This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

thanks: email: [email protected]thanks: email: [email protected]

Local electronic structure of dilute hydrogen in β\beta-Ga2O3 probed by muons

M. Hiraishi Muon Science Laboratory and Condensed Matter Research Center, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK-IMSS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Ibaraki University 2-1-1 Bunkyo, Mito, Ibaraki, 310-8512, Japan.    H. Okabe Muon Science Laboratory and Condensed Matter Research Center, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK-IMSS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan Institute for Materials Research, Tohoku University (IMR), 2-1-1 Katahira, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8577, Japan    A. Koda Muon Science Laboratory and Condensed Matter Research Center, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK-IMSS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan Department of Materials Structure Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan    R. Kadono Muon Science Laboratory and Condensed Matter Research Center, Institute of Materials Structure Science, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK-IMSS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan Department of Materials Structure Science, The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (Sokendai), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan    T. Ohsawa National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan    N. Ohashi National Institute for Materials Science (NIMS), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0044, Japan    K. Ide Materials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan    T. Kamiya Materials and Structures Laboratory, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan Materials Research Center for Element Strategy, Tokyo Institute of Technology (MCES), Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan    H. Hosono Materials Research Center for Element Strategy, Tokyo Institute of Technology (MCES), Yokohama, Kanagawa 226-8503, Japan
Abstract

The local electronic structure of muons (Mu) as dilute pseudo-hydrogen in single-crystalline β\beta-Ga2O3 has been studied by the muon spin rotation/relaxation (μ\muSR). High-precision measurements over a long time range of \sim25 μ\mus have clearly identified two distinct Mu states: a quasi-static Mu (Mu1) and fast-moving Mu (Mu2). By comparing this result with predictions from the recently established ambipolarity model, these two states are respectively attributed to the relaxed-excited states associated with the donor (E+/0E^{+/0}) and acceptor (E/0E^{-/0}) levels predicted by density functional theory (DFT) calculations for the interstitial H. Furthermore, the local electronic structure of Mu1 is found to be an OMu-bonded state with three-coordinated oxygen. The structure is almost identical with the thermal equilibrium state of H, and it is found to function as an electron donor. The other Mu2 is considered to be in the hydride state (Mu-) from the ambipolarity model, suggesting that it is in fast diffusion motion through the short-lived neutral state due to the charge exchange reaction with conduction electrons (Mu+0e{}^{0}+e^{-}\rightleftarrowsMu-).

I Introduction

Gallium trioxide (β\beta-Ga2O3) is attracting attention as a material for high-voltage power devices and other applications because of its large band gap (EgE_{\mathrm{g}}\sim4.9 eV) and associated high critical electric field Galazka (2018), where control of electrical activity by pp/nn-type carrier doping is one of the critical issues. While Sn or Si doping is known to induce nn-type conductivity Ueda et al. (1997); Orita et al. (2000), it has been pointed out that impurity hydrogen (H) is the possible cause of unintentional carrier doping in as-grown samples Galazka et al. (2020).

From infrared spectroscopic studies of β\beta-Ga2O3 containing macroscopic amounts of H, a variety of H states including O-H defects have been observed Weiser et al. (2018); Qin et al. (2019). However, their relationship to carrier doping is not always clear due to the lack of information on their local electronic structures and H valence. Furthermore, since isolated H exists only in trace amounts in solids, experimental means to study its microscopic electronic state are limited. In this regard, theoretical studies based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations have played an important role, and for H in β\beta-Ga2O3  DFT calculations have shown that interstitial H may be indeed the origin of nn-type doping Varley et al. (2010, 2011); Li and Robertson (2014). This prompted us to introduce muons as pseudo-H into β\beta-Ga2O3 for investigating the corresponding interstitial H states by analyzing their electronic and dynamical properties in detail by muon spin rotation (μ\muSR).

The positive muon (μ+\mu^{+}) is an elementary particle with a mass of 0.1126mp0.1126m_{\mathrm{p}} (where mpm_{\mathrm{p}} is the proton mass). The local electronic structure of muon in matter is determined by the muon-electron interaction which is practically equivalent to H, as can be seen from the fact that the difference in reduced electron mass between a muon-electron bound state (muonium) and a neutral H atom is only 0.43%. Therefore, Mu in matter can be regarded as a light isotope of H (=0.1126=^{0.1126}H; we introduce the elemental symbol Mu below to denote muon as pseudo-H).

On the other hand, when interpreting the results of the μ\muSR experiment based on the results of the DFT calculations, there is an important caveat that should be pointed out at this stage. Generally, muons are implanted as an ion beam of relatively high-energy (typically \sim4 MeV), and the associated electronic excitations in the insulator crystals produce free carriers and excitons (\sim103 per muon) Thompson (1974); Alig and Bloom (1975); Itoh (1997). These often propagate rapidly in the crystal, and there is experimental evidence that Mu acts as a capture center for them Prokscha et al. (2007). Consequently, the electronic state of Mu is a relaxed-excited state generated by the interaction with free carriers and excitons, which can be different from the electronic state under thermal equilibrium as expected from the thermodynamic double charge conversion level (E+/E^{+/-}) obtained by DFT calculations.

Another well-known evidence that Mu is in a relaxed-excited state is that two or more different electronic states of Mu are often observed simultaneously in the same material Lichti et al. (2008). In order to understand the origin of this phenomenon, we have recently conducted an extensive investigation to explore the regularities between the Mu valence states observed in various oxides and the results of previous DFT calculations. As a result, assuming that these relaxed-excited states are associated with acceptor (E0/E^{0/-}) and donor (E+/0E^{+/0}) levels that are predicted by DFT calculations as metastable states, we found that the observed Mu states can be coherently explained by the relationship between acceptor/donor levels and band structure Hiraishi et al. (2022). We call it the “ambipolarity model” since such behavior of Mu is a manifestation of the ambipolarity of H through the relaxed-excited states.

In this study, we show that Mu in single-crystalline β\beta-Ga2O3 exhibits two different electronic structures corresponding to the relaxed-excited states respectively associated with the donor and acceptor levels in the ambipolarity model. One is in the OMu-bonded state (Mu+1{}_{1}^{+}) corresponding to H serving as a donor, and another is the hydride-like state in rapid motion (Mu2{}_{2}^{-}). In particular, the Mu2 state is a component overlooked in the previous μ\muSR experiments King et al. (2010); Celebi et al. (2012), and it is speculated to be a transient state diffusing rapidly along the 010\langle 010\rangle axis while undergoing the charge exchange reaction, Mu2Mu20+e{}_{2}^{-}\rightleftarrows{\rm Mu}_{2}^{0}+e^{-}. The occurrence of charge exchange is supported by the observation that the temperature dependence of the fractional yield of Mu2 exhibits a strong correlation with that of the bulk carrier electron mobility and density. This also implies that the interstitial H can take hydride state under electronic excitation and may exhibit fast diffusion motion, depending on the bulk electronic properties of the host.

