On the equals zero Conjecture for Fine Selmer groups in Iwasawa theory
Abstract.
We study the Iwasawa theory of the fine Selmer group associated to Galois representations arising from modular forms. The vanishing of the -invariant is shown to follow in some cases from a natural property satisfied by Galois deformation rings. We outline conditions under which the conjecture is shown to hold for various Galois representations of interest.
Key words and phrases:
Iwasawa -invariant, fine Selmer groups, adjoint representations, deformations of Galois representations.2010 Mathematics Subject Classification:
11R23 (primary); 11F80, 11G05, 11F11 (secondary)1. Introduction
Let be a number field and be an odd prime. The -primary roots of unity, considered as a module over the absolute Galois group of , is denoted by Set to be the unique field contained in such that . The cyclotomic -extension of is the subextension of obtained as the union of the fields In his seminal work [Iwa73], Iwasawa studied the growth of the -part of the class groups over certain towers of number fields. In particular, for the cyclotomic -extension of , Iwasawa proved that there are invariants and such that
where is the -Sylow subgroup of the class group of . The invariants and are the Iwasawa invariants associated to the -extension .
The genesis of Iwasawa theory arose from the study of these invariants for a broad class of -extensions of a number field. Iwasawa formulated various conjectures about these invariants. Amongst them is a famous conjecture, henceforth referred to as Iwasawa’s conjecture, which asserts that the -invariant of the cyclotomic -extension of any number field is zero. Let be the maximal abelian, unramified, pro- extension of , let and let . Then an equivalent formulation of this conjecture is the statement that is a finitely generated -module. When is an abelian number field, the -invariant is known to vanish by the work of Ferrero and Washington [FW79]. We remark that no general result in this direction is known for any broader class of non-abelian number fields.
In the modern language of Galois representations and arithmetic geometry, Iwasawa’s conjecture can be interpreted in terms of structural invariants associated to certain modules over the Iwasawa algebra of . These modules arise naturally in the context of the Galois representation associated to the Tate motive Subsequently, Iwasawa theory evolved to cover the study of a range of modules over Iwasawa algebras that arise from other Galois representations. An important instance of this evolution is the work of Mazur [Maz72] who initiated the Iwasawa theory of elliptic curves and abelian varieties. In this pathbreaking work, Mazur studied the -primary Selmer group of an elliptic curve (or abelian variety) which has good, ordinary reduction at all primes dividing over , and defined analogous Iwasawa and -invariants in this context. The -invariant of the -primary Selmer group need not vanish. For example, for , the -invariant of the -primary Selmer group is positive. Given the analogy between class groups and Selmer groups of elliptic curves, it is natural to frame an analogue of Iwasawa’s conjecture in this setting which we describe below.
Let be an elliptic curve defined over a number field and be a prime above which has potential good reduction. Set and let denote the corresponding Iwasawa algebra, which is defined to be the completed group algebra . Then, the -primary fine Selmer group consists of the Galois cohomology classes in that are trivial at all primes above and the primes at which has bad reduction. The fine Selmer group is believed to be cotorsion as an Iwasawa module and this is known to be true for elliptic curves over (see [CS05]). In contrast, the usual Selmer group need not satisfy this condition unless the elliptic curve is assumed to have ordinary reduction at all primes above .
The properties of the fine Selmer group were systematically studied by Coates and the third named author who showed that the Iwasawa -invariant of the fine Selmer group is related to the classical Iwasawa -invariant of the cyclotomic -extension of the number field cut out by the -torsion in . We refer to [CS05, Corollary 3.5] for the precise statement of this result. This relationship shows that the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group is a consequence of Iwasawa’s classical conjecture. This led Coates and the third named author to formulate the conjecture for the fine Selmer group of an elliptic curve (see [CS05, Conjecture A]), as the analogue of Iwasawa’s conjecture for Galois representations associated to elliptic curves.
Iwasawa theory of -adic Galois representations is currently a central theme in number theory. The fine Selmer group can be defined in the more general context of -adic Galois representations (see Definition 2.1 and Definition 2.2). We remark that the conjecture can be formulated in this broader framework (see Conjecture 2.6 and [LS18, Conjecture A, p.74]). It has interesting applications to the study of Selmer groups associated to Galois representations of interest. The goal of this article is to study the conjecture in this broader setting. The main results formulate explicit conditions under which the -invariant vanishes for the fine Selmer groups associated to important classes of -adic Galois representations. The cases of interest are the Galois representations arising from elliptic curves defined over number fields, Hecke eigencuspforms of weight at least , Tate twists of Artin representations and Tate twists of the adjoint representations associated to modular Galois representations.
In the study of Galois representations, the theme of -adic variation plays a key role. More precisely, the deformation theory of Galois representations, introduced and developed by Mazur in [Maz89], allows us to study -adic families of lifts of a fixed mod- Galois representation. Hida [Hid00] studied the relationship between certain modular deformation rings defined over the cyclotomic -extension of and the Iwasawa theory of the classical Selmer group of the adjoint representation of a modular form. In this article, the conjecture for the fine Selmer group of the first Tate twist of the adjoint representation of a -adic Galois representation is related to unobstructedness of the residual representation of (see Definition 4.1). Note that the notion of unobstructedness appears naturally in Galois deformation theory in connection with the structure of the universal deformation ring (in the sense of Mazur). This provides a new approach in investigating the fine Selmer group. It is our belief that the linkage established here will help advance the current state of art in both the Iwasawa theory of the fine Selmer group as well as deformation theory of Galois representations. In particular, our methods provide a large class of new examples of fine Selmer groups of Galois representations for which the -invariant vanishes.
Let us now briefly outline the results proved in this article. Section 2 is preliminary in nature. In section 3, we establish a criterion for the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group of a Galois representation (see Theorem 3.7). To be precise, we prove that the -invariant of the fine Selmer group of a -adic Galois representation vanishes if the second global Galois cohomology group of the first Tate twist of the dual of the residual representation of vanishes. Thus, this criterion is determined purely in terms of the residual representation. Theorem 3.8 gives explicit conditions for the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group, which we specialize to the case of elliptic curves in Theorem 3.9.
Section 4 establishes the linkage between deformation theory of Galois representations and the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group. We study the fine Selmer group of the first Tate twist of the -dimensional adjoint Galois representation associated to an -dimensional Galois representation . An important class of such Galois representations arises naturally from automorphic forms. More precisely, Theorem 4.3 shows that the -invariant vanishes for the fine Selmer group of if is unobstructed. This concept was initially introduced by Mazur in [Maz89], and it was shown by Weston in [Wes04] that Galois representations arising from modular forms are unobstructed under some explicit conditions.
Let be a normalized Hecke newform of weight . Given a prime in the field of Fourier coefficients of , let be the associated -dimensional -adic Galois representation. Theorem 4.6 shows that the -invariant of the fine Selmer group of vanishes for a set of primes of Dirichlet density . Moreover, if , then it is shown to vanish for all but finitely many primes . Furthermore, if the level of is squarefree, then there is an explicit set of primes outside of which the associated -invariant is . When and has trivial nebentypus, our results imply that the -invariant of the fine Selmer group of vanishes for a set of primes of Dirichlet density . We also prove a similar result in the setting of Hilbert modular forms (see Theorem 4.11). On the other hand, we prove that if is a rational elliptic curve with squarefree conductor, then there are infinitely many primes such that the -invariant of the fine Selmer group of vanishes (see Theorem 4.12). Here, is the -dimensional -adic Galois representation attached to and is the subrepresentation of consisting of matrices with trace .
