This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: These authors contributed equally to this workthanks: These authors contributed equally to this work

Observation of 4- and 6-magnon bound-states in the spin-anisotropic frustrated antiferromagnet FeI2

Anaëlle Legros The Institute for Quantum Matter and the Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA    Shang-Shun Zhang Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA    Xiaojian Bai School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA Neutron Scattering Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA    Hao Zhang Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA    Zhiling Dun School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA    W. Adam Phelan PARADIM, Department of Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA    Cristian D. Batista Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA    Martin Mourigal School of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, USA    N. P. Armitage [email protected] The Institute for Quantum Matter and the Department of Physics and Astronomy, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA

Spin-waves e.g. magnons are the conventional elementary excitations of ordered magnets. However, other possibilities exist. For instance, magnon bound-states can arise due to attractive magnon-magnon interactions and drastically impact the static and dynamic properties of materials Torrance and Tinkham (1969); Hoogerbeets et al. (1984). Here, we demonstrate a zoo of distinct multi-magnon quasiparticles in the frustrated spin-1 triangular antiferromagnet FeI2 using time-domain terahertz spectroscopy. The energy-magnetic field excitation spectrum contains signatures of one-, two-, four- and six-magnon bound-states, which we analyze using an exact diagonalization approach for a dilute gas of interacting magnons. The two-magnon single-ion bound states occur due to strong anisotropy and the preponderance of even higher order excitations arises from the tendency of the single-ion bound states to themselves form bound states due to their very flat dispersion. This menagerie of tunable interacting quasiparticles provides a unique platform in a condensed matter setting that is reminiscent of the few-body quantum phenomena central to cold-atom, nuclear, and particle physics experiments.

Insulating spin systems are widely studied for their unconventional ground states, exotic magnetic excitations and spin textures. Geometrically frustrated lattices, like the 2D antiferromagnetic triangular lattice, can lead to the suppression of magnetic order at low temperatures and the emergence of fractionalized excitations Broholm et al. (2020); Gingras and McClarty (2014). But even a long-range ordered magnetic phase can exhibit excitations that are entirely distinct from conventional magnons. For instance, depending on spin-space anisotropies and the range of magnetic interactions, single-magnon quasiparticles can interact attractively with each other, generating multi-magnon bound states. The existence of such bound states was first predicted in the 1930s by Bethe Bethe (1931) in 1D quantum magnets, using a spin-1/2 Heisenberg model. These exchange-driven bound-states are usually observed in 1D ferromagnetic spin chains with S \leqTorrance and Tinkham (1969); Hoogerbeets et al. (1984); Chauhan et al. (2020). Although two-magnon bound states have been detected in experiments, evidence for even higher order magnon bound states remains scarce. Recently, a 3-magnon bound state was observed in a quasi-1D antiferromagnetic spin chain system with S=2S\!=\!2 Dally et al. (2020). Because of their potential for a deeper understanding of fundamental phenomena in magnetism and of few-body problems (i.e. quantum mechanics of a finite number n>>2 of interacting particles), such excitations are of intense current interest in the study of insulating magnets Nishida et al. (2013); Kato et al. (2020); Wang et al. (2018); Keselman et al. (2020); Yoshida et al. (2017); Pradhan et al. (2020); Ward et al. (2017); Wulferding et al. (2020). But they are also important for potential technological applications since they can for example strongly affect the transport properties in a one-dimensional chain of qubits Subrahmanyam (2004).

