 3873102
- [23] Peyman Niroomand, Characterizing finite -groups by their Schur multipliers, C. R. Math. Acad. Sci. Paris 350 (2012), no. 19-20, 867–870. MR 2990893
- [24] by same author, Characterizing finite -groups by their Schur multipliers, , Math. Rep. (Bucur.) 17(67) (2015), no. 2, 249–254. MR 3375732
- [25] S. Perlis and G. L. Walker, Abelian group algebras of finite order, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 68 (1950), 420–426. MR 34758
- [26] C. Polcino Milies and S. K. Sehgal, An introduction to group rings, Algebra and Applications, vol. 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002. MR 1896125
- [27] R. Sandling, The isomorphism problem for group rings: a survey, Orders and their Applications: Proceedings of a Conference held in Oberwolfach, West Germany June 3–9, 1984, Springer, 2006, pp. 256–288.
- [28] Xiao Ming Zhou, On the order of Schur multipliers of finite -groups, Comm. Algebra 22 (1994), no. 1, 1–8. MR 1255666