We then turn our attention to Artin representations. Note that we can realize an Artin representation as a -adic Galois representation for all primes . We prove that if is an Artin representation such that , then the -invariants of the fine Selmer groups of the first Tate twists of the -adic realizations of the dual of vanish for all but finitely many primes (see Theorem 4.14).
We also connect the conjecture with the notion of neatness introduced by Mazur in [Maz89] to prove that the conjecture is true for first Tate twist of the adjoint representation of a -adic Galois representation whose residual representation is neat (see Corollary 4.19). Leveraging a construction of Mazur and Böckle, we end section 4 with explicit families of odd and even -representations such that the -conjecture holds for the fine Selmer groups of first Tate twists of all their characteristic lifts.
In section 5, we study the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group associated to -dimensional residually dihedral Galois representations. The conditions are stated purely in terms of the residual representation and the set of primes at which the characteristic zero representation ramifies. In Theorem 5.6 we give explicit conditions for the vanishing of the -invariant and obtain a large class of examples for which our results apply. Finally, we remark that our results are illustrated with concrete numerical examples.
Acknowledgements
The first named author would like to thank Gabor Wiese for helping with computation of examples presented in §5. The second named author is grateful to Ravi Ramakrishna for introducing him to the fascinating subject of Galois deformation theory, and would also like to thank Tom Weston and Jeffrey Hatley for helpful discussions along the way. His research is supported by the CRM-Simons bridge postdoctoral fellowship. The third named author gratefully acknowledges support from NSERC Discovery grant 2019-03987. The first and third named authors would also like to thank the online program on ‘Elliptic curves and the special values of -functions’ (code: ICTS/ECL2021/8) held at ICTS Bangalore, for providing the motivation and opportunity to begin discussions relevant to the work presented in this article. We would also like to thank the anonymous referee for providing many comments and suggestions which helped in improving the exposition.
2. Preliminaries
Throughout, is an odd prime number and is a number field. Set to be the set of primes of above . Let be a finite set of primes of and assume that contains and all archimedean primes of . Throughout, fix an algebraic closure of . Let be the maximal extension of contained in in which all primes are unramified. Set to be the Galois group , identified with the maximal quotient of in which the primes are unramified. Given a field , we set
For a number field contained in , set
where runs through the primes of above . The fine Selmer group associated with a Galois module is obtained by imposing the strict local condition at each prime that lies above the primes in .
Definition 2.1.
Let be a discrete -primary module and be a number field contained in . The fine Selmer group over associated to is defined as follows
Given an infinite extension , set
where runs over all number fields contained in .
Note that, in general, the definition of depends on the choice of . However, if contains the cyclotomic -extension of , then does not depend on the choice of (see [SW18, Lemma 3.2]).
For every integer , let be the group of -th roots of unity contained in and . Let (resp. ) be the field extension of generated by (resp. ). The cyclotomic -extension of is the unique -extension of contained in , and is denoted by . Let be a finite extension of and be its valuation ring. Given an integral Galois representation, , let be the underlying -lattice on which acts by and set .
Definition 2.2.
With respect to notation above, the fine Selmer group over associated with is .
Thus [SW18, Lemma 3.2] implies that the definition of does not depend on the choice of .
Set and let
be the associated Iwasawa algebra. Given a finitely generated -module , there is a map of -modules
with finite kernel and cokernel. Here, and each power series is a distinguished polynomial. In other words, is a monic polynomial all of whose non-leading coefficients are non-units in . The -invariant is the sum . Given an integral Galois representation
set to be the -invariant of , the Pontryagin dual of the fine Selmer group . The following is Conjecture A in [CS05].
Conjecture 2.3 (Coates-Sujatha).
Let be a number field, be an elliptic curve over , and be a finite set of primes of containing , all archimedean primes and all primes at which has bad reduction. If
is the -adic Galois representation arising from , then .
The following result provides evidence for the above conjecture.
Theorem 2.4 (Coates-Sujatha).
Let be a number field, be a finite set of primes of containing and all archimedean primes and
be the -adic Galois representation associated to an elliptic curve . Suppose that there is a number field such that
-
(1)
,
-
(2)
the extension is pro-.
Then, is equal to if and only if the Iwasawa’s conjecture holds for the cyclotomic -extension .
Proof.
This result is [CS05, Corollary 3.5]. ∎
Theorem 2.5.
Let be an abelian extension of , and
be the -adic Galois representation associated to an elliptic curve . Assume that the residual representation is reducible, i.e., there are characters
such that . Let be a finite set of primes of containing , all archimedean primes and all primes of bad reduction of . Let be i.e. is the representation when viewed as a representation . Then, is equal to .
Proof.
Let be the extension of which is fixed by . Note that is an abelian extension of . Let be the composite of the fields , and . Since it is a composite of abelian extensions of , it follows that is abelian. By the result of Ferrero and Washington [FW79], the Iwasawa -invariant vanishes for any abelian extension. Note that by construction, the extension is pro-. Since the conditions of Theorem 2.4 are met, the result follows. ∎
We remark that the representation in the statement of Theorem 2.5 is reducible if admits a rational -isogeny. In particular, if , then the residual representation is of the form , where is the mod- cyclotomic character. Although the conjecture for fine Selmer groups was originally stated in [CS05] for the -dimensional Galois representations associated to elliptic curves, the following generalized conjecture is expected to hold (cf. [LS18, Conjecture A, p.74]):
Conjecture 2.6.
Let be a prime number, be a number field and be the ring of integers of a finite extension of . Let be a finite set of primes of containing the primes that lie above and be an integral Galois representation. Then, is equal to .
3. A Criterion for for the fine Selmer group of a Galois representation
In this section, we shall discuss various criteria for the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group associated to a Galois representation. As in the previous section, let be an odd prime, be a number field and be a finite set of primes containing all archimedean primes and the primes above . Let be the valuation ring of a finite extension with uniformizer and let be its residue field. Fix an integral Galois representation on an -lattice . Let denote the residual representation and set to be the underlying vector space on which acts via . Setting , recall that . We identify with . Denote by the dual of the representation and by be the -adic cyclotomic character. We set to denote the representation . Recall that is the mod- cyclotomic character, and is the dual representation to . Identify with . We note that is isomorphic to the twist . Therefore, to summarize, and are integral representations acting on the -modules and , respectively. The representations and act on the -vector spaces and , respectively. We also note that is a -divisible -module which is identified with .
Conjecture 3.1 (Weak Leopoldt Conjecture for ).
With respect to notation above, .
We refer the reader to [PR00, Appendix B] for a list of cases where the Weak Leopoldt Conjecture is known.
We prove a criterion which shows that the vanishing of depends only on the residual representation . In the special case when is the Galois representation on the -adic Tate module of an elliptic curve, a brief sketch of the proof is given in [Suj10, Proposition 4.6].
