Morphisms from projective spaces to
Abstract.
We study maps between projective spaces and flag varieties. Let . We show that there is no non constant map from to full flag variety . We classify the minimal parabolic subgroups for which there is a map from to .
1. Introduction
Let . Let denote the Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices and be the maximal torus of diagonal matrices in . The projective homogeneous variety is called the generalised flag variety (or simply flag variety). Let denote the Weyl group for . In our case, it is , the symmetric group in letter. For , let be the corresponding Schubert variety inside which is defined to be the closure of orbit passing through the -fixed point . The -orbit is called a Schubert cell and is denoted by . The study of cohomology ring of the generalised flag variety goes back to Ehresmann [6]. He also showed that the flag variety has a partition in terms of Schubert cells. In [3], Borel gave a presentation of the ring. Let denote indeterminates. Let denote the graded polynomial ring with degree of being for each . acts on indeterminates by permuting the indices. Let denote the ideal of generated by invariants in positive degrees. In [3], Borel showed that there is an graded isomorphism
In [4], Chow showed that there is a basis of given by the classes of the Schubert varieties inside the Grassmannian. From [8], we know that the cohomology ring is also isomorphic to the Chow ring .
Let be a parabolic subgroup containing , let denote subgroup of generated by simple reflections that appears in the Bruhat decomposition of . Let denote the set of minimal length coset representives. In [13], Reiner–Woo–Yong gave a presentation of the cohomology ring . They show that
where denotes the ring of invariants of under the action. In the same paper, they also study a presentation of the cohomology ring and get a relatively shorter presentation of the cohomology ring of the Schubert varieties appearing in the flag varieties.
Let be two positive integers. Let denote the Grassmannian of -dimensional subspaces of an dimensional complex vector space. Note that the Grassmannian variety is also a partial flag variety for a maximal parabolic subgroup . Maps from projective spaces to Grassmannian have been studied extensively by Tango in a series of papers [16, 18, 19]. In [16], he showed that there is no map from to for . In [17], he also showed that there is an indecomposable vector bundle of rank on . While answering Lazarsfeld’s problems [9], under the assumption Paranjape–Srinivas in [12] show that there is a finite surjective morphism to if and only if and , in which case they are isomorphic. This naturally led to the study of maps between various projective homogeneous spaces.
The study of cohomology ring plays a crucial role in attempting many of these questions. Tango’s original proof compared the Chow ring of the two varieties. In [10], Muñoz–Occhetta–Conde showed that a weaker property of the cohomology ring is required to obtain Tango type result which they called effective good divisibility which was an improvement of the notion of effective good divisibility introduced by Pan in [11]. Using effective good divisibility, Naldi–Occhetta in [1] were able to extend Tango’s result and they show that every morphism between to for is constant. In the paper they show that the effective good divisibility of the Grassmannian is . In [14], Muñoz–Occhetta–Conde studied the maps between rational homogenous variety using effective good divisibility. They show that there is no map from a projective variety to a rational homogeneous variety where the effective good divisibility of the projective variety is higher than that of a rational homogeneous variety.
In our paper, we study maps from projective spaces to certain partial flag varieties. We first observe the following:
Theorem 1.1.
There is no non constant map from to .
Let be a parabolic subgroup of containing . Let denote the rank of the Picard group . We call it the rank of . For instance, rank of the Grassmannian is and the rank of the full flag variety is . Similarly, we have rank of is , for a minimal parabolic subgroup . From 1.1 and Tango’s result it is natural to ask the following question:
Question 1.2.
Does there exist a map from to where ?
We study the question when is a minimal parabolic subgroup. Let denote the set of simple roots. Let , denote the corresponding simple roots. To each such we can associate a minimal parabolic subgroup . We obtain the following two theorems.
Theorem 1.3.
There is no non constant map from to for .
Theorem 1.4.
There is a map from to for .
