This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Non-Markovian qubit dynamics in nonequilibrium environments

Xiangji Cai [email protected] School of Science, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
Abstract

We theoretically study the non-Markovian dynamics of qubit systems coupled to nonequilibrium environments with nonstationary and non-Markovian statistical properties. The reduced density matrix of the single qubit system satisfies a closed third-order differential equation with all the higher-order environmental correlations taken into account and the reduced density matrix of the two qubit system can be expressed as the Kraus representation in terms of the tensor products of the single qubit Kraus operators. We derive the relation between the entanglement and nonlocality of the two qubit system which are both closely associated with the decoherence function. We identify the threshold values of the decoherence function to ensure the existences of the concurrence and nonlocal quantum correlations for a given evolution time when the two qubit system is initially prepared in the composite Bell states and the extended Werner states, respectively. It is shown that the environmental nonstationary feature can suppress the decoherence and disentanglement dynamics and can reduce the coherence and entanglement revivals in non-Markovian dynamics regime. In addition, it is shown that the environmental non-Markovian feature can enhance the coherence revivals in the single decoherence dynamics and the entanglement revivals in the two qubit disentanglement dynamics, respectively. Furthermore, the environmental nonstationary and non-Markovian features can enhance the nonlocality of the two qubit system.

pacs:
03.65.Yz, 05.40.-a, 02.50.-r

I Introduction

Coherence and entanglement are two basic quantum features of nonclassical systems which play vital roles in quantum mechanical community as specific resources ranging from fundamental questions to wide applications in quantum computing, quantum metrology and quantum information science Horodecki et al. (2009); Chitambar and Hsieh (2016); Streltsov et al. (2017); Hu et al. (2018); Chitambar and Gour (2019). It is known that any quantum system loses quantum features during time evolution resulting from the unavoidable couplings between the system and the environments. The study of decoherence and disentanglement dynamics of open quantum systems can help us further expand the understanding of the environmental effects on the dynamical evolution of the quantum systems and the real origins of loss of quantum features and quantum-classical transition, which has potential applications in preserving quantum features against the environmental noise and in realizing quantum manipulation and control and quantum measurement Breuer and Petruccione (2002); Schlosshauer (2007, 2019); Carollo et al. (2020); Gurvitz et al. (2003); Li et al. (2005); Kang et al. (2017); Lan et al. (2020).

In recent decade, it has attracted increasing attention to study theoretically the dynamics of open quantum systems beyond the framework of Markov approximation Strunz et al. (1999); Piilo et al. (2008); Breuer et al. (2009); Rivas et al. (2010); Zhang et al. (2012); Chruściński and Maniscalco (2014); Rivas et al. (2014); Fanchini et al. (2014); Breuer et al. (2016); de Vega and Alonso (2017), and there have been well established theoretical approaches to study the non-Markovian dynamics of open quantum systems which usually assume that the environments are in equilibrium and exhibit both Markovian and stationary statistical properties within the framework of classical and quantum treatments Anderson (1954); Kubo (1954); Paladino et al. (2002); Falci et al. (2005); Bellomo et al. (2007, 2008a, 2008b); Magazzù et al. (2015); Chenu et al. (2017); Costa-Filho et al. (2017); Yan and Shao (2018); Paladino et al. (2014); Ma and Cao (2015); Hsieh and Cao (2018). However, it is quite difficult to obtain the exact dynamical evolution equation for open quantum systems and only a few physical models can be exactly solved due to the indispensable influences of the higher-order environmental correlations. Thus, it is extremely meaningful to derive the exact quantum dynamical equation with all the higher-order environmental correlations effects taken into account, which can help us better understand the real decoherence process induced by the environments and has potential applications in quantum coherent manipulation and control.

Recently, it has been observed experimentally the nonequilibrium feature of the environments in many crucial dynamical processes Taubert et al. (2008); Granger et al. (2012). In these processes, the environmental nonequilibrium states caused by the interaction with the quantum systems can not reach stationary in time Martens (2010, 2012, 2013); Lombardo and Villar (2013, 2015) which corresponds to that the environments around the quantum systems are out of equilibrium and exhibit nonstationary and non-Markovian statistical properties. It has increasingly drawn much attention to study the environmental nonequilibrium effects on quantum coherence due to the significant role in the dynamical evolution of the open quantum systems, and the theoretical results show that nonequilibrium environments cause the energy levels shift of the quantum system and delay the transition critical time of decoherence from classical to quantum Cai and Zheng (2016, 2017, 2018); Cai et al. (2019); Basit et al. (2020). Meanwhile, some other important physical questions arise naturally and should be addressed: How do the nonstationary and non-Markovian statistical properties of the nonequilibrium environments influence the disentanglement dynamics of open quantum systems, respectively? Can we find a close relation between the local decoherence and nonlocal entanglement of open quantum systems in nonequilibrium environments? And what is the influence of the environmental nonequilibrium feature on the quantum nonlocality?

In this paper, we theoretically study the non-Markovian dynamics of qubit systems interacting with nonequilibrium environments which display nonstationary and non-Markovian random telegraph noise (RTN) properties. It is shown that the nonstationary statistical property of the environments give rise to nonzero environmental odd-order correlation functions which play an essential role in the unitary dynamical evolution of the qubit system. We derive the closed third-order differential equation for the single qubit reduced density matrix with all the higher-order environmental correlations taken into account. By means of Laplace transformation, we derive analytically the exact expression of the single qubit reduced density matrix. The two qubit system consists of two noncoupling identical single qubits independently interacting with its local nonequilibrium environment, of which the reduced density matrix can be expressed as the Kraus representation in terms of the tensor products of the single qubit Kraus operators. We derive the relation between entanglement quantified by the concurrence and nonlocality characterized by the Bell function closely associated with the decoherence function. We identify the threshold values of the decoherence function to ensure the existences of the concurrence and nonlocal quantum correlations at an arbitrary evolution time for the two qubit system prepared initially in the composite Bell states and the extended Werner states, respectively. It is shown that the environmental nonstationary feature can suppress both the decoherence and disentanglement dynamics and that it can reduce the coherence and entanglement revivals in non-Markovian dynamics regime. In addition, the environmental nonstationary feature can enhance the nonlocality of the two qubit system. It is shown that the environmental non-Markovian feature can increase the coherence and entanglement revivals in the single and two qubit dynamics, respectively. Furthermore, the environmental non-Markovian feature can also enhance the nonlocality of the two qubit system.

This paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we introduce the theoretical framework of non-Markovian qubit dynamics in nonequilibrium environments. We employ the non-Markovianity and decoherence function to quantify the non-Markovian single qubit decoherence dynamics and we employ the non-Markovianity, concurrence and Bell function to describe the non-Markovian two qubit disentanglement dynamics in nonequilibrium environments. In Sec. III, we discuss the numerical results of the non-Markovian decoherence dynamics of a single qubit system and disentanglement dynamics of a two noninteracting qubit system coupled to nonequilibrium environments with nonstationary and non-Markovian statistical properties, respectively. In Sec. IV we give the conclusions from the present study.

II Qubit dynamics in nonequilibrium environments

II.1 Decoherence dynamics of a single qubit system

We consider a single qubit system SS with the states |0|0\rangle and |1|1\rangle interacting with a nonequilibrium environment EE. The environmental initial state ρE(0)\rho_{E}(0) is in nonequilibrium corresponding to the nonstationary statistical property of the environment. In the interaction picture with respect to the single qubit system Hamiltonian HS=(/2)ωSσzH_{S}=(\hbar/2)\omega_{S}\sigma_{z} and the environment Hamiltonian HEH_{E}, the Hamiltonian of the total system S+ES+E can be written as Norris et al. (2016)

HSE(t)=2ϵ(t)σz,H_{SE}(t)=\frac{\hbar}{2}\epsilon(t)\sigma_{z}, (1)

where ωS\omega_{S} is the frequency difference of the qubit system, σz\sigma_{z} denotes the Pauli matrix in the single qubit basis S={|0,|1}\mathcal{B}_{S}=\{|0\rangle,|1\rangle\}, and the environmental noise ϵ(t)\epsilon(t) is subject to a stochastic process in the presence of a classical environment whereas it is a time dependent operator in the presence of a quantum environment.

