This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

Impact of Majorana fermions on the Kondo state in the carbon nanotube quantum dot

D. Krychowski Institute of Molecular Physics, Polish Academy of Sciences
M. Smoluchowskiego 17, 60-179 Poznań, Poland
Abstract

We have studied the quantum conductance of the Kondo state in the carbon nanotube quantum dot (CNTQD) with side-attached multi-Majorana fermion states in topological superconductors (TSCs). The zero-energy Majorana fermions interfere with the fourfold degenerate states of the CNTQD in the spin-orbital Kondo regime. Using the extended Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson mean-field approach, we have analyzed the symmetry reduction of the SU(4) Kondo effect to the SU(3) Kondo state with a fractional charge in the system by increasing the tunneling strength to a single Majorana fermion (TSC). We observed the fractional quantum conductance, the residual impurity entropy, the enhancement of the thermoelectric power with two compensation points, the fractional linear and nonlinear Fano factor (FKF_{K}) and the spin polarization of the conductance. Two Majoranas (2TSC) in conjunction with the CNTQD have reduced the spin-orbital Kondo effect to the SU(2) Kondo state with 2e in the system. FKF_{K} contains information about the effective charge and the interaction between the quasiparticles, two- and three-body correlators and identifies the broken symmetry of the Kondo state. We discussed the local quadratic Casimir operator separately for the states associated with the Kondo effect and the Majorana fermion state to show the difference between the fluctuations of the pseudospin in both quantum channels. We have shown that the device coupled with three Majorana fermions (3TSC) achieves a quantized conductance 5/2(e2/h)5/2(e^{2}/h), conserves the U(1) charge symmetry at the electron-hole symmetry point and manifests the increase in nonlinear current and shot noise due to the entanglement in octuplets with opposite charge-leaking states. Furthermore, we have investigated the influence of the spin-orbit interaction in the CNTQD-TSC device on the quantum transport properties.

Kondo effect; topological qubits; Majorana fermions; CNTQD; shot noise
pacs:
72.10.Fk, 73.63.Kv, 71.27.+a, 85.35.Kt, 74.45.+c, 05.30.Pr

I Introduction

The quantum dot can be realized in the carbon nanotubes due to the quantization effect of the confinement potential [1, 2]. One of the interesting features in the low-dimensional systems is the Kondo effect [3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8], where the localized pseudospin or spin states on the quantum dot are screened by the conduction electrons in the leads. The system is in the new ground state, called the Kondo singlet, which opens the transport window in the Coulomb blockade region [4].

The screening effect plays one of the most important roles in the formation of the Kondo singlet [9]. One of the popular methods to solve the Kondo cloud problem is the numerical renormalization group (NRG) method [10], where the screening strongly depends on the number of sites in the Wilson chain and is based on deleting the states in the growing Hilbert space. In another method, the poor man’s scaling method, we solve the Kondo Hamiltonian (the effective Hamiltonian of the Anderson model reduced by the Schrieffer-Wolff canonical transformation using the projection operator technique). In the solution we observe an asymptotic strengthening of the Kondo exchange coupling, logarithmically proportional to the Kondo temperature. Other methods, which include the problem of spin-orbital fluctuations, the finite Coulomb interaction, the Fermi liquid behavior [11] and the scaling problem [12], are the symmetrized finite-U NCA (non-crossing approximation) [13], the equation of motion (EOM) method [14, 15], or the extended Kotliar-Ruckenstein slave-boson mean-field approach (KR-sbMFA)[16] based on path integral methods [17]. On the other hand, the Bethe ansatz approach (BAA) is reserved to the strong coupling limit (infinite-U) and is also limited to the number of states in the chain [18], which is a mapping between a set of quantum numbers and a set of momenta. This map is nonlinear and fully coupled. In this paper [19, 20], the authors showed that the single impurity Anderson model is completely integrable with finite U using the Bethe ansatz approach and solved the transcendent equations with the energies lying not far from the Fermi level. Formally, for non-trivial values of the interaction, Bethe’s equations form a transcendental system of equations that can’t be solved in closed form. However, as is often the case in statistical mechanics, it is hoped that moving to a thermodynamically large system will simplify matters somewhat. In any case, all these methods have some limitations, but in most general aspects they describe the N-orbital Anderson model with modifications.

The Kondo singlet has been realized in the heterostructure [21, 7] and molecular devices [22, 23, 24, 25], but was first discovered in the dilute alloys [9]. In contrast to heterostructure quantum dots [4, 7, 6], the intra- and inter-Coulomb interactions in carbon nanotube quantum dots (CNTQD) are comparable, which is an essential condition for the formation of the SU(4) Kondo effect [5, 2, 26, 27, 28]. In CNTQD, the Kondo temperature [26, 27, 3, 5] is three orders of magnitude higher than the milikelvin temperatures observed in GaAs quantum dots [4, 6]. These two aspects are the features that determine the experimental attractiveness of CNTQDs in the strongly correlated electron regime [29, 12, 17]. The Seebeck coefficient for the Kondo-correlated single quantum dot transistor is suppressed at the electron hole symmetry point and changes sign beyond this point [30, 31]. This is a result of the linear response theory [32] and is a consequence of Fermi liquid (FL) behavior. For temperatures below the Kondo temperature TKT_{K} only the linear coefficient contributes to the Seebeck effect and the thermoelectric power (TEP) is proportional to the ratio of the derivative of the quasiparticle densities to itself (the Mott’s formula) [33]. The Seebeck effect has also been observed in the Coulomb blockade regime [34]. The authors observed the large enhancement of the thermoelectric power (TEP) in a double quantum dot system due to interference and Coulomb correlation effect.

The model of CNTQD is described by the linear approach of graphene bands [8, 35]. The quantum numbers that characterize the carbon quantum dots are the spin, isospin (valley) and pseudospin (lattice) numbers. The source of the energy gap in semiconducting CNTQDs is the chirality of the nanotube (the gap is proportional to one over the diameter of the nanotube) and the perturbation effects (the perturbation gap is smaller than the geometry gap and proportional to one over the square of the diameter of the nanotube) [8, 2]. Despite the fact that the spin-orbit interaction (SOI) is negligible in graphene, the SOI has been uncovered in the semiconducting CNTQD [36, 5, 2]. In flat graphene, the symmetry forbids direct hopping between orbitals with opposite parity under the inversion. In a nanotube, the symmetry is broken by the curvature, and the SOI arises from the direct hybridization between the non-orthogonal orbitals on the A and the B sites in graphene [37, 38, 39, 2]. The spin-orbit coupling breaks the fourfold degeneracy in the shell of the CNTQD and leads to the ground state with two Kramers doublets [8] (opposite pairs in the spin and isospin sectors). Increasing the SOI changes the symmetry of the Kondo effect from SU(4) to SU(2) [35, 40, 41, 42, 43]. The SOI in CNTQD has two contributions: Zeeman (diagonal part in the A(B) lattice basis) and orbital (off-diagonal part). The value and sign of these interactions determine the ground state in the energy spectrum of holes and electrons on the multishell quantum dot. In general, the SOI is of the order of tens of meV [44, 2], but for the ultraclean semiconducting CNTQD the coupling is comparable to the Coulomb interaction. Special attention has been paid to the problem of the square dependence in the magnetic field of the CNTQD states [44] as a consequence of the narrow band gap in semiconducting CNTQD, which contributed to the spinful SU(3) Kondo state [45]. The observation of the SU(3) Kondo effect can be identified by localizing the quantum conductance to the characteristic value (9/4)(e2/h)(9/4)(e^{2}/h) [46].

One of the most important differences between SU(2) and SU(4) Kondo states in CNTQD, besides the conductance measurements, is the nonlinear shot noise detection using the lock-in technique [47, 28, 48, 49, 50]. The electronic transport is described by the free non-interacting quasiparticles around the equilibrium state (low bias). In the non-equilibrium regime, two-particle scattering processes dominate due to the residual interaction. Using the Fermi liquid theory [11, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57], the authors showed that the interaction parameter [58], called the Wilson ratio, takes the quantized values W=2W=2 for SU(2) and W=4/3W=4/3 for SU(4) Kondo states and changes the corresponding effective charges e [59]. For single Kondo QDs, the experimental measurements showed the three-body correlation function in the nonlinear conductance at finite magnetic field, validating the recent Fermi liquid theory in the nonequilibrium Kondo regime [60].

Majorana fermions are it own antiparticles originally proposed by Ettore Majorana [61]. They are called real fermion quasiparticles because of the real nature of the creation and annihilation operators [62]. These quasiparticles exhibit non-Abelian braiding properties [63, 62, 64] and the Majorana fermion states are associated with zero energy modes that occur in the Bogoliubov-de Gennes description of a paired condensate with non-Abelian exchange statistics [65]. The search for Majorana quasi-particle bound states in condensed matter systems is motivated in part by their potential use as topological qubits and possible applications in quantum computation. The Majorana qubits are predicted for quantum states in the fault-tolerant non-Abelian quantum processors [66, 67, 68, 63]. A pair of Majorana fermions can be combined into a complex Dirac fermionic state. The Majorana fermion in this composite complex fermion is half of a normal fermion, and is obtained as a superposition of two Majorana fermions. Each of the Majorana fermions is basically split into a real and an imaginary part of a fermion. The Majorana fermions exist at the edges of proximitized quantum wire by p-wave superconductor [69]. The states are spatially separated and protected from most types of decoherence. However, in [70] as a result, the authors showed that the Majorana qubit coherence and the fermion parity conservation cannot be immune to local perturbations during the braiding operations.

The statistical thermodynamic calculation based on the NRG method showed that the entropy of the quantum dot coupled to a single Majorana fermion leads to Stot/kB=ln[2]/2S_{tot}/k_{B}=\ln[2]/2 and corresponds to the NFL behavior, confirming the anyonic non-Abelian nature of the hybrid device [71]. The author presented the contribution of the impurity to the electron entropy as a function of the temperature for different values of the ratio of the Majorana tunneling rate.

Rasetti and Castagnoli argued that anyons could be used to perform quantum computations [72]. The idea of statistical mechanics in anyons was originated with Arovas et al. [73] and had previously been studied by Frank Wilczek [74]. The author mentioned that the interchange of two particles orbiting around the magnetic flux manifests itself as an arbitrary phase between bosons and fermions, and called the exotic state anyons. Other authors showed that the excitation spectrum of a half-quantum vortex in a p-wave superconductor contains a zero-energy Majorana fermion with non-Abelian statistics [75, 76, 77]. Haldane proposed that the reduction of the apparent Hilbert space dimension by non-orthogonality of states describes localized topological defects at different points in space is also seen in the fractional quantum Hall effect (FQHE), and seems to be the fundamental feature of the fractional statistics [78]. In [76] the authors suggest, that p-wave superfluids, and the Moore-Read state are predicted to support the simplest non-Abelian anyons - the Ising anyons. Their behavior can be understood in terms of Majorana fermion modes at the vortex cores, and it is argued that in 1d, non-Abelian and in particular SU(2) level-k statistics manifest themselves in fractional statistics. For k=2k=2, the authors have observed for the Ising anyons that the state counting of the internal Hilbert space associated with the non-Abelian statistics is equivalent to that of the Majorana fermion states coupled to the spinons [76].

The simplest model of the Majorana fermion is predicted by the Kitaev toy model which assumes the spinless topological superconductor (TSC) [69]. In real TSC, we should consider the polarization of the Majorana fermions in the Rashba and Dresselhaus 1d wire. The authors [79] introduced the Majorana pseudospin and showed that the local Majorana polarization is correlated with the transverse spin polarization. Other authors [80, 81] studied the selective equal spin Andreev reflections (SESARs) spectroscopy to detect the polarized Majorana quasiparticles appearing at the edges of the proximitized Rashba chain. In this paper the authors show under which conditions a pseudo-spin degree of freedom can be attributed to Majorana bound states (MBS). MBS correspond to class D and are related to the Z-topological invariant. Class DIII with mirror symmetry supports multiple MBS and is described by the Z2-invariant with an additional time-reversal symmetry [82].

Discussions remain divided regarding over the preparation and actual implementation of Majorana fermions in low-dimensional systems [83, 84, 85]. Regardless of the scientific dispute, the SU(2) Kondo effect in quantum dots can be used as a very precise detector of topologically protected Majorana states [86, 87]. There are currently several candidates for host boundary Majorana quasiparticles: vortices in two-dimensional (2d) px+ipyp_{x}+ip_{y} spinless superconductors [88], Moore-Reed type states in FQHE [89, 90], the surface of a 3d topological insulator in proximity to an s-wave superconductor [91], 2d semiconductors with strong spin-orbit coupling coupled to an s-wave superconductor with broken time-reversal symmetry (using a local ferromagnet [92, 93] or an external magnetic field [94]), domain walls in 1d p-wave topological superconductors [95], and helical Majorana modes appearing at the two ends of a 1d wire [96, 97]. In particular, the authors of the references [98] demonstrated in InSb nanowires with strong Rashba-type spin-orbit coupling, the artificial realization of a p-wave superconductor and the observation of a magnetic field-induced zero-bias conductance peak, as expected for a zero-energy Majorana fermion signature [99, 100]. In this setup, where the presence of a topological superconductor is controlled by the Zeeman gap, these systems require a delicate balance of the (spin-orbit coupling, magnetic field and chemical potential) to create the topological superconductor. The idea of 1d spinless p-wave superconductor based on the semiconducting nanowire, where spin-orbit coupling is used to shift the spin-up/down levels in the momentum space and Zeeman field, leading to spin splitting and spin texture at the Fermi level. A proximity induced SC gap within the spin-split levels would lead to an effective spinless p-wave SC [101].

Recently, a topological superconductor has been realized in 1d ferromagnetic atom chains [102], where the 1d system with a strong spin-orbit interaction is placed in proximity to a conventional s-type superconductor. Using high-resolution spectroscopic imaging techniques, the authors have demonstrated the spatially resolved signature of edge-bound Majorana fermions in Fe atom chains and the appearance of zero-energy states in the electronic density of states of the chains. Majorana fermion states are expected to be realized in class D topological superconductors (TSCs with broken time-reversal symmetry)[82]. However, Majorana zero modes can also appear in pairs in time-reversal invariant DIII class topological superconductors. These interesting types of Majorana fermions are called Majorana Kramers pairs [103, 104]. For example, chiral superconductors with px+ipyp_{x}+ip_{y} pairing state in 2d have a sharp topological distinction between the strong and weak pairing regime [103, 104, 87]. In the weak pairing regime, the gapless chiral Majorana states at the edge are topologically protected. In two dimensions, a time-reversal invariant topological defect of a Z2 non-trivial superconductor carries a Kramers pairs of Majorana fermions [105].

One of the interesting papers focuses on the aspect of Majorana-Klein hybridization: in [106, 107] the authors demonstrate a topological Kondo effect that implements the SO(M) Kondo problem for M Majorana lead couplings. These topological Kondo states give rise to robust non-Fermi liquid behavior, even for Fermi liquid leads, and to a quantum phase transition between the insulating and Kondo regimes when the leads form Luttinger liquids.

In another paper, the authors studied the interacting Majorana fermions [108]. This is quite a challenge. The simplest interactions between the Majorana degrees of freedom show an unusual non-local structure involving four distinct Majorana sites [109]. The authors [108] solved the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model and showed that correlated phases of matter with Majorana building blocks can lead to emergent spacetime supersymmetry (SUSY), topological order or Fibonacci topological phase, which are more exotic generalizations of Majorana fermions known as parafermions.

Returning to the issues discussed in this article, the previous theoretical work investigated the problem of the Majorana zero mode coupled to the spin Kondo state using NRG methods: in single [71, 110, 111] and double quantum dots [112, 113]. Several papers have discussed the thermoelectric effects of quantum dots coupled to side-attached TSCs in the Coulomb blockade regime [114, 115, 116] and in the T-shaped DQD system in the Kondo state side-attached to the Majorana fermion [117]. In these thermoelectric quantum devices, the thermopower changes sign and is fully spin polarized. Measurements of the Seebeck coefficient beyond the e-h symmetry point show strong enhancement and a violation of the Wiedeman-Franz law.

The Kondo cloud plays the role of an interference detector for Majorana fermions. In this article, we discuss the influence of weakly and strongly coupled multi-Majorana fermions on the spin-orbital SU(4) Kondo effect in the carbon nanotube quantum dot. We have coupled three TSC devices proximitized by AB superconducting pairing coat. SOI and SC leads to the Majoranization of the wire states of the zigzag CNT in the absence of a magnetic field. The Majorana states are indexed by the spin-orbital numbers and coupled to the fourfold degenerate states of the CNTQD. The Majorana-Kondo effect is observed for the strong coupling strength limit and manifests itself as the coexistence of the strongly correlated electrons and the topological Majorana states in the system. The spin-orbital type of the Majorana quasiparticles is chosen by the sign of the SOI. An alternative realization is proposed in the armchair CNT, where the electric field can induce the Majorana fermions [118].

The shot noise for the QD-TSC device in the weak coupling limit and for the SU(2) Kondo quantum dot is discussed in [119], where the the shot noise power for the linear voltage is quantized to (1/2)(e2/h)(1/2)(e^{2}/h). Alternatively results, using the Keldysh field integral description are presented in [120, 121], where the author suggests that in the Majorana state, for positive atomic level of the QD, we should observe two different fractional effective charges at low and high energies, e/e=1/2=1/2 and e/e=3/2=3/2, accessible at low and high bias voltages. In another paper [122] the authors analyzed the shot noise in a 1d Majorana chain fermion coupled to a normal metal, and found that the Fano factor is quantized to F=2F=2 for the single Majorana bound state (MBS) and to non-integer FF when both MBSs couple to the lead.

The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. II we discuss the Hamiltonian of the two-orbital Anderson model coupled with one, two and three topological superconducting wires (1TS, 2TS and 3TSC). In the subsections of Sec. III we demonstrate the detection of the symmetry reduction of the spin-orbital SU(4) Kondo effect to exotic SU(3) and SU(2) Kondo states in the quantum transport measurements (i.e. quantum conductance, thermoelectric power, linear and nonlinear shot noise). In the last part of the results we study the influence of the SOI on the Majorana-Kondo states. Finally, we summarize the results in the conclusions.

II Model of a CNTQD coupled to side-attached topological superconductors

We address the calculation to the system with quantum dot tunneling coupled to multi-Majorna fermions (Fig. 1). We model the carbon nanotube quantum dot (CNTQD) by using the two-orbital Anderson Hamiltonian with side-attached topological superconductors (TSCs):

=lsElsnls+lUnlnl+ssUn+1sn1s+\displaystyle{\mathcal{H}}=\sum_{ls}E_{ls}n_{ls}+\sum_{l}Un_{l\uparrow}n_{l\downarrow}+\sum_{ss^{\prime}}Un_{+1s}n_{-1s^{\prime}}+
kαlsEkαlsnkαls+kαlst0(ckαlsdls+h.c)+\displaystyle\sum_{k\alpha ls}E_{k\alpha ls}n_{k\alpha ls}+\sum_{k\alpha ls}t_{0}(c^{\dagger}_{k\alpha ls}d_{ls}+h.c)+ (1)
sit+1sγ+1s(d+1s+d+1s)+it1γ1(d1+d1),\displaystyle\sum_{s}it_{+1s}\gamma_{+1s}(d^{\dagger}_{+1s}+d_{+1s})+it_{-1\uparrow}\gamma_{-1\uparrow}(d^{\dagger}_{-1\uparrow}+d_{-1\uparrow}),

where the first term describes the energy of the spin-orbital quantum dot level (Els=Ed(Vg)+lsΔ/2E_{ls}=E_{d}(V_{g})+ls\Delta/2). Δ\Delta is the spin-orbit interaction (SOI) observed in the CNTQD [8, 2], which arises from the curvature of the carbon nanotube [39]. s=()s=\uparrow(\downarrow) and l=±1l=\pm 1 are the spin and orbital numbers. The second and third terms are the intra- and inter-Coulomb interactions in the system. The next two parts of the Hamiltonian (1) are related to the energy of the left and right electrodes EkαlsE_{k\alpha ls} (α=L,R\alpha=L,R) and the tunneling strength between the CNTQD and the normal electrodes (t0t_{0}). The last two terms are the tunneling terms of the Majorana fermions γls\gamma_{ls} with the QD states. The tunneling strength is given by tlst_{ls}, and in the paper we considered three types of hybrid systems: CNTQD-TSC (t+1=tt_{+1\uparrow}=t), CNTQD-2TSC (t+1=t1=tt_{+1\uparrow}=t_{-1\uparrow}=t) and CNTQD-3TSC device (where t+1s=t1=tt_{+1s}=t_{-1\uparrow}=t). The Majorana fermions are indexed by their spin-orbital number. All energies are given in Γ\Gamma units, where Γ=πt022W\Gamma=\frac{\pi t_{0}^{2}}{2W} is the tunnel coupling . 1/2W1/2W is the flat density of states in the electrode, inversely proportional to the half bandwidth (WW).

Using the extended slave-boson Kotliar-Ruckenstein mean-field approach [16, 40, 45], the Hamiltonian (1) can be written in the effective form:

~=lsE~lsnls(f)+Uνdνdν+3Ulstlstls+\displaystyle\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}=\sum_{ls}\widetilde{E}_{ls}n^{(f)}_{ls}+U\sum_{\nu}d^{\dagger}_{\nu}d_{\nu}+3U\sum_{ls}t^{\dagger}_{ls}t_{ls}+
6Uff+λ(1)λlslsQls+\displaystyle 6Uf^{\dagger}f+\lambda({\cal{I}}-1)-\lambda_{ls}\sum_{ls}Q_{ls}+ (2)
kαlst0(ckαlszlsfls+h.c)+it1γ1(z1f1+h.c)\displaystyle\sum_{k\alpha ls}t_{0}(c^{\dagger}_{k\alpha ls}z_{ls}f_{ls}+h.c)+it_{-1\uparrow}\gamma_{-1\uparrow}(z^{\dagger}_{-1\uparrow}f^{\dagger}_{-1\uparrow}+h.c)
sit+1sγ+1s(z+1sf+1s+h.c)\displaystyle\sum_{s}it_{+1s}\gamma_{+1s}(z^{\dagger}_{+1s}f^{\dagger}_{+1s}+h.c)

where E~ls=Els+λls\widetilde{E}_{ls}=E_{ls}+\lambda_{ls} is the renormalized energy level of the quasiparticle Kondo resonance. λ\lambda and λls\lambda_{ls} are the Lagrange multipliers associated with the completeness relation (=ee+lsplspls+ν=20,02,ss¯dνdν+lst¯lst¯ls+ff{\cal{I}}=e^{\dagger}e+\sum_{ls}p^{\dagger}_{ls}p_{ls}+\sum_{\nu={20,02,s\overline{s}}}d^{\dagger}_{\nu}d_{\nu}+\sum_{ls}\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{ls}\overline{t}_{ls}+f^{\dagger}f) and charge conservation (Qls=z~lsz~ls=plspls+dldl+sdssdss+t¯lst¯ls+st¯l¯st¯l¯s+ffQ_{ls}=\widetilde{z}^{\dagger}_{ls}\cdot\widetilde{z}_{ls}=p^{\dagger}_{ls}p_{ls}+d^{\dagger}_{l}d_{l}+\sum_{s^{\prime}}d^{\dagger}_{ss^{\prime}}d_{ss^{\prime}}+\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{ls}\overline{t}_{ls}+\sum_{s^{\prime}}\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{\overline{l}s^{\prime}}\overline{t}_{\overline{l}s^{\prime}}+f^{\dagger}f). The \cdot denotes the non-commutative multiplication in the charge operator. In the effective Hamiltonian, the quantum dot operators dlsd_{ls} are replaced by the product of the bosonic operator zlsz_{ls} and the pseudofermionic operator flsf_{ls} (dlszlsflsd_{ls}\equiv z_{ls}f_{ls}). Thus, all physical states are obtained by creating electrons and auxiliary bosons on the vacuum state |vac\lvert\textrm{vac}\rangle. In this formalism, the empty and the fully occupied states are generated by the operators as follows: |e=|00=e|vac\lvert e\rangle=\lvert 00\rangle=e^{\dagger}\lvert\textrm{vac}\rangle and |f=|22=flsfls|vac\lvert f\rangle=\lvert 22\rangle=f^{\dagger}\prod_{ls}f^{\dagger}_{ls}\lvert\textrm{vac}\rangle. The single particle electron state is represented by |p+s(s)=|s0(0s)=plsfls|vac\lvert p_{+s(-s)}\rangle=\lvert s0(0s)\rangle=p^{\dagger}_{ls}f^{\dagger}_{ls}\lvert\textrm{vac}\rangle. The triple occupied states are given by |t¯±s=|s2(2s)=t¯±sf±sfsfs¯|vac\lvert\overline{t}_{\pm s}\rangle=\lvert s2(2s)\rangle=\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{\pm s}f^{\dagger}_{\pm s}f^{\dagger}_{\mp s}f^{\dagger}_{\mp\overline{s}}\lvert\textrm{vac}\rangle. The auxiliary canonical particles for the double occupied state are represented by six states: |d20(02)=|20(02)=d20(02)f±f±|vac\lvert d_{20(02)}\rangle=\lvert 20(02)\rangle=d^{\dagger}_{20(02)}f^{\dagger}_{\pm\uparrow}f^{\dagger}_{\pm\downarrow}\lvert\textrm{vac}\rangle and |dss(ss¯)=|ss=dss(ss¯)f+s(+s)fs(s¯)|vac\lvert d_{ss(s\overline{s})}\rangle=\lvert ss^{\prime}\rangle=d^{\dagger}_{ss(s\overline{s})}f^{\dagger}_{+s(+s)}f^{\dagger}_{-s(-\overline{s})}\lvert\textrm{vac}\rangle.

The tunnel rates t~0ls=t0zls\widetilde{t}_{0ls}=t_{0}z_{ls} and t~ls=tlszls\widetilde{t}_{ls}=t_{ls}z_{ls} are renormalized by zls=z~ls/δnls2=(epls+pls¯dl+lsplsdss+ldlt¯ls+lsds¯st¯ls+t¯l¯s¯f)/Qls(1Qls)z_{ls}=\widetilde{z}_{ls}/\sqrt{\delta n^{2}_{ls}}=(e^{\dagger}p_{ls}+p^{\dagger}_{l\overline{s}}d_{l}+\sum_{ls^{\prime}}p^{\dagger}_{ls^{\prime}}d_{ss^{\prime}}+\sum_{l}d^{\dagger}_{l}\overline{t}_{ls}+\sum_{ls^{\prime}}d^{\dagger}_{\overline{s}s^{\prime}}\overline{t}_{ls^{\prime}}+\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{\overline{l}\overline{s}}f)/\sqrt{Q_{ls}(1-Q_{ls})}. zlsz_{ls} is the renormalization of the width of the Kondo resonance (compare with the amplitude of the quasiparticle wave function [29, 17]), and determines the Kondo temperature TK=min{TK,ls}=E~ls2+Γ~ls2T_{K}=\min\{T_{K,ls}\}=\sqrt{\widetilde{E}^{2}_{ls}+\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{ls}}, where Γ~ls=Γ|zls|2\widetilde{\Gamma}_{ls}=\Gamma|z_{ls}|^{2} is renormalized tunnel coupling. For the non-interacting system U=0U=0, zls21z^{2}_{ls}\approx 1 and we can say that the spin-orbital fluctuations are comparable to the tunneling processes involved in the in Kondo effect δnlsz~ls2\delta n_{ls}\approx\widetilde{z}^{2}_{ls}.

Refer to caption
Figure 1: (Color online) Carbon nanotube quantum dot (CTNQD) device tunnel-coupled through VV to the normal leads and through tt to the Majorana fermion quasiparticle states (γls\gamma_{ls}) in topological superconducting (TSC) wires. The backgate VgV_{g} changes the number of the electrons on the CNTQD. δT=TsTd\delta T=T_{s}-T_{d} is the temperature gradient applied to the left and right electrodes s(d) in the thermoelectric power measurements.

In the calculations, we consider three models: a quantum dot coupled to a single Majorana fermion γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow} (CNTQD-TSC), with two Majorana fermions γ±\gamma_{\pm\uparrow} (CNTQD-2TSC), and with side-attached three Majoranas γ±\gamma_{\pm\uparrow} and γ+\gamma_{+\downarrow} (CNTQD-3TSC). In all systems we take the same value for the coupling strength tt in the Hamiltonian (2). Using the saddle-point approximation, we solved the following self-consistent equations:

~bn=~bn=Δ~n+ΔE~n=0\displaystyle\frac{\partial\langle\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}\rangle}{\partial b_{n}^{\dagger}}=\frac{\partial\langle\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}\rangle}{\partial b_{n}}=\Delta\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}_{{n}}+\Delta\widetilde{E}_{{n}}=0 (3)
~λ=1=0,~λls=flsfls<Qls=0\displaystyle\frac{\partial\langle\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}\rangle}{\partial\lambda}={\cal{I}}-1=0,\frac{\partial\langle\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}\rangle}{\partial\lambda_{ls}}=\langle f^{\dagger}_{ls}f_{ls}\rangle^{<}-Q_{ls}=0

where bb^{\dagger} is represented by auxiliary boson operators: bn=116={e,pls,dν,t¯ls,f}b^{\dagger}_{n=1...16}=\{e^{\dagger},p^{\dagger}_{ls},d^{\dagger}_{\nu},\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{ls},f^{\dagger}\}.

Δ~n=kαlst0(zlsbnckαlsfls<+c.c.)\displaystyle\Delta\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}_{n}=\sum_{k\alpha ls}t_{0}\left(\frac{\partial z_{ls}}{\partial b_{n}^{\dagger}}\langle c^{\dagger}_{k\alpha ls}f_{ls}\rangle^{<}+c.c.\right)
+it1(z1bnγ1f1<+c.c.)\displaystyle+it_{-1\uparrow}\left(\frac{\partial z^{\dagger}_{-1\uparrow}}{\partial b_{n}^{\dagger}}\langle\gamma_{-1\uparrow}f^{\dagger}_{-1\uparrow}\rangle^{<}+c.c.\right) (4)
+sit+1s(z+1sbnγ+1sf+1s<+c.c.),\displaystyle+\sum_{s}it_{+1s}\left(\frac{\partial z^{\dagger}_{+1s}}{\partial b_{n}^{\dagger}}\langle\gamma_{+1s}f^{\dagger}_{+1s}\rangle^{<}+c.c.\right),

and ΔE~n={λe,(λls+λ)pls,(U+sλls+λ)dl,(U+λls+λl¯s+λ)dss,(3U+λls+sλl¯s+λ)t¯ls,(6U+lsλls+λ)f}\Delta\widetilde{E}_{n}=\{\lambda e,(\lambda_{ls}+\lambda)p_{ls},(U+\sum_{s}\lambda_{ls}+\lambda)d_{l},(U+\lambda_{ls}+\lambda_{\overline{l}s^{\prime}}+\lambda)d_{ss^{\prime}},(3U+\lambda_{ls}+\sum_{s}\lambda_{\overline{l}s}+\lambda)\overline{t}_{ls},(6U+\sum_{ls}\lambda_{ls}+\lambda)f\}. The correlators in Eqs. (3-4) can be written in the form:

flsfls<=W+WdEGls,ls<2πi\displaystyle\langle f^{\dagger}_{ls}f_{ls}\rangle^{<}=\int^{+W}_{-W}\frac{dEG^{<}_{ls,ls}}{2\pi i}
kt~0lsckαlsfls<=kt~0lsW+WdEGkαls,ls<2πi\displaystyle\sum_{k}\widetilde{t}_{0ls}\langle c^{\dagger}_{k\alpha ls}f_{ls}\rangle^{<}=\sum_{k}\widetilde{t}_{0ls}\int^{+W}_{-W}\frac{dEG^{<}_{k\alpha ls,ls}}{2\pi i} (5)
it~lsγlsfls<=it~lsW+WdEGls¯,ls<2πi\displaystyle i\widetilde{t}_{ls}\langle\gamma_{ls}f^{\dagger}_{ls}\rangle^{<}=i\widetilde{t}_{ls}\int^{+W}_{-W}\frac{dEG^{<}_{\underline{ls},ls}}{2\pi i}

where Gls,ls<G^{<}_{ls,ls}, Gkαls,ls<=t~0ls(Gls,lsRgkαls<+Gls,ls<gkαlsA)G^{<}_{k\alpha ls,ls}=\widetilde{t}_{0ls}(G^{R}_{ls,ls}g^{<}_{k\alpha ls}+G^{<}_{ls,ls}g^{A}_{k\alpha ls}) and Gls¯,ls<G^{<}_{\underline{ls},ls} are the non-equilibrium Green’s functions calculated using the EOM and Keldysh formalism for the Hamiltonian (2) [123, 124, 56]. The retarded and lesser Green’s functions in the ν=ls\nu=ls channel (decoupled from the TSC) are given by Gν,νR(E)=(EE~ν+iΓ~ν)1G^{R}_{\nu,\nu}(E)=(E-\widetilde{E}_{\nu}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu})^{-1} and Gν,ν<(E)=Gν,νRΣ~ν<Gν,νAG^{<}_{\nu,\nu}(E)=G^{R}_{\nu,\nu}\widetilde{\Sigma}^{<}_{\nu}G^{A}_{\nu,\nu}. Σ~ν<=αt~0ν2gkαν<=iΓ~ναfα\widetilde{\Sigma}^{<}_{\nu}=\sum_{\alpha}\widetilde{t}^{2}_{0\nu}g^{<}_{k\alpha\nu}=i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\sum_{\alpha}f_{\alpha} is the lesser self-energy and fα=(eE±VαkBT+1)1f_{\alpha}=(e^{\frac{E\pm V_{\alpha}}{k_{B}T}}+1)^{-1} is the Fermi-Dirac function. The Green’s functions in the ν\nu^{\prime} channel (the channel coupled to the TSC) can be written in the matrix form as follows:

G^νR=(EE^νΣ^νR)1\displaystyle\hat{G}^{R}_{\nu^{\prime}}=(E-\hat{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}-\hat{\Sigma}^{R}_{\nu^{\prime}})^{-1}
=(EE~ν+iΓ~ν0it~ν0E+E~ν+iΓ~νit~νit~νit~νE+iδ)1\displaystyle=\left(\begin{array}[]{ccc}E-\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}&0&-i\widetilde{t}_{\nu^{\prime}}\\ 0&E+\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}&-i\widetilde{t}_{\nu^{\prime}}\\ i\widetilde{t}_{\nu^{\prime}}&i\widetilde{t}_{\nu^{\prime}}&E+i\delta\\ \end{array}\right)^{-1} (9)

where E^ν\hat{E}_{\nu^{\prime}} is the matrix of the diagonal energies {±E~ν,0}\{\pm\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}},0\}, the remaining elements are the matrix of retarded self-energy Σ^R\hat{\Sigma}^{R}. δ\delta is the lifetime of the Majorana fermion, and is the lowest energy in the system δTK\delta\ll T_{K} (in our calculations δ=108\delta=10^{-8}). In practice this is the consequence of the disappearance of the overlap term between the Majorana fermions at the ends of the proximitized wire (iΔ(0)γAlsγBlsi\Delta_{(0)}\gamma_{Als}\gamma_{Bls}) in the self-energy of the TSC Σ~tR=(t~2z)/(z2Δ(0)2)\widetilde{\Sigma}^{R}_{t}=(\widetilde{t}^{2}z)/(z^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{(0)}) [69, 119]. Therefore, in our model we used the self-energy with the finite lifetime of the Majorana fermion δ\delta, where in the asymptotic limit: limΔ(0)0Σ~tR=t~2/z=t~2/(E+iδ)\lim_{\Delta_{(0)}\mapsto 0}\widetilde{\Sigma}^{R}_{t}=\widetilde{t}^{2}/z=\widetilde{t}^{2}/(E+i\delta). The lesser Green’s function matrix can be written as G^ν<=G^νRΣ^ν<G^νA\hat{G}^{<}_{\nu^{\prime}}=\hat{G}^{R}_{\nu^{\prime}}\hat{\Sigma}^{<}_{\nu^{\prime}}\hat{G}^{A}_{\nu^{\prime}}, where Σ^ν<=Σ^νRαfα\hat{\Sigma}^{<}_{\nu^{\prime}}=\hat{\Sigma}^{R}_{\nu^{\prime}}\sum_{\alpha}f_{\alpha}. The mean-field slave-boson approach has self-consistent solutions for finite temperature TT and bias voltage Vα=L(R)=±V/2V_{\alpha=L(R)}=\pm V/2 below and around the the Kondo temperature TKT_{K}.

III The Results

III.1 The Hilbert space and the states of the isolated CNTQD-TSC devices

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 2: (Color online) Isolated states of the CNTQD-TSC hybrid device: a-c) The quantum amplitudes |qN|2|q_{N}|^{2} of the ground states as a function of the quantum dot level EdE_{d} for decoupled (t=0t=0), weakly (t=102t=10^{-2}) and strongly (t=2t=2) coupled CNTQD with TSC. The insets show the spectrum of the energies EN2EdE_{N}-2E_{d} with low energy ground states indicated by colors. |qNd¯|q_{N}\rangle_{\underline{d}} represents the topological entangled quantum states except the pure quantum states in Fig. a (T=101T=10^{-1}).

The tunneling term with the Majorana fermion (MF) can be written in the form : itlsγls(dls+dls)=itls(dlsc~lsdlsc~lsdlsc~lsc~lsdls)it_{ls}\gamma_{ls}(d^{\dagger}_{ls}+d_{ls})=it_{ls}(d^{\dagger}_{ls}\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls}-d_{ls}\widetilde{c}_{ls}-d^{\dagger}_{ls}\widetilde{c}_{ls}-\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls}d_{ls}), where γls=γAls=c~ls+c~ls\gamma_{ls}=\gamma_{Als}=\widetilde{c}_{ls}+\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls} is the Majorana operator and c~ls\widetilde{c}_{ls} is the complex Dirac fermion operator in one-dimensional topological superconductor (1d TSC)[69]. As we can see, the term consists of the superconducting part dlsc~lsd^{\dagger}_{ls}\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls}, proportional to the isospin and the normal tunneling part c~lsdls\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls}d_{ls}. The Majorana fermion states are spatially separated at the ends A and B in the 1d TSC (Fig. 1). Taking two spatially separated MFs and the electron creation operator c~ls=c~Als=(1/2)(γAlsiγBls)\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls}=\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{Als}=(1/2)(\gamma_{Als}-i\gamma_{Bls}), we can define the occupation number operator in the topological superconductor as: n~ls=c~lsc~ls=(1+iγAlsγBls)/2\widetilde{n}_{ls}=\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls}\widetilde{c}_{ls}=(1+i\gamma_{Als}\gamma_{Bls})/2, what is the consequence of the number of the states {0¯,¯}\{\underline{0},\underline{\Uparrow}\}. Therefore the occupation number n~ls\widetilde{n}_{ls} is either 0 or 11. In the limit of the vanishing overlap between the Majorana fermions, there is still a nonlocal half-fermionic state in the single or zero quantum state, which is the main argument and attraction in the the topological quantum computation.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 3: (Color online) a-c) The difference between the excited states ±EN\pm E_{N} and the ground state EgsE_{gs} for decoupled, weakly and strongly coupled CNTQD with a single Majorana fermion state γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow}. The numbers represent the integer and fractional charge on the quantum dot near the zero energy.

