This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: These authors contributed equally to this study.thanks: These authors contributed equally to this study.thanks: These authors contributed equally to this study.

Molecular intercalation in the van der Waals antiferromagnets FePS3 and NiPS3

Cong Li Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Ze Hu Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Xiaofei Hou School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China    Sheng Xu Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Zhanlong Wu Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Kefan Du Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Shuo Li Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Xiaoyu Xu Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Ying Chen Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Zeyu Wang Department of Chemistry, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Tiancheng Mu Department of Chemistry, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Tian-Long Xia [email protected] Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Yanfeng Guo [email protected] School of Physical Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, 201210, China ShanghaiTech Laboratory for Topological Physics, Shanghai, 201210, China    B. Normand Laboratory for Theoretical and Computational Physics, Paul Scherrer Institute, CH-5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland Institute of Physics, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland    Weiqiang Yu [email protected] Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China    Yi Cui [email protected] Department of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Opto-electronic Functional Materials &\& Micro-nano Devices, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China Key Laboratory of Quantum State Construction and Manipulation (Ministry of Education), Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100872, China
Abstract

We have performed electrochemical treatment of the van der Waals antiferromagnetic materials FePS3 and NiPS3 with the ionic liquid EMIM-BF4, achieving significant molecular intercalation. Mass analysis of the intercalated compounds, EMIMx-FePS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3, indicated respective intercalation levels, xx, of approximately 27% and 37%, and X-ray diffraction measurements demonstrated a massive (over 50%) enhancement of the cc-axis lattice parameters. To investigate the consequences of these changes for the magnetic properties, we performed magnetic susceptibility and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) studies of both systems. For EMIMx-FePS3, intercalation reduces the magnetic ordering temperature from TN=120T_{N}=120 K to 78 K, and we find a spin gap in the antiferromagnetic phase that drops from 45 K to 30 K. For EMIMx-NiPS3, the ordering temperature is almost unaffected (changing from 148 K to 145 K), but a change towards nearly isotropic spin fluctuations suggests an alteration of the magnetic Hamiltonian. Such relatively modest changes, given that the huge extension of the cc axes is expected to cause a very strong suppression any interlayer interactions, point unequivocally to the conclusion that the magnetic properties of both parent compounds are determined solely by two-dimensional (2D), intralayer physics. The changes in transition temperatures and low-temperature spin dynamics in both compounds therefore indicate that intercalation also results in a significant modulation of the intralayer magnetic interactions, which we propose is due to charge doping and localization on the P sites. Our study offers chemical intercalation with ionic liquids as an effective method to control not only the interlayer but also the intralayer interactions in quasi-2D magnetic materials.

I Introduction

Low-dimensional magnetic systems have played a pivotal role not only in advancing our understanding of the quantum properties of materials but also in the realization and exploration of new concepts in many-body physics. Still, with the exception of certain geometrically discretized or strong-frustration scenarios, which lead to quantum disordered magnetic states including quantum spin liquids, most three-dimensional (3D) magnetic systems exhibit long-ranged order. Conversely, as emphasized by Bethe in his seminal work, low dimensions amplify quantum fluctuations and destabilize the conventional order parameters Bethe (1931). In the case of layered compounds, increasing the interlayer spacing by the insertion of large molecules is a very literal means of modulating the dimensionality, and hence the properties, from potentially 3D towards the 2D limit Alias and Sukumaran (1992); Pattayil and Sukumaran (1993). The discovery of 2D magnetic materials suitable for this type of control would hold significant promise for applications in nanoelectronics and spintronics Soumyanarayanan et al. (2016).

For this reason, magnetic van der Waals materials have attracted extensive attention in recent years Burch et al. (2018), although efforts at dimensional manipulation have so far been limited largely to approaching the monolayer limit by exfoliation. In this context, the Ising-type van der Waals magnets Cr2Ge2Te6 and CrI3 exhibit the emergence of intrinsic ferromagnetism with a high transition temperature in few- or monolayer films Gong et al. (2017); Huang et al. (2017); Tian et al. (2016); in particular, CrI3 shows a systematic evolution of the ordering temperature and even the type of magnetic order with the number of layers Huang et al. (2017). MnSe2 remains ferromagnetic (FM) at room temperature in its monolayer form O’Hara et al. (2018), and most surprisingly room-temperature FM order emerges in monolayer VSe2 despite the bulk material being paramagnetic Bonilla et al. (2018).

The transition-metal trisulfide MMPS3 (MM = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni) is a class of antiferromagnetic (AFM) van der Waals materials that has also been studied extensively Le Flem et al. (1982); Ouvrard et al. (1985); Joy and Vasudevan (1992); Chittari et al. (2016); Du et al. (2016); Wang et al. (2018). As Fig. 1(a) shows, the MMPS3 compounds are isostructural, with the magnetic ions (M2+M^{2+}) forming a honeycomb lattice. All exhibit the characteristics of a Mott insulator, displaying high resistivity at room temperature and a band gap well in excess of 1 eV (1.5 eV for FePS3 and 1.6 eV for NiPS3). This gap varies widely on exfoliation, offering an optoelectronic response over a broad frequency range for device applications Du et al. (2016). FePS3 exhibits a phase transition under pressure from insulating to metallic Haines et al. (2018) and NiPS3 in its AFM phase exhibits coherent excitonic states Kang et al. (2020).

Differences in the trigonal distortion of the MMS6 octahedra and in spin-orbit coupling mean that the anisotropy of intralayer magnetic interactions differs in the MMPS3 materials. MnPS3 appears to have Heisenberg spin interactions, NiPS3 shows a weak and CoPS3 a stronger easy-plane (XY) anisotropy, and FePS3 has a strong Ising anisotropy Kurosawa et al. (1983); Joy and Vasudevan (1992); Chandrasekharan and Vasudevan (1994); Chatterjee (1995); Rule et al. (2007); Lee et al. (2016); Wildes et al. (2017). Upon cooling, they all order in an AFM pattern, with respective transition temperatures, TNT_{N}, of 78 K, 118 K, 122 K, and 155 K for MnPS3, FePS3, CoPS3 and NiPS3 Le Flem et al. (1982); Brec (1986); Wang et al. (2018).

The weak van der Waals interlayer coupling leads to a cleavage energy close to that of graphite, and thus the MMPS3 materials are easy to exfoliate. Multiple efforts to thin MMPS3 samples have shown them to remain structurally stable down to a single layer Du et al. (2016); Kuo et al. (2016). Recent Raman scattering studies of monolayer FePS3 have reported that TNT_{N} either drops from 117 K to 104 K Wang et al. (2016) or remains unchanged Lee et al. (2016), which raises the possibility of substrate effects on this 2D Ising magnet McCreary et al. (2020). Raman investigation of monolayer NiPS3 indicates a suppression of long-range order relative to the bulk material, which was interpreted in the framework of the Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless (BKT) phase transition Hu et al. (2023).