Here we study multi-magnon bound state excitations in the spin-anisotropic triangular lattice antiferromagnet FeI2. The magnetic Fe2+ ions in this compound carry S=1S\!=\!1 and are distributed on hexagonal planes (Fig. 1). In zero magnetic field, FeI2 orders spontaneously in a striped antiferromagnetic phase below TNT_{N} \approx 9 K Fert et al. (1973). One distinctive feature for the S=1S\!=\!1 spins in FeI2 is that the energy of two spin deviations on a single-site – a particular form of 2-magnon excitation called single-ion bound-state (SIBS, Fig. 1d) – is comparable or even lower than the energy of a single magnon (Fig. 1c). Recent neutron scattering experiments in zero magnetic field at T << TNT_{N} revealed that this effect stems primarily from the balance between strong easy-axis single-ion anisotropy DD and nearest-neighbor ferromagnetic exchange interaction J1J_{1} Bai et al. (2020), although competing further-neighbor exchange interactions are necessary to explain the complex magnetic structure and details of the excitation spectrum. Modeling of these neutron scattering measurements also evinced that the large spectral weight and weak dispersion of the SIBS originates from a hybridization with the single-magnon band through off-diagonal exchange interactions. As we will see below, the almost flat band nature of the SIBS promotes further bound states formation and allows for a very rich phenomenology to develop.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Time-domain terahertz spectroscopy set-up and multimagnon excitations of FeI2. a. Sketch of the experimental time-domain terahertz spectroscopy set-up Morris et al. (2012): a polarizer (P1) linearly polarizes a terahertz waveform that is transmitted through the sample; the sample induces ellipticity; the fast rotating polarizer P2 modulates the polarization. A DC magnetic field is applied along the crystallographic c-axis of the sample in the Faraday geometry (the magnetic field is parallel to the THz propagation). b-g. Single-ion states of Fe2+ ions accesible at low-energy correspond to S=1S\!=\!1 magnetic moments with uniaxial anisotropy. The sketches represent a plane of spins in the b. ground state configuration, and with examples of c. a one-magnon elementary excitation (spin wave), d. a two-magnon bound state (SIBS), e. a 4-magnon bound state, f. a 4-magnon anti-bound state, and g. a 6-magnon bound state.

In the presence of a 𝒄\boldsymbol{c}-axis magnetic field, FeI2 undergoes several metamagnetic transitions Wiedenmann et al. (1988); we only study the low-field antiferromagnetic phase here (at T == 4 K and μ0\mu_{0}H << 5 T). Using time-domain THz spectroscopy (TDTS) we find evidence for a variety of low energy multi-magnon excitations (up to 6-magnon character), along with interactions and hybridization between them. Through a comparison with exact diagonalization calculations for a generalized spin-wave Hamiltonian, our work elucidates how hybridization and interactions between magnetic excitations with different quantum numbers stabilize a low-energy subspace with at least 4 distinct types of quasiparticles. The presence of distinct low-energy excitations that can be tuned by magnetic field is of general interest for the comprehensive understanding of interacting quasiparticles in materials.

We conducted TDTS measurements as a function of magnetic field (μ0H5\mu_{0}H\leq 5 T along the crystal 𝒄\boldsymbol{c} axis) to study the low-energy magnetic excitations of FeI2 (ν1.5\nu\leq 1.5 THz 6.2\equiv 6.2 meV) in the antiferromagnetic phase at T=4T\!=\!4 K. The Faraday geometry of the experiment (Fig. 1a) allows extracting the transmission eigenstates for both left-handed (LCP) and right-handed circular polarization (RCP) via the polarization modulation technique (see Methods). Employing long time scans of 5050 ps along with reference spectra at higher temperatures Morris et al. (2014) yields a high-frequency resolution appropriate for distinguishing resonance peaks separated by Δν0.02\Delta\nu\approx 0.02 THz (0.08 meV). While this procedure allows measuring fine features in frequency-dependent spectra, it does not allow us to extract the magnitude of the transmission coefficients with quantitative precision. We thus normalize intensity plots to their maximum value.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Magneto-transmission spectra below the Néel temperature. Magnitude of the transmission coefficients for a. right- and b. left-handed circularly polarized lights (normalized to 1 for the maximum value), at T = 4K, as a function of frequency and magnetic field. Horizontal striations on the plots are experimental artifacts. c. Calculated ω[χxx′′\omega[{\chi^{\prime\prime}_{xx}} (q = 0, ω\omega) + χyy′′\chi^{\prime\prime}_{yy}(q = 0, ω\omega)] as a function of energy (or associated frequency) and magnetic field, using the exact diagonalization Lanczos method and the model parameters described in the SI.

