This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Magnon laser based on Brillouin light scattering

Zeng-Xing Liu liuzx@dgut.edu.cn School of Electronic Engineering &\& Intelligentization, Dongguan University of Technology, Dongguan, Guangdong 523808, China    Hao Xiong haoxiong1217@gmail.com School of Physics, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, People’s Republic of China
Abstract

An analogous laser action of magnons would be a subject of interest and is crucial for the study of nonlinear magnons spintronics. Here, we demonstrate the magnon laser behavior based on Brillouin light scattering in a ferrimagnetic insulator sphere which supports optical whispering gallery modes and magnon resonances. We show that the excited magnon plays what has traditionally been the role of the Stokes wave and is coherently amplified during the Brillouin scattering process, making magnon laser possible. Furthermore, the stimulating excited magnon number increasing exponentially with the input light power can be manipulated by adjusting the external magnetic field. In addition to providing insight into magneto-optical interaction, the study of magnon laser action will help to develop novel technologies for handling spin-wave excitations and could affect scientific fields beyond magnonics. Potential applications range from preparing coherent magnon sources to operating on-chip functional magnetic devices.

pacs:
72.10.Di, 75.30.Ds,75.50.Gg

Magnons, the quasiparticle of spin-wave excitation, are well known for its favorable compatibility with a wide range of carriers such as microwaves photon1 ; photon2 ; photon4 , phonons phonon1 ; phonon11 ; phonon2 , and superconducting qubits qubit1 ; qubit2 . Recently, experimental works have reported that the coupling between magnons and microwave photons can reach a strong and even ultrastrong regime strong1 ; strong2 ; strong4 . In addition, the yttrium iron garnet (YIG) ferrimagnetic material has a high magnetic quality factor and supports magnons with long coherence times, which envisions the promising candidates for quantum information processing time2 . In particular, the YIG sphere supports optical whispering gallery modes (WGMs) and magnon resonances WGM2 ; WGM ; WGM1 . Simultaneously, the magnon-photon interaction in the YIG sphere gives rise to Brillouin light scattering BL3 , which is a well-established tool for the characterization of magnonic features and magnetic dynamics.

Brillouin light scattering, in a quantum mechanical language, is essentially an inelastic scattering of light excited by various quasiparticles waves , such as phonons, polarons, or magnons within a medium. In the YIG sphere, akin to the mechanical effect of light OMIT1 , the coherent conversion between the magnons and photons can be achieved via the Brillouin scattering process even though the large frequency mismatch between the optical and magnon modes. Previous work has shown that the Brillouin light scattering in the YIG sphere will be greatly enhanced when the triple-resonance condition is satisfied Brillouin1 , i.e., the input and output optical modes are resonance with the frequency difference given by the magnon mode. Some coherent effects, ranging from optomagnonically induced transparency EIT and magnon-induced high-order sideband generation chaos1 ; chaos2 to magnon blockade effect blockade have been revealed.

An analogous laser action of magnons would be a subject of interesting for a broad range of physics from the areas of spintronics, magnonics, and photonics. The purpose of this work is to establish a theoretical framework for magnon laser action. Some important characteristics of magnon laser, for instance, the gain factor, threshold power, laser control, and environment temperature have been analyzed. We found that the excited magnon in the YIG sphere plays what has traditionally been the role of the Stokes wave and is coherently amplified during the Brillouin scattering process, making magnon laser action possible OMIT1 . The effective magnon gain is proportional to the input light power, while the threshold power of the magnon laser is inversely proportional to the square of the magnon-photon coupling strength. Moreover, we shown that one can achieve the magnon laser control by adjusting the external magnetic field. In addition, we theoretically evaluated the possibility of observing the magnon laser action at room temperature under the current experimental conditions WGM ; WGM1 . Beyond their fundamental scientific significance, our results offer attractive prospects for preparing coherent magnon sources cool1 ; cool2 , designing magnon-laser amplifiers, and manipulating on-chip magnetic devices device1 ; device2 .

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the physical model. Similar to the optical WGMs, the YIG ferrimagnetic sphere also supports optical WGMs and magnon resonances. The inelastic scattering is a process of three-particle interaction, i.e., ωMωE+ωm\omega_{\rm{M}}\rightarrow\omega_{\rm{E}}+\omega_{\rm{m}}, where, respectively, the input photon with σ+\sigma^{+} polarization in the TM mode and the scattered photon with π\pi polarization in the TE mode.

