This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Non-perturbative approach for scalar particle production in Higgs-R2R^{2} inflation

Flavio Pineda [email protected]    Luis O. Pimentel [email protected] Departamento de Física, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Av. Ferrocarril San Rafael Atlixco 186, P. O. Box 55-534, C.P. 09310 CDMX, Mexico
Abstract

We investigate the non-perturbative production of scalar particles within the Higgs-R2R^{2} inflation model, focusing on a massive spectator field that interacts gravitationally via a non-minimal coupling to the Ricci scalar RR. By transforming the model to the Einstein frame, where direct couplings between inflationary dynamics and the spectator field emerge, we analyze both perturbative and non-perturbative particle production. We solve the spectator field equation numerically, using the Bogolyubov transformation, to calculate the comoving particle density. Our findings indicate that particle production occurs for light particles with conformal coupling and for masses mχ>M/2m_{\chi}>M/2 in the minimally coupled scenario.

Inflation, multi-field inflation, scalar fields, particle production
preprint: APS/123-QED

I Introduction

Cosmic inflation is the cornerstone of modern cosmology, providing a framework to understand the early universe and predict its fundamental characteristics. It describes a period of accelerated expansion driven by a scalar field ϕ\phi slow-rolling towards the minimum of its potential V(ϕ)V(\phi). This mechanism addresses classical problems of the standard cosmological model and has become a central paradigm in cosmology [1, 2]. During the inflationary epoch, significant particle production occurs, especially as the kinetic energy of the inflaton field approaches its potential energy. This particle production can arise from gravitational effects due to the universe’s expansion and the dynamics of the inflaton field, serving as a classical background for propagating quantum fields [3, 4]. Known as gravitational particle production, this is a fundamental mechanism in quantum field theory in curved spacetime, offering insights into the origins of dark matter and the preheating and reheating epochs following inflation [5]. Several scenarios have been proposed for vacuum particle production during the early universe, particularly during inflation due to the evolution of the inflaton field and the universe’s expansion. Typically, the inflaton field is coupled to matter fields (bosonic, fermionic, or gauge fields) by a coupling constant gg. At a critical value ϕ=ϕ\phi=\phi_{*} of the inflaton field, resonance begins and particle production is instantaneous [6, 7]. However, matter fields need not be directly coupled with the inflaton or standard model particles. Massive particles can be produced purely through gravitational effects, either via direct couplings with the gravitational field or induced couplings through a conformal transformation. If the matter field’s energy density contribution is negligible, the inflationary dynamics remain unaffected, leading to no back-reaction effects on spacetime geometry. Such fields are called spectator fields, and this mechanism provides a natural explanation for the origin of dark matter [8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. Beyond dark matter origins, gravitational particle production is linked to significant early universe phenomena such as preheating after inflation [14, 15, 16, 17], primordial gravitational waves [18, 19, 20] and primordial magnetogenesis [21, 22, 23, 24]. Additionally, it imprints significant observable effects on the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), particularly in the generation of primordial non-Gaussianities [25, 26, 27].

In this work, we study gravitational particle production during and immediately after inflation driven by the SM Higgs boson and the scalaron field in the Higgs-R2R^{2} inflation model. This model of inflation extends the SM Higgs inflationary model [28] to address the problem of large coupling [29, 30]. Here, cosmic inflation is driven by both the Higgs field and the extra scalar degree of freedom from the quadratic RR term, known as the scalaron. Unlike other multi-field inflation models, the Higgs-R2R^{2} model effectively reduces to a single-field model during inflation, with the Higgs field acting as an auxiliary field while the scalaron drives inflation [31]. At the end of inflation during the reheating phase, both fields and the Ricci scalar oscillate around the potential’s minimum. This oscillatory behaviour enhance the scalar particle production through the non-perturbative mechanisms as tachyonic inestabilities [32, 33].

We propose an extension to the Higgs-R2R^{2} model by introducing a massive scalar field χ\chi as a spectator field that it not contributing to the energy density during the inflationary epoch with negligible interactions with the SM but considering a direct coupling to Ricci scalar via a non-minimal coupling term ξχRχ2\xi_{\chi}R\,\chi^{2}. Initially, there is no explicit coupling between the inflationary sector and the spectator field in the Jordan frame; however, gravitational interactions between the scalaron, the Higgs field and free scalars induce couplings when we change the conformal frame. This process results in gravitational particle production with significant implications for preheating after inflation and background dynamics. Induced coupling in the Einstein frame between free scalars and scalar sector of the action provides an excellent channel of scalaron decay into light scalars. However, in the non-perturbative approach the field mass mχm_{\chi} does not necessarily have to be light and we can explore the possibility of scalar particle production for spectator field masses mχ>M/2m_{\chi}>M/2 where M1.3×105MpM\simeq 1.3\times 10^{-5}\,M_{p} is the scalaron mass. We take into account the oscillatory behavior of background dynamics after inflation as a classical background, which results in particle production due to the time-dependent background inducing a time-dependent frequency in the mode equations for the spectator field χ\chi. To achieve this, we use the Bogoliubov approach [3] to compute the comoving number density nk(t)n_{k}(t) of particles created by the background dynamics in Higgs-R2R^{2} inflation by solving the mode equations for the quantized modes χ\chi.

The article is organized as follows: section 2 provides a brief introduction to the Higgs-R2R^{2} model and the background dynamics during and after inflation for a set of suitable initial conditions. Section 3 analyzes the couplings induced by gravitational effects in the Einstein frame, showing the decay ratio of scalaron into light free scalars. This result indicates that the perturbative approach is kinematically valid only for masses mχ<M/2m_{\chi}<M/2 during the reheating epoch after inflation when |R|<M|R|<M. In section 4 we derive the mode equation for the spectator field, which is necessary to investigate the behaviour of the time-dependent frequency during and after inflation. We adapt a numerical approach to solve the mode equation for modes that leave 55 e-folds before the horizon crossing during inflation, which ensures that each mode is within the horizon at the start of the numerical simulation.

Section 4 focuses on massive particle production during preheating. Finally, section 5 discusses the results and conclusions. In the following, we will use natural units in wihch =1\hbar=1, c=1c=1, κB=1\kappa_{\mathrm{B}}=1 and we use the mass Planck as 8πG=Mp28\pi G=M_{p}^{-2}. We also work in the context of a spatially flat, homogeneous and isotropic universe described by the FLRW metric

ds2\displaystyle\mathrm{d}s^{2} =\displaystyle= dt2+a2(t)(dx2+dy2+dz2)\displaystyle-\mathrm{d}t^{2}+a^{2}(t)(\mathrm{d}x^{2}+\mathrm{d}y^{2}+\mathrm{d}z^{2})
=\displaystyle= a2(τ)(dτ2+dx2+dy2+dz2),\displaystyle a^{2}(\tau)(-\mathrm{d}\tau^{2}+\mathrm{d}x^{2}+\mathrm{d}y^{2}+\mathrm{d}z^{2})\,,

where tt is the cosmic time, τ\tau the conformal time and the relation between the two is dτ=dt/a(t)\mathrm{d}\tau=\mathrm{d}t/a(t) with a(t)a(t) is the scale factor.

II Brief review of Higgs-R2R^{2} inflationary model

In this section, we will give a brief review of the Higgs-R2R^{2} model in both Einstein and Jordan frames. For further details, we recommend the main references [31, 34, 30, 29] and the references therein. Let us get started the discussion in the Jordan frame; the model is giving by the action

SJ=dx4gJ[12(Mp2+ξhh2)RJ+ξs4RJ212gJμνμhνhλ4h4],S_{\mathrm{J}}=\int\mathrm{d}x^{4}\sqrt{-g_{J}}\left[\dfrac{1}{2}(M_{p}^{2}+\xi_{h}h^{2})R_{J}+\dfrac{\xi_{s}}{4}\,R_{J}^{2}\right.\\[5.69046pt] \left.-\dfrac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}_{J}\,\partial_{\mu}h\,\partial_{\nu}h-\dfrac{\lambda}{4}\,h^{4}\right]\,, (2)

where hh is the Higgs field in the unitary gauge, the subindex JJ denotes variables defined in the Jordan frame, ξh\xi_{h} is the constant coupling between Higgs field and the gravitational sector, ξs\xi_{s} is a mass parameter and λ103\lambda\sim 10^{-3} is the quartic self constant coupling of the Higgs field. This model contains a quadratic term in RJR_{J} described by the constant ξs\xi_{s}, wihch comes from the R2R^{2} model [35] . Such constant is related to the scalaron mass as

ξs=Mp23M2,\displaystyle\xi_{s}=\dfrac{M_{p}^{2}}{3M^{2}}\,, (3)

where M1.3×105MpM\simeq 1.3\times 10^{-5}M_{p} in order to be consistent with the value of the amplitude of primordial perturbations AζA_{\zeta} [36]. The model (2) can be regarded as a UV extension of Higgs inflation, so it is interesting to make a double interpretation of the gravitational coupling in this conformal frame. In Higgs inflation, the constant coupling ξh\xi_{h} must fulfill the condition ξh2/λ1010\xi_{h}^{2}/\lambda\sim 10^{10} in order to be consistent with CMB observations [28, 37]. This causes that the cutoff scale of the model to be below the natural energy scale (Planck scale) during inflation, making the predictions of the model questionable; however, it has been shown that including the Ricci scalar cuadratic term modifies the value of the energy scale, rasinig it up to the Planck scale. To solve the strong copuling problem present in the scalar sector, the parameter ξs\xi_{s} has to obey the inequality [29]