The Majorana fermions obey the Clifford algebra {γν,γν}=δν,ν\{\gamma_{\nu},\gamma^{\dagger}_{\nu^{\prime}}\}=\delta_{\nu,\nu^{\prime}} ([γν,γν]=0[\gamma_{\nu},\gamma^{\dagger}_{\nu^{\prime}}]=0), where δν,ν\delta_{\nu,\nu^{\prime}} is the Kronecker delta and ν,ν\nu,\nu^{\prime} are Majorana indices. Moreover, unlike the complex fermions, Majoranas do not square to zero, but γν2=1/2\gamma^{2}_{\nu}=1/2 (γν3=γν/2\gamma^{3}_{\nu}=\gamma_{\nu}/2). The quasiparticle parity c~lsc~ls\widetilde{c}^{\dagger}_{ls}\widetilde{c}_{ls} is accessible by a joint measurement on both Majoranas. So we are talking about new half-fermions on the both sides of the topological wire, and γls\gamma_{ls} are the real operators and are own antiparticles. We neglect in our calculation the effect of overlapping between Majorana fermions in the form iΔ(0)γAlsγBlsi\Delta_{(0)}\gamma_{Als}\gamma_{Bls}, which leads to a bowtie-like mismatch in the zero energy non-local Majorana state [125, 40]. Δ(0)=ew/λK\Delta_{(0)}=e^{-w/\lambda_{K}}, where ww is the separation length between Majoranas in the TSC, and λK\lambda_{K} determines the quality of the MFs and is the superconducting coherence length, which strongly suppresses the overlap between two Majoranas. For the Hamiltonian ls=(lsΔEg)σ^Zσ^X+Δ(l)k=±σ^kσ^Y{\mathcal{H}}_{ls}=(ls\Delta-E_{g})\hat{\sigma}_{Z}\otimes\hat{\sigma}_{X}+\Delta_{(l)}\sum_{k=\pm}\mp\hat{\sigma}_{k}\otimes\hat{\sigma}_{Y} in the Nambu basis Ψ=(cAls,cBls,cAls,cBls)\Psi=(c_{Als},c_{Bls},c^{\dagger}_{Als},c^{\dagger}_{Bls}), where Δ\Delta is the spin-orbit coupling strength [8], Eg=NΔlE_{g}=N\Delta_{l} is the perturbation gap and Δl\Delta_{l} is the triplet AB-site superconducting order parameter (different for orbital l=±l=\pm), we can find four independent Majorana bound state solutions at the zero energy level: γAls=Ψ(1/2){1,0,1,0}T\gamma_{Als}=\Psi\cdot(1/\sqrt{2})\{1,0,1,0\}^{T} and γBls=Ψ(i/2){0,1,0,1}T\gamma_{Bls}=\Psi\cdot(i/\sqrt{2})\{0,1,0,-1\}^{T} for Δ=Δl/(Nls)\Delta=\Delta_{l}/(N-ls). In this simple toy model, we consider the TSC wire with the Zeeman-like SOI term [8] and the orbital dependent AB triplet superconducting pairing strength. The proximitized term in the Hamiltonian ls{\mathcal{H}}_{ls} is the crucial point of the toy model and will be a major challenge for experimental research [65].

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 4: Isolated states of the CNTQD-2TSC hybrid device: a, b) |qN|2|q_{N}|^{2} as a function of EdE_{d} for weakly (t=102t=10^{-2}) and strongly (t=2t=2) coupled CNTQD with two Majorana fermion states (γ±\gamma_{\pm\uparrow}). c, d) EdE_{d} dependence of ±ENEgs\pm E_{N}-E_{gs} for the weak and strong tunnel coupling regime with TSCs.

Our proposed device, shown in Figure 1 is the hybrid carbon nanotube quantum dot (CNTQD) with side-attached topological superconductor (TSC) fabricated on the 1d nanotube in the spin-triplet p-wave superconducting coat. The real fermion particles γls=γls\gamma_{ls}=\gamma^{\dagger}_{ls} are located at the edges of the TSC. γls\gamma_{ls} consist of equal parts of electrons and holes with the same spin orbital. In contrast to the Bogoliubov quasiparticle operator aks=Ψk{uk,vk}T=ukcks+sgn(s)vkcks¯a^{\dagger}_{ks}=\Psi^{\dagger}_{k}\cdot\{u_{k},v_{k}\}^{T}=u_{k}c^{\dagger}_{ks}+\textrm{sgn}(s)v_{k}c_{-k\overline{s}}, where aksaksa^{\dagger}_{ks}\neq a_{ks}.

In our case, the Majorana fermions are well-prepared quantum states and are indexed by spin and orbital number, which determines the selective tunneling coupling term to lsls states on CNTQD. The main discussion in the experiments is about the preparation of the states [83, 84, 85]. We should always look on the both sides of the wire and selectively detect the non-local Majoranas, e.g. using the doubling effect in the supercurrent [126, 127]. For this reason, we focus on the problem of the side-attached TSC to the CNTQD in the Kondo state, which plays the role of a detector of non-Abelian MFs, especially observed in the quantum conductance, thermoelectric power and in the fractional noise measurements.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 5: (Color online) Quantum conductance for the fractional SU(3) Kondo state: a) The density plot of 𝒢\cal{G} as a function of EdE_{d} and tt. |qNd¯|q_{N}\rangle_{\underline{d}} represents the ground state configuration in the CNTQD-TSC device. b) The landscape plot of 𝒢\cal{G} as a function of tt. The black lines are plotted with an increment of δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15 from Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 to Ed=1E_{d}=1. c, d) EdE_{d} dependence of the total and spin-orbital conductances with increasing tt. The inset in Fig. d shows 𝒢+{\cal{G}}_{+\uparrow} (U=3U=3, Γ=0.03\Gamma=0.03, T=108T=10^{-8}).
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 6: (Color online) Quantum conductance for the integer SU(2) Kondo state in the CNTQD-2TSC system: a) The density plot of 𝒢\cal{G} as a function of EdE_{d} and tt. b) The landscape plot of GG as a function of tt (δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15). c, d) EdE_{d} dependence of 𝒢\cal{G} and 𝒢ls{\cal{G}}_{ls}.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 7: (Color online) Quantum conductance in the CNTQD-3TSC device: a, b) The density plot and the landscape plot of 𝒢\cal{G} as a function of EdE_{d} and tt (δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15). c, d) 𝒢\cal{G} and 𝒢ls{\cal{G}}_{ls} as a function of EdE_{d} with increasing tt.

Let’s first discuss the effect of the MF states on the quantum states in the isolated CNTQD (t0=0t_{0}=0). For finite Coulomb interaction U=3U=3, the two-orbital Anderson model can be written in the representation of occupation number on both orbitals |n+n\lvert n_{+}n_{-}\rangle. The system describe the sixteenth quantum states: |e=|00,|pls=|s0=|0s,|dν=|ν=|20=|02=|ss=|ss¯,|tls=|s2=|2s,|f=|22\lvert e\rangle=\lvert 00\rangle,\lvert p_{ls}\rangle=\lvert s0\rangle=\lvert 0s\rangle,\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle=\lvert\nu\rangle=\lvert 20\rangle=\lvert 02\rangle=\lvert ss\rangle=\lvert s\overline{s}\rangle,\lvert t_{ls}\rangle=\lvert s2\rangle=\lvert 2s\rangle,\lvert f\rangle=\lvert 22\rangle. Figure 2a shows the probability of the quantum amplitudes |qN|2|q_{N}|^{2} for decoupled CNTQD with TSC (t=0t=0). |qN|2=eEN/(kBT)/ZN|q_{N}|^{2}=e^{-E_{N}/(k_{B}T)}/Z_{N} are calculated for U=3U=3 and T=0.1T=0.1. ZN=NeEN/(kBT)Z_{N}=\sum_{N}e^{-E_{N}/(k_{B}T)} is the partition function and ENE_{N} are the energies of the individual quantum states. Above Ed=0E_{d}=0 and below Ed=3UE_{d}=-3U, the empty |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1} and the fully occupied states |f1\lvert f\rangle_{1} without (0e) and with four electrons on CNTQD (4e) dominate. In the three-electron (3e) and one-electron (1e) charge region, the ground states |tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} are the quadruplets with |qN|2=1/4|q_{N}|^{2}=1/4. For two electrons (2e), the two-orbital Anderson model determines the six quantum states |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} with |qN|2=1/6|q_{N}|^{2}=1/6. The lower index d¯\underline{d} in |qNd¯\lvert q_{N}\rangle_{\underline{d}} is the number of degenerate states. The inset shows the energies EN2EdE_{N}-2E_{d}. The lowest energies represent the ground state energy EgsE_{gs} of the system and are represented by colored lines in the insets.

Taking the isolated CNTQD from the normal leads with tunneling term to the Majorana fermion state, we plotted |qN|2|q_{N}|^{2} and the energies ENE_{N} with the ground states for weak (t=103t=10^{-3}) and strong coupling limit to TSC (t=2t=2) (Fig. 2). The quantum states are spanned by the basis vectors, which consist from the normal part (quantum dot) |n+n\lvert n_{+}n_{-}\rangle and the topological segment |n1n2n3\lvert n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}\rangle. In the normal part, the states are defined by n±={0,,,2}n_{\pm}=\{0,\uparrow,\downarrow,2\}. The topological segment with two topological edge states is defined by a wave function describing one-qubit states for |0¯\lvert\underline{0}\rangle and |¯\lvert\underline{\Uparrow}\rangle, and for the last two topological states n2(3)n_{2(3)}, the allowed configurations are |0¯,|¯{\lvert\overline{0}\rangle,\lvert\overline{\Uparrow}\rangle} and |0¯¯,|¯¯{\lvert\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle,\lvert\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle}. The states are orthogonal and degenerate at zero energy, forming a two-dimensional Hilbert space for a single qubit state. Maximally, in the topological segment, the Hilbert space is the direct product of three Hilbert spaces and the many-body ground states are given by: |n1n2n3=|n1|n2|n3\lvert n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}\rangle=\lvert n_{1}\rangle\otimes\lvert n_{2}\rangle\otimes\lvert n_{3}\rangle. The ground state degeneracy of 1d topological superconductors is 2NTS2^{N_{TS}}. On CNTQD we have 2n=24=162^{n}=2^{4}=16 quantum states (|n+n\lvert n_{+}n_{-}\rangle). If we couple TSC to our setup, the number of states grows to the number 2n+NTS2^{n+N_{TS}}. The quantum amplitudes in Fig. 2b reach the half value for |qzd¯\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{\underline{d}} and |qxd¯\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{\underline{d}}. In the extended Hilbert space (25=322^{5}=32, |n+nn1\lvert n_{+}n_{-}n_{1}\rangle) for Ed>0E_{d}>0 and Ed<3UE_{d}<-3U dominates |qz2=|qz1(1¯)=12(|000¯(¯)+|0¯(0¯))\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}=\lvert q_{-z_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(-\lvert 00\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle) and |qx2=|qx1(1¯)=12(|20¯(¯)+|22¯(0¯))\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2}=\lvert q_{-x_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(-\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\lvert 22\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle). The minus sign in the lower index refers to the lower energy, the plus sign is reserved for the excited quantum states. In the following discussion, we have omitted the minus sign in the lower index, because we are focusing on the ground state. This is interesting because TSC entangles the pure quantum states from the even |00(22)\lvert 00(22)\rangle and the odd |0(2)\lvert\uparrow 0(\downarrow 2)\rangle charge number sectors and opens the possibility of manipulating the states at the boundary of the integer charge numbers (Q=0Q=0e, 1e, 2e, 4e). The topological qubit forms two doublets for fractional charge numbers Q=(1/2)Q=(1/2)e and Q=(7/2)Q=(7/2)e. This scenario is observed for weak and strong coupling strengths tt (Fig. 2a, b). Fig.2b shows the highly degenerate states for the weak coupling limit: two octuplets |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8}(|qb8\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{8}) and one duodecuplet |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}. The low energy octuplets |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8} in the 1e charge sector are given by:

|qa1(1¯)=a|000¯(¯)+a|0¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-a_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 00\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qa2(2¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-a_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle (10)
|qa3(3¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|20¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-a_{3(\overline{3})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qa4(4¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-a_{4(\overline{4})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle

and the high energy octuplets |qb8\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{8} can be written as follows:

|qb1(1¯)=a|20¯(¯)+a|22¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-b_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 22\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qb2(2¯)=a|0¯(¯)+a|2¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-b_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle (11)
|qb3(3¯)=a|020¯(¯)+a|2¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-b_{3(\overline{3})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 02\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qb4(4¯)=a|0¯(¯)+a|2¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-b_{4(\overline{4})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle

In the 2e charge region, the ground state of the system represents the duodecuplet |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} in the form:

|qw1(1¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-w_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qw2(2¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|20¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-w_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qw3(3¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-w_{3(\overline{3})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle (12)
|qw4(4¯)=a|20¯(¯)a|¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-w_{4(\overline{4})}}\rangle=\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle-\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qw5(5¯)=a|20¯(¯)a|02¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-w_{5(\overline{5})}}\rangle=\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle-\textrm{a}\lvert 02\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qw6(6¯)=a|20¯(¯)a|¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-w_{6(\overline{6})}}\rangle=\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle-\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle

a(a)\textrm{a}(\textrm{a}^{\prime}) are the amplitudes as the function of EdE_{d}, UU and the coupling strength tt. Despite the fact that aa\textrm{a}^{\prime}\ll\textrm{a} in the weak coupling limit to TSC, the states are entangled and the Hilbert space is extended (this is particularly important and visible in the Q=2Q=2e charge region). Fig. 2b shows |qN|2=1/8|q_{N}|^{2}=1/8 for the two octuplets and 1/121/12 for the single duodecuplet.

In the strong coupling limit aa\textrm{a}\approx\textrm{a}^{\prime} for Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e, two sextuplets are the ground states of the system. The low energy quantum states |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} can be expressed as:

|qg1(1¯)=a|0¯(¯)+a|2¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-g_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle
|qg2(2¯)=a|020¯(¯)+a|2¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-g_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 02\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle (13)
|qg3(3¯)=a|0¯(¯)+a|2¯(0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-g_{3(\overline{3})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle

and the high energy ground states |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} are described by: |qy1(1¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|¯(0¯)\lvert q_{-y_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle, |qy2(2¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|20¯(0¯)\lvert q_{-y_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle and |qy3(3¯)=a|00¯(¯)+a|¯(0¯)\lvert q_{-y_{3(\overline{3})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0})\rangle. The insets in Fig. 2 show the energies ENE_{N}. The lower colored lines are the ground state energies. As the tunneling strength increases, the lines on the insets, especially for intermediate couplings tt, are the nonlinear function of EdE_{d}.

Figure 3 shows the difference between the energies ENE_{N} and the ground state energy for low bias ±EN+Egs\pm E_{N}+E_{gs}. At the zero energy line the system is determined by the ground state EgsE_{gs} and all lines above and below this point show the excited states ±EN+Egs\pm E_{N}+E_{gs}. The excited states can be observed in the range of finite bias voltages |Vs(d)|>0|V_{s(d)}|>0, higher than the Kondo temperature of the strongly correlated system. For decoupled CNTQD with TSC we observed the integer charge regions Q=1e,2e,3eQ=1e,2e,3e, where for ±ENEgs=0\pm E_{N}-E_{gs}=0 the SU(4) Kondo state is realized. In the range of weak coupling strength regime the fractional charge regions Q=(1/2)Q=(1/2)e, (3/2)(3/2)e, (5/2)(5/2)e and (7/2)e(7/2)e are formed. For Q=(1/2)Q=(1/2)e and (7/2)(7/2)e the ground state of the system is determined by two doublets |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} and |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2}, opening the Majorana channel in transport measurements. For the strong coupling tt, the Majorana channel is independent and separate from the channels involved in the fractional SU(3) Kondo effect. The Kondo state is denoted by \star because, in the contrast to the standard SU(3) Kondo effect [46, 45], the quasiparticle state is formed for the fractional charges Q=(3/2)eQ=(3/2)e and Q=(5/2)eQ=(5/2)e, which is non-trivial and the main result of the paper. The SU(3) Kondo state is a signature of sixfold degenerate states: low |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} high energy sextuplets.

For the CNTQD-2TSC device, two spin-orbital channels ++\uparrow and -\uparrow are correspondingly coupled to two selected Majorana quasiparticles γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow} and γ\gamma_{-\uparrow}. The Hilbert space for the isolated system CNTQD-2TSC is spanned by 24+2=642^{4+2}=64 quantum states. In the weak coupling regime (Fig. 4a), the probability amplitudes |qa(b)|2|q_{a(b)}|^{2} lead to 1/161/16 for 11e and 33e on the quantum dot. In the 22e charge region, the amplitudes reach the value |qN|2=1/24|q_{N}|^{2}=1/24 and the lowest energy state is represented by the twenty-fourfold degenerate state |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24}. The sum of all degeneracies in the weak coupling limit leads to the number d¯=4+16+24+16+4=64\underline{d}=4+16+24+16+4=64, which is the number of all quantum states in the system. A similar relation can be written for CNTQD-TSC, where d¯=2+8+12+8+2=32\underline{d}=2+8+12+8+2=32. With increasing tt (Fig. 4c, d) the four charge regions are reduced, and we observe the three quantum integer charge numbers Q=1Q=1e, 22e and 33e. Empty |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1} and full |f1\lvert f\rangle_{1} occupied quantum states are switched to two quartets |qx4\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{4} and |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4}, which are visible in the transport measurements with the channels coupled to Majorana fermions. In the strong coupling regime the quantum states |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} are represented by:

|qz1(1¯)=12(|000¯0¯(¯¯)±|00¯¯(¯0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-z_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(\mp\lvert 00\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle\pm\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle
+|0¯0¯(0¯¯)+|¯¯(0¯0¯))\displaystyle+\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle) (14)
|qz2(2¯)=12(±|000¯¯(¯0¯)±|00¯0¯(¯¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-z_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(\pm\lvert 00\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle\pm\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle
|0¯¯(0¯0¯)+|¯0¯(0¯¯))\displaystyle-\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle+\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle)

and the high energy quartets |qx4\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{4} have the following forms: |qx1(1¯)=12(|22¯¯(0¯0¯)+|2¯0¯(0¯¯)|20¯¯(¯0¯)±|0¯0¯(¯¯))\lvert q_{-x_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(\lvert 22\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle+\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle\mp\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle\pm\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle) and |qx2(2¯)=12(|22¯0¯(0¯¯)|2¯¯(0¯0¯)|20¯0¯(¯¯)|0¯¯(¯0¯))\lvert q_{-x_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=\frac{1}{2}(\lvert 22\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle-\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle\mp\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle\mp\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle). The probability amplitudes for these states have the following value |qN|2=1/4|q_{N}|^{2}=1/4 (Fig. 4b). As we can see in the inset of Fig. 4b, the energy ground states EN2EdE_{N}-2E_{d} are the quadratic function of the atomic level EdE_{d}. For Q=2Q=2e the ground state is the octuplet |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} with eightfold degenerate states. All states contributing to the SU(2) Kondo effect. The strongly correlated state is realized for even number of electron in the system, which is typical e.g for the charge Kondo state with polarons. The octuplet quantum states can written in the form:

|qy1(1¯)=a|20¯0¯(0¯¯)+a|2¯¯(0¯0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-y_{1(\overline{1})}}\rangle=\textrm{a}\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle
a|00¯0¯(¯¯)±a|0¯¯(¯0¯)\displaystyle\mp\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle\pm\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle
|qy2(2¯)=a|20¯¯(0¯0¯)+a|2¯0¯(0¯¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-y_{2(\overline{2})}}\rangle=-\textrm{a}\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle
±a|00¯¯(¯0¯)±a|0¯0¯(¯¯)\displaystyle\pm\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle\pm\textrm{a}\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle (15)
|qy3(3¯)=a|020¯¯(¯0¯)±a|00¯0¯(¯¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-y_{3(\overline{3})}}\rangle=\mp\textrm{a}\lvert 02\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle\pm\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle
+a|2¯¯(0¯0¯)+a|¯0¯(0¯¯)\displaystyle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle+\textrm{a}\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle
|qy4(4¯)=a|020¯0¯(¯¯)a|00¯¯(¯0¯)\displaystyle\lvert q_{-y_{4(\overline{4})}}\rangle=\mp\textrm{a}\lvert 02\underline{0}\overline{0}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle\mp\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0})\rangle
+a|2¯0¯(0¯¯)a|¯¯(0¯0¯)\displaystyle+\textrm{a}^{\prime}\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}(\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow})\rangle-\textrm{a}\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}(\underline{0}\overline{0})\rangle

The states are the combination of one single, one triple and two double quantum states spanned by Majorana fermion quantum states in TSCs. For the coupling strength t~νΓ~ν\widetilde{t}_{\nu}\gg\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}, the amplitudes in Eq. (12) are comparable aa\textrm{a}^{\prime}\approx\textrm{a} (|qN|2=1/8|q_{N}|^{2}=1/8). All these eight states are the linear combination of the four extended states |n+n(n1n2)\lvert n_{+}n_{-}(n_{1}n_{2})\rangle. Figures 4c, d show that except for the zero energy state, which is represented by the integer charge Q=1Q=1e, 2e, 3e, the excited states are determined by fractional charges Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and (5/2)(5/2)e. All excited states can be observed in tunneling spectroscopy measurements. The fractional charges are manifested in the spin dependent conductances of a quantum dot side-attached to the topological superconductor [128]. For example, in [63] the authors have shown that non-Abelian rotations within the degenerate ground state manifold of a set of Majorana fermions and the quantum dot in the Coulomb blockade regime can be realized by adding or removing a single electron, and by exchanging electrons we can generate rotations similar to braiding operations. In the paper [63] the authors proposed the scheme to manipulate the state of a set of two Majorana fermions by changing the even/odd parity and degeneracy of the dot qubit states with the quantum flux φ1=2nπ\varphi_{1}=2n\pi.

The carbon nanotube quantum dot with side-attached three Majorana fermions (CNTQD-3TSC) remains in the strongly correlated Kondo phase only in the weak coupling strength regime. The CNTQD-3TSC device is determined in the weak coupling limit for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e by the states |qa(b)32\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{32}. |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} is the ground state for Q=2Q=2e and is squeezed to the e-h symmetry point in the strong coupling limit. The squeezing mechanism created the new type of the U(1) charge symmetry for even number of electrons in the system. In the normal state, this symmetry exists only for the points with the fractional charge in the quantum dot system. Beyond this line, the system defines the low and high energy octuplets |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8}. One of the interesting points is the opposite charge-leaking mechanism (observed in the general susceptibilities, nonlinear current and shot noise) - directly visible in the structure of the topological qubit states (the leaking states are marked in red in Eqs. (13-14)). The high energy octuplet |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} can be expressed, as follows:

|qz1=18(|000¯0¯0¯¯+|00¯¯0¯¯|20¯0¯¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-z_{1}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(-\lvert 00\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle+\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
+|2¯¯¯¯|0¯¯¯¯+|00¯0¯¯¯\displaystyle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}+\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}-\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle+\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
+|0¯0¯0¯¯|¯¯0¯¯)\displaystyle+\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle)
|qz2=18(|000¯0¯¯¯+|00¯¯¯¯|20¯0¯0¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-z_{2}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(-\lvert 00\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle+\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle-\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle
+|2¯¯0¯¯+|00¯0¯0¯¯|0¯¯0¯¯\displaystyle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}+\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}+\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle
+|0¯0¯¯¯|¯¯¯¯)\displaystyle+\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle-\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle) (16)
|qz3=18(|000¯¯0¯¯+|00¯0¯0¯¯|20¯¯¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-z_{3}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(-\lvert 00\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle+\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert 20\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
+|2¯0¯¯¯+|00¯¯¯¯|0¯0¯¯¯\displaystyle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}+\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}+\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle-\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
+|0¯¯0¯¯|¯0¯0¯¯)\displaystyle+\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle)
|qz4=18(|00¯0¯0¯¯+|0¯¯0¯¯|200¯0¯¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-z_{4}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(-\lvert 00\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle+\lvert 0\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert 20\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
+|20¯¯¯¯+|0¯0¯¯¯|¯¯¯¯\displaystyle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}+\lvert 2\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}+\lvert\downarrow 0\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle-\lvert\downarrow\uparrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
+|00¯0¯0¯¯|0¯¯0¯¯)\displaystyle+\lvert\uparrow 0\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert\uparrow\uparrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle)

|qz1¯\lvert q_{-z_{\overline{1}}}\rangle, |qz2¯\lvert q_{-z_{\overline{2}}}\rangle, |qz3¯\lvert q_{-z_{\overline{3}}}\rangle and |qz4¯\lvert q_{-z_{\overline{4}}}\rangle are the states with opposite configuration in the topological part. The |2n1n2n3\lvert 2\uparrow n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}\rangle states penetrate into the forbidden charge sectors in the CNTQD-3TSC quantum device. The states leak from the triple occupied states on the quantum dot to the charge states above the e-h symmetry point. The mechanism is related to the entanglement of eight spanned states by the tunneling strength between CNTQD and the three Majorana fermions. The charge-leaking states appear around the e-h symmetry point, indicating the strong dependence on the Coulomb interaction. The low energy states, which show the same charge-leaking mechanism can be written as follows:

|qx1=18(|020¯¯0¯¯|00¯0¯0¯¯+|22¯¯¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-x_{1}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(\lvert 02\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}-\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}+\lvert 22\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
|2¯0¯¯¯|20¯¯¯¯+|0¯0¯¯¯\displaystyle-\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle-\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle+\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
|2¯¯0¯¯+|¯0¯0¯¯)\displaystyle-\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle+\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle)
|qx2=18(|020¯¯¯¯|00¯0¯¯¯+|22¯¯0¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-x_{2}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(\lvert 02\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}-\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}+\lvert 22\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle
|2¯0¯0¯¯|20¯¯0¯¯+|0¯0¯0¯¯\displaystyle-\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle-\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle+\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle
|2¯¯¯¯+|¯0¯¯¯)\displaystyle-\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle+\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle)
|qx3=18(|020¯0¯0¯¯|00¯¯¯¯+|22¯0¯¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-x_{3}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(\lvert 02\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}-\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}+\lvert 22\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
|2¯¯¯¯|20¯0¯¯¯+|0¯¯¯¯\displaystyle-\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle-\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle+\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle (17)
|2¯0¯0¯¯+|¯¯0¯¯)\displaystyle-\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle+\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle)
|qx4=18(|02¯¯0¯¯|0¯0¯0¯¯+|220¯¯¯¯\displaystyle\lvert q_{-x_{4}}\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{8}}(\lvert 02\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle\color[rgb]{1,0,0}-\lvert 0\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle\color[rgb]{0,0,0}+\lvert 22\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
|20¯0¯¯¯|2¯¯¯¯+|¯0¯¯¯\displaystyle-\lvert 2\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle-\lvert\downarrow 2\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle+\lvert\downarrow\downarrow\underline{\Uparrow}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{\Downarrow}}\rangle
|20¯¯0¯¯+|0¯0¯0¯¯)\displaystyle-\lvert\uparrow 2\underline{0}\overline{\Uparrow}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle+\lvert\uparrow\downarrow\underline{0}\overline{0}\underline{\underline{0}}\rangle)

|qx1¯\lvert q_{-x_{\overline{1}}}\rangle, |qx2¯\lvert q_{-x_{\overline{2}}}\rangle, |qx3¯\lvert q_{-x_{\overline{3}}}\rangle and |qx4¯\lvert q_{-x_{\overline{4}}}\rangle are the states with opposite configuration in the topological sector of ket states. Three Majorana fermions do not allow the formation of the Kondo state. These three channels {±,+}\{\pm\uparrow,+\downarrow\} are involved in interference with the Majorana fermion quantum states. The effect is qualitatively similar to result for the SU(2)-Kondo dot with a side-attached MF, where in the strong coupling limit the quantum conductance at the e-h symmetry point reaches 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h)[110, 119].

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 8: (Color online) a-c) The density plot of the spin Δ𝒢(s)\Delta{\cal{G}}_{(s)} and orbital Δ𝒢(o)\Delta{\cal{G}}_{(o)} polarization of the conductance as a function of EdE_{d} and tt for CNTQD coupled to single, double and triple MF states. d) tt dependence of Δ𝒢s\Delta{\cal{G}}_{s} for CNTQD-TSC. The upper and lower insets in Fig. d show Δ𝒢(s)\Delta{\cal{G}}_{(s)} for QD coupled to 2TSC and 3TSC.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 9: (Color online) a) The characteristic temperature T[]T_{[\star]} as a function of tt. TKSU(4)T^{SU(4)}_{K}, TKSU(3)T^{SU^{\star}(3)}_{K} and TKSU(2)T^{SU^{\star}(2)}_{K} are the Kondo temperatures. The dark, dark dashed, and light lines present T[]T_{[\star]} for CNTQD-TSC, CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD coupled to 3MFs. b) 𝒢\cal{G} of the CNTQD-TSC device as a function of EdE_{d} and tt for finite temperature T=103>TKT=10^{-3}>T_{K}. c) tt dependence of 𝒢\cal{G} with increasing TT for Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 and Ed=3E_{d}=-3 (inset). The quantum conductances are obtained for CNTQD associated with a single MF.

III.2 Thermodynamics of the Kondo system

The thermodynamic potential F~\widetilde{F} in the KR-sbMFA approach is given by the partition function Z~\widetilde{Z} at the saddle point of the action function S~\widetilde{S} (see [129]):

F~=Tln(Z~)=F~b+F~f+ΔF~=Uνdνdν\displaystyle\widetilde{F}=-Tln(\widetilde{Z})=\widetilde{F}_{b}+\widetilde{F}_{f}+\Delta\widetilde{F}=U\sum_{\nu}d^{\dagger}_{\nu}d_{\nu}
+3Ulstlstls+6Uff+λ(1)λlslsQls\displaystyle+3U\sum_{ls}t^{\dagger}_{ls}t_{ls}+6Uf^{\dagger}f+\lambda({\cal{I}}-1)-\lambda_{ls}\sum_{ls}Q_{ls}
+F~f+ΔF~\displaystyle+\widetilde{F}_{f}+\Delta\widetilde{F} (18)

where F~b(f)\widetilde{F}_{b(f)} are the bosonic and fermionic parts of the free energy. ΔF~\Delta\widetilde{F} is the correction to the thermodynamic potential (it includes the two- and three-body fluctuations introduced by the FL theory [52, 57, 53]). The F~f\widetilde{F}_{f} can be written in terms of the Matsubara Green’s functions using the contour integral method with cut along the real frequency axis [130, 87]:

F~f=Tν,iwnln[Λνiwn]\displaystyle\widetilde{F}_{f}=-T\sum_{\nu,iw_{n}}ln[\Lambda_{\nu}-iw_{n}] (19)
Tmν,iwnamln[Λmνiwn]=νΛνIm{X[z]}𝑑z\displaystyle-T\sum_{m\nu^{\prime},iw_{n}}a_{m}ln[\Lambda_{m\nu^{\prime}}-iw_{n}]=\sum_{\nu}\int^{\Lambda_{\nu}}_{-\infty}Im\{X[z]\}dz
+mνΛmνIm{amX[z]}𝑑z\displaystyle+\sum_{m\nu^{\prime}}\int^{\Lambda_{m\nu^{\prime}}}_{-\infty}Im\{a_{m}X[z]\}dz

iwniw_{n} is the Matsubara frequency, and Λν(mν)\Lambda_{\nu(m\nu^{\prime})} are the complex poles of the quasiparticle Kondo resonance. The poles of the channel ν\nu^{\prime} coupled to the TSC are represented by Λmν\Lambda_{m\nu^{\prime}} where m=0,±m=0,\pm (m=0m=0 is associated with the zero Majorana bound state and m=±m=\pm represents the states excited by tt). The complex poles can be written in the form Λ0ν=(2iΓ~νiδ+c)/3+b/(3c)\Lambda_{0\nu^{\prime}}=(-2i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}-i\delta+c)/3+b/(3c) and Λ±ν=(2iΓ~νiδ±iemi(π/6))/3±(iem¯i(π/6)b)/(3c)\Lambda_{\pm\nu^{\prime}}=(-2i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}-i\delta\pm ie^{mi(\pi/6)})/3\pm(ie^{\overline{m}i(\pi/6)}b)/(3c), where c=d+b3+d23c=\sqrt[3]{d+\sqrt{b^{3}+d^{2}}}, b=3E~ν26t~2+Γ~ν2b=-3\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}-6\widetilde{t}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}} and d=2iΓ~ν(9E~ν29t~2+Γ~ν2)d=-2i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}(9\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}-9\widetilde{t}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}). The coefficients are defined by am=(t~2+(Λmν+iδ)(Λmν+E~ν+iδ+iΓ~ν))/mm(ΛmνΛmν)a_{m}=(-\widetilde{t}^{2}+(\Lambda_{m\nu^{\prime}}+i\delta)(\Lambda_{m\nu^{\prime}}+\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}+i\delta+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}))/\prod_{m^{\prime}\neq m}(\Lambda_{m\nu^{\prime}}-\Lambda_{m^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}). Here ν=+,,+\nu^{\prime}=+\uparrow,-\uparrow,+\downarrow are the quantum numbers addressed to one (two) and three TSCs coupled with CNTQD. X[z]=(1/(2π))α=L,R{Ψ0[1/2+(z±Vα)/(2πiT)]ln[W/(2πiT)]}X[z]=(1/(2\pi))\sum_{\alpha={L,R}}\{\Psi_{0}[1/2+(z\pm V_{\alpha})/(2\pi iT)]-ln[W/(2\pi iT)]\} where Ψ0\Psi_{0} is the hypergeometric digamma function, and X[z]X[z] is written for the non-equilibrium case.

The Fermi liquid theory describes the low-energy regime and is based on the following assumptions: the Kondo singlet elastically scatters conduction electrons, the dressed polarization of the singlet leads to the weak interactions between electrons with different spin orbitals, and the energy of the system is a function of the bare energies EkE_{k} and the relative quasiparticle occupancy numbers δnν\delta n_{\nu}. Using the FL theory [11] and adopting the results of [52, 56], ΔF~\Delta\widetilde{F} can be expressed in the following general form:

ΔF~=1πTKν,E(α1,νE+α2,νE2TK)δnν+\displaystyle\Delta\widetilde{F}=-\frac{1}{\pi T_{K}}\sum_{\nu,E}\left(\alpha_{1,\nu}E+\frac{\alpha_{2,\nu}E^{2}}{T_{K}}\right)\delta n_{\nu}+
1πTKν<ν,EE(φ1,νν+φ2,ννν(E+E)2TK)δnνδnν+\displaystyle\frac{1}{\pi T_{K}}\sum_{\nu<\nu^{\prime},EE^{\prime}}\left(\varphi_{1,\nu\nu^{\prime}}+\frac{\varphi_{2,\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}(E+E^{\prime})}{2T_{K}}\right)\delta n_{\nu}\delta n_{\nu^{\prime}}+
1πTKν<ν<ν′′,EEE′′φ2,ννν′′(N2)TKδnνδnνδnν′′\displaystyle-\frac{1}{\pi T_{K}}\sum_{\nu<\nu^{\prime}<\nu^{\prime\prime},EE^{\prime}E^{\prime\prime}}\frac{\varphi_{2,\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime\prime}}}{(N-2)T_{K}}\delta n_{\nu}\delta n_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta n_{\nu^{\prime\prime}} (20)

where α1,ν/π=χ~νν\alpha_{1,\nu}/\pi=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu} (α2,ν/π=(1/2)χ~ννν[3]\alpha_{2,\nu}/\pi=-(1/2)\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu\nu}), φ1,νν/π=χ~νν\varphi_{1,\nu\nu^{\prime}}/\pi=-\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} (φ2,ννν′′/π=2χ~ννν′′[3]\varphi_{2,\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime\prime}}/\pi=2\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime\prime}}) are the FL coefficients [see [53][57]], which are the functions of the renormalized spin-orbital two- (χ~ν1ν2\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu_{1}\nu_{2}}) and three-body static correlators (χ~ν1ν2ν3[3]\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu_{1}\nu_{2}\nu_{3}}).

In this approach, we can integrate the energies EE by δnν\delta n_{\nu} in Eq. (17) and find ΔF~\Delta\widetilde{F} in the form intended for sbMFA calculations, determined by the general susceptibilities:

ΔF~=ν(χ~ννδE~ν2+χ~ννν[3]δE~ν26)δE~ν+\displaystyle\Delta\widetilde{F}=-\sum_{\nu}\left(\frac{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}}{2}+\frac{\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu\nu}\delta\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu}}{6}\right)\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}+
ν<ν(χ~ννχ~ννν[3](δE~ν+δE~ν)4)δE~νδE~ν+\displaystyle\sum_{\nu<\nu^{\prime}}\left(-\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-\frac{\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}(\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}+\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}})}{4}\right)\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}+
ν<ν<ν′′χ~ννν′′[3]2δE~νδE~νδE~ν′′\displaystyle\sum_{\nu<\nu^{\prime}<\nu^{\prime\prime}}\frac{\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime\prime}}}{2}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime\prime}} (21)

χ~νν=2ΔF~δE~ν2\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=-\frac{\partial^{2}\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial\delta\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu}} and χ~ννν[3]=3ΔF~δE~νδE~ν2\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}=-\frac{\partial^{3}\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}\partial\delta\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}. δE~ν=E~ν2E~ν2\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}=\sqrt{\langle\widetilde{E}_{\nu}^{2}\rangle-\widetilde{E}_{\nu}^{2}} is the fluctuation of the quasiparticle level and δE~νE~ν\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}\ll\widetilde{E}_{\nu}. In the weak coupling ansatz (t~t\widetilde{t}\ll t), ΔF~\Delta\widetilde{F} does not fundamentally change the solution of the equations in the self-consistent sbMFA procedure. Formally, we can prove this by considering δE~ν=(ΔΓ~ν)cot[πQν]\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}=(\Delta\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu})\cot[\pi Q_{\nu}], where ΔΓ~ν=Γνδzν2Γνzν2\Delta\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}=\Gamma_{\nu}\delta z^{2}_{\nu}\ll\Gamma_{\nu}z^{2}_{\nu} and δzν=νzννzνzν2\delta z_{\nu}=\sqrt{\sum_{\nu}z^{\dagger}_{\nu}\cdot\sum_{\nu}z_{\nu}-z^{2}_{\nu}}. The expected values of the boson fields bnb_{n} and the constraints λ,λls\lambda,\lambda_{ls} we found by solving the non-equilibrium self-consistent equations from Eq.(3), modified by the ΔF~\Delta\widetilde{F} and completed with an additional equation:

F~bn=Δ~n+ΔE~n+ΔF~bn=0\displaystyle\frac{\partial\widetilde{F}}{\partial b_{n}}=\Delta\widetilde{{\mathcal{H}}}_{{n}}+\Delta\widetilde{E}_{{n}}+\frac{\partial\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial b_{n}}=0
F~λ=1=0\displaystyle\frac{\partial\widetilde{F}}{\partial\lambda}={\cal{I}}-1=0 (22)
F~λls=flsfls<Qls+ΔF~λls=0\displaystyle\frac{\partial\widetilde{F}}{\partial\lambda_{ls}}=\langle f^{\dagger}_{ls}f_{ls}\rangle^{<}-Q_{ls}+\frac{\partial\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial\lambda_{ls}}=0
F~δE~ν=0\displaystyle\frac{\partial\widetilde{F}}{\partial\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}}=0

Another approach that can be applied to the sbMFA method is presented in [131], where quantum fluctuations are taken into account at the level of individual boson fields and Lagrange multipliers. By integrating over the Grassmann variables and expanding to second order in the boson variables, one obtains Gaussian corrections to the saddle-point action. The alternative methods are based on the spin-rotation invariant (SRI) representation of the auxiliary bosons, where by finding the Z-component and the transverse components of the spin operators, the charge and spin density fluctuations can be obtained in terms of the auxiliary boson fields [132].

