This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Investigating SS-wave bound states composed of two pseudoscalar mesons

Zi-Long Li Physics Department, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China    Xing-Yue Tan Physics Department, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China    Zhu-Feng Zhang Physics Department, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China    Zhen-Yang Wang 111Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Physics Department, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China    Xin-Heng Guo 222Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract

In this work, we systematically investigate the two-pseudoscalar meson systems with the Bethe-Salpeter equation in the ladder and instantaneous approximations. By solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation numerically with the kernel containing the one-particle exchange diagrams, we find that the KK¯K\bar{K}, DKDK, BK¯B\bar{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}, BB¯B\bar{B}, BDBD, DK¯D\bar{K}, BKBK, and BD¯B\bar{D} systems with I=0I=0 can exist as bound states. We also study the contributions from heavy meson (J/ψJ/\psi and Υ\Upsilon) exchanges, and we find that the contribution from heavy meson exchange can not be ignored.

pacs:
***

I Introduction

Quantum chromodynamics (QCD) is the theory of the strong interaction between quarks mediated by gluons, which are color-charged Han:1965pf . In principle, QCD allows complex quark and gluon compositions of hadrons, like multiquark hadrons, hadronic molecules, hybrid hadrons, and glueballs which are nonstandard hadronic particles. Most of these nonstandard hadrons have unusual masses, decay widths, etc., which cannot be given a satisfactory explanation by the traditional quark model. Up to now, more than thirty non-qq¯q\bar{q} state candidates in light and heavy sectors have been reported experimentally ParticleDataGroup:2020ssz . These resonances are crucial for the deep understanding of the hadron spectroscopy and the nonperturbative nature and spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking of QCD.

In the low-lying scalar meson sector, f0(980)f_{0}(980) Astier:1967zz , a0(980)a_{0}(980) Ammar:1968zur and Ds0(2317)D^{\ast}_{s0}(2317) BaBar:2003oey have nonexotic JP(=0+)J^{P}(=0^{+}) quantum numbers. However, their masses are much lower than the quark model expectation for the corresponding PP-wave qq¯q\bar{q} states Godfrey:2015dva ; Olsen:2017bmm . Their natures are still under debate in spite of the efforts during the past several decades. Since their masses are near the threshold of the constituent particles and have spin-parity quantum numbers corresponding to the SS-wave combinations of the constituent particles, one would naturally identify them as hadronic molecules, which are analogs of nuclei. f0(980)f_{0}(980) and/or a0(980)a_{0}(980) could be KK¯K\bar{K} molecules Weinstein:1982gc ; Weinstein:1983gd ; Weinstein:1990gu ; Oller:2002na ; Baru:2003qq ; Dai:2014zta ; Ahmed:2020kmp ; Wang:2022vga and Ds0(2317)D^{\ast}_{s0}(2317) could be a DKDK molecule Szczepaniak:2003vy ; Hofmann:2003je ; Guo:2006fu ; Flynn:2007ki ; Xie:2010zza ; Guo:2015dha ; Du:2017ttu ; Wu:2019vsy ; Kong:2021ohg ; Huang:2021fdt ; Zhang:2006ix . Such a picture leads to the results consistent with the experiments. Besides these particles, the possible SS-wave bound states of B¯K\bar{B}{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}, BB¯B\bar{B}, BDBD, B¯K¯\bar{B}\bar{K}, DDDD, B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}, and B¯D\bar{B}D systems have not been observed experimentally.

On the theoretical aspect, the authors in Ref. Zhang:2006ix systematically study the possible SS-wave bound state of two pseudoscalar mesons by the nonrelativistic Schro¨\ddot{o}dinger (NRS) equation. Ref. Guo:2006fu predicted the existence of a BK¯B\bar{K} bound state Bs0B_{s0}^{\ast} with a mass of 5.725 ±\pm 0.039 GeV based on the heavy chiral unitary approach. Subsequently, Refs. Faessler:2008vc and Feng:2011zzb confirmed the existence of Bs0B_{s0}^{\ast} in the BK¯B\bar{K} bound state scenario and further studied the decay widths of its possible decay channels. Recently, Kong et al. Kong:2021ohg systematically investigated DKDK/B¯K\bar{B}K and D¯K\bar{D}K/BKBK systems in a quasipotential Bethe-Salpter equation (qBSE) approach by considering the light meson exchange potential, and found only the isoscalar systems can exist as molecular states. However, the mass of X(5568)X(5568) reported by the D0 collaboration D0:2016mwd is too far below the BKBK threshold to be a BKBK molecule Xiao:2016mho ; Agaev:2016urs ; Chen:2016npt ; Chen:2016ypj ; Lu:2016kxm ; Wang:2018jsr . In Ref. Liu:2008mi , the authors studied the SS-wave DD¯D\bar{D}, BDBD and BB¯B\bar{B} systems in chiral SU(3) quark model (QM), their calculation favors the existence of the isoscalar BB¯B\bar{B} molecule but the existence of isovector DD¯D\bar{D} and BDBD molecules is disfavored. In Ref. Ohkoda:2012hv , D()D()D^{(\ast)}D^{(\ast)} and B()B()B^{(\ast)}B^{(\ast)} molecular states were studied by solving the coupled channel Schro¨\mathrm{\ddot{o}}dinger (CCS) equations, only the I(JP)=1(0+)I(J^{P})=1(0^{+}) BBBB can be a bound state in the PPPP (P=D,BP=D,B) system because of the the kinetic term is suppressed in the bottom sector and the effect of channel couplings becomes more important. With the qBSE approach Ding:2020dio , the existence of DD¯D\bar{D} and BB¯B\bar{B} molecular states with I(JP)=0(0+)I(J^{P})=0(0^{+}) were predicted, yet no bound state was produced from the DDDD and B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} interaction. In Ref. Gamermann:2006nm , a new hidden charm resonance with mass 3.7 GeV was predicted within the coupled channel unitary approach. Later the DD¯D\bar{D} bound state was searched in several processes, such as BDD¯KB\rightarrow D\bar{D}K Dai:2015bcc , ψ(3770)γD0D¯0\psi(3770)\rightarrow\gamma D^{0}{\bar{D}}^{0} Dai:2020yfu , and γγDD¯\gamma\gamma\rightarrow D\bar{D} Wang:2020elp ; Deineka:2021aeu . There are some differences in the results of different methods. Therefore, more efforts are needed to investigate the possible SS-wave bound state composed of two pseudoscalar mesons.