An alternative approach to dimensionality reduction is the incorporation of organic cations as spacers in the bulk materials, such that the altered layer separation enables control over the interlayer interactions Zhang et al. (2020, 2022). This is complementary to electrochemical treatments with ionic liquids whose primary effect is to induce protonation, or other electron doping effects, when the sample is placed on the cathode side Cui et al. (2018, 2019). It was reported in the early literature that pyridine (C5H5N) can be intercalated into MnPS3, leading to a transition from an AFM to a weakly FM ground state Alias and Sukumaran (1992), and that the intercalation of alkylamines (CnH2n+1NH2) into FePS3 causes a strong reduction of TNT_{N} Pattayil and Sukumaran (1993). Much more recently, the intercalation of tetraheptylammonium-bromide (C28H60BrN) into NiPS3 was found to cause a transition from AFM to ferrimagnetic (FIM) order, followed by another transition to AFM order, in effects ascribed to the electron doping of the layers Mi et al. (2022).

In this work, we report the successful interlayer intercalation of EMIM+ into FePS3 and NiPS3, using the ionic liquid C6H11N2BF4 (EMIM-BF4). By measuring changes in the mass and interlayer spacing, we estimate the intercalation levels to be approximately 0.27 EMIM+/f.u. in FePS3 and 0.37 EMIM+/f.u. in NiPS3, and that both procedures dilate the cc-axis lattice parameter by over 50%. We investigated the magnetic properties of EMIMx-FePS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3, and compared them with FePS3 and NiPS3, by magnetic susceptibility and 31P nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements.We found that intercalation in FePS3 causes changes in the Curie-Weiss temperatures determined above TNT_{N}, a suppression of TNT_{N} itself, and a reduced spin gap at the lowest temperatures. For intercalated NiPS3, the magnetic transition temperature barely changes and the spin fluctuations become very isotropic, suggesting an evolution from weakly XY toward Heisenberg-type magnetism. Taken together with a dramatic suppression of any interlayer magnetic interactions, these data provide strong evidence for the systematic modulation of intralayer magnetic interactions by intercalation, for which we deduce that charge doping on the P site should be taken into account.

The structure of this article is as follows. In Sec. II we describe our MMPS3 samples and intercalation procedure, and in Sec. III report our structural characterization. Section IV reports our measurements of the magnetic properties of pure and intercalated FePS3 and Sec. V our data for pure and intercalated NiPS3. In Sec. VI we discuss the consequences of our results for the understanding of magnetism in MMPS3 materials and provide a brief conclusion.

II Materials and Methods

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Lattice and magnetic structure of MMPS3. (a) Crystal structure. The figure illustrates two unit cells containing eight MMPS3 units. (b) Magnetic structure below TNT_{N}. J1J_{1}, J2J_{2}, and J3J_{3} label magnetic interactions between nearest-, next-nearest-, and next-next-nearest-neighbor sites, respectively; JJ^{\prime} labels the interlayer interaction, which we note corresponds to ABC stacking of the magnetic ions in the honeycomb layers. Blue and red arrows illustrate the relative orientations of local moments in the ordered phases.

Single crystals of FePS3 and NiPS3 were grown by the method of chemical vapor transport (CVT) Brec (1986). As Fig. 1(a) shows, the MMPS3 layer is composed of covalently bonded MMS6 octahedra and double-cone [P2S6]4- units in a 2:1 ratio Brec et al. (1985). The MM ions are thought to be in a robustly divalent M2+M^{2+} state in all compounds, as shown for FePS3 by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) Yu et al. (2019). These ions form the honeycomb lattice, with the P-P pairs located at the centers of the MM hexagons Brec (1986); Joy and Vasudevan (1992); Le Flem et al. (1982). The S2- layers stack in an ABC configuration along the cc direction to form a monoclinic structure with space group C2/m Ouvrard et al. (1985).

Both FePS3 and NiPS3 order magnetically with a “zig-zag” pattern, as shown in Fig. 1(b). The Fe2+ ions in FePS3 take their high-spin, S=2S=2 state and order with the moments normal to the abab plane Joy and Vasudevan (1992). These moments have FM alignment parallel to the aa axis and AFM alignment along the bb and cc axes, with propagation wave vector 𝒌=[0112]\bm{k}=[0~{}1~{}\frac{1}{2}] Kurosawa et al. (1983); Rule et al. (2007); Wildes et al. (2012); Lançon et al. (2016); Coak et al. (2021); Paul et al. (2023). For NiPS3, the Ni2+ (S=1S=1) moments are oriented primarily along the aa axis with a small component perpendicular to the abab plane; the zig-zag chains also lie along the aa axis, with AFM alignment along bb but an FM repeat along the cc axis, resulting in 𝒌=[010]\bm{k}=[0~{}1~{}0] Kurosawa et al. (1983); Wildes et al. (2015); Kim and Park (2021); Wildes et al. (2022).

Figure 2(a) shows the configuration that we adopt for electrochemical treatment in order to achieve interlayer intercalation. The ionic liquid EMIM-BF4 was packed in a container with two platinum electrodes placed approximately 20 mm apart and subjected to a 3 V potential difference Cui et al. (2019, 2018). A single crystal of FePS3 or NiPS3 was attached to the cathode and covered with silver paint. The ionic liquid was heated to a temperature around 60C. After 24 hours the mass of the samples had changed significantly, but longer treatment times led to no further change, and so one could declare the intercalation process to be complete.

X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements were performed using Cuα and Cuβ radiation to determine the cc-axis lattice parameters. The d.c. magnetic susceptibility was measured in a Magnetic Property Measurement System (MPMS) with a field of 100 Oe and at temperatures down to 1.8 K in field-cooled (FC) and zero-field-cooled (ZFC) conditions. 31P has nuclear spin I=1/2I=1/2 and a Zeeman factor of γ31=17.235{}^{31}\gamma=17.235 MHz/T. The 31P NMR measurements were performed on single crystals using a top tuning circuit and the spectra collected by spin-echo pulse sequences. For broad spectra, frequency sweeps were used to acquire the full spectrum. NMR Knight shifts were calculated from Kn=(f/31γH1)×100%K_{n}=(f/^{31}\gamma H-1){\times}100\%, where ff is the resonance frequency of the spectral peaks in the paramagnetic phase and the average frequency in the ordered phase. Spin-lattice relaxation rates, 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1}, were measured by the standard magnetization inversion-recovery method. These constitute a sensitive probe of low-energy spin fluctuations, because 1/T1T=limω0ΣqAhf2(q)Imχ(q,ω)/ω1/T_{1}T={\rm lim}_{\omega\to 0}\Sigma_{q}A^{2}_{\rm hf}(q)\,{\rm Im}\,\chi(q,\omega)/\omega, where χ(q,ω)\chi(q,\omega) is the dynamical susceptibility, Ahf(q)A_{\rm hf}(q) is the hyperfine coupling, and ω\omega is the NMR measurement frequency, which for electronic spins lies in the zero-energy limit.

III Lattice structure and doping of EMIMx-FePS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Sample intercalation and structural characterization of FePS3 and NiPS3. (a) Configuration for electrochemical treatment with EMIM-BF4. Two platinum electrodes are placed in the ionic liquid, set to a potential difference of 3 V, and the sample is attached to the negative electrode. (b) Single-crystal XRD data for FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3. (c) Single-crystal XRD data for NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3.