After we had put up the first version in the arXiv, it was communicated to us via an email from Yanjie Li that the proof of Theorem 5.1 has an error. Formula (8) in the proof of the theorem is wrong. To overcome that, we are giving a completely elementary proof of theorem 1.4. Due to the same error, we have now removed Theorem 6.1 from the arxiv version where we state that there is no morphism from to for . We have some evidence for the statement and we are working on it currently. After putting up our first version we have been communicated of a generalisation of some of our results by Fang and Ren (see, [7]).
Acknowledgement We are very thankful to Shrawan Kumar for informing us about his conjecture, and various helpful discussions. We are thankful to Rohith Varma for stimulating discussions. We are also thankful to Senthamarai Kannan for suggesting the article [14].
2. Kumar’s conjecture
In this section we discuss Kumar’s conjecture. This conjecture is due to Shrawan Kumar (see, [15]). Let be a complex connected homogeneous projective variety. Then can be written as for a complex semisimple connected algebraic group and a parabolic subgroup. Observe that the and are not necessarily unique. For instance, the projective space is a homogeneous space for as well as . Assume also that is indecomposable, ie cannot be written as where none of or is singleton.
Definition 2.1.
Let be a complex connected indecomposable semisimple algebraic group with a parabolic subgroup. The semisimple rank of the pair is defined to be the rank of the semisimple part of the Levi subgroup of .
Definition 2.2.
Let be complex connected indecomposable homogeneous projective variety. The minimum semisimple stabilizer rank (respectively, maximum semisimple stabilizer rank) of is the minimum (respectively, maximum) of the semisimple ranks for all possible realisations of as a , with simple and connected algebraic group and a parabolic subgroup. If the minimum semisimple stabilizer rank of coincides with the maximum semisimple stabilizer rank of we call it the rank of . Denote the minimum semisimple rank (respectively, maximum semisimple rank) by minss rank (respectively, maxss rank).
For instance, has minss rank because it is realisable as a homogeneous space of whereas the maxss rank is when it is realised as a quotient of . Note that we have minss rank if and only if has a realisation of the form for a Borel subgroup inside . In this case, the maxss rank is also . We also observe that the minss rank is same as maxss rank in most cases, however the cases where it doesn’t hold can be found in [5, §2].
Conjecture 2.3.
[15, Conjecture 5] Let and be two connected indecomposable homogeneous projective varieties.
-
(a)
Assume that is different from (for ) and
Then, there does not exist any nonconstant algebraic map from to .
-
(b)
If (for ) and there exists a non-constant regular map from , then
Kumar in [15] has proved the conjecture when can be written as for a simple algebraic group with a Borel subgroup. Note that this is equivalent to the case when semisimple rank of is . However, to what generality the conjecture is solved remains unclear, and our paper is a step towards understanding this conjecture. We look at the conjecture when has rank or is a rank homogeneous space of . In the former case, we verify conjecture (a) when is homogeneous spaces of . In the later, we verify the conjecture for any projective space. Some of the major computations in this paper analyses the map from which has minss rank to for a minimal parabolic subgroup (which has maxss rank as well).
3. Preliminaries
Let denote the set of all matrices with determinant . Let denote the Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices, and denote the maximal torus consisting of diagonal matrices inside . Denote the root system of . Let denote the subset of consisting of positive roots. Let denote the character of which sends to . Let . Then a subset of gives a set of simple roots. The Weyl group is the group generated by the simple reflections , . In our case, is the symmetric group in letters . The simple reflections can be thought of as the transposition of -th and -th letter. We would use the one-line notation to denote the permutation in .
