Linear probing of molecules at micrometric distances from a surface with sub-Doppler frequency resolution
Abstract
We report on precision spectroscopy of sub-wavelength confined molecular gases. This was obtained by rovibrational selective reflection of and gases using a quantum cascade laser at . Our technique probes molecules at micrometric distances () from the window of a macroscopic cell with sub-MHz resolution, allowing molecule-surface interaction spectroscopy. We exploit the linearity and high-resolution of our technique to gain novel spectroscopic information on the greenhouse gas, useful for enriching molecular databases. The natural extension of our work to thin-cells will allow compact frequency references and improved measurements of the Casimir-Polder interaction with molecules.
pacs:
High-resolution molecular spectroscopy in gas cells has far-reaching applications ranging from Earth and atmospheric sciences Polyansky et al. (2015); Vaskuri et al. (2018) to astrophysics Roueff et al. (2020), metrology and frequency referencing Gilbert et al. (2001); Benabid et al. (2005); Zektzer et al. (2020); Santagata et al. (2019), gas sensing and trace detection Galli et al. (2016), as well as fundamental physics measurements Daussy et al. (2007); Moretti et al. (2013); Daussy et al. (1999); Diouf et al. (2020); Cournol et al. (2019). The growing demand for miniaturisation has led to the fabrication of compact platforms that interface molecular gases with solid-state devices, such as on-chip waveguides Zektzer et al. (2020), hollow core fibres Benabid et al. (2005), porous media Svensson et al. (2011) and thin cells Hartmann et al. (2016). However, the above experiments typically operate at high gas pressures due to low transition probabilities of molecular lines and the resolution is limited either by pressure or Doppler broadening. Therefore, achieving precision spectroscopy of a confined molecular gas is challenging.
Confined gases have been studied primarily with atomic alkali vapors with implications ranging from fundamental physics to quantum technologies. Thin cells have been used to study the Dicke narrowing effect Romer and Dicke (1955), allowing high-resolution sub-Doppler linear spectroscopy Dutier et al. (2003), and more recently, investigations of dipole-dipole interactions with high density atomic vapors Peyrot et al. (2018). Probing Rydberg atoms in thin cells is also a promising approach for quantum information processing Ripka et al. (2018). Three dimensional atomic confinement has also been explored with photonic crystals Ballin et al. (2013) or random media Villalba et al. (2013). Finally, the fundamental Casimir-Polder interaction has been studied with confined atomic vapors, either in nanometric thin cells Fichet et al. (2007), or by selective reflection spectroscopy Bloch and Ducloy (2005).
High-resolution spectroscopy of confined molecules offers attractive prospects for fabricating compact frequency references. Additionally, it paves the way for spectroscopic probing of the Casimir-Polder molecule-surface interaction, a topic of interest for physical-chemistry or atmospheric sciences Fiedler et al. (2019); Antezza et al. (2020), as well as for fundamental physics due to the rich geometry of polyatomic molecules. The dependence of the Casimir-Polder interaction on molecular orientation (anisotropy) Thiyam et al. (2015); Bimonte et al. (2016); Antezza et al. (2020) or on molecular chirality Butcher et al. (2012) (when the surface is also chiral), are for instance open theoretical questions. Although molecule-surface interactions are of fundamental interest, so far experimental tests are few and comparison with theoretical predictions has been challenging Shih et al. (1974); Raskin and Kusch (1969); Boustimi et al. (2001); Brand et al. (2015); Wagner et al. (2014).