The physical model is schematically shown in Figure 1, in which a micrometer-scale YIG sphere supports optical WGMs and magnon resonances. A bias magnetic field B perpendicular to the plane of the WGMs (x-y plane) is applied to saturate the magnetization. The frequency of the uniform Kittel (magnon) mode in the YIG sphere can be flexibly tuned by adjusting the external magnetic field Q2 , i.e., Ωm=ϱHm\Omega_{\rm{m}}=\varrho\rm{H_{m}}, where ϱ=2π×28\varrho=2\pi\times 28 GHz/T\rm{GHz/T} is the gyromagnetic ratio and Hm\rm{H_{m}} is the magnetic field strength. The input light is introduced through a polarization controller and then evanescently coupled to the optical WGMs via a tapered nanofiber. The transverse-electric (TE) mode and the transverse-magnetic (TM) mode in the optical WGMs with the same mode index have distinct frequency differences due to the geometrical birefringence, which is demonstrated to be valid regardless of the circulation direction of the photon birefringence1 . Assuming that the input light is adjusted to couple to the TM mode (TM input), as shown in Fig. 1, the light in the resonator is σ+\sigma^{+} polarized WGM ; WGM1 . The inelastic scattering process occurs in the YIG sphere, i.e., the annihilation of a σ+\sigma^{+}-polarized photon in the TM mode accompanied by the creation of a magnon and a down-converted red-sideband photon with π\pi polarization in the TE mode. The interaction between the two light photons and one magnon can be well described by the Hamiltonian Hint=g(aMaEm+aMaEm){\rm{H_{int}}}=\hbar g(a_{\rm{M}}a_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}m^{\dagger}+a_{\rm{M}}^{\dagger}a_{\rm{E}}m), where aM(E)a_{\rm{M(E)}} (aM(E)a_{\rm{M(E)}}^{\dagger}) and mm (mm^{\dagger}) are the annihilation (creation) operators of the photon in the TM (TE) mode and the magnon mode, respectively. g=𝕍cnr2nspin𝐕g=\mathbb{V}\frac{c}{n_{\rm{r}}}\sqrt{\frac{2}{n_{\rm{spin}}\mathbf{V}}} is the magnon-photon coupling strength WGM1 , with the Verdet constant 𝕍\mathbb{V}, the vacuum speed of light cc, the refractive index nrn_{\rm{r}}, the spin density nspinn_{\rm{spin}}, and the YIG sphere volume 𝐕\mathbf{V}. In this circumstance, the magnon mode plays what has traditionally been the role of the Stokes wave and is coherently amplified during the Brillouin scattering process.

In order to model the magnon laser action more rigorously, we proceed from the Hamiltonian including the TE and TM modes and the magnon mode, as well as the interaction Hamiltonian

H\displaystyle\rm{H} =\displaystyle= ΩMaMaM+ΩEaEaE+Ωmmm\displaystyle\hbar\Omega_{\rm{M}}a_{\rm{M}}^{\dagger}a_{\rm{M}}+\hbar\Omega_{\rm{E}}a_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}a_{\rm{E}}+\hbar\Omega_{\rm{m}}{m}^{\dagger}{m} (1)
+g(aMaEm+aMaEm),\displaystyle+\hbar g(a_{\rm{M}}a_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}m^{\dagger}+a_{\rm{M}}^{\dagger}a_{\rm{E}}m),

where ΩM(E)\Omega_{\rm{M(E)}} and Ωm\Omega_{\rm{m}} are, respectively, the frequency of the TM (TE) mode and the magnon mode. We assume that the TM mode is driven by a input light with the frequency ωM\omega_{\rm{M}}, which allows us to replace the operator aMa_{\rm{M}} with a classical field nMeiωMt\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}e^{-i\omega_{\rm{M}}t}, where

nM\displaystyle n_{\rm{M}} =\displaystyle= ΥMPinωM[ΔM2+(γM2)2],\displaystyle\frac{\Upsilon_{\rm{M}}{\rm{P_{in}}}}{\hbar\omega_{\rm{M}}[\Delta_{\rm{M}}^{2}+(\frac{\gamma_{\rm{M}}}{2})^{2}]}, (2)

