Multisummability of formal solutions for a family of generalized singularly perturbed moment differential equations
Abstract.
The notion of moment differentiation is extended to the set of generalized multisums of formal power series via an appropriate integral representation and accurate estimates of the moment derivatives.
The main result is applied to characterize generalized multisummability of the formal solution to a family of singularly perturbed moment differential equations in the complex domain, broadening widely the range of singularly perturbed functional equations to be considered in practice, such as singularly perturbed differential equations and singularly perturbed fractional differential equations.
Key words and phrases:
multisummability, formal solution, moment estimates, moment derivatives, moment differential equations, singular perturbation2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
34K26, 34K41, 34E10, 34M301. Introduction
The main aim of this work is to give a step forward in the theory of summability of formal solutions to functional equations in the complex domain. More precisely, we deal with the so-called moment (partial) differential equations, in which the operators known as moment derivatives act on the unknown function.
The main advances in the present study are twofold: on the one hand, we provide an integral representation of the moment derivatives of generalized sums of formal power series which can be extended to an infinite sector satisfying some generalized exponential growth. In addition to this, we describe the dependence of such moment derivatives with respect to three elements, namely the moment sequence, the sequence involved in the asymptotic representation of the sum, and also the generalized exponential growth at infinity (Theorem 2). Consequently, a novel definition of moment derivatives acting on generalized multisums of formal power series makes sense, and induces many possible applications in the theory, as the following one. On the other hand, we apply the previous result to achieve the main result of this research, namely the multisummability of the formal solutions to certain family of singularly perturbed moment differential equations (Theorem 3). More precisely, we prove that the formal solution to
(1) |
is multisummable along a certain appropriate multidirection with respect to the perturbation parameter if and only if the forcing term and the initial conditions , for are multisummable along the same multidirection. Here, stands for a small complex parameter, is a holomorphic function near the origin, is a sequence of moments, and are positive integers with . The precise description of the elements involved in the problem is given in Section 5.
The study of moment differential equations is motivated by the versatility of the moment derivative operator, whose definition was initially put forward by W. Balser and M. Yoshino in [2] for formal power series. Let be a sequence of positive real numbers. Then, the moment derivative is defined by for every positive integer and , defining moment derivatives for elements in by linearity. It is natural to extend the previous definition to a holomorphic function on some disc at the origin by identifying the function with its Taylor series at . In addition to this, the authors proved that one can extend the definition of moment differentiation to the generalized sums in a direction of a formal power series, as the sum of the moment derivative of that formal power series (see Corollary 1 and Definition 10, [13]). In this work, we further extend it to the generalized multisums of a formal power series (Corollary 1 and Definition 10).
The most suitable choice for is to be a moment sequence of certain Laplace-like operator. It is clear that the sequence gives rise to the usual derivative when considering the moment operator . Apart from that choice for , many other derivations which appear in concrete applications can be represented as a moment derivative. For example, for every , the sequence is associated with the Caputo fractional derivative via the relation , valid for every (see [16], Remark 3, for further details). Recently, many applications of Caputo derivatives appear in the literature such as [3, 8], also in the study of the asymptotic periodic solutions of evolution equations [21], numerical studies, etc. Let . The sequence , with is known as the sequence of factorials, where . It determines the moment differentiation which coincides with the derivative given by for every . This moment differentiation is quite related to the dilation operator, appearing in the study of difference equations which is of great interest in the scientific community with interesting advances in the knowledge of the asymptotic behavior of the solutions of difference equations (see [9, 15] among others, and the references therein).
The interest of moment functional equations has increased in the last decade, and recent achievements have been reached in this concern. A first step was given in the seminal work [2], where the authors study the formal solutions and Gevrey estimates of their coefficients of linear moment partial differential equations with constant coefficients. The development of a more general theory through the construction of kernels for generalized summability by J. Sanz in [22] allows to enlarge the class of moment sequences considered, in the framework of strongly regular sequences. The sequence above belongs to such a family for every , whereas does not. The so-called level, appearing in the asymptotic study of difference equations is also related to a strongly regular sequence [4, 5].
After the seminal work [2], the second author gave answer to the problem of analyticity of such problems [16], via splitting of the characteristic equation with respect to one of its variables. We also refer to [17] for a further study in the homogeneous situation, while dropping the condition of the convergence of the initial data. Further knowledge on the solutions to moment partial differential equations with constant coefficients is given in [18] to study the growth properties and summability of the formal solutions. It is also worth mentioning the family of partial differential equations studied in [10], where the coefficients of the equation under study belong to certain functional spaces associated with functions whose derivatives are uniformly bounded in terms of some strongly regular sequence.