One possible way for probing molecular gases close to a dielectric surface, in an effectively confined environment, is via selective reflection in a molecular gas cell Woerdman and Schuurmans (1975); Schuurmans, M. F. H. (1976). Frequency modulated selective reflection spectroscopy (FMSR), under normal incidence, is sensitive to particles (molecules or atoms) that move parallel to the dielectric window of the gas cell at distances comparable to the reduced wavelength of excitation (). This feature has made FMSR an important spectroscopic technique for measuring Casimir-Polder interactions with excited states atoms Ducloy and Fichet (1991); Martine Chevrollier et al. (1992). Additionally, FMSR is a linear spectroscopy without cross-over resonances that often muddle saturated absorption spectra. This allows easy interpretation of observed lineshapes and the study of gas properties, such as collisional shifts and broadenings Akulshin et al. (1982); Vuletic et al. (1993); Laliotis et al. (2008); Martine Chevrollier et al. (1992), even at high densities where volume absorption spectroscopy is unfeasible. The above advantages of FMSR can have an important impact for molecular spectroscopy Polyansky et al. (2015); Vaskuri et al. (2018); Roueff et al. (2020); Galli et al. (2016); Faye et al. (2018); Khalil (1999); Krieg et al. (2005) allowing simultaneous measurements of transition frequencies, intensities and collisional broadenings. Although attempts have been made to probe alkali dimers Shmavonyan et al. (2015) at high temperatures, high resolution FMSR has so far been exclusively performed on atomic vapors.
Here, we perform high resolution rovibrational FMSR of and gases at . Our experiment probes molecules at a depth of about with a sub-MHz resolution, limited by the linewidth of our quantum cascade laser (QCL) source. The exceptional combination of linearity and high-resolution offered by selective reflection is used to resolve the hyperfine structure of and gain novel spectroscopic information on the molecule, of importance to atmospheric physics and corresponding molecular databases. Finally, we use FMSR to perform molecule-surface interaction spectroscopy with a sensitivity in Casimir-Polder shifts of about 10 kHz at 1 from the surface.
Selective reflection is performed on a gas cell at room temperature constructed out of metallic vacuum tubes with ZnSe windows. We use a commercial QCL, of output power 5 mW, whose frequency is scanned by changing the laser current. A frequency modulation (FM) is applied at kHz with a peak-to-peak amplitude MHz. The reflection from the gas/window interface (Fig.1) is demodulated at frequency with a lock-in amplifier. In the limit where is the homogeneous linewidth, this provides the derivative of the direct signal and increases the contrast of the sub-Doppler contribution originating from molecules that are slow in the direction of the beam Ducloy and Fichet (1991). To avoid any residual Doppler broadening, selective reflection is performed at normal incidence. When , where is the Doppler full-width-at-half-maximum (FWHM), the FMSR signal () becomes a dispersive Lorentzian curve of width equal to Akulshin et al. (1982):
(1) |
Here, is defined as the FM demodulated signal normalized by the off-resonant reflection; is the dipole moment matrix element of the probed transition, N is the population of the lower state, is the most probable molecular velocity in the direction of the beam and is the laser detuning.
We focus on and molecules with strong rovibrational transitions in the mid-infrared () window. Ammonia () is of tetrahedral geometry with widely spaced rotational levels. The only major line of the most abundant ammonia isotope within the 150 GHz spectral window of our laser is the saP(1,0) rovibrational transition at MHz Gordon et al. (2017), from the ground state to the first vibration. The spread of the observed hyperfine structure, resulting from electric quadrupole interactions in the lower level, is a few MHz . Urban et al. (2000) (Fig.2) and is unresolved with Doppler limited resolution ( at room temperature). Sulfur hexafluoride () is of spherical geometry, presenting a multitude of transitions of the vibrational mode in the frequency range of our laser with a superfine structure occasionally resolved even with Doppler limited resolution ( at room temperature) Bobin et al. (1987); Acef et al. (2000).
A saturated absorption set-up provides a molecular frequency reference in the volume at low gas pressure, allowing a frequency calibration of our scans. Saturated absorption is recorded simultaneously with selective reflection and is demodulated with a lock-in amplifier at or . demodulation provides a better contrast of the narrow peaks at the expense of signal amplitude. The frequency drift of the free running QCL is incompatible with high resolution spectroscopy. We thus use an auxiliary set-up to lock the laser frequency either on the side of a direct absorption profile, or at the slope of the first derivative of the linear absorption of the ammonia saP(1,0) transition. The laser frequency is then scanned by adding an offset to the error signal. The laser stabilization circuit only corrects the slow laser frequency drift (timescale ) and not the laser linewidth.