Theorem 3.2.
Let be a Galois representation such that the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for . Then, the following are equivalent.
-
(1)
The fine Selmer group is cotorsion over and .
-
(2)
The cohomology group is equal to .
The proof of the above theorem is provided later in this section, following Lemma 3.5. The vanishing of is studied in greater detail in this article. Given a -module , the Iwasawa cohomology group is defined to be the inverse limit with respect to corestriction maps. Given a -module , we denote the Pontryagin dual by . Recall that the fine Selmer group of over is , and .
Theorem 3.3.
Let be a Galois representation such that the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for . Then, contains no non-zero finite -submodule (i.e., -submodule having finite cardinality).
Proof.
Corollary 3.4.
Let be a Galois representation and assume that the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for . Then, the following are equivalent:
-
(1)
is finite,
-
(2)
.
Proof.
For ease of notation, denote by throughout the proof. From the long exact sequence in cohomology associated with
we have
From our hypothesis on Weak Leopoldt conjecture for , we obtain that is a -submodule of . By Theorem 3.3, does not contain any non-zero finite -submodule which proves the corollary. ∎
From the Poitou-Tate sequence associated to , we obtain the following exact sequences (see [PR00, Section 1.3.1] for more details):
(3.1) |
Lemma 3.5.
Let be a Galois representation. The following statements are equivalent
-
(1)
is -torsion with ,
-
(2)
is -torsion with .
Proof.
From the Poitou-Tate sequence, we get the following exact sequence
Every non-archimedean prime is finitely decomposed in , hence, it is not hard to see that is finitely generated as a -module. As a -module, is thus clearly torsion with -invariant equal to . The result is seen to follow from this. ∎
We now give a proof of Theorem 3.2. Denote the mod- Iwasawa algebra by .
Proof of Theorem 3.2.
For ease of notation, denote by throughout the proof. Identify with . Note that is finitely generated as a -module. This follows easily from the Poitou-Tate sequence (3.1) together with the proof of Lemma 3.5. According to the Lemma 3.5, condition (1) is equivalent to being a finitely generated -module. From the short exact sequence
we obtain
The isomorphism
shows that (1) is equivalent to the finiteness of .
We show that (2) is also equivalent to the finiteness of . Given a finitely generated -module , we set to denote the Ext-group . Setting , we find that the Iwasawa cohomology group is related to the cohomology groups via Jannsen’s spectral sequence [Jan13, Corollary 13]. The spectral sequence states that
Letting to be the cohomology group , note that for , the adjoint Iwasawa module is -torsion. Recall that condition (2) is the requirement that . According to Corollary 3.4, if and only if is finite. On the other hand, it is clear that is finite if and only if is . Therefore, (i.e., (2) holds) if and only if . From the above spectral sequence, it follows that (2) is equivalent to the finiteness of . ∎
Lemma 3.6.
Let be a Galois representation. With notation as above, suppose that . Then, the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for and is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
Consider the short exact sequence of Galois modules
from which we find that surjects onto . From the assumption , it follows that . The vanishing of implies that . Thus, it follows that the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for . It follows from Theorem 3.2 that is cotorsion over with . ∎
The following criterion will be used in establishing new cases of the conjecture for the fine Selmer group.
Theorem 3.7.
Let be a Galois representation as above. Suppose that . Then, is cotorsion over with . Furthermore, the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for .
Proof.
Since the -cohomological dimension of is , by the Hochschild-Serre spectral sequence, the restriction map
is surjective. Hence, if , then,
Since is pro-, this implies that , and the result follows from Lemma 3.6. ∎
In the remainder of this section, we outline sufficient conditions for the vanishing of . We shall illustrate these conditions for Galois representations that arise from elliptic curves. In section 5, it is shown that these conditions are satisfied for a number of examples of dihedral Galois representations of interest. Given , we let be defined as follows
Set to be the Galois extension of cut out by . In other words, it is the extension of fixed by the kernel of . Set to be the mod- class group . Denote by the maximal quotient of such that the primes of that lie above are split in the corresponding subextension of the Hilbert class field of . Note that is a stable with respect to the natural action of on . Given a prime of , set , which is viewed as a subgroup of after fixing an embedding . Set (resp. ) to denote the restriction of (resp. ) to .
Theorem 3.8.
Let be a Galois representation and be the associated residual representation. With respect to notation above, assume that the following conditions are satisfied:
-
(1)
,
-
(2)
.
-
(3)
At each prime , the local representation does not have the trivial -dimensional representation as a subrepresentation.
Then, is cotorsion over with . Furthermore, the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
Proof.
According to Theorem 3.7, if , then the assertions follow. We show that , thus proving the result. Note that fits into an exact sequence
By Global duality of -groups [NSW08, Theorem 8.6.7],
By local Tate duality [Ser13, pp. 91-92], , and hence, is trivial since we are assuming that the trivial representation does not occur as a subrepresentation of .
The hypothesis , together with the inflation-restriction sequence applied to the extensions , implies that injects into . Since it is assumed that , it follows that , and hence as well. Thus, putting everything together, we have shown that . ∎
Let be an elliptic curve defined over a number field and let be an odd prime number. Let be the Galois representation on the -adic Tate module of and let be its residual representation. Let denote the Galois group . For a prime of , denote by the completion of at and by the residue field of .
Theorem 3.9.
Let be an elliptic curve. Let be the set of primes of that consists of primes , all archimedean primes and the primes at which has bad reduction. Let be the -adic Galois representation attached to . With respect to above notation, assume that the following conditions are satisfied
-
(1)
the residual representation is irreducible,
-
(2)
,
-
(3)
for every prime , we assume that .
Then, the following assertions hold:
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for ,
-
(b)
is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
We verify that the conditions of Theorem 3.8. Clearly, the conditions (2) and (3) are satisfied. Note that is identified with . That condition (1) is satisfied follows from [PS21, Lemma 2.2]. This requires the assumption that is irreducible. Hence, Theorem 3.8 implies that the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for and is cotorsion over with . As is the -adic Galois representation attached to an elliptic curve, . This finishes the proof of the theorem. ∎
We note here that for elliptic curves with Mordell Weil rank and the Tate-Shafarevich group , the upper bound given by [PS21, Theorem 4.2] provides sufficient conditions for the vanishing of . To illustrate this, consider the following example.
Example 3.10.
Let be the elliptic curve over given by 11a2 and Weierstrass equation and set . According to the data provided by the L-functions and Modular forms database [LMF22],
-
(1)
,
-
(2)
has conductor and thus, has good reduction at ,
-
(3)
has split multiplicative reduction at , thus, ,
-
(4)
,
-
(5)
the mod- representation is irreducible,
-
(6)
the Tamagawa product is ,
-
(7)
.
Set . The conditions (1) and (3) are satisfied. In order to see that condition (2) is satisfied, it suffices to show that the stronger vanishing condition . We refer to the notation in [PS21, Theorem 4.2]. Since the Mordell-Weil rank of is and , it follows that the mod- Selmer group defined in loc.cit. is . Furthermore, since the set in loc.cit. is empty. Thus, by the upper bound of [PS21, Theorem 4.2], we find that , and in particular, (2) is also satisfied for at .