Let be a subset of . Let denote the subgroup of generated by , . For every we associate a parabolic subgroup as follows
The set is called the set of minimal length coset representatives. Alternatively, we have (see, [2, Section 2.5])
The full flag variety is by definition the variety . The projective homogeneous space is called a partial flag variety and its Bruhat decomposition is given by
Whenever is generated by one element for , we call the associated parabolic subgroup a minimal parabolic subgroup and we denote it as . Note that, is isomorphic to . Whenever is obtained from by removing one simple root , we call the associated parabolic subgroup a maximal parabolic subgroup and we denote it by . We recall that the Grassmannian variety of dimensional subspaces of a -dimensional complex vector space is isomorphic to . Let
Let . Let be the standard basis of . Let denote the vector space spanned by . The Schubert cell in the Grassmannian is defined as
The dimension of such a Schubert cell is given by . The Schubert variety which is the closure of in Grassmannian can be seen to be
Let denote the polynomial ring in variables with degree of being . We recall that acts on the variables as
The action extends to an action of on . A polynomial in is symmetric if and only if
for all . The power sum symmetric polynomial is defined as
We recall that the subring of invariants of is a graded subring and is generated by symmetric polynomials. Let denote the ideal generated by symmetric polynomials in positive degree. The power sum symmetric polynomials for form a set of generators for .
Let be a projective variety. Let denote the cohomology ring of the variety with integer coefficients. Let denote its Chow ring. We recall from [8, Chapter 19] that there exists a cycle map
Whenever is a partial flag variety the map is an isomorphism (see, [8, Example 19.1.11]) and the cohomologies in odd degrees vanish. When is the full flag variety we recall
Theorem 3.1.
[6, Ehresmann] has a basis consisting of classes of Schubert varieties where where is the longest word in .
In [3], Borel, gave a presentation of the cohomology ring using the polynomial ring and the ideal
Theorem 3.2.
[3, Borel] .
The results were extended for , where is a parabolic subgroup of containing in [13]. Let such that . We have the subgroup of Weyl group generated by as above. Since is subgroup of it also acts on . Reiner–Woo–Yong show that,
Theorem 3.3.
[13][Reiner–Woo–Yong] .
We observe that
Remark 3.4.
Under this inclusion we recall from [13], the cohomology classes where lies in and forms a basis of . More precisely, a basis of consists of the Schubert classes , where and is a codimension Schubert subvariety of . This can be thought of as a generalisation of Ehresmann’s theorem.
4. Maps from to
As in the previous section, we have , denotes the Borel subgroup consisting of the diagonal matrices in . We will begin this section by proving the following:
Theorem 4.1.
There exists no nonconstant map from to .
Proof.
Let be such a map and
be the map induced at the level of cohomology. We have from 3.2
where is the proper ideal of consisting of elementary symmetric polynomials. We have lies in . In other words, degree of is . And we have,
where degree of is . Since , we can assume
for some . Since is generated by power sum symmetric polynomials, we have
in . Thus in the image we will have,
Since are all integer we have for all . Therefore for all . Hence, the map is a constant map. ∎
Corollary 4.2.
Let be a reductive group and be a Borel subgroup of . Then there is no non constant morphism from to .
Proof.
Choose a faithful representation of in such that maps to a Borel subgroup of . So we get a embedding of inside . We now use theorem 4.1 to conclude the proof. ∎
Corollary 4.3.
A morphism from where to is constant.
Proof.
Since is , we have every map from to a projective variety is either finite or constant. Since sits inside whenever and we have only constant morphism from to , the maps from to must be constant as well. ∎
Let be a vector space of dimension and
be a sequence of integers. We define the partial flag variety consisting of linear subspaces of such that and .
Remark 4.4.
If and we obtain as the Grassmannian variety . The full flag variety is obtained by choosing . And any partial flag variety where contains can be obtained this way.
Lemma 4.5.
There exists a with passing through each point of where is a parabolic subgroup which is not a Borel subgroup.
Proof.
Since is not a Borel subgroup we have . We are already done for the case of Grassmannian variety . So we can assume and . If is not then there either or and there exists a smallest such that . If , then we have the fibers of the projection
is with , hence we are done.
