This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Massive Scalar Perturbations and Quasi-Resonance of Rotating Black Hole in Analog Gravity

Hang Liu [email protected] College of Physics and Materials Science, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China    Hong Guo [email protected] Escola de Engenharia de Lorena, Universidade de São Paulo, 12602-810, Lorena, SP, Brazil
Abstract

It was reported that the optical field fluctuations in self-defocusing media can be described by sound waves propagating in a two-dimensional photon-fluid which is controlled by the driving laser beam. The photon-fluid can be regarded as the background where the sound waves propagate in the way like a scalar field propagating in curved spacetime, thus providing a platform to study physics in analog gravity. In this analog gravity model, to be more specific, in the analog rotating black hole background, we study the quasinormal modes (QNMs) of massive scalar field perturbations, as a natural extension of the recent work on the massless QNMs in photon-fluid. We analyze the properties of the spectrum of fundamental QNMs which are calculated by Continued Fraction Method and WKB approximation method. We also investigate the quasi-resonance and find that it may exist in this analog gravity model. The existence of quasi-resonance is important to study the QNMs in analog gravity apparatus due to its slow damping rate and longevity which give us better opportunity to probe and study it in laboratory.

I Introduction

Black holes, predicted as fundamental “particles” within the framework of general relativity, play the role as the crucial objects for understanding the evolution of the universe and probing the theories of gravity Yagi:2016jml . With the detection of gravitational waves produced by binary black hole mergers via ground-based gravitational wave detectors LIGOScientific:2016lio ; LIGOScientific:2016vlm ; LIGOScientific:2018mvr , gravitational wave astronomy has emerged as a significant tool for systematically investigating black hole properties and near-horizon physics Barausse:2016eii ; Barack:2018yly ; Baibhav:2019rsa . However, space-based gravitational wave detectors like LISA LISA:2017pwj , Taiji Hu:2017mde ; Gong:2021gvw and TianQin Gong:2021gvw ; TianQin:2015yph , which are capable of detecting low-frequency gravitational waves, will not be operational for several years. Meanwhile, the analysis of gravitational wave data still faces challenges such as immense computational demands and the need for a vast template database Christensen:2022bxb ; Thrane:2018qnx . On the other hand, we also face huge challenges of observing some intriguing features of black holes in astrophysical environments, such as Hawking radiation, which is rather difficult to be observed, and such a difficulty prevents us from examining the validity of quantum field theory in curved spacetime. These obstacles delay the fulfillment of the growing demand for exploring black holes in the near term.

Due to the challenges in the detections of black holes and their relevant important characteristics arising from fundamental physics, it is fantastic if we can study black hole physics in laboratory by contemporary technology via the language of analogy, i.e. analog gravity. The theoretical side of this idea had been realized by Unruh in 1981, whose pioneering work Unruh:1980cg laid the basis of the analog gravity research over the past decades. Since then, people have made significant strides in this field. The analog studies of properties associated with astrophysical black holes have been extensively discussed, including mechanisms such as black hole superradiance Basak:2002aw ; Richartz:2009mi ; Anacleto:2011tr ; Patrick:2020baa , and ongoing discussions on black hole thermodynamics Zhang:2016pqx , particularly topics like black hole entropy Zhao:2012zz ; Anacleto:2014apa ; Anacleto:2015awa ; Anacleto:2016qll . In recent years, relativistic acoustic black holes have also been constructed in Minkowski spacetime using the Abel mechanism Ge:2010wx ; Anacleto:2010cr ; Anacleto:2011bv ; Anacleto:2013esa and other methods Bilic:1999sq ; Fagnocchi:2010sn ; Visser:2010xv ; Giacomelli:2017eze . Furthermore, researchers have explored acoustic black holes in curved spacetimes, including Schwarzschild spacetime Guo:2020blq ; Qiao:2021trw ; Vieira:2021ozg ; Ditta:2023lny and Reissner-Nordström (RN) spacetime Ling:2021vgk ; Molla:2023hou , as detailed in Ge:2019our . On another front, the first acoustic black hole was successfully created in a rubidium Bose-Einstein condensate as early as 2009 Lahav:2009wx . Following this, several key experiments MunozdeNova:2018fxv ; Isoard:2019buh reported observations of thermal Hawking radiation in analog black holes and corresponding temperature measurements. For the latest research on analog Hawking radiation, see Anacleto:2019rfn ; Balbinot:2019mei ; eskin2021hawking . A series of foundational works PhysRevA.70.063615 ; PhysRevA.69.033602 ; PhysRevLett.91.240407 laid the groundwork for studying analog gravity in ultracold quantum gases, which has seen further progress in recent years Tian:2020bze ; PhysRevA.106.053319 ; PhysRevD.105.124066 ; PhysRevD.107.L121502 . Additionally, an exciting recent breakthrough Svancara:2023yrf reported the observation of rotating curved spacetime characteristics within giant quantum vortices, further fueling interest in the study of analog gravity.

In modern black hole physics, quasinormal modes (QNMs) serve as a vital tool for probing information of black holes Berti:2009kk ; Konoplya:2011qq . Linear perturbations around a perturbed black hole typically manifest as damped oscillations, where the real part of the QNM corresponds to the oscillation frequency, and the imaginary part determines the lifetime of the perturbation. During the ringdown phase of binary black hole mergers Ma:2022wpv ; Ghosh:2021mrv and in extreme mass-ratio inspiral gravitational wave systems Thornburg:2019ukt ; Nasipak:2019hxh , the QNM spectrum carries vital information about the black hole. Notably, QNMs are independent of the initial conditions of the perturbation, which makes them essential in gravitational wave observations and the study of astrophysical black holes Franchini:2023eda . Due to the importance of QNMs, it is natural and significant to study QNMs in analog gravity. Actually, QNMs have garnered significant attention in the study of analog gravity models. The theoretical studies on quasinormal modes (QNMs) can be traced back to early works on 2+1 and 3+1 dimensional acoustic black hole models Visser:1997ux ; Berti:2004ju ; Cardoso:2004fi , and recent advances in this area have also garnered widespread attention Daghigh:2014mwa ; Hegde:2018xub ; Patrick:2020yyy ; Liu:2024vde . In 2018, Torres demonstrated that vortices in the scattering of water waves by rotating analog black holes could be fully characterized by QNMs Torres:2017vaz . This finding was further supported by experimental validation, where the QNMs of a 2+1 dimensional analog rotating black hole was studied Torres:2020tzs . Additionally, the excitation of QNMs in the Hawking radiation spectrum of analog black holes has been explored within quantum fluid analog models Jacquet:2021scv , highlighting the broader relevance of QNMs in both classical and quantum analog systems. The study of QNMs in analog black holes allows for mutual validation through both theoretical and experimental approaches, thereby establishing a key research method for simulating and analyzing astrophysical black holes within the framework of analog gravity using laboratory platforms.