The qubit system undergoes pure decoherence during its dynamical evolution due to the fact that [HS,HSE(t)]=0[H_{S},H_{SE}(t)]=0, and the environmental decoherence effect on the qubit system is reflected in the dynamics of the coherence element. The dynamical evolution of the density matrix of the total system is described by the Liouville equation dρSE(t)/dt=(i/)[HSE(t),ρSE(t)]d\rho_{SE}(t)/dt=-(i/\hbar)[H_{SE}(t),\rho_{SE}(t)]. By taking a partial trace over the degrees of freedom of the environment, the reduced density matrix of the single qubit system can be written as

ρS(t)=USE(t;ϵ(t))ρSE(0)US(t;ϵ(t))=μ=12KSμ(t)ρS(0)KSμ(t),\begin{split}\rho_{S}(t)&=\left\langle U_{SE}\bm{(}t;\epsilon(t)\bm{)}\rho_{SE}(0)U_{S}^{{\dagger}}\bm{(}t;\epsilon(t)\bm{)}\right\rangle\\ &=\sum_{\mu=1}^{2}K_{S\mu}(t)\rho_{S}(0)K_{S\mu}^{{\dagger}}(t),\end{split} (2)

where =TrE(ρE)\langle\cdots\rangle=\mathrm{Tr}_{E}(\cdots\rho_{E}) represents a trace over the environmental degrees of freedom with the environment state ρE(t)\rho_{E}(t), USE(t;ϵ(t))=exp[(i/)0t𝑑tHSE(t)]U_{SE}\bm{(}t;\epsilon(t)\bm{)}=\exp\big{[}-(i/\hbar)\int_{0}^{t}dt^{\prime}H_{SE}(t^{\prime})\big{]} denotes the unitary time evolution operator in terms of the HSE(t)H_{SE}(t) in Eq. (1) and the single qubit Kraus operators KSμK_{S\mu} satisfy

KS1(t)=(100D(t)),KS2(t)=(0001|D(t)|2),K_{S1}(t)=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 0&D(t)\end{array}\right),K_{S2}(t)=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\sqrt{1-|D(t)|^{2}}\end{array}\right), (3)

with the decoherence function D(t)=eiΦ(t)Γ(t)D(t)=e^{-i\Phi(t)-\Gamma(t)} in terms of the time-dependent phase angle Φ(t)\Phi(t) and decay factor Γ(t)\Gamma(t) expressed respectively as

Φ(t)=n=1(1)n(2n1)!𝒞2n1(t),Γ(t)=n=1(1)n(2n)!𝒞2n(t),𝒞n(t)=0t𝑑t10t𝑑tnCn(t1,,tn),\begin{split}\Phi(t)&=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{(2n-1)!}\mathcal{C}_{2n-1}(t),\\ \Gamma(t)&=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}}{(2n)!}\mathcal{C}_{2n}(t),\\ \mathcal{C}_{n}(t)&=\int_{0}^{t}dt_{1}\cdots\int_{0}^{t}dt_{n}C_{n}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{n}),\end{split} (4)

based on the statistical characteristics of the environmental noise ϵ(t)\epsilon(t). The nnth-order cumulant Cn(t1,,tn)C_{n}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{n}) depends on the environmental correlation function ϵ(t1)ϵ(tk)\langle\epsilon(t_{1})\cdots\epsilon(t_{k})\rangle with knk\leq n and \langle\cdots\rangle denoting an ensemble average with respect to the initial state of the environment ρE(0)\rho_{E}(0). The odd-order and even-order cumulants of the environmental noise characterize the degrees of the asymmetry and broadness of the distribution, respectively. It is worth mentioning that the environmental noise ϵ(t)\epsilon(t) is stationary if and only if [HE,ρE(0)]=0[H_{E},\rho_{E}(0)]=0 which corresponds to the environment in a certain equilibrium state initially, and in this case the qubit system undergoes no phase evolution since the odd-order cumulants of the environmental noise vanish Norris et al. (2016). For the general case [HE,ρE(0)]0[H_{E},\rho_{E}(0)]\neq 0 corresponding to the environment in an initial nonequilibrium state, the statistical property of the environment is nonstationary and the environmental odd-order correlation functions play an essential role in the unitary dynamical evolution of the qubit system.

Based on the Kraus operators expression for the single qubit reduced density matrix in Eq. (2), the diagonal elements are time independent and the off diagonal elements are time dependent

ρ00(t)=ρ00(0),ρ11(t)=1ρ00(t),ρ01(t)=ρ10(t)=ρ01(0)D(t).\begin{split}\rho_{00}(t)&=\rho_{00}(0),\\ \rho_{11}(t)&=1-\rho_{00}(t),\\ \rho_{01}(t)&=\rho_{10}^{*}(t)=\rho_{01}(0)D(t).\end{split} (5)

The dynamics of the single qubit system satisfies a time-local quantum master equation as

ddtρS(t)=i2ϕ(t)[σz,ρS(t)]14γ(t)[σz,[σz,ρS(t)]],\frac{d}{dt}\rho_{S}(t)=-\frac{i}{2}\phi(t)[\sigma_{z},\rho_{S}(t)]-\frac{1}{4}\gamma(t)[\sigma_{z},[\sigma_{z},\rho_{S}(t)]], (6)

where ϕ(t)=dΦ(t)/dt\phi(t)=d\Phi(t)/dt represents the frequency shift caused by the odd-order environmental correlations and γ(t)=dΓ(t)/dt\gamma(t)=d\Gamma(t)/dt denotes the decoherence rate induced by the even-order environmental correlations. Due to the environmental decoherence, the diagonal elements of the qubit reduced density matrix do not evolve with time while the off-diagonal elements decay monotonously (Markovian behavior) or non-monotonously (non-Markovian behavior). The non-Markovianity quantifying the exchange of a flow of information between the single qubit system and environment can be, by taking the optimization over all pairs of initial states, expressed as Breuer et al. (2009); Laine et al. (2010)

𝒩S=maxρS1,2(0)d𝒟dt>0ddt𝒟(ρS1(t),ρS2(t))𝑑t=γ(t)<0γ(t)|D(t)|𝑑t,\begin{split}\mathcal{N}_{S}&=\max\limits_{\rho_{S}^{1,2}(0)}\int_{\frac{d\mathcal{D}}{dt}>0}\frac{d}{dt}\mathcal{D}(\rho_{S}^{1}(t),\rho_{S}^{2}(t))dt\\ &=-\int_{\gamma(t)<0}\gamma(t)|D(t)|dt,\end{split} (7)

where 𝒟(ρ1,ρ2)=12tr|ρ1ρ2|\mathcal{D}(\rho^{1},\rho^{2})=\frac{1}{2}\mathrm{tr}|\rho^{1}-\rho^{2}| denotes the trace distance between the states ρ1\rho^{1} and ρ2\rho^{2} and the optimal pair of initial states is chosen as the maximally coherent states |ψS±(0)=(|0±|1)/2|\psi_{S}^{\pm}(0)\rangle=(|0\rangle\pm|1\rangle)/\sqrt{2}. The single qubit dynamics displays non-Markovian behavior if the decoherence rate γ(t)\gamma(t) takes negative values in some time intervals.

