Moments and One level density of sextic Hecke -functions
Abstract.
Let . In this paper, we study moments of central values of sextic Hecke -functions of and one level density result for the low-lying zeros of sextic Hecke -functions of . As a corollary, we deduce that, assuming GRH, at least of the members of the sextic family do not vanish at .
Mathematics Subject Classification (2010): 11L05, 11L40, 11M06, 11M41, 11M50, 11R16
Keywords: Hecke -functions, low-lying zeros, one level density, sextic Hecke characters
1. Introduction
Due to important arithmetic information encoded by the central values of -functions, their possible zeros there have been investigated extensively. In general, one expects an -function to be non-vanishing at the central point unless there is a good reason for it. This can be further expounded by instancing an -function attached to an elliptic curve of positive rank in view of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture or an -function whose functional equation has the sign of . In the classical case of Dirichlet -functions, it is conjectured by S. Chowla [chow] that for every primitive Dirichlet character .
There are two methods of studying these potential central zeros of -functions. One typical approach to achieve the non-vanishing result is to study the moments of a family of -functions. In this way, H. Iwaniec and P. Sarnak [I&S] showed that for at least of the primitive Dirichlet characters . M. Jutilia [Jutila] showed that that there are fundamental discriminants with such that . This result is improved by K. Soundararajan [sound1], who showed that for at least of the real characters . For the family of -functions of primitive cubic Dirichlet characters, S. Baier and M. P. Young [B&Y] showed that for any , there are primitive cubic Dirichlet characters with conductor such that .
The result of Baier and Young [B&Y] is similar to another one of W. Luo [Luo], who studied moments of the family of associated to cubic Hecke characters with square-free modulus in with and derived a non-vanishing result for this family. A more general result for the first moment of central -values associated to the -th order Hecke characters of any number field containing the -th root of unity was obtained by S. Friedberg, J. Hoffstein and D. Lieman [FHL]. Corresponding non-vanishing results were obtained by V. Blomer, L. Goldmakher and B. Louvel in [BGL].
In [G&Zhao1, G&Zhao20], the authors studied moments of for families of quadratic and quartic Hecke characters in and . In this paper, we first extend our studies above to the family of -functions associated to sextic Hecke characters in . We have
Theorem 1.1.
We note here that for , is the principal character instead of a sextic one. It follows from [BGL, Corollary 1.4] that
From this and Theorem 1.1, we readily deduce, via a standard argument (see [Luo]), the following
Corollary 1.2.
For and any , we have
The main different feature of Theorem 1.1 and the result in [FHL] is that moment of our study is over square-free integers. Our proof of Theorem 1.1 is similar to that of the main result in [Luo], but our choice of the smooth weight follows the treatment in [B&Y].
The other approach, alluded to earlier, towards establishing the non-vanishing result is via the study of the -level densities of low-lying zeros of families of -functions. The density conjecture of N. Katz and P. Sarnak [KS1, K&S] suggests that the distribution of zeros near of a family of -functions is the same as that of eigenvalues near of a corresponding classical compact group. For the family of quadratic Dirichlet -functions, the density conjecture implies that for almost all such . Assuming GRH, A. E. Özlük and C. Snyder [O&S] computed the one level density for this family to show that for at least of the fundamental discriminants . Following the computations carried out in [B&F, ILS], one can improve this percentage to .
Our next result is on the one level density of low-lying zeros of a family of sextic Hecke -functions in . In [Gu], A. M. Güloğlu studied the one level density of the low-lying zeros of
a family of cubic Hecke -functions in . The result was extended by C. David and A. M. Güloğlu in [DG] to hold for test functions whose Fourier transforms are supported in . This allows them to deduce that at least of the corresponding -functions do not vanish at the central point under GRH.
Our result here is motivated by the above-mentioned works. To state it, we first need to set some notations. Let
We shall define in Section 2.1 the primitive quadratic Kronecker symbol for . We denote the non-trivial zeroes of the Hecke -function by . Without assuming GRH, we order them as
We set
and define for an even Schwartz class function ,
We further let be a non-negative smooth function supported on , satisfying for with and such that for all integers . We refer the reader to [Tu, Chapter 13] for the construction of such functions. Our result is as follows:
Theorem 1.3.