In the present paper, we will systematically investigate whether the SS-wave bound states of two-pseudoscalar meson systems exist in the Bethe-Salpeter (BS) approach (in the ladder approximation and the instantaneous approximation for the kernel). For the doubly heavy pseudoscalar meson systems, we will not only consider the interaction through exchanged light mesons (ρ\rho, ω\omega and σ\sigma), but also the contribution of heavy vector mesons (J/ψJ/\psi or Υ\Upsilon). As studied in Aceti:2014kja ; Aceti:2014uea , in spite of the large mass of the J/ψJ/\psi, which suppresses the propagator of the exchanged J/ψJ/\psi, it was found that the interaction could bind the DD¯D^{\ast}\bar{D}^{\ast} and DD¯D\bar{D}^{\ast} systems. Similarly, Refs. Ding:2020dio ; Ding:2021igr also found the contribution from heavy meson exchange (J/ψJ/\psi or Υ\Upsilon) is very important to form a molecular state, especially in the systems with the contributions from ρ\rho and ω\omega canceling each other.

The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II, we discuss the BS equation for the two-pseudoscalar meson systems and establish the BS equation for this system. This equation is solved numerically and the numerical results of the two-pseudoscalar meson systems are presented in Sec. III. In the last section, we give a summary.

II The bethe-salpeter formalism for the two-pseudoscalar meson system

The BS wave function for the bound state |P|P\rangle composed of two pseudoscalar mesons have the following form:

χ(x1,x2,P)=0|T𝒫1(x1)𝒫2(x2)|P,\chi\left(x_{1},x_{2},P\right)=\langle 0|T\mathcal{P}_{1}(x_{1})\mathcal{P}_{2}(x_{2})|P\rangle, (1)

where 𝒫1(x1)\mathcal{P}_{1}(x_{1}) and 𝒫2(x2)\mathcal{P}_{2}(x_{2}) are the field operators of the two constituent particles at space coordinates x1x_{1} and x2x_{2}, respectively. The BS wave function in momentum space is defined as

χP(x1,x2,P)=eiPXd4p(2π)4eipxχP(p),\chi_{P}(x_{1},x_{2},P)=e^{-iPX}\int\frac{d^{4}p}{(2\pi)^{4}}e^{-ipx}\chi_{P}(p), (2)

where pp represents the relative momentum of the two constituent particles and p=λ2p1λ1p2p=\lambda_{2}p_{1}-\lambda_{1}p_{2} (p1=λ1P+pp_{1}=\lambda_{1}P+p, p2=λ2Ppp_{2}=\lambda_{2}P-p) with λ1=m1/(m1+m2)\lambda_{1}=m_{1}/(m_{1}+m_{2}) and λ2=m2/(m1+m2)\lambda_{2}=m_{2}/(m_{1}+m_{2}), p1(2)p_{1(2)} and m1(2)m_{1(2)} represent the momentum and mass of the constituent particle, respectively.

The BS wave function χP(p)\chi_{P}(p) satisfies the following BS equation:

χP(p)=S𝒫1(p1)d4q(2π)4K(P,p,q)χP(q)S𝒫2(p2),\chi_{P}(p)=S_{\mathcal{P}_{1}}(p_{1})\int\frac{d^{4}q}{(2\pi)^{4}}K(P,p,q)\chi_{P}(q)S_{\mathcal{P}_{2}}(p_{2}), (3)

where S𝒫1(p1)S_{\mathcal{P}_{1}}(p_{1}) and S𝒫2(p2)S_{\mathcal{P}_{2}}(p_{2}) are the propagators of constituent particles, and K(P,p,q)K(P,p,q) is the kernel, which is defined as the sum of all the two-particle irreducible diagrams.

In the following we use the variables pl(=pv)p_{l}(=p\cdot v) and pt(=pplv)p_{t}(=p-p_{l}v) as the longitudinal and transverse projections of the relative momentum (pp) along the bound state velocity (vv), respectively. Then, the propagators of the constituent mesons can be expressed as

S𝒫1(λ1P+p)=i(λ1M+pl)2ω12+iϵ,S_{\mathcal{P}_{1}}(\lambda_{1}P+p)=\frac{i}{\left(\lambda_{1}M+p_{l}\right)^{2}-\omega_{1}^{2}+i\epsilon}, (4)

and

S𝒫¯2(λ2Pp)=i(λ2Mpl)2ω22+iϵ,S_{\bar{\mathcal{P}}_{2}}(\lambda_{2}P-p)=\frac{i}{\left(\lambda_{2}M-p_{l}\right)^{2}-\omega_{2}^{2}+i\epsilon}, (5)

where ω1(2)=m1(2)2+pt2\omega_{1(2)}=\sqrt{m_{1(2)}^{2}+p_{t}^{2}} (we have defined pt2=ptptp_{t}^{2}=-p_{t}\cdot p_{t}).