The environmental influences on open quantum systems have been well modeled by RTN in a wide variety of dynamical processes in physics, chemistry and biology, such as, fluorescence process of single molecules Zheng and Brown (2003); Brokmann et al. (2003), decoherence and disentanglement processes in the presence of 1/fα1/f^{\alpha} noise Burkard (2009); Lo Franco et al. (2014); Castelano et al. (2016) and optical trapping and frequency modulation processes in quantum optics Ashkin et al. (1987); Silveri et al. (2017). Unlike the Gaussian noise of which all cumulants Cn(t1,,tn)C_{n}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{n}) beyond n=2n=2 are zero, the generalized RTN displays distinct non-Gaussianity. Its cumulants higher than second-order do not vanish and contribute to the dynamical decoherence of the qubit system. We here consider that the environmental noise ϵ(t)\epsilon(t) exhibits with generalized RTN property which is non-Markovian and nonstationary. The noise process transits randomly with an average transition rate η\eta between values ±1\pm 1 with the amplitude χ\chi which describes the environmental coupling. Its non-Markovian and nonstationary features are respectively characterized by a generalized master equation for the conditional probability with a memory kernel and by an initially nonstationary distribution. For the generalized RTN process, the environmental non-Markovian feature is described by a generalized master equation for the time evolution of the conditional probability Fuliński (1994)

tP(ε,t|ε,t)=ttK(tτ)ηTP(ε,τ|ε,t)𝑑τ,\frac{\partial}{\partial t}P(\varepsilon,t|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})=\int_{t^{\prime}}^{t}K(t-\tau)\eta TP(\varepsilon,\tau|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})d\tau, (8)

where K(tτ)K(t-\tau) is the memory kernel of the environmental noise and the conditional probability P(ε,t|ε,t)P(\varepsilon,t|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime}) and transition matrix TT are respectively expressed as

P(ε,t|ε,t)=(P(+χ,t|ε,t)P(χ,t|ε,t)),T=(1111).P(\varepsilon,t|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}P(+\chi,t|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})\\ P(-\chi,t|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})\end{array}\right),T=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}-1&1\\ 1&-1\end{array}\right). (9)

We consider the case that the environmental memory kernel is of an exponential form as K(tτ)=κeκ(tτ)K(t-\tau)=\kappa e^{-\kappa(t-\tau)} with κ\kappa denoting the memory decay rate. The smaller the decay rate κ\kappa is, the stronger the environmental non-Markovian feature is. For the case κ\kappa\rightarrow\infty, namely, the memoryless case K(tτ)=δ(tτ)K(t-\tau)=\delta(t-\tau), the environmental noise only exhibits Markovian feature.

By means of the Laplace transformation P~(ε,s|ε,t)=0P(ε,t|ε,t)est𝑑t\tilde{P}(\varepsilon,s|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})=\int_{0}^{\infty}P(\varepsilon,t|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})e^{-st}dt, the conditional probability in Eq. (8) can be analytically expressed as

P~(ε,s|ε,t)=[sI2K~(s)T]1P(ε,t|ε,t)=12(1s+estΩ~(s)1sestΩ~(s)1sestΩ~(s)1s+estΩ~(s))P(ε,t|ε,t),\begin{split}\tilde{P}(\varepsilon,s|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})=&[sI_{2}-\tilde{K}(s)T]^{-1}P(\varepsilon,t^{\prime}|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime})\\ =&\frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\frac{1}{s}+e^{-st^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Omega}(s)&\frac{1}{s}-e^{-st^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Omega}(s)\\ \frac{1}{s}-e^{-st^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Omega}(s)&\frac{1}{s}+e^{-st^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Omega}(s)\end{array}\right)P(\varepsilon,t^{\prime}|\varepsilon^{\prime},t^{\prime}),\end{split} (10)

where I2I_{2} is the 2×22\times 2 identity matrix, K~(s)=κ/(s+κ)\widetilde{K}(s)=\kappa/(s+\kappa) represents the Laplace transform of the environmental memory kernel, and Ω~(s)=1/[s+2λK~(s)]\widetilde{\Omega}(s)=1/[s+2\lambda\widetilde{K}(s)]. The environmental nonstationary feature arises from the initial distribution

P(ε,0)=(P(+χ,0)P(χ,0))=12(1+a01a0),P(\varepsilon,0)=\left(\begin{array}[]{c}P(+\chi,0)\\ P(-\chi,0)\end{array}\right)=\frac{1}{2}\left(\begin{array}[]{c}1+a_{0}\\ 1-a_{0}\end{array}\right), (11)

where a0a_{0} is the nonstationary parameter and 1a01-1\leq a_{0}\leq 1. For the case a0=0a_{0}=0, the environment is in equilibrium and the environmental noise only displays stationary feature.

Based on the non-Markovian and nonstationary features, the statistical characteristics of the environmental noise ϵ(t)\epsilon(t) are described by the first and second-order moments

M1(t)=ϵ(t)=a0χ1[Ω~(s)],M2(t,t)=ϵ(t)ϵ(t)=χ21[estΩ~(s)],\begin{split}M_{1}(t)&=\langle\epsilon(t)\rangle=a_{0}\chi\mathscr{L}^{-1}[\widetilde{\Omega}(s)],\\ M_{2}(t,t^{\prime})&=\langle\epsilon(t)\epsilon(t^{\prime})\rangle=\chi^{2}\mathscr{L}^{-1}[e^{-st^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Omega}(s)],\end{split} (12)

where 1\mathscr{L}^{-1} denotes the inverse Laplace transform. According to the Bayes’ theorem, the environmental higher-order moments satisfy the factorization

Mn(t1,,tn)=ϵ(t1)ϵ(tn)=ϵ(t1)ϵ(t2)ϵ(t3)ϵ(tn),M_{n}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{n})=\langle\epsilon(t_{1})\cdots\epsilon(t_{n})\rangle=\langle\epsilon(t_{1})\epsilon(t_{2})\rangle\langle\epsilon(t_{3})\cdots\epsilon(t_{n})\rangle, (13)

for the order of the time instants t1>>tnt_{1}>\cdot\cdot\cdot>t_{n} (n3)(n\geq 3).

To obtain the quantum master equation (6) of the qubit system, we need to derive the exact expressions of the phase angle Φ(t)\Phi(t) and decay factor Γ(t)\Gamma(t) based on Eq. (4). However, it is hardly to calculate them for general environmental noise due to the fact that the number of order of the cumulants approaches infinity. It is difficult to derive the exact quantum master equation (first-order differential equation) for reduced density matrix ρS(t)\rho_{S}(t) and only a few physical models can be exactly solved. For the general case, we need to truncate the environmental correlations effects to some finite order within some approximations. The time-ordered factorization rule for the higher-order moments in Eq. (13) results in all the higher-order moments closely associated with the second-order moments, which makes it possible to derive the closed higher-order differential equation for reduced density matrix ρS(t)\rho_{S}(t) to contain all the infinite environmental correlations effects. As an effective methodology, we derive the closed higher-order differential equation for the reduced density matrix ρS(t)\rho_{S}(t). We can solve the closed higher-order differential equation to obtain the exact expression of the qubit reduced density matrix and to derive the exact solutions of the frequency shift ϕ(t)\phi(t) and decoherence rate γ(t)\gamma(t).

In terms of the statistical characteristics of the environmental noise ϵ(t)\epsilon(t) in Eqs. (12) and (13), the second-order moment of the environmental noise obeys the closed differential relation

d2dt2M2(t,t)=κddtM2(t,t)2ηκM2(t,t).\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}M_{2}(t,t^{\prime})=-\kappa\frac{d}{dt}M_{2}(t,t^{\prime})-2\eta\kappa M_{2}(t,t^{\prime}). (14)

Based on the closed differential relation for the moments in Eq. (14) and the relation between cumulants and moments of the environmental noise

Cn(t1,,tn)=Mn(t1,,tn)k=1n1(n1k1)Ck(t1,,tk)×Mnk(t1,,tnk),\begin{split}C_{n}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{n})=&M_{n}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{n})-\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}{n-1\choose k-1}C_{k}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{k})\\ &\times M_{n-k}(t_{1},\cdots,t_{n-k}),\end{split} (15)

with (nm)=n!/[(nm)!m!]{n\choose m}=n!/[(n-m)!m!], the dynamical evolution of the reduced density matrix of the single qubit system is governed by a closed third-order differential equation

d3dt3ρS(t)=κ[d2dt2ρS(t)+2ηddtρS(t)]14χ2[σz,[σz,ddtρS(t)+κρS(t)]],\begin{split}\frac{d^{3}}{dt^{3}}\rho_{S}(t)=&-\kappa\Big{[}\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\rho_{S}(t)+2\eta\frac{d}{dt}\rho_{S}(t)\Big{]}\\ &-\frac{1}{4}\chi^{2}[\sigma_{z},[\sigma_{z},\frac{d}{dt}\rho_{S}(t)+\kappa\rho_{S}(t)]],\end{split} (16)

where the initial conditions satisfy

ddtρS(0)=i2a0χ[σz,ρS(0)],d2dt2ρS(0)=14χ2[σz,[σz,ρS(0)]].\begin{split}\frac{d}{dt}\rho_{S}(0)&=-\frac{i}{2}a_{0}\chi[\sigma_{z},\rho_{S}(0)],\\ \quad\frac{d^{2}}{dt^{2}}\rho_{S}(0)&=-\frac{1}{4}\chi^{2}[\sigma_{z},[\sigma_{z},\rho_{S}(0)]].\end{split} (17)

