This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Molecular Impurities as a Realization of Anyons on the Two-Sphere

M. Brooks [email protected] IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria    M. Lemeshko IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria    D. Lundholm Uppsala University, Department of Mathematics - Box 480, SE-751 06 Uppsala, Sweden    E. Yakaboylu [email protected] IST Austria (Institute of Science and Technology Austria), Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria
Abstract

Studies on experimental realization of two-dimensional anyons in terms of quasiparticles have been restricted, so far, to only anyons on the plane. It is known, however, that the geometry and topology of space can have significant effects on quantum statistics for particles moving on it. Here, we have undertaken the first step towards realizing the emerging fractional statistics for particles restricted to move on the sphere, instead of on the plane. We show that such a model arises naturally in the context of quantum impurity problems. In particular, we demonstrate a setup in which the lowest-energy spectrum of two linear bosonic or fermionic molecules immersed in a quantum many-particle environment can coincide with the anyonic spectrum on the sphere. This paves the way towards experimental realization of anyons on the sphere using molecular impurities. Furthermore, since a change in the alignment of the molecules corresponds to the exchange of the particles on the sphere, such a realization reveals a novel type of exclusion principle for molecular impurities, which could also be of use as a powerful technique to measure the statistics parameter. Finally, our approach opens up a simple numerical route to investigate the spectra of many anyons on the sphere. Accordingly, we present the spectrum of two anyons on the sphere in the presence of a Dirac monopole field.

The study of quasiparticles with fractional statistics, called anyons, has been an active field of research in the past decades. This field has gained a lot of attention, due to the possible usage of these quasiparticles in quantum computation Kitaev (2003); Lloyd (2002); Freedman et al. (2003); Nayak et al. (2008). In contrast to bosons and fermions, anyons acquire a phase eiπαe^{i\pi\alpha} under the exchange of two particles, where the statistics parameter α\alpha is not necessarily an integer. The integer cases α=0\alpha=0 and α=1\alpha=1 represent bosons and fermions, respectively. For non-integer α\alpha, the transformation law ΨeiπαΨ\Psi\rightarrow e^{i\pi\alpha}\Psi under the exchange of two particles, can only be realized by allowing the wave function Ψ\Psi to be multivalued. The idea is that the multiple values keep book of the different possible ways the particles could “braid” around each other. Due to the triviality of the braid group in 3+13+1 dimensions, anyons are a purely low-dimensional phenomenon.

Although anyons are predicted to be realized in the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE) Tsui et al. (1982); Laughlin (1983); Arovas et al. (1984); Thouless et al. (1982); Kane and Mele (2005); Fu et al. (2007); Haldane (1988); Lundholm and Rougerie (2016), they have not yet been unambiguously detected in experiment. Indeed there has been a recent upsurge in interest concerning the realization of anyons in experimentally feasible systems Cooper and Simon (2015); Zhang et al. (2014, 2015); Morampudi et al. (2017); Umucalılar et al. (2018); Correggi et al. (2019). For instance, it has been recently shown in Refs. Yakaboylu and Lemeshko (2018); Yakaboylu et al. (2020) how these quasiparticles emerge from impurities in standard condensed matter systems. Nevertheless, all these works focus on the particles moving on the two-dimensional plane, i.e., on 2\mathbb{R}^{2}. Since the theory of anyons and their statistical behavior are strongly dependent on the geometry and topology of the underlying space, investigations on curved spaces reveal novel features of quantum statistics Thouless and Wu (1985); Einarsson (1990, 1991); Pithis and Ruiz Euler (2015); Ouvry and Polychronakos (2019); Tononi and Salasnich (2019); Tononi et al. (2020); Polychronakos and Ouvry (2020). In particular, theoretical discussions for systems having various geometry and topology have widened our understanding of the FQHE  Haldane (1983); Laughlin (1983).

In the present Letter, we explore the possibility of emerging fractional statistics for particles restricted to move on the sphere, 𝕊2\mathbb{S}^{2}, instead of on the plane. We show that such quasiparticles naturally arise from a system of molecular impurities exchanging angular momentum with a many-particle bath. In the regime of low energies, we identify the spectrum of this system with that of anyons. This does not only allow us to realize anyons on the sphere, but also to open up various numerical approaches to investigate the spectrum of NN anyons on the sphere. To illustrate this, we present the spectrum of two anyons on the sphere in the presence of a Dirac monopole field, extending the recent result of Ref. Ouvry and Polychronakos (2019); Polychronakos and Ouvry (2020). Furthermore, the anyonic behavior of molecular impurities suggests that a novel type of exclusion principle holds, which concerns the alignment of the molecules, instead of the exchange of their actual position.

