On the properties of acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras
Abstract.
We study the tropical dualities and properties of exchange graphs for the totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra under a condition. We prove that the condition always holds for acyclic cluster algebras, then all results hold for the acyclic case.
1. Introduction
Cluster algebras, introduced by Fomin and Zelevinsky in [FZ02] for providing a combinatorial framework to study total positivity and canonical bases associated by Lusztig to algebraic groups, are certain commutative algebras generated by certain combinatorially defined generators (called cluster variables) which are grouped into overlapping clusters. Since cluster algebras were invented, many links between cluster algebras and other subjects have been discovered. For example, cluster algebras have close relations with Riemann surfaces and triangulations, Zamolodchikov’s periodicity properties concerning -systems, representation theory, Donaldson-Thomas invariant theory and scattering diagrams.
The initial data to construct a cluster algebra is a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix in the first paper in the series of foundational papers of cluster theory. Since then, most authors prefer to study skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras and many important properties and conjectures were proved in the skew-symmetrizable case. Even though there are still many unkonwns for totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras, we believe that their properties behave like the skew-symmetrizable case.
The most important property of cluster algebras is the Laurent phenomenon. Fomin and Zelevinsky conjectured the cluster variables written as Laurent polynomials of a cluster always have the positive coefficients, which is called the positivity conjecture. This conjecture was proved by Lee and Schiffler for the symmetric case [LS15], by Gross, Hacking, Keel and Kontsevich for the skew-symmetrizable case [GHKK18], Huang and Li for the acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras. Recently, Li and Pan proved it for all totally sign-skew-symmetric case [LP].
In the fourth paper of the foundational papers [FZ07], Fomin and Zelevinsky introduced a lot of combinatorial objects including -vectors and -vectors (also -matrices and -matrices) to study cluster algebras. The well-known sign coherence conjecture was also proposed in [FZ07]. The dualities of -matrix and -matrix were systematically studied by Nakanishi and Zelevinsky in [NZ12]. In their paper, they shall assume the sign coherence conjecture holds for -vectors for all skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras. This was confirmed by Derksen, Weyman, and Zelevinsky in the skew-symmetric case [DWZ10] and by Gross, Hacking, Keel, and Kontsevich in the skew-symmetrizable case [GHKK18]. Thus the dualities obtained by Nakanishi and Zelevinsky in [NZ12] are true for skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras. Let be a skew-symmetrizable cluster algebra of rank . Roughly speaking, they proved the following results for skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras:
(1.1) | Every -matrix is an invertible matrix of some -matrix; | |||
(1.2) | The invertible matrix of every -matrix is also some -matrix; | |||
(1.3) | Every -matrix has the row sign-coherent property; | |||
(1.4) | The dual mutations of -matrix and -matrix hold. |
These claims were proved by Nakanishi and Zelevinsky [NZ12] (see also [Nak]) by assuming -vectors are sign coherent. Even though the sign coherence conjecture of -vectors was proved for the acyclic case by Huang and Li [HL18], and in full generality by Li and Pan [LP], the proofs in [NZ12] largely depends on the skew-symmetrizable property.
Reading studied the property of -fan consisting of all -cones (non-negative spans of the column vectors of -matrices) and their faces in [Rea14]. For the skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras, he also defined the mutation fan, and he proved the following result.
(1.5) | is a fan. Indeed it is a subfan of the mutation fan. |
The bijection of -vectors and cluster variables is a corollary of the positivity conjecture and the above claims as proved in [Nak].
(1.6) | Two cluster variables are the same their corresponding -vectors are the same. |
Fomin and Zelevinsky also made a series of conjectures on the properties of exchange graphs of as follows.
(1.7) | Every seed is uniquely defined by its cluster. | |||
(1.8) | Two clusters are adjacent they have exactly common cluster variables. | |||
(1.9) | Each seed with principal coefficients is determined by the corresponding -matrix.. |
These conjectures were proved for skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras by Gekhtman, Shapiro, and Vainshtein [GSV08], Cao and Li [CL18], and Cao, Huang, and Li [CHL18].
In this paper, we show that under an condition (the Assumption in Section 4.2), the claims (1.1—1.9) hold for totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras. In particular, they hold for acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras.