Suppose that GRH is true for the Hecke -functions discussed above. Let be an even Schwartz function whose Fourier transform has compact support in , then
(1.1) |
Here, as earlier, the “” on the sum over means that the sum is restricted to squarefree elements of .
The left-hand side of (1.1) represents the one level density of low-lying zeros of the sextic family of Hecke -functions in . On the other hand, the right-hand side of (1.1) shows that, in connection with the random matrix theory (see the discussions in [G&Zhao2]), the family of sextic Hecke -functions of is a unitary family.
Using the argument in the proof of [G&Zhao4, Corollary 1.4], we deduce readily a non-vanishing result for the family of sextic Hecke -functions under our consideration.
Corollary 1.4.
Suppose that GRH is true for the Hecke -functions and that is a zero of of order . As ,
Moreover, as
We note that, analogue to the situation in , the authors previously studied in [G&Zhao4, G&Zhao9] the one level densities of the low-lying zeros of families of quadratic Hecke -functions in all imaginary quadratic number fields of class number one as well as a family of quartic Hecke -functions in . Our proof of Theorem 1.3 is similar to those in [Gu, DG] and [G&Zhao4]. A two dimensional Poisson summation over is used to treat the character sums over the primes, then we use essentially a result derived from the theorem of S. J. Patterson in [P] to estimate certain sextic Gauss sums at the primes.
1.5. Notations
The following notations and conventions are used throughout the paper.
We write for .
.
or means for some unspecified
positive constant .
means .
denotes the Möbius function on .
stands for the Dedekind zeta function of .
2. Preliminaries
2.1. Residue symbols and Kronecker symbol
It is well-known that has class number . For , the symbol is the quadratic (), cubic () and
sextic () residue symbol in the ring of integers . For a prime , we define for
, by , with , the cyclic group of order generated by . When
, we define
. Then these symbols can be extended
to any composite with multiplicatively. We further define when is a unit in . We note that we have
whenever is defined.
We say that
in is primary if , which is equivalent to , and (see [B&Y, p. 209]).
Recall that (see [B&Y, p. 883]) the following cubic reciprocity law holds for two co-prime primary :
We also have the following supplementary laws for a primary (see [Lemmermeyer, Theorem 7.8]),
(2.1) |
Following the notations in [Lemmermeyer, Section 7.3], we say that any primary , with is -primary if
It follows from [Lemmermeyer, Lemma 7.9] that is -primary if and only if with such that and . This implies that products of -primary numbers are again -primary. Note that in , every ideal co-prime to has a unique -primary generator. Furthermore, the following sextic reciprocity law holds for two -primary, co-prime numbers :
We also have the following supplementary laws for an -primary with (see [Lemmermeyer, Theorem 7.10]):
(2.2) |
where denotes the Jacobi symbol in .
The above discussions allow us to define a sextic Dirichlet character for any element , such that for any ,
One deduces from (2.1), (2.2) and the sextic reciprocity that when . It follows from this that is well-defined. As is clearly multiplicative, of order and trivial on units, it can be regarded as a sextic Hecke character modulo of trivial infinite type. We write for this Hecke character as well and we call it the Kronecker symbol. Furthermore, if is square-free, is non-principal and primitive. To see this, we write with a unit and primes . Suppose is induced by some modulo with , then by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists an such that and . It follows from this that but , a contradiction. Thus, can only be possibly induced by some modulo or modulo . Suppose it is induced by some modulo , then by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists an such that and , then we have but by (2.2), a contradiction. Suppose it is induced by some modulo , then by the Chinese Remainder Theorem, there exists an such that and , then we have but
by (2.1) (note that we have ), a contradiction. This implies that is primitive. This also shows that is non-principal.
2.2. Gauss sums
Suppose that with . For , the quadratic (), cubic () and sextic () Gauss sum is defined by
where .
We can infer from its definition that . Moreover, the following well-known relation (see [P, p. 195]) holds for all :
(2.3) |
More generally, for any , with , we set
We need the following properties of :
Lemma 2.3.
For , any prime satisfying , we have
(2.4) | ||||
(2.5) | ||||
(2.6) |
Proof.
Both (2.4) and (2.5) follow easily from the definition. For (2.6), the case is easily verified. If , then
(2.7) | ||||
If , we write where varies over a set of representatives in and varies over a set of representatives in to see that
where the last equality follows from [He, Lemma, p. 197]. This proves the last case when .