II EXPERIMENTAL METHODS and DFT CALCULATIONS

The sample used in the μ\muSR experiment was a slab of single crystal (sc-Ga2O3, 10×\times15×\times0.6 mm3) with 001\langle 001\rangle plane synthesized by the edge-defined film-fed (EFG) method (provided by Novel Crystal Technology, Inc.) Kuramata et al. (2016). It is reported to have no twin boundary and the lowest carrier density (Ne2×N_{\mathrm{e}}\sim 2\times1017cm-3) commercially available Kuramata et al. (2016). The electrical conductivity and Hall effect measurements were performed using the PPMS (Quantum Design Co.). Ohmic contacts were formed from vacuum-deposited Ti at room temperature Víllora et al. (2008); Irmscher et al. (2011) and gold paste (Seishin Trading Co. LTD., No. 8556). The impurity H content in the sc-Ga2O3 sample was estimated to be 3.5×1018cm3\times 10^{18}\mbox{cm}^{-3} by thermal desorption spectrometry, which is sufficient to explain the above described NeN_{\mathrm{e}}. Details are described in Supplemental Material (SM) sm .

In this study, μ\muSR measurements and data analysis were also performed on a powder sample (99.99%, provided by Rare Metallics Co.) for comparison, and the results were found to be significantly different from those for single crystal. However, these results are excluded from the discussion in this paper, because it is difficult to measure the bulk electronic properties of powder samples which is necessary to consider the cause of the difference. Instead, they are presented with a brief interpretation in SM sm .

Conventional μ\muSR measurements were performed using the S1 instrument (ARTEMIS) at the Materials and Life-science Experiment Facility, J-PARC Kojima et al. (2014), where high-precision measurements over a long time range of 20–25 μ\mus can be routinely performed using a high-flux pulsed muon beam (\sim3×1043\times 10^{4} μ+\mu^{+}/cm2/s for the single-pulse mode at a proton beam power of 0.8 MW). The μ\muSR spectra [the time-dependent decay-positron asymmetry, A(t)A(t)] which reflects the magnetic field distribution at the Mu site, was measured from room temperature to 4 K under zero field (ZF), weak longitudinal field (LF, parallel to the initial Mu polarization 𝑷μ{\bm{P}}_{\mu}), and weak transverse field (TF, perpendicular to 𝑷μ{\bm{P}}_{\mu}), and were analyzed by least-squares curve fitting Suter and Wojek (2012). The background contribution from muons which missed the sample was estimated from μ\muSR measurements on a holmium plate of the same geometry and subtracted from the asymmetry.

Since the μ\muSR spectra were found to be dominated by signals from the diamagnetic Mu (i.e., Mu+ or Mu-), the data under ZF/LF conditions were analyzed using the dynamical Kubo-Toyabe (KT) function, GzKT(t;Δ,ν,BLF)G_{z}^{\mathrm{KT}}(t;\Delta,\nu,B_{\mathrm{LF}}), where Δ\Delta is the linewidth determined by random local fields from nuclear magnetic moments, BLFB_{\mathrm{LF}} is the magnitude of LF, and ν\nu is the fluctuation rate of Δ\Delta Hayano et al. (1979). The KT function is expressed analytically in the case of static (ν=0\nu=0) and ZF (BLF=0B_{\mathrm{LF}}=0) conditions,

GzKT(t;Δ,0,0)=13+23(1Δ2t2)e12Δ2t2,G_{z}^{\mathrm{KT}}(t;\Delta,0,0)=\frac{1}{3}+\frac{2}{3}\left(1-\Delta^{2}t^{2}\right)e^{-\frac{1}{2}\Delta^{2}t^{2}}, (1)

The magnitude of Δ\Delta for a given Mu site is evaluated by calculating the second moments of dipolar fields from nuclear magnetic moments by the following equation,

Δ2\displaystyle\Delta^{2} γμ2mfmjα=x,yβ=x,y,zγm2(𝐀^mj𝐈m)2sin2Θj\displaystyle\simeq\gamma_{\mu}^{2}\sum_{m}f_{m}\sum_{j}\sum_{\alpha=x,y}\sum_{\beta=x,y,z}\gamma_{m}^{2}({\bf\hat{A}}_{mj}{\bf I}_{m})^{2}\sin^{2}\Theta_{j} (2)
𝐀^mj\displaystyle{\bf\hat{A}}_{mj} =Amjαβ=(3rmjαrmjβδαβrmj2)/rmj5(α,β=x,y,z)\displaystyle=A^{\alpha\beta}_{mj}=(3r_{mj}^{\alpha}r_{mj}^{\beta}-\delta_{\alpha\beta}r_{mj}^{2})/r_{mj}^{5}\quad(\alpha,\beta=x,y,z)

where γμ/2π=135.539\gamma_{\mu}/2\pi=135.539 [MHz/T] is the muon gyromagnetic ratio, 𝒓mj=(xmj,ymj,zmj){\bm{r}}_{mj}=(x_{mj},y_{mj},z_{mj}) is the position vector from the muon site to the jj-th nucleus, 𝝁m=γm𝑰m{\bm{\mu}}_{m}=\gamma_{m}{\bm{I}}_{m} is the nuclear magnetic moment of the atom with the natural abundance of fmf_{m}, Θj\Theta_{j} is the polar angle of 𝒓mj{\bm{r}}_{mj} Hayano et al. (1979). Since 69Ga with f1=0.604f_{1}=0.604 and 71Ga with f2=0.396f_{2}=0.396 have nuclear spins of Im=3/2I_{m}=3/2, respectively, they have electric quadrupole moments. In this case, 𝝁m{\bm{\mu}}_{m} is subject to electric quadrupolar interactions with the electric field gradient generated by the point charge of the diamagnetic Mu, leading to the reduction of the effective 𝝁m{\bm{\mu}}_{m} (by a factor sin2Θj\sin^{2}\Theta_{j}) and to the modification of Δ\Delta that depends on the initial muon spin direction relative to the crystal axis. (In the powder sample, the spatial averaging leads to sin2Θj=2/3\langle\sin^{2}\Theta_{j}\rangle=2/3.) The Δ\Delta of the candidate Mu sites inferred from DFT calculations were evaluated using the Dipelec code Kojima with Eq. (2) implemented.

