On the regularized products of some Dirichlet series
Abstract.
In this paper, we show that the regularized determinants of some Dirichlet series are multiplicative. As an application, we give generalizations of Lerch’s formula for the classical gamma function and we determine the sum of some Dirichlet series generalizing Euler’s formula on the sum of the reciprocal of squares. We recover the results of Kurokawa and Wakayama, and give a new proof for some Euler’s formulas.
MSC 2000: 11M36.
Keywords: Lerch’s formula, Hurwitz zeta function, zeta regularized product.
1. Introduction
Let be a sequence of real numbers, and assume that
converges absolutely on , and can be continued meromorphically to the whole complex plane and holomorphic at . The regularized determinant of is defined as follows
When is the spectrum of
a positive self-adjoint operator , then using techniques of heat-kernels, one can show that can be continued analytically to , and is called the regularized determinant of the operator (see [16]).
The zeta regularization method can be applied to the sequence where (Here, ). We obtain the regularized product , which can be viewed as a function in the variable , and it can be continued analytically to . The classical Gamma function can be defined from the Hurwitz zeta function via the Lerch formula [15],
(1) |
where for (the Hurwitz zeta function).
Only a few general methods for the exact evaluation of are available. Many authors aimed to give complete results for a number of cases where it was possible to find formulas for the zeta invariants in terms of some known special functions, see for instance [3, 4, 12, 14, 19]. In [3, 4], the authors determine the regularized product of the spectrum of the Laplacian on the -dimensional ball.
In the case of the complex projective space endowed with its Fubini-Study metric, the computation of its holomorphic analytic torsion (see [16]), which is by definition a linear combination of the regularized determinants of the Laplacians acting on the space of smooth -forms on for , was an important step toward the formulation of an arithmetic Riemann-Roch theorem in the context of Arakelov Geometry (see [6] for the computation of the holomorphic analytic torsion of , and [17, Chapter VIII] for the general formulation of the arithmetic Riemann-Roch theorem). In [11, Section 2], we gave a new method for the computation of the regularized determinant of on endowed with the Fubini-Study metric. This approach can be adapted easily to get the regularized determinant of for . One can use the arithmetic Riemann-Roch theorem to compute the analytic torsion of the line bundles , with , on endowed with their Fubini-Study metrics, this was done by L. Weng in [21]. In [8], we defined a new class of singular Laplacians associated with on endowed with their canonical metrics. We showed that the spectrum of can be determined explicitly in terms of Bessel functions (see [8, Theorem 1.4]). In [7], we showed that the zeta function associated with the spectrum of can be continued analytically to , and using [7, Theorem 3.6] we obtained that
and, we computed the regularized determinant
(see [7, Theorem 1.1]). In [9], we developed a generalized spectral theory explaining these results.
Let and be two sequences of positive real numbers. We assume that and converge for , and admit meromorphic continuations to which are holomorphic at . An interesting question is to evaluate the following ratio:
(2) |
This question was raised in [17, p. 100]. In [10], we give a partial
answer to this question. Garate and Friedman in
[5]
develop a different method which allows them to compute some special cases.
In this paper, we use the main result of [10] to evaluate the following regularized products
(3) |
where is a positive integer and . Our main result is,
Theorem 1.1.
Let be a positive integer . Let , with . We have
where such that , is an -th root of .
In this situation,
we see that the regularized determinant is multiplicative, i.e. (2) is equal to . In general,
(2) may be , see [10, Eq. 11].
Let us review some basic facts about the classical Gamma function. Let be the classical Gamma function. This function can be defined as follows
(4) |
Bohr and Mollerup used this definition to give a characterization for the Gamma function (see [2, p.14] for more details). We know that
(5) |
The Gamma function is a meromorphic function in the complex plane, with simple poles in . Weierstrass theory shows that
(6) |
where is the Euler-Mascheroni constant.
Using the Lerch formula, which is proved in Appendix 5, our theorem recovers the result of Kurokawa and Wakayama [13]. Our approach is new and self-contained. Kurokawa and Wakayama use of the infinite product expression (6) for the Gamma function and the Lerch’s formula (1) which is a crucial step in their proof.
As an application of Theorem 1.1, we obtain the following identities:
and
(7) |
for any (see Theorem 4.1). From the first identity, we obtain a new proof for Euler’s theorem:
By considering the Laurent expansion near of the third identity, we obtain a second proof for Euler’s theorem.
Motivated by the above results, we established the following theorem which generalizes identity (7).
Corollary 1.2.
(see Theorem 3.2) Let with and . For any positive integer , we have
(8) |
where denotes an -th root of and is the logarithmic derivative of the Gamma function.
2. On the regularized determinant of some Dirichlet series
Let be an unbounded and nondecreasing sequence of positive real numbers. To this data, we associate the following series
We suppose that satisfies the following three conditions:
-
(1):
The series converges for any ,
-
(2):
The series admits an asymptotic expansion for
where is an unbounded and non-decreasing sequence of real numbers. Moreover, we assume that ,
-
(3):
for , for some positive real number .