2.4. The approximate functional equation
Let be square-free. It follows from (2.2) that is trivial on units, it can be regarded as a primitive Hecke character of trivial infinite type. The Hecke -function associated with is defined for by
where runs over all non-zero integral ideals in and is the
norm of . As shown by E. Hecke, admits
analytic continuation to an entire function and satisfies a
functional equation. We refer the reader to [Gu, Luo, G&Zhao1, G&Zhao20] for a more detailed discussion of these Hecke characters and -functions.
Let be any even function which is holomorphic and bounded in the strip satisfying . We have the following expression for for (see [G&Zhao20, Section 2.4]):
(2.8) |
where is the Gauss sum defined in Section 2.1, is the discriminant of and
We write for and note that for a suitable (for example ), we have for any (see [HIEK, Proposition 5.4]):
On the other hand, when , we have (see [sound1, Lemma 2.1]) for the -th derivative of ,
(2.9) |
2.5. Analytic behavior of Dirichlet series associated with sextic Gauss sums
For any Hecke character of trivial infinite type, we let
(2.10) |
The following lemma gives the analytic behavior of on .
Lemma 2.6.
Let be -primary. The function has meromorphic continuation to the complex plane. It is holomorphic in the region except possibly for a pole at . For any , letting , then for , and we have
where . Moreover, the residue satisfies the bound
Lemma 2.6 is shown in the same manner as that of [G&Zhao1, Lemma 2.5]. We use Lemma 2.7 to remove the condition in (2.10), and the result of Lemma 2.6 then follows from the proof of the Lemma on [P, p. 200], taking into account the observation from (2.6) that when for any -primary prime .
To state the next lemma, we define for ,
It is easy to see that is a Hecke character of trivial infinite type.
Furthermore, for any square-free , we let be the set of distinct -primary prime divisors of and we define for ,
where we set the empty product to be . In particular, we have when is a unit and when is a unit or a prime.
As for two distinct -primary
primes , one checks easily by induction on the number of prime divisors of and the sextic reciprocity that is independent of the order of
when . Similarly, as , and are also independent of the order of
.
Now we have
Lemma 2.7.
Let . Suppose are square-free and , and set
Furthermore suppose where is square-free, and let be the product of primes dividing . Let and
where the empty product is understood to be . Then
(2.11) |
Proof.
As the proof is similar to that of [B&Y, Lemma 3.6], we only give the proof for the last equality given in (2.11) here. To prove this, we let and let be an -primary prime in such that is square-free, where . Then
Writing in the latter sum with , then (2.5) gives that
Using (2.4) and (2.6) we see that unless , in which case we deduce from sextic reciprocity and (2.4) that
This implies that
(2.12) |
2.8. The large sieve with sextic symbols
One important input of this paper is the following large sieve inequality for sextic Hecke characters. The study of the large sieve inequality for characters of a fixed order has a long history. We refer the reader to [DRHB, DRHB1, G&Zhao, B&Y, BGL].
Lemma 2.9.
[BGL, Theorem 1.3] Let be positive integers, and be an arbitrary sequence of complex numbers, where runs over . Then we have
for any , where the asterisks indicate that and run over square-free -primary elements of and is the sextic residue symbol.
2.10. Poisson Summation
The proof of Theorem 1.3 requires the following Poisson summation formula.
Proposition 2.11.
Let be -primary and be the sextic residue symbol . For any Schwartz class function , we have
where
The above result is an easy consequence of a variation of [G&Zhao2019, Lemma 2.6], we omit its proof here. When is the one given in Theorem 1.3, we have the following estimations for and its derivatives [G&Zhao9, (2-15)]: for any and
(2.13) |
for all integers , and all .
3. Proof of Theorem 1.1
3.1. Evaluating , the main term
Since any integral non-zero ideal in has a unique generator
, with , , , and an -primary , it follows from (2.1) and (2.2) that , which implies that
.
We now define for being -primary, ,
Similar to our discussions in Section 2, one can check easily that is a Hecke character modulo of trivial infinite type.
The above discussions allow us to recast as
where
Now we use Möbius inversion to detect the square-free condition of , getting
with
By Mellin inversion, we have
where
Integrating by parts together with (2.9) shows is a function satisfying the bound
(3.1) |
for all and any integer .