To obtain the interaction kernel of the two-pseudoscalar meson systems through exchanging light and heavy vector mesons, and light scalar meson, the following effective Lagrangians as in Ref. Ding:2020dio ; Branz:2008ha ; Li:2012as are needed:

KK𝕍=igKKρρμ(KτμKμKτK)+i(gKKωωμ+gKKωϕμ)(KμKμKK),DD𝕍=igDD𝕍(DbαDaDaαDb)𝕍baα+igDDJ/ψ(DαDDαD)J/ψα,BB𝕍=igBB𝕍(BbαBaBaαBb)𝕍baα+igBBΥ(BαBBαB)Υα,DDσ=gDDσDaDaσ,BBσ=gBBσBaBaσ\begin{split}\mathcal{L}_{KK\mathbb{V}}=&ig_{KK\rho}\vec{\rho}^{\mu}\cdot\left(K^{\dagger}\vec{\tau}\partial_{\mu}K-\partial_{\mu}K^{\dagger}\vec{\tau}K\right)+i\left(g_{KK\omega}\omega^{\mu}+g_{KK\omega}\phi^{\mu}\right)(K^{\dagger}\partial_{\mu}K-\partial_{\mu}K^{\dagger}K),\\ \mathcal{L}_{DD\mathbb{V}}=&ig_{{DD}\mathbb{V}}(D_{b}\partial_{\alpha}D_{a}^{\dagger}-D_{a}^{\dagger}\partial_{\alpha}D_{b})\mathbb{V}^{\alpha}_{ba}+ig_{DDJ/\psi}\left(D\partial_{\alpha}D^{\dagger}-D^{\dagger}\partial_{\alpha}D\right)J/\psi^{\alpha},\\ \mathcal{L}_{BB\mathbb{V}}=&ig_{{BB}\mathbb{V}}(B_{b}\partial_{\alpha}B_{a}^{\dagger}-B_{a}^{\dagger}\partial_{\alpha}B_{b})\mathbb{V}^{\alpha}_{ba}+ig_{BB\Upsilon}\left(B\partial_{\alpha}B^{\dagger}-B^{\dagger}\partial_{\alpha}B\right)\Upsilon^{\alpha},\\ \mathcal{L}_{DD\sigma}=&g_{DD\sigma}D_{a}D^{\dagger}_{a}\sigma,\,\,\,\,\,\,\mathcal{L}_{BB\sigma}=g_{BB\sigma}B_{a}B^{\dagger}_{a}\sigma\\ \end{split} (6)

where J/ψαJ/\psi^{\alpha}, Υα\Upsilon^{\alpha}, and σ\sigma represent the J/ψJ/\psi, Υ\Upsilon, and σ\sigma field operators, and the nonet vector meson matrix reads as

𝕍\displaystyle\mathbb{V} =\displaystyle= (ρ02+ω2ρ+K+ρρ02+ω2K0KK¯0ϕ).\displaystyle\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}\frac{\rho^{0}}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{\omega}{\sqrt{2}}&\rho^{+}&K^{*+}\\ \rho^{-}&-\frac{\rho^{0}}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{\omega}{\sqrt{2}}&K^{*0}\\ K^{*-}&\bar{K}^{*0}&\phi\end{array}\right). (10)

The coupling constants involved in Eq. (6) are taken as gKKρ=gKKω=gKKϕ=3g_{KK\rho}=g_{KK\omega}=g_{KK\phi}=3, gDD𝕍=gBB𝕍=βgv2g_{DD\mathbb{V}}=g_{BB\mathbb{V}}=\frac{\beta g_{v}}{\sqrt{2}} with gv=5.8g_{v}=5.8, β=0.9\beta=0.9, gDDJ/ϕ=mJ/ψ/fJ/ψg_{DDJ/\phi}=m_{J/\psi}/f_{J/\psi} with fJ/ψ=405f_{J/\psi}=405 MeV, and gBBΥ=mΥ/fΥg_{BB\Upsilon}=m_{\Upsilon}/f_{\Upsilon} with fΥ=715.2f_{\Upsilon}=715.2 MeV.

In the so-called ladder approximation, the interaction kernel K(P,p,q)K(P,p,q) can be derived in the lowest-order form as following:

K(p1,p2;q1,q1,mV)=(2π)2δ4(q1+q2p1p2)CIgPPVgPPV(p1+q1)μ(p2+q2)νΔμν(k,mV),K(p1,p2;q1,q1,mσ)=(2π)2δ4(q1+q2p1p2)CIgPPσ2Δσ(k,mσ),\begin{split}K(p_{1},p_{2};q_{1},q_{1},m_{V})&=-(2\pi)^{2}\delta^{4}(q_{1}+q_{2}-p_{1}-p_{2})C_{I}g_{PPV}g_{P^{\prime}P^{\prime}V}(p_{1}+q_{1})_{\mu}(p_{2}+q_{2})_{\nu}\Delta^{\mu\nu}(k,m_{V}),\\ K(p_{1},p_{2};q_{1},q_{1},m_{\sigma})&=-(2\pi)^{2}\delta^{4}(q_{1}+q_{2}-p_{1}-p_{2})C_{I}g_{PP\sigma}^{2}\Delta_{\sigma}(k,m_{\sigma}),\end{split} (11)

where mVm_{V} represent the masses of the exchanged light and heavy vector mesons (ρ\rho, ω\omega, ψ\psi, J/ψJ/\psi, and Υ\Upsilon). Δμν(k,mV)\Delta^{\mu\nu}(k,m_{V}) and Δσ(k,mσ)\Delta_{\sigma}(k,m_{\sigma}) represent the propagators for the vector and the scalar mesons, respectively, and they have the following forms:

Δμν(k,mV)=ik2mV2(gμνkμkνmV2),Δσ(k,mσ)=ik2mσ2.\begin{split}\Delta^{\mu\nu}(k,m_{V})&=\frac{-i}{k^{2}-m_{V}^{2}}\left(g^{\mu\nu}-\frac{k^{\mu}k^{\nu}}{m_{V}^{2}}\right),\\ \Delta_{\sigma}(k,m_{\sigma})&=\frac{i}{k^{2}-m_{\sigma}^{2}}.\end{split} (12)

The CIC_{I} in Eq. (11) is the isospin coefficient for I=0I=0 and I=1I=1. For the KK¯K\bar{K}, DKDK, B¯K\bar{B}{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}, BB¯B\bar{B} and BDBD systems,

C0={3/2forρ1/2forω1forϕ1forJ/ψ1forΥ1forσ,C1={1/2forρ1/2forω1forϕ1forJ/ψ1forΥ1forσ.C_{0}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{rl}3/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\rho\\ 1/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\omega\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\phi\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}J/\psi\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\Upsilon\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\sigma\end{array}\right.,~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}C_{1}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{rl}-1/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\rho\\ 1/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\omega\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\phi\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}J/\psi\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\Upsilon\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\sigma\end{array}\right.. (13)