The last advances in the theory of the asymptotic behavior of solutions to moment functional equations have been obtained recently regarding the summability of certain families of moment integro-differential equations [12], and also Maillet-type theorems [11, 24]. We mention the recent works by P. Remy in the study of partial differential equations [19] and integro-differential equations [20] of a similar nature as those considered in these works.
Recent results on generalized multisummability of formal power series concerning different (comparable and nonequivalent) levels associated with ultraholomorphic classes achieved in [6] are applied in the present study to achieve asymptotic properties of the solutions to a singularly perturbed moment differential equation. That concept of multisummability as long as previous results achieved by the authors in [13] have been the key points used to describe generalized multisummability of the formal solution of the main equation (1). As mentioned above, novel integral representations and accurate estimates of the moment derivatives of generalized sums of formal power series are needed, arriving to the coherent definition of moment derivation of the generalized multisum of a formal power series. More precisely, the first main result of the present study, Theorem 2, resorts to an appropriate deformation path which is split in order to provide upper bounds for the moment derivative of a sectorial holomorphic function, quite related to the multisummability process. As a consequence, Corollary 1 and Definition 10 encompass the notion of moment derivation of the multisum of a formal power series along some multidirection. As an application of these results, Section 5 characterizes multisummability of the formal solution to (1) in terms of that of the initial data and the forcing term (Theorem 3). The proof of this last result is based on the properties of formal Borel transform which transform the problem into an auxiliary moment partial differential equation, which is easier to handle.
The paper is structured as follows. We fix notation in Section 2, followed by Section 3, where we recall the definition and main results on strongly regular sequences, generalized summability and multisummability of formal power series. In that section, some technical results needed in the sequel are also proved. The main purpose of Section 4 is to state Theorem 2, leading to a coherent definition of moment derivative of the generalized multisum of a formal power series. Section 5 describes an application (Theorem 3) of the previous results in the framework of singularly perturbed moment differential equations.
2. Notation
By we shall denote the set of all positive integers, i.e., and .
stands for the Riemann surface of the logarithm.
For all and , stands for the open disc in the complex plane centered at and with radius . For any fixed and a subset of defined as
is an open infinite sector with vertex at the origin, bisecting direction and opening . In cases where the opening is not specified, we simply write . For every , we write . A sectorial region is a subset of such that there exists for which and for any there exists such that .
We put . Analogously, we write (resp. ) whenever the radius (resp. the radius and the opening ) can be omitted. We write if is an infinite sector with vertex at the origin such that , where the closure is considered with respect to . Similarly, for two sectorial regions and we write whenever and relation holds for the sectors appearing in the definitions of both sectorial regions.
If is a complex Banach space, by we denote the set of all functions holomorphic on the open set with values from . For we simply write . The set of all formal power series in with coefficients in is denoted by .
3. Preliminary results and definitions
The purpose of this section is to recall the main facts on the theory of generalized summability and also one of the equivalent notions of generalized multisummability of a formal power series along certain multidirection, developed in [6]. We first remind the main elements regarding the theory of strongly regular sequences and related properties together with the theory of generalized summability, for the sake of completeness. These definitions and the detailed constructions can be found in [23] and the references therein.
3.1. Strongly regular sequences
The concept of strongly regular sequences was put forward by V. Thilliez in [25].
Definition 1.
Let be a sequence of positive real numbers with . is a strongly regular sequence if the following statements hold:
-
(lc)
, ( is logarithmically convex).
-
(mg)
there exists such that , for all ( is of moderate growth).
-
(snq)
there exists such that , for all ( satisfies the strong non-quasianalyticity condition).
The previous notion generalizes that of Gevrey sequences of order , , which widely appear in the theory of summability of formal solutions to functional equations. In association with a strongly regular sequence , one can define the function
(2) |
It turns out that is a non-decreasing and continuous function in , with . We also consider the positive real number
which determines the limit opening for a sector to admit nontrivial flat ultraholomorphic functions defined on them. We refer to [7] for a deeper study in this direction.
Lemma 1 ((17), [22]).
For every , there exist such that for all one has
Lemma 2.
Let be a strongly regular sequence, and let . There exists (only depending on and ) such that
Lemma 3.
Let be a strongly regular sequence. The sequence defines a strongly regular sequence for every . Moreover, .
Lemma 4.
Let be a sequence satisfying (lc) property. Then
-
•
is nondecreasing.