We start by considering a system of NN free anyons on the two-sphere. The Hamiltonian is given by the sum of the Laplacian of the jjth particle on the sphere: H0=j=1Nj2H_{\text{0}}=-\sum_{j=1}^{N}\nabla_{j}^{2}, which acts on a multivalued wave function Ψ\Psi. By performing a singular gauge transformation, ΨeiβΨ\Psi\rightarrow e^{i\beta}\Psi, one can get rid of the multivaluedness Wu (1984); Mund and Schrader (1993); Lee and Oh (1994); Oh (1996); Rao (2016) and the free anyon Hamiltonian on the sphere H0H_{\text{0}} becomes equivalent to

Hanyon=j=1N(jiAj)2,H_{\mathrm{anyon}}=-\sum_{j=1}^{N}\left(\nabla_{j}-iA_{j}\right)^{2}\,, (1)

which now acts on single valued bosonic (fermionic) wave functions. Here anyons are depicted as bosons (fermions) interacting with the magnetic gauge field AA, which explains that the calculation of the anyonic spectra is very hard Lundholm (2017). Note that A=βA=\nabla\beta is an almost pure gauge field, up to the singularities of β\beta, where the particles meet, and it can be found as the variational solution of the Chern-Simons (CS) Lagrangian L𝕊2=j(Aq˙j+A0)(4πα)1𝕊2dΩAdAL_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}=\sum_{j}\left(A\cdot\dot{q}_{j}+A_{0}\right)-(4\pi\alpha)^{-1}\int_{\mathbb{S}^{2}}\mathrm{d}\Omega\ A\wedge\mathrm{d}A, where qjq_{j} is the position of the nonrelativistic point particle coupled to the CS field, A0A_{0} the time component of the gauge field, and \wedge the wedge product. For anyons on the plane, one can always find a single magnetic potential AA as a solution. However, due to the non trivial homology of 𝕊2\mathbb{S}^{2}, the CS Lagrangian on the sphere can only be solved in two different stereographic coordinate charts: north and south patches, ANA^{N} and ASA^{S}. As they should be a single object in the overlap patch, we require them to be gauge equivalent. This equivalence is given by the Dirac quantization condition (DQC) (N1)α(N-1)\alpha\in\mathbb{Z} Lee and Oh (1994); Oh (1996).

In what follows, in order to simplify our expressions, we represent the stereographic coordinates (x,y)(x,y) as a complex number, z=x+iyz=x+iy. In these coordinates, we define the gauge transformation F=eiβF=e^{i\beta}, with β(z1,..,zN)=iαj<klog(zjzk|zjzk|)\beta(z_{1},..,z_{N})=-i\alpha\underset{j<k}{\sum}\log\left(\frac{z_{j}-z_{k}}{|z_{j}-z_{k}|}\right). The connections (gauge fields) are Az¯j=iDz¯jβ=α(1+|zj|2)2kj(z¯jz¯k)1A_{\bar{z}_{j}}=iD_{\bar{z}_{j}}\beta=-\frac{\alpha(1+|z_{j}|^{2})}{2}\sum_{k\neq j}\left(\bar{z}_{j}-\bar{z}_{k}\right)^{-1} and Azj=iDzjβ=α(1+|zj|2)2kj(zjzk)1A_{z_{j}}=iD_{z_{j}}\beta=\frac{\alpha(1+|z_{j}|^{2})}{2}\sum_{k\neq j}\left(z_{j}-z_{k}\right)^{-1}, where we encode the contribution from the metric on 𝕊2\mathbb{S}^{2} in the differential operators Dz¯j=(1+|zj|2)z¯jD_{\bar{z}_{j}}=(1+|z_{j}|^{2})\partial_{\bar{z}_{j}} and Dzj=(1+|zj|2)zjD_{z_{j}}=(1+|z_{j}|^{2})\partial_{z_{j}} Comtet et al. (1992). In the language of connections, FF represents the holonomy of AA, and it is discontinuous along the lines which connect the particles with the north (south) pole, usually called the Dirac lines. Without loss of generality, we consider the north pole, which corresponds to the choice of zj=cot(θj/2)exp(iφj)z_{j}=\cot(\theta_{j}/2)\exp(i\varphi_{j}), with spherical coordinates θj\theta_{j} and φj\varphi_{j}. These lines represent the magnetic potential in the singular gauge, by assigning the particle an additional phase factor whenever it crosses them. The DQC makes sure that the Dirac lines are invisible, in the sense that one cannot distinguish between the theory where the lines run to the north pole and theories where they run to any other point. This means that our system is rotational invariant, up to gauge equivalences.

