Local coefficients and Gelfand-Graev representations for non-split covers on SL
Abstract.
A purely local approach has been developed by Krishnamurthy and Kutzko to compute Langlands-Shahidi local coefficient for via types and covers à la Bushnell-Kutzko. In this paper, we extend their method to the non-split case and complete their project. We also study the algebraic structure of Gelfand-Graev representations, which generalizes the results of Chan-Savin and Mishra-Pattanayak to over non-archimidean local fields without any restriction on the characteristic.
Key words and phrases:
Bushnell–Kutzko’s types and covers, Gelfand-Graev representations, Langlands-Shahidi local coefficients2020 Mathematics Subject Classification:
Primary 11F70; Secondary 22E501. Introduction
Throughout this paper will denote a non-arhimedean local field and we let . The purpose of this paper is to illustrate an algebraic method of achieving an explicit formula for the Langlands–Shahidi local coefficients and computing the isotypic subspace of Gelfand–Graev representations of by means of types and non-split covers à la Bushnell–Kutzko. At a first glance, the results seem to be rather tangential to each other, but two topics are commonly concerned with what is known as Whittaker models, which play an important role in the automorphic forms and representation theory of linear reductive groups due to the nature of its relation to -functions, notably in the Langlands–Shahidi method and Rankin–Selberg integrals as well. Specifically, local coefficient by definition is a constant of proportionality arising from the uniqueness of Whittaker models [Rod72], whereas the Gelfand–Graev representation is given by the dual of the Whittaker space. In the meantime, the theory of types and covers provides a systematic way of analyzing the structure of smooth representations of linear reductive -adic groups via the representation theory of compact open subgroups (cf. Section 2.1).
This paper consists of two parts. Our first main result of this paper is a complete expression of local coefficients via types and covers, restricting to the case of as a Levi subgroup of . Specifically, the character of is quadratic and ramified (“non-split”). As a matter of fact, this case is more challenging than others. We resolve the only remaining case of non-split cover, which is addressed in the work by Krishnamurthy and Kutzko [KK, §3.4 Remark 2]. The reader should consult §2.1 and §3.1 for details about the unexplained notations in the statement below.
Theorem A (Theorem 3.1).
Let be a fixed additive character of level . Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of of level with . Then we have
The local coefficient has a great influence on the development of contemporary number theory, and is closed related to the theory of local factors à la the Langlands-Shahidi method [Sha78, Sha81, Sha84]. Shahidi subsequently defined the so-called Langlands–Shahidi -factors inductively so that the local coefficient factorizes as a product of such -factors. Another briefly aforementioned method for constructing local exterior square factors via the theory of integral representations is developed by Bump and Friedberg in late 1980’s [BF89]. By definition, it is a proportionality factor between an integral and its dual integral related to each other through the theory of either Fourier transforms or intertwining operators [Mat15]. On the perspective of the local Langlands correspondence, the resulting local factors ought to be the same, probably up to some normalizations of certain Haar measures. In practice, this flavor of comparisons is surely non-trivial to answer, and is known for only a handful amount of cases; for example, we refer the reader to [Kap15, Sha84] for Rankin–Selberg local factors, and [AKMSS21, BP21] for Asai local factors. In this regard, Bump and Friedberg [BF89, Conjecture 4] predicted that the equality should be valid in the context of local exterior square factors attached to irreducible admissible representation of . Our A confirms that the equality between local factors [BF89, Conjecture 4] obtains from the Langlands–Shahidi method and those obtained via Bump–Friedberg integrals holds unconditionally at least for .
Our strategy to tackle the problem of computing local coefficient on inside is going back to at least the pioneering work of Casselman [Cas80], where local coefficients in the context of unramified principal series representations are explicitly computed. The computation there relies on finding the effect of the intertwining operator on the subspace of vectors fixed by the Iwahori subgroup. The role played by the trivial representation of the Iwahori subgroup in Casselman’s trick can be regarded as an extreme incident of the theory of types and covers. Previously, types and covers are adapted by Krishnamurthy and Kutzko [KK] for split covers of , or in other words, the case where the character is not an unramified twist of a quadratic character. Afterwords, the author and Krishnamurthy [JK21] dealt with local coefficients associated to covers of a homogeneous pair of irreducible supercuspidal representations of the Levi subgroup embedded in .
Our next aim of this paper is to express the principal series block of the Gelfand–Graev representation as a cyclic module over the Iwahori–Hecke algebra. As before, the reader is advised to refer to Section 2.1 for Hecke algebras, and undefined terminology and to Section 3.2 for Gelfand–Graev representations in the following statement.
