This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Modeling photon radiation in soft hadronic collisions thanks: Presented at “Diffraction and Low-xx 2022”, Corigliano Calabro (Italy), September 24-30, 2022.

B. Z. Kopeliovich    I. K. Potashnikova
M. Krelina
K. Reygers
Departamento de Física, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Avenida España 1680, Valparaíso, Chile Czech Technical University in Prague, FNSPE, Břehová 7, 11519 Prague, Czech Republic Physikalisches Institut, University of Heidelberg, Germany
Abstract

Soft hadronic collisions with multiple production of (anti)quarks accompanied with soft photon radiation are described in terms of higher Fock states of the colliding hadrons, which contain a photon component as well. The Fock state distribution functions are shaped with the Quark-Gluon String Model. Photon radiation by quarks is described within the color-dipole phenomenology. The results of calculations are in a good accord with available data in a wide range of transverse momenta of the photons.

It was demonstrated in [1] that the bremsstrahlung model (BM) [2], used as a reference for comparison with the production rate of small-kTk_{T} photons radiated in inelastic hadronic collisions at high energy, is incorrect, what led to so called soft photon puzzle (see e.g. in [3]). Therefore, an alternative description of soft photon radiation is required.

1 Parton model description at a hard scale

Within the parton model radiation of a heavy photon of mass MM (Drell-Yan) in the target rest frame, based on the factorization theorem, has the form,

d4σdM2dxFdkT2=αem3πM2x1x1+x2\displaystyle\frac{d^{4}\sigma}{dM^{2}dx_{F}dk_{T}^{2}}=\frac{\alpha_{em}}{3\pi M^{2}}\frac{x_{1}}{x_{1}+x_{2}} x11dαα2fZf2{qf(x1α)+q¯f(x1α)}\displaystyle\int\limits_{x_{1}}^{1}\frac{d\alpha}{\alpha^{2}}\sum\limits_{f}Z_{f}^{2}\left\{q_{f}\left(\frac{x_{1}}{\alpha}\right)+\bar{q}_{f}\left(\frac{x_{1}}{\alpha}\right)\right\}
×dσ(qfNγX)dlnαd2kT,\displaystyle\times\frac{d\sigma(q_{f}N\to\gamma^{*}X)}{d\ln{\alpha}d^{2}k_{T}}, (1)

with the standart notations, α=p+γ/p+q\alpha=p_{+}^{\gamma}/p_{+}^{q}; x1x2=M2/sx_{1}x_{2}=M^{2}/s; x1x2=xFx_{1}-x_{2}=x_{F}.

The hard perturbative scale is imposed by the large invariant mass MM of the photon (dilepton). The sum of the (anti)quark distribution function in (1) is given by the well measured proton stricture function F2(x,M2)F_{2}(x,M^{2}). The parton distribution functions in the colliding hadrons are illustrated by a parton comb in Fig. 1.

Refer to caption


Figure 1: Space-time pattern of particle production at high energies.

2 Parton model at a soft scale

Extrapolation of expression (1) to the soft regime is a challenge, since involves unknown nonperturbative effects. That can be done only within models. For the quark distribution function we rely on the popular and successful quark-gluon string model (QGSM) [4, 5], or a similar dual parton model [6, 7]. Both models assume Regge behavior at the end-points x1x\to 1 or x0x\to 0, of the quark distribution functions, and a simple, but ad hoc, interpolation at medium xx. We skip the simple, but lengthy expressions. The details can be found e.g. in [5].

The last factor in the radiation cross section (1) dσ(qfNγX)/dlnα/d2kTd\sigma(q_{f}N\to\gamma X)/d\ln{\alpha}/d^{2}k_{T} is calculated at the soft scale within the color dipole phenomenology [8]-[13], adjusted to precise data on DIS from HERA,

dσ(qNγX)dlnαd2kT\displaystyle\frac{d\sigma(qN\to\gamma X)}{d\ln{\alpha}d^{2}k_{T}} =\displaystyle= 12π)2d2r1d2r2exp[ikT(r1r2)]\displaystyle\frac{1}{2\pi)^{2}}\int d^{2}r_{1}d^{2}r_{2}\,\exp[i\vec{k}_{T}(\vec{r}_{1}-\vec{r}_{2})] (2)
×\displaystyle\times Ψγq(α,r1)Ψγq(α,r2)σγ(r1,r2,α),\displaystyle\Psi^{*}_{\gamma q}(\alpha,\vec{r}_{1})\Psi_{\gamma q}(\alpha,\vec{r}_{2})\,\sigma_{\gamma}(\vec{r}_{1},\vec{r}_{2},\alpha),

where

σγ(r1,r2,α)=12{σq¯q(αr1)+σq¯q(αr2)σq¯q[α(r1r2)]}.\sigma_{\gamma}(\vec{r}_{1},\vec{r}_{2},\alpha)={1\over 2}\left\{\sigma_{\bar{q}q}(\alpha r_{1})+\sigma_{\bar{q}q}(\alpha r_{2})-\sigma_{\bar{q}q}[\alpha(\vec{r}_{1}-\vec{r}_{2})]\right\}. (3)

The quark-photon distribution function reads,

Ψγq(α,r)=αem2πχfO^χiK0(αmqr),\Psi_{\gamma q}(\alpha,\vec{r})=\frac{\sqrt{\alpha_{em}}}{2\pi}\,\chi_{f}\hat{O}\chi_{i}K_{0}(\alpha m_{q}r), (4)

and

O^=e{imqα2[n×σ]+α[σ×]i(2α)}.\hat{O}=\vec{e^{*}}\left\{im_{q}\alpha^{2}\left[\vec{n}\times\vec{\sigma}\right]+\alpha\left[\vec{\sigma}\times\vec{\nabla}\right]-i(2-\alpha)\vec{\nabla}\right\}. (5)

The q¯q\bar{q}q dipole-nucleon cross section σq¯q(r)\sigma_{\bar{q}q}(r) in (3) has been parametrized and fitted to DIS and photoproduction data from NMC and HERA. The details can be found in [10].