Fig.2 shows selective reflection spectra of at various gas pressures (from P=25 mTorr to P=200 mTorr) along with a saturated absorption reference (Fig.2a). The hyperfine structure of the lower rovibrational level and crossover resonances are visible on the saturated absorption spectrum, typically recorded at . The hyperfine structure of ammonia is also resolved by FMSR for pressures lower than 50 mTorr (Fig.2c,d). However, unlike for saturated absorption spectroscopy, there are no crossover resonances and the ratio between the amplitudes of each hyperfine transition is defined by its theoretical estimated strength (1:5:3 for respectively . Urban et al. (2000)). The FMSR signals of Fig.2 are the result of averaging 40 individual 2 min long scans.
The frequency resolution of both saturated absorption and FMSR is determined by the laser linewidth, pressure broadening and FM excursion, whereas power and transit-time broadening have a minor effect in these conditions. The laser linewidth is FWHM, experimentally measured by examining the saturated absorption linewidth while reducing FM distortions and pressure broadening Lukusa Mudiayi (2019). At low molecular pressures, laser linewidth is the frequency resolution limit for both techniques in the current set-up.
At sufficiently high pressures, the FMSR signal linewidth is dominated by collisional broadening which is proportional to gas pressure. In this case the FMSR amplitude (about ) remains constant with pressure because the reduction of lower state population is compensated by the decrease of transition linewidth (the ratio in eqn.1 stays constant). This is seen in Fig.2a,b and was also verified for ammonia pressures as high as a few Torr Lukusa Mudiayi (2019). The loss of FMSR signal amplitude at lower pressures is a consequence of the laser linewidth limited frequency resolution (Fig.2d). In the experimental conditions of Fig.2 the 2 saturated absorption amplitude is about 1 order of magnitude larger than FMSR, however, the pressure range of saturated absorption is limited mainly because the saturation intensity increases with transition linewidth.
The black dotted curves of Fig.2 show the predicted FMSR lineshapes, including the exact FM lineshape distortion Ducloy and Fichet (1991) (beyond the assumptions of eqn.1) and the effects of laser linewidth, considered to be a Gaussian function of FWHM. The curves are adjusted for an overall amplitude (the ratio of the hyperfine components is fixed to its theoretical value), a collisional linewidth and shift (compared to the saturated absorption reference) and an offset. The deduced pressure broadening is about 27 MHz/Torr (FWHM) consistent with other values reported in literature Mejri et al. (2015), while the shift between FMSR and saturated absorption remains negligeable.
We also use FMSR in order to measure molecule-surface, Casimir-Polder interactions. In Fig.2d we show the theoretical spectra including molecule-surface interaction effects Ducloy and Fichet (1991), adjusted for an overall amplitude and offset (blue and dashed red curves). We assume a potential, where z is the molecule-surface distance and is the spectroscopic van der Waals coefficient (the difference between coefficients of the probed states). Our FMSR spectroscopic Casimir-Polder measurement gives an upper bound of to the coefficient. Systematic errors are reduced by the elimination of a parasitic background and laser frequency drift. There are no theoretical calculations for the spectroscopic of ammonia that depends on the allowed electronic and vibrational contributions Buhmann et al. (2012); Brand et al. (2015); Wagner et al. (2014) and on the anisotropy due to the molecular rotation Bimonte et al. (2016). Nevertheless, based on previous calculations for other molecules Buhmann et al. (2012); Brand et al. (2015); Bimonte et al. (2016) we estimate that should be less than . We note that Casimir-Polder retardation can also play a role in such experiments Buhmann et al. (2012). The sensitivity of dedicated molecule-surface FMSR spectroscopy can be improved by reducing the QCL linewidth Cappelli et al. (2012); Sow et al. (2014); Argence et al. (2015) or by probing smaller wavelength transitions. For more details see the supplementary materials.