We have derived the closed third-order differential equation for the single qubit reduced density matrix in the presence of a nonequilibrium environment exhibiting non-Markovian and nonstationary RTN properties. We stress that the reduced density matrix in the closed differential equation (16) contains all the environmental correlations and it is exact without any approximation. The exact solution of the reduced density matrix in Eq. (16) can be analytically expressed as

ρS(t)=1[ρ~S(s)],ρ~S(s)=(ρ11(0)1sρ10(0)D~(s)ρ01(0)D~(s)ρ00(0)1s),\rho_{S}(t)=\mathscr{L}^{-1}[\tilde{\rho}_{S}(s)],\tilde{\rho}_{S}(s)=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}\rho_{11}(0)\frac{1}{s}&\rho_{10}(0)\tilde{D}^{*}(s)\\ \rho_{01}(0)\tilde{D}(s)&\rho_{00}(0)\frac{1}{s}\end{array}\right), (18)

where D~(s)\tilde{D}(s) is Laplace transform of the decoherence function D(t)D(t) given by

D~(s)=D~r(s)+iD~i(s),D~r(s)=s2+κs+2ηκs3+κs2+(2ηκ+χ2)s+κχ2,D~i(s)=a0χ(s+κ)s3+κs2+(2ηκ+χ2)s+κχ2.\begin{split}\tilde{D}(s)&=\tilde{D}_{r}(s)+i\tilde{D}_{i}(s),\\ \tilde{D}_{r}(s)&=\frac{s^{2}+\kappa s+2\eta\kappa}{s^{3}+\kappa s^{2}+(2\eta\kappa+\chi^{2})s+\kappa\chi^{2}},\\ \tilde{D}_{i}(s)&=\frac{a_{0}\chi(s+\kappa)}{s^{3}+\kappa s^{2}+(2\eta\kappa+\chi^{2})s+\kappa\chi^{2}}.\end{split} (19)

The exact expression of the decoherence function D(t)D(t) can be obtained based on the approach we derived in Refs. Cai and Zheng, 2018; Cai, 2020. We here focus on the general case that the denominator of D~(s)\tilde{D}(s) has three different roots rn(n=1,2,3)r_{n}(n=1,2,3) and the decoherence function D(t)D(t) can be exactly expressed as

D(t)=Dr(t)+iDi(t),Dr(t)=n=13crnernt,Di(t)=n=13cinernt,\begin{split}D(t)&=D_{r}(t)+iD_{i}(t),\\ D_{r}(t)&=\sum_{n=1}^{3}c_{r}^{n}e^{r_{n}t},D_{i}(t)=\sum_{n=1}^{3}c_{i}^{n}e^{r_{n}t},\end{split} (20)

where the coefficients satisfy cnr=limsrn[(srn)D~r(s)]c_{n}^{r}=\lim\limits_{s\rightarrow r_{n}}\big{[}(s-r_{n})\tilde{D}_{r}(s)\big{]} and cni=limsrn[(srn)D~i(s)]c_{n}^{i}=\lim\limits_{s\rightarrow r_{n}}\big{[}(s-r_{n})\tilde{D}_{i}(s)\big{]}. Correspondingly, the frequency shift and decoherence rate can be respectively written as

ϕ(t)=n=13k=13(crncikcincrk)rke(rn+rk)t(n=13crnernt)2+(n=13cinernt)2,γ(t)=n=13k=13(crncrk+cincik)rke(rn+rk)t(n=13crnernt)2+(n=13cinernt)2.\begin{split}\phi(t)&=-\frac{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{3}\sum\limits_{k=1}^{3}(c_{r}^{n}c_{i}^{k}-c_{i}^{n}c_{r}^{k})r_{k}e^{(r_{n}+r_{k})t}}{\Big{(}\sum\limits_{n=1}^{3}c_{r}^{n}e^{r_{n}t}\Big{)}^{2}+\Big{(}\sum\limits_{n=1}^{3}c_{i}^{n}e^{r_{n}t}\Big{)}^{2}},\\ \gamma(t)&=-\frac{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{3}\sum\limits_{k=1}^{3}(c_{r}^{n}c_{r}^{k}+c_{i}^{n}c_{i}^{k})r_{k}e^{(r_{n}+r_{k})t}}{\Big{(}\sum\limits_{n=1}^{3}c_{r}^{n}e^{r_{n}t}\Big{)}^{2}+\Big{(}\sum\limits_{n=1}^{3}c_{i}^{n}e^{r_{n}t}\Big{)}^{2}}.\end{split} (21)

II.2 Disentanglement dynamics of a two qubit system

In the following, we study the disentanglement dynamics of a two qubit system TT consisting of two noninteracting identical single qubits independently coupled to its local nonequilibrium environment. With respect to the two qubit system Hamiltonian HT=(/2)ωSσzI2+(/2)ωSI2σzH_{T}=(\hbar/2)\omega_{S}\sigma_{z}\otimes I_{2}+(\hbar/2)\omega_{S}I_{2}\otimes\sigma_{z} and the environment Hamiltonian HEH_{E}, the Hamiltonian of the total system T+ET+E in the interaction picture can be expressed as

HTE(t)=2ϵ(t)σzI2+2ϵ(t)I2σz.H_{TE}(t)=\frac{\hbar}{2}\epsilon(t)\sigma_{z}\otimes I_{2}+\frac{\hbar}{2}\epsilon(t)I_{2}\otimes\sigma_{z}. (22)

We construct the reduced density matrix of the two qubit system in the standard product basis T={|1=|11,|2=|10,|3=|01,|4=|00}\mathcal{B}_{T}=\{|1\rangle=|11\rangle,|2\rangle=|10\rangle,|3\rangle=|01\rangle,|4\rangle=|00\rangle\}. Based on the two qubit basis and by taking a partial trace over the environmental degrees of freedom, the reduced density matrix of the two qubit system can be expressed as

ρT(t)=UTE(t;ϵ(t))ρT(0)UTE(t;ϵ(t))=μ=14KTμ(t)ρT(0)KTμ(t),\begin{split}\rho_{T}(t)&=\left\langle U_{TE}\bm{(}t;\epsilon(t)\bm{)}\rho_{T}(0)U_{TE}^{{\dagger}}\bm{(}t;\epsilon(t)\bm{)}\right\rangle\\ &=\sum_{\mu=1}^{4}K_{T\mu}(t)\rho_{T}(0)K_{T\mu}^{{\dagger}}(t),\end{split} (23)

where UTE(t;ϵ(t))=exp[(i/)0t𝑑tHTE(t)]U_{TE}\bm{(}t;\epsilon(t)\bm{)}=\exp\big{[}-(i/\hbar)\int_{0}^{t}dt^{\prime}H_{TE}(t^{\prime})\big{]} denotes the unitary time evolution operator in terms of the Hamiltonian HTE(t)H_{TE}(t) in Eq. (22) and the two qubit Kraus operators KTμ(t)=KSν(t)KSυ(t)(ν,υ=1,2)K_{T\mu}(t)=K_{S\nu}(t)\otimes K_{S\upsilon}(t)(\nu,\upsilon=1,2) are the tensor products of the single qubit Kraus operators

KT1(t)=(100D(t))(100D(t)),KT2(t)=(100D(t))(1001|D(t)|2),KT3(t)=(0001|D(t)|2)(100D(t)),KT4(t)=(0001|D(t)|2)(0001|D(t)|2).\begin{split}K_{T1}(t)&=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 0&D(t)\end{array}\right)\otimes\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 0&D(t)\end{array}\right),\\ K_{T2}(t)&=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 0&D(t)\end{array}\right)\otimes\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 0&\sqrt{1-|D(t)|^{2}}\end{array}\right),\\ K_{T3}(t)&=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\sqrt{1-|D(t)|^{2}}\end{array}\right)\otimes\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}1&0\\ 0&D(t)\end{array}\right),\\ K_{T4}(t)&=\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\sqrt{1-|D(t)|^{2}}\end{array}\right)\otimes\left(\begin{array}[]{cc}0&0\\ 0&\sqrt{1-|D(t)|^{2}}\end{array}\right).\end{split} (24)