In the next section, we recall basic theory of cluster algebras. In Section 3, we describe behaviors about cluster algebras under folding theory. In Section 4, we prove the properties of -matrices for totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras that satisfy a certain condition (which we conjecture it is always true). In the final section, we study the properties of exchange graphs.
2. Preliminaries
Let be a countable set. We say an integer matrix is locally finite if for each , there are only finitely many nonzero entries and , and say is sign-skew-symmetric if and for all . A skew-symmetrizable matrix admits a diagonal matrix with positive integer diagonal entries such that , which is clearly sign-skew-symmetric. A quiver is a directed graph without loops or -cycles, and since a locally finite skew-symmetric matrix naturally corresponds to a locally finite quiver, we do not distinguish them in the following sections.
A semifield is a set equipped with a structure of abelian multiplicative group and a structure of abelian additive semigroup (the addition is usually denoted by ) such that the addition is distributive with respect to the multiplication in . The tropical semifield with an index set is a multiplicative group generated freely by the elements , whose addition is given by
Let be the quotient field of the integral domain .
Definition 2.1.
A (labeled) seed is a triplet , where
-
-
is a countable set of indeterminates over such that is a purely transcendental field extension of , and is called a cluster, are called cluster variables;
-
-
is a subset of the semifield indexed by ;
-
-
is a locally finite sign-skew-symmetric matrix, and it is called the exchange matrix.
For , define another triplet which is called the mutation of at and obtained by the following rules:
-
-
is given by
-
-
is given by
-
-
is given by
where .
Say two labeled seeds and define the same unlabeled seed if there is a bijection of such that , , for all .
If every matrix obtained from a locally finite sign-skew-symmetric matrix by an arbitrary finite sequence of mutations is also sign-skew-symmetric, we call it a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix. Clearly, skew-symmetrizable matrices are totally mutable. For a sign-skew-symmetric matrix , we may define a directed graph whose vertices are indexed by , and there is an arrow from to if . We say is acyclic if the corresponding directed graph has no oriented cycles. Huang and Li also proved acyclic sign-skew-symmetric matrices are totally mutable [HL18].
Let be an -regular tree and its valencies emitting from each common vertex are labeled by . A cluster pattern is an -regular tree such that for each vertex , there is a seed and for each edge labeled by , two seeds in the endpoints are obtained from each other by seed mutation at . Note that a cluster pattern is determined by a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix. The corresponding exchange graph is the graph whose vertices are unlabeled seeds and two unlabeled seeds are connected by an edge if they are related by a single mutation. The cluster algebra associated to a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix is the -subalgebra of generated by all cluster variables on corresponding to the matrix . The cluster algebra is said to have principal coefficients, if the semifield is the tropical semifield given by .
Fomin and Zelevinsky proved the following Laurent property for cluster algebras, and they also conjectured cluster variables have non-negative Laurent expressions.
Theorem 2.2 (The Laurent phenomenon, [FZ02, FZ07]).
Let be a cluster pattern. Then for arbitrary two vertices and any , we have that . Moreover,
-
(1)
when is a tropical semifield, we have that .
-
(2)
when is the principal case, each cluster variable is homogeneous with respect to a given -grading in , which is given by
where are the standard basis vectors in , and is the -th column vector of .
In the following discussion, we shall fix a seed, which we call the initial seed and is usually placed at , to obtain other datum from it.
Let be a cluster algebra with principal coefficients and initial seed . Then by Theorem 2.2, we have that . The polynomial is called the -polynomial (with the initial seed at ). Since , we have that is of the form for some integers . The column vector is called the -vectors and the matrix is called the -matrix at . The column vector , the degree vector of with respect to the grading given in Theorem 2.2, is called the -vector, and the matrix is called the -matrix at . Note that the definitions of -polynomials, -matrices and -matrices depend on the choice of the initial seed. Also in [FZ07], Fomin and Zelevinsky obtained the mutation rules for -polynomials, -matrices and -matrices.
For each edge on , we have that
-
-
-
-
-
-
A nonzero vector is said to be sign-coherent if it has either all non-negative coordinates or all non-positive coordinates. Fomin and Zelevinsky conjectured every -vectors is sign coherent and each row vector of every -matrix is sign-coherent. The sign coherence conjecture were solved for skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras in [GHKK18] and for acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras in [HL18, CHL22].