Recently, it was realized that rotating acoustic black holes can be generated within a self-defocusing optical cavity based on the fact that the fluid dynamics are also applicable to nonlinear optics PhysRevA.78.063804 , thereby establishing a new platform which is called photon-fluid for analog black hole research. The spin of the current analog black hole can be achieved by introducing a driving light beam with a vortex profile into the cavity. Ever since the seminal work of PhysRevA.78.063804 , this new analog gravity system has attracted much attentions in community, including research works on acoustic superradiance and superradiant instability PhysRevA.80.065802 ; Ciszak:2021xlw , experimental construction of this analog rotating black hole Vocke2018 , measurement of superradiance in laboratory Braidotti:2021nhw , and the potential applications of the fluids system in the analog simulations of quantum gravity Braunstein:2023jpo . In addition, a recent paper Krauss:2024vst provided exciting insights about employing photon-fluid system to help resolve long-standing problems related to quantum gravity, including the black hole information-loss paradox and the removal of spacetime singularities.

These advancements have demonstrated that the photon-fluid system is a versatile and promising platform with significant potential to enhance our understanding of gravity through analogy. In this paper, we focus on investigating the massive QNMs of an analog rotating black hole under the massive scalar field perturbations in a two-dimensional photon-fluid model. As a natural extension of the recent work on the massless QNMs in photon-fluid Liu:2024vde , we examine the properties of fundamental QNM spectra, calculated using the Continued Fraction Method and WKB approximation. Additionally, we explore the possibility of quasi-resonance within this analog gravity model, noting its potential significance. The presence of quasi-resonance is particularly important for studying QNMs in analog gravity experiments, as its slow damping rate and extended duration provide a valuable opportunity for detailed investigation in a laboratory setting. With the experimental advancements mentioned above, we are optimistic that the QNMs we have investigated here will soon be observable in apparatus of this photon-fluid model by which provides a novel testbed to black hole physics and theories of gravitation.

This work is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we derive the master equation of the fluctuation field. In Sec. III, we introduce the numerical methods employed in our calculations of QNF. In Sec. IV, the numerical results of QNF are demonstrated and analyzed. In Sec. V, we investigate the existence of quasi-resonance. The Sec. VI, as the last section, is devoted to conclusions and discussions.

II Basic Formulas

In this section, we briefly illustrate the basic parts of this photon-fluid system. The dynamics of the photon-fluid in our consideration is governed by the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NSE) describing the slowly varying envelope of the optical field

Ez=i2k2Eikn2n0E|E|2,\frac{\partial E}{\partial z}=\frac{i}{2k}\nabla^{2}E-i\frac{kn_{2}}{n_{0}}E|E|^{2}, (1)

where zz is the coordinate of propagation direction, |E|2|E|^{2} stands for optical field intensity and 2E\nabla^{2}E is defined by the transverse coordinates (x,y)(x,y), k=2πn0/λk=2\pi n_{0}/\lambda is the wave number, λ\lambda is the laser wavelength in vacuum, n0n_{0} is the linear refractive index, nn is the intensity dependent refractive index defined by n=n0Δn=n0n2|E|2n=n_{0}-\Delta n=n_{0}-n_{2}|E|^{2} where n2>0n_{2}>0 is the material local nonlinear coefficient. Since the dynamics of this system lives on the transverse plane (x,y)(x,y), the propagation coordinate zz acts as effective time by relation t=n0czt=\frac{n_{0}}{c}z. In addition to the local nonlinearity, a non-local thermo-optical nonlinearities can be introduced to some medium such that Marino:2019flp ; Ciszak:2021xlw

Δn=n2|E|2+nth.\Delta n=n_{2}|E|^{2}+n_{th}. (2)

Based on NSE, the following effective metric of an analog rotating black hole can be obtained PhysRevA.78.063804 ; PhysRevA.80.065802 ; Ciszak:2021xlw

ds2=(1rHrrH4ΩH2r2)dt2+(1rHr)1dr22rH2ΩHdθdt+r2dθ2,ds^{2}=-\left(1-\frac{r_{H}}{r}-\frac{r_{H}^{4}\Omega_{H}^{2}}{r^{2}}\right)dt^{2}+\left(1-\frac{r_{H}}{r}\right)^{-1}dr^{2}-2r_{H}^{2}\Omega_{H}d\theta dt+r^{2}d\theta^{2}, (3)

where rHr_{H} is the event horizon, ΩH\Omega_{H} represents the angular velocity of the black hole, ξ\xi describes the healing length, jj is an integer representing the topological charge of the optical vortices, and they are given by

rH=ξ2r0,ΩH=jξπrH2,ξ=λ2n0n2ρ0.r_{H}=\frac{\xi^{2}}{r_{0}},\quad\Omega_{H}=\frac{j\xi}{\pi r_{H}^{2}},\quad\xi=\frac{\lambda}{2\sqrt{n_{0}n_{2}\rho_{0}}}. (4)

In this analog black hole back ground, the propagation of density perturbation ρ1\rho_{1} of optical field is governed by a massive Klein-Gordon equation Ciszak:2021xlw

ρ1μ2ρ1=1gμ(ggμνμρ1)μ2ρ1=0,\Box\rho_{1}-\mu^{2}\rho_{1}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{-g}}\partial_{\mu}(\sqrt{-g}g^{\mu\nu}\partial_{\mu}\rho_{1})-\mu^{2}\rho_{1}=0, (5)

where the mass term μ2\mu^{2} comes from the introduction of the non-local thermo-optical nonlinearities nthn_{th} introduced by Eq. (2), and gg is the determinant of the effective metric. With the massive Klein-Gordon equation, we can obtain the master equation of the perturbation field

d2Ψ(r)dr2+U(ω,r)Ψ(r)=0,\displaystyle\frac{d^{2}\Psi(r_{\ast})}{dr^{2}_{\ast}}+U(\omega,r)\Psi(r_{\ast})=0, (6)
U(ω,r)=(ωmΩHr2)2(11r)(m2r2+12r314r2(11r)+μ2),\displaystyle U(\omega,r)=\left(\omega-\frac{m\Omega_{H}}{r^{2}}\right)^{2}-\left(1-\frac{1}{r}\right)\left(\frac{m^{2}}{r^{2}}+\frac{1}{2r^{3}}-\frac{1}{4r^{2}}\left(1-\frac{1}{r}\right)+\mu^{2}\right), (7)

where we have set rH=1r_{H}=1 which means that rr is measured in units of rHr_{H}, and both ω\omega and ΩH\Omega_{H} are measured in units of rH1r_{H}^{-1}. The derivation of this equation can be found in Appendix A. Then for our asymptotically flat analog black hole spacetime, the QNF, i.e. ω\omega, can be determined by solving Eq. (6) associated with the following boundary conditions

Ψ{ei(ωmΩH)r,r(rrH,rH=1),e+iω2μ2r,r+(r+),\Psi\sim\begin{cases}e^{-i(\omega-m\Omega_{H})r_{\ast}},&r_{\ast}\to-\infty\quad(r\to r_{H},r_{H}=1),\\ e^{+i\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}r_{\ast}},&r_{\ast}\to+\infty\quad(r\to+\infty),\end{cases} (8)

which means that the perturbation field is ingoing at the event horizon and outgoing at infinity.