The frequency (ν\nu) and magnetic-field (μ0H\mu_{0}H) dependence of the complex transmission functions, plotted in magnitude as |TR||T_{R}| (RCP, Fig. 2a) and |TL||T_{L}| (LCP, Fig. 2b) shows dark regions corresponding to strong absorption. We associate these absorption lines with a wealth of distinct magnetic excitations with several crossings and apparent hybridizations. At fixed frequency and magnetic field, most branches show a different response in the RCP and LCP channels; several resonances are present in both channels. The steep field-slope of several branches is clear evidence for their multi-magnon character, as discussed further below. Earlier far-infrared spectroscopy and electron spin resonance studies Petitgrand et al. (1980); Katsumata et al. (2000) observed the zero-field absorption branches at ν=0.65,0.88\nu=0.65,0.88 and 0.970.97 THz. The high energy and field resolution of our experiments uncover new and very steep branches, as well as additional details that are important to fully understand the low-energy excitations of FeI2 (see Supplemental Information for comparison to earlier results).

To gain further insight, we extract the absorption lines’ position by inspecting the spectra for both polarization channels (Fig. 3a). Weak modes are sometimes difficult to track from these spectra, and we infer their energies from 2D intensity plots, along with error-bar estimates. In addition to elucidating the slope of all observed branches, i.e. the different 𝒄\boldsymbol{c}-axis magnetization SzS^{z} of the underlying excitations, this data elucidates crossing and hybridization between modes with different slopes. Given that the uniform magnetization is small below 55 T, these excitations can be further characterized via the sign of SzS^{z} relative to the magnetic field. In Faraday geometry, this is related to the circular dichroism of the material, which we plot using the imaginary part of the complex angle θF=arctan[(TRTL)/i(TR+TL)]\theta_{F}=\arctan[(T_{R}-T_{L})/i(T_{R}+T_{L})], the ellipticity (see Methods), as a function of frequency and magnetic field (Fig. 3b). As absorptions mainly appear in either the RCP or LCP channel, this accentuates the fact that different excitation branches exhibit different signs of SzS^{z} (Fig. 3b).

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Excitation branches and spectrum ellipticity. a. Position of the magnetic resonances at T = 4K as a function of frequency and magnetic field. All resonances in both RCP and LCP channels are represented (with some overlap). All resonances correspond to dips in the transmission spectra, except for the data points with error bars which are only distinguishable in the 2D color plot of Fig. 2a and assigned by eye. The numbers are used to label the different excitation branches. b. Imaginary part of the complex Faraday angle θF\theta_{F} (ellipticity) in arbitrary units, at T = 4 K, as a function of frequency and magnetic field. c. Calculated ω[χ+′′(q=0,ω)χ+′′(q=0,ω)]\omega\left[\chi^{\prime\prime}_{+-}(q=0,\omega)-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{-+}(q=0,\omega)\right] as a function of energy (frequency) and magnetic field, using the exact diagonalization (ED) Lanczos method. The model parameters are detailed in the SI.

The evolution of the excitation energies with the magnetic field yields effective g-factors (see SI for extracted values) from which we identify at least four different kinds of excitations, including the previously reported single modes and 2-magnon excitations (branches labeled #1 to #4 in Fig. 3a), the latter with single-ion bound-state (SIBS) character (Fig. 1cd). Given that the SIBS excitations have an almost flat dispersion throughout the Brillouin Zone Bai et al. (2020), and given the ferromagnetic nature of nearest-neighbor exchange interactions, SIBS display a strong propensity to form bound states with themselves. As a result, we infer that excitations with the highest effective g-factors (branches labeled #5 to #9 in Fig. 3a) are exchange bound states comprising primarily two and three SIBS, i.e. 4-magnon (Fig. 1e) and 6-magnon bound states (Fig. 1g), respectively. For all excitations, we observe effective g-factors that do not reach precisely the maximum hypothetical values of twice, four times, or six times that of single magnon excitations. We associate this effect to the hybridization between the different excitations, e.g. a 4-magnon bound state can still be regarded as a bound state of two SIBS, but other states mix in when proximate in energy. In fact, similar to neutron scattering experiments Bai et al. (2020), the multi-magnon bound states in FeI2 only become detectable in TDTS due to their hybridization with single magnon modes.