Figure 2(b) shows single-crystal XRD data for our FePS3 samples before and after 24-hour electrochemical treatment with the ionic liquid EMIM-BF4, and Fig. 2(c) the analogous data for NiPS3. We focus on the (0 0 LL) Bragg peaks in order to extract the interlayer (cc-axis) dimension of the unit cell. Studying the intralayer structure, meaning the aa and bb parameters, requires powder XRD measurements, but it has been found that the grinding process introduces disorder within the layers that precludes a meaningful analysis. The positions of the (0 0 LL) XRD peaks change appreciably after the intercalation treatment, and the cc-axis lattice parameters are shown and compared in Table I. The cc-axis dimension increases from 6.72 Å to 10.40 Å for FePS3 and from 6.64 Å to 10.34 Å for NiPS3. Such an extremly large (over 50%) increase in interlayer spacing can be expected to have a very strong effect on reducing the dimensionality to the 2D limit.

Because the sample is attached to the cathode, and because of the large change in cc-axis parameter, we deduce that EMIM+, rather than H+, is intercalated into the materials. A similar observation of intercalation by a large organic molecule has also been reported in NiPS3 using a different type of ionic liquid Mi et al. (2022). We note that our intercalation in EMIMx-NiPS3 was not complete by volume, in that a small portion of the XRD pattern of EMIMx-NiPS3 coincided with that of pristine NiPS3 [visible in Fig. 2(c)]. However, the volume ratio of residual NiPS3 is rather small, as we establish later from the absence of detectable signals in the magnetic susceptibility and NMR spectra.

Table 1: Lattice parameters of FePS3, EMIMx-FePS3, NiPS3, and EMIMx-NiPS3, and the estimated doping, xx.
FePS3   EMIMx-FePS3 NiPS3   EMIMx-NiPS3
cc (Å)   6.723(1) 10.401(1)   6.642(1) 10.343(1)
xx 0 27±327\pm 3% 0 37±0.437\pm 0.4%

The mass of the FePS3 crystal increased from 0.18±0.010.18\pm 0.01 mg before to 0.21±0.010.21\pm 0.01 mg after intercalation. From this we estimate the intercalant concentration and the charge doping level to be x=27±3%x=27\pm 3\%, given the molecular mass of 183 g/mol for FePS3 and 111 g/mol for EMIM+. For the NiPS3 crystal, the mass changed from 3.86±0.013.86\pm 0.01 mg to 4.71±0.014.71\pm 0.01 mg, and thus we extracted the doping level as x=37±0.4%x=37\pm 0.4\%, using the molecular mass of 186 g/mol for NiPS3. Our NMR studies revealed in addition the presence of F- ions in the intercalated samples, but at an unknown small concentration (data not shown), which suggests that the actual doping xx may vary with position across the samples.

IV Experimental data on FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3

IV.1 Magnetic susceptibility

Our susceptibility measurements were conducted on single crystals of FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3 with a small field applied parallel and perpendicular to the crystalline abab plane, and data under FC and ZFC conditions are shown in Fig. 3. In both pure and intercalated FePS3, χ(T)\chi(T) is much bigger at temperatures above TNT_{N} when the field is perpendicular to the abab plane than when it lies in the abab plane, but much smaller below TNT_{N}. Such an anisotropy should indicate the Ising nature of the system, which is attributed to combination of trigonal distortion and spin-orbit coupling Chatterjee (1995); Chandrasekharan and Vasudevan (1994); Joy and Vasudevan (1992); Amirabbasi and Kratzer (2023). With HabH\perp ab, χ\chi does not reach zero in the zero-temperature limit, which may be the consequence of a small field misalignment.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: Magnetic susceptibility of FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3. χ(T)\chi(T) measured in a field of 100 Oe applied parallel and perpendicular to the abab plane, under ZFC and FC conditions. (a) Susceptibility of FePS3 shown as a function of temperature. (b) 1/χ(T)1/\chi(T) of FePS3 in the high-temperature PM phase. (c) Susceptibility of EMIMx-FePS3 shown as a function of temperature. (d) 1/χ(T)1/\chi(T) of EMIMx-FePS3 in the high-temperature PM phase. TNT_{N} in panels (a) and (c) labels the AFM transition temperature, which is located at the peak of χ(T)\chi(T). Solid lines in panels (b) and (d) are linear fits to the data made over the temperature range shown, with θ\theta obtained from the intercept on the xx axis (i.e. at y=0y=0).

On cooling in FePS3 [Fig. 3(a)], χ(T)\chi(T) exhibits a peak followed by a sharp drop at 120 K in both field orientations, indicating the Néel transition at TN120T_{N}\simeq 120 K as found in previous reports Joy and Vasudevan (1992); Le Flem et al. (1982); Okuda et al. (1983). There is no appreciable hysteresis with FC and ZFC conditions, which supports a second-order AFM transition, in contrast to earlier reports that this transition may be of first order Jernberg et al. (1984); Ferloni and Scagliotti (1989). Turning to EMIMx-FePS3, TNT_{N} taken from the peak position in χ(T)\chi(T) is reduced to 80 K by intercalation [Fig. 3(c)], which is a value still 2/3 of that in the pristine sample. These values of TNT_{N} will be verified by the NMR measurements to follow, and already contain one of our primary results, that there is little to no connection between TNT_{N} and a hypothetical interlayer coupling. The FC and ZFC data for EMIMx-FePS3 already differ at temperatures above TNT_{N}, but this difference is affected only minimally by the onset of magnetic order at TNT_{N}; thus we believe that the difference between the FC and ZFC datasets is not an intrinsic effect, but an extrinsic one caused by impurities that enter the sample during chemical intercalation.

In all cases shown in Fig. 3, χ(T)\chi(T) above TNT_{N} can be well fitted by the Curie-Weiss (CW) form, χ=Nμ0μeff23kB(Tθ)\chi=\dfrac{N\mu_{0}\mu_{\rm eff}^{2}}{3k_{B}(T-\theta)}, where μeff\mu_{\rm eff} is the effective paramagnetic (PM) moment and θ\theta is the CW temperature. In FePS3 [Fig. 3(b)], the CW temperatures are found to be θ=22±1\theta_{\perp}=22\pm 1 K and θ=104±2\theta_{\parallel}=-104\pm 2 K for the two field orientations. In our convention, the positive θ\theta_{\perp} indicates the presence of FM interactions, as one may expect from the zig-zag ground-state order; nevertheless, this ordered state is dominated by AFM interactions and by the Ising anisotropy, so our result reflects the magnetic frustration in the system. The CW fit to the perpendicular-field data returns a PM moment μeff=6.4±0.2μB\mu_{\rm eff}=6.4\pm 0.2\mu_{B}/Fe, which is close to the literature value Joy and Vasudevan (1992); as noted in early studies, such a large μeff\mu_{\rm eff} for divalent Fe2+ ions can be explained only by taking the spin-orbit coupling into account Joy and Vasudevan (1992).

For EMIMx-FePS3, the susceptibility shows the same type of anisotropy as the pristine sample [Fig. 3(c)]. The PM moments we extract, 6.0±0.2μB6.0\pm 0.2\mu_{B}/Fe, are largely unaltered, indicating that intercalation causes no significant changes to the ionic properties. The CW temperatures we obtain, θ=26±1\theta_{\perp}=26\pm 1 K and θ=18±3\theta_{\parallel}=-18\pm 3 K [Fig. 3(d)], suggest that no dramatic changes take place in the signs or energy scales of the couplings, but offer no straightforward interpretation as alterations to the dominant AFM or frustrating FM interactions. Because the susceptibility measurements contain significant impurity contributions whose subtraction is difficult to benchmark, we turn next from a bulk to a microscopic probe in order to gain deeper insight into the magnetic properties after intercalation.

