This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Lie symmetries, conservation laws and exact solutions of a generalized quasilinear KdV equation with degenerate dispersion

M.S. Bruzóna, E. Reciob, T.M. Garridoc, R. de la Rosad
a Universidad de Cádiz, Spain (e-mail: [email protected] ).
b Universidad de Cádiz, Spain (e-mail: [email protected]).
c Universidad de Cádiz, Spain (e-mail: [email protected]).
d Universidad de Cádiz, Spain (e-mail: [email protected] ).
Abstract

We provide a complete classification of point symmetries and low-order local conservation laws of the generalized quasilinear KdV equation in terms of the arbitrary function. The corresponding interpretation of symmetry transformation groups are given. In addition, a physical description of the conserved quantities is included. Finally, few travelling wave solutions have been obtained.

Keywords: Quasilinear KdV, Lie point symmetries, conservation laws, conserved quantities and travelling wave solutions.
2010 MSC: Primary: 35B06, 35L65, 35C07; Secondary: 35Q53.

1 Introduction

Non-linear dispersive partial differential equations (PDEs) model a wide range of physical behaviour and phenomena. It is important to differentiate the dispersive effects of these equations. There are linear dispersive effects, non-linear dispersive effects and equations whose dispersive effects could vanish.

The well-known Korteweg de Vries (KdV) equation

ut+uux+uxxx=0,u_{t}+uu_{x}+u_{xxx}=0,

is a non-linear dispersive PDE whose dispersive term, uxxxu_{xxx}, is linear. Hence, this term establishes a linear dispersion in the dynamics of this equation.

In the same way, there are dispersive equations in which the term which generates the dispersive effects is itself non-linear. With regard to the third case, there are problems in which the dispersive effects may vanish. Such equations are called degenerate dispersive equations [2].

The following quasilinear KdV equation

ut+(u(uux)x+μu3)x=0,u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+\mu u^{3})_{x}=0, (1)

is an example with degenerate dispersion that appeared in [17, 23].

In this paper, we have studied a generalization of equation (1) given by

ut+(u(uux)x+f(u))x=0,u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+f(u))_{x}=0, (2)

with f(u)0f^{\prime}(u)\neq 0.

The research of Lie symmetries of PDEs may allow to construct invariant solutions, reduce the number of independent variables, reduce the PDE to ordinary differential equations (ODE) or reduce the order of the ODE, among others. Therefore, symmetries have become a powerful tool in the study of PDE [14, 15, 16, 22].

Lie method is a systematic method that allows to obtain all the Lie symmetries for a given equation, including those that only occur for some specific function ff. When we are searching for symmetries the method will provide a set of special forms for the unknown function ff for which the equation admits symmetries.

Conservation laws are continuity equations which yield conserved physical quantities and conserved norms for all solutions of a given evolution equation [10, 21]. Their applications include checking the integrability of a PDE and verifying the accuracy of numerical methods for solutions.

There is a systematic method for finding all local conservation laws admitted by any given evolution equation, namely, the multiplier method [1, 21]. We apply this method to the generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2) by setting up and solving an overdetermined linear system of determining equations, which Anco and Bluman showed [1, 5, 7, 8, 4] it is an adjoint version of the standard method for finding all symmetries of any given evolution equation.

Moreover, the study of Lie symmetries and conservation laws of equation (1) is also motivated by the research in [18]. It is presented that equation (1) admits a Hamiltonian structure, it has translation, reflection and scaling symmetries, and it conserves besides the Hamiltonian, the mass and the momentum.

Consequently, for the generalized equation (2) it is interesting to focus on the study of Lie symmetries and conservation laws in order to determine special cases for the arbitrary function, f(u)f(u), with extra symmetries or conservation laws.

Finally, we seek for special cases of the arbitrary function that allow us to obtain exact solutions with physical interest.

2 Point Symmetries

Let consider the one-parameter Lie group of infinitesimal transformations on the space of independent and dependent variables

t^(t,x,u;ϵ)=t+ϵτ(t,x,u)+O(ϵ2),x^(t,x,u;ϵ)=x+ϵξ(t,x,u)+O(ϵ2),u^(t,x,u;ϵ)=u+ϵη(t,x,u)+O(ϵ2),\begin{array}[]{lcl}\hat{t}(t,x,u;\epsilon)&=&t+\epsilon\,\tau(t,x,u)+O(\epsilon^{2}),\\ \hat{x}(t,x,u;\epsilon)&=&x+\epsilon\,\xi(t,x,u)+O(\epsilon^{2}),\\ \hat{u}(t,x,u;\epsilon)&=&u+\epsilon\,\eta(t,x,u)+O(\epsilon^{2}),\end{array} (3)

where ϵ\epsilon represents the group parameter. Each infinitesimal point symmetry (3) constitutes a generator

X=τ(t,x,u)t+ξ(t,x,u)x+η(t,x,u)u.X=\tau(t,x,u)\partial_{t}+\xi(t,x,u)\partial_{x}+\eta(t,x,u)\partial_{u}. (4)