III The Methods

In this section, we would like to introduce two different numerical methods for calculating QNF of this analog black hole. As a standard procedure, the QNF is usually calculated by one method and then confirmed by another one, since this process can not only enhance the reliability of our numerical results but also examine the validity of the numerical methods.

III.1 Leaver’s Continued Fraction Method (CFM)

Leaver Leaver ; PhysRevD.41.2986 first calculated QNF by numerically solving a three-term recurrence relation, which is well-known as CFM. To learn more about this method please refer to Leaver ; PhysRevD.41.2986 ; Konoplya:2011qq for a comprehensive introduction.

In current context, it is better to work in the original radial coordinate, under which the master equation takes the form

Ψ′′(r)+1r(r1)Ψ(r)+r2(r1)2U(ω,r)Ψ(r)=0,\Psi^{\prime\prime}(r)+\frac{1}{r(r-1)}\Psi^{\prime}(r)+\frac{r^{2}}{(r-1)^{2}}U(\omega,r)\Psi(r)=0, (9)

which has two regular singular points at r=1r=1 and r=0r=0, and one irregular singularity at rr\to\infty. According to the asymptotic behavior (boundary condition Eq. (8)) of the perturbation field Ψ\Psi, we are able to get the asymptotic solutions at the horizon rrHr\to r_{H} and infinity rr\to\infty in the original radial coordinate. First, when rrHr\to r_{H}, we have ingoing modes

Ψ(r)(r1)i(ωmΩH),rrH.\Psi(r)\thicksim(r-1)^{-i(\omega-m\Omega_{H})},\quad r\to r_{H}. (10)

While when rr\to\infty, we need to be carful to get the appropriate asymptotic solution due to the fact that infinity is a irregular singularity, which indicates that beside the dominant exponential behavior, the subdominant power law behavior should also be considered in order to make the CFM as accurate as possible. To this end, we take the following ansatz of outgoing modes at infinity

Ψ(r)eiω2μ2rrκ.\Psi(r)\thicksim e^{i\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}r}r^{\kappa}. (11)

Substituting this formula back to Eq. (9) and take a limit rr\to\infty, we can get

κ=i(2ω2μ2)2ω2μ2,\kappa=\frac{i(2\omega^{2}-\mu^{2})}{2\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}}, (12)

which leads us to

Ψ(r)eiω2μ2rri(2ω2μ2)2ω2μ2,r.\Psi(r)\thicksim e^{i\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}r}r^{\frac{i(2\omega^{2}-\mu^{2})}{2\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}}},\quad r\to\infty. (13)

Combining the asymptotic solutions which are divergent at the boundary, and then expanding the remaining part into the Frobenius series around event horizon r=1r=1, we arrive at an appropriate expansion formulation of Ψ(r)\Psi(r)

Ψ(r)=eiω2μ2rri(ω2μ2+μ22ω2μ2)+i(ωmΩH)(r1)i(ωmΩH)n=0an(r1r)n.\Psi(r)=e^{i\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}r}r^{i\left(\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}+\frac{\mu^{2}}{2\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}}\right)+i(\omega-m\Omega_{H})}(r-1)^{-i(\omega-m\Omega_{H})}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}\left(\frac{r-1}{r}\right)^{n}. (14)

The merit of this expansion is that the singular factor (i.e. boundary conditions for QNMs) of the solution to master equation has been singled out in front of a series which is required to be convergent in the region 1r1\leq r\leq\infty, and this convergence can only be achieved by QNF. In addition, one can check that the boundary conditions Eq. (10) and Eq. (13) are indeed satisfied by Eq. (14).

The next step is to derive the recurrence relation of the expansion coefficients ana_{n}. To this end, we just need to substitute Eq. (14) into Eq. (9), but before we do this, it seems necessary to work in a new coordinate

z=r1r,z=\frac{r-1}{r}, (15)

by which we have

Ψ(r)=eiω2μ2rri(ω2μ2+μ22ω2μ2)zi(ωmΩH)n=0anzn.\Psi(r)=e^{i\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}r}r^{i\left(\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}+\frac{\mu^{2}}{2\sqrt{\omega^{2}-\mu^{2}}}\right)}z^{-i(\omega-m\Omega_{H})}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}a_{n}z^{n}. (16)

Within this coordinate, we can get the following three-term recurrence relation

α0a1+β0a0=0,αnan+1+βnan+γnan1=0,n1,\begin{split}&\alpha_{0}a_{1}+\beta_{0}a_{0}=0,\\ &\alpha_{n}a_{n+1}+\beta_{n}a_{n}+\gamma_{n}a_{n-1}=0,\quad n\geq 1,\end{split} (17)

where

αn\displaystyle\alpha_{n} =4(1+n)(μω)(μ+ω)(1+n2iω+2imΩH),\displaystyle=4(1+n)(\mu-\omega)(\mu+\omega)\left(1+n-2i\omega+2im\Omega_{H}\right), (18)
βn\displaystyle\beta_{n} =4μ4+2μ2(2m2(1+2n)2+4i(1+2n)ω+10ω2+3iμ2+ω2+6inμ2+ω2\displaystyle=-4\mu^{4}+2\mu^{2}\left(-2m^{2}-(1+2n)^{2}+4i(1+2n)\omega+10\omega^{2}+3i\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}+6in\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right.
+6ωμ2+ω2)2ω2(12m24n2+4iω+4iμ2+ω2+8ω(ω+μ2+ω2)\displaystyle\left.+6\omega\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)-2\omega^{2}\left(-1-2m^{2}-4n^{2}+4i\omega+4i\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}+8\omega\left(\omega+\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)\right.
+4in(i+2ω+2μ2+ω2))+4m(3μ2μ2+ω2+4ω2μ2+ω2\displaystyle\left.+4in\left(i+2\omega+2\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)\right)+4m\left(-3\mu^{2}\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}+4\omega^{2}\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right.
+2(i+2in+2ω)(μ2+ω2))ΩH,\displaystyle\left.\quad+2(i+2in+2\omega)\left(-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}\right)\right)\Omega_{H},
γn\displaystyle\gamma_{n} =μ4+ω2(14n2+8in(ω+μ2+ω2)+8ω(ω+μ2+ω2))\displaystyle=\mu^{4}+\omega^{2}\left(1-4n^{2}+8in\left(\omega+\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)+8\omega\left(\omega+\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)\right)
μ2(14n2+4in(2ω+μ2+ω2)+4ω(2ω+μ2+ω2))\displaystyle-\mu^{2}\left(1-4n^{2}+4in\left(2\omega+\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)+4\omega\left(2\omega+\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)\right)
+4m(2(μω)(in+ω)(μ+ω)+μ2μ2+ω22ω2μ2+ω2)ΩH.\displaystyle+4m\left(2(\mu-\omega)(in+\omega)(\mu+\omega)+\mu^{2}\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}-2\omega^{2}\sqrt{-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}}\right)\Omega_{H}.

