myquote () \BODY \NewEnvironmyquote2 \BODY () \cftpagenumbersoffpart
On -adic -functions for symplectic representations of over number fields
Abstract
Let be a number field, and a regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representation of of symplectic type. When is spherical at all primes , we construct a -adic -function attached to any regular non-critical spin -refinement of to -parahoric level, where is the -parabolic. More precisely, we construct a distribution on the Galois group of the maximal abelian extension of unramified outside , and show that it interpolates all the standard critical -values of at (including, for example, cyclotomic and anticyclotomic variation when is imaginary quadratic). We show that satisfies a natural growth condition; in particular, when is ordinary, is a (bounded) measure on . As a corollary, when is unitary, has very regular weight, and is -ordinary at all , we deduce non-vanishing of the twisted central value for all but finitely many Dirichlet characters of -power conductor.
1. Introduction
The special values of -functions are highly important in modern number theory, and are the subject of a vast network of conjectures, including:
-
(I)
The Beilinson and Bloch–Kato conjectures, which describe arithmetic data in terms of the complex analytic properties of special values. As a special case, non-vanishing of a special value should force finiteness of an associated Selmer group.
-
(II)
Deligne’s conjecture [Del79], which predicts that the special values, ostensibly arbitrary transcendental numbers, are algebraic after scaling by controlled complex ‘periods’.
- (III)
The congruences predicted by (III) are encoded in the existence of a -adic -function. Beautiful objects in their own right, -adic -functions are fundamental in Iwasawa theory, and have led to substantial results towards (I), including special cases of the Birch–Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture.
A very general setting to consider these questions is that of regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representations (RACARs) of over a number field . In this paper, we attack (III) by constructing -adic -functions for those which are symplectic (RASCARs, for RA-symplectic-CARs).
1.1. Main result
Let us state our main result more precisely. Let be an arbitrary number field, , and a RASCAR of . This forces to be even, and to be essentially self-dual, for a Hecke character of . Further, is symplectic if and only if it admits a Shalika model, if and only if it is a functorial transfer from [FJ93, AS06, AS14]. In this setting, the automorphic realisation of Deligne’s conjecture was recently proved – including the period relations at infinity – in work of Jiang–Sun–Tian [JST].
Let be a prime, and assume that is spherical at all primes of above . Then is an unramified principal series, the normalised induction of some unramified character (where is the upper-triangular Borel). Let be the standard parabolic subgroup with Levi , and let be the parahoric subgroup of type . If , a regular -refinement to level is a choice of simple Hecke eigenvalue on , defined precisely in Definition 3.3. We assume this choice is spin (Definition 3.3), in that it interacts well with the Shalika model; as explained in the introduction of [BGW], we expect this is essential for constructions of -adic -functions via Shalika models. Write for with such a choice of regular spin -refinement at each . We assume to be non--critical (Definition 7.1). This is satisfied if the integrally normalised eigenvalues , defined in §7.1, have non--critical slope. In particular if is ordinary (i.e. each ) then it is non--critical.
We say a Hecke character is critical for if is a Deligne-critical value of , and then we define . The critical characters are determined by their infinity type and the weight of . For general , this -function can have many different critical regions; see e.g. the pictures in [LLZ15, p.1605] or [BDP13, §4.1]. We focus here on the ‘standard’ critical range111Constructions of -adic -functions interpolating other ranges would be extremely interesting; see e.g. [BDP13], which gives an example for over an imaginary quadratic field, assuming is base-change., corresponding to the ‘balanced weight’ condition in [JST] (and, when is imaginary quadratic, region in [LLZ15]). We describe this range in Lemma 2.4. For example, when is imaginary quadratic, this gives a square of standard critical infinity types (see §7.4). Crucially, these standard critical values admit a representation-theoretic interpretation via branching laws for , described in Lemma 2.6.
We write for the set of standard critical characters that have -power conductor. Let be the Galois group of the maximal abelian extension of unramified outside . Attached to any is a canonical character on (see §2.5).
We construct a -adic -function attached to , in the following sense:
Theorem A.
The growth condition is described in Definition 7.4. In particular, if is ordinary, then is a bounded distribution, that is, a -adic measure. Here is the -function with the Euler factors at removed, is a Gauss sum, , and is a uniformiser. This agrees exactly with the conjectures of Coates–Perrin-Riou/Panchishkin [Pan94, Conj. 6.2], except possibly the term , which we comment on in Remark 3.8.
If is imaginary quadratic, and has non--critical slope, then (a) and (b) determine uniquely by [Loe14]. Analogous unicity results for totally real are [BDW, Prop. 6.25].
To our knowledge, Theorem A gives the first such construction beyond the special cases of (over any ) or totally real; see §1.3 for a summary of previous results. The totally real case was handled in [DJR20, BDW]. The construction we give is inspired by those works, particularly the overconvergent approach of [BDW]. There are some additional features in the general number field setting, which we briefly summarise.
-
(1)
Notably, whilst Leopoldt’s conjecture predicts that is 1-variabled when is totally real, in general our -adic -functions can be many-variabled. For example, when we have , and one only has cyclotomic variation; when is imaginary quadratic, one has a two-variable -adic -function, with both cyclotomic and anticyclotomic variation.
-
(2)
The method uses automorphic cycles/modular symbols. The totally real (resp. ) constructions relied on a certain numerical coincidence; that these cycles have dimension equal to the top degree (resp. bottom degree) in which cuspidal cohomology for contributes. This rendered some relevant cohomology groups 1-dimensional, making certain choices unique up to scalar. In the general number field case, we work in the middle of the cuspidal range, where the analogous groups are never 1-dimensional.