3. Folding theory
Recall that a quiver is a directed graph (may be infinite) which has no loops or -cycles. It is well-known that a quiver is naturally associated to a skew-symmetric matrix.
Definition 3.1.
Let be a locally finite quiver with frozen vertices set , and be a group acting on the vertex set of . The vertices in are called mutable vertices. Assume that is the matrix corresponding to , we say is -admissible, if the following condition are satisfied:
-
(i)
is mutable is mutable, for all and ;
-
(ii)
, for all , and ;
-
(iii)
, for all mutable , and ;
-
(iv)
, for all , , and .
Definition 3.2 (Orbit mutation).
Assume that is -admissible, and its corresponding matrix. For each mutable , the matrix of orbit mutation of at is given by the following rule:
The following Lemma follows easily from the definition.
Lemma 3.3.
Suppose that there are two actions of on the vertices set making -admissible, and these two actions on the mutable vertices are the same. Then for each mutable vertex , the orbit mutations of at with respect to the two actions of are the same.
Assume that is -admissible, denote the -orbit for each , the set of -orbits, and the orbit mutation. The matrix is defined by the following rule:
Definition 3.4.
The locally finite quiver is said to be globally foldable with respect to the group , if is -admissible, and for any sequence of orbits , the quiver is also -admissible. In this case, we say is an unfolding of .
The following Lemma follows easily from the definition.
Lemma 3.5 ([FWZ]).
Let be a locally finite quiver globally foldable with respect to an action of a group . Let be a quiver constructed from by introducing new frozen vertices together with some arrows connecting them to the mutable vertices in . Extend the action of from to by making fix every newly added vertex. Then the quiver is globally foldable with respect to .
Notice that for a locally finite quiver , the cluster algebra , -polynomials, -vectors, and -vectors could be defined naturally. If is globally foldable with respect to and for any mutable , then define by the rules: if , and if .
Lemma 3.6 ([HL18]).
Assume that the locally finite quiver is globally foldable with respect to the group . Then we have the following results: for any mutable vertices
-
(1)
the cluster variables of is the same as the cluster variables of ;
-
(2)
any finite variables in is contained in a cluster of ;
-
(3)
any variable in is a cluster variable of ;
-
(4)
any monomial with variables in is a cluster monomial of ;
-
(5)
each -polynomial has the constant term .
Proof.
Let be a locally finite quiver without frozen vertices. The corresponding framed quiver is obtained from by adding frozen vertices and arrows . If is globally foldable with respect to , by Lemma 3.5, is globally foldable with respect to with fixing frozen vertices.
Lemma 3.7.
If the locally finite quiver without frozen vertices is globally foldable with respect to , then for any vertices , there are no two frozen vertices and a mutable vertex such that there are arrows of the form in .
Proof.
By Lemma 3.5, we know that is globally foldable with respect to with fixing frozen vertices, then is well-defined.
If the claim is not true, let us consider the cluster algebra , here and are frozen variables. Suppose that . By Lemma 3.6, the variables in and the variable
are cluster variables in . Under the specialization of for all , we have that
By Lemma 3.6, the left side will be and the right side will be by letting for all . This is a contradiction. ∎
Lemma 3.8.
Let be a globally foldable quiver with respect to , and its framed quiver. Extend the action of on to the action of on by for each . then is -admissible for any sequence of orbit mutations with .
Proof.
We prove the claim by the induction on the length of orbit mutation sequences.
It is not hard to see that is also -admissible. Assume that is -admissible, we only need to show that is also -admissible for every .
For simplicity, we may abuse notations and let denote the matrix of and to denote the matrix of , where and . Since is -admissible, by Lemma 3.3 and Lemma 3.7, and have the column sign-coherent property and . Thus we have that for .
Note that and are related by the following relations by Definition :
It is easy to check that for all . If , then , and hence . If and , such that , then , and satisfies that , . Thus we have that
The other cases can be checked similarly.
This proves that is also -admissible. ∎
Theorem 3.9.
Let be a locally finite globally foldable quiver with respect to . Then the positivity conjecture holds for the cluster algebra , i.e., for every cluster variable and every cluster , we have that is a Laurent polynomial with variables in and positive coefficients.
Moreover, each -polynomial has the constant term , and thus the -vectors have the sign-coherent property.
Proof.
Theorem 3.10 ([HL18]).