We subsequently expanded our studies to for which molecular databases are incomplete Faye et al. (2018), because its dense rovibrational spectrum is difficult to resolve with traditional Fourier transform spectroscopy. High resolution saturated absorbtion measurements of have also been performed with lasers. However, these measurements were strongly limited to the parts of the 10.6 spectrum Bobin et al. (1987); Acef et al. (2000) that are accessible with sources. Here, we perform selective reflection spectroscopy on rovibrations in the previously unexplored frequency range centered around the saP(0,1) transition of ammonia.
Fig.3 shows our experimental selective reflection results at a pressure of 150 mTorr, along with the saturated absorption reference taken at 15 mTorr. The HITRAN database is incomplete for transitions Gordon et al. (2017). We therefore used a Bristol Instruments wavemeter with a relative frequency uncertainty of 5 MHz to pinpoint the frequency positions of the rovibrations. Long frequency scans, such as the 300 MHz scan of Fig.3 can suffer from an oscillating background due to interference of the selective reflection signal with other parasitic reflections originating from various parts of the set-up. In order to reduce this background, we have used a system of electronic valves allowing us to empty and refill the chamber with molecules within tens of seconds and detect the difference between the two signals. Using this technique the interferometric background is reduced to values below (see Supplementary materials).
The saturated absorption spectrum provides a higher signal to noise ratio, however, the transition amplitudes cannot be easily extracted due to non-linearity, differential saturation between lines and the possible existence of cross-over resonances. Conversely, the amplitudes of the resolved molecular transitions can be extracted using linear selective reflection. For this purpose, we perform many local fits (see zoom in Fig.3a), delimiting a small part of the selective reflection spectrum, to minimize the effects of the interferometric background. The fits provide the relative amplitude, frequency position and pressure broadened linewidth of the transitions. Here, the effects of molecule-surface interactions are ignored. The uncertainty on the relative transition amplitudes depends on the short term noise of our experiment, which is smaller than (Fig.3b). This translates to uncertainty for the strongest transitions (see Supplementary Materials). Further improvements can be made by increasing the scan integration time. Within the resolution of our experiment (limited by laser linewidth), no collisional frequency shift is measurable between the positions obtained by FMSR and saturated absorption. The final simulated spectrum is shown in Fig.3c (solid blue curve). For comparison we also show the positions and amplitudes of transitions listed in the HITRAN database Gordon et al. (2017) (black bars). The HITRAN data are insufficient to interpret our experimental curves. We can gain further information by expanding these measurements in the entire spectrum of the rovibration of .
Accurate determination of transition amplitudes and positions in laboratory experiments is crucial in atmospheric physics applications, in particular for monitoring gas concentrations by remote sensing experiments Polyansky et al. (2015); Vaskuri et al. (2018). Measuring the atmospheric abundance of , an important greenhouse gas, is essential for monitoring global warming Faye et al. (2018); Khalil (1999). However, and other heavy atmospheric species (, ,…) with low-lying vibrational modes exhibit both a dense rotational structure and many hot bands, and traditional Fourier transform infrared spectra do not show isolated lines, but rather unresolved clusters of many transitions. For such species, molecular databases neglect many significant hot bands, feature inaccurate intensities, and cannot be exploited for atmospheric quantification Faye et al. (2018); Krieg et al. (2005). In this respect, selective reflection spectroscopy which combines linearity and crossover-transitions-free sub-Doppler resolution could be useful, offering complementary information on transition amplitudes and positions for heavy atmospheric molecules.
In conclusion, we have performed high-resolution, linear spectroscopy of gas phase molecules at micrometric distances away from a surface. The achieved resolution is limited by the laser linewidth but can be further improved by locking the QCL to a more stable frequency source Cappelli et al. (2012); Sow et al. (2014); Argence et al. (2015). We demonstrate the advantages of this technique for enriching molecular databases and for molecule-surface interaction spectroscopy.
This work, and its natural extension to molecular thin cells of sub-wavelength thickness paves the way towards:
1)The fabrication of simple and compact molecular frequency references throughout the spectrum without resorting to saturated absorption schemes, required in fiber platforms Triches et al. (2015); Knabe et al. (2009); Takiguchi et al. (2011). Multiple cells Naumov et al. (2001) or multipass techniques can increase the signal of such devices without compromising their compactness.
