Inspiral and Plunging Orbits in Kerr-Newman Spacetimes
Yu-Chung Ko
Da-Shin Lee
[email protected]Chi-Yong Lin
[email protected]
Department of Physics, National Dong Hwa University, Hualien, Taiwan, Republic of China
Abstract
We present the analytical solutions for the trajectories of particles that spiral and plunge inward the event horizon along the timelike geodesics following general non-equatorial paths within Kerr-Newman spacetimes.
Our studies encompass both bound and unbound motions.
The solutions can be written in terms of the elliptical integrals and the Jacobian elliptic functions of manifestly real functions of the Mino time.
They can respectively reduce to the Kerr, Reissner-Nordstrm, and Schwarzschild black holes in certain limits of the spin and charge of the black holes, and can be compared with the known ones restricted in equatorial motion.
These explicit solutions may have some implications for the gravitational wave emission from extreme mass-ratio inspirals.
pacs:
04.70.-s, 04.70.Bw, 04.80.Cc
I Introduction
Recent detections of gravitational waves emitted from the merger of binary systems have confirmed Einstein’s century-old prediction as a consequence of general relativity [1, 2, 3].
The capture of the spectacular images of supermassive black holes M87* at the center of M87 galaxy [4]
and Sgr A* at the center of our galaxy [5]
leads to another scientific achievement of a direct evidence of the existence of black holes.
The black hole is one of the mysterious stellar objects, and it is the solution derived from the Einstein’s field equations [6, 7].
In astrophysics, extreme mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs), which consist of a stellar mass object orbiting around a massive black hole, have recently received considerable attention.
The goal is to analyze gravitational wave signals to accurately test the predictions of general relativity in its strong regime.
Gravitational wave signals generated through EMRIs, which are key sources of low frequency gravitational waves and to be observed in the planned space-based Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), provides an opportunity to measure various fascinating properties of supermassive black holes [8, 9, 10, 11, 12].
The present work is motivated by EMRIs, which can be approximated as a light body travels along the geodesic of the background spacetime of a massive black hole.
In particular, the recent studies in [13, 14] have been devoted to inspirals of the particle on the equatorial plane asymptotically from the innermost stable circular orbits (ISCO) of Kerr black holes.
They also derive a simple expression for the equatorial radial flow from the ISCO relevant to the dynamics of the accretion disk.
These exact solutions may have applications to the generated gravitational waveforms arising from EMRIs [10] as well as constructing theories of black hole accretion [15, 16, 18, 17, 19].
Additionally, the work by [20, 21] broadens the investigation of equatorial motion to encompass generic non-equatorial orbits in Kerr black holes.
In the family of the Kerr black holes
due to the underlying spacetime symmetry the dynamics possesses two conserved quantities, the energy and the azimuthal angular momentum of the particle.
Nevertheless, the existence of the third conserved quantity, discovered in the sixties and known nowadays as Carter constant, renders the geodesic equations as a set of first-order differential equations [22].
Later, the introduction of the Mino time [23] further fully decouples the equations of motions with the solutions given in terms of the elliptical functions [24, 25].
In our previous paper [26], we have studied the null and time-like geodesics of the light and the neutral particles respectively in the exterior of Kerr-Newman black holes.
We then obtain the solutions of the trajectories written in terms of the elliptical integrals and the Jacobi elliptic functions [27], in which the orbits are manifestly real functions of the Mino time and also the initial conditions can be explicitly specified [28].
In this work, we will mainly focus on the infalling particles into the Kerr-Newman black holes in general nonequatorial motion.
Theoretical considerations, together with recent observations of structures near Sgr A* by the GRAVITY experiment [29], indicate possible presence of a small electric charge of central supermassive black hole [30, 31].
Thus, it is of great interest to explore the geodesic dynamics in the Kerr-Newman black hole [32].
Layout of the paper is as follows.
In Sec. II, a mini review of the time-like geodesic equations is provided with three conserved quantities of a particle, the energy, azimuthal angular momentum, and Carter constant.