With this three-term recurrence relation, the ratio of successive ana_{n} can be formulated in two ways, one is given by infinite continued fraction as

an+1an=γn+1βn+1αn+1γn+2βn+2αn+2γn+3βn+3,\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}}=\frac{-\gamma_{n+1}}{\beta_{n+1}-\frac{\alpha_{n+1}\gamma_{n+2}}{\beta_{n+2}-\frac{\alpha_{n+2}\gamma_{n+3}}{\beta_{n+3}-...}}}, (19)

another one is by finite continued fraction

an+1an=γnαnαn1βn1αn2γn1βn2αn3γn2/βnαn.\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}}=\frac{\gamma_{n}}{\alpha_{n}}\frac{\alpha_{n-1}}{\beta_{n-1}-\frac{\alpha_{n-2}\gamma_{n-1}}{\beta_{n-2}-\alpha_{n-3}\gamma_{n-2}/\ldots}}-\frac{\beta_{n}}{\alpha_{n}}. (20)

Thus the equivalence relation between the two equations above can be employed to allow us to numerically obtain infinite number of roots corresponding to QNF of the following equation for n1n\geq 1

γn+1βn+1αn+1γn+2βn+2αn+2γn+3βn+3=βnαnγnαnαn1βn1αn2γn1βn2αn3γn2/,n1\frac{\gamma_{n+1}}{\beta_{n+1}-\frac{\alpha_{n+1}\gamma_{n+2}}{\beta_{n+2}-\frac{\alpha_{n+2}\gamma_{n+3}}{\beta_{n+3}-...}}}=\frac{\beta_{n}}{\alpha_{n}}-\frac{\gamma_{n}}{\alpha_{n}}\frac{\alpha_{n-1}}{\beta_{n-1}-\frac{\alpha_{n-2}\gamma_{n-1}}{\beta_{n-2}-\alpha_{n-3}\gamma_{n-2}/\ldots}},\quad n\geq 1 (21)

and for n=0n=0

β0α0γ1β1α1γ2β2α2γ3β3=0.\beta_{0}-\frac{\alpha_{0}\gamma_{1}}{\beta_{1}-\frac{\alpha_{1}\gamma_{2}}{\beta_{2}^{\prime}-\frac{\alpha_{2}\gamma_{3}}{\beta_{3}-\ldots}}}=0. (22)

Actually, for every n0n\geq 0, Eq. (21) and Eq. (22) are completely equivalent in the sense that every solution to Eq. (21) is also a solution to Eq. (22), and vice versa. However, the most stable roots depend on nn, i.e. the nnth QNF ωn\omega_{n} is numerically the most stable roots of Eq. (21) for a certain n>0n>0 (overtone modes) or Eq. (22) for n=0n=0 (fundamental modes) Leaver ; PhysRevD.41.2986 .

III.2 WKB Approximation Method

WKB approximation method is also a powerful method in the calculation of QNF. By WKB, the QNF can be determined by solving following equation Konoplya:2019hlu

ω2\displaystyle\omega^{2} =V0(ω)+A2(𝒦2,ω)+A4(𝒦2,ω)+A6(𝒦2,ω)+\displaystyle=V_{0}(\omega)+A_{2}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2},\omega\right)+A_{4}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2},\omega\right)+A_{6}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2},\omega\right)+\ldots (23)
i𝒦2V2(ω)(1+A3(𝒦2,ω)+A5(𝒦2,ω)+A7(𝒦2,ω)),\displaystyle-i\mathcal{K}\sqrt{-2V_{2}(\omega)}\left(1+A_{3}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2},\omega\right)+A_{5}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2},\omega\right)+A_{7}\left(\mathcal{K}^{2},\omega\right)\ldots\right),

where potential V(ω,r)V(\omega,r) satisfies U(ω,r)=ω2V(ω,r)U(\omega,r)=\omega^{2}-V(\omega,r), and Vm(ω)V_{m}(\omega) are given by

Vm=dmV(ω,r)drm|r=ro,m2,V_{m}=\left.\frac{d^{m}V(\omega,r_{\ast})}{dr_{\ast}^{m}}\right|_{r_{\ast}=r_{\ast o}},\quad m\geq 2, (24)

in which ror_{\ast o} is the location of the maximum value of V(ω,r)V(\omega,r_{\ast}) in tortoise coordinate, and naturally V0=V(ω,ro)V_{0}=V(\omega,r_{\ast o}). Ak(𝒦2,ω)A_{k}(\mathcal{K}^{2},\omega) are polynomials of V2,V3,V2kV_{2},V_{3},\ldots V_{2k}, and 𝒦\mathcal{K} stands for eikonal formula

𝒦=iω2V02V2.\mathcal{K}=i\frac{\omega^{2}-V_{0}}{\sqrt{-2V_{2}}}. (25)

By employing the boundary conditions of QNMs, it is found that 𝒦\mathcal{K} has to satisfy

𝒦=n+12,n,\mathcal{K}=n+\frac{1}{2},\quad n\in\mathbb{N}, (26)

where nn is the overtone number. With these basic formulas of WKB, we are going to calculate QNF with 66th order WKB approximation method, which means that we have to calculate AkA_{k} up to A6A_{6}. The expressions of AkA_{k} are rather complex and we just only demonstrate A2A_{2} and A3A_{3} as examples

A3\displaystyle A_{3} =113824V25[940(n+12)2V34+1800(n+12)2V2V4V32672(n+12)2V22V5V3\displaystyle=\frac{1}{13824V_{2}^{5}}\Bigg{[}-940\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{3}^{4}+1800\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}V_{4}V_{3}^{2}-672\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}^{2}V_{5}V_{3} (27)
204(n+12)2V22V42+96(n+12)2V23V6385V34+918V2V4V32456V22V5V3\displaystyle-204\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}^{2}V_{4}^{2}+96\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}^{3}V_{6}-385V_{3}^{4}+918V_{2}V_{4}V_{3}^{2}-456V_{2}^{2}V_{5}V_{3}
201V22V42+120V23V6],\displaystyle-201V_{2}^{2}V_{4}^{2}+120V_{2}^{3}V_{6}\Bigg{]},

and

A2=60(n+12)2V32+36(n+12)2V2V47V32+9V2V4288V22.A_{2}=\frac{-60\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{3}^{2}+36\left(n+\frac{1}{2}\right)^{2}V_{2}V_{4}-7V_{3}^{2}+9V_{2}V_{4}}{288V_{2}^{2}}. (28)

IV Numerical Results of Massive QNF

In this section we demonstrate and analyze the properties of the numerical results of QNF of massive scalar perturbation. To obtain the QNF, we adopt previously introduced CFM and WKB method. In the cases of winding number m>0m>0, both CFM and WKB are used and they give consistent results, while in the m<0m<0 case we only use CFM due to the poor performance of WKB for massive QNF.