The anyon Hamiltonian in our stereographic coordinate system is written as

Hanyon=j=1N(Dzjz¯jAzj)(Dz¯jAz¯j).H_{\mathrm{anyon}}=-\sum^{N}_{j=1}\left(D_{z_{j}}-\bar{z}_{j}-A_{z_{j}}\right)\left(D_{\bar{z}_{j}}-A_{\bar{z}_{j}}\right)\,. (2)

Direct calculations to investigate the spectra of HanyonH_{\mathrm{anyon}} turn out to be problematic, when the spectrum is calculated from the bosonic end. This is due to that the matrix elements of AzjAz¯jA_{z_{j}}A_{\bar{z}_{j}} for certain bosonic states are singular, which is similar to the case of anyons on the plane Yakaboylu et al. (2020). We can overcome this difficulty with the similarity transformation Hanyon=eαj<klog|zjzk|Hanyoneαj<klog|zjzk|H^{\prime}_{\mathrm{anyon}}=e^{\alpha\sum_{j<k}\log|z_{j}-z_{k}|}H_{\mathrm{anyon}}e^{-\alpha\sum_{j<k}\log|z_{j}-z_{k}|}. The advantage is that one of the two magnetic potentials vanishes in this pseudo-gauge and the Hamiltonian simplifies to

Hanyon=j=1N(Dzjz¯jAzj)Dz¯j,H^{\prime}_{\mathrm{anyon}}=-\sum^{N}_{j=1}\left(D_{z_{j}}-\bar{z}_{j}-A^{\prime}_{z_{j}}\right)D_{\bar{z}_{j}}\,, (3)

where the non-zero magnetic potential is Azj=2AzjA^{\prime}_{z_{j}}=2A_{z_{j}}. Note that HanyonH^{\prime}_{\mathrm{anyon}} is self-adjoint in a weighted L2L^{2} space. As we discuss below, while the first form of the anyon Hamiltonian (2) allows us to realize anyons in natural quantum impurity setups, the Hamiltonian (3) provides powerful numerical techniques to calculate the spectra of anyons on the sphere within the simplified impurity models.

We will now consider a general impurity problem of NN bosonic or fermionic impurities on 𝕊2\mathbb{S}^{2} interacting with some Fock space \mathcal{F}. Within the Bogoliubov-Fröhlich theory Fröhlich (1954); Bogolyubov (1947); Pitaevskii and Stringari (2016), the impurity Hamiltonian is

Himp=j=1N(Dzjz¯j)Dz¯j+vωvbvbv\displaystyle H_{\mathrm{imp}}=-\sum_{j=1}^{N}\left(D_{z_{j}}-\bar{z}_{j}\right)D_{\bar{z}_{j}}+\sum_{v}\omega_{v}b_{v}^{\dagger}b_{v} (4)
+vλv(z1,..,zN)(eiβv(z1,..,zN)bv+eiβv(z1,..,zN)bv),\displaystyle+\sum_{v}\lambda_{v}(z_{1},..,z_{N})\left(e^{-i\beta_{v}(z_{1},..,z_{N})}b_{v}^{\dagger}+e^{i\beta_{v}(z_{1},..,z_{N})}b_{v}\right)\,,

where bv,bvb_{v}^{\dagger},b_{v} are the bosonic creation and annihilation operators in \mathcal{F}, ωv\omega_{v} is the energy of the mode vv, and λv(z1,..,zN)\lambda_{v}(z_{1},..,z_{N}) and βv(z1,..,zN)\beta_{v}(z_{1},..,z_{N}) describe the interaction of the impurities with the Fock space, depending on their coordinates z1,..,zNz_{1},..,z_{N}. In the limit of ωv\omega_{v}\rightarrow\infty (the adiabatic limit), one can justify that the lowest spectrum of HimpH_{\mathrm{imp}} is described by the Born-Oppenheimer (BO) approximation; see Ref Yakaboylu et al. (2020) for an analysis of this assumption in the planar case. The projection of the Hamiltonian to the smaller Hilbert space manifests itself as a minimal coupling of the otherwise free particles with effective magnetic potentials Az1,..,AzNA_{z_{1}},..,A_{z_{N}} and a scalar potential Φ\Phi.

