Interplay between core and corona from small to large systems
Abstract
We present new results in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC energies from the updated dynamical core–corona initialization framework (DCCI2). The fractions of final hadron yields originating from equilibrated and non-equilibrated components are extracted as functions of multiplicity. We find that the contributions from non-equilibrated components are non-negligible even in Pb+Pb collisions and affect -integrated multi-particle correlations. These suggest the importance of non-equilibrated components for the sophisticated extraction of properties of the quark gluon plasma from comparisons between dynamical frameworks and experimental data.
1 Introduction
The properties of the quark-gluon plasma (QGP) have been investigated through dynamical frameworks based on relativistic hydrodynamics. Recently, several attempts from dynamical frameworks are reported Novak:2013bqa ; Sangaline:2015isa ; Bernhard:2015hxa ; Bernhard:2016tnd ; Auvinen:2017fjw ; Bernhard:2019bmu ; JETSCAPE:2020shq ; Nijs:2020ors ; Auvinen:2020mpc ; Parkkila:2021tqq to quantitatively extract the QGP transport coefficients from the data-to-model comparison. This indicates that sophisticated description with dynamical frameworks is needed for a further investigation of transport coefficients. On the other hand, the possibility of the QGP formation in small colliding systems has been discussed following the report of strangeness enhancement in p+p collisions by the ALICE Collaboration ALICE:2017jyt . Thus, the extension of the applicability of those dynamical frameworks to small colliding systems is indispensable.
Motivated by these backgrounds, we build the dynamical core–corona initialization as a state-of-the-art dynamical framework that is capable of describing from small to large colliding systems Kanakubo:2018vkl ; Kanakubo:2019ogh ; Kanakubo:2021qcw . Under the core–corona picture Werner:2007bf , the system generated in high-energy nuclear collisions is described with two components: equilibrated matter (core) and non-equilibrated matter (corona). In our framework, we realize the dynamical description of the separation of the system into the core and corona by incorporating the picture with the novel dynamical initialization approach Okai:2017ofp .
2 Dynamical Core–Corona Initialization framework
Under the dynamical initialization approach, initial conditions of QGP fluids are generated dynamically via source terms of relativistic hydrodynamic equations. We assume that the system is described with the two components, QGP fluids as core and non-equilibrated partons as corona, respectively, and consider the energy and momentum conservation for the entire system generated in a collision. Thus, the depositions of energy and momentum from non-equilibrated partons become sources of QGP fluids, and which makes it possible to model the generation of initial conditions of QGP fluids with keeping the energy and momentum conservation of the entire system. The dynamical realization of the core–corona picture is attained by modeling the energy and momentum deposition rates of non-equilibrated partons. Based on the core–corona picture, non-equilibrated partons with low transverse momentum, , and in high-density regions are likely to deposit their energy and momentum while those with high and in low-density regions are not.
A brief summary of the latest version of our framework Kanakubo:2021qcw ; Kanakubo:2022ual is as follows: Initial conditions are phase-space distributions of partons after the final-state radiation obtained from Pythia8 Sjostrand:2007gs and Pythia8 Angantyr Bierlich:2016smv ; Bierlich:2018xfw for p+p and A+A collisions, respectively. The dynamical initialization is performed with those initially produced partons and the system is dynamically separated into the core and corona. The space-time evolution of the core, QGP fluids, is described with (3+1)-D ideal hydrodynamics Tachibana:2014lja by incorporating the equation of state 95-v.1.1 Huovinen:2009yb . Once temperatures of fluids become lower than a switching temperature, fluids are particlized with iS3D McNelis:2019auj , a Monte-Carlo sampler of hadrons from hydrodynamic fields. The non-equilibrium partons are hadronized via the Lund string fragmentation with Pythia8. Finally, those directly emitted hadrons are handed to Jam Nara:1999dz , a hadronic transport model that performs hadronic rescatterings and resonance decays.
3 Results
We simulate p+p and Pb+Pb collisions at the LHC energies with our framework. Some major parameters control the fraction of generated core and corona components. We determine them so that the full simulation results can reasonably describe the multiplicity dependence of the yield ratios of omega baryons to charged pions in p+p and Pb+Pb collisions Kanakubo:2021qcw 111 Note that some parameters are minor updated from Ref. Kanakubo:2021qcw . For details, see Ref. Kanakubo:2022ual . reported by the ALICE Collaboration ALICE:2017jyt . By fixing those parameters, we extract the fractions of hadron yields originating from core and corona as functions of multiplicity near mid-pseudo-rapidity () in p+p collisions at 7 and 13 TeV and Pb+Pb collisions at TeV as shown in Fig. 1. One sees that the fractions of core and corona components show clear multiplicity scaling regardless of the system size or collision energies. Thus, within our framework, final hadron yields can be one of the reasonable estimators to evaluate the fraction of equilibrated and non-equilibrated components. We also find that the fraction of core components becomes dominant when multiplicity exceeds . It should be also noted that the fraction of core (corona) components does not reach () even at the highest multiplicity bin in Pb+Pb collisions.

