Investigating the gauge boson at the future lepton colliders
Abstract
boson as a new gauge boson has been proposed in many new physics models. The interactions of coupling to fermions are detailed studied at the large hadron collider. A with the mass of a few TeV has been excluded in some special models. The future lepton colliders will focus on the studies of Higgs physics which provide the advantage to investigate the interactions of Higgs boson with the new gauge bosons. We investigate the interaction via the process of . The angular distribution of the final leptons decaying from the -boson is related to the mixing of - and the mass of . The forward-backward asymmetry has been proposed as an observable to investigate the - mixing. The angular distributions change significantly with some special beam polarization comparing to the unpolarized condition.
I Introduction
With the running of the large hadron collider (LHC), the exploration of the heavy resonance, such as additional Higgs boson, neutral gauge boson () and charged ones (), has been reached Tera-eV era currently. The Standard Model (SM) Higgs particle has been discovered in 2012 at LHC Aad et al. (2012); Chatrchyan et al. (2012), which confirms the prediction of the standard model for fundamental particles and the role of Higgs in the electroweak symmetry breaking. Further precision measurements on the Higgs particles have been proposed at the future Higgs factories, including the Circular Electron Positron Collider (CEPC) Dong et al. (2018), the electron-positron stage of the Future Circular Collider (FCC-ee) Abada et al. (2019a, b), and the International Linear Collider (ILC) Bambade et al. (2019). It is attractive to study the new physics effects in Higgs production at the future Higgs factories.
A simple extension of the SM can be possible by adding an additional group which may arise in models derived from grand unified theories (GUT). Additional groups can also arise from higher dimensional constructions like string compactifications. In many models of GUT symmetry breaking, groups survive at relatively low energies, leading to corresponding neutral gauge bosons, commonly referred to as bosons Langacker (2009). Such bosons typically couple to SM fermions via the electroweak interaction, and can be observed at hadron colliders as narrow resonances. This extra gauge boson has been searched for many years at the Tevatron, LEP and LHC Aaltonen et al. (2009a); Abazov et al. (2011); Feldman et al. (2006a); Chiappetta et al. (1996); Barger et al. (1996); Sirunyan et al. (2020); Aaboud et al. (2017). Another interesting motivation is that the boson as a mediator or candidate for the dark matter sectors, which is out of the reach of this paper.
There are many experimental searches for the extra gauge boson and the strong constraints on the mass of . The primary studied mode for a at a hadron collider is the Drell-Yan production of a dilepton resonance , where or . Other channels, such as where is jet, , , or , are also possible. The forward-backward asymmetry for due to , , interference below the peak is also important. Nowadays, the collider phenomenology of the boson has been extensively studied (see, for example Rizzo (1986); Nandi (1986); Baer et al. (1987); Barger and Whisnant (1987); Gunion et al. (1988); Hewett and Rizzo (1989); Feldman et al. (2006b); Rizzo (2006); Lee (2009); Barger et al. (2009); Cao and Zhang (2016); Gulov et al. (2018)). Phenomenological implications of the boson in an additional extended model are enormous. They can be explored in fermion pair production processes in collisions Funatsu et al. (2020); Gao et al. (2010); Das et al. (2021). With the accumulated events increasing on the Higgs particle, the interaction of and Higgs boson draws ones attention. An important process to study the boson is an associated production of the SM Higgs boson () with the SM boson, such as at the LHC Li et al. (2013); Das and Okada (2020); Aaboud et al. (2018a); Sirunyan et al. (2021a) and at future linear colliders Gutiérrez-Rodríguez and Hernández-Ruiz (2015).
To study the properties of , including one additional extension of the SM, we investigate the signal via the process of at the electron-positron collision in this paper. The cross section has been calculated including the - mixing effects. As the leptonic decay of boson can be a good trigger for the signal process, we show the final lepton angular distribution with the subsequent decay of and . The correlation of the final lepton angular distribution with the interactions has been investigated at the unpolarized/polarized electron-positron collision.
