Mapping class groups of circle bundles over a surface
Abstract.
In this paper, we study the algebraic structure of mapping class group of 3-manifolds that fiber as a circle bundle over a surface . There is an exact sequence . We relate this to the Birman exact sequence and determine when this sequence splits.
1. Introduction
For , let denote the closed oriented surface of genus , and for , let denote the closed 3-manifold that fibers
as an oriented circle-bundle with Euler number . Assuming , the mapping class group fits into a short exact sequence
(1) |
This paper is motivated by the following question.
Question 1.1.
For which values of is the extension in (1) split?
Interestingly, the extension does split for , in which case is unit tangent bundle . In fact, there is a natural action of on by homeomorphisms, which gives a splitting of (1) upon taking isotopy classes. For , this action comes from the action of the punctured mapping class group on triples of points on the boundary of hyperbolic space . This construction dates back to the work of Nielsen. See [FM12, §5.5.4, §8.2.6] and [Sou10, §1].
In general, Question 1.1 reduces to a question about group cohomology. The extension (1) splits if and only if its Euler class vanishes [Bro82, §IV.3]. Here the coefficients are twisted via the natural action of on . However, a computation of does not appear to be in the literature.
The extension (1) is related to the Birman exact sequence
By taking quotients by the commutator subgroup , we obtain the following extension
(2) |
Theorem A.
Theorem A implies the Euler classes of the extensions (1) satisfy for fixed . Next we determine the subgroup generated by in .
Theorem 1.2.
Fix , and let be the Euler class of the extension (1). Then has order in . Furthermore, if , then generates this group, i.e.
Corollary 1.3.
For and , the extension (1) splits if and only if is divisible . For the extension splits for each .
When a splitting exists, the different possible splittings (up to the action of on by conjugation) are parameterized by elements of [Bro82, Ch. IV, Prop. 2.3]. This group vanishes for [Mor85, Prop. 4.1], so the splitting, when it exists, is unique.
Connection to Nielsen realization. Instead of Question 1.1, one can ask whether there is a splitting of the composite surjection
This is an instance of a Nielsen realization problem. Of course, if does not split, then neither does , and Corollary 1.3 gives examples of this. Since has a natural action on , the surjection does split for . This is somewhat surprising since mapping class groups are rarely realized as groups of surface homeomorphisms [Mar07, Che19, CS22]. We wonder whether this splitting is unique, or if a splitting exists for other values divisible by (for example, ). We plan to study this in a future paper.
Previous work and proof techniques. Waldhausen [Wal68, §7] proved that the group is isomorphic to the outer automorphism group . From this, the short exact sequence (1) can be derived from work of Conner–Raymond [CR77] and the Dehn–Nielsen–Baer theorem; alternatively, see McCullough [McC91, §3]. The Dehn–Nielsen–Baer theorem also plays a central role in Theorem A, since it allows us to translate back and forth between topology and group theory. There is a mix of both in the proof of Theorem A in §3.
To prove Theorem A, we consider a version of Question 1.1 where and are punctured. For the punctured manifolds, similar to (1), there is a short exact sequence
and we construct a splitting
See Corollary 3.1. A key part of our proof of Theorem A is to determine the image of the point-pushing subgroup under . For this we relate three natural surface group representations that appear in the following diagram, where the diagonal map is point pushing on (not a commutative diagram).
See Proposition 3.4 for a precise statement.
In order to deduce Corollary 1.3, we use a spectral sequence argument to prove that generates a subgroup of isomorphic to . A different spectral sequence computation proves that generates when is large. These computations use several known computations, including work of Morita [Mor85].
Section outline. In §2 we collect the results we need about the manifolds and their mapping class groups, including Waldhausen’s work. Theorem A is proved in §3; this section is the core of the paper. In §4, we do two spectral sequence computations to prove Theorem 1.2.
Acknowledgement. Thanks to B. Farb for sharing the reference [McC91] and to D. Margalit for comments on a draft. The authors are supported by NSF grants DMS-2203178, DMS-2104346 and DMS-2005409.
2. Circle bundles over surfaces
Here we review some results about circle bundles over surfaces that we will need in future sections.
