This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

NON-EQUILIBRIUM IONIZATION PLASMA DURING LARGE SOLAR LIMB FLARE OBSERVED BY HINODE/EIS

S. Imada,11affiliation: Institute for Space-Earth Environmental Research (ISEE), Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
Abstract

This study on plasma heating considers the time-dependent ionization process during a large solar flare on September 10, 2017, observed by Hinode/EIS. The observed Fe XXIV / Fe XXIII ratios increase downstream of the reconnection outflow, and they are consistent with the time-dependent ionization effect at a constant electron temperature Te = 25 MK. Moreover, this study also shows that the non-thermal velocity, which can be related to the turbulent velocity, reduces significantly along the downstream of the reconnection outflow, even when considering the time-dependent ionization process.

Sun: photosphere—Sun: flow—Sun: solar cycle

1 INTRODUCTION

Magnetic reconnection has been recognized as one of the key mechanisms for heating and bulk acceleration of space plasmas. This energy conversion mechanism is not limited to the solar atmosphere (e.g., Pneuman et al., 1981), but was also observed in the Earth’s magnetosphere (e.g., Hones, 1979; Øieroset et al., 2002; Imada et al., 2005, 2007a, 2011a) and in laboratory (e.g., Ono et al., 1988; Yamada et al., 1997; Ji et al., 1998), as well as in other space plasmas. The solar atmosphere is an excellent space laboratory for magnetic reconnection study, as it allows large-scale observation of magnetic reconnection.

Over the past several decades, many studies have been conducted to explain the conversion of magnetic energy into plasma energy during solar flares, and various models have been proposed. It is now widely believed that magnetic reconnection (as per the so-called CSHKP model) is the fundamental energy conversion mechanism of flares (Carmichael, 1964; Sturrock, 1966; Hirayama, 1974; Kopp & Pneuman, 1976). Modern telescope observations confirm many of the features predicted by the reconnection model (the cusp-like structure: Tsuneta et al. (1992); high-energy electron acceleration: Masuda et al. (1994); chromospheric evaporation: Teriaca et al. (2003); Imada et al. (2008, 2015); reconnection inflow: Yokoyama et al. (2001); outflows: Hara et al. (2011); Liu et al. (2013); Imada et al. (2013); plasmoid ejection: Ohyama & Shibata (1998); CMEs: Svestka & Cliver (1992); Imada et al. (2007b, 2011b)). As predicted by the CSHKP model, magnetic reconnection occurs above the flare arcade. To date, many observations have been made on the solar limb to confirm the presence of high-temperature and high-speed plasma flows produced by magnetic reconnection above flare arcades. Limb observation has the advantage that the height information can be clearly determined. For example, Super Arcade Downflows (SADs) with reconnection outflow predicted from the flare model are observed by corona imagers. During the gradual phase of flares, dark voids and sometimes bright features of X-rays move from the high corona toward the solar surface (downward) at an apparent velocity of a few 100 km s-1, (e.g., McKenzie & Hudson, 1999; McKenzie, 2000; Savage et al., 2012). On the other hand, equivalent spectroscopic observations are extremely rare, and only a few spectroscopic limb observations have reported the presence of hot fast flows above the flare arcade (e.g., Innes et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2007; Imada et al., 2013). Most of these studies were based on a single slit position above the flare arcades, so spatial information on hot fast flows was not available. Recently, Warren et al. (2018) reported on the structure and evolution of a current sheet formed above the flare arcade. They found that plasma heating seems to occur downstream of the reconnection outflow and reaches temperatures of approximately 25 MK with the ionization equilibrium assumption.

In the solar corona, plasma is believed to be in thermal equilibrium because of the presence of a weak Coulomb collision. Many studies have discussed the plasma dynamics in a solar corona based on the thermal equilibrium assumption. Most phenomena observed in the solar corona can be explained by the assumption that the temporal resolution is not sufficient to resolve the non-equilibrium conditions. Imada et al. (2011c) pointed out that ionization cannot reach equilibrium in the magnetic reconnection region because of its fast flow and rapid heating. In fact, the timescale for ionization (\sim100 s) is comparable to the Alfvén timescale (\sim100 s) in the magnetic reconnection region. Therefore, it is important to consider time-dependent ionization processes when interpreting observations of the magnetic reconnection region. In this letter, I will discuss plasma heating considering the time-dependent ionization process during the X8.3 flare on September 10, 2017, which was reported by Warren et al. (2018).