We note here that our condition is a weaker condition than . Since explicit computation with class groups of fields generated by torsion points of elliptic curves is difficult, we do not provide an example to illustrate this.
4. The Adjoint representation of a modular form and for the fine Selmer group
In this section, we prove results for the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group for the first Tate-twist of the adjoint Galois representation associated with a newform. Here, by newform, we mean a new cuspidal eigenform. We will use this convention throughout the article. When the newform has weight and trivial nebentypus, the symmetric square representation is a direct summand of this Tate-twist, and hence, in this case, we effectively obtain results for the symmetric square representation as well. Moreover, given a rational elliptic curve of squarefree conductor, we prove results for the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group for . Here is the -adic Galois representation attached to and is the subrepresentation of the adjoint representation of consisting of matrices with trace .
The study of these adjoint Galois representations is of special significance in deformation theory. We shall introduce ideas from deformation theory to study the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group. Our methods also extend to Artin representations and neat representations (in the sense of Mazur) and we prove results for the vanishing of the -invariants of the fine Selmer groups of their first Tate-twists.
For a number field , we will be studying continuous mod representations of which are unramified outside a finite set of primes of and their lifts to characteristic . Our focus will be on -invariants of fine Selmer groups of such representations. Of particular significance are the Galois representations arising from modular eigenforms.
4.1. Adjoints of Galois representations
The notion of unobstructedness arises naturally in the study of Galois deformation theory. It was initially introduced by Mazur in [Maz89] and is recalled below. Let be a finite field of characteristic , be a number field and be a finite set of primes of containing all primes dividing and all archimedean primes. Let be a continuous representation. Recall, from § 2, that is the maximal extension of unramified at all primes of lying outside and is the corresponding Galois group .
Let be the ring of integers of a finite extension of with residue field . Let be the category of complete local noetherian -algebras with residue field isomorphic to . Given , let be the maximal ideal of and fix a residual isomorphism of -algebras . As is noetherian, there exist such that . Since is a complete local -algebra, there exists a morphism which sends to for all (see [Eis95, Theorem 7.16 (a)]). Note that the map induced by is surjective and generate . Therefore, it follows, from [Eis95, Theorem 7.16 (b)], that is surjective. Hence, we get a presentation for of the form
An -lift of is a Galois representation such that . The subgroup of matrices that reduce to the identity modulo the maximal ideal of is denoted by . Two -lifts and of are strictly equivalent if for some matrix . An -deformation of is a strict equivalence class of -lifts.
Given a Galois representation , set to be the adjoint representation of . As an -module, consists of all matrices with entries in . The Galois action on is defined by the adjoint action
where, and . Thus, we may view as a Galois representation
In particular, specializing this construction to the case and , we get the adjoint representation of :
Definition 4.1.
A representation is said to be unobstructed if . Following this definition, we say that is unobstructed if the corresponding residual representation (obtained by composing with the natural surjective map ) is unobstructed.
Associated to , consider a functor of deformations
which takes to the set consisting of -deformations of considered as a representation of the group . When is absolutely irreducible, there is a universal Galois representation unramified away from (see [Maz89, Proposition 1]), which we denote by
Here, is the universal deformation ring associated to and the group (the set being suppressed in our notation). It is universal in the sense that for any -deformation of , there exists a unique homomorphism of complete noetherian local -algebras such that the following diagram commutes
where the vertical map is induced by .
In general, finding the explicit structure of the universal deformation ring is a very difficult problem. However, if is unobstructed, then we know that
where (see [Maz89, Proposition 2]). Indeed, [Maz89, Section 1.6] implies that is a quotient of . Since is unobstructed, [Maz89, Proposition 2] implies that the Krull dimension of is at least . This allows us to conclude that is isomorphic to . In particular, specializing to the case and , we get:
Proposition 4.2.
Suppose that is absolutely irreducible and unobstructed. Then:
-
(1)
If is odd, then is isomorphic (as a complete noetherian local -algebra) to the formal power series ring .
-
(2)
If is even, then is isomorphic (as a complete noetherian local -algebra) to the formal power series ring .
Proof.
If is odd, then the global Euler characteristic formula implies that . If is even, then the global Euler characteristic formula implies that . The result now follows from [Maz89, Proposition 2] and the explanations given above. ∎
Let be a representation. As we are assuming that is odd, we get a direct sum decomposition
as -representations with summands and corresponding to trace matrices and scalars, respectively. We have a similar decomposition for as well. Recall that we denoted the -adic cyclotomic character by . So we have
Thus, if , then is a subrepresentation of . We obtain the following criterion for the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group of the first Tate-twist of the adjoint representation (without assuming ):
Theorem 4.3.
Let be a continuous Galois representation. If is unobstructed, then the following assertions hold:
-
(1)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
-
(2)
the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
-
(3)
If and , then the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
Observe that . Unobstructedness of implies that . Hence, the assertions (1) and (2) above follow directly from Theorem 3.7. For (3), consider the case when and . In this case, we find that . Hence, is a direct summand of , and therefore is equal to . The assertion in this case follows once again from Theorem 3.7. ∎
The unobstructedness of modular Galois representations is studied in greater detail in [Wes04]. Before recalling the main result of [Wes04], we briefly describe its setup. Let be a newform (i.e. a new cuspidal eigenform) of weight on , where . Let be a finite set of primes of containing the primes dividing and . Denote by the field of Fourier coefficients of and let be a prime of . Set to be the completion of at . Fix a uniformizer of and set to denote the residue field . Let be the prime of lying below and let . Let
be an integral Galois representation associated to and the prime by the construction of Eichler-Shimura and Deligne. Let be the residual representation obtained by reducing modulo . Note that the construction of Eichler-Shimura and Deligne gives a Galois representation over the fraction field of and the Galois representation arises from a choice of a Galois stable -lattice in it. When the residual representation is absolutely irreducible, there is a unique choice of . In all the examples that we consider, the residual representation will be absolutely irreducible. We will mostly be working with this setup in the rest of the section.
Denote by the set of primes of at which is obstructed (i.e., not unobstructed). An important notion in this context is that of a congruence prime.
Definition 4.4.
Let be a divisor of . We say that is a congruence prime of level for if there is a newform such that
-
•
has weight and level ;
-
•
is not Galois conjugate to ;
-
•
for some prime of above .
Denote by the set of all congruence primes of (as ranges through all divisors of ).
Since there are only finitely many newforms whose level is a divisor of , it is easy to see, by comparing their Hecke eigenvalues which are not equal, that is finite. Let denote Euler’s totient function.
The following explicit result is due to Weston and has been subsequently generalized in various directions.
Theorem 4.5 (Weston).
Let be a Hecke newform of weight on and let be the conductor of the nebentypus of . Consider two cases.
-
(1)
First, consider the case . Then, for all but finitely many primes of , the Galois representation is unobstructed. Furthermore, if is assumed to be squarefree, we have that
-
(2)
Consider the case . Then, the set of obstructed primes has Dirichlet density zero.
Proof.
Combining the above theorem with Theorem 4.3, one obtains an immediate application towards the vanishing of the -invariant of the fine Selmer group.
Theorem 4.6.