For the K¯K¯\bar{K}\bar{K}, DK¯D\bar{K}, B¯K¯\bar{B}\bar{K}, DDDD, B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} and B¯D\bar{B}D systems,

C0={3/2forρ1/2forω1forϕ1forJ/ψ1forΥ1forσ,C1={1/2forρ1/2forω1forϕ1forJ/ψ1forΥ1forσ.C_{0}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{rl}3/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\rho\\ -1/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\omega\\ -1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\phi\\ -1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}J/\psi\\ -1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\Upsilon\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\sigma\end{array}\right.,~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}~{}C_{1}=\left\{\begin{array}[]{rl}-1/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\rho\\ -1/2&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\omega\\ -1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\phi\\ -1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}J/\psi\\ -1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\Upsilon\\ 1&~{}~{}{\rm for}~{}\sigma\end{array}\right.. (14)

In Eqs. (13) and (14) the exchanged mesons of ϕ\phi, J/ψJ/\psi and Υ\Upsilon only appear for the KK¯K\bar{K}/K¯K¯\bar{K}\bar{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}/DDDD and BB¯B\bar{B}/B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} systems, and σ\sigma is only considered in the doubly heavy pseudoscalar meson systems.

In order to manipulate the off shell effect of the exchanged mesons and finite size effect of the interacting hadrons, we introduce a form factor (k2)\mathcal{F}(k^{2}) at each vertex. Generally, the form factor has the following form:

M(k2)=Λ2m2Λ2k2,\mathcal{F}_{M}(k^{2})=\frac{\Lambda^{2}-m^{2}}{\Lambda^{2}-k^{2}}, (15)

where Λ\Lambda, mm and kk represent the cutoff parameter, mass and momentum of the exchanged meson, respectively. This form factor is normalized at the on shell momentum of k2=m2k^{2}=m^{2}. On the other hand, if k2k^{2} were taken to be infinitely large (-\infty), the form factor, which can be expressed as the overlap integral of the wave functions of the hadrons at the vertex, would approach zero. Considering the difference in the wave functions and masses of the light and heavy mesons, and ensuring a positive form factor, different magnitudes of cutoff Λ\Lambda will be chosen for the heavy and light mesons.

Substituting the propagators (4) and (5), the interaction kernel (11), and the form factor (15) into the BS Eq. (3) and considering the instantaneous approximation (pl=qlp_{l}=q_{l}, which mesons the energy exchanged between the constituent particles of the binding system is neglected.) in the kernel. Then, the BS Eq. (3) with exchanging a vector meson and a scalar meson in the center-of-mass frame of the bound state (P=0\vec{P}=0) becomes

χP(pl,pt)=i[(λ1M+pl)2ω12+iϵ][(λ2Mpl)2ω22+iϵ]dql2πd3qt(2π)3×{CIgPPVgPPV4(λ1M+pl)(λ2pl)+(pt+qt)2+(pt2qt2)/mV2(ptqt)mV2(Λ2mV2)2[Λ2+(pt+qt)2]2+CIgPPσgPPσ1(ptqt)mσ2(Λ2mσ2)2[Λ2+(pt+qt)2]2}χP(ql,qt).\begin{split}\chi_{P}(p_{l},\vec{p}_{t})=&\frac{i}{\left[\left(\lambda_{1}M+p_{l}\right)^{2}-\omega_{1}^{2}+i\epsilon\right]\left[\left(\lambda_{2}M-p_{l}\right)^{2}-\omega_{2}^{2}+i\epsilon\right]}\int\frac{dq_{l}}{2\pi}\frac{d^{3}\vec{q}_{t}}{(2\pi)^{3}}\\ \times&\Bigg{\{}C_{I}g_{PPV}g_{P^{\prime}P^{\prime}V}\frac{4\left(\lambda_{1}M+p_{l}\right)\left(\lambda_{2}-p_{l}\right)+\left(\vec{p}_{t}+\vec{q}_{t}\right)^{2}+\left(\vec{p}_{t}^{2}-\vec{q}_{t}^{2}\right)/m_{V}^{2}}{-\left(\vec{p}_{t}-\vec{q}_{t}\right)-m_{V}^{2}}\frac{\left(\Lambda^{2}-m_{V}^{2}\right)^{2}}{\left[\Lambda^{2}+\left(\vec{p}_{t}+\vec{q}_{t}\right)^{2}\right]^{2}}\\ &+C_{I}g_{PP\sigma}g_{P^{\prime}P^{\prime}\sigma}\frac{1}{-\left(\vec{p}_{t}-\vec{q}_{t}\right)-m_{\sigma}^{2}}\frac{\left(\Lambda^{2}-m_{\sigma}^{2}\right)^{2}}{\left[\Lambda^{2}+\left(\vec{p}_{t}+\vec{q}_{t}\right)^{2}\right]^{2}}\Bigg{\}}\chi_{P}(q_{l},\vec{q}_{t}).\end{split} (16)

In the above equation, there are poles in the plp_{l} plane at λ1Mω1+iϵ-\lambda_{1}M-\omega_{1}+i\epsilon, λ1M+ω1iϵ-\lambda_{1}M+\omega_{1}-i\epsilon, λ2M+ω2iϵ\lambda_{2}M+\omega_{2}-i\epsilon and λ2Mω2+iϵ\lambda_{2}M-\omega_{2}+i\epsilon. After integrating the plp_{l} on both sides of Eq. (16) by selecting the proper contour, we can obtain the three-dimensional integral equation for χ~P(pt)\tilde{\chi}_{P}(\vec{p}_{t}) (χ~P(pt)=𝑑plχP(pl,pt)\tilde{\chi}_{P}(\vec{p}_{t})=\int dp_{l}\chi_{P}(p_{l},\vec{p}_{t})), which only depends on the the three momentum, pt\vec{p}_{t}. By completing the azimuthal integration, the three-dimensional BS equation becomes a one-dimensional integral equation as

χ~P(|pt|)=d|pt|A(|pt|,|qt|)χ~P(|qt|),\tilde{\chi}_{P}(|\vec{p}_{t}|)=\int d|\vec{p}_{t}|A\left(|\vec{p}_{t}|,|\vec{q}_{t}|\right)\tilde{\chi}_{P}(|\vec{q}_{t}|), (17)

where the propagators and kernels after one-dimensional simplification are included in A(|pt|,|qt|)A\left(|\vec{p}_{t}|,|\vec{q}_{t}|\right). The numerical solutions for χ~P(|pt|)\tilde{\chi}_{P}(|\vec{p}_{t}|) can be obtained by discretizing the integration region into nn pieces (with nn sufficiently large). In this way, the integral equation becomes a matrix equation and the BS scalar function χ~P(|pt|)\tilde{\chi}_{P}(|\vec{p}_{t}|) becomes nn dimensional vector.