This paper is organized as follows. The theoretical framework is listed in details in Section II and the current experimental status on has been summarized as well. In Section III, we investigate the production via mediators and give the final leptons’ angular distributions with various parameter sets. A forward-backward asymmetry has been proposed to be an observable for - mixing. Finally, the summary and discussion are given.
II Theoretical framework and experimental status
The gauge group structure of the standard model (SM), , can be extended with an additional group. We follow the notations in reference Wells (2008) to display the interactions and mass relations. The new gauge sector is only coupled with the standard model by kinetic mixing with hypercharge gauge boson . The kinetic energy terms of the gauge group are
(1) |
where is helpful to keep precision electroweak predictions consistent with experimental measurements. And the Lagrangian for the gauge sector is given by
(2) |
where , , are the field strength tensors for , , , respectively. We can diagonalize the 33 neutral gauge boson mass matrix, and write the mass eigenstates as
(3) |
where the usual weak mixing angle and the new gauge boson mixing angle are
(4) |
with = , = , . and are masses before mixing. The two heavier boson mass eigenvalues are
(5) |
With the assumption of , we can take the mass eigenvalues as GeV and . Therefore, the and coupling to SM fermions are
(6) |
(7) |
and interaction can be written as
(8) |
The above is a very common model including boson. There are also such kinds of models which differ from the coupling strength, e.g., , , etc., which have been studied extensively at high energy colliders.
The processes of and are studied by the D0 Abazov et al. (2011) and CDF collaborations Aaltonen et al. (2009b), respectively, and lower limit on the mass of the Sequential Standard Model (SSM) boson of 1023 GeV is given by D0. The CDF excludes the mass region of 100 GeV 982 GeV for a boson in the E6 model.
For the SSM bosons decaying to a pair of -leptons with 2.42 TeV is excluded at 95 confidence level by the ATLAS experiment, while 2.25 TeV is excluded for the non-universal model that exhibits enhanced couplings to third-generation fermions Aaboud et al. (2018b). And searches are performed for high-mass resonances in the dijet invariant mass spectrum. gauge bosons are excluded in the SSM with for masses up to 2.0 TeV, and excluded in the leptophobic model with SM-value couplings to quarks for masses up to 2.1 TeV Aaboud et al. (2018c).
It shows that the results imply a lower limit of 4.5 (5.1) TeV on for the E6-motivated () boson in the dilepton channel Aad et al. (2019). Upper limits are set on the production cross section times branching fraction for the boson in the top color-assisted-technicolor model, resulting in the exclusion of masses up to 3.9 TeV and 4.7 TeV for decay widths of 1 and 3 , respectively Aad et al. (2020). The heavy gauge bosons decay into final states in proton-proton collisions are excluded for masses up to 4.4 TeV by the CMS experiment Sirunyan et al. (2018). By analyzing data of proton-proton collision collected by the CMS experiment from 2016 to 2018, the limit of mass is obtained for the combination of the dielectron and dimuon channels. The limits are 5.15 TeV for the and 4.56 TeV for the Sirunyan et al. (2021b).
The studies on the boson also conducted at the lepton colliders especially in the small mass regions. The experiments of ALEPH and OPAL at the LEP limited the mass of the boson with the process of where is a lepton or quark. The lower limits of from -pair production are 365 GeV at ALEPH and 355 GeV at OPAL, and those from production are 523 GeV at ALEPH and 375 GeV at OPAL Lynch et al. (2001). With the proposal of the future lepton colliders, the mass region and the coupling strength of the boson can be extended extensively, especially in the process of Higgs boson production.