2)The measurement of the molecule-surface interaction in nanometric thin cells that allow us to control molecular confinement by changing cell thickness Fichet et al. (2007). Probing molecule-surface interactions using rovibrational spectroscopy can be promising for measurement of the Casimir-Polder anisotropy (Thiyam et al., 2015). This is because light induced transitions tend to orientate the molecule along the electric field of the probing beam Bimonte et al. (2016), while the electronic cloud remains in its ground state. Additionally, the interaction of molecules with near field thermal emission Shchegrov et al. (2000); Greffet et al. (2002); Laliotis et al. (2014) can be a point of interest, as molecular rovibrational energy can be comparable to the thermal energy even at room temperatures. Finally, molecular electronic transitions can be used for exploring chirality effects Butcher et al. (2012).
(3) Exploring the fundamental physics of subwavelength confinement with molecules. This includes studies of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution close to surfaces with narrow velocity selection Todorov and Bloch (2017); Rabi et al. (1994), studies of supperradiance with molecules Skribanowitz et al. (1973) or studies of local field corrections Vuletic et al. (1993); Guo et al. (1996); Peyrot et al. (2018) with high density molecular gases. In this respect, the flexibility of molecular cells that operate at room temperature with independent control of gas pressure, can be an additional advantage compared to atomic vapors.
Acknowledgements.
We thank J. R. Rios Leite, M. Ducloy for discussions and A. Shelkovnikov, J. Grucker for participating in preliminary measurements. We acknowledge financial support from the ANR project SQUAT (Grant No. ANR-20- CE92-0006-0.1), PVCM (Grant No.ANR-15-CE30-0005-01) and the Labex First-TF ANR 10 LABX 48 01.References
- Polyansky et al. (2015) O. L. Polyansky, K. Bielska, M. Ghysels, L. Lodi, N. F. Zobov, J. T. Hodges, and J. Tennyson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 243001 (2015).
- Vaskuri et al. (2018) A. Vaskuri, P. Kärhä, L. Egli, J. Gröbner, and E. Ikonen, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 11, 3595 (2018).
- Roueff et al. (2020) E. Roueff, S. Sahal-Bréchot, M. S. Dimitrijević, N. Moreau, and H. Abgrall, Atoms 8, 36 (2020).
- Gilbert et al. (2001) S. L. Gilbert, W. C. Swann, and T. Dennis, in Laser Frequency Stabilization, Standards, Measurement, and Applications, Vol. 4269, edited by J. L. Hall and J. Ye, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE, 2001) pp. 184 – 191.
- Benabid et al. (2005) F. Benabid, F. Couny, J. C. Knight, T. A. Birks, and P. S. J. Russell, Nature 434, 488 (2005).
- Zektzer et al. (2020) R. Zektzer, M. T. Hummon, L. Stern, Y. Sebbag, Y. Barash, N. Mazurski, J. Kitching, and U. Levy, Laser & Photonics Reviews 14, 1900414 (2020).
- Santagata et al. (2019) R. Santagata, D. B. A. Tran, B. Argence, O. Lopez, S. K. Tokunaga, F. Wiotte, H. Mouhamad, A. Goncharov, M. Abgrall, Y. Le Coq, H. Alvarez-Martinez, R. Le Targat, W. K. Lee, D. Xu, P.-E. Pottie, B. Darquié, and A. Amy-Klein, Optica 6, 411 (2019).
- Galli et al. (2016) I. Galli, S. Bartalini, R. Ballerini, M. Barucci, P. Cancio, M. D. Pas, G. Giusfredi, D. Mazzotti, N. Akikusa, and P. D. Natale, Optica 3, 385 (2016).
- Daussy et al. (2007) C. Daussy, M. Guinet, A. Amy-Klein, K. Djerroud, Y. Hermier, S. Briaudeau, C. J. Bordé, and C. Chardonnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 250801 (2007).
- Moretti et al. (2013) L. Moretti, A. Castrillo, E. Fasci, M. D. De Vizia, G. Casa, G. Galzerano, A. Merlone, P. Laporta, and L. Gianfrani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 060803 (2013).