indicates the average number of photons in the TM mode with the detuning ΔM=ΩMωM\Delta_{\rm{M}}=\Omega_{\rm{M}}-\omega_{\rm{M}}, the input light power Pin\rm{P_{in}} and the decay rate γM=κM+ΥM\gamma_{\rm{M}}=\kappa_{\rm{M}}+\Upsilon_{\rm{M}} (κM\kappa_{\rm{M}} the intrinsic decay rate and ΥM\Upsilon_{\rm{M}} the external coupling). Next we would like to turn to a rotation framework subject to an unitary transformation 𝐔(t)=exp(iωMaMaMt+iωEaEaEt+iωmmmt\mathbf{U}(t)=\exp(i\omega_{\rm{M}}a_{\rm{M}}^{\dagger}a_{\rm{M}}t+i\omega_{\rm{E}}a_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}a_{\rm{E}}t+i\omega_{\rm{m}}{m}^{\dagger}{m}t) with ωM(E)\omega_{\rm{M(E)}} and ωm\omega_{\rm{m}} the frequency of the input (output) field for the TM (TE) mode and the magnon mode. The Hamiltonian describes the coupling between the TE and the magnon modes driven by the TM mode, therefore, can be obtained as

H\displaystyle\rm{H} =\displaystyle= ΔEaEaE+Δmmm\displaystyle\hbar\Delta_{\rm{E}}a_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}a_{\rm{E}}+\hbar\Delta_{\rm{m}}{m}^{\dagger}{m} (3)
+gnM(aEmeiδt+aEmeiδt),\displaystyle+\hbar g\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}(a_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}m^{\dagger}e^{-i\delta t}+a_{\rm{E}}me^{i\delta t}),

where ΔE(m)=ΩE(m)ωE(m)\Delta_{\rm{E}(\rm{m})}=\Omega_{\rm{E}(\rm{m})}-\omega_{\rm{E}(\rm{m})} denotes the detuning from the TE mode and magnon mode resonances, respectively. Under the condition of triple resonance, i.e., ωMωE=ωm\omega_{\rm{M}}-\omega_{\rm{E}}=\omega_{\rm{m}}, the index factor e±iδt1e^{\pm i\delta t}\equiv 1 for δωMωEωm=0\delta\equiv\omega_{\rm{M}}-\omega_{\rm{E}}-\omega_{\rm{m}}=0. The evolution of the photons and magnons can be well described by the following coupling equations

a˙E\displaystyle\dot{a}_{\rm{E}} =\displaystyle= (iΔEγE2)aEignMm+κEψE(in)(t),\displaystyle(-i\Delta_{\rm{E}}-\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}){a}_{\rm{E}}-ig\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}m^{\dagger}+\sqrt{\kappa_{\rm{E}}}\psi_{\rm{E}}^{(\rm{in})}(t),
m˙\displaystyle\dot{m} =\displaystyle= (iΔmγm2)mignMaE+κmφ(in)(t),\displaystyle(-i\Delta_{\rm{m}}-\frac{\gamma_{\rm{m}}}{2})m-ig\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}{a}_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}+\sqrt{\kappa_{\rm{m}}}\varphi^{(\rm{in})}(t), (4)

where γE\gamma_{\rm{E}} (κE\kappa_{\rm{E}}) and γm\gamma_{\rm{m}} (κm\kappa_{\rm{m}}) are, respectively, the total (intrinsic) decay rates of the TE and magnon modes. ψE(in)(t)\psi_{\rm{E}}^{(\rm{in})}(t) and φ(in)(t)\varphi^{(\rm{in})}(t) represent the thermal noise terms of the photon and magnon modes, and characterized by the following temperature-dependent correlation functions Noise ψE(in)(t)ψE(in)(t)\langle\psi_{\rm{E}}^{(\rm{in})}(t)\psi_{\rm{E}}^{(\rm{in})\dagger}(t^{\prime})\rangle = [nth(ωE)+1]δ(tt)[n_{\rm{th}}(\omega_{\rm{E}})+1]\delta(t-t^{\prime}), ψE(in)(t)ψE(in)(t)\langle\psi_{\rm{E}}^{(\rm{in})\dagger}(t)\psi_{\rm{E}}^{(\rm{in})}(t^{\prime})\rangle = [nth(ωE)]δ(tt)[n_{\rm{th}}(\omega_{\rm{E}})]\delta(t-t^{\prime}), and φ(in)(t)φ(in)(t)\langle\varphi^{(\rm{in})}(t)\varphi^{(\rm{in})\dagger}(t^{\prime})\rangle = [mth(ωm)+1]δ(tt)[m_{\rm{th}}(\omega_{\rm{m}})+1]\delta(t-t^{\prime}), φ(in)(t)φ(in)(t)\langle\varphi^{(\rm{in})\dagger}(t)\varphi^{(\rm{in})}(t^{\prime})\rangle = [mth(ωm)]δ(tt)[m_{\rm{th}}(\omega_{\rm{m}})]\delta(t-t^{\prime}), where nth(ωE)=[exp(ωEKBT)1]1n_{\rm{th}}(\omega_{\rm{E}})=[{\rm{exp}}(\frac{\hbar\omega_{\rm{E}}}{\rm{K_{B}T}})-1]^{-1}, and mth(ωm)=[exp(ωmKBT)1]1m_{\rm{th}}(\omega_{\rm{m}})=[{\rm{exp}}(\frac{\hbar\omega_{\rm{m}}}{\rm{K_{B}T}})-1]^{-1} with the Boltzmann constant KB\rm{K_{B}} and the ambient temperature T\rm{T}, are, respectively, the equilibrium means thermal photon and magnon numbers. For an experiment temperature of T \sim 100 mK strong4 , the thermal magnon numbers are mth0.0083m_{\rm{th}}\approx 0.0083, which is far less than the emitted magnon numbers, and thus the environment thermal noises can be safely ignored.