2 DATA

On September 10, 2017, a large solar flare (GOES X8.3, peak time 16:06) occurred in the northwest solar limb (30 N, 90 W). Several studies have successfully captured the characteristics of flare-associated phenomena, such as temperature (Warren et al., 2018), flows (Cheng et al., 2018; Longcope et al., 2018), non-thermal velocity (Li et al., 2018; Polito et al., 2018), and structures in the hot plasma sheet above the post-flare loop. Elemental abundances in coronal post-flare loops have also been studied by Doschek et al. (2018). Many new findings, such as the presence of microstructures and turbulence inside the plasma sheet, have been discussed with this flare event (e.g., Cai et al., 2019; French et al., 2020). The EUV Imaging Spectrometer (EIS) aboard Hinode is a high-spectral/spatial resolution spectrometer aimed at studying dynamic phenomena in the corona (Culhane et al., 2007). Hinode EIS observed a flare with a slit scanning mode over a field of 240”×\times304” with a 2 arcsec wide slit and 3 arcsec steps between exposures. The exposure time at each position was fixed at 5 s, and the total time for each raster was 535 s. The observation period was from 05:44 to 16:53 UT on September 10, 2017. To process the EIS data, we used the software provided by the EIS team (eis_prep), which corrects for the flat field, dark current, cosmic rays, and hot pixels. Since in this study I am interested in temperature diagnostics in flare heated plasma, I used only Fe XXIV 255.10 Å and Fe XXIII 263.76 Å data.

3 TIME-DEPENDENT IONIZATION

In order to study plasma heating considering the time-dependent ionization process during a flare, the time evolution of the charge state of iron in the downstream of reconnection outflow was calculated in the same manner as in Imada et al. (2011c). The continuity equations for iron are expressed as follows:

niFet+niFe𝐯=ne[ni+1Feαi+1Fe+ni1FeSi1FeniFe(αiFe+SiFe)],\frac{\partial n^{Fe}_{i}}{\partial t}+\nabla\cdot n^{Fe}_{i}{\bf v}=n_{e}\left[n^{Fe}_{i+1}\alpha^{Fe}_{i+1}+n^{Fe}_{i-1}S^{Fe}_{i-1}-n_{i}^{Fe}\left(\alpha^{Fe}_{i}+S^{Fe}_{i}\right)\right], (1)

where niFen_{i}^{Fe} is the number density of the ith charge state of the iron, αFe\alpha^{Fe} represents the collisional and dielectronic recombination coefficients, SFeS^{Fe} represents the collisional ionization coefficients, 𝐯{\bf v} represents flow velocity, and nen_{e} represents the electron density. The calculation code used in this study is the same as that used by Imada et al. (2011c, 2015). The ionization and recombination rates were calculated using the work of Arnaud & Rothenflug (1985), Arnaud & Raymond (1992), and Mazzotta et al. (1998). Here, it is assumed that all ions and electrons have the same flow speed and temperature in the same location.

