Non-unital algebra objects of stable symmetric monoidal model categories by Smith ideal theory
Abstract.
This note remarks that the correspondence between non-unital algebras and augmented unital algebras can be derived from Hovey’s Smith ideal theory. Applying Smith ideal theory of stable symmetric monoidal model category, we formulate non-unital algebra objects of stable symmetric monoidal model categories and generalize the correspondence between non-unital algebra objects and augmented algebra objects.
Key words and phrases:
Symmetric monoidal model categories, Smith ideals, Non-unital algebras1. Introduction
A ring without the assumption existence of a multiplicative unit is called a non-unital ring. Any unital ring is regarded as a non-unital ring by forgetting the existence of . This paper fixes a base unital ring and let denote the category of non-unital -algebras. An augmentation is a ring homomorphism that the unit homomorphism is a section of , and a -algebra with an augmentation is called an augmented -algebra, denoting the category of augmented -algebras. It is well-known that there exists a categorical equivalence between and : For any -algebra , the direct sum has a canonical unital ring structure defined by
for and . It is easily checked that the functor the adjunction
is a pair of categorical equivalences, where is the kernel functor of augmentations.
The main result of this paper is a model categorical analogue of the above categorical equivalence (Theorem 3.4): A stable model category is a model category whose homotopy category is triangulated. We generalize the definition of non-unital algebras for stable symmetric monoidal model categories by using Hovey’s Smith ideal theory [Hov14, Theorem 4.3]. An advantage of Smith ideal theory of stable symmetric monoidal model categories is that it enables us to clarify that a symmetric monoidal model structure of non-unital algebra objects is the push-out products induced by ones.
Acknowledgements
The author was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research No.23K03080, Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.
2. Smith ideal theory of symmetric monoidal model categories
We explain Hovey [Hov14]’s Smith ideal theory of symmetric monoidal categories. This section assumes that categories are always pointed, and denotes the zero object.
2.1. Smith ideal theory of pointed categories
For any symmetric monoidal category , let denote the subcategory of spanned by monoid objects in the sense of MacLane [Mac88].
Let denote the category with two objects and , and only one non-identity morphism . For any pointed category , the diagram category is called the arrow category, and denotes it. The symmetric monoidal structure of inherits two symmetric monoidal structures: For any two morphisms in , and , the tensor product monoidal structure is defined by as the composition
and another is the push-out product monoidal structure defined by the induced morphism:
We let the arrow category with the tensor product monoidal structure and with the push-out monoidal structure. Hovey proved the cokernel functor is strongly monoidal and admits a lax monoidal right adjoint:
Theorem 2.1 ([Hov14] Theorem 1.4).
Let be a pointed closed symmetric monoidal category. Then the functor
is strongly symmetric monoidal, and its right adjoint is the kernel functor .
Hovey mentioned in [Hov14], in general, the kernel functor is lax symmetric monoidal: A canonical functor
is induced by the canonical morphism for any . Hence those functors and send monoid objects to monoid objects. A Smith ideal is a monoid object of the symmetric monoidal category with respect to the push-out product monoidal structure.
2.2. Definition of non-unital algebra objects of symmetric monoidal categories
For any pointed closed symmetric monoidal category with a monoidal unit , let denote the full subcategory of spanned by augmentations of algebra objects of the tensor product monoidal structure.
Let be a pointed closed symmetric monoidal category and denotes the full subcategory spanned those objects such that the unit is an isomorphism. Then the cokernel functor is a categorical equivalence.
Proposition 2.2.
Let be a locally presentable abelian symmetric monoidal category. Then the arrow category is also locally presentable and there exist reflective localization functors by the unit and by the counit such that the adjunction
induces categorical equivalences
-
proof.
Since any abelian category is binormal, is an isomorphism if and only if is a monomorphism. By Adámek–Rosický [AR94, p.44, Corollary 1.5.4], the arrow category is locally presentable, and it admits reflective localization. By the definitions of those functors: and , the restriction are quasi-inverse functors.
Definition 2.3.