We handle (1) by blending the methods of [BDW] with earlier work [Wil17, BW19] of the author and Barrera for . Problem (2) is more serious, and for this we exploit works of Lin–Tian [LT20] and Jiang–Sun–Tian [JST]. They nailed down good elements in these higher-dimensional cohomology groups and proved not only the non-vanishing hypothesis of attached zeta integrals at infinity, but also the expected period relations at infinity, at least in the cyclotomic direction (see Remark 3.8). We hope that the period relations in all directions can be extracted via similar methods, but do not address that here, instead focusing on the -adic interpolation.
We imagine the following special case might be of particular interest. Let be a cohomological Siegel modular form on , and base-change it to an imaginary quadratic field . Under appropriate assumptions, we may apply our construction to the Langlands transfer of to (via [AS06]), giving a two-variable -adic spin -function for , including anticyclotomic variation. For , such constructions for base-change modular forms have had important arithmetic consequences, such as proofs of one divisibility of the Iwasawa Main Conjecture [SU14].
1.2. Application: non-vanishing of central twists
When is ordinary at each , then as mentioned above, our construction yields a -adic measure. As an immediate application, we get the following generalisation of a result of Dimitrov–Januszewski–Raghuram (who in [DJR20] treated the case totally real). Let denote the weight of , where is dominant and is the set of embeddings (see §2.3).
Theorem B.
Let be a unitary RASCAR of , and suppose
(1.1) |
Suppose there exists a rational prime such that is spherical and -ordinary for all . Then for all but finitely many Dirichlet characters of -power conductor, we have non-vanishing of the twisted central -value
Here -ordinarity is in the sense of [Hid98, §1.1]. The unitary assumption ensures is a Deligne-critical value of .
Given Theorem A, the proof of Theorem B is simple. The argument is literally identical to [DJR20, §4.4], so we give only a sketch, and refer the reader there for full details.
Proof.
Since is -ordinary for all , by [DJR20, Lem. 4.4] there is a (unique) regular spin ordinary -refinement of . Let the -adic -function from Theorem A. By [JS76] (see [BDW, Lem. 7.4]), the weight condition forces existence of some such that the (non-central) twisted -values are non-zero for all Dirichlet characters .
If is a Dirichlet character of -power conductor, then is a cyclotomic character of . The restriction of to the cyclotomic line is a bounded rigid analytic function on the disjoint union of a finite number of open unit discs. By the interpolation property and non-vanishing at non-central values, the -adic -function is non-zero on each disc that contains characters of the form . By Weierstrass preparation, it has finitely many zeros in each such disc, hence on the cyclotomic line; so the theorem follows from the interpolation property. ∎
If one drops assumption (1.1), the theorem instead becomes: if there exists a as in the theorem such that , then there are infinitely many such .
In the case, after transferring via [AS06], this gives non-vanishing of many twisted central values of spin -functions of (very regular weight, cohomological, Klingen-ordinary) genus 2 Siegel modular forms over number fields.
1.3. Relation to the literature
This work generalises (and is visibly inspired by) many other constructions. We summarise a few. In the case of , i.e. , every RACAR is a RASCAR, and our main results/methods specialise exactly to those of [BW19]; and the results/methods of that paper in turn followed the earlier works [PS11, Bar18, Wil17] (over , totally real, and imaginary quadratic base fields respectively). These methods were later used in [Bel12, BDJ22, BH, BW21a, BW21b] to vary -adic -functions in families.
In the case of general , when is totally real our main result specialises exactly to [BDW, Thm. 6.23]. Earlier constructions in the ordinary situation were given in [AG94, Geh18, DJR20]. This construction was then used in [BDW, BDG+] to construct and study -adic families, and – under some technical hypotheses – to vary -adic -functions over these families.
The variation of the present construction in families would be very interesting. The methods of these earlier papers – which worked in either top or bottom cohomological degree – do not apply. Fundamental difficulties include: controlling the families; constructing classes in the correct cohomological degree; and showing that these classes interpolate the ‘good’ elements from [JST].
Acknowledgements
This paper would not exist without my previous collaboration with Daniel Barrera and Mladen Dimitrov, and I thank them wholeheartedly for several years’ worth of discussions. I also thank Andy Graham and Andrei Jorza for many highly relevant discussions during our follow-up collaboration, and David Loeffler for his comments and corrections on an earlier draft. This research was supported by EPSRC Postdoctoral Fellowship EP/T001615/2.
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Notation
Let be a number field of degree , where has real embeddings and pairs of complex embeddings. Let be the union of the real and complex embeddings. Each has a conjguate , and if and only if . Fix a rational prime and an isomorphism . Let be the maximal abelian extension of unramified outside , and let be its Galois group. Let be the standard non-trivial additive character of (as e.g. fixed in [DJR20, §4.1]).
If is a place of , we write for the completion of at , for its ring of integers, and for its residue field. We fix a choice of uniformiser .
Let , be the upper-triangular Borel sugroup in , the diagonal torus and the unipotent. Let , with , . We may abuse notation and write e.g. for the upper-triangular matrices in .
Let , where is the center and is the maximal compact subgroup of . If is a reductive real Lie group, then denotes the connected component of the identity.
Let be the standard parabolic with Levi . For a prime of , let be the parahoric subgroup of type , and .
2.2. RASCARs
Let be a regular algebraic cuspidal automorphic representation (RACAR) of . If is essentially-self-dual, i.e. there exists some Hecke character such that , then . This has a simple pole at , which occurs either in the symmetric or exterior square -function. Then:
Definition 2.1.
We say that has symplectic type, and call it a RASCAR (RA-symplectic-CAR), if any (hence all) of the following equivalent conditions hold:
-
(1)
The exterior square -function has a pole at ;
-
(2)
is the functorial transfer of an irreducible generic cuspidal automorphic representation of with central character ;
-
(3)
admits a non-trivial -Shalika model.