III Numerical results

In this section, we will solve the BS equation numerically and study whether the SS-wave bound states composed of two pseudoscalar mesons exist or not. In our model, there is only one parameter, the cutoff Λ\Lambda, which comes from the form factor. The binding energy EbE_{b} is defined as Eb=Mm1m2E_{b}=M-m_{1}-m_{2} in the rest frame of the bound state. We take the averaged masses of the pseudoscalar mesons and the exchanged light and heavy mesons from PDG pdg2020 , mKm_{K} = 494.988 MeV, mDm_{D} = 1868.04 MeV, mBm_{B} = 5279.44 MeV, mρm_{\rho} = 775.26 MeV, mωm_{\omega} = 782.65 MeV, mϕm_{\phi} = 1019.461 MeV, mJ/ψm_{J/\psi} = 3096.9 MeV, and mΥm_{\Upsilon} = 9460.3 MeV.

In Fig. 1, we present some possible bound states composed of two pseudoscalar mesons when only the light meson (ρ\rho, ω\omega, ϕ\phi, and σ\sigma) exchange contributions are considered. Here we vary the binding energy from 0 to -50 MeV and the cutoff in a wide range (0.8-5) GeV. We find that only the KK¯K\bar{K}, DKDK, B¯K\bar{B}{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}, BB¯B\bar{B}, BDBD, DK¯D\bar{K}, B¯K¯\bar{B}\bar{K}, B¯D\bar{B}D systems with I=0I=0 can exist as bound states. For the K¯K¯\bar{K}\bar{K}, DDDD, and B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} systems with I=0I=0 are forbidden because of the Bose symmetry and the interactions in I=1I=1 systems are repulsive, hence no bound states exist in the K¯K¯\bar{K}\bar{K}, DDDD, and B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} systems. Furthermore, we cannot predict with certainty masses of bound states which will be measured experimentally due to that our results are dependent on the cutoff Λ\Lambda. The contribution of the σ\sigma exchange is included in our work, despite the large uncertainties in its mass and structure. In our previous works Zhao:2021cvg ; Wang:2020lua and Ref. Ding:2008gr it was found that the contribution of σ\sigma exchange is very small to form bound states, and the same result is found in our current work.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 1: The numerical results for KK¯K\bar{K}, DKDK, B¯K\bar{B}{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}, BB¯B\bar{B}, and BDBD systems with I=0I=0 (a) and DK¯D\bar{K}, B¯K¯\bar{B}\bar{K}, and B¯D\bar{B}D systems with I=0I=0 (b).

The systems that may exist as bound states are presented in Fig. 1 . It is noted that in the hidden bottom system the cutoff is the smallest in Fig. 1(a). This is because the mass of BB meson is the largest one, which requires smaller cutoff value as compared to the other systems, and the cutoff is determined by the overlap integrals of the wave functions the hadrons at the vertices and the size of BB meson is the smallest among the constituent particles. There is no bound state for the system with I=1I=1. This is because the isospin coefficients of ρ\rho and ω\omega are -1/2 and 1/2, respectively, as shown in Eq. (13) and the masses of ρ\rho and ω\omega are almost equal, leading to the contributions from ρ\rho and ω\omega exchanges almost canceling each other. Among these possible bound states, the KK¯K\bar{K} and DKDK bound states can be related to the experimentally observed f0(980)f_{0}(980) and Ds0(2317)D_{s0}^{\ast}(2317), respectively Guo:2017jvc . Based on the heavy chiral unitary approach Guo:2006fu and the linear chiral symmetry Bardeen:2003kt , the authors predicted the existence of a bb-partner state Bs0B_{s0}^{\ast} of Ds0(2317)D_{s0}^{\ast}(2317) as the BK¯B\bar{K} bound state, which also can be confirmed in our model with the cutoff Λ\Lambda = 2436 MeV. For the experimentally observed X(5568)X(5568), it cannot be a BK¯B\bar{K} bound state in our model Wang:2018jsr . In Ref. Gamermann:2006nm , a new hidden charm resonance with mass 3.7 GeV (named as X(3700)X(3700)) was predicted corresponding mostly to a DD¯D\bar{D} state. Later it has been searched in BDD¯KB\rightarrow D\bar{D}K Dai:2015bcc , e+eJ/ψDD¯e^{+}e^{-}\rightarrow J/\psi D\bar{D} Xiao:2012iq , ψ(3770)X(3700)γ\psi(3770)\rightarrow X(3700)\gamma Gamermann:2009ouq , γγDD¯\gamma\gamma\rightarrow D\bar{D} Wang:2020elp ; Deineka:2021aeu , ΛbΛDD¯\Lambda_{b}\rightarrow\Lambda D\bar{D} Wei:2021usz , etc. Recently, lattice QCD also found a DD¯D\bar{D} bound state just below the threshold with the binding energy Eb=4.05.0+3.7E_{b}=-4.0^{+3.7}_{-5.0} MeV Prelovsek:2020eiw . The existence of the BB¯B\bar{B} bound state was also confirmed by the effective potential model Liu:2009qhy , the heavy quark effective theory Liu:2017mrh , the chiral SU(3) QM Liu:2008mi and the qBSE Ding:2020dio . The BDBD system, in analogy to the DKDK system, can also be a bound state in the local hidden gauge symmetry (HGS) approach Sakai:2017avl .