Let be a locally presentable symmetric monoidal abelian category with a monoidal unit . A non-unital monoid object of is a Smith ideal in the localized full subcategory satisfying that the cokernel is isomorphic with an argumentation , and denote the full subcategory of spanned by non-unital algebra objects, where denotes the arrow category of whose monoidal structure is the push-out monoidal structure.
Proposition 2.4.
Further, let denote the full subcategory of the full subcategory which is the essential image of the restriction of the kernel functor on . Then any object of , the unit is an isomorphism.
-
proof.
By definition of the category , one has an isomorphism . The assertion is clear.
Corollary 2.5.
Let be a locally presentable symmetric monoidal abelian model category. The adjunction
induces categorical equivalences
3. Non-unital commutative algebra objects of symmetric monoidal model categories
A symmetric monoidal model category is a model category with a symmetric monoidal structure such that, for any object of , those functors and are left Quillen functors on .
3.1. The arrow categories of pointed symmetric monoidal model categories
The category has two canonical model structures, the injective model structure and the projective model structure induced by ’s:
Definition 3.1.
Let be a model category. The arrow category has the following two model structures.
-
•
(Injective model structure) A morphism is a cofibrations (resp. weak equivalence) in if and only if so is each for . Fibrations are morphisms with the right lifting property for all trivial cofibrations.
-
•
(Projective model structure) A morphism is a fibrations (resp. weak equivalence) in if and only if so is each for . Cofibrations are morphisms with the right lifting property for all trivial fibrations.
In a pointed model category , we consider a homotopically commutative diagram:
If the diagram is a homotopy Cartesian square, then is said to be a homotopy kernel of , and if it is a homotopy coCartesian square, then is a homotopy cokernel of . We can consider homotopy image objects and homotopy coimage objects as additive categories.
On the arrow category , those functors and are defined as follows: For a morphism in , the arrow is and . Then the pair
is a Quillen adjunction.
Definition 3.2.
Let be a pointed symmetric monoidal model category. A Smith ideal in is a monoid object in the symmetric monoidal model category with respect to the push-out product monoidal model structure.
We say that a Smith ideal is unit cokernel if the cokernel of is isomorphic to the monoidal unit object and is an augmentation of the unit morphism . Let denote the full subcategory of spanned by unit cokernel Smith ideals.
Definition 3.3.
Let be a stable symmetric monoidal model category with a monoidal unit and denote the full subcategory spanned by Smith ideals whose cokernels are weakly equivalent to . We say that an object of is a non-unital commutative algebra object of .
Theorem 3.4.
Let be a stable symmetric monoidal model category with a monoidal unit . Then the Quillen equivalence
induces a left Quillen equivalence between .
-
proof.
By using the second statement of [Hov14, Theorem 4.3], the cokernel functor induces the left Quillen functor , being essentially surjective on the homotopy categories by definition. Since the unit is a weak equivalence by [Hov14, Theorem 4.3] again, the induced functor is homotopically fully faithful.
Remark 3.5.
If is a locally presentable stable symmetric monoidal model category, the presentable -category of augmented algebra is represented by the model category . Hence the left-hand-side is equivalent to the -category defined by Lurie [Lur17, p.949, Definition 5.4.4.9 and Proposition 5.4.4.10].
References
- [1]
- [AR94] Adámek, Jiří ; Rosický, Jiří: Lond. Math. Soc. Lect. Note Ser.. Bd. 189: Locally presentable and accessible categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994. – ISBN 0–521–42261–2
- [Hir03] Hirschhorn, Philip S.: Math. Surv. Monogr.. Bd. 99: Model categories and their localizations. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2003. – ISBN 0–8218–3279–4
- [Hov99] Hovey, Mark: Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. Bd. 63: Model categories. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999. – xii+209 S. – ISBN 0–8218–1359–5
- [Hov14] Hovey, Mark: Smith ideals of structured ring spectra. Available at:https://arxiv.org/abs/1401.2850, 2014
- [Lur17] Lurie, Jacob: Higher Algebra. available at:https://www.math.ias.edu/ lurie/papers/HA.pdf, 2017
- [Mac88] MacLane, Saunders: Grad. Texts Math.. Bd. 5: Categories for the working mathematician. 4th corrected printing. New York etc.: Springer-Verlag, 1988. – ISBN 3–540–90035–7