Recall has a -Shalika model if there is an intertwining , where is the Shalika group and . Our conventions are summarised in [BDW, §2.6].
2.3. Weights
Let be the set of algebraic weights for . A general has form , where . Let be the set of dominant weights, where for all and . Attached to any is an algebraic representation of of highest weight , with dual . We can decompose , , where is the algebraic -representation of highest weight , with acting via .
Definition 2.2.
We say is pure if there exists such that
We write for the space of pure dominant weights.
2.4. Critical -values
Let be a RASCAR with standard -function . For a Hecke character , let denote the RASCAR with -action twisted by . We write .
Definition 2.3.
Let be a Hecke character with infinity type , and let have weight . We say is a standard critical value for if
(2.1) |
In this case, we say is critical for . We write for the set of all such .
Lemma 2.4.
If , then is a Deligne-critical value of .
Proof.
Remark 2.5.
For in this range, is a balanced weight in the sense of [JST]. There are other Deligne-critical values, but for these is not balanced.
Crucially also admits a representation-theoretic description. For , let be the -representation of highest weight , that is, . The following is proved in the same way as [GR14, Prop. 6.3.1] and [JST, Prop. 2.20], via [Kna01, Thm. 2.1].
Lemma 2.6.
A Hecke character of infinity type is in if and only if
In this case, is a line, generated by some .
We will interpolate the standard critical -values ‘at ’. As such, let
(2.2) |
where , for a multiexponent.
2.5. Hecke characters on ray class and Galois groups
Let be a Hecke character with infinity type . We have an algebraic homomorphism given by This then induces maps
(2.3) |
Definition 2.7.
Recall is the Galois group for the maximal abelian extension of unramified outside . The structure of this group is described in detail in [BDW, §6.1]; in particular, the Artin reciprocity map induces an isomorphism , and we have an exact sequence
(2.4) |
Via reciprocity, we may consider as a character of .
2.6. Locally symmetric spaces and local systems
If is open compact, the locally symmetric space of level is
If is a left -module, then we have an attached ‘archimedean’ local system on given by the locally constant sections of
(2.5) |
where .
Similarly, if is a left -module, then we have an attached ‘-adic’ local system on , given by the local constant sections of (2.5), but with action .
If is a left -module, then acts via , and acts via projection to . We get two attached local systems and , and these are isomorphic via the map of local systems. For more detail see [BDW, §2.3].
2.7. Algebraic and analytic coefficient modules
2.7.1. Algebraic coefficients
If is a dominant algebraic weight, recall is the algebraic -representation of highest weight . If , we describe via algebraic induction ; namely,
where is the opposite Borel. This space carries a natural left action of given by
(2.6) |
inducing a dual left action on by . By §2.6, we have attached local systems and , and a natural isomorphism .
For our -adic interpolation, the subgroup plays a crucial role; its importance is that is a spherical variety. It is thus convenient to consider as a double algebraic induction, namely
(2.7) |
(see [BDW, Lem. 3.6]). Write for the algebraic -representation of highest weight , and denote the standard action of on by . Then precisely, (2.7) means we can identify with the space of algebraic satisfying
(2.8) |
2.7.2. Parahoric analytic coefficients
Recall is the -parahoric subgroup. The theory of distributions on was developed in [BW21c], and – in our setting – described in detail in [BDW, §3]. In (2.7), we replace the second algebraic induction with locally analytic induction, i.e. we let
whence is the space of locally analytic such that
(2.9) |
Let be the continuous dual.
Dualising the natural inclusion yields a specialisation map
(2.10) |
2.7.3. The -action on distributions
The space carries a left -action by
Recall is a uniformiser for , and let
(2.11) |
If , then the function defined by extends uniquely to an element of (recalling is the unipotent radical). We get an induced dual action on given by , as in [BDW, §3.4].
Let (resp. ) be the semigroup generated by and (resp. ) for . The actions above extend to actions of on and on .
2.7.4. Intertwining of actions
The -action of on preserves the subspace . In particular, the -action on descends to the quotient . Moreover, this -action preserves natural integral subspaces in all of these spaces (see [BDW, Rem. 3.13]).
As , (2.6) induces a -action of on . The - and -actions of visibly agree; but the actions of differ. From the definitions, if , then
(2.12) |
Since the - and -actions of agree, if is a parahoric-at- level group, then both actions yield the same local system on . However, since the actions of are different, we get two different Hecke operators on the cohomology : the ‘automorphic’ operator , which is canonical but may have non-integral eigenvalues; and the ‘-adic’ operator , which is integrally normalised but depends on the choice of .
2.8. Automorphic cohomology classes
By [Clo90, p.120], if has weight then the -cohomology is non-zero exactly when
(2.13) |
3. Local test data
To get useful cohomology classes from the map (2.14), we must make good choices of local input data, that is, elements for all finite , and a class in the -cohomology. We do so here; in §3.1 for , in §3.2 for , and §3.3 at infinity.
Since our motivation is global, let be a RASCAR with an -Shalika model. Let be the weight of , with purity weight . Let be a Hecke character of infinity type (and -power conductor). Let be the character of . We write , and for the restrictions to , and .
For each place of , fix a local intertwining of into its Shalika model. This induces finite and infinite intertwinings and .
3.1. Friedberg–Jacquet integrals at finite places
First we recap [FJ93, §3] (see also [JST, Prop. 2.10]). Let be a finite place, and fix a Haar measure on such that has volume 1. The local Friedberg–Jacquet integral is
This converges absolutely for . Its normalisation
admits analytic continuation to .