Differentiating F~f\widetilde{F}_{f} with respect to E~ν\widetilde{E}_{\nu} we get the spin-orbital occupation number nν=lsn_{\nu=ls} in the following way:

nν=Qν=flsfls<=F~fE~ν=δνπ=\displaystyle n_{\nu}=Q_{\nu}=\langle f^{\dagger}_{ls}f_{ls}\rangle^{<}=\frac{\partial\widetilde{F}_{f}}{\partial\widetilde{E}_{\nu}}=\frac{\delta_{\nu}}{\pi}= (23)
αIm{ln[W2πiT]+Ψ0[1/2+E~ν+iΓ~ν±Vα2πiT]2π}.\displaystyle\sum_{\alpha}\textrm{Im}\left\{\frac{-ln\left[\frac{W}{2\pi iT}\right]+\Psi_{0}\left[1/2+\frac{\widetilde{E}_{\nu}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]}{2\pi}\right\}.

In further calculations (especially for the shot noise and the current in the nonlinear voltage range), the general two- and three-body susceptibilities will be relevant. Thermodynamically, we can define two- and three-body correlation functions as follows χ~ν1ν2=01/T𝑑τδnν2(τ)δnν1(0)<\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu_{1}\nu_{2}}=\int^{1/T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta n_{\nu_{2}}(\tau)\delta n_{\nu_{1}}(0)\rangle^{<} and χ~ν1ν2ν3[3]=01/T𝑑τ301/T𝑑τ2T[τ]δnν3(τ3)δnν2(τ2)δnν1(0)<\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu_{1}\nu_{2}\nu_{3}}=-\int^{1/T}_{0}d\tau_{3}\int^{1/T}_{0}d\tau_{2}\langle T_{[\tau]}\delta n_{\nu_{3}}(\tau_{3})\delta n_{\nu_{2}}(\tau_{2})\delta n_{\nu_{1}}(0)\rangle^{<} (for diagonal parts ν1=ν2=ν3=ν\nu_{1}=\nu_{2}=\nu_{3}=\nu). According to the definitions, the static nonequilibrium partial susceptibilities of the renormalized quasiparticle cloud can be expressed by the following (as used in the NRG calculations [56]):

χ~νν=2F~fE~ν2=\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}=-\frac{\partial^{2}\widetilde{F}_{f}}{\partial\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu}}=
αIm{Ψ1[1/2+E~ν+iΓ~ν±Vα2πiT]4π2iT}=V=T=0\displaystyle\sum_{\alpha}\textrm{Im}\left\{\frac{-\Psi_{1}\left[1/2+\frac{\widetilde{E}_{\nu}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]}{4\pi^{2}iT}\right\}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle V=T=0}}{{=}} (24)
Γ~νπ(E~ν2+Γ~ν2)=Γ~νπTK,ν2=sin2[δν]πΓ~ν=sin2[δν]δnνπΓz~ν2\displaystyle\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}}{\pi(\widetilde{E}_{\nu}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}^{2})}=\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}}{\pi T^{2}_{K,\nu}}=\frac{\sin^{2}[\delta_{\nu}]}{\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}}=\frac{\sin^{2}[\delta_{\nu}]\delta n_{\nu}}{\pi\Gamma\widetilde{z}^{2}_{\nu}}
χ~ννν[3]=3F~fE~ν3=\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu\nu}=-\frac{\partial^{3}\widetilde{F}_{f}}{\partial\widetilde{E}^{3}_{\nu}}=
αIm{Ψ2[1/2+E~ν+iΓ~ν±Vα2πiT]8π3T2}=V=T=0\displaystyle\sum_{\alpha}\textrm{Im}\left\{\frac{\Psi_{2}\left[1/2+\frac{\widetilde{E}_{\nu}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]}{8\pi^{3}T^{2}}\right\}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle V=T=0}}{{=}} (25)
2Γ~νE~νπ(E~ν2+Γ~ν2)2=2Γ~νE~νπTK,ν4=2cos[δν]sin3[δν]πΓ~ν2\displaystyle\frac{-2\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\widetilde{E}_{\nu}}{\pi(\widetilde{E}_{\nu}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}^{2})^{2}}=\frac{-2\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\widetilde{E}_{\nu}}{\pi T^{4}_{K,\nu}}=\frac{-2\cos[\delta_{\nu}]\sin^{3}[\delta_{\nu}]}{\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu}}

The diagonal ν=ν\nu^{\prime}=\nu static susceptibilities, according to Yamada and Yosida [133] are determined by the renormalization factor 1/z~ν21/\widetilde{z}^{2}_{\nu}. In the channel directly coupled to the Majorana fermion ν\nu^{\prime}, two and three-body correlation functions can be expressed as follows:

χ~νν=V=T=0Γ~ν+t~ν2δπ(E~ν2+Γ~ν2+2t~ν2Γ~νδ)\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle V=T=0}}{{=}}\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}+\frac{\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta}}{\pi(\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}^{2}+\frac{2\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta})} (26)
χ~ννν[3]=χ~ννE~ν=2(Γ~ν+t~ν2δ)E~νπ(E~ν2+Γ~ν2+2t~ν2Γ~νδ)2\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}=\frac{\partial\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}}{\partial\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}}=\frac{-2(\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}+\frac{\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta})\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\pi(\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}^{2}+\frac{2\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta})^{2}} (27)

In both cases the two-body static correlation functions are equal to the quasiparticle density of states at the Fermi level: χ~νν=fν;fν|E=0=ϱ~ν(0)\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}=\langle\langle f_{\nu};f^{\dagger}_{\nu}\rangle\rangle|_{E=0}=\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0) (χ~νν=ϱ~ν\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}=\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}). The diagonal and off-diagonal two- and three-body correlation functions result from the FL theory and the spin-orbital fluctuations can be obtained by using the derivatives in the following form:

χ~νν=2ΔF~δE~ν2=χ~νν+νχ~ννν[3]δE~νδE~ν0χ~νν\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}=-\frac{\partial^{2}\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial\delta\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu}}=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}+\sum_{\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu\nu}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}\approx 0}}{{\approx}}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}
χ~ννν[3]=3ΔF~δE~ν3=χ~ννν[3]=χ~ννE~ν\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu\nu}=-\frac{\partial^{3}\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial\delta\widetilde{E}^{3}_{\nu}}=\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu\nu}=\frac{\partial\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}}{\partial\widetilde{E}_{\nu}}
χ~νν=2ΔF~δE~νδE~ν=χ~νν+χ~ννν[3]δE~ν+χ~ννν[3]δE~ν\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=-\frac{\partial^{2}\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}\partial\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}}=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}+\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}+\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu\nu}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}
(1/2)ν′′(ν,ν)χ~ννν′′[3]δE~ν′′δE~ν(ν,ν′′)0χ~νν=\displaystyle-(1/2)\sum_{\nu^{\prime\prime}\neq(\nu,\nu^{\prime})}\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime\prime}}\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime\prime}}\stackrel{{\scriptstyle\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu(\nu^{\prime},\nu^{\prime\prime})}\approx 0}}{{\approx}}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=
(Wνν1)χ~ννχ~νν\displaystyle-(W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1)\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}} (28)
χ~ννν[3]=3ΔF~δE~νδE~ν2=χ~ννν[3]=χ~ννE~ν=\displaystyle\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}=-\frac{\partial^{3}\Delta\widetilde{F}}{\partial\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}\partial\delta\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}=\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}=\frac{\partial\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}{\partial\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}}=
(Wνν1)χ~ννχ~ννE~ν+W˙ννχ~ννχ~νν=\displaystyle-(W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1)\frac{\partial\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}}}{\partial\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}}+\dot{W}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}}=
Kννχ~ννν[3]\displaystyle-K_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}

where Wνν1χ~νν/χ~ννχ~ννW_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\equiv 1-\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}/\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}} is the Wilson ratio [10, 130, 29, 58, 17]. By definition, WννW_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} is expressed by the susceptibilities and, in its original form, is experimentally determinable by the ratio of the spin susceptibility χ(s)\chi_{(s)} and the linear coefficient of the specific heat γN\gamma_{N}, as will be discussed later in this subsection. Two-body correlation functions written on the basis of ΔF~\Delta\widetilde{F} are more general and include the correction for the fluctuation δE~ν\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}. For the systems where δE~νE~ν\delta\widetilde{E}_{\nu}\sim\widetilde{E}_{\nu} the additive part can play a crucial role. In practice, to compute 2-body even correlation functions χ~νν\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} and 3-body odd correlation functions χ~ννν\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}, we can formally adopt the Random Phase Approximation (RPA) method and its correction for non-zero frequency susceptibility [130, 134]. This alternative approach introduces the imaginary and real parts of the higher-order correlations and will be useful for discussing of the frequency dependent shot noise and the current. In this paper we have proposed to use the weak coupling approach to calculate the Wilson ratios and consequently the higher-order correlation functions. The weak coupling approach is based on the low renormalization coupling strength of the Kondo resonance to the normal electrodes (zν2z^{2}_{\nu}) (t~0t0\widetilde{t}_{0}\ll t_{0}). Finally, in the general case for SU(N) Anderson model, we found that the Wilson ratio Wνν=1χ~νν/χ~ννχ~νν1+1/(N1)W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=1-\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}/\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}}\approx 1+1/(N-1) and as we can see χ~νν/χ~ννχ~νν=1/(N1)-\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}/\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}}=1/(N-1) is the correction from two-particle correlators. Wνν>1W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}>1 is the consequence of the finite Coulomb (residual) interaction between the quasipaticles and depends on the degree of degeneracy NN[58]. In general terms, using the weak coupling ansatz and exact expression for the partition function ZNZ_{N}, the Wilson ratio can be written as follows:

Wνν1=nνnνnννδnν2δnν2=\displaystyle W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1=\frac{n_{\nu}n_{\nu}-n_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}{\sqrt{\delta n^{2}_{\nu}\delta n^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}}= (29)
QνQνQννQν(IQν)Qν(IQν)=δQννΔQνν\displaystyle\frac{Q_{\nu}Q_{\nu^{\prime}}-Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}{\sqrt{Q_{\nu}(I-Q_{\nu})Q_{\nu^{\prime}}(I-Q_{\nu^{\prime}})}}=\frac{\delta Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}{\Delta Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}
Kνν=δQννδnν2\displaystyle K_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=\frac{\delta Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta n^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}} (30)

where QνQ_{\nu} is the charge expressed by the boson fields operators (averaged over the time, in the static susceptibilities) and Qνν=ννbνν2IQ_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=\sum_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}b^{2}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}I is the sum over all boson fields amplitudes at which the two-particle state νν\nu\nu^{\prime} exists. Surprisingly, the ansatz quantitatively reproduces the NRG result, which use the self-energy and the Ward identities to calculate 2(3)-body quantities [135, 56]. W˙νν\dot{W}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} in Eq. (25) is the derivative of the Wilson ratio and plays the important role in the 3-body correlation function. Formally, W˙νν\dot{W}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} can be expressed in terms of KννK_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}, but using the weak coupling approach, it can be defined as:

W˙νν=WννE~ν=\displaystyle\dot{W}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=-\frac{\partial W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}{\partial\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}}= (31)
δnν2δQνν[Qν(Qν+QνI2Qνν)+Qνν]2ΔQνν3\displaystyle-\frac{\delta n^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}[Q_{\nu}(Q_{\nu}+Q_{\nu^{\prime}}-I-2Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}})+Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}]}{2\Delta Q^{3}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 10: (Color online) a) The density plot of the charge fluctuation ΔN2\Delta N^{2} as function of EdE_{d} and tt for the CNTQD-TSC hybrid device. b) The EdE_{d} dependence of ΔN2\Delta N^{2} with increasing of tunnel coupling to a single TSC. ΔN2=1/4\Delta N^{2}=1/4 shows the saturation value in the strong coupling with MF.

Using the two-body correlators, we can write down the charge, spin and pseudospin susceptibilities in the forms (following A.C. Hewson et al. in [58]): χ(c)=01/kBT𝑑τδQ(τ)δQ(0)<=lsls01/kBT𝑑τδnls(τ)δnls(0)<=ν=ls(1ννU~ννϱ~ν)ϱ~ν=ννχ~νν\chi_{(c)}=\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta Q(\tau)\delta Q(0)\rangle^{<}=\sum_{lsl^{\prime}s^{\prime}}\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta n_{ls}(\tau)\delta n_{l^{\prime}s^{\prime}}(0)\rangle^{<}=\sum_{\nu=ls}(1-\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}})\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}=\sum_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}, χ(s)=l01/kBT𝑑τδSlZ(τ)δSlZ(0)<=14lsss¯01/kBT𝑑τδnls(τ)δnls(0)<=14ν=ls(1+U~ννϱ~ν=ls¯)ϱ~ν=14lssssχ~lsls\chi_{(s)}=\sum_{l}\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta S^{Z}_{l}(\tau)\delta S^{Z}_{l}(0)\rangle^{<}=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{ls}s\overline{s}\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta n_{ls}(\tau)\delta n_{ls}(0)\rangle^{<}=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{\nu=ls}(1+\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}=l\overline{s}})\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{lss^{\prime}}ss^{\prime}\widetilde{\chi}_{lsls^{\prime}} and χ(ps)=1401/kBT𝑑τδTZ(τ)δTZ(0)<=14lslsll01/kBT𝑑τδnls(τ)δnls(0)<=14ν=ls(1U~νν=ls¯ϱ~ν=ls¯+ν=l¯sU~ννϱ~ν)ϱ~ν=14ν=lsν=lsllχ~νν\chi_{(ps)}=\frac{1}{4}\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta T^{Z}(\tau)\delta T^{Z}(0)\rangle^{<}=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{lsl^{\prime}s^{\prime}}ll^{\prime}\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta n_{ls}(\tau)\delta n_{l^{\prime}s^{\prime}}(0)\rangle^{<}=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{\nu=ls}(1-\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu^{\prime}=l\overline{s}}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}=l\overline{s}}+\sum_{\nu^{\prime}=\overline{l}s}\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}})\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}=\frac{1}{4}\sum_{\nu=ls\nu^{\prime}=l^{\prime}s^{\prime}}ll^{\prime}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}, where δnν=nνnν\delta n_{\nu}=n_{\nu}-\langle n_{\nu}\rangle, δQ=νnννnν\delta Q=\sum_{\nu}n_{\nu}-\langle\sum_{\nu}n_{\nu}\rangle, δSlZ=(1/2)(nlnlnlnl)\delta S^{Z}_{l}=(1/2)(n_{l\uparrow}-n_{l\downarrow}-\langle n_{l\uparrow}-n_{l\downarrow}\rangle) and δTZ=(1/2)(n+nn+n)\delta T^{Z}=(1/2)(n_{+}-n_{-}-\langle n_{+}-n_{-}\rangle) are the total charge, spin and pseudospin fluctuations. Consequently, the residual quasiparticle interaction is given by U~ννχ~νν/(χ~ννχ~νν)\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\equiv-\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}/(\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}) [58, 33, 56]. The linear coefficient of the quasiparticle specific heat for SU(4) Kondo symmetry in a Fermi liquid theory is given by γN=π23ν=lsϱ~ν\gamma_{N}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{3}\sum_{\nu=ls}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}. For a fully symmetric SU(4) Kondo effect, the spin, charge and pseudospin susceptibilities are determined by the quasiparticle two-body correlation function as follows: χ(c)=χ~νν[1(U~νν+2U~νν¯)χ~νν]=χ~νν[13/(N1)]0\chi_{(c)}=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}[1-(\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu}+2\widetilde{U}^{\nu\overline{\nu}})\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}]=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}[1-3/(N-1)]\approx 0, χ(s)=χ~νν[1+U~ννχ~νν]=χ~νν[1+1/(N1)]=χ~ννW(s)\chi_{(s)}=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}[1+\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}]=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}[1+1/(N-1)]=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}W_{(s)} and χ(ps)=χ~νν[1(U~νν2U~νν¯)χ~νν]=χ~νν[1+1/(N1)]=χ~ννW(ps)\chi_{(ps)}=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}[1-(\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu}-2\widetilde{U}^{\nu\overline{\nu}})\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}]=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}[1+1/(N-1)]=\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}W_{(ps)}. For the fully symmetric SU(4) Kondo state, both Wilson ratios are the equal Wps=Ws=Wνν=(π2Nχ(s))/(3γN)=(4/3)W_{ps}=W_{s}=W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=(\pi^{2}N\chi_{(s)})/(3\gamma_{N})=(4/3) [58].

To discuss the expected value of the local pseudospin for SU(4) symmetry, we used a quadratic Casimir operator, which is the bilinear sum of N21N^{2}-1 generators belonging to the Lie group. The quadratic Casimir operator is proportional to the fluctuations of the local pseudospin momentum. For the SU(4) Kondo effect, the pseudospin is screened by the conduction electrons. Based on the Lie algebra generators 𝒪^\hat{\mathcal{O}} we can define the total local Casimir operator: C=iννdν𝒪^ννidνC=\sum_{i\nu\nu^{\prime}}d^{\dagger}_{\nu}{\hat{\mathcal{O}}}^{i}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}d_{\nu^{\prime}}, where i=1N21i=1...N^{2}-1 [46, 43]. The Z-component of the Casimir operator can be constructed from N1N-1 diagonal Lie generators of SU(N=4N=4) symmetry as follows: CZ=i=3,8,15ννdν𝒪^ννidνC_{Z}=\sum_{i=3,8,15\nu\nu^{\prime}}d^{\dagger}_{\nu}{\hat{\mathcal{O}}}^{i}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}d_{\nu^{\prime}} [136]. Finally, we can express the total quadratic Casimir operator and its Z-component in the following way: C2=(15/8)(νQν(2/3)νQνQν¯)C^{2}=(15/8)(\sum_{\nu}Q_{\nu}-(2/3)\sum_{\nu}Q_{\nu}\cdot Q_{\overline{\nu}}), and CZ2=(3/8)(νQν(2/3)νQνQν¯)=(1/4)(ννχνννχνν¯)C^{2}_{Z}=(3/8)(\sum_{\nu}Q_{\nu}-(2/3)\sum_{\nu}Q_{\nu}\cdot Q_{\overline{\nu}})=(1/4)(\sum_{\nu\nu}\chi_{\nu\nu}-\sum_{\nu}\chi_{\nu\overline{\nu}}). The local Z-component, depending on the coupling strength with 1TSC, 2TSC or 3TSC. For further discussion, we can express CZ2C^{2}_{Z} in the boson fields operators and separate in the following sum CZ2=CZ(K)2+CZ(M)2C^{2}_{Z}=C^{2}_{Z(K)}+C^{2}_{Z(M)}, where CZ(K)2C^{2}_{Z(K)} describes the fluctuations in the normal (Kondo-like) channel and CZ(M)2C^{2}_{Z(M)} is related to the Majorana fermion part. For the CNTQD-1TSC device, the relations of the quadratic Casimir operators can be expressed as:

CZ(K)2=(1/3)(p+2+sps2+νdν2\displaystyle C^{2}_{Z(K)}=(1/3)(p^{2}_{+\downarrow}+\sum_{s}p^{2}_{-s}+\sum_{\nu}d^{2}_{\nu}
+t¯+2+st¯s2)\displaystyle+\overline{t}^{2}_{+\uparrow}+\sum_{s}\overline{t}^{2}_{-s}) (32)
CZ(M)2=(1/24)(9p+2+p+2+sps2+4νdν2+\displaystyle C^{2}_{Z(M)}=(1/24)(9p^{2}_{+\uparrow}+p^{2}_{+\downarrow}+\sum_{s}p^{2}_{-s}+4\sum_{\nu}d^{2}_{\nu}+
+t¯+2+9t¯+2+st¯s2).\displaystyle+\overline{t}^{2}_{+\uparrow}+9\overline{t}^{2}_{+\downarrow}+\sum_{s}\overline{t}^{2}_{-s}). (33)

CZ2C^{2}_{Z} for two Majoranas that are coupled to CNTQD can be obtained in the following way:

CZ(K)2=(1/4)(lpl2+ldl2+d2+d2\displaystyle C^{2}_{Z(K)}=(1/4)(\sum_{l}p^{2}_{l\downarrow}+\sum_{l}d^{2}_{l}+d^{2}_{\uparrow\downarrow}+d^{2}_{\downarrow\uparrow}
+t¯+2+t¯2)\displaystyle+\overline{t}^{2}_{+\uparrow}+\overline{t}^{2}_{-\downarrow}) (34)
CZ(M)2=(1/8)(3lpl2+lpl2+2ldl2\displaystyle C^{2}_{Z(M)}=(1/8)(3\sum_{l}p^{2}_{l\uparrow}+\sum_{l}p^{2}_{l\downarrow}+2\sum_{l}d^{2}_{l} (35)
+2d2+2d2+4sdss2+t¯+2+3t¯+2+3t¯2+t¯2).\displaystyle+2d^{2}_{\uparrow\downarrow}+2d^{2}_{\downarrow\uparrow}+4\sum_{s}d^{2}_{ss}+\overline{t}^{2}_{+\uparrow}+3\overline{t}^{2}_{+\downarrow}+3\overline{t}^{2}_{-\uparrow}+\overline{t}^{2}_{-\downarrow}).

The quadratic Casimir operator for the CNTQD-3TSC system can be written using the following formulas:

CZ(K)2=(1/24)(sp+s2+p2+9p2+4νdν2\displaystyle C^{2}_{Z(K)}=(1/24)(\sum_{s}p^{2}_{+s}+p^{2}_{-\uparrow}+9p^{2}_{-\downarrow}+4\sum_{\nu}d^{2}_{\nu}
+st¯+s2+t¯2+9t¯2)\displaystyle+\sum_{s}\overline{t}^{2}_{+s}+\overline{t}^{2}_{-\uparrow}+9\overline{t}^{2}_{-\downarrow}) (36)
CZ(M)2=(1/3)(sp+s2+p2+νdν2\displaystyle C^{2}_{Z(M)}=(1/3)(\sum_{s}p^{2}_{+s}+p^{2}_{-\uparrow}+\sum_{\nu}d^{2}_{\nu}
+st¯+s2+t¯2).\displaystyle+\sum_{s}\overline{t}^{2}_{+s}+\overline{t}^{2}_{-\uparrow}). (37)

In the calculations we used the invariant of the two-body susceptibility χ(z)\chi_{(z)}, which is equal to CZ2C^{2}_{Z} in the isolated (local) case (or when TTKT\gg T_{K}). χ(z)\chi_{(z)} is the quantum metric in the two-body correlation space and can be expressed as follows χ(z)=(1/4)(νχ~ννννχ~νν)\chi_{(z)}=(1/4)(\sum_{\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}-\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}). The charge susceptibility is given by: χ(c)=ννχ~νν\chi_{(c)}=\sum_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}. The three-body susceptibility can be written as χ(z)[3]=(1/4)(νχ~ννν[3]ννχ~ννν[3])\chi_{(z)}^{[3]}=(1/4)(\sum_{\nu}\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu\nu}-\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}) - in fact, the cubic Casimir operator C3C^{3} would be more appropriate. However, after expanding this in terms of the conformal Lie group generators, it turns out that it is simply proportional to the quadratic Casimir (by the explicit relation C3=(d/2)C2C^{3}=(d/2)C^{2}). Formally, the conformal group in dd dimensions (in our case d=4d=4) consists of a single dilation operator D^\hat{D}, dd translations P^\hat{P}, dd special conformal transformations K^\hat{K} and d(d1)/2d(d-1)/2 rotations J^\hat{J} [137].

Using the quadratic Casimir operator we have computed T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}, T[]χ(c)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} and T[]2χ(z)[3]T_{[\star]}^{2}\chi_{(z)}^{[3]} which are quantized at zero temperature. T[]=min{TK,ν}T_{[\star]}=\min\{T_{K,\nu}\} is the scaling characteristic energy. In the Fermi liquid phase it corresponds to the Kondo temperature. T[]χ(z,c)(T=0K)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z,c)}(T=0K) and T[]2χ(z)[3](0)-T_{[\star]}^{2}\chi_{(z)}^{[3]}(0) are the frozen effective spin/charge and the three-body correlator in the system [60]. Last year the physicists crossed the Rubicon, and measured the spin susceptibility in the SU(2) Kondo quantum dot, in fact it was the fundamental measurement of the spin of the Kondo impurity, using the charge-sensing method [138]. One of the most important results in this matter is the measurement of the three-body correlations, indirectly using the lock-in technique to detect linear and nonlinear shot noise [60].

III.3 Transport measurements

At the Fermi level, the system in Fig. 1 satisfies the Friedel sum rule, and the linear conductance for the normal (Kondo) channel can be written as follows:

𝒢ν(V)=e2hαRe{Γ~νΨ1[12+E~ν+iΓ~ν±Vα2πiT]4πT}\displaystyle{\cal{G}}_{\nu}(V)=\frac{e^{2}}{h}\sum_{\alpha}\textrm{Re}\left\{\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\Psi_{1}\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\widetilde{E}_{\nu}+i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]}{4\pi T}\right\}
=V=T=0e2hΓ~ν2TK,ν2=e2hsin2[δν]\displaystyle\stackrel{{\scriptstyle V=T=0}}{{=}}\frac{e^{2}}{h}\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu}}{T^{2}_{K,\nu}}=\frac{e^{2}}{h}\sin^{2}[\delta_{\nu}] (38)

where the quantum conductance in the ν\nu^{\prime} channels that are coupled to the TSC is given by :

𝒢ν(V)=e2hαmRe{Γ~νamΨ1[12+Λmν±Vα2πiT]4πT}\displaystyle{\cal{G}}_{\nu^{\prime}}(V)=\frac{e^{2}}{h}\sum_{\alpha m}\textrm{Re}\left\{\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}a_{m}\Psi_{1}\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\Lambda^{*}_{m\nu^{\prime}}\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]}{4\pi T}\right\}
=V=T=0e2hΓ~ν(Γ~ν+t~ν2δ)E~ν2+Γ~ν2+2t~ν2Γ~νδ\displaystyle\stackrel{{\scriptstyle V=T=0}}{{=}}\frac{e^{2}}{h}\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}(\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}+\frac{\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta})}{\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}^{2}+\frac{2\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu}\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta}} (39)
=e2hδΓ~ν+t~ν2δΓ~νcsc2[δν]+2t~ν2.\displaystyle=\frac{e^{2}}{h}\frac{\delta\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}+\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}{\delta\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\csc^{2}[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}]+2\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}}.

The total conductance can be expressed as 𝒢=ν𝒢ν+ν𝒢ν{\cal{G}}=\sum_{\nu}{\cal{G}}_{\nu}+\sum_{\nu^{\prime}}{\cal{G}}_{\nu^{\prime}} where ν=±1,+1\nu^{\prime}=\pm 1\uparrow,+1\downarrow and depends on the number of the spin-orbital channels coupled to the TSC. The quantum conductance 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} develops from the current formula in the following way 𝒢(0)=dI/dV|V0{\mathcal{G}}(0)=dI/dV|_{V\mapsto 0}. The thermal fluctuations (thermal noise) can be related to the linear conductance via the fluctuation-dissipation theorem and the nonlinear temperature part, as shown in [56]: ST=4kBTν(𝒢ν(0)(e2/h)νcT,ν(πkBT)2+..)S_{T}=4k_{B}T{\sum_{\nu}(\mathcal{G}_{\nu}}(0)-(e^{2}/h)\sum_{\nu}c_{T,\nu}(\pi k_{B}T)^{2}+..), where cT,νc_{T,\nu} is the temperature coefficient explicitly expressed by the higher-order correlations. In our analysis we have focused on the zero temperature shot noise and, therefore the equilibrium fluctuations are negligible in the further discussion of the shot noise SS. Using the Keldysh formalism for nonequilibrium Green’s functions, and zero-frequency limit for the shot noise, we can write the zero temperature current II and the shot noise SS as a function of the unitary transmission TνT_{\nu} for the ν\nu channel, in the Landauer-Bütikker form:

I=I^=(e/h)|V|/2|V|/2νTν(E)dE\displaystyle I=\langle\hat{I}\rangle=(e/h)\int^{|V|/2}_{-|V|/2}\sum_{\nu}T_{\nu}(E)dE (40)
S(t,t)=(1/4)αSαα>(t,t)+Sαα<(t,t)\displaystyle S(t,t^{\prime})=(1/4)\sum_{\alpha}S^{>}_{\alpha\alpha}(t,t^{\prime})+S^{<}_{\alpha\alpha}(t,t^{\prime})
Sαα¯>(t,t)Sαα¯<(t,t)=S(τ,0)\displaystyle-S^{>}_{\alpha\overline{\alpha}}(t,t^{\prime})-S^{<}_{\alpha\overline{\alpha}}(t,t^{\prime})=S(\tau,0)
=(1/2){I^(τ),I^(0)}I2\displaystyle=(1/2)\langle\{\hat{I}(\tau),\hat{I}(0)\}\rangle-I^{2}
S=limw02+eiwτS(τ,0)𝑑τ\displaystyle S=\lim_{w\mapsto 0}2\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}e^{iw\tau}S(\tau,0)d\tau (41)
=2(e2/h)|V|/2|V|/2νTν(E)[1Tν(E)]dE\displaystyle=2(e^{2}/h)\int^{|V|/2}_{-|V|/2}\sum_{\nu}T_{\nu}(E)[1-T_{\nu}(E)]dE

where I^=ieh[~,kα=L(R)ν±(1/2)ckανckαν]\hat{I}=\frac{ie}{h}[\widetilde{{\cal{H}}},\sum_{k\alpha=L(R)\nu}\pm(1/2)c^{\dagger}_{k\alpha\nu}c_{k\alpha\nu}] is the current operator. Applying the Wick theorem, to compute contour-ordered auto and cross-correlation functions, the shot noise can expressed in following way Sαα>(<)(t,t)=2(ie)2kqννt~0νt~0ν[Gν,qαν>(<)(t,t)Gν,kαν<(>)(t,t)+Gkαν,ν>(<)(t,t)Gqαν,ν<(>)(t,t)Gν,ν>(<)(t,t)Gqαν,kαν<(>)(t,t)Gkαν,qαν>(<)(t,t)Gν,ν<(>)(t,t)]S^{>(<)}_{\alpha\alpha^{\prime}}(t,t^{\prime})=2\left(\frac{ie}{\hbar}\right)^{2}\sum_{kq\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{t}_{0\nu}\widetilde{t}_{0\nu^{\prime}}[G^{>(<)}_{\nu,q\alpha^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}(t,t^{\prime})G^{<(>)}_{\nu^{\prime},k\alpha\nu}(t^{\prime},t)+G^{>(<)}_{k\alpha\nu,\nu^{\prime}}(t,t^{\prime})G^{<(>)}_{q\alpha^{\prime}\nu^{\prime},\nu}(t^{\prime},t)-G^{>(<)}_{\nu,\nu^{\prime}}(t,t^{\prime})G^{<(>)}_{q\alpha^{\prime}\nu^{\prime},k\alpha\nu}(t^{\prime},t)-G^{>(<)}_{k\alpha\nu,q\alpha^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}(t,t^{\prime})G^{<(>)}_{\nu^{\prime},\nu}(t^{\prime},t)]. Two-correlation functions in SS are decoupled in Hartree-Fock approximation (HFA) for two-particle Green’s functions [139]. TνT_{\nu} in Eqs. (37-38) is the transmission, expressed by the formulas for decoupled and coupled channel to TSC in the following form: Tν(E)=Γ~ν2/[(EE~ν)2+Γ~ν2]T_{\nu}(E)=\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu}/[(E-\widetilde{E}_{\nu})^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu}] and Tν(E)=Γ~νIm[GννR]T_{\nu^{\prime}}(E)=-\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\textrm{Im}[G^{R}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}], where GννR=G^11RG^{R}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}=\hat{G}^{R}_{11} is the retarded Green’s function in the matrix Eq. (6). In general, we have developed the current and the shot noise in the series: I=I0VνcV,νV3+0[V5]I=I_{0}V-\sum_{\nu}c_{V,\nu}V^{3}+0[V^{5}] and S=S0V+νcS,νV3+0[V5]S=S_{0}V+\sum_{\nu}c_{S,\nu}V^{3}+0[V^{5}] where F0=limV0S0/2eI0=νTν(0)(1Tν(0))νTν(0)F_{0}=\lim_{V\mapsto 0}S_{0}/2eI_{0}=\frac{\sum_{\nu}T_{\nu}(0)(1-T_{\nu}(0))}{\sum_{\nu}T_{\nu}(0)} is the linear Fano factor expressed by the linear shot noise S0S_{0} and the current I0I_{0}. For identical transmissions in both spin-orbital channel (ν=ν\nu=\nu^{\prime}), the linear Fano factor can be written as follows: F0=1Tν(0)F_{0}=1-T_{\nu}(0). The nonlinear contribution is described by FK=|SS0|/(2e|II0|)=|SK|/(2e|IK|)=δSKδIK=eeF_{K}=|S-S_{0}|/(2e|I-I_{0}|)=|S_{K}|/(2e|I_{K}|)=\frac{\delta S_{K}}{\delta I_{K}}=\frac{e^{\star}}{e}. SKS_{K} and IKI_{K} measurements contain the information about the effective charge e of the current-carrying particles. The charge differs from the electron charge e. The nonlinear shot noise SKS_{K} and the nonlinear current IKI_{K} are defined as the absolute values and scaled by the characteristic temperature expression: δSK=T[]2|SK|\delta S_{K}=T^{2}_{[\star]}|S_{K}| and δIK=2eT[]2|IK|\delta I_{K}=2eT^{2}_{[\star]}|I_{K}|. These definitions simplify the following discussion, emphasize the Fermi liquid behavior, and are formulated by the expressions of the two- and three-body correlation functions. The coefficients can be written as separate parts of the sum: cV,ν=cV,ν|Wνν1=0+δcV,ν|Wνν1>0c_{V,\nu}=c_{V,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1=0}+\delta c_{V,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1>0} and cS,ν=cS,ν|Wνν1=0+δcS,ν|Wνν1>0c_{S,\nu}=c_{S,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1=0}+\delta c_{S,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1>0}, where δcV(S),ν|Wνν1>0\delta c_{V(S),\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1>0} is the correction developed from the residual interaction U~νν\widetilde{U}^{\nu\nu^{\prime}} between the Kondo quasiparticles. δcS,ν|Wνν1=0\delta c_{S,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1=0} is related to the elastic scattering processes and δcS,ν|Wνν1>0\delta c_{S,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1>0} includes the elastic and inelastic scattering contribution [59, 52, 55]. If we write the equations in the series: Tνi1+i2E+i2E2+0[E3]T_{\nu}\approx i_{1}+i_{2}E+i_{2}E^{2}+0[E^{3}], Tν(1Tν)s1+s2E+s2E2+0[E3]T_{\nu}(1-T_{\nu})\approx s_{1}+s_{2}E+s_{2}E^{2}+0[E^{3}], we can find that I0=i1I_{0}=i_{1}, cV,ν|Wνν1=0=i2/12c_{V,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1=0}=i_{2}/12 and S0=s1S_{0}=s_{1}, cS,ν|Wνν1=0=s2/12c_{S,\nu}|_{W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1=0}=s_{2}/12. Based on the main results of [56], where the authors found the nonlinear transport coefficients to the shot noise and the current for the SU(N) Anderson model using vertex corrections, we adopted the general expressions to calculate the nonlinear Fano factor FK=|cS|/|cV|=ν|cS,ν|/ν|cV,ν|F_{K}=|c_{S}|/|c_{V}|=\sum_{\nu}|c_{S,\nu}|/\sum_{\nu}|c_{V,\nu}|. The transport coefficients are determined by the static linear and nonlinear susceptibilities at low energies. The authors showed that the Ward identities, between the casual self-energies and the Feynman diagrams for the Keldysh vertex function of the zero temperature formalism, can be expressed in terms of the collision integrals. The formulas derived in [56], as suggested by the authors are applicable to a wide class of quantum dots without particle-hole or time-reversal symmetry. According to [56], the coefficients cV,νc_{V,\nu} and cS,νc_{S,\nu} can be expressed in the following way:

cS,ν=π212(cos[4δν]χνν2+(2+3cos[4δν])ννχνν2+\displaystyle c_{S,\nu}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{12}(\cos[4\delta_{\nu}]\chi^{2}_{\nu\nu}+(2+3\cos[4\delta_{\nu}])\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\chi^{2}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}+
4ννcos[2δν]cos[2δν]χνν2\displaystyle 4\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\cos[2\delta_{\nu}]\cos[2\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}]\chi^{2}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} (42)
+3ννν′′ν,νsin[2δν]sin[2δν]χνν′′χνν′′\displaystyle+3\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\sum_{\nu^{\prime\prime}\neq\nu,\nu^{\prime}}\sin[2\delta_{\nu}]\sin[2\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}]\chi_{\nu\nu^{\prime\prime}}\chi_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime\prime}}
(χννν+3ννχννν)sin[4δν]4π)\displaystyle-(\chi_{\nu\nu\nu}+3\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\chi_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}})\frac{\sin[4\delta_{\nu}]}{4\pi})
cV,ν=π212(cos[2δν](χνν2+5ννχνν2)+\displaystyle c_{V,\nu}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{12}(-\cos[2\delta_{\nu}](\chi^{2}_{\nu\nu}+5\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\chi^{2}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}})+ (43)
(χννν+3ννχννν)sin[2δν]2π).\displaystyle(\chi_{\nu\nu\nu}+3\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\chi_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}})\frac{\sin[2\delta_{\nu}]}{2\pi}).

The factors are calculated for symmetric coupling to the normal electrodes Γ~L=Γ~R\widetilde{\Gamma}_{L}=\widetilde{\Gamma}_{R} and are derived from the Keldysh vertex corrections to the current and the shot noise using the principles of Fermi liquid theory. The main contribution to the current and shot noise coefficients is determined by the charge (in the phase shift δν\delta_{\nu}), 2-body (susceptibilities) and 3-body correlation functions. In connection with the previous results, the authors introduced the higher-order fluctuations into the shot-noise formula and expressed the transport coefficients in the elegant form of the general static susceptibilities [56]. In this article we propose to calculate the dressed susceptibilities (χ~ν1ν2\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu_{1}\nu_{2}}) and the 3-body correlations (χ~ν1ν2ν3[3]\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu_{1}\nu_{2}\nu_{3}}) using the extended K-R slave boson mean-field approach [130, 140, 40] and the weak coupling ansatz to calculate the Wilson ratio (t~0t0\widetilde{t}_{0}\ll t_{0}).