Transferring the variables to the rotating frame by setting a~E=aEeiΔEt\tilde{a}_{\rm{E}}={a}_{\rm{E}}e^{i\Delta_{\rm{E}}t} and m~=meiΔmt\tilde{m}=me^{i\Delta_{\rm{m}}t}, we shall have

a~˙E\displaystyle\dot{\tilde{a}}_{\rm{E}} =\displaystyle= γE2a~EignMei(ΔE+Δm)tm~,\displaystyle-\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}\tilde{a}_{\rm{E}}-ig\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}e^{i(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})t}\tilde{m}^{\dagger},
m~˙\displaystyle\dot{\tilde{m}} =\displaystyle= γm2m~ignMei(ΔE+Δm)ta~E.\displaystyle-\frac{\gamma_{\rm{m}}}{2}\tilde{m}-ig\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}e^{i(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})t}\tilde{a}_{\rm{E}}^{\dagger}. (5)

We can adiabatically eliminate the optical mode degrees of freedom since γmγE\gamma_{\rm{m}}\ll\gamma_{\rm{E}} adiabatic , and then by solving for the antiderivative, we can obtain that

Refer to caption
Figure 2: The threshold power of the magnon laser Pth(mW)\rm{P_{th}}(\rm{mW}) as a function of the magnon-photon coupling strength g/(2π×39.2g/(2\pi\times 39.2 Hz)\rm{Hz}) and the detuning from the magnon mode Δm/Ωm\Delta_{\rm{m}}/\Omega_{\rm{m}}. The red, yellow, green solid lines correspond to the threshold power Pth\rm{P_{th}} = 22, 10, 4 mW\rm{mW}, respectively. The simulation parameters we use are WGM ; WGM1 ΩM/2π\Omega_{\rm{M}}/2\pi \approx ΩE/2π\Omega_{\rm{E}}/2\pi = 300 THz\rm{THz}, Ωm/2π\Omega_{\rm{m}}/2\pi = 10 GHz\rm{GHz}, γM/2π\gamma_{\rm{M}}/2\pi = γE/2π\gamma_{\rm{E}}/2\pi = 15 MHz\rm{MHz}, γm/2π\gamma_{\rm{m}}/2\pi = 1 MHz\rm{MHz}, ΥM=γM/2\Upsilon_{\rm{M}}=\gamma_{\rm{M}}/2, and ΔM=ΔE=0\Delta_{\rm{M}}=\Delta_{\rm{E}}=0.
a~E\displaystyle\tilde{a}_{\rm{E}} =\displaystyle= eγE2𝑑tignMm~ei(ΔE+Δm)teγE2𝑑tdt\displaystyle e^{-\int\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}dt}\int-ig\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}\tilde{m}^{\dagger}e^{i(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})t}e^{\int\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}dt}dt (6)
=ignMi(ΔE+Δm)+γE2ei(ΔE+Δm)tm~.\displaystyle=\frac{-ig\sqrt{n_{\rm{M}}}}{i(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})+\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}}e^{i(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})t}\tilde{m}^{\dagger}.