Assuming ionization equilibrium, Warren et al. (2018) found that the temperature of the current sheet formed above the flare arcade heated to approximately 20 MK. The highest temperatures were observed in the cusp of the flare arcade, and the temperature in the current sheet decreased with height. This can be interpreted as the plasma being heated along the reconnection outflow. Because the temperature estimated by the ionization equilibrium assumption can be lower than the actual temperature, I calculated the time evolution of the charged state of iron assuming an electron temperature (Te = 20, 25, 30 MK) higher than the temperature estimated in a previous study. Only Fe XXIII and Fe XXIV are shown in the case of Te==25 and 30 MK. The dotted and dashed lines in Figure 1 show the peak times of Fe XXIII/Fe XXIV, respectively. The electron density with the isothermal assumption was also discussed by Warren et al. (2018). They concluded that the density is 1010 /cc, which is much larger than the density considered in many previous studies. Longcope et al. (2018) also discussed the density of hot flare plasma in the current sheet and concluded that the density is 1010\sim 10^{10} /cc or less. Time-dependent ionization is typically highly dependent on density. If the density becomes 10 times higher, then the equilibrium time scale becomes 10 times shorter, and vice versa Therefore, to avoid overestimating the time-dependent ionization effect, the electron density was assumed to be 1010 /cc. Figure 1 shows the temporal variation in the charge state of iron. The horizontal axis represents the time on a logarithmic scale, and the vertical axis shows the ionization fraction of iron on a logarithmic scale. The initial temperature is assumed to be 1 MK. Ionization reaches equilibrium in approximately 10 s in all cases. The timescale of the ionization equilibrium is temperature-independent. The rate of decrease in Fe XXIII immediately before reaching equilibrium is clearly higher as the temperature rises. However, the Fe XXIV does not change significantly after its peak time in all cases. Note that the time-dependent ionization is not sensitive to the initial temperature of the ionization equilibrium because the ionization process is fast at the beginning.

4 NON-EQUILIBRIUM IONIZATION PLASMA OBSERVED BY HINODE/EIS

The time evolution of the charge state of iron downstream of the reconnection outflow discussed in the previous section was applied to the Hinode/EIS observation of the large flare on September 10, 2017. The EIS Fe XXIII (263.76 Å) image is shown in Figure 2a. A sheet structure formed above the cusp-shaped structure is observed. The intensity ratio between Fe XXIV (255.10 Å) and Fe XXIII (263.76 Å) is shown in Figure 2b. The diamonds in Figure 2b represent the height dependence (white dashed line in Figure 2a) of the intensity ratio between Fe XXIV (255.10 Å) and Fe XXIII (263.76 Å) observed by Hinode/EIS. This result is almost the same as that reported by Warren et al. (2018). The red solid line shows the intensity ratio between Fe XXIII and Fe XXIV considering the time-dependent ionization effect with a constant electron temperature Te = 25 MK. It is assumed that the reconnection point is located at X = 1100 arcsec, and the plasma is assumed to move downstream (toward X = 1000 arcsec) at a rate of 1000 km/s. Therefore, the ionization proceeds as X becomes smaller, and the Fe XXIV / Fe XXIII ratio becomes larger. The intensity ratios considering the time-dependent ionization effect with constant electron temperatures Te = 20 and 30 MK are also shown with dashed lines in Figure 2b. The observed ratios (diamonds) seem to be consistent with the results obtained considering the time-dependent ionization effect at a constant electron temperature Te = 25 MK.

To discuss the non-thermal velocity, the line width of the emission line of Fe XXIV (192.04 Å) was used. The full width at half-maximum (FWHM), WobsW_{obs}, of the observed lines in velocity units, is described by

Wobs=WI2+4log2(2kBTionM+ξ2),W_{obs}=\sqrt{W_{I}^{2}+4\log{2}\left(\frac{2k_{B}T_{ion}}{M}+\xi^{2}\right)}, (2)

where WIW_{I} is the instrumental width, kBk_{B} is the Boltzmann constant, TionT_{ion} is the ion thermal temperature, M is the mass of the ion, and ξ\xi is the non-thermal velocity. The ion temperature in the calculation was replaced with the electron temperature. The main difference from previous study is the height dependence of the electron temperature. Here, the time-dependent ionization effect is considered, and the electron temperature does not change with the height. Figure 3 shows the height dependence of the non-thermal velocity estimated from the line of Fe XXIV (192.04 Å) observed by EIS. The diamonds show the same results as those discussed in a previous study. The red solid lines in Figure 3 correspond to the nonthermal velocity at Te = 25 MK, as shown in Figure 2b. The black dashed lines also correspond to those at Te = 20 and 30 K. It can be observed that the non-thermal velocity increases significantly with the height of the sheet structure, even in the case where the time-dependent ionization process is considered. This trend is largely the same in Warren et al. (2018), who did not consider the time-dependent ionization process.