- Daussy et al. (1999) C. Daussy, T. Marrel, A. Amy-Klein, C. T. Nguyen, C. J. Bordé, and C. Chardonnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1554 (1999).
- Diouf et al. (2020) M. L. Diouf, F. M. J. Cozijn, K.-F. Lai, E. J. Salumbides, and W. Ubachs, Physical Review Research 2, 023209 (2020).
- Cournol et al. (2019) A. Cournol, M. Manceau, M. Pierens, L. Lecordier, D. B. A. Tran, R. Santagata, B. Argence, A. Goncharov, O. Lopez, M. Abgrall, Y. L. Coq, R. L. Targat, H. A. Martinez, W. K. Lee, D. Xu, P. E. Pottie, R. J. Hendricks, T. E. Wall, J. M. Bieniewska, B. E. Sauer, M. R. Tarbutt, A. Amy-Klein, S. K. Tokunaga, and B. Darquié, Quantum Electronics 49, 288 (2019).
- Svensson et al. (2011) T. Svensson, E. Adolfsson, M. Lewander, C. T. Xu, and S. Svanberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 143901 (2011).
- Hartmann et al. (2016) J.-M. Hartmann, X. Landsheere, C. Boulet, D. Sarkisyan, A. S. Sarkisyan, C. Leroy, and E. Pangui, Phys. Rev. A 93, 012516 (2016).
- Romer and Dicke (1955) R. H. Romer and R. H. Dicke, Phys. Rev. 99, 532 (1955).
- Dutier et al. (2003) G. Dutier, A. Yarovitski, S. Saltiel, A. Papoyan, D. Sarkisyan, D. Bloch, and M. Ducloy, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 63, 35 (2003).
- Peyrot et al. (2018) T. Peyrot, Y. R. P. Sortais, A. Browaeys, A. Sargsyan, D. Sarkisyan, J. Keaveney, I. G. Hughes, and C. S. Adams, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 243401 (2018).
- Ripka et al. (2018) F. Ripka, H. Kübler, R. Löw, and T. Pfau, Science 362, 446 (2018).
- Ballin et al. (2013) P. Ballin, E. Moufarej, I. Maurin, A. Laliotis, and D. Bloch, Applied Physics Letters 102, 231115 (2013).
- Villalba et al. (2013) S. Villalba, H. Failache, A. Laliotis, L. Lenci, S. Barreiro, and A. Lezama, Opt. Lett. 38, 193 (2013).
- Fichet et al. (2007) M. Fichet, G. Dutier, A. Yarovitsky, P. Todorov, I. Hamdi, I. Maurin, S. Saltiel, D. Sarkisyan, M.-P. Gorza, D. Bloch, and M. Ducloy, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 77, 54001 (2007).
- Bloch and Ducloy (2005) D. Bloch and M. Ducloy, in Advances In Atomic, Molecular, and Optical Physics, Vol. 50, edited by B. Bederson and H. Walther (Academic Press, 2005) Chap. Atom-wall interaction, pp. 91 – 154.
- Fiedler et al. (2019) J. Fiedler, D. F. Parsons, F. A. Burger, P. Thiyam, M. Walter, I. Brevik, C. Persson, S. Y. Buhmann, and M. Boström, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 21, 21296 (2019).
- Antezza et al. (2020) M. Antezza, I. Fialkovsky, and N. Khusnutdinov, Phys. Rev. B 102, 195422 (2020).
- Thiyam et al. (2015) P. Thiyam, P. Parashar, K. V. Shajesh, C. Persson, M. Schaden, I. Brevik, D. F. Parsons, K. A. Milton, O. I. Malyi, and M. Boström, Phys. Rev. A 92, 052704 (2015).
- Bimonte et al. (2016) G. Bimonte, T. Emig, R. L. Jaffe, and M. Kardar, Phys. Rev. A 94, 022509 (2016).
- Butcher et al. (2012) D. T. Butcher, S. Y. Buhmann, and S. Scheel, New Journal of Physics 14, 113013 (2012).