ξsξh24π.\displaystyle\xi_{s}\gtrsim\dfrac{\xi_{h}^{2}}{4\pi}\,. (4)

This inequality allow us to make a perturbative treatment of the model. In order to describe the inflationary dynamics of the model, it is more convenient to bring the action (2) into the canonical Einstein-Hilbert form. So that we need to carry out a conformal transformation Ω2(x)\Omega^{2}(x) introducing an extra scalar degree of freedom ϕ\phi called scalaron, which comes from the quadratic term in RJR_{J}. Thus, to go from Jordan frame to Eintein frame one has to perform a conformal transformation of the space-time metric gμνΨ2(x)gμνg_{\mu\nu}\to\Psi^{2}(x)g_{\mu\nu} with Ψ(x)>0\Psi(x)>0, where the correct form of it is

ϕ=α1logΨ2,\displaystyle\phi=\alpha^{-1}\log\Psi^{2}\,, (5)

where α=2/3Mp1\alpha=\sqrt{2/3}M_{p}^{-1}. The conformal transformation (5) removes the quadratic term of the scalar curvature RJR_{J} introducing the scalaron ϕ\phi. Then in the Einstein frame the Higgs-R2R^{2} model of inflation takes the form of a two-sacalar fields model with non-canonical kinetic term

SE=d4xg{Mp22R12gμνμϕνϕ12eαϕgμνhνhV(ϕ,h)},S_{E}=\int\mathrm{d}^{4}x\,\sqrt{-g}\,\left\{\dfrac{M_{p}^{2}}{2}R-\dfrac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\,\partial_{\nu}\phi\right.\\[5.69046pt] \left.-\dfrac{1}{2}\,e^{-\alpha\phi}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{h}\,\partial_{\nu}h-V(\phi\,,h)\right\}\,, (6)

which can be wirtten in the general action for multi-field inflationary models

S=d4xg[Mp22R12GIJgμνμϕIνϕJV(ϕI)],S=\int\mathrm{d}^{4}x\,\sqrt{-g}\left[\dfrac{M_{p}^{2}}{2}R\right.\\[5.69046pt] \left.-\dfrac{1}{2}G_{IJ}\,g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi^{I}\,\partial_{\nu}\phi^{J}-V(\phi^{I})\right]\,, (7)

where in our case ϕI=(ϕ,h)\phi^{I}=(\phi\,,h) and GIJG_{IJ} is the non-flat field-space metric given by

GIJ=(100eαϕ).\displaystyle G_{IJ}=\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\ 0&e^{-\alpha\phi}\end{pmatrix}\,. (8)

We can see that the non-canonical kinetic term is associated with the geometry of the field space via the metric GIJG_{IJ} [38]. On the other hand, the potential in the Einstein frame has interaction terms between the Higgs field hh and the scalaron ϕ\phi, and takes the form

V(ϕ,h)=14e2αϕ[Mp4ξs(eαϕ1ξhMp2h2)2+λh4].\displaystyle V(\phi\,,h)=\dfrac{1}{4}\,e^{-2\alpha\phi}\left[\dfrac{M_{p}^{4}}{\xi_{s}}\left(e^{\alpha\phi}-1-\dfrac{\xi_{h}}{M_{p}^{2}}\,h^{2}\right)^{2}+\lambda\,h^{4}\right]\,.
(9)
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Higgs-Starobinsky potential V(ϕ,h)/Mp4V(\phi\,,h)/M_{p}^{4} in the Einstein frame (9). It is clear the position of the hill at h=0h=0 and the position of the two valleys.

The potential V(ϕI)V(\phi^{I}) depends on both the ϕ\phi and hh, and mixes terms which make more difficult analyze analytically the background trayectories. Nevertheless, during inflation we can make an effective approximation of the model such that inflation is driven by the single scalar field ϕ\phi [31], and with the following interesting features

  1. 1.

    V(ϕI)V(\phi^{I}) shows two valleys and one ridge

  2. 2.

    For ξh\xi_{h}, ξs\xi_{s} possitive and enough large, the potential presents an attractor behavior

  3. 3.

    If ϕMp\phi\gg M_{p} with arbitrary initial conditions, the fields ϕ\phi and hh will always evolve towards one of the valleys and thus beginning the slow-roll evolution

  4. 4.

    If ϕ<<Mp\phi<<M_{p}, the potential is reduced to Higgs potential

    V(ϕMp,h)V(h)=λeff4h4,\displaystyle V(\phi\ll M_{p}\,,h)\simeq V(h)=\dfrac{\lambda_{\mathrm{eff}}}{4}\,h^{4}\,, (10)

    where λeff\lambda_{\mathrm{eff}} is the effective quartic self-coupling constant defined by

    λeff=λ+ξh2ξs.\displaystyle\lambda_{\mathrm{eff}}=\lambda+\dfrac{\xi_{h}^{2}}{\xi_{s}}\,. (11)

    The condition λeff4π\lambda_{\mathrm{eff}}\lesssim 4\pi is neccessary for perturbative preheating

  5. 5.

    If hMph\ll M_{p}, the potential is reduced to Starobinsky potential

    V(ϕ,hMp)Mp44ξs(1eαϕ)2.\displaystyle V(\phi\,,h\ll M_{p})\simeq\dfrac{M_{p}^{4}}{4\xi_{s}}(1-e^{-\alpha\phi})^{2}\,. (12)

We can see the positions of the valleys and the hill at h=0h=0 in the figure 1. The inflationary dynamics ocurr along one of these valleys, showing a universal attractor behavior, so that inevitably the fields ϕ\phi and hh will always fall into one of the valleys and then drive slow-roll inflation. To find the valleys, we can perform the analysis in both Einstein [31] and Jordan [39] frames. In the Einstein frame in the limit ϕMp\phi\gg M_{p} (it is required for enough long inflation) and hvh\gg v, where v=246GeVv=246\,\mathrm{GeV}, the valleys are found out by the condition

Vh=0,\displaystyle\dfrac{\partial V}{\partial h}=0\,, (13)

which implies that the Higgs field is completely determined by the inflaton field ϕ\phi

hmin2(ϕ)=Mp2ξhξh2+λξs(eαϕ1).\displaystyle h^{2}_{\mathrm{min}}(\phi)=\dfrac{M_{p}^{2}\xi_{h}}{\xi_{h}^{2}+\lambda\xi_{s}}\,(e^{\alpha\phi}-1)\,. (14)

Because of the potential (9) is symmetric respect to transformation hhh\to-h, the two valleys are localizated by the condition (14). Thus, this shows that the Higgs field is an auxiliary field during inflation, so if we put the result (14) back into the Einstein potential (9), we give the effective potential along the valleys

Veff(ϕ,hmin)=Mp44(ξs+ξh2/λ)(1eαϕ)2\displaystyle V_{\mathrm{eff}}(\phi\,,h_{\mathrm{min}})=\dfrac{M_{p}^{4}}{4(\xi_{s}+\xi_{h}^{2}/\lambda)}\,(1-e^{-\alpha\phi})^{2} (15)

Notice that the effective potential reduces to Higgs inflation if λξsξh2\lambda\xi_{s}\ll\xi_{h}^{2} while one get R2R^{2} inflation for λξsξh2\lambda\xi_{s}\gg\xi_{h}^{2}. In order to provide the correct amplitude of primordial scalar perturbations, the amplitude of (15) has to fulfill [40]

ξs+ξh2λ=N272π2Aζ2×109,\displaystyle\xi_{s}+\dfrac{\xi_{h}^{2}}{\lambda}=\dfrac{N_{*}^{2}}{72\pi^{2}A_{\zeta}}\simeq 2\times 10^{9}\,, (16)
Refer to caption
Figure 2: We present the numerical solution of the background dynamics after inflation in cosmic time tt for the Higgs and scalaron fields within the valley of the potential. We have numerically solved (17), (18), and (19) using the numerical parameters ξh=4000\xi_{h}=4000, ξs=2×109\xi_{s}=2\times 10^{9} and λ=0.013\lambda=0.013 together with initial conditions ϕ(t0)=5.7Mp\phi(t_{0})=5.7M_{p} and h(t0)=0.096Mph(t_{0})=0.096M_{p}.

where N5060N_{*}\sim 50-60 is the number of e-folds before the end of inflation, and Aζ2×109A_{\zeta}\sim 2\times 10^{-9} is the amplitude of the primordial power spectrum. For λ=0.013\lambda=0.013 and ξh,ξs>0\xi_{h}\,,\xi_{s}>0 which satisfy (16), the inflationary dynamics is effectively the same as single-field slow-roll inflation. In this paper we will only analyze the standard parameter region ξh,ξs,λ>0\xi_{h}\,,\xi_{s}\,,\lambda>0. Specifically, if we have ξh0\xi_{h}\gg 0 the isocurvature effects of the model are absent and the bending is whithin the weak mixing case η0\eta_{\perp}\to 0 [31], and the isocurvature and adiabatic modes are not coupled so that they evolve independetly in the standard parameter region of Higgs-R2R^{2} model. Therefore, the description of the dynamics inside the valleys is an effective single-field inflation.