We recall (4) is a point symmetry of equation (2) if the third order prolongation of (4) leaves invariant equation (2). In order to avoid unnecessary calculations, prolongations can be taken into account from a geometric point of view [10, 21]. In this way, the action of (4) on the solution space of equation (2) is similar to the action of the symmetry in characteristic form

X^=η^u,η^=ητutξux,\hat{X}=\hat{\eta}\partial_{u},\quad\hat{\eta}=\eta-\tau u_{t}-\xi u_{x},

Thus, by applying the symmetry invariance condition

pr(3)X^(ut+(u(uux)x+f(u))x)=0whenut+(u(uux)x+f(u))x=0,pr^{(3)}\hat{X}(u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+f(u))_{x})=0\quad\mbox{when}\quad u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+f(u))_{x}=0, (5)

point symmetries can be determined. Here,

pr(3)X^=X^+(Dxη^)ux+(Dtη^)ut+(Dx2η^)uxx+(Dx3η^)uxxx,pr^{(3)}\hat{X}=\hat{X}+\left(D_{x}\hat{\eta}\right)\partial_{u_{x}}+\left(D_{t}\hat{\eta}\right)\partial_{u_{t}}+\left(D_{x}^{2}\hat{\eta}\right)\partial_{u_{xx}}+\left(D_{x}^{3}\hat{\eta}\right)\partial_{u_{xxx}},

represents the third prolongation of the generator X^\hat{X} whereas DtD_{t} and DxD_{x} represent the total derivatives respect to tt and xx respectively.

The symmetry determining equation (5) splits with respect to the tt-derivatives and xx-derivatives of uu which leads to a overdetermined linear system of determining equations for the infinitesimals τ\tau, ξ\xi and η\eta along with the function ff satisfying f(u)0f^{\prime}(u)\neq 0. By simplifying this system we obtain that τ=τ(t)\tau=\tau(t), ξ=ξ(t,x)\xi=\xi(t,x), η=η(t,x,u)\eta=\eta(t,x,u) and f(u)f(u) must satisfy the following conditions:

u2ηxxx+ηxfu+ηt=0,3uηxu3uξxx+4ηx=0,3u2ηuu+4uηu4η=0,2η3ξxu+τtu=0,u3ηuuu+4u2ηuu+2uηu2η=0,3u2ηxuu+8uηxu+3ηx4ξxxu=0,3u3ηxxu+4u2ηxx+ufuuη2fuηξxxxu3+2ξxufuξtu=0.\begin{array}[]{r}u^{2}\eta_{xxx}+\eta_{x}f_{u}+\eta_{t}=0,\\ 3u\eta_{xu}-3u\xi_{xx}+4\eta_{x}=0,\\ 3u^{2}\eta_{uu}+4u\eta_{u}-4\eta=0,\\ 2\eta-3\xi_{x}u+\tau_{t}u=0,\\ u^{3}\eta_{uuu}+4u^{2}\eta_{uu}+2u\eta_{u}-2\eta=0,\\ 3u^{2}\eta_{xuu}+8u\eta_{xu}+3\eta_{x}-4\xi_{xx}u=0,\\ 3u^{3}\eta_{xxu}+4u^{2}\eta_{xx}+uf_{uu}\eta-2f_{u}\eta-\xi_{xxx}u^{3}+2\xi_{x}uf_{u}-\xi_{t}u=0.\par\par\end{array} (6)

Maple is used for setting up the determining equation, and the commands “dsolve” and “pdsolve” to solve the determining system (6), a complete classification of all solution cases has been achieved. Now, we proceed to show the results.

Theorem 1

The point symmetries admitted by the generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2) for arbitrary f(u)f(u) are generated by:

𝐗1\displaystyle{\bf X}_{1} =\displaystyle= t,\displaystyle\partial_{t}, (7)
𝐗2\displaystyle{\bf X}_{2} =\displaystyle= x.\displaystyle\partial_{x}. (8)

Additional point symmetries are admitted by the generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2) in the following cases:

  • \bullet

    If f(u)=f0un+f1u+f2f(u)=f_{0}u^{n}+f_{1}u+f_{2},

    𝐗3=(3n5)tt+((n3)x+2f1(n1)t)x2uu.{\bf X}_{3}=\left(3n-5\right)t\partial_{t}+\left((n-3)x+2f_{1}(n-1)t\right)\partial_{x}-2u\partial_{u}. (9)

    Moreover, if n=1n=1, f1=0f_{1}=0 besides 𝐗3{\bf X}_{3} we obtain the following symmetry

    𝐗4=2(xf0t)x+3uu.{\bf X}_{4}=2\left(x-f_{0}t\right)\partial_{x}+3u\partial_{u}. (10)
  • \bullet