- Shih et al. (1974) A. Shih, D. Raskin, and P. Kusch, Phys. Rev. A 9, 652 (1974).
- Raskin and Kusch (1969) D. Raskin and P. Kusch, Phys. Rev. 179, 712 (1969).
- Boustimi et al. (2001) M. Boustimi, J. Baudon, F. Pirani, M. Ducloy, J. Reinhardt, F. Perales, C. Mainos, V. Bocvarski, and J. Robert, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 56, 644 (2001).
- Brand et al. (2015) C. Brand, J. Fiedler, T. Juffmann, M. Sclafani, C. Knobloch, S. Scheel, Y. Lilach, O. Cheshnovsky, and M. Arndt, Annalen der Physik 527, 580 (2015).
- Wagner et al. (2014) C. Wagner, N. Fournier, V. G. Ruiz, C. Li, K. Müllen, M. Rohlfing, A. Tkatchenko, R. Temirov, and F. S. Tautz, Nature Communications 5, 5568 (2014).
- Woerdman and Schuurmans (1975) J. Woerdman and M. Schuurmans, Optics Communications 14, 248 (1975).
- Schuurmans, M. F. H. (1976) Schuurmans, M. F. H., J. Phys. France 37, 469 (1976).
- Ducloy and Fichet (1991) M. Ducloy and M. Fichet, Journal de Physique II 1, 1429 (1991).
- Martine Chevrollier et al. (1992) Martine Chevrollier, Michèle Fichet, Marcos Oria, Gabriel Rahmat, Daniel Bloch, and Martial Ducloy, J. Phys. II France 2, 631 (1992).
- Akulshin et al. (1982) A. M. Akulshin, V. L. Velichanskii, A. S. Zibrov, V. V. Nikitin, V. V. Sautenkov, E. K. Iurkin, and N. V. Senkov, JETP Lett. 36, 303 (1982).
- Vuletic et al. (1993) V. Vuletic, V. Sautenkov, C. Zimmermann, and T. Hansch, Optics Communications 99, 185 (1993).
- Laliotis et al. (2008) A. Laliotis, I. Maurin, M. Fichet, D. Bloch, M. Ducloy, N. Balasanyan, A. Sarkisyan, and D. Sarkisyan, Applied Physics B 90, 415 (2008).
- Faye et al. (2018) M. Faye, L. Manceron, P. Roy, V. Boudon, and M. Loëte, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 348, 37 (2018), molecular Spectroscopy, Atmospheric Composition and Climate Change.
- Khalil (1999) M. A. K. Khalil, Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 24, 645 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.24.1.645 .
- Krieg et al. (2005) J. Krieg, J. Nothholt, E. Mahieu, C. Rinsland, and R. Zander, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 92, 383 (2005).
- Shmavonyan et al. (2015) S. Shmavonyan, A. Khanbekyan, A. Gogyan, M. Movsisyan, and A. Papoyan, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 313, 14 (2015).
- Gordon et al. (2017) I. Gordon, L. Rothman, C. Hill, R. Kochanov, Y. Tan, P. Bernath, M. Birk, V. Boudon, A. Campargue, K. Chance, B. Drouin, J.-M. Flaud, R. Gamache, J. Hodges, D. Jacquemart, V. Perevalov, A. Perrin, K. Shine, M.-A. Smith, J. Tennyson, G. Toon, H. Tran, V. Tyuterev, A. Barbe, A. Császár, V. Devi, T. Furtenbacher, J. Harrison, J.-M. Hartmann, A. Jolly, T. Johnson, T. Karman, I. Kleiner, A. Kyuberis, J. Loos, O. Lyulin, S. Massie, S. Mikhailenko, N. Moazzen-Ahmadi, H. Müller, O. Naumenko, A. Nikitin, O. Polyansky, M. Rey, M. Rotger, S. Sharpe, K. Sung, E. Starikova, S. Tashkun, J. V. Auwera, G. Wagner, J. Wilzewski, P. Wcisło, S. Yu, and E. Zak, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer 203, 3 (2017), hITRAN2016 Special Issue.