II.1 Background dynamics

What follows is to analyze the dynamics of the model. We assume that during inflation both scalaron ϕ\phi and higgs field hh are homogeneous and only depend on cosmic time tt. In this case the equations of motion can be written as

ϕ¨+3Hϕ˙+Vϕ\displaystyle\ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+\dfrac{\partial V}{\partial\phi} =\displaystyle= α2eαϕh˙2,\displaystyle-\dfrac{\alpha}{2}\,e^{-\alpha\phi}\dot{h}^{2}\,, (17)
h¨+3Hh˙+eαϕVh\displaystyle\ddot{h}+3H\dot{h}+e^{\alpha\phi}\,\dfrac{\partial V}{\partial h} =\displaystyle= αϕ˙h˙.\displaystyle\alpha\dot{\phi}\,\dot{h}\,. (18)

The Einstein equations give the Friedman equations for H(t)=a˙/aH(t)=\dot{a}/a

3Mp2H2\displaystyle 3M_{p}^{2}\,H^{2} =\displaystyle= 12ϕ˙2+12eαϕh˙2+V(ϕ,h),\displaystyle\dfrac{1}{2}\dot{\phi}^{2}+\dfrac{1}{2}\,e^{-\alpha\phi}\dot{h}^{2}+V(\phi\,,h)\,, (19)
H˙\displaystyle\dot{H} =\displaystyle= 12Mp2(ϕ˙2+eαϕh˙2).\displaystyle-\dfrac{1}{2M_{p}^{2}}\,\left(\dot{\phi}^{2}+e^{-\alpha\phi}\dot{h}^{2}\right)\,. (20)

One has to numerically solve the system of equations (17), (18), (19) and (20) in order to explore the inflationary dynamics of the model in the Einstein frame given some combination values of the parameters ξh,ξs,λ\xi_{h}\,,\xi_{s}\,,\lambda and given a suitable initial conditions for ϕ(t0)\phi(t_{0}), h(t0)h(t_{0}). The inflation occurs when ϕMp\phi\gg M_{p} and the value of the auxiliary field hh is given by (14) inside one of the valleys of the potential. In the figure 2 we present the oscillatory regime of both fields after inflation in terms of cosmic time for the initial conditions ϕ0=5.7Mp\phi_{0}=5.7M_{p} and h00.096Mph_{0}\approx 0.096M_{p}. However, according to the argument we have presented above, during inflation the isocurvature effects are absent and the dynamics inside the valleys is an effective single-field description. Then the scalaron field should fulfill the single-field equation

ϕ¨+3Hϕ˙+dVeffdϕ0,\displaystyle\ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi}+\dfrac{\mathrm{d}V_{\mathrm{eff}}}{\mathrm{d}\phi}\simeq 0\,, (21)

and the evolution of the Higgs field is determined by the condition (14). We can assume a single-field slow roll approximation in the inflationary dynamics inside the valleys. This happens when ϕ¨3Hϕ˙\ddot{\phi}\ll 3H\dot{\phi}, thus the field equation for ϕ\phi is

3Hϕ˙+dVeffdϕ0,\displaystyle 3H\dot{\phi}+\dfrac{\mathrm{d}V_{\mathrm{eff}}}{\mathrm{d}\phi}\simeq 0\,, (22)

which is intregrable by a quadrature together with the Friedman equations:

ϕ(t)=ϕ0+α1log(1ttend),\displaystyle\phi(t)=\phi_{0}+\alpha^{-1}\log\left(1-\dfrac{t}{t_{\mathrm{end}}}\right)\,, (23)
a(t)=eH0t(1ttend)3/4,\displaystyle a(t)=e^{H_{0}t}\,\left(1-\dfrac{t}{t_{\mathrm{end}}}\right)^{3/4}\,, (24)
H(t)=H032tend1(1ttend)1,\displaystyle H(t)=H_{0}\,-\dfrac{3}{2}\,t_{\mathrm{end}}^{-1}\,\left(1-\dfrac{t}{t_{\mathrm{end}}}\right)^{-1}\,, (25)

where

tend=34H01eαϕ0,H0Mp412(ξs+ξh2/λ),\displaystyle t_{\mathrm{end}}=\dfrac{3}{4}\,H_{0}^{-1}\,e^{\alpha\phi_{0}}\,,\quad H_{0}\simeq\dfrac{M_{p}^{4}}{\sqrt{12}(\xi_{s}+\xi_{h}^{2}/\lambda)}\,, (26)

is the time that the effective inflation ends and H0H_{0} is the scale Hubble parameter during inflation, with ϕ05.7Mp\phi_{0}\sim 5.7M_{p} is the value of ϕ\phi at the beginning of inflation. It is clear from slow-roll solutions that during inflation we have the usual quasi De Sitter solutions for ϕ\phi, aa and HH. The effective single-field inflation ends when the slow roll parameter ϵ\epsilon is ϵ(tend)=1\epsilon(t_{\mathrm{end}})=1, which happens at the final values

ϕ(tend)\displaystyle\phi(t_{\mathrm{end}}) =\displaystyle= α1log(1+23)0.92Mp,\displaystyle\alpha^{-1}\log\left(1+\dfrac{2}{\sqrt{3}}\right)\approx 0.92M_{p}\,, (27)
He\displaystyle H_{e} \displaystyle\approx 0.54H0.\displaystyle 0.54\,H_{0}\,. (28)

III Free scalar fields in the Einstein frame

In this section we study spectator fields present in the Higgs-R2R^{2} model such as free scalar fields, initial assuming no direct coupling between the matter fields and the inflationary sector in the Jordan frame. In other words, we get started in the Jordan frame and after conformal transformation, the matter sector is gravitationally coupled to the inflatonary sector. In the Jordan frame our model is giving by

SJ=dx4gJ[12(Mp2+ξhH2)RJ+ξs4RJ212gJμνμhνhλ4h4]+Smatt[ψi],S_{J}=\int\mathrm{d}x^{4}\sqrt{-g_{J}}\left[\dfrac{1}{2}(M_{p}^{2}+\xi_{h}H^{2})R_{J}+\dfrac{\xi_{s}}{4}\,R_{J}^{2}\right.\\[5.69046pt] \left.-\dfrac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}_{J}\,\partial_{\mu}h\,\partial_{\nu}h-\dfrac{\lambda}{4}\,h^{4}\right]+S_{\mathrm{matt}}[\psi_{i}]\,, (29)

where ψi\psi_{i} are the different matter fields that are present during and after inflation. In this work we will consider a massive spectator scalar field χ\chi that only interacts gravitationally. The action of such field is giving by

SJ[χ]=dx4gJ(12gJμνμχνχmχ22χ212ξχRJχ2).S_{J}[\chi]=\int\mathrm{d}x^{4}\sqrt{-g_{J}}\left(-\dfrac{1}{2}g^{\mu\nu}_{J}\partial_{\mu}\chi\partial_{\nu}\chi-\dfrac{m_{\chi}^{2}}{2}\chi^{2}\right.\\[5.69046pt] \left.-\dfrac{1}{2}\,\xi_{\chi}\,R_{J}\,\chi^{2}\right)\,. (30)

The dimensionless parameter ξχ\xi_{\chi} represents the non-minimal coupling to gravity sector and may take any value; however, studies based on electroweak vacuum stability [41] suggest that the value of non-minimal coupling constant should not exceed the value 1010. Moreover, there are two interest special cases: ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0 and ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6. The value ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0 is called minimal coupling case and the value ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6 is called conformal coupling. The first case corresponds to a free scalar field theory and the second one ensures the conformal invariance of the model if in addition mχ=0m_{\chi}=0. Although there are no direct coupling between matter fields and the inflatonary sector in the first case, both scalaron ϕ\phi and Higgs field hh gravitationally interact with every matter field is present during inflation and after inflation, and may occur gravitational particle production process. In the second one, free scalar χ\chi is coupled to the Ricci scalar and the particle production may also ocurr as long as the matter fields are not conformally invariant, namely, if the scalar fied is massive mχ0m_{\chi}\neq 0. These kind of models which in the scalar fields interacts only gravitationally is specially interesting since it can explain the particle production process, with the gravitational field responsible for creating χ\chi particles. This process of particle creation due to gravitational interactions has implications in the reheating process [17, 42, 43] and gravitational dark matter production [44, 45, 46, 12, 11, 9, 47].

