This paper was converted on www.awesomepapers.org from LaTeX by an anonymous user.
Want to know more? Visit the Converter page.

hyperbolic fibered slice knots with right-veering monodromy

Dongtai He Shanghai Center for Mathematical Science, Fudan University, Shanghai, China 200438 [email protected]
Abstract.

We construct a hyperbolic fibered slice knot with right-veering monodromy, which disproves a conjecture posed in [HKK+21].

1. introduction

We give a negative answer to Question 8.2 posed in [HKK+21].

Question 1.1.

If K is a hyperbolic fibered slice knot, does the fractional Dehn twist coefficient (FDTC) of the monodromy vanish?

We construct a hyperbolic slice fibered knot KK^{\prime} with positive FDTC.

1.1. Motivation.

The authors [HKK+21] observes that many low-crossing slice fibered knots have zero FDTC. Any (p,1)(p,1)-cable of slice fibered knot is still slice fibered, whereas FDTC of (p,1)(p,1)-cable equals to 1/p1/p. The authors therefore ask the above question about hyperbolic fibered slice knots.

Baldwin, Ni and Sivek [BNS22, Corollary 1.7] prove the following related proposition in terms of the τ\tau-invariant in Heegaard Floer homology:

Proposition 1.2.

If KS3K\subset S^{3} is a fibered knot with thin knot Floer homology such that τ(K)<g(K)\tau(K)<g(K), then FDTC vanishes.

The τ\tau-invariant vanishes for slice knots. Proposition 1.2 explains the case for low-crossing fibered slice knots because many of those are thin.

We have an immediate corollary:

Corollary 1.3.

The knot Floer homology of KK^{\prime} is not thin.

1.2. Organization.

We follow the recipe of Kazez and Roberts [KR13] to construct hyperbolic fibered knots with positive FDTC. The search for ribbon knot is inspired by the work of Hitt and Silver [HS91]. In section 2 we review Nielson-Thurston classification of surface automorphism and examples from Kazez and Roberts. We construct our example KK^{\prime} in section 3.

2. monodromies of fibered knots in S3S^{3}

2.1. Surface automorphism.

We first recall Nielson-Thurston classfication of surface automorphisms:

Theorem 2.1.

[CCB88, Thu88] Let SS be an oriented hyperbolic surface with geodesic boundary, and let hAut(S,S)h\in Aut(S,\partial S). Then hh is freely isotopic to either

  1. (1)

    a pseudo-Anosov homeomorphism ϕ\phi that preserves a pair of geodesic laminations λs\lambda^{s} and λu\lambda^{u},

  2. (2)

    a periodic homeomorphism ϕ\phi such that ϕn=id\phi^{n}=id for some nn,

  3. (3)

    a reducible homeomorphism hh^{\prime} that preserves a maximal collection of simple closed geodesic curves in SS. To avoid overlap, we consider hh reducible only when it is not periodic.

In particular, we only regard hh as reducible only if it is not periodic to avoid overlap. Let Φ:S×[0,1]S\Phi:S\times[0,1]\rightarrow S be an isotopy from hh to its Thurston representative ϕ\phi. Considering the restriction of Φ\Phi to the boundary S\partial S, we have a homeomorphism:

Φ:S×[0,1]S×[0,1]\Phi_{\partial}:\partial S\times[0,1]\rightarrow\partial S\times[0,1]

defined by Φ(x,t)=(Φt(x),t)\Phi_{\partial}(x,t)=(\Phi_{t}(x),t). The fractional Dehn twist coefficient c(h)c(h) can be defined as the winding number of the arc Φ(θ×[0,1])\Phi_{\partial}(\theta\times[0,1]). Nielson-Thurston classification guarantees that c(h)c(h)\in\mathbb{Q}.

Thurston proved that a fibered knot is hyperbolic if and only if its monodromy is pesudo-Anosov. Fractional Dehn twist coefficient is closely related to the following notion of right-veeringness.

Definition 2.2.

[HKM07] A homeomorphism hAut(S,S)h\in Aut(S,\partial S) is called right-veering if for every based point xSx\in\partial S and every properly embedded arc α\alpha starting at xx, h(α)h(\alpha) is to the right of α\alpha, after isotoping h(α)h(\alpha) so that it intersects α\alpha minimally. Similarly, hh is called left-veering if h(α)h(\alpha) is to the left of α\alpha.

Proposition 2.3.

[HKM07] hh is right-veering if and only if c(h)>0c(h)>0 for every component of S\partial S, and hh is left-veering if and only if c(h)<0c(h)<0 for every component of S\partial S.