III interaction at the lepton colliders
III.1
In this section, we consider the process of at the future lepton colliders. The cross sections are displayed in Fig.1 as a function of . The mass of is 300, 400, 500 and 600 GeV respectively. The cross section for GeV is the largest one due to the resonance enhanced effects with the center-of-mass-system (C.M.S.) energy GeV. We can notice that the cross section is 11.33 pb with GeV when is 0.01. The cross section of is closed to 0.1 pb with a slight decrease when get large, that is because the interaction of and Higgs boson has a slight dependence on the mixing angle. The resonance threshold effects are obvious with the from the lines in the right panel comparing with the left ones. In Fig.2, we show the cross section distribution with various C.M.S. energies for GeV. With the increase of , the cross section of gets large. If the C.M.S. energy is set around the value of , the cross section of will be three or four orders larger than that without resonance effects.



III.2 Angular distribution of the final leptons
With the cascaded decay of and , we choose the final state of as the final signature at the collider. Following the discussion in the reference of Li et al. (2013), we adopt the angular distribution of the final leptons to investigate the interaction. The angle can be expressed from the following formula,
(9) |
where is the three-momentum of the negative charged lepton in the boson rest frame and is the three-momentum of the electron in the rest frame.


Fig.3 shows the angular distribution for the charged lepton in the process of with . The distributions with pure contributions are well separated from those with both and -boson mediators effects in Fig.3 (a) with GeV. The angular distributions are not very sensitive to the mass of bosons. Comparing the distributions with different C.M.S. energies from Fig.3(a) and Fig.3(b), the discrepancy is reduced with the increase of the collision energy. A forward-backward asymmetry can be defined as
(10) |
Corresponding to the studies in Fig.3, the asymmetries are listed in Table 1. The forward-backward asymmetry is 0.0726 with GeV for the pure contribution, while it changes to after considering the -boson contributions.
GeV | 1000 GeV | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 GeV | 500 GeV | 1000 GeV | 200 GeV | 500 GeV | 1000 GeV | |

The angular distributions of the charge lepton are showed in Fig.4 with . The distributions with 0 are lower than those with for in Fig.4 (a) and (b). And the distributions are separated obviously with various comparing with Fig.4 (a) and Fig.4 (c), where the contribution from -boson and - interference are included in Fig.4 (c). With increase of the C.M.S. energy as Fig.4 (d), the discrepancies are lessened but the asymmetries can be found with the resonance effects when GeV for . The corresponding forward-backward asymmetries are listed in Table 2.
GeV | 1000 GeV | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
200 GeV | 500 GeV | 1000 GeV | 200 GeV | 500 GeV | 1000 GeV | |
In Fig.5 we show the angular distributions of and with different - mixing angles. With the increase of the mixing angle, the asymmetry becomes large with GeV. The asymmetry for is close to the SM process of with the small mixing angle displayed in Fig.5 (a), and the same performance are showed within -boson effects from Fig.5 (c). The asymmetry of the process with is hardly distinguished from the asymmetry of pure -boson contribution. With the increase of the collision energy, the distributions show the same tendency in Fig.5 (b) and (d) except that the discrepancies become small comparing with Fig.5 (a) and (b). The detailed values are listed in Table.3 with different collision energy and . The asymmetry is 0.0722 (0.213) with () for process with GeV. Both including the and effects, the asymmetry is (0.210) with () for process with GeV.

GeV | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
GeV | ||||
III.3 Signals with beam polarization
The lepton colliders have the advantage at the polarization of electron/positron beams and somehow it can affect the measurement on the final particles’ distribution. We consider the production of with the beam polarization. The cross sections for the studied process are displayed in Fig.6 with various polarizations of positron and a fixed value of electron. denotes the longitudinal polarization of . corresponds to purely right-handed . The cross sections are decreased with the positron’s polarization changed from to 100 when the electron is right-handed, while the inverse trends are showed when electron is left-handed. There is an interesting point with that all the lines are crossing together. This is due to the dependence on the polarization being cancelled at this point. Besides, the cross section gets small when the positron and the electron have the same sign polarizations.

