On bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomials
Abstract
We introduce poly-Bernoulli polynomials in two variables by using a generalization of Stirling numbers of the second kind that we studied in a previous work. We prove the bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomial version of some known results on standard Bernoulli polynomials, as the addition formula and the binomial formula. We also prove a result that allows us to obtain poly-Bernoulli polynomial identities from polynomial identities, and we use this result to obtain several identities involving products of poly-Bernoulli and/or standard Bernoulli polynomials. We prove two generalized recurrences for bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomials, and obtain some corollaries from them.
keywords:
poly-Bernoulli polynomial, poly-Bernoulli number, Generalized Stirling number, Generalized recurrence.11B68, 11B73. \VOLUME31 \YEAR2023 \NUMBER1 \DOIhttps://doi.org/10.46298/cm.10327 {paper}
1 Introduction
Bernoulli numbers are one of the most important mathematical objects that have been studied by mathemathicians since they appeared in the 18-th century (see [Ma]). A recent important generalization of the Bernoulli numbers and Bernoulli polynomials is about the so-called poly-Bernoulli numbers and poly-Bernoulli polynomials. Poly-Bernoulli numbers , where is a given positive integer, were introduced by M. Kaneko [Ka] in 1997, by means of the generating function
where Li is the polylogarithm function. The case corresponds to the standard Bernoulli numbers (except the sign of ). Poly-Bernoulli polynomials can be defined by the generating function
(see [Ce-Ko]). The case corresponds to , and the case corresponds to the poly-Bernoulli numbers mentioned before. Some slightly different definitions of poly-Bernoulli polynomials , with replaced by , and/or with an additional factor , can be found in some related papers (see [Ba-Ha], [Ce-Ko], [Co-Ca], [Ha]). In this work we use the following explicit formula
(1) |
as our definition of poly-Bernoulli polynomials (see formula (1.8) in [Ba-Ha]). It is important to mention that the notation is also used for a different kind of mathematical objects, namely, Bernoulli polynomials of -th order (see [Ca1]). A different generalization of Bernoulli polynomials, studied in the past few years, is about considering Bernoulli polynomials in several variables , that is, polynomials of degree in the variable , with
seeking that reasonable generalizations of the known properties in the one-variable case, remain valid. This kind of work is done in [Shib], with a flavor of multivariable analysis and working with Jack polynomials. A different approach is presented in [Shishk] (see also [Bre], [DiNar]). In this work we study poly-Bernoulli polynomials in two variables (bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomials). We define the bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomials by using a generalization of Stirling numbers of the second kind we studied in [Pi], and then we use the results in [Pi] to obtain results for the bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomials considered in this work. We present now the definitions and results in [Pi] that we will use in the remaining sections. The generalized Stirling numbers of the second kind (GSN, for short), denoted as , where , , , and non-negative integers, are defined by means of the expansion
(2) |
( if or ). An explicit formula for these numbers is
(3) |
If , we write the GSN as . We have
(4) |
In the case , the corresponding GSN are the known Stirling numbers of the second kind. We will refer to them as “standard Stirling numbers”, and in this case we use the known notation . From (3) it is clear that . We can see directly from (4) that
(5) | |||||
(6) |
In this work we will use GSN of the form . Some important facts about the GSN are the following:
-
•
Some values of the GSN are
(7) -
•
The GSN can be written in terms of the GSN as follows
(8) -
•
The GSN can be written in terms of standard Stirling numbers as follows
(9) where is an arbitrary non-negative integer.
-
•
The GSN can be written in terms of standard Stirling numbers as follows
(10) where is an arbitrary positive integer, and are the unsigned Stirling numbers of the first kind.
-
•
The GSN satisfy the identity
(11) -
•
The GSN satisfy the recurrence
(12)
2 Definitions and preliminary results
The relation of Bernoulli (numbers and polynomials) with Stirling (numbers of the second kind) is an old story, that dates back to Worpitsky [W] (see also [G-K-P, p. 560] and [Ke, p. 5]). We have the following formula for Bernoulli numbers
(13) |
and in the case of Bernoulli polynomials we have
(14) |
An important observation of formula (1) is that poly-Bernoulli polynomial can be written in terms of the GSN as
(15) |
The generalization of (15) to the case of two variables comes through the GSN: we define poly-Bernoulli polynomial in the variables , denoted by , as
(16) |
If , formula (16) becomes (15). By using (9) we can write in terms of standard Stirling numbers as
(17) | |||||
where is an arbitrary non-negative integer. Similarly, by using (10) we have that
(18) | |||||
where is an arbitrary positive integer. The simplest cases of (17) and (18) are
(19) |
and
(20) | ||||
respectively. Two examples are the following
Clearly we have
(21) |
Observe also that
(22) |
In particular, we have
(23) |
(24) |
from where we see that
We can use (8) to write in terms of , , , as
(25) |
that generalizes the known addition formula for one-variable poly-Bernoulli polynomials. In fact, we have
as claimed. In particular, if we set in (25) we obtain an expression for the bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomial in terms of one-variable poly-Bernoulli polynomials , , namely
(26) |
and then we can write the bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomial in terms of poly-Bernoulli numbers , , as
(27) |
The cases and of (27) are
(28) |
and
(29) |
respectively. In fact, according to (16), formulas (28) and (29) are the particular cases and of the identity
(30) |
where is a non-negative integer. We leave the proof of (30) to the reader. Observe also that (25) implies that
(31) |
which generalizes the known binomial formula for standard Bernoulli polynomials
(32) |
If we set in (25), we obtain a formula for the standard poly-Bernoulli polynomial in terms of the bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomials , , , namely
(33) |
Some additional simple observations are the following
(34) | |||||
(35) |
and
(36) | |||||
(37) |
3 Some identities
In this section we obtain some identities involving poly-Bernoulli polynomials, by using the following result:
Theorem 3.1.