The equations of motion can be recast into integral forms involving two effective potentials.
In particular, the roots of the radial potential determine the different types of the infalling trajectories of particles to black holes [33].
Sec. III focuses on the parameter regime of the conserved quantities to have triple roots giving the radius of the innermost stable spherical orbits (ISSO) [34].
The analytical solutions of the infalling orbits are derived for the case that the particle starts from the coordinate slightly less than that of the ISSO.
The two additional infalling orbits of interest are determined by the roots of the radial potential, consisting of a pair of complex roots and two real roots.
In Sec. IV, we consider bound motion with one of the real roots inside the horizon and the other outside the horizon.
In this case, the particle motion is bound by the turning point from the real root outside the horizon.
In Sec. V we will consider unbound motion, in which both real roots are inside the event horizon.
The exact solutions for plunging trajectories are given and illustrative examples for such trajectories are plotted.
In VI the conclusions are drawn.
For the clarity of notation and the completeness of the paper, Appendixes A and B provide some of relevant formulas derived in the earlier publications [26, 36].
II Equation of motion for time-like geodesics
We start from a summary of the equations of motion for the particle in the Kerr-Newman black hole exterior.
We work with the Boyer-Lindquist coordinates . The spacetime of
the exterior of the Kerr-Newman black hole with the gravitational mass , angular momentum , and angular momentum per unit mass is described by the metric
(1)
where
and .
The roots of determine outer/inner event horizons as
(2)
We assume that throughout the paper.
For the asymptotically flat, stationary, and axial-symmetric black holes, the metric is independent of and .
Thus, the conserved quantities are energy and azimuthal angular momentum of the particle along a geodesic.
These can be constructed through the four momentum , defined in terms of the proper time and the mass of the particle as
(3)
(4)
Additionally, another conserved quantity is the Carter constant explicitly obtained by
(5)
Together with the time-like geodesics, , one obtains the equations of motion
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
where we have normalized , , and by the mass of the particle
(10)
The symbols and are defined by the 4-velocity of the particle.
Moreover, the radial potential in (6) and and angular potential in (7) are obtained as
(11)
(12)
As well known [23], the set of equations of motion (6)-(9) can be fully decoupled by introducing the so-called Mino time defined as
(13)
For the source point and observer point , the integral forms of the equations above can be rewritten as [28]
(14)
(15)
(16)
where the integrals , , and involve the radial potential
(17)
(18)
(19)
The angular integrals are
(20)
(21)
(22)
The radial potential is given by a quartic polynomial and the types of its roots play essential roles in the classification of different orbits.
In the previous work [26, 36], we have shown the exact solutions to some of the cases of both null and time-like geodesics.
For the present work, we will mainly focus on the infalling orbits of the bound and the unbound motion at the black hole exterior.
In this context, we will consider three types of such orbits in the subsequent sections.
The discussion of the angular potential and the integrals involved has been presented in Ref. [26]. For the sake of completeness, we will provide a short summary in Appendix A.
Before ending this section, let us introduce a few notations that will be used in the subsequent sections.
Related to we define the integrals
(23)
(24)
In terms of , , and we can rewrite (18) and (19) as follows
(25)
(26)
III INSPIRAL ORBITS IN BOUND MOTION
According to previous studies of radial potential [26], by examining different ranges of the parameters and for bound motion (), it is clear that there are two distinct categories of infalling motion that traverse the horizon and enter the black hole.
One is that the particle starts from , where the radius of the ISSO orbit is within the parameters located at A and B in Fig. 1,
spirals and then plunge into the horizon of the black holes [37, 38].
The other one is starting from , with the parameters of C and D in Fig. 5, and plunge through the horizon of the black holes.
Figure 1:
The main graphics shows the parametric plot of versus . The triple roots are the solutions of the equations .
The inset illustrates the behavior of the radial potential with the parameters located at A and B. The case of B has , which is an example of equatorial motion.
We first consider the particle starts from .