-
•
for all .
3.2. Generalized summability
In this subsection, stands for a complex Banach space.
The classical summability theory of formal power series related to Gevrey sequences (see for example [1, 14]) has recently been adapted to the more general settings involving strongly regular sequences (see [22, 23]). This notion leans on the approximation of holomorphic functions in sectors of the complex plane by formal power series whenever the approximation is given in terms of a given strongly regular sequence.
Definition 2.
Let be a sequence of positive real numbers, and let be a sectorial region, for some and . A function admits the formal power series as its -asymptotic expansion in if for every and with and all integer , there exist with
for all .
Further details on the following result can be found in Section 3 [23].
Lemma 5.
In the situation of the previous definition, there exist such that
for every .
The exponential growth in sectors of the complex plane is extended in terms of the function as follows.
Definition 3.
Let and , and suppose that is a fixed sequence of positive real numbers. We define the set as consisting of all functions such that for every there exist constants satisfying
(3) |
The construction of operators involved in the summability process leans on the existence of kernel functions for generalized summability, related to a given strongly regular sequence.
Definition 4.
Let be a strongly regular sequence with and with function defined as in (2). Two complex functions are strong kernel functions for -summability if the following properties hold:
-
•
. There exists such that for all bounded proper subsectors of , there exists with
(4) Furthermore, is a flat function in every infinite subsector of . More precisely, for every there exist such that
(5) We also assume that for every real .
-
•
with generalized exponential growth at infinity
(6) for some . There also exists such that for all and , there exists with
(7) -
•
Functions and are connected by the moment function associated with defined by
(8) is a holomorphic function on , continuous up to its boundary. Indeed, is determined from via the sequence of moments associated with , , by
(9)
Lemma 6 (Proposition 5.7, [22]).
Given a kernel function for -summability, associated with some strongly regular sequence , the sequence of moments and are equivalent, i.e., there exist such that
As a matter of fact, the classical kernels for summability involved in the Gevrey theory satisfy weaker properties (see [1]). These more restrictive conditions are justified (see Section 4.2, [6]) regarding their applicability and adaptability to practical situations. Indeed, given a strongly regular sequence, the existence of a pair of kernels for -summability is guaranteed whenever admits a nonzero proximate order. We refer to Section 2.3 [6] for a brief review on sequences admitting a nonzero proximate order. This property will turn into an assumption for every strongly regular sequence under consideration hereinafter.
The classical formal Borel transform can also be adapted to this framework.
Definition 5.
Let be a sequence of moments. Then the formal -Borel moment transform is given by
An -analog of Laplace transform is also available (see Section 6, [23]).
Proposition 1.
Let . Given a strongly regular sequence which admits a nonzero proximate order, and a pair of kernel functions for -summability associated, say and , we define for every the -Laplace transform of along direction by
for all , and small enough . The variation of among the arguments of determines a holomorphic function, denoted , defined in a sectorial region of bisecting direction and opening larger than .
As a matter of fact, there exists a generalization to the classical Borel-Laplace procedure for the effective summation of a given formal power series.
Definition 6.
Let be a strongly regular sequence which admits a nonzero proximate order and let denote a sequence of moments associated with . The series is -summable along direction if is a series with a positive radius of convergence, and the analytic function defining such series, say , can be extended to an infinite sector of bisecting direction , say , with .
Proposition 2.
In the situation of the previous definition, the function is holomorphic on a bounded sector of bisecting direction and opening larger than .
Definition 6 does not depend on the kernel functions for -summability (and therefore on the moment sequence) considered. In addition to this, the procedure described there provides us with the only function (due to Watson’s Lemma, see Corollary 3.16, [7]) admitting the initial formal power series as its -asymptotic expansion in a wide enough sector of bisecting direction , known as the -sum of the formal power series along direction .
Definition 7.
The function in Proposition 2 is known as the -sum of along direction , and is denoted by . The set of formal power series with coefficients in which are -summable along direction is denoted by .
Lemma 7.
Let be a formal power series, and let . We define the formal power series .
Let be a strongly regular sequence admitting a nonzero proximate order. Let . Then, the following statements are equivalent:
-
•
The formal power series is -summable in the direction .
-
•
The formal power series is -summable in the direction .
If one of the previous equivalent statements holds, then
(10) |
Proof.