What follows is to perform the conformal transformation (5) to the action (30) to change to the Einstein frame. Since χ\chi is a spectator field, it remains energetically subdominant, ρχ3H2Mp2\rho_{\chi}\ll 3H^{2}M_{p}^{2}, throughout the entire background evolution. Therefore, we can apply the same conformal transformation of the metric (5) as in the previous section. By doing so, we avoid considering back-reaction effects on the space-time geometry and the background dynamics. In the Einstein frame, we obtain the following action

SE[χ~]=12d4xg(gμνμχ~νχ~+ξχRχ~2+eαϕmχ2χ~2)+3α(ξχ16)d4xg[χ~gμνμχ~νϕ+α4χ~2gμνμϕνϕ],S_{E}[\tilde{\chi}]=-\dfrac{1}{2}\int\mathrm{d}^{4}x\,\sqrt{-g}\left(g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\tilde{\chi}\partial_{\nu}\tilde{\chi}+\xi_{\chi}R\tilde{\chi}^{2}\right.\\[8.5359pt] +\left.e^{-\alpha\phi}m_{\chi}^{2}\tilde{\chi}^{2}\right)+3\alpha\left(\xi_{\chi}-\dfrac{1}{6}\right)\int\mathrm{d}^{4}x\,\sqrt{-g}\left[\tilde{\chi}\,g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\tilde{\chi}\partial_{\nu}\phi\right.\\[8.5359pt] \left.+\dfrac{\alpha}{4}\tilde{\chi}^{2}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi\right]\,, (31)

where χχ~=Ψ1χ\chi\to\tilde{\chi}=\Psi^{-1}\chi is the re-scaled scalar field and the Ricci scalar in the Einstein frame is given by R=6(H˙+2H2)R=6(\dot{H}+2H^{2}). We can perform another conformal transformation which involve the scalar field χ~\tilde{\chi} leading to another Einstein frame in order to remove the non-minimal coupling constant ξχ\xi_{\chi}. However, we are only interested in the situation where χ\chi is an spectator field and both scalaron field ϕ\phi and Higgs field are responsible of the dynamics during and after inflation. One can see that the conformal transformation (5) induces interaction terms between the scalaron ϕ\phi, the Higgs field hh and the free scalar χ~\tilde{\chi}. We can identify the interaction terms from the following action

Sint=3α(ξχ16)d4xg[χ~gμνμχ~νϕ+α4χ~2gμνμϕνϕ].S_{\mathrm{int}}=3\alpha\left(\xi_{\chi}-\dfrac{1}{6}\right)\int\mathrm{d}^{4}x\,\sqrt{-g}\left[\tilde{\chi}\,g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\tilde{\chi}\partial_{\nu}\phi\right.\\[8.5359pt] \left.+\dfrac{\alpha}{4}\tilde{\chi}^{2}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\phi\partial_{\nu}\phi\right]\,. (32)

This action describes the interaction between the background fields ϕ\phi and hh with the massive spectator field χ~\tilde{\chi}. We can see that even with ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0 this interaction does not disappear, unless the field χ~\tilde{\chi} is conformal invariant (mχ=0,ξχ=1/6m_{\chi}=0\,,\xi_{\chi}=1/6). One can see this fact from the decay ratio of the scalaron into a pair of light scalar particles during reheating epoch [8], [48]

Γϕχχ=(16ξχ+2mχ2M2)2M314mχ2/M2192πMp2.\displaystyle\Gamma_{\phi\to\chi\chi}=\left(1-6\xi_{\chi}+\dfrac{2m_{\chi}^{2}}{M^{2}}\right)^{2}\,\dfrac{M^{3}\sqrt{1-4m_{\chi}^{2}/M^{2}}}{192\pi M_{p}^{2}}\,.
(33)

If ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6 and mχ0m_{\chi}\to 0, the decay ratio vanishes. In addition, if the mass of scalar field χ\chi is mχ>M/2m_{\chi}>M/2 where MM is scalaron mass term, the scalaron decay into a pair of χ\chi particles is forbidden. Then, the perturbative production of χ\chi particles is allowed only in the case of light scalars with mass mχ<M/2m_{\chi}<M/2. However, it can also occur a scalar particle production by non perturbative effects by time-dependent background dynamics of ϕ\phi, hh and aa for a spectator field with mass mχ>M/2m_{\chi}>M/2. In order to study this process it is necessary to find the equation of motion for the spectator field χ~\tilde{\chi} and track the mode evolution during and after inflation. Varying the action (31) respect to χ~\tilde{\chi} yields the following equation of motion

(eαϕmχ2ξχR)χ~+[α2(16ξχ)ϕα24(16ξχ)(ϕ)2]χ~=0.(\square-e^{-\alpha\phi}\,m_{\chi}^{2}-\xi_{\chi}\,R)\tilde{\chi}\\[5.69046pt] +\left[\dfrac{\alpha}{2}\,\left(1-6\xi_{\chi}\right)\square\phi-\dfrac{\alpha^{2}}{4}\left(1-6\xi_{\chi}\right)(\partial\phi)^{2}\right]\tilde{\chi}=0\,. (34)

Notice that the background dynamics is explicit in the equation of the spectator field χ~\tilde{\chi} due to the conformal transformation. This induces a time-dependent effective mass term, meff2(t),m_{\mathrm{eff}}^{2}(t), for the spectator field χ~\tilde{\chi}. Consequently, in the Einstein frame, the model presents an interaction term with the dynamics of the classical background through the Ricci scalar, the scale factor aa, and the dynamics of the fields ϕ\phi and hh. As a result, studying the solutions is generally highly complex from an analytical perspective; hence a numerical treatment of the background dynamics is necessary for a comprehensive analysis of mode evolution, specially after inflation when both fields ϕ\phi and hh exhibit a strongly interacting anharmonic oscillatory behavior, as one can see in the figure 2. By numerically determining the background evolution of the scalaron, the Higgs field, and the scale factor, we can compute the Ricci scalar using R=6(H˙+2H2)R=6(\dot{H}+2H^{2}), ensuring that the dynamics are well-determined. However, during effective inflation along one of the potential’s valleys, we can approximate the background dynamics using the single-field equation of motion (21).

IV Mode evolution

In this section, we numerically solve the equation of motion (34) along with the background equations (17), (18), (I) to obtain the mode functions χ\chi for calculating the number density of particles produced, nkn_{k}. The equation of motion for χ~\tilde{\chi} considering a FLRW universe (I) can be written in terms of the cosmic time tt as

χ~¨+3Hχ~˙+Ω2(t)χ~=0,\displaystyle\ddot{\tilde{\chi}}+3H\dot{\tilde{\chi}}+\Omega^{2}(t)\tilde{\chi}=0\,, (35)

where Ω2(t)\Omega^{2}(t) is a background variables dependent and is given by

Ω2(t)=eαϕmχ2a22+ξχR+3α(16ξχ)(ϕ¨+3Hϕ˙)3α22(16ξχ)ϕ˙2.\Omega^{2}(t)=e^{-\alpha\phi}m_{\chi}^{2}-a^{-2}\nabla^{2}+\xi_{\chi}R\\[5.69046pt] +3\alpha\left(\dfrac{1}{6}-\xi_{\chi}\right)(\ddot{\phi}+3H\dot{\phi})-\dfrac{3\alpha^{2}}{2}\left(\dfrac{1}{6}-\xi_{\chi}\right)\dot{\phi}^{2}\,. (36)

Rescaling the field χ~a3/2(t)χ~(t,𝐫)\tilde{\chi}\to a^{-3/2}(t)\,\tilde{\chi}(t,\mathbf{r}) and using the background equations of motion (17), (20) the equation for the scalar field χ~\tilde{\chi} becomes a oscillator-like equation with time-dependent frequency

X¨(t,𝐫)+ω2(t)X(t,𝐫)=0,\displaystyle\ddot{X}(t,\mathbf{r})+\omega^{2}(t)\,X(t,\mathbf{r})=0\,, (37)

where ω2(t)\omega^{2}(t) is given by

ω2(t)=Ω2(t)94H232H˙.\displaystyle\omega^{2}(t)=\Omega^{2}(t)-\dfrac{9}{4}H^{2}-\dfrac{3}{2}\dot{H}\,. (38)

Particle production in the early universe is a process of quantum field theory in curved spacetime, where the gravitational field is not quantized, but the free scalar field χ\chi is quantized. Therefore, the production of χ\chi particles is a quantum effect [3, 4, 5]. We proceed by quantizing the spectator field in the Heisenberg picture so that the χ\chi field and its conjugate momentum πχ=χ˙\pi_{\chi}=\dot{\chi} are treated as field operators. In Fourier space the rescaled field can be written as

X(t,𝐫)=d3k(2π)3(a^𝐤Xk(t)ei𝐤𝐫+a^𝐤Xk(t)ei𝐤𝐫),\displaystyle X(t,\mathbf{r})=\int\dfrac{\mathrm{d}^{3}\mathrm{k}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\left(\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}\,X_{k}(t)\,e^{-i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}+\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\mathbf{k}}\,X^{*}_{k}(t)\,e^{i\mathbf{k}\cdot\mathbf{r}}\right)\,,

where 𝐤\mathbf{k} is the comoving wave number and a^𝐤\hat{a}_{\mathbf{k}}, a^𝐤\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\mathbf{k}} are the creation and annihilation operators respectively, which obey the standard commutation relations at equal times [a𝐤,a𝐤]=(2π)3δ(3)(𝐤𝐤)[a_{\mathbf{k}}\,,a^{\dagger}_{\mathbf{k^{\prime}}}]=(2\pi)^{3}\delta^{(3)}(\mathbf{k}-\mathbf{k}^{\prime}) and [a𝐤,a𝐤]=[a𝐤,a𝐤]=0[a_{\mathbf{k}}\,,a_{\mathbf{k^{\prime}}}]=[a^{\dagger}_{\mathbf{k}}\,,a^{\dagger}_{\mathbf{k^{\prime}}}]=0. The field equation for Fourier mode Xk(t)X_{k}(t) is given by