There exists an unfolding for every sign-skew-symmetric matrix mutation equivalent to an acyclic sign-skew-symmetric matrix.
Theorem 3.11 (cf. [HL18]).
The positivity conjecture holds for the sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras with the initial seed mutation equivalent to an acyclic seed.
Corollary 3.12.
If is a sign-skew-symmetric matrix which is mutation equivalent to an acyclic sign-skew-symmetric matrix, then for any sequence , the matrix is sign-skew-symmetric.
Proof.
∎
Conjecture 3.13.
Corollary 3.12 holds for all totally sign-skew-symmetric matrices.
4. The properties of -matrices
The tropical dualities for -matrices and -matrices were studied by Nakanishi and Zelevinky for the skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras [NZ12]. Notice that Nakanishi and Zelevinsky’s proof depends on the sign coherence of -vectors. In this section, we consider the dual phenomenon for the totally sign-skew-symmetric case. In this section and the next section, we always assume that .
As we mentioned in the Introduction, Fomin and Zelevinsky proposed a series of conjectures on -matrices and -matrices in their paper [FZ07]. Let us recall them.
Conjecture 4.1.
For the totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix pattern with , the following statements are true.
-
(i)
For each , the -matrix has the column sign-coherent property.
-
(ii)
For each , the -vectors form a -basis of the lattice .
-
(iii)
For each , the -matrix has the row sign-coherent property.
-
(iv)
Let be two adjacent vertices in , and let . Then, for any and , then -vectors and are related as follows:
In the skew-symmetrizable case, these conjectures are proved by a series of papers [DWZ10, GHKK18]. In the totally sign-skew-symmetric case, the Conjectures (i-iv) were proved by Huang and Li [HL18] and by Cao, Huang and Li [CHL22] for the acyclic sign-skew-symmetric case using the folding theory and categorification, and the Conjecture 4.1 (i) was proved by Li and Pan in full generality. In the following sections, we show that under an assumption Conjecture (ii-iv) are true. In particular, for the acyclic sign-skew-symmetric matrix, we obtain these results. Moreover, we show the duality between -matrices and -matrices, which has been only proved for the skew-symmetrizable case by Nakanishi and Zelevinsky [NZ12]. The essential idea of the proofs is developed by Nakanishi and Zelevinsky.
4.1. Mutations revisited
The mutations of -matrices and -matrices are given in the Section 2. Now we re-write them in the matrix form. Let be the -regular tree and be a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix. Then we have an exchange pattern of matrices such that . Now for each vertex , let us replace by a triple , where and are respectively the corresponding -matrix and -matrices at with respect to the initial vertex . Then we obtain a new pattern and we call it the matrix pattern.
Let us introduce some notations we will need in the following. Assume that is a real matrix, and .
-
(1)
denotes the matrix obtained from by replacing by for all .
-
(2)
denotes the matrix obtained from by replacing for with .
-
(3)
denotes the matrix obtained from by replacing for with .
-
(4)
denotes the matrix obtained from the identity matrix by replacing the -th diagonal element with .
Proposition 4.2 ([FZ07, NZ12]).
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix. In the matrix pattern, for each in , we have that
where .
We shall notice that the so-called the first duality always holds for the totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix pattern.
Proposition 4.3 ([FZ07]).
For each , we have the following equality:
Proof.
This equality was proved by Fomin and Zelevinsky in [FZ07] using the fact that -vectors are the -grading of cluster variables coming from cluster algebras with principal coefficients. Later, Nakanishi proved it using the Proposition 4.2 and induction on the distance between and on in [Nak]. Their proofs all hold for the totally sign-skew-symmetric case. ∎
In Li and Pan’s latest paper [LP], they proved the following theorem which affirms the column sign-coherence for all -matrices arising from totally sign-skew-symmetric matrices.
Theorem 4.4 ([LP]).
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix and be the corresponding cluster algebras with principal coefficients. Then every -polynomial has a constant term . Consequently, the -matrices are column sign-coherent.
Since the column sign-coherence holds for -matrices, we can use to denote the sign of the -th column of the -matrix . Then we have the following result.
Proposition 4.5.
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix. In the matrix pattern, for each in , we have that
where .
Proof.
By the sign-coherence of the -matrix, we know that . Then this proposition is an easy corollary of the Proposition 4.2. ∎
Now we can see that Conjecture 4.1 (ii) always holds for totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix pattern.