Let be a Hecke newform of weight on and let be the conductor of the nebentypus of . Let be the number field generated by its Hecke eigenvalues and let be the ring of integers of . Consider two cases.
-
(1)
If , then, for all but finitely many primes of , the following assertions hold:
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for .
-
(b)
Let denote any one of the representations or . Then the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Furthermore, if is squarefree, then the above assertions hold for all primes outside the finite set
-
(a)
-
(2)
Consider the case . Then, for a set of primes of of Dirichlet density one, the following assertions hold:
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
-
(b)
For , the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
-
(a)
Remark 4.7.
If is a newform of weight with trivial nebentypus, then, under the notation established above, Theorem 4.6 implies that for a set of primes of of Dirichlet density one, the fine Selmer group associated to the symmetric square representation is co-torsion over with .
Remark 4.8.
For Galois representations associated to elliptic curves of rank (not the adjoint or symmetric square representation, but the representation itself), similar results can be proved for a set of primes of Dirichlet density , see [Wut07]. On the other hand, for modular forms of weight , Theorem 4.6 proves that the -invariant of the first Tate twist of the adjoint representation vanishes for all but finitely many primes, which is stronger than showing that it vanishes for a set of primes of Dirichlet density . Moreover, the set of primes outside which the -invariant is known to vanish, is made explicit in the squarefree level case by the above result. Also, in the weight case, when coincides with an abelian variety of -type, there is no assumption made on the rank of this abelian variety.
Remark 4.9.
Hatley [Hat16] has generalized [Wes05, Theorem 1] to modular newforms of arbitrary level. Thus, combining [Hat16, Theorem 3.6] with Theorem 3.7, one can explicitly describe a finite set of primes of outside of which and vanish even when the level of is not squarefree. Since the description of this set is tedious, we will not give it here. We refer the reader to [Hat16, Theorem 3.6] for more details.
Specializing to the case when , and is the unique normalized cusp form of level and weight , we get, for every prime , the -adic Galois representation
attached to . Let
be the reduction of modulo .
Theorem 4.10.
Let be the unique normalized cusp form of level and weight . If is a prime such that is absolutely irreducible, then
-
(1)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
-
(2)
For , the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
If is one of the newforms considered in Theorem 4.10, then the set of primes such that is not absolutely irreducible is given in [Wes04, Section 5.4]. In particular if , then the hypotheses of Theorem 4.10 are satisfied by primes and .
Weston’s work on unobstructedness of modular Galois representations has been generalized in several directions by various authors. In the setting of Hilbert modular forms, such results have been obtained by Gamzon [Gam16]. Using his main result, we get:
Theorem 4.11.
Let be a totally real field, be a Hilbert modular newform over and be a finite set of primes of containing all prime divisors of the level of and all archimedean primes of . Let be the number field generated by its Hecke eigenvalues and let be the ring of integers of . For a prime of , let be the rational prime lying below , be and
be the corresponding Galois representation attached to . Suppose the following hypotheses hold:
-
(1)
has no CM,
-
(2)
is not a twist of a base change of a Hilbert newform over a proper subfield of ,
-
(3)
All weights of are greater than .
Then, for all but finitely many primes of , the following assertions hold:
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
-
(b)
The fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
The analogous problem for -representations is studied by Broshi, Mullath, Sorensen and Weston [BMSW20]. On the other hand, Guiraud in [Gui20] has established a related generalization (in the spirit of Gamzon) in the setting of regular algebraic conjugate self-dual cuspidal (RACSDC) automorphic representations (see [Gui20, Theorem 1.2] for more details). We expect that Theorem 4.6 can be suitably generalized to such settings.
We end this subsection by proving an analogue of Theorem 4.6 for the vanishing of -invariant of , where is the Galois representation associated to an elliptic curve.
Theorem 4.12.
Let be an elliptic curve over with squarefree conductor and let be the set of primes dividing and . For a prime , let
be the -adic Galois representation attached to . Then, for infinitely many primes , the following assertions hold:
-
(1)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for .
-
(2)
The fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
Recall that . So, by Theorem 3.7, it suffices to prove that for infinitely many primes p, we have . Using Poitou-Tate duality, we get the following exact sequence (see [Was97, Proposition 10]):
(4.1) |
Hence, we conclude that if the following conditions hold:
-
(1)
for all ,
-
(2)
,
-
(3)
.
Suppose is absolutely irreducible. Hence, it follows that . Note that, in [Wes05], Weston defines a suitable Selmer group of (see [Wes05, p. 204]). This Selmer group is also extensively studied in [DFG05]. Since , we get, using the proof of [Wes05, Lemma 7] and [Wes05, Equation 2.3], that is a subgroup of . Let be the weight modular form associated to . From [DFG05, Theorem 3.7], we get that the length of is the -valuation of the congruence ideal defined in [DFG05, Section 1.7.3]. As is an ideal of , we conclude that for all but finitely many primes (see the proofs of [Wes04, Theorem 5.4, Theorem 5.6] for more details). Note that is absolutely irreducible for all but finitely many primes . Hence, we conclude that for all but finitely many primes .
Now is a rational elliptic curve of conductor . So it follows, from the modularity of rational elliptic curves, that there exists a newform of level and weight with rational Fourier coefficients such that for all primes .
Now, in addition to irreducibility of , suppose and for some . As is squarefree and has trivial nebentypus, it follows that is reducible, semi-simple and hence, unramified at (see the proof of [Wes05, Lemma 11] for more details). So, we conclude, from [Edi97, (B) of p. 221], that is a congruence prime of level dividing (see Definition 4.4 for the definition of congruence primes). Since is absolutely irreducible for all but finitely many primes and there are only finitely many congruence primes, we conclude that for all but finitely many primes , for all .
Note that if is a supersingular prime of , then the restriction of to is absolutely irreducible and hence, . A celebrated theorem of Elkies ([Elk87, Theorem 2]) implies that has infinitely many supersingular primes. Combining this with all the analysis given above proves the theorem. ∎
4.2. Artin representations
Note that, in Theorem 4.5, the weight of the modular newforms is always assumed to be greater than . Therefore, it does not shed any light on the unobstructedness of Artin representations as they arise only in the setting of weight modular forms. Moreover, an Artin representation can be considered as a -adic representation for every prime (as we will see below). So it is easy to formulate the question studied by Weston [Wes04] for Artin representations of arbitrary dimensions. This question is studied by Böckle, Guiraud, Kalyanswamy and Khare in [BGKK18] in more generality. In particular, they focus on the vanishing of for arbitrary Artin representations rather than restricting to the case of adjoint of Artin representations. We will now briefly describe their setup following [BGKK18, Section 6.1].
Let be a non-trivial irreducible Artin representation (which is not necessarily odd). So it is a continuous, irreducible representation with finite non-trivial image. Let be the finite extension of fixed by . Let and be the class number of . Let be the set of primes of consisting of primes which are ramified in and .
As is finite, there exists a number field such that, under a suitable basis, . Let be the ring of integers of and be a prime of . Let be the completion of at , be its ring of integers and be its residue field. Let be the rational prime lying below and let . Then, under a suitable basis, the representation , obtained by composing with the map induced by completion, takes values in .