DFT calculations were performed to investigate in detail the local structure of H-related defects using OpenMX Ozaki (2003) and VASP codes Kresse and Hafner (1993). Structural relaxation calculations with H (to mimic Mu) using the GGA-PBE exchange correlation function were performed on a 1×3×21\times 3\times 2 superlattice with cutoff energies of 200 Ry for OpenMX (520 eV for VASP), and KK points were set to 3×4×33\times 4\times 3. Structures were relaxed until the the maximum force on each atom was less than 3×1043\times 10^{-4} (Hartree/Bohr) for OpenMX (0.01 eV/Å for VASP). Additional structural relaxation calculations using the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE06) hybrid functional implemented in VASP were performed with KK points of 2×3×22\times 3\times 2 to confirm the structure of the minimum formation energy Krukau et al. (2006). The Hartree-Fock mixing parameter was set to 0.35, which reproduces the experimental value of the band gap Varley et al. (2010, 2011).

III RESULTS

First, we investigated the initial asymmetry [A(0)A(0)] of the μ\muSR spectrum under TF = 2 mT and found that it is independent of temperature (TT) and nearly constant within experimental error over the entire measured temperature range 4T3004\leq T\leq 300 K [see Fig. S5(a) in SM sm ]. Since the absence of a paramagnetic Mu at 300 K is confirmed from the TF data, the TT-independent A(0)A(0) values indicates that the muon is mostly in diamagnetic state(s) at all temperatures. (For the possibility of Mu0 with extremely small hyperfine parameters to exist, see Section IV.)

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (a) ZF and LF μ\muSR time spectra observed at 300 K (4.0×1084.0\times 10^{8} positron events collected for ZF and 2.0×1082.0\times 10^{8} for LF), which consists of two components (Mu1 and Mu2). (b) ZF spectra at typical temperatures (3.0×1083.0\times 10^{8} positron events collected). The solid curves represent the least-square fit by Eq. (3). The horizontal dashed line shows f2f_{2}. (c), (d) Temperature dependence of the linewidth Δ1\Delta_{1} and fluctuation rate ν1\nu_{1} for the Mu1 component.

The normalized μ\muSR time spectra [Gz(t)A(t)/A(0)G_{z}(t)\equiv A(t)/A(0)] at 300 K under ZF and LF (001\parallel\langle 001\rangle) are shown in Fig. 1(a). The ZF-μ\muSR spectrum shows that it consists of two components, one we call Mu1, which partially recovers at t12t\gtrsim 12 μs\mu\mathrm{s} following slow Gaussian relaxation, and Mu2, which exhibits almost no relaxation. Note that the recovery of Gz(t)G_{z}(t) characteristic to the 1/3-tail of the Kubo-Toyabe function in Eq. (1) is clearly visible only for tt\gtrsim15 μ\mus. This could not have been detectable by previous μ\muSR measurements under TF alone King et al. (2010) or those using a continuous muon beam Celebi et al. (2012), and has been first revealed by precise ZF-μ\muSR measurements using the high-flux pulsed muon beam at J-PARC. The suppression of the Gaussian relaxation by the weak LF indicates that the relaxation for the Mu1 component is induced by the quasi-static random local fields from Ga nuclear magnetic moments.

It is clear from Fig. 1(b) that the relative yield of Mu1 vs Mu2 apparently depends on TT at lower temperatures. Furthermore, the lineshape exhibits change from a Gaussian to exponential-like behavior at low temperatures [see Gz(t)G_{z}(t) for t6t\lesssim 6 μ\mus at 30 K]. Considering these features, we analyzed the ZF and LF spectra by global curve-fits using the following function,

Gz(t)=f1GzKT(t;Δ1,ν1,BLF)eλt+f2,G_{z}(t)=f_{1}G_{z}^{\mathrm{KT}}(t;\Delta_{1},\nu_{1},B_{\mathrm{LF}})e^{-\lambda t}+f_{2}, (3)

where fif_{i} (i=1,2i=1,2) are the relative yields of the Mui components. The exponential damping with the relaxation rate λ\lambda is introduced to describe the possible influence of the fluctuating magnetic fields from unpaired electrons (including excited carriers and excitons localized nearby Mu). As shown by the solid lines in Figs. 1(a) (b), curve fit using Eq. (3) provides reasonable agreement with the data, and Δ1=0.140(1)\Delta_{1}=0.140(1) MHz is obtained from the fit at 300 K. The TT dependencies of Δ1\Delta_{1} and ν1\nu_{1} obtained from the fit are shown in Figs. 1(c) and (d), and those of f2f_{2} and λ\lambda in Figs. 2(a) and (c), respectively.

Refer to caption
Figure 2: Temperature dependence of (a) fractional yield for the Mu2 component [f2A2/A(0)f_{2}\equiv A_{2}/A(0)] which is characterized by the changes at Tα30T_{\alpha}\simeq 30 K, Tβ55T_{\beta}\simeq 55 K and Tγ80T_{\gamma}\simeq 80 K, (b) bulk carrier density (NeN_{\mathrm{e}}) multiplied by mobility [μe\mu_{\rm e}, shown in (d)], (c) exponential relaxation rate (λ\lambda) at ZF and LF = 3 mT. Note that the vertical axis of (b) is on a logarithmic scale.

Above Tγ80T_{\gamma}\simeq 80 K where the f1f_{1} (=1f2=1-f_{2}) is nealy independent of TT, Δ1\Delta_{1}, ν1\nu_{1} and λ\lambda also show similar trends; Δ1\Delta_{1} increases slightly to \sim0.15 MHz as TT decreases, while ν1\nu_{1} and λ\lambda shows a constant value close to zero (Δ1\ll\Delta_{1}). This indicates that the Mu1 component is quasistatic for TTγT\gtrsim T_{\gamma}. Meanwhile, the rapid motion of Mu2 is inferred from the fact that there is no interstitial sites free of local magnetic fields from Ga nuclear magnetic moments (with 100% natural abundance); Δ\Delta calculated at any site is always larger than \sim0.15 MHz for the unrelaxed lattice, which is only compatible with the situation where the relaxation due to the local field (with a linewidth Δ20.15\Delta_{2}\gtrsim 0.15 MHz) is suppressed by the motional averaging, namely,

Gz(t)=f1GzKT(t;Δ1,ν1,BLF)eλt+f2GzKT(t;Δ2,ν2),G_{z}(t)=f_{1}G_{z}^{\mathrm{KT}}(t;\Delta_{1},\nu_{1},B_{\mathrm{LF}})e^{-\lambda t}+f_{2}G^{\rm KT}_{z}(t;\Delta_{2},\nu_{2}), (4)

with GzKT(t;Δ2,ν2)1G^{\rm KT}_{z}(t;\Delta_{2},\nu_{2})\simeq 1 for ν2Δ2\nu_{2}\gg\Delta_{2}.