Not long ago, the TccT_{cc} with the quantum numbers I(JP)=0(1+)I(J^{P})=0(1^{+}) and the quark content ccu¯d¯cc\bar{u}\bar{d} was reported by the LHCb Collaboration LHCb:2021auc , which is the first experimentally discovered open charmed tetraquark state. The mass of TccT_{cc} is just below the threshold of DDDD^{\ast}, and could be an ideal candidate for the DDDD^{\ast} bound state. In fact, this inspired us to investigate the possibility of two-pseudoscalar meson systems as bound states with open flavour. In Ref. Li:2012ss , the authors systematically investigated possible deuteron-like molecular states with two heavy quarks by one-boson-exchange (OBE) model. According to their results, the I=1I=1 DDDD system might not be a molecule, the I=1I=1 B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B}, I=0I=0 and I=1I=1 DB¯D\bar{B} systems might be molecule candidates, but the results depend a little sensitively on the cutoff. Based on the Heavy-Meson Effective Theory, the DDDD with I=1I=1, B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} with I=1I=1, and DB¯D\bar{B} with I=0I=0 and I=1I=1 systems could exist as shallow bound states Abreu:2022sra .

For the results of two-pseudoscalar meson systems only the isoscalar system can exist as bound states, which are presented in Fig. 1(b). This is because for the isovector systems the isospin coefficients corresponding to ρ\rho and ω\omega exchanges are -1/2, as shown in Eq. (14), so the total interaction is repulsive in the isovector systems. Comparing the results in Fig. 1 (a) and Fig. 1(b), we can obviously see that the cutoff Λ\Lambda is larger in Fig. 1(b), which is caused by the difference in the isospin coefficients, i.e. 1/2 and -1/2 in the systems with I=0I=0 due to the ω\omega exchange in Eq. (13) and Eq. (14), respectively. From Fig. 1(a) and Fig. 1(b), we can also find that for the constituent particles with same masses, the larger the mass of the constituent particle the smaller the cutoff Λ\Lambda. And the larger difference in masses of the constituent particles the larger cutoff Λ\Lambda. In order to facilitate the comparison the results of different theoretical models, we have listed the results of some different models and our results in Table 1.

Table 1: The results for different theoretical models. “\surd” and “×\times” denote that the corresponding system might be a bound state or not, respectively. “-” means corresponding system without study.
KK¯K\bar{K} DKDK B¯K\bar{B}K DD¯D\bar{D} BB¯B\bar{B} BDBD K¯K¯\bar{K}\bar{K} DK¯D\bar{K} B¯K¯\bar{B}\bar{K} DDDD B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} B¯D\bar{B}D
II 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1
qBSE Kong:2021ohg ; Ding:2020dio - - \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times - - - - \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times - -
HGS Sakai:2017avl ; Dai:2022ulk - - - - - - - - - - \surd ×\times - - - - - - - - ×\times ×\times \surd ×\times
OBE Liu:2009qhy ; Li:2012ss - - - - - - ×\times \surd ×\times \surd \surd ×\times - - - - - - ×\times ×\times ×\times \surd \surd \surd
CCS Ohkoda:2012hv ; Ohkoda:2011vj - - - - - - - - ×\times \surd - - - - - - - - ×\times ×\times ×\times \surd - -
QM Liu:2008mi - - - - - - \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times - - - - - - - - - - - -
NRS Zhang:2006ix ×\times ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times ×\times ×\times \surd ×\times ×\times ×\times ×\times ×\times ×\times ×\times \surd ×\times
Our results \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times ×\times ×\times \surd ×\times \surd ×\times ×\times ×\times ×\times ×\times \surd ×\times

In Ref. Aceti:2014uea , the authors systematically studied the interaction of DD¯D\bar{D}^{\ast} in the isospin I=0I=0 channel. In their work it is shown the exchange of a light qq¯q\bar{q} is OZI forbidden in the I=1I=1 channel. As a consequence, only the J/ψJ/\psi exchange is allowed in the case of I=1I=1, and the simultaneous two pion exchange, which was evaluated in Aceti:2014uea and Aceti:2014kja , was found to be weaker than the exchange of the vector meson. In spite of the large mass of the J/ψJ/\psi, which suppresses the propagator of the exchanged J/ψJ/\psi exchange, it was found in Aceti:2014uea and Aceti:2014kja that the interaction could bind the DD¯D\bar{D}^{\ast} and DD¯D^{\ast}\bar{D}^{\ast} systems with I=1I=1 weakly. Subsequently, in Ref. He:2015mja it was also found the bound state DD¯D\bar{D}^{\ast} with IG(JP)=1+(1+)I^{G}(J^{P})=1^{+}(1^{+}) would disappear if the J/ψJ/\psi exchange were removed, which means that the J/ψJ/\psi exchange is important to provide an attractive interaction to produce the pole in the isovector system. In the present work, we also consider the effects of exchanged heavy mesons. Considering the differences in the wave functions and masses of the light and heavy mesons, and ensuring a positive from factor, we choose different magnitudes of cutoffs ΛL\Lambda_{L} and ΛH\Lambda_{H} for the exchanged light and heavy mesons, respectively.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: The numerical results for I=0I=0 (a) and I=1I=1 (b) DD¯D\bar{D} systems with J/ψJ/\psi meson exchange included.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: The numerical results for I=0I=0 (a) and I=1I=1 (b) BB¯B\bar{B} systems with Υ\Upsilon meson exchange included.