Recall that we have fixed to be an odd prime. Moreover, assume that , is unramified in and . Then, the residual representation obtained by reducing modulo the maximal ideal of is absolutely irreducible (see [BGKK18, Section 6.1] for more details). Thus it is natural to ask whether for all but finitely many such primes . This question is studied in [BGKK18].
To be precise, in the setup described above, they prove:
Theorem 4.13 (Böckle-Guiraud-Kalyanswamy-Khare).
Let be a non-trivial irreducible Artin representation and let be a number field over which is defined as above. Let be the ring of integers of . Let be the set of primes of consisting of primes at which is ramified and . If , then for all but finitely many primes of .
Proof.
This is a part of Proposition of [BGKK18]. ∎
Combining this theorem with Theorem 3.7, we get:
Theorem 4.14.
Let be a non-trivial irreducible Artin representation and let be a number field over which is defined as above. Let be the ring of integers of . Suppose . Then, for all but finitely many primes of , the following assertions hold:
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
-
(b)
The fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Remark 4.15.
Note that the same question for Artin representations of arbitrary number fields is analyzed in Section of [BGKK18].
4.3. Neat Representations
Let be a number field, be a finite field of characteristic and be a finite set of primes of containing all primes of dividing and all archimedean primes. Let be a continuous, absolutely irreducible representation. Let be the ring of integers of a finite extension of with residue field . Fix a uniformizer of .
Suppose is unobstructed and let . Then, from [Maz89, Proposition 2], it follows that the residual representation lifts to the universal representation unramified away from
which we view as a family of Galois representations. Indeed, given any -tuple , the -valued homomorphism sending to gives rise to a Galois representation given by the composite
(4.2) |
where the second homomorphism is induced by . Since is unobstructed, it follows from Theorem 4.3 that the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for , and moreover, . Thus, we get a family of Galois representations parametrized by for which the -invariant of the fine Selmer group of the adjoint representation vanishes.
Recall that if and , then we get that if is odd and if is even (see Proposition 4.2).
In [Maz89], Mazur introduced the notion of neatness and constructed odd Galois representations of that are unobstructed and unramified away from a single prime . Böckle [B9̈9] gave a similar construction for even, unobstructed Galois representations of . We relate the notion of neatness to vanishing of the -invariant of fine Selmer groups.
Fix an absolutely irreducible residual representation as above, let be the splitting field cut out by . Denote by the set of primes of that lie above the non-archimedean primes of and set to be the Galois group . For a prime , denote by the completion of at . Denote the subgroups of and consisting of of -th roots of unity by and , respectively. Denote the ring of integers of and by and , respectively.
An -module is said to be coprime to if the tensor product does not contain the identity representation.
Definition 4.16.
We define three Galois modules , and associated to as follows:
-
(1)
;
-
(2)
;
-
(3)
, where is the class group of .
Definition 4.17 (Mazur).
With notation as above, is said to be neat if does not divide the cardinality of and , and are coprime to .
See [Maz89, Section 1.12] for more details.
Theorem 4.18 (Mazur).
Let be a finite field of characteristic , be a number field and be a set of primes of containing all primes above and all archimedean primes. Let be a neat residual representation. Then is unobstructed.
Proof.
The reader is referred to the proof of [Maz89, Proposition 7]. ∎
Corollary 4.19.
Let be a neat Galois representation as in Theorem 4.18, let and let be the -deformation of associated to as above (see (4.2) for the definition of ). Then, the following assertions hold:
-
(1)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for ,
-
(2)
the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with . If , then the same assertion holds for .
In section 1.13 of loc.cit., Mazur constructs examples of -dimensional neat, odd Galois representations associated to certain -extensions of ( which means ). The examples give a family of odd representations for which the above Corollary applies. More specifically, let be a prime number which can be represented as , where is an integer. Let be the splitting field of , the Galois group is isomorphic to . The discriminant of is and therefore, is the only prime that is ramified in . There is a natural inclusion of into , via which we obtain a Galois representation . We refer to loc. cit. for further details. Such Galois representations are referred to as special -representations since they are unobstructed, i.e., . Since is an -representation, it is easy to see that is a direct summand of . Hence, it follows that . Note that is self-dual i.e. . Therefore, it follows from Theorem 3.7 that for any representation that lifts , the following assertions hold:
-
(1)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for ,
-
(2)
the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Similarly in [B9̈9, Section 3.1], Böckle constructs examples of -dimensional neat, even Galois representations associated to certain totally real -extensions of (which means ). The examples give a family of even representations for which the above Corollary applies. To be precise, let be a prime number which can be represented as , where is an integer and be the splitting field of . So the Galois group is isomorphic to . The discriminant of is and therefore, is the only prime that is ramified in . Using the arguments of the previous paragraph, we obtain a Galois representation . In [B9̈9, Theorem 3.1], Böckle proves that is neat and hence, unobstructed if the following hypotheses are satisfied:
-
(1)
satisfies the Ankeney-Artin-Chowla conjecture,
-
(2)
, where for , .
It is verified in loc.cit. that these hypotheses are satisfied for all primes of the form with (see [B9̈9, Section 3.1] for more details). As noted above, is a direct summand of in this case as well. Therefore, we conclude, using the same arguments as above, that for any representation that lifts , the following assertions hold:
-
(1)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
-
(2)
The fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
5. Residually dihedral representations
In this section, we study residually dihedral Galois representations that arise from modular forms to illustrate Theorem 3.8.
To be precise, let be an odd prime, be a finite field of characteristic , be a finite set of primes of containing and and be a continuous representation. We assume that is dihedral, which is to say that there exists a quadratic extension of and a character , where is the set of primes of that lie above the primes in , such that is isomorphic to the induced representation . For the ease of notation, we will denote this representation by .
Let be the ring of integers of a finite extension of with residue field and fix a uniformizer of . We say that a representation is residually dihedral if the residual representation obtained by reducing modulo is dihedral as described above. Note that a residually dihedral representation is not necessarily dihedral.
Now suppose is dihedral which means for some character . Then the projective image of (i.e. the image of under the natural surjective map obtained by going modulo scalars) is either a dihedral group or a cyclic group. Moreover, is absolutely irreducible if and only if the projective image of is a dihedral group.
In addition to being dihedral, now assume is also odd and absolutely irreducible. Combining the work of Khare and Wintenberger on Serre’s conjecture ([KW09, Theorem 9.1]) and work of Kisin ([Kis09, Theorem 0.1]), we see that lifts to a -adic modular Galois representation without increasing the set of ramified primes for the representation. There is however, always a natural choice of lift (where is the ring of Witt vectors of ), letting denote the Teichmüller lift of , we see that is a lift of .
In the setting of dihedral representations as above, we will provide explicit criteria for the conditions in Theorem 3.8 to be satisfied. As a result, we obtain that if satisfies these criteria, then for all characteristic lifts of , and in particular for the lifts arising from modular newforms, the weak Leopoldt conjecture holds for and (see Theorem 5.8). Note that lifts of such representations arising from CM modular forms have been studied in [BN18].
Lemma 5.1.
Proof.