The angular distribution is displayed in Fig.7 for process with various beam polarizations. The parameters are set as GeV and . Comparing with the unpolarized condition, the distributions change obviously especially with the right-handed positron and left-handed electron collisions. Supposing the initial state with right-handed polarized positron and unpolarized electron, the distinctions are significantly in the distributions from Fig.7. The forward-backward asymmetries have been listed in Table 4. The asymmetry can reach with one hundred percents polarization of right-handed positron and left-handed electron.


(, ) | (, ) | ||
---|---|---|---|
IV Summary and Discussion
The extensions of the standard model have been studied extensively at the frontier of energy and luminosity of high energy collision experiments. boson as a new gauge boson has been proposed in many new physics models. As a proton-proton collider, the LHC has reported the searching results of with the mass of a few TeV. The interactions for coupling to fermions have been investigated in detail. The next generation of high energy colliders possibly focuses on the Higgs physics, i.e., Higgs-factory, which provides an opportunity to study the interaction of coupling to Higgs boson.
In this paper we investigated the process of . The interactions and couplings are followed up the models proposed by J.D. Wells et al.. The couplings to the standard models are related to the - mixing. We investigate the production cross section. The cross section will be at the same order as the standard model process with the mixing angle . The angular distributions of the leptons decaying from the -boson rely on the mixing angle and mass, we have investigated the distributions with the parameters variation of , GeV and GeV. The forward-backward asymmetry can reach 0.0729 for and GeV. The beam polarization effects have been investigated for the signal process . The final particles distributions change obviously with some special polarization comparing to the unpolarized condition. As the raising of the precision measurement on the Higgs boson, these studies will promote the understanding of the interactions between Higgs particle and the new physics ones.
Ackonwledgement
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NNSFC) under grant Nos. 11635009 and 11805081, Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province under grant No. ZR2019QA021, and the Open Project of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Nuclear Physics and Nuclear Technology, No. NLK2021-07.
References
- Aad et al. (2012) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Lett. B 716, 1 (2012), eprint 1207.7214.
- Chatrchyan et al. (2012) S. Chatrchyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Lett. B 716, 30 (2012), eprint 1207.7235.
- Dong et al. (2018) M. Dong et al. (CEPC Study Group) (2018), eprint 1811.10545.
- Abada et al. (2019a) A. Abada et al. (FCC), Eur. Phys. J. C 79, 474 (2019a).
- Abada et al. (2019b) A. Abada et al. (FCC), Eur. Phys. J. ST 228, 261 (2019b).
- Bambade et al. (2019) P. Bambade et al. (2019), eprint 1903.01629.
- Langacker (2009) P. Langacker, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1199 (2009), eprint 0801.1345.
- Aaltonen et al. (2009a) T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 031801 (2009a), eprint 0810.2059.
- Abazov et al. (2011) V. M. Abazov et al. (D0), Phys. Lett. B 695, 88 (2011), eprint 1008.2023.
- Feldman et al. (2006a) D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 021801 (2006a), eprint hep-ph/0603039.
- Chiappetta et al. (1996) P. Chiappetta, J. Layssac, F. M. Renard, and C. Verzegnassi, Phys. Rev. D 54, 789 (1996), eprint hep-ph/9601306.
- Barger et al. (1996) V. D. Barger, K.-m. Cheung, and P. Langacker, Phys. Lett. B 381, 226 (1996), eprint hep-ph/9604298.
- Sirunyan et al. (2020) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 131802 (2020), eprint 1912.04776.
- Aaboud et al. (2017) M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), JHEP 10, 182 (2017), eprint 1707.02424.
- Rizzo (1986) T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. D 34, 1438 (1986).
- Nandi (1986) S. Nandi, Phys. Lett. B 181, 375 (1986).
- Baer et al. (1987) H. Baer, D. Dicus, M. Drees, and X. Tata, Phys. Rev. D 36, 1363 (1987).