Theorem B (Theorem 3.6).
Let be a fixed additive character of level . Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of of level with . As modules, we obtain isomorphisms
The structure of Gelfand–Graev representation was originally treated by Chan and Savin for unramified principal series blocks of split reductive groups [CS18], and was further refined by Mishra and Pattanaya for principal series blocks for connected reductive groups over whose residue characteristic is large enough [MP21]. Shortly after, Gao, Gurevich, and Karasiewicz extended Chan and Savin’s result for linear groups [CS18] to the Iwahori fixed vectors in the Gelfand-Graev representation of covering groups as a module over the Iwahori-Hecke algebra [GGK22].
A part of reasons why Mishra and Pattanaya [MP21] primarily considered limited characteristics of is that they made a reduction to depth-zero cases and then to finite group cases. In doing so, they were able to determine the generator of isotypical space for the cover of Gelfand-Graev representations over finite fields, which in turn admits the -dimensional sign representation. On the other hand, our proof takes elements from Chan and Savin’s [CS18] unconditional and direct argument. Similarly to Chan and Savin, we laboriously compute the outcome of Hecke operators on test functions from which we find the generator possessing the -dimensional sign representation (cf. Proposition 3.5).
In principle, all the computations boil down to understanding the behavior of the intertwining or Hecke operators on certain test functions (cf. Proposition 2.4, Proposition 3.5). We expect that those test functions that naturally occur in the theory of types and cover open a new chapter for other situation, and consider the present paper a groundwork for that direction. Benefiting from [JK21], it is also our belief that the structure of the isotypic component of the space of compactly supported Whittaker functions as modules over Iwahori-Hecke algebra, is responsible for computing exterior square local coefficients in more general settings, remarkably, Siegel Levi subgroups isomorphic to lying inside . It will be therefore very interesting to see if our robust arguement can be carried out to parabolically induced representations of symplectic groups in -variables. The author plans to investigate them in a future study.
2. Non-split Covers and Intertwining Operators
2.1. Types and Covers
Let be a non-archimedean local field with its residual finite field and denote by the characteristic of . The base field is a finite extension of or , called a -adic field in characteristic 0, or a local function field in characteristic . Let be its ring of integers, its maximal ideal. We fix a generator of and normalize the absolute value of so that . When there is no possibility of confusion, we sometimes drop the subscripts, while working over a fixed . We let . Let be the subgroup of -points of the Borel subgroup of upper triangular matrices. Then , where
To be specific, we identify with when no confusion can arise. Let denote the opposite Borel subgroup of lower triangular matrices, where
Let be a maximal compact subgroup and let , where
are two fixed distinct representatives of cosets in . We let denotes the length function on defined by and . The character is given by the formula
We may view it as a character of by extending trivially to . Let denote the modulus character of ; explicitly,
For a subgroup of and , let denote . If is a representation of , let be a representation of such that , . Let denote a trivial character on .
For any topological group , we write to denote the group of continuous homomorphism from to . Particularly, we are interested in the character group . Let . Specifically, . Then is a free abelian group of rank . Let denote the group of continuous homomorphisms of into which are trivial on – called the group of unramified characters of . Moreover is equipped with the structure of a complex variety whose ring of regular functions is .
By a a cuspidal pair in , we mean a pair in , where is either or , and is a supercuspidal representation of . Two such pairs , , are said to be inertially equivalent if there exist and an unramified character of such that , and is equivalent to the representation of . We denote by the -inertial equivalence class of a cuspidal pair in . Let denote the set of inertial equivalence classes of cuspidal pairs in . In particular, we let be a character of and we put . Let , , be characters of . Then is -inertially equivalent to if and only if there exists such that .
It is a fundamental result of Bernstein (cf. [Kut04, §1.4]) that of smooth complex representations of decomposes into a product of full subcategories
We divide the equivalence classes into so-called
-
supercuspidal blocks;
-
principal series blocks.
For each irreducible supercuspidal representation of , we write for the equivalence class of in . We let be the full subcategory of whose objects are isomorphic to sums of copies of . Let be a character of , and the functor of normalized parabolic induction. We let denote the space of . To be precise, is the space of smooth functions that satisfy
for any , , and , and the action of on is by right translation, namely . We denote -intertially equivalent class by . We let be the full subcategory of whose irreducible objects are exactly those that occur as a subquotient of some , where is either or [KK, §3.2, P.228].