    If f(u)=f0ulnu+f1u+f2f(u)=f_{0}u\ln u+f_{1}u+f_{2},

    𝐗5=tt+(x+f0t)x+uu.{\bf X}_{5}=t\partial_{t}+\left(x+f_{0}t\right)\partial_{x}+u\partial_{u}. (11)
  • \bullet

    If f(u)=f0lnu+f1u+f2f(u)=f_{0}\ln u+f_{1}u+f_{2},

    𝐗6=5tt+(3x+2f1t)x+2uu.{\bf X}_{6}=5t\partial_{t}+\left(3x+2f_{1}t\right)\partial_{x}+2u\partial_{u}. (12)

In the above symmetries, n0n\neq 0, f00f_{0}\neq 0, f1f_{1} and f2f_{2} are arbitrary constants. On the other hand, symmetries (7)-(8) represent space and time-translations. Symmetries (9)-(12) are scalings combined with Galilean boosts.

The corresponding symmetry transformation groups are given by

(t,x,u)1(t+ϵ,x,u),(t,x,u)2(t,x+ϵ,u),(t,x,u)3(e(3n5)ϵt,e(n3)ϵ(xf1t)+e(3n5)ϵf1t,e2ϵu),(t,x,u)4(t,e2ϵ(xf0t)+f0t,e3ϵu),(t,x,u)5(eϵt,eϵ(x+f0ϵt),eϵu),(t,x,u)6(e5ϵt,e3ϵ(xf1t)+e5ϵf1t,e2ϵu),\begin{array}[]{l}(t,x,u)_{1}\longrightarrow(t+\epsilon,x,u),\\ (t,x,u)_{2}\longrightarrow(t,x+\epsilon,u),\\ (t,x,u)_{3}\longrightarrow(e^{(3n-5)\epsilon}t,e^{(n-3)\epsilon}(x-f_{1}t)+e^{(3n-5)\epsilon}f_{1}t,e^{-2\epsilon}u),\\ (t,x,u)_{4}\longrightarrow(t,e^{2\epsilon}\left(x-f_{0}t\right)+f_{0}t,e^{3\epsilon}u),\\ (t,x,u)_{5}\longrightarrow(e^{\epsilon}t,e^{\epsilon}(x+f_{0}\epsilon t),e^{\epsilon}u),\\ (t,x,u)_{6}\longrightarrow(e^{5\epsilon}t,e^{3\epsilon}\left(x-f_{1}t\right)+e^{5\epsilon}f_{1}t,e^{2\epsilon}u),\end{array}

with ϵ\epsilon the group parameter.

3 Conservation laws

For the generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2), a local conservation law is a space-time divergence expression, given by

DtT+DxX=0,D_{t}T+D_{x}X=0, (13)

holding on the solution space of equation (2), where TT is the conserved density, and XX is the spatial flux, which are functions of tt, xx, uu and its derivatives. DtD_{t} and DxD_{x} denote, respectively, the total derivatives with respect to tt and xx.

If we consider solutions u(t,x)u(t,x) in a given spatial domain Ω=(a,b)\Omega=(a,b)\subseteq\mathbb{R}, then every conservation law yields a conserved integral, given by

𝒞[u]=abT𝑑x\mathcal{C}[u]=\int_{a}^{b}T\,dx (14)

which satisfies the balance equation

ddt𝒞[u]=X|ab.\frac{d}{dt}\mathcal{C}[u]=-X\Big{|}_{a}^{b}. (15)

Similarly, in the case when the spatial domain for solutions is given by (,b)(-\infty,b), (a,)(a,\infty) or (,)(-\infty,\infty). The physical meaning of the global equation (15) is that the rate of change of the quantity 𝒞[u]\mathcal{C}[u] on the spatial domain Ω\Omega is balanced by the net flux through the endpoints.

Since the quasilinear KdV equation (2) is an evolution equation, by substituting all tt derivatives of uu through equation (2), we can write the conservation law (13) in an equivalent form

DtT(t,x,u,ux,uxx,uxxx,)+DxX(t,x,u,ux,uxx,uxxx,)=0,D_{t}T(t,x,u,u_{x},u_{xx},u_{xxx},\dots)+D_{x}X(t,x,u,u_{x},u_{xx},u_{xxx},\dots)=0, (16)

that will be satisfied on the solution space of equation (2).