Additional insight on the role of multi-magnon hybridization in FeI2 is gained by calculating the absorption spectra using the microscopic spin-exchange Hamiltonian

=ijμνSiμ𝒥ijμνSjνi[DQizz+μ0μBgHSiz],\displaystyle{\cal H}=\sum_{\langle ij\rangle}\sum_{\mu\nu}{S}_{i}^{\mu}{\cal J}_{ij}^{\mu\nu}{S}_{j}^{\nu}-\sum_{i}\left[DQ_{i}^{zz}+\mu_{0}\mu_{B}gHS_{i}^{z}\right],\, (1)

where Qizz=(Siz)22/3Q_{i}^{zz}=(S_{i}^{z})^{2}-2/3, the values of the exchange parameters 𝒥ijμν{\cal J}_{ij}^{\mu\nu} and single-ion anisotropy DD have been established from the neutron scattering data Bai et al. (2020), and g=3.2g=3.2 Petitgrand et al. (1980). As previously demonstrated, the nearest-neighbor interactions in FeI2 are spatially-anisotropic and include symmetric off-diagonal terms, J1z±J_{1}^{z\pm} and J1±±J_{1}^{\pm\pm}, that are responsible for the hybridization between states with different SzS^{z}, such as the single-magnon and SIBS. A generalized spin-wave Hamiltonian describes the model’s low-energy spectrum as a dilute gas of interacting single-magnon and SIBS quasiparticles, which are treated on equal footing Muniz et al. (2014); Bai et al. (2020). To study this problem beyond linear spin-wave theory, we enforce the dilute limit by eliminating states with more than two quasiparticles from the Hilbert space (see SI) and perform an exact diagonalization (ED) of the restricted spin-wave Hamiltonian on a finite lattice of 5×5×55\times 5\times 5 unit cells (500 spins). As the Hilbert space dimension becomes prohibitively large for ED if we include states with three quasiparticles, our calculation can only account for 1-, 2- and 4-magnon excitations and ignores the 6-magnon states.

The results of our theoretical calculations are shown through the angular average of the frequency-weighted susceptibility ω[χxx′′(q=0,ω)+χyy′′(q=0,ω)]\omega\left[\chi^{\prime\prime}_{xx}(q=0,\omega)+\chi^{\prime\prime}_{yy}(q=0,\omega)\right] (Fig. 2c) and as the difference between the absorption in the right and the left channels via ω[χ+′′(q=0,ω)χ+′′(q=0,ω)]\omega\left[\chi^{\prime\prime}_{+-}(q=0,\omega)-\chi^{\prime\prime}_{-+}(q=0,\omega)\right] (Fig. 3c). Both plots exhibit a remarkable correspondence with the experimental data (excepting the absence of 6-magnon excitations in the ED). Compared to the linear generalized spin-wave approach of Ref. Bai et al. (2020), ED includes non-linear interactions that slightly renormalize quasiparticle energies. Therefore, precisely reproducing the energies of the low-energy modes in zero-field requires us to slightly adjust the parameters in Eq. 1 (see SI) compared to Ref. Bai et al. (2020).

ED calculations give the absolute value of the change in 𝒄\boldsymbol{c}-axis magnetization, |ΔSz||\Delta S^{z}|, for each excitation branch as a function of frequency and magnetic field (Fig. 4). Given that the striped magnetic structure of FeI2 has several sub-lattices, we expect various branches to be present for each magnon sector, some of which optically inactive due to sub-lattice effects. The color-coded expectation value of |ΔSz||\Delta S^{z}| shows that in the absence of hybridization (J1z±=J1±±=0J_{1}^{z\pm}=J_{1}^{\pm\pm}=0), excitations have a well defined SzS^{z} character, with single and two-magnon modes in purple and blue, respectively (Fig. 4a). The four two-magnon branches are degenerate at zero field as SIBS are completely localized on each lattice site. The Zeeman term splits the zero-field SIBS quartet into two doublets. In the presence of the hybridization terms J1z±J_{1}^{z\pm} and J1±±J_{1}^{\pm\pm}, the two SIBS doublets are split by the Jz±J^{z\pm} term via hybridization with non-degenerate single-magnon modes (Fig. 4b). Including 4-magnon excitations yields a rich excitation spectrum with a sequence of hybridization effects between all types of excitations between 1 T and 4 T (Fig. 4c).