We set
(9) |
and call it the index of . The zeta function associated with , is by definition the function
The properties and imply that can be continued into a meromorphic function on the whole complex plane, which is holomorphic at .
In the sequel, we consider the following sequence , where is a monic polynomial of degree having only distinct roots with positive real part, and for any It is known that the Dirichlet series
converges on any compact subset of , and has a meromorphic continuation to the whole complex plane (see [10, Theorem 3.2]). The regularized product of the sequence is by definition
We have
Theorem 2.1.
Under the conditions above,
where are the roots of .
Proof.
Let . By definition,
Let
We put . We have
where for . We have
Then, it is easy to see that .
By [10, Theorem 3.4], there exists a polynomial in variables such that
(10) |
(see also [10, eq. (11)]).
But , then
On the other hand,
So,
Proof of Theorem 1.1.
Let be a positive integer. We consider the polynomial in :
with , and . We choose an -th root of , which we denote by . Note that
We conclude the proof by using Theorem 2.1. ∎
Using Lerch’s formula, we obtain
Corollary 2.2.
With the same assumptions as in Theorem 1.1, we have
3. On the variation of the regularized product
For , and , we set
(10) |
The following proposition is important in our study of the variation of
as a function in the variable .
Proposition 3.1.
The function is smooth on and has an asymptotic expansion for small positive of the form
(where are constants which depend on and ), and which decays exponentially at infinity, more precisely, we have for sufficiently large, for , where is a constant which depends continuously on ).
Moreover, for and ,
which admits a meromorphic continuation to and has only one simple pole at . In particular,
Proof.
It is clear that is a smooth function.
Let be two real numbers. On the closed strip , we have for any ,
as in the strip. This decay follows from the complex version of Stirling’s formula (see [1, p. 257]). On the other hand, it is known that for , one has
Since is the inverse Mellin transform of , and knowing that can be continued analytically to , we can use the Mellin inversion theorem to show that has an asymptotic expansion for small enough,
where the dominant term corresponds to the unique pole of . In fact, the coefficients of the asymptotic expansion can be determined in terms of the special values of at the non-negative integers (see [10, Proposition 2.1]). Since , we can deduce the asymptotic expansion (10). That is the existence of a sequence of constants such that
(11) |
We have, for and
So, we deduce the existence of a constant which depends continuously on such that
(12) |
From (11) and (12), and using [10, Proposition 2.1], we conclude that admits a meromorphic continuation to with only one pole at . The asymptotic expansion shows that this pole is simple.
∎
Theorem 3.2.
Let . For any we have
where denotes an -th root of .
Proof.
By Theorem 1.1, it is enough to prove the following identity
(13) |
for and sufficiently small, and to notice that the left hand side of this equality is
(see the notations in Proposition 3.1).
We have
where , which decays exponentially as .
We set
By Proposition 3.1, is a bounded function for small enough. Using the asymptotic expansion of we have
It follows that can be continued into a holomorphic function in the variables and , for any in an open neighborhood of and in any bounded subset of .
In the sequel, we shall use the same notation to denote its holomorphic continuation. We have
which holds on an open neighborhood of .
We obtain
But,
So,
Since is holomorphic at (use Proposition 3.1). Then
Hence
Therefore,
This concludes the proof of the theorem.
∎
4. Some applications
Theorem 4.1.
We have
-
(1)
-
(2)
-
(3)
For any ,
for any .
Proof.
-
(1)
For any , we have
(this is identity is a direct consequence of (3) of Theorem 5.1). So, from (13), we get the following identity
(14) That is
-
(2)
From [13], we know that
(The authors uses the reflection formula to prove this equation. See Reflection formula for a proof of this formula). Using again (13), we get for any ,
That is,
Then
-
(3)
Using the reflection formula, we obtain
Then,
Taking the logarithmic derivative, we get
By letting , we obtain the desired identity.
∎
Corollary 4.2.
For any ,
where is the -th Bernoulli number.
Proof.
Corollary 4.3.
We have
-
(i)
(15) -
(ii)
(Euler) -
(iii)
-
(iv)
where is Hurwitz’s zeta function.
5. Appendix : On Lerch’s formula
The reflection formula was first proved by Euler. In order to obtain his formula, Euler has to prove the following product formula for the sine function:
which can be deduced from the following identity
where stands for the Eisenstein summation, see [20] for the proof of this identity. Now,
Therefore, replacing by :
Therefore,
So,
In the sequel, we give a different proof of Lerch’s formula and the reflection formula for the Gamma function. We do not claim that our proof is new. Probably this method is known, but we could not find a reference containing this proof.
We set
Theorem 5.1.
The function extends to an analytic function on which possesses the following properties:
-
(1)
for any ,
-
(2)
for any ,
-
(3)
For ,
-
(4)
.
Moreover,
and
(Reflection formula) |
Proof.