In Table 1 we show the numerical results of the fundamental QNF at winding number m=1m=1 for different values of mass μ\mu and angular velocity ΩH\Omega_{H}. The data displayed in this table are obtained by CFM and WKB whose results are in good agreement with each other, which confirms the validity of the numerical methods we adopted. For the QNF’s real part ωR\omega_{R} which stands for the oscillation frequency of QNMs, it can be observed that ωR\omega_{R} will monotonically increase with the grow of ΩH\Omega_{H}, and this behavior holds for all the mass values considered in this table. On the hand, one can find that for any given ΩH\Omega_{H}, the ωR\omega_{R} can be also improved by increasing the value of mass μ\mu. These results suggest that QNMs with higher oscillation frequency can be observed either by choosing a background driving optical field whose profile can induce faster rotating analog black hole, or choosing the medium of which non-local thermo-optical nonlinearities can bring us bigger effective mass of perturbation field. For the QNF’s imaginary part ωI\omega_{I} which is negative and reflects the damping rate of QNMs, we find that its magnitude becomes larger when increasing ΩH\Omega_{H}, and this property holds for all scalar perturbations with different mass in our current consideration. This result indicates that QNMs will have a shorter life in this analog rotating black hole spacetime with higher angular velocity ΩH\Omega_{H}, since a negative ωI\omega_{I} with larger magnitude clearly suggests a faster damping rate of QNMs. In contrast, it is found that the magnitude of ωI\omega_{I} can be decreased by increasing the mass value μ\mu of the perturbation field, such that for a given ΩH\Omega_{H} the QNMs can live longer if it has a bigger effective mass. Furthermore, the behavior of ωR\omega_{R} and ωI\omega_{I} under the change of ΩH\Omega_{H} manifests a remarkable contrast, as ωR\omega_{R} monotonically grows with the increment of ΩH\Omega_{H} and seems to be unbounded, while for ωI\omega_{I} whose magnitude can be also monotonically improved by higher ΩH\Omega_{H} but all ωI\omega_{I} seems to approach a constant around ωI0.25\omega_{I}\approx-0.25 when ΩH\Omega_{H} is large enough. Additionally, the differences between QNF, both real and imaginary part, induced by different mass values, will be suppressed by sufficient large ΩH\Omega_{H}, as a natural consequence of the effects of μ\mu on QNF can be ignored when compared with the effects of large ΩH\Omega_{H}.

m=1m=1
μ\mu Method ΩH=0\Omega_{H}=0 ΩH=0.5\Omega_{H}=0.5 ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1 ΩH=5\Omega_{H}=5 ΩH=10\Omega_{H}=10
0 WKB 0.3661520.194512i0.366152-0.194512i 0.6768620.222138i0.676862-0.222138i 1.102830.237139i1.10283-0.237139i 5.021370.249731i5.02137-0.249731i 10.01190.249279i10.0119-0.249279i
CFM 0.3659260.193965i0.365926-0.193965i 0.6767900.222215i0.676790-0.222215i 1.102900.237129i1.10290-0.237129i 5.021820.249306i5.02182-0.249306i 10.01090.249825i10.0109-0.249825i
0.10.1 WKB 0.3688120.191628i0.368812-0.191628i 0.6785290.221165i0.678529-0.221165i 1.104030.236772i1.10403-0.236772i 5.022600.248940i5.02260-0.248940i 10.01120.249950i10.0112-0.249950i
CFM 0.3685820.191090i0.368582-0.191090i 0.6784600.221261i0.678460-0.221261i 1.103980.236755i1.10398-0.236755i 5.022070.249288i5.02207-0.249288i 10.01110.249820i10.0111-0.249820i
0.30.3 WKB 0.3898470.167652i0.389847-0.167652i 0.6919030.213403i0.691903-0.213403i 1.112750.233745i1.11275-0.233745i 5.024050.249065i5.02405-0.249065i 10.01150.249943i10.0115-0.249943i
CFM 0.3895690.167218i0.389569-0.167218i 0.6918300.213516i0.691830-0.213516i 1.112660.233748i1.11266-0.233748i 5.024050.249139i5.02405-0.249139i 10.01210.249783i10.0121-0.249783i
0.50.5 WKB 0.4168780.111628i0.416878-0.111628i 0.7186720.197276i0.718672-0.197276i 1.130040.227639i1.13004-0.227639i 5.028110.248758i5.02811-0.248758i 10.01380.249807i10.0138-0.249807i
CFM 0.4284640.115165i0.428464-0.115165i 0.7186030.197413i0.718603-0.197413i 1.130080.227633i1.13008-0.227633i 5.028030.248842i5.02803-0.248842i 10.01410.249708i10.0141-0.249708i
Table 1: The fundamental QNF obtained by WKB and CFM at m=1m=1 for different mass values μ\mu and angular velocity ΩH\Omega_{H}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: The dependence of real part ωR\omega_{R} (left plot) and imaginary part ωI\omega_{I} (right plot) of fundamental QNF on ΩH\Omega_{H} at m=1m=1 for various mass values.
m=5m=5
μ\mu Method ΩH=0\Omega_{H}=0 ΩH=0.5\Omega_{H}=0.5 ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1 ΩH=5\Omega_{H}=5 ΩH=10\Omega_{H}=10
0 WKB 1.920590.192508i1.92059-0.192508i 3.457590.223514i3.45759-0.223514i 5.572140.238331i5.57214-0.238331i 25.12390.24938i25.1239-0.24938i 50.06210.249844i50.0621-0.249844i
CFM 1.920590.192507i1.92059-0.192507i 3.457590.223514i3.45759-0.223514i 5.572140.238330i5.57214-0.238330i 25.12390.24938i25.1239-0.24938i 50.06210.249844i50.0621-0.249844i
0.50.5 WKB 1.941890.188920i1.94189-0.188920i 3.467690.222449i3.46769-0.222449i 5.5780.237937i5.578-0.237937i 25.12460.247791i25.1246-0.247791i 50.06060.253713i50.0606-0.253713i
CFM 1.941890.188919i1.94189-0.188919i 3.467690.222449i3.46769-0.222449i 5.5780.237936i5.578-0.237936i 25.12520.249362i25.1252-0.249362i 50.06280.249839i50.0628-0.249839i
1.51.5 WKB 2.115450.159159i2.11545-0.159159i 3.548980.213791i3.54898-0.213791i 5.625060.234771i5.62506-0.234771i 25.13520.249266i25.1352-0.249266i 50.06380.258024i50.0638-0.258024i
CFM 2.115450.159159i2.11545-0.159159i 3.548980.213791i3.54898-0.213791i 5.625060.234770i5.62506-0.234770i 25.13510.249213i25.1351-0.249213i 50.06780.249801i50.0678-0.249801i
2.52.5 WKB 2.483790.0896973i2.48379-0.0896973i 3.714430.195614i3.71443-0.195614i 5.719770.228318i5.71977-0.228318i 25.15520.249032i25.1552-0.249032i 50.07790.249314i50.0779-0.249314i
CFM 2.483810.0897163i2.48381-0.0897163i 3.714430.195614i3.71443-0.195614i 5.719770.228318i5.71977-0.228318i 25.15510.248915i25.1551-0.248915i 50.07770.249727i50.0777-0.249727i
Table 2: The fundamental QNF obtained by WKB and CFM at m=5m=5 for different mass values μ\mu and angular velocity ΩH\Omega_{H}.