The following are proved in Propositions 3.1 and 3.2 of [FJ93] respectively (cf. [DJR20, Prop. 3.3]). Let be the valuation of the different of , where , and let be the size of .
Proposition 3.1 (Friedberg–Jacquet).
-
(i)
There exists a test vector such that
(3.1) for all and all unramified .
-
(ii)
If is spherical, the spherical vector is such a test vector.
Note we do not get 1 on the right-hand side of (3.1), as our need not have conductor .
If can be written as , then define (and similarly ). Note that
Let . If and , then is unramified, hence:
Proposition 3.2.
For , let be arbitrary, and let . Then for any , and for , we have
(3.2) |
where is the -function without the Euler factors at .
3.2. -refinements and local choices at
For -adic interpolation, it is essential to treat the primes separately. In this case, good local vectors have been pinned down in [DJR20, §3], [BDW, §2.7], [BDG+, §9], which we summarise here. For ease of notation, for §3.2 only, we will largely drop subscripts , i.e. write , , , etc.).
Assume that is spherical. We write , with as in [BDG+, §6.1]. Recall from (2.11). On , we have the Hecke operator .
Definition 3.3.
A -refinement of is a choice of -eigenvalue on . We say is regular if is a simple eigenvalue.
A regular spin -refinement was called ‘-regular’ in [DJR20].
Let be a regular spin -refinement. Let . Up to reordering the , by [Che04, Lem. 4.8.4] (cf. [BDG+, Prop. 2.5]) we may assume
(3.3) |
The relevant Friedberg–Jacquet integral at is a twisted one, as is familiar in the theory of -adic -functions; see §5. The following ‘local Birch lemma’ is [BDG+, Prop. 9.3]. Let , where is the longest Weyl element for . Recall is the valuation of the different of . For a smooth character of , let be the local Gauss sum (normalised as in [BDG+, Prop. 9.3]).
Proposition 3.4.
There exists an eigenvector such that for any smooth character of of conductor , we have
where and
Proof.
If is not spin, then by contrast we expect this zeta integral vanishes identically on the -eigenspace (see [BGW, §8]).
3.3. Classes at infinity
We now choose a class at infinity, via the ‘zeta integral at infinity’. The choice connects closely to the automorphic cycles in §4 (cf. [JST, §4.1]).
3.3.1. The zeta integral at infinity
Recall and from §2.1, let , and let . Let , and let . Letting , we have . Given a -valued Haar measure on , the attached Friedberg–Jacquet integral at infinity
is defined when by
3.3.2. Modular symbols at infinity
The following is [JST, §4.3]. As -modules, we have
In particular, our choice (from Lemma 2.6) induces an -module map , and hence an -module map . We thus obtain a map
Definition 3.5.
Let . The modular symbol at infinity is the composition
Theorem 3.6 (Lin–Tian, Jiang–Sun–Tian).
There exists a class such that for all .
Proof.
After replacing (globally) with for some (fixed) , and modifying accordingly, we may assume the weight of is balanced in the sense of [JST] (since then is a critical integer). Let be the class chosen by Jiang–Sun–Tian after Proposition 4.9 of [JST]. The required non-vanishing is shown op. cit. for of the form , with finite-order and ; that is, for parallel. If has a real embedding, this accounts for all possible critical , and we are done.
If has no real embedding, then can have non-parallel infinity type. To see the more general non-vanishing we state here, we look at the proof in [JST]. The choice of stems from the choice of map in Lemma 5.12 op. cit. Once this choice is fixed, non-vanishing follows from non-vanishing of the composition of three maps in Lemma 5.13 op. cit. The first two maps are independent of , so are non-vanishing as op. cit. Non-vanishing of the third follows from non-vanishing of on the minimal -type in . But this was shown by Lin–Tian in [LT20, Thm. 1.2]. We are in situation (2) of that theorem since is a standard critical character. ∎
Definition 3.7.
Define the period at (attached to the choice ) to be .
Remark 3.8.
Once is fixed, clearly depends only on , which in turn depends only on and a sign (notation as in [BW19, §2.2.1]). We further expect that for certain normalised choices of that should have very light, explicit dependence on .
To be more precise: fix finite order, and let . In [JST] the are normalised (in Lemma 4.8) to send to 1, where is a highest weight vector in . One of their main technical results is then that there exists such that is independent of . This leads to their proof of the period relations for as ranges over critical integers .
We will later, via a different method, specify choices of via a different method that allows -adic interpolation. Naturally one should expect that our choices are related to those of [JST], and that such a relation should imply the value of our -adic -function at any special value on the cyclotomic line would satisfy exactly the interpolation predicted by Panchishkin (including the factor at infinity). If has a real embedding, this accounts for all special values. When has no real embedding, it is natural to hope that an adaptation of the methods in [JST] would provide an analogous result for the more general , which would mean our -adic -functions have the correct interpolation factor at at all special values.
3.4. Summary
We collect together our choices.
Test Data 3.9.
Let . Then for any , we have computed in terms of , explicit terms at , and a non-zero period.
4. Critical -values via cohomology
We now describe a cohomological interpretation of the Friedberg–Jacquet integrals, and hence the standard critical -values, following [GR14] and [JST]. We begin to tailor our approach towards -adic interpolation, however, with features from [DJR20, BDW, BDG+].
Throughout, let be a RASCAR with an -Shalika model. Let be the weight of , with purity weight . Let be a Hecke character of infinity type and conductor , where is a multiexponent. For technical reasons (cf. Proposition 3.4), we let and let .
4.1. Automorphic cycles
One of the main results of [FJ93, §2], reinterpreted in [JST, Prop. 4.1], is that the product
introduced here in §3, can be computed via period integrals for . In particular, they showed that there exists a Haar measure such that
where is an automorphic cycle for that we define below. We will explain this, and interpret the right-hand side via cohomology.