5 SUMMARY and DISCUSSION

I have studied plasma heating considering the time-dependent ionization process during a large solar flare on September 10, 2017, as observed by Hinode/EIS. The observed Fe XXIV / Fe XXIII ratios are consistent with the results of considering the time-dependent ionization effect at a constant electron temperature Te = 25 MK. It is also discussed that the non-thermal velocity considers the time-dependent ionization process during a large solar flare. The non-thermal velocity increases significantly with the height of the sheet structure, even when considering the time-dependent ionization process.

Let us discuss the validity of our results by comparing them with those of previous studies. As mentioned above, Warren et al. (2018) studied the same flare observation data. They found that plasma heating appeared to occur downstream of the reconnection outflow, and that the plasma was heated to temperatures from \sim10 to \sim25 MK under the assumption of ionization equilibrium. On the other hand, I considered the ionization process and performed an analysis of the reconnection region assuming isothermal temperature. As a result, it was found that the Fe XXIV / Fe XXIII observed ratio can be well explained assuming a density of approximately 1010 / cc, a velocity of 1000 km s-1, and a temperature of 25 MK in the magnetic reconnection region. The density and velocity used in the analysis were higher than those normally observed in the reconnection region. Note that the estimated spatial profiles of Fe XXIV / Fe XXIII ratios are the same at a density of 5x109 /cc and a velocity of 500 km s-1. Longcope et al. (2018) and Cheng et al. (2018) reported the lower velocity (approximately 200-300 km s-1) in the same event. In addition, they mentioned that downflows show a rapid deceleration–a behavior that has been well reported in numerous previous studies on SADs velocities. At low speeds such as 300 km s-1, the plasma in the outflow region may approach ionization equilibrium, and it may be assumed that the temperature of the plasma is not isothermal in the height direction but has a gradient. In contrast, the velocity at the beginning of the flare (\sim16:05) seems to be high– approximately 500-800 km s-1 (see Figure 7 in Longcope et al. (2018)). Therefore, the assumption of a flow velocity of 1000 km s-1 is valid in the beginning of the flare. In fact, Warren et al. (2018) studied the temporal evolution of height dependence of the Fe XXIV/Fe XXIII ratio, and discovered that the gradient became more gradual over time. The outflow in the later phase of the flare is slower than the flow in the beginning, and the plasma in the outflow region may approach the ionization equilibrium. To determine whether there is a temperature gradient in the magnetic reconnection region, it is necessary to perform density, temperature, and velocity diagnostics considering the non-equilibrium ionization. For this purpose, it is necessary to observe other ionization degree lines, for example, from Fe XIX to Fe XXII. The Solar-C(EUVST) mission currently under consideration has many high-temperature lines and line pairs capable of density diagnosis. The plasma diagnostic studies with regard to the reconnection region are expected to progress dramatically with the Solar-C(EUVST). From a theoretical standpoint, the temperature downstream of the reconnection region is considered to be almost isothermal until the termination shock, because the energy transport by the thermal conduction is large in the corona. These temperature structures are confirmed by various numerical calculations (e.g., Yokoyama & Shibata, 2001). In contrast, there exists theoretically controversy as to whether the method of providing thermal conduction during a flare is appropriate (e.g., Imada et al., 2015), and further discussion is required on this subject.

The effect of non-equilibrium ionization on the line width (nonthermal velocity) was also analyzed. The non-thermal velocities were found to be sufficiently large regardless of whether ionization non-equilibrium was considered. The relationship between plasma heating/acceleration and turbulence, as discussed by Warren et al. (2018) and Polito et al. (2018) does not change even when non-equilibrium ionization is considered. On the other hand, the energy related to the line width is not very large compared to the energy required to heat the plasma (nonthermal velocity <<<< thermal velocity), and further discussion on how much it can contribute to plasma heating is necessary.