Substituting this solution into Eq. (Magnon laser based on Brillouin light scattering ) yields

m~˙\displaystyle\dot{\tilde{m}} =\displaystyle= {γm2+g2nMi(ΔE+Δm)+γE2}m~.\displaystyle\left\{-\frac{\gamma_{\rm{m}}}{2}+\frac{g^{2}n_{\rm{M}}}{-i(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})+\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}}\right\}\tilde{m}. (7)

From Eq. (7) we observe that the Brillouin scattering process between the optical photon and magnon in YIG sphere contributes an effective magnon gain as

𝔾=Re{g2nMi(ΔE+Δm)+γE2}=g2nMγE2(ΔE+Δm)2+(γE2)2.\displaystyle\mathbb{G}={\rm{Re}}\left\{\frac{g^{2}n_{\rm{M}}}{-i(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})+\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}}\right\}=\frac{g^{2}n_{\rm{M}}\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2}}{(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{m}})^{2}+(\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2})^{2}}.

We define M[γm1\gamma_{\rm{m}}^{-1}] = exp[(2𝔾γm)/γm]{\rm{exp}}[(2\mathbb{G}-\gamma_{m})/\gamma_{m}] as the steady state number of magnons. We can see that the magnon gain factor is proportional to the input light power enlightening us of the possibility of implementing magnon laser by using light. By setting γm/2=𝔾\gamma_{\rm{m}}/2=\mathbb{G} , we obtain the threshold power of the magnon laser

Pth\displaystyle\rm{P}_{th} =\displaystyle= ωMγmγM2[(ΔE+ΔM)2+(γE2)2]4g2ΥMγE,\displaystyle\frac{\hbar\omega_{\rm{M}}\gamma_{\rm{m}}\gamma_{\rm{M}}^{2}[(\Delta_{\rm{E}}+\Delta_{\rm{M}})^{2}+(\frac{\gamma_{\rm{E}}}{2})^{2}]}{4g^{2}\Upsilon_{\rm{M}}\gamma_{\rm{E}}}, (9)

referring to the incident power required when the magnon gain induced by Brillouin scattering overcomes the dissipation of the magnon, which is the necessary condition for the generation of magnon laser.

Figure 2 shows the threshold power of the magnon laser Pth\rm{P_{th}} varies with the magnon-photon coupling strength gg and the detuning Δm/Ωm\Delta_{\rm{m}}/\Omega_{\rm{m}}.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: The stimulated emitted magnon number M[γm1\gamma_{\rm{m}}^{-1}] as a function of the input power in the context of different magnon-photon coupling strength gg under the resonance condition Δm/Ωm=0\Delta_{\rm{m}}/\Omega_{\rm{m}}=0. The black dotted line represents the threshold conditions for the generation of magnon laser, i.e., M[γm1\gamma_{\rm{m}}^{-1}] = 1. The threshold condition denoted by the thick points is obtained for γm/2=𝔾\gamma_{\rm{m}}/2=\mathbb{G}. The insets (a) and (b) plot the magnon line shape function in the case of Pin\rm{P_{in}} = 15 and 1 mW\rm{mW}, respectively. The other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 2.

We can clearly see that the threshold power is the lowest when the magnon mode satisfies the resonance condition, i.e., Δm=Ωmωm=0\Delta_{\rm{m}}=\Omega_{\rm{m}}-\omega_{\rm{m}}=0, but will exponentially increase when it deviates from the resonance position. For a YIG sphere with a diameter of 200-μm\mu m strong1 , without assuming further optimization process of the YIG sphere, the magnon-photon coupling constant is theoretically evaluated to be g=2π×39.2g=2\pi\times 39.2 Hz\rm{Hz} WGM1 . In this realistic assumption, the threshold power of the magnon laser is about 22 mW\rm{mW} (the red line shown). In addition, increasing the coupling strength to g=1.5×2π×39.2g=1.5\times 2\pi\times 39.2 Hz\rm{Hz} and g=2.4×2π×39.2g=2.4\times 2\pi\times 39.2 Hz\rm{Hz}, as the yellow and green lines shown, the threshold power is correspondingly reduced from Pth=10\rm{P}_{\rm{th}}=10 mW\rm{mW} to 4 mW\rm{mW}. The physical mechanism as Eq. (9) reveals that the threshold power of the magnon laser is inversely proportional to the square of the magnon-photon coupling strength gg. In experiment, the improvement of the magnon-photon coupling strength might be realized in several aspects, for instance, scaling down the YIG sphere size to reduce the mode volume WGM1 , manufacturing the nanostructured magnets device1 ; device2 to increase the spatial overlap between the optical and magnon fields, and further purifying and chemically processing of the YIG sphere are also recommended Brillouin2 . With these improvements, the magnon-photon coupling strength is expected to increase two orders of magnitude EIT , and the threshold power is decreased to Pth\rm{P}_{{\rm{th}}}\sim 2.3 μ\muW. In this context, even if the input power is quite weak, the magnon laser action can be observed experimentally in the near future.