The solutions along the direction can be obtained from the inversion of (14) with the integral in (17), where the radial potential (11) is given in the case of the triple root located at the ISSO radius, namely , and the initial is set at .
So, from the integral (14) and (17),
we can have the Mino time as the function of
(27)
The particle moves toward the horizon with . Thus, the inverse of (27) leads to
(28)
where
(29)
The solution (28) of the coordinate involves the triple root of the radial potential, which can be determined as follows.
From the double root solutions [26], two constants of motion in the case of spherical orbits are given by
(30)
(31)
The subscript ”ss” means the spherical orbits with , which denotes the two types of motion with respect to the relative sign between the black hole’s spin and the azimuthal angular of the particle (see Section III C of [26]).
Together with the two relations above, an additional equation from determines the triple roots.
We have found the radius of satisfying the following equation
(32)
where
(33)
We proceed by evaluating the coordinates and using (15) and (16), which involve not only the angular integrals and , but also the radial integrals (18) and (19).
With the help of (25) and (26), we first rewrite (18) and (19) as
(34)
(35)
For the present case of the triple roots, the calculation of the integrals is straightforward and one can express and in terms of elementary functions,
(36)
(37)
(38)
It is worthwhile to mention that
, , are obtained by evaluating , , at of the initial condition, that is,
.
The solutions of and can be constructed from (18), (21) and (19) and (22) through (15) and (16).
Together with the solutions along and directions in (28) and (90), they are infalling motions of the general nonequatorial orbits in the Kerr-Newman exterior.
An illustrative example is shown in Fig. 2 with the parameters of the case A in Fig. 1.
The particle starts by inspiraling around and then plunges into the black hole’s horizon.
Figure 2:
An illustrative example of nonequatorial orbit with parameters A of Fig. 1.
In this case, the particle starts from and inspirals into the black hole after many azimuthal and longitudinal revolutions.
From the top view one notices the very different time scales of the spiralling and plunging phases
For the particle initially at , the solution (28) gives obtained from in (29) when , meaning that the particle will stay in spherical motion with the radius. However, for of our interest, as reaches the outer horizon ,
it takes finite Mino time .
Nevertheless, because of the function in (36), as , giving the coordinate time and the azimuthal angle observed in the asymptotical flat regime.
The above expressions can be further reduced to the Kerr black hole case by sending in [20].
As for the contributions to the evolution of the angle in (15) from the integrals involving the radial potential , one can write the function in by function through . Then, the remaining terms in (34) directly proportional to are the same in [20]. Together with (93) of the integrals involving the potential , the variables and defined in [20] can be related to the roots of by
and , leading to , which gives the same expression in [20] from (93).
One of the interesting cases is considering the equatorial motion by taking and limits in the results above.
The particle starts from the coordinate slightly less than the radius of innermost circular motion .
In particular, and the solution of in (15) simplifies to [26, 36]
(39)
where is given by (34).
In addition, one can replace Mino time by the coordinate through Eq. (27).
Then the infalling solution of the angle
on the equatorial plane
can be expressed as a function of ,
(40)
Likewise, for the equatorial orbits, Eq. (16) with gives
(41)
where has been calculated in (35). Substituting to replace , we find
(42)
As for the initial conditions one can determine and by and vanishing at the initial .
The corresponding trajectories are shown in Fig. 3, with the additional parameter apart from of the black holes.
This generalizes the solution in [13] for the Kerr black holes, where the particle starts from at and inspirals to the event horizon.
In the limit of where , , and , the first term of Eq.(40) reduces to the corresponding term of in [13]. Together with defined in [13], one can make the replacement
(43)
to reproduce the terms.
One of the limiting cases that can significantly simplify the above expressions is to consider the extremal limit of the Kerr black hole, . For giving , and for the extremal black holes, the ISCO radius for direct orbits is on the event horizon.
Here we focus on the extremal retrograde motion with , and .
Notice that in the extremal black holes, and collapse into
the same value.