Theorem 4.6.
For each , we have that
-
(i)
the -vectors form a -basis of the lattice ,
-
(ii)
the -vectors form a -basis of the lattice .
Moreover, we have that .
Proof.
Let us prove by induction on the distance between and on .
For , then , we have that and thus . Assume that it holds for and let be an edge on . Then by Proposition 4.5, we have that
where . Note that
and
and . We have that and are invertible in , and . ∎
4.2. Sign-coherence and tropical dualities
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix and be the corresponding matrix pattern with the initial vertex . It is clear that is also totally sign-skew-symmetric. The corresponding -matrices and -matrices for are denoted by and respectively. Note that is also a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix. Let denote the matrix pattern corresponding to the matrix with the initial vertex . It is easy to see that for all .
Assumption for : The signs of the columns of -matrices and are always the same for arbitrary initial vertex for the cluster algebra and for the cluster algebra .
Note that Conjecture 3.13 implies the Assumption, thus Assumption holds for acyclic sign-skew-symmetric matrices.
Proposition 4.7.
Suppose the Assumption holds. For any , we have that
Proof.
Let us prove it by induction on the distance of and on .
It is obvious when , since in this case Suppose that . Let us consider the following sequence:
By the Proposition 4.5, we have
Then
Here the third equality holds because the Assumption ensures that Then we finish the proof. ∎
The row sign-coherence for -matrices was proved for the skew-symmetric case by Derksen, Weyman and Zelevinsky in [DWZ10], for the skew-symmetrizable case by Gross, Hacking, Keel and Kontsevich in [GHKK18], and for the acyclic sign-skew-symmetric case in [CHL22]. Next, we will prove the row sign-coherence for -matrices under the Assumption. The idea of the following proof comes from the proofs in [NZ12] with a little modification.
Proposition 4.8.
Suppose the Assumption holds. Then we have the following results:
-
(a)
For any , we have
(4.1) (4.2) This implies that the row sign-coherence holds for -matrices, and we use to denote the sign of the -th row of the -matrix .
-
(b)
For any such that are two adjacent vertices on , we have that
(4.3) (4.4) Here is well-defined when (a) holds.
-
(c)
For any and , we have that the -th column of is if and only if the the -th column of is .
-
(d)
For any and , we have that the signs of the -th rows of and are the same, and the -th row of is if and only if the the -th row of is .
Proof.
We will prove these statements by induction on the distance of and on .
Let us write the following claims:
-
.
The claim holds for any such that .
-
.
The claim holds for any such that , and are two adjacent vertices on labeled by any .
-
.
The claim holds for any such that .
-
.
The claim holds for any such that .
Let us prove these claims in the following order.
(4.5) |
Firstly, we show that and hold. Since implies that , thus we have that
and therefore hold naturally. For , we need to show that
By the Proposition 4.5, we have that
Thus holds.
Assume that the claims in 4.5 up to , then we show . Suppose that . Let us consider the following sequence:
We need to prove that
By and , we have that
Note that . Then take the transpose, we have
The third equality follows from the Proposition 4.5. And similarly, we have that
Hence holds.
Now assume that the claims in 4.5 up to , then we show . Assume that . Let us consider the following sequence:
We need to prove that
(4.6) |
(4.7) |
To prove the equality 4.6, we need to prove that
Note that we have that
The second equality follows from . So it is enough to prove that
Now let us discuss the signs in detail. We shall notice that by the mutation of -matrices, and differ only in the -th column, and thus we have the following result:
-
(1)
if and only if there is a nonzero entry in the -th row of outside the entry at ,
-
(2)
if and only if the -th row of is .
On the other hand, by , we know that and differ only in the -th row, and thus we have the following result:
-
(3)
if and only if there is a nonzero entry in the -th column of outside the entry at ,
-
(4)
if and only if the -th column of is .
If , we need to show that . Indeed, if , then the -th column of is , and by , we know that the -th column of is . By Proposition 4.7, , this implies that the -th row of is , and hence , which is a contradiction. Thus if , the equality 4.6 holds.