Following Ref Yakaboylu et al. (2020), we first apply the transformation S(z1,..,zN)=eivβvbvbvS(z_{1},..,z_{N})=e^{-i\sum_{v}\beta_{v}b_{v}^{\dagger}b_{v}} to Eq. (4), and then project the transformed Hamiltonian onto the coherent state |ϕ(z1,..,zN)=evλvωv(bvbv)|0\ket{\phi(z_{1},..,z_{N})}=e^{-\sum_{v}\frac{\lambda_{v}}{\omega_{v}}(b^{\dagger}_{v}-b_{v})}\ket{0}. The emerging magnetic potential in complex coordinates is then given by

Azjimp=iv(λvωv)2Dzjβv.\displaystyle A^{imp}_{z_{j}}=i\sum_{v}\left(\frac{\lambda_{v}}{\omega_{v}}\right)^{2}D_{z_{j}}\beta_{v}\,. (5)

Let us consider the specific choice βv(z1,..,zN)=ipvj<klog(zjzk|zjzk|)\beta_{v}(z_{1},..,z_{N})=-ip_{v}\underset{j<k}{\sum}\log\left(\frac{z_{j}-z_{k}}{|z_{j}-z_{k}|}\right), which results in Azjimp=α(1+|zj|2)2kj(zjzk)1A^{\mathrm{imp}}_{z_{j}}=\frac{\alpha(1+|z_{j}|^{2})}{2}\sum_{k\neq j}\left(z_{j}-z_{k}\right)^{-1} with α(z1,..,zN)=vpv(λvωv)2\alpha(z_{1},..,z_{N})=\sum_{v}p_{v}\left(\frac{\lambda_{v}}{\omega_{v}}\right)^{2}. We thus see that Az¯jimpA^{\mathrm{imp}}_{\bar{z}_{j}} is the sought CS gauge field and obeys the DQC if α(z1,..,zN)\alpha(z_{1},..,z_{N}) is a constant and satisfies (N1)α(N-1)\alpha\in\mathbb{Z}. We emphasize, however, that for the values of α\alpha which do not satisfy the DQC, the impurity Hamiltonian (4) is still well-defined. The only difference for these values is that the theory is no longer fully rotational invariant, but, instead, it is invariant under rotation around the zz axis. In other words, the Dirac lines, which emerge together with the statistical gauge field, are not invisible Park et al. (1994) and they puncture the sphere. These features have drastic effects on the physical realization of anyons on the sphere in terms of quantum impurities, in comparison to emergent anyons on the plane studied in Ref. Yakaboylu et al. (2020).

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Numerical computations of the energy of two anyons on the sphere in the presence of a Dirac monopole in terms of the relative statistics parameter, i.e., α=0\alpha=0 corresponds to fermions and α=1\alpha=1 to bosons. We set 2B=α2B=\alpha and consider spherical harmonics with the angular momentum up to lmax=8l_{\mathrm{max}}=8 for the numerics. Compare Fig. 1 in Ref. Polychronakos and Ouvry (2020).

In general, the impurity Hamiltonian (4) corresponds to interacting anyons due the presence of the scalar potential Φ\Phi. An impurity Hamiltonian whose lowest-energy spectrum is governed by the anyon Hamiltonian in the pseudo-gauge (3), however, describes free anyons, as the scalar potential vanishes with Az¯=0A_{\bar{z}}=0. Although such an impurity Hamiltonian is not Hermitian and may be harder to realize experimentally, considered as a toy model its non-Hermiticity is harmless for our purposes and it opens up simple numerical approaches to calculate the spectra of anyons on the sphere.