2.1. Classification
By an oriented circle bundle we mean a fiber bundle
with structure group , the group of orientation preserving homeomorphisms of . The inclusion of the rotation group in is a homotopy equivalence, so circle bundles are in bijection with rank-2 real vector bundles. The classifying space is homotopy equivalent to , which is an Eilenberg–Maclane space . Thus each circle bundle is uniquely determined up to isomorphism by its Euler class , which is the primary obstruction to a section of the bundle.
When is a closed, oriented surface, , we can speak of the Euler number. We use to denote the total space of the circle bundle
with Euler number . For example, for the unit tangent bundle (the Euler characteristic), so . We also note that and are homeomorphic 3-manifolds, since the sign of the Euler number of a circle bundle over depends on the choice of orientation on .
2.2. Fundamental group and its automorphisms
From the long exact sequence of a fibration, we have an exact sequence
The group has a presentation
(3) |
Using this, one finds is the center of as long as . When follows from the fact that the group has trivial center; the case can be treated directly.
Given this computation of the center, any automorphism of induces an automorphism of and descends to an automorphism of . The latter gives a homomorphism
that restricts to an isomorphism between the inner automorphism groups
(4) |
and hence descends to a homomorphism
(5) |
Orientations. It will be convenient to define
as the subgroup that acts trivially on (the “orientation-preserving” subgroup). We define
as the group of automorphisms that project into and that act trivially on the center . In particular, has index 4 in .
These orientation-preserving subgroups contain the (respective) inner automorphism groups, and we denote the quotients and .
2.3. Mapping class group
Fix and , and assume . Let denote the group of homeomorphisms whose image in is contained in . Define
Waldhausen [Wal68, Cor. 7.5] proved that the natural homomorphism
is an isomorphism. Then, by the definitions, this homomorphism restricts to an isomorphism . Waldhausen also proved that is isomorphic to the group of fiber-preserving homeomorphisms modulo homeomorphisms that are isotopic to the identity through fiber-preserving isotopies; see [Wal68, Rmk. following Cor. 7.5]. Consequently, there is a homomorphism
(6) |
Altogether, we have the following commutative diagram relating the maps (5) and (6).
(7) |
The right vertical map is an isomorphism by the Dehn–Nielsen–Baer theorem [FM12, Thm. 8.1]. Furthermore, by Conner–Raymond [CR77, Thm. 8] that there is a short exact sequence
(8) |
This establishes the short exact sequence (1) in the introduction. We will give a concrete derivation of this exact sequence in Corollary 3.1 below.
3. Relating to the Birman exact sequence
In this section, we prove Theorem A. To construct the map of short exact sequences in Theorem A, our main task is to first define a homomorphism and then to compute that its kernel is the commutator subgroup of (the point-pushing subgroup). We do this is §3.1 and §3.2.
3.1. A homomorphism
Fix a basepoint , and set . By the Dehn–Nielsen–Baer theorem, is isomorphic to , where is the free group of rank and is the subgroup that preserves the conjugacy class corresponding to the free homotopy class of the curve around the puncture in . We construct as a composition
(9) |
To define , fix a generating set for such that represents the conjugacy class of the curve around the puncture. Let
(10) |
be the homomorphism defined by and . Given , fix an automorphism that represents , and assume that (this can always be achieved by composing any lift with an inner automorphism of ). Next we define on generators of by
(11) |
To show that extends to a homomorphism of , we check that the relation is preserved under :
The second equality uses the the fact that . The map is independent of the choice of because different choices of differ by conjugation by powers of (because the centralizer of in is the cyclic subgroup )111Note that the centralizer is isomorphic to and contains . It is only bigger if for some and . By contradiction, if for , then is cyclically reduced because is. This implies that is a subword of , which is absurd. and is central in . The homomorphism is an automorphism and belongs to by definition. Furthermore, is a homomorphism, which is easy to check using the observation that if , then .
Composing with gives the desired homomorphism . As a corollary of this construction, we have proved the following.
Corollary 3.1.
Fix and , and assume . The natural map (see §2.2) fits into an exact sequence
(12) |
and this exact sequence splits.
Proof.
First we compute the kernel of . Using the presentation for in (3), if , then
for some . The map , extends to a homomorphism . It is elementary to check that the map defined by is an isomorphism.
The homomorphism defined above shows that is a split surjection. Note that the (basepoint vs. puncture), so by Dehn–Nielsen–Baer there is an isomorphism , and we use this isomorphism to view as a splitting of . ∎
Remark 3.2.