Below TγT_{\gamma}, ν1\nu_{1} increases with decreasing TT in correlation with f2f_{2}, and tends to approach a constant value or decrease for TTα30T\lesssim T_{\alpha}\simeq 30 K. A similar correlation is observed between f2f_{2} and λ\lambda; λ\lambda gradually increases with decreasing TT to exhibit a small peak around TγT_{\gamma}, then decreases towards TβT_{\beta}, followed by an increase to reach another maximum near TαT_{\alpha}. Here, we point out that, as shown in Fig. 2(b), the complicated TT dependence of f2f_{2} and the increase of λ\lambda occur in correlation with the decrease of NeμeN_{\mathrm{e}}\mu_{\rm e} (with μe\mu_{\rm e} being the mobility) of the sample used for μ\muSR measurements. More specifically, NeN_{\mathrm{e}} exhibits gradual decrease around TγT_{\gamma} with decreasing TT, followed by a sharp decrease below TβT_{\beta} and an increase below TαT_{\alpha} (see Fig. S2 in SM sm ). As shown in Fig. 2(d), μe\mu_{\rm e} decreases with decreasing TT below \sim120 K, reaching a minimum around TβT_{\beta}, and then increases to a maximum at TαT_{\alpha}. The behavior of μe\mu_{\rm e} for T>TγT>T_{\gamma} is qualitatively in line with previous reports Parisini and Fornari (2016); Kabilova et al. (2019). This implies that the electronic state of Mu is highly sensitive to the quality of samples, which is also supported by the fact that the TT dependence of f2f_{2} (and f1f_{1}) in powder sample differs significantly from that in single crystal (see Fig. S5(b) in SM sm ).

IV DISCUSSION

In the ambipolarity model, the electronic state of the interstitial Mu is determined by where the donor and acceptor levels associated with H, predicted from the Fermi energy (EFE_{F}) dependence of defect formation energy (Ξq\Xi^{q}) for Hq (q=±,0q=\pm,0), is located in the energy band structure of the host material. Figure 3(a) shows Ξq(EF)\Xi^{q}(E_{F}) for each valence state of H obtained by previous DFT calculations Li and Robertson (2014), where H is substituted with Mu. The relationship between the donor/acceptor levels and band structure predicts that Mu can take two different diamagnetic states: a donor-like state in which it releases an electron into the conduction band to become Mu+, and a hydride (Mu-) state, which is qualitatively consistent with the present observations. Interestingly, the E+/E^{+/-} level, which determines the charge state of H at thermal equilibrium, is in the conduction band as is the donor level, so the behavior of H is expected to be the same as that of the donor-like Mu.

Refer to caption
Figure 3: a) The formation energy (Ξq\Xi^{q}) of interstitial Mu (Muiq{}^{q}_{\rm i}, q=0,±q=0,\pm) vs the Fermi level (EFE_{F}) in β\beta-Ga2O3 inferred from DFT calculations for Hq Li and Robertson (2014). The donor/acceptor levels are determined as cross points between Ξ±(EF)\Xi^{\pm}(E_{F}) and Ξ0(EF)\Xi^{0}(E_{F}). The dashed line shows the intrinsic charge neutral level (EFintE_{F}^{\rm int}) obtained from the DFT calculation. b) Schematic band diagrams for the electron energy associated with the donor/acceptor levels in a).
Table 1: Comparison of the linewidth (Δ\Delta) between those at the H sites obtained from structural relaxation calculations and the experimental value. Δsc\Delta_{\rm sc}, and Δpwdr\Delta_{\mathrm{pwdr}} for single crystalline (sc) and powder (pwdr) samples, respectively. dOHd_{\mathrm{OH}} is the distance from H to the nearest oxygen (see also Fig. 4).
Site dOHd_{\mathrm{OH}} [nm] Δsc\Delta_{\rm sc} (MHz) Δpwdr\Delta_{\mathrm{pwdr}} (MHz)
HI 0.0966 0.136 0.137
HII 0.1036 0.150 0.153
HIII 0.1003 0.161 0.156
H- 0.345 0.299
Δ1\Delta_{1} (300 K) 0.140(1) 0.136(1)

To determine the local defect structure of the Mu1 state, Δ1\Delta_{1} was compared with those calculated for the candidate sites, and the results are summarized in Table  1. The value for the HI site bonded to the three-coordinated OI [see Fig. 4(a)] is in good agreement with Δ1\Delta_{1} at 300 K, indicating that HI+Mu1+{}_{\rm I}^{+}\approx{\rm Mu}_{1}^{+} in the dilute limit (\sim105 cm-3). This confirms the earlier point that, aside from not knowing the exact location of E+/E^{+/-}, HI can serve as donor Varley et al. (2011). The existence of H in the HI structure hss been also inferred from the infrared spectroscopy of hydrogenated β\beta-Ga2O3 Qin et al. (2019). The possibility that Mu1 corresponds to H trapped in Ga and O vacancies is excluded by the comparison of Δ1\Delta_{1} with those for Mu in these vacancies (shown in Table S1 in SM sm ).

As seen in Fig. 1(c), Δ1\Delta_{1} exhibits a slight increase with decreasing TT, approaching the value at the HII/HIII sites [see Fig. 4(b), (c)]. This can be interpreted as reflecting the fact that the initial population of relaxed-excited states immediately after muon implantation is a random sampling of available metastable sites. Considering that the difference in the formation energy estimated by DFT calculations is small among these sites (e.g., \sim30 meV between HI and HII), the decrease in Δ1\Delta_{1} with increasing TT above TγT_{\gamma} suggests that the Mu site distribution approaches the lowest energy state by the annealing process. A similar TT dependence of Δ\Delta exhibited by donor-like Mu has been reported for InGaZnO4 in which multiple H sites are available Kojima et al. (2019).

Refer to caption
Figure 4: Local structures H-related defects corresponding to (a) HI, (b) HII, (c) HIII and (d) H- state. HI-III are bonded to O, while H- forms bonding with two Ga3+ ions Li and Robertson (2014). The crystal structures were displayed using VESTA Momma and Izumi (2011).

