Momentum dependent band splitting in LaFeAsO
Abstract
We performed angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) studies of the electronic structure of the nematic phase in LaFeAsO. Degeneracy breaking between the and hole bands near the and point is observed in the nematic phase. Different temperature dependent band splitting behaviors are observed at the and points. The energy of the band splitting near the point decreases as the temperature decreases while it has little temperature dependence near the point. The nematic nature of the band shift near the point is confirmed through a detwin experiment using a piezo device. Since a momentum dependent splitting behavior has been observed in other iron based superconductors, our observation confirms that the behavior is a universal one among iron based superconductors.
I I. Introduction
The discovery of iron based superconductors (IBS) over a decade ago brought renewed interest in high TC superconductivity research intro1 ; intro2 . In addition to the superconductivity itself, its various phases have attracted much attention due to their possible relation to superconductivity. Among these phases, the nematic phase, a rotational symmetry broken state in the electronic structure, has been intensively studied as it also occurs in other unconventional superconductors intronem . Moreover, the divergent nematic susceptibility at the optimal doping suggests that the nematic fluctuation may play an important role in the formation of the Cooper pairs in IBS ibsres1 ; ibsres2 . Therefore, understanding the origin of the nematic phase can be a key to unraveling the mechanism of the unconventional superconductivity in IBS.
A number of angle-resolve photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) experiments have been conducted to investigate the rotational symmetry broken electronic states. However, interpretations of experimental data differ from each other, making the origin of the nematic phase a more controversial issue. Various scenarios were proposed as the origin of the nematic phase based on ARPES results, such as simple Ferro-orbital order ming1 ; ming2 , -wave bond order dwave , unidirectional nematic bond order watson , and sign reversal order signreverse . Among various candidates, the instability of the momentum dependent band splitting which is commonly observed in FeSe, NaFeAs and BaFe2As2 is favored as the true origin of the nematic phase huh ; pfau ; 111 .
In resolving such issue, confirming if the behavior of the nematic electronic structure is universal among IBS should be an important step. Despite the intensive research on the nematic phase, there is a lack of APRES study on the nematic phase of LaFeAsO even though it is the first IBS that was discovered feng ; peng . Therefore, investigating electronic structure of the LaFeAsO nematic phase is an important step towards finding the origin of the nematic phase. In this work, we performed temperature dependent ARPES experiments on twinned and detwinned LaFeAsO crystals. The results show a nematic behavior similar to other IBS: finite near the point but very small near the point huh ; pfau ; 111 . Our observation of the momentum dependent nematic band splitting establishes a universal nematic behavior in IBS.
II II. Experiment
High quality LaFeAsO single crystals were synthesized by using solid state crystal growth technique growth . The structural and magnetic transition temperatures ( and ) were found to be around 145 and 127 K, respectively growth ; character . ARPES measurements were performed at the beam line 4.0.3 of the Advanced Light source (ALS) and beam line 03U of the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility (SSRF), and also with a lab-based system at Seoul National University (SNU). Piezo detwin ARPES experiments were performed with the system at SNU. 150 V bias voltage was applied to the piezo device to detwin samples. All spectra were acquired with VG-Scienta electron analyzers. The samples were cleaved in an ultrahigh vacuum better than torr. To minimize the aging effect, all the data were taken within 8 hours after cleave.
III III. Results and discussion
Figs. 1(a) and 1(c) show Fermi surface maps of LaFeAsO taken with - and -polarized 80 eV light, respectively. Considering all the features of the two Fermi surface maps taken with different polarizations, we determine that the Fermi surface consists of three circular pockets around the point and two peanut like pockets around the point. Due to the low intensity near the point, the intensity of the Fermi surface near the point is multiplied by 10 and depicted in the inset. The observed Fermi surface topology is consistent with that from previous ARPES studies on LaFeAsO feng ; peng ; sm ; dong . Band structures near and are shown in Figs. 1(b) and 1(d) for - and -polarizations, respectively. Shown in Fig. 1(b) are the band dispersions as well as their orbital characters, determined based on tight binding calculation (See Supplementary). It is noteworthy that the bands which cannot be identified with the calculation results are surface states.