According to the two qubit Kraus operators expression for the reduced density matrix in Eq. (23), the diagonal elements are time independent

ρ11(t)=ρ11(0),ρ22(t)=ρ22(0),ρ33(t)=ρ33(0),ρ44(t)=1[ρ11(0)+ρ22(0)+ρ33(0)],\begin{split}\rho_{11}(t)&=\rho_{11}(0),\\ \rho_{22}(t)&=\rho_{22}(0),\\ \rho_{33}(t)&=\rho_{33}(0),\\ \rho_{44}(t)&=1-[\rho_{11}(0)+\rho_{22}(0)+\rho_{33}(0)],\end{split} (25)

and time-dependent off diagonal elements can be written as

ρ21(t)=ρ12(t)=ρ21(0)D(t),ρ31(t)=ρ13(t)=ρ31(0)D(t),ρ32(t)=ρ23(t)=ρ32(0)|D(t)|2,ρ41(t)=ρ14(t)=ρ41(0)D2(t),ρ42(t)=ρ24(t)=ρ42(0)D(t),ρ43(t)=ρ34(t)=ρ43(0)D(t).\begin{split}\rho_{21}(t)&=\rho^{*}_{12}(t)=\rho_{21}(0)D(t),\\ \rho_{31}(t)&=\rho^{*}_{13}(t)=\rho_{31}(0)D(t),\\ \rho_{32}(t)&=\rho^{*}_{23}(t)=\rho_{32}(0)|D(t)|^{2},\\ \rho_{41}(t)&=\rho^{*}_{14}(t)=\rho_{41}(0)D^{2}(t),\\ \rho_{42}(t)&=\rho^{*}_{24}(t)=\rho_{42}(0)D(t),\\ \rho_{43}(t)&=\rho^{*}_{34}(t)=\rho_{43}(0)D(t).\end{split} (26)

By taking the optimization over all pairs of initial states, the non-Markovianity quantifying the flow of information exchange between the two qubit system and environment can be expressed as Breuer et al. (2009); Laine et al. (2010)

𝒩T=maxρT1,2(0)d𝒟dt>0ddt𝒟(ρT1(t),ρT2(t))𝑑t=2γ(t)<0γ(t)|D(t)|2𝑑t,\begin{split}\mathcal{N}_{T}&=\max\limits_{\rho_{T}^{1,2}(0)}\int_{\frac{d\mathcal{D}}{dt}>0}\frac{d}{dt}\mathcal{D}(\rho_{T}^{1}(t),\rho_{T}^{2}(t))dt\\ &=-2\int_{\gamma(t)<0}\gamma(t)|D(t)|^{2}dt,\end{split} (27)

where the optimal pair of initial states can be chosen as the maximally entangled states super-decoherent Bell states |ψT±(0)=(|00±|11)/2|\psi_{T}^{\pm}(0)\rangle=(|00\rangle\pm|11\rangle)/\sqrt{2} or sub-decoherent Bell states |φT±(0)=(|01±|10)/2|\varphi_{T}^{\pm}(0)\rangle=(|01\rangle\pm|10\rangle)/\sqrt{2} Addis et al. (2013, 2014). It is obvious that similar to the single qubit case, the two qubit dynamics also displays non-Markovian behavior if the decoherence rate γ(t)\gamma(t) takes negative values sometimes which depends on both the environmental coupling χ\chi and memory decay rate κ\kappa. Because of the entanglement between the two identical single qubits for the optimal pair of maximally entangled states, the non-Markovianity of the two qubit system is less than twice that of the single qubit system, namely, 𝒩T<2𝒩S\mathcal{N}_{T}<2\mathcal{N}_{S}.

Due to the environmental effects on its evolution, the two qubit system undergoes dynamical disentanglement. For a two qubit system, all the entanglement measures are compatible. In order to study the nonstationary and non-Markovian effects of the nonequilibrium environment on the disentanglement dynamics of the two qubit system, we here use the concurrence to quantify the entanglement defined as Wootters (1998); Yu and Eberly (2004)

𝒞(t)=max{0,λ1(t)λ2(t)λ3(t)λ4(t)},\mathscr{C}(t)=\max\left\{0,\sqrt{\lambda_{1}(t)}-\sqrt{\lambda_{2}(t)}-\sqrt{\lambda_{3}(t)}-\sqrt{\lambda_{4}(t)}\right\}, (28)

where λi(t)\lambda_{i}(t) are the eigenvalues of the matrix ζ(t)=ρT(t)(σyσy)ρT(t)(σyσy)\zeta(t)=\rho_{T}(t)(\sigma_{y}\otimes\sigma_{y})\rho_{T}^{*}(t)(\sigma_{y}\otimes\sigma_{y}) arranged in decreasing order with ρT(t)\rho_{T}^{*}(t) denoting the complex conjugation of the two qubit reduced density matrix ρT(t)\rho_{T}(t) in the two qubit basis T\mathcal{B}_{T}. The concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) varies from the maximum 1 for a maximally entangled state to the minimum 0 for a completely disentangled state. For pure quantum state, the entanglement corresponds to nonlocal correlations whereas it is not the general case for mixed states due to the fact that the environmental noise gives rise to the decay of nonlocal correlations. The nonlocality can be identified by the violation of the Bell inequalities in the presence of entanglement (𝒞(t)>0\mathscr{C}(t)>0). The Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) form of Bell function has been widely used to determine whether there are nonlocal correlations of the entangled system. The maximum Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for an entangled two qubit system can be, based on the Horodecki criterion, expressed as Horodecki et al. (1995)

(t)=2maxj>k[μj(t)+μk(t)],\mathscr{B}(t)=2\sqrt{\max_{j>k}[\mu_{j}(t)+\mu_{k}(t)]}, (29)

where the subscripts j,k=1,2,3j,k=1,2,3 and μj(t)\mu_{j}(t) and μk(t)\mu_{k}(t) are functions in terms of the elements of the two qubit reduced density matrix. If the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) is larger than the classical threshold th=2\mathscr{B}_{\mathrm{th}}=2, the quantum correlations of the entangled two qubit system cannot be reproduced by any classical local model.

It is known that the Bell states and Werner mixed states of a two qubit system play an essential role in quantum computation and quantum information Nielsen and Chuang (2000). The two qubit reduced density matrix expressed in Eq. (23) for initial composite Bell states and extended Werner states has an XX structure both initially and during the dynamical evolution. The concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) for an initial XX structure reduced density matrix of a two qubit system can be computed in a particular form as Yu and Eberly (2007)

𝒞X(t)=max{0,𝒞1(t),𝒞2(t)},\mathscr{C}_{X}(t)=\max\left\{0,\mathscr{C}_{1}(t),\mathscr{C}_{2}(t)\right\}, (30)

where

𝒞1(t)=2[|ρ23(t)|ρ11(t)ρ44(t)],𝒞2(t)=2[|ρ14(t)|ρ22(t)ρ33(t)].\begin{split}\mathscr{C}_{1}(t)&=2\Big{[}|\rho_{23}(t)|-\sqrt{\rho_{11}(t)\rho_{44}(t)}\Big{]},\\ \mathscr{C}_{2}(t)&=2\Big{[}|\rho_{14}(t)|-\sqrt{\rho_{22}(t)\rho_{33}(t)}\Big{]}.\end{split} (31)

The time dependent maximum CHSH-Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for an X structure two qubit density matrix can be expressed analytically as Derkacz and Jakóbczyk (2005); Mazzola et al. (2010a)

X(t)=max{1(t),2(t)},\mathscr{B}_{X}(t)=\max\left\{\mathscr{B}_{1}(t),\mathscr{B}_{2}(t)\right\}, (32)

where 1(t)=2μ1(t)+μ2(t)\mathscr{B}_{1}(t)=2\sqrt{\mu_{1}(t)+\mu_{2}(t)} and 2(t)=2μ1(t)+μ3(t)\mathscr{B}_{2}(t)=2\sqrt{\mu_{1}(t)+\mu_{3}(t)} with