IV.2 NMR spectra

Refer to caption
Figure 4: 31P NMR spectra of FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3. (a) Spectra of FePS3 over a range of temperatures above and below TNT_{N}, taken at a fixed in-plane field of 4 T. Successive datasets are offset vertically for clarity. (b) Spectra of EMIMx-FePS3 taken under the same conditions. The spectral intensities at 30 and 60 K are multiplied by a factor of two; dashed lines represent Gaussian fits to the data.

We measured 31P NMR spectra for FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3 over a wide range of temperatures on both sides of TNT_{N}, and show our results in Fig. 4. In FePS3, the single NMR peak observed at temperatures above 120 K splits into two nearly symmetrical peaks, presenting a clear signature of AFM ordering at TNT_{N} [Fig. 4(a)]. We note here that the field was applied in the abab plane, where from Fig. 1(b) one expects the 31P nucleus to experience hyperfine fields from the two different sites that are in opposite directions relative to the external field. We then fitted the peak or peaks in each NMR spectrum with Gaussian profiles to extract the full width at half-maximum height (FWHM) and the peak splitting below TNT_{N}. As Fig. 5(a) shows, the single NMR peak above 120 K broadens rapidly at TNT_{N}, from approximately 18 to over 50 kHz where it splits. The line splitting, Δf{\Delta}f, approaches 2.8 MHz at low temperatures and, as shown in Fig. 5(b), from its shape can serve as an order parameter for the AFM phase.

Refer to caption
Figure 5: NMR line widths and splittings in FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3. (a) FWHM of the primary spectral peak, or peaks, in FePS3 [Fig. 4(a)] shown as a function of temperature. (b) Splitting, Δf\Delta f, of NMR peaks in FePS3 as a function of temperature. (c) FWHM of the broad NMR spectrum of EMIMx-FePS3 [Fig. 4(b)] shown as a function of temperature.

For EMIMx-FePS3, the single NMR peak remains rather narrow when cooled down to 80 K [Fig. 4(b)]. Here it shows no evidence of a line splitting, but instead undergoes a large increase in line width [Fig. 5(c)]. This broadening can be taken to indicate the onset of magnetic order at TN80T_{N}\simeq 80 K, consistent with the susceptibility data of Fig. 3, and Gaussian peak fits show the FWHM broadening from 300 kHz above TNT_{N} to 3 MHz below TNT_{N}. We draw attention to the fact that the low-temperature FWHM in EMIMx-FePS3 has the same order as Δf{\Delta}f in FePS3, which suggests a distribution of ordered moments in the system. Because we observe only one peak, we propose that these results reflect an incommensurate magnetic order in the 2D layers, with a systematic distribution of local-moment magnitudes and/or directions, as opposed to a multi-domain structure. Such an incommensurate order could arise from rather small alterations of the intralayer interactions in FePS3, whose pre-intercalation compromise configuration is the Ising zig-zag order shown in Fig. 1(b).

IV.3 Spin-lattice relaxation rates and spin gaps

Refer to caption
Figure 6: Spin-lattice relaxation rates of FePS3 and EMIMx-FePS3. (a) 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} shown as a function of temperature, measured with an in-plane field of 4 T. (b) 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} shown in semilog form as a function of 1/T1/T. The straight solid lines represent linear fits to the data in the low-temperature regime. Δ\Delta is a gap value extracted from the gradient of each line.

The spin-lattice relaxation rates, 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1}, of pure and intercalated FePS3 are shown in Fig. 6. FePS3 exhibits the characteristic behavior on decreasing temperature that 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} first increases to a maximum at T=120T=120 K, which reflects the AFM transition at TNT_{N}, followed by a rapid drop [Fig. 6(a)]. Far below TNT_{N}, the exponential fall suggests the form 1/31T1eΔ/kBT1/^{31}T_{1}\propto e^{-{\Delta}/k_{B}T}, where Δ\Delta is the spin gap expected in an ordered Ising magnet. Plotting ln(1/31T1)\ln(1/^{31}T_{1}) as a function of 1/T1/T reveals that the data below 50 K follow a straight line [Fig. 6(b)], whose gradient gives a gap Δ=45±3\Delta=45\pm 3 K. Here we comment that inelastic neutron scattering (INS) measurements of the anisotropic spin-wave spectra have reported a gap of 15 meV Lançon et al. (2016), which is significantly larger than our NMR value. Because the NMR 1/T11/T_{1} is a very sensitive, low-energy local probe that sums contributions from all of momentum space, it is possible that our results reveal a process missed by both triple-axis and time-of-flight INS for reasons of energy resolution or reciprocal-space coverage; however, the higher temperatures at which we obtained an NMR signal also leave open the possibility of probing a finite-energy transition, and we hope that future studies may resolve this apparent contradiction.

Similar magnetic ordering and spin-gap behavior are observed in EMIMx-FePS3, as Fig. 6(a) shows. Here TNT_{N} is determined quite precisely at 78 K from the sharp peak in 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1}. Analysis of the low-temperature response, shown in Fig. 6(b), gives the equivalent spin gap as Δ=30±3\Delta=30\pm 3 K. This suppression of the gap upon intercalation scales linearly with the suppression of TNT_{N}, which would be consistent with a straightforward reduction of the relevant intralayer energies.

V Experimental data on NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3

V.1 Magnetic susceptibility

Refer to caption
Figure 7: Magnetic susceptibility of NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3. χ(T)\chi(T) measured in an out-of-plane field of 100 Oe under FC and ZFC conditions.
Refer to caption
Figure 8: 31P NMR spectra of NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3. (a) Spectra of NiPS3 measured in an out-of-plane field of 3 T over a wide range of temperatures above and below TNT_{N}. Successive datasets are offset vertically for clarity. (b) As in panel (a) with an in-plane field. The low-temperature spectra are fitted to double-Lorentzian functions. (c) and (d) Spectra of EMIMx-NiPS3 measured under the same conditions of field and temperature.

The magnetic susceptibilities of NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3 are shown in Fig. 7. For both compounds, the peak in χ(T)\chi(T) occurs around 250 K, which makes it impossible to reach a high-temperature regime in which to extract the CW behavior. Such high intralayer energy scales are found by high-precision INS measurements of the spin dynamics of NiPS3 Wildes et al. (2022), and the broad peak in χ\chi indicates the development of 2D AFM correlations. We note that the AFM ordering transition is essential invisible in χ(T)\chi(T), and we will show by NMR that TN=148T_{N}=148 K (below). Detailed measurements on NiPS3 showed that the susceptibility is isotropic above TNT_{N} and anisotropic below it Wildes et al. (2015). The most dramatic feature in our measurements (Fig. 7) is the onset of a large difference between the FC and ZFC data below 25 K, which may be caused by quenched disorder or a change of magnetic structure.

For EMIMx-NiPS3, χ(T)\chi(T) is remarkably similar to the pristine compound, with only a small deviation setting in at temperatures below 200 K. This minimal alteration despite the massive increase in interlayer spacing is a strong indication that all the magnetic properties of NiPS3 are intrinsically 2D. For the intercalated system, a difference between the ZFC and FC data develops gradually with decreasing temperature, unaffected by the onset of magnetic order (shown below by NMR), and we believe this to be a consequence of impurities introduced by the intercalation, similar to the situation in EMIMx-FePS3 (Fig. 3).