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Theoretical modeling of multi-magnon states in FeI2. The value of |ΔSz||\Delta S^{z}| calculated using ED of a generalized spin-wave theory Hamiltonian including: a. only single and two-magnon excitations, without hybridization terms (J1z±=J1±±=0J_{1}^{z\pm}=J_{1}^{\pm\pm}=0). Full (dotted) lines correspond to optically active (inactive) branches due to sublattice effects; b. same as the previous panel but with hybridization effects included; c. same as previous panel but with the addition of 4-magnon bound states and no distinction between optically active and inactive branches. These plots give an insight on the character of the various magnetic excitations and the hybridization between them.

These results highlight that the character of magnetic excitations in FeI2 in an applied magnetic field is profoundly affected by their strong mutual hybridization; most branches have a mixed and changing |ΔSz||\Delta S^{z}| character. Therefore, even if the effective g-factors give some insight into the nature and degeneracies of the observed resonances, labeling excitations based on their SzS^{z} is not possible. Given that excitation branches #5, #6 and #7 from Fig. 3a have primarily 4-magnon character by comparison to theoretical predictions (Fig. 4c), the even larger slope of excitation branches #8 and #9 indicate an even higher-order character, i.e. these are primarily 6-magnon bound states. The hybridization of 4- and 6-magnon bound states with lower-order excitations has three important consequences. First, they become detectable in TDTS in the proximity of energy crossings. Second, this explains why the effective g-factors of the steeper branches do not reach their hypothetical maximum values, as mentioned above. Finally, it explains why the four low-field branches, labeled #1 to #4 in Fig. 3a, have comparable absorption intensities and similar slopes. These are roughly equal mixtures of single and two-magnon excitations.

In summary, we have used high frequency-resolution time-domain terahertz spectroscopy in a magnetic field to study the spin-anisotropic frustrated compound FeI2 and developed a quantitative understanding of the nature of its low-energy excitations for fields up to around 4 T. Our experiments unraveled a wealth of multi-magnon excitations, including 4-magnon and 6-magnon bound states. ED calculations of a generalized spin-wave Hamiltonian Bai et al. (2020) elucidated spectral contributions from each |ΔSz||\Delta S^{z}| sector, enabling a complete understanding of the microscopic character of excitations up to 4-magnons. The strong hybridization that stems from spin-space anisotropy leads to a unique spectroscopic situation where bound states and their interactions can be tracked as a function of the magnetic field. Thus, FeI2 is a promising field-tunable material platform to study fundamental quantum phenomena in magnetism and strongly-interacting few-body models encountered in various contexts such as excitons in semiconductors, cold atoms, and nuclear and particle physics.

Methods

Sample preparation

Polycrystalline samples of FeI2 were prepared from pure elements according to Ref. Bai et al. (2020). Samples were ground into fine powders in a glovebox and sealed in thin quartz tubes under vacuum. Large single crystals were subsequently grown by passing the tubes in a graphite crucible with rotating speed 20 RPM/min and pulling rate 10mm/hr through a high-temperature induction Bridgman furnace hosted in the PARADIM facility at Johns Hopkins University. Crystals suitable for time-domain terahertz spectroscopy were cut from larger crystals, resulting in shiny plaquettes of several millimeters long with the c-axis perpendicular to the large surface. Powder X-ray diffraction was carried out at room temperature to characterize the crystals Bai et al. (2020). This compound is highly hygroscopic and degrades within a few seconds when exposed to air, so the sample studied in this work was protected by a layer of photoresist on both sides using a spin coater in a dry glove box, and then mounted on a thin Kapton piece. Another identical Kapton piece was covered on both sides with photoresist to serve as a reference for the THz transmission measurements.