It is straightforward that being -summable in the direction yields being -summable in the same direction, as the set of summable functions in a direction is an algebra. The second part of the equivalence can be proved following an analogous argument as that for Exercise 3, Section 4.5, in [1]. More precisely, an iterative argument allows us to assume that . Let Then, there exists a bounded sector with bisecting direction and opening larger than such that for any subsector there exist with
valid for every and . Therefore, one has that
regarding property of . Observe that , which concludes the proof. ∎
3.3. Generalized multisummability
As in the classical theory, the procedure of Borel-Laplace summation does not succeed when dealing with the formal solutions to some functional equations. As a matter of fact, a more general approach called multisummability is needed in the study of formal solutions to ordinary differential equations. A generalized theory of multisummability can be considered in this framework from different points of view.
The theory of generalized multisummability deals with summability processes with respect to sequences obtained by algebraic actions on the initial strongly regular sequences handled. More precisely, given two sequences of positive real numbers and , we denote . The comparison of sequences and their properties is studied in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 [6] in a more general framework. In the present work, we focus on the case where both and are powers of some strongly regular sequence admitting a nonzero proximate order, the sequence of quotients being a positive power of the initial sequence, which turns out to be a strongly regular sequence (see Lemma 3) admitting a nonzero proximate order (see Remark 4.8 (i), [22]).
The iterated procedure approach to multisummability in the more general context of strongly regular sequences reads as follows.
Definition 8 (Definition 4.22, [6]).
Let , where , be two strongly regular sequences admitting nonzero proximate orders. We assume that . For , we consider a strong kernel of -summability and its associated sequence of moments . The formal power series is -summable in the multidirection with if:
-
(i)
is -summable along direction . Let denote such -sum.
-
(ii)
admits analytic continuation in an infinite sector of bisecting direction with .
The -sum of in the multidirection is given by , which determines a holomorphic function on a bounded sector of bisecting direction and opening slightly larger than (see Proposition 2). We denote the -sum of in the multidirection by , and stands for the set of all formal power series which are -multisummable along the multidirection .
It is worth remarking that -summability along a direction is stated in [6] in terms of weight sequences satisfying less restrictive conditions than strongly regular sequences. However, any weight sequence admitting a nonzero proximate order is indeed a strongly regular sequence. According to Theorem 4.23 [6], we recall that the previous construction does not depend on the kernels for -summability considered in the process, . Indeed, an equivalent definition of multisummability is the following.
Proposition 3 (Definition 4.1, [6]).
In the situation of Definition 8, the formal power series is -summable in the multidirection if there exist a formal power series which is -summable in and a formal power series which is -summable in such that . Moreover, the -sum of in the multidirection is given by .
The splitting of into a sum in Proposition 3 is essentially unique (see Proposition 4.2, [6]). This equivalent definition of multisummability allows to give a direct proof of the following result.
Lemma 8.
Let be a formal power series, and let . We define the formal power series .
Let , where , be two strongly regular sequences admitting nonzero proximate orders. We assume that . We choose with . Then, the following statements are equivalent:
-
•
The formal power series is -summable in the multidirection .
-
•
The formal power series is -summable in the multidirection .
If one of the previous equivalent statements hold, then one has that
(11) |
Proof.
If is -summable in the multidirection , then , with being -summable in and being -summable in . Then, is -summable in and is -summable in . Then, , which entails that is -summable in the multidirection .
On the other hand, if is -summable in the multidirection , then , with being -summable in and being -summable in . As the splitting is essentially unique, and , one can choose a splitting in which , for . Lemma 7 guarantees that the formal power series is -summable along direction iff is -summable along direction . Then, can be written in the form , where is -summable along direction , for , leading to multisummability of .
Regarding the construction of the sums above, one also arrives at (11).
∎
4. On moment differentiation
In this section, we focus our attention on the concept of a moment derivative and recall some properties associated with this notion. We also state some new results to be applied in the work.
The notion of a generalized derivative operator allows to consider functional problems under greater generality. More precisely, we deal with the following formal operator.
Definition 9.
Let be a complex Banach space. For any fixed sequence of moments we define the -differential operator by the formula:
Usual derivatives are recovered when considering the moment sequence , which is associated with the kernel function . In addition to this, moment derivatives can be read in terms of Caputo -fractional derivatives as follows. Let be a positive rational number. The moment sequence is associated with the kernel function and the fractional derivative of order is defined on formal power series in by
Therefore, one has
for every .
We may also observe that derivatives defined by
for some fixed can be interpreted in terms of the moment derivatives associated with the moment sequence , with and .
We also have the following result.
Lemma 9 (Lemma 3, [13]).
Let for be two sequences of moments. Then,
-
-
The sequence is a sequence of moments.