In this paper, we also theoretically investigate the thermoelectric power using the Onsager equations [32]. In the linear response theory, the electric and thermal currents can be expressed as: I=e2νLν(0)δV(e/T)νLν(1)δTI=e^{2}\sum_{\nu}L^{(0)}_{\nu}\delta V-(e/T)\sum_{\nu}L^{(1)}_{\nu}\delta T and IQ=eνLν(1)δV+(1/T)νLν(2)δTI_{Q}=-e\sum_{\nu}L^{(1)}_{\nu}\delta V+(1/T)\sum_{\nu}L^{(2)}_{\nu}\delta T, where δV=VLVR\delta V=V_{L}-V_{R} and δT=TdTs\delta T=T_{d}-T_{s} are the difference of the bias voltage and the temperature gradient. Finally, we can write the conductance 𝒢\mathcal{G} and the thermoelectric power 𝒮=(δV/δT)|I=0{\mathcal{S}}=(\delta V/\delta T)|_{I=0} using the integral Lν(n)=Tα+(EVα)nTν(E)(fαE)𝑑EL^{(n)}_{\nu}=T\sum_{\alpha}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}(E-V_{\alpha})^{n}T_{\nu}(E)\left(-\frac{\partial f_{\alpha}}{\partial E}\right)dE - in the following forms:

𝒢=dI/dV=νLν(0)/T\displaystyle\mathcal{G}=dI/dV=\sum_{\nu}L^{(0)}_{\nu}/T
𝒮=kB|e|TνLν(1)νLν(0)=\displaystyle\mathcal{S}=-\frac{k_{B}}{|e|T}\frac{\sum_{\nu}L^{(1)}_{\nu}}{\sum_{\nu}L^{(0)}_{\nu}}= (44)
kB|e|TαmνIm{Γ~νam(Λmν+Vα)4πiΨ1[12+ΛνVα2πiT]}αmνRe{Γ~νam4πΨ1[12+ΛmνVα2πiT]}\displaystyle-\frac{k_{B}}{|e|T}\frac{\sum_{\alpha m\nu}Im\left\{\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}a_{m}(\Lambda_{m\nu}+V_{\alpha})}{4\pi i}\Psi_{1}\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\Lambda_{\nu}-V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]\right\}}{\sum_{\alpha m\nu}Re\left\{\frac{\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}a_{m}}{4\pi}\Psi_{1}\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{\Lambda_{m\nu}-V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]\right\}}

where for the normal channels: am=1a_{m}=1, Λmν=Λν\Lambda_{m\nu}=\Lambda_{\nu} and the sums run only over the αν\alpha\nu. For t=0t=0 the system is in the symmetric SU(4) Kondo state, and the thermoelectric power is given by:

𝒮=π23|e|νχ~νν(sin[2δν]/Γ~ν)ν(sin2[δν]/(πΓ~ν))T+0[T3]\displaystyle\mathcal{S}=-\frac{\pi^{2}}{3|e|}\frac{\sum_{\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}(\sin[2\delta_{\nu}]/\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu})}{\sum_{\nu}(\sin^{2}[\delta_{\nu}]/(\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}))}T+0[T^{3}] (45)

If we measure 𝒮{\mathcal{S}} below the Kondo temperature TKT_{K}, the Seebeck effect of the quasiparticles is determined by the linear part of the thermoelectric power and FL corrections give the same results as the sbMFA (γScos[δν]\gamma_{S}\approx-\cos[\delta_{\nu}]). Finally we can introduce the linear thermoelectric power coefficient in the form γ(S)=(𝒮TK)/(2πT)\gamma_{(S)}=({\mathcal{S}}T_{K})/(2\pi T). For the SU(4) Kondo state, the coefficient leads to γ(S)=(kB/|e|)(π/3)(E~ν/TK)=(kB/|e|)(π/3)cos[δν]\gamma_{(S)}=-(k_{B}/|e|)(\pi/3)(\widetilde{E}_{\nu}/T_{K})=-(k_{B}/|e|)(\pi/3)\cos[\delta_{\nu}]. The quantity γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} is given by the phase shift δν\delta_{\nu} and changes its sign at the electron-hole symmetry point [114]. The coefficient contains the information about the position and the width of the quasiparticle resonance and the SU(N) symmetry of the Kondo state. For the SU(4) Kondo effect, the linear TEP coefficient is related to the numbers π/(32)\mp\pi/(3\sqrt{2}) in the 1e(3e)1e(3e) charge sector, and for the fully symmetric SU(3) Kondo state, γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} reaches π/6\mp\pi/6 [45]. Generally, TEP developed to the lowest order in terms of temperature is given by the Mott’s formula 𝒮=π23|e|νdϱ~ν/dE|E=0νϱ~νT\mathcal{S}=-\frac{\pi^{2}}{3|e|}\frac{\sum_{\nu}d\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}/dE|_{E=0}}{\sum_{\nu}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}}T. In particular, for the fractional SU(3) Kondo state in the whole range of the coupling strength tt, we obtain γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} as follows:

γ(S)=\displaystyle\gamma_{(S)}= (46)
πTK{3ϱ~˙ν(0)+cot[δν][Γ~νδ2+t~ν2(δΓ~ν)]πΓ~ν(2t~ν2+Γ~νδcsc2[δν])2}3ϱ~ν(0)+ϱ~ν(0)\displaystyle\frac{-\pi T_{K}\left\{3\dot{\widetilde{\varrho}}_{\nu}(0)+\frac{\cot[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}][\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta^{2}+\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}(\delta-\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}})]}{\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}(2\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta\csc^{2}[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}])^{2}}\right\}}{3\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0)+\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}(0)}

where ϱ~˙ν(0)=χ~ννν[3]/2=cos[δν]sin3[δν]πΓ~ν2\dot{\widetilde{\varrho}}_{\nu}(0)=-\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu\nu}/2=\frac{\cos[\delta_{\nu}]\sin^{3}[\delta_{\nu}]}{\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu}} (see Eq.(22)). In the limit of the strong coupling strength to the Majorana fermion (t~ν\widetilde{t}_{\nu^{\prime}}\mapsto\infty), the linear TEP factor reaches γ(S)=πsin[δν]sin[2δν]4+3cos[2δν]=3π/220.42..<π/6\gamma_{(S)}=\mp\frac{\pi\sin[\delta_{\nu}]\sin[2\delta_{\nu}]}{-4+3\cos[2\delta_{\nu}]}=\mp 3\pi/22\approx\mp 0.42..<\mp\pi/6 [45]. γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} in the strong coupling limit leads to the number 3π/22\mp 3\pi/22 and, in contrast to the SU(3) Kondo state, the value is modified by the coupling term to TSC. The result is different from the broken Kondo state e.g. by the magnetic field, because the topological channel with an increase of t~ν\widetilde{t}_{\nu} is active in 𝒮{\mathcal{S}}. The results suggest that the symmetry of the Kondo effect is violated and is associated with the fractional SU(3) Kondo state.

In our device we use the finite bias Vs(d)V_{s(d)} and the temperature gradient δT\delta T to study the quantum conductance, shot noise and thermoelectric power. In all the results we can distinguish three sectors of the coupling strengths: t1=δΓ/6t_{1}=\sqrt{\delta\Gamma/6}, which shares the normal and crossover region in the transport, t2=ΓUt_{2}=\Gamma U is the upper limit of the transport in the intermediate coupling strength, and t3=U/2t_{3}=U/2 is the starting point of the strong coupling regime, where the new Kondo phase is realized.

III.4 SU(3) and SU(2) Kondo states and the U(1) charge symmetry phase in CNTQD-TSC devices

Figure 5a shows the density plot of the quantum conductance for the weak, intermediate and strong coupling regions in the CNTQD-TSC system. For t0t\approx 0 the unitary conductance can be expressed directly from the phase shift δν\delta_{\nu} of the Kondo quasiparticle resonance 𝒢=(e2/h)νsin2[δν]{\mathcal{G}}=(e^{2}/h)\sum_{\nu}\sin^{2}[\delta_{\nu}].

In this limit, the full SU(4) Kondo effect is realized in the device. For Q=1Q=1e and 33e, the total conductance reaches 𝒢=2(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=2(e^{2}/h) (black lines in Figure 5c-d and blue area in Figure 5a). SU(4) Kondo effect emerges from the fourfold degeneracy of the states |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4}. In the case of Q=2Q=2e (two electrons on the quantum dot), the conductance is quantized to 4e2/h4e^{2}/h for t=0t=0 (dark black area in Figure 5a). The half-filling region is determined by the six states |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}. The SU(4) Kondo effect in the CNTQD was first observed by [26] and confirmed by the measurements of the other groups [27, 5]. In comparison with the results of the sbMFA method [40], the NRG calculation also showed the two-stage quantized conductance for the SU(4) Kondo state in CNTQD [42, 43].

As the coupling strength increases, the multiplet states are formed in the system. Below t1t_{1}, as we can see in Figure 5b, in the intermediate coupling range there is a decrease in the conductance for the Q=2eQ=2e region, the conductance reaches (7/2)(e2/h)(7/2)(e^{2}/h) (red line on the landscape plot). The Kondo effect is determined by the duodecuplet states |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}. The conductance in the channel coupled to the Majorana fermion is quantized to 𝒢+=(1/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{+\uparrow}=(1/2)(e^{2}/h) (inset in Figure 5d), the remaining conductance value comes from the Kondo channels and reaches 3(e2/h)3(e^{2}/h). With increasing the coupling to the TSC, the conductance at the e-h symmetry point (Ed=Eeh=3U/2=4.5E_{d}=E_{e-h}=-3U/2=-4.5) does not change, this is due to the number of twelve states |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6}, |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} involved in the quantum transport (red curve in Figure 5b and dark purple area in Figure 5a).

The quantum conductance for the low and high energy octuplets |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8} and |qb8\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{8} in the weak coupling regime reaches 2(e2/h)2(e^{2}/h), of which in the Majorana-coupled channel 𝒢+=(1/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{+\uparrow}=(1/2)(e^{2}/h), and the other three normal channels contribute to 𝒢=𝒢++s𝒢s=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}={\mathcal{G}}_{+\downarrow}+\sum_{s}{\mathcal{G}}_{-s}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h). In the strong coupling regime above t2t_{2}, especially near t3t_{3}, the conductance for Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (respectively Ed=7.5E_{d}=-7.5) reaches (3/2)(e2/h)(3/2)(e^{2}/h) (green line in Figure 5b). As can be seen from the partial contributions of the total conductance (Figure 5d), the conductance in the Majorana channel remains unchanged 𝒢+=(1/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{+\uparrow}=(1/2)(e^{2}/h) but in the other channels it reaches 𝒢+(s)=(1/3)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{+\downarrow(-s)}=(1/3)(e^{2}/h), due to the charge degeneracy between the dd and pp states. For Ed=1E_{d}=1, above the t1t_{1} (cyan line in Figure 5b), the conductance reaches a constant value of 𝒢+=1/2(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{+\uparrow}=1/2(e^{2}/h) and originates only from the Majorana fermion-coupled channel (a value previously confirmed by calculations within NRG [110, 112, 113, 111], EOM and sbMFA method [128]). The half-quantum conductance originates from the ground state of the doublet |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. The transition to the strong coupling strength regime depends on the ratio of U/ΓU/\Gamma. t1=δΓ/6t_{1}=\sqrt{\delta\Gamma/6} separates the normal and the entangled qubit states by TSC. The quantum measurements above t3=U/2t_{3}=U/2 show only well-defined quantum states in the strong coupling regime. t1t_{1} and t2t_{2}, shown as vertical dashed gray lines in Figure 5b, can be shifted by reducing the coupling to the normal electrodes Γ~\widetilde{\Gamma}.

The most significant result predicted by the theory is the transition with increasing the coupling strength tt from the charge degeneracy line between Q=1Q=1e, 2e and Q=2Q=2e, 3e to the SU(3) Kondo state in the fractional charge region. The symmetry type of the Kondo effect is upper indexed by \star due to the fact that the Kondo state appears in three channels with quantized conductance 𝒢+(s)=(3/4)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{+\downarrow(-s)}=(3/4)(e^{2}/h) for the half-occupancy region Q=3/2Q=3/2e and Q=5/2Q=5/2e (green lines in Figs. 5c, d). This is a surprising result in contrast to the fully SU(3) Kondo effect [46], where it occurs for integer charges Q=1Q=1e and 22e. This is mainly due to the degeneracy of the six quantum states, the low and high energy sextuplets |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} (Eq.(10)). The Kondo state does not follow from the degeneracy of the three pure quantum states |pls3\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{3} or |dls3\lvert d_{ls}\rangle_{3} [45], but from the degeneracy of the six entangled states |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} for Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e and six high energy quantum states |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} for Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e. In the quantum conductance map, we observe the light violet sector of the SU(3) Kondo effect, where the total conductance reaches 𝒢=(𝒢++s𝒢s)+𝒢+=(9/4)(e2/h)+(1/2)(e2/h)=(11/4)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=({\mathcal{G}}_{+\downarrow}+\sum_{s}{\mathcal{G}}_{-s})+{\mathcal{G}}_{+\uparrow}=(9/4)(e^{2}/h)+(1/2)(e^{2}/h)=(11/4)(e^{2}/h) (blue line in Fig. 5b). The conductance in the channel coupled to the Majorana fermion is independent of the coupling strengths tt and EdE_{d}. The contribution of 𝒢ν{\mathcal{G}}_{\nu^{\prime}} to the total conductance is (1/2)(e2/h)(1/2)(e^{2}/h).

Figure 6 shows the quantum conductance for the CNTQD-2TSC system. The quantum dot is coupled to two Majorana fermions γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow} and γ\gamma_{-\uparrow} (Fig. 1). Two half-fermions can also be prepared, e.g. in DIII class superconductors, where the quantum state with two Majoranas can be realized as a Majorana Kramers pairs at the edge of a single topological superconducting wire [103, 104, 87]. The conductance of the CNTQD-2TSC device reaches 𝒢=l𝒢l+l𝒢l=(e2/h)+2(e2/h)=3(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=\sum_{l}{\mathcal{G}}_{l\uparrow}+\sum_{l}{\mathcal{G}}_{l\downarrow}=(e^{2}/h)+2(e^{2}/h)=3(e^{2}/h) for Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 and t>t1t>t_{1}. For the subsequent growth of the coupling strength, 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} is unchanged (red curve in Fig. 6b, light violet region in Fig. 6a). Around t1t_{1} we observe a transition in the state configuration from |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} to |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24}. In the weak coupling regime, the quantum state of the system is determined by twenty-four states |qw\lvert q_{w}\rangle in 24+2=642^{4+2}=64 dimensional Hilbert space. The SU(2) Kondo state is mainly realized for t>t2t>t_{2} and includes the eight entanglement quantum states. The ground state is the octuplet |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} (Eq. (12)). The channels coupled to the Majorana states contribute (e2/h)(e^{2}/h) to the quantum conductance, the other two channels are related to the Kondo effect. It is difficult to determine the moment of the transition between strongly and weakly coupled systems with TSCs - based only on the quantum conductance. However, the quantum transition will be detectable in the nonlinear shot noise and the current measurements, in the temperature dependent effective pseudospin or in the entropy detection [138], which we will discuss later. In the Q=1Q=1e and 33e charge region, the total conductance is quantized to 𝒢=2(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=2(e^{2}/h) for the intermediate coupling strength. The conductance in the channels associated with the Kondo states contributes 𝒢±=(1/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{\pm\downarrow}=(1/2)(e^{2}/h) and is determined by the degeneracy of the sixteen quantum states |qb16\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{16} and |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16}. Beyond the Kondo solutions for weak and strong coupling with TSCs, the total conductance reaches e2/he^{2}/h, for two quartets |qx4\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{4} and |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} as the ground states. For the strong coupling to the Majorana fermion, the conductance for Q=1,3Q=1,3e in the channels associated with the Kondo state is suppressed to e2/he^{2}/h, because the next two quantum channels are operated by Majorana fermions (green lines in Figures 6c,d).

Figure 7 shows the quantum conductance as a function of EdE_{d} and the effect of breaking the SU(4) Kondo state by increasing the coupling strength to three Majorana fermion in the CNTQD-3TSC device. For Q=0Q=0e and Q=4Q=4e with increasing the coupling strength we observe a transition from empty and fully occupied states to high and low energy octuplets: |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} and |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8}. The conductance reaches 𝒢=s𝒢+s+𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=\sum_{s}{\mathcal{G}}_{+s}+{\mathcal{G}}_{-\uparrow}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h), when the transport goes through the channels coupled to three Majorana fermions (red region in Figure 7a). The number of available states in the system is 24+3=1282^{4+3}=128, and all quantum states are spanned by the basis vectors |n+nn1n2n3>|n_{+}n_{-}n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}>. The total charge on the quantum dot is Q=5/2eQ=5/2e and Q=3/2eQ=3/2e for two octuplets |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}, defined in Eqs. (13-14). Each of these states is a linear combination of eight pure quantum states mutually mixed with a topological segment. The transitions from |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} via |qa32\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{32} to |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} and from |tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4} via |qb32\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{32} to |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} are observed as an increase mechanism from integer charges Q=1eQ=1e and Q=3eQ=3e to the fractional charges Q=(3/2)eQ=(3/2)e and Q=(5/2)eQ=(5/2)e.

The conductance for Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (green line in Fig. 7b) changes the quantized value from 2(e2/h)2(e^{2}/h) to (3/2)(e2/h)(3/2)(e^{2}/h) (contributed by the channels in the conjunction with the MFs). For Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 we observe a transition from |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} to the entangled quantum states with the highest degeneracy in the hybrid system |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48}. In this case the conductance decreases from 4(e2/h)4(e^{2}/h) to (5/2)(e2/h)(5/2)(e^{2}/h) (red curve in Fig. 7b). In the normal channel 𝒢=1(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{-\downarrow}=1(e^{2}/h), the remaining contribution from the channels coupled to the TSC is quantized to (3/2)(e2/h)(3/2)(e^{2}/h) and dominates in the quantum transport measurements. In the strong coupling regime for t>t3t>t_{3} at the e-h symmetry point, the conductance is fixed and quantized to 5/2(e2/h)5/2(e^{2}/h). Two quantum octuplets |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} degenerate on this line. The system at this point is determined by the charge degrees of freedom and we observe a U(1) charge symmetry solution. U(1) symmetry is observed in the normal state between the charge regions for the fractional charge on the quantum dot. U(1) symmetry appears for Q=2Q=2e. The analogous result was found for Q=1Q=1e in the QD coupled to 1TSC [112], since in this system we have only two channels s=,s=\uparrow,\downarrow, where s=s=\uparrow is coupled to the single Majorana fermion, consequently the total conductance at this point reaches a value of (3/2)(e2/h)(3/2)(e^{2}/h) [141]. It is worth noting that saturation occurs at the e-h symmetry point, so applying an external magnetic field or polarization would allow this point to be moved along the EdE_{d} axis (see the effect of the exchange field on the Kondo state [142]). The analogy can be found in the charge Kondo effect with the polarons, where the Kondo temperature for the charge Kondo state decreases with increasing coupling strength to the phonon bath [143]. For the CNTQD-3TSC device, the characteristic energy scale T[]T_{[\star]} is saturated (light red curve in Fig. 9a). Comparing the results from Figures 5-7b, we observe the effect of squeezing the conductance around the value 2sin2[π/2]=2(e2/h)2\sin^{2}[\pi/2]=2(e^{2}/h). From this we can conclude that for the Kondo effect with even SU(N) symmetry, the squeezed conductance will be seen around the value (N/2)(e2/h)(N/2)(e^{2}/h) when all quantum states in the quantum dot are coupled to TSC segments.

Let us introduce the magnitude of the spin and orbital polarization in terms of Δ𝒢s=l(𝒢l𝒢l)/𝒢\Delta{\mathcal{G}}_{s}=\sum_{l}({\mathcal{G}}_{l\uparrow}-{\mathcal{G}}_{l\downarrow})/{\mathcal{G}} and Δ𝒢o=s(𝒢+s𝒢s)/𝒢\Delta{\mathcal{G}}_{o}=\sum_{s}({\mathcal{G}}_{+s}-{\mathcal{G}}_{-s})/{\mathcal{G}}. TSC strongly polarizes the conduction channels. In two cases, namely coupling with 1TSC and 3TSC, the orbital and spin polarization are equal Δ𝒢s=Δ𝒢o\Delta{\mathcal{G}}_{s}=\Delta{\mathcal{G}}_{o}. In Figure 8a we see a negatively polarized conduction for Q=2Q=2e and and for twelvefold degenerate quantum states |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}. The value of the spin (orbital) polarization for |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} reaches 1/7-1/7 and saturates for t>t1t>t_{1} (red lines in Figure 8d and lower inset in Figure 8d). In the case where the sextuplets |qg(y)6\lvert q_{g(y)}\rangle_{6} are the ground states of the fractional SU(3) Kondo effect, the spin polarization of the conductance is negative and corresponds to the rational number 1/11-1/11. For Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e and t<t2t<t_{2} the polarizations are equal to zero. For t>t2t>t_{2}, Δ𝒢s\Delta{\mathcal{G}}_{s} is positive and reached +1/9+1/9 for the CNTQD-1TSC device and +1/3+1/3 for the CNTQD-3TSC (green lines in Fig. 8d). The highest spin(orbital) polarization in the hybrid systems is dominated by the conductance contribution of the Majorana channels and occurs for doublet |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} and quartet |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4} states. The spin and orbital polarizations reach a value of +1+1 for these ground states. For the Majorana-Kondo state, the polarizations are always negative, in contrast to cases where the channels coupled to the Majorana fermions dominate, where they are positive. The reversal of the polarization sign is observed for Ed=3E_{d}=-3, where the value of Δ𝒢s\Delta{\mathcal{G}}_{s} changes from negative to positive enhancement for the CNTQD-3TSC device and is suppressed for the CNTQD-2TSC system (blue lines in the insets in Fig. 8d). For the CNTQD-2TSC device, due to the type of the coupling strength (t~±\widetilde{t}_{\pm\uparrow}), the orbital polarization is equal to zero, and we only observed the spin polarization of the conductances in the system (Fig. 8b). The spin and orbital polarization of the conductance for the CNTQD-3TSC system reaches a positive rational number +1/3+1/3 when the transport is determined by the two octuplets |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} (light blue region in Fig. 8c). For |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} the spin(orbital) polarization of the conductance of CNTQD with side-attached three Majorana fermions is saturated at the negative quantized value 1/5-1/5 (red curve in the lower inset in Fig. 8d and dark blue region in Fig. 8c).

The transport in the channel coupled to the Majorana fermion is determined by the anomalous Green’s function, which significantly modifies the Kondo temperature TKT_{K} in the system (Eq. (6)). Looking at the quantum conductance in terms of linear transport, we can see that the channels associated with the Kondo state are described by Eq. (35), while in the case of a channel coupled to the TSC we have found the relation in Eq. (36). Both formulas are determined by the characteristic temperature TK,ν2=E~ν2+Γ~ν2T^{2}_{K,\nu}=\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu}+\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu} and for the channel coupled to MFs, TK,ν2=E~ν2+Γ~ν2+(2t~ν2Γ~ν)/δT^{2}_{K,\nu^{\prime}}=\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu}+\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu}+(2\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}})/\delta. Within the sb-MFA formalism, E~ν2\widetilde{E}^{2}_{\nu} and Γ~ν2\widetilde{\Gamma}^{2}_{\nu} determine the position and width of the quasiparticle Kondo resonance. In an elegant way, following Coleman [130], we can relate the complex pole of the quasiparticle Green function with TKT_{K} and the charge QνQ_{\nu} in the following form ln[E~νiΓ~ν]=ln[TK]iπQν\ln[\widetilde{E}_{\nu}-i\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu}]=\ln[T_{K}]-i\pi Q_{\nu}, where in the context of FL theory, QνQ_{\nu} is given by the phase shift δν\delta_{\nu} (Eq. (20)). If we write the expression as eiπQν=TK/Λνe^{i\pi Q_{\nu}}=T_{K}/\Lambda^{*}_{\nu}, we get the Euler’s formula, which materializes in the physics. This is why we talk about the logarithmic scaling of the Kondo effect at low temperatures. In my opinion, the wide range of mathematical functions (in particular the hypergeometric functions [144]) opens up to experimental physics a multiversum of a new type of correlated states, not yet discovered. In summary, if we find a functional relation (correlation) between the charge (spin etc.) and the pole of the Green’s function of a new quantum state - then we have a simple recipe to open the door to a new world of correlated systems of spin(electron) and other particles. Perhaps AI, with its uncompromising approach to finding solutions, will be a great tool in this research, the future will tell us.

Figure 9a shows the characteristic temperatures, defined as T[]=min{TK,ν,TK,ν}T_{[\star]}=\min\{T_{K,\nu},T_{K,\nu^{\prime}}\}. In the decoupled CNTQD with TSC (t=0t=0), the system is determined by the SU(4) Kondo temperature TKSU(4)T^{SU(4)}_{K}. For Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 the Kondo resonance is centered on the Fermi level due to the phase shift δν=π/2\delta_{\nu}=\pi/2, and the sixfold degenerate quantum states |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} determines the Kondo temperature (red lines in Fig. 9a). However, the number of six states for 2e is higher than the fourfold degeneracy for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e, TK,Q=1e(3)SU(4)>TK,Q=2eSU(4)T^{SU(4)}_{K,Q=1e(3)}>T^{SU(4)}_{K,Q=2e}, as is well documented in the literature [42, 43, 145]. From the extended K-R sbMFA we obtained the relation TK,2eSU(4)/TK,1e(3)SU(4)eπU4ΓΛT^{SU(4)}_{K,2e}/T^{SU(4)}_{K,1e(3)}\equiv e^{\frac{-\pi U}{4\Gamma\Lambda}}, where Λ=60\Lambda=60 and follows from the derivatives of the renormalization of the tunneling rates with respect to the boson fields operators for two charge regions Q=1(2)Q=1(2)e. The characteristic temperature T[]T_{[\star]} in the weak coupling limit at the charge degeneracy line for Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and Ed=3E_{d}=-3 (similarly for Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e) is proportional to the hybridization parameter Γ\Gamma, which determines the width of the charge resonances (all blue lines in Fig. 9a). For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5, increasing the coupling strength to the TSC leads to an increase in the characteristic temperature (the temperature in the Majorana channel determines the saturation of T[]T_{[\star]}, green curves in Fig. 9a). We have shown that rise of the number of NTSN_{TS} topological segments in the strong coupling regime leads to the enhancement and saturation of T[]T_{[\star]} for Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (dark, dotted and light green lines represent the results for CNTQD-1TSC, CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD-3TSC). Similar effects are observed for Ed=3E_{d}=-3 and Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5, in the case where the transport determines the channel directly coupled to the Majorana fermions.

A fractional Kondo effect with SU(3) symmetry is observed in the CNTQD-1TSC system for Q=(3/2)eQ=(3/2)e and Q=(5/2)eQ=(5/2)e. The transport is mainly determined by the channels associated with the Kondo effect (𝒢ν=(9/4)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}_{\nu}}=(9/4)(e^{2}/h)), which is manifested by a decrease in the characteristic temperature T[]T_{[\star]} (dark blue line for Ed=3E_{d}=-3 in Fig. 9a). For Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5, in the CNTQD coupled with two Majorana fermions, T[]T_{[\star]} decreases with increasing the coupling strength to the topological wire, and we observe a strong decrease of TKSU(2)T^{SU^{\star}(2)}_{K}. By increasing tt for the CNTQD-2TSC device, we start from the SU(4) Kondo effect and end up in the SU(2) Kondo state with the reduced characteristic temperature scale TKSU(2)T^{SU^{\star}(2)}_{K}. Between these two types of strongly correlated states we observed a strong enhancement of T[]T_{[\star]}, which is characteristic of crossover [40]. The similar effects of the Kondo temperature boost, have been observed with an increase of the spin-orbital interaction (SOI) in the CNTQD system, as indicated by sbMFA [40] and the NRG method [43]. Based on the NRG framework it is difficult to explain the increase of TKT_{K}, in the sb-MFA method we can relate it to the trends in the bosonic fields, more precisely to the products of operators in the renormalization parameter of the quasiparticle resonance zlsz_{ls}. An increase of the Coulomb interaction U in CNTQD increases the values of these products and finally we observe the enhancement of TKT_{K} in the crossover region [40]. We expect the same effects for the CNTQD-2TSC device with an increase of the coupling strength tt.

Furthermore, the fact that the characteristic temperature increases with tt determines the behavior of the quantum conductance at finite temperature T. Fig.9b shows the density plot of the quantum conductance for CNTQD coupled to a single Majorana fermion at finite temperature T=102T=10^{-2}. The SU(4) and SU(3) Kondo states are destroyed by the temperature effects, leading to a suppression of the quantum conductance in the unitary Kondo regions (𝒢0{\mathcal{G}}\mapsto 0 for |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8}, |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} and 𝒢𝒢ν=(1/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}\mapsto{\mathcal{G}}_{\nu^{\prime}}=(1/2)(e^{2}/h) for |qg(y)6\lvert q_{g(y)}\rangle_{6}). The transport takes place along the line of charge degeneracy, e.g. between the quantum states |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8} and |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} and between |qg8\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{8} and |qg8\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{8} we observe a value of finite quantum conductance at a level of (5/2)(e2/h)(5/2)(e^{2}/h). Between |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8} and |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} the conductance reaches a value of (3/2)(e2/h)(3/2)(e^{2}/h). Since T[]T_{[\star]} is higher than TT for the |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} states, the Majorana fermion channel remains active in the quantum transport. The doublet states |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} in the weak coupling regime are collapsed, and the transport is determined by two singlets |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1} and by the fully occupied quantum state |f1\lvert f\rangle_{1}. Figure 9c shows the evolution of the conductance as a function of tt for different temperatures T. It can be seen that the transition from |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} to |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} is shifted at low temperatures (red line in Fig. 9c). For T=104T=10^{-4} the quantum conductance decreases to 2(e2/h)2(e^{2}/h) and gradually approaches zero. In the strong coupling regime the quantum conductance reaches 𝒢=(7/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(7/2)(e^{2}/h), and after passing T=103T=10^{-3}, 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} is quantized to (5/2)(e2/h)(5/2)(e^{2}/h) (black line in Fig. 9c). The inset shows the evolution of the quantum conductance with increasing temperature for Ed=3E_{d}=-3. For T>TKSU(3)T>T^{SU^{\star}(3)}_{K}, the fractional SU(3) Kondo state is destroyed and the quantum conductance reduces to (1/2)(e2/h)(1/2)(e^{2}/h). The inset of Fig. 9c shows the gradual decrease of the quantum conductance for Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and shift to the characteristic coupling strength t3t_{3}. In the weak coupling regime, 𝒢\mathcal{G} leads to (5/2)(e2/h)(5/2)(e^{2}/h) for the charge degeneracy line (black curve in the inset of Fig.9c).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 11: (Color online) Total occupancy number NN for CNTQD coupled to 1MF (a), 2MFs (b) and 3MFs (c). The numbers indicate the integer and fractional electron charge in the system. SU(4)SU(4), SU(3)SU^{\star}(3), SU(2)SU^{\star}(2) and U(1)U^{\star}(1) symbolize the spin-orbital, fractional, integer Kondo states and the charge degeneracy line.

In this section, we will now turn to discussing the charge fluctuations that occur in the CNTQD-TSC device. The total occupancy number of CNTQD is given by N=νQν+νQνN=\sum_{\nu}Q_{\nu}+\sum_{\nu^{\prime}}Q_{\nu^{\prime}}. The quadratic charge fluctuation is evaluated by the difference of the expectation value of N2\langle N^{2}\rangle and N2\langle N\rangle^{2} in the following form: ΔN2=N2N2\Delta N^{2}=\langle N^{2}\rangle-\langle N\rangle^{2}. The magnitude ΔN2\Delta N^{2} can be expressed in terms of the boson fields: ΔN2=lspls2+4νdν2+9lst¯ls2+16f2(lspls2+2νdν2+3lst¯ls2+4f2)2\Delta N^{2}=\sum_{ls}p^{2}_{ls}+4\sum_{\nu}d^{2}_{\nu}+9\sum_{ls}\overline{t}^{2}_{ls}+16f^{2}-(\sum_{ls}p^{2}_{ls}+2\sum_{\nu}d^{2}_{\nu}+3\sum_{ls}\overline{t}^{2}_{ls}+4f^{2})^{2}. In Figures 10a and 10b we can see that for the SU(4) Kondo state, in the regime of weak and intermediate coupling strengths determined by |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4}, |tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} (|qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8} and |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}) quantum states, the charge fluctuation ΔN2\Delta N^{2} is strongly suppressed, comparable to T[]T_{[\star]} (more precisely to TKT_{K}) [45]. By increasing the coupling tt to the TSC for Q=(3/2)(e2/h)Q=(3/2)(e^{2}/h), the charge fluctuation remains at the level ΔN2=1/4\Delta N^{2}=1/4, which is the significant result for the fractional SU(3) Kondo state (dark blue areas in Fig. 10a and blue curve in Fig. 10b). At the charge boundary for Q=1Q=1e and Q=2Q=2e, the charge fluctuation reaches 1/2. The main contribution to the large finite value of ΔN2\Delta N^{2} comes from the Majorana fermion-coupled channel. N2N^{2} is determined by the expected values of the boson fields operators. For the SU(3) Kondo state, ΔN2\Delta N^{2} reaches 1/41/4 and the value is associated with p+(s)2=d20,,2=1/6p^{2}_{+\downarrow(-s)}=d^{2}_{20,\uparrow\uparrow,\uparrow\downarrow}=1/6 for Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and t¯+(s)2=d02,,2=1/6\overline{t}^{2}_{+\uparrow(-s)}=d^{2}_{02,\downarrow\downarrow,\downarrow\uparrow}=1/6 for Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e. In contrast to the region where the MF-coupled channel dominates in the quantum transport, ΔN2=1/4\Delta N^{2}=1/4 but is determined by the amplitudes e2=p+2=1/2e^{2}=p^{2}_{+\uparrow}=1/2 for the quantum states |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} and f2=p+2=1/2f^{2}=p^{2}_{+\downarrow}=1/2 for |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2}.

Fig. 11 shows the evolution of the occupancy number N=νQνN=\sum_{\nu}Q_{\nu} with the increase of the coupling strength to 1TSC, 2TSC and 3TSC. The black lines on the landscape plots represent the total occupancy number NN with an increment δEd=+0.15\delta E_{d}=+0.15 for EdE_{d} in the range 12-12 to +3+3. We observed a significant change in the value of the total charge for t>t2t>t_{2}. The strong influence of the anomalous Green’s function G^12R=fν;fνR\hat{G}^{R}_{12}=\langle\langle f^{\dagger}_{\nu^{\prime}};f^{\dagger}_{\nu^{\prime}}\rangle\rangle^{R} on the statistical value of the total charge NN is manifested by an increase in the value of the correlator it~νγνfν<i\widetilde{t}_{\nu^{\prime}}\langle\gamma_{\nu^{\prime}}f^{\dagger}_{\nu^{\prime}}\rangle^{<}. In the total charge number Q we observe the leakage of the charge by finite value of the tunnel correlator and additional degrees of freedom of the Majorana fermion. Formally, by decomposing the tunneling term into two parts (see Sec. IIIA), we can say that the local isospin fνfν\langle f^{\dagger}_{\nu^{\prime}}f^{\dagger}_{\nu^{\prime}}\rangle in the system increases and at the same time the value of the charge is modified by tunneling processes. In the CNTQD-TSC device we observe characteristic fractional charges Q=(1/2)Q=(1/2)e and Q=(7/2)Q=(7/2)e when the system is determined by two doublets |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. In terms of the fractional SU(3) Kondo state, the charge values are quantized to 3/23/2e and 5/25/2e, where two sextuplets |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} are the ground states. In the CNTQD-2TSC system the SU(2) effect is realized in the strong coupling regime. For the Kondo state, the quantum conductance reaches 3(e2/h)3(e^{2}/h) and the total charge is N=Q=2N=Q=2e (Fig. 11b), where the octuplet quantum states |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} are the ground state. In the channel coupled to the Majorana fermion, the occupancy number reaches Q=1Q=1e and 33e for the quantum states |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} and |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2}. The coupling strength to the three Majoranas with chirality ls=+sls=+s and ls=ls=-\uparrow leads with increasing tt to the degeneracy line of the two octuplets |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}. The transport here occurs through three Majorana fermion-coupled channels and one normal channel between the charges Q=5/2Q=5/2e and Q=3/2Q=3/2e, i.e. exactly for Q=2Q=2e (Fig. 11c). The CNTQD-3TSC system is determined by the U(1) charge symmetry state.

Figure 12 presents the absolute values of the X- and Z-components of the spin and isospin as a function of the atomic level of the quantum dot (EdE_{d}). The spin components can be written as S^X=(1/2)l(dldl+dldl)\hat{S}_{X}=(1/2)\sum_{l}(d^{\dagger}_{l\downarrow}d_{l\uparrow}+d^{\dagger}_{l\uparrow}d_{l\downarrow}) and S^Z=(1/2)l(nlnl)\hat{S}_{Z}=(1/2)\sum_{l}(n_{l\uparrow}-n_{l\downarrow}) and the isospin components can be expressed by I^X=(1/2)l(dldl+dldl)\hat{I}_{X}=(1/2)\sum_{l}(d_{l\downarrow}d_{l\uparrow}+d^{\dagger}_{l\uparrow}d^{\dagger}_{l\downarrow}) and I^Z=(1/2)lsnls1\hat{I}_{Z}=(1/2)\sum_{ls}n_{ls}-1.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 12: (Color online) The absolute value of the spin Sq=X,ZS_{q=X,Z} and the isospin Iq=X,ZI_{q=X,Z} components plotted for t=103t=10^{-3} (dashed lines) and t=20t=20 (solid lines) in: a) CNTQD-1TSC, b) CNTQD-2TSC and c) CNTQD-3TSC devices.