If c(h)=0c(h)=0, one can find two arcs such that one is moved by hh to the right and the other to the left. The significance of right-veeringness is highlighted by the following theorem of Honda, Kazez and Matić:

Theorem 2.4.

[HKM09] Every open book that is compatible with a tight contact structure is right-veering.

A large source of examples of reducible right-veering homeomorphism comes from the class of fibered cable knots. Indeed, if hh is the monodromy of a fibered (p,q)(p,q)-cable knot Kp,qK_{p,q} with Seifert surface SS, then c(h)=1/pqc(h)=1/pq and hh is reducible. Let {Ci}\{C_{i}\} be the collection of curves preserved by hh^{\prime}. {Ci}\{C_{i}\} partitions SS into subsurfaces {Sj}\{S_{j}\} permuted by hh^{\prime}. Let S0S_{0} be the subsurface containing S=Kp,q\partial S=K_{p,q}, then h|S0h^{\prime}|_{S_{0}} is periodic. Kazez and Roberts characterize the monodromy hh of a fibered knot KK in S3S^{3} in the following theorem:

Theorem 2.5.

[KR13]

  1. (1)

    If hh is periodic, then KK is the unkont or a (p,q)(p,q)-torus knot.

  2. (2)

    If hh has a reducible Thurstion representative hh^{\prime} with periodic h|S0h^{\prime}|_{S_{0}}, then KK is a (p,q)(p,q)-cable knot, and c(h)=1/pqc(h)=1/pq.

  3. (3)

    [Gab97] If hh is either pseudo-Anosov or reducible with h|S0h^{\prime}|_{S_{0}} pseudo-Anosov. Then either c(h)=0c(h)=0 or c(h)=1/rc(h)=1/r, where 2|r|4g(K)22\leq|r|\leq 4g(K)-2.

Corollary 2.6.

c(h)=0c(h)=0 or 1/r1/r for some integer rr, |r|2|r|\geq 2. In particular, |c(h)|1/2|c(h)|\leq 1/2.

In particular, the (2,1)(2,1)-cable of a fibered knot in S3S^{3} has its monodromy attaining maximum FDTC. We review hyperbolic case in the next section.

2.2. Stallings’ twist and (2,1)-cable.

Let UU be an unknot properly embedded in a surface FF. We say UU is untwisted relative to FF if UU bounds a disk transverse to FF along UU. A Stallings’ twist [Sta78] is a surgery along such an untwisted UU. Kazez and Roberts apply Stallings’ twist on (2,1)(2,1)-cables to produce hyperbolic fibered knots with maximum FDTC =1/2=1/2.

Let (S,h)(S,h) be an open book decomposition of S3S^{3} with connected binding KK, where hh is pseudo-Anosov and c(h)=0c(h)=0. Let K2,1K_{2,1} be the (2,1)(2,1)-cable of KK. The fibered surface Σ\Sigma of K2,1K_{2,1} can be viewed as the union of two copies S0S_{0}, S1S_{1} of SS connected by a 1-handle. Let HH be the monodromy of this new open book.

We choose a simple closed curve CC in Σ\Sigma such that C0=CS0C_{0}=C\cap S_{0} and C1=CS1C_{1}=C\cap S_{1} are two essential arcs. Moreover, we require CiC_{i} to be nonseparating in SiS_{i}. Let TCT_{C} be the right-handed Dehn twist along CC and H=TcHH^{\prime}=T_{c}\circ H.

Theorem 2.7.

[KR13] HH^{\prime} is pseudo-Anosov and c(H)=1/2c(H^{\prime})=1/2.

3. ribbon fibered knot

We are ready to construct a hyperbolic ribbon fibered knot with positive FDTC. Let KK be the knot 1015310_{153} from Rolfsen’s knot table. KK is a hyperbolic ribbon fibered knot with 3-genus 3. Figure 1 is a ribbon diagram for 1015310_{153}.

Refer to caption
Figure 1. A ribbon diagram for the knot K=10153K=10_{153}

Let hh denote the monodromy. According to [CL], hh can be presented as decribed in Figure 2. One can see that hh is neither right-veering nor left-veering by choosing different endpoints of γ\gamma. Therefore, c(h)=0c(h)=0.