-
-
as operators defined in .
Moment differentiation can be naturally extended to holomorphic functions on some neighborhood of the origin by identifying the function with its Taylor series at the origin. However, this formal differentiation does not preserve convergence unless some regularity property is assumed for the sequence of moments. However, if one departs from a strongly regular sequence which admits a nonzero proximate order, and considers a pair of kernel functions associated with it and then constructs the corresponding sequence of moments , then it holds that and generate the same ultraholomorphic space of functions (i.e., they are equivalent sequences) and is indeed a strongly regular sequence (see Remark 3.8, [10]). In [13], the definition of moment differentiation was also extended to the generalized sum along a direction of a formal power series as the generalized sum along that same direction of the formal moment derivative of the initial formal power series. For that purpose, the moment derivative was also provided for any function defined on some neighborhood of the origin with holomorphic extension to an infinite sector and with certain generalized exponential growth at infinity (as described in Definition 3). Indeed, the first part of Theorem 3 [13] reads as follows.
Theorem 1.
Let be a sequence of moments. We also fix with and . Then, there exists such that for all , all and all , one has that
(12) |
with . The integration path is a deformation of the circle , for any choice of , which depends on . More precisely, such deformation consists of substituting some arc of the circle contained in by a simple path which attains an adequate sufficient distance to the origin while it remains inside .
At this point, we give a step forward in order to define the moment derivatives on functions defined on some sectorial region, and which can be extended under certain generalized exponential growth to infinity.
Theorem 2.
Let be a sequence of moments, and be a strongly regular sequence admitting a nonzero proximate order. Let satisfying for some . We choose and write , for some sectorial region with , as seen in Figure 1. Assume moreover that can be extended (the extension is also denoted by ) to an infinite sector of bisecting direction , with . Then, the following statements hold:
-
(a)
There exists such that for every and and all and
where . The path depends on .
-
(b)
There exist such that
(13) where is the function defined in (2), corresponding to the strongly regular sequence .

Proof.
The proof of the previous result is based on that of Theorem 3 and Proposition 2, [13]. We provide a complete proof for the sake of completeness and focus on distinctive points with respect to the results in that previous work.
Let and . Let and such that and . We take , where is given in (6), is defined in (5), and is as in Lemma 2. Let and . Choose . The path is constructed as follows. Let be the points in and let be the points in . We assume . We define , is the arc of the circle of radius from to . We also put , with to be determined. is the arc of circle from to , , is the arc of the circle of radius from to and . We finally define the integration path
see Figure 2. In case that , where is given in (6), is defined in (5), and is as in Lemma 2, then one can choose and remove , and from the concatenation. Otherwise, .

For the first part of the proof, we observe from (35) in [23] that
for every pair of complex numbers in which both sides of the previous expression are defined. Hence, if then one may replace the contour in (12) by .
We now provide the estimates in (13). We first observe (see (17) in [13]) that
(14) |
valid for all with and , for with . This entails there exist such that
for , valid for every . We recall that in this case and do not appear in the integration path. It only remains to give upper bounds regarding the paths and , which are postponed.
If , for every one can choose with
This entails (see (22)–(26) in the proof of Theorem 3 [13]) the existence of with
for , and all . The previous expression can be bounded from above by
for some taking into account the growth at infinity determined by and the choice of the integration paths. On the other hand, parametrizing the integration path and analogous estimates as in the previous expression yield
for some (see (28) in [13]). These same upper bounds hold for the integration along . Again, the parametrization of and usual estimates yield
for some (see (31) in [13]).
At this point, it only remains to provide upper bounds for
(15) |
for for all . Let . We write and define
Lemma 10.
The function belongs to . In addition to this, for every there exist , which do not depend on , such that
for all .
Proof.
It is clear that . We have that for all one has that (3) holds for some .
Bearing in mind that admits as its asymptotic expansion, there exist such that
(16) |
for all with , provided that the opening of is small enough. On the other hand, for every with and all , one can apply Lemma 5 and usual estimates to arrive at
Also,
(17) |
for all with . The result follows from here. ∎
Observe that for every one has that
(18) |
In view of (18) one may substitute the study of upper estimates of (15) by those of
(19) |
We provide upper bounds for (19) for , which remain valid for the case .
In view of Lemma 10, one derives
(20) |
By Proposition 2, [13] there exists , such that the estimation (13) holds for . Hence, we may assume that . Let be a positive constant given in Definition 4.