If , then the -th row of is . Thus by Proposition 4.7 and the Assumption, we know that -th column of is . Notice that in this case, we have , and hence . Thus we may let , and . To prove the equality 4.6, it suffices to show that
which is equivalent to prove that
Then compute the above equality, we only need to show that
Note that in this case we have that
Thus we have that
Here the first equality and the third equality follow from the facts that for any matrices and , and any , we have that
By Proposition 4.3, we have that , and . This proves the equality 4.6 in this case.
Let us prove the equality 4.7. Similarly, it is enough to show that
After similar discussion as above, the case of is similar. When , as above, we only need to show that
Similarly, we have that
Therefore, the equality 4.7 holds in this case. Then holds.
Now assume that the claims in 4.5 up to , then we show . Suppose that . (We shall emphasis that here we assume that , while in the previous proof we often assume that .) For any , we need to prove that the -th column of is if and only if the -th column of is . Consider the following sequence
Since and holds, we have that
(4.8) |
(4.9) |
Then we have the following facts:
-
(1)
By the equality 4.8, we know that the -th column of is if and only if .
-
(2)
By the equality 4.9, we know that the -th column of is if and only if .
-
(3)
By the Assumption, we know that and
Therefore the -th column of is if and only if the -th column of is .
Now assume that the claims in 4.5 up to , then we show .
Suppose that . By , we have that
By the Assumption, we know that the signs of the columns of the -matrices and are the same. Thus the signs of the rows of the -matrices and are the same.
Note that the -th row of is if and only if the -th column of is , and the -th row of is if and only if the -th column of is . While by , the -th column of is if and only if the -th column of is . Hence we have that the -th row of is if and only if the the -th row of is . This finishes the proof. ∎
Proposition 4.9.
Suppose that the Assumption holds. Let be two adjacent vertices in , and let . Then, for any and , then -vectors and are related as follows:
(4.10) |
Proof.
Then we have the following results for acyclic cluster algebras.
Theorem 4.10.
If is mutation to an acyclic sign-skew-symmetric matrix. Then we have that
-
(1)
For each and , .
-
(2)
For any and , we have that the -th column of is if and only if the the -th column of is .
-
(3)
For any ,
-
(4)
For any such that are two adjacent vertices on , we have that
(4.11) (4.12) -
(5)
For each and , , and the -th row of is if and only if the the -th row of is .
4.3. -fan and the mutation fan
In this subsection, we always assume that the Assumption holds. Let us recall some basic notions on cones and fans.
Definition 4.11.
A subset is called a convex cone if and for any and . In particular, is called a convex polyhedral cone if there exists a finite number of elements such that
The convex polyhedral cone is called a simplicial cone, if can be chosen to be -linearly independent.
A convex cone is rational if it is non-negative -linear span of finitely many integer vectors, or equivalently, it can be defined by finitely many weak linear inequalities with integer coefficients.
Definition 4.12.
A subset of a convex set is a face if is convex and if any line segment whose interior intersects has .
Definition 4.13.
A fan in is a collection of closed convex cones, such that
-
(1)
any face of a cone in is also a cone in ;
-
(2)
the intersection of any two cones in is a face of each.
In the Definition 4.13, we do not require that the fan is a finite set.
Definition 4.14.
For a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix pattern , the cone
is called a -cone. The interior of is denoted by .
Since the -matrix is invertible, we have that
For a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix pattern with the initial vertex , let us introduce a notation as follows:
For , there are two half spaces of defined as follows:
Let be two adjacent vertices in . Define the piece-linear map as follows:
Note that is well-defined, since if , we have that . By the Proposition 4.8, we have that for any ,
which means that
Thus we have that
for any and .
Proposition 4.15 (cf, [Nak, Rea14]).
The following statements hold.
-
(1)
.
-
(2)
.
-
(3)
the map
is a bijection between and preserving the intersection and the inclusion of cones.
Proof.
By Proposition 4.8, we know that the row sign-coherence holds for -matrices, thus we have that either or . Thus is linear on and note that , we have that
∎
Proof.
The proof is similar to the proof of [Theorem 3.17, [Nak]]. ∎
Corollary 4.17.
For any and , if the -vector is non-negative, then for some , and consequently, the cluster variable satisfies that .
Definition 4.18.
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix, and let be the corresponding matrix pattern. Two vectors are said to be sign-equivalent (with respect to ), if
for any . Here for , .
Sign-equivalence defines an equivalence relation. We call the equivalence classes -classes.