The dependence of real part and imaginary part of QNF given in Table 1 on the angular velocity are separately plotted in Fig. 1 in order to have a more perspicuous demonstration of the features of QNF we have discussed above. In the following Table 2 and 3 we respectively illustrate the QNF for m=5m=5 and m=10m=10, and the corresponding figures are shown in Fig. 2 from which we find that the QNF with higher positive winding number mm behaves qualitatively the same as the m=1m=1 case, especially all the ωI\omega_{I} for the mm ranges from m=1m=1 to m=10m=10 approaches ωI0.25\omega_{I}\approx-0.25 when ΩH\Omega_{H} is increasing to large value.

Based on the ωR\omega_{R} in Fig. 1 and 2 are shown by log-log plots, the slope corresponding to any given mass value μ\mu at high ΩH\Omega_{H} can be determined by linear regression

ΔlnωRΔlnΩH1,\frac{\Delta\ln\omega_{R}}{\Delta\ln\Omega_{H}}\approx 1, (29)

which is dependent neither on winding number nor perturbation field mass, and directly leads to

lnωRlnΩH+lnCm.\ln\omega_{R}\approx\ln\Omega_{H}+\ln C_{m}. (30)

By taking ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1, the mm dependent constant CmC_{m} is determined to be CmmC_{m}\approx m, such that when ΩH+\Omega_{H}\to+\infty we have

ωRmΩH,ωI0.25,m>0.\omega_{R}\approx m\Omega_{H},\quad\omega_{I}\approx-0.25,\quad m>0. (31)
m=10m=10
μ\mu Method ΩH=0\Omega_{H}=0 ΩH=0.5\Omega_{H}=0.5 ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1 ΩH=5\Omega_{H}=5 ΩH=10\Omega_{H}=10
0 WKB 3.847040.192464i3.84704-0.192464i 6.920120.223568i6.92012-0.223568i 11.1480.23837i11.148-0.23837i 50.24880.249383i50.2488-0.249383i 100.1250.249844i100.125-0.249844i
CFM 3.847040.192464i3.84704-0.192464i 6.920120.223568i6.92012-0.223568i 11.1480.23837i11.148-0.23837i 50.24880.249383i50.2488-0.249383i 100.1250.249844i100.125-0.249844i
11 WKB 3.890230.188852i3.89023-0.188852i 6.940440.2225i6.94044-0.2225i 11.15980.237976i11.1598-0.237976i 50.25130.249365i50.2513-0.249365i 100.1260.249109i100.126-0.249109i
CFM 3.890230.188852i3.89023-0.188852i 6.940440.2225i6.94044-0.2225i 11.15980.237976i11.1598-0.237976i 50.25130.249364i50.2513-0.249364i 100.1260.249839i100.126-0.249839i
33 WKB 4.242130.158906i4.24213-0.158906i 7.103990.213812i7.10399-0.213812i 11.25410.234804i11.2541-0.234804i 50.27100.249249i50.2710-0.249249i 100.1370.252134i100.137-0.252134i
CFM 4.242130.158906i4.24213-0.158906i 7.103990.213812i7.10399-0.213812i 11.25410.234804i11.2541-0.234804i 50.27120.249215i50.2712-0.249215i 100.1360.249802i100.136-0.249802i
55 WKB 4.991830.0887351i4.99183-0.0887351i 7.437010.195566i7.43701-0.195566i 11.4440.228342i11.444-0.228342i 50.31110.248916i50.3111-0.248916i 100.1560.249700i100.156-0.249700i
CFM 4.991830.0887355i4.99183-0.0887355i 7.437010.195566i7.43701-0.195566i 11.4440.228342i11.444-0.228342i 50.31110.248917i50.3111-0.248917i 100.1560.249727i100.156-0.249727i
Table 3: The fundamental QNF obtained by WKB and CFM at m=10m=10 for different mass values μ\mu and angular velocity ΩH\Omega_{H}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The dependence of real part ωR\omega_{R} (left plots) and imaginary part ωI\omega_{I} (right plots) of fundamental QNF on ΩH\Omega_{H} at m=5m=5 and m=10m=10 for various mass values.

Now we focus our attention on the QNF for negative winding number m<0m<0. In the negative mm case, our numerical methods are not capable of dealing with large ΩH\Omega_{H}, which is in contrast to m>0m>0 case where the numerical methods work well for large ΩH\Omega_{H}. On the other hand, the capability of WKB method to calculate precision massive QNF in this case is depressed. As a consequence, we can only rely on CFM to calculate QNF for ΩH\Omega_{H} which is not large.

In Table 4, we present QNF data for m=5m=-5 under different mass and angular velocity values. One can observe that the QNF in current case shows a remarkably contrasting features compared to positive mm case, as both ωR\omega_{R} and the magnitude of ωI\omega_{I} decreases with the grow of ΩH\Omega_{H}. However, the effects of perturbation field mass values μ\mu on QNF are remained qualitatively identical to m>0m>0 case, as when increasing μ\mu the ωR\omega_{R} will become bigger while ωI\omega_{I} will be smaller. Hence we may conclude that the characteristics of the effects of ΩH\Omega_{H} on QNF depend on the sign of winding number which will not change the way of how mass μ\mu affects QNF. The data of QNF for m=10m=-10 are listed in Table 5 from which a qualitatively identical behaviors of QNF can be found. This result may suggest that the fundamental QNF under all the negative mm has the same properties. The corresponding plots of QNF in current two cases are demonstrated in Fig. 3 which gives clear illustrations of features of QNF for negative mm. With the help of the plots, we find that the differences between QNF induced by different mass values will increase when ΩH\Omega_{H} grows, this is another behavior differs from the m>0m>0 case.