With this notation, we have
Recall that for any , the ray class group is defined to be , where and with and denoting the group of fractional ideals in and the subgroup of principal ideals, respectively. We now use the ray class characters to detect the condition that , getting
where runs over all ray class characters , and
We compute by shifting the contour to the half line. If is principal, the Hecke -function
has a pole at . We set to be the contribution to of these residues, and to be the
remainder.
We first evaluate . Note that is principal if and only if both and are principal. Hence must be a sixth power. We denote for the principal ray class character . Then we have
Let , the residue of at . Then we have
Set
which is holomorphic and bounded for .
Note that using the Mellin convolution formula shows
where
Then
We move the contour of integration to , crossing a pole at only. The new contour contributes , while the pole at gives
(3.2) |
Note that converges absolutely at so it is easy to express explicitly as an Euler product, if desired. We then conclude that
(3.3) |
3.2. Estimating , the remainder term
To deal with , we bound everything by absolute values and use (3.1) to get that for any ,
(3.4) |
We now need the following estimation to bound the sum over :
(3.5) |
The proof of (3.5) is similar to that of [B&Y, (39)] and we will give a sketch of the arguments. We factor as where is square-free. Then equals times a principal character. Here (respectively ) can be regarded as a cubic Hecke character (respectively ) of trivial infinite type and can be regarded as a quadratic Hecke character of trivial infinite type. For each fixed , it suffices to show that
(3.6) |
where the asterisk indicates that runs over -primary square-free elements of .
With this bound and the convergence of the sums over , a use of Cauchy’s inequality gives (3.5).
Note that as is square-free, the character is primitive with conductor satisfying
We may now further assume that is primitive. Thus the Hecke -function
viewed as a degree two -function over , has analytic conductor .
We then apply the approximate functional equation (2.8) with for Hecke -functions, removing the weight using the Mellin transform to reduce the problem of estimating (3.6) to bounding
Moreover, by [HIEK, Proposition 5.4], we may truncate the
sum over so that with a negligibly small error.
3.3. Estimating
From the discussions at the beginning of Section 3.1, we have
Note that we can drop the restriction ∗ in sum over above, as it follows from (2.3) that unless is square-free.
We further use the ray class characters to detect the condition that to obtain
where
We estimate with the following:
Lemma 3.4.
For any -primary and any ray class character , we have
Proof.
Note that the identity (2.4) implies for . Introducing the Mellin transform of , we get
(3.8) |
Now, to estimate , we note that we may truncate the sums over so that with a negligibly small error. By summing trivially over , one easily deduces that
(3.9) |
3.5. Conclusion
4. Proof of Theorem 1.3
The proof of Theorem 1.3 is similar to that of [G&Zhao4, Theorem 1.3] and [G&Zhao9, Theorem 1.1]. First, as in [G&Zhao20, Section 3.1], we can show that for some constant as . Next, we take and write where
We shall write for throughout. We define with
and
Here is smooth and has its support in the interval for some . To emphasize
this condition, we shall set and write the condition explicitly throughout this section .
Analogue to what is shown in the proof of [G&Zhao4, Theorem 1.2], we see that in order to establish Theorem 1.3, it suffices to show that
Using standard techniques (see [G&Zhao4, Section 3.3]), we have that
(4.1) |
Indeed, with the truth of GRH, the inner-most sum of , a character sum over primes, can be bounded very sharply (see [G&Zhao4, Lemma 2.5]) and we immediately get the estimate in (4.1).
To bound , we rewrite it as
In essentially the same manner (with some minor modifications) as in the proof of [G&Zhao4, Lemma 4.2], we derive from Lemma 2.6 the following:
Lemma 4.1.
Let . For any , we have
Using Lemma 4.1 instead of Proposition 1 of [P, p. 198] in the sieve identity in Section 4 of [P] and noting that in our case Proposition 2 on [P, p. 206] is still valid, we obtain that (taking as in [P] and noting that we have in our case)
It follows from this, (2.13) and partial summation that
Acknowledgments. P. G. is supported in part by NSFC grant 11871082 and L. Z. by the FRG grant PS43707 at the University of New South Wales (UNSW). The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for his/her careful reading of the paper and many helpful comments.
References
School of Mathematical Sciences | School of Mathematics and Statistics |
Beihang University | University of New South Wales |
Beijing 100191 China | Sydney NSW 2052 Australia |
Email: [email protected] | Email: [email protected] |