If , choose the smallest such that and . If , ie. , we have the fibres of the projection
(1) |
is where . If , then we have the fibre of
(2) |
is where .
This proves the lemma. ∎
Remark 4.6.
Let be a parabolic subgroup which is not a maximal parabolic or a Borel. The proof of the above lemma provides a -fibration for some where is a parabolic subgroup containing
Corollary 4.7.
Let be a reductive group and be a Borel subgroup of . Fix a parabolic subgroup of and a non constant morphism . Then is a Borel subgroup.
Proof.
We know that any embeds inside a where is a Borel subgroup of . So we are reduced to the case where and is a Borel subgroup of .
We assume on the contrary that is not a Borel subgroup. If is a maximal parabolic subgroup then by lemma 4.3 the map must be constant.
We can therefore assume not a Borel or a maximal parabolic subgroup. From corollary 4.6 we obtain a parabolic subgroup containing such that is -fibration with . Since is constant on we have factors through . Repeating the argument we can assume that factors through a where is a maximal parabolic subgroup and hence we conclude that is constant.
∎
5. Maps from to for a minimal parabolic subgroup
We assume the notations from the previous sections. We thus have the minimal parabolic subgroup . When we will show that there is no non constant map from to . Since we conclude that there is no non constant map from to as well. However, when we have any other minimal parabolic subgroup , we will show that there are non constant maps from to .
Fix a basis of . Define the subspaces to the span of . Let denote the Schubert divisor in the which is defined as
We define the following two codimension 2 Schubert subvarieties of the Grassmannian :
We note that and are empty sets. We prove the following lemmas.
Lemma 5.1.
Let . We have the following relation in
Proof.
To prove the lemma we would intersect the Schubert divisors fixing two different complimentary dimensional vector subspaces. Let is the vector space generated by and . Let be the divisor linearly equivalent to defined with respect to . Then we can see that
which by definition is . Hence, the lemma follows. ∎
Lemma 5.2.
We have the following relation in the cohomology
Proof.
We note that the intersection of with is happening at . is linearly equivalent to in . We observe that both and lie in the intersection of and . If we choose a from the intersection not in we observe that and . Then and are non zero and linearly independent, so they span atleast two dimensional vector space and it is contained in . So we have,
Hence, the lemma follows. ∎
Let denote the codimension Schubert cycle defined by the Schubert variety . Let be the codimension Schubert cycle defined by the Schubert variety .
Lemma 5.3.
We have the following relations in :
-
(i)
.
-
(ii)
.
Proof.
(i) Let be the dimensional vector space spanned by . Let be the divisor linearly equivalent to defined by . We have as it is in . It follows that is nonzero. Therefore, .
(ii) Let be the dimensional vector space spanned by . Let be the divisor linearly equivalent to defined by . Let be in the intersection of and . If then is the component . So we assume . Notice that . But on the other hand and , therefore is contained in the span of and which is . Hence is contained in , i.e . Hence the lemma.
∎
Since the map to is injective the above relations holds in as well. We use the same notations and to define the Schubert classes in . Note that the above relations can also be deduced from Monk’s formula.
Theorem 5.4.
There is no nonconstant map from to .
Proof.
Let . So is . Let
be a map. Let
be the map at the level of cohomology. Let
be the map at degree . We know that . We will show that for all .
Letting in and in we obtain the following relations in .
So rewriting in terms of we obtain
We know Schubert classes are represented by algebraic cycles and hence their pullbacks are algebraic cycles in the projective space. Therefore, Schubert polynomials are mapped to non negative classes in the cohomology of projective spaces. So . Therefore, we obtain . We have . If we observe . Hence,
which implies that
which forces for all .
If we have . Then we obtain
which implies
which forces all . Therefore, we conclude that for all . ∎
Corollary 5.5.
There is no nonconstant map from to .
Proof.