With , , as above, is -inertially equivalent to if and only if there exists such that . Let be the corresponding -inertially equivalent class. Let be the full subcategory of whose object has the property that for all and . Then the category similarly decomposes as a product of its subcategories :
Let be a compact open subgroup of , let be a smooth irreducible representation of , and write for the contragredient representation. Then is the space of compactly supported function that satisfy
It is a unital (associative) algebra with respect to the standard convolution operation
where we normalized the Haar measure on such that .
An element is called intertwine if there is a non-zero -homomorphism between and the conjugate representation . It is equivalent to saying that the double coset supports a non-zero function in [Kut04, §2.2]. Specifically, when is -dimensional, for any . We denote by the set of elements in which intertwine .
A pair is said to be a type for , or simply a -type if for every irreducible object , we have if and only if contains , that is to say, the space of -covariants is non-trivial. For , denote the transpose of with respect to the canonical pairing between and . We similarly define the Hecke algebra . There is a canonical anti-isomorphism from given by . There is a natural left structure (also denoted as ) given by
for , , and . For -type , the map induces an equivalence of categories .
Given and as above, set if . We let to be the smallest number so that ; otherwise it is defined to be the smallest positive integer so that . In particular, if is unramified, . The compact open subgroup is given by
and is a function on given by
It follows from [Kut04] that the pair is a -cover for . We recall certain crucial properties of a -cover :
-
(Iwahori Factorization) .
-
The representation is trivial on and , while . The pair is a type for .
-
There is a support preserving injective algebra map that realizes the parabolic induction functor at the level of Hecke algebras. It means that the following diagram commutes:
where is a right adjoint of the restriction functor .
We oftentimes identify as a sub-algebra of using the embedding . The cover is said to be a split cover, when , and is called a non-split cover, otherwise. Among non-split covers, local coefficients and Gelfand–Graev representations in the frame work of unramified characters is well understood since the seminal work of Casselman [Cas80]. For this reason, we fix a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of with so that , and only focus on these types of characters in the rest of this paper.
2.2. Intertwining Operators
We write to denote the induced space . We define to be the space of complex numbers for which acts on by . Throughout the rest of the paper, we put . Let be the -isotypic subspace of . As is one-dimensional, it is straightforward from [BK98, (2.13)] that there is a natural isomorphism given by . The functions and in are given by
and
For , let denote the function supported on the double coset and given by the formula , . Let be the sub-algebra in spanned by the function for . Just as in [Kut04, §3.3], we let be the normalized Hecke operator so that
The sub-algebra inherits a left action on given by for and . We summarize the properties of from [BK98, §11.5 and §11.6].
Lemma 2.1.
The set is a -basis of . Specifically, .
Since any element in certainly intertwines the representation , [Kut04, Lemma 2.3] (cf. [BK98, (11.6)]) implies that . In addition, we observe from [Kim16, Lemma 3.2.4] that
is a subset of , because . Hence, any is determined by its restriction to . In this regard, we define
(2.1) |
by for , and .
Lemma 2.2.
Cf. [Kim16, Lemma 3.2.6] The map is well defined and is a homomorphism of left modules.
Proof.
Let and . Thanks to , we decompose with , , and . We see that elements intertwine the character . With these in hand, we have
Appealing to , is trivial, and it becomes
having used the fact that . We confirm that is well defined, that is to say, belongs to .
It remains to show that is a homomorphism of left modules. Upon making the change of variables , for , equals to
from which the desired conclusion follows. It is noteworthy that the support of all these integrals above is actually in . ∎
The following proposition can be thought of as the -analogue of [JK21, Proposition 5.9] and [Kim16, Lemma 3.2.9].
Proposition 2.3.
As left modules, is isomorphic to . Consequently, the -isotypic subspace is two dimensional with a -basis .
Proof.
Since , we may identify the measure on and with the additive measure on , and we take to be on . The Haar measure is normalized so that has volume one. We define a standard -intertwining operator by
(2.2) |
for all . The integral converges absolutely for and defines a rational function on a non-empty Zariski open subset of the complex torus . The character is said to be regular if . If is irreducible almost everywhere in , every -morphism from to is a scalar multiple of . We set . Our calculation is inspired from the idea in [JK21].
Proposition 2.4.
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of and assume that is regular. Then we have
and
Proof.
Since is equivalent to Mod, we have
Therefore, induces an intertwining map , which we by abuse of notation we will again denote by . We prove equalities when the integral in (2.2) converges absolutely, that is to say, the real part of is sufficiently large, and then extend meromorphically to the entire complex plane.