When considered off of the solution space of equation (2), the conservation law (16) has an equivalent characteristic form

DtT+Dx(XΨ)=(ut+(u(uux)x+f(u))x)QD_{t}T+D_{x}(X-\Psi)=\big{(}u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+f(u))_{x}\big{)}Q (17)

where

Ψ=(ut+(u(uux)x+f(u))x)E^ux(T)+Dx(ut+(u(uux)x+f(u))x)E^uxx(T)+\Psi=\big{(}u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+f(u))_{x}\big{)}\hat{E}_{u_{x}}(T)+D_{x}\big{(}u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+f(u))_{x}\big{)}\hat{E}_{u_{xx}}(T)+\cdots (18)

vanishes on the solution space of equation (2), and where QQ is a multiplier given by

Q=E^u(T),Q=\hat{E}_{u}(T), (19)

where E^u\hat{E}_{u} is the spatial Euler operator with respect to the variable uu [4, 10, 21]. To find the conservation laws of equation (2) we need to find the multipliers that solve the characteristic equation (17). Since the right hand side of equation (17) must be a divergence expression, all multipliers can be found by solving the determining equation holding off of solutions, given by

Eu((ut+(u(uux)x+f(u))x)Q)=0.E_{u}\big{(}(u_{t}+(u(uu_{x})_{x}+f(u))_{x})Q\big{)}=0. (20)

Here EuE_{u} is the Euler operator with respect to the variable uu, which is characterized by annihilating total derivatives expressions [4, 10, 21]. The determining equation (20) can be solved by splitting with respect to the variables that do not appear in QQ, yielding an overdetermined linear system of equations for QQ and the arbitrary function f(u)f(u).

The most interesting conservation laws for dispersive wave equations that are interesting for physics usually correspond to low-order multipliers, meanwhile high-order multipliers are related to the integrability of the equation [3, 4]. Therefore the dispersive quasilinear KdV equation (2) has low-order multipliers QQ given by

Q(t,x,u,ux,uxx).Q(t,x,u,u_{x},u_{xx}). (21)

The dependence of QQ can be found by considering the variables uu that can be differentiated to obtain a leading derivative of equation (2). Thus, in order to obtain a general classification of low-order multipliers (21) for equation (2) we solve the determining equation (20). We carry out this classification by using the Maple package “rifsimp” and “pdsolve”.

The solutions with f(u)0f^{\prime}(u)\neq 0 are given by:

  • f(u)f(u) arbitrary function,

    Q1=1,\displaystyle Q_{1}=1, (22)
    Q2=u,\displaystyle Q_{2}=u, (23)
    Q3=u2uxxuux2f(u).\displaystyle Q_{3}=-u^{2}u_{xx}-uu_{x}^{2}-f(u). (24)
  • f(u)=f0u5+f1u+f2f(u)=f_{0}u^{5}+f_{1}u+f_{2}, where f0f_{0}, f1f_{1}, f2f_{2} are arbitrary constants with f0f10f_{0}f_{1}\neq 0.

    Q1,Q2,Q3,Q_{1},\quad Q_{2},\quad Q_{3},
    Q4=2t(u2uxx+uux2+f0u5)+25(f1tx)u.Q_{4}=2t(u^{2}u_{xx}+uu_{x}^{2}+f_{0}u^{5})+\tfrac{2}{5}(f_{1}t-x)u. (25)

Next, for each of the multipliers (22)–(25) we determine the corresponding conserved density TT and flux XX. This is straightforwardly done by integrating the characteristic equation (17) or by using a homotopy integral formula [4]. We summarize the results in the following theorem.

Theorem 2

(i) The low-order local conservation laws of the generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2) for arbitrary f(u)0f^{\prime}(u)\neq 0 are given by:

T1=u,X1=u2uxx+uux2+f(u).\begin{split}T_{1}=&u,\\ X_{1}=&u^{2}u_{xx}+uu_{x}^{2}+f(u).\end{split} (26)
T2=12u2,X2=u3uxx+12u2ux2+uf(u)𝑑u.\begin{split}T_{2}=&\tfrac{1}{2}u^{2},\\ X_{2}=&u^{3}u_{xx}+\tfrac{1}{2}u^{2}u_{x}^{2}+\textstyle\int uf^{\prime}(u)\,du.\end{split} (27)
T3=12u2ux2f(u)𝑑u,X3=12u4uxx2u3ux2uxx12u2ux4u2utuxf(u)u2uxxf(u)uux212f(u)2.\begin{split}T_{3}=&\tfrac{1}{2}u^{2}u_{x}^{2}-\textstyle\int f(u)\,du,\\ X_{3}=&-\tfrac{1}{2}u^{4}u_{xx}^{2}-u^{3}u_{x}^{2}u_{xx}-\tfrac{1}{2}u^{2}u_{x}^{4}-u^{2}u_{t}u_{x}-f(u)u^{2}u_{xx}\\ &\qquad-f(u)uu_{x}^{2}-\tfrac{1}{2}f(u)^{2}.\end{split} (28)

(ii) The generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2) only admits an additional low-order local conservation law for f(u)=f0u5+f1u+f2f(u)=f_{0}u^{5}+f_{1}u+f_{2}, where f0f_{0}, f1f_{1}, f2f_{2} are arbitrary constants with f0f10f_{0}f_{1}\neq 0, given by:

T4=13f0tu6tu2ux2+15(f1tx)u2,X4=2f0tu7uxx+tu4uxx2+2tu3ux2uxx+25f1tu3uxx25xu3uxx+25u3ux+tu2ux415xu2ux2+2tu2utux+2f0tu6ux2+65f1tu2ux2+f02tu10+23f0f1tu613f0xu6+15f12tu215f1xu2.\begin{split}T_{4}=&\tfrac{1}{3}f_{0}tu^{6}-tu^{2}u_{x}^{2}+\tfrac{1}{5}(f_{1}t-x)u^{2},\\ X_{4}=&2f_{0}tu^{7}u_{xx}+tu^{4}u_{xx}^{2}+2tu^{3}u_{x}^{2}u_{xx}+\tfrac{2}{5}f_{1}tu^{3}u_{xx}-\tfrac{2}{5}xu^{3}u_{xx}+\tfrac{2}{5}u^{3}u_{x}\\ &\qquad+tu^{2}u_{x}^{4}-\tfrac{1}{5}xu^{2}u_{x}^{2}+2tu^{2}u_{t}u_{x}+2f_{0}tu^{6}u_{x}^{2}+\tfrac{6}{5}f_{1}tu^{2}u_{x}^{2}+f_{0}^{2}tu^{10}\\ &\qquad\qquad+\tfrac{2}{3}f_{0}f_{1}tu^{6}-\tfrac{1}{3}f_{0}xu^{6}+\tfrac{1}{5}f_{1}^{2}tu^{2}-\tfrac{1}{5}f_{1}xu^{2}.\end{split} (29)

Now we give the physical meaning of the conservation laws for solutions u(t,x)u(t,x) of the generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2). Conservation law (26) is equation (2) itself, describing conservation of mass

[u]=Ωu𝑑x.\mathcal{M}[u]=\int_{\Omega}u\,dx. (30)

Conservation law (27) describes conservation of momentum

𝒫[u]=Ω12u2𝑑x.\mathcal{P}[u]=\int_{\Omega}\tfrac{1}{2}u^{2}\,dx. (31)

Conservation law (28) describes conservation of energy

[u]=Ω(12u2ux2f(u)𝑑u)𝑑x.\mathcal{E}[u]=\int_{\Omega}\Big{(}\tfrac{1}{2}u^{2}u_{x}^{2}-\textstyle\int f(u)\,du\Big{)}\,dx. (32)

Finally, conservation law (29) yields the conserved quantity

𝒥[u]=Ω(13f0tu6tu2ux2+15(f1tx)u2)𝑑x,\mathcal{J}[u]=\int_{\Omega}\Big{(}\tfrac{1}{3}f_{0}tu^{6}-tu^{2}u_{x}^{2}+\tfrac{1}{5}(f_{1}t-x)u^{2}\Big{)}\,dx, (33)

for solutions u(t,x)u(t,x) of the quasilinear KdV equation (2) with f(u)=f0u5+f1u+f2f(u)=f_{0}u^{5}+f_{1}u+f_{2}.

4 Travelling wave reductions

For the generalized quasilinear KdV equation (2) we obtain travelling wave reductions through the change of variables

z=μxλt,u=w(z),\begin{array}[]{lll}z=\mu x-\lambda t,&&u=w(z),\end{array} (34)

where w(z)w(z) satisfies

μ3w2w′′′+4μ3www′′λw+μ3(w)3+fwμw=0.\mu^{3}\,w^{2}\,w^{\prime\prime\prime}+4\,\mu^{3}\,w\,w^{\prime}\,w^{\prime\prime}-\lambda\,w^{\prime}+\mu^{3}\,\left(w^{\prime}\right)^{3}+f_{w}\,\mu\,w^{\prime}=0. (35)

By integrating equation (35) with respect to zz we get

μ3w2w′′λw+μ3w(w)2+μf+k=0,\mu^{3}\,w^{2}\,w^{\prime\prime}-\lambda w+\mu^{3}\,w\,\left(w^{\prime}\right)^{2}+\mu f+k=0, (36)

where kk is a constant of integration.

4.1 Integrating factors and first integrals

Next we focus our attention on obtaining integrating factors of ODE (36). From [6, 9] for any nnth-order ODE finding an integrating factor is equivalent to finding a first integral. Furthermore, a first integral of equation (36) yields a quadrature which reduces (36) to a 1st-order ODE in terms of the original variables zz, ww, ww^{\prime}.

An integrating factor of equation (36) is a function Q(z,w,w)0Q(z,w,w^{\prime})\neq 0 which verifies the characteristic equation [9]

DzX~\displaystyle D_{z}\tilde{X} =\displaystyle= (μ3w2w′′λw+μ3w(w)2+μf(w)+k)Q,\displaystyle\left(\mu^{3}\,w^{2}\,w^{\prime\prime}-\lambda w+\mu^{3}\,w\,\left(w^{\prime}\right)^{2}+\mu f(w)+k\right)Q, (37)

where the spatial flux X~\tilde{X} is a function of zz, ww, and zz-derivatives of ww.