For the rest of §4, let be an open compact subgroup fixing from Test Data 3.9. Recall . (Here we take intersections with with respect to ).
Definition 4.1.
Let be open compact. The automorphic cycle of level is
By [Ash80, Lemma 2.7], induces a proper map , which we also denote .
In §5, we will choose at , which (as in [BDW, §4.1]) is sufficiently small that:
-
•
and are trivial on ,
-
•
is a real manifold,
-
•
and for all .
Recall , and has (resp. ) real (resp. complex) places.
Lemma 4.2.
We have
Proof.
At each real place, we get a contribution of , which has dimension .
At each complex place, we get , which has dimension , noting . ∎
4.2. Evaluation maps, I
Still summarising [JST], we now give a global version. Recall from Lemma 2.6. Let be the composition
(4.1) | ||||
The final arrow is an integration map (that we will make precise in (5.4)).
As in [JST, (4.12)], the Lie algebra cohomology yields a natural injective map (and class)
The choice of (from Theorem 3.6) yields, via (2.14), an injective map
(4.2) |
The following is the commutative diagram after [JST, Lem. 4.11]. The term arises because of our normalisation of , compared to their period integral in (4.7) op. cit.
Proposition 4.3.
We have a commutative diagram
Finally, we rephrase in language we will consider in the next sections, and summarise all the above results. Let
(4.3) |
From Proposition 3.2, we see immediately that:
Corollary 4.4.
If , then for all , we have
(4.4) |
5. Evaluation maps
We now give abstract generalisations of . To connect the above to the study in [BDW], we first give a more pedestrian reinterpretation of , before describing analogues with -adic local systems. As in the last section, will be a RASCAR with an -Shalika model, of weight , with purity weight . Let be a Hecke character of conductor , with , and infinity type critical for . Again set and let .
We want to work with -adic, rather than complex, coefficients; so recall we fixed an isomorphism . Via this isomorphism, we identify and , and let
(5.1) |
for the map from (4.2).
5.1. Automorphic cycles revisited
5.1.1. Level structures
We now specify the levels . Let , such that:
Let be the matrix with if , and for all . For a multiexponent , let , where (taking all intersections with with respect to ):
-
(i)
away from , is the principal congruence subgroup of some (fixed, suppressed) prime-to- ideal , chosen so that ;
-
(ii)
and
We take large enough that the three conditions after Definition 4.1 are satisfied, and as op. cit., we let , the automorphic cycle of level .
Remark 5.1.
The matrix is an open-orbit representative of the spherical variety (that is, is open in ). The matrix induces the action of the Hecke operator.
5.1.2. Connected components and fundamental classes
Lemma 5.2.
The map descends to a surjective map
By strong approximation for , the connected components of are indexed by
(5.2) |
where is the narrow ray class group of conductor . For , we write for its associated class in and denote the corresponding connected component
We can describe these components as arithmetic quotients of the symmetric space from §3.3. For and , define a congruence subgroup
(5.3) |
The group acts on by left translation via , and there is an isomorphism
where if , we write for its image in .
5.2. The map revisited
Now let containing . For -adic interpolation we must twist the map . Define
One may check , so for , we have maps
where can be checked to be the local system given by locally constant sections of with action (cf. §2.6).
If is a left -module, let be the coinvariants. The quotient map trivialises the local system, inducing a map
Definition 5.3.
Define
(5.5) | ||||
(5.6) | ||||
Recall is the algebraic -representation of highest weight . Recalling from (2.3), is an -representation, with acting by
(5.7) |
Recall we chose (via Lemma 2.6) a non-zero element .
Lemma 5.4.
The map induces a map .
Proof.
It suffices to prove acts trivially on the target. If , then . Moreover and (by Lemma 5.2).
By assumption there exists a Hecke character of infinity type and conductor dividing ; this forces , as in [BW19, §5.2.3]. Similarly, existence of with infinity type and conductor dividing forces . Thus , i.e. acts trivially on , as required. ∎
Definition 5.5.
Let
Here we have chosen a basis of to identify it with . Via , we can do this compatibly with the choices in §4.2.
By considering how all these maps behave on the local systems, we see that actually this ‘new’ construction is just a twisted version of the map from (4.3) (hence it is independent of the choices of ). Precisely, recall
Note , so we can apply at level . If , then , and:
Lemma 5.6.
The following diagram commutes:
Note that the twisting matrix is exactly what appeared in Proposition 3.4.
5.3. Abstract evaluation maps
So far we have only considered evaluation maps only with coefficients in , the local system attached to with its -action. Ultimately we will consider coefficients in -adic distributions, for which only the -local systems make sense. We now present a version of the above maps for -local systems, with abstract coefficient modules, generalising those constructed in [BDW, §4] (when is totally real) and [BW19, §10.1] (for ).
The constructions/proofs of [BDW] all go through exactly as op. cit., so we omit details.
Recall from §2.7.3. Let be a left -module, with action denoted . (When , this will be the -action. When , recall from §2.7.4 that we have two such actions, the - and -actions, and we shall need to consider both).
The level acts on via its projection to , giving a local system on via §2.6. If (from (5.3)), then , so acts on via . Hence we may take coinvariants for this action.
The evaluation maps for are inspired by those in Definition 5.3 for . A crucial difference is that is not any more, but there is a map
Definition 5.7.
The evaluation map for of level at is the composition
(5.8) | ||||
We track dependence on . The following are proved exactly as in [BDW, §4.3].
Lemma 5.8.
(Variation in ; [BDW, Lem. 4.6]) Let be a -module map. There is a commutative diagram
Proposition 5.9.