V.2 NMR spectra

Refer to caption
Figure 9: NMR line widths and splittings in NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3. (a) FWHM of the primary spectral peak, or peaks, in NiPS3 [Figs. 8(b)] shown as a function of temperature. (b) Splitting, Δf\Delta f, of NMR peaks in NiPS3 as a function of temperature. (c) FWHM of the broad NMR spectrum of EMIMx-NiPS3 [Figs. 8(d)] shown as a function of temperature. The arrows mark the transition temperatures, TNT_{N} and TT^{*}, extracted for the two compounds.

Figure 8 shows the 31P NMR spectra of NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3 over a wide range of temperature for both field orientations. For NiPS3 in an out-of-plane field, the spectra above 148 K have a single peak characteristic of the PM phase, which broadens significantly on further cooling from 148 K to 140 K [Fig. 8(a)]. By contrast, the double-peak feature developing at all temperatures below 148 K in an in-plane field demonstrates clearly the onset of AFM order and fixes TN=148±2T_{N}=148\pm 2 K. In this case, Lorentzian functions gave a slightly better fit to the spectra, although this choice made little difference for the purpose of extracting the FWHM of each peak and the line splitting, Δf\Delta f, below TNT_{N} [shown in Figs. 9(a) and 9(b)]. The FWHM is about 40 kHz at temperatures above TNT_{N} and saturates around 0.2 MHz far below TNT_{N}, while Δf{\Delta}f also tends to level off around 0.2 MHz at low temperatures in the ordered state.

For EMIMx-NiPS3 in both field orientations, the NMR peaks also broaden significantly towards low temperatures [Fig. 8(c,d)]. However, we were not able to resolve any line splitting, even in an in-plane field. Again we used Lorentzian fits, to the peaks obtained in in-plane fields, in order to extract the FWHM shown in Fig. 9(c). The sudden increase in FWHM occurring at 145 K, which we label TT^{*}, is characteristic of a static magnetic order. However, the absence of any line splitting at any lower temperatures suggests that this order could be of a type different from that in pristine NiPS3.

V.3 Spin-lattice relaxation rates

Refer to caption
Figure 10: Spin-lattice relaxation rates of NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3. 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} shown as a function of temperature, measured with in- and out-of-plane fields of 3 T.

The spin-lattice relaxation rates of NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3, measured in both field orientations, are presented in Fig. 10. We comment that it was not possible to obtain a reliable 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} signal at temperatures significantly below 100 K, in contrast to the situation in FePS3 (Fig. 6), but our data characterize well the magnetic transitions in both materials, which are clearly evident from the kinks in 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1}. For NiPS3 in both orientations, the rapid drop in 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} determines precisely the AFM ordering temperature TN=148T_{N}=148 K, a value slightly lower than that obtained from early susceptibility data Le Flem et al. (1982); Joy and Vasudevan (1992); Ziolo et al. (1988). Below TNT_{N}, 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} for an in-plane field drops significantly faster than with an out-of-plane field, which is consistent with XY magnetic order Rosenblum et al. (1994); Kim et al. (2019); Jana et al. (2023) in that the gapless (Goldstone) modes should be preserved only when the field is applied out of the plane.

For EMIMx-NiPS3, our 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} data for the two field orientations are barely distinguishable above TT^{*}, where they decrease with decreasing temperature from 200 K to 160 K and then increase over the range from 160 K to 145 K. Below this they drop more rapidly, allowing us to fix the putative magnetic ordering temperature as T=145T^{*}=145 K. Below TT^{*}, the relaxation rates under in- and out-of-plane fields are truly indistinguishable, presenting the first of two distinctive contrasts between NiPS3 and EMIMx-NiPS3. Such isotropic behavior suggests that intercalation in this system genuinely alters the intralayer magnetic interactions to a Heisenberg form. Second, although TT^{*} is reduced by only 3 K on intercalation, 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} at T=100T=100 K (far below TT^{*}) is enhanced by a factor of five. This apparent strong enhancement of low-energy spin fluctuations points once again to the possibility of a magnetically ordered state different from that of pure NiPS3 [Fig. 1(b)], candidates for which would include an incommensurate order. Further measurements are therefore required to investigate the magnetic structure of the intercalated system.

Table 2: Magnetic interactions of FePS3 and NiPS3 Lançon et al. (2016); Wildes et al. (2022); JiJ_{i} indicates a Heisenberg interaction between neighboring ions of differing separations [Fig. 1(b)] and DzD_{z} the leading magnetic anisotropy fitted by INS.
J1J_{1} (meV) J2J_{2} (meV) J3J_{3} (meV) JJ^{\prime} (meV) DzD_{z} (meV)
FePS3 1.46-1.46 0.04 0.96 0.0073 2.66-2.66
NiPS3 2.6-2.6 0.2 13.5 0.3-0.3 0.21

VI Discussion

Our susceptibility data show that the intercalation of FePS3 and NiPS3 does not cause any depletion of the available magnetic moments. Thus the changes we observe, specifically the reduction of TNT_{N} in EMIMx-FePS3 and the isotropic spin response of EMIMx-NiPS3, should be attributed to changes of the magnetic interactions. To discuss these, in Table II we list the values of the magnetic interactions deduced by INS experiments for FePS3 Lançon et al. (2016) and NiPS3 Wildes et al. (2022). The authors of both studies adopted a minimal model consisting of the three intralayer Heisenberg interactions illustrated in Fig. 1(b), an interlayer Heisenberg interaction (JJ^{\prime}), and single-ion anisotropy terms, of which only one was found to be significant. The JJ^{\prime} term was found to be very small in FePS3 but potentially significant in NiPS3. The J3J_{3} term, for third-neighbor M2+M^{2+} ions, was found to be completely dominant in NiPS3 and to play an essential role in establishing the zig-zag order of FePS3.

Considering the increase of the cc-axis lattice parameter that we achieve, in excess of 50%, it is natural to expect that the interlayer couplings should be reduced dramatically. Thus our primary conclusion is that the JJ^{\prime} terms have no role in the magnetism of either material, where 2D ordering remains well established in both in EMIMx-FePS3 and in EMIMx-NiPS3. In the light of theoretical studies demonstrating that quasi-2D magnets with very small JJ^{\prime} may nevertheless have significant TNT_{N} values Yasuda et al. (2005), this result was not fully clear for FePS3 (Table II). Our study demonstrates that it is also true for NiPS3, despite the 3 K interlayer coupling scale extracted in Ref. Wildes et al. (2022).

It is then important to understand how the intralayer magnetic interactions are modified by intercalation. In principle, the addition of EMIM+ should lead to electron doping in both materials, with the electrons presumably located on the Fe or P ions, and reaching a doping around 1/3 e-/f.u. (0.27 in EMIMx-FePS3, 0.37 in EMIMx-NiPS3). Considering the unchanged paramagnetic moments we extracted for EMIM+-FePS3 and the unchanged magnetic properties of EMIM+-NiPS3, a change of the M2+M^{2+} valence seems to be excluded. Thus we propose that the electronic doping affects the P sites, by transforming the less favorable P4+ ions Yu et al. (2019) to P3+. With the P ions located at the centers of the MM hexagons, we expect that this doping should be very effective in modifying the intralayer superexchange interactions, particularly the strong J3J_{3} terms. We remark in this context that we found the intercalated samples to remain highly insulating, which is a prerequisite to regard the doped charges as localized, such that they can affect the magnetic interactions rather than drive a metallic transition.