Refer to caption
Figure 2. Monodromy of the fibered knot 1015310_{153}. hh can be presented as the word 𝐚𝐛𝐜𝐁𝐄𝐆𝐡𝐜𝐝\mathbf{abcBEGhcd}, where xx denotes a right-handed Dehn twist about xx and XX denotes a left-handed Dehn twist about xx. A word is read from right to left so that aBaB means perform a left-handed Dehn twist about bb then perform a right-handed Dehn twist about aa.

A Seifert surface SS of KK can be obtained by Seifert’s algorithm as explained in Figure 3. The genus of FF is 3 so that FF is the fibered surface.

Refer to caption
Figure 3. The surface obtained by Seifert’s algorithm has genus 3. cc is a non-seperating properly embedded arc on the surface.

Let K2,1K_{2,1} be the (2,1)(2,1)-cable of KK (Figure 4). The twisted band connecting the two copies of KK is added at pp. cc is a nonseperating properly embedded arc on the fibered surface of KK. K2,1K_{2,1} is also fibered whose fibered surface Σ\Sigma can be obtained by connecting two copies of SS with the same twisted band at pp. Then define a simple closed curve CC to be a band sum of the two copies of cc along an arc running across the twisted band.

Refer to caption
Figure 4. (2,1)(2,1)-cable of KK.

Let TCT_{C} denote the right-handed Dehn twist along CC, and denote the resulting fibered knot KK^{\prime}. By [KR13, Corollary 4.6], the monodromy TCHT_{C}\circ H is pseudo-Anosov and right-veering with c(TCH)=12c(T_{C}\circ H)=\frac{1}{2}.

Recall that K=10153K=10_{153} is a ribbon knot, so is K2,1K_{2,1}. CC is an unknotted untwisted curve. Performing a right-handed Dehn twist along CC has the same effect on (S3,K2,1)(S^{3},K_{2,1}) applying a (1)(-1)-surgery along CC. The resulting manifold is still S3S^{3} and we have a new knot KK^{\prime}. CC winds around two copies of a ribbon band (Figure 5).

Refer to caption
Figure 5. The curve CC winds around two copies of a ribbon band. This figure shows one of the ribbon. The other ribbon is on the other copy from the (2,1)(2,1)-cable

.

Figure 6 illustrates the effect of (1)(-1)-surgery along CC to the ribbon bands. The resulting knot KK^{\prime} is still a ribbon knot.

Theorem 3.1.

KK^{\prime} is a hyperbolic ribbon fibered knot with FDTC=1/2=1/2. Hence, the monodromy is right-veering.

Refer to caption
Figure 6. The effect of (1)(-1)- surgery along CC after isotopy.

References

  • [BNS22] John A Baldwin, Yi Ni, and Steven Sivek. Floer homology and right-veering monodromy, 2022. preprint, arXiv:2204.04093.
  • [CCB88] Andrew J Casson, Andrew J Casson, and Steven A Bleiler. Automorphisms of surfaces after Nielsen and Thurston. Number 9. Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • [CL] Jae Choon Cha and Charles Livingston. Knotinfo: Table of knot invariants. http://www.indiana.edu/ knotinfo.
  • [Gab97] David Gabai. Problems in foliations and laminations. Stud. in Adv. Math. AMS/IP, 2:1–34, 1997.
  • [HKK+21] Diana Hubbard, Keiko Kawamuro, Feride Ceren Kose, Gage Martin, Olga Plamenevskaya, Katherine Raoux, Linh Truong, and Hannah Turner. Braids, fibered knots, and concordance questions. In Research Directions in Symplectic and Contact Geometry and Topology, pages 293–324. Springer, 2021.
  • [HKM07] Ko Honda, William H. Kazez, and Gordana Matić. Right-veering diffeomorphisms of compact surfaces with boundary. Invent. Math., 169(2):427–449, 2007.
  • [HKM09] Ko Honda, William H. Kazez, and Gordana Matić. On the contact class in Heegaard Floer homology. J. Differential Geom., 83(2):289–311, 2009.
  • [HS91] L Richard Hitt and Daniel S Silver. Ribbon knot families via stallings’ twists. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, 50(3):356–372, 1991.
  • [KR13] William H. Kazez and Rachel Roberts. Fractional Dehn twists in knot theory and contact topology. Algebr. Geom. Topol., 13(6):3603–3637, 2013.
  • [Sta78] John R. Stallings. Constructions of fibred knots and links. In Algebraic and geometric topology (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif., 1976), Part 2, Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., XXXII, pages 55–60. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, R.I., 1978.
  • [Thu88] William P Thurston. On the geometry and dynamics of diffeomorphisms of surfaces. Bulletin of the American mathematical society, 19(2):417–431, 1988.