We split the path of integration in the inner integral in (19) into the segment and the ray , and we interchange the order of integration in (19). Next, we observe that and . Hence
(21) |
for .
Observe that
(22) |
On the opposite case , using Lemma 1 and Lemma 6 and (5) we estimate (22) by
(25) |
for some constants .
Since and , there exists such that for every there exists satisfying . Hence, using (7) and (25) we estimate
(26) |
for some and .
This concludes the proof of (13). ∎
In the last part of this section, we describe compatibility conditions regarding asymptotic expansions and moment derivation, which allows to provide a differential structure to the set of multisummable formal power series.
Lemma 11.
In the situation of Theorem 2, one has that is the -sum of in .
Proof.
Observe that . Therefore, for every one has
Analogously,
which yields
In view of (12), this means that given which admits as its asymptotic expansion at the origin in , then
On the other hand,
which entails that
We conclude that
This is an equivalent condition for to admit as its asymptotic expansion in . ∎
Corollary 1.
Let be a sequence of moments, and let be a strongly regular sequence which admits a nonzero proximate order. We also choose positive numbers such that . Given any multidirection such that , the space is closed under -differentiation.
Proof.
In view of Lemma 3, we have that is a strongly regular sequence which admits a nonzero proximate order (see Remark 4.8 (i), [22]). This guarantees the existence of a moment sequence associated with some kernel function for -summability.
Let . It holds that is -summable in direction . Equivalently, there exists , for some sectorial region of bisecting direction and opening larger than such that admits as its -asymptotic expansion in . Lemma 11 guarantees that is the -sum of in .
We recall from Lemma 9 that
This entails that the formal power series is -summable along direction . Moreover, its sum can be extended to an infinite sector of bisecting direction , which belongs to due to the fact that assumptions in Theorem 2 hold, and regarding (13). This allows to conclude that . ∎
As a consequence, a definition of moment derivative for multisums of formal power series can be stated.
Definition 10.
Let be a sequence of moments, and let be a strongly regular sequence which admits a nonzero proximate order. We also choose positive numbers such that . Given any multidirection such that . For every we define
We conclude with some properties of multisummable series which will appear in the next section.
Lemma 12.
Let be the Banach space of holomorphic functions on some nonempty closed neighborhood of the origin, , endowed with the supremum norm. Let for be two strongly regular sequences admitting nonzero proximate orders, with . Let such that . We also consider a moment sequence and .
For every with , one has:
-
•
.
-
•
, where is the Banach space of holomorphic functions on some endowed with the supremum norm.
Proof.
We write for . Regarding Proposition 3, one can write , with being -summable along direction , . We write for . We observe that
For , there exists a sectorial region of bisecting direction and opening larger than , a holomorphic function , and positive constants such that for all and all one has
(27) |
for all . Therefore, the series is such that
for all . This entails that is the -sum of along direction . This concludes that again in view of Proposition 3.
For the second part of the proof, it only remains to check that for all the formal power series is -summable along direction , for . We first observe that the coefficients of as a formal power series in are holomorphic and bounded functions on some common neighborhood of the origin , due to the properties of . Let
and define as the Banach space of holomorphic and bounded functions in with the sup. norm. We observe from (27), which is valid for all , that
for all . We have obtained that
(28) |
We write
An analogous argument as that of Theorem 2 yields
for some , which can be bounded from above taking into account (14) and (28). This way one arrives at
or equivalently
valid for all . This yields that is the -sum of along direction .
∎
5. Application. Multisummability of formal solutions to singularly perturbed moment differential equations
In this section, we state the main result of the present work, namely the multisummability properties of the formal solutions to certain families of singularly perturbed moment differential equations.
Let be a strongly regular sequence which admits a nonzero proximate order.
Let with . Let and be two sequences of moments associated with two strongly regular sequences admitting nonzero proximate order, and assume that is the moment sequence associated with for some . Moreover, we assume that is an -sequence of order , i.e., there exist positive constants such that
We also assume that , and that .
Let be a holomorphic function on some closed disc centered at the origin, say , such that . Moreover, and are formal power series.
We consider a singularly perturbed moment differential equation of the form
(29) |
where is a small complex parameter.
The main result of the present work reads as follows.
Theorem 3.
-
(i)
There exists a unique formal solution of (29), which belongs to if .
-
(ii)
Let and choose with
The following statements are equivalent:
-
(ii.1)
is -summable in the multidirection .
-
(ii.2)
and , , are -summable in the multidirection .