The polynomial identity
(38) |
implies the poly-Bernoulli polynomial identity
(39) |
Proof 3.2.
Observe that the hypothesis of the polynomial identity (38), comes together with the identity of its derivatives:
where is a non-negative integer. We have
as desired.
Remark 3.3.
For example, by using Theorem 3.1 in the trivial identity we obtain the addition formula for poly-Bernoulli polynomials
(40) |
that we can write as
(41) |
We can use again Theorem 3.1 to obtain from (41) that
(42) |
Set in (42) to get the identity
(43) |
If we set in (43), and replace by , we obtain
(44) |
By using that together with (43), we obtain from (44), after some elementary algebraic steps, the curious identity
(45) |
From (17), (18) and (19) we have that
(46) | ||||
where , are arbitrary integers, , . Now we use Theorem 3.1 in (46) and then set , to obtain the identities
(47) | ||||
From (26) we see that
(48) | ||||
We can use Theorem 3.1 to get from (48), the identity
(49) | ||||
Set to obtain from (49) that
(50) | ||||
With , , and , where is an arbitrary parameter, we obtain from (50) the identities
(51) | ||||
In the case , if some (or all) of the parameters are equal to , we can use the known property to simplify the corresponding expression in (51). For example, if and , we have the following identities involving standard Bernoulli numbers and polynomials
(52) | ||||
In particular, by setting in (52), we see that if is odd, then
(53) |
From (30) together with (9) (with ) and (10) (with ), we have
(54) | ||||
and then, applying Theorem 3.1 in (54) we get
(55) | |||
where is an arbitrary non-negative integer. Now let us consider the difference
(56) |
where is an arbitrary positive integer. In the case , we know that (56) is equal to (see [Shib])
(57) |
We can use (26) to write (56) as
(58) | ||||
where and are arbitrary parameters. If , we have from (57) and (58) that
(59) | ||||
By using Theorem 3.1 in (59) we get
(60) | ||||
Set in (60), to obtain the following identities involving poly-Bernoulli polynomials, standard Bernoulli polynomials and Bernoulli numbers
(61) | |||
4 Generalized recurrences
In this section we show two generalized recurrences for bi-variate poly-Bernoulli polynomials, and obtain some consequences of them.
Proposition 4.1.
We have
where , and for the functions are defined recursively by
Proof 4.2.
For example, we have
(64) |
and then, formula (4.1) with is
(65) | ||||
and with is
(66) | ||||
We can write (4.1) by using (26) as
(67) | ||||
By setting in (67), we get the identities
(68) | ||||
If we set in (68), we get
(69) | ||||
The case of (69) reduces to
Formula (4) is the famous Carlitz identity [Ca]. In terms of bi-variate Bernoulli polynomials, Carlitz identity is written as
(71) |
For example, we can use (71) to write the following version of (4.1) in the case , when
or, explicitly
It is easy to check that in the case , the functions of Proposition 4.1 are . Thus, the case of (4.1) is the case of (30). Also, in the case , we have that , and then the case of (4.1) is the case of (30).
Proposition 4.3.
For non-negative integers we have
(72) | ||||
Proof 4.4.
Formula (72) with looks as
or, explicitly
(75) | ||||
If we set in formula (4), we can use Carlitz identity (71) to write the following enriched version of (4)
or, explicitly
(77) | ||||
To end this section, let us consider the case of the first two lines of (72). That is
(78) |
Formula (78) is the first step of two results contained in the following proposition.
Proposition 4.5.
We have the following identities:
-
a)
(79) -
b)
(80)
Proof 4.6.
Let us prove (79) by induction on . The case is a trivial identity. Let us suppose that (79) is true for a given . Then
as desired. In the last step we used (78). Now let us prove (80). Again we proceed by induction on . The case is a trivial identity. Let us suppose that (80) is true for a given . Then
as desired. We used (78) (with replaced by ) in the last step.