Now it follows from Proposition 2.3 that . We may evaluate both sides of this equation at to establish
For , we have the Iwasawa decomposition:
(2.3) |
In particular, for , we have . We may rewrite as with and , and then use the relation of additive Haar measure for to determine :
(2.4) |
But being ramified implies that the series of equality of above integrals is zero. In other words, .
Let us turn our attention to . Owing to Proposition 2.3, we know that
Our aim is to determine unknown coefficients and precisely. To this end, we evaluate both sides of the above equation at . The test function is supported on so that
thereby providing . Just as in (2.4), we use the Iwasawa decomposition (2.3) (cf. (3.5)) to arrive at
Once again, being ramified forces that the innermost integral over is equal to zero, which yields , as requested. ∎
The Plancherel constant is a scalar valued function attached to is by the defining relation [Sha84, §6]
on a Zariski open dense subset of . It is a rational function in and clearly depends on the measure defining intertwining operators.
Theorem 2.5 (The Plancherel Constant I).
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of of level with . Then we have
Proof.
We apply Proposition 2.4 twice. ∎
The Plancherel constant in Theorem 2.5 coincides with that in split cases [KK, §3.3] on the common Zariski open dense subset of (Refer to [KM09, Theorem 4.5] for the precise description), and this recovers the work by Kutzko and Morris [KM09, Theorem 4.5.(2)-(ii)].
3. Local Coefficients and Gelfand-Graev Representations
3.1. The Local Coefficient
Let be a non-trivial additive character of trivial on but not on , and a character of . It is a theorem of Rodier [Rod72] that the dimension of the space of -Whittaker functionals on is one. We may define a basis vector for the -Whittaker functionals on by the formula
This integral may not converge for all but can be extended to the whole space as a principal value integral. We also have the following convenient reinterpretation for as a principal value integral; Given a compact open subgroup of , there exists a suitably large compact open subgroup such that
for all and for all . We similarly define on via
as a principal value integral in the above sense. Appealing to the aforementioned result of Rodier [Rod72], there exists a non-zero constant called the Langlnads-Shahidi local coefficient satisfying
(3.1) |
For , the Gauss sum attached to is defined by
Theorem 3.1 (The Local Coefficient).
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of of level with . Then we have
Proof.
Since is a rational function in , it suffices to prove the assertion on a Zariski open dense subset of . In particular, we impose the assumption that and are all irreducible. Our argument is rather close in spirit to the work by Krishnamurthy and Kutzko [KK, Proposition 3.1]. Evaluating one side of (3.1) at is straightforward, since the function is supported on . Indeed we see that
from which it follows that
We know that is trivial on , and consequently,
(3.2) |
This brings us to the central issue of computing the other side . In contrast to , this is not immediate, because is supported near the identity element. To this end, we deduce from (2.3) that is , if , and , otherwise. Then equals to
for some large positive integer . For convenience, let denote
For any integer , let denote the shell, . Then our domain of the integration can be decomposed as shells . The crux of the proof of [KK, Proposition 3.1] is that only the last shell contributes to . Assembling all of this information, we achieve
(3.3) |
We can draw the conclusion from (3.2) combined with (3.3). ∎
This result should be compared with the work of Shahidi [Sha78, Lemma 4.4]. In addition, the local coefficient coincides with the corresponding Hecke–Tate local -factor [Tat77], which can be viewed as Bump and Friedberg exterior square local factors for (cf. [Mat15, Proof of Theorem 5.4]). Indeed, Theorem 3.1 confirms Conjecture 4 in [BF89].
Let be the unique polynomial satisfying such that is the numerator of . Whenever is unitary, the local -factor is defined by
The local -factor is defined to satisfy the relation:
Corollary 3.2 (Local Factors).
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of . Then we have
Corollaries 3.3 and 3.4 match with the corresponding formulæ [Sha81, Proposition 3.1.1] and [Sha84, §Introduction].
Corollary 3.3 (The Functional Equation).
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of . Then we have
Proof.
The functional equation for the local constant (cf. [BH06, Corollary 23.4.2]) produces
The local coefficient is related to the Plancherel constant which is more or less saying that “the square root of the local coefficient equals the associated Plancherel constant” as given in Corollary 3.4.
Corollary 3.4 (The Plancherel Constant II).
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of . Then we have
Proof.
