This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Nonmonotonic Pressure Dependence of the Lattice Parameter aa in the Quasi-one-dimensional Superconductor Pr2Ba4Cu7O15-δ

Haruka Taniguchi1 [email protected]    Yuya Nakarokkaku1    Riku Takahashi1    Masatoshi Murakami1    Atsuko Nakayama1    Michiaki Matsukawa1    Satoshi Nakano2    Makoto Hagiwara3    and Takahiko Sasaki4 1 Department of Physical Science and Materials Engineering1 Department of Physical Science and Materials Engineering Iwate University Iwate University Morioka 020-8551 Morioka 020-8551 Japan
2 National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) Japan
2 National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS) Tsukuba Tsukuba Ibaraki 305-0044 Ibaraki 305-0044 Japan
3 Department of Comprehensive Sciences Japan
3 Department of Comprehensive Sciences Kyoto Institute of Technology Kyoto Institute of Technology Kyoto 606-8585 Kyoto 606-8585 Japan
4 Institute for Materials Research Japan
4 Institute for Materials Research Tohoku University Tohoku University Sendai 980-8577 Sendai 980-8577 Japan Japan
Abstract

In the quasi-one-dimensional superconductor, Pr2Ba4Cu7O15-δ, we found that the lattice parameter, aa increased against pressure, starting at 2.0 GPa at approximately 300 K. This result suggests that the two-dimensional inter-conducting-chain interaction along the aa axis is most enhanced at approximately 2.0 GPa. To discuss the dimensionality, we also measured the resistance under magnetic fields up to 14 T, because magneto-resistance is induced when a system changes from one-dimensional to two-dimensional.

Pr2Ba4Cu7O15-δ (Pr247) (see crystal structure shown in Fig. 1(b)) exhibits superconductivity below approximately 27 K due to a reduction treatment in order to change the amount of oxygen deficiency [(1), (2)]. Electron conduction is realized along the Cu-O double chains [(3)], which is different to Y-based cuprate superconductors with conductive CuO2 planes. The electron phase diagram of a quasi-one-dimensional (1D) system, such as Pr247 has been proposed in theoretical studies [(4), (5), (6)]. Regarding experiments, pressurization is expected to be effective in causing a dimensional crossover from 1D to 2D. In our recent study on Pr247 (δ\delta = 0.56) up to 1.6 GPa [(7)], pressure-induced magneto-resistance was found in the temperature region above the onset of superconductivity TconsetT_{\mathrm{c-onset}}, suggesting the generation of quasi-2D warped Fermi surfaces. The pressure dependence of the superconductivity was investigated for several samples with different δ\delta values in magnetization or resistivity [(8), (9), (10), (7)]. In this study, to investigate changes in the dimensionality of Pr247 under pressure from the viewpoint of the lattice parameters, we measured x-ray diffraction under high pressure. Furthermore, we report magneto-resistance below 2.0 GPa for the same sample as in Ref. 7.

Polycrystalline Pr247 was synthesized via the citrate pyrolysis method Hagiwara2006 . The pelletized precursors were sintered at 887 C for 120 h under a 1-atm oxygen-gas atmosphere. The reduction treatment was performed for the as-sintered samples at 500 C for 48 h in vacuum. The value of the oxygen deficiency of the prepared sample was determined to be δ\delta = 0.56 by gravimetric analysis. The sample for XRD measurements was ground into a fine powder in an alumina mortar cooled in liquid nitrogen. InIn-situsitu XRD experiments under pressure were performed using a diamond anvil cell, in which the powdered sample, ruby balls, and high-density He gas as pressure medium were set Nakayama2014 . Each pressure was determined by the ruby fluorescence method Zha2000 . Angle-dispersive powder patterns were obtained using synchrotron radiation (SR) at the beam line BL-18C at the Photon Factory, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK). The SR beam was monochromatized to a wavelength of 0.6168 Å and introduced to the sample through a collimator with a diameter of 100 μ\mum. 2D diffraction images were obtained by exposing the x-rays to the sample for 15 min using an imaging plate. One image consists of 2000 ×\times 2560 pixels with a resolution of 100 ×\times 100 μ\mum2 per pixel. The electrical resistance up to 14 T was measured in a piston-cylinder pressure cell at the High Field Laboratory for Superconducting Materials (HFLSM), Tohoku University Kuwabara2016 , whereby Fluorinert was used as the pressure medium. The magnitude of pressure was calibrated using the superconducting transition temperature of lead.