Moreover, all first integrals of ODE (36) derive from integrating factors verifying the characteristic equation (37) for any function w(z)w(z). The determining equation to obtain all integrating factors is

Ew((μ3w2w′′λw+μ3w(w)2+μf+k)Q)\displaystyle E_{w}\Big{(}(\mu^{3}\,w^{2}\,w^{\prime\prime}-\lambda w+\mu^{3}\,w\,\left(w^{\prime}\right)^{2}+\mu f+k)Q\Big{)} =\displaystyle= 0,\displaystyle 0, (38)

where EwE_{w} represents the variational derivative with respect to ww. This equation must hold off of the set of solutions of equation (36). Once the integrating factors are found, the corresponding non-trivial first integrals are obtained by using a line integral [9].

The determining equation (38) splits with respect to the variable w′′w^{\prime\prime} and its derivatives. This yields a linear determining system for QQ from which we obtain the integrating factor Q=wQ=w^{\prime}. For any integrating factor Q(z,w,w)Q(z,w,w^{\prime}) the first integral formula yields [6]

12w2μ3w2+(μf(w)λw+k)dw=c,with c constant.\displaystyle\tfrac{1}{2}{w^{\prime}}^{2}{\mu}^{3}{w}^{2}+\int\!(\mu f\left(w\right)-\lambda w+k)\,{\rm d}w=c,\quad\mbox{with $c$ constant}. (39)

4.2 Some exact solutions

Equation (39) can be written in the form

w2=2μ2w2f(w)𝑑w2kμ3w+2cμ3w2+λμ3.w^{\prime 2}=-{\frac{2}{\mu^{2}\,w^{2}}}\,\int{f\left(w\right)}{\;dw}-{\frac{2\,k}{\mu^{3}\,w}}+{\frac{2\,c}{\mu^{3}\,w^{2}}}+{\frac{\lambda}{\mu^{3}}}. (40)

Equation (40) with

f(w)=3C4μ2w55C3μ2w422C2μ2w33C1μ2w22C0μ2w+λwμkμ,f(w)=-3{C_{4}}\mu^{2}w^{5}-{\frac{5{C_{3}}\mu^{2}w^{4}}{2}}-2{C_{2}}\mu^{2}w^{3}-{\frac{3{C_{1}}\mu^{2}w^{2}}{2}}-{C_{0}}\mu^{2}w+{\frac{{\lambda}w}{\mu}}-{\frac{k}{\mu}},

is the equation for the Jacobi elliptic function

w2=C4w4+C3w3+C2w2+C1w+C0,w^{\prime 2}=C_{4}w^{4}+C_{3}w^{3}+C_{2}w^{2}+C_{1}w+C_{0}, (41)

where CiC_{i}, i=0,4i=0\ldots,4 are constants.

Equation (40) with

f(w)=10μ2w4+3g2μ2w22+g3μ2w+λwμkμ,f(w)=-10\mu^{2}w^{4}+{\frac{3{g_{2}}\mu^{2}w^{2}}{2}}+{g_{3}}\mu^{2}w+{{{\lambda}w}\over{\mu}}-{{k}\over{\mu}},

is the equation for the Weierstrass elliptic function

w2=4w3g2wg3.w^{\prime 2}=4w^{3}-g_{2}w-g_{3}. (42)

If C0=C1=C4=0C_{0}=C_{1}=C_{4}=0, C3=4C_{3}=-4 and C2=4C_{2}=4 then equation (41) admits the solution w=sech2(z)w={\rm sech}^{2}(z). Consequently, for

f(w)=10μ2w48μ2w3+λwμkμ,f(w)=10\,\mu^{2}\,w^{4}-8\,\mu^{2}\,w^{3}+{{{\lambda}\,w}\over{\mu}}-{{k}\over{\mu}},

equation (2) admits the solution

u(x,t)=sech2(μxλt).u(x,t)={\rm sech}^{2}(\mu x-\lambda t).

This solution represents a soliton solution with speed λμ\frac{\lambda}{\mu} and moving coordinate μxλt\mu x-\lambda t.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: Solution u(x,t)=sech2(xt)u(x,t)={\rm sech}^{2}(x-t) of Eq. (2)

Non-singular solutions are interesting in physical sciences. From [27] we provide some sets of these types of solutions of equation (41) considering C1=C3=0C_{1}=C_{3}=0:

  1. 1.

    If C0=a2C_{0}=a^{2}, C2=2m21C_{2}=2m^{2}-1 and C4=m4m2a2C_{4}={{m^{4}-m^{2}}\over{a^{2}}}

    w1(z)=asn(z,m)1m2sn2(z,m).w_{1}(z)={{a\,{\rm sn}\left(z,m\right)}\over{\sqrt{1-m^{2}\,{\rm sn}^{2}\left(z,m\right)}}}.
  2. 2.