With Mu1 identified as being in the donor-like state, the paired Mu2 component is presumed to be in the acceptor-like diamagnetic state (Mu2{}_{2}^{-}) from the ambipolarity model. According to DFT calculations, the corresponding H- state is bonded to the two nn Ga ions, as shown in Fig. 4(d) Li and Robertson (2014). The E0/E^{0/-} level is near the conduction band, and it can still accommodate two electrons as it is located below the charge neutral level (EFintE_{F}^{\rm int}, see Fig. 3). This means that it is possible for Mu2 to exchange electrons with the conduction band. Moreover, the conduction band has a relatively large dispersion (effective mass \sim0.28mem_{e}) around the Γ\Gamma point Peelaers and Van de Walle (2015), allowing fast migration of electrons.

While Mu2{}_{2}^{-} is unlikely to exhibit fast diffusion by itself due to the bonding to cations, there are many reported examples of fast diffusive motion of acceptor-like Mu0 in semiconductors and alkali halides Patterson (1988); Kadono et al. (1994); Gxawu et al. (2005); Chow et al. (2000). Since NeμeN_{\rm e}\mu_{\rm e} and f2f_{2} show almost the same TT dependence for T>TβT>T_{\beta}, it is inferred that the Mu2 state diffuses rapidly for T>TγT>T_{\gamma} through the neutral state temporally attained by the charge exchange reaction Mu2Mu20+e{}_{2}^{-}\rightleftarrows{\rm Mu}_{2}^{0}+e^{-}. The reaction rate is given by

rex=1τ0+τ0=r0r0r0+r0,r_{\mathrm{ex}}=\frac{1}{\tau_{-0}+\tau_{0-}}=\frac{r_{-0}r_{0-}}{r_{-0}+r_{0-}}, (5)

where r0r_{-0} (=1/τ0=1/\tau_{-0}) is the ionization probability (eΔE/kBT\propto e^{-\varDelta E/k_{B}T}, with ΔEEcE0/\varDelta E\sim E_{c}-E^{0/-} and EcE_{c} the CBM energy) and r0r_{0-} (=1/τ0=1/\tau_{0-}) is the capture rate of the free carriers (σcNeμeVr\propto\sigma_{\rm c}N_{\mathrm{e}}\mu_{\rm e}V_{r}, with σc\sigma_{\rm c}, μe\mu_{\rm e}, and VrV_{r} being the cross section, carrier mobility, and electric field exerted from the Mu-Ga complex state, respectively). Note that λ\lambda due to the charge exchange is also quenched by the motional averaging when rexr_{\mathrm{ex}} is much greater than the hyperfine parameter. Such motional effects have also been observed in SiO2 and are thought to be responsible for the disappearance of anisotropy in the hyperfine interaction of Mu0 with increasing TT Chow et al. (2000). The existence of the non-relaxing Mu component has also been reported for variety of materials including NaAlH4, LaScSiHx, and FeS2 Kadono et al. (2008); Okabe et al. (2018); Hiraishi et al. (2021), implying the ubiquitous nature of acceptor-like Mu states.

It is natural to assume that Mu2 diffuses along the 010\langle 010\rangle direction because β\beta-Ga2O3 has an open channel structure along the 010\langle 010\rangle direction, In fact, secondary ion mass spectrometry analysis of 2H implanted β\beta-Ga2O3 Reinertsen et al. (2020) revealed that 2H diffuses more easily in the 010\langle 010\rangle direction than perpendicular to the 201\langle-201\rangle surface. It has also been reported for rutile TiO2 that hydrogen diffusion is more likely to occur in open channels along the cc-axis than in the aa-bb plane Bates et al. (1979).

There are three different open channels in the 010\langle 010\rangle direction in β\beta-Ga2O3. The potentials associated with diffusion in each channel were investigated by total energy calculations (see Sect. III in SM sm for details), and it was found that hydrogen tends to diffuse in the same channel as the Mu1 site. Since the two charged states Mu+1{}_{1}^{+} and Mu2{}_{2}^{-} accompany mutually different lattice distortions, it is assumed that the potential barriers caused by these distortions allow Mu2 to diffuse while maintaining its state. However, because the adopted calculations do not take structural relaxation into account, it is a future task to evaluate using the nudged-elastic band (NEB) method.

The details of what causes the decrease in f2f_{2} (increase in f1f_{1}) and recovery below TγT_{\gamma}, which is apparently correlated with the onset of slow dynamics for Mu1 (as inferred from the TT dependence of Δ1\Delta_{1}, ν1\nu_{1}, and λ\lambda), are currently unknown. Nevertheless, when analyzing the time spectra in this TT range using Eq. (4) with Δ1\Delta_{1} and Δ2\Delta_{2} as free parameters, Δi\Delta_{i} converge to mutually close values (\sim0.13–0.14 MHz). A curve fit performed with Δ1\Delta_{1} fixed at 0.136 MHz and Δ2\Delta_{2} at 0.345 MHz (corresponding to the stationary hydride state) and the other parameters free fails to reproduce the data, as indicated by a large reduced chi-square (see Fig. S6 in SM). Thus, the decrease in f2f_{2} suggests that a transition from Mu2 to Mu1 occurs in the relevant TT range. One possible scenario is that Mu2{}_{2}^{-} can be ionized by thermal excitation and transitions to Mu+1{}_{1}^{+} for T<TβT<T_{\beta}, but the ionization is prevented by increasing NeμeN_{\rm e}\mu_{\rm e} for T>TβT>T_{\beta} [i.e., r0r0r_{0-}\gg r_{-0} in Eq. (5)], allowing it to continue to exist as a metastable state again above TγT_{\gamma}.

Finally, we comment on the relationship between our experimental results and the prior μ\muSR studies on β\beta-Ga2O3. In Ref. [King et al., 2010], TF-μ\muSR measurements are reported for a powder sample from a commercial vendor, and it is observed that about 10% of the signal exhibits slight increase of relaxation rate from 0.08 MHz to 0.12 MHz below 50–100 K. Ref. [Celebi et al., 2012] reports results for a single-crystal sample (orientation unknown) and observes a 4–6% decrease in the initial asymmetry below 50–100 K in both ZF and TF-μ\muSR measurements and an increase in Δ\Delta of the component described by GzKT(t)G_{z}^{\rm KT}(t) from 0.10–0.11 MHz to 0.15 MHz in the ZF-μ\muSR spectra. Although detailed comparisons with our results are not possible because no time spectra are available for either case, these changes appear to correspond to the increase in f1f_{1} at T<TγT<T_{\gamma} that we observed in both the powder and single-crystalline samples [see Fig. S5(b) in SM sm ]. Meanwhile, these reports are silent about the component corresponding to Mu2. We stress that the existence and origin of Mu2 are clearly identified for the first time in this study with the help of the ambipolarity model.