Then the solutions can be reduced into the known ones [13, 14]
(44)
(45)
Figure 3:
Illustration of the orbit on the equatorial plane with the parameters of B in Fig. 1. The particle starts from and inspirals into the black hole horizon.
Another limiting case is considering the Reissner Nordstrm (RN) black hole.
Since leading to the spherically symmetric metric,
the general motion can be studied by considering equatorial motions. The coefficients of the terms of the above expressions (40) all vanish.
The expressions of and can be simplified as
(46)
(47)
Further simplification occurs in the extremal limit. For in the RN black holes, , and with , , and , (46) and (47) can have such a simple form
(48)
(49)
Finally, in the limits of and we have the case of Schwarzschild black hole, with the spherical symmetric metric.
The horizons become and , and the general motion can be considered in the equatorial plane.
Thus, with the further ISCO inputs in this case, , , and , the solutions become as simple as
(50)
(51)
We then recover the results of two recent publications [13, 14].
Figure 4:
The plots show the variation of azimuthal angle as a function of for the inspire bound motion for various black-hole models, including Kerr-Newman (), Kerr-extremal () and RN ().
In the figure, the blue curve and red curves illustrate the direct and retrograde orbits, respectively. See the text for more discussion.
It is then of great interest to plot and observe how the azimuthal angle depends on the evaluation of coordinate , as illustrated for a few exemplary cases in Fig. 4.
In particular, when the motion approaches the horizon, the angle diverges for the spinning black holes whereas it remains finite for non-spinning black holes.
From Eq. (46) for RN black holes and Eq. (50) for Schwarzschild black holes, smoothly changes across the horizon.
Thus, another usefulness of the obtained result in (40) is to examine the behavior of across the horizon. The divergence in the azimuthal angle arises from the terms and the straightforward calculations shows that
. However, for the extremal Kerr-Newman black holes where , the additional divergence in the coefficients of the terms in (40) shifts the leading order divergence into that of in (44), apart from the divergence. However, for the extremal Kerr black holes, from (44), where the divergence disappears.
The dramatic difference in the behavior of the azimuthal angle across the horizon has been found
on equatorial infalling trajectories in Kerr black holes [13, 14]. The same types of phenomena are also seen on infalling trajectories of general nonequatorial orbits in Kerr-Newman black holes. Notice that in all cases, the coordinate time as .
This finding may have some implications for the gravitational wave emission measured by an observer far away from the black holes [10] as in the study of another interesting trajectories of homoclinic orbits in [35, 36].
IV Plunging ORBITS IN BOUND MOTION
Another bound orbit, in which particles eventually fall into the black hole, is the motion with the parameters of C and D in Fig. 5.
In this case, there are two real roots, being inside the inner horizon, outside the outer horizon, and a pair of the complex-conjugated roots .
Assuming that the particle starts from ,
it will either plunge directly into the black hole or travel toward the root , return back and plunge into the black hole, in the absence of any other real root along its trajectory.
This section is devoted to finding the analytical solution for the orbit in this case of and .
Figure 5:
The graphics shows the portion of parameter space bound by the double root solution, .
The equation =0 with parameters in the blue zone have complex roots, , so that, a particle in this region, say C or D, and starts from will plunge directly into the black hole horizon.
The inset shows the behavior of the radial potential for the case of the parameters located in C and D.
The solutions in the present cases are expressed in a similar form as in the previous section.
The integration of (14) is straightforward, but elliptical integrals and the Jacobi elliptic functions are involved for the representation of the solutions [27].
We find after some algebra
(52)
where is the incomplete elliptic integral of the first kind. The two parameters of the elliptic integrals are
(53)
and
(54)
where we have used the short notations
(55)
With the help of the Jacobian elliptic cosine function [27] one finds the inversion of (52) as
(56)
where
(57)
Notice that , , and for , . The Jacobian elliptic cosine function is the real-valued function.
The solutions of the coordinates and involve the integrals and given in (25) and (26).
In the present case, the integration of , , and is direct, but the results have cumbersome representations:
(58)
(59)
(60)
In the formulas above, the parameters of the functions and are related with the roots of as follows
(61)
(62)
where is the Jacobi amplitude function.