The operators of the local X- and Z-spin components are defined by the boson fields operators in the following terms:

S^X=(1/2)(lsplspls¯+sdss¯(dss+ds¯s¯)\displaystyle\hat{S}_{X}=(1/2)(\sum_{ls}p^{\dagger}_{ls}p_{l\overline{s}}+\sum_{s}d^{\dagger}_{s\overline{s}}(d_{ss}+d_{\overline{s}\overline{s}})
+sdss(dss¯+ds¯s)+lst¯lst¯ls¯)\displaystyle+\sum_{s}d^{\dagger}_{ss}(d_{s\overline{s}}+d_{\overline{s}s})+\sum_{ls}\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{ls}\overline{t}_{l\overline{s}})
S^Z=(1/2)(l(plplplpl)\displaystyle\hat{S}_{Z}=(1/2)(\sum_{l}(p^{\dagger}_{l\uparrow}p_{l\uparrow}-p^{\dagger}_{l\downarrow}p_{l\downarrow})
+2dd2dd+l(±t¯lt¯lt¯lt¯l))\displaystyle+2d^{\dagger}_{\uparrow\uparrow}d_{\uparrow\uparrow}-2d^{\dagger}_{\downarrow\downarrow}d_{\downarrow\downarrow}+\sum_{l}(\pm\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{l\uparrow}\overline{t}_{l\uparrow}\mp\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{l\downarrow}\overline{t}_{l\downarrow})) (47)

The Majorana fermion leads to the local pairing-induced on CNTQD and modifies the X- and Z-isospin components in quantum dot. I^X\hat{I}_{X} and I^Z\hat{I}_{Z} can be written in the bilinear form of the slave boson operators in the following way:

I^X=(1/2)(pp+s(p+st¯+s+pst¯s¯)\displaystyle\hat{I}_{X}=(1/2)(-p^{\dagger}_{-\downarrow}p_{-\uparrow}+\sum_{s}(p^{\dagger}_{+s}\overline{t}_{+s}+p^{\dagger}_{-s}\overline{t}_{-\overline{s}})
+d20(e+f)+e(d20+d02)+d02ffd02\displaystyle+d^{\dagger}_{20}(-e+f)+e^{\dagger}(d_{20}+d_{02})+d^{\dagger}_{02}f-f^{\dagger}d_{02}
ddddt¯t¯st¯sps¯)\displaystyle-d^{\dagger}_{\downarrow\downarrow}d_{\downarrow\uparrow}-d^{\dagger}_{\uparrow\downarrow}d_{\uparrow\uparrow}-\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{-\uparrow}\overline{t}_{-\downarrow}-\sum_{s}\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{-s}p_{-\overline{s}})
I^Z=(1/2)(lsplspls+2νdνdν\displaystyle\hat{I}_{Z}=(1/2)(\sum_{ls}p^{\dagger}_{ls}p_{ls}+2\sum_{\nu}d^{\dagger}_{\nu}d_{\nu}
+3lst¯lst¯ls+4ff)1\displaystyle+3\sum_{ls}\overline{t}^{\dagger}_{ls}\overline{t}_{ls}+4f^{\dagger}f)-1 (48)

The dashed and solid lines in Fig. 12 represent the spin and isospin components for the intermediate coupling to the topological superconductor (t=103t=10^{-3}) and for the strong coupling strength to a Majorana fermions (solid lines, t=20t=20). The spin X-component in Fig. 12a leads to 1/21/2 and 1/21/\sqrt{2} for the quantum states |qb(a)8\lvert q_{b(a)}\rangle_{8} and |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}, where in the SU(3) Kondo state |SX|=1/3|S_{X}|=1/3 for |gy6\lvert g_{y}\rangle_{6} and at the e-h symmetry point the expectation value of the transverse spin leads to |SX|=1/2|S_{X}|=1/2. The spin Z-component reaches 0\approx 0 for t=103t=10^{-3}, in the strong coupling region |SZ|=1/12|S_{Z}|=1/12 for |gy6\lvert g_{y}\rangle_{6} and |SZ|=1/4|S_{Z}|=1/4 for |gx(z)2\lvert g_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} (solid magenta line in Fig. 12a). The isospin |IZ||I_{Z}| for t=103t=10^{-3} (dashed blue line) is quantized to 1/21/2 for the octuplets |qb(a)8\lvert q_{b(a)}\rangle_{8} and |IZ|=0|I_{Z}|=0 for the duodecuplet state |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}. The Z-component of the isospin for t=20t=20 (solid blue line) reaches the value |IZ|=1/4|I_{Z}|=1/4 for sextuplets |qg(y)6\lvert q_{g(y)}\rangle_{6} and |IZ|=3/4|I_{Z}|=3/4 for the doublet quantum states |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2}. The transverse component of the isospin is also modified, under the weak coupling strength to TSC: |IX||I_{X}| approaches 1/81/8 for octuplets and |IX|=1/6|I_{X}|=1/6 for duodecuplets. For the SU(3) Kondo state, the transverse isospin component leads to a quantized value of |IX|=1/6|I_{X}|=1/6 for the fractional charges on the quantum dot Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e (orange solid line in Fig. 12a).

Figure 12b shows the values of |SX(Z)||S_{X(Z)}| and |IX(Z)||I_{X(Z)}| for the CNTQD-2TSCs system. We can see that, in terms of coupling strengths for the octuplet states |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} and the SU(2) Kondo effect: |SZ|=|IZ|=0|S_{Z}|=|I_{Z}|=0, and for the quartets |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4}, |SZ|=|IZ|=1/2|S_{Z}|=|I_{Z}|=1/2. The X-components for |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4} reach the values |SX|=1/12|S_{X}|=1/12 and |IX|=0|I_{X}|=0. Figure 12c presents the expected values of the local spin and isospin for the CNTQD coupled to the three Majorana fermions {γ+s,γ}\{\gamma_{+s},\gamma_{-\uparrow}\}. The Z-components of the spin and isospin vanish |SZ|=|IZ|=0|S_{Z}|=|I_{Z}|=0 in the e-h symmetry point at the boundary of the octuplets |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8}. At this point, the charge state U(1) is realized and the local transverse spin leads to |SX|=1/2|S_{X}|=1/2. For the quantum states |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8}, when Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e and Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e, the spin and isospin components reach |SX|=1/3|S_{X}|=1/3, |SZ|=1/4|S_{Z}|=1/4 and |IX|=0|I_{X}|=0, |IZ|=1/3|I_{Z}|=1/3.

Since the Majorana mode is assumed to be coupled to the spin-orbital energy level of the CNTQD with fourfold degeneracy, it breaks the spin and orbital symmetry of the system and is manifested in the temperature dependence of the entropy. Figure 13a shows the total entropy StotS_{tot} for the CNTQD-1TSC system as the sum of the quantum dot entropy SQDS_{QD}, the tunneling entropy STS_{T} and the entropy of the topological superconductor STSS_{TS}. We can express these quantities following the author [146] in the form Stot=F~fTS_{tot}=-\frac{\partial\widetilde{F}_{f}}{\partial T}, using the thermodynamic potential F~f\widetilde{F}_{f} and Matsubara Green’s functions [130, 17]:

Stot=SQD+ST+STS\displaystyle S_{tot}=S_{QD}+S_{T}+S_{TS}
SQD=ανIm{ilogΓ[12+z±Vα2πiT]+\displaystyle S_{QD}=-\sum_{\alpha\nu}Im\left\{i\log\Gamma\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{z\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]+\right.
(z±Vα)Ψ0[12+z±Vα2πiT]2πT}|z=Λνz=ΛνW\displaystyle\left.\frac{(z\pm V_{\alpha})\Psi_{0}\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{z\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]}{2\pi T}\right\}|^{z=\Lambda_{\nu}}_{z=\Lambda_{\nu}-W} (49)
ST=αν+Re{(E±Vα)ln[δGν]16πiT2cosh2[E±Vα2T]}𝑑E\displaystyle S_{T}=\sum_{\alpha\nu^{\prime}}\int^{+\infty}_{-\infty}Re\left\{\frac{(E\pm V_{\alpha})\ln[\delta G_{\nu^{\prime}}]}{16\pi iT^{2}\cosh^{2}\left[\frac{E\pm V_{\alpha}}{2T}\right]}\right\}dE
STS=ανIm{ilogΓ[12+z±Vα2πiT]+\displaystyle S_{TS}=-\sum_{\alpha\nu^{\prime}}Im\left\{i\log\Gamma\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{z\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]+\right.
(z±Vα)Ψ0[12+z±Vα2πiT]2πT}|z=iT1z=iT12T2\displaystyle\left.\frac{(z\pm V_{\alpha})\Psi_{0}\left[\frac{1}{2}+\frac{z\pm V_{\alpha}}{2\pi iT}\right]}{2\pi T}\right\}|^{z=iT_{1}}_{z=iT_{1}-2T_{2}} (50)

where logΓ[z]\log\Gamma[z] is the logarithm of the Euler gamma function, T1=δT_{1}=\delta and T2T_{2} are the characteristic temperatures in the entropy of the isolated TSC (T2T_{2} is a characteristic temperature found in the tunneling entropy STS_{T} and is related to the vanishing of the first derivative of δGν\delta G_{\nu^{\prime}}). δGν\delta G_{\nu^{\prime}} in the tunneling entropy is given by [146]:

δGν=k=1,2±G^1kA(E)G^k1R(E)k=1,2±G^1kR(E)G^k1A(E).\displaystyle\delta G_{\nu^{\prime}}=\frac{\sum_{k=1,2}\pm\hat{G}^{A}_{1k}(-E)\hat{G}^{R}_{k1}(E)}{\sum_{k=1,2}\pm\hat{G}^{R}_{1k}(-E)\hat{G}^{A}_{k1}(E)}. (51)

where G^ikR(A)(E)\hat{G}^{R(A)}_{ik}(-E) are the Green’s function of the matrix in Eq. (6). In the evolution of STS_{T} as a function of T, we observed the third characteristic temperature T3=t~ν2/2|E~ν|T_{3}=\widetilde{t}^{2}_{\nu^{\prime}}/2|\widetilde{E}_{\nu^{\prime}}|, where STS_{T} goes to zero.

Figure 13a shows the saturation of the total entropy at the value Stot=ln[4]S_{tot}=\ln[4], which corresponds to the fraction of the four quantum states in the high temperature limit above TKT_{K}. The value of the coupling is t=103t=10^{-3}, and the SU(4)-like Kondo state is realized by the octuplet quantum states |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8}, where Stot=0S_{tot}=0. It is an SU(4)-like state, because 𝒢2(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}\approx 2(e^{2}/h) and the octuplet states |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8} are different from the pure quantum states |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} (|tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4}) (even if aaa\gg a^{\prime}, see Eq.(7)). At intermediate temperatures between TKT_{K} and T2T_{2}, the first entropy plateau Stot=ln[4]/4S_{tot}=\ln[4]/4 is observed . This is strictly related to the Majorana fermion-coupled channel in the CNTQD-TSC device. Analogous results are reported in the literature for the SU(2) Kondo dot coupled to a single Majorana fermion [71, 146], where Stot=ln[2]/2S_{tot}=\ln[2]/2. Below the temperature T2T_{2} the sign of STS_{T} changes to ST=ln[4]/4S_{T}=-\ln[4]/4. In this case the contribution of the tunneling entropy is compensated by the entropy of the topological superconductor STS=ln[4]/4S_{TS}=\ln[4]/4. The characteristic temperature T1=δT_{1}=\delta is directly related to the lifetime of the Majorana fermion. In an analogous way the problem was defined in the paper [146], but there the author assumed the finite value of the overlap strength Δ(0)\Delta_{(0)} between the two Majorana fermions in the TSC wire, and STS_{T} has an opposite sign. STS_{T} is positive in the range between T1T_{1} and T2=Δ(0)T_{2}=\Delta_{(0)} and takes a negative sign below T2T_{2}. This is a consequence of the self-energy expression in [146]. For the model with the overlapping between Majorana fermions, the self-energy can be expressed as Σ~tR=(t~2z)/(z2Δ(0)2)\widetilde{\Sigma}^{R}_{t}=(\widetilde{t}^{2}z)/(z^{2}-\Delta^{2}_{(0)}). In our calculations we assumed Δ(0)=0\Delta_{(0)}=0 (highly coherent TSC wire, where λK0\lambda_{K}\approx 0) and therefore Σ~tR=t~2/z=t~2/(E+iδ)\widetilde{\Sigma}^{R}_{t}=\widetilde{t}^{2}/z=\widetilde{t}^{2}/(E+i\delta), where δ\delta is a finite lifetime of the Majorana fermion (see [119]). The sign reversal of STS_{T} is observed for the SU(2) Kondo effect (Fig. 13d), where T2<T3T_{2}<T_{3} and TK<T2T_{K}<T_{2} in opposite to the SU(4)-like Kondo state for the low coupling regime, where T2<T3T_{2}<T_{3} and TK>T2T_{K}>T_{2} (the ground state is determined by the octuplet |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8}).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 13: (Color online) The total entropy StotS_{tot}, the tunneling entropy STS_{T}, the entropy of the isolated topological superconductor STSS_{TS} and the entropy of the quantum dot SQDS_{QD} as a function of temperature TT for a-c) CNTQD-1TSC device and d) CNTQD-2TSC device. Figures a, b) and Figs. c, d) are plotted for t=102t=10^{-2} and t=20t=20.

Figure 13b shows the entropy for the weak coupling to a single Majorana fermion (t=103t=10^{-3}) with two electrons on the quantum dots Q=2Q=2e. The ground state is determined by the duodecuplet |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} (Eq. (9)). The conductance reaches 𝒢=(7/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(7/2)(e^{2}/h), in contrast to the fully SU(4) Kondo state, where 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} is quantized to 4(e2/h)4(e^{2}/h) (here the Kondo effect is determined by the six quantum states |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}). For the duodecuplet state, the tunneling entropy is negative ST<0S_{T}<0 and is compensated by the STSS_{TS} contribution. In StotS_{tot} we observe a small boost above ln[6]\ln[6], around T2T_{2}.

For the strong coupling strength (t=20t=20), the SU(3) Kondo state is realized in the system for a fractional charge on the quantum dot Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e. The quantum conductance reaches 𝒢=(11/4)(e2/h)=(1/2)(e2/h)+(9/4)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(11/4)(e^{2}/h)=(1/2)(e^{2}/h)+(9/4)(e^{2}/h). In the high temperature limit Stot=ln[3]S_{tot}=\ln[3] and is dominated by the SQDS_{QD} contribution. In the low temperature regime, the SU(3) Kondo state is formed and the contribution of STS_{T} is completely compensated by STSS_{TS} (blue and red lines in Figure 13c). For the CNTQD-2TSC system with strong coupling tt (Fig. 13d) we observe the sign reversal of the tunneling entropy ST=ln[6]/2S_{T}=\mp\ln[6]/2 (blue line). The negative entropy of STSS_{TS} is the consequence of a high order topological state. The ordered part below the temperature T2T_{2} is compensated by the entropy STSS_{TS}, and for T>T2T>T_{2} we observe an increase of the entropy to a value of Stot=ln[6]+ln[6]/2S_{tot}=\ln[6]+\ln[6]/2 (between T2T_{2} and T3T_{3}) at the expense of the tunneling entropy STS_{T} (transient states effect). This is due to the mechanism of expanding the Hilbert space by a topological segment and the realization of the SU(2) Kondo state by the octuplet state |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} (Eq. (12)). The Hilbert space is expanded and allows the higher entropy than ln[6]\ln[6] for 2e on the quantum dots.

Figure 14 shows the influence of the number of Majorana fermions on the SU(4)-like Kondo effect for 1e on QD, i.e. in terms of the weak coupling strength t=103t=10^{-3}, where TK>T2T_{K}>T_{2}. The Kondo state for the CNTQD-1TSC system is determined by the octuplet state. In Figure 14 the dark lines symbolize the tunneling entropies STS_{T} and the light curves are associated with the total entropy StotS_{tot}. For |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8}, in the temperature range between T2T_{2} and TKT_{K}, the total entropy reaches a quantized value of Stot=ln[4]/4S_{tot}=\ln[4]/4 (blue curves in Fig.14). For T<T2T<T_{2}, the tunneling entropy is compensated by the STS_{T} contribution. The SU(4)-like Kondo state is observed from T1=δT_{1}=\delta to TKT_{K}. In the CNTQD-2TSC system the value of the total entropy reaches Stot=ln[4]/2S_{tot}=\ln[4]/2, which is related to the quantum states defined by |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16} and the expanding of the Hilbert space via the topological segments {|0¯,|¯}\{\lvert\underline{0}\rangle,\lvert\underline{\Uparrow}\rangle\} and {|0¯,|¯}\{\lvert\overline{0}\rangle,\lvert\overline{\Uparrow}\rangle\}. The inclusion of a third Majorana state γ+{\gamma_{+\downarrow}} in the CNTQD-3TSC device increases the value of the total entropy in the range between T2T_{2} and TKT_{K}. The total entropy is quantized to Stot=(3ln[4])/4S_{tot}=(3\ln[4])/4. The tunneling entropy in this case changes the sign below T2T_{2}, and reaches a maximum positive value of ST=Stot=(3ln[4])/4S_{T}=S_{tot}=(3\ln[4])/4 above the characteristic temperature. In the high temperature limit StotS_{tot} is saturated for all devices and the quantum limit Stot=ln[4]S_{tot}=\ln[4] is reached. The first plateau in StotS_{tot} is associated with the Majorana-coupled channels. The normal channels are temperature resistant and participate in the Kondo effect (TK>T2T_{K}>T_{2}). The number NTSN_{TS} of Majorana fermions [146], determines the value of the total entropy as follows Stot=NTSln[4]/4S_{tot}=N_{TS}\ln[4]/4, and contains the information about the SU(4) symmetry of the Kondo state and about the spin-orbital degrees of freedom of the MF state.

Refer to caption
Figure 14: (Color online) The total entropy StotS_{tot}, the tunneling entropy STS_{T}, the entropy of the isolated topological superconductor STSS_{TS} and the entropy of the quantum dot SQDS_{QD} as a function of temperature TT for Q=1e and t=102t=10^{-2}. STS_{T} and StotS_{tot} are represented by dark and light curves. Colors are assigned to the model: CNTQD-1TSC (blue lines), CNTQD-2TSC (green lines) and CNTQD-3TSC (red lines).

There are already several papers in the literature investigating the thermoelectric power in a QD system with a Majorana fermion using the equation of motion technique [114] and the renormalization group [117, 112, 113]. In the first article, the authors analyze a single quantum dot device coupled to a Majorana fermion. The thermoelectric power in this system undergoes a transverse modification, and the authors observe a change in the sign of 𝒮{\mathcal{S}}. In the paper [114], the authors analyzed the non-interacting QD-TSC system (U=0U=0) and showed that the thermoelectric transport measurements can be used to detect the Majorana fermion. The authors pointed out that a finite phase shift for the Kondo SU(4) effect could significantly affect the value and sign of the thermal conductivity [114]. In the second paper [117], the authors discussed the spin-resolved thermal signatures of the Majorana-Kondo effect in the DQD-T-shaped system. Using the numerical renormalization group method the authors focus on the two-stage Kondo effect and the leakage of Majorana quasiparticles into the double dot system. Majorana-induced interference with strong electron correlations on the DQD system and is observed in the spin-Seebeck effect. For these problems, the authors have modified the linear response current Is=e2Ls(0)δV±e2Ls(0)δVS(e/T)Ls(1)δTI_{s}=e^{2}L^{(0)}_{s}\delta V\pm e^{2}L^{(0)}_{s}\delta V_{S}-(e/T)L^{(1)}_{s}\delta T by adding the spin-dependent voltage in the form δVS=δVδV\delta V_{S}=\delta V_{\uparrow}-\delta V_{\downarrow}. This introduces the possibility to detect spin (orbital) contributions of the TEP, which is particularly interesting for spin (valley) dependent quantum calorimetry.

In terms of the linear response at small temperature δT\delta T and voltage difference δV\delta V, the electric current II and the thermal current IQI_{Q} obey the linear equations presented in Sec. IIIC, where Lν(0)L^{(0)}_{\nu} and Lν(1)L^{(1)}_{\nu} are the kinetic transport coefficients. In this paper we study the thermoelectric power (TEP), which can be expressed as follows 𝒮=(δV/δT)|I=0=(1/eT)(νLν(1)/νLν(0)){\mathcal{S}}=(\delta V/\delta T)|_{I=0}=-(1/eT)(\sum_{\nu}L^{(1)}_{\nu}/\sum_{\nu}L^{(0)}_{\nu}). Since we mainly want to relate the value of the thermoelectric power to a symmetry of the Kondo effect [45], we introduced the linear coefficient of the thermoelectric power γ(S)=(𝒮TK)/(2πT)\gamma_{(S)}=({\mathcal{S}}T_{K})/(2\pi T). In general, we can express the TEP for the CNTQD-TSCs device by the following Mott’s formula 𝒮=(π2/3|e|)[(νdϱ~ν/dE|E=0+νdϱ~ν/dE|E=0)/(νϱ~ν+νϱ~ν)]\mathcal{S}=-(\pi^{2}/3|e|)[(\sum_{\nu}d\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}/dE|_{E=0}+\sum_{\nu^{\prime}}d\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}/dE|_{E=0})/(\sum_{\nu}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}+\sum_{\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}})], where ν\nu^{\prime} is associated with the channels coupled to the Majorana fermions. Considering TTKT\ll T_{K} and t0t\approx 0, the thermoelectric power satisfies the main prediction of FL theory, where the linear coefficient of the specific heat is independent of the quasiparticle interactions (γN=π23ν=lsϱ~ν\gamma_{N}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{3}\sum_{\nu=ls}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}). Based on this assumption 𝒮{\mathcal{S}} is proportional to the two-body correlation function (Eq. (42)).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 15: (Color online) Thermoelectric power in the CNTQD-1TSC device: a, b) The density plot of the linear thermoelectric power coefficient γ(S)=(𝒮)/2πT[]\gamma_{(S)}={\cal{(S)}}/2\pi T_{[\star]} as a function of EdE_{d} and tt for T=108T=10^{-8} and T=103T=10^{-3}. c, d) The landscape plots of γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} as a function of tt (δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15).

For decoupled CNTQD to TSCs, the linear coefficient of thermoelectric power reaches a value of ±π/(32)\pm\pi/(3\sqrt{2}) for the quantum states |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4} (yellow and blue areas in Fig. 15a and red line in Fig. 15c), as we predicted earlier [45]. 𝒮{\mathcal{S}} probes the Kondo resonance close to the Fermi level EFE_{F}, and due to the position of the quasiparticle resonance, the linear coefficient of the thermoelectric power in terms of the SU(4) Kondo effect approaches to the finite value γ(S)=(kB/|e|)(π/3)(E~ν/TK)=(kB/|e|)(π/3)cos[δν]\gamma_{(S)}=-(k_{B}/|e|)(\pi/3)(\widetilde{E}_{\nu}/T_{K})=-(k_{B}/|e|)(\pi/3)\cos[\delta_{\nu}]. In the range of the fractional charges Q=(5/2)eQ=(5/2)e and Q=(3/2e)Q=(3/2e) for the strong Majorana-coupled channel, the thermal transport is determined by low and high energy sextuplets |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6}. For the SU(3) Kondo effect, γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} has reached the quantized value ±3π/22\pm 3\pi/22 and the system is still the FL state (light blue and light yellow regions in Fig. 15a, and blue line in Fig. 15c).

The density plot of γS\gamma_{S} shows the transition around t1t_{1} to the two doublet quantum states |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. The transition line is gate independent and appears as the inverse sign of γS\gamma_{S}. The sign of γS\gamma_{S} changes a second time around t2t_{2}, where the Majorana-coupled channels dominate over the normal thermoelectric transport. In the weak coupling regime for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e, we observe the sharp sign reversal for the octuplets |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8}. The transition line is gate-dependent and the inhomogeneous sharp transition line is associated with the compensation of two processes in the Majorana-coupled channel πTK(cot[δν][Γ~νδ2+t~2δ])πTK(cot[δν]Γ~νt~2)-\pi T_{K}(\cot[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}][\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta^{2}+\widetilde{t}^{2}\delta])\approx-\pi T_{K}(-\cot[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}]\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{t}^{2}). For Q=2Q=2e, the linear thermoelectric coefficient approaches zero in a statement of charge neutrality. This is the consequence of the Friedel sum rule and the phase shift δν=π/2\delta_{\nu}=\pi/2 at the energy of the Fermi level. The gate-dependent behavior in the NFL phase is also indicated by the slight indentation for Q=2Q=2e. In the region of strong coupling strength, when the system goes to the SU(3) Kondo state, for Ed=3E_{d}=-3 and Ed=6E_{d}=-6, we observe two flat areas: light yellow and light blue for Q=3/2Q=3/2 and Q=5/2Q=5/2. The γS\gamma_{S} reaches a value of γ(S)=πsin[δν]sin[2δν]4+3cos[2δν]=3π/22\gamma_{(S)}=\mp\frac{\pi\sin[\delta_{\nu}]\sin[2\delta_{\nu}]}{-4+3\cos[2\delta_{\nu}]}=\mp 3\pi/22, which is significantly different from the value for SU(3) Kondo state, as shown in Figure 15a. This difference is shown by the dark violet line in Fig. 16a (γS=±π/6\gamma_{S}=\pm\pi/6), where we have subtracted the contribution to 𝒮{\mathcal{S}} from the Majorana fermion channel ν\nu^{\prime}. This result is confirmed in the literature [45]. γS=±3π/22\gamma_{S}=\pm 3\pi/22 is observed for the sextuplets, and due to the Onsager relations is associated with the finite topological value of the quantum conductance quantized at 𝒢=(11/4)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(11/4)(e^{2}/h). A finite temperature gradient T=103T=10^{-3} changes the picture in γS\gamma_{S} (Fig.15b and Fig. 15d). The finite temperature violates the quantum conductance in the crossover region, where the energy ground state is defined by high-degenerate quantum states |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8} (Fig. 9c). The effect of reversal sign for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e in TEP disappears (red line on Fig. 15d) and reduced to the spots under these temperature conditions (Fig. 15b). For |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4} we observe decrease of the TEP to γS±1/2\gamma_{S}\approx\pm 1/2. Increasing the temperature gradient (red line in Fig. 15d), the SU(4) Kondo effect is suppressed for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e, therefore ±1/2<±π/(32)\pm 1/2<\pm\pi/(3\sqrt{2}). The transition between |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1} (|f1\lvert f\rangle_{1}) and the doublets |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} is shifted (Fig. 15b). The same effect was observed for Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e, where t1t_{1} changes its position on the axis of the coupling strength tt (blue curve in Fig. 15d). The second point is stable for T=103T=10^{-3} and is associated with the second compensation processes, where πTK(3ϱ~˙ν(0))/[(3ϱ~ν(0)+ϱ~ν(0))]=πTK(cot[δν][Γ~νδ2+t~2(δΓ~ν)])/[(3ϱ~ν(0)+ϱ~ν(0))(πΓ~ν(2t~2+Γ~νδcsc2[δν])2)]-\pi T_{K}(3\dot{\widetilde{\varrho}}_{\nu}(0))/[(3\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0)+\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}(0))]=-\pi T_{K}(\cot[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}][\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta^{2}+\widetilde{t}^{2}(\delta-\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}})])/[(3\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0)+\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}(0))(\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}(2\widetilde{t}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta\csc^{2}[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}])^{2})]. In the intermediate coupling strength between t=102t=10^{-2} and t3t_{3} the linear coefficient exceeds the value of γS±3π/22\gamma_{S}\approx\pm 3\pi/22 (blue line in Fig. 15d). For TKSU(3)<TT^{SU^{\star}(3)}_{K}<T and t>t3t>t_{3} we observe the suppression of γS\gamma_{S} to zero in the sextuplet regions (blue line in Fig. 15d). The envelope of the NFL-like region, where we observe the strong enhancement of γS\gamma_{S} (black, and dark violet area in Fig. 15a,b), depends strongly on the compensation conditions and the energy level of the quantum dot. An increase in temperature contributes to a gradual narrowing of the NFL crossover region.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 16: (Color online) a-c) |γS||\gamma_{S}| as a function of EdE_{d} for CNTQD coupled to 1MF, 2MFs and 3MFs. The dark volet line in figure a shows γ(S)=±π/6\gamma_{(S)}=\pm\pi/6, the result for the SU(3) Kondo effect (where the ++\uparrow channel in 𝒮\cal{S} is neglected) [45]. γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} changes the sign at a half-filling point Q=2Q=2e d) |γS||\gamma_{S}| as a function tt for Q=3Q=3e.

Fig. 16 shows the cross sections of |γS||\gamma_{S}| on a logarithmic plot as a function of EdE_{d} for different values of tt. In Figure 16a-c, the black lines present |γS||\gamma_{S}| for SU(4) Kondo state in CNTQD. For Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e we observed the quantized values |γS|=π/(32)|\gamma_{S}|=\pi/(3\sqrt{2}). The ground state of the system |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} has on average two electrons (Q=2Q=2e) and the thermoelectric power in this region is strongly flattened and suppressed. |γS||\gamma_{S}| with t=5×103t=5\times 10^{-3} leads to 3π/223\pi/22 for 11e and 33e charge sectors (magenta line in Fig.16a). Around the enhancement, we observed two compensation points, where γS\gamma_{S} changed the sign. For this cross section, we have observed the third point of compensation in Q=2Q=2e. Orange line shows the saturation of γS\gamma_{S} to ±π/6\pm\pi/6 for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e. For the strong coupling strength (t=3t=3 and t=20t=20), |γS||\gamma_{S}| quantized to 3π/223\pi/22, where formed SU(3) Kondo state for the fractional charge on the quantum dot. The theory for this phase predicts the linear coefficient TEP in the form γ(S)=πsin[δν]sin[2δν]4+3cos[2δν]\gamma_{(S)}=\mp\frac{\pi\sin[\delta_{\nu}]\sin[2\delta_{\nu}]}{-4+3\cos[2\delta_{\nu}]}. At the e-h symmetry point we observed a narrowing line of blocked thermoelectric transport γS=0\gamma_{S}=0 (blue and green lines in Fig. 16a). Fig. 16b shows |γS||\gamma_{S}| as a function of EdE_{d} for CNTQD-2TSC device. For t=3t=3 and t=20t=20, we observed the area of the SU(2) Kondo state, when the quantum dot is in the octuplet state |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8}. The thermoelectric power remains strongly suppressed (|γS|=0|\gamma_{S}|=0), in contrast to the charge degeneracy point, for the Kondo state the region is strictly flattened, as indicated by the scaling energy T[]T_{[\star]}. Around the boundary between |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} and |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4}, |γS||\gamma_{S}| reaches π/8\pi/8 and this is associated with the U(1) charge symmetry, where the quantum conductance leads to 2(e2/h)2(e^{2}/h) (Fig. 6c). For the weak coupling strength to TSC (t=5×103t=5\times 10^{-3}), γS\gamma_{S} vanishes and changes sign around Ed=(U/2)E_{d}=-(U/2) and Ed=(5U/2)E_{d}=-(5U/2) (magenta curve in Fig. 16b). In Fig. 16d for the red and blue line we observe γS=0\gamma_{S}=0. At this point γS\gamma_{S} shows a sharp sign reversal. Red curved on Fig. 16d shows the saturation of γS\gamma_{S} to π/6\pi/6 for the strong coupling strength of CNTQD to TSC. The value appears at the charge degeneracy point between the entangled quantum states |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2} and |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6}. A this point, the quantum conductance leads to 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h). In the case of the CNTQD-3TSC system, TEP is suppressed for Q=2eQ=2e and γS=0\gamma_{S}=0 for two degenerate octuplets |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8} at the e-h symmetry point. The switching around the charge degeneracy point reaches |γS|=π/16|\gamma_{S}|=\pi/16 (blue and green lines in Fig. 16c). Decreasing of the coupling strength tt, shift the solution into the NFL-like behavior region, where γS\gamma_{S} reverses the sign and is strongly increases (magenta curve in Fig.16c). The dark magenta line in Fig. 16d shows the evolution of |γS||\gamma_{S}| as the function of the coupling strength tt to the TSCs. Comparing the lines in Fig. 16d, we conclude that increasing the number of TSCs coupled to the quantum dot shifts the second compensation point into the region of strong coupling strength. Even if, the evolution of γS\gamma_{S} explains the Mott’s formula, the behavior in the region for the weak Majorana coupling strength has not been scaled by the Kondo temperature, and in this sense we mean about NFL-like phase. The strong enhancement in the weak coupling regime is reflected in the temperature dependence of the entropies SQDS_{QD} and STSS_{TS}, where the channels ν\nu associated with the Kondo state are much more temperature resistant than the channels ν\nu^{\prime} interfering with the spin-orbital states in the quantum dots (Fig. 13a).

Before investigating the nonlinear current and shot noise, let’s first discuss the influence of the coupling strength to Majorana fermions on the quantities of the two- and three-body correlation functions. Based on the thermodynamics of the Kondo state described in Sec. IIIB, we showed that the general static susceptibilities in Eqs. (21-24) can be expressed as the second and third derivatives of the thermodynamic potential and are related to the density of the quasiparticle states. Using the results of [58, 56], we have postulated the weak-coupling approach to find the off-diagonal two- and three-particle correlations, based on the Wilson ratio Wνν=1χ~νν/χ~ννχ~νν=1+U~ννχ~ννχ~νν=1+δQννΔQννW_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}=1-\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}/\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}}=1+\widetilde{U}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\sqrt{\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}}=1+\frac{\delta Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}{\Delta Q_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}}. At this point, we include the (residual) interaction between the quasiparticles U~νν\widetilde{U}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}, and we can express as an invariant, the two-particle static susceptibility χ(z)=(1/4)(νχ~ννννχ~νν)\chi_{(z)}=(1/4)(\sum_{\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu}-\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}), which is proportional to the Z-component of the partial fluctuations in the pseudospin space. The same quantum metric can be defined for an odd three-body correlation function in the following way: χ(z)[3]=(1/4)(νχ~νννννχ~ννν)\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}=(1/4)(\sum_{\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu\nu}-\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}). Tχ(z)(T)T\chi_{(z)}(T) is screened, when Tχ(z)(T)=0T\chi_{(z)}(T)=0 and the Kondo state is formed. At low temperatures in χ(z)(T)\chi_{(z)}(T) we observe the saturated constant value, proportional to 1/TK1/T_{K} in the limit T0T\mapsto 0. Therefore, the quantities T[]χ(z)(0)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}(0) and T[]2χ(z)[3](0)T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}(0) are the information about the frozen pseudospin and three-particle correlation. In the context of experimental results for single Kondo dot [138], we suggest that more significant information about the symmetry of the Kondo state and all modifications of the SU(N)-Anderson model (i.e. by the coupling term with Majorana fermions) is hidden in the extremely low- temperature measurements of χ(z)\chi_{(z)} by the charge-sensing technique.

The magnitude of limT0Tχ(z)(T)\lim_{T\mapsto 0}T\chi_{(z)}(T) is screened for the SU(4) Kondo state and is close to zero. For the high temperature limit Tχ(z)(T)T\chi_{(z)}(T) reaches the value corresponding to the expectation value of the Z-component of the quadratic Casimir operator (TCZ2TC^{2}_{Z}). Although Tχ(z)[3](T)T\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}(T) in the high temperature limit is not equivalent to the Z-component of the cubic of the Casimir operator (TCZ3TC^{3}_{Z}), for further analysis it is a good approach to investigate the contributions to the nonlinear current and the shot noise, where inelastic processes, beyond the e-h symmetry point play an important role. χ(z)[3]\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} includes all three-body correlation functions, except χ~σ1σ2σ3[3]\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\sigma_{1}\sigma_{2}\sigma_{3}}, which are non-zero only for the tunneling asymmetry between the left and right electrodes (Γ~LΓ~R\widetilde{\Gamma}_{L}\neq\widetilde{\Gamma}_{R}) [56] (last term in Eq.(18)). Gate-dependent three-particle correlators in quantum dot are the odd parity functions and change the sign when passing through the e-h symmetry point.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 17: (Color online) a, b) The density plots of the two-body (T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}) and three-body (T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}) frozen correlation functions versus EdE_{d} and tt for the CNTQD-1TSC device. c, d) The landscape plots of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} as function of tt. The black lines are plotted with an increment of δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15 from Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 to 11. The numbers indicate the values of the correlations in the Kondo phases.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 18: (Color online) Two- and three-body correlations for the CNTQD-2TSC system: a, b) T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}) and T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} versus EdE_{d} and tt. c, d) the landscape plots of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} as function of tt.

Fig. 17a, b shows the density plots of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} as a function of EdE_{d} and the coupling strength tt. The magnitudes are multiplied by the characteristic temperature T[]T_{[\star]}, to scale the two-body and three-body correlators proportional to 1/TK,ν2\sim 1/T^{2}_{K,\nu} and 1/TK,ν4\sim 1/T^{4}_{K,\nu} (Eqs. (21-24)). T[]χ(z)(0)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}(0) and T[]2χ(z)[3](0)-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}(0) correspond to the fluctuations of the frozen second and third moments of the pseudospin in CNTQD. In the strongly correlated phase, we observed the Kondo cloud and T[]T_{[\star]} is equal to the Kondo temperature TKT_{K}. As we have shown in Fig. 9a, T[]T_{[\star]} varies with the increase of the coupling strength tt and reaches characteristic values for a given phase. Fig. 17a presents T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} for the SU(4) Kondo state, via the intermediate phase to the SU(3) Kondo effect. In the weak coupling regime, T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} leads to 0.440.44 (green line in Fig. 17c), and remains constant for the quantum states |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8} (purple area in Fig. 17a). With increasing tt, T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} reaches to the quantized value 1/41/4. T[]χ(z)=1/4T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=1/4 is related to the charge degeneracy line between two quantum states |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. The transition between |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and the octuplet |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8} is visible in the three-body correlators (Fig. 17b, d). The value of T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} changes from 0.630.63 via 0.470.47 for the weak coupling strength to 1/31/3 for the strong coupling limit. In Figure 17b, we observe the color change in this region from orange to purple for Q=1Q=1e, and from black to violet for Q=3Q=3e, respectively. The response in the three-particle correlator T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} is much more sensitive for odd charges than in the two-body susceptibilities when the ground state configuration changes, because the high-order correlator, is the derivative of the two-particle correlators (Eq. (22) and Eq. (24)).

For Q=2Q=2e (Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5) we observe in the two-body correlation a transition between |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} and |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} (light and dark blue regions in Fig. 17a). T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} changes from 0.630.63 to 0.540.54 at the transition line around t1t_{1} (red line in Figure 17c). The three-particle correlation function for the e-h symmetry point is equal to zero (red line in Figure 17d), due to the oddity and mirror symmetry of T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}. The three-body correlator changes the sign at this point. Even if, the transition is observed in T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} (red line in Fig. 17c), the argument of the enhancement in the derivative is weaker than vanishing by reciprocal zeroing of the partial three-body correlators in T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}. The dependence of E~ν(ν)\widetilde{E}_{\nu(\nu^{\prime})} is responsible for reducing the three-body correlators in Eqs. (22) and (24). The early experiment confirmed and showed, that the three-body correlators are capable of being measured using the nonlinear current and the shot noise detection [60]. The important issue about the zeroing of higher-order susceptibilities suggests that they will be helpful in the experimental measurements, where the e-h symmetry point is shifted e.g. by the Zeeman compensating field in CNTQD Kondo dot attached to ferromagnetic electrodes [142]. In this device, the exchange field disappears at the e-h symmetry point, the spin Kondo state is restored, and this point is shifted by applying the compensating magnetic field. In terms of the transition between |f1\lvert f\rangle_{1}(|e1\lvert e\rangle_{1}), and |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2}(|qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}), we observe around t1t_{1} a slight boost in two-body correlation function and suppression in T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} (dark cyan line in Figures 17c, d). For the fractional charges Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e, the SU(3) Kondo state is formed in the strong coupling region, and both correlators, which are significant, are quantized to T[]χ(z)=|T[]2χ(z)[3]|=0.41T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=|T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}|=0.41. The system is determined by the two sextuplets |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} and |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6}. The equality of these quantities is due to the expectation values of the boson fields operators, where |p+(s)|2=|d20,,|2=1/6|p_{+\downarrow(-s)}|^{2}=|d_{20,\uparrow\uparrow,\uparrow\downarrow}|^{2}=1/6 (|t+(s)|2=|d02,,|2=1/6|t_{+\uparrow(-s)}|^{2}=|d_{02,\downarrow\downarrow,\downarrow\uparrow}|^{2}=1/6).

