Keywords: Divisor function; Moment; Dirichlet series.
MR(2020) Subject Classification: 11N37,11N64
On moments of the error term of the multivariable k-th divisor functions
Abstract.
Suppose is an integer. Let be the number of ways can be written as a product of fixed factors. For any fixed integer , we have the asymptotic formula
where and are computable constants. In this paper we study the mean square of and give upper bounds for and an asymptotic formula for the mean square of . We also get an upper bound for the third power moment of . Moreover, we study the first power moment of and then give a result for the sign changes of it.
1. Introduction and Results
Let be an integer, denote the number of ways can be written as a product of fixed factors. When , is the Dirichlet divisor function. The problems about it are important in analytic number theory and hence have a long history [6, 8, 12].
For , suppose is a large real positive number, we have
(1.1) |
where is a given polynomial in of degree and is the error term. We denote
(1.2) |
There are many results about the upper bounds and lower bounds for and . For unified conclusions on , Voronoi [13] proved that for in 1903. In 1916 Hardy [3] showed that holds for . Hardy and Littlewood [4] proved that for in 1923. Ivić [6] gave a summary, namely
(1.3) |
and
(1.4) |
For the results on , in 1956, Tong [10] developed a new method of deriving an asymptotic formula for the mean square for , which can be stated as follows:
Suppose is a large real number, is a sufficiently small real positive number and is defined in (1.1), then
(1.5) |
Let be a fixed integer. In this paper we consider the sum
(1.6) |
where is the main term and is the error term. Tóth and Zhai [11] studied the condition . In this paper we first show that
Theorem 1.1.
Let , be fixed integers. Suppose are expressed in (1.3), then for any real number , the asymptotic formula
holds for any , and is expressed by
where are computable constants.
The first author [2] have studied the mean square for and have got an asymptotic formula. In this paper we concentrate on the integral
for and large real . We give an asymptotic formula for and the upper bounds for . The results are stated as follows.
Theorem 1.2.
Let be a large real number and be a fixed integer. Then the asymptotic formula
holds for any , where is a polynomial in of degree denoted by
and are computable constants.
Theorem 1.2 can be viewed as an analogue of Tong’s result.
For higher power moments of , in 1992 Heath-Brown [5] proved that for a large real positive , the upper bound estimate
(1.7) |
holds for any . This is the best upper bound since the average order of is , which can be obtained by (1.5). In this paper we give a similar result for .
Theorem 1.3.
Let be a large real number, we have
Using Theorem 1.2 we have the average order of is . Thus this is also the best upper bound.
Moreover, we obtain the following result.
Theorem 1.4.
Let be a large real number, we have
Corollary 1.5.
For a large real number , has at least sign changes in .
Theorem 1.6.
Notation.
Throughout this paper, denotes a sufficiently small real positive number, not necessarily the same at each occurrence. As usual, denotes the set of real numbers, denotes the set of natural number, denotes the Riemann-zeta function. For a positive integer , denotes the th Dirichlet divisor function. For a complex number , denotes the real part of . For integers and , denotes a binomial coefficient (). For a complex number , the function denotes .
2. Some lemmas
We present some lemmas.
Lemma 2.1.
Let be a given large real number and be a real number such that , and be defined in (1.1). For any , define
Then we have
Proof.
See Lemma 2.12 in Cao, Tanigawa and Zhai [1]. ∎
Lemma 2.2.
Let , be integers, and be complex numbers such that . Then
which means this polynomial does not contain terms of the form and for every .
Proof.
For any given , there are terms in the latter series which contains . By comparing the coefficients of in the first term and in the latter series, and using the binomial theorem we can finish the proof. ∎
Lemma 2.3.
Let be a fixed integer and let be complex numbers. Then for , we have
where
This series is absolutely convergent provided that and , and is multiplicative and symmetric in all variables.
Moreover, for any function satisfying , the series
(2.1) |
is absolutely convergent provided that and .
Proof.
The function is multiplicative and for every prime power . The function is multiplicative, viewed as a function of variables. Therefore its multiple Dirichlet series can be expanded into an Euler product. We obtain
where
where . And the terms (the case for all and ) only appear in
Using Lemma 2.2 in the case that we obtain that the coefficient of is zero for every and .
Hence if and , then is absolutely convergent. And the convergence of (2.1) is a direct corollary. ∎
Lemma 2.4.
Suppose are fixed real positive numbers, let G(x) be a monotonic function defined on such that and m(x) be a differentiable real function such that on , or or , then
Proof.
See Lemma 2.1 in Ivić [6]. ∎
Lemma 2.5.
Suppose is a given large real number, are given real numbers, are integers such that . Define
Then we have
Proof.
Let , we have , so we can find a constant such that , , where is an integer such that , thus
similarly we have , thus . ∎
Lemma 2.6.
Suppose are large real numbers, is a fixed integer, are given real numbers such that , is defined in Lemma 2.3 in the case k=3. Let and denote the vectors and , and denote and , respectively. Let
where is any function which satisfies , then we have
(i) is absolutely convergent.
(ii) We have
Proof.
Use the same argument of Lemma 2.5 in the first author [2]. ∎
Lemma 2.7.
Suppose is a complex number, is an arithmetic function with Dirichlet series
which is convergent for . Then for any real number and fixed real number , we have
Proof.
Using Theorem 5.1(the Perron’s formula) in Karatsuba [7] we can finish the proof. ∎
Lemma 2.8.
Let be a real number and be defined in (1.1), then we have
Proof.
Taking and in Lemma we have
Then using (1.1) the left side becomes
where we use partial summation to get
Thus
where is a real number such that .