Our numerical tools work for an arbitrary number of particles. Nevertheless, we will here study only the two-anyon case, since the computational effort strongly scales with the number of particles. Furthermore, we investigate impurities interacting with a Dirac monopole field BB. This allows us to investigate the spectrum for all values of α\alpha, as the DQC in the presence of a Dirac monopole field is 2B(N1)α2B-(N-1)\alpha\in\mathbb{Z} Ouvry and Polychronakos (2019); Polychronakos and Ouvry (2020). Accordingly, we consider the following simple model

Himp=HB+ω(bb+αp)\displaystyle H^{\prime}_{\mathrm{imp}}=H_{B}+\omega\left(b^{\dagger}b+\frac{\alpha}{p}\right) (6)
+αpω(eplog(z1z2)b+eplog(z1z2)b),\displaystyle+\sqrt{\frac{\alpha}{p}}\omega\left(e^{-p\log\left(z_{1}-z_{2}\right)}b^{\dagger}+e^{p\log\left(z_{1}-z_{2}\right)}b\right)\,,

where HB=H0+j=12AzjBDz¯jH_{B}=H_{0}+\sum^{2}_{j=1}A^{B}_{z_{j}}D_{\bar{z}_{j}} describes the bosonic or fermionic particles interacting with the Dirac monopole field BB generated by the gauge field AzjB=2Bz¯jA^{B}_{z_{j}}=2B\bar{z}_{j}, pp is an integer, and we subtracted the vacuum energy, ωα/p-\omega\alpha/p, of the pure Fock space part of the Hamiltonian.

One could calculate the lowest spectrum of HimpH^{\prime}_{\mathrm{imp}} by diagonalizing the matrix S(A);n|Himp|S(A);n\bra{S(A);n}H^{\prime}_{\mathrm{imp}}\ket{S^{\prime}(A^{\prime});n^{\prime}}, where |S(A)=|Yl1,m1S(A)Yl2,m2\ket{S(A)}=\ket{Y_{l_{1},m_{1}}\otimes_{S(A)}Y_{l_{2},m_{2}}} are the impurity basis with Yl,mY_{l,m} being the spherical harmonics, S(A)\otimes_{S(A)} the (anti-)symmetric tensor product, and |n\ket{n} the nn-particle state in the Fock space. Instead of this direct diagonalization technique, we first diagonalize the Fock space part of the Hamiltonian with the displacement operator. The anyon Hamiltonian (3) in the presence of a Dirac monopole field, which emerges in the limit of ω\omega\to\infty, is, then, given by

HanyonB=HB+αp(eplog(z1z2)H0eplog(z1z2)H0),H^{\prime B}_{\mathrm{anyon}}=H_{B}+\frac{\alpha}{p}\left(e^{p\log\left(z_{1}-z_{2}\right)}H_{\mathrm{0}}e^{-p\log\left(z_{1}-z_{2}\right)}-H_{\mathrm{0}}\right)\,, (7)

see Supplemental Material for the derivation. We underline that a similar form of the Hamiltonian (7) for anyons on the plane has been previously introduced in Ref. Yakaboylu et al. (2020), where the second term of the right hand side was written in terms of composite bosons/fermions for an even integer pp. Extending this approach we use here Bose-Fermi mixtures which enable us to set p=1p=1. Within such a simple choice Eq. (7) can be written as the following matrix equation

EanyonB=Ebos+2BWS+α(Z1EferZEbos),E^{B}_{\mathrm{anyon}}=E_{\text{bos}}+2B\,W_{S}+\alpha\left(Z^{-1}E_{\mathrm{fer}}Z-E_{\mathrm{bos}}\right)\,, (8)

where the elements of the matrices are given by Ebos=S|H0|SE_{\mathrm{bos}}=\bra{S}H_{0}\ket{S^{\prime}}, Efer=A|H0|AE_{\mathrm{fer}}=\bra{A}H_{0}\ket{A^{\prime}}, WS=S|j=12z¯jDz¯j|SW_{S}=\bra{S}\sum^{2}_{j=1}\bar{z}_{j}D_{\bar{z}_{j}}\ket{S^{\prime}}, and Z1=S|z1z2|AZ^{-1}=\bra{S}z_{1}-z_{2}\ket{A}. As the latter two terms are straightforward to calculate numerically, and the matrix ZZ can be obtained by taking the (pseudo)inverse of Z1Z^{-1}, Eq. (8) opens up a powerful route to calculate the anyonic spectrum. The spectrum from the fermionic end in terms of the relative statistics parameter can be calculated simply with the replacement of the basis |S(A)|A(S)\ket{S(A)}\to\ket{A(S)} in Eq. (8).

As an example, we compute the eigenvalues for α\alpha ranging from 0 to 11. For an easier comparison with the result existing in Ref. Polychronakos and Ouvry (2020), we calculate the spectrum from the fermionic end. The result presented in Fig. 1 is consistent with the one shown in Ref. Polychronakos and Ouvry (2020), where the spectrum was calculated only for the subset of energy levels with unit total angular momentum.