Combining the QGSM distribution functions with the cross section (2) results in the radiation cross section, which is parameter free (we do not fit the data to be explained), either in the shape of kTk_{T} distribution, or in the absolute values. We assumed a primordial transverse momentum distribution of the incoming quarks to have a Gaussian shape with qT2=0.35GeV\sqrt{\langle q_{T}^{2}\rangle}=0.35\,\mbox{GeV}. Correspondingly the radiated photon acquires additional transverse momentum kT=αqT\vec{k}^{\prime}_{T}=\alpha\vec{q}_{T}.

3 Comparison with data

The results of calculations are compared with data on the radiative cross section of π+pγ+X\pi^{+}p\to\gamma+X from the NA22 experiment at Elab=250GeVE_{lab}=250\,\mbox{GeV} in Fig. 2, and from WA91/WA83 experiments at Elab=280GeVE_{lab}=280\,\mbox{GeV} in Fig. 3.

Refer to caption

Figure 2: Comparison with data of the NA22 experiment [14] for π+pγX\pi^{+}p\to\gamma X at Elab=250GeVE_{lab}=250\,\mbox{GeV}.

Refer to caption

Figure 3: Comparison with data of the WA83 [15] and WA91 [16] experiments for π+pγX\pi^{+}p\to\gamma X at Elab=280GeVE_{lab}=280\,\mbox{GeV}.

We see no sizable deviation from data at small kTk_{T}, i.e. no anomalous enhancement of soft photons.

At somewhat higher energy Elab=450GeVE_{lab}=450\,\mbox{GeV} [17] our calculations depicted by solid curve in Fig. 4, apparently overestimate the data of the WA102 experiment.

Refer to caption


Figure 4: Comparison with data of the WA102 [17] experiment for π+BeγX\pi^{+}Be\to\gamma X at Elab=450GeVE_{lab}=450\,\mbox{GeV}.

However, the experiment had specific cuts, namely, events with number of charge tracks Nch>8N_{ch}>8, were excluded. To calculate the multiplicity distribution we assume the Poisson distribution of the number of unitary cut Pomerons, and employed the result of QGSM [18]. So we obtained a suppression factor

δ=Nch=08Nch=0=0.39.\delta=\frac{\sum\limits_{N_{ch}=0}^{8}}{\sum\limits_{N_{ch}=0}^{\infty}}=0.39. (6)

Dashed curve, which incorporate this factor well agrees with data.

4 Conclusions

  • The observed enhancement of low-kTk_{T} photons in comparison with incorrect calculations, should not be treated as a puzzle.

  • The parton model description of photon radiation is extrapolated to to the soft scale regime. The (anti)quark distribution functions are evaluated within the popular quark-gluon string model, based of Regge phenomenology.

  • Soft photon bremsstrahlung by projectile quarks is calculated within the color-dipole model. The quark-antiquark dipole cross section is fitted to DIS and soft photo-production data in a wide range of transverse dipole separations and energies.

Acknowledgements: This work of B.Z.K. and I.K.P. was supported in part by grant (Chile) ANID PIA/APOYO AFB220004.
The work of M.K. was supported by the project of the International Mobility of Researchers - MSCA IF IV at CTU in Prague CZ.02.2.69/0.0/0.0/20_079/0017983, Czech Republic.

References

  • [1] B. Z. Kopeliovich, I. K. Potashnikova, Ivan Schmidt, “The Low theorem for diffractive bremsstrahlung and the soft photon puzzle”, Diffraction and Low-x 2022, Sept. 24-30, 2022, Corigliano Calabro, Italy.
  • [2] A.T. Goshaw et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1065 (1079).
  • [3] K. Reygers, “Soft photons: an experimental overview”, ALICE workshop, Oc. 13-15, 2020, Heidelberg.
  • [4] A. Kaidalov, Phys.Lett. B116 (1982) 459.
  • [5] A. Kaidalov and M. Poghosyan, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 (2010) 397.
  • [6] A. Capella, U. Sukhatme, C-I Tan, J. Tran Thanh Van, Phys. Rept. 236 (1994) 225.
  • [7] A.Capella, A. Kaidalov, C. Merino, J.Tran Thanh Van, Phys. Lett. B 337 (1994) 358.
  • [8] B.Z. Kopeliovich, Hirschegg 1995, hep-ph/9609385.
  • [9] B.Z. Kopeliovich, A. Schäfer, A. Tarasov, Phys. Rev. C 59 (1999) 1609.
  • [10] B.Z. Kopeliovich, A. Schäfer, A. Tarasov, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 054022.
  • [11] B.Z. Kopeliovich, J. Raufeisen and A. Tarasov, Phys. Lett. B503 (2001) 91 .
  • [12] B.Z. Kopeliovich, A. Rezaeian, H-J. Pirner, I. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 653 (2007) 210.
  • [13] B.Z. Kopeliovich, E. Levin, A. Rezaeian, I. Schmidt, Phys. Lett. B 675 (2009) 190.
  • [14] EHS-NA22 Collaboration., F. Botterweck, et al., Z. Phys. C 51, (1991) 541.
  • [15] WA83 Collaboration, S. Banerjee et al., Phys. Lett. B 305 (1993) 182.
  • [16] A. Belogianni et al., Phys. Lett. B 548 (2002) 122.
  • [17] J. Antos et al., Z. Phys. C 59 (1993) 547.
  • [18] A. B. Kaidalov and K. A. Ter-Martirosian, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 39 (1984) 979.