It is well known that has the functional equation
where satisfies for and . Thus for ,
holds by taking , where the convergence of the latter integral can be obtained by integration by parts and the fourth power moment result of :
which can be found in Titchmarsh [9]. Hence we complete the proof. ∎
3. Proof of Theorem 1.1 and Expression of
Then we deduce by (1.1) that
(3.1) | ||||
We evaluate the main term
Since with a polynomial in u of degree , we have
(3.2) |
where
the sum being over and are computable constants. Thus we have
(3.3) | ||||
where
is convergent by choosing in Lemma 2.3, and where means there is at least one such that . Without loss of generality, we suppose .
4. Proof of Theorem 1.6
4.1. Mean Square of
Let be a large real number, and , , and be defined in Lemma 2.6.
5. Proof of Theorem 1.2
5.1. Mean Square of
In order to evaluate
we divide the into three parts, namely
where
and is a parameter such that . Thus
(5.1) |
Let be defined in Lemma 2.6, then change the order of summation and integration, by (1.1) we obtain
using Cauchy-Schwarz’s inequality and (1.2) we deduce that
then by Lemma 2.3 we have
(5.2) | ||||
Let , similarly we get
(5.3) | ||||
By (5.1), (5.2), (5.3) we conclude that
It remains to evaluate , and then it will follows that and can be estimated by the Cauchy-Schwarz’s inequality.
5.2. Mean Square of
We are going to evaluate the mean square of . Using (3.2) we obtain
We denote by , then using we get
(5.6) |
where
and
Then it turns to deal with
5.2.1. Evaluation of
Since satisfies
we choose , , in Lemma 2.6, then
Since is related to , we denote by , therefore
where
is a polynomial of degree . Then it follows that
(5.7) |
5.2.2. Estimates of and
We use and to get
(5.8) | ||||
where we use partial summation on and the convergence of the latter series is obtained by Lemma 2.3.
Then we turn to estimate , similar to , we have
(5.9) | ||||
where
Then we have
(5.10) |
by using partial summation.
For , using the Lagrange’s Mean Value Theorem, for ,
holds when . Thus choosing , we get
Let satisfy . Then using we deduce that
(5.11) | ||||
where we use Lemma 2.5 in the case that .
5.2.3. Other terms in (5.5)
Suppose that , using the Cauchy-Schwarz’s inequality and Lemma 2.1 we have
Thus
(5.14) | ||||
where the convergence of all the series can be obtained by Lemma 2.3.
Since , the term is superfluous.
5.3. Conclusion
Taking , using (5.3), (5.16) and the Cauchy-Schwarz’s inequality we easily have
(5.17) | ||||
And similarly we obtain
(5.18) |
Above all, choosing which indeed satisfies ,
holds from (3.7), (5.1), (5.2), (5.3), (5.16), (5.17) and (5.18). Then replacing by , and so on, and adding up all the results, we obtain
where we use integration by part several times to get is a polynomial in of degree denoted by
Hence we have completed the proof of the Theorem.
6. Proof of Theorem 1.3
By (3.7) we obtain
7. Proof of Theorem 1.4
We are going to estimate . Since are symmetric in , we have
where
Changing the order of integration and summation, using (3.2) and we have
and the convergence of the latter series is obtained by Lemma 2.3.
For , similar to and using Lemma 2.3 we have
Then we turns to estimate . By (3.7) we have
and its derivative satisfies
For a real number , define
and we denote by , then changing the order of integration and summation we have
where we use integration by parts, Lemma 2.3 and Lemma 2.8. Hence we complete the proof.
7.1. Proof of the Corollary
Acknowledgement
The authors would like to appreciate the referee for his/her patience in refereeing this paper. This work is supported by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (Grant No.1242003), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.11971476).
References
- [1] Xiaodong Cao, Yoshio Tanigawa, and Wenguang Zhai. On hybrid moments of and . Ramanujan J., 58(2):597–631, 2022.
- [2] Zhen Guo. On mean square of the error term of a multivariable divisor function. AIMS Mathematics, 9(10):29197–29219, 2024.
- [3] G. H. Hardy. On Dirichlet’s Divisor Problem. Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 15:1–25, 1916.
- [4] G. H. Hardy and J. E. Littlewood. The Approximate Functional Equation in the Theory of the Zeta-Function, with Applications to the Divisor-Problems of Dirichlet and Piltz. Proc. London Math. Soc. (2), 21:39–74, 1923.
- [5] D. R. Heath-Brown. The distribution and moments of the error term in the Dirichlet divisor problem. Acta Arith., 60(4):389–415, 1992.
- [6] Aleksandar Ivić. The Riemann zeta-function. A Wiley-Interscience Publication. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1985. The theory of the Riemann zeta-function with applications.
- [7] Anatolij A. Karatsuba. Basic analytic number theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, russian edition, 1993.
- [8] Ekkehard Krätzel. Lattice points, volume 33 of Mathematics and its Applications (East European Series). Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1988.
- [9] E. C. Titchmarsh. The Theory of the Riemann Zeta-Function. Oxford, at the Clarendon Press,, 1951.
- [10] Kwang-Chang Tong. On divisor problems. II, III. Acta Math. Sinica, 6:139–152, 515–541, 1956.
- [11] László Tóth and Wenguang Zhai. On multivariable averages of divisor functions. J. Number Theory, 192:251–269, 2018.
- [12] Kai-Man Tsang. Recent progress on the Dirichlet divisor problem and the mean square of the Riemann zeta-function. Sci. China Math., 53(9):2561–2572, 2010.
- [13] Georges Voronoi. Sur un problème du calcul des fonctions asymptotiques. J. Reine Angew. Math., 126:241–282, 1903.