Finally, I discuss the relationship between the magnetic reconnection model and non-equilibrium ionization. Currently, there are two types of theoretical models of magnetic reconnection: Petschek-type reconnection, which is associated with large-scale slow-mode shocks (e.g., Yokoyama & Shibata, 2001), and plasmaoid-unstable type reconnection in which many plasmoids are formed (e.g., Bhattacharjee et al., 2009; Shibayama et al., 2015). The two models can be distinguished observationally by considering the ionization process in the solar corona. Petschek-type reconnection is usually thought to be accompanied by laminar flow, and ionization is also thought to be a layered structure, as seen in Imada et al. (2011c). In contrast, in the case of plasmoid-unstable reconnection, the heated plasmoids sometimes coalesce and/or wander through the reconnection region to the right and to the left. Therefore, ionization in the reconnection region may not be a layered structure, but a structure in which multiple ionized states coexist (Figure 4). For example, in the reconnection event I analyzed, the reconnection region can be interpreted as the ionization progresses as it goes to the outside of the reconnection region (a layered structure). Hence, it can be considered that Petschek-type reconnection might have occurred in this event. On the other hand, in the limb flare event observed at Takasao et al. (2012), the reconnection region was observed at various wavelengths (emission lines) at the same time and location, and the plasma is considered to be a mixture of multiple ionized states. In addition, many plasmoids were also observed iduring this event. Therefore, it can be considered that a plasmoid-unstable reconnection might occur in that event. The number of high-temperature lines observed by Hinode/EIS is limited, so it is difficult to make a sufficient diagnosis of the reconnection region. Recently, the next-generation solar observation satellite Solar-C (EUVST) has been discussed intensively. An ultraviolet imaging spectrometer with dramatically improved spatial and temporal resolution is planned for this satellite. In the Solar-C era, thermal non-equilibrium plasma will be extensively discussed. I expect that Solar-C (EUVST) will reveal the reconnection region in detail.

The authors thank K. Kusano, T. Kawate, H. Iijima, T. Shibayama for fruitful discussions. This work was partially supported by the Grant-in-Aid for 17K14401 and 15H05816.