-
(ii.1)
The proof of the main result is left to the end of the work, and is preceded by some auxiliary results modifying the shape of the main problem or stating asymptotic results of related problems.
Let . Then equation (29) can be rewritten in the form
(30) |
Let us write . Then the following lemma holds for the formal operator :
Lemma 13.
If then .
Proof.
Notice that
∎
After applying the formal Borel transform to both sides of (30), from Lemma 13 we receive
(31) |
where and .
We fix such that . Let be a strongly regular sequence which admits nonzero proximate order.
The following result is a direct consequence of Lemma 8
Lemma 14.
The formal power series is -multisummable (with respect to ) in the multidirection if and only if is -multisummable (with respect to ) in the multidirection . Let and be the corresponding -sums. Then, it holds that .
Proposition 4.
The formal power series is -multisummable in the admissible multidirection if and only if the following conditions are met
-
(1)
is -summable in the direction ,
-
(2)
the sum of , denoted by , is analytically continued to and .
By Theorem 4 from [13] the formal power series is -summable in the direction if and only if and , , are -summable in the same direction .
The next result extends Lemma 4 and Theorem 4, [13].
Theorem 4 (Compare Lemma 4 and Theorem 4, [13]).
Let us consider the Cauchy problem
(32) |
with being a fixed neighborhood of the origin.
-
1.
There exists a unique formal solution of (32), which belongs to if .
-
2.
Let denote the Banach space of holomorphic functions in with the norm of the supremum. Assume that . The following statements are equivalent:
-
2.1.
is -summable in direction (seen as a formal power series in with coefficients in ) with sum being an analytic solution of (32), and moreover , where stands for the Banach space of holomorphic and bounded functions defined on for some , endowed with the supremum norm.
-
2.2.
and are -summable in direction with sums and , respectively. Moreover, and .
-
2.1.
Proof.
The proof heavily rests on that of Lemma 4 and Theorem 4, [13]. We only give details at the points in which it differs from the proof of those previous results.
The existence of a unique formal solution follows from the recursion satisfied by their coefficients, written as a formal power series in . Holomorphy of the coefficients is also guaranteed from that recursion formula.
For the second statement, we first observe that the implication ( follows from the fact that -summable formal power series along any fixed direction are compatible with respect to sums, product, and also moment derivation (see Corollary 1, [13]), we obtain that and are -summable along the same direction. In addition to this, due to Theorem 2. It is easy to check that .
We proceed to prove the implication (. Let . We denote by the Banach space of holomorphic and bounded functions on , where is the norm defined by
for , with for . Denoting , one has that is a formal solution of
where , and with , . We also define
with and for . From the hypotheses made one has that is -summable in direction , with sum , for some sectorial region of opening larger than and bisecting direction . By Theorem 4, [13] and by Theorem 2 we obtain that for every and every there exist positive constants such that
for all and , and some . An induction argument and the application of Lemma 5 [13] (see the proof of Theorem 4, [13]) yield that is -summable in direction , and
for all , with and with . It is direct to check that
valid for some and all , all , for some . This entails that is a holomorphic function on which is the -sum of along direction . A direct application of Watson’s lemma (Corollary 4.12, [22]) allows us to conclude that the sum of , denoted by is an analytic solution of (32) with , where stands for the Banach space of holomorphic and bounded functions defined on . ∎
All the previous arguments allow us to conclude with the proof of the main result of the present work.
Proof of Theorem 3.
It is straightforward to check that (29) admits a unique formal solution which is obtained from the unique solution of (32) obtained in Theorem 4 by reversing the relations and .
If is -summable in , it is clear that is also -summable in , and from Lemma 8 and Lemma 12 we have that also belongs to . The sum of two elements in remains in that space, which in view of (29) entails that
It is clear that implies .
We proceed to give a proof for the implication . In view of Proposition 4 one only has to check that is -summable in direction and its sum can be extended to an infinite sector of bisecting direction , say , being that extension in the space . turns out to be a formal solution of (31).
We observe that and are both -summable in direction . On the one hand, and is -multisummable in . On the other hand, we have
which is -summable in .
According to our best knowledge, the main result of the paper is new even in the case of singularly perturbed differential equations and classical multisummability (for the classical approach to multisummability see Section 10 [1] or Section 7 [14]). Namely, putting and in Theorem 3 we conclude that
Corollary 2.
-
(i)
Let be such that also . Moreover, and are formal power series. Then there exists a unique formal solution of the singularly perturbed differential equation of the form
where is a small complex parameter. If additionally then also .