Acknowledgements.
This work was supported by the MEXT Elements Strategy Initiative to Form Core Research Center for Electron Materials (Grant No. JPMXP0112101001) and JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 19K15033). The μ\muSR experiments were conducted under user programs (Proposal No. 2019MS02) at the Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility of the J-PARC. We also acknowledge the Neutron Science and Technology Center, CROSS for the use of PPMS in their user laboratories.

References

  • Galazka (2018) Z. Galazka, “β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} for wide-bandgap electronics and optoelectronics,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 33, 113001 (2018).
  • Ueda et al. (1997) N. Ueda, H. Hosono, R. Waseda,  and H. Kawazoe, “Synthesis and control of conductivity of ultraviolet transmitting β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} single crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 3561–3563 (1997).
  • Orita et al. (2000) M. Orita, H. Ohta, M. Hirano,  and H. Hosono, “Deep-ultraviolet transparent conductive β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} thin films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 4166–4168 (2000).
  • Galazka et al. (2020) Z. Galazka, K. Irmscher, R. Schewski, I. M. Hanke, M. Pietsch, S. Ganschow, D. Klimm, A. Dittmar, A. Fiedler, T. Schroeder,  and M. Bickermann, “Czochralski-grown bulk β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} single crystals doped with mono-, di-, tri-, and tetravalent ions,” J. Cryst. Growth 529, 125297 (2020).
  • Weiser et al. (2018) P. Weiser, M. Stavola, W. B. Fowler, Y. Qin,  and S. Pearton, “Structure and vibrational properties of the dominant O-H center in β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3},” Appl. Phys. Lett. 112, 232104 (2018).
  • Qin et al. (2019) Y. Qin, M. Stavola, W. B. Fowler, P. Weiser,  and S. J. Pearton, “Hydrogen centers in β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3}: Infrared spectroscopy and density functional theory,” ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 8, Q3103–Q3110 (2019).
  • Varley et al. (2010) J. B. Varley, J. R. Weber, A. Janotti,  and C. G. Van de Walle, “Oxygen vacancies and donor impurities in β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3},” Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 142106 (2010).
  • Varley et al. (2011) J B Varley, H Peelaers, A Janotti,  and C G Van de Walle, “Hydrogenated cation vacancies in semiconducting oxides,” J. Phys. Condens.: Matter 23, 334212 (2011).
  • Li and Robertson (2014) H. Li and J. Robertson, “Behaviour of hydrogen in wide band gap oxides,” J. Appl. Phys. 115, 203708 (2014).
  • Thompson (1974) M. W. Thompson, Defects and Radiation Damage in Metals, Cambridge Monographs on Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1974).
  • Alig and Bloom (1975) R. C. Alig and S. Bloom, “Electron-hole-pair creation energies in semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1522–1525 (1975).
  • Itoh (1997) N. Itoh, “Bond scission induced by electronic excitation in solids: A tool for nanomanipulation,” Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. B 122, 405–409 (1997).
  • Prokscha et al. (2007) T. Prokscha, E. Morenzoni, D. G. Eshchenko, N. Garifianov, H. Glückler, R. Khasanov, H. Luetkens,  and A. Suter, “Formation of hydrogen impurity states in silicon and insulators at low implantation energies,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 227401 (2007).
  • Lichti et al. (2008) R. L. Lichti, K. H. Chow,  and S. F. J. Cox, “Hydrogen defect-level pinning in semiconductors: The muonium equivalent,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 136403 (2008).
  • Hiraishi et al. (2022) M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono,  and H. Hosono, “Ambipolarity of diluted hydrogen in wide-gap oxides revealed by muon study,” J. Appl. Phys. 132, 105701 (2022).
  • King et al. (2010) P. D. C. King, I. McKenzie,  and T. D. Veal, “Observation of shallow-donor muonium in Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3}: Evidence for hydrogen-induced conductivity,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 062110 (2010).
  • Celebi et al. (2012) Y. G. Celebi, R. L. Lichti, B. B. Baker, P. W. Mengyan,  and H. N. Bani-Salameh, “Motion of Mu+\text{Mu}^{+} intransparent conducting oxides,” Phys. Proc. 30, 206–209 (2012).
  • Kuramata et al. (2016) A. Kuramata, K. Koshi, S. Watanabe, Y. Yamaoka, T. Masui,  and S. Yamakoshi, “High-quality β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} single crystals grown by edge-defined film-fed growth,” Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1202A2 (2016).
  • Víllora et al. (2008) E. G. Víllora, K. Shimamura, T. Ujiie,  and K. Aoki, “Electrical conductivity and lattice expansion of β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} below room temperature,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 202118 (2008).
  • Irmscher et al. (2011) K. Irmscher, Z. Galazka, M. Pietsch, R. Uecker,  and R. Fornari, “Electrical properties of β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} single crystals grown by the Czochralski method,” J. Appl. Phys. 110, 063720 (2011).
  • (21) See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for details on sample characterization by TDS and Hall coefficient measurements, DFT calculations for muon sites, μ\muSR results for a powder sample, and on the comparison of curve fits for the μ\muSR spectra around TβT_{\beta}.
  • Momma and Izumi (2011) K. Momma and F. Izumi, “VESTA3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data,” J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 1272–1276 (2011).
  • Kresse and Hafner (1993) G. Kresse and J. Hafner, “Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals,” Phys. Rev. B 47, 558–561 (1993).
  • Krukau et al. (2006) A. V. Krukau, O. A. Vydrov, A. F. Izmaylov,  and G. E. Scuseria, “Influence of the exchange screening parameter on the performance of screened hybrid functionals,” J. Chem. Phys 125, 224106 (2006).
  • Ozaki (2003) T. Ozaki, “Variationally optimized atomic orbitals for large-scale electronic structures,” Phys. Rev. B 67, 155108 (2003).
  • Kojima et al. (2014) K. M. Kojima, T. Murakami, Y. Takahashi, H. Lee, S. Y. Suzuki, A. Koda, I. Yamauchi, M. Miyazaki, M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, S. Takeshita, R. Kadono, T. Ito, W. Higemoto, S. Kanda, Y. Fukao, N. Saito, M. Saito, M. Ikeno, T. Uchida,  and M. M. Tanaka, “New μSR\mu\text{SR} spectrometer at J-PARC MUSE based on Kalliope detectors,” J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 551, 012063 (2014).
  • Suter and Wojek (2012) A. Suter and B.M. Wojek, “Musrfit: A free platform-independent framework for μ\musr data analysis,” Phys. Proc. 30, 69–73 (2012).
  • Hayano et al. (1979) R. S. Hayano, Y. J. Uemura, J. Imazato, N. Nishida, T. Yamazaki,  and R. Kubo, “Zero-and low-field spin relaxation studied by positive muons,” Phys. Rev. B 20, 850–859 (1979).
  • (29) K. M. Kojima, private communication.
  • Parisini and Fornari (2016) A. Parisini and R. Fornari, “Analysis of the scattering mechanisms controlling electron mobility in β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3} crystals,” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31, 035023 (2016).
  • Kabilova et al. (2019) Z. Kabilova, C. Kurdak,  and R. L. Peterson, “Observation of impurity band conduction and variable range hopping in heavily doped (010) β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3},” Semicond. Sci. Technol. 34, 03LT02 (2019).
  • Kojima et al. (2019) K. M. Kojima, M. Hiraishi, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, K. Ide, S. Matsuishi, H. Kumomi, T. Kamiya,  and H. Hosono, “Electronic structure of interstitial hydrogen in In-Ga-Zn-O semiconductor simulated by muon,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 122104 (2019).
  • Peelaers and Van de Walle (2015) H. Peelaers and C. G. Van de Walle, “Brillouin zone and band structure of β\beta-Ga2O3\text{Ga}_{2}\text{O}_{3},” Phys. Status Solidi (b) 252, 828–832 (2015).
  • Patterson (1988) B. D. Patterson, “Muonium states in semiconductors,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 60, 69–159 (1988).
  • Kadono et al. (1994) R. Kadono, A. Matsushita, K. Nagamine, K. Nishiyama, K. H. Chow, R. F. Kiefl, A. MacFarlane, D. Schumann, S. Fujii,  and S. Tanigawa, “Charge state and diffusivity of muonium in n-type gaas,” Phys. Rev. B 50, 1999–2002 (1994).
  • Gxawu et al. (2005) D. Gxawu, I. Z. Machi, S. H. Connell, K. Bharuth-Ram, M. J. Sithole,  and S. F. J. Cox, “Diffusion of interstitial muonium, Mut\text{Mu}_{\rm{t}}, in a C13{}^{13}\text{C} diamond,” Diamond Relat. Mater. 14, 375–379 (2005).
  • Chow et al. (2000) K. H. Chow, R. F. Kiefl, B. Hitti, T. L. Estle,  and R. L. Lichti, “Novel behavior of bond-centered muonium in heavily doped nn-type silicon: Curie-like spin susceptibility and charge screening,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2251–2254 (2000).
  • Kadono et al. (2008) R. Kadono, K. Shimomura, K. H. Satoh, S. Takeshita, A. Koda, K. Nishiyama, E. Akiba, R. M. Ayabe, M. Kuba,  and C. M. Jensen, “Hydrogen bonding in sodium alanate: A muon spin rotation study,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 026401 (2008).
  • Okabe et al. (2018) H. Okabe, M. Hiraishi, S. Takeshita, A. Koda, K. M. Kojima,  and R. Kadono, “Local electronic structure of interstitial hydrogen in iron disulfide,” Phys. Rev. B 98, 075210 (2018).
  • Hiraishi et al. (2021) M. Hiraishi, K. M. Kojima, H. Okabe, A. Koda, R. Kadono, J. Wu, Y. Lu,  and H. Hosono, “Anomalous diamagnetism of electride electrons in transition metal silicides,” Phys. Rev. B 103, L241101 (2021).
  • Reinertsen et al. (2020) V. M. Reinertsen, P. M. Weiser, Y. K. Frodason, M. E. Bathen, L. Vines,  and K. M. Johansen, “Anisotropic and trap-limited diffusion of hydrogen/deuterium in monoclinic gallium oxide single crystals,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 117, 232106 (2020).
  • Bates et al. (1979) J. B. Bates, J. C. Wang,  and R. A. Perkins, “Mechanisms for hydrogen diffusion in TiO2\text{TiO}_{2},” Phys. Rev. B 19, 4130–4139 (1979).