The case of (80) is
(81) |
The case of (81) is the addition formula for standard poly-Bernoulli polynomials, namely
The case of (79) is
(82) |
As a final comment, we mention that by considering the GSN involved in the expansion
(83) |
where are non-negative integers given, one can define poly-Bernoulli polynomials in variables , denoted as , as
or explicitly as
In this more general setting we have natural generalizations of results (4.1), (72), (79) and (80). We show the corresponding results in the case of poly-Bernoulli polynomials in 3 variables:
Acknowledgments
I thank the anonymous referee for his/her helpful observations, that certainly contributed to improve the final version of this work.
References
- [1] \referPaperBa-Ha \RauthorBayad A. and Hamahata Y. \RtitlePolylogarithms and poly-Bernoulli polynomials \RjournalKyushu J. Math. \Rvolume65 \Ryear2011 \Rpages15-24
- [2] \referPaperBre \RauthorBretti G. and Ricci P. E. \RtitleMultidimensional extensions of the Bernoulli and Appel polynomials \RjournalTaiwanese J. Math. \Rvolume8 \Ryear2004 \Rnumber3 \Rpages415-428
- [3] \referPaperCa1 \RauthorCarlitz L. \RtitleA note on Bernoulli numbers and polynomials of higher order \RjournalProc. Amer. Math. Soc. \Rvolume3 \Ryear1952 \Rnumber4 \Rpages608-613
- [4] \referPaperCa \RauthorCarlitz L. \RtitleProblem 795 \RjournalMath. Mag. \Rvolume44 \Ryear1971 \Rpages107
- [5] \referPaperCe-Ko \RauthorCenkci M. and Komatsu T. \RtitlePoly-Bernoulli numbers and polynomials with a parameter \RjournalJ. Number Theory \Rvolume152 \Ryear2015 \Rpages38-54
- [6] \referPaperCo-Ca \RauthorCoppo M-A. and Candelpergher B. \RtitleThe Arakawa–Kaneko zeta functions \RjournalRamanujan J. \Rvolume22 \Ryear2010 \Rpages153-162
- [7] \referPaperDiNar \RauthorDi Nardo E. and Oliva I. \RtitleMultivariate Bernoulli and Euler polynomials via Levy processes \RjournalAppl. Math. Lett. \Rvolume25 \Ryear2012 \Rpages1179-1184
- [8] \referBookG-K-P \RauthorGraham R. L., Knuth D. E. , and Patashnik O. \RtitleConcrete Mathematics: A Foundation for Computer Science, 2nd. ed. \RpublisherAddison-Wesley \Ryear1994 \Rpages657
- [9] \referPaperHa \RauthorHamahata Y. \RtitleThe Arakawa–Kaneko zeta function and poly-Bernoulli polynomials \RjournalGlasnik Matematički \Rvolume48 \Ryear2013 \Rnumber68 \Rpages249-263
- [10] \referPaperKa \RauthorKaneko M. \RtitlePoly-Bernoulli numbers \RjournalJ. Théor. Nombres Bordeaux \Rvolume9 \Ryear1997 \Rpages221-228
- [11] \referPaperKe \RauthorKellner B. C. \RtitleIdentities between polynomials related to Stirling and harmonic numbers \RjournalIntegers \Rvolume14 \Ryear2014 \RnumberA54 \Rpages1-22
- [12] \referPaperKo-Pi \RauthorKomatsu T. and C. Pita-Ruiz C. \RtitleSeveral explicit formulae for Bernoulli polynomials \RjournalMath. Commun. \Rvolume21 \Ryear2016 \Rpages127-140
- [13] \referOtherMa \RauthorMazur B. \RtitleBernoulli numbers and the unity of mathematics, available at http://people.math.harvard.edu/~mazur/papers/slides.Bartlett.pdf
- [14] \referArxivPi \RauthorPita-Ruiz C. \RtitleGeneralized Stirling Numbers I \RarxividArXiv:1803.05953v1
- [15] \referPaperPi2 \RauthorPita-Ruiz C. \RtitleCarlitz-Type and other Bernoulli Identities \RjournalJ. Integer Sequences \Rvolume19 \Ryear2016 \Rnumber16.1.8 \Rpages1-27
- [16] \referArxivShib \RauthorShibukawa G. \RtitleMultivariate Bernoulli polynomials \RarxividArXiv:1905.01914v2
- [17] \referPaperShishk \RauthorShishkina O. A. \RtitleMultidimensional Analog of the Bernoulli Polynomials and its Properties \RjournalJournal of Siberian Federal University. Mathematics & Physics \Rvolume9 \Ryear2016 \Rnumber3 \Rpages384-392
- [18] \referPaperW \RauthorWorpitzky J. \RtitleStudien über die Bernoullischen und Eulerschen Zahlen \RjournalJ. Reine Angew. Math. \Rvolume94 \Ryear1883 \Rpages203-232
- [19]
October 08, 2020November 28, 2021Karl Dilcher