The general form of the impurity Hamiltonian (4) allow us also to physically realize anyons on the sphere in terms of quantum impurities. The kinetic energy of the particles on the sphere, which is given by the Laplacian, (Dzjz¯j)Dz¯j-\left(D_{z_{j}}-\bar{z}_{j}\right)D_{\bar{z}_{j}}, can be realized as the angular momentum operator 𝑳j2\boldsymbol{L}_{j}^{2}. The latter can be considered as the Hamiltonian of linear molecules, which enables us to map rotation of molecules to motion of point particles on the sphere. Consequently, instead of point-like impurities, which have been considered for the planar case in Ref. Yakaboylu et al. (2020), we consider here linear molecules and explore the angular momentum exchange with the bath. Such a realization exposes a novel correlation between molecular impurities. Specifically, the exchange of the particles on the sphere corresponds to a change in the alignment of the molecules, but not the exchange of the molecules themselves, see Fig. 2 (Top). Therefore, the emerging statistical interaction manifests itself in the alignment of molecules.

To illustrate this in a transparent way, we consider the simple impurity Hamiltonian (6) in the absence of the Dirac monopole. We investigate the alignment (cosθ1cosθ2)2\langle\left(\cos\theta_{1}-\cos\theta_{2}\right)^{2}\rangle as a function of the statistics parameter for two molecules. In Fig. 2 (Bottom) we present the alignment for the ground state, which is obtained from Eq. (8) for the case of B=0B=0. We note that the Hamiltonian is still well-defined for the values of α\alpha which do not satisfy the DQC as we discussed before. Thus, the alignment of the molecules could be used as an experimental measure of the statistics parameter. Such a measurement can be performed, for instance, within the technique of laser-induced molecular alignment Friedrich and Herschbach (1995); Lemeshko et al. (2013). Further discussion of the alignment of molecules as a consequence of the statistical interaction will be the subject of future work.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Top) Realization of anyons on the sphere in terms of linear molecules immersed in a quantum many-particle environment. A change in the alignment of the molecules (dumbbells), which is depicted by the white arrows, corresponds to the exchange of the particles on the sphere (dots), shown by the curvy black arrows. (Bottom) The alignment (cosθ1cosθ2)2\langle\left(\cos\theta_{1}-\cos\theta_{2}\right)^{2}\rangle as a function of the absolute statistics parameter for the ground state. The curve follows the bosonic state |Y0,0SY0,0\ket{Y_{0,0}\otimes_{S}Y_{0,0}} at α=0\alpha=0 to the fermionic state |Y1,0AY0,0\ket{Y_{1,0}\otimes_{A}Y_{0,0}} at α=1\alpha=1. We consider spherical harmonics with the angular momentum up to lmax=8l_{\mathrm{max}}=8 for the numerics.

A physical realization of the interaction between the molecules and a bath is also natural in the physics of impurities. Indeed, it was shown that the molecular impurities rotating in superfluid helium can be described within an impurity problem Schmidt and Lemeshko (2015, 2016); Lemeshko and Schmidt (2016). The resulting quasiparticle, which is called the angulon, represents a quantum impurity exchanging orbital angular momentum with a bath of quantum oscillators, and serves as a reliable model for the rotation of molecules in superfluids Lemeshko (2017). Therefore, we consider the following angulon Hamiltonian Yakaboylu et al. (2018); Li et al. (2019)

Hangulon=j=12𝑳j2+V(q1,q2)+k,l,mωk,l,mbk,l,mbk,l,m\displaystyle H_{\text{angulon}}=\sum^{2}_{j=1}\boldsymbol{L}_{j}^{2}+V(q_{1},q_{2})+\sum_{k,l,m}\omega_{k,l,m}b_{k,l,m}^{\dagger}b_{k,l,m} (9)
+k,l,mλk,l,m(q1,q2)(eiβk,l,m(q1,q2)bk,l,m+H.c.),\displaystyle+\sum_{k,l,m}\lambda_{k,l,m}(q_{1},q_{2})\left(e^{-i\beta_{k,l,m}(q_{1},q_{2})}b^{\dagger}_{k,l,m}+\text{H.c.}\right)\,,