μ1(t)=4[|ρ14(t)|+|ρ23(t)|]2,μ2(t)=[ρ11(t)+ρ44(t)ρ22(t)ρ33(t)]2,μ3(t)=4[|ρ14(t)||ρ23(t)|]2.\begin{split}\mu_{1}(t)&=4\left[|\rho_{14}(t)|+|\rho_{23}(t)|\right]^{2},\\ \mu_{2}(t)&=\left[\rho_{11}(t)+\rho_{44}(t)-\rho_{22}(t)-\rho_{33}(t)\right]^{2},\\ \mu_{3}(t)&=4\left[|\rho_{14}(t)|-|\rho_{23}(t)|\right]^{2}.\end{split} (33)

We first focus on the initial states of the system in the composite Bell states of the form Mazzola et al. (2010b)

ρT(0)=1+c2|ψT±(0)ψT±(0)|+1c2|φT±(0)φT±(0)|,\rho_{T}(0)=\frac{1+c}{2}|\psi_{T}^{\pm}(0)\rangle\langle\psi_{T}^{\pm}(0)|+\frac{1-c}{2}|\varphi_{T}^{\pm}(0)\rangle\langle\varphi_{T}^{\pm}(0)|, (34)

where the initial state parameter cc is real and satisfies 1c1-1\leq c\leq 1. It has, by studying the quantum mutual information, quantum discord and classical correlations of the dynamics, shown that for the initial states in Eq. (34) there is a sudden transition from classical to quantum decoherence for the two qubit system coupled to a nonequilibrium environment exhibiting with generalized RTN property, and the nonequilibrium feature of the environment can delay the critical time of the transition of decoherence from classical to quantum Basit et al. (2020). The concurrence at time tt in Eq. (28) for the two qubit system prepared in the initial states of Eq. (34) can be reduced to

𝒞(t)=max{0,(1c)|D(t)|2(1+c),(1+c)|D(t)|2(1c)}.\mathscr{C}(t)=\max\left\{0,(1-c)|D(t)|^{2}-(1+c),(1+c)|D(t)|^{2}-(1-c)\right\}. (35)

The initial concurrence of the two qubit system prepared in the composite Bell states in Eq. (34) can be expressed as 𝒞(0)=2|c|\mathscr{C}(0)=2|c| since the initial value of the decoherence function satisfies D(0)=1D(0)=1. Therefore, the entanglement of the two qubit system exists except for the special case c=0c=0. For the case 1c<0-1\leq c<0, the concurrence at time tt exists if the threshold value of the decoherence function satisfies |D(t)|>|Dth|=(1+c)/(1c)|D(t)|>|D_{\mathrm{th}}|=\sqrt{(1+c)/(1-c)} whereas if it exists at time tt for the case 0<c10<c\leq 1, the threshold value of the decoherence function satisfies |D(t)|>|Dth|=(1c)/(1+c)|D(t)|>|D_{\mathrm{th}}|=\sqrt{(1-c)/(1+c)}. The time dependent maximum CHSH-Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for the initial states of the two qubit system of Eq. (34) can be reduced to

(t)=4|D(t)|4+c2.\mathscr{B}(t)=4\sqrt{|D(t)|^{4}+c^{2}}. (36)

The presence of entanglement 𝒞(t)>0\mathscr{C}(t)>0 is a necessary condition to achieve nonlocality. The close relation between (t)\mathscr{B}(t) and 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) for the two qubit system prepared in the initial composite Bell states of Eq. (34) can be expressed as

(t)={41c[𝒞(t)+(1+c)]2+c2(1c)2,1c<0,41+c[𝒞(t)+(1c)]2+c2(1+c)2,0<c1.\mathscr{B}(t)=\left\{\begin{array}[]{cc}\frac{4}{1-c}\sqrt{\big{[}\mathscr{C}(t)+(1+c)\big{]}^{2}+c^{2}(1-c)^{2}},&-1\leq c<0,\\ \frac{4}{1+c}\sqrt{\big{[}\mathscr{C}(t)+(1-c)\big{]}^{2}+c^{2}(1+c)^{2}},&0<c\leq 1.\end{array}\right. (37)

For the case 1c<0-1\leq c<0, the classical threshold 𝒞th\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}} which corresponds to the Bell function (t)th=2\mathscr{B}(t)\geq\mathscr{B}_{\mathrm{th}}=2 only exists for 1/2c<0-1/2\leq c<0 and can be expressed as 𝒞th=(1c)1/4c2(1+c)\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}}=(1-c)\sqrt{1/4-c^{2}}-(1+c) whereas for 1c<1/2-1\leq c<-1/2 the maximum CHSH-Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) is always larger than the threshold th=2\mathscr{B}_{\mathrm{th}}=2. Similarly, for the case 0<c10<c\leq 1, the threshold 𝒞th\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}} for the Bell function larger than the threshold th=2\mathscr{B}_{\mathrm{th}}=2 exists for 0<c1/20<c\leq 1/2 and can be expressed as 𝒞th=(1+c)1/4c2(1c)\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}}=(1+c)\sqrt{1/4-c^{2}}-(1-c) while the maximum CHSH-Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) is always larger than the threshold th=2\mathscr{B}_{\mathrm{th}}=2 for 1/2<c11/2<c\leq 1. Therefore, the two qubit system always displays quantum nonlocality at time tt for the case 1/2<|c|11/2<|c|\leq 1 whereas for the case 0<|c|1/20<|c|\leq 1/2 the threshold value of the decoherence function should satisfies |D(t)|>|Dth|=1/2c24|D(t)|>|D_{\mathrm{th}}|=\sqrt[4]{1/2-c^{2}} to ensure that the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) is larger than the classical threshold 𝒞th\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}}.

We now focus on the case that the two qubit system is prepared in the extended Werner states initially as Bellomo et al. (2008a); Lo Franco et al. (2014)

ρTψ(0)=r|ψT(0)ψT(0)|+1r4I4,ρTφ(0)=r|φT(0)φT(0)|+1r4I4,\begin{split}\rho_{T}^{\psi}(0)&=r|\psi_{T}(0)\rangle\langle\psi_{T}(0)|+\frac{1-r}{4}I_{4},\\ \rho_{T}^{\varphi}(0)&=r|\varphi_{T}(0)\rangle\langle\varphi_{T}(0)|+\frac{1-r}{4}I_{4},\end{split} (38)

where 0r10\leq r\leq 1 denotes the purity parameter of the initial states, I4I_{4} is the 4×44\times 4 identity matrix and |ψT(0)=α|00+β|11|\psi_{T}(0)\rangle=\alpha|00\rangle+\beta|11\rangle and |φT(0)=α|01+β|10|\varphi_{T}(0)\rangle=\alpha|01\rangle+\beta|10\rangle represent the initial entangled states with the complex coefficients α\alpha, β\beta and |α|2+|β|2=1|\alpha|^{2}+|\beta|^{2}=1. For the case α=±β=1/2\alpha=\pm\beta=1/\sqrt{2}, the extended Werner states corresponds to a subclass of Bell-diagonal states, namely, the Werner states Verstraete and Wolf (2002); Horodecki et al. (2009). The concurrence for the two qubit system prepared in the extended Werner states initially of Eq. (38) can be reduced to

𝒞ψ(t)=𝒞φ(t)=max{0,2|αβ||D(t)|212(1r)}.\mathscr{C}^{\psi}(t)=\mathscr{C}^{\varphi}(t)=\max\left\{0,2|\alpha\beta||D(t)|^{2}-\frac{1}{2}(1-r)\right\}. (39)

The entanglement of the two qubit system exists if the initial value of concurrence 𝒞(0)\mathscr{C}(0) in the extended Werner states is larger than zero, correspondingly

r>14|αβ|+1,r>\frac{1}{4|\alpha\beta|+1}, (40)

except for the special cases α=0\alpha=0 and α=1\alpha=1. The concurrence exists at time tt if the threshold value of the decoherence function satisfies |D(t)|>|Dth|=(1r)/|αβ|/2|D(t)|>|D_{\mathrm{th}}|=\sqrt{(1-r)/|\alpha\beta|}/2. The time dependent maximum CHSH-Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for the initial extended Werner states of Eq. (38) can be reduced to