We performed temperature dependent experiments presented to gain more information. Experiments were done 1 hour after cleaving the sample at 30 K to remove the surface reconstruction effect peng . The temperature evolution of / splitting near the point can be seen in the high symmetry cut and its second derivative data shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b), respectively. Temperature dependent high symmetry cut data shows that the band dispersions around the point hardly change except the thermal broadening. That is, hole band splitting near , as indicated by the red dashed lines, appears to remain almost unchanged over the temperature range we studied. The energy splitting size may be obtained from the temperature dependent energy distribution curves (EDCs) of the second derivative data in Fig. 2(c). The EDCs are from as indicated by the yellow dotted line in Fig. 1(b). Peak positions of and hole bands are indicated by the arrows. The band splitting at 30 K is about 50 meV and changes very little with the temperature, remaining finite even above . That is, the / hole band splitting near the point is not sensitive to the nematic phase transition.
In previous studies on other IBS, the / hole band splitting near the point has been intensively studied because of its large temperature dependence ming1 ; ming2 ; dwave ; signreverse ; huh ; peng ; pfau . For that reason, we also focus on the temperature dependence of the electronic structure near the point. Measurements were done with 21.2 eV photon energy where the cross section is higher for . Temperature dependent data and their second derivatives are plotted in Figs. 2(d) and 2(e). Split and hole bands are observed at low temperatures as indicated by red dashed lines. In contrast to the temperature independent behavior near the point, the splitting between the two hole bands gradually decreases as the temperature increases. The two bands finally merge each other to a single band above . The temperature dependence of band splitting may be observed more clearly in the EDCs of second derivative data at in Fig. 2(f). The splitting energy at a low temperature is about 40 meV and vanishes above the nematic phase transition temperature .
Even though the temperature dependent behavior strongly indicates that the band splitting near is due to the nematic order, a true confirmation of the nematic nature should come from observation of dependent shift. In previous ARPES studies on detwinned IBS ming1 ; ming2 ; huh , nematic band shift has been observed in which the () hole band from a single domain shifts upward (downward) along - (). Such band shifts lead to a simple energy splitting between the and hole bands in the twinned sample due to the mixed signals from two perpendicularly arranged domains in the nematic phase. It is reasonable to speculate that observed band splitting near the point in our data is also from the superposition of the hole band along - and the hole band along - in LaFeAsO. This can be clarified through detwin experiments.
Detwinning was done by using a piezo stack based strain device which was adopted in previous FeSe studies huh . Tensile strain is transmitted to the sample glued to the piezo device when voltage is applied to the device. In our experiment, we applied 150 V to the piezo device at 200 K and cooled down the sample. Band dispersion near the point along the -direction in twinned and detwinned samples are presented in Figs. 3(b) and (c), respectively. In the detwin data, only the upper hole band () without the lower hole band () is seen in comparison to the twin data. Note that the band dispersion in this experimental geometry is the same as the one obtained along the -direction at due to the band folding; was chosen because the intensity is higher. Therefore, considering the normal state band dispersions as well as our detwin experiment result, we conclude that LaFeAsO also has nematic band shifts similar to other IBS nor .
The discovery of the nematic band shift near was taken to be an evidence for a Ferro-orbital order which in turn was considered to be the origin of the nematic phase. It is theoretically suggested that a nearly constant band splitting is expected in the entire Brillouin zone when Ferro-orbital order exists ccl ; ccc . However, ARPES results show that the band splitting has momentum dependence for all IBS systems including LaFeAsO, which excludes the Ferro-orbital scenario as the origin. Rather than the Ferro-orbital order, the instability for the observed universal momentum dependent band splitting should be the true origin of the nematic phase. There are proposals such as different form of orbital degree of freedom hopping , Pomeranchuk instability pom and spin degree of freedom orbdepspin ; spin1 ; spin2 that require momentum dependence. Finding out which one of these is truly responsible for the nematic phase requires full understanding of the nematic electronic structure. As proposed very recently huh ; ming3 , in addition to consideration of and hole bands, evolution of / electron bands, spin orbit coupling and role of band should be elucidated to resolve the issue.