Time-domain terahertz spectroscopy measurements

Sample and reference were cooled down to T = 4 K, in the magnetically ordered phase, with magnetic fields up to H = 5 T being applied at low temperature. The magnetic field is applied in the Faraday geometry (magnetic field parallel to the propagation of the incident THz beam, see Fig. 1). We use a linearly polarized incident beam and a polarization modulation technique to measure the transmitted THz electric field in both x and y directions simultaneously Morris et al. (2012). This allows us to determine the transmission coefficients of the sample for left-handed and right-handed circular polarizations (labeled LCP and RCP, the eigenstates of the transmission for this system in such geometry). Indeed, by measuring the complex transmission coefficients Txx and Txy, we can determine the coefficients TR and TL for RCP and LCP light using the change of basis TR,LT_{R,L} = TxxT_{xx} ±\pm iTxyiT_{xy}. On this sample, our TDTS experimental set-up enables us to measure accurately in the frequency range of 0.2 THz to 2 THz. A set of measurements of the transmission coefficient in zero field at different temperatures ranging from 3 K up to 300 K confirmed the appearance of magnetic excitations below the Néel temperature in this frequency range.

To obtain the highest resolution in frequency reachable with our experimental set-up, we need to measure long time scans. Indeed the length of the time trace, labeled τ\tau, directly affects the resolution in frequency after Fourier transform (Δν\Delta\nu = 1/τ\tau). However, such data is affected by the Fabry-Perot effect e.g. multiple reflections within the crystal which appear in the time trace signal, inducing artificial oscillations in the frequency domain. Therefore, we use the same technique of referencing as in Morris et al. Morris et al. (2014) to extract the high-resolution spectra. We first reference long time scans at low temperature (4 K) with time scans of the same length at higher temperature (11 K, above the Néel temperature) where no sharp feature is observed.

Assuming that the index of refraction is the same at these two temperatures (aside from the absorption due to magnetic excitations), this procedure cancels the Fabry-Perot oscillations. The resulting spectrum is further referenced to a spectrum at T = 60K to correct for the broad resonance still present at T = 11K, using now short time scans to avoid the Fabry-Perot effect (but giving a high enough resolution to account for the broad resonance at 11K), hence the displayed spectra as follows:

TR,L=TR,L(4K,ν,τl)TR,L(11K,ν,τl)TR,L(11K,ν,τs)TR,L(60K,ν,τs),T_{R,L}=\frac{T_{R,L}(4K,\nu,\tau_{l})}{T_{R,L}(11K,\nu,\tau_{l})}\frac{T_{R,L}(11K,\nu,\tau_{s})}{T_{R,L}(60K,\nu,\tau_{s})}, (2)

with τl,s\tau_{l,s} corresponding to long and short time scans respectively. See the Supplemental Information for THz spectra at various temperatures from 4K to 60K. The complex transmission is directly related to the magnetic susceptibiliy (ln(T(ω))ωχ(q=0,ω)-\ln(T(\omega))\propto\omega\chi(q=0,\omega)), but this process makes it difficult to access accurate quantitative values of the susceptibility (hence the renormalization of the transmission mentioned for Fig. 2). Nevertheless, the gain in frequency resolution enables the characterization of fine features in the magnetic spectra.

One can also extract the ellipticity of the sample as a function of frequency and field, which quantifies the magnetic dichroism of the material. A complex angle θ\theta given by arctan[(TRTL)/i(TR+TL)]\arctan[(T_{R}-T_{L})/i(T_{R}+T_{L})] contains all information on the THz polarization rotation: the real part of this angle θ\theta is the angle of rotation of the major axes of the elliptically polarized transmitted beam (polar rotating angle) and the imaginary part is the ellipticity.