The figures 18 show the higher-order correlation functions for the CNTQD-2TSC device. For Q=1Q=1e, we observe a transition from |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} to |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16}, and in the strong coupling region to the quantum quartet |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4}. In the same way as before, it is difficult to separate the transition in the weak coupling regime, because aaa^{\prime}\ll a in the quantum state, and finally for |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16} the SU(4)-like Kondo state is realized (even if 𝒢ν=𝒢ν=(1/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}_{\nu}={\mathcal{G}}_{\nu^{\prime}}=(1/2)(e^{2}/h), the transmissions are different). Although, in the same weak coupling region, T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} demonstrates two values 0.630.63 and 0.310.31 at the transition line between the two states |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16} (green line around t1t_{1} in Fig. 18d). The frozen effective Kondo spin features a constant value T[]χ(z)=0.45T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=0.45. In the strong coupling to two Majorana fermions γl\gamma_{l\uparrow}, T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} sloped down to 1/81/8. The similar result is observed for Ed=1E_{d}=1, where in both cases the quantum quartets |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} dominate (purple region in Fig.18a and dark cyan line in Fig. 18c). For Q=2Q=2e in the two-particle correlation function, we observe three characteristic values: T[]χ(z)=0.63T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=0.63 for the sextuplet |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}, 0.460.46 for |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24} and finally constant quantized value 0.310.31 for the octuplet |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} (red line in Fig. 18c). T[]χ(z)=0.31T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=0.31 is associated with the restoration of the SU(2) Kondo state in the system. In the density plot of T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} we observe an enhancement at the transitions between the states |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} and |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16}, similarly for |qx4\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{4} and |qb16\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{16}. In the weak coupling strength region, the three-body correlation is quantized to T[]2χ(z)[3]=±0.31-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}=\pm 0.31. T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} approaches to 1/31/3 around |f1\lvert f\rangle_{1}, where empty |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1} and fully occupied state |f1\lvert f\rangle_{1} evolve to quartets, and strongly decreases with increasing of the number of the topological segments (dark cyan line in Fig. 18d). The opposite tendency is observed for two-body correlators, where T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} saturates to a constant value (dark cyan lines in Figs. 17-19c).

Fig. 19 shows the evolution of the frozen effective pseudospin moment T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and three-body correlation T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} versus EdE_{d} with increasing the coupling strength tt for the CNTQD-3TSC hybrid device. One of the most significant results is the shogun helmet-like gate dependence of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} in the strong coupling region. Formally, for CNTQD-3TSC, the quantum conductance is suppressed by increasing the tunneling term between the Kondo dot and three Majorana fermions (Fig. 7d). The 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} in all three Kondo-like channels, is determined by the interference effect with Majorana fermions. The single normal channel preserves the quantized value 𝒢=(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(e^{2}/h) for Q=2Q=2e at the e-h symmetry point, where the ground state is defined by two octuplets |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}. Beyond this line, the total quantum conductance reaches (3/2)(e2/h)(3/2)(e^{2}/h) and the transport through the normal channel is blocked. In contrast to the static high-order correlations, where we observed the enhancement of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and the sign reversal in T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} around Ed=UE_{d}=-U and Ed=2UE_{d}=-2U. There is an amplification associated with a leakage of the quantum states |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48}, into the forbidden charge region Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e and Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e, where |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} are the new energy ground states. The effect requires further analysis, but we can tentatively conclude that the mechanism is due to the presence in two octuplets |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} the states (the basis vectors) from the forbidden charge region in the normal phase. We have marked in red two significant quantum states |2n1n2n3\lvert 2\uparrow n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}\rangle and |0n1n2n3\lvert 0\downarrow n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}\rangle in Eqs. (13-14), which are responsible for the quantum leakage. The physics behind this effect can be explained by the entanglement mechanism with opposite charge-leaking states.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 19: (Color online) Two- and three-body correlations for the CNTQD-3TSC device: a, b) T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[]2χ(z)[3]T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} as a function of EdE_{d} and tt. c, d) The landscape plots of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} as function of tt.

The density plots in Fig. 19a, b show the transition with increasing of tt between the empty(fully) occupied states |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1}(|f1\lvert f\rangle_{1}) and the low energy octuplets |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8}. In the weak coupling regime for the high degenerate quantum states |qa(b)32\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{32}, the frozen two-body susceptibilities lead to 0.430.43 (green line in Fig. 19c). For the strong coupling strength, T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} approaches to 1/41/4 for both energies Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 and Ed=1E_{d}=1, where one of the octuplet states dominates (green and dark cyan curves in Fig. 19c). The red curve in Fig. 19c shows three characteristic values: T[]χ(z)=0.63T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=0.63, 0.380.38 and 0.150.15. We observed the enhancement of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} to 1/21/2 above t3=U/2t_{3}=U/2. The charge-leaking states form the shogun helmet-like shape in the density plot of the susceptibilities. Fig. 19d shows T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)}. For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5, the three-body correlation function changes from 0.630.63 to 0.150.15 at the transition line between |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |qa32\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{32} (green curve in Fig. 19d). For the strong coupling region, where two octuplets |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} dominate, T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} is reduced, except for the charge-leaking lines (Fig. 19d). In Fig. 19d, the sign of χ(z)[3]\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} changes between ±1/4\pm 1/4 along the shogun helmet-like shape. For Ed=1E_{d}=1, with increasing the coupling strength between quantum dot and Majoranas, the device demonstrates a decrease in T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} to zero and a saturation in T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} to 1/41/4.

Figures 20 show the frozen higher-order quantities: the effective pseudospin T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}, frozen charge susceptibility T[]χ(c)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} and its three-particle correlations T[][3]χ(z)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[3]χ(c)T^{[3]}_{\star}\chi_{(c)} for CNTQD coupled to multi-Majorana device. The charge susceptibility can be expressed as follows χ(c)=ννχ~νν\chi_{(c)}=\sum_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}, and in the analogous way the charge three-body correlator T[][3]χ(z)=ννχ~ννν[3]T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=\sum_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\chi}^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}. Fig. 20a compares two-body correlators in three types of nanodevices as a function of tt for different gate voltages applied to CNTQD (EdE_{d}). The dark, light and lighter lines are the results for CNTQD device coupled to 1TSC, 2TSC and three Majoranas (3TSC). For Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 and Ed=3E_{d}=-3, the frozen effective pseudospin decreases with increase of the coupling strength to the topological segments. The quantum steps observed in Tχ(z)T_{\star}\chi_{(z)} correspond to ground states that determine the specific phase in the strongly correlated hybrid device. In the strong coupling limit, SU(3) Kondo state is formed for the fractional charge Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e (dark blue line). For the fractional Kondo phase, the two-body correlator leads to T[]χ(z)=0.41T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=0.41 and converges to the same value at the e-h symmetry point, for Q=2Q=2e as mentioned before. At high degeneracy point of two sextuplets |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6}, the phase is determined by the UU^{\star}(1) charge symmetry. The difference between two states, SU(3) Kondo and charge UU^{\star}(1) phase, is visible in the quantized value of T[]χ(c)=0T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)}=0 and T[]χ(c)=1/3T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)}=1/3. Formally, the frozen charge susceptibility is related to the sum of the charge fluctuations lsδnls2\sum_{ls}\delta n_{ls}^{2}, and for the screened Kondo cloud T[]χ(c)0T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)}\approx 0 (dark blue and light red curves in Fig. 20b). For Ed=+1E_{d}=+1 we observe a gradual increase of T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} with the growth of the number of Majorana fermions NTSN_{TS} coupled to the CNTQD device (cyan lines in Fig. 20a). T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} is the magnitude proportional to quadratic of the spin-orbital fluctuations (where χ(z)=ν01/kBT𝑑τδnν(τ)δnν(0)<νν01/kBT𝑑τδnν(τ)δnν(0)<\chi_{(z)}=\sum_{\nu}\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta n_{\nu}(\tau)\delta n_{\nu}(0)\rangle^{<}-\sum_{\nu^{\prime}\neq\nu}\int^{1/k_{B}T}_{0}d\tau\langle\delta n_{\nu}(\tau)\delta n_{\nu^{\prime}}(0)\rangle^{<}), which increases with NTSN_{TS} for Ed=1E_{d}=1, in contrast to the local isospin Z-components shown in Fig. 12. In the strong coupling region, for Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5, Tχ(z)T_{\star}\chi_{(z)} converges to 1/41/4 in CNTQD coupled to: 1TSC and 3TSC devices. For the strongly coupled CNTQD-3TSC system, the frozen two-body correlator is reduced to T[]χ(z)=1/6T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)}=1/6. T[]χ(c)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} vanishes for the SU(4), SU(3) and SU(2) Kondo states (Fig. 20b). For Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, the two-body charge susceptibilities start from 1/81/8 for uncoupled QD to TSCs. In the intermediate and strong coupling region, T[]χ(c)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} is enhanced by the number of topological wires NTSN_{TS} (cyan lines in Fig. 20b). T[]χ(c)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} leads to 0.340.34 for |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}, 0.620.62 for |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} and T[]χ(c)=0.87T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)}=0.87 for |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}. In particular the partial susceptibilities indexed by ν\nu^{\prime} channels coupled to Majorana fermions for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1 raise the value of T[](c)T_{[\star]}{(c)}. In the charge susceptibility we observe a dip around t3t_{3} due to the opposite contributions of diagonal and off-diagonal parts in the sum of χ(c)=ννχ~νν\chi_{(c)}=\sum_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{\chi}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}. Between t1t_{1} and t2t_{2} for Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 and 1.5-1.5, when CNTQD is determined by the high degenerate states, we observe low fluctuations of T[]χ(c)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)}, characterized for the Kondo states. Above t2t_{2}, for strong coupling strength, the two-body charge correlator increases and saturates at finite values, when the quantum states are in the U(1) charge phases (all lines except the dark blue and light red curves in Fig. 20b). The three-body correlation function T[][3]χ(z)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} versus tt is shown in Fig. 20c. T[][3]χ(z)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} shows three quantized values, related to the change of the quantum ground states (blue and green lines in Fig. 20c). In the strong coupling region, T[][3]χ(z)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} vanishes for the CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD-3TSC devices, where the quartets |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} and the octuplets |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} determine the lowest energy solution in the system. The transition between the empty occupied state and the entangled doublet, quartet and octuplet for Ed=1E_{d}=1 is manifested by raising the value around t1=δt_{1}=\delta. For the fractional SU(3) Kondo state, T[][3]χ(z)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} is quantized to 0.410.41 (dark blue line in Fig. 20c). We observed a similar evolution in the frozen three-body charge correlation T[3]χ(c)T^{[3]}_{\star}\chi_{(c)} (Fig. 20d). For CNTQD coupled to 2TSC and 3TSC, in particular for the weak coupling region, T[][3]χ(c)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} changes sign due to the dominant role of the off-diagonal three-body correlations (light and lighter green curves in Fig. 20d). At the e-h symmetry point, both correlations T[][3]χ(z)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and T[][3]χ(c)T^{[3]}_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} are suppressed and obtains to zero.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 20: (Color online) a, b) T[]χ(z)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(z)} and the frozen charge susceptibilities T[]χ(c)T_{[\star]}\chi_{(c)} against tt. c, d) T[]2χ(z)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(z)} and T[]2χ(c)[3]-T^{2}_{[\star]}\chi^{[3]}_{(c)} as a function of the coupling strength tt. Dark, light and brightest color of the lines show the results for CNTQD coupled to MF, 2MFs and 3MFs.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 21: (Color online) a-c) The expected value of the quadratic of the Casimir operator CZ2C^{2}_{Z} as a local spin fluctuations versus tt for CNTQD-TSC, CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD-3TSC devices. Dark and light lines present TCZ(K)2TC^{2}_{Z(K)} and TCZ(M)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)} in Kondo and Majorana-coupled channels.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 22: (Color online) a-c) The expected value of the quadratic of the Casimir operator CZ2C^{2}_{Z} as a function of EdE_{d} with increasing of tt for the CNTQD-TSC, CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD-3TSC devices. Dark and light lines present TCZ(K)2TC^{2}_{Z(K)} and TCZ(M)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)} in Kondo and Majorana-coupled channels.

Figures 21 and 22 show the fluctuations of the local effective pseudospin TCZ2=TCZ(K)2+TCZ(M)2TC^{2}_{Z}=TC^{2}_{Z(K)}+TC^{2}_{Z(M)}, expressed by the expected value of the Z-component of the quadratic Casimir operator [137]. The quadratic Casimir operator is written as a sum of two parts CZ(K)2C^{2}_{Z(K)} and CZ(M)2C^{2}_{Z(M)} (dark and light lines in Figs. 21-22). The first contribution describes the local fluctuations in the ν\nu channel associated with the normal states and the second CZ(M)2C^{2}_{Z(M)}, represents the two-particle correlations in the ν\nu^{\prime} Majorana-coupled channel. We have expressed the Casimir operator by the boson fields operators in Eqs. (29-34). For the CNTQD-TSC device the fluctuations in the normal channels are higher than the contribution in the ν\nu^{\prime} channel: TCK2>TCM2TC^{2}_{K}>TC^{2}_{M}. For Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5, TCZ(K)2=1/3TC^{2}_{Z(K)}=1/3 and is constant with increasing the tunneling strength, in contrast to TCZ(M)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)}, which changes from 0.160.16 to 0.10.1 in the strong coupling limit (dark red and light red curves in Fig. 21a). For this behavior is responsible the transition from |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} in the Kondo state to the U(1) charge symmetry (dark and light cyan lines in Fig. 22a). For both quantum states |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} for Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} for Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e, TCZ(K)2TC^{2}_{Z(K)} reaches 1/31/3, and TCZ(M)2=0.1TC^{2}_{Z(M)}=0.1, which is the fingerprint of the SU(3) Kondo state [46]. In practice, the states in the ν\nu channel are screened by the nonlocal fluctuation TCsd2=limT0Tχ(z)(T)TCZ(K)2(T)=1/3TC^{2}_{s-d}=\lim_{T\mapsto 0}T\chi_{(z)}(T)-TC^{2}_{Z(K)}(T)=-1/3 consisting of the quantum dot and electrode states (TCsd2TC^{2}_{s-d} is called the nonlocal quadratic Casimir operator). In Tχ(z)(T)T\chi_{(z)}(T), in the strong coupling limit, with increasing temperature we should observe two quantum steps, first for the Majorana-coupled channel ν\nu, where Tχ(z)(T)=0.1T\chi_{(z)}(T)=0.1 and second for the high temperature limit Tχ(z)(T)=0.1+1/3T\chi_{(z)}(T)=0.1+1/3, in contrast to the entropy, where the tunneling entropy is compensated by the topological part (Fig. 13c). For Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, the transport is determined by the Majorana-coupled channel, and TCZ(M)2>TCZ(K)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)}>TC^{2}_{Z(K)}. In the strong coupling limit, the TCZ(M)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)} saturates and reaches to 0.180.18 (light cyan lines in Fig. 21a and 22a). In this region, |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} is the ground state and the spin and isospin components achieve |SZ|=1/4|S_{Z}|=1/4 and |IZ|=3/4|I_{Z}|=3/4 (Fig. 12a).

In CNTQD-2TSC, the tendencies of the fluctuations are opposite TCZ(M)2>TCZ(K)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)}>TC^{2}_{Z(K)}, except for Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5, in the strong coupling limit, where the SU(2) Kondo state is realized. With increasing the coupling strength tt, for Q=2Q=2e, we observed the transition between the Kondo state for |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} and SU(2) Kondo effect. This occurs, when TCZ(M)2<TCZ(K)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)}<TC^{2}_{Z(K)} and the fluctuation in the Majorana-coupled channel achieves TCZ(M)2=0.2TC^{2}_{Z(M)}=0.2 and in the channel associated with the Kondo state TCZ(K)2=1/4TC^{2}_{Z(K)}=1/4 (dark and light cyan lines in Fig. 22b and both red curves in Fig. 21b). For these quantities are responsible the expected values of the boson fields operators Eqs. (31-32). As we see, in the topological qubit states |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} in Eq. (12), only two bosons of dνd_{\nu}, single plsp_{ls} and one tlst_{ls} contribute to the increase of the fluctuations. The spin and the isospin are zero for the SU(2) Kondo effect, due to the symmetry of the strongly correlated state and are determined by the values of the boson fields operators in Eq. (44-45). Topological states in the octuplets |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} contribute to the increase of the total entropy for the intermediate temperature (black line in Fig. 13d). For |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} states, in the strong coupling region for Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 and Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, the transport is determined by the channels coupled to Majorana fermions (light green and cyan lines in Fig. 21b), and only TCZ(M)2=0.29TC^{2}_{Z(M)}=0.29 contributes to the pseudospin fluctuations (light cyan line in Fig. 22b). In this region we observe a sharp switch in the Z-component of the spin and isospin, |SZ|=|IZ|=1/2|S_{Z}|=|I_{Z}|=1/2 (Fig. 12b). The topological qubits |qzn(n¯)\lvert q_{-z_{n(\overline{n})}}\rangle are determined by the entanglement of the empty, two single occupied states and one double occupied state in the auxiliary slave boson representation (Eq. (11)).

For the CNTQD-3TSC device, the contributions from the ν\nu^{\prime} channels coupled to the three Majorana fermions exceed the fluctuation from the normal channel: TCZ(M)2>TCZ(K)2TC^{2}_{Z(M)}>TC^{2}_{Z(K)} (Fig. 21c). In the strong coupling limit, the octuplet states |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} dominate on the both sides of the e-h symmetry point. With increasing tt we observe the completely flat and constant gate-dependent behavior for both fluctuations TCZ(M)2=1/4TC^{2}_{Z(M)}=1/4 and TCZ(K)2=0.1TC^{2}_{Z(K)}=0.1 (light and dark cyan curves in Fig. 22c). This is caused by the fact that topological superconductors use N1N-1 degrees of freedom of the QD.

Let’s turn to the problem of the shot noise in the CNTQD-TSC devices. According to the results in the paper [56], the current and the shot noise (in terms of linear voltages) can be expressed by the transmission in the Landauer-Bütikker form Eqs. (37-38). The shot noise formula is derived using the Hartree-Fock approximation (HFA) for a two-particle Green’s function [139, 147]. Finally, in the context of the shot noise (the fluctuations of the current), we can introduce the linear Fano factor F0=limV0S0/2|e|I0F_{0}=\lim_{V\mapsto 0}S_{0}/2|e|I_{0} in the low bias region. The quantum magnitude for certain quantum systems yields to the quantized values less than or greater than 1. For the non-interacting particles, F0F_{0} is equal to 1. F0F_{0} manifests two types of statistical behavior: sub-Poissonian noise (F0<1F_{0}<1) and super-Poissonian noise (F0>1F_{0}>1). The particles in the nanodevice (mostly electrons) are bunched or anti-bunched, by the repulsive and attractive Coulomb interaction. The type of interaction between the quasiparticles determines the value of the Fano factor, e.g. Cooper pairs in BCS superconductors demonstrate 22, the Fano factor of the Dirac fermions is equal to 1/31/3, and for the Kondo singlet quasiparticle, the experiments show 5/35/3. In the CNTQD-TSCs device, we couple the Kondo quasiparticle to Majorana fermions (real half-fermion state), and by increasing of the tunneling terms, the Kondo cloud is modified by the interference effects. We observe the coexistence of two states, the Majorana-Kondo state. In the first part of the discussion, we analyze the ballistic transport (for low bias voltage), where the current fluctuation S0S_{0} is described by the transmission. In this picture, the quasiparticle in the Kondo state, behaves like non-interacting particles (in particular for the SU(2) Kondo effect, where δν=π/2\delta_{\nu}=\pi/2). This quantity is observed in the linear coefficient of the specific heat, where in the frame of FL theory γN=π23ν=lsϱ~ν\gamma_{N}=\frac{\pi^{2}}{3}\sum_{\nu=ls}\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu} [58]. In general, the non-interacting particles are modified by the renormalization, in this sense the symmetry of the SU(4) Kondo effect and the interaction reveal in low-bias measurements. Finally, the Fano factor consists of the linear and nonlinear parts in the following form:

F=S2|e|I=S0V+SKV3+0[V5]2|e|(I0V+IKV3+0[V5])\displaystyle F=\frac{S}{2|e|I}=\frac{S_{0}V+S_{K}V^{3}+0[V^{5}]}{2|e|(I_{0}V+I_{K}V^{3}+0[V^{5}])} (52)

where the nonlinear part is measured by subtracting the linear parts S0S_{0} and I0I_{0} from the noise and the currents:

FK=|SK|2|e||IK|=δSKδIKd2S/dV2d2I/dV2\displaystyle F_{K}=\frac{|S_{K}|}{2|e||I_{K}|}=\frac{\delta S_{K}}{\delta I_{K}}\approx\frac{d^{2}S/dV^{2}}{d^{2}I/dV^{2}} (53)

FKF_{K} is the nonlinear contribution to the shot noise and includes the elastic and inelastic scattering processes, which develops from the high-order correlations and the interaction between dressed Kondo quasiparticles (eV,T<TKeV,T<T_{K}). In the further calculations, we have adopted the Eqs. (39-40) from [56].

Fig. 23a shows the density plot of F0F_{0} as a function of EdE_{d} and the coupling strength tt. In Fig. 23a, for the CNTQD-1TSC device, with respect to the transition from the empty (full) occupied states |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1}(|f1\lvert f\rangle_{1}) to the doublets |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} (|qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2}), we observe a reduction of the shot noise from F0=1F_{0}=1 (red area in Fig.23a) to a value of 1/21/2 (dark orange region in Fig.23a). Comparing the figures in section 23, the reduction is quantized to F0=1/2F_{0}=1/2, regardless of the number of TSC segments in the hybrid devices. This is a consequence of the geometry of the measurements (T-shaped like device). The NTSN_{TS} dependence in F0F_{0} is detectable, only in the direct coupling geometry, where the TSC is one of the transport electrodes, where we measure the Andreev reflection contributions to the shot noise [86]. Formally, in the systems with direct coupling, where the quartet |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4} and the octuplet |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8} are the ground states, we should observe F01F_{0}\gg 1 in the strong coupling limit.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 23: (Color online) a-c) The density plot of the linear Fano factor F0=S0/(2eI0)F_{0}=S_{0}/(2eI_{0}) versus EdE_{d} and tt for the CNTQD-MF, CNTQD-2MFs and CNTQD-3MFs systems.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 24: (Color online) a-c) The landscape plots of F0F_{0} as a function tt with increment δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15 for CNTQD-TSC, CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD-3TSC devices.

F0=1/2F_{0}=1/2 has been confirmed for the QD-TSC circuit [86, 146], and is related to the fact that the sum of transmissions in the Majorana-coupled channel reaches (1/2)(e2/h)(1/2)(e^{2}/h). One comment is necessary here, F0F_{0} leads to 1/21/2, only beyond the e-h symmetry point, at the charge degeneracy line the device is in the U(1) charge symmetry phase, the quantum conductance is equal to 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h) and the linear Fano factor converges to 1/61/6 (the increase of the quantum conductance is also confirmed by NRG calculations [141]).

The difference between F0F_{0} in CNTQD-TSCs devices is significant in the measurements of S0S_{0} and I0I_{0}. F0=1/2F_{0}=1/2 has a different source for the CNTQD-1TSC circuit. For |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} we observe the noise S0=(1/4)(e/h)S_{0}=(1/4)(e/h) and the current quantized to 2|e|I0=(1/2)(e/h)2|e|I_{0}=(1/2)(e/h). For CNTQD-2TSC, F0=1/2F_{0}=1/2 is related to two quartets |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4}, where S0=(1/2)(e/h)S_{0}=(1/2)(e/h) and 2|e|I0=1(e/h)2|e|I_{0}=1(e/h). For a system coupled to three Majorana fermions F0=1/2F_{0}=1/2, but S0=(3/4)(e/h)S_{0}=(3/4)(e/h) and 2|e|I0=(3/2)(e/h)2|e|I_{0}=(3/2)(e/h), and the transport is determined by two octuplets |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8}. The value F0=1/2F_{0}=1/2 is observed for t>t1t>t_{1} and is symbolized by the orange area in Fig. 23 and by the dark cyan lines in Figures 24a-c. The black lines in Fig. 24 are plotted in the range from Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 to 11 with the increment δEd=+0.15\delta E_{d}=+0.15.

Let us discuss F0F_{0} for the e-h symmetry point (Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5). Increasing tt we observe the transition in F0F_{0} between the quantum state |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}, where F0=0F_{0}=0, to the finite quantized values, i.e. F0=S02|e|I0=1/47/2=1/14F_{0}=\frac{S_{0}}{2|e|I_{0}}=\frac{1/4}{7/2}=1/14 for |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}, F0=1/23=1/6F_{0}=\frac{1/2}{3}=1/6 for |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24} and F0=3/45/2=3/10F_{0}=\frac{3/4}{5/2}=3/10 for |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} (Fig. 23 and red curves in Fig. 24). F0=1/6F_{0}=1/6 is related to the SU(2) Kondo state, F0=1/14F_{0}=1/14 and F0=3/10F_{0}=3/10 are determined by the U(1) charge symmetries with twelvefold and sixteenfold degeneracy point. For the fractional SU(3) Kondo state, F0=13/44F_{0}=13/44, where the noise is quantized to S0=(13/16)(e/h)S_{0}=(13/16)(e/h) and the current leads to 2|e|I0=(11/4)(e/h)2|e|I_{0}=(11/4)(e/h) (dark yellow region in Fig. 23a and blue line in Fig. 24a). For the quantum states with Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e on the dot, in the range of weak coupling strength F01/2F_{0}\approx 1/2 (orange region in Fig. 23 and green lines in Fig. 24). The transition between the states |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4}(|tls4\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{4}) and |qa8(16,32)\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8(16,32)}(|qb8(16,32)\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{8(16,32)}) appears in the shot noise, exactly like in the quantum conductances (Figs. 5-7a). Finally, we can conclude that increasing the number of NTSN_{TS} topological superconducting wires coupled to the CNTQD squeezes the Fano factor in the landscape plots to 1/21/2 in the limit NTS=NN_{TS}=N.

In the V3V^{3} bias range, the nonlinear Fano factor dominates, which consider the information of the interaction between Kondo quasiparticles. The effective sbMFA Hamiltonian, includes the Coulomb interaction, but formally to calculate the inelastic scattering processes, we take into account the fluctuations in the free energy ΔF~\Delta\widetilde{F}. On this basis we can introduce into the system the quantity called the Wilson coefficient, which for the interacting quasiparticles leads to Wνν1>0W_{\nu\nu^{\prime}}-1>0, and exactly in the backscattering processes with the Kondo singlet, takes the value of 1/(N1)1/(N-1) for the N-orbital Anderson model [53, 56]. CNTQD-TSC devices with N-1 channels coupled to the Majorana fermion behave like the Fermi liquid systems, where nν=δν/πn_{\nu}=\delta_{\nu}/\pi. Based on this assumption, and on the fact that the shot noise and the current have similar linear and the third power bias contributions, we can formally adopt in the first approach the result of the paper [56]. Previous papers, using the Fermi liquid approach, showed that the nonlinear current and shot noise can be expressed by the sum of the elastic and inelastic contributions [51, 55, 52]. In [56] the authors showed for the first time that the FL coefficient can be expressed by the two- and three-body correlation functions (χνν\chi_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} and χννν[3]\chi^{[3]}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}\nu^{\prime}}), and the factors cV,νc_{V,\nu} and cS,νc_{S,\nu} at V3V^{3} in the current and shot noise series are given by the sum of the high-order correlation functions consisting of the backscattering processes found by using the Ward identities [135] and including the vertex functions [56].

Figure 25 shows the shot noise and current in the nonlinear regime for V<TKV<T_{K}, which includes the information about the quasiparticle interaction in the Kondo state. The quantities are expressed in terms of two- and three-particle correlation functions. The δIK=T[]2|IK|\delta I_{K}=T_{[\star]}^{2}|I_{K}| is the excess current multiplied by the square of the characteristic temperature T[]T_{[\star]}. The two-body correlation functions determine the δIK\delta I_{K}. The static susceptibilities are expressed by Eqs. (21-24), and are thus inversely proportional to the square of TKT_{K}, so that the characteristic temperature scales the quantities to quantum values in the range between 0 and 11 for δIK\delta I_{K}, and from 0 to 3/23/2 for δSK=T[]2|SK|\delta S_{K}=T_{[\star]}^{2}|S_{K}|. The δIK\delta I_{K} is directly expressed by the sum of the factors cV,νc_{V,\nu} and cV,νc_{V,\nu^{\prime}} for the uncoupled and coupled channels to the topological superconductor. The two-particle and three-particle scattering in cV,νc_{V,\nu} have opposite signs, and in certain ranges of parameters tt and EdE_{d} the processes can be equivalent. Figure 25a shows the density plot of δIK\delta I_{K} and Fig. 25b presents the landscape plot of the nonlinear current as a function of tt. The δIK\delta I_{K} in Figure 25b is plotted with an increment of δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15. The colored lines represent δIK\delta I_{K} in the different ground state regions. For Ed=1E_{d}=1 (dark cyan line in Fig. 25b), with increasing tt we evolve from the empty state |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1} to the doublet |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. The δIK\delta I_{K} in terms of the weak and strong coupling regime to the Majorana fermion takes the value δIK0.08\delta I_{K}\approx 0.08 and for t=0t=0 the value δIK=0.018\delta I_{K}=0.018. Between intermediate and strong coupling strength we observe a clear point where the current is extinguished δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0 (yellow line in Figure 25a and dark cyan curve in Figure 25b). Above this point, the contribution of the two-particle correlation dominates over the three-particle correlation, and δIK\delta I_{K} reverses the sign. For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (green line in Fig. 25b), we observe three characteristic values of δIK=0.33\delta I_{K}=0.33 for the quartet |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4}, δIK=0.25\delta I_{K}=0.25 for the octuplet |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8} and δIK0\delta I_{K}\mapsto 0 at the boundary of the charge areas Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and Q=(1/2)Q=(1/2)e. For Q=2Q=2e (Ed=EehE_{d}=E_{e-h}, red line in Fig. 25b), the current takes on the values: δIK=0.89\delta I_{K}=0.89 for the |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} states, δIK=0.69\delta I_{K}=0.69 for the duodecuplet states |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} and δIK=0.525\delta I_{K}=0.525 in the strong coupling regime at the degeneracy point between the sextuplets |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6}. For SU(3) (the blue line in Fig. 25b), the nonlinear current reaches a value of δIK=0.515\delta I_{K}=0.515 for the ground state |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6}. Fig. 25a shows that the zeroing of the current occurs at the boundary between the doublets |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}.

Figures 25c and 25d illustrate the nonlinear shot noise δSK=T[]2|SK|\delta S_{K}=T_{[\star]}^{2}|S_{K}| as a function of EdE_{d} and tt. In contrast to the current factor Eqs. (39-40), the number of scattering processes in δSK\delta S_{K} leads to a double line of the reduction of the shot noise (light yellow lines in Fig. 25c). The δSK\delta S_{K} is a fluctuation of the current, called second cumulant [148], which zeroes predominantly at other points than the current. For Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, δSK\delta S_{K}, has double zero points and the nonlinear shot noise between the compensation points is negative δSK<0\delta S_{K}<0 (dark cyan line in Fig. 25d). This follows from a simple fact, the coefficient cS,νc_{S,\nu} is expressed by doubling the phase shift 2δν2\delta_{\nu} and quadrupling 4δν4\delta_{\nu} in the trigonometric functions. The zeroing effect, as before, occurs on the boundary with the doublet states |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2}. The δSK\delta S_{K} for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, with increasing the coupling strength takes values of δSK=0.016\delta S_{K}=0.016 for the empty state |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1}, in the weak and strong coupling range it is δSK=0.07\delta S_{K}=0.07. A pronounced suppression of the noise δSK=0\delta S_{K}=0 occurs for the two coupling values t=0.25t=0.25 and t=1.5t=1.5 (yellow line in Figure 25c, and dark cyan curve in Figure 25d). At these points, the transport is noiseless. The δSK<0\delta S_{K}<0 occurs in the interval between these specific lines. The magnitude of the negative noise, is affected by the static three-particle correlators, which increases the negative value of the shot noise. This is a very interesting result considering that the noise is a variance of the nonlinear current [148]. For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (the green line in Fig. 25d), we observe a constant value of δSK=0.11\delta S_{K}=0.11 for the quartet |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and the octuplet |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8}. The δSk=0\delta S_{k}=0, at t=4.5t=4.5, and the noise takes on a negative value of δSK=0.013\delta S_{K}=-0.013 in the strong coupling regime, i.e. for the quantum state |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}, with dominant role of the three-body correlators. For Q=2Q=2e (Ed=EehE_{d}=E_{e-h}, red line in Fig. 25d), the shot noise is quantized to δSK=1.33\delta S_{K}=1.33 for |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}, δSK=1.02\delta S_{K}=1.02 for the duodecuplet quantum state |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12} and reaches 0.740.74 for the strong coupling regime at the degeneracy point of two sextuplets |qg6\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{6} and |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6}. The δSK\delta S_{K} for Ed=3E_{d}=-3 (blue line in Fig. 25d) at the boundary of the quantum states of |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}, |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}, |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8} takes on values of 0.440.44 and 0.350.35. Finally, for the SU(3) Kondo state, the shot noise reaches δSK=0.35\delta S_{K}=0.35. The blue line shows a characteristic minimum around t0.25t\approx 0.25, most likely due to a quantum state transition from U(1) charge symmetry to threefold SU(3) symmetry with a reduction of cSc_{S} by contributions from the three-body correlation functions. This is the main argument why the three-particle interactions are significant in the current and shot noise for the states with broken symmetry.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 25: (Color online) CNTQD-TSC device: a, c) The density plot of the rescaled nonlinear current δIK=T[]2IK\delta I_{K}=T^{2}_{[\star]}I_{K} and shot noise δSK=T[]2SK\delta S_{K}=T^{2}_{[\star]}S_{K} versus EdE_{d} and tt. b, d) The landscape log-log plot of δIK\delta I_{K} and δSK\delta S_{K} as a function of tt with increment δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15. Yellow lines indicate the vanishing of δIK\delta I_{K} and δSK\delta S_{K}, respectively.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 26: (Color online) CNTQD-2TSC device: a, c) The density plot of the rescaled nonlinear current δIK\delta I_{K} and shot noise δSK\delta S_{K} versus EdE_{d} and tt. b, d) The landscape log-log plot of δIK\delta I_{K} and δSK\delta S_{K} as a function of tt with an increment of δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 27: (Color online) CNTQD-3TSC system: a, c) The density plot of the rescaled nonlinear current δIK\delta I_{K} and shot noise δSK\delta S_{K} versus EdE_{d} and tt. b, d) The landscape log-log plot of δIK\delta I_{K} and δSK\delta S_{K} as a function of tt with increment δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15.

Fig. 26 shows the shot noise and current in the nonlinear regime for the CNTQD-2TSC device. For Ed=+1E_{d}=+1 (dark cyan line in Fig. 26b), δIK\delta I_{K} reaches 0.160.16 with increasing tt, where the quantum state changes from the |e1\lvert e\rangle_{1} to the quartet |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4}. The δIK\delta I_{K} between the weak and strong coupling range to two Majorana fermions shows a pronounced extinction for t=1t=1 (δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0 presents yellow line in Figure 26a, and dark cyan curve in 26b). The mechanism for changing the sign is identical to the CNTQD-1TSC system. For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (green line in Fig. 26b), we observe three characteristic values of δIK\delta I_{K}: 0.330.33 for the quartets |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} (this corresponds to the SU(4) Kondo symmetry), δIK=0.16\delta I_{K}=0.16 for |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16} and |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4}. It is interesting to note that for δIK=1/3\delta I_{K}=1/3 and δSK=1/10\delta S_{K}=1/10 the Fano factor is equal to 1/31/3, which is similar to the result for Dirac fermions. The analogy of these systems derives from the bispinor of the Dirac fermion state and the spin-orbital SU(4) Kondo state with one electron in the system. In δIk\delta I_{k} we observe the boost of the current between the configuration change from |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16} to the quartet states |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} (green line in Fig. 26b). For Ed=3E_{d}=-3, the current with increasing the coupling strength tt is quantized to: δIK=0.5\delta I_{K}=0.5, 0.30.3 and 0.070.07 at the boundaries of areas with different charge numbers on the dot. For Q=2Q=2e (i.e. Ed=EehE_{d}=E_{e-h}, red line in Fig. 26b), the current takes on values: δIK=0.89\delta I_{K}=0.89 for the sextuplets |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6} (SU(4) Kondo symmetry), δIK=0.51\delta I_{K}=0.51 for |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24} and δIK=1\delta I_{K}=1 in the region of strong coupling strength, where the octuplet |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} determines the SU(2) Kondo phase (red line in Fig. 26b, and the black area in Fig. 26a).

Figures 26c, d present the nonlinear shot noise δSK\delta S_{K} versus EdE_{d} and tt. δSK\delta S_{K} has double zero points for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, where we observe the sign reversal of the shot noise (δSK<0\delta S_{K}<0). The δSK\delta S_{K} for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1 in the weak and strong coupling range reaches a value of δSK=0.14\delta S_{K}=0.14 for the quartet states |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} (dark cyan curve in Fig. 26d). A pronounced suppression of the shot noise (δSK=0\delta S_{K}=0) occurs for the two coupling strength values t=0.3t=0.3 and t=2.7t=2.7 (yellow line in Fig. 26c, and dark cyan curve in Fig. 26d). At these points, the transport is noiseless, which can be very attractive for quantum measurements. For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (green line in Fig. 26d), we observe a constant value of δSK=0.11\delta S_{K}=0.11 for |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16}, in contrast to δIK\delta I_{K} where the transition is detectable. With increasing the coupling tt, the shot noise saturates to 0.140.14, which corresponds to the quartet state |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4} in the quantum dot. For Ed=3E_{d}=-3 (blue line in Fig. 26d), the noise leads to three quantized values 0.440.44, 0.240.24 and 0.060.06, which occur at the boundary of the different charge sectors. We observe the noiseless transport at the point t=1t=1 for Ed=3E_{d}=-3, and for t>1t>1 the shot noise takes on a negative value δSK=0.06\delta S_{K}=-0.06. For Q=2Q=2e (Ed=EehE_{d}=E_{e-h}, red line in Fig. 26d), the nonlinear noise is quantized to the values: δSK=1.33\delta S_{K}=1.33 for |dw6\lvert d_{w}\rangle_{6} (the SU(4) Kondo state), δSK=0.75\delta S_{K}=0.75 for |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24} and δSK=1.65\delta S_{K}=1.65 in terms of strong coupling strength, where the Kondo SU(2) effect is realized by the octuplet |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} - as the ground state in the system.