- Barger and Whisnant (1987) V. D. Barger and K. Whisnant, Phys. Rev. D 36, 3429 (1987).
- Gunion et al. (1988) J. F. Gunion, L. Roszkowski, and H. E. Haber, Phys. Rev. D 38, 105 (1988).
- Hewett and Rizzo (1989) J. L. Hewett and T. G. Rizzo, Phys. Rept. 183, 193 (1989).
- Feldman et al. (2006b) D. Feldman, Z. Liu, and P. Nath, JHEP 11, 007 (2006b), eprint hep-ph/0606294.
- Rizzo (2006) T. G. Rizzo, in Theoretical Advanced Study Institute in Elementary Particle Physics: Exploring New Frontiers Using Colliders and Neutrinos (2006), pp. 537–575, eprint hep-ph/0610104.
- Lee (2009) H.-S. Lee, Phys. Lett. B 674, 87 (2009), eprint 0812.1854.
- Barger et al. (2009) V. Barger, P. Langacker, and H.-S. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 251802 (2009), eprint 0909.2641.
- Cao and Zhang (2016) Q.-H. Cao and D.-M. Zhang (2016), eprint 1611.09337.
- Gulov et al. (2018) A. V. Gulov, A. A. Pankov, A. O. Pevzner, and V. V. Skalozub, Nonlin. Phenom. Complex Syst. 21, 21 (2018), eprint 1803.07532.
- Funatsu et al. (2020) S. Funatsu, H. Hatanaka, Y. Hosotani, Y. Orikasa, and N. Yamatsu, Phys. Rev. D 102, 015029 (2020), eprint 2006.02157.
- Gao et al. (2010) T.-J. Gao, T.-F. Feng, X.-Q. Li, Z.-G. Si, and S.-M. Zhao, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron. 53, 1988 (2010).
- Das et al. (2021) A. Das, P. S. B. Dev, Y. Hosotani, and S. Mandal (2021), eprint 2104.10902.
- Li et al. (2013) H.-L. Li, Z.-G. Si, X.-Y. Yang, Z.-J. Yang, and Y.-J. Zheng, Phys. Rev. D 87, 115024 (2013), eprint 1305.1457.
- Das and Okada (2020) A. Das and N. Okada (2020), eprint 2008.04023.
- Aaboud et al. (2018a) M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), JHEP 03, 174 (2018a), [Erratum: JHEP 11, 051 (2018)], eprint 1712.06518.
- Sirunyan et al. (2021a) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 688 (2021a), eprint 2102.08198.
- Gutiérrez-Rodríguez and Hernández-Ruiz (2015) A. Gutiérrez-Rodríguez and M. A. Hernández-Ruiz, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2015, 593898 (2015), eprint 1506.07575.
- Wells (2008) J. D. Wells, pp. 283–298 (2008), eprint 0803.1243.
- Aaltonen et al. (2009b) T. Aaltonen et al. (CDF), Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 091805 (2009b), eprint 0811.0053.
- Aaboud et al. (2018b) M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), JHEP 01, 055 (2018b), eprint 1709.07242.
- Aaboud et al. (2018c) M. Aaboud et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Rev. D 98, 032016 (2018c), eprint 1805.09299.
- Aad et al. (2019) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), Phys. Lett. B 796, 68 (2019), eprint 1903.06248.
- Aad et al. (2020) G. Aad et al. (ATLAS), JHEP 10, 061 (2020), eprint 2005.05138.
- Sirunyan et al. (2018) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), JHEP 04, 073 (2018), eprint 1802.01122.
- Sirunyan et al. (2021b) A. M. Sirunyan et al. (CMS), JHEP 07, 208 (2021b), eprint 2103.02708.
- Lynch et al. (2001) K. R. Lynch, E. H. Simmons, M. Narain, and S. Mrenna, Phys. Rev. D 63, 035006 (2001), eprint hep-ph/0007286.