IV IV. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, we report the detailed electronic structure of the nematic phase in LaFeAsO. We observe momentum dependent / band splitting behavior near the and points in temperature dependent experiments. The splitting size near the point decreases as the temperature increases, while it is less temperature sensitive near the point. We confirmed the nematic nature of the band splitting near by piezo detwin method. Our observation establishes the momentum dependent splitting as the universal behavior of the electronic structure in the nematic phase of IBS. Our result suggests that instability causes the observed universal momentum dependent band splitting should be the true origin of the nematic phase.
V Acknowledgment
Authors would like to thank H. Pfau and Y. Ishida for helpful discussions. This work is supported by IBS-R009-G2 through the IBS Center for Correlated Electron Systems. Theoretical part was supported by grants from CAS (XDB07000000). Part of this research used Beamline 03U of the Shanghai Synchron Radiation Facility, which is supported by ME2 project under contract No. 11227902 from National Natural Science Foundation of China. The work at Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH) was supported by IBS (no. IBS-R014-D1) and the NRF through the SRC (No. 2018R1A5A6075964) and the Max Planck-POSTECH Center (No. 2016K1A4A4A01922028). The work at IFW was supported by the (DFG) through the Priority Program SPP 1458. The work at Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) was supported by NRF through National RD Program (No. 2018K1A3A7A09056310), Creative Materials Discovery Program (No. 2015M3D1A1070672), and Basic Science Resource Program (No. 2017R1A4A1015426, No. 2018R1D1A1B07050869). The Advanced Light Source is supported by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences of the US DOE under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.
References
- (1) Y. Kamihara, T. Watanabe, M. Hirano, and H. Hosono, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 3296 (2008).
- (2) J. Paglione and R. L. Greene, Nat. Phys. 6, 645 (2010).
- (3) R. M. Fernandes, A. V. Chubukov, and J. Schmalian, Nat. Phys. 10, 97 (2014).
- (4) J. -H. Chu, H. –H. Kuo, J. G. Analytis, I. R. Fisher, Science 337, 710-712 (2012).
- (5) H.-H. Kuo, J.-H. Chu, J. C. Palmstrom, S. A. Kivelson, I. R. Fisher, Science 352, 958-962 (2016).
- (6) M. Yi, D. Lu, J.-H. Chu, J. G. Analytis, A. P. Sorini, A. F. Kemper, B. Moritz, S.-K. Mo, R. G. Moore, M. Hashimoto, W.-S. Lee, Z. Hussain, T. P. Devereaux, I. R. Fisher, Z.-X. Shen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 6878-6883 (2011).
- (7) M. Yi, D. H. Lu, R. G. Moore, K. Kihou, C. –H. Lee, A. Iyo, H. Eisaki, T. Yoshida, A. Fujimori, Z. -X. Shen, New J. Phys. 14, 073019 (2012).
- (8) P. Zhang, T. Qian, P. Richard, X. P. Wang, H. Miao, B. Q. Lv, B. B. Fu, T. Wolf, C. Meingast, X. X. Wu, Z. Q. Wang, J. P. Hu, H. Ding, Phys. Rev. B 91, 214503 (2016).
- (9) M. D. Watson, T. K. Kim, L. C. Rhodes, M. Eschrig, M. Hoesch, A. A. Haghighirad, A. I. Coldea, Phys. Rev. B 94, 201107 (2016).
- (10) Y. Suzuki, T. Shimojima, T. Sonobe, A. Nakamura, M. Sakano, H. Tsuji, J. Omachi, K. Yoshioka, M. Kuwata-Gonokami, T. Watashige, R. Kobayashi, S. Kasahara, T. Shibauchi, Y. Matsuda, Y. Yamakawa, H. Kontani, and K. Ishizaka, Phys. Rev. B 92, 205117 (2015).