Figure 1(a) shows the SR XRD patterns of Pr247 with an oxygen deficiency determined to be δ=0.56\delta=0.56. The pattern profiles showed an orthorhombic AmmmAmmm symmetry. As shown in Fig. 1(c), the lattice parameters aa, bb, and cc were obtained by fitting Gaussian functions to the 2 0 0, 0 2 0, and 0 0 26 reflection peaks with the least square method. In general, except for some cases mentioned below, the magnitude of each error was estimated from the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of each fitted Gaussian function (see black arrows in Fig. 1(c)). We confirmed that the parameter cc determined from the 0 0 26 reflection exhibited the same pressure dependence as that obtained from the 0 0 4 reflection. The accuracy of the obtained value of aa is enhanced above 0.88 GPa, because the 2 0 0 peak was isolated from the 0 2 0 and 0 0 26 peaks, as indicated by the blue arrows in Fig. 1(a). We evaluated the error in bb carefully, because the low 0 2 0 peak overlapped with the tail of the high 0 0 26 peak and the top position of the 0 2 0 peak was difficult to be distinguished clearly: As shown by the blue arrow in Fig. 1(c), we defined the error of 2θ2\theta for the 0 2 0 reflection to cover not only the FWHM region of the 0 2 0 Gaussian function but also that of the 0 0 26 Gaussian function (and also, that of the 2 0 0 Gaussian function for P<P< 0.88 GPa). For P<P< 0.88 GPa, the error of aa was estimated in the same manner.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) (a) Superimposed display of powder XRD patterns of polycrystalline Pr2Ba4Cu7O15-δ (δ=0.56\delta=0.56) observed at pressures of up to 5.36 GPa at approximately 300 K. (b) Crystal structure of Pr2Ba4Cu7O15. (c) Enlarged view of the main peaks (the 0 2 0, 0 0 26, and 2 0 0 reflection peaks) with fitted Gaussian functions.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) Pressure dependence of (a) the lattice parameters aa, bb, and cc, (b) the ratio of aa/bb, and (c) the unit cell volume of Pr2Ba4Cu7O15-δ (δ=0.56\delta=0.56). The broken line in panel (c) represents a Murnaghan-type equation of state fit to the experimental data up to 3 GPa Murnaghan1944 .

Figure 2(a) presents the pressure dependence of the lattice parameters. We obtained a=3.90(4)a=3.90(4) Å, b=3.932(16)b=3.932(16) Å, and c=50.75(15)c=50.75(15) Å at ambient pressure, and a=3.801(12)a=3.801(12) Å, b=3.872(14)b=3.872(14) Å, and c=50.0(2)c=50.0(2) Å  at 5.36 GPa. Interestingly, the length of aa started to increase at pressures above 2.0 GPa. As shown in Fig. 2(b), the ratio of a/ba/b exhibited a minimum at 2.5 GPa. Because Cu-O double chains exist along the bb axis and the length of aa is the distance between neighboring double chains (Fig. 1(b)), the suppression of aa indicates an enhancement in inter-double-chain interactions along the aa axis, which is related to quasi-2D conductivity. Thus, the nonmonotonic pressure dependence of aa suggests that the quasi-2D feature is most enhanced at approximately 2.0 GPa. As shown in Fig. 2(c), the pressure dependence of the unit cell volume below 3.0 GPa could be described well by a Murnaghan-type equation of state Murnaghan1944 P=(B0/B0)((L/L0)B01)P=(B_{0}/B^{\prime}_{0})((L/L_{0})^{-B^{\prime}_{0}}-1), and the bulk modulus B0B_{0} was determined to be 33.9 GPa, which is similar to that of cuprates Ledbetter1990 ; Hyatt2001 . Although a structural transition was not observed, deviations from the Murnaghan-type curve above 3.0 GPa suggest that the lattice deformation at high pressures is different from that at low pressures.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) (a)Resistivity of Pr2Ba4Cu7O15-δ (δ=0.56\delta=0.56) under several magnetic fields at 2.0 GPa. The broken line indicates TconsetT_{\mathrm{c-onset}}. (b) Pressure dependence of the magneto-resistance at 14 T. For PP\leq 1.6 GPa, our previous paper Kuwabara2016 was referred to.