The quantities , , and are obtained by evaluating , , and at of the initial condition, .
Finally, and are the integral of Jacobian elliptic cosine function,
(63)
(64)
in which
(65)
In particular, for where , the solutions are the real-valued functions.
We then apply the exact solution obtained above to the parameters set C of Fig. 5.
In this case, , , and ,
with the black hole parameters and .
Fig. 6 shows that the particle stars from the initial position , , and and it falls almost directly into the black hole.
Figure 6:
Illustration of an orbit off the equatorial plane with the parameters of C in Fig. 5. In this case the particle starts from and plunges directly into the black hole horizon.
From the above general formulas one obtains the case of the equatorial motion, in which and .
The bound plunge solution of the coordinates and can be rewritten as the function of as follows
(66)
(67)
where
(68)
(69)
(70)
Fig. 7 shows an exemplary orbit of this type using the these solutions.
Figure 7:
Illustration of an orbit on the equatorial plane with the parameters of D in Fig. 5.
The particle initiates its journey at point , moves outward, reaches the turning point at , and then reverses its course, plunging back into the black hole.
The expression can also be converted into the solutions of the Kerr and RN black holes by taking the respective and limit.
For the Kerr black hole, one can substitute straightforwardly and the root into the definition of and in (54) and (55), as well as the solutions (66) and (67).
Nevertheless, in the RN black hole the limits of but give huge simplification. The formula (66) becomes
(71)
whereas the solution of remains the same form as in (67) in the corresponding limits.
In the Schwarschild black hole where , two event horizons, , giving , together with , lead to the further simplification from (71) and (67).
One usefulness of the analytical formulas is to explore the changes of azimuthal angle as the motion crosses the horizon. In particular for the equatorial motion, as , the term of in (66) due to the function of in (63) gives the logarithmic divergence, namely . However, in the extremal case when , the extra divergence occurs in the coefficient of so that the leading order divergence becomes . In the case of for non spinning black hole, the coefficient of vanishes and the angle smoothly changes across the horizon. The corresponding plot is shown in Fig. 8.
Figure 8:
The plots show the as a function of for bound motion with the various black holes including Kerr-Newman (), Kerr-extremal () and RN ().
In this plot, the red and blue curves illustrate the examples of direct and retrograde orbits, respectively.
V Plunging ORBITS IN UNBOUND MOTION
For unbound motion (), the particle may start from the spatial infinity characterized by the constants of motion with the azimuthal angular momentum , the energy , and the Carter constant .
In this section we consider the parameters mainly in the E regime shown in Fig. 9, in which the roots of the radial potential have the properties, and .
This means that there is no turning point in the black hole exterior and the particle starting from the spatial infinity will plunge directly into the black hole.
Figure 9:
The graphics shows the portion of parameter space limited by the double root solution, and .
For the region of the parameter space for E and F, the roots and are complex, and .
The inset shows the details of the roots of illustrative cases E and F in the main figure . See the text for more discussion.
The main propose here is also to derive the exact solutions for the coordinates , , , and (We have added the upper index for the unbound case).
While the procedure is identical to that of the previous two sections, special care is required due to differences in the properties of the roots.
The counterpart of Eq. (52) becomes
(72)
where
(73)
(74)
and
(75)
Notice that and have different combinations of roots compared to the bound case (55).
The evolution of the coordinate is then
(76)
where
(77)
Once again, the specified conditions—, , and , together with the inequality ensure that the Jacobian elliptic cosine function in Eq. (76) remains a real-valued function.
The missing pieces for a complete description of the motions are the unbound version of equations (25) and (26), in which the integral (23) and (24) have been solved in Sec. IV. The results can be written as follows
(78)
(79)
(80)
where the functions and have been defined in (63) and (64) and the unbound version of the parameters now read as
(81)
(82)
As before, the initial conditions , , are obtained by evaluating , , at of the initial condition.