X¨k(t)+ωk2(t)Xk(t)=0,\displaystyle\ddot{X}_{k}(t)+\omega_{k}^{2}(t)X_{k}(t)=0\,, (40)

with

ωk2(t)=(ka)2+meff2(t),\displaystyle\omega_{k}^{2}(t)=\left(\dfrac{k}{a}\right)^{2}+m_{\mathrm{eff}}^{2}(t)\,, (41)

and the following effective mass term

meff2(t)=eαϕmχ2+ξχR94H232H˙+3α(ξχ16)(VϕαMp2H˙).m_{\mathrm{eff}}^{2}(t)=e^{-\alpha\phi}m_{\chi}^{2}+\xi_{\chi}\,R-\dfrac{9}{4}H^{2}-\dfrac{3}{2}\dot{H}\\[5.69046pt] +3\alpha\left(\xi_{\chi}-\dfrac{1}{6}\right)(V_{\phi}-\alpha M_{p}^{2}\dot{H})\,. (42)

The equation for XkX_{k} describes an oscillator with time-dependent frequency ωk2(t)\omega_{k}^{2}(t), hence to track the evolution of the modes XkX_{k} during and after inflation, it is necessary to analyze ωk2(t)\omega_{k}^{2}(t). One can see that during the quasi De Sitter phase during inflation when the effective single field inflation is valid, the effective mass is simplified because of H˙0\dot{H}\to 0. In this case one can see that the effective mass takes the form

meff2(ttend)eαϕmχ2+12(ξχ316)H2+3α(ξχ16)Vϕ.m_{\mathrm{eff}}^{2}(t\ll t_{\mathrm{end}})\simeq e^{-\alpha\phi}m_{\chi}^{2}+12\left(\xi_{\chi}-\dfrac{3}{16}\right)H^{2}\\[5.69046pt] +3\alpha\left(\xi_{\chi}-\dfrac{1}{6}\right)V_{\phi}\,. (43)

We can see that the mass term is exponentially suppressed during inflation when ϕMp\phi\gg M_{p}, making the mass of the spectator field much smaller than the Hubble parameter at the end of inflation, mχHendm_{\chi}\ll H_{\mathrm{end}}. However, after inflation, when the scalaron takes values ϕMp\phi\ll M_{p}, the free scalar χ~\tilde{\chi} becomes superheavy, mχHendm_{\chi}\gg H_{\mathrm{end}}, due to the exponential dependence on the scalaron ϕ\phi. Then at the beginning of inflation, when ttendt\ll t_{\mathrm{end}} the Ricci scalar is R12H2R\simeq 12H^{2} and the dominant terms in (41) are k2/a2k^{2}/a^{2}, H2H^{2} and 12ξχH212\xi_{\chi}H^{2}. However, towards the end of inflation, the term H˙\dot{H} cannot be neglected, as after inflation, H˙\dot{H} and the background oscillations dominate the dynamics. The term VϕV_{\phi} regulates the oscillations of the effective mass after inflation, but it is small compared to H2H^{2} and H˙\dot{H}. The contribution of each term depends on the moment at which it is considered. The mass term benefits from exponential growth when ϕMp\phi\ll M_{p}, as we anticipated earlier. Therefore, after inflation, the dominant terms are the mass term and H˙\dot{H}. Additionally, if the coupling constant is ξχ<1/6\xi_{\chi}<1/6, the effective mass could be negative during inflation. In such a case, the frequency ωk2(t)\omega_{k}^{2}(t) can become negative for super-horizon modes kaHk\ll aH, leading to a exponential mode growth χ~e|ωk|t\tilde{\chi}\sim e^{|\omega_{k}|t} during inflation due to tachyonic instability. This regime may result in a very efficient amplification of particle production [42, 33].

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Time-dependent frequency as a function of cosmic time t for a mass mχ=102Mm_{\chi}=10^{-2}M, a non-minimal coupling ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0, and kaHk\gg aH for 5 e-folds before horizon crossing. We set Ne=60N_{e}=60 before the end of inflation as the moment when the mode crosses the horizon.

However, for large enough modes kk, namely

k2>k2=meff2(t),\displaystyle k^{2}>k_{*}^{2}=-m_{\mathrm{eff}}^{2}(t)\,, (44)

have positive frequency ωk2(t)>0\omega_{k}^{2}(t)>0 even if meff2<0m_{\mathrm{eff}}^{2}<0, which corresponds to sub-horizon regime kaHk\gg aH. This occurs when the modes are well inside the horizon at the beginning of inflation. In the figure 3 we show the evolution of ωk2(t)\omega_{k}^{2}(t) for a non-minimal coupling ξ=0\xi=0. Before tcrosst_{\mathrm{cross}}, the frequency is dominated by the decay of the physical mode k/aeHtk/a\sim e^{-Ht}. Once the mode crosses the horizon (kaH)(k\ll aH), ωk2(t)\omega_{k}^{2}(t) remains almost constant, and its value is negative since the coefficient of the dominant term H2H^{2} is negative. For ttendt\gtrsim t_{\mathrm{end}}, the frequency increases and oscillates after inflation as the background terms oscillate around the minimum of the potential (preheating). One can also observe growth due to the exponential dependence of the scalaron in the mass term toward the end of inflation.

To numerically solve equation (40) along with the background equations, we must specify suitable intial conditions that ensure the modes are within the horizon at early times. In the asymptotic limit t0t\to 0 and according to the behavior of ωk2(t)\omega_{k}^{2}(t) at the beginning of inflation, the dominant term is k/ak/a. In this limit, the modes are sub-horizon kaHk\gg aH, and the modes exhibit Minkowski-like behavior. This motivates choosing the Bunch-Davies vacuum as the initial condition [14]

limt0Xk(t)=12ωkeiωkt.\displaystyle\lim_{t\to 0}X_{k}(t)=\dfrac{1}{\sqrt{2\omega_{k}}}\,e^{-i\omega_{k}t}\,. (45)

As previously mentioned, for certain values of ξχ\xi_{\chi}, the modes experience tachyonic excitations during the time they are outside the horizon. Therefore, to ensure that each mode is within the horizon and to use (45)\eqref{BD vacuum} as the initial condition, we must track the evolution of the corresponding mode at times tinit_{\mathrm{ini}} when the mode is inside the horizon. For concreteness, we assume that the Planck pivot scale kk_{*} leaves the horizon N=60N_{*}=60 e-folds before the end of inflation and a total duration of inflation of Ntot=76.150N_{\mathrm{tot}}=76.150 e-folds. We also take the initial conditions to be the values of XkX_{k} and the background variables 5 e-folds before the mode crosses the horizon of that mode. This guarantees that the initial conditions for the modes Xk(t)X_{k}(t) and their derivatives X˙k(t)\dot{X}_{k}(t) can then be safely taken to be of Bunch-Davies type.

V Description of particle production

Once we have established the behavior of mode functions XkX_{k} during and after inflation for some values of spectator mass, the non-minimal coupling ξχ\xi_{\chi} and comoving wave number kk, it is turn to analyze the non-perturbative particle production. The production of χ\chi particles is due to the time dependence of the background variables, in particular the non-adiabatic behaviour of the frequency ωk(t)\omega_{k}(t) that induces a mix among negative- and positive-frequency [3]. The adiabaticity condition is given by the adiabatic paramater AkA_{k} defined as

Refer to caption
Figure 4: An example of non-adiabatic mode evolution leading the gravitational particle production of χ\chi particles described by the adiabaticity parameter |Ak(t)||A_{k}(t)| for mχ=102Mm_{\chi}=10^{-2}M and ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6. At the end of inflation, one see an abruptly increase on |Ak(t)||A_{k}(t)| and non-adiabaticity is induced, leading gravitational particle production nk(t)0n_{k}(t)\neq 0. At late times, when the stabilization occurs, we recover the adiabaticity evolution.
Ak(t)=ω˙kωk2.\displaystyle A_{k}(t)=\dfrac{\dot{\omega}_{k}}{\omega_{k}^{2}}\,. (46)

The adiabatic evolution of ωk(t)\omega_{k}(t) under the WKB approximation of the modes Xk(t)X_{k}(t) guarantees that the positive-frequency mode at early times evolves into positive-frequency modes at late times. That is, for asymptotically early times t0t\to 0, the modes Xk(t)X_{k}(t) evolve as [49]

limt0Xk(t)=eitωk(t)dt2ωk(t).\displaystyle\lim_{t\to 0}X_{k}(t)=\dfrac{e^{-i\int^{t}\omega_{k}(t^{\prime})\mathrm{d}t^{\prime}}}{\sqrt{2\omega_{k}(t)}}\,. (47)