(Variation in ; [BDW, Prop. 4.9]) Let be a left -module, with action , such that and act trivially. Let be a map of -modules. Then
is well-defined and independent of the representative of .
Fix , and define , where and for . We have natural projections
The action of on yields an action of on , via [BDW, §2.3.2].
5.4. Classical evaluation maps
We now use the above to construct linear functionals
analogous to with . We have
Lemma 5.4 says factors through the -coinvariants. That lemma used the -action on , but by the same proof it is also true of the -action.
To apply Proposition 5.9 to , we now extend to an -module in such a way that and act trivially (as required by the statement of that proposition).
Definition 5.11.
Let be the 1-dimensional -module , recalling and are the ray class characters attached to and in §2.5. Precisely, it is the space , with acting as
By construction, and act trivially on .
Lemma 5.12.
The identity map is an isomorphism of 1-dimensional -modules
Here acts on via projection to , and on by restricting the -action.
Proof.
Corollary 5.13.
For any , the map
is well-defined and depends only on the class .
Definition 5.14.
The classical evaluation map attached to and the action is the map
It depends on the choices of and a basis of the line , each unique up to scalar.
As mentioned previously, there are two natural choices of action on : the standard -action (which connects more cleanly to the theory from §4), and the -action inherited as a quotient of . We get two evaluation maps and . Since the only dependence on is in the map , from (2.12) we have (recalling has conductor related to )
(5.11) |
5.5. Comparison between and
We now connect the evaluation with to Definition 5.5 and hence to §4. Let , and let denote the natural isomorphism
from §2.6. Then, taking -actions everywhere:
Proposition 5.15.
We have
Proof.
We have a commutative diagram (cf. [DJR20, Prop. 4.6] and [BDJ22, Prop. 4.1])
where the horizontal maps are induced by the stated maps of local systems. In particular,
as elements of . Composing with the -module map gives
(5.12) |
Now consider both sides as elements of by Lemma 5.12, and act by on both sides (via the action on ). On the left-hand side, the factor in cancels with the left-most term in (5.12), so we have
On the right-hand side we get, by definition, Summing both sides over completes the proof. ∎
The following theorem, now using the -action, summarises the last three sections. As in the last line of the proof of [DJR20, Thm. 4.7]), the global Gauss sum is
(5.13) |
this is different from some treatments, as our has conductor , rather than .
Theorem 5.16.
Let and be as in Test Data 3.9. For all , we have
(5.14) |
where
and
(5.15) |
is a constant independent of . Here (i.e. we take for all ).
Proof.
By (5.11) (to pass from to evaluations, introducing ), Corollary 4.4 and Lemma 5.6, noting that is trivial outside primes above , we have
By [BDG+, Lem. 4.4] (cf. Lemma 5.2) we have
The twisted local zeta integrals at were evaluated222This is where we want to use , rather than the ‘true’ conductor ; for -adic interpolation it is necessary to twist non-trivially at each , even when the conductor itself is trivial. in Proposition 3.4. Combining all of this, we get the factor and (resp. ) if is unramified (resp. ramified). Finally we conclude by the identity (5.13). ∎
6. -adic interpolation of evaluation maps
We will interpolate the -values appearing on the right-hand side of Theorem 5.16 by interpolating the left-hand side, i.e. , as varies. The main result of §6 is Proposition 6.12.
6.1. Alignment of branching laws
The evaluation maps of the previous section depended on choices of bases
(6.1) |
The choices can be combined into a single choice defined by
(6.2) |
In Theorem 5.16, these choices manifested themselves on the left-hand side in the definition of , and on the right-hand side (via ) in the zeta integral at infinity. To interpolate the requires a careful alignment of the choices as varies, which we carry out here. The main idea is that we can collapse all the different choices (as varies) of branching law for onto a single choice of branching law for , diagonally embedded.
Write , where are two weights for . Then as -representations . We can restrict this under the diagonal embedding of , obtaining:
Lemma 6.1.
The restriction to a diagonal copy of contains the -representation with multiplicity 1.
Proof.
At each , since , we have , so
which contains with multiplicity 1. Since is just the tensor product over all , and , the result follows. ∎
Fix a generator . Recall the description from (2.7). Let
(6.3) |
Proposition 6.2.
-
(i)
For each critical for , there exists a unique
with
for all .
-
(ii)
generates
Proof.
Definition 6.3.
We fix the choice of by setting . Note this corresponds to the choices of and in the proof, after rescaling so that the attached .
6.2. Branching laws for distributions
We now construct a ‘master branching law’ , interpolating all the above. Let be the space of locally analytic functions on , with an -action by
This induces a dual left-action on . Recall if , then induces a character on via §2.5. The following is immediate.
Lemma 6.4.
-
(i)
and act trivially on .
-
(ii)
The map defines an -module map .
Recall from (2.4) there is a natural map , which we denote . Given and , abusing notation we write . For such , define a map
(6.5) | ||||
noting by the definition (6.3) of . Extending by 0, is a locally analytic function , whence it defines an element via the parahoric transformation law (2.9).
If there was a function , then comparing Proposition 6.2 with (6.5), we would formally have for . Unfortunately the function on does not induce a function on in general (since it is not -invariant). However, if with infinity type and conductor dividing , then is a function on , and for with . As such, recalling that , let:
-
•
,
-
•
be the space of functions supported on ,
-
•
-
•
,
-
•
(resp. ) be the space of functions (resp. distributions) supported on .
If , then , so . If , we can thus define a function exactly as in (6.5). After extending by 0 to , as above we obtain a function
Then, recalling that has conductor dividing and infinity type :
Lemma 6.5.
If , then .
Proof.
Dualising gives a map .
Proposition 6.6.
If has conductor dividing and infinity type , we have a commutative diagram
Proof.