Since , we have an automorphism of which is induced by the Dynkin involution taking to for all . Under this automorphism we have isomorphic to . We have isomorphic to .
∎
Lemma 5.6.
There is a morphism from to .
Proof.
Let be a vector space of dimension . Let be the projective space of lines in . Fix a non-degenerate alternating bilinear form. Because the form is non-degenerate and alternating it follows that for every line the orthogonal compliment of is a dimensional subspace of containing . Hence, is an element of and the map defines the required morphism. ∎
Theorem 5.7.
There are maps from to for all minimal parabolic subgroup with .
Proof.
Let where . Fix a flag
where dimension of . Then the fiber over this flag of the map
is isomorphic to which is identified as the flags . So we have a map from to . And using lemma 5.6 we proof the theorem.
∎
6. Declaration
Conflicts of interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
References
- [1] Gianluca Occhetta Angelo Naldi, Morphisms between Grassmannians., arXiv:2202.11411.
- [2] Sara Billey and V. Lakshmibai, Singular loci of Schubert varieties, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 182, Birkhäuser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 2000. MR 1782635
- [3] Armand Borel, Sur la cohomologie des espaces fibrés principaux et des espaces homogènes de groupes de Lie compacts, Ann. of Math. (2) 57 (1953), 115–207. MR 51508
- [4] Wei-Liang Chow, Algebraic varieties with rational dissections, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 42 (1956), 116–119. MR 78006
- [5] M. Demazure, Automorphismes et déformations des variétés de Borel, Invent. Math. 39 (1977), no. 2, 179–186. MR 435092
- [6] Charles Ehresmann, Sur la topologie de certains espaces homogènes, Ann. of Math. (2) 35 (1934), no. 2, 396–443. MR 1503170
- [7] Xinyi Fang and Peng Ren, Morphisms from to flag varieties, arXiv:2310.08151 (2023).
- [8] William Fulton, Intersection theory, second ed., Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. 3. Folge. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas. 3rd Series. A Series of Modern Surveys in Mathematics], vol. 2, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998. MR 1644323
- [9] Robert Lazarsfeld, Some applications of the theory of positive vector bundles, Complete intersections (Acireale, 1983), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1092, Springer, Berlin, 1984, pp. 29–61. MR 775876
- [10] Roberto Muñoz, Gianluca Occhetta, and Luis E. Solá Conde, Splitting conjectures for uniform flag bundles, Eur. J. Math. 6 (2020), no. 2, 430–452. MR 4104563
- [11] Xuanyu Pan, Triviality and split of vector bundles on rationally connected varieties, Math. Res. Lett. 22 (2015), no. 2, 529–547. MR 3342245
- [12] K. H. Paranjape and V. Srinivas, Self-maps of homogeneous spaces, Invent. Math. 98 (1989), no. 2, 425–444. MR 1016272
- [13] Victor Reiner, Alexander Woo, and Alexander Yong, Presenting the cohomology of a Schubert variety, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 363 (2011), no. 1, 521–543. MR 2719692
- [14] Luis E. Solá Conde Roberto Muñoz, Gianluca Occhetta, Maximal disjoint Schubert cycles in rational homogeneous varieties., arXiv:2211.08216.
- [15] Kumar Shrawan, Nonexistance of regular maps between homogeneous projective varieties, arXiv:2307.07018 (2023).
- [16] Hiroshi Tango, On -dimensional projective spaces contained in the Grassmann variety , J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 14 (1974), 415–460. MR 371915
- [17] by same author, An example of indecomposable vector bundle of rank on , J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 16 (1976), no. 1, 137–141. MR 401766
- [18] by same author, On morphisms from projective space to the Grassmann variety , J. Math. Kyoto Univ. 16 (1976), no. 1, 201–207. MR 401787
- [19] by same author, On morphisms from projective space to the Grassmann variety . II, Bull. Kyoto Univ. Ed. Ser. B (1984), no. 64, 1–20. MR 759949