This behavior usually happens at early times ti0t_{i}\to 0 and at sufficiently late times tf+t_{f}\to+\infty, but for intermediate times ti<t<tft_{i}<t_{*}<t_{f} during the expansion of the universe the evolution of the modes is no longer adiabatic |Ak|1|A_{k}|\gg 1. During inflation, the positive-frequency solution corresponds to the Bunch-Davies vacuum (45), as described in the previous section. This evolution remains valid as long as the parameter |Ak|1|A_{k}|\ll 1 at all times. While this condition is met, no particle production occurs, as adiabatic evolution is ensured, and there is no mixing of negative- and positive-frequency modes. From figure 3, we can see that the evolution of ωk(t)\omega_{k}(t) is smooth until the end of inflation. At that point, the condition |Ak|1|A_{k}|\ll 1 is strongly violated, leading to an enhancement in particle production and gravitational particle production is enhanced at the time tt_{*}, which corresponds to the end of inflation. We show the non-adiabaticity evolution in the figure 4 parametrized by the adiabatic parameter |Ak(t)||A_{k}(t)|. The mixture of positive and negative frequency modes at time tendt_{\mathrm{end}} can be represented as the sum of the solutions exp(±itωk(t)dt)\exp(\pm i\int^{t}\omega_{k}(t^{\prime})\mathrm{d}t^{\prime}) using the WKB approximation [14, 5]

Xk(t)=α(t)2ωk(t)eitωk(t)dt+β(t)2ωk(t)eitωk(t)dt,\displaystyle X_{k}(t)=\dfrac{\alpha(t)}{\sqrt{2\omega_{k}(t)}}\,e^{-i\int^{t}\omega_{k}(t^{\prime})\mathrm{d}t^{\prime}}+\dfrac{\beta(t)}{\sqrt{2\omega_{k}(t)}}\,e^{i\int^{t}\omega_{k}(t^{\prime})\mathrm{d}t^{\prime}}\,,

where αk(t)\alpha_{k}(t) and βk(t)\beta_{k}(t) are the time-dependent Bogolyubov coefficients. Comparing with the Bunch-Davies initial condition (47), one see thats αk(t0)=1\alpha_{k}(t_{0})=1 and βk(t0)=0\beta_{k}(t_{0})=0. The comoving particle number density nχ(t)n_{\chi}(t) is related to the coefficient βk\beta_{k} of the Bogolyubov transformations which relate the vacuum states at the asymptotic limits t0t\to 0 and tt\to\infty, and coincides with βk(t)\beta_{k}(t) at late times. We can compute βk(t)\beta_{k}(t) by solving (40) and evaluating

|βk(t)|2=ωk2|Xk|2+|X˙k|22ωk12.\displaystyle|\beta_{k}(t)|^{2}=\dfrac{\omega_{k}}{2}|X_{k}|^{2}+\dfrac{|\dot{X}_{k}|^{2}}{2\omega_{k}}-\dfrac{1}{2}\,. (49)
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: Left: Comoving number density of particles created for mχ=101Mm_{\chi}=10^{-1}M and ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6. The graph shows the evolution of the occupation number nk/kend3n_{k}/k_{\mathrm{end}}^{3} as a function of time tt, where the mode kk was chosen to be 5 e-folds before leaving the horizon during inflation and kend=aendHendk_{\mathrm{end}}=a_{\mathrm{end}}H_{\mathrm{end}} is the mode at the end of inflation. Right: Spectrum of the gravitationally produced scalar particles for the same numerical example. Modes with k=aHk=aH are on the horizon scale at the end of inflation. The mass and the momenta kk both are given in units of MM.

The physical number density nχ(t)n_{\chi}(t) in the late-time limit tt\to\infty is given by

a3(t)nχ(t)=0dlogknk(t),nk(t)=k3|βk(t)|22π2,\displaystyle a^{3}(t)\,n_{\chi}(t)=\int_{0}^{\infty}\mathrm{d}\log k\,n_{k}(t)\,,\quad n_{k}(t)=\dfrac{k^{3}|\beta_{k}(t)|^{2}}{2\pi^{2}}\,,
(50)

where nk(t)n_{k}(t) is the comoving number density of particles with comoving wavenumber kk.

V.1 Numerical results

What follows is to find the spectrum of χ\chi particles and its evolution in the cosmic time tt. Hence we numerically solve (40), constructed the Bogolyubov coeffcient |βk(t)||\beta_{k}(t)| and compute the spectrum nkn_{k} using (50). In the previous section we described the procedure to numerically evaluate the set of equations to ensure that each mode kk is within the horizon at the beginning of the evolution, which allows us to use the Bunch-Davies vacuum (45) as a initial condition of the mode equation for XK(t)X_{K}(t). The initial conditions for the background are set at time tinit_{\mathrm{ini}}, corresponding to the moment when the modes are within the horizon. For example, for N=60N_{*}=60 at the time of crossing, the initial time corresponds to tini28.712t_{\mathrm{ini}}\approx 28.712 in units of [105Mp1][10^{-5}M_{p}^{-1}], and the corresponding mode k=aHk=aH will be the value of aHaH at time tinit_{\mathrm{ini}}. Then, the Bogolyubov coefficient |βk(t)|2|\beta_{k}(t)|^{2} is calculated using (49) and the comoving number density of gravitational particle production is determined by nk(t)n_{k}(t).

V.1.1 Conformal coupling ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6

First of all, we focus on the conformal coupling ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6 and consider light masses mχM/2m_{\chi}\ll M/2. As first example, we show the the comoving number density of particles nk(t)n_{k}(t) as a function of time tt and the corresponding spectrum for the case of mχ=101Mm_{\chi}=10^{-1}M. In the left panel of figure 5, we observe that the number of particles created saturates at the end of inflation, stabilizing and becoming constant at late times tt\to\infty. This growth in nkn_{k} is due to the non-adiabaticity of ωk\omega_{k} at the end of inflation, as can be seen in the figure 4. The oscillations of nk(t)n_{k}(t) after inflation are due to resonances at certain moments between the oscillations of the modes XkX_{k} and the frequency itself. In the right panel, we observe the corresponding spectrum of nk(t)n_{k}(t). Several remarkable features can be observed. For IR modes (kaH)(k\ll aH), we see that the spectrum is blue-tilted, reaching a peak at some intermediate value kpeakk_{\mathrm{peak}}, and then is suppressed for UV modes (kaH)(k\gg aH) due to inflation, that is, those that remain within the horizon during inflation. Modes with kkendk\ll k_{\mathrm{end}} leaves the horizon during inflation and re-enter later during the reheating epoch after inflation. Therefore, the dynamics of the Xk(t)X_{k}(t) modes are dictated by the effective mass term (43) with a quasi-De Sitter spacetime as background with HconstantH\simeq\mathrm{constant}. It is important to note that the UV modes cross the horizon just at the end of inflation, leading to the production of these modes at that instant and their subsequent evolution during the preheating epoch after inflation, as seen in the left panel of figure 5. During this epoch, the production occurs mainly due to the oscillatory nature of the scalaron and the Higgs field, as shown in figure 2, through the term H˙\dot{H} and the Ricci scalar RR via the non-minimal coupling ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6. The suppression of UV modes occurs because the χ\chi scalars become supermassive at the end of inflation due to the exponentially scalaron-dependence mass, causing the effective mass to become substantial. As a result, gravitational particle production becomes less efficient, leading to a significant suppression in the particle density number nk(t)n_{k}(t).

Figure 6 presents the spectrum of the comoving number of particles produced across the range of light masses considered in this study.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Comoving spectrum of gravitational scalar particle production nkn_{k} for a range of light masses of the field χ\chi as a function of rescaled horizon modes k/kendk/k_{\mathrm{end}}. Masses are given in units of scalaron mass MM. One can seen that the UV tail is suppressed for light masses mχ<M/2m_{\chi}<M/2.

The numerical results exhibit a blue-tilted behavior in the infrared (IR) modes, with an exponential suppression in the ultraviolet (UV) tail for light masses mχ<M/2m_{\chi}<M/2. The mass of the field plays a key role in determining the amplitude of nkn_{k} at the peak momentum kpeakk_{\mathrm{peak}}, which systematically decreases as mχm_{\chi} increases [44]. It is important to emphasize that, in this mass range, particle production following inflation is predominantly driven by the decay of the scalaron into pairs of light χ\chi particles, as described by expression (33). Furthermore, figure 6 indicates that non-perturbative particle production within this mass range remains minimal, suggesting that such production could lead to an overproduction [8, 50]. For the specific cases of mχ=0.2Mm_{\chi}=0.2M and mχ=0.3Mm_{\chi}=0.3M, the production is significantly more moderate. The spectra also exhibit a tendency to flatten in the UV region, implying that gravitational particle production becomes increasingly inefficient for larger masses.

V.1.2 Non-minimal coupling ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Comoving spectrum of gravitational scalar particle production nkn_{k} for ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0 as a function of rescaled horizon modes k/kendk/k_{\mathrm{end}}. Masses are given in units of scalaron mass MM. One can seen that the spectrum is nearly scale-invariant with a blue-tilted behavior for larger masses.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: Comoving number density of particles nk/kend3n_{k}/k_{\mathrm{end}}^{3} for mχ=101Mm_{\chi}=10^{-1}M and ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0 as a function of cosmic time tt.