where b^k,l,m\hat{b}^{\dagger}_{k,l,m} and b^k,l,m\hat{b}_{k,l,m} are the bosonic creation and annihilation operators written in the spherical basis Schmidt and Lemeshko (2015), qi=(θi,φi)q_{i}=(\theta_{i},\varphi_{i}) are the angular coordinates representing the molecular rotation of the ii-th molecule, VV is a confining potential, and H.c. stands for Hermitian conjugate. Note that the coupling terms might depend on the intermolecular distance, as well. For heavy molecules the BO approximation can be justified with a gapped dispersion ωk,l,m\omega_{k,l,m}. Furthermore, following our previous reasoning and Eq. (5), if the impurity-bath coupling satisfies the relation ik,l,m(λk,l,mωk,l,m)2Dzjβk,l,m=Azji\sum_{k,l,m}\left(\frac{\lambda_{k,l,m}}{\omega_{k,l,m}}\right)^{2}D_{z_{j}}\beta_{k,l,m}=A_{z_{j}}, the lowest-energy spectrum of the two linear molecules immersed in the bath coincide with the spectrum of two anyons on the sphere. In principle, such an interaction is feasible with the state-of-art techniques in the physics of superfluid helium as well as ultracold molecules.

In order to present a simple and intuitive realization, we first neglect the intermolecular distance. This enables us to define the interaction term simply as λk,l,m(q1,q2)eiβk,l,m(q1,q2)=uk,lj=12Yl,m(qj)\lambda_{k,l,m}(q_{1},q_{2})e^{-i\beta_{k,l,m}(q_{1},q_{2})}=u_{k,l}\sum_{j=1}^{2}Y_{l,m}(q_{j}) with the impurity-bath coupling uk,lu_{k,l}. For a physical configuration, we consider molecular impurities in superfluid helium nanodroplets. The corresponding coupling captures the details of the molecule-helium interaction. For the form of the coupling and the relevant parameters we refer the reader to Supplemental Material and Ref. Cherepanov and Lemeshko (2017); Cherepanov et al. (2019), where the model has been used in order to describe angulon instabilities and oscillations observed in the experiment. Furthermore, the dispersion relation of superfluid helium allows us to achieve a gapped dispersion at the roton minimum ωr\omega_{r} Lemeshko and Schmidt (2016). Following the experimental realization proposed in Ref. Yakaboylu et al. (2020) for anyons on the plane, we also couple the impurities to an additional constant magnetic field and rotate the whole system at the cyclotron frequency Ω\Omega, which breaks time reversal symmetry so that anyons can emerge on the lowest-energy spectrum.

A priori, the emerging statistics parameter α=α(θ)\alpha=\alpha(\theta) depends on the relative angle θ\theta between the points q1q_{1} and q2q_{2}. However, with a careful choice of the model parameters, α\alpha becomes approximately constant with the condition Ωlmax/ωr1\Omega\,l_{\text{max}}/\omega_{r}\gg 1, see Supplemental Material. The condition imposes that the cyclotron frequency should be at the order of the roton minimum. This implies that molecular impurities should be subjected to a strong magnetic field at the order of MωrM\omega_{r} with MM being the mass of the molecules. The θ\theta dependence of α\alpha is demonstrated in Fig. 3. In general, the statistics parameter does not satisfy the DQC. Therefore, the molecular impurities correspond to anyons interacting with the magnetic potential depicted by the Dirac lines, with broken rotational symmetry. We also note that with the additional confining potential, VV, the particles are confined to one of the half spheres so that the statistics parameter becomes accessible to the experiment.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The dependence of the statistics parameter α\alpha on the relative angle θ\theta. The computation is performed for the parameters modeling the molecule-helium interaction, given in Supplemental Material. The other parameters are ωr=1\omega_{r}=1, Ω=1.1\Omega=1.1, and lmax=20l_{\text{max}}=20.

Thus, we see that a system of two linear molecules exchanging angular momentum with a many-particle bath can give rise to a system of quasiparticles with anyonic statistics, and can be realized by considering molecular impurities in superfluid helium droplets. It would be interesting to continue this approach and investigate, whether one can generalize the results above e.g. to non-Abelian Chern-Simons particles with the help of a higher order Born-Oppenheimer approximation.

Acknowledgements.
We are grateful to A. Ghazaryan for valuable discussions and also thank the anonymous referees for comments. D.L. acknowledges financial support from the Göran Gustafsson Foundation (grant no. 1804) and LMU Munich. M.L. gratefully acknowledges financial support by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreements No 801770).

References

\foreach\x

in 1,…,5 See pages \x of SupplementalMaterial12.pdf