Observe that the order of is coprime to . Therefore, it follows that . ∎
Let and let be the field extension of which is fixed by the kernel of as above. Note that . Let and be the mod- Hilbert class fields of and , respectively. In other words, and are identified with the mod- quotients of the class groups of and , respectively. Now is a finite set of primes of containing , and the primes at which is ramified. So contains the primes that ramify in . Set (resp. ) to be the maximal subextension of (resp. ) in which the primes of (resp. ) above split completely. Thus, (resp. ) is identified with the maximal quotient of (resp. ) such that the primes of (resp. ) above split completely in the corresponding subextension. The fields defined fit into the following diagram:
Note that all fields in the diagram are Galois over and that acts naturally on and . Here, the action is described as follows. Given and , pick a lift of to . Since is a normal subgroup of it follows that belongs to . Since is abelian, is independent of the choice of lift of . The action is defined by setting for any choice of lift of . The module is a -stable quotient of , i.e., a quotient by a -stable submodule.
Lemma 5.2.
Suppose that is a dihedral representation and let , and be the fields defined as above. Assume that . Let and be an irreducible -module such that . Then, with respect to notation above,
Proof.
Since it is assumed that , it follows that the -action on factors through an action of the quotient . Indeed, both and are abelian extensions of and hence, so is . Therefore, acts trivially on . As is abelian, it follows that any irreducible representation of is one-dimensional. The order of is coprime to and hence, it follows that decomposes into -dimensional representations of that factor through the action of . Combining this with the assumption that is an irreducible -module with , we get that . ∎
Lemma 5.3.
Proof.
Since the projective image of is dihedral, it follows that is an irreducible representation of of dimension . Hence, the lemma follows directly from Lemma 5.2. ∎
We shall provide some examples in which the condition is satisfied. First, we obtain sufficient conditions for condition (3) in Theorem 3.8 to hold. Let be a generator of and be defined as follows:
where is a lift of in . Note that in the above formula, is independent of the choice of the lift of .
Lemma 5.4.
Assume that . Then the projective image of is a dihedral group if and only if . Moreover, the image of is itself a non-abelian dihedral group if and only if and .
Proof.
Recall that the projective image of is dihedral if and only if is irreducible.
Let be the vector space underlying . As , we get, after choosing a suitable basis of , that for all and for some Now . Therefore, is reducible if and only if there exists a non-zero which is a common eigenvector for and for all . If , then such an eigenvector clearly exists and hence, is reducible.
If , then there exists a such that . So if a non-zero vector is an eigenvector for , then either or . Let . Then . If , then . As and , it follows that is not a scalar multiple of . This means that is not an eigenvector of . If , then we similarly conclude that is not an eigenvector of . Therefore, if , then is irreducible. This finishes the proof of the first part of the lemma.
Note that the image of is a non-abelian dihedral group if and only if is a cyclic group of order and for all . Further, for all if and only if . Moreover, if this holds, then is cyclic. If , then is cyclic of order if and only if . Therefore, we conclude that the image of is a non-abelian dihedral group if and only if and . ∎
Lemma 5.5.
Assume that . Let be a prime and be the extension of cut out by . Suppose that the trivial representation is a subrepresentation of . Let be a choice of prime of that lies above . Then, at least one of the following conditions hold:
-
(1)
splits in and either or ,
-
(2)
is either inert or ramified in , and the unique prime of lying above splits completely in .
Proof.
Assume that splits in . Then, we have that , and the result follows in this case.
Now suppose is either inert or ramified in . Then is the unique prime of lying above and we can choose . As the trivial representation is a subrepresentation of , it follows that either or .
As and is normal in , it follows that . Therefore, it follows that if , then and vice versa. This finishes the proof of the Lemma.
∎
Theorem 5.6.
Let be the ring of integers in a finite extension of with residue field and be a set of primes of containing and . Consider a Galois representation and let be its residual representation. Assume that the following assertions hold:
-
(1)
For some quadratic field extension and a character (where is the set of primes of lying above primes in ), the residual representation is isomorphic to the induced representation . In addition, we assume that the projective image of is a non-abelian dihedral group.
-
(2)
With respect to above notation, we assume that (cf. Lemma 5.3).
-
(3)
At each prime , the local representation does not have the trivial representation as a subrepresentation.
Then, the following assertions hold:
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for ,
-
(b)
the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
Note that the above theorem involves conditions on the residual representation and the set of primes . Via purely Galois theoretic computations, we construct a class of examples of residual representations satisfying the above conditions.
Note that the condition is satisfied if . Examples satisfying this condition are constructed in [DW20, section 5.2] (see [DW20, Table 1]). We will adapt the approach of [DW20, Section 5.2] to our context to obtain a class of examples satisfying the conditions of Theorem 5.6. We will now briefly outline our strategy to get examples.
Let be an imaginary quadratic extension of and be an odd prime. Assume that there is an odd prime such that divides the class number of . Let be the maximal extension of contained in the Hilbert class field of with odd degree of extension . By class field theory, is a Galois extension of and is identified with the odd part of i.e. with , where is the -Sylow subgroup of . Note that is stable under the action of on . Therefore, using class field theory, we conclude that is Galois over .
Let be a lift of the generator of in with order . Since is odd, such a lift does exist. Let .
Lemma 5.7.
Under the notation and set-up established above, for all .
Proof.
As is normal in , . Let and . So and are subgroups of and moreover, they are normal in . As has odd order, we have . We now claim that .
Let and suppose . Let and . So . As , we get that and . So and . Thus for all . As is abelian and has odd order, every element of is a square and hence, .
Suppose . Note that is an abelian group of order . So if is the fixed field of , then is an abelian extension of with . Note that is an unramified extension of . Therefore, a prime of is ramified in if and only if it is ramified in . As is quadratic over , the order of the inertia group at any rational prime in is at most .
As is odd and is abelian, contains a unique subgroup of order . Thus the subfield of fixed by is an unramified abelian extension of of degree . This gives us a contradiction. Hence, which means proving the lemma. ∎
Let be a cyclic, unramified extension of with , odd (i.e. ) and . Note that such an extension exists as we are assuming that the class number of is divisible by an odd prime . From Lemma 5.7, we conclude that is Galois over , with , the dihedral group with elements. As is odd, is non-abelian.
Theorem 5.8.
Let be a field of characteristic . Let be an imaginary quadratic field with class number divisible by an odd prime different from . Let be a cyclic extension of contained in the Hilbert class field of with , odd and . Let and be non-trivial characters. Set to denote the induced representation of . Let be the extension of cut out by . Let be a set of prime numbers containing , and the primes which are ramified in . Let be a lift of . Assume that the following conditions are satisfied:
-
(1)
If , is split in and is a fixed place of lying above , then ,
-
(2)
If is either inert or ramified in and is the unique place of lying above , then is non-trivial and is not the quadratic character of corresponding to ,
-
(3)
.
Then, the following assertions hold:
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for ,
-
(b)
the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Proof.
Note that, under the hypotheses of the theorem above, conditions (1) and (2) of Theorem 5.6 hold. Therefore, by Theorem 5.6, it suffices to check that no condition of Lemma 5.5 is satisfied. Let and fix a place of lying above .
Suppose is split in . Now condition (1) implies that . As is a non-abelian dihedral group, it follows that . As is a character of , we get that . Therefore, condition (1) implies that . Thus condition (1) of Lemma 5.5 is not satisfied.