m=5m=-5
μ\mu Method ΩH=0\Omega_{H}=0 ΩH=0.5\Omega_{H}=0.5 ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1 ΩH=5\Omega_{H}=5 ΩH=8\Omega_{H}=8
0 CFM 1.920590.192507i1.92059-0.192507i 1.158370.154622i1.15837-0.154622i 0.8035360.123037i0.803536-0.123037i 0.2249110.0423650i0.224911-0.0423650i 0.1456260.0281561i0.145626-0.0281561i
0.10.1 CFM 1.921440.192364i1.92144-0.192364i 1.159990.154262i1.15999-0.154262i 0.8060510.122409i0.806051-0.122409i 0.2349840.0394395i0.234984-0.0394395i 0.1614720.0235405i0.161472-0.0235405i
0.20.2 CFM 1.923990.191935i1.92399-0.191935i 1.164870.153182i1.16487-0.153182i 0.8136020.120527i0.813602-0.120527i 0.2655570.0309244i0.265557-0.0309244i 0.2104100.0109232i0.210410-0.0109232i
0.30.3 CFM 1.928250.191219i1.92825-0.191219i 1.173000.151381i1.17300-0.151381i 0.8262140.117392i0.826214-0.117392i 0.3178410.0177205i0.317841-0.0177205i non-convergence
Table 4: The fundamental QNF obtained by CFM at m=5m=-5 for different mass values μ\mu and angular velocity ΩH\Omega_{H}. The non-convergence in the table means that our numerical method failed to give convergent results.
m=10m=-10
μ\mu Method ΩH=0\Omega_{H}=0 ΩH=0.5\Omega_{H}=0.5 ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1 ΩH=5\Omega_{H}=5 ΩH=10\Omega_{H}=10
0 CFM 3.847040.192464i3.84704-0.192464i 2.322980.154473i2.32298-0.154473i 1.612960.122871i1.61296-0.122871i 0.4526340.0422895i0.452634-0.0422895i 0.2374190.0229592i0.237419-0.0229592i
0.10.1 CFM 3.847470.192428i3.84747-0.192428i 2.323810.154383i2.32381-0.154383i 1.614250.122712i1.61425-0.122712i 0.4578370.0415430i0.457837-0.0415430i 0.2475620.0214801i0.247562-0.0214801i
0.20.2 CFM 3.848770.192320i3.84877-0.192320i 2.326300.154110i2.32630-0.154110i 1.618130.122235i1.61813-0.122235i 0.4734650.0393243i0.473465-0.0393243i 0.2780970.0172152i0.278097-0.0172152i
0.30.3 CFM 3.850920.192140i3.85092-0.192140i 2.330450.153655i2.33045-0.153655i 1.624590.121441i1.62459-0.121441i 0.4995750.0356964i0.499575-0.0356964i 0.3293910.0107323i0.329391-0.0107323i
Table 5: The fundamental QNF obtained by CFM at m=10m=-10 for different mass values μ\mu and angular velocity ΩH\Omega_{H}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The dependence of real part ωR\omega_{R} (left plots) and imaginary part ωI\omega_{I} (right plots) of fundamental QNF on ΩH\Omega_{H} at m=5m=-5 and m=10m=-10 for various mass values.

As the last part of this section, we would like to compare the QNF among different wingding numbers in order to disclose how the QNF is affected by mm. The comparisons are made in Fig. 4 where we plot the QNF among m=10m=-10 to m=10m=10 by separately fixing μ=0\mu=0 and μ=0.3\mu=0.3 in each plot. The plots of ωR\omega_{R} and ωI\omega_{I} are placed on the left side and right side of Fig. 4, respectively. For the ωR\omega_{R}, it can be found that different mass values μ\mu do not have noticeable influences on the behaviors of ωR\omega_{R}. Regarding the influences of the winding number on ωR\omega_{R}, it is clearly to see that among the positive mm, the QNF with a larger winding number always has a higher ωR\omega_{R}. When it comes to negative mm, the larger ωR\omega_{R} comes from the modes with higher magnitude |m||m|. The plots for ωI\omega_{I} under the two different mass values manifest obvious unique features. In the μ=0\mu=0 plot, the ωI\omega_{I} for all m>0m>0 coincides and forms a single branch, while another branch is formed by ωI\omega_{I} for all wingding numbers m<0m<0. This result means that the ωI\omega_{I} of fundamental QNF with mass μ=0\mu=0 depends on the sign of winding number whose magnitude can just mildly affect it. However, for the ωI\omega_{I} of massive perturbation field, as shown in our plot in which μ=0.3\mu=0.3, this kind of degeneracy is broken. When we change μ=0\mu=0 into μ=0.3\mu=0.3, the original two branches start to diverge. This divergency in m<0m<0 branch happens and becomes more pronounced when increasing ΩH\Omega_{H} to larger values. In contrast, in the m>0m>0 branch, the divergence occurs at small ΩH\Omega_{H} and it starts to disappear if we keep increasing ΩH\Omega_{H} to large values.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: The comparison of fundamental QNF between different winding numbers mm for scalar field mass μ=0\mu=0 (plots on the top) and μ=0.3\mu=0.3 (plots on the bottom).

V Quasi-Resonance

In this section we discuss an interesting phenomenon uncovered in the spectrum of massive QNMs. In the calculation of QNF of massive perturbation field, people have found that the ωI\omega_{I} of QNF will increase and gradually approaches zero when we improve the mass μ\mu to some value, while the ωR\omega_{R} remains to be nonvanishing. As a consequence, the QNMs can be arbitrarily long-lived due to the ωI\omega_{I} which represents damping rate of QNMs can be sufficiently small. This phenomenon is called quasi-resonance which was first observed in Ohashi:2004wr where the authors studied the massive scalar field perturbation in the Reissner-Nordström black hole spacetime. Subsequently, it was realized in Konoplya:2004wg that quasi-resonance can exist only if the effective potential is nonzero at infinity. Note that the effective potential in the master equation of the massive scalar perturbation in present work, therefore we would like to learn whether the quasi-resonance can exist in our analog rotating black hole system. To this end, we need to observe how the QNF behaves when we change the value of perturbation field mass.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: The dependence of fundamental QNF at ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1 for different winding numbers mm on scalar field mass μ\mu.

In Fig. 5 we demonstrate the dependence of real and imaginary part of fundamental QNF for m=±5m=\pm 5 at ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1 on the perturbation field mass μ\mu. We should point out that we calculated QNF for m=5m=-5 in a small range of μ\mu compared to m=5m=5, since our numerical method can yield convergent results only for comparatively small μ\mu in the context of negative winding number. For both positive and negative mm, this figure shows that when increasing μ\mu, the ωR\omega_{R} will grow while the magnitude of ωI\omega_{I} decreases meanwhile with a trend to get close to zero. The zero-approaching tendency of ωI\omega_{I} suggests that a sufficient small damping rate can be achieved if we further increase μ\mu to some certain value, but the numerical method start to work poorly which stops us here. In this sense, we may claim that the quasi-resonance can exist in present analog rotating black hole system. Another property reflected by the plots is that the QNF with negative wingding number seem to be more sensitive to the change of μ\mu, as the slope of the curves for m=5m=-5 seems to be higher than that of m=5m=5. On the other hand, we combine the two plots together in Fig. 5 to get the behaviors of QNF on the complex plane, as shown in Fig. 6 which gives a more clear and straightforward illustration of how QNF behaves under the variation of mass μ\mu.

Refer to caption
Figure 6: The fundamental QNF demonstrated in complex plane for different mass values μ\mu and winding number mm at ΩH=1\Omega_{H}=1.