From Eqs. (7) and (Magnon laser based on Brillouin light scattering ), the stimulated emitted magnon number can be derived as M[γm1\gamma_{\rm{m}}^{-1}] = exp(η1){\rm{exp}}(\eta-1) OMIT1 , where

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Three-dimensional graph of the stimulated emitted magnon number M[γm1\gamma_{\rm{m}}^{-1}] varies with the magnetic field strength H/Hm\rm{H/H_{m}}, and (a) the optical power Pin\rm{P_{in}} (mW)(\rm{mW}), (b) the magnon-photon coupling strength gg. The red solid line represents the threshold condition of the magnon laser. We use g=2π×39.2g=2\pi\times 39.2 Hz\rm{Hz} in Fig. 3(a) and Pin=1mW\rm{P_{in}=1mW} in Fig. 3(b), and the other parameters are the same as those in Fig. 2.
η\displaystyle\eta =\displaystyle= 8g2PinωMγMγEγm,\displaystyle\frac{8g^{2}\rm{P_{in}}}{\hbar\omega_{\rm{M}}\gamma_{\rm{M}}\gamma_{\rm{E}}\gamma_{\rm{m}}}, (10)

represents the pure gain factor of the emitted magnon number under the triple-resonance condition. In the case of η>1\eta>1 implies that the magnon gain caused by the Brillouin light scattering overcomes the mode dissipation and yields the magnon coherent amplification. As the green solid line shown in Fig. 3, for the magnon-photon coupling strength g=2π×39.2g=2\pi\times 39.2 Hz\rm{Hz}, the magnon laser action would be observed when the incident light power reaches about 22 mW\rm{mW}, which is highly accessible under the current experimental technique WGM1 . More importantly, the emitted magnon number M[γm1\gamma_{\rm{m}}^{-1}] increases exponentially with the incident power. In particular, when the magnon-photon coupling strength increase to g=3×2π×39.2g=3\times 2\pi\times 39.2 Hz\rm{Hz}, as the blue solid line shown, the threshold power of the magnon laser is reduced to 2.5 mW\rm{mW}. And the steady state number of stimulated emitted magnons is calculated to be M[γm1\gamma_{\rm{m}}^{-1}] \approx 1.82×1041.82\times 10^{4} when the input light power Pin\rm{P}_{\rm{in}} = 15 mW\rm{mW}, which is much larger than the number of thermally populated magnons mth624.8m_{\rm{th}}\approx 624.8 at room temperature (T = 300 K), consequently, the magnon laser effect can be measured at room temperature. Besides, the magnon line shape function are plotted in the illustration (a) and (b) of Fig. 3 in the context of the pumping points below (Pin\rm{P_{in}} = 1 mW\rm{mW}) and above (Pin\rm{P_{in}} = 15 mW\rm{mW}) the threshold, respectively. We can see that the stimulated emitted magnons are mainly populated in the vicinity of the frequency ωm\omega_{\rm{m}} = 2π×102\pi\times 10 GHz\rm{GHz} \simeq 62.83 GHz\rm{GHz}, and the linewidth of the magnon laser above the threshold is significantly narrower narrower . These results, therefore, are enlightening for the realization of magnon operation by using light, and may offer theoretical support for the manufacture of high-intensity magnon-laser amplifiers.