Also, for in the functions (63) and , we have now , where , which ensure that the solutions are real-valued functions. Fig. 10 illustrates the orbits with the parameters of E in Fig. 9, where , , and .
Figure 10:
Illustration of a general nonequatorial plunging orbit exemplifies with the parameters E in Fig. 9. In this case and the particle starts from spatial infinity and infalls directly into the black horizon. Figure 11:
Illustration of an equatorial inspiral orbit with the parameters in the F region in Fig. 9 for where the particle starts from spatial infinity and plunge directly into the horizon.
Following the same steps of the previous sections, one can straightforwardly calculate the trajectories on the equatorial plane.
The solutions of and as the function of can be written as follows
(83)
(84)
where
(85)
(86)
(87)
Fig. 11 shows the orbit of the particle with the parameters in F in Fig. 9.
Figure 12:
The plots show the as a function of for unbond infalling motion, with the various black hole including Kerr-Newman (), Kerr extremal () and RN ().
The blue and red curves show the examples of direct and retrograde orbits, respectively.
In the Kerr black hole, for , the solutions are given by taking to (83) and (84). In the RN black hole for but , Eq. (83) can be significantly simplified as
(88)
In the Schwarschild black hole, and the root further simplify
the RN solution above.
Nevertheless, the solution of in various black holes remains the same form as (84) after taking the proper limits.
The behavior of the azimuthal angle as the motion crosses the horizon shares the same features as in bound motion. In particular for the equatorial motion, as crossing the horizon, the term of in (83) due to the function of in (63) gives the logarithmic divergence in general Kerr-Newman black holes. However, in the extremal case, the leading order divergence becomes . In the case of for non spinning black hole, again the coefficient of vanishes and the angle smoothly changes across the horizon. The corresponding plot is shown in Fig. 12.
VI Conclusions
In this paper, we analytically derive the solutions of infalling orbits in the context of general nonequatorial motion in the Kerr-Newman black holes, considering both bound and unbound motion.
These solutions can be written in terms of the elliptical integrals and the Jacobian elliptic functions of manifestly real functions of the Mino time.
Various limits have been taken to show the respective solutions in Kerr, Reissner-Nordstrm, and Schwarzschild black holes.
In the case of the bound motion, we extend the study of [13, 14] on equatorial motion to consider that the particle starts from and then inspirals into the black hole on general nonequatorial motion.
In the limits of and restricting on the equatorial plane, the obtained solutions reduces to the ones in [13, 14] .
We also consider the other types of the plunge motion, with the values of
, , and shown in Fig.5.
In these cases, one has two real-valued roots of the radial potential, one inside the horizon, , and the other outside the horizon, .
Thus, the particle starts from and can either travel toward the , come back and then plunge directly into the black hole or travel directly into the black hole.
As for the unbound state, we showed the parameters , , and in Fig.9.
Interestingly, while the two real-valued roots and are inside the event horizon, the other two roots are complex conjugate pair, .
The particle starts from the spatial infinity and will plunge directly into the black holes.
The analytical solutions allow us, in particular, to explore the behavior of the variation of azimuthal angle as the equatorial motion crosses the horizon.
In general Kerr-Newman black holes, the angle diverges as . However, in the extremal case, the leading order divergence becomes .
In the case of non spinning black hole, the angle smoothly changes across the horizon.
The dramatic difference in the behavior of the azimuthal angle across the horizon, which has been found in equatorial infalling orbits in Kerr black holes [13, 14], is also seen in Kerr-Newman black holes in general nonequatorial orbits. This may have some implications for the associated gravitational wave emission observed far away from the black holes.
These exact solutions of the spiral and plunge motions into the black hole are also of astrophysical interest due to the fact that they have direct relevance to black hole accretion phenomena. These explicit solutions may have applications to the numerical accretion as well as extending current theories of black hole accretion [15, 16, 18, 17].
Appendix A The angular potential and the integrals , , and
The detailed studies related to the potential in the direction can be found in the papers [28, 26, 36]. Here we summarize some of the relevant parts for the completeness of presentation.