Figure 27 shows the δSK\delta S_{K} and δIK\delta I_{K} for the CNTQD-3TSC system. For t=0t=0, the Kondo effect with SU(4) symmetry is realized in the system and δSK\delta S_{K} and δIK\delta I_{K} are identical to the previously presented numbers. In the weak and strong coupling regime to the TSC for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1 δIK\delta I_{K} reaches 1/41/4 for the octuplet state |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} (dark cyan line in Fig. 27b). The sign reversal appears above t=1.3t=1.3 for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, but as we can see from Figure 27a, the suppression effect depends on the atomic level of the quantum dot EdE_{d} and the coupling strength to the TSC (yellow line shows δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0). For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (green line in Fig. 27b) in the weak coupling regime, we observe a value of δIK=0.08\delta I_{K}=0.08 for |qa32\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{32} with saturation in the strong coupling strength range up to a value of δIK=0.25\delta I_{K}=0.25 for |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}. For Ed=3E_{d}=-3, we observe three values of the current with increasing the coupling tt: δIK=0.5\delta I_{K}=0.5, 0.210.21 and 0.270.27. The δIK=0.21\delta I_{K}=0.21 appears at the boundary of the regions with different charge numbers on the quantum dot (between |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} and |qa32\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{32}). In the strong coupling region there is an increase in the nonlinear current, labeled δIK\delta I^{\star}_{K} in Figure 27b, where the quantum state |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} is close enough to the e-h symmetry point to enhance the current by the entanglement mechanism with opposite charge-leaking states. This is closely related to the quantum states marked in red in Eqs. (13-14). The state |2n1n2n3\lvert 2\uparrow n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}\rangle is entangled with states below the e-h symmetry point (from a different charge region). The identical situation occurs on the other side of the e-h symmetry point, for the octuplet |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8}. In this case, the state |0n1n2n3\lvert 0\downarrow n_{1}n_{2}n_{3}\rangle in Eq. (14) is responsible for the charge leakage effect. This seems to be the first report in the literature that indicates such a mechanism, and at the same time suggests the possibility of verifying with the lock-in technique in the noise measurement. To emphasize this result, let us call this shogun helmet-like state. For Q=2eQ=2e (i.e. Ed=EehE_{d}=E_{e-h}, red line in Fig. 27b), the current takes on the values: δIK=0.89\delta I_{K}=0.89 for the states |dw6\lvert d_{w}\rangle_{6} (the Kondo state with SU(4) symmetry), δIK=0.35\delta I_{K}=0.35 for |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} and δIK=0.5\delta I_{K}=0.5 in the range of strong coupling tt at the e-h symmetry point where the octuplet states degenerate: |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} (red line in Fig. 27b, and the shogun helmet-like state in Fig. 27a). Figures 27c, d show the nonlinear shot noise δSK\delta S_{K}, which is rescaled by the characteristic energy T[]T_{[\star]} for a CNTQD system coupled to three Majorana fermions. For Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, δSK\delta S_{K} (dark cyan curve at 27d) has double zeros. The δSK=0\delta S_{K}=0 appears for two coupling values t=0.4t=0.4 and t=4t=4 (yellow line in Figure 27c, and dark cyan curve in Figure 27d). Between these points δSK\delta S_{K} is negative. The δSK\delta S_{K} for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1, in the range of the weak and strong coupling strength takes the value around 0.250.25, when the ground state is determined by the octuplet |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}. For Ed=1.5E_{d}=-1.5 (the green line in Fig. 27d) we observe a constant value of δSK=0.11\delta S_{K}=0.11 for |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} and |qa32\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{32}. As the coupling strength increases, the shot noise saturates to δSK=0.25\delta S_{K}=0.25, which corresponds to the octuplet |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8} as the ground state energy. For Ed=3E_{d}=-3 the noise reaches three quantized values of 0.440.44, 0.190.19 and 0.250.25 (blue line in Fig. 27d), which occur at the boundary of the different charge sectors. At the the shogun helmet-like point there is an increase in shot noise to a maximum value denoted by δSK\delta S^{\star}_{K} in Fig. 27d. This is also related to the mechanism of entanglement with opposite charge-leaking states. For Q=2Q=2e (Ed=EehE_{d}=E_{e-h}, red line in Fig. 27d), the noise takes on the values: δSK=1.33\delta S_{K}=1.33 for the |dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}, δSK=0.52\delta S_{K}=0.52 for the quantum state |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} and δSK=0.15\delta S_{K}=0.15 in the strong coupling regime for the U(1) charge symmetry phase at the e-h symmetry point.

The analyzed quantity in the quantum transport measurements is the nonlinear Fano factor FK=δSK/2eδIK=e/eF_{K}=\delta S_{K}/2e\delta I_{K}=e^{\star}/e, whose value different from 11, indicates for the influence of the residual interaction U~νν\widetilde{U}_{\nu\nu^{\prime}} between the quasiparticles. The main factors affecting these values are the second and third order fluctuations observed in the current δIK\delta I_{K} and in the shot noise δSK\delta S_{K}. Figures 28, show the density plots of the nonlinear Fano factor as a function of the quantum dot level energy and the coupling strength to the topological superconductor. Figure 28a, shows FKF_{K} for the CNTQD-1TSC model, in the density plot we observe bright areas resulting from the blocked current δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0, with a non-zero negative shot noise value δSK<0\delta S_{K}<0. On these lines, FKF_{K} has an asymptotic behavior. In the density plot, we also see regions where the transport is noiseless FK=0F_{K}=0 (black colored lines). This occurs at the boundary between |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} and between |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}, where δSK=0\delta S_{K}=0 and δIK>0\delta I_{K}>0. Similar behavior was observed in the results of the NRG method [33]. It is definitely not the effect of the absence of the higher order corrections in the coefficients at V5V^{5}, since these contributions are insignificant below the Kondo energy scale, where current and shot noise are described by the Fermi liquid theory assumptions and the vertex corrections for the current-current correlation. Could quaternary and higher-order fluctuations affect the values of the coefficients cV,νc_{V,\nu} and cS,νc_{S,\nu}? This is difficult to answer unambiguously, the authors in [56] have limited themselves to two- and three-particle correlations, pointing to low-energy excitation as the mechanism of the Kondo phase. The zeroing of FKF_{K} also occurs for a single quantum dot in the Kondo state (we have only four states there {0,,,2}\{0,\uparrow,\downarrow,2\}), where is difficult to imagine fourth-order dot correlators, which says something about the physical implications of this behavior.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 28: (Color online) a-c) The density plot of the fractional nonlinear Fano factor FK=|cS|/|cV|F_{K}=|c_{S}|/|c_{V}| versus EdE_{d} and tt for the CNTQD-TSC, CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD-3TSC devices. Black and white lines correspond to SK=0S_{K}=0 and IK=0I_{K}=0 respectively.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 29: (Color online) a-c) The landscape log-log plots of FKF_{K} as a function of tt with increment δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15 for the CNTQD coupled with MF, 2MFs, and 3MFs.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 30: (Color online) a-c) EdE_{d} dependence of FKF_{K} with increasing tt for CNTQD-TSC, CNTQD-2TSC and CNTQD-3TSC devices. Dashed vertical and horizontal lines divide the charge regions Q=0e,1e,2e,3e,4eQ=0e,1e,2e,3e,4e and show characteristic limits of FKF_{K}.

Figure 28a illustrates the characteristic values of FKF_{K} in the density plot for the CNTQD-1TSC device. For SU(4) Kondo state, (a result known from the literature [51, 33]), as tt approaches 0 we observe FK=3/2F_{K}=3/2 for Q=2Q=2e and (|dν6\lvert d_{\nu}\rangle_{6}) FK=0.33F_{K}=0.33 for Q=1Q=1e (|pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4}). For the empty and fully occupied states the Fano factor reaches FK=1F_{K}=1 and is negative FK=SK(2eIK=1F_{K}=\frac{S_{K}}{(2eI_{K}}=-1 for the doublet state |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. In the weak coupling regime the device demonstrates FK=3/2F_{K}=3/2 for |qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}) and FK=0.11/0.250.44F_{K}=0.11/0.25\approx 0.44 for the octuplet quantum states |qa(b)8\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{8}. For the SU(3) Kondo state, the Fano factor reaches 0.620.62. The influence of the Majorana fermion-coupled channel ν=+\nu^{\prime}=+\uparrow is negligible, and the result is consistent with the SU(3) Kondo state. In a sense this is understandable due to the fact that the residual interaction occurs only between the Kondo quasiparticles. Majorana fermions do not interact with each other (they are only represented by two states {0¯,¯}\{\underline{0},\underline{\Uparrow}\}). The interaction between the Majorana fermions analyzes the authors in this papers [109, 108] and based on the concept of Wilson ratio, the type of interaction can be relevant for FKF_{K}. At the level of the linear regime of the current and the shot noise F0F_{0} is equal to 1/21/2 in the channel coupled to the Majorana fermion state, in the nonlinear regime of bias voltage, it is probably insignificant [119]. However, there is a paper [146] where the author suggests for QD-TSC device with the infinite U on quantum dot, FK=3/2F_{K}=3/2 in the high voltage regime for t>V>Ed0t>V>E_{d}\ll 0 [146], beyond the Kondo regime (VTKV\gg T_{K}).

Figure 28b shows the density plot of FKF_{K} as a function of EdE_{d} and the coupling strength tt for the CNTQD-2TSC system. The SU(2) Kondo effect arises in the strong coupling region for Q=2Q=2e. In this region FK=5/3F_{K}=5/3 and the channels associated with SU(2) Kondo effect play a significant role in the nonlinear shot noise and current (Fig. 26). The fractional super-Poissonian Fano factor is identical to the prediction for the SU(2) Kondo state[59] and the experimental results [149]. Majorana channels in the strong coupling limit remain inactive in the nonlinear voltage regime. In the strong coupling limit, the channels coupled to the TSC contribute only to the linear Fano factor (see Fig. 23b). In the weak coupling limit, the ground state is represented by |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24} and |qa(b)16\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{16}. For this quantum state, Majorana fermions modify the value of the Fano coefficient for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e from 1/31/3 to FK2/3F_{K}\approx 2/3 (green line in Fig. 29b). Super-Poissonian values of FKF_{K} occur at the boundary of the states |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4} and |qa(b)16\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{16}. Noiseless transport (δSK=0\delta S_{K}=0) is represented by the black lines in the density plot of the nonlinear Fano factor. FK=0F_{K}=0 is realized at the boundary of the octuplet |qy8\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{8} and the two quartets |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4}, and around the transition between |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4} and |qa(b)16\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{16}.

Fig. 28c illustrates FKF_{K} as a function of EdE_{d} and the coupling strength tt for the CNTQD-3TSC hybrid device. In terms of the weak coupling to three Majorana fermion states, we observe an SU(4) Kondo-like effect, with a ground state |qa(b)32\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{32} in the charge regions Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e. The FKF_{K} in this area reaches FK1.33F_{K}\approx 1.33 (the light blue region in Fig. 28c). The FKF_{K} shows the difference between the fully SU(4) Kondo phase and the SU(4) Kondo-like state. For Q=2Q=2e, the area is determined by the quantum state |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48}, and FKF_{K} approaches the quantized value FK=3/2F_{K}=3/2, which corresponds to the result for the SU(4) Kondo effect. The variability of δSK\delta S_{K} and δIK\delta I_{K} is intersected as a red curves in Fig. 26b,d. The role of the Majorana fermion is significant in the current and the shot-noise, even if FK=|SK|/2e|IK|=3/2F_{K}=|S_{K}|/2e|I_{K}|=3/2 with increasing tt, is constant and does not depend on the coupling strength tt in terms of weak coupling to the TSC. In both magnitudes SKS_{K} and IKI_{K}, the mechanism of entanglement with opposite charge-leaking states is evident, but in FKF_{K} the mechanism is practically invisible, due to the comparable values of IKI_{K} with SKS_{K}. In Fig. 28c, black lines present noiseless transport, where δSK=0\delta S_{K}=0 and the white areas represent the blocked transport for δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0.

Figure 29 shows the cross sections of FKF_{K} as a function of tt with the increment δEd=0.15\delta E_{d}=0.15 in the range EdE_{d} from 12-12 to 33. Figure 29 a-c presents FK=1F_{K}=1 for Ed=+1E_{d}=+1 in the weak coupling regime to TSC (dark cyan lines). In the intermediate region, between t2t_{2} and t3t_{3}, we observe a sign reversal in δSK\delta S_{K}, leading to an extinction of FKF_{K} at two characteristic points. Significantly, for t>t3t>t_{3}, SKS_{K} becomes positive again, however IKI_{K} has a negative value in the strong coupling regime. We can say that the quasiparticles reverse the flow of the current. This is due to the two-body correlations in δIK\delta I_{K}. The red line shows FK=3/2F_{K}=3/2 for Q=2Q=2e and the green line reaches a value of FK=1/3F_{K}=1/3 in the weak coupling regime [59, 55]. For the octuplet |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8}, we observe FK0.44F_{K}\approx 0.44 with a small increase of the Fano factor around t2t_{2} to the quantized value FK=3/2F_{K}=3/2. Above t3t_{3}, there is point of the noiseless transport and FKF_{K} saturates with increasing tt to the value FK=1/2F_{K}=-1/2 (green line Fig. 29a). For the sextuplet |qy6\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{6}, a fractional effect is realized in the strong coupling regime to the TSC. The SU(3) Kondo state is formed and FKF_{K} reaches 0.620.62 (blue line Fig. 29a). In Fig. 29b and Fig. 29c for Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 we observe the Kondo effect with the SU(2) symmetry and a charge-degenerate state with U(1) symmetry (between two octuplets |qx8\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{8} and |qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}). In terms of strong coupling strength, FKF_{K} leads to values of 5/35/3 and 11, respectively. Of note is the fact that, for the CNTQD-3TSC system, for the states of |qa32\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{32}, we observe a boost of the Fano factor to the value of FK3/2F_{K}\approx 3/2, which formally occurred for the case of full SU(4) symmetry at the half-filling (green line in Fig. 29c).

Figures 30 include the cross sections of FKF_{K} as a function of EdE_{d} for the uncoupled, intermediate and strong coupling regimes to the TSC. Fig. 30a shows the gate-dependent FKF_{K} for a CNTQD system coupled to a single Majorana fermion γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow}. The plot shows the absolute value of the Fano factor, there are regions where FK<0F_{K}<0, preceded by the noiseless points (FK=0F_{K}=0), as we have written, this is due to the dominance of two-body processes over three-particle correlators. For t=106t=10^{-6}, the system is in the SU(4) Kondo state, and FKF_{K} assumes two characteristic numbers: FK=3/2F_{K}=3/2 for Q=2Q=2e and FK=1/3F_{K}=1/3 for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e. At the transition between the charges Q=0(4)Q=0(4)e and Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e, we observe the suppression of the shot noise in two points with super-Poissonian behavior in the middle, when δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0. In terms of weak coupling, there is a modification of FKF_{K} (green line for t=0.1t=0.1 in Fig. 30a), FKF_{K} is close to 3/23/2 for Q=2eQ=2e (|qw12\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{12}) and increases to 5/4\approx 5/4 for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e. In Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e, the value varies from sub- to super-Poissonian noise with increasing the coupling strength (δIK>δSKδIKδSK\delta I_{K}>\delta S_{K}\mapsto\delta I_{K}\ll\delta S_{K}). For the strong coupling limit, we observe two contrasting behaviors around the U(1) charge symmetry line, where FK=0F_{K}=0 and FK+F_{K}\mapsto+\infty (black and white lines in Fig. 28a).

Figure 30b shows the cross sections of FKF_{K} corresponding to the density plot of Fig. 28b for t=106t=10^{-6}, 0.10.1, 10310^{-3} and 2020. In the figure, we observe a gradual change of FKF_{K} from the full SU(4) Kondo effect through the intermediate crossover region (|qa16\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{16}) to the strong coupling solution for the quartet |qz4\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{4}. For t=0.1t=0.1, the value of the δIK\delta I_{K} and δSK\delta S_{K} at the transition between the states |qa(b)16\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{16} and |qz(x)4\lvert q_{z(x)}\rangle_{4} shows an asymptotic maximum and between |qa(b)16\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{16} and |qw24\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{24} leads to minimum FK=1/3F_{K}=1/3 (green line Fig. 29 b). In the strong coupling regime FKF_{K} changes its sign to 1-1. For the quantum state |qa(b)16\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{16}, the value of FKF_{K} approaches to 2/32/3 (dark blue line Fig. 29b). For two electrons on the quantum dot FKF_{K} evolves from 2/32/3 to a quantized value of 5/35/3 for the SU(2) Kondo state. Although FK=5/3F_{K}=5/3, as for the full SU(2) Kondo effect [59], we denote the state by \star because the strongly correlated state appears for an even number of electrons Q=2Q=2e. The full SU(2) Kondo state is observed for Q=1Q=1e. Below Ed=6E_{d}=-6 and above Ed=3E_{d}=-3, where Q=3Q=3e and Q=1Q=1e, the ground state is defined by two quadruplets |qx(z)4\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{4}, FK=1F_{K}=-1 and the reverse current δIK<0\delta I_{K}<0 dominates in the nonlinear transport (blue line in Fig. 29b).

Fig. 30c shows the cross sections of FKF_{K} from Fig. 28c for t=106t=10^{-6}, 0.10.1, 10310^{-3} and 2020. The FKF_{K} evolve from the full SU(4) Kondo state and reconstructs via the crossover region (|qa32\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{32}) to the stable U(1) charge phase in the range of the strong coupling strength (|qz8\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{8}). Two transition points are observed for t=103t=10^{-3}: the first one at the boundary between |qa(b)32\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{32} and |qz(x)8\lvert q_{z(x)}\rangle_{8} shows a maximum and the second one between |qa(b)32\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{32} and |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} reaches a minimum close to 1/31/3 (dark blue line in Fig. 29c). For half filling and Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e FKF_{K} approaches to 3/23/2 for |qw48\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{48} and |qa(b)32\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{32} (dark blue line Fig. 29c). With increasing the coupling strength, FKF_{K} reaches 1/31/3 at t2t_{2} and approaches to 1-1 in the broad region of EdE_{d}, in particular for U(1) charge symmetry point. A line of degeneracy appears for Q=2Q=2e between the fractional charges Q=5/2Q=5/2e and Q=3/2Q=3/2e, therefore we denote this state by \star (blue line in Fig. 29c). The quantum conductance at this point leads to 𝒢=(5/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(5/2)(e^{2}/h) and is negatively spin (orbital) polarized Δ𝒢s(o)=1/5\Delta{\mathcal{G}}_{s(o)}=-1/5 (Fig. 7a and Fig. 8c). This corresponds to the result for the QD-TSC device [141], where the quantum conductance in the strong coupling regime is narrowed to the e-h symmetry line and reaches the value 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h).

III.5 SOI and transport properties in CNTQD-1TSC device

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 31: (Color online) CNTQD-MF device with spin-orbit interaction Δ\Delta: a-c) The density plot of 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} versus EdE_{d} and tt for Δ=102,101\Delta=10^{-2},10^{-1} and 22. d) 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} as a function of tt. Brightest, light and dark color of the lines show the results for weak, intermediate and strong SOI.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 32: (Color online) a-c) The density plot of γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} versus EdE_{d} and tt for Δ=102,101\Delta=10^{-2},10^{-1} and 22. d) 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} as a function of tt. Brightest, light and dark color of the lines show the results for weak, intermediate and strong SOI.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 33: (Color online) a-c) The landscape log-log plots of |γ(S)||\gamma_{(S)}| as a function of tt for weak, intermediate, and strong SOI. The lines are plotted with an increment of δEd=0.5\delta E_{d}=0.5 from 10-10 to 0.50.5.

In the last subsection we will discuss the effect of the spin-orbit interaction (Δ\Delta) on the transport quantities in the CNTQD-TSC hybrid system. The SOI in the CNTQD originates from the curvature of the nanotube and reaches the values ranging from thousands to a few meV [36, 8, 2, 44]. The Δ\Delta removes the fourfold degeneracy of the states on the quantum dot, and forms two Kramers doublets: a low energy doublet E+=EE_{+\downarrow}=E_{-\uparrow} and a high energy doublet E+=EE_{+\uparrow}=E_{-\downarrow}. The SU(4) Kondo state is broken by SOI and we observe the Kondo effect with SU(2) symmetry [42, 43, 40]. When we connect the quantum dot to a Majorana fermion of type γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow}, one of the channels from the high-energy doublet, is operated by a topological superconductor. The other low-energy doublet is not directly connected to the topological state, but is indirectly capacitively coupled to the ν=+\nu^{\prime}=+\uparrow state through the Coulomb interactions. Figure 31 shows the quantum conductance maps of 𝒢{\mathcal{G}} for the weak SOI Δ=102\Delta=10^{-2} (a), intermediate Δ=101\Delta=10^{-1} (b) and for the strong spin-orbital interaction Δ=2\Delta=2 (ΔU\Delta\approx U) (c) [2, 44]. Coupling with 1TSC changes the ground state configuration in the system. For Q=1Q=1e, with increasing Δ\Delta there is a transition from the quartet |pls4\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{4} to the doublet |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2}, in the weak coupling regime from the octuplet |qa8\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{8} to the quadruplet |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4} and in the strong coupling range the U(1) charge symmetry phase is realized for two doublet states |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. It is noteworthy that for large SOI the |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} state is replaced by a lower energy state |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} for the Q=2Q=2e sector (Fig. 31c) . The degenerate line between the two doublets disappears under the influence of Δ\Delta (Fig. 31a). This is particularly evident in Fig. 31d, where the sharp maximum between |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} is gradually suppressed (red curves for Q=2Q=2e). For Q=1Q=1e we observe the transitions between three quantum states. The first transition is observed between the doublet |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2} and the quadruplet state |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4} and the conductance changes from 𝒢=2(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=2(e^{2}/h) to 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h). Finally, for the strong coupling strength, the quantum conductance 𝒢=(1/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(1/2)(e^{2}/h) determines the doublet state |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}. However, in |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}, the charge is reduced to Q=(1/2)Q=(1/2)e. At the charge degeneracy between the two doublets: |qy(w)2\lvert q_{y(w)}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2}, the system is in the U(1) charge state and the conductance reaches the value 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h) (green lines in Fig. 32d, and red narrow line in Fig. 31c). This is important, because for U(1) charge symmetry, the quantum conductance always approaches the value of the single quanta (e2/h)(e^{2}/h).

The most significant result is the asymmetry relation in the quantum conductance, with respect to the e-h symmetry point, between Q=1Q=1e and Q=3Q=3e. The reason for the asymmetry is that the high energy is tunnel-coupled to the Majorana fermion state γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow}, in contrast to the excited doublet, which is only capacitively coupled to n+n_{+\uparrow} via the Coulomb interaction. In the weak and strong coupling regime for Q=3Q=3e-(5/2)(5/2)e, the SU(2) Kondo states are realized in the presence of Majorana state. The Kondo phases are determined by two quadruplets |qb4\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{4} and |qg4\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{4} (blue lines in Fig. 31d). In Fig. 31d, the tunneling term tt depends on EdE_{d}, using this dependence, we show the quantum conductance for the integer and fractional charges and we pass through the most important ground states of the system (in the contrast to Fig. 32d).

Figures 32-33 show the linear thermoelectric coefficient γ(S)\gamma_{(S)}, defined by Eq. (43) for the CNTQD-1TSC device. In the density plots, we see that for the weak coupling regime, depending on the value of Δ\Delta, the thermoelectric power gradually reduces to the full SU(2) Kondo state, where the quasiparticle resonance is centered at the Fermi level, hence γ(S)=0\gamma_{(S)}=0 (bright white areas in Fig. 32c for |tls2\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{2} and |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2} and green and blue lines in Fig. 33c). For Δ=102\Delta=10^{-2} and Δ=101\Delta=10^{-1}, the ground state energy is determined by two doublets |tls2\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{2} and |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2}, however, we observe finite values of |γS|π/(32)|\gamma_{S}|\ll\pi/(3\sqrt{2}), indicating that we are not exactly in the full SU(2) or SU(4) Kondo state. The value of γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} determines the symmetry and the quality of the Kondo effect.

In the range of intermediate coupling tt and Δ=102,101\Delta=10^{-2},10^{-1}, we observe an enhancement of the thermoelectric power for |qa(b)4\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{4}. The system behaves like a non-Fermi liquid in this region, because T[]T_{[\star]}, does not scale the γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} to a constant FL number [45]. In Figures 33a, b, we observe the first and second compensation points in γS\gamma_{S} (for Q=1Q=1e and Q=3Q=3e). The first zero in Eq. (43) occurs when πTK(cot[δν][Γ~νδ2+t~2δ])/[(3ϱ~ν(0)+ϱ~ν(0))(πΓ~ν(2t~2+Γ~νδcsc2[δν])2)]=πTK(cot[δν]Γ~νt~2)/[(3ϱ~ν(0)+ϱ~ν(0))(πΓ~ν(2t~2+Γ~νδcsc2[δν])2)]-\pi T_{K}(\cot[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}][\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta^{2}+\widetilde{t}^{2}\delta])/[(3\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0)+\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}(0))(\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}(2\widetilde{t}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta\csc^{2}[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}])^{2})]=-\pi T_{K}(-\cot[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}]\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\widetilde{t}^{2})/[(3\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0)+\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}(0))(\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}(2\widetilde{t}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta\csc^{2}[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}])^{2})]. The first compensation point appears near the value of t1=δt_{1}=\delta (where δ\delta is the lifetime of the Majorana fermion) and is related to the contribution of the ν\nu^{\prime} channel. With increasing the coupling strength we then observe a maximum in the channel coupled to the Majorana fermion. The sign of γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} changes in the intermediate coupling regime. The similar effect of the sign reversal is presented in the paper [114]. The second compensation point is already a result of balancing of the normal contribution, coming from the ν\nu channel, with the contribution from the ν\nu^{\prime} quantum channel for the condition πTK(3ϱ~˙ν(0))/[(3ϱ~ν(0)+ϱ~ν(0))]=πTK(cot[δν][Γ~νδ2+t~2(δΓ~ν)])/[(3ϱ~ν(0)+ϱ~ν(0))(πΓ~ν(2t~2+Γ~νδcsc2[δν])2)]-\pi T_{K}(3\dot{\widetilde{\varrho}}_{\nu}(0))/[(3\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0)+\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}(0))]=-\pi T_{K}(\cot[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}][\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta^{2}+\widetilde{t}^{2}(\delta-\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}})])/[(3\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu}(0)+\widetilde{\varrho}_{\nu^{\prime}}(0))(\pi\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}(2\widetilde{t}^{2}+\widetilde{\Gamma}_{\nu^{\prime}}\delta\csc^{2}[\delta_{\nu^{\prime}}])^{2})]. In the strong coupling regime, we observe in the linear thermoelectric power coefficient a constant value of γs±(1/2)\gamma_{s}\approx\pm(1/2) at the boundary between |qx2\lvert q_{x}\rangle_{2} and |qg4\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{4} and between |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} (blue, green lines in Fig. 32a-b). The results correspond to the quantum conductances 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h) for Q=1Q=1e and Q=3Q=3e (brightest and light green curves in Fig. 32d). In contrast to Fig. 15a, where we have shown the symmetric evolution of the density plot of γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} in the NFL phase for Δ=103\Delta=10^{-3}, we observe a significant asymmetry in the NFL state. In terms of weak and intermediate SOI, γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} is negative for the doublet and quartet states: |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4}. The sharp switch is observed at the charge degeneracy line between |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4}. The position of the e-h symmetry line in the NFL phase is perturbed due to the dominant role of the hole states in Eqs. (8-9). For Δ=2\Delta=2 in the intermediate coupling regime, the regions for |qa(b)4\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{4} are well defined, and we already observe the full SU(2) Kondo states, where γS=0\gamma_{S}=0 (flat white areas in Fig. 32c). Interesting was the intersection by the NFL state of the region for the doublet |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} (the enhancement for t106t\approx 10^{-6} in Fig. 32c). This suggests that we need a much weaker coupling to remove the NFL phase from the dependence of γ(S)\gamma_{(S)}. The quantum measurements of the thermoelectric power 𝒮{\mathcal{S}} give us the information about the quality of the Kondo effect, much more precisely than the linear quantum conductance 𝒢{\mathcal{G}}. If we look on the lines in Fig. 31d and Fig. 32d for Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e, we observe a small fluctuation of the conductance around 𝒢=(5/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(5/2)(e^{2}/h) and 𝒢=(3/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(3/2)(e^{2}/h), but in γS\gamma_{S} this is a drastic change in character from NFL (green and blue lines in Fig. 33a, b) to FL behavior (green and blue lines in Fig. 33c).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 34: (Color online) CNTQD-MF device with SOI: a-c) The density plot of the rescaled nonlinear current δIK\delta I_{K} versus EdE_{d} and tt for Δ=102,101\Delta=10^{-2},10^{-1} and 22.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 35: (Color online) a-c) The density plot of the rescaled nonlinear shot noise δSK\delta S_{K} versus EdE_{d} and tt for weak, intermediate and strong SOI. Yellow lines denote noiseless transport δSK0\delta S_{K}\approx 0.
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 36: (Color online) a-c) The density plot of FKF_{K} as a function of EdE_{d} and tt for Δ=102,101\Delta=10^{-2},10^{-1} and 22. Black and white lines correspond to SK=0S_{K}=0 and IK=0I_{K}=0.

Fig. 34 shows the δIK\delta I_{K} as a function of EdE_{d} and tt for weak (a), intermediate (b) and strong SOI on the quantum dot (c). The yellow lines and the yellow areas in Fig. 34a show the blocked nonlinear transport. The δIK0\delta I_{K}\approx 0 occurs for Δ=102\Delta=10^{-2} in the region of the charge stability for two doublet quantum states |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2}. For Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1, the zero lines merge into two lines at the charge degeneracy point between even and odd charges (Fig. 34b). For t=106t=10^{-6}, when the system determines two doublets |tls2\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{2} and |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2}, δIK\delta I_{K} varies from 1/21/2 for Δ=102\Delta=10^{-2}, via δIK0.75\delta I_{K}\approx 0.75 for Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1, to δIK1\delta I_{K}\approx 1 for Δ=2\Delta=2. For the strong SOI, the SU(2) Kondo states on the two quantum doublets are well defined and well separated (black regions in Fig. 34c). In the region of Q=1(3)Q=1(3)e and Δ=0.1,2\Delta=0.1,2, for the weak tunneling rate, where t=103t=10^{-3} we observe an asymmetry between the SU(2) Kondo effects in two quartet states |qb4\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{4} and |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4} (Fig. 34b and Fig. 34c). In these domains, the δIK=T[]2|IK|\delta I_{K}=T^{2}_{[\star]}|I_{K}| is quantized to δIK1\delta I_{K}\approx 1 for |qb4\lvert q_{b}\rangle_{4} and δIK1/2\delta I_{K}\approx 1/2 for |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4}. For Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1, the states are also separated, but the nonlinear currents approach δIK0.75\delta I_{K}\approx 0.75 and 0.350.35. The transition between weak and strong coupling strength tt is clearly visible in δIK\delta I_{K} for the two doublets |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2}. In these regions, with increasing tunneling strength we observe a change in the value from δIK=0.15\delta I_{K}=0.15 (purple color in Fig. 34a-c) to δIK=1030\delta I_{K}=10^{-3}\approx 0 (yellow area). In Fig. 25a, for CNTQD without spin-orbit interaction, the quantum states |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} are shared by the yellow line representing δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0, where two- and three-body correlators are compared. For the hybrid device with finite SOI, the line extends into the region with blocked nonlinear transport δIK0\delta I_{K}\approx 0. The consequence of this effect is the super-Poissonian value of FKF_{K}. The transition between the Kondo effect with SU(2)symmetry and the SU(2) Kondo state is visible in the current, especially for Q=1Q=1e, where δIK1\delta I_{K}\approx 1 for |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2} changes to δIK(1/2)\delta I_{K}\approx(1/2) for |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4}. This is particularly evident, in the high energy doublet, due to the fact that the CNTQD is coupled to γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow}. The interference effects between the topological and quantum dot states, significantly modify the value of the δIK\delta I_{K}. The low energy doublet is insensitive to increasing the coupling strength tt, in contrast to the quantum conductance (black region in Fig. 34c), which changes from 2(e2/h)2(e^{2}/h) to (5/2)(e2/h)(5/2)(e^{2}/h) (Fig. 31b, c).

Figures 35 show the density plots of the nonlinear shot noise δSK=T[]2|SK|\delta S_{K}=T^{2}_{[\star]}|S_{K}| as a function of EdE_{d} and tt. The yellow lines represent the noiseless transport δSK0\delta S_{K}\approx 0. The lines are doubled and between them the noise due to three-particle processes changes the sign δSK<0\delta S_{K}<0 (yellow lines in Fig. 35a-c). In Fig. 35b we observe two noiseless lines separating the quantum states |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} from |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} and |qa(b)4\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{4} from |qz(x)2\lvert q_{z(x)}\rangle_{2}. In the intermediate and strong coupling regime for |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2}, δSK\delta S_{K} reaches a finite value δSK0.15\delta S_{K}\approx 0.15, leading to super-Poissonian behavior of FKF_{K} (the bright white area in Fig. 36a-c). The double black lines where FK0F_{K}\approx 0 result from two types of phase shifts in Eq. (39) : 2δν2\delta_{\nu} and 4δν4\delta_{\nu}. For Δ=102\Delta=10^{-2} the noiseless transport occurs in the charge stability regions for two quantum states |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} (Fig. 35a). With increasing SOI there is a significant asymmetry in δSK\delta S_{K} between Q=1Q=1e and Q=3Q=3e. In the high energy doublet, due to the coupling strength of the CNTQD to γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow}, interference effects of the topological state significantly modify the value of the nonlinear shot noise. For Q=1Q=1e, we observe a change of the δSK\delta S_{K} for |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2} and |qa2\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{2} from 1.251.25 to 0.550.55 for Δ=101\Delta=10^{-1} and from 1.51.5 to 0.750.75 for Δ=2\Delta=2.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 37: (Color online) a-c) EdE_{d} dependence of FKF_{K} with increasing tt for weak, intermediate and strong SOI.

Figure 36 shows the density plots of the evolution of FK=δSK/δIKF_{K}=\delta{S}_{K}/\delta{I}_{K} in functions EdE_{d} and tt with increasing SOI in the quantum dot. Fig. 36a shows FKF_{K} for Δ=0.01\Delta=0.01. In the sector of the doublet states |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} and between |qa(b)4\lvert q_{a(b)}\rangle_{4} and |qz(x)2\lvert q_{z(x)}\rangle_{2}, we observe the black lines symbolizing the noiseless transport δSK0\delta S_{K}\approx 0, with strong enhancement when δIK0\delta I_{K}\approx 0 and the nonlinear transport is blocked (bright white line and regions Fig. 36). For Q=1Q=1e and Q=3Q=3e, we observe the partially filled blue region where FK1F_{K}\approx 1 (Δ=0.01\Delta=0.01), which is a precursor of the SU(2) and SU(2) Kondo states. Figure 36a shows a narrow region for Q=1Q=1e and Q=3Q=3e with FK1/3F_{K}\approx 1/3, which reveals as a residual of the Kondo state with SU(4) symmetry (Fig. 28a). The asymmetry of FKF_{K} manifests itself for the broken SU(3) Kondo state, where finite Δ=0.01\Delta=0.01 for Q(5/2)Q\approx(5/2)e leads to an increase of the shot noise FK(5/3)F_{K}\approx(5/3) (|qg4\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{4}) and for the Q(3/2)Q\approx(3/2)e we observe a decrease of the noise FK0.5F_{K}\approx 0.5 (|qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2}). The transition from |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2} to |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} is seen by changing the sign and reducing the nonlinear current δIK\delta I_{K}, then FKF_{K} reaches 1/21/2, via 1-1 and to the super-Poissonian value FK1F_{K}\gg 1 (Fig. 36).

The cross sections of FKF_{K} are shown in Fig. 37a. The blue line in Fig. 37a, for Q=(5/3)Q=(5/3)e approaches to the value of FK=e/e(5/3)F_{K}=e^{\star}/e\approx(5/3) for the SU(2) Kondo effect. For Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e and t=20t=20, we observe the reduction of the Fano factor to FK=e/e1/2F_{K}=e^{\star}/e\approx 1/2 (Fig. 37a). In the region, where two doublets |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} dominate, the Fano factor FKF_{K} reaches the super-Poissonian values FK1F_{K}\gg 1, which is due to the finite value of the nonlinear shot noise δSK0.15\delta S_{K}\approx 0.15, relative to the value of the current δIK103\delta I_{K}\approx 10^{-3}. This behavior persists for the three values of the SOI Δ=0.01,0.1\Delta=0.01,0.1 and 22 (the white areas in Fig. 36, and the blue lines in Fig. 37). For Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1 and t=106t=10^{-6}, FKF_{K} in the region of one and three electrons on the quantum dot is quantized close to 5/35/3 for |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2} and |tls2\lvert t_{ls}\rangle_{2} states, which is the characteristic fingerprint of the SU(2) Kondo state (red line in Fig. 37b). With increasing the coupling strength tt, the e-h symmetry is broken and for Δ=0.1,2\Delta=0.1,2, the SU(2) Kondo state is realized for the quadruplet |qg4\lvert q_{g}\rangle_{4} (blue curves in Fig. 37c). The high energy doublet evolves to the U(1) charge symmetry, where between |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} we observe FK=1F_{K}=1 splitting two super-Poissonian regions.

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 38: (Color online) a-c) The landscape log-log plot of FKF_{K} as a function of tt for Δ=102,101\Delta=10^{-2},10^{-1} and 22. FK=0F_{K}=0 corresponds the noiseless nonlinear transport (SK=0S_{K}=0).

Figure 38 shows the landscape plots of FKF_{K} as a function of tt. The black curves are plotted from Ed=10E_{d}=-10 to Ed=1E_{d}=1 with increment δEd=0.25\delta E_{d}=0.25. In Fig. 38a, b for Ed=6E_{d}=-6 (blue line) and in Fig. 38c for Ed=7.5E_{d}=-7.5 (red line), in the the strong coupling regime, FKF_{K} approaches to 5/35/3 for Q=(5/2)Q=(5/2)e, in contrast to Q=(3/2)Q=(3/2)e (Ed=3E_{d}=-3, Fig. 38a, c), where FK(1/2)F_{K}\approx(1/2) for Δ=0.01\Delta=0.01 and FK1F_{K}\approx 1 for Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1. The changes in nonlinear current and shot noise are determined by the doublet quantum state |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2}. The coupling term to γ+\gamma_{+\uparrow} and Δ\Delta contributes to the asymmetry in FKF_{K} between low and high energy doublets. The curve for Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 (Q=2Q=2e) shows two points of compensation in the Fano factor FK=0F_{K}=0. We observe the noiseless transport for |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2}. Between the point of the blocked nonlinear transport, we observe a negative shot noise δSK<0\delta S_{K}<0 (red line in Fig. 38a). For Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1, two compensation points are reduced to one noiseless point at the boundary of the doublet state (red curve in Fig. 38b). For the quantum state |qy2\lvert q_{y}\rangle_{2}, we observe the asymptotic enhancement of the Fano factor FK1F_{K}\gg 1 (green lines in Fig. 38a). With increasing the SOI, for the intermediate spin-orbit coupling Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1, the enhancement of FKF_{K} shifts from t3t_{3} to t1t_{1}. At this point we observe the super-Poissonian value of FKF_{K}, and the nonlinear current is blocked. For Δ=0.1\Delta=0.1, δIK0\delta I_{K}\approx 0 appears on the charge degeneracy line between two states |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} and the quadruplet |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4}. With increasing SOI, the super-Poissonian FKF_{K} evolves to noiseless transport for Ed=4.5E_{d}=-4.5 (green line in Fig. 38c). For t=106t=10^{-6} and intermediate and strong SOI, the SU(2) Kondo effect is realized by two doublets |pls2\lvert p_{ls}\rangle_{2} and the Fano factor reaches to the quantized value FK=(5/3)F_{K}=(5/3) (dark cyan lines in Fig. 38b, c). With increasing the coupling strength FKF_{K} is constant and reaches 5/35/3, but the effective charge e determines the quartet state |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4}. The dynamical changes to super-Poissonian values are observed in the strong coupling regime for |qx(z)2\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{2} and Q=2Q=2e, when |qw2\lvert q_{w}\rangle_{2} is the ground state (green line in Fig. 38c). The enhancement of FKF_{K} is preceded by noiseless point around t3t_{3} (black lines in Fig. 36 and green line in Fig. 38c).

Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Refer to caption
Figure 39: (Color online) Super-Poissonian FKF_{K}: a-c) Gate-dependent δIK\delta I_{K}, δSK\delta S_{K} and FKF_{K} as a function of tt (Δ=2\Delta=2). FK1F_{K}\gg 1 appears for tt, where the nonlinear transport is determined by Majorana fermion-coupled channel.

Figure 39 shows the nonlinear current, shot noise and Fano factor as a function of the coupling strength tt for Δ=2\Delta=2. The cross sections are drawn from Ed=1/2E_{d}=1/2 to 1.751.75 and intersect the quartet |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4} for the weak coupling strength to TSC and the doublet |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} in the strong coupling regime. The curve for Ed=2E_{d}=2 is plotted at the boundary of the |qa4\lvert q_{a}\rangle_{4} and |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} states. At the charge boundary, δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0 and δSK=0\delta S_{K}=0 appear for two different values of tt, hence we observe the logarithmic divergence of FKF_{K} for t=102t=10^{-2}, and noiseless transport near t2t_{2} (darker cyan curve Fig. 39c). For Ed=2.25E_{d}=2.25 the transport is determined by double |qz2\lvert q_{z}\rangle_{2} and in FKF_{K} we observe the opposite tendency, the transport is blocked around t2t_{2} and FKF_{K} is logarithmically divergent at t3t_{3}. For weak coupling and in the range between Ed=0.5E_{d}=0.5 and 1.51.5, the SU(2) Kondo effect is realized (Fig. 38c) and FKF_{K} reaches 5/35/3. The super-Poissonian FKF_{K} results from the blocking effect of the nonlinear current, and the presence of the spin-orbit interaction in the system. The FKF_{K} for the doublet states show two types of the behavior: FK1F_{K}\approx 1 for weak coupling strength to the TSC and FK1F_{K}\gg 1 in the strong coupling regime (Fig. 36c). The current and shot noise are modified by the SOI, in particular the contributions of the two- and three-body correlators in the current are compared to each other (Fig. 39a), hence δIK0\delta I_{K}\approx 0 we observe the logarithmic divergence of FKF_{K} (Fig. 39c). For Ed=1.25E_{d}=1.25 and Ed=1.5E_{d}=1.5 we observe two compensation points, where δIK=0\delta I_{K}=0. Between these points the current is negative and in the nonlinear regime, the current flows in the opposite direction to the applied voltage (the backward current of the quasiparticles), whereas before this behavior was reserved only for nonlinear noise. The super-Poissonian value of the nonlinear Fano is always accompanied by a sign reversal of the nonlinear current. The calculations require a more detailed analysis in the future. However, it is worth mentioning that the result of the experiment [149], where the authors obtained FK=3F_{K}=3 for the quantum dot system, is also surprising, perhaps the system is not in the full SU(2) Kondo state, and the symmetry is broken by an additional disorder. At the moment it is difficult to explain this with the existing theory.

IV Conclusions

In summary, we have studied the transport properties of the novel type of the fractional Kondo effect with SU(3) symmetry in the strong coupling regime with 1TSC. For the CNTQD system coupled with two Majorana fermions, we discovered the SU(2) Kondo state with an even number of electrons on the quantum dot. The CNTQD-3TSC device showed that a state with charge symmetry U(1) determines the quantum conductance 𝒢=(5/2)(e2/h){\mathcal{G}}=(5/2)(e^{2}/h) in the strong coupling regime. For the octuplets |qx(z)8\lvert q_{x(z)}\rangle_{8} we observed the charge leakage quantum effect. The effect was seen in the high order susceptibilities, nonlinear current and shot noise measurements. For SU(3) Kondo phase, the charge fluctuations were finite and led to ΔN2=1/4\Delta N^{2}=1/4, which is due to the coexistence of a coupled channel with a Majorana fermion.

In the linear thermoelectric power coefficient, in the range of weak coupling to TSCs, we observed NFL behavior with strong enhancement of the TEP with two compensation points, where γ(S)=0\gamma_{(S)}=0. In the range of weak and strong coupling, γ(S)\gamma_{(S)} led to FL-type behavior and the numbers characterized the Kondo state with full symmetry. The extended KR sbMFA method showed the complementary results to the NRG calculations [54], in particular with respect to the SU(4) Kondo effect. The new type of strongly correlated phases SU(3) and SU(2) showed FK=2/3F_{K}=2/3 and FK=5/3F_{K}=5/3. In this paper, a so-called the weak coupling ansatz is proposed to calculate the Wilson coefficients, and consequently the off-diagonal two- and three-body correlators. Measurements of the linear coefficient of the TEP and the nonlinear Fano factor, in the case of the broken SU(2) Kondo state, by SOI and most likely in the case of arbitrary other perturbations contain the information about the quality of the Kondo effect and its symmetry. The Kondo temperature with increasing coupling to TSCs, at the transition limit between the SU(2) and SU(2) showed an enhancement controlled by the Coulomb interaction in CNTQD and by the tunneling rate to the normal electrodes. The total entropy as a function of temperature is quenched for the Kondo state. For a single electron in the CNTQD-1TSC device, the entropy has reached ln[4]/4\ln[4]/4, which is closely related to the symmetry of the Kondo effect. By increasing the number of Majorana fermions coupled to the CNTQD, the entropy is raised in the intermediate temperature range to the following numbers (NTSln[4])/4(N_{TS}\ln[4])/4.

In the tunneling entropy we observed a sign reversal and a negative value, which is characteristic for TSC-coupled systems - indicating strong order. For the SU(3) Kondo state, the fluctuations of the pseudospin moment increased with the temperature, and the high temperature limit of the entropy reached to the value of ln[3]\ln[3], suggesting the threefold degeneracy of the quantum states. The linear Fano effect led to the quantized fractional values. By measuring the linear coefficient of the TEP, we presented the detection of the lifetime of the Majorana fermion state and the moment of the transition from the NFL-like behavior to the FL phase. Hybrid devices with TSC showed the negative spin (orbital) polarization of the quantum conductance. For 1TSC and 3TSC, the spin and orbital polarization are identical in sign and value. Shot noise and current measurements allowed indirect the determination of the pseudospin and charge susceptibilities. The SOI in the CNTQD-1TSC system, due to the formation of two quadruplets, led to an asymmetric behavior in the nonlinear current, shot noise and effective charge. The number of NTSN_{TS} topological sectors was introduced for the entanglement of the quantum states from even and odd charge regions, and the Hilbert space was extended to 2n+NTS2^{n+N_{TS}}. In the strong coupling regime, for the doublet states as the ground state, we observed super-Poissonian values of the Fano factor, which is related to the damping of the nonlinear current by the SOI in CNTQD. In this paper, we have investigated the transport and correlation properties of the CNTQD system in the Kondo state coupled to a TSC. We have studied the quantum transport quantities such as quantum conductance, thermoelectric power, linear and nonlinear current, and shot noise in a wide range of the coupling term to the topological superconductor. We have shown that CNTQD in the SU(4) Kondo state, can provide a very precise detector of the Majorana bound states, and the residual interaction between the quasiparticles.

Acknowledgements. This work received support from National Science Center in Poland through the research Project No. 2018/31/D/ST3/03965.

References

  • Sapmaz et al. [2006] S. Sapmaz, P. Jarillo-Herrero, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and H. S. J. van der Zant, Quantum dots in carbon nanotubes, Semicond. Sci. and Tech. 21, S52 (2006).
  • Laird et al. [2015] E. A. Laird, F. Kuemmeth, G. A. Steele, K. Grove-Rasmussen, J. Nygård, K. Flensberg, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Quantum transport in carbon nanotubes, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 703 (2015).
  • Nygård et al. [2000] J. Nygård, D. H. Cobden, and P. E. Lindelof, Kondo physics in carbon nanotubes, Nature 408, 342 (2000).
  • Schmid [2000] J. D. Schmid, The Kondo Effect in quantum dotsPhd thesis, Max-Planck-Institut für Festkörperforschung Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany (2000).
  • Cleuziou et al. [2013] J. P. Cleuziou, N. V. N’Guyen, S. Florens, and W. Wernsdorfer, Interplay of the Kondo Effect and Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling in Multihole Ultraclean Carbon Nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 136803 (2013).
  • Keller et al. [2014] A. J. Keller, S. Amasha, I. Weymann, C. P. Moca, I. G. Rau, J. A. Katine, H. Shtrikman, G. Zaránd, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Emergent SU(4) Kondo physics in a spin-charge-entangled double quantum dot, Nat. Phys. 10, 145 (2014).
  • Sasaki et al. [2000] S. Sasaki, S. De Franceschi, J. M. Elzerman, W. G. van der Wiel, M. Eto, S. Tarucha, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Kondo effect in an integer-spin quantum dot, Nature 405, 764 (2000).
  • Jespersen et al. [2011] T. S. Jespersen, K. Grove-Rasmussen, J. Paaske, K. Muraki, T. Fujisawa, J. Nygård, and K. Flensberg, Gate-dependent spin-orbit coupling in multielectron carbon nanotubes, Nat. Phys. 7, 348 (2011).
  • Kondo [1964] J. Kondo, Resistance Minimum in Dilute Magnetic Alloys, Prog. of Theo. Phys. 32, 37 (1964).
  • Wilson [1975] K. G. Wilson, The renormalization group: Critical phenomena and the Kondo problem, Rev. Mod. Phys. 47, 773 (1975).
  • Nozières [1974] P. Nozières, A Fermi-liquid description of the Kondo problem at low temperatures, J. of Low Temp. Phys. 17, 31 (1974).
  • Haldane [1978] F. D. M. Haldane, Scaling Theory of the Asymmetric Anderson Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 416 (1978).
  • Haule et al. [2001] K. Haule, S. Kirchner, J. Kroha, and P. Wölfle, Anderson impurity model at finite Coulomb interaction U: Generalized noncrossing approximation, Phys. Rev. B 64, 155111 (2001).
  • Hamann [1967] D. R. Hamann, Derivation of Kondo Anomalous Scattering from the Anderson Dilute-Alloy Model, Phys. Rev. 154, 596 (1967).
  • Van Roermund [2010] R. Van Roermund, Theoretical Study of non-equilibrium transport in Kondo quantum dots, Phd thesis, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France (2010).
  • Kotliar and Ruckenstein [1986] G. Kotliar and A. E. Ruckenstein, New Functional Integral Approach to Strongly Correlated Fermi Systems: The Gutzwiller Approximation as a Saddle Point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1362 (1986).
  • Coleman [2015] P. Coleman, Introduction to Many-Body Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2015).
  • Coleman and Andrei [1986] P. Coleman and N. Andrei, Diagonalisation of the generalised Anderson model, J. of Phys. C: Sol. Sta. Phys. 19, 3211 (1986).
  • Wiegmann and Tsvelick [1983] P. B. Wiegmann and A. M. Tsvelick, Exact solution of the Anderson model: I, J. of Phys. C: Sol. Sta. Phys. 16, 2281 (1983).
  • Okiji and Kawakami [1983] A. Okiji and N. Kawakami, Thermodynamic Properties of the Anderson Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1157 (1983).
  • Goldhaber-Gordon et al. [1998] D. Goldhaber-Gordon, H. Shtrikman, D. Mahalu, D. Abusch-Magder, U. Meirav, and M. A. Kastner, Kondo effect in a single-electron transistor, Nature 391, 156 (1998).
  • Liang et al. [2002a] W. Liang, M. Bockrath, and H. Park, Shell Filling and Exchange Coupling in Metallic Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 126801 (2002a).
  • Grove-Rasmussen et al. [2007] K. Grove-Rasmussen, H. Jørgensen, and P. Lindelof, Fabry-Perot interference, Kondo effect and Coulomb blockade in carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B 40, 92 (2007).
  • Kurzmann et al. [2021] A. Kurzmann, Y. Kleeorin, C. Tong, R. Garreis, A. Knothe, M. Eich, C. Mittag, C. Gold, F. K. de Vries, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, V. Fal’ko, Y. Meir, T. Ihn, and K. Ensslin, Kondo effect and spin-orbit coupling in graphene quantum dots, Nat. Commun. 12, 6004 (2021).
  • Liang et al. [2002b] W. Liang, M. P. Shores, M. Bockrath, J. R. Long, and H. Park, Kondo resonance in a single-molecule transistor, Nature 417, 725 (2002b).
  • Jarillo-Herrero et al. [2005] P. Jarillo-Herrero, J. Kong, H. S. van der Zant, C. Dekker, L. P. Kouwenhoven, and S. De Franceschi, Orbital Kondo effect in carbon nanotubes, Nature 434, 484 (2005).
  • Makarovski et al. [2007] A. Makarovski, A. Zhukov, J. Liu, and G. Finkelstein, SU(2) and SU(4) Kondo effects in carbon nanotube quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 75, 241407 (2007).
  • Hata [2019] T. Hata, Non-equilibrium Fluctuations Along Symmetry Crossover in a Kondo-Correlated Quantum Dot, in Non-equilibrium Many-body States in Carbon Nanotube Quantum Dots (Springer Singapore, Singapore, 2019) pp. 47–59.
  • Hewson [1997] A. C. Hewson, The Kondo problem to heavy fermions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
  • Dutta et al. [2019] B. Dutta, D. Majidi, A. García Corral, P. A. Erdman, S. Florens, T. A. Costi, H. Courtois, and C. B. Winkelmann, Direct Probe of the Seebeck Coefficient in a Kondo-Correlated Single-Quantum-Dot Transistor, Nano Lett. 19, 506 (2019).
  • Scheibner et al. [2005] R. Scheibner, H. Buhmann, D. Reuter, M. N. Kiselev, and L. W. Molenkamp, Thermopower of a Kondo Spin-Correlated Quantum Dot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 176602 (2005).
  • Costi et al. [1994] T. A. Costi, A. C. Hewson, and V. Zlatic, Transport coefficients of the Anderson model via the numerical renormalization group, J. of Phys.: Cond. Mat. 6, 2519 (1994).
  • Teratani et al. [2020a] Y. Teratani, R. Sakano, and A. Oguri, Fermi liquid theory for nonlinear transport through a multilevel anderson impurity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 216801 (2020a).
  • Trocha and Barnaś [2012] P. Trocha and J. Barnaś, Large enhancement of thermoelectric effects in a double quantum dot system due to interference and Coulomb correlation phenomena, Phys. Rev. B 85, 085408 (2012).
  • Niklas et al. [2016] M. Niklas, S. Smirnov, D. Mantelli, M. Margańska, N.-V. Nguyen, W. Wernsdorfer, J.-P. Cleuziou, and M. Grifoni, Blocking transport resonances via Kondo many-body entanglement in quantum dots, Nat. Commun. 7, 12442 (2016).
  • Kuemmeth et al. [2008] F. Kuemmeth, S. Ilani, D. C. Ralph, and P. L. McEuen, Coupling of spin and orbital motion of electrons in carbon nanotubes, Nature 452, 448 (2008).
  • Ando [2000] T. Ando, Spin-Orbit Interaction in Carbon Nanotubes, J. of the Phys. Soc. of Japan 69, 1757 (2000).
  • Huertas-Hernando et al. [2006] D. Huertas-Hernando, F. Guinea, and A. Brataas, Spin-orbit coupling in curved graphene, fullerenes, nanotubes, and nanotube caps, Phys. Rev. B 74 (2006).
  • Jeong and Lee [2009] J.-S. Jeong and H.-W. Lee, Curvature-enhanced spin-orbit coupling in a carbon nanotube, Phys. Rev. B 80, 075409 (2009).
  • Krychowski and Lipiński [2018] D. Krychowski and S. Lipiński, Intra- and inter-shell Kondo effects in carbon nanotube quantum dots, J. Eur. Phys. B 91, 8 (2018).
  • Schmid et al. [2015] D. R. Schmid, S. Smirnov, M. Margańska, A. Dirnaichner, P. L. Stiller, M. Grifoni, A. K. Hüttel, , and C. Strunk, Broken SU(4) symmetry in a Kondo-correlated carbon nanotube, Phys. Rev. B 91, 155435 (2015).
  • Galpin et al. [2010] M. R. Galpin, F. W. Jayatilaka, D. E. Logan, and F. B. Anders, Interplay between Kondo physics and spin-orbit coupling in carbon nanotube quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 81, 075437 (2010).
  • Mantelli et al. [2016] D. Mantelli, C. Paşcu Moca, G. Zaránd, and M. Grifoni, Kondo effect in a carbon nanotube with spin–orbit interaction and valley mixing: A DM-NRG study, Physica E: Low-dim. Sys. and Nano. 77, 180 (2016).
  • Steele et al. [2013] G. A. Steele, F. Pei, E. A. Laird, J. M. Jol, H. B. Meerwaldt, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Large spin-orbit coupling in carbon nanotubes, Nat. Commun. 4, 1573 (2013).
  • Florków et al. [2020] P. Florków, D. Krychowski, and S. Lipiński, Kondo effects in small-bandgap carbon nanotube quantum dots, Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology 11, 1873 (2020).
  • López et al. [2013] R. López, T. c. v. Rejec, J. Martinek, and R. Žitko, SU(3) Kondo effect in spinless triple quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 87, 035135 (2013).
  • Ferrier et al. [2016] M. Ferrier, T. Arakawa, T. Hata, R. Fujiwara, R. Delagrange, R. Weil, R. Deblock, R. Sakano, A. Oguri, and K. Kobayashi, Universality of non-equilibrium fluctuations in strongly correlated quantum liquids, Nat. Phys. 12, 230 (2016).
  • Teratani et al. [2016] Y. Teratani, R. Sakano, R. Fujiwara, T. Hata, T. Arakawa, M. Ferrier, K. Kobayashi, and A. Oguri, Field-Enhanced Kondo Correlations in a Half-Filling Nanotube Dot: Evolution of an SU(N) Fermi-Liquid Fixed Point, J. of the Phys. Soc. of Japan 85, 094718 (2016).
  • Ferrier et al. [2020] M. Ferrier, R. Delagrange, J. Basset, H. Bouchiat, T. Arakawa, T. Hata, R. Fujiwara, Y. Teratani, R. Sakano, A. Oguri, K. Kobayashi, and R. Deblock, Quantum Noise in Carbon Nanotubes as a Probe of Correlations in the Kondo Regime, J. of Low Temp. Phys. 201, 738 (2020).
  • Delattre et al. [2009] T. Delattre, C. Feuillet-Palma, L. G. Herrmann, P. Morfin, J.-M. Berroir, G. Fève, B. Plaçais, D. C. Glattli, M.-S. Choi, C. Mora, and T. Kontos, Noisy Kondo impurities, Nat. Phys. 5, 208 (2009).
  • Mora et al. [2009] C. Mora, P. Vitushinsky, X. Leyronas, A. A. Clerk, and K. Le Hur, Theory of nonequilibrium transport in the SU(N) Kondo regime, Phys. Rev. B 80, 155322 (2009).
  • Mora [2009] C. Mora, Fermi-liquid theory for SU(N)\text{SU}(N) Kondo model, Phys. Rev. B 80, 125304 (2009).
  • Oguri and Hewson [2018] A. Oguri and A. C. Hewson, Higher-Order Fermi-Liquid Corrections for an Anderson Impurity Away from Half Filling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 126802 (2018).
  • Teratani et al. [2020b] Y. Teratani, R. Sakano, T. Hata, T. Arakawa, M. Ferrier, K. Kobayashi, and A. Oguri, Field-induced SU(4) to SU(2) Kondo crossover in a half-filling nanotube dot: Spectral and finite-temperature properties, Phys. Rev. B 102, 165106 (2020b).
  • Mora et al. [2008] C. Mora, X. Leyronas, and N. Regnault, Current Noise through a Kondo Quantum Dot in a SU(N)\mathrm{SU}(N) Fermi Liquid State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 036604 (2008).
  • Oguri et al. [2022] A. Oguri, Y. Teratani, K. Tsutsumi, and R. Sakano, Current noise and Keldysh vertex function of an Anderson impurity in the Fermi-liquid regime, Phys. Rev. B 105, 115409 (2022).
  • Mora et al. [2015] C. Mora, C. P. Moca, J. von Delft, and G. Zaránd, Fermi-liquid theory for the single-impurity Anderson model, Phys. Rev. B 92, 075120 (2015).
  • Nishikawa et al. [2013] Y. Nishikawa, A. C. Hewson, D. J. G. Crow, and J. Bauer, Analysis of low-energy response and possible emergent SU(4) Kondo state in a double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 88, 245130 (2013).
  • Sela et al. [2006] E. Sela, Y. Oreg, F. von Oppen, and J. Koch, Fractional Shot Noise in the Kondo Regime, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 086601 (2006).
  • Hata et al. [2021] T. Hata, Y. Teratani, T. Arakawa, S. Lee, M. Ferrier, R. Deblock, R. Sakano, A. Oguri, and K. Kobayashi, Three-body correlations in nonlinear response of correlated quantum liquid, Nat. Commun. 12, 3233 (2021).
  • Majorana [1937] E. Majorana, Teoria simmetrica dell’elettrone e del positrone, Il Nuovo Cimento (1924-1942) 14, 171 (1937).
  • Leijnse and Flensberg [2012] M. Leijnse and K. Flensberg, Introduction to topological superconductivity and Majorana fermions, Semicond. Sci. and Tech. 27, 124003 (2012).
  • Flensberg [2011] K. Flensberg, Non-Abelian Operations on Majorana Fermions via Single-Charge Control, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 090503 (2011).
  • Ezawa [2020] M. Ezawa, Non-Abelian braiding of Majorana-like edge states and topological quantum computations in electric circuits, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075424 (2020).
  • Beenakker [2013] C. W. J. Beenakker, Search for Majorana Fermions in Superconductors, Ann. Rev. of Cond. Matt. Phys. 4, 113 (2013).
  • Kitaev [2003] A. Kitaev, Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons, Ann. of Phys. 303, 2 (2003).
  • Beenakker [2020] C. W. J. Beenakker, Search for non-Abelian Majorana braiding statistics in superconductors, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 15 (2020).
  • Nayak et al. [2008] C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quantum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1083 (2008).
  • Kitaev [2001] A. Y. Kitaev, Unpaired Majorana fermions in quantum wires, Physics-Uspekhi 44, 131 (2001).
  • Lai and Zhang [2020] H.-L. Lai and W.-M. Zhang, Decoherence dynamics of Majorana qubits under braiding operations, Phys. Rev. B 101, 195428 (2020).
  • Žitko [2011] R. Žitko, Detection of Majorana edge states in topological superconductors through non-Fermi-liquid effects induced in an interacting quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 83, 195137 (2011).
  • Castagnoli and Rasetti [1993] G. Castagnoli and M. Rasetti, The notions of symmetry and computational feedback in the paradigm of steady, simultaneous quantum computation, Int. J. of Theo. Phys. 32, 2335 (1993).
  • Arovas et al. [1985] D. P. Arovas, R. Schrieffer, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Statistical mechanics of anyons, Nuc. Phys. B 251, 117 (1985).
  • Wilczek [1982] F. Wilczek, Quantum Mechanics of Fractional-Spin Particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 957 (1982).
  • Ivanov [2001] D. A. Ivanov, Non-Abelian Statistics of Half-Quantum Vortices in p\mathit{p}-Wave Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 268 (2001).
  • Greiter et al. [2019] M. Greiter, F. D. M. Haldane, and R. Thomale, Non-Abelian statistics in one dimension: Topological momentum spacings and SU(2) level-kk fusion rules, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115107 (2019).
  • Greiter and Wilczek [2024] M. Greiter and F. Wilczek, Fractional Statistics, Ann. Rev. of Cond. Matt. Phys. 15, 131 (2024).
  • Haldane [1991] F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional statistics in arbitrary dimensions: A generalization of the Pauli principle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 937 (1991).
  • Sticlet et al. [2012] D. Sticlet, C. Bena, and P. Simon, Spin and Majorana Polarization in Topological Superconducting Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 096802 (2012).
  • He et al. [2014] J. J. He, T. K. Ng, P. A. Lee, and K. T. Law, Selective Equal-Spin Andreev Reflections Induced by Majorana Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 037001 (2014).
  • Maśka and Domański [2017] M. M. Maśka and T. Domański, Polarization of the Majorana quasiparticles in the Rashba chain, Sci. Rep. 7, 16193 (2017).
  • Sedlmayr et al. [2015] N. Sedlmayr, M. Guigou, P. Simon, and C. Bena, Majoranas with and without a ‘character’: hybridization, braiding and chiral Majorana number, J. of Phys.: Cond. Matt. 27, 455601 (2015).
  • Mourik et al. [2012] V. Mourik, K. Zuo, S. M. Frolov, S. R. Plissard, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Signatures of Majorana Fermions in Hybrid Superconductor-Semiconductor Nanowire Devices, Science 336, 1003 (2012).
  • Lee et al. [2014] E. J. H. Lee, X. Jiang, M. Houzet, R. Aguado, C. M. Lieber, and S. De Franceschi, Spin-resolved Andreev levels and parity crossings in hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanostructures, Nat. Nano. 9, 79 (2014).
  • Yu et al. [2021] P. Yu, J. Chen, M. Gomanko, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, K. Zuo, V. Mourik, and S. M. Frolov, Non-Majorana states yield nearly quantized conductance in proximatized nanowires, Nature Physics 17, 482 (2021).
  • Cheng et al. [2014a] M. Cheng, M. Becker, B. Bauer, and R. M. Lutchyn, Interplay between Kondo and Majorana Interactions in Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031051 (2014a).
  • Kim et al. [2016] Y. Kim, D. E. Liu, E. Gaidamauskas, J. Paaske, K. Flensberg, and R. M. Lutchyn, Signatures of Majorana Kramers pairs in superconductor-Luttinger liquid and superconductor-quantum dot-normal lead junctions, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075439 (2016).
  • Fu and Kane [2008] L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting Proximity Effect and Majorana Fermions at the Surface of a Topological Insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 096407 (2008).
  • Moore and Read [1991] G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the Fractional Quantum Hall effect, Nuc. Phys. B 360, 362 (1991).
  • Read and Green [2000] N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000).
  • Li et al. [2014] Z.-Z. Li, F.-C. Zhang, and Q.-H. Wang, Majorana modes in a topological insulator/s-wave superconductor heterostructure, Sci. Rep. 4, 6363 (2014).
  • Sau et al. [2010] J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, S. Tewari, and S. Das Sarma, Generic New Platform for Topological Quantum Computation Using Semiconductor Heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 040502 (2010).
  • Cheng et al. [2014b] M. Cheng, M. Becker, B. Bauer, and R. M. Lutchyn, Interplay between Kondo and Majorana Interactions in Quantum Dots, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031051 (2014b).
  • Alicea [2010] J. Alicea, Majorana fermions in a tunable semiconductor device, Phys. Rev. B 81, 125318 (2010).
  • Fu and Kane [2009] L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Josephson current and noise at a superconductor/quantum-spin-Hall-insulator/superconductor junction, Phys. Rev. B 79, 161408 (2009).
  • Oreg et al. [2010] Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical Liquids and Majorana Bound States in Quantum Wires, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 177002 (2010).
  • Jäck et al. [2019] B. Jäck, Y. Xie, J. Li, S. Jeon, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Observation of a Majorana zero mode in a topologically protected edge channel, Science 364, 1255 (2019).
  • Deng et al. [2012] M. T. Deng, C. L. Yu, G. Y. Huang, M. Larsson, P. Caroff, and H. Q. Xu, Anomalous Zero-Bias Conductance Peak in a Nb-InSb Nanowire-Nb Hybrid Device, Nano Lett. 12, 6414 (2012).
  • Zhang et al. [2019] H. Zhang, D. E. Liu, M. Wimmer, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, Next steps of quantum transport in Majorana nanowire devices, Nat. Commun. 10, 5128 (2019).
  • Zhang et al. [2018] H. Zhang, C.-X. Liu, S. Gazibegovic, D. Xu, J. A. Logan, G. Wang, N. van Loo, J. D. S. Bommer, M. W. A. de Moor, D. Car, R. L. M. Op het Veld, P. J. van Veldhoven, S. Koelling, M. A. Verheijen, M. Pendharkar, D. J. Pennachio, B. Shojaei, J. S. Lee, C. J. Palmstrøm, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, S. D. Sarma, and L. P. Kouwenhoven, RETRACTED ARTICLE: Quantized Majorana conductance, Nature 556, 74 (2018).
  • Das Sarma [2023] S. Das Sarma, In search of Majorana, Nat. Phys. 19, 165 (2023).
  • Nadj-Perge et al. [2014] S. Nadj-Perge, I. K. Drozdov, J. Li, H. Chen, S. Jeon, J. Seo, A. H. MacDonald, B. A. Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, Observation of Majorana fermions in ferromagnetic atomic chains on a superconductor, Science 346, 602 (2014).
  • Zhang et al. [2013] F. Zhang, C. L. Kane, and E. J. Mele, Time-Reversal-Invariant Topological Superconductivity and Majorana Kramers Pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 056402 (2013).
  • Gaidamauskas et al. [2014] E. Gaidamauskas, J. Paaske, and K. Flensberg, Majorana Bound States in Two-Channel Time-Reversal-Symmetric Nanowire Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 126402 (2014).
  • Yamazaki et al. [2020] Y. Yamazaki, S. Kobayashi, and A. Yamakage, Magnetic Response of Majorana Kramers Pairs Protected by Z2 Invariants, J. of the Phys. Soc. of Japan 89, 043703 (2020).
  • Béri [2013] B. Béri, Majorana-Klein Hybridization in Topological Superconductor Junctions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 216803 (2013).
  • Béri and Cooper [2012] B. Béri and N. R. Cooper, Topological Kondo Effect with Majorana Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 156803 (2012).
  • Rahmani and Franz [2019] A. Rahmani and M. Franz, Interacting Majorana fermions, Rep. Prog. Phys. 82, 084501 (2019).
  • Chiu et al. [2015] C.-K. Chiu, D. I. Pikulin, and M. Franz, Strongly interacting Majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. B 91, 165402 (2015).
  • Lee et al. [2013] M. Lee, J. S. Lim, and R. López, Kondo effect in a quantum dot side-coupled to a topological superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 87, 241402 (2013).
  • Wrześniewski and Weymann [2021] K. Wrześniewski and I. Weymann, Magnetization dynamics in a Majorana-wire-quantum-dot setup, Phys. Rev. B 103, 125413 (2021).
  • Weymann et al. [2020] I. Weymann, K. P. Wójcik, and P. Majek, Majorana-Kondo interplay in T-shaped double quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235404 (2020).
  • Majek and Weymann [2021] P. Majek and I. Weymann, Majorana mode leaking into a spin-charge entangled double quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 104, 085416 (2021).
  • López et al. [2014] R. López, M. Lee, L. Serra, and J. S. Lim, Thermoelectrical detection of Majorana states, Phys. Rev. B 89, 205418 (2014).
  • Leijnse [2014] M. Leijnse, Thermoelectric signatures of a Majorana bound state coupled to a quantum dot, New J. of Phys. 16, 015029 (2014).
  • Chi et al. [2020] F. Chi, Z.-G. Fu, J. Liu, K.-M. Li, Z. Wang, and P. Zhang, Thermoelectric Effect in a Correlated Quantum Dot Side-Coupled to Majorana Bound States, Nano. Res. Lett. 15, 79 (2020).
  • Majek et al. [2022] P. Majek, K. P. Wójcik, and I. Weymann, Spin-resolved thermal signatures of Majorana-Kondo interplay in double quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 105, 075418 (2022).
  • Klinovaja et al. [2012] J. Klinovaja, S. Gangadharaiah, and D. Loss, Electric-field-induced Majorana Fermions in Armchair Carbon Nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 196804 (2012).
  • Liu et al. [2015] D. E. Liu, M. Cheng, and R. M. Lutchyn, Probing Majorana physics in quantum-dot shot-noise experiments, Phys. Rev. B 91, 081405 (2015).
  • Smirnov [2017] S. Smirnov, Non-equilibrium Majorana fluctuations, New J. of Phys. 19, 063020 (2017).
  • Smirnov [2022] S. Smirnov, Revealing universal Majorana fractionalization using differential shot noise and conductance in nonequilibrium states controlled by tunneling phases, Phys. Rev. B 105, 205430 (2022).
  • Golub and Horovitz [2011] A. Golub and B. Horovitz, Shot noise in a Majorana fermion chain, Phys. Rev. B 83, 153415 (2011).
  • Elk and Gasser [1979] K. Elk and W. Gasser, Die Methode der Greenschen Funktionen in der Festkörperphysik (Akademie-Verlag Berlin, Berlin, 1979).
  • Elk and Gasser [2012] K. Elk and W. Gasser, Nonequilibrium Green’s Functions Approach to Inhomogeneous Systems (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012).
  • Prada et al. [2017] E. Prada, R. Aguado, and P. San-Jose, Measuring Majorana nonlocality and spin structure with a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085418 (2017).
  • Kwon et al. [2004] H.-J. Kwon, K. Sengupta, and V. M. Yakovenko, Fractional ac Josephson effect in p- and d-wave superconductors, The Eur. Phys. J. B - Cond. Matt. and Compl. Sys. 37, 349 (2004).
  • Rokhinson et al. [2012] L. P. Rokhinson, X. Liu, and J. K. Furdyna, The fractional a.c. Josephson effect in a semiconductor-superconductor nanowire as a signature of Majorana particles, Nat, Phys. 8, 795 (2012).
  • Krychowski et al. [2018a] D. Krychowski, S. Lipiński, and G. Cuniberti, Spin Dependent Conductance of a Quantum Dot Side attached to Topological Superconductors as a Probe of Majorana Fermion States, Acta Phys. Pol. A 133, 552–554 (2018a).
  • Igoshev et al. [2015] P. A. Igoshev, M. A. Timirgazin, V. F. Gilmutdinov, A. K. Arzhnikov, and V. Y. Irkhin, Spiral magnetism in the single-band Hubbard model: the Hartree–Fock and slave-boson approaches, J. of Phys.: Cond. Matt. 27, 446002 (2015).
  • Coleman [1987] P. Coleman, Mixed valnece as an almost broken symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 35, 5072 (1987).
  • Lavagna [1990] M. Lavagna, Functional-integral approach to strongly correlated Fermi systems: Quantum fluctuations beyond the Gutzwiller approximation, Phys. Rev. B 41, 142 (1990).
  • Zimmermann et al. [1997] W. Zimmermann, R. Frésard, and P. Wölfle, Spin and charge structure factor of the two-dimensional Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 56, 10097 (1997).
  • Yamada [1975] K. Yamada, Perturbation Expansion for the Anderson Hamiltonian. II, Prog. of Theo. Phys. 53, 970 (1975).
  • Lee and Choi [2004a] H. C. Lee and H.-Y. Choi, Slave-boson approach to the infinite-UU Anderson-Holstein impurity model, Phys. Rev. B 70, 085114 (2004a).
  • Mihály and Zawadowski [1978] L. Mihály and A. Zawadowski, Fermi liquid theory of the degenerate anderson model, J. de Phys. Lett. 39, 483 (1978).
  • Lee and Chen-Tsai [1965] Y. Y. Lee and C. T. Chen-Tsai, The Fifteenfold way of the SU(4) symmetry scheme of strongly interacting particles, Chin. J. Phys. 3, 45 (1965).
  • Iachello [2007] F. Iachello, Lie Algebras and Applications (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 2007).
  • Piquard et al. [2023] C. Piquard, P. Glidic, C. Han, A. Aassime, A. Cavanna, U. Gennser, Y. Meir, E. Sela, A. Anthore, and F. Pierre, Observing the universal screening of a Kondo impurity, Nat. Commun. 14, 7263 (2023).
  • Kadanoff and Baym [1962] L. Kadanoff and G. Baym, Quantum Statistical Mechanics: Green’s Function Methods in Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Problems, Frontiers in Physics. A Lecture Note and Reprint Series (W. A. Benjabin, Inc., New York, 1962).
  • Lee and Choi [2004b] H. C. Lee and H.-Y. Choi, Slave-boson approach to the infinite-UU Anderson-Holstein impurity model, Phys. Rev. B 70, 085114 (2004b).
  • Weymann and Wójcik [2017] I. Weymann and K. P. Wójcik, Transport properties of a hybrid majorana wire-quantum dot system with ferromagnetic contacts, Phys. Rev. B 95, 155427 (2017).
  • Hauptmann et al. [2008] J. R. Hauptmann, J. Paaske, and P. E. Lindelof, Electric-field-controlled spin reversal in a quantum dot with ferromagnetic contacts, Nat. Phys. 4, 373 (2008).
  • Krychowski et al. [2022] D. Krychowski, M. Antkiewicz, and S. Lipiński, Transport through strongly correlated triple quantum dot, J. of Mag. and Magn. Mat. 541, 168564 (2022).
  • Rao et al. [2005] K. Rao, G. Berghe, and C. Krattenthaler, An entry of Ramanujan on hypergeometric series in his Notebooks, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 173, 239 (2005).
  • Krychowski et al. [2018b] D. Krychowski, S. Lipiński, and G. Cuniberti, Spin dependent conductance of a quantum dot side attached to topological superconductors as a probe of Majorana fermion states, Acta Phys. Polon. A 133, 552 (2018b).
  • Smirnov [2015] S. Smirnov, Majorana tunneling entropy, Phys. Rev. B 92, 195312 (2015).
  • López et al. [2004] R. López, R. Aguado, and G. Platero, Shot noise in strongly correlated double quantum dots, Phys. Rev. B 69, 235305 (2004).
  • Nazarov and Blanter [2009] Y. V. Nazarov and Y. M. Blanter, Quantum Transport: Introduction to Nanoscience (Cambridge University Press, 2009).
  • Yamauchi et al. [2011] Y. Yamauchi, K. Sekiguchi, K. Chida, T. Arakawa, S. Nakamura, K. Kobayashi, T. Ono, T. Fujii, and R. Sakano, Evolution of the Kondo Effect in a Quantum Dot Probed by Shot Noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 176601 (2011).