Let . Then
where we have used that has support on , and since . ∎
6.3. Overconvergent evaluation maps
Lemma 6.7.
The action of preserves .
Proof.
If , and , then for any , we have . By the proof of [BDG+, Lem. 4.5], we have ; so if and only if . Thus has support on if does; so preserves , hence . ∎
To make Proposition 6.6 useful, we need the following support condition.
Lemma 6.8.
The map
has image in .
Proof.
Identical to [BDG+, Lem. 12.4]. ∎
Lemma 6.9.
The map is a map of -modules.
Proof.
Proposition 6.10.
For any , the map
is well-defined and depends only on the class .
Definition 6.11.
The overconvergent evaluation map of level is the map
6.4. Interpolation of classical evaluation maps
The map from (2.10) is by definition a -module map when is given the -action, hence induces a -equivariant map
(6.6) |
Proposition 6.12.
For any of conductor dividing , we have a commutative diagram
Proof.
It suffices to check every square in
commutes, since the top row is and the bottom row . The left-most square commutes by Lemma 5.8 (noting the top arrow is well-defined by Lemma 6.8). The middle square commutes by Proposition 6.6. The right-most square commutes by Lemma 6.4(ii), noting that acts on the bottom row via the identification . ∎
7. The -adic -function
7.1. Construction
Let now be a RASCAR of weight , spherical at all , and let be a regular spin -refinement as in §3.2. Let and be chosen as in Test Data 3.9, and let
(7.1) |
There exists some finite extension such that is defined over , rather than . The map is Hecke-equivariant when we give the right-hand side the -action, hence
the second via (2.12). Let , the -eigenvalue.
Definition 7.1.
Recall the map from (6.6). We say is non--critical if becomes an isomorphism after restricting to the -generalised eigenspaces for the Hecke algebra (precisely, the algebra from [BDW, Def. 2.10]). We say has non--critical slope if
where is the set of that extend to , and is the ramification index of . (If is ordinary – i.e. for all – then it has non--critical slope.)
Theorem 7.2.
If has non--critical slope, then it is non--critical.
If is non--critical, then there exists a unique Hecke eigenclass with . If , then let .
7.2. Growth conditions
The following is an adaptation of [Loe14, Def. 2.14] for our setting. For , let . We have an exact sequence
where is the image of under the natural map from (2.4). Let
Then is the union of all the ’s. Moreover each is a Banach -space with respect to a discretely valued norm . Dualising gives a family of norms
(7.2) |
on , which thus obtains the structure of a Fréchet module.
Definition 7.4.
Let . We say is admissible of growth if there exists such that for each we have where .
Note that if is admissible of growth , then it defines a bounded measure. Indeed, if is open compact, define its volume to be , where is the indicator function. For such that , we see , so is bounded.
Proposition 7.5.
Let be a Hecke eigenclass with for all . The distribution is admissible of growth .
Proof.
This is a higher-variable version of [BDW, Prop. 6.20] and [BDJ22, Prop. 3.11], and it is proved essentially identically. We indicate changes of notation. One defines , and replaces all instances of op. cit. (a positive integer) with . After (6.21) op. cit., should instead be analytic on , and there replaced with here. The space there is the translate of by here. The rest of the proof is identical. ∎
7.3. Proof of Theorem A
Finally we assemble our results and prove Theorem A from the introduction. We have constructed the distribution in Definition 7.3. It has the required growth property by Proposition 7.5. For the interpolation, if has conductor dividing , we have
by Proposition 6.12. Since , this gives times the right-hand side of Theorem 5.16, which has a factor . By definition of , we have
If is unramified, then , and this factor of cancels the one appearing in in Theorem 5.16, leaving exactly from Theorem A. If is ramified, then this factor of is exactly the difference between and . This proves the interpolation formula, and completes the proof of Theorem A. ∎
7.4. Unicity in the imaginary quadratic case
Now let be imaginary quadratic. The purity condition on (Definition 2.2) implies that , say, so the range of standard critical infinity types for forms the square . The non--critical slope bound says, then, that ‘the growth is strictly less than the number of critical values’. Let be as in Theorem A. The following is proved in [Loe14] (cf. [Wil17, §7.5]).
Proposition 7.6.
If is non--critical slope, then is uniquely determined by its growth and interpolation properties.
References
- [AG94] Avner Ash and David Ginzburg. -adic -functions for . Invent. Math., 116(1-3):27–73, 1994.
- [AS06] Mahdi Asgari and Freydoon Shahidi. Generic transfer for general spin groups. Duke Math. J., 132(1):137–190, 2006.
- [AS14] Mahdi Asgari and Freydoon Shahidi. Image of functoriality for general spin groups. Manuscripta Math., 144(3-4):609–638, 2014.
- [Ash80] Avner Ash. Non-square-integrable cohomology of arithmetic groups. Duke Math. J., 47(2):435–449, 1980.
- [Bar18] Daniel Barrera Salazar. Overconvergent cohomology of Hilbert modular varieties and -adic -functions. Ann. I. Fourier, 68(5):2177–2213, 2018.
- [BDG+] Daniel Barrera Salazar, Mladen Dimitrov, Andrew Graham, Andrei Jorza, and Chris Williams. On the GL(2n) eigenvariety: branching laws, Shalika families and -adic -functions. Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.08126.
- [BDJ22] Daniel Barrera, Mladen Dimitrov, and Andrei Jorza. -adic -functions of Hilbert cusp forms and the trivial zero conjecture. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 24(10):3439–3503, 2022.
- [BDP13] Massimo Bertolini, Henri Darmon, and Kartik Prasanna. Generalized Heegner cycles and -adic Rankin -series. Duke Math. J., 162(6):1033–1148, 2013. With an appendix by Brian Conrad.