References

  • Torrance and Tinkham [1969] J. B. Torrance and M. Tinkham. Excitation of multiple-magnon bound states in CoCl2·2H2O. Phys. Rev., 187(2):595–606, November 1969. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.187.595. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.187.595.
  • Hoogerbeets et al. [1984] R. Hoogerbeets, A. J. van Duyneveldt, A. C. Phaff, C. H. W. Swuste, and W. J. M. de Jonge. Evidence for magnon bound-state excitations in the quantum chain system (C6H11N3)CuCl3. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys., 17(14):2595–2608, May 1984. URL https://doi.org/10.1088%2F0022-3719%2F17%2F14%2F016.
  • Broholm et al. [2020] C Broholm, RJ Cava, SA Kivelson, DG Nocera, MR Norman, and T Senthil. Quantum spin liquids. Science, 367:6475, 2020. URL https://science.sciencemag.org/content/367/6475/eaay0668.
  • Gingras and McClarty [2014] M. J. P. Gingras and P. A. McClarty. Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets. Rep. Prog. Phys., 77(5):056501, May 2014. URL https://doi.org/10.1088%2F0034-4885%2F77%2F5%2F056501.
  • Bethe [1931] Hans Bethe. Zur theorie der metalle. Zeitschrift für Physik, 71(3-4):205–226, 1931. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341708.
  • Chauhan et al. [2020] Prashant Chauhan, Fahad Mahmood, Hitesh J. Changlani, S. M. Koohpayeh, and N. P. Armitage. Tunable magnon interactions in a ferromagnetic spin-1 chain. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(3):037203, January 2020. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.037203.
  • Dally et al. [2020] Rebecca L. Dally, Alvin J. R. Heng, Anna Keselman, Mitchell M. Bordelon, Matthew B. Stone, Leon Balents, and Stephen D. Wilson. Three-magnon bound state in the quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet α\alpha-NaMnO2. Phys. Rev. Lett., 124(19):197203, May 2020. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.197203.
  • Nishida et al. [2013] Y. Nishida, Y. Kato, and C. Batista. Efimov effect in quantum magnets. Nat. Phys., 9:93–97, 2013. URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys2523.
  • Kato et al. [2020] Yasuyuki Kato, Shang-Shun Zhang, Yusuke Nishida, and C. D. Batista. Magnetic field induced tunability of spin Hamiltonians: Resonances and Efimov states in Yb2Ti2O7. Phys. Rev. Research, 2:033024, Jul 2020. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033024.
  • Wang et al. [2018] Zhe Wang, Jianda Wu, Wang Yang, Anup Kumar Bera, Dmytro Kamenskyi, ATM Nazmul Islam, Shenglong Xu, Joseph Matthew Law, Bella Lake, Congjun Wu, et al. Experimental observation of Bethe strings. Nature, 554(7691):219–223, 2018. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25466.
  • Keselman et al. [2020] Anna Keselman, Leon Balents, and Oleg A. Starykh. Dynamical signatures of quasiparticle interactions in quantum spin chains. Phys. Rev. Lett., 125:187201, Oct 2020. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.187201.
  • Yoshida et al. [2017] M Yoshida, K Nawa, H Ishikawa, M Takigawa, Minki Jeong, S Krämer, M Horvatić, C Berthier, K Matsui, T Goto, et al. Spin dynamics in the high-field phases of volborthite. Physical Review B, 96(18):180413, 2017. URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.180413.
  • Pradhan et al. [2020] Subhasree Pradhan, Niravkumar D Patel, and Nandini Trivedi. Two-magnon bound states in the Kitaev model in a [111] field. Physical Review B, 101(18):180401, 2020. URL https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.180401.
  • Ward et al. [2017] Simon Ward, M Mena, Pierre Bouillot, Corinna Kollath, Thierry Giamarchi, KP Schmidt, B Normand, KW Krämer, D Biner, R Bewley, et al. Bound states and field-polarized Haldane modes in a quantum spin ladder. Physical Review Letters, 118(17):177202, 2017. URL https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.177202.
  • Wulferding et al. [2020] Dirk Wulferding, Youngsu Choi, Seung-Hwan Do, Chan Hyeon Lee, Peter Lemmens, Clément Faugeras, Yann Gallais, and Kwang-Yong Choi. Magnon bound states versus anyonic Majorana excitations in the Kitaev honeycomb magnet α\alpha-RuCl3. Nature Communications, 11(1):1603, March 2020. URL https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-15370-1.