Finally, achieving the effective control of the magnon laser action is of fundamental importance and is also a key link for the practical application of the magnon laser in the future. Obviously, we can see from Figure 4 that the stimulated magnon number reaches the peak only when the magnetic field strength was adjusted to H=Hm=Ωm/ϱ357.14{\rm{H=H_{m}}}=\Omega_{\rm{m}}/\varrho\approx 357.14 mT\rm{mT}. In this circumstances, the frequency of the magnon mode in YIG sphere is resonant with the frequency difference between the incident photons and the scattered photons. Otherwise, the emitted magnon number decreases exponentially when the magnetic field strength deviates from Hm\rm{H_{m}}, i.e., H>Hm\rm{H}>\rm{H_{m}} or H<Hm\rm{H}<\rm{H_{m}}. Physically, on one hand, the frequency of the Kittel mode in YIG sphere is determined by the external magnetic field strength Q2 , i.e., Ωm=ϱHm\Omega_{\rm{m}}=\varrho\rm{H_{m}}. On the other hand, as Fig. 2 shown, the threshold power of the magnon laser is the weakest when the optical mode as well as the magnon mode simultaneously on resonance. The red line in Fig. 4 indicates the threshold conditions of the magnon laser, i.e., the gain factor η=1\eta=1. Namely, if and only if the system parameters within the red line region, i.e., the gain factor η>1\eta>1, the magnon laser action can be achieved, in which the external magnetic field plays a paramount role. Our proposal thus provides a pathway for implementing magnetic-field-modulated magnon laser that can be applied to both fundamental problems in cavity optomagnonics and influences a broad range of scientific fields beyond magnonics.

In conclusion, the magnon laser action based on Brillouin light scattering in a YIG ferrimagnetic sphere has been theoretically demonstrated. We manifest that the stimulated emitted magnon number increases exponentially with the input light power, similar to the photon amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, providing a theoretical foundation for the realization of magnon laser. The magnon laser action discussed here further demonstrates the feasibility of achieving magnon manipulation by using light. These results, therefore, are expected to pave a path toward the achievement of microwave-to-optical converter as well as the preparation of coherent magnon sources, and may promote the rapid development of the thermodynamics and spintronics of the magnet.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (11774113, 61775036); The high-level talent program of Dongguan University of Technology (KCYCXPT2017003).