Now suppose is either inert or ramified in . As is an unramified extension of and is a quadratic extension of , it follows that the image of in is abelian. As with odd, it follows that the image of in is an abelian group of order . Hence, is totally split in . Now as is not the quadratic character corresponding to and , it follows that and hence, is not completely split in . Therefore, condition (2) of Lemma 5.5 is not satisfied. This finishes the proof of the theorem. ∎
Examples: Let and with
We verify, using LMFDB [LMF22], that the class number of is (see Imaginary quadratic number fields with class number 15). Let be the unramified, abelian extension of of degree . Let be the mod cyclotomic character of of . So . We verify, from LMFDB [LMF22], that which means condition (3) of Theorem 5.8 is satisfied for all finite set of primes of . Let
and
Let . Note that, by Chebotarev density theorem, is an infinite set with Dirichlet density . Let be a finite subset of and let . Then satisfies conditions (1) and (2) of Theorem 5.8. Let be the finite field with elements and let be a non-trivial character. Let be the induced representation of . If is a lift of , then by Theorem 5.8, we conclude that
-
(a)
the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for ,
-
(b)
the fine Selmer group associated to is cotorsion over with .
Moreover, observe that is self-dual i.e. . Hence, we conclude that the weak Leopoldt conjecture is true for .
References
- [B9̈9] G. Böckle. Explicit universal deformations of even Galois representations. Math. Nachr., 206:85–110, 1999.
- [BGKK18] G. Böckle, D.-A. Guiraud, S. Kalyanswamy, and C. Khare. Wieferich primes and a mod leopoldt conjecture. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00131, 2018.
- [BMSW20] M. Broshi, M. Z. Mullath, C. Sorensen, and T. Weston. Unobstructed deformation problems for . arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.06575, 2020.
- [BN18] N. Billerey and F. A. E. Nuccio. Représentations galoisiennes diédrales et formes á multiplication complexe. Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, 30(2):651–670, 2018.
- [CS05] J. Coates and R. Sujatha. Fine selmer groups of elliptic curves over -adic lie extensions. Mathematische Annalen, 331(4):809–839, 2005.
- [DFG05] F. Diamond, M. Flach, and L. Guo. The tamagawa number conjecture of adjoint motives of modular forms. Annales scientifiques de l’École Normale Supérieure, Série 4, 37(5):663–727, 2005.
- [DW20] S. V. Deo and G. Wiese. Dihedral universal deformations. Research in Number Theory, 6(3):37 pp., 2020.
- [Edi97] B. Edixhoven. Serre’s conjecture. In Modular forms and Fermat’s last theorem (Boston, MA, 1995), pages 209–242. Springer, New York, 1997.
- [Eis95] David Eisenbud. Commutative algebra, volume 150 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. With a view toward algebraic geometry.
- [Elk87] N. D. Elkies. The existence of infinitely many supersingular primes for every elliptic curve over . Inventiones Mathematicae, 89:561–567, 1987.
- [FW79] B. Ferrero and L. C. Washington. The Iwasawa invariant vanishes for abelian number fields. Annals of Mathematics, pages 377–395, 1979.
- [Gam16] A. Gamzon. Unobstructed Hilbert modular deformation problems. Journal de Théorie des Nombres de Bordeaux, 28(1):221–236, 2016.
- [Gre89] R. Greenberg. Iwasawa theory for -adic representations. Advanced Studies in Pure Math, (17):97–137, 1989.
- [Gui20] D. A. Guiraud. Unobstructedness of Galois deformation rings associated to regular algebraic conjugate self-dual cuspidal automorphic representations. Algebra & Number Theory, 14(6):1331–1380, 2020.
- [Hat16] J. Hatley. Obstruction criteria for modular deformation problems. International Journal of Number Theory, 12(01):273–285, 2016.
- [Hid00] H. Hida. Adjoint Selmer groups as Iwasawa modules. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 120(2):361–427, 2000.
- [Iwa73] K. Iwasawa. On -extensions of algebraic number fields. Annals of Mathematics, pages 246–326, 1973.
- [Jan13] U. Jannsen. A spectral sequence for Iwasawa adjoints. arXiv preprint arXiv:1307.6547, 2013.
- [Kis09] Mark Kisin. Modularity of 2-adic Barsotti-Tate representations. Invent. Math., 178(3):587–634, 2009.
- [KW09] Chandrashekhar Khare and Jean-Pierre Wintenberger. Serre’s modularity conjecture. I. Invent. Math., 178(3):485–504, 2009.
- [LMF22] The LMFDB Collaboration. The L-functions and modular forms database. http://www.lmfdb.org, 2022. [Online; accessed 7 April 2022].
- [LS18] Meng Fai Lim and Ramdorai Sujatha. Fine selmer groups of congruent galois representations. Journal of Number Theory, 187:66–91, 2018.
- [Maz72] B. Mazur. Rational points of abelian varieties with values in towers of number fields. Inventiones mathematicae, 18(3):183–266, 1972.
- [Maz89] B. Mazur. Deforming Galois representations. In Galois Groups over , pages 385–437. Springer, 1989.
- [Maz97] B. Mazur. An “infinite fern” in the universal deformation space of Galois representations. volume 48, pages 155–193. 1997. Journées Arithmétiques (Barcelona, 1995).
- [NSW08] J. Neukirch, A. Schmidt, and K. Wingberg. Cohomology of number fields, volume 323 of Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2008.
- [OV02] Y. Ochi and O. Venjakob. On the structure of Selmer groups over -adic lie extensions. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 11(3):547–580, 2002.
- [PR00] B. Perrin-Riou. -adic -functions and -adic representations, volume 3 of SMF/AMS Texts and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Société Mathématique de France, Paris, 2000. Translated from the 1995 French original by Leila Schneps and revised by the author.
- [PS21] D. Prasad and S. Shekhar. Relating the Tate–Shafarevich group of an elliptic curve with the class group. Pacific Journal of Mathematics, 312(1):203–218, 2021.
- [Ser13] J. P. Serre. Galois cohomology. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
- [Suj10] R. Sujatha. Elliptic curves and Iwasawa’s = 0 conjecture. In Quadratic forms, linear algebraic groups, and cohomology, pages 125–135. Springer, 2010.
- [SW18] R. Sujatha and M. Witte. Fine Selmer groups and isogeny invariance. In Geometry, algebra, number theory, and their information technology applications, volume 251 of Springer Proc. Math. Stat., pages 419–444. Springer, Cham, 2018.
- [Was97] Lawrence C. Washington. Galois cohomology. In Modular forms and Fermat’s last theorem (Boston, MA, 1995), pages 101–120. Springer, New York, 1997.
- [Wes04] T. Weston. Unobstructed modular deformation problems. American Journal of Mathematics, 126(6):1237–1252, 2004.
- [Wes05] T. Weston. Explicit unobstructed primes for modular deformation problems of squarefree level. Journal of Number Theory, 110(1):199–218, 2005.
- [Wut07] C. Wuthrich. Iwasawa theory of the fine Selmer group. Journal of Algebraic Geometry, 16(1):83–108, 2007.