  • Subrahmanyam [2004] V. Subrahmanyam. Entanglement dynamics and quantum-state transport in spin chains. Phys. Rev. A, 69(3):034304, March 2004. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.034304.
  • Fert et al. [1973] A. R. Fert, J. Gelard, and P. Carrara. Phase transitions of FeI2 in high magnetic field parallel to the spin direction, static field up to 150 kOe, pulsed field up to 250 kOe. Solid State Communications, 13(8):1219–1223, October 1973. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0038109873905681.
  • Bai et al. [2020] Xiaojian Bai, Shang-Shun Zhang, Zhiling Dun, Hao Zhang, Qing Huang, Haidong Zhou, Matthew B. Stone, Alexander I. Kolesnikov, Feng Ye, Cristian D. Batista, and Martin Mourigal. Hybridized quadrupolar excitations in the spin-anisotropic frustrated magnet FeI2. arXiv:2004.05623, April 2020. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2004.05623.
  • Morris et al. [2012] C. M. Morris, R. Valdés Aguilar, A. V. Stier, and N. P. Armitage. Polarization modulation time-domain terahertz polarimetry. Opt. Express, 20(11):12303–12317, May 2012. URL https://www.osapublishing.org/oe/abstract.cfm?uri=oe-20-11-12303.
  • Wiedenmann et al. [1988] A. Wiedenmann, L. P. Regnault, P. Burlet, J. Rossat-Mignod, O. Koundé, and D. Billerey. A neutron scattering investigation of the magnetic phase diagram of FeI2. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 74(1):7–21, August 1988. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304885388901436.
  • Morris et al. [2014] C. M. Morris, R. Valdés Aguilar, A. Ghosh, S. M. Koohpayeh, J. Krizan, R. J. Cava, O. Tchernyshyov, T. M. McQueen, and N. P. Armitage. Hierarchy of bound states in the one-dimensional ferromagnetic Ising chain CoNb2O6 investigated by high-resolution time-domain terahertz spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett., 112(13):137403, April 2014. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.137403.
  • Petitgrand et al. [1980] D. Petitgrand, A. Brun, and P. Meyer. Magnetic field dependence of spin waves and two magnon bound states in FeI2. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 15-18:381–382, January 1980. URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304885380910975.
  • Katsumata et al. [2000] K. Katsumata, H. Yamaguchi, M. Hagiwara, M. Tokunaga, H.-J. Mikeska, P. Goy, and M. Gross. Single-ion magnon bound states in an antiferromagnet with strong uniaxial anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B, 61(17):11632–11636, May 2000. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.11632.
  • Muniz et al. [2014] Rodrigo A Muniz, Yasuyuki Kato, and Cristian D Batista. Generalized spin-wave theory: Application to the bilinear–biquadratic model. Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, 2014:8, 2014. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptu109.

I Data Availability

Data in this manuscript is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

II Acknowledgments

Work at Johns Hopkins University (A.L, N.P.A.) was supported as part of the Institute for Quantum Matter, an EFRC funded by the DOE BES under DE-SC0019331. The work at Georgia Tech (X.B., Z.L.D., M.M.) was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division under award DE-SC-0018660. Growth of FeI2 crystals is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (Platform for the Accelerated Realization, Analysis, and Discovery of Interface Materials (PARADIM)) under Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1539918. Work by H.Z. was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, Materials Sciences and Engineering Division. The work at the University of Tennessee (C.D.B. and S-S.Z.) was partially funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences.

III Author Contributions

A.L. performed the experiments and analyzed the THz data. S.S.Z, H.Z., and C.B. performed the theoretical calculations. X.B., Z.L.D., and W.A.P grew the crystals. C.D.B, M.M., and N.P.A supervised the project. A.L., S.S.Z., X.B., H.Z., C.B., M.M. and N.P.A. contributed to the discussion and to the write-up of the manuscript.