Considering FePS3 in more detail, the TNT_{N} we measure for bulk EMIMx-FePS3 is lower than the value TN=104T_{N}=104 K obtained for monolayer FePS3 Wang et al. (2016). Thus our intercalation is more than a simple isolation of the 2D units, and its effects on the competing intralayer interactions require more detailed microscopic modelling. In fitting their INS results, the authors of Ref. Lançon et al. (2016) assumed an extremely minimal model where all of the anisotropy was ascribed to one single-ion term, and further anisotropic interactions such as Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya or Ising-type spin-spin interactions were neglected. The modelling of these terms is a complex task that was approached only recently by correlated density functional theory (DFT) methods Amirabbasi and Kratzer (2023), while further experimental information on the magnetic anisotropy has been obtained by X-ray photoelectron microscopy Lee et al. (2023). With the ongoing interest in FePS3 as a candidate spintronic material Soumyanarayanan et al. (2016), and for band engineering by ultrafast coherent light Mertens et al. (2023), a deeper understanding of the key interaction terms remains a priority.

In EMIMx-NiPS3, the fact that TT^{*} is only 3 K lower than TNT_{N} in NiPS3 demonstrates immediately that JJ^{\prime} terms are irrelevant. Nevertheless, the absence of line splitting at low temperatures in the 31P spectra of EMIMx-NiPS3 [Fig. 8(d)], in contrast to the behavior in NiPS3 [Fig. 8(b)], and the enhancement of 1/31T11/^{31}T_{1} (Fig. 10), lead us to suggest that the ordering at TT^{*} may be of a different type, such as incomplete (short-ranged) or incommensurate. Recent theoretical work has indeed proposed that NiPS3 is close to incommensurate magnetic order Mellado (2023), and the large overlap of the two NMR peaks we observe in Fig. 8(b) may support this scenario. Another possibility could be weak anisotropy caused by intralayer strain arising from a lattice mismatch with the size of the intercalated molecules. Finally, a BKT transition is also possible if the system retains an easy-plane anisotropy, however weak, and in the intercalated system it is likely that quenched disorder would help to pin true long-range order from the quasi-long-ranged BKT order. We note here that a BKT phase has already been reported in monolayer NiPS3 Hu et al. (2023).

In summary, we performed electrochemical treatment of FePS3 and NiPS3 with the ionic liquid EMIM-BF4, obtaining a significant intercalation of the large EMIM+ ions into both compounds. The most important consequence of intercalation is a large and uniform increase of the cc-axis lattice parameters, which unavoidably causes a strong reduction of interlayer couplings. The fact that we do not observe order-of-magnitude changes in the magnetic properties of either system demonstrates conclusively that the magnetic properties of the pristine materials are intrinsically 2D, being determined almost exclusively by intralayer physics. The changes we do observe are a consequence of modulated intralayer magnetic interactions. In FePS3, the drop in magnetic ordering temperature suggests a change in the competing FM and AFM interactions while the system remains in the Ising limit; the effects in NiPS3 are far more subtle, with the interactions changing from weakly XY-type to almost isotropic (Heisenberg-type). We propose the charge doping that accompanies intercalation, which appears to be localized around the P ions and reaches a level of 0.3-0.4 e-/f.u., as the mechanism most likely to drive these changes. Our study of chemical intercalation with ionic liquids paves the way not only for approaching the 2D limit in van der Waals magnetic materials but also for tuning their intralayer magnetic interactions.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (under Grant Nos. 2023YFA1406500, 2022YFA1402700, 2023YFA1406100, and 2019YFA0308602), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (under Grant Nos. 12134020, 12374156, 12174441, and 12074425), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China (under Grant Nos. 22XNH096 and 23XNKJ22). Y. F. Guo acknowledges the Double First-Class Initiative Fund of ShanghaiTech University.