We vary the cutoff ΛL\Lambda_{L} due to the exchanged light mesons in the range of (800-1500) MeV to find the cutoff ΛH\Lambda_{H} due to the exchanged heavy mesons that can form bound states. The results for some possible bound states of DD¯D\bar{D} and BB¯B\bar{B} are presented in Figs. 2 and 3. From these results in Figs 2 and 3, we can see that the effect of the exchange of a heavy meson can not be ignored. Due to the contributions of the exchanged ρ\rho and ω\omega almost cancel each other in the I=1I=1 DD¯D\bar{D} and BB¯B\bar{B} systems, the main contribution comes from the heavy meson exchange. It can be seen that the results for ΛH\Lambda_{H} are almost twice the mass of the exchanged heavy meson in Figs. 2(b) and 3(b). This has the same situation with only considered the light mesons exchange, the value of the cutoff Λ\Lambda are also about twice the mass of the exchange meson as in Fig. 1(a). Whether the bound states can be formed only considered the contribution of the heavy meson exchange, the existence of D¯D\bar{D}D and BB¯B\bar{B} bound states with I=1I=1 experimentally is determinant.

IV summary

In this paper we derived the BS equation for the SS-wave KK¯K\bar{K}, DKDK, BK¯{B}\bar{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}, BB¯B\bar{B}, BDBD, KKKK, DK¯D\bar{K}, B¯K¯\bar{B}\bar{K}, DDDD, B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} and B¯D\bar{B}D systems, and systematically studied the possible bound states of these systems with the ladder approximation and the instantaneous approximation for the kernel. In our model, the kernel containing one-particle-exchange diagrams induced by the light meson (ρ\rho, ω\omega, ϕ\phi, and σ\sigma) and the heavy meson (J/ψJ/\psi and Υ\Upsilon) exchanges. To investigate the bound states, we have numerically solved the BS equations for SS-wave systems composed of two pseudoscalar mesons. The possible SS-wave bound states studied in our work are helpful in explaining the structures of experimentally discovered exotic states and predicting unobserved exotic states.

As results, we found the KK¯K\bar{K}, DKDK, B¯K\bar{B}{K}, DD¯D\bar{D}, BB¯B\bar{B}, BDBD, DK¯D\bar{K}, B¯K¯\bar{B}\bar{K}, and B¯D\bar{B}D with I=0I=0 can exist as bound states. For the K¯K¯\bar{K}\bar{K}, DDDD, and B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} systems with I=0I=0 are forbidden because of the Bose symmetry and the interactions in I=1I=1 systems are repulsive, hence no bound states exist in the K¯K¯\bar{K}\bar{K}, DDDD, and B¯B¯\bar{B}\bar{B} systems. We also found that for the constituent particles with same masses, the larger mass of the constituent particle the smaller the cutoff Λ\Lambda. And the larger difference in masses of the constituent particles the larger cutoff Λ\Lambda. The contribution of σ\sigma exchange is very small to form bound states.

In the calculation, we considered the heavy meson exchanges in the kernel. We found the effect of the heavy mesons exchange can not be neglected for the DD¯D\bar{D} and BB¯B\bar{B} systems. Since the contributions from the ρ\rho and ω\omega exchanges almost cancel each other in the I=1I=1 DD¯D\bar{D} and BB¯B\bar{B} systems, the main contribution comes from the heavy meson exchanges, and the I=1I=1 DD¯D\bar{D} and BB¯B\bar{B} systems can exist as bound states . However, since the cutoff ΛH\Lambda_{H} for the heavy meson exchanges is very big. Whether the bound states can be formed only considered the contribution of the heavy meson exchange, the existence of D¯D\bar{D}D and BB¯B\bar{B} bound states with I=1I=1 experimentally is determinant.

With the restarted LHC and other experiments, more experimental studies of exotic hadrons will be performed in the near future. Recently, the LHCb collaboration observed three never-before-seen particles: a new kind of pentaquark and the first-ever pair of tetraquarks, which includes a new type of tetraquark LHCb . These will help physicists better understand how quarks bind together into exotic particles. There is still controversy about the theoretical explanation of the structures of experimentally observed exotic hadrons and the existence of possible molecular states predicted theoretically. Therefore, more precise experimental studies of the exotic states will be needed to test the results of theoretical studies and to improve theoretical models.

Acknowledgements.
One of the authors (Z.-Y. Wang) thanks Professor Jia-Jun Wu and Dr. Rui-Cheng Li for helpful discussions and useful suggestions. This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Projects No. 12105149 and No. 11775024).