For a further investigation, we show spectra of charged pions obtained in 20-40% centrality Pb+Pb collisions at TeV in Fig. 2 (left). As an overall tendency, the core (corona) component dominates low (high) regions, which is exactly the consequence of implementing the core–corona picture. However, against the naive expectation of the above tendency, there is a slight enhancement of the corona components at the very low regions ( GeV). This can be intuitively understood just as a result of the interplay between the two different shapes of spectra: exponential for the core components and power law for the corona components. The hadronic productions at such low regions in the spectra of corona components originate from the feed-down from string fragmentation of non-equilibrated partons that lose their initial energy and momentum in dynamical initialization Kanakubo:2021qcw .
To see the influence of the existence of the corona components in the very low on observables, four-particle cumulant of charged particles, , as a function of the number of charged particles, , produced near midrapidity obtained from Pb+Pb collisions at TeV is shown in Fig. 2 (right). For the kinematic ranges, and are obtained from charged particles with and GeV which is the same ranges used in Ref. Acharya:2019vdf . The results from simulations switching off hadronic rescatterings and from the core components show the negative values of , while those from the corona components are zero-consistent in the entire range of . Notably, from the comparisons among those three results, one sees that the absolute values of solely from the core components are diluted due to the existence of the corona contributions.


4 Summary
We reported new results from the updated version of the dynamical core–corona initialization framework. We found that the fractions of the core and corona components show clear scaling with multiplicity regardless of the system size or collision energies and that the core components become dominant above . We also showed that there are non-negligible contributions from corona components, which significantly affect as a function of . Our results suggest the importance of the non-equilibrium components even in heavy-ion collisions to extract the QGP properties quantitatively.
References
- (1) J. Novak, K. Novak, S. Pratt, J. Vredevoogd, C. Coleman-Smith, R. Wolpert, Phys. Rev. C 89, 034917 (2014), 1303.5769
- (2) E. Sangaline, S. Pratt, Phys. Rev. C 93, 024908 (2016), 1508.07017
- (3) J.E. Bernhard, P.W. Marcy, C.E. Coleman-Smith, S. Huzurbazar, R.L. Wolpert, S.A. Bass, Phys. Rev. C 91, 054910 (2015), 1502.00339
- (4) J.E. Bernhard, J.S. Moreland, S.A. Bass, J. Liu, U. Heinz, Phys. Rev. C 94, 024907 (2016), 1605.03954
- (5) J. Auvinen, J.E. Bernhard, S.A. Bass, I. Karpenko, Phys. Rev. C 97, 044905 (2018), 1706.03666
- (6) J.E. Bernhard, J.S. Moreland, S.A. Bass, Nature Phys. 15, 1113 (2019)
- (7) D. Everett et al. (JETSCAPE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 242301 (2021), 2010.03928
- (8) G. Nijs, W. van der Schee, U. Gürsoy, R. Snellings, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 202301 (2021), 2010.15130
- (9) J. Auvinen, K.J. Eskola, P. Huovinen, H. Niemi, R. Paatelainen, P. Petreczky, Phys. Rev. C 102, 044911 (2020), 2006.12499
- (10) J.E. Parkkila, A. Onnerstad, D.J. Kim, Phys. Rev. C 104, 054904 (2021), 2106.05019
- (11) J. Adam et al. (ALICE), Nature Phys. 13, 535 (2017), 1606.07424
- (12) Y. Kanakubo, M. Okai, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, PTEP 2018, 121D01 (2018), 1806.10329
- (13) Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C 101, 024912 (2020), 1910.10556
- (14) Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C 105, 024905 (2022), 2108.07943
- (15) K. Werner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 152301 (2007), 0704.1270
- (16) M. Okai, K. Kawaguchi, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C95, 054914 (2017), 1702.07541
- (17) Y. Kanakubo, Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano (2022), 2207.13966
- (18) T. Sjostrand, S. Mrenna, P.Z. Skands, Comput. Phys. Commun. 178, 852 (2008), 0710.3820
- (19) C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, JHEP 10, 139 (2016), 1607.04434
- (20) C. Bierlich, G. Gustafson, L. Lönnblad, H. Shah, JHEP 10, 134 (2018), 1806.10820
- (21) Y. Tachibana, T. Hirano, Phys. Rev. C90, 021902 (2014), 1402.6469
- (22) P. Huovinen, P. Petreczky, Nucl. Phys. A 837, 26 (2010), 0912.2541
- (23) M. McNelis, D. Everett, U. Heinz, Comput. Phys. Commun. 258, 107604 (2021), 1912.08271
- (24) Y. Nara, N. Otuka, A. Ohnishi, K. Niita, S. Chiba, Phys. Rev. C 61, 024901 (2000), nucl-th/9904059
- (25) S. Acharya et al. (ALICE), Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 142301 (2019), 1903.01790