(t)=2r1+4|αβ|2|D(t)|4.\mathscr{B}(t)=2r\sqrt{1+4|\alpha\beta|^{2}|D(t)|^{4}}. (41)

In the presence of entanglement 𝒞(t)>0\mathscr{C}(t)>0, for the two qubit system prepared initially in the extended Werner states of Eq. (38), the close relation between (t)\mathscr{B}(t) and 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) can be expressed as

(t)=2r2+[𝒞(t)+12(1r)]2.\mathscr{B}(t)=2\sqrt{r^{2}+\Big{[}\mathscr{C}(t)+\frac{1}{2}(1-r)\Big{]}^{2}}. (42)

The classical threshold 𝒞th\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}} corresponding to the Bell function (t)th=2\mathscr{B}(t)\geq\mathscr{B}_{\mathrm{th}}=2 can be expressed as 𝒞th=1r2(1r)/2\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}}=\sqrt{1-r^{2}}-(1-r)/2 which depends only on the purity parameter rr of the initial states of Eq. (38), and it is a decreasing function of the purity parameter rr and for the presence of entanglement 1/(4|αβ|+1)<r11/(4|\alpha\beta|+1)<r\leq 1 (α0\alpha\neq 0 and α1\alpha\neq 1), it satisfies 0𝒞th<2(4|αβ|2+2|αβ||αβ|)/(4|αβ|+1)0\leq\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}}<2\big{(}\sqrt{4|\alpha\beta|^{2}+2|\alpha\beta|}-|\alpha\beta|\big{)}/(4|\alpha\beta|+1). Thus, the two qubit system displays quantum nonlocality at time tt provided that the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) is larger than the classical threshold 𝒞th\mathscr{C}_{\mathrm{th}} corresponding to that the threshold value of the decoherence function satisfies |D(t)|>|Dth|=1r24/2|αβ||D(t)|>|D_{\mathrm{th}}|=\sqrt[4]{1-r^{2}}/\sqrt{2|\alpha\beta|}.

III Results and discussion

In this section we show the numerical results of the non-Markovian dynamics of a single qubit system and a two noninteracting qubit system coupled to nonequilibrium environments with nonstationary and non-Markovian RTN statistical properties, respectively. In the presence of RTN only exhibiting Markovian feature, there are two important dynamics regimes identified: the weak coupling regime χ/η<1\chi/\eta<1 and the strong coupling regime χ/η>1\chi/\eta>1 Bergli and Faoro (2007); Cywiński et al. (2008), and the quantum dynamics displays Markovian and non-Markovian behavior in the weak coupling regime and strong coupling regime, respectively. However, the boundary of the quantum dynamics regimes depends both on the environmental coupling χ\chi and the environmental non-Markovian feature κ\kappa in the presence of RTN exhibiting non-Markovian feature, and in the weak coupling regime, the quantum dynamics can also display non-Markovian behavior Cai and Zheng (2016, 2018); Cai (2020).

III.1 Decoherence of a single qubit system in nonequilibrium environments

In this subsection, we show the numerical results of the non-Markovian decoherence dynamics of a single qubit system coupled to nonequilibrium environments. We mainly focus on how the environmental nonstationary and non-Markovian features influence the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} and the decoherence function. The comparisons with the environmental stationary and memoryless cases are also discussed.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) Scaled non-Markovianity 𝒩~=𝒩/(𝒩+1))\tilde{\mathcal{N}}=\mathcal{N}/(\mathcal{N}+1)) of a single qubit system in nonequilibrium environments as a function of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa and the nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} in (a) weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8 and (b) strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The bottom panel of (b) stands for the memoryless case κ+\kappa\rightarrow+\infty.

Figure 1 shows the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} of a single qubit system coupled to nonequilibrium environments as a function of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa and the nonstationary parameter a0a_{0}. In both weak and strong coupling regimes, for a given value of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa, the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} displays symmetrical behavior for positive and negative values of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0}. For small value of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa (strong environmental non-Markovian feature), the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} shows nonmonotonical decay whereas it shows monotonical decay for large value of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa as the environmental nonstationary parameter |a0||a_{0}| increases. This reflects that the environmental nonstationary feature can reduce the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} in weak environmental non-Markovian feature while it contributes nonmonotonically to the non-Markovian behavior of the decoherence dynamics in strong environmental non-Markovian feature. For a given value of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0}, the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} increases as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases in both weak and strong coupling regimes. This indicates that the environmental non-Markovian feature can enhance the non-Markovian behavior of the decoherence dynamics. In the weak coupling regime as displayed in Fig. 1 (a), the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} decreases to zero as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa increases whereas it does not decrease to zero in the strong coupling regime as shown in Fig. 1 (b). This reflects that the boundary of the decoherence dynamics regimes depends closely on the environmental coupling χ\chi and the environmental non-Markovian feature κ\kappa.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) Time evolution of the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| for different values of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} in (a) weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8 and (b) strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The environmental memory decay rate is given by κ/η=1\kappa/\eta=1. The right panels of (a) and (b) are for the stationary case a0=0a_{0}=0.

Figure 2 displays the time evolution of the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| for different values of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0}. Obviously, the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| shows nonmonotonical decays with nonzero coherence revivals for a00a_{0}\neq 0 in both the weak and strong coupling regimes whereas for the stationary case a0=0a_{0}=0, it decays with nonzero coherence revivals and with zero coherence revivals in the weak and strong coupling regimes, respectively. As the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} departs from zero, the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| decays slowly in both the weak and strong coupling regimes. This implies that the environmental nonstationary feature can suppress the decoherence dynamics. In the strong coupling regime as shown in Fig. 2 (b), the nonmonotonical behavior in the decoherence function decreases as the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} departs from zero. In contrast, there is no obvious change in the weak coupling regime as shown in Fig. 2 (a). This reflects that the environmental nonstationary feature can reduce the coherence revivals in the strong coupling regime whereas it has no obvious influence on the coherence revivals in the weak coupling regime. In addition, the environmental nonstationary feature can not make the dynamics regime of the qubit system undergo transition due to the fact that the boundary of the quantum dynamics regimes does not depend on the environmental nonstationary feature.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) Time evolution of the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| for different values of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa in (a) weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8 and (b) strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The environmental nonstationary parameter is given by |a0|=0.5|a_{0}|=0.5. The right panels of (a) and (b) stand for the Markovian case κ=+\kappa=+\infty.

Figure 3 shows the time evolution of the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| for different values of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa. In both the weak and strong coupling regimes, the coherence revivals in the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| enhance as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases. This reflects that the environmental non-Markovian feature can enhance the non-Markovian behavior in the quantum dynamics. Different from the strong coupling regime, the coherence revivals undergoes a transition from that with nonzeros to that with zeros in weak coupling regime as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases. However, due to the difference in the coupling strength, the period of coherence revivals in the weak coupling regime is larger than that in the strong coupling regime. For the environmental memoryless case κ\kappa\rightarrow\infty, in the weak coupling regime as shown in Fig. 3 (a), the decoherence function |D(t)||D(t)| decays monotonically with no coherence revivals whereas it decays nonmonotonically with nonzero coherence revivals in the strong coupling regime as shown in Fig. 3 (b). This indicates that the quantum dynamics displays a transition from Markovian to non-Markovian in the weak coupling regime as the environmental non-Markovian feature increases and the threshold value of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa for the transition boundary depends on the value of the environmental coupling χ\chi.

III.2 Disentanglement of a two qubit system in nonequilibrium environments

In this subsection, we show the numerical results of the non-Markovian disentanglement dynamics of a two qubit system consisting of two noninteracting identical single qubits independently coupled to its local nonequilibrium environment. We mainly focus on how the environmental nonstationary and non-Markovian features influence the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N}, the entanglement quantified by the concurrence and the nonlocality characterized by the Bell function. The comparisons with the environmental stationary and memoryless cases are also discussed.

Refer to caption
Figure 4: (Color online) Scaled non-Markovianity 𝒩~=𝒩/(𝒩+1))\tilde{\mathcal{N}}=\mathcal{N}/(\mathcal{N}+1)) of a two qubit system in nonequilibrium environments as a function of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa and the nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} in (a) weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8 and (b) strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The bottom panel of (b) is for the memoryless case κ+\kappa\rightarrow+\infty.