VI Conclusions and Discussions

In this paper, we have investigated the fundamental QNF of massive scalar field perturbation in the analog rotating black hole spacetime which is established by photon-fluid system. The QNF with opposite sign of winding number is found to behave rather differently, while the modes with the same sign of winding number have qualitatively similar properties. If winding number m>0m>0, both the ωR\omega_{R} and the magnitude of ωI\omega_{I} which is negative increase with the ωH\omega_{H}. When ωH\omega_{H} is large enough, the effects of the mass values of perturbation field on the QNF will be suppressed and all the QNF behaves identically, as the ωR\omega_{R} will asymptotically behave as ωRmΩH\omega_{R}\approx m\Omega_{H}, and the ωI\omega_{I} will approach a constant ωI0.25\omega_{I}\approx-0.25. In winding number m<0m<0 case, the increase of ΩH\Omega_{H} will lead to the decrease of both ωR\omega_{R} and magnitude of ωI\omega_{I}, which is contrary to m>0m>0 case. The influences of winding number on QNF are also analyzed. We find that among the positive winding numbers, the QNMs with bigger mm always has a larger ωR\omega_{R}, and this result is reversed among the QNMs with m<0m<0. We also note that the perturbation field mass seems not to change the behaviors of ωR\omega_{R} among different winding numbers, while it has been found to have noticeable influences on ωI\omega_{I}. In the μ=0\mu=0 case, we find a kind of degeneracy, which manifests as all the ωI\omega_{I} with the same sign of winding number almost coincide with each other. As a consequence, we can only find two branches of curves standing for positive and negative winding numbers, respectively. This phenomenon indicates that for the massless QNF, only the sign of winding number can influence ωI\omega_{I} which is almost independent of the magnitude of mm. However, when the perturbation field mass μ\mu becomes nonzero, we find that the degeneracy is broken, as the original single branch will diverge. Note that the divergence will be enhanced when increasing ΩH\Omega_{H} for m<0m<0 QNMs, and for m>0m>0 it will be suppressed and eventually converge. Despite the QNMs with opposite sign of winding number usually have very contrasting characteristics, the perturbation field mass μ\mu can influence the QNF with all different mm in the same way: it increases the ωR\omega_{R} and reduces the magnitude of ωI\omega_{I}.

Besides the conventional properties of QNMs, we also studied the quasi-resonance which is an interesting feature of the massive QNMs. The quasi-resonance is a kind of QNF whose real part ωR\omega_{R} remains nonvanishing while the imaginary part ωI\omega_{I} can approach zero which suggests the existence of arbitrarily long-lived QNMs. We find that the QNF in complex plane will quickly move toward the real axis as we have shown in Fig. 6, which may indicate the existence of quasi-resonance in current analog rotating black hole system. It is worth pointing out that the quasi-resonance is favored in the study of black hole physics through analog gravity, since its long damping time will make it less hard for us to successfully detect QNMs in experiment. As an aside, note that this analog rotating black hole has been experimentally constructed in Vocke2018 , and the recent work in Solidoro:2024yxi has demonstrated that the QNMs can indeed be easily excited in finite-sized experimental settings of analog gravity. In light of these two developments, we hopefully expect that the successful detection of the QNMs in analog gravity model by photon-fluid system can be realized, and thus bringing us a more promising future of studying the physics in the black holes spacetime by analogy.

Acknowledgements.
H.L. is grateful to Yanfei for her unwavering support to his career. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No.12305071. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support from Brazilian agencies Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP), Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).

Appendix A The derivation of the master equation

To obtain the radial wave equation of the perturbation field, we perform a separation of variable to ρ1\rho_{1}, as

ρ1(t,r,θ)=R(r)ei(ωtmθ),\rho_{1}(t,r,\theta)=R(r)e^{-i(\omega t-m\theta)}, (32)

where integer mm is called the winding number. We substitute Eq. (32) into Klein-Gordon equation to get

d2R(r)dr2+P(r)dR(r)dr+Q(r)R(r)=0,\displaystyle\frac{d^{2}R(r)}{dr^{2}}+P(r)\frac{dR(r)}{dr}+Q(r)R(r)=0, (33)
P1(r)=1rrH,\displaystyle P_{1}(r)=\frac{1}{r-r_{H}}, (34)
Q1(r)=r3(rHμ2+r(μ2+ω2))2mr2rH2ωΩH+m2(r2+rrH+rH4ΩH2)r2(rrH)2.\displaystyle Q_{1}(r)=\frac{r^{3}\left(r_{H}\mu^{2}+r\left(-\mu^{2}+\omega^{2}\right)\right)-2mr^{2}r_{H}^{2}\omega\Omega_{H}+m^{2}\left(-r^{2}+rr_{H}+r_{H}^{4}\Omega_{H}^{2}\right)}{r^{2}(r-r_{H})^{2}}. (35)

Now we set

R(r)=G(r)Ψ(r),R(r)=G(r)\Psi(r), (36)

and then introduce a new coordinate rr_{\ast} defined by

drdr=Δ(r).\frac{dr_{\ast}}{dr}=\Delta(r). (37)

When working in this new coordinate, Eq. (33) will be transformed into

G(r)Δ2(r)d2Ψ(r)dr2+P2(r)dΨ(r)dr+Q2(r)Ψ(r)=0,G(r)\Delta^{2}(r)\frac{d^{2}\Psi(r_{\ast})}{dr_{\ast}^{2}}+P_{2}(r)\frac{d\Psi(r_{\ast})}{dr_{\ast}}+Q_{2}(r)\Psi(r_{\ast})=0, (38)

where

P2(r)=G(r)Δ(r)rrH+2Δ(r)dG(r)dr+G(r)dΔ(r)dr,\displaystyle P_{2}(r)=\frac{G(r)\Delta(r)}{r-r_{H}}+2\Delta(r)\frac{dG(r)}{dr}+G(r)\frac{d\Delta(r)}{dr}, (39)
Q2(r)=d2G(r)dr2+P1(r)dG(r)dr+Q1(r)G(r).\displaystyle Q_{2}(r)=\frac{d^{2}G(r)}{dr^{2}}+P_{1}(r)\frac{dG(r)}{dr}+Q_{1}(r)G(r). (40)

In order to obtain the Schrödinger-like equation, the coefficient P2(r)P_{2}(r) of dΨ(r)/drd\Psi(r_{\ast})/dr_{\ast} should vanish

G(r)Δ(r)rrH+2Δ(r)dG(r)dr+G(r)dΔ(r)dr=0.\frac{G(r)\Delta(r)}{r-r_{H}}+2\Delta(r)\frac{dG(r)}{dr}+G(r)\frac{d\Delta(r)}{dr}=0. (41)

This equation can be easily solved by following solution

G(r)=1(rrH)Δ(r).G(r)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{(r-r_{H})\Delta(r)}}. (42)

In order to get Schrodinger-like master equation and map the radial coordinate rr to turtle coordinate rr_{\ast} which runs over (,+)(-\infty,+\infty), we take the following definition of Δ(r)\Delta(r)

Δ(r)=(1rHr)1.\Delta(r)=\left(1-\frac{r_{H}}{r}\right)^{-1}. (43)

Substituting G(r)G(r) and Δ(r)\Delta(r) into Eq. (38), we finally arrive at the master equation Eq. (6) of the perturbation field.

References