The angular potential (12) for the particle can be rewritten in terms of
and the equation of motion requires , which restricts the parameter space of , , and (see Fig. 9 in [26]).
The roots of can be written as [28],
(89)
with
, which give the boundaries of the parameter space.
For positive and nonzero the particle starts off from the black hole exterior, is the only positive root, which in turn gives two roots at .
The particle travels between the southern and northern hemispheres crossing the equator at .
The solution of the coordinate can be obtained by an
inversion of (14) [28, 26]
(90)
where Mino time
(91)
and sn denotes the Jacobi Elliptical sine function. In (91) counts the times the trajectory passes through the turning points and .
The function is
(92)
The evolution of coordinates and in (15) and (16) involves the integrals (21) and (22), which can expressed as follows [26]
(93)
(94)
(95)
(96)
In the formulas above and are the incomplete elliptic integral of the second and third kinds, respectively.
Also the prime denotes the derivative with respect to the second argument,
(97)
Appendix B The radial potential and its roots
As for the radial potential (11), it is a quartic polynomial. We then rewrite
as follows
(98)
where the coefficients functions are given in terms constants of motion and parameters of the black hole as
(99)
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
Furthermore, it is useful to represent the radial potential using its roots, namely
(104)
The different dynamical behaviors of the system are characterized by the positions of these roots. See figures (1), (5), (9), and also References [28, 26].
The representation of roots of a quartic equation are well known, but cumbersome. We will write them down for the sake of unifying notation and ensuring the completeness of the work
(105)
(106)
(107)
(108)
where
(109)
and
(110)
with
(111)
, , and are the short notation for
(112)
(113)
(114)
Acknowledgements.
This work was supported in part by the National Science and Technology council (NSTC) of Taiwan, Republic of China.
References
[1]
B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations),
Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger,
Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 061102 (2016).
[2]
B. P. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations),
GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observing Runs,
Phys. Rev. X 9, 031040 (2019).
[3]
R. Abbott et al. (LIGO Scientific and Virgo Collaborations),
GWTC-2: Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run,
Phys. Rev. X 11, 021053 (2021).
[4]
K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope),
First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole,
Astrophys. J. 875, L1 (2019).
[5]
K. Akiyama et al. (Event Horizon Telescope),
First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way,
Astrophys. J. Lett. 930, L12 (2022).
[6]
C. W. Misner, K. S. Thorne, and J. A. Wheeler,
Gravitation
(W. H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, 1973).
[7]
S. Chandrasekhar,
The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes,
International Series of Monographs on Physics (Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, 1992).
[8]
eLISA Consortium et al., The gravitational universe, arXiv:1305.5720.
[9]
Enrico Barausse et al., Prospects for fundamental physics with LISA, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 52, 81 (2020).
[10]
LISA Consortium Waveform Working Group,
Waveform Modelling for the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna,
arXiv:2311.01300.
[11]
Stanislav Babak et al., Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V. Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys.Rev.D 95, 103012 (2017).
[12]
Bence Kocsis, Nicolas Yunes,and Abraham Loeb, Observable signatures of extreme mass-ratio in spiral black hole binaries embedded in thin accretion disks, Phys. Rev.D 84, 024032 (2011).
[13]
Andrew Mummery and Steven Balbus, Inspirals from the Innermost Stable Circular Orbit of Kerr Black Holes: Exact Solutions and Universal Radial Flow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 161101 (2022).
[14]
Andrew Mummery and Steven Balbus, A complete characterisation of the orbital shapes of the non-circular Kerr geodesic solutions with circular orbit constants of motion, Phys. Rev. D 107, 124058 (2023).
[15]
A. C. Fabian et.al, The soft state of the black hole transient source MAXIJ1820+070:
emission from the edge of the plunge region?, MNRAS 493, 5389 (2020)
[16]
Don N. Page and Kip S. Thorne, Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion Disk, The Astrophysical Journal 191, 499 (1974).