References

  • Bethe (1931) H. Bethe, “On the theory of metals.” Eur. J. Phys. A 71, 205 (1931).
  • Alias and Sukumaran (1992) J. P. Alias and V. Sukumaran, “The intercalation reaction of pyridine with manganese thiophosphate, MnPS3\mathrm{MnPS}_{3},” J. Am. Chem. Soc 114, 7792 (1992).
  • Pattayil and Sukumaran (1993) A. J. Pattayil and V. Sukumaran, “Intercalation of n-alkylamines in iron thiohypophosphate (FePS3),” Chem. Mater. 5, 1182 (1993).
  • Soumyanarayanan et al. (2016) A. Soumyanarayanan, N. Reyren, A. Fert,  and C. Panagopoulos, “Emergent phenomena induced by spin-orbit coupling at surfaces and interfaces,” Nature 539, 509 (2016).
  • Burch et al. (2018) K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus,  and J.-G. Park, “Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials,” Nature 563, 47 (2018).
  • Gong et al. (2017) C. Gong, L. Li, Z. L. Li, H. W. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Z. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia,  and X. Zhang, “Discovery of intrinsic ferromagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals,” Nature 546, 265 (2017).
  • Huang et al. (2017) B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo-Herrero,  and X. D. Xu, “Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit,” Nature 546, 270 (2017).
  • Tian et al. (2016) Y. Tian, M. J. Gray, H. W. Ji, R. J. Cava,  and K. S. Burch, “Magneto-elastic coupling in a potential ferromagnetic 2D atomic crystal,” 2D Mater. 3, 025035 (2016).
  • O’Hara et al. (2018) D. J. O’Hara, T. C. Zhu, A. H. Trout, A. S. Ahmed, Y. Q. K. Luo, C. H. Lee, M. R. Brenner, S. Rajan, J. A. Gupta, D. W. McComb,  and R. K. Kawakami, “Room Temperature Intrinsic Ferromagnetism in Epitaxial Manganese Selenide Films in the Monolayer Limit,” Nano Lett. 18, 3125 (2018).
  • Bonilla et al. (2018) M. Bonilla, S. Kolekar, Y. J. Ma, H. C. Diaz, V. Kalappattil, R. Das, T. Eggers, H. R. Gutierrez, M.-H. Phan,  and M. Batzill, “Strong room-temperature ferromagnetism in VSe2 monolayers on van der Waals substrates,” Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 289 (2018).
  • Le Flem et al. (1982) G. Le Flem, R. Brec, G. Ouvard, A. Louisy,  and P. Segransan, “Magnetic interactions in the layer compounds MPX3 (M = Mn, Fe, and Ni; X = S, Se),” J. Phys. Chem. Solids 43, 455 (1982).
  • Ouvrard et al. (1985) G. Ouvrard, R. Brec,  and J. Rouxel, “Structural determination of some MPS3 layered phases (M = Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, and Cd),” Mater. Res. Bull. 20, 1181 (1985).
  • Joy and Vasudevan (1992) P. A. Joy and S. Vasudevan, “Magnetism in the layered transition-metal thiophosphates MPS3 (M = Mn, Fe, and Ni),” Phys. Rev. B 46, 5425 (1992).
  • Chittari et al. (2016) B. L. Chittari, Y. Park, D. Lee, M. Han, A. H. MacDonald, E. Hwang,  and J. Jung, “Electronic and magnetic properties of single-layer MPX3\mathrm{MPX}_{3} metal phosphorous trichalcogenides,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 184428 (2016).
  • Du et al. (2016) K. Z. Du, X. Z. Wang, Y. Liu, P. Hu, M. I. B. Utama, C. K. Gan, Q. H. Xiong,  and C. Kloc, “Weak van der Waals Stacking, Wide-Range Band Gap, and Raman Study on Ultrathin Layers of Metal Phosphorus Trichalcogenides,” ACS Nano 10, 1738 (2016).
  • Wang et al. (2018) F. M. Wang, T. A. Shifa, P. Yu, P. He, Y. Liu, F. Wang, Z. X. Wang, X. Y. Zhan, X. D. Lou, F. Xia,  and J. He, “New Frontiers on van der Waals Layered Metal Phosphorous Trichalcogenides,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 28, 1802151 (2018).
  • Haines et al. (2018) C. R. S. Haines, M. J. Coak, A. R. Wildes, G. I. Lampronti, C. Liu, P. Nahai-Williamson, H. Hamidov, D. Daisenberger,  and S. S. Saxena, “Pressure-Induced Electronic and Structural Phase Evolution in the van der Waals Compound FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3},” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 266801 (2018).
  • Kang et al. (2020) S. Kang, K. Kim, B. H. Kim, J. Kim, K. I. Sim, J.-U. Lee, S. Lee, K. Park, S. Yun, T. Kim, A. Nag, A. Walters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Li, L. Chapon, K.-J. Zhou, Y.-W. Son, J. H. Kim, H. Cheong,  and J.-G. Park, “Coherent many-body exciton in van der Waals antiferromagnet NiPS3,” Nature 583, 785 (2020).
  • Kurosawa et al. (1983) K. Kurosawa, S. Saito,  and Y. Yasuo, “Neutron diffraction study on MnPS3\mathrm{MnPS}_{3} and FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3},” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 52, 3919 (1983).
  • Chandrasekharan and Vasudevan (1994) N. Chandrasekharan and S. Vasudevan, “Magnetism, exchange and crystal field parameters in the orbitally unquenched I\mathrm{I}sing antiferromagnet FePS3\mathrm{Fe}\mathrm{PS}_{3},” Pramana 43, 21 (1994).
  • Chatterjee (1995) I. Chatterjee, “Magnetic properties of layered antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. B 51, 3937 (1995).
  • Rule et al. (2007) K. C. Rule, G. J. McIntyre, S. J. Kennedy,  and T. J. Hicks, “Single-crystal and powder neutron diffraction experiments on FePS3\mathrm{Fe}\mathrm{PS}_{3}: Search for the magnetic structure,” Phys. Rev. B 76, 134402 (2007).
  • Lee et al. (2016) J. U. Lee, S. Lee, J. H. Ryoo, S. Kang, T. Y. Kim, P. Kim, C. H. Park, J. G. Park,  and H. Cheong, “Ising-Type Magnetic Ordering in Atomically Thin FePS3,” Nano Lett. 16, 7433 (2016).
  • Wildes et al. (2017) A. R. Wildes, V. Simonet, E. Ressouche, R. Ballou,  and G. J. McIntyre, “The magnetic properties and structure of the quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet CoPS3\mathrm{CoPS}_{3},” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 455801 (2017).
  • Brec (1986) R. Brec, “Review on structural and chemical properties of transition metal phosphorous trisulfides MPS3,” Solid State Ion. 22, 3 (1986).
  • Kuo et al. (2016) C. T. Kuo, M. Neumann, K. Balamurugan, H. J. Park, S. Kang, H. W. Shiu, J. H. Kang, B. H. Hong, M. Han, T. W. Noh,  and J.-G. Park, “Exfoliation and Raman Spectroscopic Fingerprint of Few-Layer NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3} van der Waals Crystals,” Sci. Rep. 6, 20904 (2016).
  • Wang et al. (2016) X. Z. Wang, K. Z. Du, Y. Y. F. Liu, P. Hu, J. Zhang, Q. Zhang, M. H. S. Owen, X. Lu, C.W. Gan, P. Sengupta, C. Kloc,  and Q. H. Xiong, “Raman spectroscopy of atomically thin two-dimensional magnetic iron phosphorus trisulfide (FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3}) crystals,” 2D Mater. 3, 031009 (2016).
  • McCreary et al. (2020) A. McCreary, J. R. Simpson, T. T. Mai, R. D. McMichael, J. E. Douglas, N. Butch, C. Dennis, R. Valdés Aguilar,  and A. R. Hight Walker, “Quasi-two-dimensional magnon identification in antiferromagnetic FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3} via magneto-Raman spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B 101, 064416 (2020).
  • Hu et al. (2023) L. L. Hu, H. X. Wang, Y. Z. Chen, K. Xu, M.-R. Li, H. Y. Liu, P. Gu, Y. B. Wang, M. D. Zhang, H. Yao,  and Q. H. Xiong, “Observation of a magnetic phase transition in monolayer NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3},” Phys. Rev. B 107, L220407 (2023).
  • Zhang et al. (2020) H. X. Zhang, A. Rousuli, S. C. Shen, K. N. Zhang, C. Wang, L. P. Luo, J. Z. Wang, Y. Wu, Y. Xu, W. H. Duan, H. Yao, P. Yu,  and S. Y. Zhou, “Enhancement of superconductivity in organic-inorganic hybrid topological materials,” Sci. Bull. 65, 188 (2020).