Reading proved that the closure of any -class are convex cones.
Definition 4.20.
Let be the collection consisting of all -cones, together with all faces of -cones. This collection is called the mutation fan for .
Theorem 4.21 ([Rea14]).
The mutation fan is a complete fan.
Next, following Reading, we show that the -fan is a subfan of the mutation fan. Note that we always assume that the Assumption holds for appearing in this section.
Definition 4.22.
Two full dimensional cones are adjacent if they have a common face of codimension and they have disjoint interiors.
We say two full dimensional cones and in a fan are transitively adjacent if there is a sequence of full-dimensional cones in such that and are adjacent for all . The full dimensional cones in that are transitively adjacent to nonnegative cone in are the maximal cones of a subfan of .
Theorem 4.23 (cf. [Rea14]).
For a totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix , the following fans are the same:
Proof.
The proof is similar to the proof in [Rea14]. ∎
5. Exchange graphs
Recall that Fomin and Zelevinsky proposed the following conjecture:
Conjecture 5.1.
Every seed is uniquely defined by its cluster; thus, the vertices of the exchange graph can be identified with the clusters, up to a permutation of cluster variables.
Conjecture 5.2.
Two clusters are adjacent in the exchange graph if and only if they have exactly common cluster variables.
Conjecture 5.3.
Let be the cluster algebra with principal coefficients. Then each cluster is uniquely determined by the corresponding -matrix .
These two conjectures were proved by Gekhtman, Shapiro, and Vainshtein for the skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras of geometric type [GSV08], and they had shown that if Conjecture 5.1 holds, then the Conjecture 5.2 holds. Cao and Li proved Conjecture 5.1 for generalized cluster algebras with any coefficients [CL18]. Cao, Huang and Li proved Conjecture 5.3 for the skew-symmetrizable cluster algebras [CHL22]. In this section, we prove these three conjectures for cluster algebras whose exchange matrices satisfying the Assumption and the positivity conjecture. These conditions hold for acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras. We also give a proof of Conjecture 5.1 and Conjecture 5.2 for cluster algebras of odd rank and with indecomposable exchange matrix without the Assumption condition.
The following theorem is powerful, since it establishes the one-to-one correspondence between -vectors and cluster variables with any coefficients.
Theorem 5.4.
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra with coefficients coming from an semifield satisfying the Assumption. Then for any , we have the following bijective map
Proof.
See the proof of [Theorem 8.2, [Nak]] for the details. ∎
Notice that Theorem 5.4 was also proved in full generality for cluster algebras with principal coefficients by Li and Pan in their recent paper [LP].
Definition 5.5.
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra with coefficients coming from an arbitrary semifield . The cluster complex is the simplicial complex whose vertices are cluster variables and whose simplicies are non-empty subsets of clusters.
We have the following results:
Corollary 5.6.
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra with coefficients coming from an arbitrary semifield . Then for any , we have an isomorphism of simplicial complices:
Here is the corresponding -fan.
Before we prove the main results, let us make some preparations. Recall the following formula for the universal coefficients for cluster algebras with totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix.
Theorem 5.7 ([FZ07]).
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra with coefficients coming from the universal semifield . Then we have that for any and ,
where are -polynomials.
For a permutation and a seed , the action of on the seed , is denoted by and given by
Theorem 5.8.
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra with coefficients coming from an semifield . Suppose that the Assumption holds for the exchange matrix of . Then we have that:
-
(1)
Every seed is uniquely defined by its cluster, i.e., if there is a permutation such that for some , then
-
(2)
Two clusters are adjacent in the exchange graph if and only if they have exactly common cluster variables.
Proof.
(1) Assume that for some . We may let for simplicity. Then by Theorem 5.4, we have that there is a bijective map
Let us consider the cluster algebra with principal coefficients simultaneously.
Since , thus the -matrix is a permutation matrix (every column and every row of only have one element .) This implies that the -polynomials are , and the matrix is also , as and . By the Proposition 4.8, we know that .
By the Proposition 4.3, we have that
By the Theorem 5.7, we have that for each , and thus for each , i.e.,
(2) It is a Corollary of (1). ∎
Next, we abandon the Assumption, and prove that Theorem 5.8 holds for all totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras of odd rank.
Theorem 5.9.