[17]
Jeremy D. Schnittman, Julian H. Krolik, and Scott C. Noble, Disk Emission from Magneto-hydrodynamic Simulations of Spinning Black Holes, The Astrophysical Journal 819, 48 (2016).
[18]
Christopher S. Reynolds and Mitchell C. Begelman,Intermittent radio galaxies and source statistics, The Astrophysical Journal 487, L135 (1997).
[19]
Puttarak Jai-akson, Auttakit Chatrabhuti, Oleg Evnin, Luis Lehner, Black hole merger estimates in Einstein-Maxwell and Einstein-Maxwell-dilaton gravity, Phys. Rev. D 96, 044031 (2017).
[20]
Conor Dyson, Maarten van de Meent, Kerr-fully Diving into the Abyss: Analytic Solutions to Plunging Geodesics in Kerr, Class.Quant.Grav. 40, 19 (2023).
[21]
Conor Dyson, David Pereñiguez, Magnetic Black Holes: from Thomson Dipoles to the Penrose Process and Cosmic Censorship,
arXiv:2306.15751 [gr-qc].
[22]
B. Carter, Global Structure of the Kerr Family of Gravitational Fields, Phys. Rev. 174, 1559 (1968).
[23]
Y. Mino, Perturbative approach to an orbital evolution around a supermassive black hole, Phys. Rev. D 67, 084027 (2003).
[24]
W. Schmidt,
Celestial mechanics in Kerr spacetime,
Classical Quantum Gravity 19, 2743 (2002).
[25]
Ryuichi Fujita and Wataru Hikida,
Analytical solutions of bound timelike geodesic orbits in Kerr spacetime,
Classical Quantum Gravity 26, 135002 (2009).
[26]
Chen-Yu Wang, Da-Shin Lee, and Chi-Yong Lin, Null and time-like geodesics in Kerr-Newman black hole exterior,
Phys. Rev. D 106, 084048 (2022).
[27]
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,
Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, 9th ed. (Dover, New York, 1964).
[28]
S. E. Gralla and A. Lupsasca,
Null geodesics of the Kerr exterior,
Phys. Rev. D 101, 044032 (2020).
[29]
R. Abuter, et al. (GRAVITY Collaboration),
Detection of orbital motions near the last stable circular orbit of the massive black hole SgrA*
Astronom. Astrophys. 618, L10 (2018).
[30]
M. Zajacek, A. Tursunov, A. Eckart, and S. Britzen,
On the charge of the Galactic centre black hole,
Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 480, 4408 (2018).
[31]
M. Zajacek, A. Tursunov, A. Eckart, S. Britzen, E. Hackmann, V. Karas, Z. Stuchlik, B. Czerny, J.A. Zensus,
Constraining the charge of the Galactic Centre black hole,
J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1258, 012031 (2019).
[32]
Eva Hackmann and Hongxiao Xu,
Charged particle motion in Kerr-Newmann space-times,
Phys. Rev. D 87, 124030 (2013).
[33]
G. Compère, Y. Liu, and J. Long,
Classification of radial Kerr geodesic motion, Phys. Rev. D 105, 024075 (2022).
[34]
L. C. Stein and N. Warburton,
Location of the last stable orbit in Kerr spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 101, 064007
(2020).
[35]
Janna Levin, Gabe Perez-Giz, Homoclinic orbits around spinning black holes I: Exact solution
for the Kerr separatrix, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124013 (2009).
[36]
Yi-Ting Li, Chen-Yu Wang, Da-Shin Lee, and Chi-Yong Lin, Homoclinic orbits in Kerr-Newman black holes,
Phys. Rev. D 108, 044010 (2023).
[37]
Amos Ori and Kip S. Thorne,
Transition from inspiral to plunge for a compact body in a circular equatorial orbit around a massive, spinning black hole,
Phys. Rev. D 62, 124022 (2000).
[38]
R. O’Shaughnessy,
Transition from inspiral to plunge for eccentric equatorial Kerr orbits,
Phys. Rev. D 67, 044004 (2003).