Supplemental Material: Local electronic structure of dilute hydrogen in β\beta-Ga2O3 probed by muons

M. Hiraishi et al.

I Properties of Single Crystalline β\beta-𝐆𝐚𝟐𝐎𝟑{\bf Ga_{2}O_{3}}

I.1 Thermal Desorption Spectrometry (TDS)

Figure S1 shows the TDS results for the 001\langle 001\rangle sample, which was linearly heated from room temperature to 800C and held at 800C for 1 hour. Temperature is shown on the right axis and the signal intensities obtained by the quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS) are shown on the left vertical axis. The analysis revealed that the 001\langle 001\rangle sample contains 3.5×1018cm3\times 10^{18}\mathrm{cm}^{-3} of hydrogen (m/z=2m/z=2, with mm being the mass number, zz the ion valence). Considering that the desorption process is diffusion-limited for crystalline specimens, this value may correspond to the lower limit. The signal intensity for m/z=18m/z=18 (1H162{}_{2}^{16}O, 18O) is greater than that for m/z=16m/z=16 (16O) multiplied by 0.002 (natural abundance of 18O), indicating that m/z=18m/z=18 is derived from water (H2O). The similar temperature dependence of m/z=1m/z=1 and 17 to that of 18 strongly suggests that m/z=1,17m/z=1,17 are also water-related signals. The steep increase below 100C (\sim20 min.) is probably due to residual moisture on the sample surface, chamber, and so on.

Refer to caption
Figure S1: TDS spectra of the β\beta-Ga2O3 sample used for μ\muSR measurements. Purple, green, yellow, red, and gray are signals for m/z=m/z=1, 2, 16, 17, and 18, respectively (mm: mass number, zz: ion valence). Temperature history is shown on the right vertical axis.

I.2 Carrier concentration

The temperature dependence of carrier concentration obtained from Hall coefficient measurements for the β\beta-Ga2O3 sample (with 001\langle 001\rangle orientation) used for μ\muSR measurements is shown in Fig. S2. The sign of the Hall coefficient indicates that majority carriers are electrons.

Refer to caption
Figure S2: Temperature dependence of the electron carrier concentration in the single crystalline sample of β\beta-Ga2O3.

II Result of DFT calculations

The relaxed structures obtained by DFT calculations are shown in Fig. S3, and the simulated muon spin relaxation rates Δ\Delta in the Kubo-Toyabe function for each structure are shown in Table S1.