We observe from [BH06, (23.6.3)] that
3.2. The Gelfand-Graev Representation
We take this occasion to explore the structure of the Gelfand-Graev space, which extends the results of [CS18] and [MP21]. The Gelfand-Graev representation [CS18, §4.1] is provided by the space of smooth functions which are compactly supported modulo . They also satisfy
(3.4) |
Let denote the full space of smooth functions which satisfy (3.4). As a potential application (cf. [JK21, §5.3.2 (5.25)]), the contragredient of appears in the target space of the Whittaker map corresponding to via Frobenius reciprocity. For , we define the functions and in the -co-invariant Gelfand-Graev space given by
and
Given a smooth (complex) representation of , let be the maximal quotient of on which acts trivially. According to \citelist[Bor76]*Lemma 4.7 [CS18]*Proposition 4.2 (cf. [BK98, Lemma 10.3]) accompanied by [BH03, Lemma 2.3], the usual projection from onto defined by
descends to an isomorphism as -modules. Let be a test function supported on such that for all . Owing to [MP21, Theorem 1] (cf. [CS18, The discussion preceding Lemma 4.3]), in turn endows the isomorphism as -modules of with , where is a generator.
Proposition 3.5.
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of with . Then we have
-
.
-
for .
Proof.
The first assertion is immediate from Claim located in the halfway of the proof of [CS18, Lemma 4.1].
As for , we take and the function is equal to
The support of the function is contained in . Upon using the support of , we find that the convolution is supported on
This permits us to simplify the computation into specializing the values at and .
We consider the case that . We know that is a -algebra, while is the identity in this Hecke algebra so must surely act as the identity on itself . Henceforth we conclude that
We bring our attention to the effect of intertwiners on the generator. We treat the term first. The value is , as supports and of and , respectively, are disjoint. Now thanks to the Iwahori factorization of , we may identify
from which we deduce that is equal to
In this circumstance, we have employed the relation and it is worthwhile to notice that the sign change occurs. Upon writing , if and only if . As a result, we end up at
Let us focus our attention to the term . Then the support of tells us that
In light of , we are led to
Concerning the value at , we use the fact that the integrand below is supported on and is right invariant under coupled with the fact that the map induces a bijection (cf. [Kut04, Lemma 3.2] to see that
The integrand of the last integral is right invariant under . In this way, we find that
The integrand is , unless . Then for , we apply the Bruhat decomposition (cf. [Kut04, P. 606]);
(3.5) |
whence . Therefore it can be expressed in terms of Gauss sums attached to the ramified character and then eventually this term vanishes
as was to be shown. In short, we accomplish that
and the outcome we seek for follows from this. ∎
It is noteworthy that by applying Proposition 3.5- repeatedly, we get
which is consistent with the consequence from [Kut04, Proposition 3.3]. We denote by the one-dimensional module on which acts as , for . We are now in a position to state our main theorem.
Theorem 3.6.
Let be a non-trivial ramified quadratic character of with . As -modules, we have isomorphisms
Proof.
In virtue of Proposition 3.5-, we construct an element in given by . We attain the following Frobenius reciprocity
where the element corresponds to the element . In summary, we form a non-zero map
of -modules, which assigns to .
It suffices to show that is an isomorphism of -modules. To verify it, Proposition 3.5- ensures that we find an isomorphism of -modules provided by mapping to . Upon invoking the isomorphism attributed to [Kut04, Proposition 3.1], we end up with a series of isomorphisms as left modules
which sends to . Gathering all information, the conclusion thereby follows, because is indeed -modules. In other words, and are free -modules generated by and respectively. ∎
When the characteristic of the field is and that of the residual field is greater than , the above theorem has been settled in the work by Mishra and Pattanayak [MP21, Theorem 3]. To the best of our knowledge, Theorem 3.6 is new when has positive characteristics, and also when it has residual characteristic or .
Remark 3.7.
Acknowledgments.
I am deeply indebted to Muthu Krishnamurthy for introducing his unfinished project [KK] to me. Without his suggestion and countless encouragement, this paper never has come into existence. I also want to take this opportunity to thank to Jack Buttcane, Brandon Hanson, and Andrew Knightly for fruitful mathematical conversation and their feedbacks on some aspects of this manuscript. I am grateful to the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at University of Maine for their warm hospitality, while the paper was written. The author would like to convey our appreciation to anonymous referees for thoughtfully reading our paper and correcting many inaccuracies which significantly improved the exposition of this manuscript. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (No. RS-2023-00209992).
Conflicts of interest.
The author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Data availability.
This manuscript has no associated data.