This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

11institutetext: Department of Physics, Sophia University, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan 22institutetext: Akita International University, Yuwa, Akita-city 010-1292, Japan

Interplay between core and corona from small to large systems

\firstnameYuuka \lastnameKanakubo\fnsep 11 y-kanakubo-75t@eagle.sophia.ac.jp    \firstnameYasuki \lastnameTachibana\fnsep 22 ytachibana@aiu.ac.jp    \firstnameTetsufumi \lastnameHirano\fnsep 11 hirano@sophia.ac.jp
Abstract

We present new results in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC energies from the updated dynamical core–corona initialization framework (DCCI2). The fractions of final hadron yields originating from equilibrated and non-equilibrated components are extracted as functions of multiplicity. We find that the contributions from non-equilibrated components are non-negligible even in Pb+Pb collisions and affect pTp_{T}-integrated multi-particle correlations. These suggest the importance of non-equilibrated components for the sophisticated extraction of properties of the quark gluon plasma from comparisons between dynamical frameworks and experimental data.

1 Introduction

The properties of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) have been investigated through dynamical frameworks based on relativistic hydrodynamics. Recently, several attempts from dynamical frameworks are reported Novak:2013bqa ; Sangaline:2015isa ; Bernhard:2015hxa ; Bernhard:2016tnd ; Auvinen:2017fjw ; Bernhard:2019bmu ; JETSCAPE:2020shq ; Nijs:2020ors ; Auvinen:2020mpc ; Parkkila:2021tqq to quantitatively extract the QGP transport coefficients from the data-to-model comparison. This indicates that sophisticated description with dynamical frameworks is needed for a further investigation of transport coefficients. On the other hand, the possibility of the QGP formation in small colliding systems has been discussed following the report of strangeness enhancement in p+p collisions by the ALICE Collaboration ALICE:2017jyt . Thus, the extension of the applicability of those dynamical frameworks to small colliding systems is indispensable.

Motivated by these backgrounds, we build the dynamical core–corona initialization as a state-of-the-art dynamical framework that is capable of describing from small to large colliding systems Kanakubo:2018vkl ; Kanakubo:2019ogh ; Kanakubo:2021qcw . Under the core–corona picture Werner:2007bf , the system generated in high-energy nuclear collisions is described with two components: equilibrated matter (core) and non-equilibrated matter (corona). In our framework, we realize the dynamical description of the separation of the system into the core and corona by incorporating the picture with the novel dynamical initialization approach Okai:2017ofp .

2 Dynamical Core–Corona Initialization framework

Under the dynamical initialization approach, initial conditions of QGP fluids are generated dynamically via source terms of relativistic hydrodynamic equations. We assume that the system is described with the two components, QGP fluids as core and non-equilibrated partons as corona, respectively, and consider the energy and momentum conservation for the entire system generated in a collision. Thus, the depositions of energy and momentum from non-equilibrated partons become sources of QGP fluids, and which makes it possible to model the generation of initial conditions of QGP fluids with keeping the energy and momentum conservation of the entire system. The dynamical realization of the core–corona picture is attained by modeling the energy and momentum deposition rates of non-equilibrated partons. Based on the core–corona picture, non-equilibrated partons with low transverse momentum, pTp_{T}, and in high-density regions are likely to deposit their energy and momentum while those with high pTp_{T} and in low-density regions are not.

A brief summary of the latest version of our framework Kanakubo:2021qcw ; Kanakubo:2022ual is as follows: Initial conditions are phase-space distributions of partons after the final-state radiation obtained from Pythia8 Sjostrand:2007gs and Pythia8 Angantyr Bierlich:2016smv ; Bierlich:2018xfw for p+p and A+A collisions, respectively. The dynamical initialization is performed with those initially produced partons and the system is dynamically separated into the core and corona. The space-time evolution of the core, QGP fluids, is described with (3+1)-D ideal hydrodynamics Tachibana:2014lja by incorporating the equation of state ss95pp-v.1.1 Huovinen:2009yb . Once temperatures of fluids become lower than a switching temperature, fluids are particlized with iS3D McNelis:2019auj , a Monte-Carlo sampler of hadrons from hydrodynamic fields. The non-equilibrium partons are hadronized via the Lund string fragmentation with Pythia8. Finally, those directly emitted hadrons are handed to Jam Nara:1999dz , a hadronic transport model that performs hadronic rescatterings and resonance decays.

3 Results

We simulate p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC energies with our framework. Some major parameters control the fraction of generated core and corona components. We determine them so that the full simulation results can reasonably describe the multiplicity dependence of the yield ratios of omega baryons to charged pions in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions Kanakubo:2021qcw 111 Note that some parameters are minor updated from Ref. Kanakubo:2021qcw . For details, see Ref. Kanakubo:2022ual . reported by the ALICE Collaboration ALICE:2017jyt . By fixing those parameters, we extract the fractions of hadron yields originating from core and corona as functions of multiplicity near mid-pseudo-rapidity (|η|<0.5|\eta|<0.5) in p+p collisions at s=\sqrt{s}= 7 and 13 TeV and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 TeV as shown in Fig. 1. One sees that the fractions of core and corona components show clear multiplicity scaling regardless of the system size or collision energies. Thus, within our framework, final hadron yields can be one of the reasonable estimators to evaluate the fraction of equilibrated and non-equilibrated components. We also find that the fraction of core components becomes dominant when multiplicity exceeds dNch/dη20\left\langle dN_{\mathrm{ch}}/d\eta\right\rangle\approx 20. It should be also noted that the fraction of core (corona) components does not reach 100%\approx 100\% (0%\approx 0\%) even at the highest multiplicity bin in Pb+Pb collisions.