    If C0=a2C_{0}=a^{2}, C2=(m2+1)C_{2}=-(m^{2}+1) and C4=m2a2C_{4}=\frac{m^{2}}{a^{2}} and m2<1m^{2}<1

    w2(z)=asn(z,m)m2cn2(z,m)m2+1m21.w_{2}(z)={{a\,{\rm sn}\left(z,m\right)}\over{\sqrt{-{{m^{2}\,{\rm cn}^{2}\left(z,m\right)-m^{2}+1}\over{m^{2}-1}}}}}.
  3. 3.

    If C0=a2(m21)C_{0}=-a^{2}(m^{2}-1), C2=3m63m4m213m41C_{2}=-{{3\,m^{6}-3\,m^{4}-m^{2}-1}\over{3\,m^{4}-1}} and C4=m2(8m4+m21)a2(m2+1)2C_{4}=-{{m^{2}\,\left(8\,m^{4}+m^{2}-1\right)}\over{a^{2}\,\left(m^{2}+1\right)^{2}}}

    w3(z)=acn(z,m)dcn2(z,m)+1.w_{3}(z)={{a\,{\rm cn}\left(z,m\right)}\over{\sqrt{d\,{\rm cn}^{2}\left(z,m\right)+1}}}.
  4. 4.

    If C0=a2C_{0}=a^{2}, C2=(m2+1)C_{2}=-(m^{2}+1) and C4=m2a2C_{4}=\tfrac{m^{2}}{a^{2}}

    w4(z)=acn(z,m)1m2sn2(z,m).w_{4}(z)={{a\,{\rm cn}\left(z,m\right)}\over{\sqrt{1-m^{2}\,{\rm sn}^{2}\left(z,m\right)}}}.
  5. 5.

    If C0=a2(m1)(m+1)m2C_{0}={{a^{2}\,\left(m-1\right)\,\left(m+1\right)}\over{m^{2}}}, C2=m2+1m2C_{2}=-{{m^{2}+1}\over{m^{2}}} and C4=1a2(m1)(m+1)C_{4}={{1}\over{a^{2}\,\left(m-1\right)\,\left(m+1\right)}}

    w5(z)=adn(z,m)dn2(z,m)+m21m21.w_{5}(z)={{a\,{\rm dn}\left(z,m\right)}\over{\sqrt{{{{\rm dn}^{2}\left(z,m\right)+m^{2}-1}\over{m^{2}-1}}}}}.

In the previous solutions, sn(z,m){\rm sn}\left(z,m\right) is the Jacobi elliptic sine function, cn(z,m){\rm cn}\left(z,m\right) is the Jacobi elliptic cosine function, and dn(z,m){\rm dn}\left(z,m\right) is the Jacobi elliptic function of the third kind. Taking into account (34) we derive exact solutions for equation (2).

For example, for C0=C2=1C_{0}=C_{2}=1, C1=C3=C4=0C_{1}=C_{3}=C_{4}=0, and by using both sn(z,1)=tanh(z){\rm sn}\left(z,1\right)={\rm tanh}(z) and cn(z,1)=sech(z){\rm cn}\left(z,1\right)={\rm sech}(z) along with the relation sn2(z)+cn2(z)=1{\rm sn}^{2}(z)+{\rm cn}^{2}(z)=1, equation (41) admits the solution w1=sinh(z)w_{1}={\rm sinh}(z). Therefore, for

f(w)=2μ2w3μ2w+λwμkμ,f(w)=-2\mu^{2}w^{3}-\mu^{2}w+{\frac{{\lambda}w}{\mu}}-{\frac{k}{\mu}},

equation (2) admits the solution

u(x,t)=sinh(μxλt).u(x,t)={\rm sinh}(\mu x-\lambda t).
Refer to caption
Figure 2: Solution u(x,t)=sinh(xt)u(x,t)={\rm sinh}(x-t) of Eq. (2)

On the other hand, for C0=1C_{0}=1, C2=1C_{2}=-1, C1=C3=C4=0C_{1}=C_{3}=C_{4}=0, and since sn(z,0)=sin(z){\rm sn}\left(z,0\right)={\rm sin}(z), equation (41) admits the solution w2=sin(z)w_{2}={\rm sin}(z). Therefore, for

f(w)=2μ2w3μ2w+λwμkμf(w)=2\mu^{2}w^{3}-\mu^{2}w+{\frac{{\lambda}w}{\mu}}-{\frac{k}{\mu}}

equation (2) admits the periodic solution

u(x,t)=sin(μxλt).u(x,t)={\rm sin}(\mu x-\lambda t).
Refer to caption
Figure 3: Solution u(x,t)=sin(xt)u(x,t)={\rm sin}(x-t) of Eq. (2)

5 Conclusions

In this work, we have analysed a generalized quasilinear KdV equation with degenerate dispersion containing an arbitrary function of the dependent variable from the point of view of symmetries and conservation laws. To begin with, we have derived a complete classification of all point symmetries that equation (2) admits as well as provided a physical interpretation of them. Next, we have obtained all low-order local conservation laws of the quasilinear KdV equation (2). In addition, we have given the physical description of the conserved quantities. Finally, some exact solutions have been derived through the travelling wave reduction and by the quadrature obtained by using first integrals.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial support from Junta de Andalucía group FQM-201 and they express their sincere gratitude to the Plan Propio de Investigación de la Universidad de Cádiz.