For the case of ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0, we have a different situation. During inflation, the effective mass (43) can be negative for light masses mχHendm_{\chi}\ll H_{\mathrm{end}}

meff2(t)eαϕmχ294H2α2Vϕ<0,\displaystyle m_{\mathrm{eff}}^{2}(t)\approx e^{-\alpha\phi}m_{\chi}^{2}-\dfrac{9}{4}H^{2}-\dfrac{\alpha}{2}V_{\phi}<0\,,

and once the modes cross the horizon, we obtain ωk2(t)<0\omega_{k}^{2}(t)<0, leading to tachyonic instabilities as pointed out in the discussion following equation (43). Therefore, particle production can be due to resonances from oscillations or due to the instabilities caused by ωk2(t)<0\omega_{k}^{2}(t)<0. In figure 8, we can observe the behavior of nk(t)n_{k}(t) normalized to its value at the end of inflation as a function of cosmic time. We can see that for the same mass value mχ=101Mm_{\chi}=10^{-1}M, particle production is significantly larger than in the case of conformal coupling (see figure 5).

The tachyonic growth of the modes Xk(t)X_{k}(t) outside the horizon is the main driver for the enhanced production of minimally coupled particles compared to the ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6 case. We observe that after inflation, nk(t)n_{k}(t) exhibits an anharmonic oscillatory behavior with maximum production peaks until it reaches a constant value as tt\to\infty. However, for masses mχHendm_{\chi}\gg H_{\mathrm{end}}, the dominant terms in the effective mass during inflation are eαϕmχ2e^{-\alpha\phi}m_{\chi}^{2} and (k/a)2(k/a)^{2}, which implies a positive frequency ωk2(t)>0\omega_{k}^{2}(t)>0. In figure 7, we show the spectrum of scalar particles created in the case of minimal coupling and masses mχM/2m_{\chi}\gtrsim M/2. As can be seen, the spectrum generated in the IR region is qualitatively different as the mass increases. We observe an almost scale-invariant spectrum that is slightly blue-tilted for masses mχ>M/2m_{\chi}>M/2.

VI Discussion and remarks

In this study, we investigated the gravitational and non-perturbative production of free scalar particles, χ\chi, in Higgs-R2R^{2} inflation. We began with a free spectator field, χ\chi, interacting solely through the gravitational term ξχR\xi_{\chi}R in the Jordan frame. By applying a conformal transformation to transition into the Einstein frame, direct couplings between the χ\chi field and the scalaron ϕ\phi emerged. Within the context of inflationary dynamics in the Einstein frame, we derived the equation of motion for the χ\chi field, taking into account the non-minimal coupling with R. We numerically solved this system of equations, imposing Bunch-Davies conditions on the χ\chi field 5 e-folds before the modes crossed the horizon, to determine the mode functions of the χ\chi field. From these solutions, we extracted the Bogolyubov coefficient βk(t)\beta_{k}(t) to calculate the comoving particle density and visualize their spectrum. We explored two distinct scenarios for the non-minimal coupling ξχ\xi_{\chi}, considering different mass ranges. For ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6 and light masses, we observed efficient particle production at the end of inflation due to the term eαϕmχ2e^{-\alpha\phi}m_{\chi}^{2}, which becomes dominant at that stage. The resulting power spectrum exhibited a blue-tilted behavior, indicating that particle production was dominated by modes near the Hubble radius (aH)1(aH)^{-1} at the end of inflation, while shorter wavelength modes were suppressed.

In the case of ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6 and for masses close to mχM/2m_{\chi}\sim M/2, the spectrum tends to flatten out without exhibiting a peak in the UV region. This phenomenon is possibly due to the mass term that depends exponentially on the scalaron ϕ\phi, causing the effective mass to become superheavy at the end of inflation. In contrast, for ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0, the spectrum remained nearly scale-invariant for masses mχM/2m_{\chi}\gtrsim M/2, with a blue tilt emerging for larger masses. For light masses and ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0, we find that the comoving number of particles created is significantly higher compared to the case of conformally coupled particles, which is due to the tachyonic growth of the modes Xk(t)X_{k}(t). We have not attempted a detailed exploration of the parameter space of the Higgs-R2R^{2} inflation model or the parameters of the scalar field χ\chi. Instead, we have taken the Higgs-R2R^{2} inflation model, whose observables are consistent with Planck, and considered the possibility of non-perturbative particle production through the direct couplings that arise between the χ\chi field and the inflationary sector when changing the conformal frame. We found that inflation driven by the Higgs field and the scalaron can produce scalar particles in the cases ξχ=0\xi_{\chi}=0 and ξχ=1/6\xi_{\chi}=1/6 and for a specific range of masses. This field could potentially contribute to the abundance of dark matter, for which its current abundance would need to be calculated.

There remains much to be done for future work, such as considering the production of spin-1/21/2 and spin-11 dark matter, the production of gauge bosons Wμ±W^{\pm}_{\mu}, ZμZ_{\mu}, as well as the implications on primordial non-Gaussianities in the CMB induced by particle production. It would also be interesting to study the isocurvature constraints for light scalar field masses in this model. We leave these intriguing topics for future studies.

VII Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to Dr. Marcos Garcia for his insightful comments and input, which made it possible to write the code for this article. We would also like to acknowledge Dr. Andrew Long for providing an example of numerical code. The work of F.P. has been sponsored by CONACHyT-Mexico through a doctoral scholarship. This work was also partially supported by CONACHyT-Mexico through the support CBF2023-2024-1937.