Let be a totally sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra of odd rank with coefficients coming from an semifield and with indecomposable exchange matrix. Then we have that:
-
(1)
Every seed is uniquely defined by its cluster, i.e., if there is a permutation such that for some , then
-
(2)
Two clusters are adjacent in the exchange graph if and only if they have exactly common cluster variables.
Proof.
Let for simplicity. Without loss of generality, we may assume that .
We also consider the cluster algebra with principal coefficients simultaneously. By Theorem 5.4, we have that
We also know that the -matrix is the identity matrix . For any , we have that
Since is a Laurent polynomial of with coefficients in , thus we have that for each , there is a number such that
Since the exchange matrix is indecomposable and sign-skew-symmetric, we have that . Thus we have that either
or
Since the cluster algebra is of odd rank, i.e., is odd. Then if , we have that . Note that we have proved that , thus . While by Proposition 4.6, we have that . Thus is a contradiction. Thus we have that , .
By Theorem 5.7 and the fact that , we know that . This finishes the proof. ∎
Theorem 5.10.
Let be the cluster algebra with principal coefficients such that the Assumption holds for the exchange matrix. Then each cluster is uniquely determined by the corresponding -matrix .
Proof.
Corollary 5.11.
If the totally sign-skew-symmetric matrix satisfies the Assumption, then the -matrix and the -matrix are uniquely determined by each other, and they determine the seeds uniquely.
As a corollary, we obtain the following results.
Theorem 5.12.
-
(1)
Let be an acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebra with coefficients coming from an semifield . Then
-
(a)
Every seed is uniquely defined by its cluster, i.e., if there is a permutation such that for some , then
-
(b)
Two clusters are adjacent in the exchange graph if and only if they have exactly common cluster variables.
-
(a)
-
(2)
Let be an acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras with principal coefficients. Then each cluster is uniquely determined by the corresponding -matrix .
Acknowledgements: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants No.12071422).
References
- [CHL18] P. Cao, M. Huang, and F. Li. A conjecture on -matrices of cluster algebras. Nagoya Mathematical Journal, pages 1–10, 2018.
- [CHL22] P. Cao, M. Huang, and F. Li. Categorification of sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras and some conjectures on g-vectors. Algebr. Represent. Theory, 25(6):1685–1698, 2022.
- [CL18] P. Cao and F. Li. Some conjectures on generalized cluster algebras via the cluster formula and -matrix pattern. Journal of Algebra, 493(57-78), 2018.
- [DWZ10] H. Derksen, J. Weyman, and A. Zelevinsky. Quivers with potentials and their representations ii: applications to cluster algebras. J. Amer. Math. Soc, 23(749-790), 2010.
- [FWZ] S. Fomin, L. Williams, and A. Zelevinsky. Introduction to cluster algebras chapter 4-5. arxiv: 1707.07190.
- [FZ02] S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky. Cluster algebras i: Foundations. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 15(2):497–529, 2002.
- [FZ07] S. Fomin and A. Zelevinsky. Cluster algebras iv: Coefficients. Compos. Math., 143(1):112–164, 2007.
- [GHKK18] M. Gross, P. Hacking, S. Keel, and M. Kontsevich. Canonical bases for cluster algebras. J. Amer. Math. Soc., 31:497–608, 2018.
- [GSV08] M. Gekhtman, M. Shapiro, and A. Vainshtein. On the properties of the exchange graph of a cluster algebra. Math. Res. Lett., 15(2):321–330, 2008.
- [HL18] M. Huang and F. Li. Unfolding of acyclic sign-skew-symmetric cluster algebras and applications to positivity and -polynomials. Advances in Mathematics, 340:221–283, 2018.
- [LP] F. Li and J. Pan. Recurrence formula, positivity and polytope basis in cluster algebras via newton polytopes. arXiv:2201.01440.
- [LS15] K. Lee and R. Schiffler. Positivity for cluster algebras. Ann. Math., 2(1):73–125, 2015.
- [Nak] T. Nakanishi. Cluster patterns and scattering diagrams. arxiv: 2103.16309.
- [NZ12] T. Nakanishi and A. Zelevinsky. On tropical dualities in cluster algebras. Contemp. Math, 565:217–226, 2012.
- [Rea14] N. Reading. Universal geometric cluster algebras. Mathematische Zeitschrift, 277:499–547, 2014.