As shown in Fig. 3(a), we observed magneto-resistance above TconsetT_{\mathrm{c-onset}} at 2.0 GPa. Magneto-resistance is important for discussing dimensionality. 1D systems do not exhibit magneto-resistance because the Lorentz force cannot bend the orbitals of the itinerant electrons owing to the straight Fermi surfaces without the wave numbers being perpendicular to the conducting direction, whereas 2D systems exhibit magneto-resistance because of warped Fermi surfaces with finite wave numbers perpendicular to the conducting direction. As shown in Fig. 3(b), the magneto-resistance at 30 and 35 K was enhanced with pressure up to 2.0 GPa, and that at 40 K exhibited a maximum at approximately 1.6 GPa. Although we were not able to apply a higher pressure owing to the limits of the piston-cylinder cell, the magneto-resistance above 2.0 GPa is an intriguing future issue for investigation because the nonmonotonic pressure dependence of aa predicts that the magneto-resistance would be suppressed above approximately 2.0 GPa owing to weakened inter-double-chain interactions along the aa axis.

In summary, we performed synchrotron x-ray diffraction and magneto-resistance measurements of the metallic double-chain superconductor Pr247 in the pressure range of 0.88-5.36 GPa and 0.4-2.0 GPa, respectively. Interestingly, the lattice parameter aa was elongated against pressure above 2.0 GPa. This result suggests that the pressure-induced magneto-resistance observed below 2.0 GPa would be suppressed at higher pressures.

{acknowledgment}

This work was supported by Iwate University, Photon Factory (Project 2017P005), NIMS, and HFLSM.

References

  • (1) M. Matsukawa, Y. Yamada, M. Chiba, H. Ogasawara, T. Shibata, A. Matsushita, and Y. Takano, Physica C 411, 101 (2004).
  • (2) M. Hagiwara, S. Tanaka, T. Shima, K. Gotoh, S. Kanda, T. Saito, and K. Koyama, Physica C 468, 1217 (2008).
  • (3) S. Sasaki, S. Watanabe, and Y. Yamada, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 310, 696 (2007).
  • (4) L. Balents and M. P. A. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 53, 12133 (1996).
  • (5) K. Sano, Y. O¯\bar{O}no, and Y. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 74, 2885 (2005).
  • (6) S. Nishimoto, K. Sano, and Y. Ohta, Phys. Rev. B 77, 085119 (2008).
  • (7) M. Kuwabara, M. Matsukawa, K. Sugawara, H. Taniguchi, A. Matsushita, M. Hagiwara, K. Sano, Y. O¯\bar{O}no, and T. Sasaki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 85, 124704 (2016).
  • (8) F. Ishikawa, K. Fukuda, S. Sekiya, A. Kaeriyama, Y. Yamada, and A. Matsushita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 76, 92 (2007).
  • (9) F. Ishikawa, K. Fukuda, Y. Hiura, Y. Onda, A. Nakayama, Y. Yamada, A. Matsushita, and T. Kagayama, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 150, 052079 (2009).
  • (10) S. Toshima, M. Matsukawa, T. Chiba, S. Kobayashi, S. Nimori, and M. Hagiwara, Physica C 480, 1 (2012).
  • (11) M. Hagiwara, T. Shima, T. Sugano, K. Koyama, and M. Matsuura, Physica C 445-448, 111 (2006).
  • (12) A. Nakayama, Y. Onda, S. Yamada, H. Fujihisa, M. Sakata, Y. Nakamoto, K. Shimizu, S. Nakano, A. Ohmura, F. Ishikawa, and Y. Yamada, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 83, 093601 (2014).
  • (13) C. S. Zha, H. K. Mao, and R. J. Hemlsy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 13494 (2000).
  • (14) F. D. Murnaghan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 30, 244 (1944).
  • (15) H. Ledbetter, M. Lei, and S. Kim, Phase Transitions 23, 61 (1990).
  • (16) N. C. Hyatt, J. A. Hriljac, Y. Miyazaki, I. Gameson, P. P. Edwards, and A. P. Jephcoat, Phys. Rev. B 65, 014507 (2001).