-
(ii)
Let and choose with . The following statements are equivalent:
-
(ii.1)
is -summable in the multidirection .
-
(ii.2)
and , , are -summable in the multidirection .
-
(ii.1)
References
- [1] W. Balser, Formal power series and linear systems of meromorphic ordinary differential equations, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2000.
- [2] W. Balser, M. Yoshino, Gevrey order of formal power series solutions of inhomogeneous partial differential equations with constant coefficients, Funkcial. Ekvac. 53 (2010), 411–434.
- [3] M.I. Gomoyunov, On representation formulas for solutions of linear differential equations with Caputo fractional derivatives, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 23, No 4 (2020), 1141–1160.
- [4] G.K. Immink, Exact asymptotics of nonlinear difference equations with levels 1 and 1+, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse T.XVII (2) (2008), 309–356.
- [5] G. K. Immink, Accelero-summation of the formal solutions of nonlinear difference equations, Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 61 (2011), No 1, 1–51.
- [6] J. Jiménez-Garrido, S. Kamimoto, A. Lastra, J. Sanz, Multisummability in Carleman ultraholomorphic classes by means of nonzero proximate orders, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 472 (2019), No. 1, 627–686.
- [7] J. Jiménez-Garrido, J. Sanz, G. Schindl, Injectivity and surjectivity of the asymptotic Borel map in Carleman ultraholomorphic classes, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 469 (2019), 136–168.
- [8] A. Kilbas, H. Srivastava, J. Trujillo, Theory and applications of fractional differential equations, North-Holland Math. Stud. 204, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2006.
- [9] A. Lastra, S. Malek, On multiscale Gevrey and Gevrey asymptotics for some linear differencedifferential initial value Cauchy problems, J. Difference Equ. Appl. 23 (2017), No. 8, 1397–1457.
- [10] A. Lastra, S. Malek, J. Sanz, Summability in general Carleman ultraholomorphic classes, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 430 (2015), 1175–1206.
- [11] A. Lastra, S. Michalik, M. Suwińska, Estimates of formal solutions for some generalized moment partial differential equations, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 500 (2021), no. 1, Paper No. 125094, 18 pp.
- [12] A. Lastra, S. Michalik, M. Suwińska, Summability of formal solutions for a family of generalized moment integro-differential equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 24 (2021), no. 5, 1445–1476.
- [13] A. Lastra, S. Michalik, M. Suwińska, Summability of formal solutions for some generalized moment partial differential equations, Results Math. 76, 22 (2021), 27 pp.
- [14] M. Loday-Richaud, Divergent series, summability and resurgence II, Simple and multiple summability, Lecture Notes in Math. 2154. Springer, 2016.
- [15] S. Malek, Asymptotics and confluence for some linear differencedifferential Cauchy problem, J. Geom. Anal 32, 93 (2022).
- [16] S. Michalik, Analytic solutions of moment partial differential equations with constant coefficients, Funkcial. Ekvac. 56 (2013), 19–50.
- [17] S. Michalik, Summability of formal solutions of linear partial differential equations with divergent initial data, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 406 (2013), no. 1, 243–260.
- [18] S. Michalik, B. Tkacz, The Stokes phenomenon for some moment partial differential equations, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 25 (2019), no. 4, 573–598.
- [19] P. Remy, Summability of the formal power series solutions of a certain class of inhomogeneous nonlinear partial differential equations with a single level, J. Differ. Equations 313 (2022), 450–502.
- [20] P. Remy, Gevrey order and summability of formal series solutions of certain classes of inhomogeneous linear integro-differential equations with variable coefficients, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 23 (2017), 853–878.
- [21] L. Ren, J. Wang, M. Fečkan, Asymptotically periodic solutions for Caputo type fractional evolution equations, Fract. Calc. Appl. Anal. 21, No 5 (2019), 1294–1312.
- [22] J. Sanz, Flat functions in Carleman ultraholomorphic classes via proximate orders, J. Math. Anal. Appl. 415 (2014), no. 2, 623–643.
- [23] J. Sanz, Asymptotic analysis and summability of formal power series, Analytic, Algebraic and Geometric Aspects of Differential Equations, Trends Math., Birkhäuser/Springer, Cham (2017), 199–262.
- [24] M. Suwińska, Gevrey estimates of formal solutions for certain moment partial differential equations with variable coefficients, J. Dyn. Control Syst. 27 (2021), no. 2, 355–370.
- [25] V. Thilliez, Division by flat ultradifferentiable functions and sectorial extensions, Results Math. 44 (2003), 169–188.