- [BDW] Daniel Barrera Salazar, Mladen Dimitrov, and Chris Williams. On -adic -functions for in finite slope Shalika families. Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2103.10907.
- [Bel12] Joël Bellaïche. Critical -adic -functions. Invent. Math., 189:1 – 60, 2012.
- [BGW] Daniel Barrera Salazar, Andrew Graham, and Chris Williams. On the classical symplectic locus in the -eigenvariety. Preprint.
- [BH] John Bergdall and David Hansen. On -adic -functions for Hilbert modular forms. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. To appear. https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.05324.
- [BW19] Daniel Barrera Salazar and Chris Williams. -adic -functions for . Canad. J. Math., 71(5):1019–1059, 2019.
- [BW21a] Daniel Barrera Salazar and Chris Williams. Families of Bianchi modular symbols: critical base-change -adic -functions and -adic Artin formalism. Selecta Math. (N.S.), 27(82), 2021. Appendix by Carl Wang-Erickson.
- [BW21b] Daniel Barrera Salazar and Chris Williams. Overconvergent cohomology, -adic -functions and families for over CM fields. J. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux, 33(3, part 1):659–701, 2021.
- [BW21c] Daniel Barrera Salazar and Chris Williams. Parabolic eigenvarieties via overconvergent cohomology. Math. Z., 299(1-2):961–995, 2021.
- [Che04] Gaëtan Chenevier. Familles -adiques de formes automorphes pour . J. Reine Angew. Math., 570:143–217, 2004.
- [Clo90] Laurent Clozel. Motifs et formes automorphes: applications du principe de fonctorialité. In Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and -functions, Vol. I (Ann Arbor, MI, 1988), volume 10 of Perspect. Math., pages 77–159. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990.
- [Coa89] John Coates. On -adic -functions attached to motives over . II. Bol. Soc. Brasil. Mat. (N.S.), 20(1):101–112, 1989.
- [CPR89] John Coates and Bernadette Perrin-Riou. On -adic -functions attached to motives over . In Algebraic number theory, volume 17 of Adv. Stud. Pure Math., pages 23–54. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1989.
- [Del79] Pierre Deligne. Valeurs de fonctions et périodes d’intégrales. Proc. Symp. Pure Math., 33:313–346, 1979.
- [DJ] Mladen Dimitrov and Andrei Jorza. Parahoric level -adic -functions for automorphic representations of GL(2n) with Shalika models. In preparation.
- [DJR20] Mladen Dimitrov, Fabian Januszewski, and A. Raghuram. -functions of : -adic properties and nonvanishing of twists. Compositio Math., 156(12):2437–2468, 2020.
- [FJ93] Solomon Friedberg and Hervé Jacquet. Linear periods. J. Reine Angew. Math., 443:91–139, 1993.
- [Geh18] Lennart Gehrmann. On Shalika models and -adic -functions. Israel J. Math., 226(1):237–294, 2018.
- [GR14] Harald Grobner and A. Raghuram. On the arithmetic of Shalika models and the critical values of -functions for . Amer. J. Math., 136(3):675–728, 2014. With an appendix by Wee Teck Gan.
- [Hid98] Haruzo Hida. Automorphic induction and Leopoldt type conjectures for . volume 2, pages 667–710. 1998. Mikio Sato: a great Japanese mathematician of the twentieth century.
- [JS76] Hervé Jacquet and Joseph A. Shalika. A non-vanishing theorem for zeta functions of . Invent. Math., 38(1):1–16, 1976.
- [JS90] Hervé Jacquet and Joseph Shalika. Exterior square -functions. In Automorphic forms, Shimura varieties, and -functions, Vol. II (Ann Arbor, MI, 1988), volume 11 of Perspect. Math., pages 143–226. Academic Press, Boston, MA, 1990.
- [JST] Dihua Jiang, Binyong Sun, and Fangyang Tian. Period relations for standard -functions of symplectic type. Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/1909.03476.
- [Kna01] A. W. Knapp. Branching theorems for compact symmetric spaces. Represent. Theory, 5:404–436, 2001.
- [LLZ15] Antonio Lei, David Loeffler, and Sarah Livia Zerbes. Euler systems for modular forms over imaginary quadratic fields. Compos. Math., 151(9):1585–1625, 2015.
- [Loe14] David Loeffler. -adic integration on ray class groups and non-ordinary -adic -functions. In T. Bouganis and O. Venjakob, editors, Iwasawa 2012: State of the art and recent advances, volume 7 of Contributions in Mathematical and Computational Sciences, pages 357 – 378. Springer, 2014.
- [LT20] Bingchen Lin and Fangyang Tian. Archimedean non-vanishing, cohomological test vectors, and standard -functions of : complex case. Adv. Math., 369:107189, 51, 2020.
- [Pan94] Alexei A. Panchishkin. Motives over totally real fields and -adic -functions. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 44(4):989–1023, 1994.
- [PS11] Robert Pollack and Glenn Stevens. Overconvergent modular symbols and -adic -functions. Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4), 44(1):1–42, 2011.
- [Roh89] David E. Rohrlich. Nonvanishing of -functions for . Invent. Math., 97(2):381–403, 1989.
- [RY] Maksym Radziwiłł and Liyang Yang. Non-vanishing of twists of -functions. Preprint: https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.09171.
- [SU14] Christopher Skinner and Eric Urban. The Iwasawa Main Conjectures for GL. Invent. Math., 195 (1):1–277, 2014.
- [Wei56] André Weil. On a certain type of characters of the idele-class group of an algebraic number-field. In Proceedings of the international symposium on algebraic number theory, 1956.
- [Wil17] Chris Williams. -adic -functions of Bianchi modular forms. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 114(4):614–656, 2017.