- . Urban et al. (2000) . Urban, F. Herlemont, M. Khelkhal, H. Fichoux, and J. Legrand, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 200, 280 (2000).
- Bobin et al. (1987) B. Bobin, C. J. Bordé, J. Bordé, and C. Bréant, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 121, 91 (1987).
- Acef et al. (2000) O. Acef, C. J. Bordé, A. Clairon, G. Pierre, and B. Sartakov, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy 199, 188 (2000).
- Lukusa Mudiayi (2019) J. Lukusa Mudiayi, Spectroscopie de réflexion sélective sur des raies rovibrationnelles moléculaires, Ph.D. thesis, Université de Paris 13 (2019).
- Mejri et al. (2015) S. Mejri, P. L. T. Sow, O. Kozlova, C. Ayari, S. K. Tokunaga, C. Chardonnet, S. Briaudeau, B. Darquié, F. Rohart, and C. Daussy, Metrologia 52, S314 (2015).
- Buhmann et al. (2012) S. Y. Buhmann, S. Scheel, S. A. Ellingsen, K. Hornberger, and A. Jacob, Phys. Rev. A 85, 042513 (2012).
- Cappelli et al. (2012) F. Cappelli, I. Galli, S. Borri, G. Giusfredi, P. Cancio, D. Mazzotti, A. Montori, N. Akikusa, M. Yamanishi, S. Bartalini, and P. D. Natale, Opt. Lett. 37, 4811 (2012).
- Sow et al. (2014) P. L. T. Sow, S. Mejri, S. K. Tokunaga, O. Lopez, A. Goncharov, B. Argence, C. Chardonnet, A. Amy-Klein, C. Daussy, and B. Darquié, Applied Physics Letters 104, 264101 (2014).
- Argence et al. (2015) B. Argence, B. Chanteau, O. Lopez, D. Nicolodi, M. Abgrall, C. Chardonnet, C. Daussy, B. Darquié, Y. Le Coq, and A. Amy-Klein, Nature Photonics 9, 456 (2015).
- Triches et al. (2015) M. Triches, M. Michieletto, J. Hald, J. K. Lyngsø, J. Lægsgaard, and O. Bang, Opt. Express 23, 11227 (2015).
- Knabe et al. (2009) K. Knabe, S. Wu, J. Lim, K. A. Tillman, P. S. Light, F. Couny, N. Wheeler, R. Thapa, A. M. Jones, J. W. Nicholson, B. R. Washburn, F. Benabid, and K. L. Corwin, Opt. Express 17, 16017 (2009).
- Takiguchi et al. (2011) M. Takiguchi, Y. Yoshikawa, T. Yamamoto, K. Nakayama, and T. Kuga, Opt. Lett. 36, 1254 (2011).
- Naumov et al. (2001) A. Naumov, A. Podshivalov, K. Drabovich, R. Miles, and A. Zheltikov, Physics Letters A 289, 207 (2001).
- Shchegrov et al. (2000) A. V. Shchegrov, K. Joulain, R. Carminati, and J.-J. Greffet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 1548 (2000).
- Greffet et al. (2002) J. J. Greffet, R. Carminati, K. Joulain, J. P. Mulet, S. Mainguy, and Y. Chen, Nature 416, 61 (2002).
- Laliotis et al. (2014) A. Laliotis, T. Passerat de Silans, I. Maurin, M. Ducloy, and D. Bloch, Nat. Commun. 5, 4364 (2014).
- Todorov and Bloch (2017) P. Todorov and D. Bloch, The Journal of Chemical Physics 147, 194202 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4997566 .
- Rabi et al. (1994) O. A. Rabi, A. Amy-Klein, S. Saltiel, and M. Ducloy, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 25, 579 (1994).
- Skribanowitz et al. (1973) N. Skribanowitz, I. P. Herman, J. C. MacGillivray, and M. S. Feld, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 309 (1973).
- Guo et al. (1996) J. Guo, J. Cooper, and A. Gallagher, Phys. Rev. A 53, 1130 (1996).