References

  • Guth [1981] A. H. Guth, Inflationary universe: A possible solution to the horizon and flatness problems, Phys. Rev. D 23, 347 (1981).
  • Linde [1982] A. Linde, A new inflationary universe scenario: A possible solution of the horizon, flatness, homogeneity, isotropy and primordial monopole problems, Physics Letters B 108, 389 (1982).
  • Parker [1969] L. Parker, Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. i, Phys. Rev. 183, 1057 (1969).
  • Ford [1987] L. H. Ford, Gravitational particle creation and inflation, Physical Review D 35, 2955 (1987).
  • Kolb and Long [2023] E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, Cosmological gravitational particle production and its implications for cosmological relics, arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.09042  (2023).
  • Chung et al. [2000] D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, A. Riotto, and I. I. Tkachev, Probing planckian physics: Resonant production of particles during inflation and features in the primordial power spectrum, Phys. Rev. D 62, 043508 (2000).
  • Romano and Sasaki [2008] A. E. Romano and M. Sasaki, Effects of particle production during inflation, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 7810.1103/PhysRevD.78.103522 (2008).
  • Gorbunov and Panin [2012] D. S. Gorbunov and A. G. Panin, Free scalar dark matter candidates in R 2-inflation: The light, the heavy and the superheavy, Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics 718, 15 (2012)arXiv:1201.3539 .
  • Ema et al. [2018] Y. Ema, K. Nakayama, and Y. Tang, Production of purely gravitational dark matter, Journal of High Energy Physics 201810.1007/JHEP09(2018)135 (2018), arXiv:1804.07471 .
  • Chung [2003] D. J. Chung, Classical inflaton field induced creation of superheavy dark matter, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 6710.1103/PhysRevD.67.083514 (2003), arXiv:9809489 [hep-ph] .
  • Chung et al. [2001] D. J. Chung, P. Crotty, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, Gravitational production of superheavy dark matter, Physical Review D 6410.1103/PhysRevD.64.043503 (2001).
  • Hashiba and Yokoyama [2019] S. Hashiba and J. Yokoyama, Gravitational particle creation for dark matter and reheating, Physical Review D 9910.1103/PhysRevD.99.043008 (2019), arXiv:1812.10032 .
  • Cembranos et al. [2020] J. A. Cembranos, L. J. Garay, and J. M. Sánchez Velázquez, Gravitational production of scalar dark matter, Journal of High Energy Physics 2020, 1 (2020).
  • Kofman et al. [1997] L. Kofman, A. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D 56, 3258 (1997).
  • Kaiser [1997] D. I. Kaiser, Preheating in an expanding universe: Analytic results for the massless case, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 56, 706 (1997).
  • Shtanov et al. [1995] Y. Shtanov, J. Traschen, and R. Brandenberger, Universe reheating after inflation, Physical Review D 51, 5438 (1995)arXiv:9407247 [hep-ph] .
  • Dorsch et al. [2024] G. C. Dorsch, L. Miranda, and N. Yokomizo, Gravitational reheating in starobinsky inflation, arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.04161  (2024).
  • Adshead et al. [2019] P. Adshead, L. Pearce, M. Peloso, M. A. Roberts, and L. Sorbo, Gravitational waves from fermion production during axion inflation, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019 (10), arXiv:1904.10483 .
  • Cook and Sorbo [2012] J. L. Cook and L. Sorbo, Particle production during inflation and gravitational waves detectable by ground-based interferometers, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 8510.1103/PhysRevD.85.023534 (2012), arXiv:1109.0022 .
  • García-Bellido [2011] J. García-Bellido, Primordial gravitational waves from inflation and preheating, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement 190, 322 (2011)arXiv:1012.2006 .
  • Durrer and Neronov [2013] R. Durrer and A. Neronov, Cosmological magnetic fields: Their generation, evolution and observation, Astronomy and Astrophysics Review 2110.1007/s00159-013-0062-7 (2013), arXiv:1303.7121 .
  • Giovannini and Shaposhnikov [2000] M. Giovannini and M. Shaposhnikov, Primordial magnetic fields from inflation?, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 62, 1 (2000)arXiv:0004269 [hep-ph] .
  • Kobayashi [2014] T. Kobayashi, Primordial magnetic fields from the post-inflationary universe, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014 (5), arXiv:1403.5168 .
  • Kandus et al. [2011] A. Kandus, K. E. Kunze, and C. G. Tsagas, Primordial magnetogenesis, Physics Reports 505, 1 (2011)arXiv:1007.3891 .
  • Barnaby et al. [2012a] N. Barnaby, E. Pajer, and M. Peloso, Gauge field production in axion inflation: Consequences for monodromy, non-Gaussianity in the CMB, and gravitational waves at interferometers, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 8510.1103/PhysRevD.85.023525 (2012a), arXiv:1110.3327 .
  • Barnaby et al. [2012b] N. Barnaby, J. Moxon, R. Namba, M. Peloso, G. Shiu, and P. Zhou, Gravity waves and non-Gaussian features from particle production in a sector gravitationally coupled to the inflaton, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 8610.1103/PhysRevD.86.103508 (2012b), arXiv:1206.6117 .
  • Langlois and Sorbo [2009] D. Langlois and L. Sorbo, Primordial perturbations and non-Gaussianities from modulated trapping, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2009 (8).
  • Bezrukov et al. [2009] F. Bezrukov, D. Gorbunov, and M. Shaposhnikov, On initial conditions for the hot big bang, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2009 (6), arXiv:0812.3622 .
  • Gorbunov and Tokareva [2019] D. Gorbunov and A. Tokareva, Scalaron the healer: removing the strong-coupling in the higgs- and higgs-dilaton inflations, Physics Letters B 788, 37 (2019).
  • Ema [2017] Y. Ema, Higgs scalaron mixed inflation, Physics Letters B 770, 403 (2017).
  • Gundhi and Steinwachs [2020] A. Gundhi and C. F. Steinwachs, Scalaron-higgs inflation, Nuclear Physics B 954, 114989 (2020).
  • Bassett and Liberati [1998] B. A. Bassett and S. Liberati, Geometric reheating after inflation, Physical Review D 58, 021302 (1998).
  • Dufaux et al. [2006] J. F. Dufaux, G. N. Felder, L. Kofman, M. Peloso, and D. Podolsky, Preheating with trilinear interactions: Tachyonic resonance, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2006 (07), 006.
  • He et al. [2018] M. He, A. A. Starobinsky, and J. Yokoyama, Inflation in the mixed higgs-r2 model, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2018 (05), 064.
  • Starobinsky [1980] A. Starobinsky, A new type of isotropic cosmological models without singularity, Physics Letters B 91, 99 (1980).
  • Planck Collaboration et al. [2020] Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., Ballardini, M., Banday, A. J., Barreiro, R. B., Bartolo, N., Basak, S., Battye, R., Benabed, K., Bernard, J.-P., Bersanelli, M., Bielewicz, P., Bock, J. J., Bond, J. R., Borrill, J., Bouchet, F. R., Boulanger, F., Bucher, M., Burigana, C., Butler, R. C., Calabrese, E., Cardoso, J.-F., Carron, J., Challinor, A., Chiang, H. C., Chluba, J., Colombo, L. P. L., Combet, C., Contreras, D., Crill, B. P., Cuttaia, F., de Bernardis, P., de Zotti, G., Delabrouille, J., Delouis, J.-M., Di Valentino, E., Diego, J. M., Doré, O., Douspis, M., Ducout, A., Dupac, X., Dusini, S., Efstathiou, G., Elsner, F., Enßlin, T. A., Eriksen, H. K., Fantaye, Y., Farhang, M., Fergusson, J., Fernandez-Cobos, R., Finelli, F., Forastieri, F., Frailis, M., Fraisse, A. A., Franceschi, E., Frolov, A., Galeotta, S., Galli, S., Ganga, K., Génova-Santos, R. T., Gerbino, M., Ghosh, T., González-Nuevo, J., Górski, K. M., Gratton, S., Gruppuso, A., Gudmundsson, J. E., Hamann, J., Handley, W., Hansen, F. K., Herranz, D., Hildebrandt, S. R., Hivon, E., Huang, Z., Jaffe, A. H., Jones, W. C., Karakci, A., Keihänen, E., Keskitalo, R., Kiiveri, K., Kim, J., Kisner, T. S., Knox, L., Krachmalnicoff, N., Kunz, M., Kurki-Suonio, H., Lagache, G., Lamarre, J.-M., Lasenby, A., Lattanzi, M., Lawrence, C. R., Le Jeune, M., Lemos, P., Lesgourgues, J., Levrier, F., Lewis, A., Liguori, M., Lilje, P. B., Lilley, M., Lindholm, V., López-Caniego, M., Lubin, P. M., Ma, Y.-Z., Macías-Pérez, J. F., Maggio, G., Maino, D., Mandolesi, N., Mangilli, A., Marcos-Caballero, A., Maris, M., Martin, P. G., Martinelli, M., Martínez-González, E., Matarrese, S., Mauri, N., McEwen, J. D., Meinhold, P. R., Melchiorri, A., Mennella, A., Migliaccio, M., Millea, M., Mitra, S., Miville-Deschênes, M.-A., Molinari, D., Montier, L., Morgante, G., Moss, A., Natoli, P., Nørgaard-Nielsen, H. U., Pagano, L., Paoletti, D., Partridge, B., Patanchon, G., Peiris, H. V., Perrotta, F., Pettorino, V., Piacentini, F., Polastri, L., Polenta, G., Puget, J.-L., Rachen, J. P., Reinecke, M., Remazeilles, M., Renzi, A., Rocha, G., Rosset, C., Roudier, G., Rubiño-Martín, J. A., Ruiz-Granados, B., Salvati, L., Sandri, M., Savelainen, M., Scott, D., Shellard, E. P. S., Sirignano, C., Sirri, G., Spencer, L. D., Sunyaev, R., Suur-Uski, A.-S., Tauber, J. A., Tavagnacco, D., Tenti, M., Toffolatti, L., Tomasi, M., Trombetti, T., Valenziano, L., Valiviita, J., Van Tent, B., Vibert, L., Vielva, P., Villa, F., Vittorio, N., Wandelt, B. D., Wehus, I. K., White, M., White, S. D. M., Zacchei, A., and Zonca, A., Planck 2018 results - vi. cosmological parameters, A&A 641, A6 (2020).
  • Barvinsky et al. [2008] A. Barvinsky, A. Y. Kamenshchik, and A. Starobinsky, Inflation scenario via the standard model higgs boson and lhc, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2008 (11), 021.
  • Karamitsos and Pilaftsis [2018] S. Karamitsos and A. Pilaftsis, Frame covariant nonminimal multifield inflation, Nuclear Physics B 927, 219 (2018).
  • Kehagias et al. [2014] A. Kehagias, A. Moradinezhad Dizgah, and A. Riotto, Remarks on the starobinsky model of inflation and its descendants, Phys. Rev. D 89, 043527 (2014).
  • Akrami et al. [2020] Y. Akrami, F. Arroja, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini, A. J. Banday, R. Barreiro, N. Bartolo, S. Basak, et al., Planck 2018 results-x. constraints on inflation, Astronomy & Astrophysics 641, A10 (2020).
  • Markkanen [2018] T. Markkanen, Vacuum stability in the early universe and the backreaction of classical gravity, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 376, 20170115 (2018).
  • Markkanen and Nurmi [2017] T. Markkanen and S. Nurmi, Dark matter from gravitational particle production at reheating, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (2), arXiv:1512.07288 .
  • Ema et al. [2017] Y. Ema, R. Jinno, K. Mukaida, and K. Nakayama, Violent preheating in inflation with nonminimal coupling, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2017 (02), 045.
  • Garcia et al. [2023a] M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, Isocurvature constraints on scalar dark matter production from the inflaton, Phys. Rev. D 107, 123508 (2023a).
  • Garcia et al. [2023b] M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, New window into gravitationally produced scalar dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 108, 115024 (2023b)arXiv:2305.14446 [hep-ph] .
  • Garcia et al. [2023c] M. A. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, Scalar dark matter production from preheating and structure formation constraints, Physical Review D 10710.1103/PhysRevD.107.043530 (2023c), arXiv:2206.08940 .
  • Kolb et al. [2023] E. W. Kolb, A. J. Long, E. McDonough, and G. Payeur, Completely dark matter from rapid-turn multifield inflation, Journal of High Energy Physics 202310.1007/JHEP02(2023)181 (2023), arXiv:2211.14323 .
  • Vilenkin [1985] A. Vilenkin, Classical and quantum cosmology of the starobinsky inflationary model, Physical Review D 32, 2511 (1985).
  • Winitzki [2005] S. Winitzki, Cosmological particle production and the precision of the WKB approximation, Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology 72, 104011 (2005)arXiv:0510001 [gr-qc] .
  • Kuzmin and Tkachev [1999] V. Kuzmin and I. Tkachev, Matter creation via vacuum fluctuations in the early universe and observed ultrahigh energy cosmic ray events, Physical Review D 59, 123006 (1999).