References

  • Arnaud & Rothenflug (1985) Arnaud, M., & Rothenflug, R. 1985, A&AS, 60, 425
  • Arnaud & Raymond (1992) Arnaud, M., & Raymond, J. 1992, ApJ, 398, 394
  • Bhattacharjee et al. (2009) Bhattacharjee, A., et al. 2009, Phys. Plasma, 16, 112102
  • Cai et al. (2019) Cai, Q., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 3183
  • Carmichael (1964) Carmichael, H. 1964, in The Physics of Solar Flares, ed. W. N. Hess (NASA Special Publication 50; Washington, DC: NASA), 451
  • Cheng et al. (2018) Cheng, X., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 64
  • Culhane et al. (2007) Culhane, J. L., et al. 2007, Sol. Phys., 243, 19
  • Doschek et al. (2018) Doschek, G. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 178
  • French et al. (2020) French, R. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 192
  • Hara et al. (2011) Hara, H., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 107
  • Hirayama (1974) Hirayama, T. 1974, Sol. Phys., 34, 323
  • Hones (1979) Hones, E.W. 1979, Space Sci. Rev., 23, 393
  • Imada et al. (2005) Imada, S., et al. 2005, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L09101
  • Imada et al. (2007a) Imada, S., et al. 2007a, J. Geophys. Res., 112, A03202
  • Imada et al. (2007b) Imada, S., et al. 2007b, PASJ, 59, S793
  • Imada et al. (2008) Imada, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 679, L155
  • Imada et al. (2011a) Imada, S., et al. 2011a, J. Geophys. Res., 116, A08217
  • Imada et al. (2011b) Imada, S. et al. 2011b, ApJ, 743, 57
  • Imada et al. (2011c) Imada, S. et al. 2011c, ApJ, 742, 70
  • Imada et al. (2013) Imada, S. et al. 2013, ApJ, 776, L11
  • Imada et al. (2015) Imada, S., et al. 2015, Phys. Plasma, 22, 101206
  • Innes et al. (2003) Innes, D. E., et al. 2003, Sol. Phys., 217, 267
  • Ji et al. (1998) Ji, H., et al. 1998, Phys. Rev. Lett., 80, 3256
  • Kopp & Pneuman (1976) Kopp, R. A., & Pneuman, G. W. 1976, Sol. Phys., 50, 85
  • Landi et al. (2013) Landi, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 763, 86
  • Li et al. (2018) Li, Y., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, L15
  • Liu et al. (2013) Liu, W. et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 168
  • Longcope et al. (2018) Longcope, D., et al. 2018, ApJ, 868, 148
  • Masuda et al. (1994) Masuda, S., et al. 1994, Nature, 371, 495
  • Mazzotta et al. (1998) Mazzotta, P., et al. 1998, A&AS, 133, 403
  • McKenzie & Hudson (1999) McKenzie, D. E. & Hudson, H. S. 1999, ApJ, 519, L93
  • McKenzie (2000) McKenzie, D. E. 2000, Sol. Phys., 195, 381
  • Ohyama & Shibata (1998) Ohyama, M. & Shibata, K. 1998, ApJ, 499, 934
  • Øieroset et al. (2002) Øieroset, M., et al. 2002, Phys. Rev. Lett., 89, 195001
  • Ono et al. (1988) Ono, Y., et al. 1988, Phys. Rev. Lett., 61, 2847
  • Polito et al. (2018) Polito, V., et al. 2018, ApJ, 864, 63
  • Pneuman et al. (1981) Pneuman, G.W. 1981, In Solar Flare Magnetohydrodynamics, ed. ER Priest, 379, London:Gordon & Breach
  • Savage et al. (2012) Savage, S. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, L40
  • Shibayama et al. (2015) Shibayama, T., et al. 2015, Phys. Plasma, 22, 100706
  • Sturrock (1966) Sturrock, P. A. 1966, Nature, 211, 695
  • Svestka & Cliver (1992) Svestka, Z. & Cliver, E. W. 1992, History and Basic Characteristics of Eruptive Flares. in IAU Colloq. 133, Eruptive Solar Flares, Vol. 399, ed. Z. Svestka, B. V. Jackson, & M. E. Macado (New York: Springer), 1
  • Takasao et al. (2012) Takasao, S., et al. 2012, ApJ, 745, L6
  • Teriaca et al. (2003) Teriaca, L., et al. 2003, ApJ, 588, 596
  • Tothova et al. (2011) Tothova, D., Innes, D. E., & Stenborg, G. 2011, A&A, 528, L12
  • Tsuneta et al. (1992) Tsuneta, S., et al. 1992, PASJ, 44, 63
  • Wang et al. (2007) Wang, T. J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 661, L207
  • Warren et al. (2018) Warren, H. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 122
  • Yamada et al. (1997) Yamada, M., et al. 1997, Phys. Plasma, 4, 1936
  • Yokoyama et al. (2001) Yokoyama, T., et al. 2001, ApJ, 546, L69
  • Yokoyama & Shibata (2001) Yokoyama, T. & Shibata, K. 2001, ApJ, 549, 1160
Refer to caption
Figure 1: Example of time-dependent ionization with Te = 20, 25, 30 MK. The horizontal axis show the time in logarithmic scale, and the vertical axis show the ionization fraction of iron in logarithmic scale. The dotted/dashed line show the peak time of Fe XXIII/Fe XXIV, respectively. The calculation was carried out in the plasma comoving frame.
Refer to caption
Figure 2: EIS Fe XXIII (263.76 Å) image of flare (a), intensity ratio between Fe XXIV (255.10 Å) and Fe XXIII (263.76 Å) along the downstream of the reconnection outflow (b). Diamonds represent the observation. The red solid line and the black dashed lines represent the theoretical estimation of intensity ratio with constant temperature.
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Height dependence of the non-thermal velocity estimated from the line of Fe XXIV (192.04 Å) observed by Hinode/EIS.
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Schematic illustration of the ionization in the Petschek-type and plasmoid-unstable reconnection region. The color depths represent the degree of ionization.