References

  • (1) Ö.O. Soykal and M.E. Flatté, Phys. Rev. Lett. ”Strong Field Interactions between a Nanomagnet and a Photonic Cavity,” 104, 077202 (2010).
  • (2) H. Huebl, C.W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifenstein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S.T.B. Goennenwein, ”High Cooperativity in Coupled Microwave Resonator Ferrimagnetic Insulator Hybrids,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127003 (2013).
  • (3) L. Bai, M. Harder, Y.-P. Chen, X. Fan, J.-Q. Xiao, and C.-M. Hu, ”Spin Pumping in Electrodynamically Coupled Magnon-Photon Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 227201 (2015).
  • (4) X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H.X. Tang, ”Cavity magnomechanics,” Sci. Adv. 2, e1501286 (2016).
  • (5) T. Kikkawa, K. Shen, B. Flebus, R.A. Duine, K.I. Uchida, Z. Qiu, G.E.W. Bauer, and E. Saitoh, ”Magnon Polarons in the Spin Seebeck Effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 207203 (2016).
  • (6) J. Li, S.-Y. Zhu, and G.S. Agarwal, ”Magnon-Photon-Phonon Entanglement in Cavity Magnomechanics,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 203601 (2018).
  • (7) Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, ”Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit,” Science 349, 405 (2015).
  • (8) D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, and Y. Nakamura, ”Resolving quanta of collective spin excitations in a millimeter-sized ferromagnet,” Sci. Adv. 3, e1603150 (2017).
  • (9) M. Goryachev, W.G. Farr, D.L. Creedon, Y. Fan, M. Kostylev, and M.E. Tobar, ”High-Cooperativity Cavity QED with Magnons at Microwave Frequencies,” Phys. Rev. Appl. 2, 054002 (2014).
  • (10) X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H.X. Tang, ”Strongly Coupled Magnons and Cavity Microwave Photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014).
  • (11) Y.-P. Wang, G.-Q. Zhang, D. Zhang, T.-F. Li, C.-M. Hu, and J.-Q. You, ”Bistability of Cavity Magnon Polaritons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 057202 (2018).
  • (12) L.J. Cornelissen, J. Liu, R.A. Duine, J.B. Youssef, and B.J. van Wees, ”Long-distance transport of magnon spin information in a magnetic insulator at room temperature,” Nat. Phys. 11, 1022 (2015).
  • (13) A.B. Matsko and V.S. Ilchenko, Optical resonators with whispering-gallery modes-part I: basics, IEEE J SEL TOP QUANT 12, 3-14 (2006).
  • (14) X. Zhang, N. Zhu, C.-L. Zou, and H.X. Tang, ”Optomagnonic Whispering Gallery Microresonators,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123605 (2016).
  • (15) A. Osada, R. Hisatomi, A. Noguchi, Y. Tabuchi, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, M. Sadgrove, R. Yalla, M. Nomura, and Y. Nakamura, ”Cavity Optomagnonics with Spin-Orbit Coupled Photons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 223601 (2016).
  • (16) S. Klingler, H. Maier-Flaig, R. Gross, C.M. Hu, H. Huebl, S.T.B. Goennenwein, and M. Weiler, ”Combined Brillouin light scattering and microwave absorption study of magnon-photon coupling in a split-ring resonator/YIG film system,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 072402 (2016).
  • (17) R.Y.Chiao, C.H. Townes and B P. Stoicheff, ”Stimulated Brillouin Scattering and Coherent Generation of Intense Hypersonic Waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 592 (1964).
  • (18) H. Jing, S.K. Özdemir, X.-Y. Lü, J. Zhang, L. Yang, and F. Nori, ”PT -Symmetric Phonon Laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 053604 (2014).
  • (19) J.A. Haigh, A. Nunnenkamp, A.J. Ramsay, and A.J. Ferguson, ”Triple-Resonant Brillouin Light Scattering in Magneto-Optical Cavities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 133602 (2016).
  • (20) T. Liu, X. Zhang, H.X. Tang, and M.E. Flatté, ”Optomagnonics in magnetic solids,” Phys. Rev. B 94, 060405(R) (2016).
  • (21) Z.-X. Liu, B. Wang, H. Xiong, and Y. Wu, ”Magnon-induced high-order sideband generation,” Opt. Lett. 43, 3698-3701 (2018).
  • (22) Z.-X. Liu, C. You, B. Wang, H. Xiong, and Y. Wu, ”Phase-mediated magnon chaos-order transition in cavity optomagnonics,” Opt. Lett. 44, 507-510 (2019).
  • (23) Z.-X. Liu, H. Xiong, and Y. Wu, ”Magnon blockade in a hybrid ferromagnet-superconductor quantum system,” Phys. Rev. B 100, 134421 (2019).
  • (24) T. Kampfrath, A. Sell, G. Klatt, A. Pashkin, S. Mährlein, T. Dekorsy, M. Wolf, M. Fiebig, A. Leitenstorfer, and R. Huber, ”Coherent terahertz control of antiferromagnetic spin waves,” Nat. Photonics 5, 31 (2011).
  • (25) M. Jäckl, V.I. Belotelov, I.A. Akimov, I.V. Savochkin, D.R. Yakovlev, A.K. Zvezdin, and M. Bayer, ”Magnon Accumulation by Clocked Laser Excitation as Source of Long-Range Spin Waves in Transparent Magnetic Films,” Phys. Rev. X 7, 021009 (2017).
  • (26) Y. Li, T. Polakovic, Y.-L. Wang, J. Xu, S. Lendinez, Z. Zhang, J. Ding, T. Khaire, H. Saglam, R. Divan, J. Pearson, W.K. Kwok, Z. Xiao, V. Novosad, A. Hoffmann, and W. Zhang, ”Strong Coupling between Magnons and Microwave Photons in On-Chip Ferromagnet-Superconductor Thin-Film Devices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 107701 (2019).
  • (27) J. T. Hou and L. Liu, ”Strong Coupling between Microwave Photons and Nanomagnet Magnons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 107702 (2019).
  • (28) A.A. Serga, A.V. Chumak, and B. Hillebrands, ”YIG magnonics,” J. Phys. D 43, 264002 (2010).
  • (29) S. Schiller and R.L. Byer, ”High-resolution spectroscopy of whispering gallery modes in large dielectric spheres,” Opt. Lett. 16, 1138 (1991).
  • (30) C.W. Gardiner and P. Zoller, Quantum Noise (Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2000).
  • (31) D.F.V. James, ”Quantum Computation with Hot and Cold Ions: An Assessment of Proposed Schemes,” Fortschr. Phys. 48, 823 (2000).
  • (32) S. Sharma, Y.M. Blanter, and G.E.W. Bauer, ”Optical Cooling of Magnons,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 087205 (2018).
  • (33) R.W. Boyd and K. Rzyzewski, Noise initiation of stimulated Brillouin scattering, Phys. Rev. A 42, 5514 (1990).