Refer to caption
Figure S3: Left: Crystal structure of β\beta-Ga2O3. Isolated pink balls indicate the initial positions of hydrogen in the structural relaxation calculations shown in (a)-(f), respectively corresponding to HI, HII, HIII, HIV, HV, and HVI in the Table S1. The crystal structures were drawn using VESTA Momma and Izumi (2011). The nuclear dipolar linewidth Δ\Delta calculated for each structure is shown in Table S1.
Table S1: The nuclear dipolar linewidth Δ\Delta for the various local structures involving interstitial H obtained from structural relaxation calculations. \bigstar indicate the results of VASP:HSE06 calculations Kresse and Hafner (1993); Krukau et al. (2006), while others were those by OpenMX:GGA-PBE Ozaki (2003). dOHd_{\mathrm{OH}} denotes the distance between H and the nearest O. Δ001\Delta_{\langle 001\rangle} and Δpwdr\Delta_{\mathrm{pwdr}} are the linewidths for single crystalline and powder samples, respectively.
Type Config. nn oxygen dOHd_{\mathrm{OH}} Δ001\Delta_{\langle 001\rangle} Δpwdr\Delta_{\mathrm{pwdr}}
(nm) (MHz) (MHz)
Interstitial HI OI 0.0966 0.136 0.137
Interstitial HII OII 0.1036 0.150 0.153
Interstitial HIII OII 0.1003 0.161 0.158
Interstitial HIV OIII 0.1024 0.157 0.165
Interstitial HV OIII 0.0996 0.158 0.170
Interstitial HVI OI 0.0989 0.175 0.162
Vacancy VGaI{}_{\mathrm{Ga_{I}}}-H OI 0.0983 0.106 0.117
Vacancy VGaII{}_{\mathrm{Ga_{II}}}-H OI 0.0988 0.108 0.115
Vacancy VOI{}_{\mathrm{O_{I}}}-H 0.286 0.250
Vacancy VOII{}_{\mathrm{O_{II}}}-H 0.168 0.235
Vacancy VOIII{}_{\mathrm{O_{III}}}-H 0.229 0.238

III 010\langle 010\rangle Axial diffusion: Evaluation based on total energy.

To investigate the Mu2 diffusion path, 010\langle 010\rangle axis position yy dependence of the total energy EtotE_{\mathrm{tot}} was calculated in a 1×2×11\times 2\times 1 superlattice. Figure S4 shows the variation of the total energy,

ΔEtotEtot(𝒓)Emin,\displaystyle\Delta E_{\mathrm{tot}}\equiv E_{\mathrm{tot}}({\bm{r}})-E_{\mathrm{min}},

where 𝒓\bm{r} is the position vector of channel cic_{i} (i=1,2,3)(i=1,2,3) and EminE_{\mathrm{min}} is the global minimum of Etot(𝒓)E_{\mathrm{tot}}(\bm{r}). Here, 𝒓{\bm{r}} for c1=(0.25,y,0)c_{1}=(0.25,y,0), c2=(0.5,y,0.5)c_{2}=(0.5,y,0.5) and c3=(0.5,y,0)c_{3}=(0.5,y,0), respectively. The ΔEtot\Delta E_{\mathrm{tot}} of c2c_{2} and c3c_{3} show large changes of more than 0.5 eV, whereas the ΔEtot\Delta E_{\mathrm{tot}} of c1c_{1} is almost independent of yy and the difference is only 0.04 eV, suggesting that c1c_{1} is a the possible diffusion path for Mu2.

Refer to caption
Figure S4: Hydrogen position on the 010\langle 010\rangle axis dependence of the total energy calculated at the center cic_{i} (i=1,2,3)(i=1,2,3) of each channel, shown in left panel, using the 1×2×11\times 2\times 1 structure.

IV Supplemental μ\muSR Results

IV.1 μ\muSR results on powder Sample

μ\muSR measurements and data analysis for the powder sample were performed as for the single crystal. The temperature dependence of each parameter obtained by curve fitting of the μ\muSR time spectra is shown in Fig. S5. For comparison, the results for the single-crystal sample presented in the main text are also shown.

Refer to caption
Figure S5: Temperature dependence of (a) Gz(0)G_{z}(0) determined by TF-μ\muSR, (b) the fractional yield f1f_{1}, (c) the Kubo-Toyabe linewidth Δ1\Delta_{1}, (d) the fluctuation rate ν1\nu_{1}, and (e) the exponential relaxation rate λ\lambda for the Mu1 component. The result for the single crystalline sample is quoted from the main text for comparison.

As can be seen in Fig. S5(a), the most significant difference is that the yield f1f_{1} of the Mu1 component in the powder sample is greatly increased in place of the Mu2 component. In addition, it is observed for the powder sanple that ν1\nu_{1} (the fluctuation rate of Δ1\Delta_{1}) is almost zero (static) for TTγ80T\lesssim T_{\gamma}\simeq 80 K, whereas it takes on finite values for TTγT\gtrsim T_{\gamma}, suggesting slow diffusive motion of the Mu1 component. These behaviors are in remarkable contrast to the single-crystal sample. On the other hand, the increase in f1f_{1} (decrease in f2f_{2}) from TβT_{\beta} (55\simeq 55 K) to TγT_{\gamma} is common. From these observations, it may be interpreted that for T<TβT<T_{\beta}, the component corresponding to Mu2 in the powder sample is bounded by some defects, etc., and that a part of it is detrapped and begins to exhibit fast diffusion for Tβ<T<TγT_{\beta}<T<T_{\gamma}, which is gradually suppressed above TγT_{\gamma}.

IV.2 Comparison of curve fits for the data around TβT_{\beta}

To test the possibility that quasi-static Mu1 and Mu2 coexist in the μ\muSR spectrum near the temperature at which f2f_{2} decreases significantly, we performed global curve fits for the ZF and LF-μ\muSR spectra with the linewidth Δ1\Delta_{1} and Δ2\Delta_{2} as free parameters in each state, as well as for those fixed to the values expected for the corresponding sites (Δ1=0.136\Delta_{1}=0.136 MHz and Δ2=0.345\Delta_{2}=0.345 MHz). The results of the respective analyses for the spectra at 57 K are shown below in Fig. S6(a) and (b). The fits with Δ\Delta fixed to the expected values at the two sites show large residual chi-squares, clearly indicating that the data are not well reproduced.

Refer to caption
Figure S6: Analyzed μ\muSR spectra at 57 K (global fit of the entire ZF/LF data). (a) with Δ1\Delta_{1} and Δ2\Delta_{2} as free parameters, (b) fixed to Δ1=0.136\Delta_{1}=0.136 MHz and Δ2=0.345\Delta_{2}=0.345 MHz.