Let . has the following integral representation for any ,
It is clear that the first and the third integrals have a analytic continuation to , and their derivatives with respect to at is an analytic function in .
is an analytic function for any . We conclude that
is an analytic function on , and hence on .
Let . Let . The series
is well defined. By definition,
We set
So, can be continued analytically to .
Note that this result is a special case of theory developed in [19].
-
(1)
By definition, we have for any , . It is clear that when , and its meromorphic continuation is a real-valued function on . So,
and hence
-
(2)
Since,
Then,
By the uniqueness of the analytic continuation, the above identity holds on .
We know that
-
(3)
According to [19], is a holomorphic function of the complex variable whose zeros (counted with multiplicity) are the numbers , which is by bounded by for some constants and (i.e. is a function of finite order, see [18, p. 138]). The sine function is an entire function of finite order.
We can conclude that the following function
is entire of finite order without zeros on . By Hadamard’s factorization theorem, there exists a polynomial such that
We can verify easily that for any , and since is continuous, then is the constant polynomial. It follows that for some . Taking the logarithmic derivative of , we get
But for any . Then, , and hence for any That is,
Recall that . Then, we obtain the reflection formula for the Gamma function:
(16) (we have used that ).
∎
Let us evaluate . We have
By a meromorphic continuation, and elementary computations, we obtain,
That is,
The computation of is well known, and uses 16. For reader’s convenience, we recall the proof here. We have
Using an elementary change of variables, . We conclude that
Then,
We conclude that
This ends the proof of the theorem.
References
- [1] Milton Abramowitz and Irene A. Stegun, editors. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. Dover Publications Inc., New York, 1992. Reprint of the 1972 edition.
- [2] Emil Artin. The gamma function. Athena Series: Selected Topics in Mathematics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York-Toronto-London, 1964. Translated by Michael Butler.
- [3] M. Bordag, B. Geyer, K. Kirsten, and E. Elizalde. Zeta function determinant of the Laplace operator on the -dimensional ball. Comm. Math. Phys., 179(1):215–234, 1996.
- [4] Michael Bordag, Klaus Kirsten, and Stuart Dowker. Heat-kernels and functional determinants on the generalized cone. Comm. Math. Phys., 182(2):371–393, 1996.
- [5] Victor Castillo-Garate and Eduardo Friedman. Discrepancies of products of zeta-regularized products. Math. Res. Lett., 19(1):199–212, 2012.
- [6] H. Gillet and C. Soulé. Analytic torsion and the arithmetic Todd genus. Topology, 30(1):21–54, 1991. With an appendix by D. Zagier.
- [7] Mounir Hajli. Sur la fonction zêta associée au laplacien singulier . J. Number Theory, 133(12):4069–4139, 2013.
- [8] Mounir Hajli. Spectre du laplacien singulier associé aux métriques canoniques sur et la théorie des séries de Fourier-Bessel généralisée. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 103(2):429–471, 2015.
- [9] Mounir Hajli. A generalized spectral theory for continuous metrics on compact Riemann surfaces. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 481(1):123456, 26, 2020.
- [10] Mounir Hajli. On a formula for the regularized determinant of zeta functions with application to some Dirichlet series. Q. J. Math., 71(3):843–865, 2020.
- [11] Mounir Hajli. On the spectral zeta functions of the Laplacians on the projective complex spaces and on the -spheres. J. Number Theory, 208:120–147, 2020.
- [12] Kazufumi Kimoto, Nobushige Kurokawa, Chie Sonoki, and Masato Wakayama. Some examples of generalized zeta regularized products. Kodai Math. J., 27(3):321–335, 2004.
- [13] Nobushige Kurokawa and Masato Wakayama. A generalization of Lerch’s formula. Czechoslovak Math. J., 54(129)(4):941–947, 2004.
- [14] Nobushige Kurokawa and Masato Wakayama. Zeta regularizations. Acta Appl. Math., 81(1-3):147–166, 2004.
- [15] M Lerch. Dalsi studie v oburu malmsténovských ŕad. Rozpravy Ceske Akad. 1894,, 3(28):p.68, 1894.
- [16] D. B. Ray and I. M. Singer. Analytic torsion for complex manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2), 98:154–177, 1973.
- [17] C. Soulé. Lectures on Arakelov geometry, volume 33 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992. With the collaboration of D. Abramovich, J.-F. Burnol and J. Kramer.
- [18] Elias M. Stein and Rami Shakarchi. Complex analysis, volume 2 of Princeton Lectures in Analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2003.
- [19] A. Voros. Spectral functions, special functions and the Selberg zeta function. Comm. Math. Phys., 110(3):439–465, 1987.
- [20] André Weil. Elliptic functions according to Eisenstein and Kronecker. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Band 88. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976.
- [21] Lin Weng. Regularized determinants of Laplacians for Hermitian line bundles over projective spaces. J. Math. Kyoto Univ., 35(3):341–355, 1995.