References

  • [1] L. M. Alonso, On the Noether map, Letters in Mathematical Physics, 3 (1979), 419–424.
  • [2] D. Ambrose and J. Wright, Traveling waves and weak solutions for an equation with degenerate dispersion, Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 141 (2013), 3825–3838.
  • [3] S. C. Anco, Symmetry properties of conservation laws, International Journal of Modern Physics B, 30 (2016).
  • [4] S. C. Anco, Generalization of Noether’s Theorem in Modern Form to Non-variational Partial Differential Equations, in Recent Progress and Modern Challenges in Applied Mathematics, Modeling and Computational Science 79, Springer, (2017), 119–182.
  • [5] S. C. Anco and G. W. Bluman, Direct construction of conservation laws from field equations, Physical Review Letters, 78 (1997), 2869–2873.
  • [6] S. C. Anco and G. W. Bluman, Integrating factors and first integrals for ordinary differential equations, European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 9 (1998), 245–259.
  • [7] S. C. Anco and G. W. Bluman, Direct constrution method for conservation laws of partial differential equations part 1: Examples of conservation law classifications, European Journal of Applied Mathematics, 5 (2002), 545–566.
  • [8] S. C. Anco and G. W. Bluman, Direct construction method for conservation laws of partial differential equations part 2: General treatment, European Journal of Applied Mathematics., 5 (2002), 567–585.
  • [9] G.  W. Bluman, S. Anco, Symmetry and Integration Methods for Differential Equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences series 154, Springer, 2002.
  • [10] G. W. Bluman, A. F. Cheviakov and S.C. Anco, Applications of symmetry methods to partial differential equations, Springer-New York, 2010.
  • [11] G. W. Bluman and J. Cole, General similarity solution of the heat equation, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 18 (1969), 1025–1042.
  • [12] G. W. Bluman and S. Kumei, On the remarkable nonlinear diffusion equation, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 21 (1980), 1019–1023.
  • [13] G. W. Bluman, S. Kumei and G. J. Reid, New classes of symmetries for partial differential equations, Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 29 (1988), 806–811.
  • [14] M. S. Bruzón and T. M. Garrido, Symmetries and conservation laws of a KdV6 equation, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series S, 11 (2018), 631–641.
  • [15] M. S. Bruzón, E. Recio, T. M. Garrido, A. P. Márquez and R. de la Rosa, On the similarity solutions and conservation laws of the Cooper-Shepard-Sodano equation, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 41 (2018), 7325–7332.
  • [16] M. S. Bruzón, M. L. Gandarias and R. de la Rosa, An Overview of the Generalized Gardner Equation: Symmetry Groups and Conservation Laws, in A Mathematical Modeling Approach from Nonlinear Dynamics to Complex Systems, (2019), 7–27.
  • [17] F. Cooper, H. Shepard and P. Sodano, Solitary waves in a class of generalized Korteweg-de Vries equations, Physical Review E, 48 (1993), 4027–4032.
  • [18] P. Germain, B. Harrop-Griffiths and J. Marzuola, Existence and uniqueness of solutions for a quasilinear KdV equation with degenerate dispersion, preprint, arXiv: 1801.00420v1.
  • [19] A. Karasu-Kalkanli, A. Karasu, A. Sakovich, S. Sakovich and R. Turhan, A new integrable generalization of the Korteweg de Vries equation, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 49 (2008).
  • [20] N. Kudryashov, On ‘new travelling wave solutions’ of the KdV and the KdV Burgers equations. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 14 (2009), 1891–1900.
  • [21] P. J. Olver, Applications of Lie groups to differential equations, Springer-Verlag, 1986.
  • [22] E. Recio and S. C. Anco, Conservation laws and symmetries of radial generalized nonlinear p-Laplacian evolution equations, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, 452 (2017), 1229–1261.
  • [23] P. Rosenau and J. M. Hyman, Compactons: solitons with finite wavelength, Physical Review Letters, 70 (1993), 564–567.
  • [24] J. Satsuma and R. Hirota, A coupled KdV equation is one case of the four–reduction of the KP hierarchy, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 51 (1982), 3390–3397.
  • [25] K. Sawada and T. Kotera, A method for finding N-soliton solutions of the KdV equation and KdV-like equation, Progress of Theoretical Physics, 51 (1974), 1355–1367.
  • [26] J. Weiss, M. Tabor and G. Carnevale, The painlevè property for partial differential equations, Journal of Mathematical Physics, 24 (1983), 522–526.
  • [27] G. A. Zakeri, E. Yomba, Exact solutions of a generalized autonomous Duffing-type equation, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39 (2015), 4607–4616.