- (11) S. Huh, J. Seo, B. Kim, S. Cho, J. Jung, S. Kim, Y. Koh, C. Kwon, J. Kim, W. Kyung, J. D. Denlinger, Y. Kim, B. Chae, N. Kim, Y. Kim, and C. Kim, Commun. Phys. 3, 52 (2020).
- (12) H. Pfau, S. D. Chen, M. Yi, M. Hashimoto, C. R. Rotundu, J. C. Palmstrom, T. Chen, P.-C. Dai, J. Straquadine, A. Hristov, R. J. Birgeneau, I. R. Fisher, D. Lu, and Z.-X. Shen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066402 (2019).
- (13) Q. Q. Ge, Z. R. Ye, M. Xu, Y. Zhang, J. Jiang, B. P. Xie, Y. Song, C. L. Zhang, P. Dai, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Rev. X 3, 011020 (2013).
- (14) L. X. Yang, B. P. Xie, Y. Zhang, C. He, Q. Q. Ge, X. F. Wang, X. H. Chen, M. Arita, J. Jiang, K. Shimada, M. Taniguchi, I. Vobornik, G. Rossi, J. P. Hu, D. H. Lu, Z. X. Shen, Z. Y. Lu, and D. L. Feng, Phys. Rev. B 82, 104519 (2010).
- (15) P. Zhang, J. Ma, T. Qian, Y. G. Shi, A. V. Fedorov, J. D. Denlinger, X. X. Wu, J. P. Hu, P. Richard, and H. Ding, Phys. Rev. B 94, 104517 (2016).
- (16) R. Kappenberger, S. Aswartham, F. Scaravaggi, C. G. F. Blum, M. I. Sturza, A. U. B. Wolter, S. Wurmehl, and B. Büchner, J. Cryst. Growth 483, 9 (2018).
- (17) P. Materne, W. Bi, J. Zhao, M. Y. Hu, R. Kappenberger, S. Wurmehl, S. Aswartham, B. Büchner, and E. E. Alp, Phys. Rev. B 98, 174510 (2018).
- (18) A. Charnukha, S. Thirupathaiah, V. B. Zabolotnyy, B. Büchner, N. D. Zhigadlo, B. Batlogg, A. N. Yaresko, and S. V. Borisenko, Sci. Rep. 5, 10392 (2015).
- (19) D. H. Lu, M. Yi, S.-K. Mo, A. S. Erickson, J. Analytis, J.-H. Chu, D. J. Singh, Z. Hussain, T. H. Geballe, I. R. Fisher, and Z.-X. Shen, Nature (London) 455, 81 (2008).
- (20) S. Onari, Y. Yamakawa, and H. Kontani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 227001 (2016).
- (21) C. C. Lee, W. G. Yin, and W. Ku, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 267001 (2009).
- (22) C.-C. Chen, J. Maciejko, A. P. Sorini, B. Moritz, R. R. P. Singh, and T. P. Devereaux, Phys. Rev. B 82, 100504(R) (2010).
- (23) T. Li and Y. Su, J. Phys. Condens. Matter. 29, 425603 (2017).
- (24) A. V. Chubukov, M. Khodas, and R. M. Fernandes, Phys. Rev. X 6, 041045 (2016).
- (25) L. Fanfarillo, J. Mansart, P. Toulemonde, H. Cercellier, P. Le Févre, F. Bertran, B. Valenzuela, L. Benfatto, and V. Brouet, Phys. Rev. B 94, 155138 (2016).
- (26) F. Wang, S. A. Kivelson, and D.-H. Lee, Nat. Phys. 11, 959 (2015).
- (27) R. M. Fernandes, L. H. VanBebber, S. Bhattacharya, P. Chandra, V. Keppens, D. Mandrus, M. A. McGuire, B. C. Sales, A. S. Sefat, and J. Schmalian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 157003 (2010).
- (28) M. Yi, Y. Zhang, H. Pfau, T. Chen, Z. Ye, M. Hashimoto, R. Yu, Q. Si, D.-H. Lee, P. Dai, Z. X. Shen, D. Lu, and R. J. Birgeneau, Phys. Rev. X. 9, 041049 (2019).