References

  • (1) M. Y. Han and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 139, B1006-B1010 (1965).
  • (2) P. A. Zyla et al. [Particle Data Group], PTEP 2020, 083C01 (2020).
  • (3) A. Astier, L. Montanet, M. Baubillier and J. Duboc, Phys. Lett. B 25, 294-297 (1967).
  • (4) R. Ammar, R. Davis, W. Kropac, J. Mott, D. Slate, B. Werner, M. Derrick, T. Fields and F. Schweingruber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1832-1835 (1968).
  • (5) B. Aubert et al. [BaBar], Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 242001 (2003).
  • (6) S. Godfrey and K. Moats, Phys. Rev. D 93, 034035 (2016).
  • (7) S. L. Olsen, T. Skwarnicki and D. Zieminska, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015003 (2018).
  • (8) J. D. Weinstein and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 659 (1982).
  • (9) J. D. Weinstein and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 27, 588 (1983).
  • (10) J. D. Weinstein and N. Isgur, Phys. Rev. D 41, 2236 (1990).
  • (11) J. A. Oller, Nucl. Phys. A 714, 161-182 (2003).
  • (12) V. Baru, J. Haidenbauer, C. Hanhart, Y. Kalashnikova and A. E. Kudryavtsev, Phys. Lett. B 586, 53-61 (2004).
  • (13) L. Y. Dai and M. R. Pennington, Phys. Rev. D 90, 036004 (2014).
  • (14) H. A. Ahmed and C. W. Xiao, Phys. Rev. D 101, 094034 (2020).
  • (15) Z. Q. Wang, X. W. Kang, J. A. Oller and L. Zhang, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074016 (2022).
  • (16) A. P. Szczepaniak, Phys. Lett. B 567, 23-26 (2003).
  • (17) J. Hofmann and M. F. M. Lutz, Nucl. Phys. A 733, 142-152 (2004).
  • (18) F. K. Guo, P. N. Shen, H. C. Chiang, R. G. Ping and B. S. Zou, Phys. Lett. B 641, 278-285 (2006).
  • (19) J. M. Flynn and J. Nieves, Phys. Rev. D 75, 074024 (2007).
  • (20) Z. X. Xie, G. Q. Feng and X. H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 81, 036014 (2010).
  • (21) Z. H. Guo, U. G. Meißner and D. L. Yao, Phys. Rev. D 92, 094008 (2015).
  • (22) M. L. Du, F. K. Guo, U. G. Meißner and D. L. Yao, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 728 (2017).
  • (23) T. W. Wu, M. Z. Liu, L. S. Geng, E. Hiyama and M. P. Valderrama, Phys. Rev. D 100, 034029 (2019).
  • (24) S. Y. Kong, J. T. Zhu, D. Song and J. He, Phys. Rev. D 104, 094012 (2021).
  • (25) B. L. Huang, Z. Y. Lin and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 105, 036016 (2022).
  • (26) Y. J. Zhang, H. C. Chiang, P. N. Shen and B. S. Zou, Phys. Rev. D 74, 014013 (2006).
  • (27) A. Faessler, T. Gutsche, V. E. Lyubovitskij and Y. L. Ma, Phys. Rev. D 77, 114013 (2008).
  • (28) G. Q. Feng, Z. X. Xie and X. H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 83, 016003 (2011).
  • (29) V. M. Abazov et al. [D0], Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 022003 (2016).
  • (30) C. J. Xiao and D. Y. Chen, Eur. Phys. J. A 53, 127 (2017).
  • (31) S. S. Agaev, K. Azizi and H. Sundu, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 131, 351 (2016).
  • (32) X. Chen and J. Ping, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 351 (2016).
  • (33) R. Chen and X. Liu, Phys. Rev. D 94, 034006 (2016).
  • (34) J. X. Lu, X. L. Ren and L. S. Geng, Eur. Phys. J. C 77, 94 (2017).
  • (35) Z. Y. Wang, J. J. Qi and X. H. Guo, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2019, 7576254 (2019).
  • (36) Y. R. Liu and Z. Y. Zhang, Phys. Rev. C 80, 015208 (2009).
  • (37) S. Ohkoda, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, K. Sudoh and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 86, 034019 (2012).
  • (38) Z. M. Ding, H. Y. Jiang and J. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 1179 (2020).
  • (39) D. Gamermann, E. Oset, D. Strottman and M. J. Vicente Vacas, Phys. Rev. D 76, 074016 (2007).
  • (40) L. R. Dai, J. J. Xie and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 121 (2016).
  • (41) L. Dai, G. Toledo and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 80, 510 (2020).
  • (42) E. Wang, H. S. Li, W. H. Liang and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054008 (2021).
  • (43) O. Deineka, I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136982 (2022).
  • (44) F. Aceti, M. Bayar, J. M. Dias and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. A 50, 103 (2014).
  • (45) F. Aceti, M. Bayar, E. Oset, A. Martinez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, J. M. Dias, F. S. Navarra and M. Nielsen, Phys. Rev. D 90, 016003 (2014).
  • (46) Z. M. Ding, H. Y. Jiang, D. Song and J. He, Eur. Phys. J. C 81, 732 (2021).
  • (47) T. Branz, T. Gutsche and V. E. Lyubovitskij, Phys. Rev. D 78, 114004 (2008).
  • (48) G. Li, F. l. Shao, C. W. Zhao and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. D 87, 034020 (2013).
  • (49) Particle Data Group, P. Zyla et al., Review of particle physics, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 6, 083C01 (2020).
  • (50) M. J. Zhao, Z. Y. Wang, C. Wang and X. H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 105, 096016 (2022).
  • (51) Z. Y. Wang, J. J. Qi, J. Xu and X. H. Guo, Phys. Rev. D 102, 036008 (2020).
  • (52) G. J. Ding, Phys. Rev. D 79, 014001 (2009).
  • (53) F. K. Guo, C. Hanhart, U. G. Meißner, Q. Wang, Q. Zhao and B. S. Zou, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015004 (2018).
  • (54) W. A. Bardeen, E. J. Eichten and C. T. Hill, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003), 054024.
  • (55) L. R. Dai, J. J. Xie and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. C 76, 121 (2016).
  • (56) C. W. Xiao and E. Oset, Eur. Phys. J. A 49, 52 (2013).
  • (57) D. Gamermann, E. Oset and B. S. Zou, Eur. Phys. J. A 41, 85-91 (2009).
  • (58) E. Wang, H. S. Li, W. H. Liang and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 103, 054008 (2021).
  • (59) O. Deineka, I. Danilkin and M. Vanderhaeghen, Phys. Lett. B 827, 136982 (2022).
  • (60) L. L. Wei, H. S. Li, E. Wang, J. J. Xie, D. M. Li and Y. X. Li, Phys. Rev. D 103, 114013 (2021).
  • (61) S. Prelovsek, S. Collins, D. Mohler, M. Padmanath and S. Piemonte, JHEP 06, 035 (2021).
  • (62) X. Liu, Z. G. Luo, Y. R. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Eur. Phys. J. C 61, 411-428 (2009).
  • (63) M. Z. Liu, D. J. Jia and D. Y. Chen, Chin. Phys. C 41, 053105 (2017).
  • (64) S. Sakai, L. Roca and E. Oset, Phys. Rev. D 96, 054023 (2017).
  • (65) R. Aaij et al. [LHCb], Nature Commun. 13, 3351 (2022).
  • (66) N. Li, Z. F. Sun, X. Liu and S. L. Zhu, Phys. Rev. D 88, 114008 (2013).
  • (67) L. M. Abreu, [arXiv:2206.01166 [hep-ph]].
  • (68) S. Ohkoda, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Yasui, K. Sudoh and A. Hosaka, Phys. Rev. D 86, 014004 (2012).
  • (69) L. R. Dai, E. Oset, A. Feijoo, R. Molina, L. Roca, A. M. Torres and K. P. Khemchandani, Phys. Rev. D 105, 074017 (2022).
  • (70) J. He, Phys. Rev. D 92, 034004 (2015).
  • (71) https://home.web.cern.ch/news/news/physics/lhcb-discovers-three-new-exotic-particles.