We call elements of transvections.
Remark 3.3.
The homomorphism can be constructed on the level of topology as follows. Fix a regular neighborhood of the puncture on (so is a once-punctured disk). Given a mapping class , choose a representing homeomorphism . Without loss of generality, we can assume that is the identity on . The bundle can be trivialized over (because the classifying space is simply connected). Fixing a trivialization over , we lift to the product homeomorphism . This homeomorphisms is the identity on the boundary , so we can extend by the identity to obtain a homeomorphism of . The map sending to the isotopy class is the topological version of the homomorphism . Note that the isotopy class is only well-defined up to Dehn twists about which is a loop around the puncture. This is analogous to the ambiguity encountered in the definition of , which ultimately does not affect the definition of .
Corollary 3.1 and equation (4) combine to give the short exact sequence of outer automorphism groups (8).
Warning. The splitting of the short exact sequence (12) does not give a splitting of the short exact sequence (8). Indeed we will show the latter sequence does not always split (Corollary 1.3). The subtlety comes from the fact that the inner automorphism group does not coincide with the image of under the section . Proposition 3.4 below describes the precise relationship.
3.2. Kernel of
Observe that the kernel of is contained in the point-pushing subgroup . This is because composed with the natural map is the natural map , whose kernel is the point-pushing subgroup. Thus we want to understand the image of the point-pushing subgroup under the section used to define . What we find is a simple relationship between three surface group representations:
The main results are Proposition 3.4 and Corollary 3.5 below. In order to state Proposition 3.4, we need the following notation. Let
be the Poincaré duality map, given explicitly by , where
is the algebraic intersection form. We use denote the composition
This map is given explicitly by , where is the image of under and is the corresponding homology class.
Fix a basepoint . Recall that we have fixed a standard generating set of so that is a loop around the puncture of . Define
(13) |
by , where is a fixed arc from to .
Proposition 3.4.
As a sanity check, observe that does not depend on the choice of lift because any two lifts differ by an element of the normal closure of in , and conjugation by any such element is trivial on .
Proof of Proposition 3.4.
It suffices to prove the lemma for that are represented by a non-separating simple closed curve. To see this, first note that is generated by these curves. Furthermore, the groups and commute in , so
Assume now that is represented by a non-separating simple closed curve. After an isotopy, we can assume that contains as a sub-arc. Choose as pictured in Figure 1.
at 230 430
\pinlabel at 290 430
\pinlabel at 343 435
\pinlabel at 343 459
\pinlabel at 260 425
\endlabellist
We want to show that
for each . Since this is obviously true for , it suffices to show this equality for for ; furthermore, it suffices to show the equality on any generating set of . We use the (infinite) generating set consisting of curves of one of the forms pictured in Figure 2 (the intersection of these curves with the annulus around has one component).
at 235 237
\pinlabel at 105 337
\pinlabel at 263 337
\pinlabel at 495 300
\endlabellist
Note that fixes the basepoint , so we can compute the action of on . We compute the action of on the elements in Figure 2 as follows. See Figure 3 for an illustration.
at 100 100
\pinlabel at 263 100
\pinlabel at 465 60
\endlabellist
This proves that, for example, that
We conclude similarly for the generators . This proves the desired formula for . ∎
The following corollary is an immediate consequence of Proposition 3.4.
Corollary 3.5.
Consider the composition
(15) |
The restriction of to factors as follows.
Here denotes the abelianization map .
3.3. Proof of Theorem A
Using the isomorphisms between mapping class groups and automorphism groups, the desired diagram is equivalent to the following one.
The map in (15) descends to the middle vertical map and restricts to the left vertical map by Corollary 3.5. The fact that is a section (Corollary 3.1) implies that the middle vertical map descends to the identity map on . When , the middle vertical map is an isomorphism by the five lemma. This concludes the proof of Theorem A.
4. Spectral sequence computation
In this section we prove Theorem 1.2. This is achieved by two different computations using the Lyndon–Hochschild–Serre (LHS) spectral sequence. Recall that this spectral sequence takes input a short exact sequence of groups and a -module , has page
and converges to . For both computations we use the Birman exact sequence, but with different choices of the module .
Notational note. To simplify the notation, we use the convention that cohomology groups have coefficients unless otherwise specified.