  • Zhang et al. (2022) H. X. Zhang, A. Rousuli, K. N. Zhang, L. P. Luo, C. G. Guo, X. Cong, Z. Z. Lin, C. H. Bao, H. Y. Zhang, S. N. Xu, R. F. Feng, S. C. Shen, K. Zhao, W. Yao, Y. Wu, S. H. Ji, X. Chen, P. H. Tan, Q. K. Xue, Y. Xu, W. H. Duan, P. Yu,  and S. Y. Zhou, “Tailored Ising superconductivity in intercalated bulk NbSe2,” Nat. Phys. 18, 1425 (2022).
  • Cui et al. (2018) Y. Cui, G. H. Zhang, H. B. Li, H. Lin, X. Y. Zhu, H.-H. Wen, G. Q. Wang, J. Z. Sun, M. W. Ma, Y. Li, D. L. Gong, T. Xie, Y. H. Gu, S. L. Li, H. Q. Luo, P. Yu,  and W.Q. Yu, “Protonation induced high-tct_{c} phases in iron-based superconductors evidenced by NMR\mathrm{NMR} and magnetization measurements,” Sci. Bull. 63, 11 (2018).
  • Cui et al. (2019) Y. Cui, Z. Hu, J. S. Zhang, W. L. Ma, M. W. Ma, Z. Ma, C. Wang, J. Q. Yan, J. P. Sun, J. G. Cheng, S. Jia, Y. Li, J. S. Wen, H. C. Lei, P. Yu, W. Ji,  and W. Q. Yu, “Ionic-liquid-gating induced protonation and superconductivity in FeSe\mathrm{FeSe}, FeSe0.93S0.07\mathrm{FeSe}_{0.93}\mathrm{S}_{0.07}, ZrNCl\mathrm{ZrNCl}, 1T\mathrm{T} -TaS2\mathrm{TaS}_{2} and BiSe2\mathrm{BiSe}_{2},” Chin. Phys. Lett 36, 077401 (2019).
  • Mi et al. (2022) M. J. Mi, X. W. Zheng, S. L. Wang, Y. Zhou, L. X. Yu, H. Xiao, H. N. Song, B. Shen, F. S. Li, L. H. Bai, Y. X. Chen, S. P. Wang, X. H. Liu,  and Y. L. Wang, “Variation between Antiferromagnetism and Ferrimagnetism in NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3} by Electron Doping,” Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2112750 (2022).
  • Brec et al. (1985) R. Brec, G. Ouvrard,  and J. Rouxel, “Relationship between structure parameters and chemical properties in some MPS3\mathrm{MPS}_{3} layered phases,” Mater. Res. Bull. 20, 1257 (1985).
  • Yu et al. (2019) Z. Yu, J. Peng, Y. H. Liu, W. X. Liu, H. F. Liu,  and Y. Q. Guo, “Amine-assisted exfoliation and electrical conductivity modulation toward few-layer FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3} nanosheets for efficient hydrogen evolution,” J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 13928–13934 (2019).
  • Wildes et al. (2012) A. R. Wildes, K. C. Rule, R. I. Bewley, M. Enderle,  and T. J. Hicks, “The magnon dynamics and spin exchange parameters of FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3},” J. Phys. Condens. Matter 24, 416004 (2012).
  • Lançon et al. (2016) D. Lançon, H. C. Walker, E. Ressouche, B. Ouladdiaf, K. C. Rule, G. J. McIntyre, T. J. Hicks, H. M. Rønnow,  and A. R. Wildes, “Magnetic structure and magnon dynamics of the quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3},” Phys. Rev. B 94, 214407 (2016).
  • Coak et al. (2021) M. J. Coak, D. M. Jarvis, H. Hamidov, A. R. Wildes, J. A. M. Paddison, C. Liu, C. R. S. Haines, N. T. Dang, S. E. Kichanov, B. N. Savenko, S. Lee, M. Kratochvílová, S. Klotz, T. C. Hansen, D. P. Kozlenko, J. G Park,  and S. S. Saxena, “Emergent Magnetic Phases in Pressure-Tuned van der Waals Antiferromagnet FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3},” Phys. Rev. X 11, 011024 (2021).
  • Paul et al. (2023) S. Paul, D. Negi, S. Talukdar, S. Karak, S. Badola, B. Poojitha, M. Mandal, S. Marik, R. P. Singh, N. Pistawala, L. Harnagea, A. Thomas, A. Soni, S. Bhattacharjee,  and S. Saha, “Tuning the magnetic properties in MPS3\mathrm{MPS}_{3} (M\mathrm{M} = Mn\mathrm{Mn}, Fe\mathrm{Fe} and Ni\mathrm{Ni}) by proximity-induced Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions,”  (2023), arXiv:2307.13400 .
  • Wildes et al. (2015) A. R. Wildes, V. Simonet, E. Ressouche, G. J. McIntyre, M. Avdeev, E. Suard, S. A. J. Kimber, D. Lançon, G. Pepe, B. Moubaraki,  and T. J. Hicks, “Magnetic structure of the quasi-two-dimensional antiferromagnet NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3},” Phys. Rev. B 92, 224408 (2015).
  • Kim and Park (2021) T. Y. Kim and C. H. Park, “Magnetic anisotropy and magnetic ordering of transition-metal phosphorus trisulfides,” Nano Lett. 21, 10114 (2021).
  • Wildes et al. (2022) A. R. Wildes, J. R. Stewart, M. D. Le, R. A. Ewings, K. C. Rule, G. Deng,  and K. Anand, “Magnetic dynamics of NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3},” Phys. Rev. B 106, 174422 (2022).
  • Amirabbasi and Kratzer (2023) M. Amirabbasi and P. Kratzer, “Orbital and magnetic ordering in single-layer FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3}: A DFT+U\mathrm{DFT}+\mathrm{U} study,” Phys. Rev. B 107, 024401 (2023).
  • Okuda et al. (1983) K. Okuda, K. Kurosawa,  and S. Saito, “High field magnetization process in FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3},” in High Field Magnetism, edited by M. Date (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1983) pp. 55–58.
  • Jernberg et al. (1984) P. Jernberg, S. Bjarman,  and R. Wäppling, “FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3}: A first-order phase transition in 2D\mathrm{D} I\mathrm{I}sing antiferromagnet,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 46, 178 (1984).
  • Ferloni and Scagliotti (1989) P. Ferloni and M. Scagliotti, “Magnetic phase transitions in iron and nickel phosphorus trichalcogenides,” Thermochim. Acta 139, 197 (1989).
  • Ziolo et al. (1988) J. Ziolo, S. Torre, A. Rigamonti,  and F. Borsa, “31P NMR relaxation study of spin dynamics in layered transition-metal compounds MPX3\mathrm{MPX}_{3},” J. Appl. Phys. 63, 3095 (1988).
  • Rosenblum et al. (1994) S. Rosenblum, A. H. Francis,  and R. Merlin, “Two-magnon light scattering in the layered antiferromagnet NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3}: Spin\mathrm{Spin}-1/2-like anomalies in a spin-1 system,” Phys. Rev. B 49, 4352 (1994).
  • Kim et al. (2019) K. Kim, S. Y. Lim, J.-U. Lee, S. Lee, T. Y. Kim, K. Park, G. S. Jeon, C.-H. Park, J.-G. Park,  and H. Cheong, “Suppression of magnetic ordering in XXZ\mathrm{XXZ}-type antiferromagnetic monolayer NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3},” Nat. Commun. 10, 345 (2019).
  • Jana et al. (2023) D. Jana, P. Kapuscinski, I. Mohelsky, D. Vaclavkova, I. Breslavetz, M. Orlita, C. Faugeras,  and M. Potemski, “Magnon gap excitations and spin-entangled optical transition in the van der Waals antiferromagnet NiPS3\mathrm{NiPS}_{3},” Phys. Rev. B 108, 115149 (2023).
  • Yasuda et al. (2005) C. Yasuda, S. Todo, K. Hukushima, F. Alet, M. Keller, M. Troyer,  and H. Takayama, “Néel Temperature of Quasi-Low-Dimensional Heisenberg Antiferromagnets,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 217201 (2005).
  • Lee et al. (2023) Y. Lee, S. Son, C. Kim, S. Kang, J. Shen, M. Kenzelmann, B. Delley, T. Savchenko, S. Parchenko, W. Na, K.-Y. Choi, W. Kim, H. Cheong, P. M. Derlet, A. Kleibert,  and J.-G. Park, “Giant Magnetic Anisotropy in the Atomically Thin van der Waals Antiferromagnet FePS3,” Adv. Electron. Mater. 9, 2200650 (2023).
  • Mertens et al. (2023) F. Mertens, D. Mönkebüscher, U. Parlak, C. Boix-Constant, S. Man~\tilde{\rm n}as-Valero, M. Matzer, R. Adhikari, A. Bonanni, E. Coronado, A. M. Kalashnikova, D. Bossini,  and M. Cinchetti, “Ultrafast Coherent THz Lattice Dynamics Coupled to Spins in the van der Waals Antiferromagnet FePS3\mathrm{FePS}_{3},” Adv. Mater. 35, 2208355 (2023).
  • Mellado (2023) P. Mellado, “Spin model for the honeycomb NiPS3,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 123, 242403 (2023).