\sidecaptionRefer to caption
Figure 1: Fractions of hadron yields originating from the core and corona as functions of the number of charged particles produced at midrapidity |η|<0.5|\eta|<0.5. Results in p+p collisions at s=\sqrt{s}= 7 and 13 TeV (open squares and triangles, respectively) and Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 TeV (closed circles) are shown.

For a further investigation, we show pTp_{T} spectra of charged pions obtained in 20-40% centrality Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 TeV in Fig. 2 (left). As an overall tendency, the core (corona) component dominates low (high) pTp_{T} regions, which is exactly the consequence of implementing the core–corona picture. However, against the naive expectation of the above tendency, there is a slight enhancement of the corona components at the very low pTp_{T} regions (pT<1p_{T}<1 GeV). This can be intuitively understood just as a result of the interplay between the two different shapes of pTp_{T} spectra: exponential for the core components and power law for the corona components. The hadronic productions at such low pTp_{T} regions in the pTp_{T} spectra of corona components originate from the feed-down from string fragmentation of non-equilibrated partons that lose their initial energy and momentum in dynamical initialization Kanakubo:2021qcw .

To see the influence of the existence of the corona components in the very low pTp_{T} on observables, four-particle cumulant of charged particles, c2{4}c_{2}\{4\}, as a function of the number of charged particles, NchN_{\mathrm{ch}}, produced near midrapidity obtained from Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 TeV is shown in Fig. 2 (right). For the kinematic ranges, c2{4}c_{2}\{4\} and NchN_{\mathrm{ch}} are obtained from charged particles with |η|<0.8|\eta|<0.8 and 0.2<pT<3.00.2<p_{T}<3.0 GeV which is the same ranges used in Ref. Acharya:2019vdf . The results from simulations switching off hadronic rescatterings and from the core components show the negative values of c2{4}c_{2}\{4\}, while those from the corona components are zero-consistent in the entire range of NchN_{\mathrm{ch}}. Notably, from the comparisons among those three results, one sees that the absolute values of c2{4}c_{2}\{4\} solely from the core components are diluted due to the existence of the corona contributions.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Left) Charged pion pTp_{T} spectra obtained from 20-40% centrality class of Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 TeV are shown in the upper panel. Fractions of core and corona contributions in each pTp_{T} bin are shown in the lower panel. (Right) Four-particle cumulant of charged particles as a function of the number of charged particles produced at midrapidity obtained in Pb+Pb collisions at sNN=2.76\sqrt{s_{\mathrm{NN}}}=2.76 TeV. The solid lines are guides to the eyes. In both left and right figures, results with switching off hadronic rescatterings are shown in orange crosses and their breakdowns into the core and corona contributions are shown in red diagonal crosses and blue triangles, respectively.

4 Summary

We reported new results from the updated version of the dynamical core–corona initialization framework. We found that the fractions of the core and corona components show clear scaling with multiplicity regardless of the system size or collision energies and that the core components become dominant above dNch/dη20\langle dN_{\mathrm{ch}}/d\eta\rangle\approx 20. We also showed that there are non-negligible contributions from corona components, which significantly affect c2{4}c_{2}\{4\} as a function of NchN_{\mathrm{ch}}. Our results suggest the importance of the non-equilibrium components even in heavy-ion collisions to extract the QGP properties quantitatively.

References

  • (1) J. Novak, K. Novak, S. Pratt, J. Vredevoogd, C. Coleman-Smith, R. Wolpert, Phys. Rev. C 89, 034917 (2014), 1303.5769
  • (2) E. Sangaline, S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024908 (2016), 1508.07017
  • (3) J.E. Bernhard, P.W. Marcy, C.E. Coleman-Smith, S. Huzurbazar, R.L. Wolpert, S.A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 91, 054910 (2015), 1502.00339
  • (4) J.E. Bernhard, J.S. Moreland, S.A. Bass, J. Liu, U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 94, 024907 (2016), 1605.03954
  • (5) J. Auvinen, J.E. Bernhard, S.A. Bass, I. Karpenko, Phys. Rev. C 97, 044905 (2018), 1706.03666
  • (6) J.E. Bernhard, J.S. Moreland, S.A. Bass, Nature Phys. 15, 1113 (2019)
  • (7) D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 242301 (2021), 2010.03928
  • (8) G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, R. Snellings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 202301 (2021), 2010.15130
  • (9) J. Auvinen, K.J. Eskola, P. Huovinen, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044911 (2020), 2006.12499
  • (10) J.E. Parkkila, A. Onnerstad, D.J. Kim, Phys. Rev. C 104, 054904 (2021), 2106.05019
  • (11) J. Adam et al. (ALICE), Nature Phys. 13, 535 (2017), 1606.07424
  • (12) Y. Kanakubo, M. Okai, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, PTEP 2018, 121D01 (2018), 1806.10329
  • (13) Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024912 (2020), 1910.10556
  • (14) Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C 105, 024905 (2022), 2108.07943
  • (15) K. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 152301 (2007), 0704.1270
  • (16) M. Okai, K. Kawaguchi, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C95, 054914 (2017), 1702.07541
  • (17) Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano (2022), 2207.13966
  • (18) T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008), 0710.3820
  • (19) C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, JHEP 10, 139 (2016), 1607.04434
  • (20) C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, H. Shah, JHEP 10, 134 (2018), 1806.10820
  • (21) Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C90, 021902 (2014), 1402.6469
  • (22) P. Huovinen, P. Petreczky, Nucl. Phys. A 837, 26 (2010), 0912.2541
  • (23) M. McNelis, D. Everett, U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun. 258, 107604 (2021), 1912.08271
  • (24) Y. Nara, N. Otuka, A. Ohnishi, K. Niita, S. Chiba, Phys. Rev. C 61, 024901 (2000), nucl-th/9904059
  • (25) S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 142301 (2019), 1903.01790