4.1. Euler class computation
Proposition 4.1.
Fix . Let be the Euler class of the extension (1). Then , and has order in .
Proof.
The relation already follows from Theorem A. Indeed, choosing a set-theoretic section for the sequence in the top row of the diagram in Theorem A gives a cocycle representative for that is times the cocycle representative for .
Now we prove that generates a cyclic subgroup isomorphic to in . Our method is to apply the LHS spectral sequence to the Birman exact sequence with the module . Here
A portion of the associated 5-term exact sequence is as follows.
This sequence has been studied by Morita. Morita [Mor85, Prop. 4.1] computes that the first term vanishes, so the map is injective. The group is isomorphic to and generated the Poincaré duality isomorphism . Morita [Mor85, proof of Prop. 6.4] shows that the image of is . Consequently, the differential descends to an injection .
It remains to show that sends a generator to . The differential is the transgression; see e.g. [NSW08, Prop. 1.6.6, Thm. 2.4.3]. By standard knowledge of the transgression applied to our situation, we find that sends a generator to , where is the Euler class of the extension (2), and
is the isomorphism induced by the Poincaré duality isomorphism . (For this property of the transgression, see [NSW08, §I.6, Exercise 1-2]. While that reference is mainly concerned with finite or profinite groups, the analysis of the transgression contained given there applies more generally.) Finally, we observe that by Theorem A. ∎
4.2. Computation of
Running the LHS spectral sequence with the trivial module , we prove that if , then
(16) |
Combining this with Proposition 4.1 proves Theorem 1.2. The relevant portion of the spectral sequence appears below.
The computations in the first column are easy. In the second column, Morita [Mor85, Prop. 4.1] computed for . The other computation holds for because the abelianization of is finite [FM12, §5.1.2-3].
According to [BT01, Cor. 1.2],
in degrees . Here has degree 2. Applying this and using the universal coefficients theorem, we conclude that
is an isomorphism if and , and it is injective if and if .
Since the map is injective, the differential is zero. Since the map is an isomorphism, the differential is surjective.
Thus, the filtration of coming from the page gives an exact sequence
For ,
and the map is the obvious one . We claim that . From this we deduce the desired isomorphism (16). The claim follows from the fact that the extension that defines , when restricted to the point-pushing subgroup , gives the extension
where is the unit tangent bundle. See [FM12, §5.5.5]. This extension has Euler class , so the claim follows.
References
- [Bro82] K. S. Brown. Cohomology of groups, volume 87 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York-Berlin, 1982.
- [BT01] C.-F. Bödigheimer and U. Tillmann. Stripping and splitting decorated mapping class groups. In Cohomological methods in homotopy theory (Bellaterra, 1998), volume 196 of Progr. Math., pages 47–57. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2001.
- [Che19] L. Chen. On the nonrealizability of braid groups by homeomorphisms. Geom. Topol., 23(7):3735–3749, 2019.
- [CR77] P. E. Conner and F. Raymond. Deforming homotopy equivalences to homeomorphisms in aspherical manifolds. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 83(1):36–85, 1977.
- [CS22] L. Chen and N. Salter. Global fixed points of mapping class group actions and a theorem of Markovic. J. Topol., 15(3):1311–1324, 2022.
- [FM12] B. Farb and D. Margalit. A primer on mapping class groups, volume 49 of Princeton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012.
- [Mar07] V. Markovic. Realization of the mapping class group by homeomorphisms. Invent. Math., 168(3):523–566, 2007.
- [McC91] D. McCullough. Virtually geometrically finite mapping class groups of -manifolds. J. Differential Geom., 33(1):1–65, 1991.
- [Mor85] S. Morita. Family of Jacobian manifolds and characteristic classes of surface bundles. II. Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci., 61(4):112–115, 1985.
- [NSW08] J. Neukirch, A. Schmidt, and K. Wingberg. Cohomology of number fields, volume 323 of Grundlehren der mathematischen Wissenschaften [Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, second edition, 2008.
- [Sou10] J. Souto. A remark on the action of the mapping class group on the unit tangent bundle. Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6), 19(3-4):589–601, 2010.
- [Wal68] F. Waldhausen. On irreducible -manifolds which are sufficiently large. Ann. of Math. (2), 87:56–88, 1968.