Figure 4 shows the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} of a two qubit system interacting with nonequilibrium environments as a function of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa and the nonstationary parameter a0a_{0}. Similar to the case of a single qubit system coupled to nonequilibrium environments, for a given value of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa, the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} shows symmetrical behavior for positive and negative environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} in both weak and strong coupling regimes. As the environmental nonstationary parameters |a0||a_{0}| deviates from zero, the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} displays nonmonotonical and monotonical decays for small and large κ\kappa, respectively. In both weak and strong coupling regimes, for a given value of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0}, the non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} increases with the decrease of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa. The non-Markovianity 𝒩\mathcal{N} decreases to zero as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa increases in the weak coupling regime as shown in Fig. 4 (a) whereas it does not decrease to zero in the strong coupling regime as displayed in Fig. 4 (b).

Refer to caption
Figure 5: (Color online) Time evolution of (a) the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and (b) the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} for the two qubit system prepared initially in the composite Bell states with the initial state parameter |c|=1|c|=1. Left panel: the weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8. Right panel: the strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The environmental memory decay rate is given by κ/η=1\kappa/\eta=1.

Figure 5 displays the time evolution of the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} for the two qubit system prepared initially in the composite Bell states. As shown in Fig. 5 (a), the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) decays nonmonotonically with nonzero entanglement revivals in the weak coupling regime for both the nonstationary a00a_{0}\neq 0 and stationary a0=0a_{0}=0 cases. In contrast, in the strong coupling regime the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) decays nonmonotonically with nonzero entanglement revivals and zero entanglement revivals for the nonstationary case a00a_{0}\neq 0 and stationary case a0=0a_{0}=0, respectively. In both the weak and strong coupling regimes, the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) increases as the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} departs from zero. This indicates that the environmental nonstationary feature can suppress the disentanglement dynamics. In both the weak and strong coupling regimes as displayed in Fig. 5 (b), the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) shows nonmonotonical decays with oscillations and it increases as the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} departs from zero. This reflects that the environmental nonstationary feature can enhance the quantum nonlocality.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: (Color online) Time evolution of (a) the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and (b) the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa for the two qubit system prepared initially in the composite Bell states with the initial state parameter |c|=1|c|=1. Left panel: the weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8. Right panel: the strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The environmental nonstationary parameter is given by |a0|=0.5|a_{0}|=0.5.

Figure 6 displays the time evolution of the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa for the two qubit system prepared initially in the composite Bell states. As shown in Fig. 6 (a), the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) decays nonmonotonically with nonzero entanglement revivals in the strong coupling regime whereas in the weak coupling regime, it undergoes a transition from nonmonotonical decay to monotonical decay as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa increases. The entanglement revivals in the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) become obvious as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases in both the weak and strong coupling regimes. This indicates that the environmental non-Markovian feature can enhance the entanglement revivals and suppress the disentanglement dynamics. As displayed in Fig. 6 (b), in the strong coupling regime the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) decays nonmonotonically and it increases as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases. This reflects that the environmental non-Markovian feature can enhance the quantum nonlocality in the strong coupling regime. In contrast, the decay of the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) exhibits a transition from nonmonotonical decay to monotonical decay with the increase of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa in the weak coupling regime. In some time intervals, the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) decreases while it increases in some other time intervals as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases.

Refer to caption
Figure 7: (Color online) Time evolution of (a) the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and (b) the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} for the two qubit system prepared initially in the extended Werner states with the initial purity parameter r=1r=1 and the coefficients |α|=|β|=1/2|\alpha|=|\beta|=1/\sqrt{2}. Left panel: the weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8. Right panel: the strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The environmental memory decay rate is given by κ/η=1\kappa/\eta=1.

Figure 7 shows the time evolution of the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} for the two qubit system prepared initially in the extended Werner states. Similar to the case that the two qubit system initially prepared in the composite Bell states, as displayed in Fig. 7 (a), the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) decays nonmonotonically with nonzero entanglement revivals in both the weak and strong coupling regimes for the nonstationary a00a_{0}\neq 0. However, for the stationary case a0=0a_{0}=0, the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) decays nonmonotonically with nonzero and zero entanglement revivals in the weak and strong coupling regimes, respectively. In addition, the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) increases as the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} departs from zero in both the weak and strong coupling regimes. As shown in Fig. 7 (b), the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) shows nonmonotonical decays with oscillations and it increases as the environmental nonstationary parameter a0a_{0} departs from zero in both the weak and strong coupling regimes. These results indicate that the environmental nonstationary feature can suppress the disentanglement dynamics and enhance the quantum nonlocality. Comparing Fig. 7 with Fig. 5, the trends of the influence of the environmental nonstationary feature on the disentanglement dynamics and quantum nonlocality do not depend on the initial states.

Refer to caption
Figure 8: (Color online) Time evolution of (a) the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and (b) the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa for the two qubit system prepared initially in the extended Werner states with the initial purity parameter r=1r=1 and the coefficients |α|=|β|=1/2|\alpha|=|\beta|=1/\sqrt{2}. Left panel: the weak coupling regime with χ/η=0.8\chi/\eta=0.8. Right panel: the strong coupling regime with χ/η=3\chi/\eta=3. The environmental nonstationary parameter is given by |a0|=0.5|a_{0}|=0.5.

Figure 8 displays the time evolution of the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) and the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) for different values of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa for the two qubit system prepared initially in the extended Werner states. As displayed in Fig. 8 (a), similar to the case that the two qubit system initially prepared in the composite Bell states, the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) decays nonmonotonically with nonzero entanglement revivals in the strong coupling regime whereas it exhibits a transition from nonmonotonical decay to monotonical decay in the weak coupling regime as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa increases. In both the weak and strong coupling regimes, the entanglement revivals in the concurrence 𝒞(t)\mathscr{C}(t) enhances as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases. As shown in Fig. 6 (b), the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) decays nonmonotonically and it increases with the increase of the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa in the strong coupling regime. In contrast, in the weak coupling regime the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) exhibits a transition from nonmonotonical decay to monotonical decay as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases and the Bell function (t)\mathscr{B}(t) decreases in some time intervals and increases in some other time intervals as the environmental memory decay rate κ\kappa decreases. Comparing Fig. 8 with Fig. 6, similar to the influence of the environmental nonstationary feature, the trends of the influence of the environmental non-Markovian feature on the disentanglement dynamics and quantum nonlocality do not depend on the initial states.

IV Conclusions

We have theoretically studied the non-Markovian decoherence dynamics of a single qubit system and disentanglement dynamics of a two qubit system in the presence of nonequilibrium environments with nonstationary and non-Markovian statistical properties. We have derived the closed third-order differential equation for the single qubit reduced density matrix with the nonequilibrium environments exhibiting nonstationary and non-Markovian RTN properties. The reduced density matrix of the two qubit system can be expressed in terms of the Kraus representation by means of the tensor products of the single qubit Kraus operators. We have derived the relation between the entanglement characterized by the concurrence and nonlocality quantified by by the Bell function of the two qubit system which are both closely associated with the decoherence function and we have identified the threshold values of the decoherence function to ensure the existences of the concurrence and nonlocal quantum correlations for a given evolution time when the two qubit system is initially prepared in the composite Bell states and the extended Werner states, respectively. The results show that the decoherence dynamics of a single qubit system and the disentanglement dynamics of a two qubit system can be suppressed by the environmental nonstationary feature. The environmental nonstationary feature can reduce the coherence revivals in the single decoherence dynamics and entanglement revivals in the two qubit disentanglement dynamics. Furthermore, the environmental non-Markovian feature can increase the coherence and entanglement revivals in the single and two qubit dynamics, respectively. Moreover, the environmental nonstationary and non-Markovian features can enhance the nonlocality of the two qubit system. Our results are helpful for further understanding the non-Markovian qubit dynamics in the presence of nonequilibrium environments.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.11947033). X.C. also acknowledges the support from the Doctoral Research Fund of Shandong Jianzhu University (Grant No. XNBS1852).

References